What? There's no need to change any of the "means" of transmission. When a person reads an sms and a) copies the link to his/her PC browser or b) tells the phone to follow that link, does it matter that the TEXT in the link is "http://bit.ly/asdfasdf" or "short://0923abf84"? Nope, it doesn't. Any device connected to the internet can use any of the theoretical URN to URL mappers (there are tons and tons of research papers written on this and how DNS is crippling the web, etc.) I'm just way too tired to explain any further, but, please, next time you try to make a point, make sure you do have one.
I assume when you say Chrome is a "privacy killer" you have read the whole source or at least monitored network traffic while browsing. Or maybe you are pulling it all out of your Google-hating er... parts.
Am I the only one who actually paid attention to the graph? Yes, sure, the "overall" spam amounts for A is much bigger than for Z, but that is because there are more email addresses that start with the letter A than those starting with the letter Z. If not, check how spam/non-spam percentages all stay withing the 50%-75% interval.
In other words: more email messages = more spam, "OH GOD!!11ONE let's write a paper!"
Well, jerking off to random chick having sex with random guy is far worse than having sex with a girl you like/love/whatever. It has a high psychological factor added to it, and also the fact that you're not using your own hand to... well, you know.
Oh, God, no! Once US troops leave, Iraqi insurgents will be able to kill... other Iraqi people. Big deal to you, eh? Are you aware of all the other wars and everyday murders of innocent people (including children) in the rest of the world?
What the fuck? I'm not defending OOXML (2 O's, by the way). I'm just saying that your analogy (now I got where you wanted to get with it) was (and still is) wrong.
A flat screwdriver can unscrew Phillips screws. OOXML is in no way compatible with ODF.
Well, of all of the places where people ask for my ID, I have yet to see one where they have those so called "deactivated numbers" in any kind of list. And if they had them, I doubt they would even check them.
Do you mean Y2.01K?
and it eliminates the need to add complex, energy-consuming parts to hundreds or thousands of smart devices.
So, making the devices compatible with this (sending signals to your fingertips) is not complex and energy-consuming? /facepalm
Stop advertising, To anyone interested on buying Ad Muncher, just buy it through admuncher.com and not his link.
Oh, advertising on /.'s comments?
Partnership Program
The Ad Muncher partnership program allows you to refer people to an address like:
http://youraccountname.admuncher.com/
and receive 20% of all purchases later made by those people. For more information please visit the partnership program website.
"foropera" is just his partner alias. Sad.
"To try Ad Muncher free for 30 days, please visit our download page." Yeah, right.
What? There's no need to change any of the "means" of transmission. When a person reads an sms and a) copies the link to his/her PC browser or b) tells the phone to follow that link, does it matter that the TEXT in the link is "http://bit.ly/asdfasdf" or "short://0923abf84"? Nope, it doesn't. Any device connected to the internet can use any of the theoretical URN to URL mappers (there are tons and tons of research papers written on this and how DNS is crippling the web, etc.) I'm just way too tired to explain any further, but, please, next time you try to make a point, make sure you do have one.
if they had been good, they would have played on the radio
I'm just going to act as if I hadn't read that, else there would be a flame shitstorm coming down at you... I pity you, though.
!windows != linux
I'm not a bastard :(
I assume when you say Chrome is a "privacy killer" you have read the whole source or at least monitored network traffic while browsing. Or maybe you are pulling it all out of your Google-hating er... parts.
Am I the only one who actually paid attention to the graph? Yes, sure, the "overall" spam amounts for A is much bigger than for Z, but that is because there are more email addresses that start with the letter A than those starting with the letter Z. If not, check how spam/non-spam percentages all stay withing the 50%-75% interval.
In other words: more email messages = more spam, "OH GOD!!11ONE let's write a paper!"
Slow news day?
Ah... sarcastic puns to point out other person's mistakes. Good job, sir.
Electromagnates? In my intrawebz? Sorry for that :D
Well, jerking off to random chick having sex with random guy is far worse than having sex with a girl you like/love/whatever. It has a high psychological factor added to it, and also the fact that you're not using your own hand to... well, you know.
Because Dell, Sony and Toshiba computers have a command key.
Are you comparing porn to real sex? Wow.
Fuck that, couldn't read the post you were replying to. Go ahead, mod me down.
Oh, yay for being a douche. Informative? It doesn't have to be latin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R.I.P.
Oh, God, no! Once US troops leave, Iraqi insurgents will be able to kill... other Iraqi people. Big deal to you, eh? Are you aware of all the other wars and everyday murders of innocent people (including children) in the rest of the world?
Apple manufactures PCs now? Damn, their ads seem to say otherwise.
So I need iTunes to even SEE the description of an app? Wow, just wow.
-1: Smartass
What the fuck? I'm not defending OOXML (2 O's, by the way). I'm just saying that your analogy (now I got where you wanted to get with it) was (and still is) wrong.
A flat screwdriver can unscrew Phillips screws. OOXML is in no way compatible with ODF.
Try unscrewing a flat (-) screw with a phillips (+) screwdriver. Double-check your analogies first, please.
Well, of all of the places where people ask for my ID, I have yet to see one where they have those so called "deactivated numbers" in any kind of list. And if they had them, I doubt they would even check them.