Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Pave Way For Compressor-Free Refrigeration

Hugh Pickens brings news that scientists from Penn State have developed a new method for heat-transfer that may replace the common compressor-based system used in household appliances. Quoting: "Zhang's approach uses the change from disorganized to organized that occurs in some polarpolymers when placed in an electric field. The natural state of these materials is disorganized with the various molecules randomly positioned. When electricity is applied, the molecules become highly ordered and the material gives off heat and becomes colder. When the electricity is turned off, the material reverts to its disordered state and absorbs heat. The researchers report a change in temperature for the material of about 22.6 degrees Fahrenheit... Repeated randomizing and ordering of the material combined with an appropriate heat exchanger could provide a wide range of heating and cooling temperatures."

218 comments

  1. Kind of by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    a "reverse" microwave?

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Kind of by Thiez · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not at all. Microwave works by emitting electromagnatic waves that exite water molecules, thus making them and (indirectly) whatever they are a part of warmer.

    2. Re:Kind of by gerardolm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Electromagnates? In my intrawebz? Sorry for that :D

    3. Re:Kind of by QuantumG · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      like letting the air out of a balloon!!

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Kind of by iwein · · Score: 1

      It's getting the air into the balloon that requires the compressor. Or do you have a solution that blows even more?

      --
      Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
    5. Re:Kind of by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, that's using high frequency. My point was that if you reduce the agitation of the molecules by using a low frequency of, say 0hz, it should make whatever they are part of...? I thought it was a legitimate question. Evidently some mods thought differently.

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Kind of by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      While the microwaves from the microwave oven's magnetron are indeed absorbed readily by water, the truth is that they heat up anything that can absorb them (just about anything solid.) It's not just the H2O that gets heated directly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Kind of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just water molecules, but any polar molecule. It changes the electric field, causing polar molecules to vibrate. It works very well on water, but not just on water.

  2. Efficiency by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unless this is more efficient than at least Peltier it won't become commercially viable.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Efficiency by ThosLives · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this was my thought as well. TFA is, as usual, slim on the technical details...

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    2. Re:Efficiency by RuBLed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and if it isn't capable of totally drying my clothes during sunless days, it won't become commercially viable. ^^

    3. Re:Efficiency by frito_x · · Score: 3, Insightful

      well... i can see benefits in areas like this method being quieter, also it sounds like it won't produce as much heat as the conventional gas compression method.

      but then it doesn't sound like arranging these molecules into a crystal-like structure won't require considerable amounts of electric power.

      only time will tell. and even then, remember that new technologies' worst rivals are the ones they're trying to replace. even in a best case scenario, it'll probably need many years to become mainstream. gas compression refrigeration's been around almost as long as refrigeration has... it's gonna be a tough one IMO.

    4. Re:Efficiency by RobertM1968 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, this was my thought as well. TFA is, as usual, slim on the technical details...

      Yeah, but does that really matter? You are one of the three people on slashdot that actually reads the articles (which I think is against the rules here). I know I didnt read it.

      ;-)

    5. Re:Efficiency by kesuki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and since it uses PVC (plus a few more elements) it's quite toxic should it catch on fire.

      ahh the smell of chlorine gas in the morning... i can see a couple problems with this material 1. it can only change 21 degrees a cycle, this means you need multiple separate units of the stuff to cycle on and off to cool more, and since it's toxic when burned, it can't do high temperature heating. it also can't do refrigeration in an environment where it might reach it's melting point. yeah you can use heat sinks on the hot side, do you really think heat sinks are cheaper than reliable, safe, CHEAP compressor technology? if there is a significant savings on energy usage (not discussed) then yeah it's great, it's also since it's a polymer easily made into clothing articles, but they seemed to add a number of ideas that don't make sense like 'fire fighter equipment' if it's highly flammable, and creates toxic chlorine gas, it's not suitable for firefighting! and basic electric heating of gloves* is already possible, what advantage does this device have? that it can't raise the temp of your gloves by more than 21 degrees F of the temp outside? um yeah... neat, cool, new way to cool or heat stuff, doesn't mean it has any commercial value, unless it's properties are better than what we're using now.

      * = or perhaps of whole snow mobile suits, as i've seen for some modern snow mobiles...

    6. Re:Efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it sounds like it won't produce as much heat as the conventional gas compression method

      Don't forget to have your geek credentials removed on the way out. The amount of heat produced depends entirely on the efficiency. If it is less efficient than peltier elements then it is less efficient than compressors and then it produces more waste heat.

    7. Re:Efficiency by Skater · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Am I the only one who remembers absorption refrigerators? Actually they are still widely used in RVs because they can run on any heat source (such as propane) without requiring electricity. They're also extremely energy efficient and have no moving parts.

      The downsides to them are that they rely on the temperature differential between the coils and the ambient air, so on extremely hot days they aren't that good keeping cool (or if you are opening the door frequently).

    8. Re:Efficiency by Smidge204 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, peltier stacks use electric current. This method uses electric fields. In other words, it sounds like they use the polymer as a dialectric in a capacitor that is constantly charged and discharged. I know peltiers eat a lot of current, so depending on the capacitance of this new system the total power should be quite a bit less.

      Actually transporting the heat is another matter...
      =Smidge=

    9. Re:Efficiency by Peyna · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are one of the three people on slashdot that actually reads the articles (which I think is against the rules here).

      Reading of articles is strictly prohibited. However, clicking on the link and loading the article is required. This is how the Slashdot effect and ignorance of content can co-exist.

      --
      What?
    10. Re:Efficiency by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm using an unmodified AVG 8 - it performs the Slashdotting for me.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    11. Re:Efficiency by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

      it sounds like it won't produce as much heat as the conventional gas compression method

      Don't forget to have your geek credentials removed on the way out. The amount of heat produced depends entirely on the efficiency. If it is less efficient than peltier elements then it is less efficient than compressors and then it produces more waste heat.

      He didn't say that the heat didn't depend on the efficiency, just that the reduced heat output itself might be a benefit.

    12. Re:Efficiency by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      > and since it uses PVC (plus a few more elements) it's quite toxic should it catch on fire.

      Umm... what do you think the rest of the refrigerator is made of? It's basically a small metal frame with isolation foam (some plastic) and plastic around it. sometimes (more often than not) the cooling circuit is the only metal thing in there.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    13. Re:Efficiency by frito_x · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      without knowing the specifics of the method proposed... (the temp differential doesn't tell you anything if one doesn't know how much energy is required to accomplish that change of state.) you can not actually tell if it's more efficient or not... can you? (i won't (and didn't) deny i'm just guessing.

      p.s.1: sadly i'm not a geek anymore (just a chemical engineering drop-out with credentials removed a long time ago) so i'm kinda letting the rum do the talking...

      p.s.2: in perfectly acceptable /. fashion... i obviously didn't RTFA so an undetermined quantity of salt it's gonna be required for any post of mine wrt this.

    14. Re:Efficiency by kesuki · · Score: 3, Informative

      you missed the point. polystyrene is flammable, but completely lacks the poly-vinyl-chlorine.

      chlorine is an important part of many poison gasses, although 'pure' chlorine is more of an irritant combined with vinyl the chlorine gas is Quite toxic, that's the big problem, in some states it's becoming illegal to use PVC piping, because in a fire when people are trapped breathing fumes, the toxic vinyl chloride gas can kill not only trapped victims but can make onlookers and rescuer crews sick, if they survive.

      I know the following link is greenpeace, but they had the most comprehensive page about why Poly vinyl chloride (PVC) is so toxic.

      remember, this device is being proposed as a replacement for the compressor/gas phase of a fridge, not the outer housing.

      http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/how-to-find-and-avoid-toxic-vi

    15. Re:Efficiency by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      TFA is useless as usual so it's little wonder no one reads them.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    16. Re:Efficiency by flappinbooger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nah, man, a 21 degree dT is great. A typical cooling tower or hydronic HVAC operates at a 10 degree dT.

      If they can force a 21 degree temperature drop to occur with some fancy plastic and some electricity... that's awesome. The challenge will be to APPLY this to a SYSTEM that will CAPITALIZE on the TECHNOLOGY.

      Move it from the lab to the Walmart or the appliance store or the house or the car.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    17. Re:Efficiency by kesuki · · Score: 1

      just to make sure, you mean degrees F not C right? i don't always put the F there when it was in TFA...

      if your 10 degrees was C that totally reverses the statement from 'incredible' to 'plausible'

    18. Re:Efficiency by flappinbooger · · Score: 4, Informative

      I did a lot of HVAC systems in the past, and many were large scale water source heat pump systems. This is, as expected, where the air handler cools the air in the space to, say, 55 F at the coil.

      The fluids go to a condensing unit (compressor) which, instead of going to a coil with a fan directly to outside air, goes instead to a heat exchanger with water. The water runs throughout the building taking heat away from all of the water source heat pumps.

      Typically, what I remember, the water will gain 10 degrees from the loop and dump 10 degrees at the cooler. The cooler will either be an evaporative cooling tower or a "fluid cooler" but it is basically always dumping 10 degrees of heat multiplied by however many gallons per minute of flow.

      Yeah, the individual space gets a larger than 10 degree F temperature difference, and the SYSTEM gets "just" 10 degrees, but it's apples and oranges, different flow rates of fluids, CFM, BTU's, etc. Energy is energy, the temperature difference is only one part of the equation.

      So, my point, and I do have one, is that ~20 degrees C or ~20 degrees F or whatever, it's enough if applied correctly.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    19. Re:Efficiency by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      Especially since millions of small refrigerators (minibars, camping car refr., cooling boxes), etc are already compressor-free with peltier elements.

    20. Re:Efficiency by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well that sucks.

      I guess we'll have to step up the open-pit copper mining, then. Yay environmentalism!

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    21. Re:Efficiency by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      If it's cheap to manufacture, I can think of at least one use that doesn't depend on efficiency. Radiant floor heating, if you could smear a thin layer in flooring apply electric, heat the floor at night, cool the house by day...
      granted metals do this heating fine today, but no cooling, and likely not as lightweight.

    22. Re:Efficiency by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      do you really think heat sinks are cheaper than reliable, safe, CHEAP compressor technology?

      What was he thinking? We all know that a compressor is cheaper than a lump of metal.

      --
      I hate printers.
    23. Re:Efficiency by mortonda · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this was my thought as well. TFA is, as usual, slim on the technical details...

      Yeah, but does that really matter? You are one of the three people on slashdot that actually reads the articles (which I think is against the rules here). I know I didnt read it.

      ;-)

      But if it weren't for those few people, I wouldn't know that TFA is slim on details ... now I know that I may as well not RTFA. So thanks, article-reading-person! You're our hero!

    24. Re:Efficiency by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Funny

      "...although 'pure' chlorine is more of an irritant..."

      Yes, having your eyes and lungs dissolved by chlorine gas can be very irritating.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    25. Re:Efficiency by DeadChobi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, to be honest, there are things in your home and/or appliances which are just as toxic when burned. Hell, plastic water piping is PVC. So unless you make it a point to light your refrigerator on fire at the end of its lifecycle you really don't have a case there.

      And in general anything that replaces mechanical parts(a compressor) with electrical parts will achieve an increase in energy efficiency because of the absence of mechanical friction in the system.

      Also there are already heat sinks on the back of refrigerators. How would this be a different situation? So yes, I do think this will be cheaper than bulky, loud, inefficient fluid compressors.

      --
      SRSLY.
    26. Re:Efficiency by Warll · · Score: 1

      The challenge will be to APPLY this to a SYSTEM that will CAPITALIZE on the TECHNOLOGY.

      Well your keyboard looks like it will be a good place to start.

    27. Re:Efficiency by philspear · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the randomization of the polarpolymers, that's increasing the disordered information of the universe.

      WON'T SOMEONE PLEEZE THINK OF THE ENTROPY!

    28. Re:Efficiency by jabithew · · Score: 1

      I would imagine it makes fairly significant savings on energy usage, as compressors are pretty expensive to run. It really depends on how much heat can be removed per-cycle. The effect doesn't sound like it would take much heat out, so many cycles would be needed, which would be more expensive in terms of pumping costs.

      Since the cycle is contained, surely you could run high-temperature loops under pressure?

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    29. Re:Efficiency by g0dsp33d · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone asks about the compressor when buying a fridge. If it has the right volume and features, they will buy it. Bonus points if the salesman can say that there's no moving parts to break.

      --
      lol: You see no door there!
    30. Re:Efficiency by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just remember that C.O.P. is a very important factor here. Refrigerants aren't just chosen for the temperature drop they can produce, but for the overall volume of heat they can transfer and at what rates they can transfer that heat. True enough, a Condenser Water Loop on a Water Source Heat Pump system might only experience a +/- 10F fluctuation, but it is the volume of heat (in BTUs) that is probably more significant. This is why you need make up water in the cooling tower(s).

    31. Re:Efficiency by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Unless it's smaller than peltier, it won't become something PC enthusiasts care about. PC gurus tend not to care much about saving 10 watts on cooling when they're cranking 900+ through their PS.

      Since the EPA and EnergyStar are so involved in the process, unless it's more efficient than compressors, you won't see it in fridges or AC units. Peltier is both less efficient and costs more, it;s advantage is size.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    32. Re:Efficiency by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      "...although 'pure' chlorine is more of an irritant..."
      Yes, having your eyes and lungs dissolved by chlorine gas can be very irritating.

      [sarcasm]Yeah, there's a fundamentally good reason that the authorities at hand only evacuate people with lung and Cardio problems when a chlorine leak occurs.[/sarcasm]

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    33. Re:Efficiency by kesuki · · Score: 1

      they're both made from metal, but the heat sink has a lot more metal, and it has to be aluminum, whereas a compressor is typically steel, steel is a poor heat sink. if you've ever looked at the back of a fridge, you'd notice that they use the least amount of metal possible to radiate away the heat, the problem with this new thing is it creates a big flat hot spot from which one needs to apply a processor style heat sink, from aluminum if it's going to carry away 21 degrees of temp change...

      this new tech might be viable, but researchers will find out how well it scales, what it really costs, and if it's more energy efficient than compressor based systems. it also has to be durable, compressors last for decades. i've seen a working compressor over 60 years old. if this tech isn't durable that too will be a strike against it.

      that's why researchers research things instead of mass producing products without even testing if they work.

    34. Re:Efficiency by kesuki · · Score: 1

      "So unless you make it a point to light your refrigerator on fire at the end of its lifecycle you really don't have a case there."

      no the point was THIS material is the parity with 'compressed' gas in a compressor system, you don't use a mix of 66% hydrogen and 33% oxygen in a compressor because it's only a matter of time before it explodes in a giant fireball. this material is flammable! and you want to use it to what? heat and cool stuff?!!?

      okay so really it smolders and doesn't 'combust' into a giant fireball, but that smoldering releases more toxic dioxin than anything else known to man! and you're going to see just how hot you can get it by cooling a freezer to 0 f? yeah, i don't think so. that was my point. it can only be used where you've designed it to never reach smoldering temperatures even on say a 120 f day in a desert region without a fan or with a failsafe temperature shut off, that could cause your entire freezer or fridge to rot... compared to highly reliable compressor tech that lasts for decades and very rarely fail.

    35. Re:Efficiency by operagost · · Score: 1

      I don't even keep my freezer at 0 degrees F. My ice cream gets a little too hard.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    36. Re:Efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that will CAPITALIZE

      I see what you did there.

    37. Re:Efficiency by rootooftheworld · · Score: 1

      I read /. for the comments. No, really.

      --
      I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack
    38. Re:Efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still writing as anonymous coward because somehow I could not register, so I'm kind of an illegal. All this new technology is either for our military, NASA, or other governmental bodies, funding always comes from US, as in grants these guys get so they can experiment with things that most likely won't work, or aren't very useful when it comes to what we want, or need as the average/funder American. Someone mentioned storing Red Bulls in such a powered devise, if it was at all practical. My Red Bulls probably won't get cold fast enough, I'd end up throwing it away. Of course, I'd probably have to call in Hazmat when I do. Meanwhile, millions of dollars would have been granted through the years, until this thing finally has a possible, consumerist, practical application, outside of some governmental robotic lander, cooling things down for a Martian mission's sample in order to preserve its blah, blah, blah,... opposite of the thermal heaters they use now to test samples, such as what determined the presence of water on Mars. Should the well granted and noble scientist take a science prize as topping on his/her cake for an invention that helped store something on such a far away place? You decide. Let's wait and see what happens with this in say, a few months, possibly less, now that computers do all the work for these guys. Whatever anyone says, things as far as the regular person is concerned, have not changed very much at all since the fifties. Computers came along, but most else we've had, getting more tech-advanced, albeit. Microwaves have been around since the late forties, although not widespread, as is everything else now, merely widespread, and more advanced, as compared to then. Perhaps this thing won't be as toxic for US, if they seal it real well inside the fridge itself, instead of where they usually put it, at the bottom. The whole fridge would be it, sealed in walls of non toxic safety? Mario A.C. (Mars) mario@dermaessence.com

    39. Re:Efficiency by rcw-home · · Score: 1

      it sounds like it won't produce as much heat as the conventional gas compression method.

      That, again, depends on the efficiency. Any heat pump creates a certain amount of heat in the process of moving a (hopefully much larger) amount of heat. HeatDumped = ElectricityUsed + HeatRemoved.

      For example, assume a hot side of 300K and a cold side of 270K. Your max theoretical efficiency will be 1/(1-(270/300))=10 (a coefficient of performance - COP - of 10, meaning 10 watts were moved for every one watt of electricity used). Wikipedia says that Peltiers only achieve about 5-10% of this (or 0.5 to 1.0 COP) and compressors can achieve 40-60% of this (or 4 to 6 COP with the temperatures assumed above). It'll be interesting to see how this measures up.

    40. Re:Efficiency by Eivind · · Score: 1

      So ? Typical cooling in the home is like a fridge, where the temperature-range is aproximately freezing on the cold side and room-temperature on the hot end. There's some distance between room-temperature and pvc-melts, you know ?

    41. Re:Efficiency by kesuki · · Score: 1

      and in a place like Arizona where they don't use AC systems, because the outside temp gets too hot, room temperature get how hot again?

      i know since it's dry 'water fans' are popular in AZ to keep cool, but the person in front of the fan benefits, not the appliances.

      you have to plan around the worst case scenario, not around someone with AC that keeps the house at a nice cool 68F.

    42. Re:Efficiency by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Hardly matters PVC melts at 80C, That's 176F. I don't know how warm it is in Arizona, but it ain't 176F.

  3. Entropy by thedrx · · Score: 1

    I'll say, that's an interesting use of entropy.

    1. Re:Entropy by jd · · Score: 1

      Oh, I dunno. Sounds fairly routine to me. I've worked in plenty of places that were highly disorganized and gave off lots of hot air.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Entropy by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot is the ultimate source of entropy. Nothing can come close the the random BS emitted around here.

      --
      I hate printers.
    3. Re:Entropy by jd · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Slashdot has random BS, yes, but it's constant. Entropy is an increase in disorder. 100% disorder that isn't changing has no entropy, no matter what you might think of it - or of CowboyNeil.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Entropy by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is the ultimate source of entropy. Nothing can come close the the random BS emitted around here.

      You should spend a day at dig for comparison - slashdot BS has very low levels of randomness.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    5. Re:Entropy by mehemiah · · Score: 1

      does \b man anything to u?

  4. Finally by binarylarry · · Score: 1

    Man o man, how many times I've thought to myself "How can I get rid the compressor that powers my refrigerator?" Oh technology, what can't you do?

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I certainly wouldn't want a compressionless portable AC.

      What's that you say? Sorry, I can't hear you!

    2. Re:Finally by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Oh technology, what can't you do?

      It can't get me laid =(

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Finally by wonkavader · · Score: 1

      Well, that's just cause the technology isn't high enough...

  5. compressionless is new? by notgm · · Score: 1

    wasn't there a compressionless sound wave-based cooling developed a few years back? i remember ben or jerry from ben-and-jerry's championing the efforts.

    1. Re:compressionless is new? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      And don't forget Peltierâ"Seebeck junctions.

      But perhaps it might be more efficient, which is preventing more widespread use of Peltier effect devices.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:compressionless is new? by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Or Peltier coolers, like a USB Beverage cooler.

      I tried a refrigerator based on a peltier cooler, but it wasn't very good. Common applications are car beverage coolers, where they are better than no cooler at all.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    3. Re:compressionless is new? by Joebert · · Score: 4, Funny

      I tried making my own beverage cooler out of Peltiers once, it kept my beverage nice and cold but it burnt the shit out of my hand.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    4. Re:compressionless is new? by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's still based on compression (and out of Penn State, licensed to Ben and Jerry's, of course), but it's a much *faster* compression, at the frequency of the sound waves used, and it takes advantage of air's intrinsic nonlinearity at high acoustic amplitudes, rather than the much slower effects inherent in traditional refrigeration techniques.

      http://www.acs.psu.edu/thermoacoustics/refrigeration/benandjerrys.htm

    5. Re:compressionless is new? by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      And that is why the CoolItSystems version has a big heat sink and fan on the hot side.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    6. Re:compressionless is new? by maxume · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did you try using it without putting shit in your hand?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:compressionless is new? by treeves · · Score: 1

      My guess is he had to , since he wanted cold shit.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  6. let me be the first to say by chenjeru · · Score: 1

    'cool'

    --
    Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
  7. same place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the same place both exhausts the heat and gets cool? Sounds like a problem. At least with a compressor refrigerator the cold and hot spots are separate (much easier to insulate that way).

  8. Re:22.6F temperature change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Congratulations on not even reading the whole fucking summary.

  9. Unless you had multiple stages by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they can work in series to achieve greater temperature differences.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  10. What about overclocking / cooling? by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, will this pave the way for a new style of super-cooling for the home computer overclocking enthusiast? ...


    ... cuz if not, I'm not really interested.

    Wait, the fridge keeps my red-bull cold...

    1. Re:What about overclocking / cooling? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait, the fridge keeps my red-bull cold...

      The fridge? You're still using the fridge? I keep my Red Bull inside my very, very overclocked computer case. I also hang my steaks in there.

    2. Re:What about overclocking / cooling? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Funny
      I keep my Red Bull inside my very, very overclocked computer case.

      That explains the wired network.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    3. Re:What about overclocking / cooling? by CecilPL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sounds like your computer just *flies*!

    4. Re:What about overclocking / cooling? by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Funny

      10 Overclock PC
      20 Add Electromagnetic Cooling
      30 Overclock PC
      40 Overclock Electromagnetic Cooler
      50 Goto 30

    5. Re:What about overclocking / cooling? by g0dsp33d · · Score: 1

      Depends, how do you feel about having your PC in the fridge?

      --
      lol: You see no door there!
    6. Re:What about overclocking / cooling? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I keep my Red Bull inside my very, very overclocked computer case.

      Ever tasted that weird green liquid they use for so-called water-cooling?
      Its really Red Bull.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:What about overclocking / cooling? by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Considering this requires an electrical field not just electricity in general, my guess is strong forces like this anywhere near your CPU would be a bad idea... Also, since you'd still need a heat sink and heat exchanger, it would be only slightly smaller than trying to get a refrigeration coil inside your PC (or in a separate case externally).

      On the other hand, this technology could eliminate some of the spacial design limitations of compressor coil cooling, allowing the fridge to have more interior space with the same external volume, and thus store more red bull (and bigger pizza boxes)! :D

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    8. Re:What about overclocking / cooling? by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      How so you overcome the condensation issues? I'm constantly battling that in my own walk-in PC...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    9. Re:What about overclocking / cooling? by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      10 Overclock PC
      20 Add Electromagnetic Cooling
      30 Overclock PC
      40 Overclock Electromagnetic Cooler
      50 Goto 30

      Pretty BASIC idea for Slashdot, isn't it?

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    10. Re:What about overclocking / cooling? by FredFredrickson · · Score: 1

      You know, trapped in endless nested brackets, you sometimes miss that good ol' GOTO.

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
  11. Re:22.6F temperature change by Adreno · · Score: 1

    Hmm... I expect some readers to ignore the article and take the summary for granted, but did you even read the summary in total? "Repeated randomizing and ordering of the material combined with an appropriate heat exchanger could provide a wide range of heating and cooling temperatures." They will easily be able to get to normal refridgeration temperatures. Whether they can do this more efficiently than current technologies is another question entirely. It would have a great environmental impact if they could, as I assume this would also affect AC units and other temp-control devices in controlled environments within buildings.

  12. Already been done? by retro128 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How is this different from a Peltier cooler?

    --
    -R
    1. Re:Already been done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How is a incandescent light bulb different from a light emitting diode? They turn electricity into light and heat. Aren't they the same?

    2. Re:Already been done? by EdIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's pretty vague, but it sounds like it is not continuous. The Peltier effect with thermoelectric material is constant as long as electricity is applied. This new material seems to give off heat and is then able to absorb heat once the electricity is turned off.

      It's sound pretty strange and not much better than thermoelectric which already has been around quite a long time. Just wait and see if we can get more technical explanations later.

    3. Re:Already been done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's sound pretty strange and not much better than thermoelectric which already has been around quite a long time. Just wait and see if we can get more technical explanations later.

      How do you figure? The thermoelectric effect has crap efficiency. This sounds like it might work a lot better (although of course we need numbers to judge).

      It's not strange at all. It's basically taking a material in a high entropy state (disorganized), and when an electric field is applied, it converts into a low entropy state (organized).

      A natural consequence of going from high entropy to low entropy is that heat is removed from the system. Reverting back to the disorganized state increases entropy, and draws heat back into the system.

      Then you just need a mechanism which can take advantage of this.

    4. Re:Already been done? by Technician · · Score: 1

      How is this different from a Peltier cooler?

      A Peltier thermolelectric module is continious cycle with a hot and cool side.

      This device on the other hand is an absorption cycle where the same side (all sides) alternately gets hot to give off heat (hot) and then reverses to absorb heat from the same surface. This is an electrical replacement for Crosley Ice Balls.

      http://crosleyautoclub.com/IcyBall/crosley_icyball.html

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    5. Re:Already been done? by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

      But combine this with, say, a conveyor type arrangement where the heat absorbtion occurs on one side of the conveyor and dissipation takes place on the other side, and with enough of a heat sink, this could be turned into a continuous process.

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  13. Light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Delta 22.6F is pretty meager. Peltier coolers hit Delta 40C, about 4x the differential.

    1. Re:Light by shaitand · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It really doesn't matter so long as there is a Delta. It sounds like this can absorb and release heat as fast as an electrical switch can be flipped and mankind has made some pretty snappy switches that could repeat REALLY fast.

      The real question is how much power is lost. Peltier coolers for instance are horrendously inefficient. If this isn't more efficient and/or cheaper than compressor technology it will never happen. Since compressor technology isn't cheap to produce the only thing that will likely stand in the way of cheapness is greed on the part of the patent-holder. We shall see.

    2. Re:Light by Bloater · · Score: 1

      "It sounds like this can absorb and release heat as fast"

      So do you think this gives off EM radiation as an electric field is applied or that it just heats up rapidly as it becomes ordered so that a heatsink can take the heat away (thus "gives off heat" as per the article), and removal of the electric field will then cause it to return to a colder temperature.

      Since they suggest heat exchangers I going to guess that it warms with an electric field and cools without rather than gives of EM.

      An EM device would be cool (pun intended) because you could place a grid of the material in relation to a grid of reflectors that forced the EM to a black panel behind which would be connected to a heat sink and physically insulated from the rest of the fridge and you'd be totally solid state.

    3. Re:Light by Technician · · Score: 1

      It sounds like this can absorb and release heat as fast as an electrical switch can be flipped and mankind has made some pretty snappy switches that could repeat REALLY fast.

      Most people don't want the heat back in the same place it was absorbed. A fast switch isn't needed. A fast transport of the device from the hot side heatsink back to the cold side heatsink is needed.

      Maybe if this was built into an electric motor, we could have one side hot and one side cold as they spin from side to side. Hmm Maybe a fan that blows hot air through the left side and cold through the right side. ;-) Just duct the hot and cold where you want them.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Light by infolib · · Score: 1

      It sounds like this can absorb and release heat as fast as an electrical switch can be flipped and mankind has made some pretty snappy switches that could repeat REALLY fast.

      Yeah, great. Now you just have to put in the whole thermodynamic cycle:
      1. Switch on
      2. Establish thermal contact to hot side, wait for heat to leak.
      3. Cut thermal contact to hot side.
      4. Switch off.
      5. Establish thermal contact to cold side, wait for "cold" to leak.
      6. Cut thermal contact to cold side.
      7. GOTO 1.
      8. ????
      9. Profit!!

      The switching is really the easy thing.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    5. Re:Light by danaris · · Score: 1

      Yeah, great. Now you just have to put in the whole thermodynamic cycle:
      1. Switch on
      2. Establish thermal contact to hot side, wait for heat to leak.
      3. Cut thermal contact to hot side.
      4. Switch off.
      5. Establish thermal contact to cold side, wait for "cold" to leak.
      6. Cut thermal contact to cold side.
      7. GOTO 1.
      8. ????
      9. Profit!!

      I like how the last 2 steps are unreachable...are you trying to say something about the viability of this technology? ;-)

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    6. Re:Light by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Sounds far too complex to be cheap.

      Position the 'device' at the top of the fridge in an insulated tube. Put a heat sink directly above the 'device'. The heat will rise, heat the heat sink, and be removed by airflow outside the fridge.

      Simple, cheap, and since transistor switching is REALLY fast, it would put the practical limitation on the speed of the heat exchange process.

  14. Possible practical implementation by ZombieEngineer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This could feasibly be used to make a practical air conditioner by having a segmented disk shape block that allows air to pass through.

    Outside air would pass through one half of the disk that is currently energised (the electric field orders the polymer and thus releases heat).

    The inside air would pass through the other half that is currently not energised (the relaxation of the electric field allows the material to absorb heat).

    The disk rotates with segments shifting between the outside / inside halves, the electric field is applied by a simple electric comutation.

    This is not a true "no moving parts" system but it has the potential to be an order of magnitude quieter than the current air conditioning units.

    ZombieEngineer

    1. Re:Possible practical implementation by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

      Yup. Given the material's properties, I can't see any way of utilizing it without SOME mechanical action, which means the article's stated idea of a flat-panel refrigerator with no moving parts will never happen, at least not using this material.

    2. Re:Possible practical implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why complicate things more than they need to be?

      Have two layers of the stuff, back to back, with one outer surface exposed to outside and and the other to the inside of the fridge.

      Power on both, to dump their heat. Then power off the inner one while the outer is still on; it'll suck heat from inside the fridge. Then simultaneously power off the outer one and power on the inner one; most of the inner one's heat is sucked up by the cold outer one. Then flip their states again; the outer one will dump most of that absorbed heat to the outside, since the inner one is currently rejecting heat. Repeat as necessary. Additional airflow over the outer layer may improve performance, in which case there may indeed be moving parts - a fan - but that's a lot cheaper to replace than a compressor.

    3. Re:Possible practical implementation by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sort of my thought too... you need some sort of heat "valve" to enforce one-directional heat transfer with this technology (Maxwell's daemon, anyone?), otherwise the heat just flow back in the same direction with you reverse the electric field. I can't think of any way of doing this without moving parts, so I feel the "solid state refrigerator" claim is a bit of a misnomer.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Possible practical implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent insightful!

    5. Re:Possible practical implementation by Urkki · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure most of the heat would go the right way, I think it would be fifty-fifty-deal mostly. So a method like that could something like halve (or worse than halve, since there are 3 heat exchange interfaces in your system) the theoretical efficiency, since so much heat would be leaking back. It might still be worthwhile (and more efficient than peltier) because there are no moving parts, if the basic efficiency, the energy required for the electric field, is good enough.

      But adding minimal moving parts by having a heat pipe or just plain aluminum contact surfaces that could be disconnected could increase the cooling power per size quite a bit, and especially improve efficiency by reducing heat leaking the wrong way. Of course this is easy only as long as you're not trying to go below freezing point of water, after that there'll be a freezing problem with the moving parts...

    6. Re:Possible practical implementation by infolib · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then flip their states again; the outer one will dump most of that absorbed heat to the outside, since the inner one is currently rejecting heat.

      I'm sorry, but there's no such thing as "rejecting heat". If the inner one is colder, it will take heat from the outer period. Your system will be nicely wasting electricity while moving heat from inner to outer and back again.

      You need to set up some kind of touch/non-touch configuration, which means moving parts.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    7. Re:Possible practical implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should take a look at tesla pump and google The Magneto-Caloric Effect. you get a more effective system. this polimer is basicaly acting like a Magneto-Caloric material. only instead of tfa saying it a magnetic field organizing the material its and electrical field.

    8. Re:Possible practical implementation by rew · · Score: 1

      Why is your airconditioner noisy? Because you hear the pump (which is normally outside) or because lots of airflow is required along the heat exchanging elements?

    9. Re:Possible practical implementation by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1

      A modified heat pipe can be used as a thermal 'diode'. It's made by interrupting the wicking near one end.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_diode

    10. Re:Possible practical implementation by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I wasn't aware of one-way heat pipes, and that would certainly be useful in conjunction with the technology in the article. However, technically I still don't think that counts as "no moving parts", as the liquid within the heat pipe still moves. The other goal, a silent refrigerator, may also be difficult to achieve, since most materials exhibit thermal expansion and contraction when changing temperatures; this probably would as well. As a child, we had electric baseboard heaters, basically a 6-foot long resistor with a heat sink on it. You would think that would be silent, wouldn't you? No, every time it turned on or off, it emitted a clanking noise about once per second for a couple minutes, until the heat sink temperature stabilized again.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    11. Re:Possible practical implementation by Alsee · · Score: 1

      You're essentially right that the grandparent post's design doesn't work. If you simply stack and cycle them the linear conduction effects will always cancel out. However by cycling them out of phase as he described does spike one of them to a slightly higher temperature (shorter time at a higher temp, longer time at a cool temp). Thermal radiation is a nonlinear effect, so one side radiates a minute amount more than the other side. His design will incidentally pump a minuscule fraction of a degree. I programmed up a digital simulation and it is a barely detectable effect.

      With a different design you can do a non-moving-parts setup. If you have a conductive fluid, you can pass a current through it in a magnetic field. This electromagnetic interaction exerts a force directly on the fluid - a pump with no moving parts. When you reverse the direction of the current it reverses the direction it pumps the fluid. So you can electrically pump the fluid through coils on this heating/cooling material to carry the cold into the refrigerator and pump the heat out to a radiator coil, and then reverse the fluid direction at the same time you reverse the polarity on the heating/cooling material. No moving parts except for the fluid. Probably not the best design, but just a proof-of-concept that a non-moving-parts design is possible.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  15. Problem by PPH · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    These polarpolymers include poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) and poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)-chlorofluoroethylene, ...

    I'd like one of those poly-pola-try-viyl, er, I mean fluoro-frikkin-flora,.....

    Ah, screw it. Gimme a fridge with a compressor.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Problem by man_ls · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the reason we moved from R12 to R134A in cooling systems because of the environmental impact of CFCs? These are just CFC polymers.

    2. Re:Problem by kesuki · · Score: 1

      well, it lacks carbon, for one. for another it's a solid mass, not a leak prone gas. so it's not the same level of environmental problem, unless it starts smoldering or burning.

  16. Hmm by duckInferno · · Score: 1

    Cool.

    --
    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  17. Fud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just one of those tons of press releases Universities put out to show themselves off. And researchers have to make this stuff to show NSF or whoever is funding that what they do is relevant to society.

    Look at the website of almost any university and you know what I mean. You may come across my piece of FUD as well. Revolutionary break through in quantum coherence....? anyone?

    1. Re:Fud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this FUD? They announce a development which may allow compressor free refrigeration does that mean my current fridge stops working? Should I be afraid of this tech. Should I be uncertain of my compressor fridge. Should I doubt my food is still cold since this hit teh interwebs? Do you even know what FUD is?

    2. Re:Fud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vaporware (if it is vaporware) != FUD.

    3. Re:Fud by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      Your current refrigerator has compressible refrigerant in it.
      Which will destroy the world if it somehow leaks out.

      And YOU will be responsible.

  18. It's all talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The free market has no motivation to implement any more new technology. This is the exact same problem we have with Oil companies. Technology will not change until government forces step in and start providing incentives for new technologies. We still have the same home appliances we did 50 years ago, and that is not likely to change in the next 100 years. At the rate we are going we will most likely destroy ourselves before we see the technology of a refrigerator change.

    1. Re:It's all talk by amyhughes · · Score: 1

      The compressor is the noisy part of a refrigerator, right? If you could make a refrigerator without one you'd have market differentiation over a desirable feature (quietness). Problem being, the heat differential is not great enough to work for the freezer, so if that's the best that's possible then your fridge would still have to have a compressor.

    2. Re:It's all talk by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      re freezer: You are forgetting something here. The inside of the fridge/freezer combo is a closed circuit (air-wise and refrigerant-wise). When you take a new freezer and it starts to cool, it's many passes of the air inside through the evaporator before it comes anywhere near freezing. That and the fact that there is still "heat" to be absorbed well below the freezing point (heat pumps anyone?).

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    3. Re:It's all talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What free market? Patent privileges still exist. Until they are done away with, commoditisation is terribly slowed. Patents keep the pace of change down to levels the establishment can deal with. We'd see faster technological progress if the only way to keep up was to keep on innovating, not innovate once and charge rent for 20 years.

    4. Re:It's all talk by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      "We still have the same appliances we did 50 years ago, and that is not likely to change in the next 100 years."

      Yes, and everybody had microwaves in the 1950s. Oh, wait...

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
  19. Other methods by gbh1935 · · Score: 0

    What happened to the other compressorless methods? There was a method using sound a few years back that was supposed to be the next best thing...

  20. Adsorption by quenda · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or Adsorption! Those fridges are very common where silent operation is needed: hotel mini-bars, offices. They're just not efficient.
        The article is useless without mentioning efficiency. Inefficient alternatives are nothing new.

    1. Re:Adsorption by infolib · · Score: 4, Informative

      I work in a group researching magnetocaloric refrigeration at room temperature. I read the Science paper, and this is about the same, except with electrical polarization instead of magnetic. It's promising in some ways, but have some potentially fatal problems.

      1. 12 deg C is a really large temperature change, we have to do with 1-3C. My group would kill for a material like that, $EVIL_GENIUS_LAUGHTER. (With a design like this, it's possible to have a much greater cumulative change of temperature than what any single piece of material does, so that's how to cool from +25 to -18 C).

      2. The hysteresis is not too high, look at fig. 1 in the paper. This is important, because hysteresis means you're converting electricity to heat inside your fridge. Many materials have great change in entropy and temperature when you put an electric or magnetic field on them, but it's killed for practical purposes by hysteresis.

      3. You need a really high electric field. The curves in the paper are done at 100-200 MegaV/m, meaning that you need 100-200 kV to polarize a layer of 1 mm thickness. A CRT uses voltages of around 20 kV, and so it's plausible to use thin layers, or just live with the fact that you'll only get 1-2 C temperature change. (Which means it has to compete with magnetic refrigeration on an even footing).

      4. It's hard to polarize and depolarize the material without electric losses. (This is a problem for ferroelectric cooling in general). You're basically charging and discharging a huge capacitor, and you'll lose the charge on the capacitor every round. This could be fixed by putting it as the "C" in an oscillating (LCR) circuit with some inductance, but it's not easy to get an inductance (L) high enough, unless you run at high frequency. This material looks to work at high frequency (the hysteresis curves are taken at 1kHz), but how do you transport the heat into/out of it? If you run at 1kHz, you'll have less than half a ms to transfer heat to the cooling fluid, which means you'll need to use a very thin layer indeed. (Incidentally this will make it easier to get a strong field gradient). Then there's the problem of moving the cooling fluid back and forth over many layers of sub-mm thickness polymer. I'm not saying it can't be done, and there might very well be smart solutions I haven't thought of, but it's not trivial. (And btw, magnetic cooling doesn't have this problem, because we can use a permanent magnet with a several cm gap, and balance material moving into the gap with material moving out.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    2. Re:Adsorption by Alsee · · Score: 1

      magnetic cooling doesn't have this problem, because we can use a permanent magnet with a several cm gap, and balance material moving into the gap with material moving out.

      Mightn't that approach work here? You have a fixed electric field capacitor and rotate a disk of this material through it?

      I realize that the electric field gradient that this stuff wants is pretty extreme, to reach that field you want the gap as narrow as possible, and that working in such a narrow gap is a challenge, but it might be better to cycle the material through the field than to try to cycle the electric field?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Adsorption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mario A.C. here. I thought they said they were using magnetics as well as electric?

    4. Re:Adsorption by infolib · · Score: 1

      It might. But you also have to contact it with some kind of cooling fluid. Either you put the fluid in the field (wasting the precious narrow space there) or you put it outside the field, in which case the heat has to leak through the electrical contacts. Then it needs to touch, and that makes it hard to pull through. Probably not impossible, likely to be difficult.

      Actually from a comment by Urkki, I got the idea of suspending the material in a fluid, that could be pumped through the field. Might work, but you'd need several 100 kV across the fluid, and I'm not sure how easy that is to implement in household apparatus.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    5. Re:Adsorption by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Either you put the fluid in the field (wasting the precious narrow space there) or you put it outside the field, in which case the heat has to leak through the electrical contacts.

      Ahh! No! :) You don't put the fluid in the crucial space inside the field, and you don't put the fluid outside the field attempting to leech the heat through the contacts. I just thought of a third option! One that solves both issues!

      If we were in a face-to-face conversation I'd give you a moment to puzzle it over, let you try to figure it out yourself if you want. But I'll just post it below. Quit reading here if you want to puzzle it over yourself.

      .

      .

      Picture a horizontal positive electrode bar across the top, and a far distance down negative electrode across the bottom. (A useless electric field at the moment.) Now run electrode "fingers" like a comb down from the top electrode. Now you run similar fingers up from the bottom, right between the fingers coming down from the top. The distance between the comb-fingers is your electric field distance, and the heat-material is in solid contact with both electrodes. So instead of having 2-D sheet of this heat material laid between a pair of 2-D sheet electrodes, you have an almost 1-D line of heat-material snaking back and forth a hundred times between an alternating comb of lots of 1-D electrode fingers. And now you make *this* entire arrangement a reasonably thin solid 2-D sheet. Now you can use the 3rd dimension to run the fluid above and below this sheet, right in contact with the heat-material. You could hang rows of these heat-sheets in a bath of fluid.

      Sometimes times I describe a less than ideal designs just to prove some point or concept on here, but in this case I think this might actually be a really good practical design. Maybe I should go get a patent on it :D

      Hmmm, I just thought of something. Since these electrodes are high voltage but essentially zero current, you can get by with a microscopically thin electrode coating painted or otherwise deposited on the surface of a sheet of heat material. Thermo-conductivity through such a thin electrode would be a total non issue. That makes my comb design completely unnecessary. Oh well. Another get-rich-quick idea flies out the window. Oh well.... at least it was fun coming up with the idea anyway.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    6. Re:Adsorption by infolib · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's fun coming up with these ideas :-) One problem though: If your electrode is fixed to the material, the only way to cycle it is to switch the field on the electrode. But as I mentioned, I think this is hard to do without losing a lot of power.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    7. Re:Adsorption by Alsee · · Score: 1

      If your electrode is fixed to the material, the only way to cycle it is to switch the field on the electrode.

      Under ordinary situations it shouldn't cost much energy simply to pump a charge back and forth between what are essentially two capacitors. However in this case the heat material is doing work from that charge. The work-based counter field built up in the material will lose you energy when you pull the charge back out. But it costs energy to run a heat pump, period. No surprises there.

      This thing could be extremely efficient or dismally inefficient. We'd really need some sort of test results on that. Perhaps I'm just being a cynic, but the fact that no efficiency was mentioned might be because the efficiency figures have "negative advertizing value". Chuckle.

      If your electrode is fixed to the material, the only way to cycle it is to switch the field on the electrode.

      Any arrangment of physically moving parts is going to cost you just as much work to do the pumping. Physically moving charged plates at all with respect to each other would probably be a killer. I was thinking of rotating disk of material through a fixed field - the work based counter-charge in the material would create a work drag against the spinning which is OK - but the problem I missed at first is that arranging thermal contact with the moving disk is a bit messy. I think it's going to be hard for any moving-parts setup to beat simply pumping the charge around electronically .

      Oh, and another though I had. It seems entirely reasonable and beneficial to make the material layers extremely thin, perhaps even a small fraction of a millimeter thick each and stack up lots of them. Making ordinary thin film capacitors the layers much thinner than that is typical. That could get the operating voltage down to 10,000V or less. A merely mildly-annoying voltage, less than a TV tube.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    8. Re:Adsorption by infolib · · Score: 1

      Under ordinary situations it shouldn't cost much energy simply to pump a charge back and forth between what are essentially two capacitors.

      Really? How do you do that?

      If we look at it from the heat pump perspective, it's obvious that you have to add work somewhere. It's a little less obvious where, but the answer is that the permitivity of the material drops with temperature (and from the thermodynamic Maxwell relations it HAS to be that way for the material to show this effect). Now if you apply a field, and then let the stuff cool, before discharging, you'll charge at high capacitance, and discharge a low, which of course gives a net work.

      All that aside, I don't know how you're going to charge and discharge a capacitor, without losing a lot of the charging energy in the process. You could of course use several capacitors charged at intermediate voltages and then discharge to each of them in steps, but even so you'll have losses unless you've got infinitely many. How would you do it? (I'm really not an electronics geek).

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    9. Re:Adsorption by Alsee · · Score: 1

      >Under ordinary situations it shouldn't cost much energy simply to pump a charge back and forth between what are essentially two capacitors.

      Really? How do you do that?

      With ordinary caps it is virtually free. The first half of the transfer is obvious - if you simply connected the two caps then half the charge would run over to the second one. Two half-charged caps. What you actually do is connect the two caps with an inductor between them. An inductor acts like "momentum" for current. The charge on the first cap wants to bleed off. That pressure drives a current carrying half the charge into the second cap. That current turns the inductor into an electromagnet, the inductor builds up magnetic field energy. At the half way point both cap are half charged the electricity is happy, but now the inductor is stuck with a magnetic field and that energy wants to collapse. The collapsing of the magnetic field becomes a mirror image of how the field formed - the same amount of current is driven through in the same direction by the dying magnetic field. This drives the second half of the charge into the second cap.

      One you have the full charge moved to the second cap then you cut the circuit. If you don't cut the circuit then the entire process would run back the other way. The full charge swings back over to the first cap again. It's an oscillator with the charge swinging back and forth like a pendulum between the two caps. That is one of the basic electronic oscillator circuits, although it doesn't usually use two caps. Instead normally one cap bleeds all the way to zero then the "momentum" of the inductor carries everything to the same capacitor charge in the opposite direction. Again it's just like a pendulum swinging, but in this case midpoint is zero charge on one cap instead centering on half-charge across two caps.

      The only meaningful loss of energy when transferring charge from one capacitor to another in the resistance of the wiring. That loss should be minimal.

      I am mostly self-taught in electronics. I figured out how all the other circuit components worked from playing with a really great 200-in-1 electronics kit as a child, but it wasn't until years later that I understood anything about inductors.

      add work somewhere... the permitivity of the material drops... charge at high capacitance, and discharge a low

      Chuckle, I was trying to say exactly that in less technical terms last post. Permitivity is pretty much what I was describing by the "counter field in the material", and that that change lowered the energy you get back when you pull the charge out.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  21. Silent as well? by Twinbee · · Score: 1

    Being solid-state, one can hope this tech is silent. The buzz of our fridge-freezer is a pain.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  22. One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by robbak · · Score: 0, Troll

    When electricity is applied, the molecules become highly ordered and the material gives off heat and becomes colder. When the electricity is turned off, the material reverts to its disordered state and absorbs heat.

    When a thing is giving off heat, we say it is "hotter": it has a higher temperature. When a thing is absorbing heat, we say it is "colder": it has a lower temperature.

    You know, the sort of stuff they showed you in Primary School!!!!

    Stupid chip-packet doctoratates.

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    1. Re:One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Informative

      TFA is written very poorly and describes a phenomena involving polymers that is already widely known. There are many examples. Here is one you can try using something far less exotic than the polymers mentioned in the article.

      For this example, take a rubber band. Stretch it out. Touch the stretched rubber band to your lips. It will feel warm. Hold it in the stretched position for a few seconds to let it cool down to room temperature. Now let the rubber band relax, and once again touch it to your lips. You should now notice that it will feel cool.

      The above process uses exactly the same principles described in TFA. Stretching the rubber band causes reduction of disorder by aligning the polymer chains. It also warms the rubber band because of the work applied. As you hold the rubber band in the stretched state it will cool to room temperature releasing some of the energy needed to heat it. This is equivalent to the step where the electrical field is applied.

      Now release the rubber band. The polymer chains now revert back to a disordered state, cooling the rubber. Since the rubber band started in a stretched room temperature state the relaxed rubber band will now be below room temperature. this is equivalent to turning off the electric field as mentioned in the article.

      Voila. This is a wonderful new refrigeration system that will replace all existing known cooling systems. NOT.

      There are so many issues with practical application of this it is not funny. If these issues didn't exist we would have been using rubber band refrigerators for many decades already.

      Also, please note that from a thermodynamics point of view this is essentially how a conventional refrigeration system works (albeit fat far more efficiently).

    2. Re:One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a thing is giving off heat, we say it is "hotter": it has a higher temperature. When a thing is absorbing heat, we say it is "colder": it has a lower temperature.

      You know, the sort of stuff they showed you in Primary School!!!!

      Stupid chip-packet doctoratates.

      You're an idiot.

      When something gives off heat, it becomes colder.

      When something absorbs heat, it becomes hotter.

      When you touch an ice cube, it feels cold, but that's because it's absorbing heat from your hand, making your hand (which is emitting heat) colder and the ice cube (which is absorbs heat and melts) hotter.

    3. Re:One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by robbak · · Score: 1

      OK, then you and I can probably agree that it is at least ambiguous. And you will also agree that heat transfers are regularly misunderstood.

      When the charge is applied, the polymer becomes warm. If it is warmer than its surroundings, it will subsequently cool to the temperature of its surroundings.

      If that is what the writer meant, then he did not make his point very well. My reading of that statement indicated to me that applying the charge would make the temperature of the item drop as well as making it give out heat: clearly impossible. In order to give out heat, it must first become hotter.

      I imagine that the science-literate person wrote a clear and precise description, which a later reviser shortened into the mess we read.

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    4. Re:One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's fully in line with all thermodynamics courses. Heat is a defined quantity, that can be exchanged. Coldness isn't.

    5. Re:One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the article talks about having the polymer being affected by the surrounding electric field. Obviously the basic mechanics of a refrigerator aren't going to change - you absorb heat and then transfer that heat away. Rinse & repeat. But this is significantly different from your stretching rubber example since it relies on an electric rather than physical process.

      One can improve the efficiency, how fast the cooling takes place, and how noisy the system is. Significant improvements in 1 or more categories while maintaining parity with current refrigerators in the remaining ones is significant. Not saying that this system is necessarily better, since the article doesn't give enough info.

    6. Re:One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by Bender_ · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are right. There are many ways to induce first order phase transitions in various system, leading to the release or take up of heat.

      The special thing about the device in the article is that this phase transition is induced by an electric field, the so called electrocaloric effect. Therefore no movable parts in the system are required. Previously only small temperature differences have been demonstrated in metal oxides (click ...

    7. Re:One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by Bender_ · · Score: 1

      (reposting of previously mangled up comment)

      Yes, you are right. There are many ways to induce first order phase transitions in various system, leading to the release or take up of heat.

      The special thing about the device in the article is that this phase transition is induced by an electric field, the so called electrocaloric effect. Therefore no movable parts in the system are required. Previously only small temperature differences have been demonstrated in metal oxides (smaller than 10K). By using ferroelectric/antiferroelectric polymers they are apparently able to increase the temperature difference to above 10K, which is a very significant increase.

      That said, this of course typical university hype science and practial application faces many engineering and also intrinsic scientific problems. First of all they have not measured the temperature difference, but deduced it indirectly from maxwell relations. In a realistic set up the temperature difference will be lower.

      A second problem is intrinsic to the material and has been conveniently neglected: Since the principle relies on a solid insulator the heat conductivitiy is extremely low. (No convection, no electronic heat conduction). This means that you are able to create a temperature gradient, but are not able to transfer a lot of heat, thereby severely limiting the cooling ability.

      A third problem is that this effect only works in a very limited temperature range (above 70ÂC). A fourth problem is hysteretic heating due to ferroelectricity...

      Link to the original article: click

    8. Re:One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by infolib · · Score: 1

      A third problem is that this effect only works in a very limited temperature range (above 70ÃC). A fourth problem is hysteretic heating due to ferroelectricity...

      I wouldn't be so worried by that. If you look at fig. 1 you'll see that the hysteresis isn't so horrible, and that the electrocaloric effect is roughly constant in the range 70-100C. Of course that's the wrong temperature range, but this is very new, and it's quite likely that changing the composition will give materials with the same effect around room temperature.

      I very much agree with all the rest you said, though.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    9. Re:One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I think that the idea that this requires no moving parts is something of a red herring. Yes it requires no moving parts to accomplish the phase transition, however there is still the issue of heat removal from the polymer. Some sort of heat exchanger will be needed, presumably convectively cooled by something, and of course there is the issue of how do you prevent the polymer from heating whatever you are trying to cool while the electric field is applied.

      I think that there are some practical applications to this, particularly where you would want direct contact between the coolant and whatever is being cooled. The solid coolant may provide advantages in terms of not requiring a downstream separation process.

      But this isn't going to replace conventional compressor-evaporator-condenser systems.

    10. Re:One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by Gnaythan1 · · Score: 1

      cue techies around the world trying to create a rubber band refrigerator. Heh, sounds like fun.

    11. Re:One thinks a Uni would not mangle it this bad by Bender_ · · Score: 1

      They propose to combine it with peltier elements to construct a heat pump. As always the term 'refridgerator' is misleading.

  23. 2nd law says no. by SlashRSlashN · · Score: 0

    "...change from disorganized to organized..."

    This sounds like it's forgetting some important law of physics, like, say, the second law of thermodynamics that states that the entropy of all real systems always increases.

    But, hey, if you can breach that rule then you can also ignore the efficiency limits of a Carnot engine (which is really crappy) and you are home free to making the world a cooler place for a lot less effort.

    1. Re:2nd law says no. by Diomedes01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      the entropy of all closed systems always increases.

      There, fixed it for you.

      --
      "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
    2. Re:2nd law says no. by GleeBot · · Score: 1

      "...change from disorganized to organized..."

      This sounds like it's forgetting some important law of physics, like, say, the second law of thermodynamics that states that the entropy of all real systems always increases.

      Did you miss the bit where they apply an electric field?

    3. Re:2nd law says no. by robo_mojo · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...the second law of thermodynamics that states that the entropy of all isolated systems always increases.

      There. Fix'd it for you.

      When external energy is applied to the system (like, say, electricity), then the system isn't isolated.

    4. Re:2nd law says no. by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

      The entropy of a closed system always increases. In this case, that includes where the electricity is coming from.

    5. Re:2nd law says no. by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      But do we really want to invest in a technology that decreases the entropy of the only Universe we have to live in?

    6. Re:2nd law says no. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Wow, dumb much?

      Clearly the stainless steel fork on the table next to me is a figment of my imagination, since the iron ore it was made from certainly had more entropy...

    7. Re:2nd law says no. by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      By that logic, my food should've gone bad days ago. Maybe even earlier!

  24. It's not vaporware! by robbak · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is anti vaporware: it is refrigeration without vapors!! No more e-vapor-ators!

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    1. Re:It's not vaporware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if vaporware is the anti-FUD, does this mean we can get Duke Nukem Forever and Microsoft together and destroy the world?

  25. Re:22.6F temperature change by wooferhound · · Score: 1

    A compressor on a refrigerator lasts a very long time too, 20 to 30 years or more. One of the most reliable things out there. The biggest problem with refrigerators is the hinges and door seals wearing out.

    --
    We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  26. Relative or Absolute Range by Nymz · · Score: 1

    I am not a physicist, so feel free to flame me if my question is stupid. But the article mentions a design concept that would hook multiple devices up in a sequence or series, in order to continuously move a temperature in either direction. This concept would make sense if the principle of the phenomenon is based upon a relative temperature range, instead of an absolute range. But if that was true, that this phenomenon could alter an oven at 330 up to 350, or a refrigerator at 50 down to 30 freezing, and I can't imagine it being efficient without it also being magic. So, is it based upon a relative range of temperature, or an absolute one?

    1. Re:Relative or Absolute Range by robbak · · Score: 1

      The article talks about a temperature difference: The see a 22 F (12.22.. C for sane persons) difference between its energized state and its unenergized state.

      So, if it is sitting at room temperature (20C), and you power it up, its temperature raises to 32 C. If you then let it cool down to room temperature and then turn it off, its temperature will cool to 8C.

      With heat exchangers to dump heat into it when it is cold, and strip heat off it when it is hot, you could stack these devices to provide whatever differential you needed, at least until the material becomes too hot or cold for the phenomenon to work.

      Notes: if the degrees symbles do not show up, you will have to imagine them. And a difference of 22 degrees F is not -5 C.

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    2. Re:Relative or Absolute Range by robbak · · Score: 1

      Re-Reply: Yes, efficiency is the target, and the collection of heat exchangers and these devices does not sound particularly efficient to me. But then again, peltiers and compressors are also inefficient, so there is a lot of room to improve on them.

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    3. Re:Relative or Absolute Range by atamido · · Score: 1

      Is there any reason you could not stack several flat versions of this directly on top of each other and then initialize them in sequence? Or do you simply need a way to temporarily insulate the layers from one another to ensure the heat is transferred the correct direction?

      I think that if the layers sat in a vacuum then you would only need to shift the layers ever so slightly so that they made contact with one side or not with the other.

    4. Re:Relative or Absolute Range by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Why can't you imagine that? I'm having trouble imagining a device that DOESN'T work that way.

  27. Buy a new fridge... by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If your current fridge is too loud, then I suggest shopping for a new one. Many of the newer units feature far quieter compressors.

    While you're at it, I'd suggest looking for an energy star one.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Buy a new fridge... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Even with this new technology, you still have to contend with the sound of air being blown around inside the refrigerator to cool the food. Mind you, with better sound insulation, refrigerators with current technology are much quieter than older models.

    2. Re:Buy a new fridge... by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      I rarely hear mine at all. (occasionally the ice tray dumping, or the water tank filling, but that's about it). The thing is damned quiet. There's also no blower inside the fridge for circulating air. "chilling channels" in the back of the fridge do this with simple convection. It's 4 CUft bigger than my old fridge, and uses a lot less power according the the EPA info. (hard to tell looking at the power bill if there's been a real impact since we had both a colder winter and hotter summer this year).

      I have 2 thermometers in the fridge (as well as the one it has on the outside digital display) and there's only about 1 degree difference between the front top shelf and back bottom shelf temps. (my old fridge had a 6 degree variance there, and sounded like a shop compressor when running).

      It's a samsung side by side with water and ice in door, and was about $900.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    3. Re:Buy a new fridge... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is correct. The new ones are much quieter and more efficient. Interestingly the efficiency improvements seem to be due to legislation rather than whiz-bang new technology. My point is, forcing people to do the right thing can be a good idea.

    4. Re:Buy a new fridge... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      How many refrigerators actually have fans inside? I haven't seen one yet, of the dozens of fridges I've looked at. As other posters have pointed out - most fridges use passive convection.

      Even if it DOES have a fan, the extra insulation that's part of an energy star fridge* will tend to muffle any such noise.

      *Because in order to make it use less electricity not only do you need a higher efficiency compressor, an extra half inch or more of insulation doesn't hurt, and can be a heck of a lot cheaper.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  28. Cool, kind of like the gadolinium refrigeration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  29. How many times will it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I didn't understand tfa well but it is my impression that it is talking about a solid material. As the material moves between ordered and disordered states there should be some kind of material fatigue, similar to what you get when you bend a piece of metal back and forth. It sounds to me like it will wear out quickly.

  30. Multiple stages tend to be less efficient. by Firethorn · · Score: 0

    The problem you run into here is still efficiency.

    Having to go with multiple stages, especially if they're not incredibly efficient, is a token for inefficiency.

    Let's say they're 200% efficient. For every unit of energy spent, they move 2 units of heat.

    We're going to need 2 units for a fridge, 3 units for a freezer. (80-46=34, good for fridge, not good for freezer).

    Trouble - We spend 1 unit of electricity, move 2 units of heat to hot side. Due to the efficiency loses, 3 units of heat end up on the hot side.

    So the second stage needs to be 50% larger, use 50% more energy, to finish the job. 1.5 units of energy move 3 units of heat, to exhaust 4.5 units of heat out of whatever radiator system exists.

    We end up spending 2.5 units of electricity to move 2 units of heat out of the refrigerator.

    Meanwhile compressor refrigerators are capable of doing this in one stage, while being capable of moving 2, even 3 units of heat per unit of electricity.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Multiple stages tend to be less efficient. by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      More then 100% efficiency? This will make millions.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    2. Re:Multiple stages tend to be less efficient. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Coefficient of performance. You can move more heat-"energy" than the energy you put in, but the very low temperature difference makes it low quality heat. Heat pumps become more effective the closer together the temperatures are. Sadly, heat-engines become less effective the closer the temperatures are.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  31. Depends by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can freeze and melt water quite a few times before it wears out.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what I would like to know...is...does this process work in reverse? Can you heat and cool this polymer, and obtain electricity from it? This could revolutionalize the way that we obtain power from power plants, and make geothermal electricity much more viable as a solution. It would also create a tremendous power source in space, where rotating a surface from sun-facing to shaded would generate electricity.

    2. Re:Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      citation neeeded

    3. Re:Depends by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The pipes holding it however....

  32. Not Bloody Likely by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    It sound like they have essentially developed a solid refrigerant. That has got to be far less useful than a liquid refrigerant that can me moved around to where it is needed. Not to mention since there is no phase change involved you need a buttload more of this fancy polymer to get the same heat capacity.

    Nah. This will never be economically competitive.

    1. Re:Not Bloody Likely by Urkki · · Score: 1

      It sound like they have essentially developed a solid refrigerant. That has got to be far less useful than a liquid refrigerant that can me moved around to where it is needed.

      I think more useful point of view is, they have developed a refridgerant that can change temperature without moving parts, by just application of electric field.

      And presumably they do it quite efficiently, since otherwise this would not be news. Then again, inefficiency might be precisely the reason they don't tell any numbers...

      Anyway, this particular substance is solid, but just imagine if they managed to make a liquid version... No more compressor, just passing the liquid through electric field at one point of a simple closed loop with heat sinks attached to it... Elegant. Well, pretty much like refridgerators using heat (either buring gas or resistor), except without need to produce heat on purpose.

      And a step further (nothing to do with this particular material, just speculating), imagine if an electric field could force a phase change from gas to a super-critical liquid, giving both a possibility of greater heat capacity via phase change, and a possibility of no-moving-parts pump.

    2. Re:Not Bloody Likely by infolib · · Score: 1

      Anyway, this particular substance is solid, but just imagine if they managed to make a liquid version... No more compressor, just passing the liquid through electric field at one point of a simple closed loop with heat sinks attached to it... Elegant.

      That's actually a good point, but I'd take a wild guess and say it's hard to develop it to show this effect while being liquid. Instead, make a powder of this plastic, and put it in a suspension. There'll be a few problems with the field though - in the article they use 200 MV/m, so you'd need to put 100s of kV over a pipe of a few mm diameter, and a length of many cm. There'd be some NASTY caps to burn yourself on if you take a fridge like that apart!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  33. Portable Cooling by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

    I could be wrong, but it sounds to me that without the compressor machinery, this could enable smaller, quieter cooling units and lead to products like battery-powered thermoses or air-conditioned clothing. Do any engineers have a take on this?

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    1. Re:Portable Cooling by robbak · · Score: 1

      Maybe: but this is about making the same thing get hotter or colder. More machinery is needed to use that to make a flow of heat from one place to another.

      A simple way: take two blocks of this stuff. Energise A, it becomes hot: allow it to cool.
      Place A and B Together, energise B and de-energize A. A cools off, pulling all the heat from B.
      Seperate them again, energise A again to dispose of the heat pulled from B. De-energize B, and you have achieved refrigeration. Rinse and repeat.

      No doubt there are better ways to make a cycle like this (pumping some coolant, maybe), but none of them (that I can think of) make for a very portable device.

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    2. Re:Portable Cooling by mikael · · Score: 1

      Some people were experimenting with thermoaccoustic cooling. The idea is that pressure waves in air and fluids can give off heat (compression) and move heat around (standing waves?).

      This idea of solid thermoelectric blocks seems to be comparable to sliding around trays of ice-cubes or solid CO2, except that you would need a secondary refrigerator unit to convert the water or gas back into a solid.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  34. TFA is short on details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My impression, backed by no solid information in tfa, was that the material stayed solid. In any event, it didn't mention a phase change.

  35. entropy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "change from disorganized to organized"

    Why can't they just say negative change in entropy? That way if anyone cared about what it meant, they could be on the Wikipedia article in seconds. How would I learn more about this phenomena if I did not know to look up entropy? There isn't even a publication attached.

  36. Homer says yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [voice name="Homer Simpson"]In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics![/voice]

  37. Synergies by RonTheHurler · · Score: 1

    Oh, oh, oh! I have an idea. Let's combine this idea with a stirling engine and see what kind of synergies come out.

    Polymer on each end of the engine, alternating current synchronized with the displacer, etc. etc. etc.

    Whaddya think?

  38. At least 7 years old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Iowa State University was recruiting me out of high school I went to a Material Science demo there, where they had a working refridgeration unit based on this exact principle.
    The problem then was simple efficiency, as in not efficient enough to be practical.

  39. Kind of like kinetic stasis for ferropolymers by Maxmin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Going by the rough description in TFA, it sounds like electricity's effect on the ferropolymer causes its bonds to strengthen, or perhaps to magnetically align, increasing rigidity, reducing the material's potential for containing kinetic energy.

    If the material's new state caps the amount of kinetic energy it can store, it has to move on - first law of thermodynamics and all.

    This may be the next interesting bit in applying their discovery - finding a compatible heat conductor, and also learning the optimal frequency, voltage, current etc. at which to apply voltage.

    --
    O lord, bless this thy holy hand grenade, that with it thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.
    1. Re:Kind of like kinetic stasis for ferropolymers by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      Well, my understanding is that the ordered state is less entropic than the disordered state. Conversion between the two traps and releases heat, and this can be exploited in the same way as other fridge designs. You're right in that there's a finite energy range and several stages might need to be used. Unlike peltier stacking, though, each stage is actually quite efficient.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  40. Can it cool off flamewars? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Is it more or less effective than
    MOD -1 FLAMEBAIT?

    Inquiring Slashdotters want to know.

    On a serious note, a 23 degree F differential is nice for things like keeping my drink at 55F in a 75F office, cooling a house from 90F to 75F, and it might aid compressor-based systems, but it won't work well alone in those parts of the world where daytime highs get much above 100F or in cars that get baked to 130F in the hot summer sun. Still, assuming my car battery is fully charged, being able to partially turn on my all-electric no-compressor car air conditioning 10 minutes before I get in can turn 130F to 110F or perhaps even down to 20F below the outside-air temperature, which is a big help. Also, having a self-chilling seat and steering wheel to keep them below scalding would be a godsend on those hot summer days.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Can it cool off flamewars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as a single cycle of a compressor based cooler only cools a few degrees, it can be cycled repeatedly.

  41. Because of the metric system... by D4C5CE · · Score: 1

    The researchers report a change in temperature for the material of about 22.6 degrees Fahrenheit, in today's (Aug. 8) issue of Science.

    ...weird, you'd only expect the weatherman to do that (or the yellow press trying to inflate a figure).

    Tribute to Lord Kelvin, anyone?

  42. See: Adiabatic demagnetization. by siglercm · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of something I learned about low-temp cryocooling way back in P.Chem:

    Adiabatic Demagnetization.

    --
    sigfault (core dumped)
  43. Compressors are hard to beat by istartedi · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not sure how close they come to reverse Carnot in a modern "fridge", but they are very durable. It seems like we had two refridgerators the whole time I was growing up, and the only reason we got the 2nd one was because we were in a different house. It's not exactly like they were being fixed all the time either. In fact, aside from the fact that the fridge we had when I was a kid required manual defrost, I don't think they ever required maintenance. The HVAC unit in my old condo had to be pulled. This was in 2006. When the tech opened it up, we discovered it was build in 1979. These units are essentially refrigerators too, with compressors. Now, that was a good old USA unit, with a steel housing and everything. I'm not sure if the cheapo plastic jobs they installed will hold up as well, but that's an implementation issue, not a problem inherent with the underlying tech.

    The point is, can this new technology be as efficient as a compressor, as cheap as a compressor and as DURABLE as a compressor?

    That said, perhaps it will find applications outside of keeping your OJ cool and your brow dry. If it does, great; but the current tech is pretty good. I wish they were silent, but even at that, a modern fridge is pretty quiet too.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Compressors are hard to beat by Arimus · · Score: 1

      For car based Air Con it might improve the ~ 10% fuel efficiency penalty...

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    2. Re:Compressors are hard to beat by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      My AC unit on my old house was 26 year old. I had it replaced simply because it used too much energy to do the job. The new unit saves me about $200 annually in electric costs and has a 15 year warranty. Unfortunately, work had me move to another city not long after that.... Oops.

      I have a chest freezer that I'm betting is close to 20 years old, and my second fridge in the garrage which is 18. Neither has ever had service. I also have a portable AC unit in the garrage which is 12 years old. We just bought a new fridge in the kitchen last year, but again, not because the first broke down, but because we needed a bigger fridge (could not fit anything larger than a medium pizza box in the old unit). The new one is super quiet and super energy efficient, and BestBuy gave us 10 years on the compressor and 6 years warranty on the rest of the unit (for which we've actually had 2 repairs already; the LCD for fridge temp died once, and the hose for the ice maker had a leak at the seal). 2 more repairs and they give us a new fridge under their lemon replacement rules...

      no moving parts, this new cooler sounds very durable indeed... but I'll wait a good 10 years before I invest in it, unless someone offers 10 year+ warranties on this stuff too, and then I really don't care as long as it's price competitive and more efficient.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    3. Re:Compressors are hard to beat by Sandbags · · Score: 2, Informative

      most new cars only have a 2-3% AC penalty (4-5% on max AC setting). With the adoption of variable nozzle compressor technology (called variable displacement), the AC system in most cars only make air as cold as you're requesting it to, and the unit automatically disconnects during acceleration, allowing a smaller engine to feel like it has more power.

      In fact, most cars, actually get better fuel economy with the AC than with windows open, when driving over 50 MPH. In stark contract, SUVs actually get less of a benefit than do small cars... 1st, there's already so much drag, opening your windows does not add much more. Also, large engines have ample torque, and have no trouble running larger (and thus more efficient) compressors. http://www.slate.com/id/2194536/.

      Older cars, yes 8-10% was normal for AC efficiency loss, but not really anymore.

      In other interesting news, they have actually shown that comfortable drivers actually get better fuel economy than uncomfortable drivers. On hot days, drivers tend to be more impatient, and accelerate harder and driver differently than on comfortable days. ventilated seats actually help this further since not only is your front cool, but your back as well is not self insulating and sweating into the seat behind you, and in most cars with ventilated seats, AC use will be decreased slightly (drivers are more comfortable at slightly warmer temps).

      Rule of thumb: it varies from driver to driver, ,ambient temp, and with humidity, but if it's over 85, keep the windows up regardless of driving speed. If you're going over 55MPH, keep em up regardless of outdoor temp. It's not only more efficient, but has safety implications as well.

      If your car has variable temperature controls separate from the fan speed and vent position controls, generally, use the COLDEST setting, regardless of the temp you want to achieve. (most cars mix warm air with cold to make varying temps, so setting to a warmer temp does not reduce energy use). Use recycled air settings always with the AC. Use the fan speed to control your comfort level. The most efficient system will have automatic temp control (with digital temp readouts) but unfortunately there are typically only available in high end cars. Also note, in most cars, the defrost setting will use the AC unless you are blowing heat, even when the AC is off, so if you've got foggy windows in the summer, you might as well roll the windows up cuz the AC is going to be running one way or the other...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  44. Research? Anybody can do this. by rkinch · · Score: 1

    Please. You can do this with a rubber band. Stretch it and it becomes more "ordered" and hot. Release it and it gets cold. (Use your lips as a thermometer.) Not that *anything* like this makes a practical heat pump. For efficiency you need a *phase change*, and this principle just does not supply that.

  45. Now that sounds cool . . .!! by Sitxu · · Score: 0

    I mean hot, no wait, nevermind. . .

    --
    cualquier vaina hagase el muerto
  46. We already have compressor-free refrigerators! by nickovs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Researchers Pave Way For Compressor-Free Refrigeration

    Actually, we've had usable refrigeration without a compressor for most of the last century. It's the gas absorption refrigerator and they are in RVs, dorm rooms and offices all over the world. In fact most small (as opposed to tiny) fridges don't have a compressor.

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
    1. Re:We already have compressor-free refrigerators! by fazookus · · Score: 1

      Or for all you Einstein fans out there:

  47. If they can make it work in reverse by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    Then we have a whole new Thermocouple technology the question is would it be any more efficient than existing thermocouples.

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:If they can make it work in reverse by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Umm... I think by definition it works in reverse. Just flip the device around.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
  48. A lot of misunderstandings by doghouse41 · · Score: 1

    There seems to be a lot of misunderstanding about how a fridge based on these materials would work. Compare it with existing refrigeration systems: -

    1) Compressor based systems. Here a working fluid (freon, etc) is pumped around a sealed circuit. At one point in this circuit it undergoes a state change (i.e. is compressed) and releases heat to the environment (via the radiator on the back of your fridge). At another point in the circuit it undergoes a different state change (i.e. pressure drop) and it's temperature drops as a result (taking in heat from the environment). Note that this is a working fluid we are talking about here.

    2) Thermoelectic devices. These rely on devices with the property that when a voltage is applied to them a temperature gradient is created directly. Quite elegant, but not very efficient with currently available materials (although there have been recent developments in this area which may make them as efficient as compressor based systems in the medium term).

    3) Polarpolymer based devices. In this case the working material is a solid with the property that when you apply a voltage it undergoes a state change causing its temperature to rise by 22degrees. The heat released would then have to be removed to the environment (for example by blowing air over it and venting this to the environment). When the voltage is subsequently removed, the material returns to its original state (22 degrees F colder). You would then need to circulate air from the inside of your refrigerator over this material. Some of the heat in the (inside) air would transfer to this material, warming it up. A drop of more than 22 deg could be created by daisy-chaining several devices together in series to create an arbitrarily large drop.

    So a polarpolymer based refrigerator would probably require a quite different design to a traditional fridge because the working material is a solid rather than a fluid, and it does not directly create a temperature gradient across the material.

    It probably wouldn't be suitable for small scale applications such as gloves, or for cooling clothing - unless your application just wants a one-time temperature rise/drop and the reverse step takes place away from the wearer of the clothing.

  49. prior art exists by swschrad · · Score: 1

    sounds like the Szilard/Einstein refrigerator of the 20s, which used a ferrous-based refrigerant moved with magnets.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  50. FAHRENHEIT DEGREES by hoto0301 · · Score: 0

    The units of dT are Fahrenheit/Celsius degrees, not degrees Fahrenheit/Celsius.

  51. its important for wine storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://www.vintagecellars.com/productview.asp?productsid=652&prodcategoryID=7/

    When you're storing wine for a long time sediment settles out and a compressor will stir it up. Not good for the taste.

  52. Ehh. solid state? by rew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So now you have a material that can cool on command by an electrical signal. Nice.

    So now you make it touch your fridge, and tell it to go to the "cool state". Next it absorbs heat (that leaked through the walls of the fridge), and you need to expell that heat. So now you turn it to the "warm" state, Now it's heating your fridge? No you need to make it insulated from the fridge, and thermally connected to the outside to pump the heat out. How are you going to do that?

    The easiest way would be to have two of those electro-thermal-active-plastics built as a heat exchanger. One of them (the one in the "hot" state) circulates an appropriate fluid with the heat exchanger on the back. The other circulates the fluid with the heat exchanger inside the fridge.

    So, how about we get rid of those nasty ozone-layer-affecting CFKs? Nice try, but no go! These ARE CFKs we're talking about. Maybe easier to contain than CFK gasses, but CFKs notheless.

    Next, when your element is exchanging heat with the fridge, and it has come to an equilibirium.... Then you change it to the "warm" state. Now it becomes 12.5 degrees centigrade warmer! So my fridge is 4 degrees, and the element becomes 16.5 But in the summer my home is warmer than that (actually in the winter as well!). It has to become warmer than the environment to expell heat. So we're going to need a two-step heatpump.

    So instead of a fridge with one pump, two heat exchangers, and a replacement for the CFKs for the old days, we might go to a frige with three pumps, two valves, and four CFK -containing active essential elements!

    I predict that everyone will have one of these in their house in 5 years! Not!

  53. Over the top by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    This is way over the top. Even assuming this was the refidgeration assembly in your refridgerator and HVAC both, and it was made 100% of PVC, it would still have way less PVC than in other parts of your house. All the wiring in your house is PVC. It makes up the screen of your television. It makes up the casing of your laptop, your CD / DVD player, and pretty much every other piece of electronics in your house. All that vinyl siding on your house, PVC.

    Sounds like you are living in a death trap! Get out while you can!

  54. Various materials by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    "These polarpolymers include poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) and poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)-chlorofluoroethylene, however there are other polarpolymers that exhibit the same effect."

    It doesn't say what the "others" are, but perhaps there's something that can be used that would be more tolerant of high heat (or less toxic). Alternately, perhaps it could be used in a heatsink type scenario wherein the sink is cooled as it absorbs heat, but doesn't become superheated itself.

  55. nasa used this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i worked on a project at nasa that used this technique to cool (and temperature-control) some delicate detectors to below what cryogenic gas/liquid could offer - by charging a superconducting magnet, bleeding off the heat, opening the "heat switch", then slowly discharging the magnet while in thermal contact with the instruments, we were able to maintain 65 millikelvin +/1 1 microkelvin for a couple hours, before repeating the charge/dissipate-heat/discharge cycle.

    google for "paramagnetic salt"

  56. Gas fridges by baomike · · Score: 1

    I never could find the compressor in my gas refrigerator.
    Was it stolen?

  57. Spelling? by mehemiah · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Zhang's approach uses the change form disorganized to organized that occurs in some polarpolymers when placed in an electric field
    emphasis mine. you think the pin state College of engineering would proofread spelling better. DON'T TRUST WORD's SPELLCHECK

  58. More details needed by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are a lot of issues that need to be known before this could be considered useful technology.

    1. Price. Is the initial outlay too expensive?

    2. Lifetime. Will it last as long as a current unit.

    3. Efficiency. Does it require more or less power than current units.

    4. Cooling. Can it freeze ice cubes in 80 degree weather?

    5. Size. Will it fit into the same space?

    All the article says it that it is quieter. People live with a noisy AC turned on for many hours a day, and a fridge is much quieter than that, so noise isn't that much of a factor.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  59. It's called "thermoacoustics" by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    wasn't there a compressionless sound wave-based cooling developed a few years back?

    It's called "thermoacoustics". It involves "motors" that turn temperature gradients into sound and "refrigerators" that use sound to pump heat across temperature gradients.

    It's been around for perhaps a century, and is in its third generation of development. (It's a prime example of patents retarding technological development, as the current generation of development started after the patents on the second generation expired.)

    This generation is on a solid theoretical footing, with mathematical models close enough to the real behavior to perform engineering and computer simulations that can run on your laptop. Lots of cute gadgets are coming out of it.

    Example: A two-story hunk of plumbing with a gas burner. Haul it to an oil field in some out-of-the-way location where the gas is being flared off because it's too expensive to liquefy it for shipping. Hook the well gas to the input pipe, the output pipe to a storage tank, and light the burner. It sits there humming away internally, burning part of the gas and liquefying the rest.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way