Slashdot Mirror


Second Snag This Week Could Delay LHC for Weeks

sciencehabit writes "After a transformer failure earlier this week, the Large Hadron Collider has hit another snag — and this one is much more serious. As Science reports, 'At least one of the LHC's more than 1700 superconducting magnets failed, springing a leak and spewing helium gas into the subterranean tunnel that houses the collider ... How long [repairs take] will depend in part on how much of the LHC must be warmed to room temperature for servicing. If it's only a short section, the repair could be relatively quick. But the machine is built in octants, and if workers have to heat and cool an entire octant, then the cooling alone would take several weeks." Reader Simmeh contributes coverage from the BBC. We recently discussed the transformer malfunction at the LHC, which was a smaller problem and has already been fixed. Update - 9/20 at 12:52 by SS: CNN reports that the LHC will be out of commission for two months.

160 comments

  1. good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I wanna live in the dimension where the LHC works.

    1. Re:good grief by mikerubin · · Score: 1

      just wait a couple of months - we'll all be there

      --
      I sat down to write a new sig tonight and all I did was make the chair warm.
    2. Re:good grief by Metasquares · · Score: 3, Funny

      No! Don't you see!? This is quantum immortality at work! The universe in which the LHC works is the one in which WE ALL DIE!

      </paranoid>

    3. Re:good grief by DikSeaCup · · Score: 2, Funny

      I looked at a number of the early posts and didn't see this joke - hope it's not a repeat ...

      I just keep having this image in my head of two of the technicians for the LHC wandering through the innards of the thing, when one suddenly looks at the other and says, "Aw crap! A Helium leak!" ...

      Sounding, of course, like a chipmunk.

    4. Re:good grief by ikeman32 · · Score: 1

      <paranoid>

      No! Don't you see!? This is quantum immortality at work! The universe in which the LHC works is the one in which WE ALL DIE!

      </paranoid>

      Balderdash!

  2. ohno! by mactard · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seems like God is trying to send us a message...

    1. Re:ohno! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It was another magnet eating black hole!!!!!

    2. Re:ohno! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, it was the strangelets. That is why the LHC is acting strange.

    3. Re:ohno! by dotancohen · · Score: 5, Funny

      For the slashdotters who haven't yet seen the CERN webcam images of the leak occuring:
      http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    4. Re:ohno! by janwedekind · · Score: 1

      Horrible creatures are constantly probing the walls of reality and trying to get in.

    5. Re:ohno! by The+FNP · · Score: 1

      or it could just be Rincewind trying to get back.

  3. sabotage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seriously would anyone be surprised if this wasn't well-meaning but ultimately misguided sabotage?

    1. Re:sabotage by Al+Dimond · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would be surprised. Shit happens.

    2. Re:sabotage by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, but I'd be a bit surprised if it was sabotage.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    3. Re:sabotage by txoof · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would have been amazed if a structure as complex as this worked the first time the switch was thrown. Think about how simply enormous the LHC is. It has miles of wire, gigantic magnets that have to be perfectly synced and placed with amazing accuracy. It's not like LHCs are turned out every week. Gigantic super colliders are HARD to build.

      They'll eventually iron out all the problems and can proceed to cause the world to end.

      --
      This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
    4. Re:sabotage by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd be surprised too, but not as surprised as I would be if it were really time traveling sabotage agents from the future sent back to keep the experiment that while uncovering the physics that allowed time travel to ultimately be discovered unleashes the hordes of microscopic interdimensional atom-eaters that munch on matter and defecate thermal neutrons. Because these molecule sized creatures (some say they are intelligent) are alive they multiply exponentially but though the early stages of infestation they were hardly noticed. But after some years their presence was obvious and our doom was sealed unless time travel could somehow save the world... These creatures entered our plane of existance through a wormhole opened at the LHC. The LHC had to be destroyed, or if not destroyed, at least delayed. T-100, a robotic facsimilie of a particle physicist, looking remarkably like Arnold Schwartzenpecker was sent back to throw a wooden clog into the workings of the LHC.

      --
      ...
    5. Re:sabotage by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I would be surprised. Shit happens.

      Always feign ignorance so they won't attribute it to your malice.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    6. Re:sabotage by flappinbooger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but from the perspective of the non-geeks, it was finished and "turned on" just a few days ago.

      "It cost 70 bazillions of dollars to build, and now it's BROKE? What, they never actually DID anything with it yet either? What a joke" they'll say.

      From the perspective of the non-geeks, this thing is a perpetual money sink, a haven for nerds to tinker and fiddle with things that require unending tinkering and fiddling by design, with only a carrot of some potentially really great stuff that just might some day dribble out of the thing.

      Think about it, whoever wrote the grants or whatever that got them all that money is a genius - "Ummm yes, I need 70 bazillion dollars. What does it do? Ummmmm, yes, it will have the potential to reveal to us the HIGGS BOSON! Yes. HIGGS BOSON. What good is the HIGGS BOSON? Ummmm, yes, the HIGGS BOSON promises to reveal to us the very SECRETS OF THE UNIVERSE!

      Go LHC! As a geek myself, I say we need more of these things!

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    7. Re:sabotage by nospam007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      >What does it do? Ummmmm, yes, it will have the potential to reveal to us the HIGGS BOSON! Yes. HIGGS BOSON.

      Wot?
      All this money just to peek at Miss Higgs Bosom?

