Slashdot Mirror


James Powderly of Graffiti Research Labs Detained In China

An anonymous reader writes "News from Free Tibet 2008 that internationally known artist, technologist and co-founder of the Graffiti Research Lab, James Powderly, was detained in Beijing early on August 19th while preparing to debut a new work and technology of protest, the L.A.S.E.R. Stencil. According to a Twitter message received yesterday by Students for a Free Tibet at approximately 5 pm Beijing Standard Time, Powderly had been detained by Chinese authorities at 3 am. His current whereabouts remain unknown. Powderly was the inventor of throwies." (Powderly's detention was also mentioned at Make Magazine's blog.)

337 comments

  1. Whoops by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Funny

    He made the mistake of catching the wrong bus to the olympics.

    1. Re:Whoops by The+Ancients · · Score: 3, Insightful

      from that article:

      The switch from gunshots to injections is a sign that China "promotes human rights now," says Kang Zhongwen, who designed the Jinguan Automobile death van...

      So they're starting to look at how people die? Me - I would have thought looking at how people live would have been a more useful step in promoting human rights. But then what do I know - I don't control the lives of over a billion people...

    2. Re:Whoops by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I'm most proud of the bed. It's very humane, like an ambulance," Kang says. He points to the power-driven metal stretcher that glides out at an incline. "It's too brutal to haul a person aboard," he says. "This makes it convenient for the criminal and the guards."

      So, basically, it makes it easier to ignore the fact that you're killing someone.

      I'm not against capital punishment, but I think that there should be a certain amount of raw reality involved in it. No coat of sugar.

    3. Re:Whoops by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wow, Death Vans. That's creepy as hell. I mean, I know that there's been state-sanctioned capital punishment since the beginning of civilization but it just seems creepy when combined with the mobile approach. I'm used to seeing mobile clinics, mobile libraries, mobile law offices, not mobile death chambers. It reminds me of all the creepy art from the christian apocalypse stuff at my church when I was a kid. Once the UN ushered in the New World Order and the Antichrist became the General Secretary, all people now professing to be Christians post-rapture would be put to death, always by guillotine. This was absolutely agreed upon, just the same as the Antichrist working through the UN. Jack Chick had creepy little moto-guillotines in his drawings where smartly-uniformed motorcycle cops would drive up in an open-cab vehicle that looks like a landscaping utility tractor, the guillotine in the flatbed. They would then line up the Christians for the day's executions and lop off their heads. This part really freaked me out because the public works dept. of the city I lived in used tractors of exactly the same design. I was convinced that they had mounting brackets for the guillotines and were just waiting for the order to install them. Yeesh. Freddy Krueger never did anything for me but my religion scared the shit out of me.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:Whoops by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

      Wow, read the little bit on speculation about the organ trade and iit seems like China's just a step or two away from soylent green. All they have to do is turn the bus into a mobile cantina and give out free food to the populace.

    5. Re:Whoops by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "I'm most proud of the bed. It's very humane, like an ambulance," Kang says. He points to the power-driven metal stretcher that glides out at an incline. "It's too brutal to haul a person aboard," he says. "This makes it convenient for the criminal and the guards."

      So, basically, it makes it easier to ignore the fact that you're killing someone.

      I'm not against capital punishment, but I think that there should be a certain amount of raw reality involved in it. No coat of sugar.

      Whenever someone is exulting over inventing an instrument of punishment or death like this, I always wonder if they ever entertain the thought that they might have it used on them. I believe the story of Dr. Guillotine being serviced by his own device was a myth but this idea is a popular one, recurring throughout history. It just seems like poetic justice.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    6. Re:Whoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live in the scariest country in the world.

    7. Re:Whoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr. Guillotine didn't actually invent said device, that's an urban legend. He was a consultant.

    8. Re:Whoops by DilutedImage · · Score: 1

      Sheeeeesh. Sounds like your church certainly went to the extreme in depicting the Apocalypse. Fortunately though, there's no biblical basis for all those assumptions (aside from the execution of Christians).

    9. Re:Whoops by JerkBoB · · Score: 1

      Heh. I remember those movies. They showed them to 1st-graders at my (baptist) school. I'm positive of the timing, because I went to a different school after 1st grade.

      Think about that. I wouldn't show that shit to seniors. Small wonder I'm so screwy, 25 years later.

      Thinking freely for 10 years now. Bleah, sounds like I'm in recovery. Oh, wait, I am. Brainwashees Anonymous.

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    10. Re:Whoops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheeeeesh. Sounds like your church certainly went to the extreme in depicting the Apocalypse. Fortunately though, there's no biblical basis for all those assumptions (aside from the execution of Christians).

      Nope, mainstream Lutheran. The thing is, the crazy shit floats just below the surface. On the surface you see boring, bland, traditional Lutheranism. You visit the Christian bookstore down the street, get handed a Tim LaHaye book by a fellow parishioner, that's when you get introduced to the weird shit. In the youth group we saw all sorts of videos about the dangers of rock'n'roll, telling us how Iron Maiden and Black Sabbath were into devil worship, how everything from the Rolling Stones to Marvin Gaye was evil. In fact, just look at his name, Gaye! Evil!

    11. Re:Whoops by demigod · · Score: 1

      Wow did they have it wrong. I thought everybody knew George Bush was the antichrist and he's definitely no friendly to the UN.

      --
      "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
      Major Major
    12. Re:Whoops by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe the story of Dr. Guillotine being serviced by his own device was a myth ...

      If it wasn't for the tragic story of Sir Henry Blunt-Instrument, myths like that would never have arisen...

      (OK, so it's a Pratchett line. If you're gonna steal, steal from the masters! ;-)

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    13. Re:Whoops by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Wow, Death Vans. That's creepy as hell. I mean, I know that there's been state-sanctioned capital punishment since the beginning of civilization but it just seems creepy when combined with the mobile approach. I'm used to seeing mobile clinics, mobile libraries, mobile law offices, not mobile death chambers.

      Funny, most people I know drive one every day.

    14. Re:Whoops by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      The Nazis had a van with a mobile gas chamber known as "Kaiser's Kaffeegeschäft" (Kaiser's Coffee shop) which was used for killing mentally disabled people, one step creepier IMHO.

      As for the post-rapture chopping mobile, I don't remember that from the book of Revelation. What I remember is mostly stuff like locust with human heads and scorpion tails. The decapitation machine I always was afraid of was a vehicle from an illustration in The Lorax by Dr Seuss with ten arms, each holding an axe. Designed for logging and environmental destruction but easily employed for mass executions, it scared the living hell out of me.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    15. Re:Whoops by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The harsh reality would seem to be the distinct gap between the execution and the cremation of the remains with no independent witnesses to the state of the body between the two. Organ reclamation vehicles, rather than mobile execution chambers.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    16. Re:Whoops by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      That must've been a fringe Lutheran variant, the mainstream Lutheran church doesn't even recognize the concept of a "rapture". In fact I've never even heard the term until I read it in some American texts.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    17. Re:Whoops by permaculture · · Score: 1

      jollyreaper wrote:
      > "Whenever someone is exulting over inventing an instrument of punishment or death like this,
      > I always wonder if they ever entertain the thought that they might have it used on them."

      That's precisely what happens in the Kafka story "In the Penal Settlement."

      http://www.kafka.org/index.php?works
      "In the Penal Colony presents an officer who demonstrates his devotion to duty by submitting himself to the appalling (and clinically described) mutilations of his own instrument of torture. This theme, the ambiguity of a task's value and the horror of devotion to it [was] one of Kafka's constant preoccupations"

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    18. Re:Whoops by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      wow, that's pretty dark. There's a nine inch nails video with a suicide machine that is supposed to bring the victim/supplicant immense pleasure/pain before being mulched for plant food by the creepy garden below it. Intricate torture machines always creep me out, much like clowns.

      One of the worst punishments I encountered in a story was a prison built inside a mountain. The prison consists of a gigantic wheel carved into the mountain, the only opening to the outside world being at one slim port the width of a cell. The condemned are sentenced to a revolution, inserted into the cell as the openings move by. A revolution takes ten years. There are passageways above the cells for guards to observe the prisoners, pass down food, etc, but none of this is visible to the condemned. The condemned are forced to pull at their stations within the wheel or risk being crushed by the wall following behind. A slick wetness on the floor from the wall before them indicates when a prisoner has fallen and been ground to death within their very cell. There is no contact with any other human within this prison, no light, no occupation other than pulling at the wheel. The inventor of the prison was said to be among the first put inside.

      The story told here was of one prisoner who was able to make contact with the person in the cell before him, a woman. He found a point where the side of the cell facing the outer wall had fallen into disrepair and had been poorly bricked back up. he was able to work bricks free and move into the cell before him and met a beautiful woman. He had to return to his cell for the next move and hoped that he might see her again. The following night he entered her cell but someone else was there, the man from the cell in front of hers. He had already raped and murdered her and was ready to do the same to him. End of story. Pretty creepy.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    19. Re:Whoops by permaculture · · Score: 1

      Gruesome!

      I guess you've seen that film "Cube"
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0123755/ ?

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
  2. Wow by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Funny

    The Chinese must be really serious about fighting graffiti in their country.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Wow by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      except according to the article, he didn't put graffiti on anything. In fact the article doesn't say anything really. It says he got kicked out of a convention, not arrested. It says he got detained in the title and the rest of the article doesn't saw how, why, or you know, anything important.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  3. Was? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Powderly was the inventor of throwies."

    Was? You're writing him off already? Geez! And people say *I'm* a pessimist.

    1. Re:Was? by 2short · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He was, until it was pointed out that taping an LED to a battery was a bit thin to really call an "invention". Mind you, the fact that Powderly is (IMHO) a self-promoting attention monger of limited substance does not excuse any otherwise inappropriate actions of the Chinese government vis-a-vis Tibet and or Powderly.

  4. Current whereabouts? by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

    His current whereabouts remain unknown.

    Anyone got a feeling they'll remain that way?

    1. Re:Current whereabouts? by eln · · Score: 5, Informative

      He's an American citizen being detained during the Olympic Games. He's not going to disappear. They'll question him for several hours, probably including sleep deprivation and a lot of yelling, and then kick him out of the country. There was another guy earlier on in the Olympics that got detained for trying to protest, and that's pretty much what happened to him.

      The Chinese are trying to look good in front of the world, "disappearing" a foreign national, especially an American, during the Olympics would not be in line with that goal.

    2. Re:Current whereabouts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll question him for several hours, probably including sleep deprivation and a lot of yelling, and then kick him out of the country.

      Actually, they'll question him in a room with a radioactive source in, or smeared with a mutant hpv strain.

      Severl months to years later, he'll get an unfortunate and totally unrelated, right aggressive cancer, probably related to all the time he spent soldering stuff for MAKE before the US banned toxic solder like the EU did. Oh dearie me.

    3. Re:Current whereabouts? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      No but mock arresting yourself and hiding for 2 months might get a lot of media attention... if that's what you want.

      "I don't know what happened I was interrogated for weeks and then thrown in isolation they just let me go last week in the middle of nowhere and I flagged a van to rescue me!"

    4. Re:Current whereabouts? by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      nah they won't torture him, just give him a good waterboarding...

      I mean bath!

    5. Re:Current whereabouts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tibet is Chinese reunification, like Hawaii is US reunification.

      high lasers

    6. Re:Current whereabouts? by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      Actually, they'll question him in a room with a radioactive source in, or smeared with a mutant hpv strain.

      Chinese detain protesters in a whore house?

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    7. Re:Current whereabouts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I am concern, and probably many other Americans, their effort to "look good" by suppressing dissidents, and overdoing the whitewashing with drastic means, has backfired tremendously. This Olympics will only show the difficulty the world has to face dealing with China.

    8. Re:Current whereabouts? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      He's an American citizen being detained during the Olympic Games. He's not going to disappear. They'll question him for several hours, probably including sleep deprivation and a lot of yelling, and then kick him out of the country. There was another guy earlier on in the Olympics that got detained for trying to protest, and that's pretty much what happened to him.

      The Chinese are trying to look good in front of the world, "disappearing" a foreign national, especially an American, during the Olympics would not be in line with that goal.

      They could just punish them by peacefully holding them until the event is over, then forcing them to clean the event up, and then kicking them out of the country. And let the various media see that in action. Let it be known we sentenced them all to community service and they are cleaning up a global community event before returning to their national community so its all good. ;)

  5. It's China. This is no surprise. by Caraig · · Score: 1, Informative

    Anyone else think that China's human rights record doesn't affect them just because they're not Chinese citizens?

    Consider him lucky if we hear from and about him ever again.

    (Granted, going to China for the express purpose of protesting is going to get you in hot water with the Chinese authorities, but is that the sign of a healthy society?)

    --
    "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
  6. Rosa Parks by Enderandrew · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Rosa Parks knew that she was SUPPOSED to give up her seat, but she took a stand. It was arguably dangerous for her to do so.

    People who have the balls to stand up against tyrants may be called stupid by some, but they will be called heroes by others.

    Oh, and non-destructive graffiti is pretty damned cool.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Rosa Parks by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Powderly is not Tibetan, not a resident of China, a foreigner who traveled to China for the express purpose of making this protest, and achieved nothing in this protest. Powderly and his protest is nothing like Park's protest.

      And I'M BadAnalogyGuy?!

    2. Re:Rosa Parks by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rosa Parks was given a speedy trial, fined $14, and on appeal wreaked havoc on the laws that were the foundation of racial segregation in the United States.

      Since this guy is a US citizen, the Chinese government will probably let him live. A Chinese citizen probably wouldn't be so lucky.

      Hopefully this event teaches him, and and others in his home country to appreciate the freedom that they have when they're spewing their typical "baby out with the bathwater" rants about how fascist the US government is.

    3. Re:Rosa Parks by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rosa Parks

      Are you really going to compare graffiti -- a nuisance of a chosen action -- to a civil rights struggle? Based on the color of a person's skin?

      People like Rosa Parks were heroes to all, especially to racists and passive people who needed to have their eyes open. I'm not sure who James Powderly thought he was representing but going to a foreign country and committing what is a crime in that country just makes a bunch of people uneasy.

      Oh, and non-destructive graffiti is pretty damned cool.

      Light is still a form of polution. Though non-destructive, it is most likely still annoying. While I agree with the cause this man was "fighting" for, I am indifferent to his ineffective methods. He would most likely be arrested in my country too.

      His methods weren't opening people's eyes, they are alienating people like me who would rather see a message sent to the Chinese government that makes them think about their injustices.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    4. Re:Rosa Parks by spun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How do you know? Isn't it a tad/i hasty to be making assumptions? And hasn't he actually achieved at least something? When was the last time anything you did got mentioned on the front page of Slashdot?

      What does the fact that he isn't Tibetan or a Chinese citizen have to do with anything? What I'm getting out of your post is, "people should mind their own business and not rock the boat." Is that the impression you meant to convey?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:Rosa Parks by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      That sort of protest works lots better when you are in a country that is basically democratic in the first place.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    6. Re:Rosa Parks by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

      Are you really going to compare graffiti -- a nuisance of a chosen action -- to a civil rights struggle? Based on the color of a person's skin?

      I think the protest sounded kind of dumb, but that response is far dumber. A comparison between graffiti and a civil rights struggle is like one between apples and monkey wrenches, but that's not what the OP was saying. He's making a comparison between refusing to give up a seat on a bus in defiance of the law with graffiti, i.e., the act of defiance itself. In a large context, the comparison is between the civil rights struggle in the US and the struggle against Chinese occupation of Tibet, which does seem a bit more comparable.

      His methods weren't opening people's eyes, they are alienating people like me who would rather see a message sent to the Chinese government that makes them think about their injustices.

      This is almost certainly true.

    7. Re:Rosa Parks by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      How do you know? Isn't it a tad hasty to be making assumptions? And hasn't he actually achieved at least something?

      Is this like how the movement of butterfly wings can be responsible for a hurricane? Because if that's what you mean, then we can't ever discount anything as a cause for anything. And that's just stupid.

    8. Re:Rosa Parks by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      Light is still a form of polution.

      We should arrest those crazy pranksters that placed the Sun in the sky! So... much... pollution...

    9. Re:Rosa Parks by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He went over there to get publicity for a cause, and he got publicity for a cause. You could argue he achieved less than he might have, but to say he achieved nothing is idiotic.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    10. Re:Rosa Parks by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully this event teaches him, and and others in his home country to appreciate the freedom that they have when they're spewing their typical "baby out with the bathwater" rants about how fascist the US government is.

      Don't hold your breath. This idiot and his ilk can't wrap their limited minds around the concept that they are more free than most and this won't even begin to dent their thick skulls with the truth.

      And, what is really funny to me is that they espouse and wish to impose here in the U.S.A. the very ideals that created such free and open countries as Cuba, China, and the former USSR.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    11. Re:Rosa Parks by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      You could argue he achieved less than he might have, but to say he achieved nothing is idiotic.

      Let's compare

      It is pretty clear that the Tibet issue and the Free Tibet movement is much bigger and well-known than this guy's activism. Yes, a drop of water in the ocean adds to the total amount, but on the whole not so much.

    12. Re:Rosa Parks by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Hopefully this event teaches him, and and others in his home country to appreciate the freedom that they have when they're spewing their typical 'baby out with the bathwater' rants about how fascist the US government is."

      By your logic, practically nobody in the world is in a position to complain about their situation, for you'll nearly always be able to find somebody who is worse off than you are. Keeping quiet about abuses at home because other, worse abuses are taking place elsewhere is hardly a reasonable thing to demand of another. Please keep your jingoism to yourself.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    13. Re:Rosa Parks by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Rosa Parks was preceded by a number of other bus riders who did the exact same thing but are forgotten (ever heard anyone talk about the great hero Claudette Colvin?). She would have been forgotten too if her supposedly spontaneous stand that day hadn't been carefully planned well in advance by the Montgomery chapter of the NAACP (where she worked).

      Heroes are not just created by random acts of resistance, they're created by others willing to sell them as heroes.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:Rosa Parks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully this event teaches him, and and others in his home country to appreciate the freedom that they have

      Yeah, because nothing warms the cockles of my heart more than the great achievement of being more free than China.

      "Good news everybody! Now that we have more freedom than China, we can rest on our laurels. Mission Accomplished!" [/sarcasm]

    15. Re:Rosa Parks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How ironic.

      • Rosa Parks was protesting one of the remaining holdovers of slavery.
      • Powderly is protesting the rule of a government that freed Tibet from slavery and is now committing slow genocide by flooding that country with Han Chinese.

      There, fixed that for you.

    16. Re:Rosa Parks by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Please keep your jingoism to yourself.

      Jingoism: extreme chauvinism or nationalism marked especially by a belligerent foreign policy.

      Please keep your self-righteous idiocy to yourself.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    17. Re:Rosa Parks by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 1

      How exactly do you commit genocide without killing people? Are the Han Chinese magically making the Tibetans disappear by sheer virtue of their presence?

      --
      "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    18. Re:Rosa Parks by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Oh... brilliant comeback!

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    19. Re:Rosa Parks by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is not necessary for things to be as bad as they can possibly be before one has the right to complain about things that are wrong. The U.S. has in many ways grown greatly more totalitarian over the past eight years. Saying "It's not as bad as China, so the problems don't matter" is the height of idiocy. That's like saying "Linux doesn't crash as much as Windows, so it must be perfect.

      Indeed, it is precisely because people do appreciate those freedoms that they rant about signs of growing fascism in the U.S. government. They who have never seen the light cannot know that they live in darkness, and so do not complain. Therefore, I would contend that the people who do not rant are the ones who do not fully appreciate those freedoms.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    20. Re:Rosa Parks by tftp · · Score: 2

      What does the fact that he isn't Tibetan or a Chinese citizen have to do with anything?

      People of any country have an exclusive right to demand changes from their government. Only then they are free. This guy makes Chinese and Tibetans less free because he infringes on their rights, and on top of that his example justifies more oppression from the government.

      As a bad analogy, you are free to move furniture in your house, and only your family's wishes may constrain you. However what will you say if I, a total stranger, set up demonstrations around your house demanding that a certain desk should be moved into a certain corner, and not where it is now?

    21. Re:Rosa Parks by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Actually the fact that he is an American is all that much better. What is the saying, when the Nazis came for the Poles I said nothing because I wasn't Polish, etc.

      True civil rights means not necessarily forwarding the rights of your minority, but upholding human rights for all human beings. Few people seem to get that.

      And like Rosa Parks, he is advocating civil rights through non-violent demonstration.

      It is especially powerful that an American is doing so, because it garners more press, and because it shows the Tibetans that other people feel their plight.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    22. Re:Rosa Parks by multisync · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Powderly is not Tibetan, not a resident of China, a foreigner who traveled to China for the express purpose of making this protest

      So what? Are you suggesting that only those directly affected by human rights abuses can protest them, and everyone else should just mind their own business? In the Rosa Parks example given above, groups like the Congress of Racial Equality, which included white college students from northern states, took part in protests during the Montgomery bus boycott. Should they have just minded their own business?

      ... and achieved nothing in this protest

      That's debatable. The actions of any one person may be equivalent to "the movement of butterfly wings," as you stated below, but to quote Edmund Burke: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    23. Re:Rosa Parks by theIsovist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I understand that graffiti is often little more than vandalism today, but don't dismiss it completely. Graffiti is a tool for communication, and when other forms of communication are being censored or cut, it becomes very powerful. Graffiti is noticible, and can transmit a message to thousands of viewers, for very little cost. Take a look at the works of Banksy on the palestinian walls. This might sway you.

    24. Re:Rosa Parks by pejyel · · Score: 1

      a foreigner who traveled to China for the express purpose of making this protest, and achieved nothing in this protest. Powderly and his protest is nothing like Park's protest.

      And I'M BadAnalogyGuy?!

      France wasn't oppressed by Great-Britain, yet their army went to America to grant independancy to that bunch of fellows?! On a side-note, I prefer Powderly's way of exporting democracy than Dubya's

    25. Re:Rosa Parks by spun · · Score: 1

      This happened yesterday. You expect to see results in google a day later? Are you daft?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    26. Re:Rosa Parks by spun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We are all free to express our desires to anyone. We are free to demonstrate and protest that which we find morally objectionable, and no arbitrary borders or citizenship should stop us. I find your stance morally reprehensible, as it seeks to divide people into arbitrary groups who are not allowed to support each other in seeking redress for wrongs. You advocate a particularly sick form of authoritarianism.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    27. Re:Rosa Parks by bob_herrick · · Score: 1
      I think the answer to this rhetorical question:

      Are the Han Chinese magically making the Tibetans disappear by sheer virtue of their presence?

      might well be "yes, but slowly." Not in the sense of taking them out one by one and shooting them in back alleys, but in the sense of marginalizing them as a consequence, say, of not speaking the same language and not, therefore, having opportunity to compete effectively in the new 'Han' economy. Those that cling to their ways will be marginzlized economically and will survive less well, and those that 'evolve' will no longer be of the same culture and heritage as before.

      In the US we call that 'the melting pot' and claim it as a good thing overall, but not every assimilated minority (or majority, in some cases) agrees.

    28. Re:Rosa Parks by hkgroove · · Score: 1

      Prima nocte

    29. Re:Rosa Parks by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Or he is a publicity hound that knows his audience and is betting on his US citizenship to get him off with his skin intact.
      I really don't like the Chinese governments treatment of it's citizens but this is a case of useless showboating.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    30. Re:Rosa Parks by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We are all free to express our desires to anyone.

      No, you are not free to tell me how I should conduct my business. If you try to tell me things on my own land you are trespassing, please leave.

      We are free to demonstrate and protest that which we find morally objectionable,

      Absolutely, as long as you do it on your own territory, or on a public land.

      and no arbitrary borders or citizenship should stop us.

      Sorry, the property line is here and you may not cross without my permission.

      I find your stance morally reprehensible, as it seeks to divide people into arbitrary groups

      Sorry, you are swinging your ax at the freedom of association. Any group of people is free to join for any common purpose it wishes.

      who are not allowed to support each other in seeking redress for wrongs.

      Allowed? No, there is no authority over nations (the UN is not even close.) Free people, grouped into a nation or just standing on a street corner, may choose to allow or disallow an input from outsiders. It's *their* decision, if they are free, of course.

      You advocate a particularly sick form of authoritarianism

      No, I advocate freedom. You, on the other hand, advocate interventionism, a policy that hurts the United States on the international arena. What right do you have to tell other nations how to live?

    31. Re:Rosa Parks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one phrase for you, "Extraordinary Rendition".

    32. Re:Rosa Parks by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People like Rosa Parks were heroes to all, especially to racists and passive people who needed to have their eyes open.

      People like Rosa Parks were carefully chosen by lawyers to become sympathetic test cases before the Judiciary and the court of public opinion.

      You think Rosa Parks was the only black woman who got arrested for refusing to move to the back of the bus? Even Rosa Parks wikipedia page can't help but mention a pregnant 15 yr old girl named Claudette Colvin.

      Light is still a form of polution. Though non-destructive, it is most likely still annoying. While I agree with the cause this man was "fighting" for, I am indifferent to his ineffective methods.

      It shouldn't really matter how James Powderly chose to protest, in much the same way that it shouldn't have mattered that Claudette Colvin was unwed and pregnant by a much older man.

      I'm sure when the right kind of protestor gets arrested, you and others with your mindset will take notice.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    33. Re:Rosa Parks by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Powderly regularly protests all kinds of oppression, both at home and abroad.

      When he protests in the US, people say that there are much worse things going on elsewhere (usually citing China). When he protests in China, the same people say he should to mind his own business.

      At least he's doing something, and his sudden disappearance for throwing up a banner with a few lights on it certainly highlights the oppression that we all know exists in China.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    34. Re:Rosa Parks by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      Whoa whoa whoa...

      GP says:
      We are all free to express our desires to anyone.

      You then say:
      No, you are not free to tell me how I should conduct my business.

      At what point did GP say he would tell you how you should conduct your business? Don't look too hard, because he didn't -- he said free to express our desires, not free to tell others what their desires should be.

      Though I agree with the bulk of your response, that item at the top really jumped out at me.

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    35. Re:Rosa Parks by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      How dare someone attempt to bring publicity to human rights by placing themselves at risk? What a selfish move, clearly. Members of "Free Tibet" movements are without a doubt looking for personal gain.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    36. Re:Rosa Parks by tftp · · Score: 1

      You are right, he didn't, I just unthinkingly dragged this in because that's the subject we are discussing here (a foreigner came to China to tell them how to govern themselves.) It's also counter-intuitive when someone "expresses his desires" about something that you have nothing to do with. Normally if someone tells you something it's because you are somehow involved, otherwise it's waste of time.

    37. Re:Rosa Parks by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Gee so you don't think there is any chance the it was all just a publicity stunt?
      I guess that I may be jaded but it seems like a big chunk of self promotion and betting on his US passport to keep him out of trouble.
      I could be wrong but silly protests are often more for that egos of the protesters than anything else.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    38. Re:Rosa Parks by spun · · Score: 1

      How does one person going to a foreign country to express his desire that they stop oppressing others equate with interventionism? Does James Powderly have an army with which to back up his request? Is he holding a gun to anyone's head and saying, "Do it my way?" No, and you are way off base criticizing him.

      Everyone has every right to tell anyone anything, and everyone is free to ignore others' requests. You are not advocating freedom, you are stating flat out that I do not or should not have the freedom to state what I find objectionable.

      No one is forcing anyone to listen or act on Mr. Powderly's desires, yet you would force him to stop speaking out, and you have the absolute unmitigated gall to claim that you advocate freedom. Your position seems quite authoritarian.

      Practically speaking, I have exactly as much power to tell you how to conduct your business as you give me, no more, no less, unless I use force, which Mr. Powderly did not do. And me refusing to do business with you is not force. Neither is me speaking my mind where you can hear me, EVEN IF you have declared that I am not allowed to speak.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    39. Re:Rosa Parks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time anything you did got mentioned on the front page of Slashdot?

      I knew Powderly. He is a pathological attention whore. That's his thing. I am not the least bit surprised to see his name on the front page of Slashdot. It's his biggest achievement to date.

    40. Re:Rosa Parks by tftp · · Score: 1

      Does James Powderly have an army with which to back up his request?

      Policy of interventionism does not have to use an army. There are many non-military methods. Send a pile of money to the desired foreign political party and see it win. Send a pile of money to some terrorists and see unrest growing, then declare that the country is now a "failed state" and then take it over. Send some black money to a killer and take the undesirable political figure out.

      Everyone has every right to tell anyone anything, and everyone is free to ignore others' requests.

      Let's see. Do I have a right to [hypothetically] tell you to go Cheney yourself? In public? Repeatedly? Loudly? Even if you tell me in no uncertain terms that you don't want to hear this offer ever again? Of course not, this would be harassment. But if I don't have that right to annoy and harass you, then your statement is flawed.

      Your position seems quite authoritarian.

      I believe that the government represents the people and acts on their behalf. If the Chinese government does not allow certain types of speech then I presume the majority of Chinese people agree. If they don't like that, they are expected to change the government *themselves* as it is their right and obligation. Until they do so I will keep presuming that their officials speak for them. I consider them free to act as they please; if they want they can easily overthrow any government, they have the numbers and revolutions happened before in China, the Chinese people can do it if they want to.

      No one is forcing anyone to listen or act on Mr. Powderly's desires

      We are talking here about Mr. Powderly's plan to force his political statement onto hundreds of thousands of people who didn't even come to see it. Would you like to come to a baseball game and suddenly see a [as an example - I don't care about this one] graphic gay promotional video similarly projected onto the score board? Can you say that the gay activists are free and welcome to do this?

    41. Re:Rosa Parks by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Let's see. Do I have a right to [hypothetically] tell you to go Cheney yourself? In public? Repeatedly? Loudly? Even if you tell me in no uncertain terms that you don't want to hear this offer ever again?

      Yes.


        Of course not, this would be harassment. But if I don't have that right to annoy and harass you, then your statement is flawed.

      Ah, the perspective of the modern liberal...

    42. Re:Rosa Parks by Phantom+of+the+Opera · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the property line is here and you may not cross without my permission.

      It's too bad you probably don't know where this axiom comes from. However, it is not true, or at best misleading.
      When Russia troops crossed into Georgia, they did so with the permission of the Russian military command. Effectivly, when that command said the troops may cross the border, that is the only permission that mattered.

      The ownership of the land is a found thing. You bought it from someone who bought it from someone. That land was initially either found or stolen. The only thing that makes it your land is that people with force who call themselves 'the government' will back you up on that. What more to it could there be?

    43. Re:Rosa Parks by spun · · Score: 1

      So now Mr. Powderly is akin to a terrorist or hired killer for speaking his mind. Nice, will you liken him to Hitler next?

      This isn't just about the Chinese, though, is it? It is also about the Tibetans, who have asked for help and support. If the Chinese don't wish international attention, perhaps they shouldn't invade other sovereign nations. Not that Tibet was a bastion of freedom, but they were sovereign and they have asked for help, so much of your argument falls flat.

      Your arguments amount to reductio ad absurdum. Is calling attention to one country's invasion and mistreatment of another REALLY akin to telling someone to fuck themselves, or projecting graphic sexual images onto a score board?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    44. Re:Rosa Parks by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but you seem to discount any and all other opinions. Is it necessarily true that those not involved in a given situation would not have something positive to add?

      Thank you for entertaining my questions.

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    45. Re:Rosa Parks by tftp · · Score: 1

      So now Mr. Powderly is akin to a terrorist or hired killer for speaking his mind. Nice, will you liken him to Hitler next?

      Godwin aside, Mr. Powderly is reportedly a lawbreaker who lied on his visa application and conspired to violate other laws of China (not important whether they are fair or not, and a foreigner has no say in fairness of Chinese laws anyway.) I think he will be just deported with no further consequences. To look from a different angle, if a Chinese tourist will write on his immigration form that he is entering the USA to instigate a revolt against the government he'd be lucky to be only denied entry; if he lies and then instigates a revolt then he will visit Cuba, all expenses paid.

      Is calling attention to one country's invasion and mistreatment of another REALLY akin to telling someone to fuck themselves, or projecting graphic sexual images onto a score board?

      You can easily find that out by hacking into the score board and showing Abu Ghraib photos during the game. They will cover all the aspects under discussion.

    46. Re:Rosa Parks by tftp · · Score: 1

      Is it necessarily true that those not involved in a given situation would not have something positive to add?

      Not true, IMO. Imagine a phone poll about a prospective product. The pollster calls random numbers and asks "if I were to offer you this vacuum cleaner with that feature for so much, would you buy one?" The results can be very informative.

      However it is my right to enter my phone number into the "do not call" registry, or simply to not answer calls from unknown numbers. This is the harshest recourse that a citizen has in this case. A country can go farther and, for example, make all prerecorded sales calls illegal (which FCC just did, as I recall.) This becomes the law, and people can go to jail for breaking it. A country can make even harsher laws, outlawing all sales phone calls, for example. Many countries limit activities of foreign activists to social ends, and explicitly forbid them any political work. In the USA there are laws against foreign political contributions, for example - nobody wants to let China use its dollars to buy politicians here.

      To summarize, yes, a stranger may have a useful opinion on a subject that does not concern him. But still he has the right to be left alone on his land.

    47. Re:Rosa Parks by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Well... i dont agree with the chinnese in almost anything at all, and certaintly think their violent invasion of tibet stands on no moral grounds at all (then again if i remember irak, fingerpointing turns silly). However, no country in the world allows foreigners to come into their territory to express their political view in an attempt to influence it in any way.

      Check the law in any country in occident, you will find its a general rule (perhaps with some exceptions). Of course, most of occident does not apply those laws, but i dont think swarzenegger would be all to fine if tens of thousends of mexican vacationists started protesting against the discrimination of legal mexican-americans and so on.

      --
      NO SIG
    48. Re:Rosa Parks by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      You mean by your "too busy being outraged to pay attention" reading of my logic.

      What I said amounts to recognizing the good along with the bad instead of damning the whole system because of its inadequacies. I'm curious to know how you got to your interpretation of what I said though.

    49. Re:Rosa Parks by alexborges · · Score: 1

      All activists are attention whores, including FOSS activists by the way (and myself). I find this not a flaw in their character, but a necesary trait for them to do their job well and enjoy it.

      Having said this, im not surprised either and in some way just getting arrested serves his cause.

      --
      NO SIG
    50. Re:Rosa Parks by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      It seems you're implying that I was saying "It's not as bad as Chana, so the problems don't matter". As is the case with many of the other responders, and the cowards who modded me down under the non-meta-moderatable "Overrated" tag.

      It's hard to take people seriously when the claim they want you to listen, yet they don't listen themselves. I hope you take that into account when you rant or protest.

    51. Re:Rosa Parks by alexborges · · Score: 1

      For whom, for coca-cola, nike or microsoft?

      I dont see his company sponsors anywhere.

      Ah, you mean a publicity stunt in favor of a free tibet.

      You are right then, what an evil guy!

      --
      NO SIG
    52. Re:Rosa Parks by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Well, the fact that the communist government of china sucks for human rights, does not make Bush's government any less fascist than it is when compared to the US just ten years ago.

      Im not shocked by china's response (hey, to be truthfull, its fair and square), but for US citizens to be arrested and have no fair trials and be subject to espionage from their government... hey, thats a shock: its the last place on earth where one wouldve thought that was possible.

      --
      NO SIG
    53. Re:Rosa Parks by nobodyman · · Score: 1

      You seem to be confusing what one should do versus what someone is allowed to do. Powderly probably knew that what he was getting into, yet he chose to go anyway because of his hope for a free Tibet. You seem to be going a step further in saying that he *shouldn't* express an opinion on the matter.

      Supposing I stand, in Canada, just north of the US border, and I see the police beating an innocent man 10 feet to the south of me in the USA. Are you suggesting that I shouldn't speak out?

      If we exclude people's ideas based on where the ideas come from rather than the merit of the idea itself, we are doing ourselves a great disservice.

    54. Re:Rosa Parks by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      The US isn't totally fascist - yet. But the gov't sure is working on making it so.

      We currently have our emails read, our phones are wiretapped without warrants, habeas corpus has been revoked for non-citizens, U.S. citizens could be tossed into Gitmo if they're deemed a terrorist. Waterboarding was a reason to execute a few japanese in WW2 for crimes against humanity but we say it's not torture.

      Oh yeah, let's not forget about the executive branch failing to follow the laws such as the Federal Records Act, Our Energy policy was set in secret - we don't even know who attended the meeting. Let's not forget that Bush and Cheney's friends have made untold millions off the latest war.

      "This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience ... In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic process." -- President Dwight Eisenhower, farewell speech to the nation, January 17, 1961

      A more fascist gov't makes it easier to make money and gain power for those in control and that's what we're seeing. No tin foil hat needed for such blatant examples.

    55. Re:Rosa Parks by tftp · · Score: 1

      Supposing I stand, in Canada, just north of the US border, and I see the police beating an innocent man 10 feet to the south of me in the USA. Are you suggesting that I shouldn't speak out?

      This presupposes that you can instantly judge the situation. Sometimes it is easier, sometimes it is more difficult. Even in your example will you risk your life to cross a police officer? He is already doing something illegal (beating someone.) What stops him from shooting you and then dropping the bloody baton into your cold, dead hands? What good can you do when you, the only witness, are dead and framed, and the crooked cop walks? Is there a smarter thing to do?

      We can debate for hours even a trivial thing, like the one you drew. But what if the decision is about some foreign affairs? Here is a quiz: in 1917 there were three major parties in Russia - bolsheviks, mensheviks and SRs (socialist-revolutionaries.) Which one will you support? Answer: you'd have to be insane to even consider answering this question, they were all bad. And how can you, over tens of thousands of miles, recognize who is better and who is worse?

      But today, you might say, we have news, radio, internet and such. This doesn't help. You simply become the hostage of different people. Nobody among the media will tell you the truth, in part because they don't know it and in part because they are not paid to tell the truth. Remember the staged photographs of Kosovars "behind" the fence (in front of it, in fact) or the Kuwait ambassador's daughter telling tall tales about the Iraqi soldiers? All lies.

      The only way to know the truth is, IMO, to be part of it. People who live in land $X are the only true witnesses of what is happening there. And even their word should be accepted carefully, with many checks - people have interests and will lie for a dollar (or for Euro these days.)

      I can say that I do not know much about Tibet, and I suspect that Tibet is not knowable to me unless I go and live there for a while. I'm not going to do that. So I don't tell China or Tibetans even my own opinion on the subject because it is most likely wrong. If Tibet - the whole of it - truly wants to be free, there are plenty of ways to get there. A general strike of the whole Tibet will not go unnoticed. A hunger strike of all Tibetans will bring the Chinese government to its knees. I don't want to listen to loud politicians who probably represent nobody in their native land. Such loudmouths are dime a dozen and they will be glad to sell any lie that is convenient (remember Iraq's Curveball? Remember Ahmed Chalabi?) I ignore them all and try to mind my own business.

      If we exclude people's ideas based on where the ideas come from rather than the merit of the idea itself, we are doing ourselves a great disservice.

      True. Tibetans are welcome to set up a conference, in Tibet or abroad, and invite native and foreign speakers. I don't recall Mr. Powderly being invited to such an event, though. Even the wisest words will be badly received if spoken in wrong circumstances; even the tastiest food will not be welcomed if offered in a wrong moment.

    56. Re:Rosa Parks by spun · · Score: 1

      To look from a different angle, if a Chinese tourist will write on his immigration form that he is entering the USA to instigate a revolt against the government he'd be lucky to be only denied entry; if he lies and then instigates a revolt then he will visit Cuba, all expenses paid.

      And you feel that this is fair and just treatment? Seditious speech should be met with indefinite incarceration without a trial, and possibly torture?

      I guess I just don't understand why the fact that someone wasn't born in a particular place means he may not express his opinions about that place. If he were arming the natives, or bombing shit, I could understand, but this is speech we are talking about.

      I've been an activist for a large part of my life. I've engaged in civil disobedience. I've been busted for serving free food to hungry people in a public place. In America, where I was born. I suppose that you would support that, me not being a foreigner and all, or are you really just against protest in general? Honestly, is it about the nationality, or the fact that he has the balls to stand up to power, and must be slapped down hard for that affront to the status quo?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    57. Re:Rosa Parks by spun · · Score: 1

      We aren't debating whether his actions are legal or not. At least I'm not debating that, it would be stupid. We are debating whether it was right, and possibly whether it was effective at all, or merely a publicity stunt.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    58. Re:Rosa Parks by tftp · · Score: 1

      And you feel that this is fair and just treatment?

      Well, this is a very serious question now. Why? Because the true democracy can not survive; it is just as non-viable as a true communism or socialism. A true democracy, where everything is allowed, also allows for its own destruction. This happens because people are not identical clones of each other. People have interests; some people (very few) have lust for power, and they are willing to do whatever it takes to get all the power.

      In a democracy such a populist, using words of an ancient Greek, "only need to promise more money to the public" to win. This flaw was well known back then, and practically could be controlled only in small scale democracies, like village-sized cities. As societies grew, this law of nature selected Kings and Czars and many other rulers (they didn't exist in a vacuum, and a good group of barons could do a quick job on an uncooperative King.)

      Later populists came to power in France, killed thousands of people and eventually got killed themselves. Populists reoccur all the time these days; Boris Yeltsin was one such populist, he rose on the platform of government being asleep (or drunk) at the wheel, as later we learned. In Venezuela Hugo Chavez is heavily using populist methods ("money to the people".) So this is not just a theory.

      Anyhow, now we see that a true democracy can be subverted from within. Once a person gets to the reins he may well want to stay in charge. Saddam of Iraq was one such guy - he led a revolt, set up his pocket Baath party, and sat on the throne until recently. Lenin and Stalin in Russia did exactly the same thing earlier. A certain German politician, not to be named due to Godwin, was also a great orator and populist. People literally died for him. So now we see that a true democracy tends to decay into a dictatorship, and the catalyst that is needed is an aggressive, ambitious populist and the society that is not as wise as it should (it is seldom wise, as a rule - people are not paid to learn governing, and it's a boring job.)

      Now we want democracy but we don't want it to slide into fascism and tyranny. How do we do that? Democracy is not stable. If you look above you will see that to keep the democracy flourishing you need to maintain wise voters, or you need to put a clamp on politicians. The USA can not maintain wise voters because first it's too hard and only Switzerland can claim such a success. Secondly, the USA seemingly is not interested in educated citizenry - the public education system is training children to be just smart enough to hold a basic job.

      Without smart voters the society in the USA can see a massive upheaval (a revolt.) You can observe shades of it looking at Obama. But Obama is a well-trained politician, he will not stray from the party line, not any more than a Soviet politician would dare. You can see for yourself what Obama says and how he votes - it's perfectly in line with the current policy. No revolts allowed here; and if anyone tries ... remember politicians and social leaders who were suddenly killed and their killers also killed. It happened here.

      So it seems obvious that the democracy in the USA (or any democracy that wants to survive) can not afford uncontrolled rabble rousers. They are bad news. Some say: "Let them speak and the public will sort them out" - no, if the public is stupid (as all public invariably is, in the USA or in Russia or in China) then this rabble rouser can suddenly become the next Fuehrer. It has happened before, and we'd better remember that.

      You are welcome to agree or disagree, I do not advocate anything - I only tried to explain how, in my opinion, this particular political system called "democracy" works. I understand where you are coming from, but now and then you need to go into the details of how things are done in the real world. If you don't like how it works, make a plan and publish it. Karl Marx did just that, and it kept people busy for a century. I don't know how well you will be received, though, if you propose to abolish the existing system - and what will you replace it with? The planet hasn't seen yet a large scale system that is better. Design one if you can.

    59. Re:Rosa Parks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but please, please play it safe.

      We don't want our protester stabbed by some angry mob in a foreign country.
      We don't want one more body in the body count.

    60. Re:Rosa Parks by nobodyman · · Score: 1

      People who live in land $X are the only true witnesses of what is happening there.

      This I must call bullshit on. Do you truly think that the citizens of North Korea are any more informed about what their government is up to than the people outside of the country? Kim Jong-il claims to have invented the hamburger of all things, and who are the North Koreans to suspect otherwise, seeing as how all forms of media are censored and controlled by the government.

    61. Re:Rosa Parks by tftp · · Score: 1

      This I must call bullshit on

      A well known Russian comedian once said: "Let's debate the taste of a pineapple with people who ate them."

      Insiders generally know more than outsiders. This is triply true for such a paranoid society as North Korea. We do not care what North Koreans think about hamburgers. Americans similarly have no clue if there is life on Alpha Centauri, but who cares about that? We only care if they know what is happening inside the country. The whole population of North Korea knows everything on that subject - it's all made by their hands, after all. If you want to know what NK is up to, ask Kim's closest advisors - they know, they probably told him what he wants. Who outside of this circle would know that? Nobody.

    62. Re:Rosa Parks by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I interpreted your post that way, but if you didn't mean it that way, then I apologize for interpreting it as such. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    63. Re:Rosa Parks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He went over there to get publicity for a cause, and he got publicity for a cause.

      That makes him an attention whore, not a freedom fighter/protester for a cause.

      Ironically now both he and Tibet have something in common.

    64. Re:Rosa Parks by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      We are all free to express our desires to anyone.
      Yes, but what is the consequence for such freedom? I think, that's where everyone/nations differ.

      We are free to demonstrate and protest that which we find morally objectionable
      Well, depends on where we are and for the record, however we "should" be free to. What is and what isn't in China is the reality. What you are saying is only your opinion and fantasy, ideological one none the less.

      and no arbitrary borders or citizenship should stop us.
      No, I disagree. You propose taking away the rights of people and their right to maintain sovereignty as nation. You're contradicting yourself. As much as I dislike China, her law and her right to protect her sovereignty should be respected regardless of your view and many faults she has.

      as it seeks to divide people into arbitrary groups who are not allowed to support each other in seeking redress for wrongs.
      Arbitration makes us human. We define ourselves by identity. And our identities shape our perception of what is right and wrong. As human and society, we look out for our own self interest. If supporting "fellow arbitrary group" is the goal, what the fuck was he doing in US while Tibetan monks were protesting and getting shot at? Oh yeah, safely throwing his little led lights over the bridge.

      You advocate a particularly sick form of authoritarianism.
      And you are advocating "Look at how great i am" democracy. Pure fucking evil, Youtube poster child do-nothing-say-everything protesters.

      And you thought China was pretty fucking sick...

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    65. Re:Rosa Parks by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      how about his little throwies?

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    66. Re:Rosa Parks by layer3switch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Powderly regularly protests all kinds of oppression, both at home and abroad.

      ...Yeah, I saw that guy marching through the streets of Tibet among those brave monks.

      Oh wait...

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    67. Re:Rosa Parks by coaxial · · Score: 1

      You have a very unusual idea of what a infringement is. How exactly is anyone's right to protest limited or curtailed?

      As a bad analogy, you are free to move furniture in your house, and only your family's wishes may constrain you. However what will you say if I, a total stranger, set up demonstrations around your house demanding that a certain desk should be moved into a certain corner, and not where it is now?

      Ignore you.

      Go back to your crappy Ayn Rand fan club, or get a dictionary. You're using words that you don't understand.

    68. Re:Rosa Parks by JosKarith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is indeed a bad analogy. If all you were doing was moving your furniture then you have a point. On the other hand if you like the desk being where it is because it's better for beating your spouse against there then people would have a reason to get involved.
      The positioning of your deks hurts nobody. But if you turn your back on the suffering of another human being then it makes you complicit in their plight. We are a social species and part of a society is caring for those who are hurt - otherwise we are just another tribe of hairless apes screaming at the night. But hey, you choose your own life path just like we all do. Except for those who have that choice taken away from them.

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    69. Re:Rosa Parks by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I never said he was evil.
      Silly, useless, and maybe a publicity hound but that doesn't reach the level of evil.
      As to a "free" Tibet. You do know that Tibet was never "free" right? Before China invaded it was a totalitarian theocracy. Now it is a totalitarian dictatorship. As I said I don't like China's government but this "Free Tibet" is a great feel good pr campaign. If China said "Ok we will pull out tomorrow." Do you have any idea what kind of mess you would see? Are you really hopping that the Dali Lama is returned to the throne of Tibet and an unquestionable God King? What to you think will happen to the ethnic Chinese that where born there?
      You want to make a stand? The stop buying luxury items that are made in China! don't buy that shiny new iPod. And when you have a choice don't buy things made in China. When I had to buy a new lawn mower I hunted a long time to find one I could afford and wasn't made in China. I found one that was made in Canada.
      But giving up shiny toys and spending a little time and money is a lot harder than tossing throwies, shining lights, and putting a bumper sticker on your car. Oh and it is a lot less cool.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    70. Re:Rosa Parks by spun · · Score: 1

      You have a thing against protesters, don't you? Sit down, shut up, don't rock the boat.

      Now, I'm not talking about what is legal or not. I'm talking about what is right. Of course he got arrested for what he did. He knew the risks going in, and did it anyway. Who knows if he did it because he felt it was the right thing to do, or because he's an attention whore, but that's not what I'm discussing. I'm discussing the ethics of civil disobedience, and whether one can and should only engage in it in one's own country.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    71. Re:Rosa Parks by spun · · Score: 1

      Well, your critique is certainly interesting, if bleak. But it doesn't amount to anything new, after all, you are mostly paraphrasing the Greek concept of the kyklos, and pointing out that the US doesn't want educated citizenry, which anyone with half a brain can deduce from the evidence.

      You seem a bit conflicted, as if you hate the government, but you hate people who would change the government even more. I'm really not sure what to make of the last part, what are you trying to convey? And please don't make any assumptions about where I'm coming from, you really don't know me at all.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    72. Re:Rosa Parks by fooDfighter · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing a few key details. Populism alone is not enough to bring about authoritarianism, otherwise the number of democratic countries would be decreasing, not increasing, over time. In many of the populist revolutions you mentioned, the most important catalyst was a broken economy that had put the majority of that country's population in poverty. Hitler may have been a great orator, but if post WWI Germany was economically sound and not the whipping boy of Europe, many would have dismissed him as the nationalist extremist that he was. What really drives populists revolutions is watching your friends and neighbors dying of hunger or exposure because they cannot afford to take care of themselves.

    73. Re:Rosa Parks by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Powderly regularly protests all kinds of oppression, both at home and abroad.
      When he protests in the US, people say that there are much worse things going on elsewhere (usually citing China). When he protests in China, the same people say he should to mind his own business.
      At least he's doing something, and his sudden disappearance for throwing up a banner with a few lights on it certainly highlights the oppression that we all know exists in China.

      I'm kinda cynical and think the guy deserves whatever happens to him. If you have a single thing you are protesting with lots of groups, then I could see the government leaving you alone and letting you go. If there is a single nut case anywhere protesting anything by themselves, the local police ought to just throw them in jail for disturbing the peace and/or littering. If you are alone, you are a nut case. If you have a following and can get others to protest with you, then you have a political party that should be able to make changes.

    74. Re:Rosa Parks by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      You have a thing against protesters, don't you?

      Matter of fact, I do. Protest is to express one's dissatisfaction without violating or infringing rights of other people. Any numb skulls too thick to understand that, I have problem with.

      I'm discussing the ethics of civil disobedience

      No, you are not discussing the ethics of civil disobedience. You are advocating ignoring the sovereignty of nation. Protesting with flashy laser light is not some humanitarian effort such as the doctors without borders. Ethical civil disobedience implies that the civic duty of people who are disengaged and disenchanted by civil laws to do with a city or the people who live there. When foreigners protests against civil laws of unrelated country, it's no longer civil disobedience. It's foreign interventionism.

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    75. Re:Rosa Parks by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Well... how about letting the TIBETANS decide if they want their god king back or not or if they want the chinnese out of their country?

      Gee, what a novel concept don't ya think? And the dalai lama seems like such an unreasonable guy that wouldn't ever submit material government to democracy.... right?

      My friend, at least take the time to read some of the stuff the guy says.

      --
      NO SIG
    76. Re:Rosa Parks by spun · · Score: 1

      And what if the dissatisfied citizens of a particular regime call for international attention and help? I suppose their desires are not legitimate, and do not count. Civil disobedience is ALWAYS about ignoring the 'sovereignty' of a nation, specifically, ignoring the laws that are unjust.

      You are supporting the citizens of any regime that themselves support the status quo, and ignoring the desires of the citizens who don't. You also seem to be defining rights in a strange and authoritarian way, as in, 'We have the right not to hear things we don't want to hear.' Shining a light on the side of a building is not infringing anyone's rights.

      You may think you support freedom, but your stance is entirely authoritarian.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    77. Re:Rosa Parks by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I have read what he has to say. Seems like a very nice man and great at PR. But you keep saying let the Tibetan people decide. I am also all for that but are you sure that would happen if China pulled out tomorrow? Would I like to see a Free Tibet? Yes I would like to see all nations free.
      Do I think projecting something on a building or putting up some throwies will do it? Not on your life.
      I am willing to bet that if China just up and left Tibet tomorrow that there would be civil war and a blood bath in less than twenty four hours.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    78. Re:Rosa Parks by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, not doing anything at all has a much better chance at contributing for a change.

      --
      NO SIG
    79. Re:Rosa Parks by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Notice that I never said do nothing. I am just am all for not doing stupid ego stroking gestures that do NOTHING but make you feel good.
      If enough people stopped buying iPods and other expensive toys made in China then companies would move production from China. Money would stop flowing into China.
      But as I said it is SO much easier to buy the Dali Lama's book, put a bumper sticker on your car, and post on Slashdot than to give up a toy.
      Not only that but that bumper sticker show off how much you care. When I went and hunted down a lawnmower that wasn't made in China all I did was take say $100 from the Chinese company, help pay someone in a free country's wage and benefits, and put money in the pocket of a company that didn't do business in China. Well at least not all of it. I am sure at least some of the parts where made in China.
      So which do you think would have more impact. A million people putting FreeTibet bumper stickers or a million people avoiding products made in China?
      In other words stop pretending that you are doing something important and actually do something that counts. Even if nobody knows it but you.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    80. Re:Rosa Parks by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      And what if the dissatisfied citizens of a particular regime call for international attention and help?

      I haven't heard 1.3 billion people asking for help. Have you? You would think, 1.3 billion people would have louder voice... Don't you think?

      So everyone has inherited right to protest anyone's perceived righteousness on any nation's soil? Is that your stance on what "right" is? So you are imposing protesting unjust laws that doesn't affect you, enforced by government you aren't part of, affecting lives in society you don't live in... That doesn't sound right to me.

      And for your information, I don't support any citizens of any regime that themselves support the status quo, and ignoring the desires of the citizens who don't. I don't even know where you get that stuff from, but clearly you do not have understanding of my position. Look, if you want to talk to 1.3 billion people to change their government and change the way they are governed by, by all mean. But to impose your view and rights on others by means of international intervention and media whoring, it's self serving.

      Shining a light on the side of a building is not infringing anyone's rights.

      Are you sure about that? If I am showing you my penis everywhere you go, I'm not infringing your right to be straight, or am I? Shining lights on property is not a RIGHT nor infringing anyone's right. Embassy/Consulate is considered as a foreign country. If you are in Chinese embassy in New York City, US, you are in Chinese territory, not US. Your right stops at the sidewalk before entering Chinese embassy.

      You may think you support freedom, but your stance is entirely authoritarian.

      No, my stance is for republicanism, not authoritarian. Please stop throwing fancy words thinking your view is correct... because it is not.

      You sound very passionate and intelligent, but you are very very misguided and misinformed.

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    81. Re:Rosa Parks by alexborges · · Score: 1

      I agree that voting-through-the-wallet is more effective.

      But it also does not bring attention to the problem for many people, where a stunt will.

      Exposure is also positive.

      --
      NO SIG
    82. Re:Rosa Parks by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      There isn't a person in the US that can escape the Free Tibet publicity assault.

      Let the Dali Lama bring it to peoples attention. If you want to do something real than ask your friends and co workers if they know about what is going on in Tibet.
      Stunts are ego stroking fluff.
      How about this. Here is an idea that will never happen. Let's target Apple. We all know that Apple cares what people think about it as a company. So when the new iPod comes out let's all not buy it. Let's take the money we would spend on the new iPod and donate it to a charity. It can be any charity you want. But take the time to photocopy the check that you send to the charity. Send it along with a note to Apple saying. I would have really liked to buy that new iPod but I don't want my money going to China as long as they have such a terrible human rights record.
      If a million people did that then it would make a bigger difference than all the bumper stickers.
      Not only that but think of all the good a few hundred million dollars would do for say Habitat for Humanity, the United Way, and AIDS relief in Africa.
      In other words I will say it again. DO SOMETHING REAL.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    83. Re:Rosa Parks by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      Kind of ironic that you posted that with the title "Re: Rosa parks"

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    84. Re:Rosa Parks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are an idiot

    85. Re:Rosa Parks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're a fucking idiot. Please unplug your computer.

  7. You know... by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've never heard of most of these "activists" before the Olympics and I've got a feeling we won't be hearing much from them afterwards. If people have been involved with pro-Tibet, pro-Darfur, pro-democracy, pro-whatever stuff all along, then good for them. But most of these loudmouths getting press recently seem to only be interested in complaining when their neighbors are taking pleasure in something China-related.

    It reminds me of all those goofs who are so indignantly outraged every Thanksgiving, but never lift a finger to help American Indians on the other 364 days a year. Or even on Thanksgiving, for that matter.

    1. Re:You know... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps this speaks more of the level of attention that the world pays to activists (during major events versus otherwise) than it does to the level of commitment of activists to causes.

      Seriously, this guy been around a while. Your ignorance is not evidence that he's a mere opportunistic attention-grabber.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:You know... by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, this guy been around a while. Your ignorance is not evidence that he's a mere opportunistic attention-grabber.

      Feel free to convince me otherwise. The Wikipedia page linked here certainly makes him sound like an opportunistic attention-grabber. As I said, I have all the respect in the world for serious activists on this front, but this guy sounds like a self-promoting jackass who assumes (correctly, probably) that his white skin and US passport are Get Out Of Jail Free cards.

    3. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I said, I have all the respect in the world for serious activists on this front

      OK, without looking it up the internet name a few activists you consider serious.

    4. Re:You know... by db32 · · Score: 2, Funny

      American Indians?! Fuck them, what about the turkeys! Turkey Genocide Day and you are worried about American Indians (They are Native Americans by the way, they never were and never will be Indians. Indians are from India).

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    5. Re:You know... by ksd1337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It reminds me of all those goofs who are so indignantly outraged every Thanksgiving, but never lift a finger to help American Indians on the other 364 days a year. Or even on Thanksgiving, for that matter.

      I'm not offended (I'm Indian myself), nor am I one of those ultra-politically correct, don't-want-to-offend-anyone types of people, but it would be more accurate to say Native American instead of American Indian. American Indian can also refer to people of Indian descent who were born in the US, and that can get a bit confusing for people who don't know US history.

    6. Re:You know... by Sir_Real · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes those do-nothing loudmouth liberal hiptards should just die in a fire. It's almost like they're doing nothing at all... what with all that thinking about this stuff.... and talking about it...

      Since when did communication become a stoning offense? Bringing ideas to the fore without some kind of action attached to it isn't a crime.

      And regarding those loudmouths who talk about the Native Americans on Thanksgiving, they are doing something. They are doing more than you sound like you're doing (which is simply whining about people who talk about what they feel strongly about).

      Enjoy yourself a nice tall cup of STFU. On the house. With my compliments. You seem to be serving enough of it. Perhaps now would be a good time to have a drink yourself.

    7. Re:You know... by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is little point in complaining that one European word does not properly describe them, and then insisting that another European word be used instead.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, way to make an assumption regarding someone regarding their skin color and nationality.

      Isn't that generally called racism in most parts of the civilised world?

      Good job!

    9. Re:You know... by eddwee · · Score: 1

      Native Americans*

      Seriously, my girlfriend is not from India.

    10. Re:You know... by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      All the dead ones.

    11. Re:You know... by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Seriously, my girlfriend is not from India.

      Made in Taiwan?

    12. Re:You know... by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      One of the major reasons that the IOC chose to allow China to host the games was in the hope that it would draw attention to China's human rights abuses. Ideally, China would address them before the game and everyone would be happy. Alternatively, for two weeks, the world will see a shadow of what China really is.

      So far, we've seen one terrorist incident (before the games started and not widely reported), dozens of protesters arrested and deported, at least one Chineese citizen 'dissappeared' for his religious activities, as well as varying levels of cheating in the games themselves (TKD and womens gynastics being the most obvious).

      The point is, that we are actually hearing about these abuses. There is a huge international media community in China right now, and we are still only hearing about a fraction of what is actually happening. Without the international media, we wouldn't be hearing any of it at all.

    13. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what exactly is wrong with a bit of racism?

    14. Re:You know... by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've never heard of most of these "activists" before the Olympics and I've got a feeling we won't be hearing much from them afterwards. If people have been involved with pro-Tibet, pro-Darfur, pro-democracy, pro-whatever stuff all along, then good for them. But most of these loudmouths getting press recently seem to only be interested in complaining when their neighbors are taking pleasure in something China-related.

      I can just picture you, sitting on your ass and posting these comments on Slashdot, criticizing someone who did at least something, however little (and did indeed risk imprisonment by an oppressive regime), spewing your self-righteous shite.

      And for this feces of yours, you get the highest reward you can expect - being "Modded Up" - but that's also all the reward cowards like you can expect. You'll go to sleep tonight without having achieved anything of interest in your squalid little existence, save for a pat on your back by a few other losers like you, who just happened to have mod points tonight.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    15. Re:You know... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      and that can get a bit confusing for people who don't know US history.

      Americans, then? Don't worry, most of us are more than confused enough that this extra tidbit won't make a difference ;)

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    16. Re:You know... by initdeep · · Score: 1

      well off the top of my head, i can come up with one of the members of the Beastie Boys who has been doing "Free Tibet" work for damn near 10 years.

      I don't know his name but could point him out of a crowd.

      And i consider myself to not be very well versed on the subject at all, in terms of their music nor his stance, yet he popped into mind at the start of this article.

      This "artist" doesn't pop to mind for any cause.

    17. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...it would be more accurate to say Native American instead of American Indian. American Indian can also refer to people of Indian descent who were born in the US, and that can get a bit confusing for people who don't know US history.

      Even "Native American" is problematical, as it involves a secondary meaning of the word "native", and the primary meaning would make "native American" mean simply any person born in the US. The correct adjective would be "aboriginal" or, even better, "indigenous".

    18. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People of Indian descent who were born in the US would be Indian Americans and NOT American Indians.

    19. Re:You know... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      And you're doing the exact same thing, except you're criticizing the critic.

      That gives GP two points ahead of you: he sounds reasonable and intelligent, and he's not a hypocrite.

      And for the record, the only thing I'm criticizing is your uncivilized tone of voice.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    20. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this guy sounds like a self-promoting jackass

      I, and most of Brooklyn can confirm this. That said, I hope he didn't get himself hurt this time.

    21. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You suggest that only established activists have a right to make a point. That somehow his name implies that he's an attention grabber, a media whore. You also suggest that if this is his first time protesting China, his points are somehow invalid because he doesn't have credit? From who? You? And who are you anyway? Some kind of big shot protest judge who gets to name other protesters as being valid or not?

      His protests about human rights abuses are valid regardless of his fame, his status as an activist or how you view him. His sacrifice is noble and your comments are ankle biting of the worst kind. Serious activists? What the fuck does risking your life and your freedom in China make you? A joke activist?

      Good job on the bikeshedding, I'm glad to know it carries over into activist criticism too. Feel proud! You're changing the world unlike these media whores!

    22. Re:You know... by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      Aah, he's just jealous of the GP's four digit UID.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    23. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider yourself lucky that you have such a low ID, otherwise nobody would value your rubbish opinions.

    24. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're trying to say this guy is not doing anything, well he went to China to protest; that's the very definition of doing something.

    25. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone needs to mod the post by blind_biker down to Troll. Seriously that post is totally self-fulfilling; it's an exact response to itself.

      As for the subject at hand, a lot of 'activist' groups have been using the Olympics as a chance for a publicity stunt. The Chinese were pretty clear when they said not to go to China if you planned on using the Olympics to stage protests.

      For example, the 4 jerk-offs from Wyoming trying to smuggle 'bibles' into China have been getting huge press lately and all I see in the news is "Poor little Christians just trying to spread God's word in the horrible Communist China". They don't bother to mention the Chinese let them keep a bible each, constantly claim that religion is outlawed (it's not) or that the bible is illegal (it's not) and on and on.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm really not a fan of China at all, but look at the USA without the Rose-colored glasses and you'll see we're a lot closer to China than people are willing to admit.
      And if you don't believe me, try bringing 300+ copies of the Koran into the USA on a flight from Afghanistan.

    26. Re:You know... by evanism · · Score: 1

      Dont worry. He wanted to be a martyr for the cause, and after all, one less noisy American is not going to unbalance things ;)

      --
      Just bought a new quantum computer, but I'm uncertain how it works.
    27. Re:You know... by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      they never were and never will be Indians.

      So I will get my job back soon? :(

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    28. Re:You know... by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      Bringing ideas to the fore without some kind of action attached to it isn't a crime.

      Evidently it is a crime in CHINA. Yeah, CHINA.

      they are doing something.

      Since when doing something is better than doing nothing? After all, aren't we talking about "DOING THE RIGHT THING"? oh yeah... cliche~

      Two wrongs do not make it right. Just because you flash a light with provocative text, does not make it better nor signify or somehow make the cause more legitimate.

      You just flashed some fucking light. That's it. Call it something else, it makes all the sacrifices made by Tibetan monks a FUCKING JOKE.

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    29. Re:You know... by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      Without the international media, we wouldn't be hearing any of it at all.

      Huh? WTF are you talking about. There were more media attention on China's human right violation before the Olympics. Human trafficking has been haunting China for decades.

      It's been always there. Cluster fuck minds have only 5 minute tension span, that's all.

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    30. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this gentleman is making any scene during the Olympics game, the policeman will come escort him back to the policeman, the case will be settled soon. After the Olympic game, the policeman will be replaced by an angry mob throwing stones at him. Police will come to round up the usual suspects after the mob disperses. The difference is, one casualty in the hospital.

  8. Well then by prelelat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm sure he knew what might happen when he decided to protest in China about Tibet. I commend him for that, it might get some attention to people around the world to his cause. I think he either had to have had some seriouse balls or have been a little nieve to think of what would happen if he was detained by athorities. I don't think hes a dumb man he knew what he was doing and he knew what would probably happen.

    Hopefully they just ship him home after a couple days or weeks and this doesn't get too ugly for him.

    On another note "I know hippies. I've hated them all my life. I've kept this town free of hippies on my own since I was five and a half. But I can't contain them on my own anymore. We have to do something, fast!" hehe China is Cartman

    1. Re:Well then by Wiarumas · · Score: 1

      I bet he thought of the consequences, but I bet he also thought he would get away with it. Whatever he was thinking, I'm sure he is hoping that this isn't overshadowed by the Olympics and that he doesn't fade away after the show is over.

      --
      I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    2. Re:Well then by Ravon+Rodriguez · · Score: 1

      Right, he thought he would get away with it because he was an American, and he probably will get away with it just for that reason. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't want anything bad to happen to him, but it really was a boneheaded move.

      --
      Jesus loves me, he loves me a bunch, because he always puts Jiffy in my lunch.
    3. Re:Well then by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he knew what might happen when he decided to protest in China about Tibet.

      No, I don't think so. I think he thought it would be like the U.S. where he might get a ride to the police station, a ticket, and a fine. That, or he is thinking that the U.S. will come to his aid like it did that idiot in Singapore.

      Personally, I hope they toss his ass in prison for a few years so he learns to appreciate his freedom here in the U.S.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  9. Re:idiot by frovingslosh · · Score: 0

    Amen to that. Here in the Land of Freedom, the good old USA, we arrest people who make signs with simple blinking LEDs. This jerk goes to China, advocates for the freedom of Tibet, and tries to get people to shine green lasers at buildings (need I point out that many people in the USA have been arrested for pointing lasers skyward as well?). Personally I hope they keep him and we never hear from him again.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  10. Re:idiot by MRe_nl · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, they'll really stick it to him.
    He might end up a floaty.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  11. What is a L.A.S.E.R Stencil?? by stainlesssteelpat · · Score: 1

    I've seen a fair share of stencil art around the traps, but would somebody illuminate me on what a L.A.S.E.R stencil is, please. Does it have anything to do with sharks?

    --
    War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
    1. Re:What is a L.A.S.E.R Stencil?? by stainlesssteelpat · · Score: 1

      That said, I hope this guy turns up again. Some of his art sounds really cool.

      --
      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
    2. Re:What is a L.A.S.E.R Stencil?? by stainlesssteelpat · · Score: 1

      The work, "The Green Chinese Lantern," uses a 400 milliwatt handheld green laser with micro-stencils to beam simple messages and images up to three stories high on surfaces such as billboards, buildings, and bridges. The Laser Stencil technology was developed in conjunction with Students for a Free Tibet.

      Thats sounds really neat I want one.

      --
      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
    3. Re:What is a L.A.S.E.R Stencil?? by againjj · · Score: 4, Informative

      From TFA:

      The work, "The Green Chinese Lantern," uses a 400 milliwatt handheld green laser with micro-stencils to beam simple messages and images up to three stories high on surfaces such as billboards, buildings, and bridges. The Laser Stencil technology was developed in conjunction with Students for a Free Tibet.

      [...] For more information and high-resolution photos of the work, please visit http://graffitiresearchlab.com/?p=161

    4. Re:What is a L.A.S.E.R Stencil?? by JynXed · · Score: 1

      http://graffitiresearchlab.com/ see second picture for l.a.s.e.r stencil

    5. Re:What is a L.A.S.E.R Stencil?? by gknoy · · Score: 1

      LASER Tagging:

      Video of it:
      http://graffitiresearchlab.com/?page_id=76

      Background on how it's set up, and such.
      http://muonics.net/blog/index.php?postid=15

      I still don't quite understand how they can illuminate that strongly, but I've not read a lot of it. I /though/ the laser was for the pointing only, but it could be that it's used for the projection as well.

    6. Re:What is a L.A.S.E.R Stencil?? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Just don't look at the graffiti with your remaining eye...

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  12. All things being considered... by rebewt · · Score: 1

    He is still having a better day than this guy.

  13. Re:idiot by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's pretty disingenuous. Writing propaganda these days? "Arrest people who make signs with simple blinking LEDs"? Interesting description. Would you have a problem if I ran up to your house and poured pig's blood all over your porch? Why not? It's easy to clean up! "many people in the USA have been arrested for pointing lasers skyward as well"? Oh, you mean the couple of people who were attempting to shine laser lights in the eyes of pilots of commercial aircraft, and readily admitted to it? If I shone a laser in your eye while you were driving, would that bother you? Do you think someone should be arrested for possibly f*cking up your vision for the rest of your life? How about when that process might end up killing you, and any number of your passengers? I've heard b.s. "we are so bad we shouldn't criticize anyone else" and "Nazi Imperialist U.S.A." before - but I have to say - good job! If this post were a joke, I'd be very impressed. It's unfortunate that you probably mean it. Have you ever noticed that lying for your cause doesn't actually help it in the long run? Let's fix problems honestly, shall we?

  14. Is this a surprise? by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Going to foreign countries run by totalitarian governments to protest is a bit on the unwise side regardless of how just the cause.

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:Is this a surprise? by rtechie · · Score: 1

      You do it because you CAN. You, as a westerner, have a country that actually cares what happens to you and will complain when their citizens are beaten and/or imprisoned. Native Chinese who protest are almost always imprisoned and tortured, often along with their families. Sometimes protesters are simply killed.

  15. One doesn't need to be a member of the oppressed by apparently · · Score: 5, Insightful
    in order to protest oppression, numbnuts.

    Powderly is not Tibetan, not a resident of China, a foreigner who traveled to China for the express purpose of making this protest, and achieved nothing in this protest. Powderly and his protest is nothing like Park's protest. And I'M BadAnalogyGuy?!

  16. Re:idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's pretty disingenuous. Writing propaganda these days? "Arrest people who make signs with simple blinking LEDs"? Interesting description.

    Yeah, it is disingenuous. They didn't just arrest them - they then proceeded to charge them with terrorism.

    Because, like, they might have been bombs or something.

  17. Re:He's not dead yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, can you hang around a couple of minutes?

    He won't be long.

  18. Re:So many ways to make a point by Steauengeglase · · Score: 5, Funny

    Disrespecting the athletes by marring the games with these protests is no better than what happened in Munich in 1972.

    His laser wasn't that powerful.

  19. Re:but they make ipods by spun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Amen! Don't you love the way capitalism lets you profit without worrying about the moral standards of the companies you invest in? I mean, I can invest in a company that will do awful things I would never do personally, and I never even have to hear about it, let alone lose sleep over it. And even if I do hear about it, well, I'm just a little investor, I didn't make that decision, it's not my fault! I love diffusion of responsibility.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  20. Re:idiot by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In NYC on Aug 10th, some protesters projected a film onto the Chinese Consulate in NYC.

    Here's video on YouTube [Warning, there are some graphic scenes].

    Not a laser, but interesting trick nonetheless.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  21. Re:So many ways to make a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like to think that going over and killing twelve people is slightly worse than mildly pissing a few people off with an unsolicited light show, but then i'm a bit weird like that.

  22. Confucius say by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    Confucius say "It will take many many throwies to enlighten all of China."

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  23. Re:idiot by notgm · · Score: 1

    i've never understood how someone pointing a laser up could hit a pilot in the eye. most planes i've seen have windows on the top half of the cockpit, meaning you'd have to be on a similar elevation or above the airplane to even come close.

    unless they have those new bendy-lasers.

  24. Remember James.... by Itninja · · Score: 0, Troll

    At least all the Chinese prisons serve Chinese food (or as the Chinese call it, "food").

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Remember James.... by cfulmer · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that? I suspect that a number of them don't serve anything.

  25. Re:So many ways to make a point by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I like to think that banning DDT and ending up dooming millions of Africans to death by malaria is a bit worse than having to wash a few apples before eating. Unintended consequences are typically worse than anyone usually expects.

    Certainly you can't say there is a net positive outcome from this protest.

  26. Re:idiot by iandunn · · Score: 1

    Exactly! I mean... trying to promote human rights? What an asshole...

  27. Thank you China by OrangeTide · · Score: 0, Troll

    We should send more of our hippies and crackpots there to be detained. We have completely failed to deal with them here due to these silly laws we have.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  28. Re:It's China. This is no surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. All the other western "Free Tibet" protesters were chucked out of the country the next day, unharmed.

    Incidentally, the INS have the power to do exactly the same thing if I (a foreigner) came to the US to protest at some event.

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. Your rights online by Matt+Perry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What does this have to do with my online rights? Shouldn't this be filed under politics?

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  31. Would It Be Wrong To Admit ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that I beat the crap out of a guy in school every day who looked very much like the "Censorship" graphic icon? A swirly would have been the mildest punishment I doled out to this poor schmuck. I hope his old man owned stock in Optical Clinic because I broke his glasses at least once a week too.

  32. Re:idiot by Ravon+Rodriguez · · Score: 1

    Oh, you mean the couple of people who were attempting to shine laser lights in the eyes of pilots of commercial aircraft, and readily admitted to it?

    There is at least one case that I recall where a guy was pointing out stars to his son with a green laser pointer and was arrested because a plane flew in the path of the laser pointer.

    --
    Jesus loves me, he loves me a bunch, because he always puts Jiffy in my lunch.
  33. He is no Rosa Parks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know Rosa Parks, I sat in the bus with Rosa Parks, that guy is no Rosa Parks!

  34. Re:idiot by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

    He should have mounted the laser onto a shark's forehead. That way, they can't ever catch who's projecting the graffiti, because it would just swim away.

  35. Re:idiot by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    They then proceeded to charge them with terrorism.

    Please list the cases where people who tried to blind pilots were tried as terrorists.

    Also, please explain what said people should have been charged with after trying to crash commercial aircraft by blinding the pilots? How about 150 counts of attempted murder?

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  36. Re:idiot by b0bby · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, they were "were charged with misdemeanor disorderly conduct and placing a hoax device in a way that causes panic" according to Boston.com, and the charges were later dropped. Which is still a stupid overreaction, but not the same as charging them with "terrorism".

  37. Re:idiot by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Simple, you don't point the laser straight up.

    The cases referred to involve people who fired lasers into the cockpits of aircraft that were coming in for a landing. When an aircraft is landing, one can fire a laser into the cockpit because of the attitude of the aircraft.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  38. Re:idiot by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

    Isn't it kind of pointless (heh) to use a laser to point out stars. It isn't 1250AD where we had a canopy upon which to shine the laser. Space doesn't provide a surface to reflect back the pointer beam.

  39. This guy agrees with you by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1, Troll
    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:This guy agrees with you by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he wasn't protesting. He was accused of a crime, arrested, charged, released, and allowed to leave the country to return back to Russian.

      And, you kind of left off that he was tried and found not guilt.

      Now, please, STFU.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  40. Re:idiot by maxume · · Score: 1

    If the pilot can see the ground, then the ground can see the pilot's eyes.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  41. Was the inventor? by DirtySouthAfrican · · Score: 1

    That's sort of fatalist, isn't it? I'm sure he'll be released in good time.

  42. so what exactly are you trying to say? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    That's pretty disingenuous. Writing propaganda these days?.....

    So you go on to point out how dangerous it is for the people in America to shine lasers upwards and in people's eyes, but you seem to be supporting this idiot's efforts to get people to do exactly that. Or don't you think that there can be any people in those buildings looking out of windows when the crowd below shines those lasers.Don't you think the Chinese have helicopters, and that they would be present at just such events? And do you completely discount the likely hood that someone will hold the laser low so to make it harder to pinpoint them as the protester in the crowd rather than overtly hold it high over their head, and in doing so would direct it through an area that is likely to be crossed by someone else's head and eyes? It's just fine for the US government to protect us from people who do this, but it comes as a complete shock to you that this guy would be stopped by Chinese authorities for organizing people to do the same, particularly when he is a foreigner going into the country to organize political protests?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:so what exactly are you trying to say? by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about? I say that rather strongly, but I honestly have no idea what relationship your post has to mine, so if you wouldn't mind explaining, I'll be glad to try to answer whatever your question is.

  43. Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tibet has been part of China since 1792. Yes, for over two freaking centuries! You might not like it, but tough shit. And guess what, if a bunch of Chinese students came to the US and flung banners around Stanford demanding we give California back to Mexico, we'd probably tell them to get their butts back to China and mind their own business. Heck, we'd probably even detain a couple of them.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tibet has been part of China since 1792. Yes, for over two freaking centuries! You might not like it, but tough shit. And guess what, if a bunch of Chinese students came to the US and flung banners around Stanford demanding we give California back to Mexico, we'd probably tell them to get their butts back to China and mind their own business. Heck, we'd probably even detain a couple of them.

      1) At Stanford they'd probably get a few hundred locals supporting their idea.

      2) Some idiots would yell things at them about going back to China, some would defend them, and the government and 95% of the population would think of it as normal. People express dissent in the United States. It's no longer all that attention-grabbing.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're probably right. And I love your sig line!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      You are right on that particular example, but that's just because there is no danger of California seceding or being annexed by Mexico any time soon. Nobody cares about a few crackpots protesting over a lost cause. But what would happen if there is a massive campaign of protest, civil disobedience and occasional violence by a future Mexican majority say in southern California or Arizona or whatever, supported by a parallel government located in Mexico who claims the territory for itself, and who is covertly supported by other major powers?

      There is no comparison between the rights of free speech in USA and China but don't get too confident. The experience so far has been that the more USA feels threatened the tighter restrictions on speech and other rights become. After witnessing the over-reaction (secret military courts, secret indictments, NSA wiretapping of American citizens, the Patriot act etc) over a few deluded terrorists flying a plane into a building, what do you think would happen if there was a real threat to the territory of the USA comparable to the situation in Tibet? I think those hypothetical protesters at Stanford would probably be detained and questioned, just like in China

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    4. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, that's not a valid argument. Just because Tibet has been part of China doesn't mean it should be forever. This is about a people's right to self-determination. Comparing Tibet/China to California/Mexico makes me think you are really bad analogy guy.

    5. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If California wanted to go back to Mexico, what right would we have to stop them?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if a bunch of Irish people from the US returned to Ireland and demanded that the British leave; after all, they took control of Ireland in 1534! No, I'm not just talking about Northern Ireland: I'm talking about the whole country.

      This variety of argument in favor of continued Chinese occupation of Tibet is quite analogous to the arguments that were used to defend British occupation of what is today the Irish Republic until the 1922 revolution (after all, the English had effective control of Ireland from 1534 to 1922! And even the 1922 free state was only nominally independent).

      Anyway, last time I checked, there wasn't a lot of popular discontent about California's membership in the Union out in California, while Tibetans, on the other hand, aren't too crazy about being part of the PRC. (Northern Ireland is a far more complicated story: the majority population, descended from colonizers, are, like modern Californians, more than happy to stay part of Britain.)

      Anyway, you seem to have forgotten that Tibet was effectively independent between the fall of the Qing and the Communist Revolution. You are also forgetting that much of the time before 1912, Tibet was treated as an occupied nation, expected to send tribute etc., rather than as a Chinese province. (So, of course, was Mongolia, which is independent today.)

      You're more than welcome to spew PRC propaganda all you want; you can even start emitting the "the Dalai Lama is a dictator" rhetoric to which PRC sympathizers like to resort (apparently, a totalitarian oligarchy like the PRC is far preferable to a weak theocracy in their eyes). Myself, I think an independent Tibet could very well become a democratic Tibet - and that some day we could see a genuinely democratic China (after all, no country has seen more successful popular revolts in its history than China), and perhaps see a confederation of independent, democratic China, Tibet, and Mongolia (and maybe even Xinjiang and Taiwan, though that comment should be enough to get this page blocked by the Great Firewall).

    7. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by againjj · · Score: 1

      The Dalai Lama and company are asking for what amounts to a return to the status they had before PRC sent troops into the region. Basically, it was a suzerainty (a semi-autonomous self-ruling tributary). This is different from full separation from China. But "Free Tibet" is a better sound bite.

    8. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by againjj · · Score: 1

      Depends who "we" are. If it is the rest of the US, then that was settled during the civil war: try to secede from the union and you will be invaded.

    9. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      But might does not make right. The US was wrong to conquer the Confederacy in the US Civil War, and any nation is wrong to deny a popular separatist movement. No country is free that doesn't rest on the consent of the governed. For that to mean anything the consent must be voluntary, and may be withdrawn.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      True, on the other hand the states joined the union voluntarily (I think Alaska and Hawaii had over 80% support for statehood when they joined) and not all territories have become states. It's likely that if a territory voted heavily for independence there wouldn't be too much opposition to it (or at least at some point the opposition would fail).

    11. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but who would complain if they were asking us to give Texas back to Mexico? We've been waiting for an excuse to shuffle off that state since the Alamo.

    12. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by rtechie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Tibet has been part of China since 1792.

      Tibet was ruled by Imperial China from 1642 to 1913. At which point the Tibetan Dali Lama, with support for Western backers, declared independence from China due to China's demands for greater political control of Tibet (basically eliminating the Lamas). From 1914 to 1950 Tibet was a completely independent kingdom.

      Communist China, not being a representative government and not being a legitimate successor of the Ch'ing Dynasty, has no legitimate claims on Tibet, just as they had no legitimate claims on Korea. The invasion was just another communist power grab.

    13. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did this get moderated insightful? Are there really some dumb moderators out there who are taking the propaganda bait?

    14. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What you mean 'we,' white man?"
       

    15. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      if a bunch of Chinese students came to the US and flung banners around Stanford demanding we give California back to Mexico, we'd probably tell them to get their butts back to China and mind their own business.

      That would assume anyone in California would want to be part of Mexico - the US citizens don't want it, and the illegal aliens risked their lives to get out of Mexico!

    16. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      But might does not make right.

      Ignorance of history will not serve you well.

      Might does not make right. Might make reality.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    17. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      Who the hell granted Tibet, or anyone for that matter, the right to self-determination? The way I see it, rights are only granted by two bodies - God, if you believe in one, and the government. Since China obviously doesn't acknowledge any God from which Tibet might derive the right to self-determination from, and neither do they want to grant Tibet the right to self-determination, then I don't see how Tibet possibly gained that right.

      Just because your government happened to have promised you a bunch of rights, doesn't mean everyone else in the world is as fortunate.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    18. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by coaxial · · Score: 1

      The fact is, that the status of Tibet has always been much more muddy than either the PRC or the Free Tibet hippies want us to believe. Tibet has nominally been part of China, but with an incredible level autonomy, to the point of de facto independence.

      The other unsettling fact is that Tibet was a backward feudalistic theocracy. It's still greatly underdeveloped, but has improved economically under the PRC. Of course this doesn't given the PRC the right to shoot people.

      Also, to say that the PLA was "invited," to spread "democratic reforms" (Yes. Those are the exactly words I that English-language CCTV-9 used when talking about the history of Tibet.) is laughable.

    19. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think its even remotely possible we would let them? Do you remember the civil war?

    20. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Shag · · Score: 1

      Who the hell granted Tibet, or anyone for that matter, the right to self-determination?

      Well, since China is a member of the United Nations, the UN Charter, chapter XI, article 73 might apply.

      Members of the United Nations which have or assume responsibilities for the administration of territories whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government... accept as a sacred trust the obligation... to develop self-government, to take due account of the political aspirations of the peoples, and to assist them in the progressive development of their free political institutions, according to the particular circumstances of each territory and its peoples and their varying stages of advancement...

      That being said, the official list of non-self-governing territories is basically just a bunch of old colonies, since one of the things the UN is working on ending is colonialism, and doesn't include many things that would actually be found controversial.

      The Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization has more participants, I think, and then there are a whole lot of random autonomist and secessionist movements. The last group would contain the various sovereignty movements in Tibet, Hawaii, etc.

      Oh, and if you think this is all just a bunch of people whining about who's in charge, well, Armenia, East Timor, Estonia, Georgia, Latvia and Palau would beg to differ, since they were all non-self-governing in 1990 and have UN member status now. :)

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    21. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Empty+Threats · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember some kind of conflict about a state's right to leave the union, mid-19th century. Any ideas?

    22. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there was that precedent set in the civil war..

    23. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      If California wanted to go back to Mexico, what right would we have to stop them?

      Well, I'm mixed on wanting California in with the rest of the US, but when it comes down to it; we fought a freaking civil war that basically says that states have the rights to join the union, but they can't leave it. Many people are confused about the civil war and think it was about slavery. It was actually about states rights and what states could do. It turns out that the US doesn't allow its member states to leave regardless of their wishes.

      I can't really fault China applying the same logic to Tibet. Why isn't Texas its own republic? I've often wondered that of all the states in the civil war that they had the most political leverage to peacefully leave the Union and have their own republic. You find the occasional nut case that would like them to leave the US, but mostly they like the benefits of being a part of the US. I'm sure that China applies the same logic to Tibet as the US does to those that wants Texas to be its own republic.

    24. Re:Tibet rant, this needs to be said... by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Tibet has been part of China since 1792.

      Tibet was ruled by Imperial China from 1642 to 1913. At which point the Tibetan Dali Lama, with support for Western backers, declared independence from China due to China's demands for greater political control of Tibet (basically eliminating the Lamas). From 1914 to 1950 Tibet was a completely independent kingdom.

      Communist China, not being a representative government and not being a legitimate successor of the Ch'ing Dynasty, has no legitimate claims on Tibet, just as they had no legitimate claims on Korea. The invasion was just another communist power grab.

      Edited for clarity.

  44. Free Tibet? by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 1

    Should be in Chinese, not English!!!

  45. Wake up by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Then you've been sleeping with your head up your ass. They've been around a lot longer than the time since China was awarded the Olympics.

  46. Re:So many ways to make a point by maxume · · Score: 1

    As an arrogant jackass with a limited degree of self awareness, I am always dismayed by the arrogant jackasses in the news. It boggles the mind that they are more arrogant, bigger jackasses and less self aware than I am.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  47. Re:Rosa Parks!=Powderly// but he still has worth by Lucid+3ntr0py · · Score: 1

    Obviously comparing what he is doing to Rosa Parks is a horrible analogy that would give you low scores on the SAT verbal. However he is doing exactly what all people of privilege should do: use their 'gifted' place in society to help others. While most of us take our white male privilege for granted, he is openly willing to place his life on the line to share it with other people. Because he has the resources he is helping others accomplish their goals. And you mock him for this? You should have posted as a coward because that's is clearly what you are Whether or not he is correct concerning the stance and situation of Tibet with China, his goal is to allow freedom of expression through the reclamation of public spaces. How can you sit there and lambaste him when he is actually taking chances to do something he believes in- in a non-violent fashion? Besides this I won't comment on your terribly stated and obvious flamebait responses to his political ideals. I know this is /. and you obviously didn't RTFA but he isn't saying ANYTHING about the USA while he is in China. We need a mod tool to amend sigs to have "community sponsored 'special person' tag".

  48. Well... by chiefloko · · Score: 1

    He never learned the 11th commandment.
    "Don't Get Caught."

    Also it is always good to talk about what you are going to do...

  49. Re:idiot by icegreentea · · Score: 1

    The amount of dust in the air combined with the power of these lasers (typically 35-100mW) means that for people near the origin of the laser, it looks like there's a dot in the sky. The further away you get, the more it looks like a line.

  50. from a stupid motherfucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went to a a Communist country myself to help smuggle illegal documents (read Bibles).

    Many /.ers don't agree with religion or the faith but that isn't the point. I don't agree with a lot but the beauty of America and several other countries is the FREEDOM of religion and FREEDOM of expression.

    I got caught at the border. I have ~70 lbs of Bibles with me so it was very obvious they were for distribution. But I am an American and had a passport and they let me go. We know that they (Chinese and others) don't want to create an international incident. Most of the time the documents get confiscated but even if 50% of them get through, it is a 'win'.

    You can call me stupid. Many of us believe in what we are doing. We aren't blowing up bombs or shooting men/women/children. As for martyrdom, I was prepared to die for my faith. Many others were too. I won't kill for my faith. I don't think we are called to do that (anymore).

    Many people of many faiths are willing to die (or kill) for what they believe in. Others are willing to post to a website. And there are those in between.

    Someone brought up Rosa Parks. Unjust laws are not to be followed. She didn't die or get beaten. She got fined. In China, the stakes are higher.

    AC for obvious reasons.

  51. Re:idiot by chunk08 · · Score: 1

    Because of the way the beam interacts with air, you can see the beam of a green laser...

    --
    Do away with our corrupt tax code. Support the Fair Tax
  52. Re:Rosa Parks!=Powderly// but he still has worth by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    He is not helping anyone. He is an attention hound, nothing more. And, I suggest you learn to comprehend what you are reading because you have failed to understand what I wrote.

    He is not trying to reclaim public space. He is to claim public space as his own personal canvas which he can deface at will, with no regard for the rest of the public.

    I guess you forgot that there are OTHER people in the public, just like he did. Or is it that you believe you somehow have a greater right to public space than anyone else?

    You are obviously ignorant because you don't even know the meaning of the word "coward". You, however, are the epitome of "arrogant, self-righteous fool".

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  53. Re:Whoops "MEC - HO!"? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Puts a whole new ... spin... on MEC(H) warriors?

    I guess Justice is "on a roll". Amnesty might say, "But THAT's NOT JUSTICE!" And Redd Fox might say, "Just As Good..."

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  54. Re:idiot by richardellisjr · · Score: 1

    You can see a green laser's beam in day light not just what it illuminates. By pointing it at the star you show more clearly what your referencing better than pointing with your finger and saying the star to the left of those three stars. Using just your finger the person your pointing them out to has to look down your arm to see where your pointing, with a laser that's not necessary.

  55. Re:It's China. This is no surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [citation needed]

  56. "Technologist" by Newton+IV · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These "technologists" without any actual techincal knowlege are only popular in the decaying United States as it strips off manutacturing assets and sells them off to China. What replaces technology in the US are MBAs on one side, and these "artists"/ "technologists" on the other (in reality, they are socialists, political activists). In China, these "technologists" go to jail. Technologists WORK, they do spread their peacock tails.

  57. rice & cabbage & rice & cabbage & by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I lived in china 30 years ago during the "poor times". The staple wasnt the sugar+spicy rich "Chinese food" you see in American Chinese restaurants, but simple steamed rice and cabbage. Plus a seasonal vegetable and maybe pork on Sunday.

  58. Hehe by X.25 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Israelis shot foreign protestors on multiple occasions.

    How is China worse than that?

    (mind you, I don't like what either of them are doing, but that's another story)

  59. Re:Rosa Parks!=Powderly// but he still has worth by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

    Let's keep things in perspective here. The guy isn't spray-painting public property, he's just projecting laser-generated images onto buildings. Used often enough it might become a genuine nuisance, but as a tool for protest it is actually rather interesting.

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  60. Re:So many ways to make a point by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 2, Informative

    DDT isn't banned for Malaria control in Africa. It is banned outright in the US. And it is banned for agricultural uses worldwide under the Stockholm Convention, but there is no limitation on African nations using it for Malaria control. Also we didn't ban DDT because it got on our apples. We banned it because it killed off fish and bird populations. South Africa uses DDT although the environmental effects make it controversial.

    --
    It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

    -James Baldwin
  61. Re:Rosa Parks!=Powderly// but he still has worth by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it is just a nuisance to put up those laser generated images. And, when he blinds someone in the building with his laser generated images, I am sure that someone will consider being blind just a nuisance.

    Yes, let's keep things in perspective, because the risk of permanently damaging someone's vision is less important than getting one's message across

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  62. Re:It's China. This is no surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless of course you were arrested as a suspected terrorist for a reason or another and get shipped to Guantanamo, in which case you could be stuck for a few years.

  63. Re:Rosa Parks!=Powderly// but he still has worth by Omestes · · Score: 1

    To be honest, I was about to foe you for your first comment... But I think you have a point, even if you phrase it in the most inflammatory of ways. I am getting sick of people thinking of graffiti as art, much less activism. Its destructive and antisocial, and shouldn't be considered to have any merits, unless you only deface your own property. (I've gone so far as to report some acquaintances to the authorities for being "artists")

    Its another case of people thinking that their individual rights should always trump that of the society as a whole. Which is becoming more and more common these days.

    Yes, this graffiti is rather non-invasive, and doesn't damage much. But when your in a foreign country, you must follow their rules and mores, even if you don't like them. If you have the urge to "do the right thing", then you must be a trooper and accept the consequences of your actions, no matter what they are.

    Also, does this guy really think graffiti will change the world? This might be among the stupidest ideas I've heard in the last year or so.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  64. I assume this was an ill-conceived publicity stunt by hd2144 · · Score: 1

    He had to know that if he went to China and attempted to protest for free Tibet that he'd be arrested and deported. I doubt he'll get much mileage out of this though because the authorities will probably quietly put him on a plane for home and with no dramatic aspects, the whole incident will be ignored by the press.

  65. So much for freedom and openness of china by unity100 · · Score: 0, Troll

    and to think that chinese were trying to feed the bullshit before the opening of olympic games ...

    1. Re:So much for freedom and openness of china by unity100 · · Score: 1

      can the idiot who modded the above troll explain the evidence to the contrary of the statement contained therein ?

      everyone and their dog are being given mod points these days, and not only that, but they are merrily being fanatics about nationalism freely in an international platform.

      i urge anyone who is not out of the nationalism adolescence yet (many chinese, apparently) to go back to their local environment, get their satisfaction from 19th century nationalism, and THEN come out to internet and join the INTERnational community.

      get a load of that. coming from a turkish, who is supposed to be nationalist by tradition.

  66. Oh, BS by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Every other American protester so far has been, basically, taken to the airport and deported.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:Oh, BS by Caraig · · Score: 1

      Has there yet been word that Powderly's also been taken to the airport and deported?

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    2. Re:Oh, BS by davolfman · · Score: 1

      Most other American protesters don't go around in the wee hours of the morning with big honking high-powered lasers that can put words on a building from the other side of a river. Seriously if the pics of the New York demo are any indication it would have looked like he was laser-designating a target for attack.

    3. Re:Oh, BS by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Isn't painting targets usually done with invisible (IR) lasers? Doesn't strike me as a great idea to point a strong lightsource at a target when there are likely troops with guns around.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  67. sometimes prison instead of deportation by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Wired ran an article in 2005 about American jailed in China for pirating IP. Its kind of rough when your own government hates you too. (He should have been released about now)

    1. Re:sometimes prison instead of deportation by mi · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about these thieves? Good riddance, I say...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  68. Re:Whoops "SOYLENG GREEN IS MORE than... by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..."PEE-POLE"...

    But, I wonder about:

    "Injections leave the whole body intact and require participation of doctors. Organs can "be extracted in a speedier and more effective way than if the prisoner is shot," says Mark Allison, East Asia researcher at Amnesty International in Hong Kong. "We have gathered strong evidence suggesting the involvement of (Chinese) police, courts and hospitals in the organ trade.""

    Is the lethal cocktail an air injection? How do they remove the toxic lethal injection from any black market organs (of which they are accused of being in). Is the video showing the full event duration? I would imagine that IF there is organ harvesting going on, it might be better to sedate the condemned and dispatch them in a manner that doesn't pollute or derange the organs. Does an embolism by injection demolish the heart or a sedated person? Suffocating a conscious person might cause excessive adrenaline dumping.

    And, if a monkey's organs are in demand, what about human former-prisoner magic extract powder? Could alter the meaning of "Tiger Balm Medicated Ointment".... Unless the sign of the condemned IS the Tiger.

    But, as for hauling the condemned aboard the vehicle, it's probably more convenient to have a panicking, defecating dispatching occur on a ramp with a buttocks-located hole to avoid having to wash/decontaminate the Mobi-Cution Mobile. Plus, it's probably scary for the guards and staff to roam around in a $6 Million Dollar Man-like Death Probe containing the souls of the dispatched. Imagine 1700 souls a year: ~ 4 per day, and 4, in China and some other Asian locales is the same sound as "death", which is an unlucky number. Who'd want to roam the country in a tool symbolic of 4, execution, death? If executions rise, they might want to build a quantity not equal to nor divisible by nor a multiple of 4.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  69. Two words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hong Kong.

  70. Re:One doesn't need to be a member of the oppresse by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Slashdot ... always respecting freedom of expression.

    Well, except yours obviously. You don't agree with the commisar (these days the commissar is "Barack Hussein Obama"). Besides ... anti-China protests are dying. China doesn't listen and is generally too scary. So they get to massacre (hey so do the muslims, who even worship a massacring child-rapist).

    As the Barack said : let's just say the UN needs to put a stop to this !
    Sane individual : China has a veto to any UN decision
    Barack, and other progressives : that guy is not toeing the party line ! Everybody knows just how much we find it necessary to stop other socialists from killing indiscriminately ... I respectfully request you leave, sir, through the window. The top floor window. Yep you have to, Chinese tradition.
    Meanwhile some chinese guy : *pang*
    Some Tibettan : *gurgle* aargh

    (sorry but after the "oh no the police attempted to break the privacy of a child molester"-post I think this is most justified, besides the label "troll" just means you're opressing me ! whei !)

  71. Re:So many ways to make a point by Omestes · · Score: 1

    The Olympics aren't about you, and they aren't about your pet issue. There are plenty of other venues to air these protests. Disrespecting the athletes by marring the games with these protests is no better than what happened in Munich in 1972.

    Er... Nothing is more serious than sports? That is a rather silly take on things. The Olympics isn't anything special, its a massive corporate event, nothing more. I'm sorry, if someone could actually effect some degree of change, while interrupting a mere sporting event, I'm all for it. I generally hold human rights higher than throwing little disks, or swimming in a straight line really fast.

    And while I think this guy is a fool, comparing it to the Munich Olympics is rather daft. Who did he kill? Shining a little laser is generally thought to be less deadly than explosives. I'll also take lasers over fatalities and terrorism any day.

    I never understood why we hold sports so special, especially at a massive corporate event (with a dubious record itself). Yes, they're good athletes, but who cares? It isn't like they're doing anything that matters.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  72. Not a chance, bucko by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Now, please, STFU.

    Not going to happen, pal. Not with requests, pleading, negative moderation - you name it.

    And since you bring it up, you kind of left off that we kept a guy locked up for almost a half a year with no trial. For something he did in another country. Which happened to be legal there. A six month jail term for a thoughtcrime.

    All this whining about China being a totalitarian regime would be better spent on keeping our own noses clean in that regard.

    I'll bring up the Dmitry debacle every single chance I get, thank you very much. Six months in the can away from his young family - time lost forever.

    What do you want to bet James gets less time? I'll bet he does. Imagine that. Jump a plane to communist China with the express intention of protesting there, and getting less time than you would if you talk about a simple security problem in a software product in the good 'ol USA.

    This entire thing is shameful, and the only way to make sure it never happens again is to raise awareness. You do that by continually bringing it up.

    Which I did. And will continue to do.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Not a chance, bucko by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      I see you have no idea what a "thoughtcrime" is. Maybe you should try reading 1984. You don't even understand the theory of the case, or the effect the case had.

      In fact, your post shows a remarkable lack of knowledge of what he was charged with and how the legal system works.

      You are just proving yourself to be ignorant and uneducated. If you had any idea how absolutely ignorant your statements are, you would be embarrassed.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:Not a chance, bucko by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      Lots of ad hominem, zero substance. You expect anyone to take that dreck seriously?

      I'm not the one who should be embarrassed.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    3. Re:Not a chance, bucko by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's not ad hominem. It is the truth. You have proven your stupidity and incompetence.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:Not a chance, bucko by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Be niiiice.

      Every breath you take
      Every move you make
      Every bond you break
      Every step you take
      Ill be watching you

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Not a chance, bucko by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Aww, look, I have my very own stalker. This is why you don't have a significant other, at least one that is human and breathing.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    6. Re:Not a chance, bucko by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      This is why you don't have a significant other...

      Don't you know? You're it, sweetie pie.

      Oh, cant you seeeee
      You belong to me...

      Mocking and ridiculing trolls is my new hobby. Now give grandma a big kiss

      Love ya

      --
      What?
    7. Re:Not a chance, bucko by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Gee, I thought it was stalking and harrasing people because you are the troll.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    8. Re:Not a chance, bucko by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Well see? That's what you get for thinkin'. Now, do you really want me to go and link to all your flamebaiting yelling and hollering? I mean, it's not like it would be difficult or anything. I think you just play it up for laughs. The funny part is the people who take you seriously. You won't catch me doing that. Nevertheless there it is. So when you keep a civil tongue, you probably won't hear a word from me. If you want to keep messing around... well I'm always up for some cheap entertainment.

      --
      What?
    9. Re:Not a chance, bucko by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      yeah, sure. You are just another online stalker who is too much of a coward to do anything in real life.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    10. Re:Not a chance, bucko by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Cool sig. Thanks for the props! You're the greatest.

      Yeah, it's sad, believe me Missy
      When you're born to be a sissy
      Without the vim and verve
      But I could show my prowess
      Be a lion, not a mowess
      If I only had the nerve

      --
      What?
  73. Re:Whoops Combine Reagan and China: by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Funny

    and the political cartoonist: "It's not an execution chamber. It's a "Reincarnation ACCELERATION Chamber!"

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  74. Re:Rosa Parks!=Powderly// but he still has worth by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    I might be inflammatory, but people like this piss me off.

    What Powderly is doing might be "rather non-invasive", but the fact is he is using a 500mW green laser to do the projections.

    I am sure that someone who accidentally looks directly at the laser will consider it quite invasive. A laser of that power can have a permanent effect on someone eyesight, including total blindness in one or both eyes.

    That is what really pisses me off. This jackass is doing something that is dangerous to others and doesn't have the brains to realize it.

    Take those "throwies". Wasting batteries and LED, leaving them in public where they will eventually contaminate the soil and be litter, light polluting litter at that. Did anyone stop to think about where those batteries are going to end up? I will give you a clue: They will not be taken to be recycled. Want to bet they will end up in a land fill, or washed down a storm drain? And, where I live, many storm drains go directly to the sea.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  75. Re:One doesn't need to be a member of the oppresse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're as much of a liar as your parent poster.

  76. China needs more eye openers by widman · · Score: 1

    I would've shown people the Tiananmen Square protests and massacre instead of Tibet. There is a documentary about Tank Man where a group of university students are asked if they recognize the pictures and only one of a dozen has a clue, and doesn't dare to say it out loud. The masses are brainwashed even though the protests were in the millions so it is amazing educated twentysomethings don't have a clue.

  77. Re:Current whereabouts? But, his body could be by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    tossed, unconscious (if he' STILL alive for planning of forensics purposes) into the streets during another 5.3 quake when 500,000 people run out into the street and smear him to the pavement. Even an autopsy would be... "inconclusive" in "determination"...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  78. Re:idiot by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

    Did you read the thread? The AC was answering the query to what "arrest people who make signs with simple blinking LEDs" was about. Apparently people have been living under a rock and didn't hear about the incident where people got arrested for putting some decorative advertising about Boston.

    So yeah, this has nothing to do with people pointing lasers at airplanes. Reading comprehension ftw.

    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  79. They would be dead meat by shuying · · Score: 1

    if they dare to "protest" in Chinese. They'll be humiliated and beaten to death by Chinese people on the street. Average Chinese hate those who support Tibet or Taiwan independence. By "protesting" in English, these idiots are just playing a show, not to the Chinese, but to the western.

  80. Re:Rosa Parks!=Powderly// but he still has worth by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

    The images are made by a projector. A laser pointer is used to tell the computer where to draw. I doubt the laser is pointed at the building long enough to cause damage.

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  81. Re:idiot by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

    Please list the cases where people who tried to blind pilots were tried as terrorists.

    Here

    Also, please explain what said people should have been charged with after trying to crash commercial aircraft by blinding the pilots? How about 150 counts of attempted murder?

    How about 'being a bit of a dick, but not really causing any damage... or intending to'

    --
    "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  82. You're funny. by microbox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tibet has been part of China since 1792. Yes, for over two freaking centuries! You might not like it, but tough shit

    Tibetans don't think they've been part of China since 1792. They thought they were running Tibet. And they did, until they were invaded in 1959. You might not like it, but tough shit

    And guess what, if a bunch of Chinese students came to the US and flung banners around Stanford demanding we give California back to Mexico, we'd probably tell them to get their butts back to China and mind their own business.

    NONSENSE! We'd laugh. That's it. We'd laugh and laugh and laugh.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    1. Re:You're funny. by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      And guess what, if a bunch of Chinese students came to the US and flung banners around Stanford demanding we give California back to Mexico, we'd probably tell them to get their butts back to China and mind their own business.

      NONSENSE! We'd laugh. That's it. We'd laugh and laugh and laugh.

      And some of the less-than-friendly Stanford folks will no doubt tell them to go back to Cal, AKA UC Berkeley. Come to think of it, I'm pretty sure there are some protesters in Berkeley with the same messed-up disposition.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    2. Re:You're funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indians didn't like the damn U.S. government taking over their land either, and while native americans are technically also U.S. citizens, I'm pretty sure they were exactly happy to join the U.S. considering the fact that joining pretty much meant losing 95% of their land...or simple selling that 95% dirt cheap...or hell even better, simply having some U.S. lawyers argue in court that Indians don't believe in the concept of land ownership so all that land was simply "empty space" for white settlers to claim. I love how Americans have this "it's in the past; nothing we can do about it" attitude whenever racism or native americans are involved...Let me put to you this way: the communists haven't given indians blankets with smallpox on it. What? That was 400 years ago you say? Exactly, you just proved my argument.

    3. Re:You're funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "They thought they were running Tibet. And they
      > did, until they were invaded in 1959."

      No, they did not, Tibet was a theocracy.

      "Tibetans" did not run anything in Tibet, maybe the priests in charge did, but certainly not the people.

      Time to review some history books, seriously.

    4. Re:You're funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The difference is, the modern US is self-reflective about the issue and accepts that they did the wrong thing. The modern US also spends a lot of time, energy and resources to try to make things right.

      So how are these issues even remotely similar, when china:
      • busily revises history (the US does not)
      • sticks their boot in tibetans face (the US practices positive discrimination, where you get *extra* for being a native american)
      • lies audaciously about tibetan leadership (the US admits to lying to the native americans in the past, and funds academics and authors to write about that)
      • busily ties to eradicate and alienate tibetans in their own land (the US is scrambling to try to help native americans find their *own* way)

      I gotta say, China isn't self-reflective because it's impossible to stare in the mirror at a monster.

    5. Re:You're funny. by microbox · · Score: 1

      lol! You think I don't know what a theocracy is! At least the tibetans used to trust the people in charge. These days they are just bitter and afraid.

      --

      Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  83. Re:Rosa Parks!=Powderly// but he still has worth by Kagura · · Score: 1

    It's a powerful projector (read: light bulb), not a laser. He only uses a standard green laser to paint the images. Good luck blinding somebody 200 feet away with it by drawing a picture the size of a building. You're just being silly.

  84. Re:idiot by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

    There's no dot, but with even a low-powered green laser, you can see the beam reflecting off particles in the air. Imagine pointing at something with a hundred-meter finger.

    --
    "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  85. Re:It's China. This is no surprise. by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

    Actually, it occurs to me that foreigners are the best people to do the protesting, because we are relatively untouchable and can't be made to quietly disappear.

    --
    "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  86. Poking mud with sticks. by Geek-tan · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure where I'm going with this, but here's my shot on it. He went to another country to speak out against something that everyone knows is happening, and just as well everyone is rather passive about. You can have millions of people in a movement, and the majority of 'activists' could be doing nothing. However rather than doing like others and saying 'yeah I support this, I'm pro-tibet', instead of sitting around he went to China to one of the most publicized events to do something he probably knew was a risk. When you do graffiti, you know very well the risks you take before the first spray of paint or the first flash of light. It's nothing new, they just have a different take on it.

    Now pointing lasers in peoples' direction is a awfully rude thing to do. It is often detrimental to others' physical health, and is also plainly inpolite. What they do is take light and show it off on walls, usually office building where there aren't people working late in the evening, and display shows of light on the sides with artificial graffiti. Perhaps going there and showing off was just a retarded move, a wave in the air and nothing more. Perhaps at sacrifice of themselves it'll get the attention of more people, perhaps not.

    Either way, all I know is I'm rather bitter about it. I look up to this guy.

  87. If Al-Qaeda held a rally in the US.... by smitingpurpleemu · · Score: 0, Insightful

    They would get their heads ripped off.

    This douchebag had it coming, having the gall to foment terrorism during the Olympics. Being arrested is a merciful punishment for him, we could have just let a crowd beat the shit out of him while the cops look the other way.

    Free Tibet is a terrorist, separatist organization dedicated to establishing a Western protectorate over an "independent" Tibet so the Lamas can reinstitute theocracy, slavery, and poverty to the territory. They will never succeed, no matter how much the Western imperialists and the traitors who sold themselves to the West want it to be so.

    1. Re:If Al-Qaeda held a rally in the US.... by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      you make it sound like a bad thing.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    2. Re:If Al-Qaeda held a rally in the US.... by shuying · · Score: 1

      this is modded to negative for what? what the parent poster said is absolutely true. brainwashed american cannot see it though.

  88. Re:He's not dead yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, I've got to go to the Robinsons', they've lost nine today.

  89. Re:So many ways to make a point by linuxgurugamer · · Score: 1

    Ummmm, no. You should reread your history. In Munich, terrorists took captive, and then killed, Israeli athletes who where there to participate. That wasn't disrespect, that was murder. While these protests may, in your mind, "disrespect" the athletes, in no way are they similar because the athletes are not being harmed, molested, etc. These protests are against the host country, in Munich the attack was against a specific country's athletes. Quoting from Wikipedia: "The Games were marred by what has come to be known as the Munich massacre. On September 5 a group of eight Palestinian terrorists belonging to the Black September organization broke into the Olympic Village and took eleven Israeli athletes hostage in their apartment, killing two of the hostages in the apartment after fighting back; the subsequent standoff in the Olympic Village lasted for almost 18 hours." For more information, see the following link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_massacre

  90. Re:It's China. This is no surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that going to the US and looking dark-skinned could get you not thrown out, but straight into Gitmo...

  91. Re:Whoops "SOYLENG GREEN IS MORE than... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Oh, here we go with the despicable, positionless, cowardly and anonymous marking of "off-topic".

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  92. Re:Rosa Parks!=Powderly// but he still has worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're absolutely correct about the Youtube video posted above, where the laser is used by hand and a camera sensor detects what image should be sent to the projector to be displayed on the building. He's also working on a project now that uses a laser that rapidly moves in a "stencil" shape that traces out simple words or simple, one-color line-drawn pictures. The laser stencil has been done for more than a decade at the minimum, but maybe it's news because he's an amateur doing this, and also he is protesting.

  93. Re:Rosa Parks!=Powderly// but he still has worth by Lucid+3ntr0py · · Score: 1

    Explain to me how broadcasting light onto a building "defaces it" Or maybe you are talking about the sticky lights WHICH COME OFF. Seriously this isn't your gang tagger here.

    And in this instance, as in many instances of public space reclamation, the people have in fact lost their right to public space. Perhaps you should read up about the loss of common land . Or about the hundreds of thousands of people who were displaced to build the Olympic grounds.

    BTW, I'm pretty sure I understand the meaning definition of coward. However, I don't think I ever explicitly said anything about my character, e.g. I didn't mention my concepts of my own self-worth. Whatever you may have garned you must have infered. And since we already have an example of your stellar deduction skills , I'm sure we can make an educated guess about how good you are at inference.

  94. Re:One doesn't need to be a member of the oppresse by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

    Better off in what way? In Tibet the monks used to be able to live how they chose to live. Worship how, who, and what they chose to worship. The people who lived in Tibet lived as the wished. Then the Chinese came in. Now they are not free to live as they wish any more. If it was me no level of "civilization" is worth losing liberty. So in what way exactly is Tibet better?

  95. Re:idiot by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    Not a laser, but interesting trick nonetheless.

    So rolling around a projector to . . . project an image is a clever trick? So what's the projectors normal function then?

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  96. Tibet is actually better off under Chinese rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I just have to mention that I get tired of Americans who constantly lambaste China as the bad guys in the Tibet deal. The people of Tibet were treated as slaves by the ruling class before China stepped in.

    Don't believe me? Look it up before you attack me on this one.

    China is by no means perfect, but in the Tibet situation, they actually did end the medieval serfdom that plagued Tibet up until the 1950s.

    1. Re:Tibet is actually better off under Chinese rule by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      And that gives one country the right to invade another and claim it as their own and torture and kill anyone who disagrees? How Tibet used to be is a poor excuse for what happened. Who's to say that things wouldn't have changed on their own? China can't justify what they did. What you are saying is like the US invading Iraq and then claiming it as their own, attempting to control all the mosques, torturing and murdering any Muslims who disagree, all in the name of democracy. Tibet was far from perfect, but that's no excuse for what the Chinese did and are still doing today.

    2. Re:Tibet is actually better off under Chinese rule by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      What you are saying is like the US invading Iraq and then claiming it as their own, attempting to control all the mosques, torturing and murdering any Muslims who disagree, all in the name of democracy.

      Oh wait-

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    3. Re:Tibet is actually better off under Chinese rule by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      How much does this differ with the United States in Mexico or the Cherokee? England with South Africa? Spain with Mexico? No one will deny that the Chinese are particularly brutal in their methods, but what they did there is nothing new and nothing that has not been long forgotten with many "civilized" nations. Perhaps Württemberg should demand it's freedom from Germany since they were conquered by Brandenburg?

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
  97. Re:So many ways to make a point by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
    The Olympics aren't about you, and they aren't about your pet issue. There are plenty of other venues to air these protests. Disrespecting the athletes by marring the games with these protests is no better than what happened in Munich in 1972.

    Let me put it this way "The goal of Olympism is to place sport at the service of the harmonious development of man, with a view to promoting a peaceful society concerned with the preservation of human dignity." That's from the Olympic charter, in case you were wondering. In this text the personal goals of the competing athletes are not thought to be the overriding concern for the Olympic games.

  98. Re:idiot by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Blinding a pilot on landing approach is not intending to cause any damage? What exactly do you think will happen if you blind a pilot landing a plane?

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  99. Re:idiot by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's interesting. The technology has been around for years. And yet, how often have you *you* seen a protest video projected onto the outside of a Chinese Consulate?

    If the owners of the building disagree, do they have any legal grounds to prevent this?

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  100. Two old ladies by MrKaos · · Score: 1
    Well if China can sentence two old ladies to hard labour I'd imagine they could come up with something for this guy.

    How did China even get the Olympics, it just proves that the ideals of the Olympic games have been trumped by vapid consumerism and it only has teeth when it is deciding where to host a new games.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  101. Impeach Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try wearing an "Impeach Bush" t-shirt and wander around Washington to contrast what happens in a "democratic" country.

  102. Re:One doesn't need to be a member of the oppresse by alexborges · · Score: 1

    in. Now they are not free to live as they wish any more. If it was me no level of "civilization" is worth losing liberty. So in what way exactly is Tibet better?

    I agree with you.

    Civilization, on the other hand, does not: it depends on repression heavily.

    If it was up to me, they wouldnt have gotten me off the trees with any kind of treat whatsoever, or even leave the sea.

    --
    NO SIG
  103. What the hell is "China"? by The+Breeze · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Strictly speaking, if you're talking about continuity of government, the "Chinese Government" is a robust democracy in Taiwan - they are the heirs to the traditional Chinese government. The murderous thugs ruling mainland China don't have a pedigree going back past 1949.

    I've always wondered if there would have been a war in 1997 if England had said, "Ok...our 100 year lease on Hong Kong is up. Time to give Hong Kong back to China...here you go, TAIWAN!"\

    1. Re:What the hell is "China"? by Sinbios · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah? Well the "heirs" you speak of didn't exactly inherit the control of China from the Qing dynasty peacefully. If you want to talk about murderous thugs, those heirs of yours don't have a pedigree going back past October 10th, 1911. And those Qing guys didn't have a pedigree going back past 1644. There's no such thing as continuity of government in China.

      I've always wondered if there would have been a war in 1997 if England had said, "Ok...our 100 year lease on Hong Kong is up. Time to give Hong Kong back to China...here you go, TAIWAN!"

      Seeing how it was the Qing government who signed the lease on Hong Kong, and since the KMT in Taiwan overthrew the Qing government (just like how the communists, in turn, overthrew them!), by your argument those murderous thugs have zero legitimate claim on Hong Kong. I guess if you really wanted to give it back to the "heirs" of the Qing dynasty, you'd best be looking to the Manchus in northern China.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    2. Re:What the hell is "China"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No argument here - never said they were very nice - but I did think that the gang led by Chiang Kai-Shek had done something to at least pay lip service to the idea of continuity of government. And, I think - although am not sure - that Tibet would have been better off under the Chiang Kai-Shek government than under the Chi-coms.

      I guess the moral of the story is that China hasn't been very lucky in the governance department for the past century or so.

    3. Re:What the hell is "China"? by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      Strictly speaking, if you're talking about continuity of government, the "Chinese Government" is a robust democracy in Taiwan - they are the heirs to the traditional Chinese government.

      Strictly speaking, the "Chinese government" in Taiwan only started resembling a democracy in 1980s. Before that it was a dictatorship famous for murdering dissidents.

      The Taiwanese government started opening up slightly earlier than Mainland China. It's just that it's easier to do so with 20 million ethnically homogeneous people than it is to do with 1300 million ethnically diverse people.

  104. Just another moron/jackass/mouthpiece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free Tibet to what? Since when Tibetans were free under the religious ruling class. It's a worst form of dictatorship/autocracies/aristocracies morph into one. Think they are peaceful, just check how they slaughter other monks from other branches. This info is readily available on the web.
    He will be questioned for couple hours then kicked out of country. That will be it.

  105. Tibet is much better now than ever. Just go visit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just have to mention that I get tired of Americans who constantly lambaste China as the bad guys in the Tibet deal. The people of Tibet were treated as slaves by the ruling class before China stepped in.

    Don't believe me? Look it up before you attack me on this one.

  106. Re:idiot by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    You're seriously comparing an LED sign to pouring blood on someone's porch?

  107. You are Missing the Point by Safiire+Arrowny · · Score: 1

    Telling China what to do by saying, "I want you to free Tibet", is not even the point. He's trying to bring attention to this situation so more people look into the relationship between Tibet and China, and he obviously believes people will agree with him.

    This is the point of, for instance, Political Graffiti. I know absolutely nothing about what in the hell this Free Tibet shit is about, but perhaps now I will look into it. This is the point.

  108. Today's editorial on China Youth Daily by tresriogrande · · Score: 1

    China Youth Daily is a communist mouth piece owned by the communist party. If you read the editorials, you will see for yourself, some of the comments on here are so far off from reality. Here is the google translation: http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2F2008.china.com%2Fzh_cn%2Fsy%2Fpl%2F11068961%2F20080821%2F15042887.html&hl=en&ie=UTF8&sl=zh-CN&tl=en People, you are supposed to be the smart bunch.

  109. Re:So many ways to make a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, they're good athletes, but who cares?

    One billion Chinese and their supreme leaders care. It is as though their sovereignty, national pride, and self esteem are all at stake here and will diminish because of some foreigner protesting.

    China appears to keep things under control by doing what it does best - protesters are swiftly deported and silenced, disagreeable information blocked and rights trampled to pave way in the name of national good. Before you know it, China is showing the world a true form of this new superpower. This Olympics does belong in the ranks of Munich.

  110. satire versus trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't think the parent was very funny, but it sounds more like satire/off-topic than trolling.
    I'd rather spend my mod points on something interesting or something worth cleaning out.

  111. Re:idiot by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

    Merely pointing out the stupidity of the parent's post - clearly, cleaning up pigs blood is more difficult then remove these LED signs - but the connection is the same type of connection in the parent's point - tenuous at best, and pointless because it detracts from the truth and is intended to deceive. See what I did there now?

  112. Re:It's China. This is no surprise. by layer3switch · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XCZJD3qeUI

    Oh yeah, your claim just got debunked.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  113. Why don't Americans mind their own business? by melted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    GWB goes over there and raises a stink about "human rights", now this clown, too. You're not going to change anyone's mind over there. They're doing this on purpose, economic freedoms are given to the Chinese people first, political will follow. Compared to 4 year cycle of US politics, they think in a span of 50 years or so - way too long an attention span for an average US politician to be able to muster.

    It's not like there are no problems here at home, either. Infrastructure is crumbling, economy is in the toilet, military budget is astronomical, high schools put out idiots who need remedial courses to even be able to study further, space program is lagging behind, middle class is being raped with taxes, etc, etc.

    It sure as heck is much easier to just bash foreign governments for their perceived shortcomings. Fixing problems here would actually require a brain and quite a bit of work.

    1. Re:Why don't Americans mind their own business? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      economic freedoms are given to the Chinese people first, political will follow.

      Perhaps that's why they they want to keep Tibet so badly. They need a really high place to stand so they can see those political freedoms comming waaaaaay off in the distance there.

  114. Ugly by Godji · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, first of all stop saying detained and call it by its name: arrested. Second, what the hell was this guy doing in China? He should've seen it coming.

  115. Re:It's China. This is no surprise. by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

    Um... That's why I said 'relatively', and you supported my claim that they 'can't be made to quietly disappear'

    People notice when things like this happen. You can be sure that the citizens' executions don't make it onto YouTube.

    --
    "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  116. Re:It's China. This is no surprise. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

    Not really. Just find your ass in an alley with your though cut and your wallet gone. You just went from political execution to random mugging.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  117. Re:It's China. This is no surprise. by layer3switch · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asE7CdX1t6c

    Once again, your claim just got debunked... once more.

    FYI, I never argued against the point of foreigners disappearing quietly. That would be idiotic knowing I just posted a YouTube video of it.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  118. Re:So many ways to make a point by Omestes · · Score: 1

    I agree with you about the Chinese mentality towards these games. They view them very much as an international statement about their new legitimacy on the international scene.

    The problem I have is that many people outside of China has voice much the same opinion, that these are sports, and are thus serious business. Much more serious than, say, Darfur or human rights violations. I'm questioning the outsiders view, more than the Chinese.

    I don't understand why people take sports seriously, much less hold them higher than other, obviously more important, issues.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  119. Re:It's China. This is no surprise. by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

    So you found two instances disproving the stated weaker (based on the word 'relatively') point, but which directly and strongly enforce the main point of my statement?

    Debunk: to expose the sham or falseness of <debunk a legend>

    --
    "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  120. Re:but they make ipods by DeVilla · · Score: 1
    That's why I liked how Heston handled the Cop Killer thing. He didn't like the lyrics, so he went into an stockholders meeting for the label and just read them to the audience. It made them squirm. Complain about censorship all you want, but making them heard what they were selling was more than they could handle. And they hated him for making them have to recognize that.

    That was just for harsh lyrics. Things in the world might change a bit if companies had to publish the despicable things they participate in just to pad the bottom line. Perhaps requiring companies to publish things they do in other counties that they can't do at home would be worth something.

  121. Re:but they make ipods by spun · · Score: 1

    But didn't you know? Limitation of liability includes not having to feel liable. Why, if corporations had to live up to the moral standards of regular people, nothing would get done. What are you, some kind of Luddite? :/

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton