Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot's Disagree Mail

Everyone likes to belong to something. Whether it be for fun, a sense of belonging, or a need for attention, a group gives you a feeling of solidarity. Surrounding yourself with people that share common goals and ideas can be comforting. Sometimes however, you realize that you hate the people you've surrounded yourself with. Your religion doesn't allow you to read anything that has profanity or you've subscribed to Slashdot thinking you could learn more about hockey. This week's collection is composed of people who don't want to play, read, or be associated with us anymore. Read below to find out how bad they want out. On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 ****** wrote:
"I'm relly sick of the level of discrimination that goes on here. I thought it might be different with other people who maybe didn't win everything. But its no different people won't be nice when your nice first. I try to say what others are saying and they get marked up? Not me as well? How can that be? If I'm the same how can they not act the same to me. It's like you have to be around forever before they won't say bad things about your comments. I thought it was different but they are just as BIG COCSUCKERS!!!!! Take my account and throw it away I've had enough of the newbie bigotry and FUCKING UNFAIR LIES."


Being just like everyone else is harder than you think. This next guy at least isn't concerned about being accepted. He has a clear vision of what he wants out of life. His vision is a world without profanity.

On Tue, 13 May 2008 ******* wrote:
"I try to live a good clean life by learning all I can and nurturing my body and spirit. I'm afraid that I will not be able to become part of your community as I find it sick. Sick in mind body and soul. Why your people deem it necessary to use the language that they do I can never understand. Women, children and people of faith will never be able to learn what you have to impart because of the filth you are tending in this rank garden. Please stop sending me email."


This next guy had me puzzled. I'd never had a complaint from fans of Guns-N-Roses, horror movies or unsound logging practices about the confusing "Slash" part of Slashdot.

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 ******** wrote:
"I came here to learn about hockey and there is no hockey to be found. Your lucky that I didn't send you any money or we would have a big problem right now. If you don't want others to be confused to I suggest you think about changing your name to something that isn't obviously about hockey. I asked some coworkers and they agree, I'm not just some idiot. Come up with a name that means something."

69 of 426 comments (clear)

  1. So Many Questions About This Section by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What was it that prompted Slashdot to start posting its hate mail? Was someone clamoring for this? I see mild humor in it but I get a bigger kick out of watching people duke it out in ping pong comments than reading misdirected hate towards the editors.

    Also, what is the expected result of our discussions of this stuff? Is it to pick it apart and analyze it? Is it to provide user generated retorts that you can't due to legal reasons? I shall try a little of both.

    Is Slashdot trying to add an optional low brow element to satisfy users that have left for other sites dedicated to that? Because, you know that half of your users are going to tag this 'pleasestop' or some such negative approval tag.

    Also, why does it look different than the rest of Slashdot? Isn't it just another section? Why do you need another CSS for it? I seem to think it would be better site design to have a thorough reused theme but maybe you want the reader to know it's Idle. Who knows? Sure seems to upset a lot of people.

    --

    "I'm relly sick of the level of discrimination that goes on here."

    This level of reverence for the moderation system never ceases to amaze me. Hell, I myself can have a sour day if I'm given a thrashing on a post. This person doesn't even seem to be a regular user and they are already upset.

    A very peculiar amount of power, these mod points are. Enough for someone to call a negative moderation discrimination!

    --

    "I try to live a good clean life by learning all I can and nurturing my body and spirit."

    Despite being raised Roman Catholic for 18 years, this still baffles me. I know I'm not the first person to share this view (I think I read about it in Vonnegut's "Palm Sunday") but there is a reason I don't swear often. It's not so I can be 'clean' and 'pure' ... it's so that when I do swear, people know I'm not fucking around. Seriously, if you're dropping f-bombs left and right then where do you go when you're genuinely upset? I prefer to not raise my voice so those words are reserved for extreme moments. I feel bad for the people who incorporate them into everyday life ... how loud do you think an injured rapper would have to raise their voice before people gave them medical attention?

    --

    "I came here to learn about hockey and there is no hockey to be found. Your lucky that I didn't send you any money or we would have a big problem right now."

    Am I the only person that had the sudden urge to register hockeydot.org and have it redirect to Slashdot?

    "If you don't want others to be confused to I suggest you think about changing your name to something that isn't obviously about hockey. I asked some coworkers and they agree ..."

    Are these the same coworkers that face physical abuse or verbal ridicule if they don't agree with you?

    " ... I'm not just some idiot. Come up with a name that means something."

    Of course you're not an idiot, you're just a hockey fan. And if <insert object here> isn't bleeding with hockey (in this case the internet), you are angered with it. I understand. I'm from Minnesota where many of your kind roam around in large herds laying waste to beer and stadiums. I would suggest moving there for solace and the ability to experience all hockey all the time.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Cheeko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      can't tell if you're trolling, but this is just the weekly crossover from idle.slashdot.org.

      Its the /. topic section for totally random waste of time nonsensical sort of things. Its late on a Friday and they feel like sharing once a week some of the random, potentially humorous mail they get.

      I actually find them fairly entertaining each week.

    2. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by kermit1221 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "how loud do you think an injured rapper would have to raise their voice before people gave them medical attention? "

      Um... Who cares?

    3. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Sparton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe the reason that idle has been thrown up on the front page has to do with advertiser pressure (holy cow, look at those guys at Digg and stuff! They got craziness, why don't you?..). Just a hunch.

    4. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by olclops · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For what it's worth, I look forward to these disagree mails. Low brow? That's one way to see it. But on another level, I find it a useful reminder, especially in a fairly-like-minded community like this, that much of the world thinks far differently than I do.

    5. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 2

      No... It's more along the lines of... They want attention all the time, that's why they swear all the time :P I agree with GP when it comes to verbally swearing (because it's more harmful to hear than to read). Whereas online, we are already desensitized by much worse things, and I tend to swear in jokes most the time. If you are offended by reading a swear word that you have little idea of the tone used, then you have problems.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    6. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by paazin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot's moderating system is total bullshit and the admins are retards for still keeping it around. Nearly every downmodding that occurs on Slashdot is 100% invalid.

      Including the -1 you just got? ;)

    7. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are entertaining. For awhile, I wondered about moderation and how it works here, but figured it out finally. Now, When I get modded troll or flamebait, I like to think of it as a trophy... for having offended someone enough to waste their mod point that way :)

      Seeing others get angry out of confusion or just tech illiteracy does my heart good.

      Reading their comments, you just know this is the guy at your local watering hole wearing the nascar hat backwards and having a great time with some light beer. (with some luck, I've just offended a few more people :))) {it's humor people}

      It's fun to see that /. gets its share of normal people who do not know rm -rf from a hole in their hard drive.

    8. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by ChrisKnight · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Am I the only person that had the sudden urge to register hockeydot.org and have it redirect to Slashdot?"

      Registered. I'll have it redirecting to this story shortly.

      -Chris

      --
      -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    9. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by madprof · · Score: 2, Funny

      All overblown hyperbole is actually factually correct. Every single sweeping statement is entirely wrong, however.

    10. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by merreborn · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I'm relly sick of the level of discrimination that goes on here."

      This level of reverence for the moderation system never ceases to amaze me. Hell, I myself can have a sour day if I'm given a thrashing on a post. This person doesn't even seem to be a regular user and they are already upset.

      A very peculiar amount of power, these mod points are. Enough for someone to call a negative moderation discrimination!

      I actually enjoyed that email, 'cause I can understand where the kid was coming from. Until you've got positive karma, you might as well be posting directly to /dev/null most of the time. I posted for months before I got a karma bonus, and then, all the sudden, I'm getting posts modded up on a regular basis.

      I didn't find it quite as frustrating as this kid did, but that email really shows how I'm sure thousands of "outsiders" feel about slashdot. Slashdot's tendency to weed out all but the most dedicated keeps the signal-to-noise ratio extremely high, but it probably drives away many, many potential posters.

      here is a reason I don't swear often. It's not so I can be 'clean' and 'pure' ... it's so that when I do swear, people know I'm not fucking around. Seriously, if you're dropping f-bombs left and right then where do you go when you're genuinely upset? I prefer to not raise my voice so those words are reserved for extreme moments. I feel bad for the people who incorporate them into everyday life ... how loud do you think an injured rapper would have to raise their voice before people gave them medical attention?

      Seriously? You can't tell the difference between someone saying "Fucking thing sucks! We'll do it live!", and "HOLY FUCK THERE'S A HOLE IN MY ABDOMEN AND MY FUCKING SPLEEN IS ABOUT TO FALL OUT!"?

      I seriously doubt that rappers really have trouble getting medical attention whenever they need it. Really, how do you imagine that scene working out in your world? "Oh, I'm sorry Mr. DMX. When you said 'Bitch, I got shot in the knee - I need a fucking ambulance', I thought you were just experimenting with some new lyrics"?

    11. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Clearly, he knows what he is talking about. I mean, he said so THREE TIMES. Come on, would ANYONE repeat themselves THREE times if they weren't right?

      Really ... Three times! What an argument! I can't believe that you would even TRY to contest his absolute knowledge, he is clearly correct. clearly!

      No doubt about it.
      Three times sure.
      really.

    12. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Curtman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I live in the center of Canada, where I can't go one single day (even in off season) without someone attempting to talk to me about sports. I have no idea what the connection to hockey might be. Does slashdot sound too much like slapshot? Or is there another connection somewhere?

    13. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      WHOIS on hockeydot.org

      Domain ID:D154008129-LROR
      Domain Name:HOCKEYDOT.ORG
      Created On:05-Sep-2008 19:21:00 UTC
      Last Updated On:05-Sep-2008 19:21:02 UTC
      Expiration Date:05-Sep-2009 19:21:00 UTC
      Sponsoring Registrar:GoDaddy.com, Inc. (R91-LROR)
      Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
      Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
      Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
      Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
      Status:TRANSFER PROHIBITED
      Status:ADDPERIOD
      Registrant ID:GODA-052848890
      Registrant Name:Chris Knight

    14. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by danieltdp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Also, what is the expected result of our discussions of this stuff? Is it to pick it apart and analyze it? Is it to provide user generated retorts that you can't due to legal reasons? I shall try a little of both. "

      You shouldn't expect something comming out of idle because that's the section idea,right? No article or comment on idle is expected to have a point. You can say "I prefer idle not to exist", but it is actually delivering what was promissed: nothing but idle time.

      Anyways, I don't like idle either. I would go to over there for this kind of stuff

      --
      -- dnl
    15. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe /. looks kind of like a hockey stick hitting a puck?

    16. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Technically, theft of music would be shoplifting a CD. I believe you're referring to copyright infringement, as very few people actually steal music these days, it's much simpler to just download it.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    17. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by YodaToad · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've yet to see an argument that would prove you right.

    18. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe you get modded "Flamebait" and "Troll" because they're closer to "Douchebag" than any of the other choices

    19. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Informative

      By definition "Theft of Music" is stealing. Copyright infringement isn't theft.
      Don't like that? Argue with the U. S. Congress. They carefully put copyright law in Title 17 of the U.S. Legal code. The just as carefully put all theft related law in a different whole title. That title is the one reserved for ALL normally criminal violations, as it says right at the start of the code, so the U. S. congress thinks copyright infringement isn't theft AND isn't necessarily criminal at all.
      Argue with the Supreme Court. They ruled that individual states can't enforce copyright, so if violations were theft, they would be taking away the right of the individual states to stop a type of theft happening in their own physical jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has already clarified that that is not what they did.
      Argue with the Constitution. It uses the phrase "for a limited time". If violation equaled theft, then the law would be saying there is a type of theft where objects become too old to be protected under law, just from age and not from any loss of value.
      Argue with the Berne treaty. If violation is theft, then what's all that bit in the treaty about non-criminal violation? Non-criminal theft? That's an oxymoron for sure.

      If you really believe copyright violation is theft, then you need to get up impeachment proceedings against at least four of the current supreme court justices and over 40 still active congressmen who voted on these laws in the 80's and 90's. Depending on just which decisions you would rate as coddling thieves, that could be all the SCOTUS and over 250 active congress-members. You also need to impeach the President, Vice President, Secretary of State, and possibly several members of the cabinet for negotiating and signing various treaties and such. There are at least 10 currently serving ambassadors and their immediate staff that you need to get removed from office too, and various other functionaries. You probably should prosecute a large number of people now out of office, or at least support civil suits for denial of due process against many of them. You also need to get a constitutional amendment passed. If you aren't working for any of this, you don't really believe copyright violation is theft, or you lack the stones to speak truth to power. It's easy to harangue a bunch of rank and file people on slashdot - but if you really mean it, tell the big dogs off.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    20. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's generally called being an arrogant ass. It's not whether you're right or wrong, it's about making a blanket, insulting statement and then repeatedly trolling about how 'right' you are. Someone obviously thought that claiming that the "...moderation system is total bullshit and the admins are retards ..." (emphasis mine) was a troll or flamebait.

      The moderation system is not perfect, but the majority of the mods that I see are fair; those complaining about the system being broken are usually the most profane, offensive people.

    21. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Kickersny.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I personally hate the horizontal slider for the simple reason that it breaks page up/page down. The browser scrolls by a full 'page', but the toolbar takes up ~10% of the currently-viewed 'page'.

      This makes it very annoying to read the page using spacebar/page down.

    22. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by bob.appleyard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not on my internets. I have Flamebaits and Trolls auto modded up, so they'll always be +5 Trolls to me!

      --
      How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
    23. Re: So Many Questions About This Section by skam240 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So let me see if I get this right. There's some vast conspiracy amongst the randomly selected slashdot modders to cover up the truth and promote a "self server corporate agenda" (which unless you're a CEO or a board member of a corporation doesn't seem to make sense to me but what do I know?). The answer to this problem is to get rid of it so I have to root through every post some 13 year old kid makes to find something interesting or to place the modding system into the hands of some enlightened elite group of people who know better than everyone else. Is that it?

      If so, my only question is who would choose these enlightened souls and / or who would they be?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    24. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by IdahoEv · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or is there another connection somewhere?

      I was befuddled as well. Trying to find out what the connection was, I googled "hockey slash". Oops. ... page after page of hockey player slash fiction.

      /me reaches for the brain bleach

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    25. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed all I could think was how entertaining it would be to try to explain to the hockey guy how slashdot DOES mean something and makes a lot more sense in the context of what it actually is, than it would for hockey.

      He is probably that Levi Johnson guy. I wouldn't bother.

    26. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Almost every single downmodding that occurs on Slashdot is completely unjustified

      Preach it brother! Why, just the other day I was posting interesting goatse links and hilarious nigger jokes, and I kept getting modded down by fascist moderators.

    27. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Washii · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm curious about this:
      And I think the moderation system is abysmal--time and time again there has been excellent posts that are made days after a story is posted, which gets no mod points

      The moderation system is abysmal because somebody makes a post several days after the story goes up? Within several days, most stories hit the archive bin anyway (for the front page). Very rarely do I go delving into the subcategories, quite often I just scan the front page, middle-click on what seems interesting and read that. But you are saying that moderation is abysmal because the user pool dries up on a several day old article and goes to read the new stuff.

      Would you force people to use half their mod points on articles 3+ days old?

    28. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by LurkerML · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot's tendency to weed out all but the most dedicated keeps the signal-to-noise ratio extremely high, but it probably drives away many, many potential posters.

      I always suspected slashdot is a training ground for writers. Or half the Science fiction/fantasy literature out there gets quoted here. ;)

    29. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, in hockey, don't they basically just slash at a dot on the field?

    30. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by 12WTF$ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slash is a particular type of erotic fan fiction where two characters have same-sex relationship.
      cite: www.darrenbarefoot.com/archives/2003/10/hockey-slash.html

      --
      Cryonics - Keep cool and carry on.
  2. idle by qoncept · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It blows my mind you're still posting this garbage on slashdot. Listen to your users.

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:idle by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe you should write slashdot an email to complain.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:idle by TheGeniusIsOut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It blows my mind that people complain about something tagged as a complete waste of time and you should never go there being a complete waste of time but still going there...

      --
      Ignorance is Bliss -- And the Opposite is True -- Genius is Madness
    3. Re:idle by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, listen to your users.

      I find idle to be an aptly named entertaining time-waster.

      Please count me as a vote to keep it, in all its green-backgrounded, hate-mail-filled glory.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    4. Re:idle by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I likes it as well...All work and no play makes for a dull day. I wish all the goddamn whiners would learn to use the goddamn preferences if they don't want to see it.

      HERE is the LINK you whiny bastards...Scroll down to "idle" and put the little dot in the little radio box under the universal circle/slash that means DO NOT WANT.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  3. This Rank Garden by Ngarrang · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Women, children and people of faith will never be able to learn what you have to impart because of the filth you are tending in this rank garden."

    What? Hold the horses, here! There is something to be learned from Slashdot? And here I thought it was a place for over-opinionated (and often bored) tech folks committing the equivalent of mental masturbation.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
  4. Three frickin' emails!? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I seeing this right!? I don't have a problem with the idle section, but this isn't even worthy of an Idle thread.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  5. I can answer one of your questions. by RandoX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why your people deem it necessary to use the language that they do I can never understand
     
    We're a VB.Net shop. The language was forced upon us. We don't like it any more than you do. Sorry.

  6. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by abigor · · Score: 4, Informative

    To slash someone in hockey means to strike them with the blade of your stick, usually the lower legs. If the ref sees you do it, it's a two minute minor penalty.

  7. My prediction by OzPeter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sometime soon this section will die a slow death, but the stinking corpse will still lay around for all to see. Kinda like Slashback or those regular friendly fireside chats Cmdr Taco started (and then stopped) all those years ago.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  8. The Profanity Guy by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's sad to me that someone like the profanity guy just doesn't have a clue about the emailing mechanism (if he is indeed seeing emailed articles). I support people in their right to really find their own niche on the web; it's just too bad that many of them will never find it because the curve is too steep. Those of us who are happy to use Slashdot have already found our own ways of blocking trash we don't like, but many people are forced to wade through LOTS of stuff that they don't want to see as part of their normal web-surfing experience.

    So, I totally sympathize with him, even though it's obvious his email is misdirected.

  9. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 3, Funny

    >> Funny how stupid people always think they're smarter than they are.

    Oh yeah? Well I suggest you think about changing your name to something that isn't obviously about ninjas.

  10. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by digitalhermit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's another effect that's quite similar: People over-estimate mediocre skills in others when they don't possess that skill. For example, I am, at best, an average math student by most standards. However, some people think I'm mathematically gifted because I can explain a linear equation.

    Then there's the effect where people assume someone is smart because they agree on some irrelevant point. For example, say I oppose the (current incarnation) of the death penalty. Others think I'm smart because they oppose the death penalty. However, my argument may be based on the fairness of the punishment (i.e., not carried out equally to all violators) whereas their argument may be religiously based (thou shalt not kill). Politicians exploit this quite often. "I am a , therefore I am a good choice for this office."

  11. Epimenides would be proud by spazdor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is fantastic. Your comment disproves itself!

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    1. Re:Epimenides would be proud by spazdor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was just gonna leave the thread as it was because I thought it was funnier to let you have the last bewildered, headscratching word.

      But since you're intent on dragging it on and on (I commend you for having the courage for a karma suicide of this magnitude), here is a point-by-point explanation.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamebait

      I would characterize calling the admins retards as consistent with the above definition.

      You said "Nearly every downmodding that occurs on Slashdot is 100% invalid."

      But your flamebait was correctly modded as such.

      100% valid.

      Now post an angry reply to this so you can lose 3 more points.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    2. Re:Epimenides would be proud by smbarbour · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps the fact that you are being flamed in the responses to your posts, indicates that your posts are, in fact, "flamebait"

      Additionally, the abusive verbiage used in your original post indicates that you were posting clearly for incendiary value.

    3. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Surt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A completely public mod system. If you downmod someone, and I don't approve of your moderation, then I can filter your moderations in the future. Also allow controls for recently created accounts to prevent advertisers from spamming new accounts, and you're done. Better moderation system achieved.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Epimenides would be proud by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've been downmodded over 10 times because of your N posts, N of them are trolls and/or flamebait.

      Your first post is clearly a troll by stating that /.'s mod system is broken, as a reply to a comment which is unrelated to /.'s mod system. That's the precise definition of troll; furthermore, it is not a fact (no matter how much anecdotal evidence you offer), but rather, your opinion. Your other N-1 posts (all but the first) are meta-troll and/or meta-flamebait posts; in each post, you argue that the first post shouldn't have been downmodded for being troll/flamebait, thus sparking a useless discussion about trolls and flamebaits and /.'s mod system.

      PLONK

    5. Re:Epimenides would be proud by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's a pretty good idea. Though it wouldn't need to be public as such to achieve the effect, only the system would need to remember which mods made which moderations. Having said that I haven't seen a better system that /. for moderating anywhere on the internet.

    6. Re:Epimenides would be proud by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a logical fallacy: affirmation of the consequent. He could get flamed for many reasons, so we can't conclusively say that his posts are flamebait because they drew flames.

      But we can say that it is very VERY likely ...

    7. Re:Epimenides would be proud by OldSchoolNapster · · Score: 2, Funny

      (alt. account to avoid undoing moderation :-)

      hahaha. What did you expect to happen?

      You posted 10 blatenty flamebaitish messages all stating the exact same thing.

      The first one got modded down because it was flamebait, and you posted the exact same thing 10 more times. The moderation given to your flamebait posts calling admins and moderators and retards was completely appropriate.

      By the way, I gave you your first "flamebait" mod for your initial post calling admins retards. Calling someone a retard is flamebait, plain and simple.

      When you posted to complain with your illogical explenation that your blatant flamebait was in fact not flamebait, and that you are one of the few people that knows what flamebait is, I modded that post overrated.

      When you posted yet another blatant flamebait post, I modded that one flamebait as well. Then I ran out of modpoints.

      Look, there are some inappropriate moderations around here from time to time. I have been a victim of them myself, but that does not make the system fundamentally broken. It's just an environmental factor that you just kind of have to deal with.

      I sometimes post things knowing that I will get modded down. I've called moderators retards and been modded down for it.

      The trick is to limit your losses by limiting the amount of posts you make that you can reasonably expect to get modded down. Blatant flamebait will get modded down, and your posts are blatant flamebait, redundant, offtopic, and if not for the fact that you may actually be this mentally unstable, trolls.

      I don't want to undo my moderation because I (and everyone else) know it was entirely appropriate, but I will sign this message and tell you the main reason I modded you down instead of just moving on and chalking your post up to just another idiot in the shitheap.

      I thought there was a good chance you would fly off the handle. I never imagined you would take it this far, but I must admit that I am very glad it happened.

      Yes, I am an asshole, and a troll, but your posts were blatant flamebait and were modded appropriately.

      bit trollent

  12. wait.. by nimbius · · Score: 2, Funny

    my garden is dirty? i dont follow. is this some soviet code for "please stop using the word shitcock so many times"?

    i wouldnt exactly call what i impart 'wisdom' either...

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  13. Weak faith by AioKits · · Score: 4, Funny

    All I can say is that if your faith is shaken by if someone says fuck (or other profanity of choice) or not, it must be some pretty weak faith.

    On that note: Cock!

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  14. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps he should try underscoreslashdot.org ( "_/." ).

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  15. Re:I'm following the money... by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I come to that conclusion by process of elimination because there is no other intelligent reason for this

    Yeah, because nobody else in the geek community ever posts their hate mail.

    It's funny, entertaining, and it's on idle. Get over it.

    --
    "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  16. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's as if all of Digg reached out and touched slashdot in this post. It makes me hurt

  17. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure the guy was equally pissed that digg.com is not about shovels and holes.

    And The Onion. Don't even get him started on The Onion.

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  18. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by bonehead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not being a hockey fan, I guess I'm in need of some education. Just exactly how is the name slashdot "obviously about hockey"?

  19. SlapShot? by Ummite · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think the guy talk about slapshot (the hockey guy).

    Very disturbing indeed!

  20. Keep it coming by Hy-teq · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is a great series. Please continue Disagree Mail.

  21. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by DJStealth · · Score: 2, Informative

    /. looks like a hockey stick.

  22. my impression of you by spazdor · · Score: 5, Funny

    COME ON MODS, FIGHT ME YOU FAGGOTS

    What? Trying to pick a fight? Moi? Clearly you have no idea what picking a fight means, YOU DAMN FAGGOTS

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    1. Re:my impression of you by Kesch · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only sensible mod for this post would be -1 Troll, +6 Underrated. Thus achieving the holy grail of +5 troll.

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
  23. visual relief by bperkins · · Score: 2, Informative


    // ==UserScript==
    // @name           slashdot
    // @namespace      foo
    // @description    unscewup idle
    // @include        http://idle.slashdot.org/
    // ==/UserScript==

    var a, thisdomain, links;
    links = document.getElementsByTagName('div');
    for (var i = 0; i < links.length; i++) {
        a = links[i];

        if (a.getAttribute("class") == "head"   ) {

           a.style.backgroundColor = 'white';
           a.style.color = 'black';
        }

        if (a.getAttribute("class") == "details"   ) {

           a.style.color = 'black';
        }

        if (a.getAttribute("class") == "body"   ) {

           a.style.color = 'black';
           a.style.fontSize = "100%";
        }

    }

    Seems to work for now.
    YMMV.

  24. Re:I'm following the money... by Kelbear · · Score: 2, Funny

    All the internet should follow your shining example. The passion and fire within your breast that you hold for this website should be admired. Finally someone has stepped up to criticize the horrible travesty here.

    Thank you for taking the time to read these idle posting that you hate so much and draft a comment letting everyone know how much you hate these posts you've read.

    Your stirring rhetoric has compelled me to take action and block ads. We'll show the enemy we are not to be trifled with!

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. No Hockey? by genner · · Score: 5, Funny

    I never notcied this before but he's right. There's not nearly enough hockey on this site.

  27. I think this is the reason for the confusion: by default+luser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Am I the only person that had the sudden urge to register hockeydot.org and have it redirect to Slashdot?

    Check this out: Hockeydot.net.

    Yeah, I know, slashDOT, hockeyDOT...right. It's a weak connection, but the sender was a weak idiot. I would expect this kind of stupid logic from a person like him.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.