    8. Re:sabotage by wwphx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Absolutely. My wife is an astronomer. At the observatory she's at (Apache Point, as recently featured on Mythbusters) most of the instruments that they mount on the telescope require cooling either through liquid nitrogen being poured into reservoirs twice a day or through electronic CryoTigers. They just came out of shutdown (an extended maintenance period when they close for most of August to perform heavy maintenance) and a month after coming out of shutdown one of the CryoTigers developed a fault, causing an instrument to warm.

      When this happens, the instrument has to warm to ambient temperature (a full day), the CryoTiger has to be repaired (at least a day), then the instrument cooled again (another day). Instrument is out of commission for a good three days. The sad thing was that it was scheduled for a time-critical block, fortunately the weather was poor and they couldn't have used it anyway.

      Monumental PITB. I can only imagine how much nastier it is with the LHC.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    9. Re:sabotage by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

      Insightful.

      Says it all, really.

    10. Re:sabotage by Walkingshark · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fuck, I can't even get Hello World to work on the first compile most of the time.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    11. Re:sabotage by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Fuck, I can't even get Hello World to work on the first compile most of the time.

      10 PRINT "Hello World"

      You're doing it wrong.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:sabotage by Debug0x2a · · Score: 1

      Might want to CLS first and maybe check that you are in the right screen mode.

      --
      First post = troll. Cleverly worded post designed to enrage others = flamebait.
    13. Re:sabotage by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      This thing is one of a kind, highly advanced, and has 6 billion Euro worth of hardware designed to look at quantum particles.

      So yeah, shit happens. Not a conspiracy.

    14. Re:sabotage by goatherder23 · · Score: 1

      How the hell is this tripe insightful?

  4. Messin' up committee's schedule by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Milky Way Darwin Award Committee has to wait a bit longer before awarding the little blue ex-planet.

    1. Re:Messin' up committee's schedule by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh fuck off. Sick of you idiots who think that's funny...

    2. Re:Messin' up committee's schedule by infonography · · Score: 1

      The Milky Way Darwin Award Committee has to wait a bit longer before awarding the little blue ex-planet.

      We are a type 13 planet in it's final stages.

      http://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/Little_Blue_Planet_(LEXX_episode)

      On a brighter note, My End Is Near sign business still has some life left in it.

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    3. Re:Messin' up committee's schedule by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh fuck off. Sick of you idiots who think that's funny...

      If you're not nice, I'll make pro-creationism jokes next.
             

    4. Re:Messin' up committee's schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh fuck off. Sick of you idiots who think that's funny...

      If you're not nice, I'll make pro-creationism jokes next.

           

      Feck yeah, it is funny!

    5. Re:Messin' up committee's schedule by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      Okay, now why are scientist arguing that it is Creationists who oppose the LHC? As far as I know, Creationists don't believe in the Big Bang. More specifically most Christians believe that a rapture is going to occur along with some other events before the end of the world. These events are prophesied to take over several millennium after they start.

      Let's just call this what it is. It's a Scientific civil war. Some scientists disagree with other scientists.

      I guess scientists have created a flow chart out there that's a little outdated. Normally it says "Does someone else oppose your theories?" If Yes say, "They're just ignorant American Christians". It just won't work this time. Argue amongst yourselves. Christians can care less if you attempt to smash Hadrons together. It's not like quantum phenomenon is observable anyway.

    6. Re:Messin' up committee's schedule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christians can care less if you attempt to smash Hadrons together.

      Aha, I knew they cared :-P

    7. Re:Messin' up committee's schedule by pestie · · Score: 1

      Christians can care less if you attempt to smash Hadrons together.

      But God help your immortal soul if you dare to try to smash hard-ons together. 'Cause that's a sin!

    8. Re:Messin' up committee's schedule by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      *cricket* *cricket* Wha? Oh, you were trying to be funny. Jesus didn't come to condemn the world, but to save it through him. (See John 3:17)

    9. Re:Messin' up committee's schedule by pestie · · Score: 1

      Wow, it's a good thing scathing sarcasm isn't a sin, 'cause you'd totally be going to H-E-double-hockey-sticks. I suppose it could be argued that it's a form of pride, but I'll leave that up to the religious scholars.

      Yes, it's true, I'm resorting to making cheap jokes. But what else can one do when confronted with the kind of rigid belief system put forth by the Christian fundamentalists? I don't mean to accuse you, or anyone else here, of being one of them - I realize there are moderate Christians who sincerely believe in Jesus and attempt to follow His word. But this doesn't seem to be true of the religious right in general. Jesus preached love and unity; they preach fear and divisiveness. And no amount of logical reasoning will change their minds. So I resort instead to humor - the universal solvent of fear. Whether I actually succeed in being funny or not is largely a matter of personal taste, but hey, I amuse myself, and I figure at least a few others may share my sense of humor.

    10. Re:Messin' up committee's schedule by gameboyhippo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Here's the deal that you don't pick up on Fox News or whatever your source of how Christians think/feel, etc... Even if "scathing sarcasm" was a sin, I wouldn't nor anyone else who wanted to would go to Hell. Now let that sink in for a bit.

      Basically the argument is made, well if God is who he say he is, why doesn't he just simply come to Earth and say, "Here I am! I'm God! See I'm real!"? We'd all believe, right? Either that or we'd kill him and cast him off as a fool. Perhaps we would brutally kill him on a couple of sticks. I know Fox News and all the other modern day Pharisees would.

      Okay, so I guess the deal is this. There is no man without sin. Therefore, none of us is worthy of Heaven. We're all totally going to Hell. Now being a merciful God, he came up with a way out. If we just admit that we're imperfect and believe that only through God's grace can we go to Heaven then he'll let us in. Pretty simple.

      So the default consequence of dieing is a trip to Hell (since nobody's worthy of Heaven). A loving God doesn't want people to go to Hell. He makes a way out.

      Now whether you believe that or not is your own business. But I hope that puts a dent in your perspective of what Christians actually believe. It's not, "if I sin I go to Hell". It's "because I sin, I should go to Hell, but Jesus made a way out, and nothing can take that away".

    11. Re:Messin' up committee's schedule by hobbit · · Score: 1

      Now whether you believe that or not is your own business.

      See, that's the problem. Even Thomas, who knew Jesus personally, doubted. What chance do we have, with advice like "test everything, keep the good" coming from within the pages of scripture itself?!

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
  5. Were Nielsen and Ninomiya correct? by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Could it be that the to-be-discovered Higgs boson particulars are causing effecting the past and causing malfunctions with the LHC's components? http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2008/08/11/will-the-lhc%E2%80%99s-future-cancel-out-its-past/

    1. Re:Were Nielsen and Ninomiya correct? by Ardeocalidus · · Score: 1

      Immo: Minus the extra verb. It is late and I was debating whether or not the Grammar Nazi's were going to hound me.

    2. Re:Were Nielsen and Ninomiya correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hound.

    3. Re:Were Nielsen and Ninomiya correct? by Kagura · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The authors reason that any accelerator which surpasses a certain threshold of super-high-energy collisions (thus producing many of these new particles) will never go into operation because it violates some yet-unknown universal law.

      We've never isolated a single quark, yet we sure know a helluva lot about them.

      Also, for an interesting and somewhat related topic, check out the wikipedia page on Quantum Suicide and Immortality. It's an interesting thought experiment for many-worlds interpretation.

    4. Re:Were Nielsen and Ninomiya correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nazi's"?

          Duh

    5. Re:Were Nielsen and Ninomiya correct? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Immo: Minus the extra verb.

      It is late and I was debating whether or not the Grammar Nazi's were going to hound me.

      It is late and I was debating whether or not the Grammar Nazi's were going to hound me.

      whether or not the Grammar Nazi's were going to hound me.

      the Grammar Nazi's

      Nazi's

      's

      '

      Well, we're damn well going to hound you now.

    6. Re:Were Nielsen and Ninomiya correct? by hobbit · · Score: 1

      I read that article on Quantum Suicide and went off and killed myself, you insensitive clod! I'm having to post this from one of the universes in which I survived.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
  6. Black Holes Damnit!, its the black holes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See! See! Those black holes got loose, its the end, THE END! /sarcasm

  7. That's how... by doublee3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dr.Kleiner got his high pitched voice.

    1. Re:That's how... by thewiz · · Score: 1

      I'd rather hear the conversations in the tunnel while they're repairing it!

      Big, burly men with high, squeaky voices is always good for a laugh!

      --
      If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  8. Argh, Matey! by Panaflex · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thar she blows, ye scalleywag... doewn beluw deck she's spewin colder then the centre o' hell.

    Mark me wards... there's trouble brewing... somethin strange and black. Beware, I say... beware!!!

    --
    I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    1. Re:Argh, Matey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mark me wards... there's trouble brewing... somethin strange and black. Beware, I say... beware!!!

      Is it a ninja secretly attacking the LHC?

    2. Re:Argh, Matey! by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they want their revenge because they're mad they didn't get a day where you talk like them.

    3. Re:Argh, Matey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If there was such a day, it would be a silent day, as ninjas are stealthily silent until you are already dead. Then they secretly talk like pirates when nobody around them is left alive.

    4. Re:Argh, Matey! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It will be changed from "Talk Like a Pirate Day" to "Talk Like an Extinct Earthling Day".
       

    5. Re:Argh, Matey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ninjas had a huge parade in my town the other day. it was the biggest parade ever, but no one saw anything

  9. I, for one, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    predict that the LHC will have undergone all its repairs and be ready to switch on again no sooner than December 21, 2012. Yarr*!

    * Is 12:21am the next day too late? :'(

  10. That's a lot of helium... by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 5, Funny

    All I could envision was a bunch of physicists coming out of the tunnel squeaking like chipmunks.

    I have nothing to contribute but a cheap laugh and for that I am sorry.

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    1. Re:That's a lot of helium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd probably all be in HEV su.. er.. I mean, wearing oxygen tanks anyway.

    2. Re:That's a lot of helium... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      All I could envision was a bunch of physicists coming out of the tunnel squeaking like chipmunks.

      ... in French.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:That's a lot of helium... by bockelboy · · Score: 1

      :) Actually, the danger is that the helium replaces all the oxygen in the tunnel and they all die.

    4. Re:That's a lot of helium... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Why on earth would you use a smiley emoticon to preface your remark about slow death by asphyxiation?

      Oh--right.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  11. Liquid Helium Piping by pipingguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd like to know the diameter of the vacuum-insulated piping that is transporting the liquid helium for cooling. Piping large volumes of that stuff is not trivial.

    1. Re:Liquid Helium Piping by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      Of all the huge amazing thing that the LHC is you find only the vacuum-insulated piping amazing?

    2. Re:Liquid Helium Piping by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Such a giant project has many important elements. Perhaps you didn't notice the domain that I run (coming up on 10 years next month!). Kinda explains my focus, no? Some say it's an obsession, though, but those people are weirdos.

    3. Re:Liquid Helium Piping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is not just one line. There are 6 lines as far as I know. They transport superfluid helium as well as warm helium. Here is a paper about the cryo system:

      http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/AccelConf/e96/PAPERS/ORALS/THO04A.PDF

      Anyways, they are now investigating with a remote inspection train that can travel in the LHC.

      Paper accessible here:

      http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/accelconf/p07/PAPERS/MOPAN076.PDF

      Sorry but I am going to an anonymous coward -- but clearly, this post comes from CERN...

    4. Re:Liquid Helium Piping by andy_t_roo · · Score: 1

      lots of tenchinal specs of the LHC are available for free from http://www.iop.org/EJ/journal/-page=extra.lhc/jinst

    5. Re:Liquid Helium Piping by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you didn't notice the domain that I run...Kinda explains my focus, no?

      I dunno...on the internet, one always assumes that pipingguy is involved with pornography.

      Or possibly backbone routers.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  12. Re:Is this indicative of something? by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, because taking nearly 30 years to build this was rushing.

    Calm down, one of the magnets quenched. When that happens, it gets REALLY hot and things break. They knew it could happen.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  13. Or, similarly, observer-selection of broken LHCs? by 123beer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some cosmological models posit that every possible quantum state simultaneously exists, but that we can only observe one particular collapsed wave function (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse_(science)#Many_worlds_interpretation_of_quantum_physics). So, maybe the LHC *does* in fact destroy the world when it is turned on, and we always find ourselves in a world that has not been destroyed (ie, one where the LHC is not functioning properly).

  14. So what? by shma · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A delay of a few weeks for a project that has been a decade in planning is no big deal. The universe isn't going anywhere.

    --
    I came here for a good argument
    1. Re:So what? by LordLucless · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not until they get it fixed anyway.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    2. Re:So what? by b1rdy · · Score: 1

      I agree, a few weeks delay is nothing for a project like this. It could be worse, this snag could have meant they could be back up in a couple of days instead.

  15. I knew it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I shouldn't have left that weighted companion cube in there. I just couldn't bring myself to incinerate it like I was supposed to.

  16. Re:Is this indicative of something? by IanHurst · · Score: 1

    Yeah, relax. Any project of its scale is going to have issues. They'll sort it out with time.

  17. Re:Is this indicative of something? by Jerry+Beasters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you kidding me? It's an incredibly complicated machine on a scale that has never been done before in history. Things are supposed to be breaking now, that's how the scientists learn and it gets better over time. But of course people are always there in the wings ready to criticize that everything is not completely perfect.

  18. Re:Or, similarly, observer-selection of broken LHC by 123beer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    more relevant wikipedia article about the implications for observers:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-minds_interpretation
    Only minds that exist can observe; only minds that have not been destroyed by the LHC can exist. So, if the LHC really destroys the earth we'll keep observing it not functioning correctly.

  19. Re:Is this indicative of something? by jibjibjib · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Calling it the "Large Hole of Cash" seems a bit unjustified. Even in the unlikely event that it turns out to be completely useless for physics, the technologies developed for particle detectors in the LHC have direct applications in medical imaging, and the LHC's computing Grid is working on problems such as protein folding. It's certainly not a pointless cash sink. Especially considering the amount of cash that governments tend to sink into various other unproductive things.

  20. Re:Is this indicative of something? by NixieBunny · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work on helium-cooled radio telescope receivers. They have trouble regularly - it sometimes takes five or six tries to get the thing cooling properly. These poor folks have over a thousand giant Dewars to keep cold! Give them a break.

    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
  21. Re:Or, similarly, observer-selection of broken LHC by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

    And one great way (mentioned in the links) is to kill yourself, and see if that merely excludes from your observation any world in which you'd be dead.

    Hey, just puttin' it out there.

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  22. the octant? by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    oh i know this level

    just beyond the dead space marine after you open the first door (watch out for the imp sniping at you from above) there's a false panel marked "UHC" (not "LHC") on your left. shoot that with your pistol and it opens. but shooting your pistol will wake a cacodemon further down the hall

    easy

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the octant? by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      The hall is pitch dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

      You have fallen into the fangs of a slavering grue.

      Game Over

      --
      The game.
    2. Re:the octant? by GFree678 · · Score: 1

      Heh. Your DOOM reference was marked "Informative" rather than "Funny". I think certain Slashdotters need to step away from the computer. :)

  23. Re:Is this indicative of something? by blueg3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having worked on one of these, two failures this early on is par for the course. There's a lot of work to be done even after the thing is build and initial testing is done before it's stable and working (and even then, most particular accelerators are only somewhat "stable" with very heavy maintainance).

  24. Re:Is this indicative of something? by samcan · · Score: 1

    I meant it more as a joke than anything--next time, I've got to keep my mouth shut. :-)

  25. Value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they still get paid?
    If there is no work is there any pay?

  26. Protracted Development Schedule by TheBearBear · · Score: 1

    Keep Nuking 'Em Forever!

    1. Re:Protracted Development Schedule by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      So that's why DNF didn't get released yet! He got sucked into one of the black holes made by the collider.

  27. Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or does anyone else sigh/cringe/exhale violently when they hear about how this thing was constructed?

  28. Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can look at much LHC status online, including detailed cyro status. (I'm not giving the URL, so as not to Slashdot that server. You can find it if you really care.) Sector 34 of the LHC is at sector 34 at 4.5K-20K, instead of down below 4.5K where it should be. One of the magnets quenched and went normal, and much of the energy in the magnet is dumped as heat. Then the liquid helium boils to a gas and blows out through relief valves. But the sector hasn't been brought up to room temperature, so they apparently think they can fix the problem without major work on the magnet.

    Some of the cyrogenic magnets gave serious trouble last year, but apparently it's not as bad this time.

    1. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by inKubus · · Score: 0

      How many magnets are there? I mean, if there's 2000 of them 1 or 2 failing isn't that big of a deal

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    2. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by perturbed1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      About right... There are 1232 dipole magnets in total.

    3. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to a monopole magnet? ;-)

    4. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As opposed to a quadrupole, which you use to focus the beam (at the loss of longitudinal focusing, since Liouville's Theorem applies and magnets are Hamiltonian processes). There's one main quadrupole after every three dipoles in the LHC.

      Also there's even higher order and other special purpose magnets for fine control and other wacky stuff (beam dump, injection, etc).

    5. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      actually that might be worse; if all magnets must be online to keep the beam stable, having many magnets just make the statistical incidence of failure higher...

    7. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by Kjella · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pardon me, but have you or whoever modded that up any clue about that? It could be that way, or it could be that a missing magnet will cause the beam to veer off course, hit where it shouldn't and create a major fuck-up. These aren't exactly guide rails, they're the only thing keeping the particles in their place.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by AySz88 · · Score: 1

      I think it should be noted that "sector 34" is not the 34th out of some large number, it's "the sector between points 3 and 4", which is an entire eighth of the assembly.

    9. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 1 or 2 failing is a big deal because there is no redundancy. All of the magnets are required to guide the beam.

    10. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      if there's 2000 of them 1 or 2 failing isn't that big of a deal

      Yeah, 1 or 2 failing is a big deal because there is no redundancy.

      You're both right; you're just talking past each other.

      Consider any fairly complex, fairly expensive piece of technology. Think new automobile, or (for the Slashdot crowd) new file server. If you order 1238 of them from the factory, do you expect them all to work perfectly, out of the box? Hell no. Even if someone did some sort of testing prior to delivery, you never know if there's a component hanging by a thread, or something that got jostled on the truck.

      Most of us would be thrilled if only one or two out of a thousand items failed, and we don't usually buy equipment that carries thousand-ampere currents, contains both liquid helium and hard vacuum, and is exposed to hard radiation. In that sense, if one or two magnets give up during their initial burn-in, it isn't particularly surprising or worrying. If dozens started popping seals in the next couple of months then it would be a big deal, suggusting some sort of serious and costly design flaw.

      On the flip side, failure of even one magnet is serious from a scientific perspective, as the beamline can't operate (AFAIK) without all of its magnets humming. Nevertheless, I doubt that anyone working on the project is panicking. These sorts of delays are par for the course for any major engineering endeavour, and a delay of a month or two - or even a year - is going to be disappointing but entirely expected for the scientists involved.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    11. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard of a case when an MRI magnet quenched, it produced copious amounts of gaseous helium which proceeded to liquify the oxygen in the air which then rained down. The venting system, apparently, left something to be desired.

    12. Re:Cyro status: sector 34 at 20K-80K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About right... There are 1232 dipole magnets in total.

      I wonder how many monopole magnets there are then.

  29. his nick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is PIPINGGUY

  30. Maybe this is just the Universe's way of saying... by stonetony · · Score: 3, Funny

    STOP!!!!!

    Is anyone listening?

  31. Re:Is this indicative of something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well I have to admit that the LHC has been built a lot better than I had even hoped. Working at CERN I can access the LHC status pages and the internal reports on how far they have gotten and to be honest before the breakdown they had gotten things done that everyone assumed would take 3-4 weeks.

    And the big startup of LHC on 10th of September which went with only a few minor glitches was an extremely gutsy thing to do. I mean you have hundreds of reporters there when you attempt to power the thing on and do a full scale test of almost all components LIVE. That's gutsy. What's even more amazing is that it actually worked! They got the beam around both ways and by the evening (when the press had left already) they already had stable beams which did hundreds of orbits around the accelerator. Also being at CERN I can tell that the pre-testing they did before the big event was really marginal. The beam was only tested a few km along the tunnel in both directions, never too far so they were really treading on unknown territory.

    I'd love to see some other huge experiment/production like that to show their results live in front of the world when they first start it :P

  32. Time to take it back... by NormalVisual · · Score: 0, Redundant

    LHC salesdroid: "See, I TOLD you that you were gonna want that extended warranty. But NOOOOO!"

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  33. Re:Is this indicative of something? by davmoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And even if it does turn out to be completely useless for physics, I would have much rather have seen my US tax dollars be wasted on something like a particle collider than how they've been wasted in Iraq. Money spent on science is almost never truly wasted.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  34. So I guess the world isn't going to end this week. by HiVizDiver · · Score: 1

    Guess I better make that credit card payment I was going to blow off.

  35. Re:Or, similarly, observer-selection of broken LHC by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    the implications for observers: .... Many-minds_interpretation
    only minds that have not been destroyed by the LHC can exist. So, if the LHC really destroys the earth we'll keep observing it not functioning correctly.

    Somebody else please post a possibly related observation about the you-know-what administration's close calls with doomsday. I'm too chicken to risk mod points ;-)
           

  36. Re:So I guess the world isn't going to end this we by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Guess I better make that credit card payment I was going to blow off.

    Let me guess; you work for Fanny Mae. Splains alot.
             

