Slashdot Mirror


City Uses DNA To Sniff Out Dog Poop Offenders

An Israeli city is using DNA analysis of dog droppings to reward pet owners who clean up after their pets and punish those who don't. A six-month trial program launched this week, in the city of Petah Tikva, to tackle the dog mess problem in a high tech way. The program asks dog owners to take their pets to a veterinarian, who then swabs its mouth and collects DNA. The city will use the DNA database it is building to match droppings to a dog and identify its owner. Owners who scoop up their dogs' droppings and place them in specially marked bins will be eligible for rewards of pet food coupons and dog toys. Those who leave the poo on the street face fines. I wonder what sin you had to commit in a previous life to find yourself the official dog poop examiner of Petah Tikva, Israel.

190 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. The limits of forensics by MattGWU · · Score: 1

    We can identify poop with DNA but we still can't dust for vomit.

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
    1. Re:The limits of forensics by WgT2 · · Score: 1

      The contracting DNA labs: "Every thing coming up roses! (opens first 'specimen') What kind of cruel joke is this?!!"

  2. Let me be the first to say... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

    What a shitty idea.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by inKubus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Like, who gives a crap?

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    2. Re:Let me be the first to say... by i_liek_turtles · · Score: 1

      People who are really anal.

    3. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 1

      > Like, who gives a crap?

      shitheads.

      --
      My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
    4. Re:Let me be the first to say... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      I know. This idea is a real turd.

    5. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Kooty-Sentinel · · Score: 1

      What the SHIT was that (In a McLovin-isque voice)

      --
      Your evaluation period for Productivity 1.0 has ended. Please purchase more coffee to continue using this product.
    6. Re:Let me be the first to say... by moriya · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually it's a good idea...

      for me to poop on!!!

    7. Re:Let me be the first to say... by ronoholiv · · Score: 1

      - Like, who gives a crap?

      Global Dynamics' poop guy. Had to do something after being fired....

    8. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I don't want to be fined so I wouldn't give the city my Dogs DNA.

      What's next are they going to require all citizens hand over their DNA so they can fine us for public urination?

      Fuck that..

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    9. Re:Let me be the first to say... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "People who are really anal."

      Must be. I mean, what is the big deal if a dog poops in someone's yard. Unless you have kids that play in the front yard, what does it matter? It is just nature's fertilizer....and it isn't like kids play out in the yards much today anyway, they're busy indoors eating cheetoes and playing video games.

      I can understand in concrete 'jungle' of a very urban area where there aren't really many/any green areas, sure pick up after the dog, no one wants to dodge poop on the sidewalk, but, in the more prevalent living areas with lawns, green areas, etc....who cares if a dog poops here or there, it isn't like a human is gonna be walking through there and step on it....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:Let me be the first to say... by RandoX · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll tell you why I care. Because the neighbor's dog is a freaking mutant, and eats things that *aren't food* and don't get digested. I've had to clean up everything from condoms to scraps of cloth and likely carpet fibers to a piece of metal that I suspect was an underwire from a bra.

    11. Re:Let me be the first to say... by GTRacer · · Score: 2, Informative
      *I* care, simply because sometimes, I like to walk through my yard to get the mail, or to talk to a neighbor, or when taking groceries in from the car. Collecting dog poop in my shoes or toes is not something that adds to the experience of owning a yard.

      Also, there are times when I can smell it even without standing in it. Or hows about when my mulching mower tries to mulch a big pile? It gets in the wheels and sometimes the clippings bag which I have to empty manually. Ewww!

      I don't own a dog and any dog poop in my yard is someone else's mess that never should have been left there. I don't know how many times I've watched someone walking their dog stop and wait while Fido leaves a present behind. Strays are one thing but anyone with their pet that does that needs to wake up to a mailbox full of dog poop (sorry for all the poop - work filters FTL).

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    12. Re:Let me be the first to say... by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      I don't want to be fined so I wouldn't give the city my Dogs DNA.

      So they fine you for not giving it. Either way you get fined.

      Of course the idea that this entire solution could be avoided if people cleaned up their own dog's crap seems to escape people.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    13. Re:Let me be the first to say... by j-turkey · · Score: 1

      Must be. I mean, what is the big deal if a dog poops in someone's yard. Unless you have kids that play in the front yard, what does it matter? It is just nature's fertilizer....and it isn't like kids play out in the yards much today anyway, they're busy indoors eating cheetoes and playing video games.

      I can understand in concrete 'jungle' of a very urban area where there aren't really many/any green areas, sure pick up after the dog, no one wants to dodge poop on the sidewalk, but, in the more prevalent living areas with lawns, green areas, etc....who cares if a dog poops here or there, it isn't like a human is gonna be walking through there and step on it....

      I really hope that you don't own a dog, and if you do - I hope you're not my neighbor. If you are my neighbor and do have a dog, make sure your dog poops in your own yard; in fact, stay off of my lawn altogether. You're not doing me any more of a favor in 'fertilizing' my lawn than I would be by breaking into your house to crap in one of your houseplants.

      --

      -Turkey

    14. Re:Let me be the first to say... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Wow...this is interesting.

      I've not in all my years ever seen until recently, this real animosity towards dogs using the bathroom in random yards while you take them on a walk through a neighborhood.

      No one ever used to get all bitchy about it....hell, you used to never see people carrying something to pick up poop.....just was a natural thing that happened.

      When exactly did everyone get so fuckin' uptight?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:Let me be the first to say... by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you why I care. Because the neighbor's dog is a freaking mutant, and eats things that *aren't food* and don't get digested. I've had to clean up everything from condoms to scraps of cloth and likely carpet fibers to a piece of metal that I suspect was an underwire from a bra.

      So maybe you should start throwing your rubbers in the trash, not out the window?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    16. Re:Let me be the first to say... by hodet · · Score: 1

      When everyone and their dog became dog owners I guess. Depends where you live, I'm out in the country and couldn't care less if the neighbours dog has a shit on our property. It really ticked me off in town though.

    17. Re:Let me be the first to say... by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      I agree. Sure it's not the coolest thing to find, but DNA analysis? I would say when did we start treating other humans like non-humans? Everything is investigation and litigation. IMO it's something to work out between two men, a simple dispute. If you see it occurring simply talk to them and explain why you don't want them shitting in your yard.

      Also, I thought reliable DNA analysis was expensive. What will they do when the evidence is disputed? They can try to fall back on the "yeah but DNA doesn't lie" but it's not DNA that lies, it's unreliable methods and documentation.

    18. Re:Let me be the first to say... by craash420 · · Score: 1

      If you see it occurring simply talk to them and explain why you don't want them shitting in your yard.

      I wouldn't expect to have a rational conversation with someone who lets their dog shit in another person's yard, but even if it were possible what would I say? "Excuse me, perhaps you didn't notice but your pooch just dropped a steamer next to my mailbox and I'd really appreciate it if you could take it with you."

      I doubt I could string together that many words... it would probably come out as "Dude, what the fuck?!?!"

      --
      Extra medication for all!
    19. Re:Let me be the first to say... by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Yes exactly, why bring the authorities into a matter that can be resolved by two people? Such conversation could be either something eloquent or a "what the fuck!". But why immediately rely on authority to solve every problem? That's how you end up in a nanny state.

    20. Re:Let me be the first to say... by mortonda · · Score: 1

      Amen. I want to put up a sign along the lines of "My kids don't s*** in your yard, so why do they have to play in your dog's?"

    21. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Arcane_Rhino · · Score: 1

      I have a neighbor who didn't control his dogs either and they really liked to crap in my yard.

      My son raises pigs for 4H and, during one of their afternoon walks, used my front lawn for their mess as well. Before my son had a chance to clean it up, here came the Bumpus hounds. They took one sniff and began rolling in it ecstatically. Happy dogs are fun to watch. My wife asked me if we should chase them off. Nope, says I.

      Haven't seen the dogs since.

    22. Re:Let me be the first to say... by SmokeyTheBalrog · · Score: 1

      I see the Holyland, I see the shit, but no matter how hard I look you'd have to be pretty twisted to see fucking in a story about dog poo.

      On a side note: Dear god I wish they'd do this in NYC.

    23. Re:Let me be the first to say... by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      Man that's almost a haiku, retry:

      You've got to be kidding!
      Have you never stepped in crap?
      Not funny now, eh?

  3. Hey, I have an idea! by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How about I don't take my dog to the vet for the swabbing?

    I'm no criminal mastermind, but it just might work!

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by corychristison · · Score: 1

      I think, maybe, the point was more so the rewards program... but then maybe just skim through what happens if you don't clean up after your pet.
      Maybe.

    2. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I ask this in all honesty because I don't know. I was in Okinawa as a child but not since but, well, don't they EAT them over there? As off color as your post seemed initially I wanted to respond because, well, it would seem to me that in all probability (if they DO eat them) that there would be no need to abort something that was raised for food. Many of us don't see dogs as food potentially but they do and if that is their culture then I can't see any reason why they'd simply terminate them other than to eat them and if they're terminating them to eat them then I think that would be called harvesting.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I realized that this would be misleading. So I came back to say that's as close to the middle east as I've ever come. My understanding was, however, that dog was served in some Pacific islands, the Middle East, Asia, and parts of northern Africa on a regular basis. I figured I'd clear up the language if not my own understanding.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by nbert · · Score: 1

      You could also carry a bottle with a liquid containing DNA from a different dog. Whenever your dog leaves something behind you simply spray on it.

      It would be much easier to just pick it up, but imagine the fun when the city starts to look for dogs which don't even are in the same country. Maybe it will lead to the foundation of some sort of dog-interpol.

      Over here we don't have DNA tests (yet), but there are so many rules that I'm not considering buying a new dog when my 13 year old crossbreed dies. Hopefully this will not be so soon. But I'm tired of driving half an hour so I can let him run unleashed. They also made muzzles mandatory in public transport, even if your dog is as small as a rabbit and has never bitten anyone. Both measures were introduced when attacks from fighting dogs received high public awareness...

    5. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by lbgator · · Score: 1

      Or better yet - carry around a bottle of some human DNA. That should really throw them for a loop.

    6. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by karnal · · Score: 1

      why would you need a bottle? I usually have plenty with me everywhere I go.....

      --
      Karnal
    7. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      The shelters euthanize animals because their funding is limited. They do what they can, but new animals are coming in all the time, and if no one adopts an animal, they have to make room for the new ones somehow.

      You probably would *not* want to consume the meat of an euthanized dog, though. We like to think we're doing it humanely, so the typical method is lethal injection.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by d3matt · · Score: 1

      My first thoughts... Have my dog eat another dog. That way there's multiple versions of DNA in the poo...

      --
      I am d3matt
    9. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      We typically think of dogs as pets. I have had dogs that were as close to me as my family was. I guess, barring that, why not slaughter them and eat them instead? I *know* that this isn't okay with most people on slashdot but a good part of the world happily eats them.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The ones that get eaten are special races bred for consumption, you can't just take any random breed and cook it.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    11. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Dog soup is quite ok. Not my preferred meat though, and there are some issues with raising dogs specifically for meat.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    12. Re:Hey, I have an idea! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Of all the things I have eaten, dog is not one of them. I have put all sorts of strange stuff into my body but that is a different topic for another day.

      When I was in the Marines I was bunked in boot camp with a guy, shipmates later, and even ended up out at Quantico together in motor pool. He saved all his money with the goal of raising/breeding a custom breed of work dog. It was supposed to be bred with the idea that it would work, behave, and taste good.

      Yeah... I kid you not.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  4. A shitty Job, but something's gotta do it... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    I can just see it now:

    THIS technology is DA SHIT!

    Much A Shit About Nuthin'

    "It's a SHITTY job but someONE's gotta do IT"

    Now that this has come up, I imagine we'll start to see at Moscone, the "First International GeoScatological Society Meeting"

    These conferences will have a LOT of SHIT to talk about...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    1. Re:A shitty Job, but something's gotta do it... by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > Much A Shit About Nuthin'

      Judges?

      *BZZT*

      I'm sorry...the answer we were looking for is "Much A-Poo About Nothing". Thanks for playing, though, and you'll receive a copy of the home game.

  5. Let me guess... by Korey+Kaczor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just how many coupons do you think they honestly will give out? They'd probably just only check the DNA samples found on the ground because that generates revenue; they're honestly not going to use a costly procedure just to reward citizens. Actually, how much does DNA analysis of dog droppings cost? I'm skeptical that this will be done very often, as I believe DNA testing isn't really that cheap.

    1. Re:Let me guess... by magarity · · Score: 1

      Coupons are a form of corporate advertising. Get the company who wants the coupons handed out to foot the bill for the DNA test. If there's any resistance, create a mandatory package deal where if one wants to advertise on city owned property (busses, etc) a sponsor must also do the dog poop analysis promotion.

    2. Re:Let me guess... by Qubit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When I was working on a grizzly bear census about a decade ago (it wasn't as dangerous as it sounds...), we collected tufts of hair from rub trees and scat.

      I think that doing the DNA workup on a hair sample was a bit more than the scat, but that both of them were at least $5, maybe $10 each. The census didn't have enough money to do it all up front, so they were stashing samples in freezers while they tried to get more grant money.

      Prices may have gone done since then, but I'd guess that doing a sample on each dog crap is going to take a lot of time and money. And besides, don't they imagine that people are going to put the dog crap from their yard into the boxes as well? I mean, if you get a toy or something each time, aren't people going to load the boxes up?

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
    3. Re:Let me guess... by jcwayne · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...they were stashing samples in freezers...

      You mean that wasn't double chunk chocolate ice cream?

      --
      Failure to follow this advice may result in non-deterministic behavior.
    4. Re:Let me guess... by NoisySplatter · · Score: 1

      My best guess is that they aren't testing anything and just sending registered owners coupons. The fear of a possible fine will suffice to make people more aware of the problem, and should that fail to produce results they could test a small sample of the poop left on the ground and fine those people. Once word gets out that mary jane next door actually got a fine people will believe they mean business and they can go back to doing nothing.

      --
      In Soviet Russia meme tires of you!
    5. Re:Let me guess... by matria · · Score: 1

      This isn't suburban USA; very few people have yards. That's why they walk their dogs on the streets.

      http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20080916/img/pwl-a-man-walks-his-dogs-in-227fa3f5bf54.html

    6. Re:Let me guess... by lbgator · · Score: 1

      Neat - did you work for the USGS? Sounds like they are doing the same (or a similar) study. I just saw a press release (with video) about that the other day.

        * Press Release
        * Video Pod Cast

    7. Re:Let me guess... by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

      But if they fine you $50 they've paid for the next 5-10 tests...

      --
      Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
    8. Re:Let me guess... by blindd0t · · Score: 1

      You mean that wasn't double chunk chocolate ice cream?

      It's an common mistake, really. Anyone would think ice cream with bits of corn in it might actually taste good.

    9. Re:Let me guess... by BradleyAndersen · · Score: 1

      For some reason, this was what I found funny today. Bravo.

    10. Re:Let me guess... by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      If it's expensive, pass the cost of the testing onto the people who don't scoop the poop!

  6. bad karma? by no-body · · Score: 1

    . I wonder what sin you had to commit in a previous life

    Actually I think whosoever is doing this accumulates 10 x the good karma normal people accumulate in one life-time.

    One gets used to it - think about a coroner job....

    1. Re:bad karma? by largesnike · · Score: 2, Funny

      Possible sins committed in previous life

      1. invented those little sticky lables that go on fruit
      2. invented advertising
      3. invented reality tv
      4. being George Lucas (I mean he's gotta pay for Jar-Jar Binks)
      5. being any RIAA lawyer
      6. and finally (for special irony) being a fundamentalist ideologue of any stripe

      --
      "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
  7. Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So only outlaws will refuse to have their dogs' DNA recorded in their database?

  8. No vet, no license for your dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Israel, you need to have a license for your dog from the city/municipality where you live; you get it when you take your dog to the vet for its annual rabies vaccination. All licensed dogs must be "chipped" also.

    I suppose getting caught walking an unlicensed dog will also get you a hefty fine, and your dog will be confiscated. I wouldn't think that most municipalities in Israel have a lot of budget for paying people to check on dog licensing and enforcing the "clean after your dog" laws. Maybe this is one way to try to generate a new income stream for the municipality (people already pay for licensing their dogs)?

    1. Re:No vet, no license for your dog by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Funny

      income stream

      Best euphemism for bodily waste ever!

    2. Re:No vet, no license for your dog by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      In Israel, you need to have a license for your dog from the city/municipality where you live; you get it when you take your dog to the vet for its annual rabies vaccination. All licensed dogs must be "chipped" also.

      I suppose getting caught walking an unlicensed dog will also get you a hefty fine, and your dog will be confiscated. I wouldn't think that most municipalities in Israel have a lot of budget for paying people to check on dog licensing and enforcing the "clean after your dog" laws. Maybe this is one way to try to generate a new income stream for the municipality (people already pay for licensing their dogs)?

      The licensing issue is not really enforced, at least not in Haifa. As a responsible dog owner, I am glad to see this initiative. I hope it comes to Haifa soon.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:No vet, no license for your dog by phozz+bare · · Score: 1

      Don't know about you, I tend to prefer cats to rats.

  9. Privacy Concerns anyone? by stretch0611 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As far as I am concerned, this is an invasion of privacy.

    --
    Looking for a job?
    Want your resume written professionally?
    DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    1. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As far as I am concerned, this is an invasion of privacy.

      This is crazy and funny how nobody seems to really care enough to fight it. Further more anyone who is offended by this should look to there own country in which they are basically doing this to humans. Although they arent going through our shit YET! They are amassing huge databases against us and tracking us and listening to us ect. All that is an envasion of privacy. Just check out this http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/25/2537.asp This has long been a goal for the DHS but now they dont even have to ask for it. We knew it was coming just not when. I suggest you look to see what you can do politically. Nobody really likes to do it and if you do then your already doing it and probly on the inside making up BS laws against our privacy now. But run for office or support someone who is running for Constitutional form of government. We have a right to privay not from our governments but from GOD/Creator whomever he/she is to you. Check out real ID act of 2005 see how to fight it. Google it NAIS same thing except it is there to chip(RFID implanted) ALL animals on the farm/home. They are really really close to if not already a Police state here in america.

    2. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Funny

      Agreed, we need less government interference in my dog's rectum.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Vombatus · · Score: 4, Funny
      As far as I am concerned, this is an invasion of privacy.

      Yeah, keep your nose out of my business!!!

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
    4. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're so worried about your privacy, then don't go to the vet's and get the swab done. Better yet, DON'T LEAVE YOUR DOG'S SHIT LAYING AROUND!

    5. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by demiurge11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As far as I am concerned, this is an invasion of privacy.

      Do *you* like stepping on dog crap? I certainly don't. I think using doggy DNA testing to catch bad neighbors that let their dogs poop all over the place is a public service. Furthermore, dogs don't have a right to privacy. In general, municipalities already match owner to dog via licenses, so there is no additional loss of privacy here.

    6. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Born2bwire · · Score: 2, Funny

      An abandoned, steaming and odoriferous object in plain view (and smell) on a public street has claims of privacy? Please tell me more.

    7. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Kangburra · · Score: 1

      You Sir, owe me a keyboard! ;-)

      --
      Common sense is not so common
    8. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would seem to me someone who was worried about their privacy being violated by dog shit wouldn't have left said dog shit laying around in public.

    9. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Urkki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No it's not. If you leave your dog's poop on a public place, it's free game for any DNA analysis or whatever.

      You might argue that owning a dog is a matter of privacy and should not require a permit or anything (with which I disagree with, and will elaborate if you want). But if you come to me claiming that a pile of shit left on a public place is your private property, I'll ask if you're insane... :-)

    10. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Kooty-Sentinel · · Score: 1

      You know (I don't agree one bit), but the same reasoning could be used by the BSA

      Do *you* like getting your software stolen and distributed for free? I certainly don't. I think using ISP logs to catch bad internet users that download copyrighted, cracked software is a public service.

      --
      Your evaluation period for Productivity 1.0 has ended. Please purchase more coffee to continue using this product.
    11. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I can't believe anybody would violate that poor dog's privacy!

    12. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Born2bwire · · Score: 1

      I agree. I can't believe anybody would violate that poor dog's privacy!

      Well, anyone except that asshole Bob Barker. Spay or neuter your pet indeed. Who the hell does he think he is?

    13. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Then why step in it? If you don't like it, don't do it.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    14. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or are there way too many public services already?

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    15. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by liquiddark · · Score: 1

      In actual fact, the intention is to rub your nose in your dog's business. It works for the dog, after all.

    16. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Folks, you're looking at this from the wrong end.
       
      To be sure, there is no invasion of privacy in testing dog shit left around in public.
       
      The invasion comes when every dog must be DNA profiled to be permitted to live in the city. How long before the same is true of every human in the city?

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    17. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      No it's not. If you leave your dog's poop on a public place, it's free game for any DNA analysis or whatever.

      You might argue that owning a dog is a matter of privacy and should not require a permit or anything

      The greater privacy question is whether the permit should require DNA swabbing.

    18. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      "As far as I am concerned, this is an invasion of privacy."

      Technically, any dog poop on the ground is a "crime scene". There is no way it could be there unless a law were broken. Isn't DNA analysis a common tool in criminal investigation? What's new here is that in the past DNA analysis was so expensive that it was used only to help solve very serious crimes. Now it's cheap.

      Interesting that some one would be concerned about a dog's privacy anyways. I really don't think that dogs care about that.

    19. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Dogs don't have a right to privacy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      ummm, yea, I mean wasn't that established by Catherine Zeta-Jones vs Hello magazine.

    21. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by foraneagle2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, please elaborate.

    22. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by mortonda · · Score: 1

      As far as I am concerned, this is an invasion of privacy.


      Yeah, keep your nose out of my business!!!

       

      How 'bout you keep your (dog's) business out of my nose?

    23. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      How is that even connected? Dogs wear dog tags and have to be kept on a leash, how long until that is true of people? Well, as far as we can tell it won't ever be.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    24. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Ok. Note: I'm talking here about the privacy of owning a dog in general, not specifically related to this DNA analysis thing.

      Dogs in a city are members of the community. However, they are not responsible for their own actions, but instead the dog owner is. Owning a dog is not really possible (in a city) without it impacting other people. Barking, pooping, running away and doing bad stuff, this all happens all the time when dogs are part of a human community and is pretty much unavoidable.

      Also there is the issue of animal rights, it's generally thought that a pet has a right for a decent life, and that the society has not only right but an obligation to enforce that owners provide a decent life for their pets, and dogs are maybe the most common pets, and therefore the most common victims of cruelty and mistreatment.

      All this, combined with the fact that problems are in fact real, not just imagination of some control freaks, makes dog ownership non-private thing. And requiring a permit is one way to get the public side of things under control.

    25. Re:Privacy Concerns anyone? by Urkki · · Score: 1

      You're right, it's a valid question. However, I don't really see how adding a dog's DNA fingerprint into the dog permit file would impact the privacy issue any more than requiring the permit already does anyway.

      First, dogs are short-lived, and can be "put away" at will, so having dog DNA in a file is not something that affects a human for life.

      Secondly, nobody is going to screen you (for jobs, insurance, suspected terrorist) by the DNA of your dog, so the big invasion of privacy made possible by analysing human DNA just isn't there.

      Of course there are possibilites of abuse (steal your neighbours dog shit, put it in your from yard, sue for profit), but this can be controlled by simply taking into account that DNA doesn't really prove anything in a case like this. Same could be done with photoshopped photograph of the dog on neighbours lawn even without DNA.

  10. May be a useful technique....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    during election season if it can trace bullshit back to it's source.

  11. Heh by Renraku · · Score: 1

    How about spending money on something with a better cost-benefit ratio? Like free designer flu-masks for the sick? Turning all water fountains into GOOD filtered water rather than shitty chlorine water?

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  12. Re:American taxpayer funded? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    We give billions to everybody, so, no.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  13. Cigarette butts by spyder-implee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should do this with people who smoke and drop their cigarette butts on the ground.

    --
    Take what ye can. Give nothing back!
    1. Re:Cigarette butts by naer_dinsul · · Score: 5, Funny

      They should do this with people who smoke and drop their cigarette butts on the ground.

      What? Send them to the vet to get a DNA swab so they'll be eligible for coupons on dog food and doggie toys?

    2. Re:Cigarette butts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No just use the existing criminal DNA database.

    3. Re:Cigarette butts by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Send them to the vet to get a DNA swab so they'll be eligible for coupons on dog food and doggie toys?

      no but a promise of free cigarettes might do the trick...

    4. Re:Cigarette butts by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      Almost, first part was right. Send them to the vets. Snip snip.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    5. Re:Cigarette butts by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      no but a promise of free cigarettes might do the trick...

      You might have something there...

  14. I think they can use DNA to narrow the offender's by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

    breed. I think that would go a long way towards catching whoever does it. I live in an urban area and I have no sympathy for anyone who leaves their dog shit everywhere. I think they should be fined and jailed for first offense.

  15. Tag Idle: nothumor by MrMista_B · · Score: 1

    Because, seriously. It's not.

  16. How to abuse this system by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Save up like a MONTH of your dog's poo. Then go around spooning it into these containers. Get fido's mouth swabbed, and watch as all the alarms at the veterinarian's office go off. Oy vey! We have a winner!

    1. Re:How to abuse this system by smellotron · · Score: 1

      If you're willing to go through that much effort and poop storage, you deserve the rewards.

    2. Re:How to abuse this system by shliddle · · Score: 1

      Or, how about getting a friend in a vet's office to swab YOUR mouth, then jam your OWN crap in all the boxes around town?

  17. Coming up next... by icj · · Score: 1, Funny

    Law & Order: SPU (special poop unit)

  18. Re:American taxpayer funded? by mikeage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not really. The vast majority of American aid to Israel is military, and even that is generally "credits" that can only be spent at American companies, not actual cash for Israeli R&D.

    OTOH, if they start using the standard military issue M16A1 (from the Nixon era) to shoot the offending dogs (or owners...), then US taxpayers may be paying...

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  19. Re:Let's see by zappepcs · · Score: 1

    Or worse, someone takes your dog's poop out and leaves it on the sidewalk to be found because they don't like you?

