Slashdot Mirror


User Charged With Taking ISP Tech Hostage

User AttheCoalFac pointed us to an interesting tech support story from Canada. Halifax actress and playwright Carol Sinclair was arrested and is now facing criminal charges after a repairman says she threatened to hold him hostage until he fixed her Internet connection. Mrs. Sinclair denies the allegations and says that she merely stated, 'I don't want to hold you hostage, but would you mind hanging around until the other technician arrives so that the two of you can sort it out.' She was arraigned in Halifax Provincial Court Friday and is now free on conditions including that she have no contact with the repairman or any employee from her ISP. Having a lot of experience on both sides of this issue, I'm not sure who I'm cheering for.

70 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. Misleading title by kenh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Threatened to take him hostage Taking him hostage - the title is misleading.

    Here in US, most repairmen won't leave until you sign for the work, as I understand it. If your not satisfied, don't sign for the job.

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Misleading title by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 2, Informative

      It would be misleading if the title said that she actually did take the tech hostage; however, that's not what it says. It says that she was charged with doing so, something which did indeed occur.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    2. Re:Misleading title by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or rather "Hell hath no fury like a woman denied access to the internet.".

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Misleading title by MountainMan101 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, that is the common mis-quotation.

      The correct quotation of William Congreve is "Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned / Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned."

    4. Re:Misleading title by D.+Taylor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. The GP said "You know what they say", not "You know what William Congreve said"..

      In any case, I can see why it is misquoted...

    5. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He quoted it correctly, the common misquotation is "Hell hath no fury like a woman's scorn." I don't know what point you were trying to get at other than being a karma whore.

    6. Re:Misleading title by raynet · · Score: 3, Informative

      On your other note: go to prefs and sections and just disable 'idle' from the main page, simple as that.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    7. Re:Misleading title by donscarletti · · Score: 2, Funny

      Discussion about women isn't rocket science. (yes, I know, wrong William Congreve)

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    8. Re:Misleading title by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your going about it all wrong. If the girl is your friend or a relative, just say "I'm not really the one your should be asking about that, I'm biased that I have a beutiful familiy and friends and don't think an outfit could change that."

      If the girl is a good friend but not a intimate friend like a girlfriend or wife, just say, "You always look good to me but I don't want to start pimping you out or thinking of you in that way, you should ask someone else."

      Now, if it is a girlfriend or wife, you simply state, "I don't think my opinion would be too objective, it would have to be a really ugly outfit for me not to think it looks good on you and that might not be the opinion your looking for".

      If course you could always avoid the issues altogether and get pictures of the most hideous outfits you can find and tell your ol' lady that you think she might make it look good. If she has any fashion sense, she will never ask your opinion on an outfit again.

      Now, if you need advice on the "does this make me look fat" question, well, your better off just acting like you couldn't hear her instead of ever answering her.

      Either way, the goal is to not answer her an avoid the BOOM while making her not want to ask you in the future.

    9. Re:Misleading title by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your advice, while appearing sound at first glance, has one fatal flaw - women are far from logical about these things. Yes, I'm married. No, your advice does not work.

  2. Seems to me by jaxtherat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this is just a case of a disgruntled customer's remarks being taken WAY out of context.

    --
    http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    1. Re:Seems to me by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the problem is we don't know what she said.

      there are 3 versions of the truth here, her version his version and what really happened.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    2. Re:Seems to me by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 5, Funny

      Having been an on-site tech for a cable company, a DSL company, and a multi-service ISP; I can assure you that customers do think that they can prevent a technician from leaving if the service isn't working to their satisfaction. I've responded in a number of different ways to customers. Here are some of the ways I've managed to vacate the premise:

      1. Explain that the issue is elsewhere and that preventing me from leaving will only prolong their outage.
      2. Show that the problem is with their own equipment, and that I'm not responsible for it.
      3. Offer to permanently close their account, remove the equipment, and blacklist their address/company/name (this only works if you are friends with the owner of the ISP, which I am)
      4. Last resort - offer to remove some of their blood through an entirely new orifice that I will create.

      #1 and #2 are usually effective and will get you out the door
      #3 I've used twice (one resulted in the closure of the account)
      #4 I've used once (electricians scissors are truly multi-purpose)

      The key is to remain cold and unemotional when delivering your chosen line. #4 requires having the scissors in your hand.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    3. Re:Seems to me by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      there are 3 versions of the truth here, her version his version and what really happened.

      That would imply that all three are true. I prefer the B5 variation: "Understanding is a three-edged sword. Your side, their side and the truth."

      Of course sometimes it is just a matter of perception and all are equally "true" in that sense, but most of the time not...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Seems to me by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      #4 can get you shot. You can't claim they started it if you're dead with a pair of scissors in your cold dead fingers.

      --
      I hate printers.
    5. Re:Seems to me by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yea but I have a lower UID than you, so ner.

      --
      I hate printers.
    6. Re:Seems to me by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which begs the question: If a truth fell down in the middle of a forest, and nobody heard it, would your wife want to have sex with you?

      Or, put another way, if truth were a car traveling down the highway, and were to suddenly be attacked by a mac fanboi in one of Balmer's thrown chairs, would the bad car analogy still allow this post be modded +4 insightful?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    7. Re:Seems to me by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the explanation is much simpler. He noticed he wouldn't get out of there for hours because he can't fix it and she won't let him leave, he's already at the very least 1.5 hours late (after all, he came 1.5 hours late for the appointment) and I'm pretty sure he has one of those contracts where he has to do so and so many tasks a day, no matter whether customer is satisfied or not, as long as the ticket can be closed.

      He saw his daily average plummet, saw he won't be able to fix her computer (whether he is incompetent or she managed to FUBAR her internet settings in an attempt to "fix" the problem herself before he arrived is up for debate), and decided that bailing is better than explaining why he did 3 customers this day instead of his mandatory 6+.

      And to avoid a problem with his supervisor, who would probably question why he doesn't have a signature for the task, he used something we all said to a repairman some day ("you will not go anywhere until this is fixed") as a hostage threat.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Seems to me by sammyF70 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having been an on_site customer of a DSL company, I can assure you that on-site techs do think that they are paid to show up and aren't actually there to make sure the services their employers sells to me are working. Here are how I view the ways they've tried to just end the call/go away without fixing anything :

      1. "Explain that the issue is elsewhere and that preventing me from leaving will only prolong their outage." : "Elsewhere" WHERE?If the problem is not here, you can still call your colleagues, who will fix the thing wherever elsewhere is and you can stay where you are to make sure you actually fixed my problem. THAT is your job.

      2. "Show that the problem is with their own equipment, and that I'm not responsible for it." Always a good one : if there was no powersurge (a UPS works wonder to avoid losing equipment to those), no changes in the configuration nor the equipment, and everything has been rebooted and checked just ffs, and it still doesn't work, then saying that it's my equipment is pure BS. Like #1, all you do is push the responsability on someone else. As there is nobody besides me (the customer) and your employer ( which you are paid to represent), there is noone to take the blame, no matter how hard you try.

      3. That's called blackmailing, and might result in a lawsuit against you and your employer.

      4. and I might offer to have your head on a plate and your job down the drain .. depending on how good a customer I am (for your employer)

      The key in getting some sort of service from ISPs is to ask to speak with superiors until you get someone who can't do anything for you directly but will get pissed at his subordinates for passing the call up.

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
  3. Gives a whole new meaning to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Vendor lock-in.

  4. Typo by kenh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That should read "Threatened to take him hostage (is not the same as) Taking him hostage - the title is misleading. I had a less than and greater than that were scrubbed out of the final posting - sorry.

    --
    Ken
  5. What was wrong with her pc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What was wrong with her computer?

    I mean, what was it in the end. To go through this whole song and dance just to realize maybe Cat5e patch cord went bad?

    What was so beyond wrong with this computer that took 20 phone calls then to a site visit?

    Are there no local IT company's in the town they can recommend to the women that can fix computers?

    1. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by Annoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No doubt there are companies that do computer work. But she would have had to PAY them.
      People don't expect that they might have to actually pay someone to fix their computers after they frak them up.

    2. Re:What was wrong with her pc? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They didn't know what was wrong with her internet connection / computer from what I can tell. "There's something wrong with your computer" was just a way to make her go away.

       

      It's sad really all real geeks should love solving problems, but I've worked with loads of people who'll spout some excuse like that even before the customer has explained what's happening. What's even worse is that they do it in a such an obvious way that even non technical people can tell it's bullshit. And it's not like they do anything else instead of work, they just spend a bit more time in idle mode than people who actually try to fix stuff.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  6. No contact with any ISP employees? by sokoban · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait, so up in Canada they have ISPs where you can actually get in contact with the employees instead of the automated phone system from hell?

    Lucky Canadians.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by rm999 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, and after the 20th time, they reward you by sending someone to your house. Next, they waste an hour of your time, tell you they can't fix your connection, and then file criminal charges against you.

      Gotta love the Canadian ISPs ;)

    2. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, it's kind of both. We (Shaw customers anyways) go through about 3-4 menu options (English/French, phone/internet, sales/inquiries/support), then get put on hold for anywhere between 5 and 30 minutes. After that it's a real person, every time!

      Not only that, but usually (definitely not always), the tech guys actually know what they are talking about and they are always local (never India, etc.) If at the end of it no resolution can be found, they'll almost always arrange to have a Tech show up within a week.

      All in all, yes we do have it VERY good up here. Now if only we weren't getting hosed for our cell phones :(

    3. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, it only takes three or four weeks until they get tired of telling you "we're looking into it" and they send out a technician. Usually he takes a look, calls up his buddy at the switching station and they quickly realize that you haven't had Internet for the last two months because some idiot at central office didn't get around to filing the disconnect order for the previous tenant until after your connect order.

    4. Re:No contact with any ISP employees? by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fingernail file? Jeez, if a fingernail file brandished by a woman can drive terror into the soul of a technician, no wonder those bumbling idiots were able to take over a plane with boxcutters!

      Lady: Hold it right there mister. You're not going anywhere. If you even try to leave me with no internet I'll... I'll... I'll give you a manicure!

      Tech: No! Please don't! It's taken me weeks to get into this disgusting state of personal hygiene, and if you clean my fingernails, the other geeks in the office will make fun of me again!

      --
      I hate printers.
  7. Internet addiction by hoofinasia · · Score: 5, Funny
  8. Nothing to see here by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just a retarded employee with a completely artless grasp of language. Public education sucks. Get over it. Move along, please.

  9. Not Sure Who To Believe by Caraig · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The part of me that burned out on tech support oh so long ago is quick to jump on the side of the repair tech. I have known people who were crazy enough to do that sort of thing when they reached their breaking point.

    On the other hand, it's possible that even if she was at her breaking point, the tech -- caught between the rock of the customer and the hard place of his employer's prior actions -- found he had to get out of there before the customer got REALLY angry.

    On the gripping hand... I've found that in the vast majority of times that I've had internet connection problems, with the exception of Verison DSL on Staten Island, NY,* especially when I was the only one in the neighborhood with connection problems, especially after several weeks... the problem has almost invariably been with my computer.

    So, wild-ass speculation here, but I think the customer vented her frustration a bit too firmly (she did say she was not going to be polite, always a bad way to start a session); the technician hit his own breaking point and rather than go off on the customer he found an excuse to flee and a story to lay on his supervisor; his story of a crazy customer with a gun who wanted to hold him hostage got blown out of proportion and the woman was taken to court... ... and in the end, it really will be something wrong with her computer.

    While my sympathy automatically lies with the technician, rationally I'm certain the truth is going to be somewhere between these two stories. And in a larger view, this might kick up the tension between residential end-users and technicians by a notch. While residential end-users might be a bit more inclined to be more polite to techs, it might also raise their animosity towards same and the relationship becomes more hostile as a result. At best this will fade into a footnote.

    * - Kids, not much is worse in a customer sense, than a telco who sells you DSL and then moves some equipment around the central office such that you are now further from the central office than they rate DSL for. You're not actually farther from the CO, but the wiring inside the CO is now long enough that you are outside the CO's radius. And then they don't tell you. Fortunately, Verizon did the right thing and finagled something so that they returned my DSL. Part of me is pretty sure I wasn't the only one who had this happen to.

    --
    "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    1. Re:Not Sure Who To Believe by Caraig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're entirely correct, of course. There's not enough information in TFA to say one way or another. Heck, even if it goes to trial, it's literally 'he said, she said.'

      Not finding a gun is a major piece of evidence in favor of the playwright, true. Although I've known people who will use threats like that without anything whatsoever to back it up, if they thought they could get away with it; but I'm not getting that vibe. Fortunately, the trial will not be decided on vibes. =)

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
  10. Isn't that the dream by Korbeau · · Score: 2, Funny

    of any technician to be bouund hostaagee to a laaady?

    Maybe there is another sort, but I wouldn't like them to be near my peripherals!

    1. Re:Isn't that the dream by xstonedogx · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a better picture of Sinclair here, much more flattering:

      http://www.ultimatedisney.com/images/d-f/dinos34-01.jpg

  11. It's a figure of speech by Skapare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a figure of speech ... "I hate to hold you hostage, but ...". That is said in a lot of contexts. If things went down as this story claims, then the ISP tech didn't understand and just blew it all out of proportion.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  12. Counter-suit by s0ckratees · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The actress said she called her provider, Aliant, one last time, disguising her voice to sound like a man and telling the company she needed her connection right away because she was a businessman. "Lo and behold, they said someone would be over between 8 and 11 the next morning." This after the usual wall-of-please-holds she got earlier.
    Sue their asses away.

    --
    "The time has come" the walrus said " for a GOOD swim."
    1. Re:Counter-suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Lo and behold, they said someone would be over between 8 and 11 the next morning."

      My general experience with ranges is, it pretty much means they'll be there at 10:55AM, as close to the end of that range as possible.

    2. Re:Counter-suit by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Considering how badly some people deal with women up here? It's not a bad plan. Especially the number of times that I've had the nice old lady, grandmother, cousin, GF, get the run around by a various company until you act as the S/O, brother, etc, because they have a pair of ovaries instead of a pair of balls. This isn't a all companies are bad, rah-rah burn them down. It sure makes me wonder if they want their business still, but then I remember...that in most cases they're the only business in town.

      And it happens in nearly every business day in day out. From car shops, computer stores, ISP's to your utilities and right down to basic services. And it shouldn't.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  13. You forgot the best part... by xstonedogx · · Score: 2, Funny

    When you are arraigned you are told you can't call up and cancel service! :)

  14. Theatre People by fyoder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Theatre people, they're almost as bad as carnies. If you have to do on site support for theatre people, make sure there are people who know where you are going and how long you should be. If they don't hear from you after that, they should call the police.

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
  15. This is so messed up by incognito84 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm a Haligonian and I have met Carol Sinclair (acquaintance of an acquaintance).

    What a small world. She doesn't seem like the "hostage holding" type at all, and the local ISPs are known for their shitty customer service. Seems like quite a misunderstanding.

    [Insert "so, do you know Bob/Joe/Cathy from Canada?" Jokes here]

    1. Re:This is so messed up by n+dot+l · · Score: 4, Funny

      [Insert "so, do you know Bob/Joe/Cathy from Canada?" Jokes here]

      Hey! I knew Cathy. But then again, everybody did.

  16. Could have been worse... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Funny

    She could have strapped him to the bed and taken a sledgehammer to his ankles. (or, if you're a bookworm: cut off his foot with an axe and blowtorch it to cauterize the wound).

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Could have been worse... by Anachragnome · · Score: 2, Funny

      C'mon man, get real. You don't need to hobble a geek to keep him in the basement.

    2. Re:Could have been worse... by ColdSam · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but you do need a working internet connection. Which she ain't got.

  17. Court order for what happens anyway? by nick_davison · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is now free on conditions including that she have no contact with ... any employee from her ISP.

    Granted, I'm used to trying to call an engineer out from US ISPs... But how is this different to what you get without a court order?

  18. My sympathies lie... by Yalius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...squarely with the tech. I do field repair work for a smallish ISP myself, and it is absolute, zero flexibility policy that if any sort of threat, even in a joking manner, is made to our safety, we leave the premises immediately. Now to the best of my knowledge, the only circumstances this has actually been invoked under have involved unruly dogs, but were a subscriber to joke about holding one of us hostage, we're required to get the hell out, even if it means leaving equipment, up to and including entire vehicles, behind if necessary.

    The policy does allow us to return to the customer's premises at a later time, at our discretion, but only when accompanied by another tech.

    While I cannot vouch for the following, it is what has been described around the office here. "Back in the day" a subscriber apparently did use a shotgun to, ahem, "troubleshoot" a wiring ped right in front of a field tech. So, no, I have no doubt whatsoever that some people are more than capable of threatening what's implied in the article.

    1. Re:My sympathies lie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your policy is nothing more then a bullshit cover your companies legal ass policy. If someone actually threatens another person, the law supersedes any company rules and the situation is what it is. The policy is just so later in court the employee can't sue the company saying he was forced to be in that situation or he's lose his job.

      Now for your sympathies, as the tech being a person, I can sympathize with him as his customers won't know what they are doing and are going to be upset before he gets to the door so it is a shitty job in that regard, but looking at him as just a tech person, screw him. The company has created a situation where it take multiple calls and requests for the tech to be sent in the first place and the phone support offers nothing other then it's your computer with no direction for assistance since the customers keeps calling back for help.

      If tech support was actually anything other then an expense that companies try to minimize, it might actually be useful to people and the whole situation wouldn't even have occurred to begin with.

      I know her computer is completely screwed and probably has more viruses then the local hooker but someone from support needs to be able to say more then "Everything is fine on this end, it must be your computer." If someone could explain what she needs to do, and I mean during call one (1) things would be different.

      I think there is too much expectation from a customer to be knowledgeable even though they are the ones paying for a service.

  19. Physical restraint? by FooGoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did she physically prevent him from leaving? Did he even try to leave? If not he should be buried up to his neck and be pelted with muffin fans from 20 paces.

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    1. Re:Physical restraint? by hellwig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The policies of the company do not equal willful and unlawful intent on behalf of the customer. Just cause the technician might have perceived a threat based on her off-color remark doesn't mean she actually attempted to kidnap him. I can't believe they arrested this woman solely based on the account of the technician, especially since he wasn't kidnapped and they found no weapons in her house. IANAL, but I imagine she would have to have made some serious threats to his safety (not just saying "I don't mean to kidnap you but could you stay longer"), or done something physical (such as brandish a weapon or impede his escape) to even consider it kidnapping. I mean, is saying "please don't go" grounds to prosecute kidnappers in Canada? In America, you can say "I'm so angry I could kill Joe-Bob," without breaking any laws (as long as Joe-Bob isn't the president). You just have to cross your fingers that Joe-Bob isn't killed in the near future.

      I guess we just won't know if all we have is both of their stories to go by. I think her response should have been "Please disconnect my service and cease all future billing if it won't work" rather than "fix it or I'll kidnap you". Oh but wait, I'm sure Aliant as with all other ISPs/Telecoms has a total monopoly in her area, leaving her with no other option to connect to the internet. Now who's doing the hostage taking?

      --
      Eggs
      Milk
      Bread
      Cat Litter
      Soda
      ...
  20. She's an actress and a playwright by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems to me that she was just being humorously dramatic. Summary says nothing about a weapon being presented at any time.

  21. ISP excuse, thinks I by randolph · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a remarkably good excuse for the ISP not doing their job; the customer is forbidden to contact them. I think it's probably system-abuse on the part of the ISP.

  22. Huh? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's a figure of speech ... "I hate to hold you hostage, but ...". That is said in a lot of contexts.

    Huh?
    I've never heard that statement used in conversation, in any context.

    1. Re:Huh? by 98+Rezz · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've heard it before. It's sort of an apologetic jest for asking someone to stay a bit longer than they intended to get something finished.

    2. Re:Huh? by Skapare · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've heard it a lot. But I'm in the USA. Maybe the Canadians never use it enough for most people to know about it.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  23. Simple solution by xenobyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The repair man should have plugged in a laptop or similar, showing a working connection, thus placing the issue squarely on the customers computer. If the repair man couldn't make his laptop connect either, the issue is either with both computers or - much more likely - the connection, and thus he knows he has work to do.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  24. She was arrested?! by dontmakemethink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Folks, in Canada it's one thing to be charged, it's another to be arrested. In the US if the police are convinced you've committed a crime, they arrest you. In Canada, if you're not posing an imminent danger to others, you just get charged. They tell you to come in, do some paperwork, and let you know the pre-trial date etc. She must have been beyond hysterical when the cops arrived, either completely shitfaced or holding a knife, or both. That's what it would take to get arrested in your own home under those circumstances.

    --

    War as we knew it was obsolete
    Nothing could beat complete denial
    - Emily Haines
    1. Re:She was arrested?! by neverutterwhen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So she must have done something to be arrested? You have innocent before proven guilty in Canada too, right? Not just innocent before arrested.

      --
      My appreciation of Douglas Adams is far deeper than yours.
  25. I've had by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've had, though over the phone, not in person. Sadly, tempting as it is, you can't really hold someone hostage over the phone ;)

    ACT 1

    It went like this: so at some point I activate my email at T-Online. They had a handy-dandy page that allows one to change their _email_ password, and I use it.

    Suddenly I can't log in to the ISP any more. I figure, hmm, I bet the damned thing changed my ISP password too. I try the new one, it doesn't work either.

    I'm pretty sure I didn't forget the new password, since it was one I had used before. But ok, it could happen. I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt.

    So I call the ISP's tech support, he makes me try both the new and old password, neither works, ok, he says he'll send me a new one by post. But first he wants to know my invoice number, to be sure he's sending it to the right guy. I read the one from my phone bill to him. Says it's ok, all clear, he'll send me a new password.

    A week goes by, I have no new password. I call again, different employee, makes me read him the invoice number again, assures me all is well and he'll send me the new password. Nothing happens.

    The spiel continues for one and a half fucking months, in increasinly short intervals as my patience wears thin. Then I lose my patience entirely and escalate it to hell and back.

    Turns out that when I moved, both the ISP and the parent telco gave me a new invoice number. Each. Different ones. But on the bill there was only the telco one. So the retards from support saw that the numbers don't match and _lied_ to me.

    They fucking lied to me for a month and a half. They didn't even bother telling me what's wrong, or finding a simple solution like "ok, come to one of our stores to prove it's you." Nah, the bloody retards lied to me.

    (At this point it's worth noting that (A) DSL connections are point-to-point anyway, (B) they can know it's me or at least calling from my phone number since it's a subsidiary of my telco, but most importantly (C) they're sending it by post to my address. What more confirmation do they want?)

    ACT 2

    My brother buys a new house informs the same telco and isp, is assured he'll get dsl in a couple of days.

    It's worth noting that somehow he was flagged as VIP customer. Dunno why. Maybe because he and his wife are addicted to their cell phones, and get a phone bill comparable to some small companies. But anyway, he's a VIP customer and for that they assure him that it won't take more than a day or two to switch his account to the new address.

    Short story: the same spiel as in my case happens. He's repeatedly assured that, yeah, verily, someone will take care of it by tomorrow. And nothing happens. Again and again.

    What had happened? The drone who entered his new address made a typo. Let's say his new house number was 42 A (not the real one, for the obvious reasons), and the drone entered it as 42 S. Which didn't exist.

    Ok, typos happen.

    But again, they just lied to him again and again. If they do that even to "VIP customers", I rest my case.

    ACT 3

    After the previous incident, I was weary of doing anything to my connection any more. But eventually I'm dumb enough to say yes, when some salesman offers me (again) to upgrade my connection to 6000 MB/s instead 1000.

    Life goes on for a month or so, in which time nothing happens to my connection, good or bad. As in, I'm still on 1000. Well, ok, I'm fine with that. At least I still have it.

    Then suddenly I can't log in any more.

    The call this time was a surrealistic carousel affair, where I'm passed around between 6 different departments. Each sees only his slice of the problem, so as soon as it even touches any other domain or aspect, he gives me a new phone number to call. And, as we'll see, didn't even see his own slice well enough.

    It took me a whole weekend, albeit with large breaks to recharge my phone's batteries, of going round robin like that.

    In that time, I'm

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:I've had by guardian-ct · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There's a rule somewhere that the phone company's phone and internet divisions have to be as separate as possible. The theory was that having them separate would allow better competition to occur.

      I couldn't get my DSL installed until I had two techs come out to my place, one from the phone company, and one from the internet section. They swapped info, and could then begin working on the problem. The solution: replace the bad card in their DSL remote terminal box that was claiming that it was working properly, when in fact it didn't let me out past that card. Time required: 2 months until I finally convince phone company to send someone out, and 3-4 days after the 2 techs met. They weren't allowed to talk to each other until they met physically. This was about 7 years ago.

    2. Re:I've had by e-scetic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have my own horror story of a similar nature, this one with Bell and Bell Sympatico High Speed (a Canadian thing).

      Pre-Move: Bell has a "helpful" e-Move link on their website, you simply go to the page, login, fill out the info, state when you want to move, you're done. I opted to call the phone number on the page, just to be sure. Rep was extremely polite and helpful, asked when I wanted the service switched, assured me that was all there was to it.

      Day of Move: No switch. No internet.

      Move+1: Called them. Three transfers later was bumped to "Business Services" for some reason, which was a call center in India. Woman could barely speak English, line quality was atrocious, staticky - this was to be the case every time. Her computer was saying I was still at the old address, she tried to place a move order but got an error. Said to call back next day.

      Move+2: Called back. Same error, said to call back next day.

      Move+3: Same error, decided to call residential services just in case to make sure they had moved my phone line. They said their records showed me as connected at my new address, moreover they had sent someone over to physically reconnect me.

      Move+4: Business Services again, same error, bounced around by the reps. Told them what residential services had said.

      By the way, side note, everyone in India seemed to contradict each other in what they said they saw in my records, they were either lying, couldn't read, or their records are a royal mess. Also, it may be their culture, or their training, but they always try to make it seem as if its your fault, as if they'd done everything they could and you were wasting their time. There are some serious attitude problems over there.

      Move+5: Decided to call tech support instead,. Explained the problem. Tech support transferred me to High Speed services. Went through the motions of "is your modem blinking", "is your line under 10 feet long", etc. Call kept getting escalated, they started seeing that things should be working but weren't. Eventually someone found the tech that had gone out had left notes saying the wiring was FUBAR'd. Said they would send another tech. Made appointment, had to wait all day.

      Move+6: Nobody came. Around this time I noticed I had no dial tone (I know, I know, but I use the line solely for data...). Called residential support again. Found they had indeed sent someone on moving day, but had NOT hooked up the line due to complications. The Bell rep tried to sell me line insurance! Started telling him why that was so wrong but he transferred me in mid-spiel (goddamned fucker). Made appointment for them to come and finish the job. Would have to wait for them all day.

      Move+7: Waited all day, nobody came. Called Bell, they said they had sent someone - only thing was, it couldn't have been true because they sent them around the same time I was busy making the appointment for them to come. Made another appointment, again had to wait for them all day.

      Move+8: Two guys showed up, said they had a hard time finding my line outside the building, it was such a mess of old phone wiring. Took them an hour to install a whole new physical line. Line showed a signal, but no internet. They said to wait until next day to see if it came up.

      Move+9: It didn't. Called High Speed, I explained that when they sent the tech earlier there was actually no physical line, it was only just created, so could they please another. Made appointment, had to wait all day again.

      Move+10: Nobody came or so much as knocked on my door, but internet came back up.

      Long story short, I think we're headed for a world where corporations will need bunkers.

  26. Re:GOATSE! by Spatial · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, we know. Welcome to the Internet.

  27. Re:Far too long by Doc+Nielsen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i did - very interesting

    --
    To boldly mod where no one has trolled before.
  28. Re:How did she hold him hostage? by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

    Parakeet Anti-defamation league on line 4... something about libelous comparisons...

  29. ISP support a farce by luwain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had a lot of experience with ISP support, with Adelphia (before they collapsed), Comcast (before I switched) and now Verizon. I'm a computer engineer, so if I call the ISP it's usually because I've figured out that the problem is at their end, and I can tell them what to do to fix it, yet I've found myself getting very, very, very frustrated and angry at the absurdity that I've encountered. In one case, after a half-hour of maneuvering through the maddening computer prompts (press 1, press 3, press 7 etc...) to speak to a human being, I got a support person who gave me the standard "reboot your computer and reset your modem". After a few minutes of first humoring him, and then another few minutes of walking through steps I knew were not the problem, I tried to explain to him what the problem was and what he had to do. He obviously had no idea about IP addresses, default gateways, DSN or what "ping" meant -- and after pretending to listen to me, he said that I needed to call "Lynksys". I said "okay", hung up, and immediately called back, went through the same scenario with another support person, who told me "you have to call Microsoft". I said "okay" hung up and immediately called back, and after maneuvering through the prompts again to get a human, I got a support person who (after suggesting that I reboot and rest my modem) listened to what I had to say, appeared to understand everything and had my internet running again in under 5 minutes. All told, however, I was on the phone for about 3 hours, and you have to realize how maddening it is when after to finally get to the prompt that says "press 7 if you are having connectivity problems", you're put on hold and every minute the recording tells you to try going to their website!! I know few people who have my patience or restraint (and it took every bit of that restraint to avoid letting out my frustration on that third support person[the one who finally helped] when she told me to try rebooting and resetting the modem) so I can just imagine what a layperson must feel. I remember having a technician come to my house to set up the internet service who kept trying different modems (saying "I can't believe all these are defective') before I intervened and set it up myself. I think that ISPs are overwhelmed with service calls, are understaffed, and suffer from a wide discrepancy of skill-sets amongst their personnel. The use of computer prompting to carry some of this burden is what gives computer prompting a bad name. I wouldn't be surprised if the actress actually did threaten the technician -- ISP support seems designed to coerce otherwise normal, well-adjusted persons to become homicidal, suicidal and paranoid.

    1. Re:ISP support a farce by Skapare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What is really, really, absurd, is that once I encountered an ISP support tech that was naive enough that I was able to convince her to reboot her computer. Afterwards, I told her the problem was still present (it was ... it was a dialup pool that was ringing and not answering). She seemed to actually believe at that point that there were indeed problems that rebooting didn't help for.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  30. She opened the door for him, ya know? by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I might even have more sympathy for the techie, if not for the following detail: she actually opened the door for him, when he said he needed some CD from the van, and propped it open for when he returns. (Only to see him run off and drive off to the cops.)

    I'm sorry, but is there any realistic and sane way to mistake that for a genuine hostage situation? I mean, hello? Isn't that the polar opposite of _preventing_ someone from leaving?

    How would that even work, if it were a genuine hostage situation? "KK, you can go now, but please return later 'cuz you're my hostage. I'll let the door propped open for you. KTHXBYE." Or what? :P

    Surely it would count as the most incompetent kidnapping in known history.

    Look, that maybe he was close to the breaking point himself and he left an impolite customer, ok. I can live with that. Maybe the company even has a policy of leaving at the slightest perceived threat, even as a joke, as someone else suggested. Fine. Leave if you must.

    But going to the police and filing criminal charges? Nope, sorry, my sympathy for him automatically ends there. He's an arsehole who thought he can abuse the system to teach someone else a lesson. And I have no sympathy for that.

    Well, either that, or he is genuinely schizophrenic and thought that opening the door for him equals preventing him to leave. And in that case, someone put him in a nut house and on neuroleptics. Because God knows what else he might mis-interpret in surrealistic ways, and how he'll react then. Maybe at the next customer he'll think that offering him a glass of water means trying to set him on fire, or whatever. Maybe he'll end up injuring someone or himself, thinking he's fighting for his very life.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  31. Re:It's clearly her fault! by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because for me, and many, MANY people in this country, switching ISP's isn't just a matter of picking up the phone and calling the next provider. I I want to switch ISP's I have to sell my home and move elsewhere. My DSL is sold to me from the local phone company. It drops connection all the time leading me to call them over and over to fix it. I'm not at 20 yet, but I'm certainly over 10. I'm not going to switch though because dropping them means going back to dial up, and the only local access number for any ISP here is provided by guess who: THE SAME DAMNED COMPANY. So, I will continue to call them over, and over, and over, and over until they fix the damn thing because aside from moving (which I simply am not financially able to do, nor do I really want to), that's the only option.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  32. Re:I did by Feanturi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Awesome, I finally have an easy way to get some action!