  37. Re:Or, similarly, observer-selection of broken LHC by Artraze · · Score: 2

    > So, if the LHC really destroys the earth we'll keep observing it not functioning correctly.

    Until it does, in fact, start working and destroy the earth. After all, while all the many-things ideas are fun to discuss, they only say that if the LHC necessarily destroys earth when it works, there will be branches that will have observed the LHC never working and that these will be the only ones with humanity intact.

    We could very well observe the destruction of the world, but we can rest assured that some other versions of us will continue on, wondering how the LHC turned out to be a total piece of crap.

  38. Provident? by caliburngreywolf · · Score: 1

    End of the earth put off for another few months? but hey, the mayan calender of whatnot said 2012, right?

  39. Right. by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

    That sure is a great theory about how the LHC cannot work. Wonderful, actually.

    And completely ridiculous.

    When the LHC does start the kooks are going to come out and say that it just simply doesn't have the power to create these particles -- yea, that's why it's working now.

    And then we'll get our first pictures of the boson. And yet, for some strange reason, hardly anyone will remember that a bunch of people were behaving like total fools, and the world will go on. And the kooks will claim we're not looking at what we think we're looking at.

    And the world will go on.

    Call me when the LHC actually accomplishes something.

    No, wait, scratch that. I'll be happy enough just waiting until whatever it might accomplish actually reaches my doorstep in one manner or another.

    I'm all for it, don't get me wrong. But I'm pragmatic -- there's nothing about it that I can change one way or another. So, I say bring it on, and let the amazing world-changing events happen. I'm just not holding my breath nor am I doubting it in the meantime.

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
  40. Give me a bag by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    This is one of the largest, most complex projects ever conceived. By its very nature, it tests the limits of our understanding of the universe, and our ability to engineer within it. There WILL be bugs, there WILL be glitches, and progress will be slow while we work out the mechanics of operating at this level.

    That LHC is down isn't surprising, it's expected. Wait 2-5 years, at which point the majority of kinks will be worked out and the LHC will be enjoying its "second wind".

    Have you ever built something big, powerful, and complex? If you have, you'd know that "turning it on" is not a sudden point, it's a gradual process of implementation until it's fully operational, with hundreds or thousands of small, minor issues found and addressed as implementation approaches 100% complete.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Give me a bag by russotto · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you ever built something big, powerful, and complex? If you have, you'd know that "turning it on" is not a sudden point, it's a gradual process of implementation until it's fully operational, with hundreds or thousands of small, minor issues found and addressed as implementation approaches 100% complete.

      When _I_ turn something on, I set it up completely first, leaving only one final connection incomplete. That connection is made by an enormous knife switch, which I throw to the dramatic dimming of lights (managed by my assistant; my invention is of course on another power source entirely), sparks, and the scent of ozone. THAT is how you turn something big on.

    2. Re:Give me a bag by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      When _I_ turn something on, I set it up completely first, leaving only one final connection incomplete. That connection is made by an enormous knife switch, which I throw to the dramatic dimming of lights (managed by my assistant; my invention is of course on another power source entirely), sparks, and the scent of ozone. THAT is how you turn something big on.

      Trying to get Vista running again, eh?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Give me a bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes complex systems never work. Fixing the issues is an infinite whack-a-mole process which eventually gets worse as time passes because the components become less reliable as they age. At which point you give up.

  41. Re:Is this indicative of something? by lynalpha · · Score: 1

    The US is not involved in the LHC, at least not directly.

  42. Or we will all die by RichiH · · Score: 1

    The alternative is that we will all die next time they turn it on. On the other hand, I suspect the LHC will turn us into radio-active, flying sheep (optionally with fins & lasers) before it destroys the world.
    That being said, I enjoy the actual discussion about this topic, I just think it does not have any factual value whatsoever. But as a philosophical question, it's great :)

  43. I can't say I am surprised.. by RichiH · · Score: 1

    This is a hige project. More than two decades were spent on it. A myriad of components has been used, many of which were designed for the LHC. Some stuff just simply _has_ to break.
    That being said, I think those people will be able to fix the issues that come up from time to time and then have a smooth-running experimental setup.

  44. Ok, one thing for the naysayers... by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would expect at least a douzend of failures and faults of that magnitude until full power is reached.
    Its just too complex.
    And about the "expensive!!!1" aspect: A few months delay are so much cheaper than spending twice as much before so try to get everything 200% perfect. And even then things might go wrong.

    Even in a tiny normal synchrotron, shit happens. At the ALS in Berkelely they managed to detonante a main PSU because they only tested them one at a piece, and when build in they had bad crosstalk. Beam was down for several weeks.
    At the SLS in Villigen, even months after the full ramp-up beam instabilities or drops happened on rather regular basis.

    Such things happen.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  45. Re:Is this indicative of something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Shit, you had better tell the US that. Fermilab seems to be rather under the impression that they a) built the quadrapole magnets for the LHC (which failed rather spectacularly a year or so ago and see the project back but thats another story) and b) that they are actively contributing to CMS commissioning, data taking and physics including setting up and maintaining useful systems like cmsmon (although that sadly is off due to greek hackers).

    The US has a huge role in the LHC and its experiments and contribute both man power, money and equipement. They are the biggest national group on CMS (although Europe as a whole is of course bigger) and have been involved in the construction of many subsystems.

  46. It's those guys at Anomalous Materials again... by Xtense · · Score: 1

    ...messing with god knows what!

    Gordon, what the hell were you thinking, pushing that crate in front of the descending laser shield!?