    Apparently the thousands and thousands of cameras in England are no substitute for DNA testing... wonder what the ROI and cost comparisons are?

  20. Another city to add to Triumph's blacklist by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    Looks like it's another city to add to Triumph's blacklist.

    Now I can just imagine irate neighbors taking poop and planting them to get their neighbors in trouble.

    Also...wonder how this will affect that dog-poop in the mail business.

    Wait...the DNA sampling is "voluntary" right? It's not required to register your dog's DNA?

    btw, the mainstream news had a segment on it.

    1. Re:Another city to add to Triumph's blacklist by mpe · · Score: 1

      Looks like it's another city to add to Triumph's blacklist.

      You mean that being in a country which has been a "war zone" more or less since it came into existance dosn't already qualify?

      Now I can just imagine irate neighbors taking poop and planting them to get their neighbors in trouble.

      All you'd need would be a sample of the dog's DNA.
      There's also the possibility of people trying to seed the "poop bins" in order to get more freebies.

    2. Re:Another city to add to Triumph's blacklist by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

      or use exlax

      no....triumph will poop on anything...if he can get away with it.

  21. You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Having solved all other problems within their country, Israel turns it's attention and taxpayer dollars towards the onerous problem of DOG SHIT.

    As I said, you've got to be kidding me. Isn't DNA analysis still kind of expensive?

    1. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it's actually quite cheap, and easy (I teach an undergrad general bio lab where they do DNA comparisons, and believe me, if it cost anything, the school wouldn't pay for undergrads to do it). The DNA Who's-My-Daddy labs just charge a lot, because they can (or because they get government contracts). Just like cell phone providers and text messaging fees.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    2. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's right, countries should only focus the single most important problem for them. It's stupid to spend money on Alzheimer's until we solve heart disease and cancer.

       

      Meanwhile, something like this is likely to be either a gain or neutral in terms of net revenue for the government, which means there won't be any less resources devoted to other problems.

       

      I love dogs, but over the past 8 years of living in major cities, I now see most urban dog owners as mostly being people who inconvenience everyone else - often including the dogs - in order to entertain and feel better about themselves. Most urban dog owners have very little empathy for their pets and so long as the dog doesn't show obvious signs of stress, the owner thinks of them as being happy - regardless of whether the dogs bark and whine for hours on end and are locked up in a few-hundred square feet apartment for most of the day. Then the owner uses having a dog as an excuse to the same undeserved entitlements many parents' take, sometimes more: it's pretty rare to see parents handle their diapers as inconsiderately towards others as dog owners often handle their baggies of dog shit.

    3. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

      OK, for the moment I'll say I believe you on the cost issue, because for the moment I can't refute what you're saying. Still, this seems like way, way overkill for a simple problem. Seriously, couldn't they come up with a more down-to-earth solution? Or are there really so many pet dogs livng in ths suburb of Tel Aviv, making it such a huge public health issue that they have to go to this sort of extreme? I have a hard time believing that.

    4. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by rrohbeck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually we could use something like that in SoCal's parks. There isn't a single day when I don't see new dog turds on my usual running route. This is despite huge signs tha tell you to pick up after your dog, free plastic bag dispensers and large trash cans everywhere.
      Many dog owners are assholes, that's the only way I can see it. Tax the hell out of them and pay somebody to clean up the dog shit.

    5. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of damage done to the underlying grass from poo.

      With enough creative accounting, it's possible this actually saves them money.

      --
      -David
    6. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by pbf · · Score: 1

      Who cares if the DNA analysis is expensive. This cost should be more than covered by the fine issued to the offender, so really for the tax-payer that has no dog or who takes care of his dog's crap, it makes no difference. The fine for the dog owner's who litter the public space should be high enough to encourage them to not do so and to cover for all expenses related to the service.

      I don't really get why there is a need for the reward. Fine the bad players and let the good players alone.

      --
      et les Shadoks pompaient...
    7. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Which Grass are you referring to?
      Plus, i thought dogs and cattle did not have blood groups like humans and chimps. They have blood family groups, but no A1B positive kinda stuff. They have A,B,C i guess although this is irrelevant for DNA testing.
      Israelites have too much time on their hands i guess. As if they have solved the problem of jerusalem, golan heights, baby kidnappings, settlements, right-wing nut jobs, left-wing crackpots, middle-wing sufferers, etc.
      Seriously, Israel should spend this money on something useful instead of tracking down dog owners...what if the doog poop was deliberately for alibi purposes because the dog owner did an OJ Simpson kinda killing? Stupid guys.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    8. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      This isn't Israel doing it. It's a city within Israel.

      An employee who works for the government had an idea and made it happen. That employee probably couldn't solve the whole war thing, so figured they'd do this instead.

      I can't cure cancer, but that doesn't mean I can't do my part to make the world a better -- or less poopy -- place.

      --
      -David
    9. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Having solved all other problems within their country, Israel turns it's attention and taxpayer dollars towards the onerous problem of DOG SHIT. As I said, you've got to be kidding me. Isn't DNA analysis still kind of expensive?

      Not that this is the way I'd like my tax money to be spent, but this is probably just a city investment in fostering a local budding biotech industry. A private company might even provide such a service at a loss -- just so that it could get the press -- and the credit for having done it first. And for as low as $35 (retail price) per test, it's also bound to get cheaper with time and with bulk. Eventually, may be ten to twenty years from now, this kind of tech may even take the form of an hand-held device that gives you nearly-instantaneous results -- which could be used at security check points and high risk security areas.

    10. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by winterice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having solved all other problems within their country, Israel turns it's attention and taxpayer dollars towards the onerous problem of DOG SHIT.

      As I said, you've got to be kidding me.

      Well, there's the government who's job is to handle things like war and peace, intercity roads, and fiscal policy. And there's the municipality who's job is to make sure that you have nice parks and that you don't step in dog poo. This is how a country operates.

    11. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by Begemot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can I guess - you have never been to Israel, have you?

      1. It's not Israel the country, but a single rather small city within Israel, with their own INDEPENDENT budget
      2. As someone already responded, DNA tests are quite cheap, especially in Israel
      3. It's just so typically arrogant to assume that you understand better than a the people who decided to do it, a bit of credit man...
      4. In Israel we use shekels, not dollars (see #3)

      Cheers,
      Anton.

    12. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by operator_error · · Score: 1

      Seriously, couldn't they come up with a more down-to-earth solution?

      In Amsterdam, if you are walking a dog, the police may stop you and request to see the bags you are carrying in case your dog takes a dump, and you need to pick it up. No bags + dog = ticket.

    13. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Having solved all other problems within their country, Israel turns it's attention and taxpayer dollars towards the onerous problem of DOG SHIT.

      I know that the US likes to ignore ALL it's internal problems and spend all it's money on a war on the other side of the world. However, here (Israel) we tackle all our problems in moderation. In any case, this proposal sounds like it will be creating jobs and causing money to flow, not costing the government money. That is usually good for the economy, no?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    14. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, some dog owners are assholes, most pick up.
      Classic, a few ruin it for the rest syndrome.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Ah good old Israel, the center of the moderate minds. I'm sorry but were you preaching to the US about war?

      No, why would I preach to someone who knows it all already?

      As for creating jobs, well I can put you all in cages and that will mean a huge infrastructure to support these cages. This is good for the economy, no?

      You can invent as many imaginary fallacies as you like, I'm sure. Next time try to invent a fallacy that addresses the issue at hand.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    16. Re:You've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, part 85984374 by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      I just said "many". Too many for our environment to bear. Every time after a significant storm some beaches are contaminated and the primary source of bacteria is pet (mostly dog) shit.
      My guess is about 50% pick up. Some dog owners have a little blue plastic bag on them, some don't. And I can see a few dogs in the act of crapping every now and then and I can see very few dog owners picking something up.
      Given that about 50% comply with the mandatory leashing up I'd say it's probably the same with picking up their dog's shit.
      I kick a dog in the head about once a year because it's not leashed up and tries to jump me when I'm running. "But he only wants to play!" Yeah right, and I don't. I've been bitten twice, that's enough. I don't hate dogs, but I've come to dislike dog owners a lot.

  22. Matters of Karma by BhaKi · · Score: 1

    You wonder what sin you had to commit in a previous life to find yourself the official dog poop examiner of Petah Tikva, Israel. And I wonder what sin the official dog poop examiner had to commit in his previous life.

    --
    The largest prime factor of my UID is 263267.
  23. Previous life discovered... by Tofof · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder what sin you had to commit in a previous life to find yourself the official dog poop examiner of Petah Tikva, Israel.

    Why, isn't it obvious? You'd have to be the sort of person who keeps posting these idle articles to the front page.

    1. Re:Previous life discovered... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      If you don't like Idle, then TURN IT OFF IN YOUR PREFERENCES. (If you can't see the Save button, just keep tabbing)

  24. don't be so negative by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    This technology is the shit!

  25. Re:American taxpayer funded? by Xenna · · Score: 1

    I'll bet it's funded by the people who leave their dog's shit in the road.
    They pay a fine and the cost of the DNA test.

    Great plan, I wish they did it in my town. It's full of shit :(

    X.

  26. Re:American taxpayer funded? by renegadesx · · Score: 1

    Most likley not, that money would mostly go towards infastructure, military to defend its borders etc. The Israli taxpayers are most likley paying for this

    However I must say I dont think parent should be modded "troll" its a fair enough question with the answer being "unlikley" rather than "of course not"

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
  27. Hmm... by Kethryvis · · Score: 1

    That ending line would have been funny if Judaism believed in reincarnation...

    1. Re:Hmm... by Apple+Acolyte · · Score: 1
      Actually, while you're correct to the extent that it's not a generally known facet of Judaism, reincarnation is a prominent concept in Rabbi Isaac Luria's Kabbalah:

      See here Gates of Reincarnation and here

      --
      Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
  28. Re:American taxpayer funded? by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    Correct. My intention wasn't to troll. I remember learning that America gives billions to Israel for military purposes each year. But money is money, and who isn't to say that if they didn't get this money, they wouldn't be having to pool money from elsewhere to cover their military operations?

    Poor analogy: A hypothetical household gets $30k/year. Family has a burglar alarm costing $1k/year. What if a portion of that $30k/year is "free" money given to the family from another family? What if that money is cut off? Would they drop their burglar alarm service, or would they drop other "non-essential" things first in order to maintain their burglar alarm service?

    Or am I wrong to think like this?

  29. Fact to take away: DNA testing is cheap by LonghornXtreme · · Score: 2, Interesting
    DNA testing has become so cheap that:

    1) vet's can keep DNA records of pets; and

    2) cities find it economical to enforce poop-scoop laws by DNA testing dog shit.

    Sheesh.

  30. How can this be possible? by ovanklot · · Score: 1

    Petah Tikva doesn't really exist.

    --
    "Programming is life, the rest is mere details"
  31. 200 ways to incriminate thy neighbor's canine by barocco · · Score: 1

    Second installment to the popular Holy Land Times bestseller! ...
    #201.
    Step 1 - Pretend you love your neighbour (but still don't get caught)
    Step 2 - Play with his/her dog.
    Step 3 - Get the dog's saliva on your sterile, latex glove wearing hands
    Step 4 - Go home and extract DNA
    Step 5 - Clone your neighbour's dog
    Step 6 - Collect the cloned dog's wastes
    Step 7 - Drop them in as many of those bins as you can
    Step 8 - Profit! ...wait

    BTW, why is this not posted under the "Yo-Dawg Rights Online" category?

  32. Cost??? by syousef · · Score: 1

    This is absurd! What the hell does this kind of DNA testing cost anyway? If it's in the article I'll never know because I'm NOT reading an article about DNA sampling of shit for the purpose of issuing fines. Moronic idea. This government must have a lot of money to blow (or be willing to force it's citizens to pay up big for stupidity)

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Cost??? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      So you refuse to educate on the subject, knowing full well article headlines can be nmis leading, and still cast judgment on the idea.
      I would wager you don't even know where this city is.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Cost??? by syousef · · Score: 1

      You'd win that wager. I had enough time to comment on the idea of DNA testing dogshit. I did not really feel like exploring the idea further by reading the article etc. on a day that had already been shite at work and at home.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  33. Is this for real??? by theblackystrat · · Score: 1

    Gifts for cleaning up Dog poop??? I guess the authorities need to train the dogs on where to drop and where not instead of their owners. After all the it's dog poop and not dog-owners' poop

  34. Re:Let's see by Kooty-Sentinel · · Score: 1

    Even better: 1. Get dog swabbed at vet.
    2. Get dog to shit a sizable amount and collect it.
    3. Go around the city putting shit on the ground, smearing it, then cleaning it up. Repeat.
    4. Wait for city officials to give you rewards for 'picking up' dog shit.
    5. Profit!

    On a serious note, I wonder if there are any measures taken against people like this.

    --
    Your evaluation period for Productivity 1.0 has ended. Please purchase more coffee to continue using this product.
  35. Re:A shitty Job, but something's gotta do it... OH by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    You are sooooo A-pro-poooo.... I'll deliver a kit of Kennel-Ration and Gravy Train and the whole Kit and KaPoodle to yah.. woof woof...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  36. RTFP (read the f****** posts) by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's not, but most of the posts were! RTFP (always wanted to have an opportunity to use that acronym)...
    Oh, wait, is that you? You better start cleaning up all those turds on Ben-Gurion St.!

  37. Movie by starbuzz · · Score: 1
    Hmm, there was a nice movie set in Petah Tikva: Bikur Ha-Tizmoret (The Band's Visit).

    Granted, not many dogs in it, so if that's for real, the scheme is not as lucrative as collecting parking tickets.

    1. Re:Movie by birdmanbh3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the movie they never made it to Petah Tikva - they ended up in Beit Hatiqva instead.

      Why does the /. article header show a picture of a Welsh doggy doo bin? Couldn't anyone find a picture of a genuine Israeli one?

  38. How to become a poop examiner by Inovaovao · · Score: 1

    "I wonder what sin you had to commit in a previous life to find yourself the official dog poop examiner of Petah Tikva, Israel. "

    Probably you must have left too much dog poop around...

  39. Make Profit! by kolbe · · Score: 1

    Make Profit easily!

    Step 1:
    Collect all of your dogs dropping from the backyard

    Step 2:
    Distribute across city poop collection bins...

    Step 3:
    Earn rewards! Score!

  40. Re:How to de-fuse this system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Steal poo from the poo bins. Then go around spooning poo into inappropriate places. A bunch of obedient citizens get fined unfairly and go apeshit. Stand back and watch as the whole system falls apart.

  41. We need Junkyard Willie on this one. by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the fellow who thought of this is a Touch Tone Terrorist fan? (Junkyard Willie) "I wanna know who left the log in the toilet bowl!" ... "I got a sample--I put it in my refrigerizer. I'll take it down to the hospital and they can do a D.O.A. test. They can find out who it was."

    --
    "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
  42. Prototyping for the security industry. by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

    The security industry of Israel is renowned the world over. As soon as they have proved the concept on dog poop, they'll have a market to sell it to other countries, for dogs, and probably long pig as well.

    Some of me thinks that this is just a trial of a technique to raise the public acceptance of ubiquitous DNA testing. Some of me thinks it may be an exercise in raising the public FEAR of ubiquitous DNA testing. You'd only have to try a dozen cases or so and soon everyone will be a-scoopin' that poop.

    Yet another brick in the wall.

  43. 2 with the price of 1 by Teisei · · Score: 1

    I wonder what might happen if dog owners put their own poop as well into this box.

    1. Re:2 with the price of 1 by NoisySplatter · · Score: 1

      That would be pretty humorous. They go to test it and it's not like any of the other samples. Shame you wouldn't be able to see the looks of confusion on their faces.

      --
      In Soviet Russia meme tires of you!
  44. Re:Clinton let 9/11 happen by KGIII · · Score: 1

    You forgot the bit about how you'd be here all night...

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  45. Re:A shitty Job, but something's gotta do it... OH by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Nom nom nom... I haz a hotdog!

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  46. Something funny (or interesting) by GbrDead · · Score: 1

    Assuming that the final 'h' is not pronounced (as in Sarah) Petah Tikva sounds the same as the Bulgarian for "fifth pumpkin" :-)

  47. canine feces by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

    There was a movie where this dude from the 1700's traveled through time and came to present-day New York. While walking a dog that took a dump, a police officer asked him to clean it up. He said, "Do you mean to tell me there is a law compelling gentlemen to remove canine feces?" And for the life of me, I can't remember the name of that movie.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    1. Re:canine feces by kc8jhs · · Score: 1
  48. I happen to live in Petah-Tikva by S3D · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And I can assure you that dog poop is quite a problem here. There is a lot of small children on the outside and dog poop is more immediate danger to them than occasional suicidal bomber.

    1. Re:I happen to live in Petah-Tikva by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I can assure you that dog poop is quite a problem here. There is a lot of small children on the outside and dog poop is more immediate danger to them than occasional suicidal bomber.

      obviously the suicide bombers have to up their game a bit if the general populace considers dog poop to be a greater threat.

      maybe they should invent a new type of "dirty bomb".

      they may even make suicide bombing a green profession, allowing you to re-use your martyrs because there were no nails ripping them in half.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:I happen to live in Petah-Tikva by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between nuisance and "danger".. More street cops to catch people in the act seems a better solution (as they could solve other problems).. The punishment aspect, is where they can really make a difference, if they make offenders caught do community service, by picking up after other offenders, as well as just general litter.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  49. wow, you don't think too deeply do you.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    They should do this with people who smoke and drop their cigarette butts on the ground.

    Yes, lets use small scale littering as an excuse for a comprehensive genetic database.

    Then they can harvest your dna in a local hardware store, a mine where you visited your cousin or friend, and a bank you frequent, which happened to be bombed by terroists (but not you).. and "put together the pieces" with a little scaremongering before a jury of "peers" who finance fine entertainment like survivor.

    On an equally orwellian though not immediately threatening note, they could easily swab areas unobtrusively and run the combination of samples through that new process they've discovered to individualize the data from mixed samples, then cross-reference it with the database to data-mine mass surveillance on the general populace.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  50. Re:American taxpayer funded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The vast majority of American aid to Israel is military, and even that is generally "credits" that can only be spent at American companies

    Plus, when you consider what they get by way of technology exchange, unwavering loyalty and common beliefs, it's money well spent.

    When you compare that to the billions of dollars given by America to Arab states, for whom the usual return on investment is "Death to America", it's a pretty sweet deal.

    Regardless, Israeli hi-tech firms make plenty of money. The parent topic was a troll, of course, but this technology, like other Israeli innovations (such as much of the computer you are probably using) are impressive. When you consider that the chief or only export of most of their neighbouring countries is Jihad, and when you consider what Israel has achieved in spite of the sort of challenges it faces, it's a truly remarkable country.

  51. Re:American taxpayer funded? by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    I do realize dog waste is an environmental hazard. (Although I'm not familiar with the landscape in Israel, so I don't know what effect not scooping has.)

    I do question any government doing this.

    Who is going to pay for it? Will it be taxpayers, or will it be fully funded through the use of fines?

    If by fines, what happens when everyone complies? If the program is dropped, problem solved. If the program keeps going ahead, is money somehow saved compared to current situation?

    Maybe I'm just a bit annoyed at how some local governments can be so wasteful in terms of throwing money at things.

    I am still a bit curious about how any money America gives Israel affects other things they're doing. (I'm not trolling about this either. Maybe I could have been more clear with what I said.)

  52. dog cr@p problems in Israel by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 4, Informative

    I live in Modi'in (in Israel), city of the future. Apparently in the future most people refuse to pick up the poop of their horse sized dogs. This isn't a problem only in my city, this is nation wide. It's a weird cultural thing.

    In any case, we are electing a new mayor, and at a public debate we heard from all of the candidates. It was running neck and neck until one stood up and said he'd sick the gestapo on anyone who doesn't pick up after their pets. Judging by the reaction he got, dude is gonna win by a landslide!

    This method would let any city clean up it's streets without hiring more cops, which sounds great to me.

    1. Re:dog cr@p problems in Israel by Kozz · · Score: 1

      I live in Modi'in (in Israel)... [he] said he'd sick the gestapo on anyone who doesn't pick up after their pets.

      (emphasis mine)

      Israel... Gestapo. I'm guessing you're paraphrasing? It would seem usage of the term would be rather frowned upon. I can't imagine the general population frequently employing such a phrase and saying, "oh, we're over that -- it's all history now."

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  53. Doesn't take a genious... by noundi · · Score: 1

    It doesn't take a genious to figure out that this law is proposed because of irresponsible dog owners. I'm sick and tired of slaloming around dog shit every time I walk down the streets, I would love to see this law right here in Barcelona as well. What goes for license? fuck yeah. That's definetly the best solution. Next step is license to have children. Society shouldn't have to pick up (litteraly) the shit that irresponsible dog owners (parents as well, heck anyone responsible for another living creature) leave behind. I don't leave shit in your line of path, stop leaving shit in mine.

    --
    I am the lawn!
    1. Re:Doesn't take a genious... by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Next step is license to have children.

      And I hope you never get one..

  54. hrm by papasui · · Score: 1

    While this isn't the first time I've comtenplated taking a deuce in my neighbors yard, it is the first time I've considered going to Israel to do it.

  55. Instant Karma by dpiven · · Score: 1

    I wonder what sin you had to commit in a previous life to find yourself the official dog poop examiner of Petah Tikva, Israel.

    Islamic suicide bomber.

  56. This is a joke... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Right? Please tell me it is...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  57. really? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    this is the most serious problem in israel today? what a waste of resources

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  58. Moto Crotte by Twyst3d · · Score: 1

    Maybe its a complete fabrication. But I was told about a month ago in France they have something called the Moto Crotte. People are actually paid to drive around in a vehicle that has some kind of suction hose or something to essentially clean up dog crap. Creating jobs is good right?

    --
    And this has been another installament of Captain Obvious! /whoosh
  59. ah the jews by nimbius · · Score: 1

    because sequencing the DNA of a pile of hot dogshit is still more important than addressing the palistinian occupation.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  60. Wrong dept by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think rather than the take-a-bite-out-of-crime dept.
    This one should have come from the i'll-get-you-my-pretty-and-your're-little-dog-too dept

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  61. Re:Let's see by zappepcs · · Score: 1

    How many would do that? How many people feel like you do? People that hate dog shit where they can see it. How many feel strongly enough about it that when they see someone leave it on the sidewalk they wouldn't report it? You seem to have just the attitude of someone that would do that.

  62. Bigger fish to fry by kimvette · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but doesn't Israel have bigger problems to worry about, like terrorist nations who want to exterminate the Jews and push them into the ocean? Aren't Arab states constantly lobbing missiles and sending suicide bombers over the border? In light of the constant threat of war, it seems silly to me that they're cracking down so hard on dog poop. Yes, dog doo in the street is annoying, but it's not something I'd ever want tax dollars spent on were I an Israeli citizen.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Bigger fish to fry by mortonda · · Score: 1

      So, folks can only tackle one problem at a time, huh? I guess all this multitasking ability in computers must be a far fetched idea too?

    2. Re:Bigger fish to fry by kimvette · · Score: 1

      The sort of "multitasking" you refer to is exactly how we (The USA) racked up a national debt of $9.7 TRILLION dollars -- squandering monies extorted from citizens to pay for various frivolous projects.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  63. Re:??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1. the grizzly responder said it used to be 5$ per check, with price going down.
    2. make sure that your fine plus collection cost is higher than 5$
    3. ???
    4. Profit!!!

  64. As a US taxpayer, I'd say my money... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    As a US taxpayer, I'd say my money has been well spent. ;)

  65. Geography wins again? by liquiddark · · Score: 1

    Israel...previous life...

    Clearly what's happened is that the Middle East has disappeared and Israel is now adjacent to the Buddhist countries of Southeast Asia. So dog poop has become their biggest problem. Well, that and China's interest in their nuclear stockpile.

  66. hahahaah by ipooptoomuch · · Score: 1

    WAIT YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO DISPOSE OF POOP? I usually just eat it. I think I just solved my pooping problem.

  67. Also works for humans! by mkcmkc · · Score: 1

    "In other news, vets will also be asking pet owners to provide a cheek swab..."

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  68. Re:How to de-fuse this system by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Steal poo from the poo bins. Then go around spooning poo into inappropriate places. A bunch of obedient citizens get fined unfairly and go apeshit. Stand back and watch as the whole system falls apart.

    You mean, watch the shit fly?

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  69. Someone tag this YDRO plz by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

    thanks1!

    --
    93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
  70. Obligatory ISR by CompMD · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, Dog Poop Sniffs YOU!

  71. The vastly superior solution by ddt · · Score: 1

    Pay instead to have people walk the sidewalks and spray down dog poop so that the ground can absorb the nutrients. Dog poop gone, free fertilizer, problem solved. If the US took better care of its sidewalks, more people would enjoy walking, which is precisely what the country needs in particular, both to get off oil, and to get our fat citizens walking again. It's totally ridiculous that we're bagging fertilizer in plastic and then burying it in land fills.

    1. Re:The vastly superior solution by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's what my sidewalk need, more fertilizer.
      My sidewalks are fine, and everywhere I lived in the US the sidewalks have been fine.
      I have never seen a sidewalk so bad someone couldn't walk on it for crying out loud.

      And it is horrible fertilizer.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  72. Re:American taxpayer funded? by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

    No, the USA only gives money to Israel for things that involve killing Arabs.

  73. Only dogs... by AioKits · · Score: 1

    They're only able to track dog poop, right? I mean, no particular reason I'm asking... Just curious...

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  74. We NEED this here in the USA by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I REALLY wish they did this here in the USA.
    I have a 3 yr old son and live opposite a kids play park.
    The park has been totally ruined by f***ing retards who walk their dogs there and dont bother to pick up their sh1t when they think no-one is watching.
    It makes me mad thinking about those dog owners who just don't care about passing some potentially really nasty diseases onto kids.

  75. You are at the wrong board .. by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    You need tubgirl, second board on the right .. don't let the port hit you in the butt ..

    the horror already ... only THINKING of about this mental image with your disposal problem and the doorknob ..

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..