Slashdot Mirror


Rosetta Disk Designed For 2,000 Years Archive

Hugh Pickens writes "Kevin Kelly has an interesting post about an archive designed with an estimated lifespan of 2,000 -10,000 years to serve future generations as a modern Rosetta Stone. The Rosetta disk contains analog 'human-readable' scans of scripts, text, and diagrams using nickel deposited on an etched silicon disk and includes 15,000 microetched pages of language documentation in 1,500 different languages, including versions of Genesis 1-3, a universal list of the words common for each language, and pronunciation guides. Produced by the Long Now Foundation, the plan is to replicate the disk promiscuously and distribute them around the world in nondescript locations so at least one will survive their 2,000-year lifespan. 'This is one of the most fascinating objects on earth,' says Oliver Wilke. 'If we found one of these things 2,000 years ago, with all the languages of the time, it would be among our most priceless artifacts. I feel a high responsibility for preserving it for future generations.'"

115 of 659 comments (clear)

  1. Well that's embarassing by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Among the 13,500 scanned pages are 1,500 different language versions of Genesis 1-3

    I'm sure they picked bible passages because the translations were mostly done for them already but I'm a little embarassed that future generations are going to think how amazingly superstitious we were. I mean, Genesis 2 alone...

    Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.

    They're going to think we were cuckoo!

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Well that's embarassing by JohnHegarty · · Score: 4, Funny

      With the way things are going very soon the Bible will be the only book that's out of copyright....

    2. Re:Well that's embarassing by vidarh · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, "we" (as in mankind as a whole) clearly are amazingly superstitious.

      More importantly, though, it's a text that has a reasonable chance of surviving and being updated to remain understandable. Even if religion should start declining rapidly, it's played such a significant role in history and the text has been spread so widely that it's one of very few works I'd be willing to bet will exist in a "modern" translation 2000 years from now - a work that is currently considered a sacred text by more than half of the worlds population (both christians, muslims and jews) has a good shot at longevity.

      What other texts do we have that has a similar chance of surviving? There are a lot of texts that are revered to some extent, but few or none that so many people have copies of, and even fewer currently widespread works that the next generation or the one after that will still have many copies of.

    3. Re:Well that's embarassing by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Funny

      To give an idea of how embarrassing this will be, think of it like this: Bible-thumpers are the old Trekkies.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    4. Re:Well that's embarassing by inzy · · Score: 5, Funny

      What other texts do we have that has a similar chance of surviving? There are a lot of texts that are revered to some extent

      the man pages for emacs?

    5. Re:Well that's embarassing by Sophia+Ricci · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're going to think we were cuckoo!

      If the future generations have not heard this already from some other source, chances are they have developed new language and won't make head or tail out of it.

    6. Re:Well that's embarassing by uhfdude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was going to say pretty much the same thing. What bothers me is how prominent religion is in American society - leaders doing their thing in the name of God, large groups of fundamentalist christian believers picketing funerals of people they deem unworthy... I'm sure many of you can think of lots of examples. I think it's time that religions be demoted to the realm of mythology where they belong. I mean, come on, it's not gospel. (Can't take credit, stole that gospel bit from comedian Dara O'Briain)

    7. Re:Well that's embarassing by Notquitecajun · · Score: 5, Informative

      No no NO. The freaks at Westboro are NOT a "large group," and represent ONLY themselves. If you're going to complain about the excesses of religion, find a different example.

    8. Re:Well that's embarassing by Bazman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Something else that's been massively translated:

      http://www.unhchr.ch/udhr/

      I can't find a list of contents for the Rosetta Disk but hopefully it has this in bigger print than Genesis...

    9. Re:Well that's embarassing by Bazman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ooh I just read down a bit further and discovered that yay, it does have it.

    10. Re:Well that's embarassing by introspekt.i · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, vi.

    11. Re:Well that's embarassing by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's a ridiculous comparison. The bible is fictional.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    12. Re:Well that's embarassing by dontPanik · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well a lot of what we have from ancient Greek culture is religous material, and that shit is wack!
      Even so, no one goes around saying the Greeks were idiots.

      --
      "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
    13. Re:Well that's embarassing by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree, it's a shame they had to fill it with it with mythology, instead of something more useful like some sort of documentation of our current scientific knowledge, information about actual significant historical events, or something.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    14. Re:Well that's embarassing by fl!ptop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What bothers me is how prominent religion is in American society - leaders doing their thing in the name of God

      actually, that's one thing that makes America great. the realization that your civil rights are given to you by your creator (be it God, Yahweh, or whomever) leads to understanding that no mortal man can (rightly) take those rights away.

      --
      When you recognize love in another and realize how precious it is, everything else seems so insignificant.
    15. Re:Well that's embarassing by TedRiot · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ed is the standard text editor.

    16. Re:Well that's embarassing by KillerBob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because the bible is already translated, and because the bible is more likely to survive 2000 years.

      Assume that none of the 1500 languages used still exist 2,000 years from now. It's a fairly safe bet that if there's still humans, there's still going to be religion. And as annoying as it is to admit for some people, Christianity is likely to be one of those religions that survives. That'll give them a translation key for 1,500 languages, which can in turn be used to translate the rest of the information contained on the plates.

      A far more likely situation, though, is that several of the languages used will still be in use. Or at least, still readable. That's why the Rosetta stone was so useful: the other two languages on the stone were still known, allowing scholars to realize that they said the same thing and that it was likely that the third, Heiroglyphs, said the same thing. The larger the sample size you have, the better the chance that it'll be useful. Again, however, having the biblical passages present serves as a translation key for the rest of the information contained on the plates. 1,500 pages out of 15,000 isn't that much.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    17. Re:Well that's embarassing by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2

      actually, that's one thing that makes America great. the realization that your civil rights are given to you by your creator (be it God, Yahweh, or whomever) leads to understanding that no mortal man can (rightly) take those rights away.

      So there's really no point in resisting when they try to anyway, is there?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    18. Re:Well that's embarassing by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you are allowing your extreme atheism to get in the way of science?

      Why use Genesis 1-3 it is one of those stories that have been translated so many times and is ingrained in the culture of 3/4 of the world, across 3 Major religions, and which as already lasted for thousands - tens of thousands of years. Chances are that some translation of the story will survive and when people decode the disk they will have a common story to translate and if there are gaps in the translated languge they can use their knowledge of the story to fill it in and get a better understanding of the language. Very little documents are so widely known as Genesis. It is not about religion or fath in the message, it is about science of sending information to the future that can be decoded.

      If we send the DVDs of StarWars and Startrek it would be equally confusing.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    19. Re:Well that's embarassing by kungfugleek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you sure it's the prominence of religion, and not the prominence of pig-headedness masquerading as religion?

    20. Re:Well that's embarassing by Kent+Recal · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem, as usual, is in the presentation bias.
      I got myself a copy of this rosetta thing and well, see for yourself:

      .
      ./1111_README.1ST
      ./1111_README.1ST/the_bible_-_a_popes_view.avi
      ./bible
      ./bible/hot_jesus_action.avi
      ./bible/maria_sweaty_xxx.wmv
      ./bible/12_hot_studs_uncensored.avi
      ./bible2-the-moses-incident
      ./bible2-the-moses-incident/gawds-bb2mi-TS-PROPER.rar
      ./bible2-the-moses-incident/gawds-bb2mi-TS-PROPER.r00
      ./bible2-the-moses-incident/gawds-bb2mi-TS-PROPER.r01
      ./bible2-the-moses-incident/gawds-bb2mi-TS-PROPER.r02
      ./bible2-the-moses-incident/gawds-bb2mi-TS-PROPER.r03
      ..
      ./bible2-the-moses-incident/gawds-bb2mi-TS-PROPER.r44
      ./TEH_BIBLE_DIRECTORS_CUT--GAWDS-SCREENER-DVDR-XVID
      ./TEH_BIBLE_DIRECTORS_CUT/gawds-bdc-dvdrip_1.avi
      ./TEH_BIBLE_DIRECTORS_CUT/gawds-bdc-dvdrip_2.avi
       
      ( 1417 lines snipped )
       
      ./.attic
      ./.attic/misc
      ./.attic/misc/old
      ./.attic/misc/old/test
      ./.attic/misc/old/test/deutsch
      ./.attic/misc/old/test/deutsch/human_rihgts.doc~

      Sad.

    21. Re:Well that's embarassing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Might be close. Hard to date such old stuff, but Homer is usually dated from 9th to 6th century BCE, while Genesis was put together around the Babylonian Captivity (5th-4th Century BCE). Their sources are certainly older, as Genesis incorporates material from the Babylonian creation stories as well as older stories but not likely older than 10th century BCE, while Homer is based on oral sources dated at least from the 12th century BCE.

      Homer is at least as old as the Bible, and is a lot more neutral, and likely to survive for a long time yet.

    22. Re:Well that's embarassing by kabocox · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's a ridiculous comparison. The bible is fictional.

      Oh if only it mainly was. The problem is that there is far too much factual info in there and well the fictional/scifi elements get drowned out. I've tried to explain to my wife that of course there are huge chucks of the bible that are very factual. Why? The Jews used it as their history/moral/everything a person needed to know book and it was fairly up to date at the time. So of course all the cities/villages mentioned are likely to have actually existed. I try to explain to her its like if some one or family had been keeping a family history since the founding of the US, well in 2000 in the future they could use that family history to locate the cities/towns that said family lived. That part could be mostly factual, but that still doesn't mean everything in the book is factual. You could have a fictional story happen in a realistic setting and that doesn't make the story factual. Though 2000 years latter, if they find the setting, they may assume parts/pieces of the story are true.

    23. Re:Well that's embarassing by CrackedButter · · Score: 4, Funny

      "All power to the engines". - Come on, brush up on your Futurama!

    24. Re:Well that's embarassing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Genesis 1-3... already lasted for thousands - tens of thousands of years.

      Genesis is only about three thousand years old, tops, afaik... I think the earliest recorded writing (The Epic of Gilgamesh) is about 4-5k years old. No idea where you got this 'tens of thousands' from.

    25. Re:Well that's embarassing by nschubach · · Score: 2

      It would be like hieroglyphs to them and they'd assume we all worshiped some crazy invisible sky god.

      It's things like this that make me wonder if we actually understand the past or are reading one viewpoint.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    26. Re:Well that's embarassing by the_B0fh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you are allowing your extreme atheism to get in the way of science?

      Why use Genesis 1-3 it is one of those stories that have been translated so many times and is ingrained in the culture of 3/4 of the world, across 3 Major religions, and which as already lasted for thousands - tens of thousands of years. Chances are that some translation of the story will survive and when people decode the disk they will have a common story to translate and if there are gaps in the translated languge they can use their knowledge of the story to fill it in and get a better understanding of the language. Very little documents are so widely known as Genesis. It is not about religion or fath in the message, it is about science of sending information to the future that can be decoded.

      If we send the DVDs of StarWars and Startrek it would be equally confusing.

      When you say 3/4 of the world, do you mean land mass, or people? Wait, you said culture. I'd guess people. Given that China has 1.3 Billion people, and India has 1 Billion, and Korea/Japan has a bunch more people, and Indonesia is the world biggest muslim country, and hmm... all the near east countries are muslims too, another, what, 1 billion? I just counted half the world's population that does not have Christianity as its base.

      As for the tens of thousands of years - even your own bishops say your religion is only 4+ thousand years old - WTF are you smoking?

      Damned religious fundie.

      Hey, I know, why not put a copy of the FSM's teachings in there? Hey, hey, I know, Buddha's teachings, yeah, I like Buddhism, lets put that in there. After all, there's nothing that shows more on the cycle of life than us blowing ourselves up, and having another group build up a new civilization (and then blow themselves up, etc etc).

    27. Re:Well that's embarassing by SilverJets · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's a ridiculous comparison. The bible is fictional.

      Oh if only it mainly was. The problem is that there is far too much factual info in there and well the fictional/scifi elements get drowned out. I've tried to explain to my wife that of course there are huge chucks of the bible that are very factual.

      Given everything that is written in the bible, I would hardly describe the inclusion of the names of some towns and cities "huge chunks that are very factual". Everything else is just fantasy.

    28. Re:Well that's embarassing by clintp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up.

      Stories persist whether true or false and represent the oldest extant (nearly complete) texts in many languages: Genesis, the Epic of Gilgamesh, The Illiad, Beowulf, the Vedas, and the Book of the Dead to name a few.

      Many modern humans will know of, part of, or all of at least one of these stories.

      Whereas more practical texts have survived, but knowledge of them isn't as widespread. Not a lot of people can recite goat inventory from Ur or lists of Old Kingdom Egyptian rulers.

      --
      Get off my lawn.
    29. Re:Well that's embarassing by balbord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      dd
      x

      --
      "If I have been able to see so far, It is because I went out and bought a damn binoculars" - Ze da Esquina
    30. Re:Well that's embarassing by dubl-u · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If those people choose what economists call "Nash efficiency" as an ideology (what atheists do), improving themselves without conscious regard to others

      That's embarrassingly wrong. Do you know any actual atheists?

      Let's take the classic ur-atheist, the physical scientist. You're suggesting all of those people are in it for themselves? Because the ones I know could do a lot better than a post-doc's wage. The ones I've asked do it because they want to be involved in an enterprise for the ages. They want to learn and contribute that learning to human understanding. They want to teach, sharing knowledge with young minds. They are atheists, but they are not so much in it for the bucks.

      Personally, I'm an atheist and very community-minded. Why? Well really, that's who I am. But if you want me to rationalize it, I'm glad to say that I value life and hope and love, and I want to maximize those things not just for myself, but for everybody, and for the ages. Yes, it's all dust eventually, but so what? Every extra moment of beauty, of joy, of wonder that we make is that much better a universe.

    31. Re:Well that's embarassing by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Everything we know today developed in a society that was utterly permeated by the bible in every nook and cranny.

      That's pretty arrogant. Also very wrong.

      Plenty of what we know today came from the ancient Greeks, who predated the bible. And there are plenty of nooks in which the bible is not used -- despite your attempts to turn this country into a stealth theocracy, most of us still embrace the separation of church and state, and other religions do exist.

      Everything you are - your clothes, your food (clothes don't grow in the stores), your car, your very thoughts come from others, with a tiny drop of personal impact from yourself.

      I don't own a car, first of all.

      And I take responsibility for all of it, whatever my own influence is. I am aware enough to be able to make my own choices -- so if these things come from others, they come with my endorsement.

      If those people choose what economists call "Nash efficiency" as an ideology (what atheists do),

      It would help if you cited something specific -- all I can find on Nash Efficiency tells me it's a chunk of math, not an ideology.

      improving themselves without conscious regard to others (e.g. "piracy is not a crime")

      And as an atheist, I can tell you that you're dead wrong about that. What gave you the idea that atheists don't have conscious regard to others?

      For that matter, ask a pirate -- I don't think any will try to say it's not a crime. They might occasionally remind you that it's not piracy -- piracy is armed robbery on the high seas; this is copyright infringement -- and they might say that it's not immoral, or that copyright law needs to change.

      But I don't think anyone will claim it isn't a crime.

      However, if everyone around you (example ... your current employer and any other possible employer) behaved atheistically, improving primarily themselves without regard to others, you'd be out of a job,

      Unlikely. My current employer likes me as a person, and has more work than he can do himself, so there is plenty that I can do.

      What part of that requires belief in a mythical sky-god?

      (even the food would disappear from the local supermarket, as it will be more in the personal intrest of the owner to simply keep it himself). You'd die (even if you are said owner, because deliveries would stop).

      Disregarding for the moment your misguided assumptions about atheism, consider that owner -- as you said, deliveries would stop.

      So, even if the owner was the most horrible person imaginable, and didn't care at all about anyone but himself, he would keep selling food to you, because that way, deliveries continue -- and also, that way, he gets money to spend on some things he wants other than food.

      Before the vandals and visigoths started their massive immigration into the Roman Empire, life expectancy for a slave was around 60 years (this is 300-400 B.C. we're talking about). Once Rome fell, life expectancy of a king dropped to 30 years, and most people didn't live long enough to have children (life expectancy : about 10-15 years). That's what "bread and games" ultimately achieved.

      What's your evidence that "bread and games" was responsible for this, assuming the rest of your statistics are accurate?

      If you follow the Christian credo, and give to others (that are preferentially also Christians) without expecting anything in return,

      If you do that, you're a hypocrite -- you're giving to others and expecting faith in return.

      Why are they preferentially also Christians?

      And for what it's worth, what was included on the Rosetta Disk was the first few chapters of Genesis, which have absolutely nothing to do with "giving to others"

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    32. Re:Well that's embarassing by clonan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, with the exception of specific conversations between two people, the bible has proven to be almost perfectly accurate.

      Archeology, third party histories and other evidence pretty much always proves that the larger events and geographies are accurate.

      -There are egyptian writtings that confirm the plagues.
      -Sodom and Gramorrah have been found and were both destroyed at the same time, having burnt down.
      -There is more third party documentation as to the life and crusifiction of Christ than there is for the life and death of Julius Ceaser.
      -Paul's exploits were well documented
      -the dead sea scrolls showend minimal historical drift in the text

      The list goes on and on.

      There are very few sections of the bible that are presented as fact when they may be religious allegory..the genesis story and Revelation are the big ones. Most other places the extraordinary occurances are events that DO happen (ie the plagues of Egypt) or are presented in dreams. But what I find so interesting about Genesis is that it actually does follow our current understanding of the creation of the universe, our solar system and the earth-moon system. I could easily beleive that a stone age man "receiving" an image of how the universe began would come up with a Genisis story from what he saw.

      The astonding accuracy is a result of the honor placed on the document. Most of the old testement was kept in the Ark and once every 49 years it was taken out and read in public then returned to the Ark until about 60 AD. This archiving maintained the original text without historical drift. Once the new testament was cannonized in the 4th century, it was maintained equally zealously. Monks studies for years to be allowed to hand copy the bible and do so with such expertise that it was impossible to tell the original from the copy.

      The reason conversations are necessarily excluded for the statment of accuracy is simply because there is usually no way to confirm or deny them. We only have Moses's word that a bush appeared to be on fire and talked with him. However we can reasonably assume that the text in the bible is the same text that was written 1,800 years ago.

      You really should actually read the bible. It is a remarkably good read and provides real insight into that part of history, human psycology not to mention religious theory.

    33. Re:Well that's embarassing by dubl-u · · Score: 4, Informative

      You go on to admit that atheism is in fact in disagreement with you

      No. No, I don't.

      What I'm "admitting" is that your (erroneous) expectations don't match my actual views. Dreaming your dreams of a Santa Claus in the sky, the impermanence of the physical world scares you.

      It does not scare me. That nothing lasts takes none of the fun out of making something good. If anything, it makes it more poignant, more beautiful. If you don't believe me, go experience some of the art of people like Andy Goldsworthy, who make some works intentionally impermanent.

      Again we will see less moral incentive determining their actions. The cracks will be wider.

      This is a fine argument from theory, with no actual data. You, some random guy, on the Internet, "guarantee" your argument. So?

      History shows that you are wrong. Buddhism started out as a godless venture, accepting the eternal flux we live in, and the Zen Buddhists carry that atheism through today. Have they turned evil? Go meet some and let me know what you think, but I'd say they're doing fine.

      Science also suggests you are wrong. At least some and probably much of the human moral sense is provably an innate biological function. For readable introductions, see "Good Natured" by Franz de Waal or "Demonic Males" by Richard Wrangham. And in the decade since those books came out, there's been a heap of good experimental and fMRI observational work, reinforcing the biological basis of community-oriented behavior. And let's not forget "The Forest People," showing that non-Christan societies can develop strong community-oriented behavior.

      Your theory that the only source of morality is Christian memes is provably false. And the data about crime and atheism proves the opposite of your notion as well. Atheists are circa 10% of America's population, are circa 0.2% of the prison population. Japan, the least Christian country in the G8, has the lowest violent crime rate. America, the most Christian country, has the highest.

      You're really just repeating and embroidering the kind of ignorant statements that Christians make about atheists all the time.

    34. Re:Well that's embarassing by Cookie3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Christianity + Islam = ~3-4 billion people, which is 50-66% of the world, depending on how (and who) you're counting. Additionally, due to missionary work, it's likely that 3/4ths of the world has at least *heard* the Abrahamic stories, even if they discard them as being incongruous with their own beliefs.

      --
      present day... present time... hahahaha...
  2. Should have used Harry Potter... by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's contemporary, and already translated into almost every language on Earth.

    OTOH The Bible is about the only book that wouldn't have earned them a DMCA slapdown affidavit.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by maztuhblastah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OTOH The Bible is about the only book that wouldn't have earned them a DMCA slapdown affidavit.

      I know you said that partly in jest, but I actually got a little depressed when I gave it some thought. Think of what we could have included: the music that influenced generations, films that invoke anger, sadness, joy, books that literally changed the way that the world thought -- and not one bit of it can be reproduced, all because some assholes wanted to collect a check from an animated mouse.
       
       

      We fucked up somewhere.

    2. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...and how would that show we are not superstitious? Can you imagine what sort of picture a future archaeologist would paint of our society using Harry Potter as a basis? Mind you the "historical" re-enactments would be fun to watch.

    3. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by Chees0rz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, we allowed idiots acess to the internet.

      Or are you you arrogant and ignorant as to believe the only things that have so influenced mankind have only been produced within the last century?

      Oops, did somebody shit in your cereal this morning?

    4. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by deanlandolt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or are you you arrogant and ignorant as to believe the only things that have so influenced mankind have only been produced within the last century?

      That's completely beside the point. Or are you you arrogant and ignorant as to believe those things which have so influenced mankind within the last century will ever find their way into the public domain, what with the ever-increasing length of copyright terms?

    5. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tons of it can be reproduced - because it is in the public domain due to it's copyright having expired.

      And tons more cannot, because it's not in the public domain, due to said animated mouse.

      Or are you you arrogant and ignorant as to believe the only things that have so influenced mankind have only been produced within the last century?

      Except this is supposed to be a time capsule showing the world the way it is today, not the way it was a hundred years ago. And there is so much we could be showing them, were it not locked down by copyright.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    6. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by cliffski · · Score: 4, Interesting

      nonsense. You do realise it is up to the copyright holder what permissions they grant right?
      Not all copyright holders are cackling billionaire bastards.

      As an experiment pick a dozen living writers, email them and ask them if any of them object to granting permission for their books to be published on this project. I'd be amazed if every single one of them didn't say "hell yes".

      Don't tarnish the 99% of sane copyright holders with the stupidity of the noisy 1%.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    7. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by tgd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice rant.

      Really, one would've thought the reason music and film wasn't included is because... well, you can't listen to sounds or watch movies on an etched nickel disk through a 1000x microscope.

      But DMCA rants are a sure path to karma here, no matter how irrelevant to the discussion they are.

    8. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry. I get confused in the morning sometimes, I guess I found my way into his kitchen by mistake.

      I'll try to avoid further kitchen-defecation.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    9. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure plenty of writers would be right onboard with the idea.

      Convincing their publishers to allow it might be a little more difficult.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    10. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by SmokeyTheBalrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That noisy 1% of Copyright holders tend to own over 99% of the pertinent copyrights.

      Sorta like small business vs big business.

      A writer often looses the copyright over their book when it is sold to a publisher. Only some writer's who have already made a name for themselves keep their copyrights. The Harry Potter books are one of a handful where the author was able to keep her hold on the copyright.

      Good luck getting a large publishing house to allow you to use something they own for free.

    11. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And if it is significant, then why do you call its creator(s) and/or to whomever they transfered the ownership "assholes"?

      An artist, writer, or inventor can be an asshole and still produce, or be involved in the production of, a great work. Disney exploited his employees, and called the Screen Actors Guild a Communist front during the HUAC days; that doesn't make Fantasia any less great.

      Copyright is not ownership, calling it such falls into the mire of the "intellectual property" meme.

      The fact that a creator transfered copyright to someone tells you nothing about the recipient's assholery.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    12. Re:Should have used Harry Potter... by Repossessed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, it has nothing to do with showing the world as it is today, its meant to provide references for creating language translations. The bible got picked partly because its likely that a translation of genesis will still exist in thousands of years (even if only as a textbook in an ancient myths course).

      I'm glad to see this project finally nearing completion though, and I hope the tech behind it will be expanded for storing more information than just the languages.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  3. Put it into deep space by mbone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This would be a logical thing to put into deep space - on the Moon or on Mars, say. It is a good environment to preserve things, and any future civilization is going to look up our space probes sooner or later.

    1. Re:Put it into deep space by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Space is very big, and finding stuff there is pretty hard. Designing a satellite which can keep transmitting a signal (so that it will actually be found) for two thousand years is not at all easy - solar panels degrade long before this and even radiothermal generators don't last much longer than a hundred years.

      Also, part of the purpose of the Long Now Foundation is to make current scientific knowledge available to our descendants in the event of a global catastrophe. By the time they've (re)developed the technology required to retrieve something from space, there isn't a huge amount more we can teach them.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Put it into deep space by Petrushka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For something that's actually intended to be an archive, perhaps. But this is expressly designed to be merely a curiosity, not an archive. So why bother going to the tremendous effort of sending it to a different planet?

      The information that interests the archaeologists is, more often than not, the information that no one is particularly interested in preserving. Things like records of lawsuits, records of amounts of produce, textbooks used for education ... that kind of thing. Sure, mythological documents are interesting too, but they're likely to be preserved in multiple copies anyway.

      Hence, Petrushka's Made-up-on-the-spot Rule One: The documents that a society most wants to preserve are exactly those documents that archaeologists will be the least interested in. Because they know that stuff already. (Sure, there are exceptions for truly ancient civilisations where literally nothing else survives except for official documents, but ...)

    3. Re:Put it into deep space by bytesex · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why you would hide it in an intuitive place. In the middle of the biggest crater on the moon, for example, inside a big, obviously artificial thing. A black monolith, say.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    4. Re:Put it into deep space by necro81 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you had read TFA, you would have learned that the first prototype disc was placed on the Rosetta space probe, which will land on comet Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in 2014. It is likely that the disc will survive a very long time there.

    5. Re:Put it into deep space by DarthVain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know this is a joke, but seriously it makes more sense.

      Of course we are assuming that in 2000 years we will still have spaceflight and not be in some sort of virus zombie filled post apocalyptic mad max sort of existence.

      Generally speaking getting any physical object to last 2000 years is a tough sell, particularly if you are trying to protect tiny (microscopic even!) details. This is largely due to the fact that we have this pesky atmosphere and weather (and geology to a certain extent).

      On the moon however, there is none of those problems. The only problem would be getting something there, and likely it would be small size so you couldn't just place it anywhere otherwise someone might not find it.

      If you did select someplace that would generally not be overlooked, say the highest mountain or the biggest creator or something like that it would be probably found.

      Of course you would want to stop those 500 year doucebags from taking it, which would lend credibility to the idea of disbursing many copies all over the freaking' place, which given our current tech would be hard to do on the moon.

      Of course as a proof of concept you might design a satalite to orbit the moon, and eject a capsule at the moon ever so often.

      I guess to take this one step further, would be to design a spacecraft that has a sort of comet like orbit of earth and only comes around every 2000 years. Of course it would have to be a stable orbit that would not change even after the craft lost all power and just became an inert piece of junk with a large orbit.

  4. IOW there's still nothing better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    than carving it in stone

  5. Pfff by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It has been two thousand years since some girl claimed that she got knocked up by a burning bush rather then her boyfriend and millions of people worship her as a virgin.

    One person's cuckoo is another persons prophet. When everyone has forgotten Ron Hubbard was a bad Sci-Fi writer his novels may one day serve as the basis of a religion.

    Nah, that could never happen.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Pfff by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hundreds of millions of people base their lives around those stories.

      Sort of.

      When you point out the fine print to them, most of those people don't measure up so they're going to hell anyway. Might as well have partied.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Pfff by silentben · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or as Douglas Adams put it: "one man had been nailed to a tree for saying how great it would be to be nice to people for a change". Funny how near-sighted people can be - a man vilified in his own time can become symbol of hope (or fear depending on your branch of Christianity) for thousands of years afterward.

      We snicker at tribal societies for what they worship, yet are any of our "modern" religions any more sensible? Personally I choose none of the above (which is surprisingly hard with children - complex questions, family influences, etc.). But if I HAD to choose one, I think some of the classic mythologies were much more fun. Some pantheons had all the drama of a weekly TV show.

    3. Re:Pfff by strabes · · Score: 5, Informative

      A major doctrine of Christianity is that no one measures up to the holiness of God anyway, which is why Christ, God incarnate, came and took the sins of the world upon himself. Christianity isn't about being a bunch of holier-than-thou religious people who live in middle class suburbia, go to church once a week, and try not to sin a lot. If you read any one of the four Gospels, those are the types of people which Jesus condemned most frequently (the Pharisees). Christianity is about self-sacrifice, living as Christ lived, and loving as Christ loved. Unfortunately Western Christianity currently looks a lot more like the former than the latter. I'm not asking you to believe it or even find it rational, I'm just asking you to at least give an accurate portrayal of something before you critique it.

      --
      Its = possessive. It's = "it is"
    4. Re:Pfff by hobbit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone who treats the Bible as anything other than a work of fiction is missing the point of Christ.

      Test everything, keep the good...

      Try to live your life by Christ's example by all means, but for God's sake [sic] don't actually claim he was the incarnation of a personal deity.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    5. Re:Pfff by zippthorne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think some of the classic mythologies were much more fun. Some pantheons had all the drama of a weekly TV show.

      Sometimes I think they maybe WERE the weekly "tv drama" and that we've imputed a little too much significance to them because the records happened to survive.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:Pfff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you read any one of the four Gospels

      4? Oh yeah, that's right - the religious folks have only really bothered to keep around the gospels that suited their purpose. There were dozens of gospels, all from roughly the same era and time. Funny how only certain select ones are accepted.

    7. Re:Pfff by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It has been two thousand years since some girl claimed that she got knocked up by a burning bush rather then her boyfriend and millions of people worship her as a virgin.

      That's got to be one of the silliest critiques of Christianity that I've read. Even setting aside Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox questions of the veneration of Mary.

      People don't believe in Jesus because of Mary's claim that God made her pregnant. People believe in Jesus because of claims about his miracles & resurrection.

      If you're going to give the pseudoskeptic's treatment to the virgin birth, you're doing it all wrong. You should be doubting whether Mary ever claimed such a thing--you should be speculating that early Christians made up the story.

      But I realize that wouldn't make as effective an approach to junk rhetoric.

      Hmm... I guess you could throw in some half-informed claims about "mistranslation" of Isaiah 7:14, while you're at it.

    8. Re:Pfff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People can call it venerate all they want, but when you offer up a prayer to Mary, that's worshiping.

    9. Re:Pfff by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It has been two thousand years since some girl claimed that she got knocked up by a burning bush rather then her boyfriend and millions of people worship her as a virgin.

      And her prospective husband, rather than divorce her as he desired, ate a bad meal, saw a vision and decided to marry her anyway and raise the kid.

      And a bunch of fishermen were persuaded by this kid, now-grown, to leave their steady jobs to wander around listening to him preach.

      And after he was executed, they decided that rather than head back to fishing that they'd continue the job, annoying the local powers-that-were to the point that they themselves were executed.

      Or...the girl was impregnated by God, her son was the Son of God, His miracles actually did convince a bunch of fishermen that He was on to something and so forth.

      Which is more difficult to believe? That guys like Saul of Tarsus decided, 'hey, I'm tired of stoning these Christians; I'm gonna become one instead!' or that they he actually received a vision? That ignorant Judean fishermen thought it better to be tortured to death than to enjoy an old age surrounded by their grandchildren, or that they actually believed what they preached first-hand knowledge of?

      Oh, and no mainstream Christians worship Mary. We venerate her, of course, since she is the Mother of God after all.

    10. Re:Pfff by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People don't believe in Jesus because of Mary's claim that God made her pregnant. People believe in Jesus because of claims about his miracles & resurrection.

      Isn't a virgin birth one of those miracles? By casting doubt on that miracle, you cast doubt on Jesus's divinity.

      But yes, the most important question to settle is whether a "Jesus" actually ever existed in the first place. There's not much evidence for that assertion outside the Bible.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:Pfff by scotbotmosh · · Score: 2, Informative

      But yes, the most important question to settle is whether a "Jesus" actually ever existed in the first place. There's not much evidence for that assertion outside the Bible.

      Actually if you look into it there is quite a bit of evidence outside of the Bible that confirms the existence of Jesus of the Bible Here's a quick link if you would like to take some time and check it out: http://www.apologetics.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=221:do-non-christian-sources-report-aspects-of-jesus-life-video-&catid=62:historical-apologetics&Itemid=62

  6. You watch... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This thing will end up in 2000 years on someones altar as they make sacrifices to some weird god thinking it's a source of untold power. Then some nut with a hat and whip will come along and steal it for a museum only to have it end up on a coffee table somewhere.

    Or...

    2000 years from now some primitive creature will be trying to crack some kind of nut for food and end up using this as a fancy nut cracker.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  7. we did what? by nimbius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    we invent a hard disk designed for 2000 years of storage and we stick bible stories on it?!

    come on, surely we could upload 4chan instead..

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  8. You need a 500x microscope to read it by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Okay, so they include a 6x glas sphere. How nice, but you need a 500x microscope to read it. The sphere has a large base and it can be opened. Why not include the tool to read the document with the document?

    Who is to say that whoever finds it in the future has access to such a powerful microscope? For most of history we haven't.

    Nice idea, but geez, think things through, this could be found by the same kind of people who made the original rossate stone. Do you really want them to wait hundreds of years to develop magnifcation good enough to read it?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:You need a 500x microscope to read it by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would think that it would be some kind of incentive for someone / something to invent a way of reading it. There is already a 6X lens on there. Using that concept, they might reach the 100X mark in a short time period. The better they get, the more they will learn.

      One would imagine they'd have included instructions for making said 100x or 750x lenses that were readable with the 6x lens. A form of boot-strapping, if you will.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:You need a 500x microscope to read it by lordofthechia · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not include the tool to read the document with the document?

      That's how they make their money! It's brilliant! Give away the media for free, then in 2,000 years, sell the 500x microscope "readers" for a *huge* profit! Just make sure the teaser text and critical reviews are readable by the naked eye.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
  9. Genesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's a lot of Phil Collins - three Genesis albums!

    Surely a greater variety would have given a broader view of our world! Maybe some Elton John, and Boney M at least!

    1. Re:Genesis by Drathos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, if it's the first three Genesis albums, there's not a lot of Collins. He didn't join them til the third album. It is, however, a lot of Gabriel, Banks, and Rutherford.

      --
      End of line..
  10. Rosetta Archive is a truly a grand achievement. by upuv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I gotta say this is something special. Just imagine having a transcript of Roman Senate debates. Pictures of Inca ritual. Blue prints and plans of how they made the monuments of Easter Island. As almost the complete entire collection of current knowledge and experience will fade in all it's current forms, very little of our lives will survive for 2000 years. Only scraps of buildings and monuments will survive. Oops I take that all back. I forgot about Google cache.

    1. Re:Rosetta Archive is a truly a grand achievement. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Wow, three replies and all of you completely missed my point. Hint: I wasn't talking about translating the contents of the disks.

      This is a Rosetta Stone. It's not a repository of all human knowledge, it's a translation aid. It assumes the existence of other, surviving, data from this era. Without this assumption, it is useless, because learning dead languages is only worthwhile if there is something to translate. The Rosetta Stone was not valuable because it contained useful knowledge (it actually contained a very boring passage with very little historical significance) - it was valuable because it contained the same text in three different languages, allowing large numbers of other (previously untranslatable) texts to be translated easily.

      Modern printed books are unlikely to survive for 2,000 years because they use cheap paper and ink with a very short lifespan in comparison to older texts. The only thing that is likely to still be around to translate from this era is digital data which have been copied repeatedly over hundreds of different physical media. Some of this may be translated into newer formats and encodings. The rest, if not accessed frequently, will just be copied and copied in backups of backups. Eventually, if future generations do abandon ASCII and unicode, this will just appear to be a binary blob of data.

      Consider something like Project Gutenberg. If you had a print-out of this collection then these disks would help you translate it. If you just had a digital copy, then you need this disk and a definition of the character set used. Without these definitions, you have no way (short of cryptanalysis) of translating the binary files into a sequence of character symbols that you can understand.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  11. Archive readability by Wowsers · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just so long as they didn't do what the BBC did in the 1980's with the UK's modern "Doomsday Book" history archive project. The archive went on a Laserdisc, and what hardware today can read that format (not the machines on ebay)?

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/07/11/bbc_domesday_project_saved/ or
    http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/preservation/research/domesday.htm/community.htm

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
    1. Re:Archive readability by Teancum · · Score: 4, Informative

      This disc is being designed to be read through analog processes.... and in fact the first few words can be read with the naked eye, and gradually get smaller to the point that each attempt to magnify the words shows there is much more on the disc.

      Each language that is being used is also given "equal" treatment, other than some languages tend to be much more verbose than others such as Latin languages vs. Germanic languages or even the most efficient being Chinese (in terms of characters per word/idea in the language)

  12. Re:Pronounce what? by jacquesm · · Score: 3, Funny

    you start simple and work your way up from there...

  13. Also, bury at the Georgia Guidestones by mbone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they could get permission, it might also make sense to bury one of these in a waterproof enclosure at the Georgia Guidestones - the huge Monoliths in Georgia in 8 different languages.

    1. Re:Also, bury at the Georgia Guidestones by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they could get permission

      Permission from who? The Illuminati?

      Do you have their email address?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  14. Re:Pronounce what? by txoof · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any aliens that encounter our civilization may experience life in a completely incomprehensible way. For instance, they might not speak, but rather use some form of sign language or color language like squid. But, if they are a space faring race, and presumably interested in learning about other races, they'll have the necessary intelligence to make a go at learning what the disk means.

    You'd be amazed what you can tease out of a text, especially poetry. Because so much poetry depends on end rhyme, it's possible to not only figure out pronunciation, but also accent. We can be so precise as to narrow down the accent that Shakespeare wrote in by examining the songs in his plays. It's pretty freaking cool.

    But again, this all hinges on the premise that aliens can comprehend a spoken language, or even a written, symbolic language. If they can't, then of course this device won't work. Fortunately, future humans (if there are any) should be able to make some sense of this thing. It will be invaluable to future researchers. Lord knows, our land fills will be a wealth of information to any future archeologist.

    --
    This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
  15. Only 2000 Years? Pffft by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Romans managed to preserve their language and culture for 2000 years completely by accident. Do you really think all the stuff we're doing today will vanish in the same time span.

    In far less than 100 years the whole of today's Internet will fit on a single USB stick - smaller than a single shard of Roman pottery.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Only 2000 Years? Pffft by bcwright · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Romans managed to preserve their language and culture for 2000 years completely by accident. Do you really think all the stuff we're doing today will vanish in the same time span.

      It wasn't completely by accident - many early Roman and Greek works were deliberately preserved in the monasteries. Compare for example what happened to ancient Carthaginian culture, which is approximately the same age and which was nearly exterminated: about all that we know about them was written by their opponents.

    2. Re:Only 2000 Years? Pffft by bcwright · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Try reading English from 300 years ago.

      Actually English from 300 years ago is quite readable by any educated modern reader (though cursive writing can be difficult because the longhand script has changed a couple of times since then). Think Shakespeare, for example.

      However if you start talking about English from, say, 600 years ago, it's quite a bit more difficult (Chaucer), and from over 1000 years ago it's impossible unless you're a specialist (Beowulf).

      Many other languages have evolved quite a bit in that amount of time, but a few haven't. For example, written (as opposed to spoken) Greek is much less changed over the last 2000 years than is English - classical Greek is to modern Greek more like Chaucer or Shakespeare is to modern English, rather than like the difference between Beowulf and modern English.

      So even though your specific example doesn't hold water, the general sense of what you're saying is quite valid - it's quite possible (even likely) that modern English will be nearly unintelligible in 2000 years.

  16. Some versions are copyrighted by Selanit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With the way things are going very soon the Bible will be the only book that's out of copyright....

    Some versions of the Bible are copyrighted. Any translation undertaken in the last eighty years or so.

    Oh, and in Britain the Authorized King James version is subject to Crown copyright, which is perpetual. It's never going to enter the public domain. Probably not even if the monarchy were to be abolished -- any British government which saw fit to abolish the monarchy would likely retain its privileges for the state. Not that it seems like the monarchy's going away any time soon.

  17. WTF ? by daveime · · Score: 5, Funny

    replicate the disk promiscuously

    Only nerds too long in their basements would use this kind of terminology !

    The rest of us would say "make a lot of copies".

  18. Re:Wouldn't it make more sense... by Dasaan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Put a massive repository of scientific and mathematical knowledge on it and I'd buy one for £100.

    --
    XP is basicly 98 with a lot more extra features to hunt down and disable. --Dram
  19. Re:Pronounce what? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Well, here's how I'd do it, cartoon-style
    1. In the first frame put an image of a tuning fork and a representative atom of iron. Have the disk itself next to the tuning fork to indicate that the tines should be the same length as the diameter of the disk they have in their [hot | cold | slimy ] alien hands.
    2. In the next picture, show the tuning fork being struck, and waves emanating from it.
    3. In the next frame, show the details of a single sine wave, and put lines marking one cycle of the wave and text that says the symbolic equivalent of '1 Hertz'.
    4. In the next frame, show the tuning fork vibrating again, with the symbols for whatever frequency the pure iron fork resonates at.
    5. Show the sine wave with an arbitrary integer max amplitude of 1000 and show it being sampled periodically, with the numbers being copied into a list.
    6. In the next frame, show a human with sound waves emanating from their mouth, and numbers flowing into a list.
    7. Put a list of numbers on the disk so that they can reconstruct a simple WAV-like file of human speech.
    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  20. Logical next step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This sounds great. Now we need one with a copy of Wikipedia on it, so that all human knowledge can be preserved as well.

    1. Re:Logical next step... by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, that would be lovely. "Albert Einstein was a scientist who JASON MAYNOR SUCKS COCK developed one of the most important theories..."

    2. Re:Logical next step... by skeeto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is your name Hari Seldon?

  21. Re:Pronounce what? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Assume an utterly alien audience

    Why? The foundation doesn't, they assume an audience of humans in the future. Their goal is to preserve knowledge for our descendants, not for some hypothetical alien archaeologist.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  22. Re:Pronounce what? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, here's how I'd do it, cartoon-style

    I'd just send them the url to xkcd. Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  23. Re:Pronounce what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Emit gas from your third thoraxial smell-sac. Retract the parietal spikes in your stomach, and slightly part your mandibles. Now declench both dorsal sphincters and force the gas out by pushing into your abdomen with your tarsal claws. Make sure to close your nasal glands if the listeners hide is not resistant to corrosive acid. A smile is always free."

  24. This seems too expensive by joshv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To have any hope of surviving and being found in thousands of years, they need massive replication. Oh, I am sure they picked the best of materials, and they will last, but at $25,000 per, there just aren't going to be many of them left in 2,000 years because there weren't many of them made.

    I would favor a cheaper mass produced product. Maybe something that on average doesn't have much hope of lasting more than a few hundred years, but if you make millions of them and shill them on the home shopping network - maybe somebody will have a hope of finding one in the distance future perfectly preserved in a redneck's hermetically sealed grave.

    I'd suggest using something like a CD mastering process to stamp an analog message into a gold foil disk, that is then embedded in high quality, impact resistant glass. The glass seals against corrosion and moisture (if you are too cheap to go with the gold foil), and acts as a sacrificial surface that can take scratches bumps and dings and still be polished up by future archeologists.

  25. No 2.000 years by mseeger · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Hi,

    if you treat this disk the way the original rosetta stone has been treated, nobody will be able to decipher it afterwards. The only reason we were able the rosetta stone: The chars were relatively big. High information density and long lifetime (in any conditions) are contradictions....

    Yours, Martin

  26. Speak for yourself by 2Bits · · Score: 2, Funny
    Following the archiving principle of LOCKS (Lots of Copies Keep 'em Safe) we would replicate the disk promiscuously and distribute them around the world with built in magnifiers.

    Speak for yourself, man, all the geeks in us already found a better way long time ago. We store our important stuffs for long term archival in newsgroups.

  27. Re:Wouldn't it make more sense... by GrievousMistake · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The plan is to mass produce them, eventually. I expect that if they do find a way to manufacture these cheaply, other projects will want to manufacture their own discs, esp. with stuff like Wikipedia. It would be nice if they became popular with publishers and the like. Having a couple of these around is good, but having a more heterogeneous collection of high-density durable information repositories scattered around would be priceless.

    And as a fan of dystopian future scenarios, the very idea of future primitives occasionally happening across these valuable information artifacts as they rummage through ruins for scrap metal makes me all warm and fuzzy. In fact, I'm slightly miffed that they can hold so damn much information. This way we'll never have a gatherer returning to his village with a small shiny globe, that upon inspection turns out to be an artifact of the ancients that reveals the schematics for building a more powerful coil gun, which gives them an edge in fending off the attacks of the neighbouring tribes. Having the best of Wikipedia, or maybe the archives of a couple of good research journals is much more helpful and versatile of course, but not nearly as romantic. ;-)

    --
    In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  28. If you paid attention in health class by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2, Funny

    You'd know that information replication can lead to viral outbreaks of learning, unplanned knowledge, and not voting Republican.

  29. Re:GOATSE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://goatse.cz/
      You nerds love it!

    Says the guy who has goatse bookmarked.

  30. Space based storage by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Personally, I'd probably place the things into a number of satellites and keep them in orbit around the earth with just enough to keep the orbit from decaying. Then, tie the controls for maintaining the orbit to a series of earth based beacons. In the event that every beacon on earth fails, the satellites could then be instructed to enter into decaying orbits to seed the discs onto the earth's surface contained within a protective shell to prevent burning up on re-entry. This would increase the odds of the discs being found by keeping them closer to the earth's surface and their landing points would deform the surrounding land enough to warrant investigation.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  31. Re:Should have left out the religion by guruevi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you really know the meaning of the words "day" in the original language? No, it's only the Catholic Church and some other prominent so-called "christian" organizations that promote that idea.

    On the other hand, Genesis is one of the oldest book in the world that has survived thousands of years with minimal to no copying or translation differences across translations (only difference is in interpretation) since it has been written down. It's also available in almost all religions (the Christian, Jewish and Islamic religions) and languages (anywhere there was an influence of the before mentioned) of this world, it can be found in more than 90% of the world, most likely a translation will survive within 2000 years.

    It's also one of those books that has the basic/simplistic/root names (in all those languages) for members of the universe we can see with the naked eye (planet, moon, sun, stars, earth, life, male, female, sea, animals, vegetation) all in those 3 chapters as well as some abstract (religious/social) passages like cursing, naming, unions of man and woman, God, clothing.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  32. We're in the minority here by danaris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whether we like it—or agree with it—or not, the Bible is something that is very important to a very large number of people on Earth. Genesis, in particular (and much of the rest of the Old Testament) represents a creation myth believed to lesser or greater extent by 3.8 billion of our 6 billion-odd people (Wikipedia's estimate of the number of believers in Abrahamic religions).

    Just because we agnostic or atheist geeks think that such things are embarrassing doesn't make it any less representative of the world we live in.

    Dan Aris

    --
    Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    1. Re:We're in the minority here by not-my-real-name · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whether the Genesis account is believed or not, it is familiar to a large number of people. Whether you believe it or not, it's an important part of western culture. Trying to ignore it would be like trying to ignore Shakespeare in English literature.

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
    2. Re:We're in the minority here by dubl-u · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because we agnostic or atheist geeks think that such things are embarrassing doesn't make it any less representative of the world we live in.

      Yep. I'm a flaming atheist, and I'm fine with them having used Genesis. I'd bet it's the single most translated text in the world.

      If I'm going to build a bridge that I want to last 500 years, I'm going to take a hard look at all the bridges that have lasted that long already.

  33. (eg.) It tells you to give your stuff away by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anybody who owns a TV set, house, car, etc. will be turned away from the pearly gates ( http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew%2019:21;&version=31; )

    Anybody who's eaten a hot dog? Sorry. ( http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2011:7;&version=31; ).

    Anybody who doesn't hate their family? Nope. ( http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=luke+14:26 )

    I could go on... but that's pretty much the whole of the USA already.

    --
    No sig today...
  34. Original sin is nonsense by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are an troll and a serious coward but this was too much fun to pass up.

    The point that you're missing entirely is that there is NO SUCH THING as a good person.

    Which is a premise that I fundamentally disagree with and why I'm not a christian. If you want to convince someone of your logic you might want to start with a premise both parties agree to. Furthermore you'll have to come up with a definition of "good" so that we can be sure we are talking about the same thing.

    Even your hypothetical "good atheist's" actions were tainted with self-righteousness.

    Helping others == "self-righteousness"? Can be but certainly doesn't have to be. Are you trying to say we shouldn't help others because that would be "self-righteous"?

    Better to be a sinner and know it than a pompous ass who thinks that he's perfect.

    I'm not aware of anyone who thinks they are perfect though I do know some people who try very, very hard to be. The fact that no one is perfect does not and never will logically equal "no such thing as a good person".

  35. Re:And people complain the Bible is fiction... by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would it be any worse than this?

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  36. Re:Pronounce what? by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuning_fork#Calculation_of_frequency

    I see where you're going, but the material the tuning fork is made of (iron) and the length of the tines isn't enough to determine its frequency.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  37. Careful, there. by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your critique of pharisaical religion is good, and there's certainly a lot of that around among professing Christians. But two cautions for you:

    1.) Make sure you stay humble as you critique "Pharisees", or you'll be acting holier-than-thou. I think those tendencies are present in everyone. I hate that, and pray that God will be changing my heart. But it's important not to forget that it's there.

    2.) When you say that "Christianity is about self-sacrifice, living as Christ lived, and loving as Christ loved," make sure you maintain the difference between (1) walking in the Spirit, being transformed to be more like Christ, and (2) the good news. If you walk up to someone and tell them, "Look at Jesus! Live like he lived!", then you haven't given them good news. Because, as you said, we can't measure up to that standard.

    The life of a Christian is about what you said. But the gospel is forgiveness, salvation, adoption, and the receipt of the Holy Spirit--by faith, not by working to be like Christ.

  38. Re:Should have left out the religion by bcwright · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do you really know the meaning of the words "day" in the original language? No, it's only the Catholic Church and some other prominent so-called "christian" organizations that promote that idea.

    I don't believe that the Catholic Church promotes the idea any more that the world was created in 7 literal days - for quite a long time now they've accepted that the story is symbolic and mythological, not literal.

    There are a few Christian groups who do believe in 7 literal days of creation - but most of them tend to be fundamentalist Protestants rather than Catholics or "mainline" Protestants.

    Naturally there are individual members of each of these groups whose beliefs do not match the "official" beliefs of their respective denominations - but that shouldn't be used as evidence of what the denomination as a whole believes.

  39. What else is there? by whitneyw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many other stories have remained in oral culture for as long? Gilgamesh was lost. Hammurabi's Code was lost. Beowulf is recent. The Iliad is still around, but it is certainly not as widely known. The Upanishads and Confucius date only slightly before recorded history (~500 BC). I am no expert, but Job (older than Genesis, but also biblical) is the only thing I can think of that has lasted more than 5000 years.

    The story of Genesis has been around for longer than the idea of written language! It seems reasonable to guess that it will still be around when our current idea of written language begins to falter. It seems the only reasonable guess.

  40. Re:And people complain the Bible is fiction... by kesuki · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i can see plenty of people worshiping the flying spaghetti monster by then, remember harry potter isn't marketed as religion, and while the FSM is marketed as how stupid real religion is, because of the way it parallels real religion we're not far off from people actually worshiping the FSM as real, it's hard coded into our brains, when certain stimuli eg:Near death experiences, specific EM shocks to the brain, disease and hunger and drug induced hallucination.

    that or people will start worshiping the 'invisible pink unicorn' not quite sure which one i would 'rather' have replace the 'one true god'

  41. Or as Roger Waters has said wisely... by Sunshinerat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Taken from Roger Water; Amused to Death

    And when they found our shadows
    Groups 'round the TV sets
    They ran down every lead
    They repeated every test
    They checked out all the data in their lists
    And then the alien anthropologists
    Admitted they were still perplexed
    But on eliminating every other reason
    For our sad demise
    They logged the only explanation left
    This species has amused itself to death
    No tears to cry
    No feelings left
    This species has amused itself to death
    Amused itself to death

    --
    Load New Commander (Y/N)?