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams [...]."
    1. Re:It's those guys at Anomalous Materials again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice half life inspired video on youtube about the CMS detector: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoMhD24wzbg

  47. Re:Or, similarly, observer-selection of broken LHC by Repossessed · · Score: 1

    Observation in the physics sense does not require a mind.

    --
    Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  48. Re:Is this indicative of something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US is not involved in the LHC, at least not directly.

    You might want to read a bit on this page:

    http://www.uslhc.us/

    The US is involved with more than half a Billion US Dollars and more than a thousand (thousands?) of scientists and engineers. I think more than a quarter of the 2200 members of the ATLAS collaboration (one of the larger experiments at LHC) are from US universities and institutions.

  49. The LHC is a series of tubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ten hadrons rushing around that, that LHC, and what happens to your own personal experiment? I just the other day got, an experiment was sent by my staff at 10 o'clock in the moring on Tuesday and I just didn't get it yesterday. Why?

    Because it got tangled up with all these cooling problems and helium leaks going on the LHC auxiliarily.

    [...]

    They want to deliver vast amounts of hadrons and experiments over the LHC. And again, the LHC is not something you just dump something in. It's not an internet.

    It's a series of tubes.

    And if you don't understand those tubes can be filled with helium and if they are filled, when you put your experiment in, it gets in line and its going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of helium, enormous amounts of helium.

  50. So it WON'T play Crysis... pffft by implodeme · · Score: 0

    DiDnt think it was powerful enough to play Crysis, now its proving it.

  51. This is what a 'quench' is... by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you are not familiar with superconducting magnets, then some of these terms may seem a bit mysterious. So, here goes...

    A superconducting magnet is essentially a big coil of superconductor. Initially, you put current into the superconductor to build up the magnetic field. You then 'join the ends' of the superconducting loop, so the current circulates endlessly, and the middle has a constant magnetic field.

    There is a lot of energy in the magnetic field. An 11-tesla magnetic field has about the same energy per unit volume as TNT. Worse than TNT, there is no rest mass to the 'explosive' so all the magnetic field energy would be dumped straight to the surround. The surround is already under a lot of tension due to the magnetic field, so the magnet would blow apart spectacularly, if it wasn't properly designed.

    The magnet has a link in the superconductor which is heated to drive it 'normal': this is used when the magnetic field is being built up. This link usually has a great big conventional shunt resistor in parallel with it with great big heat sinks, and this arrangement is usually on the top of the magnet. If the helium level gets low or something else funny happens, the hope is that the coil superconductivity will go at this point rather than anywhere else. The magnetic energy, instead of getting dumped into the magnet's structure, gets dumped into this shunt resistor. It may glow yellow, and boil off lots of helium, but the magnetic field can collapse over a few seconds rather than instantly, and won't release an electromegnetic pulsed that might set off a chain reaction with the magnets next door.

    What has happened here is that the safety system has gone off in one of the magnets just as it ought to. I expect they will inspect the shunt assembly to check nothing has scorched when all the energy got dumped, and also to try and find out why it did. However, with luck they can get it all going again without interrupting the vacuum.

    1. Re:This is what a 'quench' is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really appreciate your description. Very interesting about the stored energy and safe dissipation of it.

    2. Re:This is what a 'quench' is... by DrLudicrous · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To add to this pretty good explanation, quenching is a normal part of "training" a SC magnet. Basically, when the SC coil is wound, there are slight imperfections that prevent a maximal field from being obtained. So you pump a shit ton of current through the magnet after cooling it for the first time till it quenches. As you put field, you actually are changing the winding configuration ever so slightly, as the field generated by the magnet can actually exert on the force wires containing the current. This process is repeated several times to maximize the attainable field, and make it homogeneous as possible, etc.

      The only other problem is that unplanned quenches can also damage the magnet. That is unlikely in this case, but I have a dead hulk of a 9T in my lab to prove that it can happen. To this day, I don't know what went wrong, but my guess is that there was damage at the point that current enters and leaves the system during field changes. Hopefully this is not the case at the LHC, and they can be back up and in business ASAP.

  52. Update by JoeKuboj · · Score: 1

    Large Hadron Collider to be shut down for two months to undergo repairs for damage caused by an electrial fault, AP reports.

  53. Pirate hangover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Talk Like a Pirate" day was yesterday. Does this mean we can continue with our pirate ways? Shiver me timbers! Ye'll meet the rope's end for that, me bucko!

  54. Re:Hawking vs Einstein video by FathomIT · · Score: 1
  55. at least 2 months of downtime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to a press release from CERN, they plan at least two months of downtime, since sector 34 needs to be warmed in order for the repair to take place:

    http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2008/PR09.08E.html

  56. Quote by michaelhood · · Score: 1

    On my Google page just now:

    If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done. - Peter Ustinov

  57. In Soviet Russia... by itsdapead · · Score: 2, Funny

    Universe destroys Large Hadron Collider!

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  58. is it possible... by mikerubin · · Score: 1

    that the bad magnet took out the first transformer?
    Then the magnet died when it was restarted on the new transformer?

    --
    I sat down to write a new sig tonight and all I did was make the chair warm.
  59. Re:Maybe this is just the Universe's way of saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the universe had something to say about the LHC, it should have done it way before; plans were available at our local office on alpha centauri...

  60. What does LHC Stand for again? by houbou · · Score: 2, Funny

    LHC = Leaking Helium Coolant

    Quite appropriately named uh?

  61. the got what they deserved by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    After the failure last year of a magnet assembly provided by Fermilab the powers that be at CERN decided to forgoe a lot of the very low power testing that should have been done, instead chosing to meet an artificial schedule. Bad move and if they have any brains they would now revert back to the original plans once they restart.

    The odds were that if Fermilab had in fact produced the Higgs the data analysis would show this before CERN could file their own discovery so there really is nothing to race against- either Fermi has the data or they dont.

  62. Outside observers by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    Only minds that exist can observe; only minds that have not been destroyed by the LHC can exist. So, if the LHC really destroys the earth we'll keep observing it not functioning correctly.

    But it could be functional if there were outside observers who wouldn't be immediately destroyed by the event. And since the total mass of the earth wouldn't change, anybody in orbit would be perfectly safe from the effect of a possible event - the ISS would keep orbiting like nothing happened (and, actually, it would be a more stable orbit, since all the atmosphere would be sucked into the black hole as well.)

    Of course, it's all a moot point anyway, if Hawking is right - any black hole created by two protons would evaporate in less time than they would take to absorb any more matter.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  63. They have to warm up sector 34 by Animats · · Score: 1

    What failed, apparently, was a non-cryogenic high-current electrical connection in one of the magnets. They didn't have a magnet winding failure, which is much worse; the whole magnet would probably have to be removed from the tunnel for repairs if that happened. To fix the current problem, they're going to have to bring some magnets up to room temperature, lose vacuum, fix the thing, and chill everything down again. It's a slow process, but not too bad.

    Even though the statements from CERN are relatively terse, you can watch the LHC cyro status on line, which gives a good idea of what's being worked on.

  64. The cause and solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to all things that matter is the Higgs Boson.

  65. 2012 by Zhila+the+Great+Z · · Score: 1

    Clearly the LHC will constantly have problems not allowing it to function, at least not for the next four years. When it finally debuts on December 21, 2012, well.....

  66. Doomsday Device by Bob+Hearn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This makes me think of the great SF story "Doomsday Device", by John Gribbin (Analog, Feb. 1985 -- unfortunately not available online, AFAIK). In that story a powerful particle accelerator seemingly fails to operate, for no good reason. Then a physicist realizes that if it were to work, it would effectively destroy the entire universe, by initiating a transition from a cosmological false vacuum state to a lower-energy vacuum state. In fact, the accelerator *has* worked; the only realities the characters experience involve highly unlikely equipment failures. (Thus, a many-worlds physics is shown to be correct.) It's further revealed that the world has been "anthropically steered" in the past by arranging for it to be destroyed when things are not going well.

    1. Re:Doomsday Device by stephen70 · · Score: 1

      Yes correct the LHC will never work (in our dimesnion) - the story is not a story it's absolutley correct we can only ever continue to exist in the remaining dimensions where the LHC Fails. This is in much the same manner as we can only exist in a universe and on a planet which can evolve complex life like humans. I think it will gradually come to realisation on the LHC operators that their machine destroys every possible dimesnion in which it operates correctly - this discovery alone is worth the cost of the machine in some ways.

    2. Re:Doomsday Device by Bob+Hearn · · Score: 1

      " this discovery alone is worth the cost of the machine in some ways."

      Well it certainly would be if it were true. However, the energies the LHC will reach are already reached every day when cosmic rays hit our atmosphere, so this accelerator, at least, can't test many-worlds theories.

  67. Re:Is this indicative of something? by mrdarreng · · Score: 1

    These poor folks have over a thousand giant Dewars to keep cold! Give them a break.

    Why should we give them a break when they have that much cold scotch?

  68. Re:Or, similarly, observer-selection of broken LHC by Derek+Loev · · Score: 1

    I felt really stupid when I read that and didn't understand it but then I realized that somewhere out there I am understanding it.

  69. Re:Is this indicative of something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grid computing is an enormous cash sink itself.

  70. Re:Or, similarly, observer-selection of broken LHC by millennial · · Score: 1

    Clearly we should test your theory. Maybe by driving the earth into the sun? If you're right, something will fail catastrophically and we won't be able to do it.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
  71. Re:Maybe this is just the Universe's way of saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, go away christfag.

  72. goodworld.c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goodbye World is much quicker.

  73. Re:Or, similarly, observer-selection of broken LHC by Loveless62 · · Score: 1

    It kind of reminds me how you can beat a video game even if you die hundreds of times: through the save game feature. Apparently, the God autosaves the Earth each time the LHC is about to become operational.

  74. or to save banks, ahahah by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    So they can find 1 trillion to save banks, but can they find 1 trillion to give usa 1st class free education and fix infrastructure?

    Let the banks fail, and use 1 trillion to fix usa, and not banks.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  75. Black Holes and God Particles by bokmann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just once, I'd like to see a report on the LHC that didn't call the Higgs Boson the "God Particle", and didn't talk about crackpot fears of mini black holes. I mean, we don't follow every report from the Mars polar lander or rovers about the "Canals of Mars were once thought to carry water", do we?

  76. chipmunks by yulek · · Score: 1

    springing a leak and spewing helium gas into the subterranean tunnel

    the biggest delay is apparently due to the difficulty of maintaining a serious attitude while in the tunnel...

    --
    in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
  77. Re:Or, similarly, observer-selection of broken LHC by hobbit · · Score: 1

    Well, we won't be the ones who get destroyed. And neither will we. Nor, indeed, us. Because for every instant that passes, there is a new choicepoint and a new us. So don't fret it -- you personally will never experience oblivion.

    --
    "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato