Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Release Cloud-Oriented Windows OS

CWmike writes "Within a month, Microsoft will unveil what CEO Steve Ballmer called 'Windows Cloud.' The operating system, which will likely have a different name, is intended for developers writing cloud-computing applications, said Ballmer, who spoke to an auditorium of IT managers at a Microsoft-sponsored conference in London. Ballmer was short on details, saying more information would spoil the announcement. Windows Cloud is a separate project from Windows 7, the operating system that Microsoft is developing to succeed Windows Vista."

209 comments

  1. Microsoft Dark Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Causes Rainy Day

    1. Re:Microsoft Dark Cloud by davester666 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This will bring Vista performance to the masses. Now you don't have to spring $25K to by a Cray with Vista to get decent performance. Instead, Microsoft will have a while bunch of Crays, and rent you access to them.

      Say, wasn't this done before, in the 60's?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Microsoft Dark Cloud by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't people usually close Windows when it turns cloudy ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:Microsoft Dark Cloud by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they will call it the Black Cloud. Will it indicate a crash with the Blue Cloud of Death?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  2. Don't hold your breath by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 5, Funny

    This sounds like vapourware to me.

    --
    ... I'm addicted to placebos
    1. Re:Don't hold your breath by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Actually, sounds like Ulteo. I've played with Ulteo and it is pretty close, and technically MS should be able to throw enough people behind something like it.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Don't hold your breath by ChienAndalu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      makes you wonder what they are smoking

    3. Re:Don't hold your breath by el+cisne · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Cloud computing"?? I'd say "water vapour ware".

    4. Re:Don't hold your breath by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, sounds like Ulteo. I've played with Ulteo and it is pretty close, and technically MS should be able to throw enough people behind something like it.

      Hell no. Unlike some people, Microsoft knows what "OS" means, and it's an OS: process management, drivers, the entire party.

      If you want to get intot he right mindset about this project, consider it a spinoff of the Windows Server family (but will likely be a subset powered mostly or entirely by .NET).

    5. Re:Don't hold your breath by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and it's an OS: process management, drivers, the entire party.

      Please click my link... Ulteo can be installed (and looks a lot like Ubuntu). I only ran in in a virtual machine, but it seemed like a pretty nice little setup. My big complaint is that they have apt-get, but you really can't use it or stuff breaks.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:Don't hold your breath by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      There is no smoke obviously. Their bong broke, and all they can actually breathe is water vapor, hence the trend that is called Cloud Computing.

    7. Re:Don't hold your breath by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      A "Windows Cloud"? Damn straight I'm holding my breath.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    8. Re:Don't hold your breath by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      A "Windows Cloud"? Damn straight I'm holding my breath.

      ...until your face turns BSOD?

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    9. Re:Don't hold your breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      A "Windows Cloud"? Damn straight I'm holding my breath.

      Blue Stratocumulus of Death? Are you implying they are "seeding the cloud(TM*)"?

      *predictive, Wonder if FSF could snag it,,

    10. Re:Don't hold your breath by jon207 · · Score: 1

      My big complaint is that they have apt-get, but you really can't use it or stuff breaks.

      'cause Ulteo don't uses apt-get but a system of squashfs layers for installing groups of applications.

      --
      "Freedom can only be the whole of freedom; a piece of freedom is not freedom." Max Stirner
    11. Re:Don't hold your breath by Snufu · · Score: 0

      Ballmer flew all the way to London to release cloud? I understand briefly stepping out of the room, but...

    12. Re:Don't hold your breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 7 ==> OS 9 ==> OSX

    13. Re:Don't hold your breath by jcwayne · · Score: 1

      They certainly do!

      --
      Failure to follow this advice may result in non-deterministic behavior.
    14. Re:Don't hold your breath by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

      Ulteo can be installed (and looks a lot like Ubuntu).

      Why not just use Ubuntu if those are the two selling points?

    15. Re:Don't hold your breath by nolife · · Score: 1

      MS Cloud computing and a fix for people not purchasing MS Office and Windows X+1 every two years. A carrot out there with "light" capability to keep you interested and to generate a more consistant revenue stream. This product is not the answer or a solution to a computing problem that people have, it is an answer to a financial problem that MS has.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    16. Re:Don't hold your breath by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I suspect you're closer than you think.

      Some time ago, rumour had it that Microsoft had allocated ~300 of its best engineers to work on Midori, a product based on its Singularity research OS.

      Singularity, for those not familiar with it, is a highly impressive piece of work. It's not actually Windows at all, in fact it bears absolutely no resemblence to any existing OS architecturally and didn't even support graphics when we were last able to look at it. But it was a ground-up fresh new OS that had the following characteristics: entirely .NET based (with extensions), extremely robust and extremely high performance.

      In particular, Singularity is able to go about 30% faster on I/O intensive apps than traditional server operating systems like Linux and Windows because it doesn't use hardware process isolation, but rather does everything in software. Hmmm, an OS with no graphics support, no applications, but which can run .NET applications far faster than the competition. Sounds basically ideal for a server OS or "cloud windows" if you ask me.

    17. Re:Don't hold your breath by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I assumed resources were being pulled away from that to focus on Windows 7, but I do remember reading up on the project.

      I think you're right however.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    18. Re:Don't hold your breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best name for Microsoft cloud computing OS?

      Microsoft Fart

    19. Re:Don't hold your breath by wellingj · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a botnet to me. See guys Microsoft is going to embrace, extend and extinguish, but this time it's for the internet's own good...

    20. Re:Don't hold your breath by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Because you can go to any other computer in the world and essentially access a copy of your own desktop from the web browser. Additionally, each one of your Ulteo installations will sync itself with one another and with the server. It's pretty nifty - but the environment is a bit limited.

      Anyway, while I find it a little too rough-edged to switch over to - if they can pull it off as a small startup, then MS "should" be able to make it work as well. They will probably constrain it in some evil way or it will be too expensive or they'll find some other way to f it up, but technically it should be feasible.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    21. Re:Don't hold your breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now, does being .NET based really mean that it can run .NET applications?

    22. Re:Don't hold your breath by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      That is an awesome signature... Would have made my GCSE electronics a lot easier.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    23. Re:Don't hold your breath by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

      Technically, clouds are a suspension of water droplets, not water vapor. I'm not sure how to turn that into an amusing quip though.

    24. Re:Don't hold your breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>In particular, Singularity is able to go about 30% faster on I/O intensive apps than traditional server operating systems like Linux and Windows because it doesn't use hardware process isolation, but rather does everything in software.

      So basically, this is MSDOS 10.1?

    25. Re:Don't hold your breath by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      So basically, this is MSDOS 10.1?

      No, because it does actually have proper multithreading and full process isolation; it's just implemented using mechanisms radically different (and faster) from anything used presently in production OSes. The central idea, IIRC, is mathematical provability that a specific part of code will never try to break the boundary; if it can be proved, then there is no need to do bound-checking for that part of the code (and you only need to run the solver once when the code is loaded, and then cache the proof).

  3. Copyright infringement by Rabbi+Shmabbi · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I own the rights to the word "cloud".

    How about Windows "Fog"?

    More appropriate, yes?

    1. Re:Copyright infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would have been funny if you'd understood the difference between copyright and trademark...

    2. Re:Copyright infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, not even then.

  4. Wonder if by thammoud · · Score: 5, Funny

    they have an HTML version of the Blue Screen Of Death.

    1. Re:Wonder if by Shaitan+Apistos · · Score: 5, Funny

      But you need to install silverlight to view it.

    2. Re:Wonder if by mangu · · Score: 1

      an HTML version of the Blue Screen Of Death.

      Yes, they do have one, here it is

    3. Re:Wonder if by Kingrames · · Score: 2, Funny

      Error 404: HTML version of the Blue Screen Of Death not found.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    4. Re:Wonder if by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Every cloud has a silverlightning.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:Wonder if by Flammon · · Score: 1

      You're right! As soon as I installed silverlight, bam, I got the bsod.

  5. cloud = vaporware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It seems so obvious now.

  6. What is it? by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this a web-based back end for hosting apps on a server? Is it an online platform of application infrastructure? Is it a toolkit/API for writing apps like Ruby-on-Rails?

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:What is it? by David+Gerard · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's Windows Vaporware. It's a dessert wax and a floor topping. It's any marketing spin at all that they think might put people off competitors' products.

      Anyone can talk up a hand of five aces. Producing it when called is a bit harder.

      Perhaps it will have $DATABASE_FILESYSTEM!

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    2. Re:What is it? by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is the pre-announcement to announce an announcement. You'll have to wait for the actual announcement to find out what the hell it is.

    3. Re:What is it? by Aram+Fingal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you're missing the point. It's all about buzzword compliance.

    4. Re:What is it? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      My guess based on the article is this is some mutant client server thingy.
      Hate to be so technical but this was in the article.
      "Ballmer was dismissive of Google, saying Docs and Spreadsheets has "relatively low usage" and that users want richer features in an office software package. "We want software more powerful than software that runs in a browser," Ballmer said."
      Well if you are not going to run in a browser then you must have some other type of client.

      My best guess is it will use SilverLight instead of AJAX. So you may see something like Office and Money written in SilverLight that you can run in your Browser as long as you are running on Windows.
      I will guess that this will be a tool that will allow companies to develop their own "Cloud" programs as well as host Cloud Office themselves on Windows servers. Sort of Cloud Visual Basic.

      This is all just a guess but with the data I have that best I can do.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why its a little black rain cloud of course!

    6. Re:What is it? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I think that is a very good guess. A full client would be Windows only, however Silverlight-in-a-browser could mean Linux supported via Moonlight.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    7. Re:What is it? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Mmm... Dessert wax

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista, now with Active Desktop

    9. Re:What is it? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      My best guess is it will use SilverLight instead of AJAX. So you may see something like Office and Money written in SilverLight that you can run in your Browser as long as you are running on Windows.

      And, probably, very soon that's the only way you'll get Office or Money, and if you don't want to host your own server and buy server licenses (which will be pricey), you'll just rent the software which will run from Microsoft's servers.

      Microsoft's been looking to switch from selling software to Software-as-a-Service for quite a while.

    10. Re:What is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anonymously, but from what I've heard directly from Microsoft regarding this, essentially it's like google's thing, but for .NET instead of python. Support for various storage strategies, which after implementing are transparent to the application layer. All the requisite load balancing and redundancy, etc.

    11. Re:What is it? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Or is it a rebadged copy of Windows Web Server 2008.

    12. Re:What is it? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Until they prevent it at some point.
      Just remember IE for the Mac.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:What is it? by Delusionner · · Score: 1

      Is this a web-based back end for hosting apps on a server? Is it an online platform of application infrastructure? Is it a toolkit/API for writing apps like Ruby-on-Rails?

      ... or is it just a statement to give RMS a heart attack?

  7. Hello? by andruk · · Score: 1

    The number of posts for this article (I think) are like the announcement itself: vapor.

  8. Will it function cross browser? by goltzc · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't even know if that was sarcasm.

    --
    Our bugs are smarter than your test scripts.
  9. Oooh, great! by PontifexMaximus · · Score: 1

    Cloudy Windows!!!! Well, I'm glad I have my Windex handy.

    Does this mean the BSOD will instead be the 'partly cloudy' screen of death? Or will it just rain on me?

    --
    Pax Vobiscum
    1. Re:Oooh, great! by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      You mean lin-dex. Penguin(tm) brand?

    2. Re:Oooh, great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't quit your day job, dude.

    3. Re:Oooh, great! by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, short memories on slashdot....doesn't anyone remember the Windows 95 clouds?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  10. hohum by BigBadBus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somehow, putting the word "vista" in the same sentence as "succeed", for whatever reason, just seems plain wrong.

    1. Re:hohum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow, putting the word "vista" in the same sentence as "succeed", for whatever reason, just seems plain wrong.

      Not to worry -- just insert a "has not", "will not", or "never will" in between.

    2. Re:hohum by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      "Vista has not succeed"

      Sounds like something from icanhascheezburger

    3. Re:hohum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is your sentence wrong?
      Then it would be right!!!

    4. Re:hohum by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It depends. If you actually count the cash flow, I guess it can be considered quite a success. Remember, even if someone bought a PC with Vista preinstalled, and downgraded to XP, MS has still got its cut.

  11. RMS was right! by MPAB · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:RMS was right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You beat me to it. It's funny that this comes out while that story is still on the front page.

    2. Re:RMS was right! by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought, as well. :) I'm actually surprised they didn't name it "Windows Clouds" as a marketing reference to their default desktop background with clouds in it - and as a way to embrace and extend the cloud concept. :D

    3. Re:RMS was right! by macraig · · Score: 1

      Indeed. As I said in response to that article:

      Stallman is right that it's a bunch of evil-doing corporations campaigning to make it true: cloud computing, as it's called, is a scheme to further legitimize and sell consumers on the notion of "web apps" and paying not once for a software license but rather paying every month, as if software is no different than a cable TV subscription.

      Software publishers have had this goal for years now; they've been envious of the consistent cash flow and healthy balance sheets of "content" publishers, and so have been eager to re-brand software as content and sell it as such to consumers. Attempts to do this directly have repeatedly failed, perhaps because of people like me who saw the ulterior motive and made it public. Since attempts to sell software directly by subscription have failed, the latest plan is to use the concept of "web apps" to sell people on software as content; once people habituate to web apps, they'll habituate to the notion of paying every month for software as well.

      Web apps are all about making more money and acquiring more control, not providing better software or services. Any tool that furthers that goal, including "Windows Cloud", is something that should be burned at the stake, along with the people that would choose to employ it.

    4. Re:RMS was right! by Tatsh · · Score: 1

      Damn you! I was going to post the following.
      ---
      'Cloud computing is a trap!' and I have good sources:

      http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/30/2146250

    5. Re:RMS was right! by MagicM · · Score: 1

      Good thing you didn't.

    6. Re:RMS was right! by Tatsh · · Score: 1

      Clearly, it was sarcasm as Slashdot is not a reliable source EVER!

    7. Re:RMS was right! by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      The Cloud is a lie.

  12. Mmm, windows cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insert fart joke here

  13. Windows for cloud computing by aldoferrel · · Score: 4, Funny

    sounds like Airborne viruses.

    1. Re:Windows for cloud computing by ptelligence · · Score: 1

      Nintendo has had this for years now.

  14. Distributed Blue Screen of Death by Sasayaki · · Score: 1

    So is the blue screen composed one line at a time by each node, or handled by the head of the cluster?

    Can you play a distributed halo on it, or is DistHalo for Windows Cloud Vista Ultimate DX11 Version UK Edition Service Pack Five only?

    Is every card in solitaire represented by a thread, or is only the extensive AI distributed?

    Will the DRM be offloaded to individual nodes or centralised?

    --
    Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
    1. Re:Distributed Blue Screen of Death by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

      Think it will be called the Blue Sky Of Death now.

    2. Re:Distributed Blue Screen of Death by Chemisor · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, the Falling Blue Sky Of Death.

    3. Re:Distributed Blue Screen of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another question might be how long will it take Linux to copy them. Uh, er, I mean "innovate", of course.

    4. Re:Distributed Blue Screen of Death by killmofasta · · Score: 1

      MOD PARENT +1 Funny. OMG. You made my day.

    5. Re:Distributed Blue Screen of Death by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      The real question would be how long would it take Microsoft to look at gOS and copy them. I mean "innovate", of course.

    6. Re:Distributed Blue Screen of Death by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Yes, Linux et al has a dearth of buzzwords. They focus far too much on recursives, substituting the first letter of a name for their brand or just getting the job done without extra mouse clicks. Gnome is an anomaly.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    7. Re:Distributed Blue Screen of Death by Vskye · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would be BSODWC. A new blue screen of death with clouds.

      --
      Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
  15. I sense a disturbance in the Force ... by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

    as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in labored puns about windows and clouds and nobody had the sense to silence them.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:I sense a disturbance in the Force ... by Rutefoot · · Score: 1

      Vapour?! I barely knew her!

    2. Re:I sense a disturbance in the Force ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. I've already moderated in this thread, and I tried to mod this funny but missed. Enjoy your free karma, good sir.

    3. Re:I sense a disturbance in the Force ... by ozphx · · Score: 1

      Vell, you know how ze vussian girls are alvays begging for it....

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  16. Cloud computing by MisterSquirrel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a marketing phrase, designed to encourage you to offload your computing to the Cloud. The Cloud is where someone else controls your information, not you. Stallman says it's a trap. I'm inclined to believe him. When MicroHard starts promoting it? All the more reason to be leery of it.

    1. Re:Cloud computing by MightyMartian · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You'd think remote file stores and databases had never existed the way people talk about distributed computing. "Oooh, store your data on our server, it's sooooooo revolutionary!!!!"

      Why is it that everything that some demented toad like Ballmer or some marketing type claims is new technology is something that's been known to the computer science community for decades, and probably has several antecedents that date back almost that far?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Cloud computing by killmofasta · · Score: 1

      I agree with Stallman, but for quite different reasons. Essentially, if you allow your computing resources to be utilized by an annoyomus task, you in fact are creating a virus/Trojan hybrid. Its entirely possible to use distributed to create virus/Trojan code and or zombie PCs. The storm bot-net is essentially that, a cloud/mesh, and runs and IS SUPPORTED by MICROSOFT and its poor security.

    3. Re:Cloud computing by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You mean the remote data stores where minimum wage
      employees steal your medical history and then try
      to black mail the originating hospital?

      You mean those remote data stores?

      Any outsourcing lowers quality and reduces control.
      You've got to decide whether or not you are willing
      to tolerate or risk either of those.

      Network clusters are fine so long as you control the cluster.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Cloud computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea is that getting a datacenter right is hard. And it is, it costs a lot of money, and you have to be prepared for outages. Not "you have to plan for them," because you can't, but you have to be prepared for your datacenter to be but a pitiful pile of worthless scrap when some social networking site links to Super Webapp 2.0. You then have to spend the next few days figuring out what happened, who to blame it on, and how to spend ten times as much money to prevent it from happening again because the executives don't understand what a freak accident it is that your site got hammered. They'll blame the fall in traffic on the fact that the service went down or whatever.

      I could go on, there are so many downfalls to running your own server farm that having someone who already has one, and will lend you pieces of it, is an amazing service. Ask all the people using Amazon EC2/S3. Talk about featureful there.

      Anyway, am I feeding a troll here or what? MicroHard? Tell you what, if you don't like the idea of 'cloud computing' aka 'grid computing' aka 'let's go back to the way we used to do it in the 70's and 80's' then, well, you can unplug your computer at any moment. We'll not stop you.

    5. Re:Cloud computing by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Personally I'm just hoping that when M$ says they're making a cloud OS it means they bought Plan 9 and have put a pretty face on it.

    6. Re:Cloud computing by dkf · · Score: 1

      It's a marketing phrase, designed to encourage you to offload your computing to the Cloud.

      That's not all bad, you know. Sometimes that's actually a good thing. But you've got to keep some level of control over the key things so that you're not beholden to a single supplier or it is indeed a trap.

      The Cloud is where someone else controls your information, not you. Stallman says it's a trap. I'm inclined to believe him. When MicroHard starts promoting it? All the more reason to be leery of it.

      They're doing it because customers say they want it.

      Of course, what we really need are standards for how to work with Clouds. Like that we can avoid vendor lock-in, and possibly get Free implementations too (provided the non-software parts get addressed right that is, and that's where it's hard for everyone anyway). Right now, Clouds are the SOA Wild West, and it's not clear yet who are the main banditos.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    7. Re:Cloud computing by DogAlmity · · Score: 1

      I'm going to start compiling a list of all the things RMS thinks is a trap. So far we have:

      cloud computering
      http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/30/2146250

      Java:
      http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html

      Then the usual stuff; shaving, bathing, etc.

  17. Needs Moar Comets... by BinaryGrind · · Score: 1

    I think I'll hold off until the refine the idea with Windows Oort Cloud.

    --
    Life is like a jar of jalapeños, what you do today may burn your ass tomorrow.
  18. Which competitor has just released something? by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I haven't been following this stuff.

    Is it safe to assume that some competitor has just released a working toolkit for developing cloud applications that works pretty well? And that Ballmer needs to get the pointy-haired boss to stop Dilbert from using that toolkit, and redesign the mission-critical project around Windows Cloud?

    1. Re:Which competitor has just released something? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Is it safe to assume that some competitor has just released a working toolkit for developing cloud applications that works pretty well?

      Its not so much a dedicated toolkit, but Amazon has just announced that Windows Server and SQL Server are in private beta on EC2 and will be generally available on that platform by the end of the year, meaning that Windows software not developed for the cloud can nonetheless be moved into Amazon's version of the cloud soon. So, yeah, there is something for them to be heading off.

    2. Re:Which competitor has just released something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it was VMware at VMworld 2008.

      VMware is in 100% of the fortune 1000 companies and Microsoft is pissed. Now not only do they have to kill Google but VMware as well...

  19. I see a Clippy, and a doggie, and a Bob... by swschrad · · Score: 1

    but are those my financial records on that torrent server?

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  20. Yay for Windows Vapor! by David+Gerard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am so excited about $NEXT_VERSION of Windows. It will go beyond just solving all of the problems with $CURRENT_VERSION, it will be an entirely new paradigm. Forget about security problems, those are all fixed in $NEXT_VERSION. And they're finally ridding themselves of $ANCIENT_LEGACY_STUFF.

    Also, there'll be $DATABASE_FILESYSTEM. It'll be awesome!

    I wonder how $NEXT_VERSION will compare to $NEXT_NEXT_VERSION.

    ("Windows Cloud"? Good freakin' gosh, what do they have for a marketing department?)

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:Yay for Windows Vapor! by Etrias · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good freakin' gosh, what do they have for a marketing department?

      The same guys who thought pairing Seinfeld and Gates could match up to the awesome juggernaut that is John Hodgman.

    2. Re:Yay for Windows Vapor! by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      First read as "John Goodman."

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
  21. So, um... by rewt66 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He's saying that in a month they're going to announce (not ship) something, but he can't talk about it now? So he's telling us that he's not telling us something, but sometime later he will? Why doesn't he just, like, not say anything?

    1. Re:So, um... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      You have obviously never worked in marketing.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    2. Re:So, um... by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      He's saying that in a month they're going to announce (not ship) something, but he can't talk about it now? So he's telling us that he's not telling us something, but sometime later he will? Why doesn't he just, like, not say anything?

      Because Amazon, knowing that Microsoft has been working in this direction, actually announced (not just pre-announced) that Windows Server and SQL Server are now running on EC2 in private beta, and will be generally available by the end of the year.

      This pre-announcement is to scare people off of Windows Server on EC2 and get them to wait for MS's offering, because once people have their apps on Windows Server on EC2, it will be harder for MS to convince them to migrate to MS's cloud. (And, conversely, once people have apps running on EC2, Windows Server or otherwise, they'll be more likely to purchase more, platform neutral, Amazon services to go with them, rather than existing or planned competing MS services.)

    3. Re:So, um... by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      You have obviously never worked in marketing.

      NOBODY in marketing actually works.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    4. Re:So, um... by Talar · · Score: 1

      Because he didn't have to, he got to spread his "brand awareness" or whatever the current marketingspeak is through Slashdot and a lot of other media anyway.

    5. Re:So, um... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      Come read the announcement for Visual Studio 2010. Same thing, really. To quote someone from the blog post:

      All I see is that some marketing drone gained access to post under msdn.microsoft.com. Few Key Insights from that "article":

      • Democratizing Lifecycle Management
      • Inspiring delight
      • Riding the wave
      • The next pillar, Enabling emerging trends.

      So, it seems to be the latest trend. Well, for VS2010 and .NET 4.0 at least we know for sure we'll get all the details in a month at PDC.

  22. No Microsoft lock-in "advantage" in this field by White+Flame · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The whole point of cloud computing is to run your server apps on whatever is available to run it. These apps do not, should not, and typically CANNOT do any configuration or long-term storage on any individual instance they run on, so everything they do is compartmentalized through specialized IO and shared storage APIs, which can be reimplemented on pretty much anything.

    Sure, on the desktop everybody supports Windows, because they've got the drivers, Office is popular, etc etc. But going to any from-scratch model like cloud computing, Microsoft carries absolutely zero advantage or momentum from their other market saturations.

    1. Re:No Microsoft lock-in "advantage" in this field by socz · · Score: 1

      From the sounds of it, this could work really well for windows. I mean they have the whole virus sharing @ 10/second down, so how much harder can it be to use the existing infrastructure to distribute computing load?

      I think i'm ready with a few infections across several machines! :P

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  23. Are you sure? by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    Are you sure you got that word right? Windows Chair has a much better ring to it, especially if it's a Steve Ballmer project,... ;-)

    1. Re:Are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *crickets*

  24. Stallman actually onto something? by ins0m · · Score: 1

    Maybe now we understand his real motives for his most recent IRL flamebaiting.

    --
    Never attribute to Hanlon that which can be adequately attributed to Heinlein.
  25. Cloud computing = fail by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mod me down for being a little jaded against ideas like this, but I just had to say something...

    Ok, so, it still requires the client to boot some sort of OS stub, right? It still needs a method to connect to the Internet...and it sure isn't going to be BOOTP or PXE. You'll still have to have a local OS, but will apps/games run on it?

    How is this going to benefit anyone except the corporate coffers? Of course $mega_corps love this idea! They don't care about your experience, they care about taking your money, and remaining in control.

    If cloud computing grabs hold of us, we'll have to pay per month. Even just $20/month over 5 years = $1200...heh, yeah, sounds like a superdeal for everybody! Oh, and of course they will charge more per accessible app...and don't expect to use the same app for years, you'll be pushed forward to new apps without your consent.

    Do I stream my data, like movies too?
    What about bandwidth caps? How about your throttle?
    What happens when my Internet connection goes down?
    What happens when THEIR Internet connection goes down?
    What happens when their SERVER goes down? Subverted? If someone doesn't notice?
    What happens when I need custom apps installed? What if they aren't "approved"?
    Who do I call when an app doesn't work/crashes?
    Will my printers work? How about the rest of my attached devices? Legacy devices?
    What happens if I want access to my stuff while I'm not near an Internet connection?
    Who gets to look at my operating log?
    Are advertisements banned?

    Imagine how convoluted the simple task of inserting a scanned image will be.

    A modern OS needs to be local, all this will be is just an in-browser-web-app, OR some virtual desktop a la Terminal Services.

    It won't happen. /rant

  26. Good Call, Microsoft by kat_skan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good Call, Microsoft. With five editions of Vista competing with three editions of XP and nine editions of Server 2008 (including three that are just the regular versions without the hypervisor software), plus separate 64-bit versions of everything, the Windows product line wasn't nearly diffuse enough.

    1. Re:Good Call, Microsoft by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I make it 14 versions of Server 2008. I think you have missed Home Server, Small Business Server, Small Business Server Premium, Essential Business Server Standard and Essential Business Server Premium.

      On the Vista side, you may have missed Business Embedded and Ultimate Embedded.

  27. Let me guess... by V!NCENT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Windows Vista that doesn't accept being offline and can store apps in a proprietary XML like format that you can display with 'the advanced and intergrated new exiting underlining technology MS has developed and maybe patented' *cough*aka IE8 extension for offline pages*cough*.

    Sounds like something even I could have made by adding and removing some stuff in Ubuntu and remaster the image...

    --
    Here be signatures
  28. Re:Don't hold your breath So hazy i can't see... by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Funny

    Project/Code Name?

    Candidates:

    Tacoma
    Wincoma
    GLAUcoma

    Cloudy
    Misty
    TearDrop
    Charmin

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  29. So... by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

    A Windows OS for Cloud Computing sounds like Kryptonite for Richard Stallman.
    Of course, we already knew that Microsoft was our industry's Lex Luthor.

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS already has kryptonite for Richard Stallman. In what just has to have been deliberate, they named their centralized DRM system after him.

      Cold. Just cold.

  30. Is it a coincidence by SlashDotDotDot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    that RMS was just railing against the cloud on Monday?

    --
    /...
    1. Re:Is it a coincidence by neuromanc3r · · Score: 1

      Yeah. They're just doing it to piss him off.

    2. Re:Is it a coincidence by johanatan · · Score: 1

      Yes, stand in awe of the mighty prophet RMS and his great foreknowledge! He has come to save us at last!

    3. Re:Is it a coincidence by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying that the new Microsoft OS is a kind of a metaforic heavy-caliber chair?

  31. vt100 terminal? by Spacepup · · Score: 1

    How is cloud computing really any different than using a (dumb) vt100 terminial to access programs such as email, word processors, chat, mud's, and any data you might have stored on the server?

    It really sounds like all cloud computing does is turn your home computer into a vt100 terminal with better graphics.

    Except that you can't be assured the people running the server have any sort of ethics, sense of privacy, or security measures in place.

    I wonder if this is going to bring back 1400 baud modems too?

    Not a new idea at all.

    1. Re:vt100 terminal? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      How is cloud computing really any different than using a (dumb) vt100 terminial...

      A vt1000 is a thin client being used as a thin client. This is a fat client being used as a thin client. Maybe we'll see a return of "Internet Appliances"

  32. windows cloud... As in sky? OMG it's skynet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the love of gods, don't do it...

  33. Succeed? by GuruBuckaroo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Windows Cloud is a separate project from Windows 7, the operating system that Microsoft is developing to succeed Windows Vista."

    If it's the slightest bit better than its predecessor, I think it'll be better described as the OS that FAILS Windows Vista. Once and for all.

    --
    Poor means hoping the toothache goes away.
  34. How do I load an OS to the cloud? by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 1

    So how do I get my server into the cloud anyway? Do I need an airplane, or a balloon? How can I find a long enough power cord? Is that a blue screen, or just a reflection of the sky?

    And most importantly, can I cluster a Microsoft cloud with an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud?

  35. What it is... by elfguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not new and it's not vaporware, it's also not Windows on the cloud. It's called Microsoft Mesh. It's been in used for many months, although only the first few services are available. Right now you get PC to PC and PC to Web synchronization of data. It's pretty much the best document remote access / sharing solution right now.

    MS wants to add applications too, which many people compare with Google Docs but it's not that at all. It's basically a way that people will be able to use the same app from anywhere, have multiple people use the same application thru this mesh. How it will end up working is.. as of yet unknown.

    The upcoming PDC conference in October will be all about Mesh, which is what Balmer is referring to.

    1. Re:What it is... by johanatan · · Score: 1

      I actually prefer DropBox as it supports Windows, Mac & Linux. Also, Live Mesh has this nasty habit of bringing everything to a screeching halt if you happen to want it to sync a folder in which a large file (such as a Visual Studio .ncb file) resides (and if it sounds like I'm speaking from experience, I am!).

    2. Re:What it is... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for game developers and the MAFIAA to get hold of this.

      A whole version of Windows DESIGNED to allow the use of one application by many people, in many locations.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:What it is... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

      Clouds are made from water vapor!

  36. They only do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so they can recycle the wallpaper from Windows 95.

  37. Re:Microsoft Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...lacks silver lining.

  38. Re:Don't hold your breath So hazy i can't see... by QRDeNameland · · Score: 5, Funny

    Project/Code Name?

    Since this is Slashdot, how about...

    "Insensitive Cloud"

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  39. Another exercise in FUC by WheresMyDingo · · Score: 1

    Fear Uncertainty Cloud (your judgement)

  40. Should've Seen it Coming by Admodieus · · Score: 1

    The writing has been on the wall for something like this for a long time. Gates has been talking for years about how this is where he thinks the future is. Microsoft has made a strong push lately for their various Windows Live products, and some of them are quite good (Mesh, Skydrive, Writer). The only thing I'm curious to see is how heavy the OS is. Will it be geared towards netbooks, like the eeePC? Or will it still require some juice on your local machine?

    --
    "It's a reverse vampire...they....they crave the sun!"
  41. It already exists and called Windows RG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Demo is available here:
    http://www.deanliou.com/WinRG/27549_winrg.swf

  42. Russians are way ahead on this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I would put the viris nets as way ahead of Microsoft on the cloud computing front for Windows Operating Systems.

    I would ask what protections are in the Microsoft release to stop the instant creation of massive bot-nets.

  43. like flies to shite... by apodyopsis · · Score: 1

    Firms really are attracted to the latest buzzwords and hot topics like a fly to a shit are they not?

    Just in case this is the latest "Netscape moment"*, the latest hot technology that might prove useful so they will carve up a slice of it for themselves and smother innovation with a deluge of patents and FUD. Stamping their branding irons into the body of development to get their logo and product into every corner.

    I'm careful to avoid mentioning any specific firm here - because this goes for them all I think.

    *by which I refer to the fact that initially the web was ignored by firms until it was clear it was a big thing at which point they all waded in with monopolistic behavior, fired up their legal teams and petitioned for more control of it from us miscreants and wasters in case we created something they could not profit from and lock down. I think nobody won that one, I would say there is too much DRM and monitoring, others would argue the other way.

    1. Re:like flies to shite... by Shados · · Score: 1

      Its ignorance in general that does that kindda stuff... its not just with firms. Having a buzzword filled resume will net you a well paying job (if you don't mind working for idiots), having a buzzword compliant product will get you customers, etc.

      It gives people unfamiliar with the details a sense of security. "Oh! this is WEB 2.0, I can't go wrong!". "Oh this web app has Ajax! Its going to be FAAAAAAAAAAST". "Oh this doesn't have any trans fat in it, its healthy FOR SURE!"

  44. Re:Don't hold your breath So hazy i can't see... by davidsyes · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clouds ARE insensitive, you clo .... (struck by lightening, vaporized...)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  45. They had this project years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was flash-based OS. It is still available here: http://www.deanliou.com/WinRG/27549_winrg.swf

  46. It's just GoogleApps by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Don't get confused. It is just Microsoft's response to GoogleAps ie: Google Docs, Gmail, Google Spreadsheet, Google Calendar, etc.

  47. but will cloud by nimbius · · Score: 1

    come with a copy of solitare?

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:but will cloud by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it will only run on Internet Explorer 9.

    2. Re:but will cloud by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping for an internet multiplayer version of Solitaire. Oh wait...

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  48. Windows cloud by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    When applications go up (or down) in a puff of blue smoke (or vapor)

  49. That's strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unlike some people, Microsoft knows what "OS" means, and it's an OS: process management, drivers, the entire party.

    Surely you're mistaken. If I recall correctly, several years ago Microsoft testified that their web browser was an integral part of the O/S during an anti-trust hearing or some other little nuisance distraction. Or maybe I'm just imagining that.

    1. Re:That's strange. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      You're making the common mistake of assuming Microsoft (or any company, politician, or person you just picked up at the bar) actually believes what they say.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:That's strange. by ozphx · · Score: 1

      It is definitely an integral part of the Windows platform. The IE COM component is commonly used by a variety of third party applications, in addition to some inbuilt applications.

      Things like, say, the "Help" facility.

      Removing it may be possible, if you want to break a bunch of stuff. I'm sure you could remove the common controls library if you really wanted to as well...

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    3. Re:That's strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the time, the prosecution demonstrated that it was indeed possible, at Windows' point of 'evolution' (barf) in 1998, to remove it without impacting O/S stability or functionality. Keep in mind that MS has had 10 more years to wire components of it into the core O/S.

  50. Windows + Cloud = Irving Berlin by nevillethedevil · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Blue screens, shinning on me.......Nothing but blues screens do I see....."

    --
    Be gone from my sight or prepare to feel my flaming wraith!
  51. Windows Cloud... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because it will take at least seven standard PCs to boot the next version of Windows.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  52. A little rant... by Nathrael · · Score: 1

    [Insert rant about how Microsoft should rather take time patching their old systems (or even better: creating a new one that actually would be _useful_ and _nice to use_) instead of developing new ones]

    --
    A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
  53. Windows has always been a cloud.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its just that its made of an 'unmanageable heap of spaghetti code." Then ten minutes later, your hungry for more RAM.

  54. This is that time of the year again? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    every year since a couple of decades ago around this days Microsoft announces a "totally new" "improved" "safe this time" vapour-oriented Windows OS. At least is updating their vocabulary with the offer this time.

  55. Linux by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Look at what they are afraid of:

    http://eeepc.asus.com/global/

    See that category list with links? It will keep growing and growing and the only thing you DON'T need to run cloud based client computing is the bulky XP or Vista. Launching "Office" on a EeePC is going to Google Docs site for example. It is all WWW standards and other standard networking products.

    They figure there is no place for them with current offers. Back in 1995, Marc Andreessen made the biggest mistake by openly saying "Netscape will soon reduce Windows to] a poorly debugged set of device drivers.", the windows of 1995 he talks about is not existent anymore, it is full of hacks on hacks, patches on patches, 5-6 frameworks doing same job. So people look to a system which will do everything on Web with least overhead. It is Linux.

    All they now need is some "DirectCloud" with the usual suspect coding some Linux non working backwards clone. You get what I mean.

  56. This already exists in the wild by multipartmixed · · Score: 4, Funny

    This windows cloud computing stuff is already used to send millions of emails a day and so on. The product itself really isn't news, the only news is that Ballmer is finally giving it a product name so we can talk about it more effectively in the media.

    For a list of computers participating in the Windows Cloud, go here and request an rsync feed for the XBL.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  57. Microsoft anti-piracy will be interesting here by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    What will they say to people who try to access the cloud without authorization? I think the error message should be: "Hey! You! Get off of my cloud!"

    At least it would make more sense to go with that Stones song than Start Me Up.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  58. Amazon has been beta a similar idea for a while by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 1

    Amazon has been beta testing running Windows servers on EC2, and from what I've heard from Amazon, one of the challenges is creating a Microsoft license that will allow Microsoft to capture revenue from this and similar projects elsewhere.

    I wouldn't be surprised if they used a business model similar to Red Hat's cloud image, where Red Hat gets a tiny payment for every hour the server is running.

  59. Sounds like Midori/Singularity... by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

    From wikipedia:
    "Midori is the code name for a managed code operating system developed secretly by Microsoft. It has been reported[1][2] to be a possible commercial successor to the Singularity operating system, a research project started in 2003 to build a highly-dependable operating system in which the kernel, device drivers, and applications are all written in managed code.

    The code name Midori was first discovered through the PowerPoint presentation CHESS: A systematic testing tool for concurrent software.[3]

    Midori has also been rumoured by some IT journalists as a possible replacement to Microsoft Windows.

    Midori is meant to be unbound to the physical hardware of the computer and is assumed to be a much more virtually-oriented system than its precursors. It's also said that it assumes that the user will be online at all times. Midori will be easily moved between different environments without reinstallation."

  60. Re:Microsoft Cloud by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, it has one

  61. Be Honest by ipb · · Score: 1

    Just call it "The W.C."

  62. Copying VMware by Traiano · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Microsoft is again trying to jump on the wave created a competitor: http://www.vmware.com/company/news/releases/vcloud_vmworld08.html

  63. Better Name by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    Windows "Pie in the Sky" Edition

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  64. Cloud, crowd, nitrous oxide computing ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    ... I'll skip the first two ... sign me up when the N2O offering walks up to the plate. The technology is totally worth jack-shit, but you don't seem to give a damn, and it's really funny ...

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  65. Re:Don't hold your breath So hazy i can't see... by BigGerman · · Score: 1

    "Seattle"?

  66. No, hold your breath! by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 1

    How's this for a project name: "Air Biscuit"

    --
    You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
  67. Re:Don't hold your breath So hazy i can't see... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

    Just to lightn the mood a little...
    I suppose if you were struck by something that decreased your opacity continuously until you were transparent, the last moments might seem like you were "vapor", but that definitely strikes me as an intentionally opaque way of describing the phenomenon.

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  68. Did Ballmer say OS? by dreemernj · · Score: 1

    There is no quote in TFA that actually mentions him saying it. It almost sounds like Windows Cloud is something like Google AppEngine.

    --
    1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
  69. Leased computing by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    The holy grail, the return to the days of the mainframe ( in concept ) where you can charge your customers for *anything* they do.

    No pay, no play.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  70. Make it the next poll! by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would have voted for "Windows Nimbus."

    This should be the next poll.

    1. Re:Make it the next poll! by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Does Harry Potter get a Windows Nimbus 2000 in the special edition?

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:Make it the next poll! by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      That depends - will it freeze when it encounters a bad driver?

  71. I'm looking thru the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but it is not clouded...

  72. And the name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rhapsody. It will finally bring safe multitasking to Windows.

  73. not just Windows Cloud.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Cloud and Rainy Showers Edition - every four minutes an innovative new "rain" feature keeps you alert by randomly deleting characters in any document you have open. (This replaces the BSOD)

    Windows Cloud and Storm Showers Edition - as above but works every seven minutes.

    Windows Cloud and Pony Edition - its pink.

    Windows Cloud and Fog Edition - text and background are all in the same grey colour.

    Windows Cloud Extreme Ballmer Edition - once you log in, it shows a page similar to Goatsx, only Ballmers rear end and a picture of the sun shining from the appropriate place.

  74. Microsoft will do what they're good at by notaprguy · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is good at making things pretty easy for developers. No, not as easy as being a script/HTML monkey but if you want to build an application for Windows using VB or build a Web site using ASP.NET, Microsoft makes it easier for their platform(s) than any other platform. A mediocre developer can fire up Visual Studio and do something pretty cool. A good developer can do really cool things. My expectation is that they'll do the same thing in the (buzzword alert) 'cloud.'

  75. Silverlight/Moonlight by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    The Mono group own all the copyright on all the Moonlight code, and part of the EU agreement is Microsoft agreeing to develop some interoperability projects. Rolling back on the specific pledges they made in regards to Mono and Moonlight would likely bring down EU fines.

    Microsoft is likely to remain largely closed off in other regards, but I don't know if they are going to suddenly try to close off Silverlight to block Moonlight users. Even they tried, it isn't like they can close off the source code for Moonlight, given that they don't own it. The Mono team can continue to support Moonlight so long as they choose to.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Silverlight/Moonlight by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Simple you add some functionality that is covered by patents.
      Just don't have any trust in Microsoft of politicians.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Silverlight/Moonlight by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      http://www.microsoft.com/interop/principles/osspatentpledge.mspx

      Any protocol they opened for developers, you can write OSS for without fear of patent reprisal.

      Again, this is what the EU demanded in their ruling. Microsoft must comply or they face fines, and the possibility of not being able to sell software in the EU.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Silverlight/Moonlight by ozphx · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would they anyway? They make their money selling Silverlight dev tools. Its a no-brainer that they want a Silverlight runtime on as many platforms as possible.

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  76. Why? by dangitman · · Score: 1

    What's the point of writing another OS to do this? Are they saying that Windows isn't good enough to perform these "cloud" functions? If so, then why don't they rewrite Windows so it is good enough?

    Or is it just a part of their trend of having dozens of versions of each OS, like "Vista: people with small hands and lactose intolerance Edition"?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Why? by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      "Vista: people with small hands and lactose intolerance Edition"?

      It's hard to digest dairy products with 5 centimeter fingers you insensitive clod.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  77. Re:Ulteo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For anyone too lazy, busy, or disinterested to do that link chasing, Ulteo is a Linux Distro, based off of Ubuntu.
    http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=ulteo

    Although there is an 'Online Desktop' thing as part of the project - but I find my interest too lacking to learn what exactly that is.

  78. citrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just download citrix. Boom! instant Windows cloud.

  79. Yes yes !!! GA-LORY !!!!! by unity100 · · Score: 1

    We masses were beating each other to oblivion, trying to get a piece of the 'vista performance' !!

    just as i was on my way home today, i have seen hundreds of people running over each other, seeking vista performance from local computer stores. thankfully it arrived on time - vista performance through cloud computing with a NEW windows version !!!

    oh sing ho, merry dol !!

  80. We dont need hadron collider anymore by unity100 · · Score: 1

    A windows version running a cloud computing network would give us all the opportunities we need to examine black holes.

    While we're at it, we can examine the rips in space/time continuum too.

  81. Re:Don't hold your breath So hazy i can't see... by miknix · · Score: 1

    LOL! You made my day.

  82. It's Really..... by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    "The operating system, which will likely have a different name," is actually WINDOWS VISTA! Doesn't Vista sound cool NOW? Clouds? Right here in the screen saver! Doesn't Vista look COOL? Isn't it AWESOME? You can tell from how it looks how great it is! See? LOOK at it. No, don't touch, that's what this specially trained Windows Operative is for. He touches things so you don't have to! You can JUST LOOK!

    Stallman was right. It's hype. It's cool because it's new and not many people understand it. Ballmer offers proof. If it's still cool (if and) when this Windows critter emerges, it will cease to be at that time. My money says MS will never release this because people will fall out of love with it before that.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  83. My main question/concern ... by WTF+Chuck · · Score: 1

    is whether the BSOD is coming from my machine, or one of the others in the "cloud"?

    --
    Note - Liberal use of <sarcasm> tags may or may not need to be applied.
  84. Ya sure, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cant trust my home system with a windows, but i sure will trust a cloud service based out of it. Imagine every time I want to refresh my page, a windows network message pops up asking "Do you want to refresh". This will lead to a new pscho buzz-word : "Internet Frustation based suicides" - people commiting suicides cause their web services (hosted on Windoes Cloud i think "Vista caused suicides" is already a part of the dictionary ;) ) An

  85. Previewed previously by Tsagadai · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think there was a preview in the 98 start up screen. Windows on a cloud and everything. If they are bringing it back it will be more amazing than the massive hint they gave in the XP default background.

  86. network boot by chris.evans · · Score: 1

    Have BIOS load the OS from microsoft.com server and you data is stored on your local harddrive.

  87. Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMHO, cloud computing is just a new way of implementing the old mainframe/dumb terminal architecture again. Microsoft is all about control of their assets, which means anything they sell to you. This has nothing to do with convenience to the consumer, it's all about control and money. Microsoft holds your data and apps hostage until you pay them, and keep paying them. Really bad idea for consumers, really good idea for Microsoft. The terms "trust" and "Microsoft" are mutually exclusive.

  88. Re:Microsoft Cloud by electrictroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Windows Cloud OS??? This is bull excrement. I want to OWN my programs (like Word 2000), not have to keep renting it "off the net" year after year after year.

    Hmmm. Looks like I'll still be using XP 'til the year 2020.
    I refuse to touch Vista and Cloud sounds like garbage too.

    --
    The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  89. Re:Microsoft Cloud by Barsteward · · Score: 1
    I think they used the wrong word from the thesaurus. i was thinking of a cloud as Vapour therefore getting Windows Vapour(ware) but there are better definitions/synonyms of "cloud" here -> http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/cloud

    Main Entry: cloud. Part of Speech: noun Synonyms: blemish, cat's-tail, cloudiness, clipse, mare's-tail, nebula, nebulosity, nimbostratus, nimbus, obscurity, rack, scud, stigma, storm scud, tarnish, wane cloud

    Main Entry: cloud; Part of Speech: adjective Synonyms: clouded, cloudy, flocculent, fuliginous, murky, nebular, nebulated, nebulose, nebulous, nimbose, nubilous, obscure, overcast, roily, turbid

    Main Entry: cloud. Part of Speech: verb Synonyms: becloud, befog, befuddle, blacken, blemish, blur, confuse, cover, darken, distort, dust, film, fog, gloom, haze, hide, mist, nebula, obfuscate, obnubilate, obscure, ominous, overcast, perplex, screen, seed, shade, shadow, smog, stigma, sully, swarm, taint, tarnish, thunderhead, vapor, veil

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  90. VM based ?!? by DrYak · · Score: 1

    They way I understood it back then is that the OS has some micro-kernel with minimalist hardware abstraction and a .NET virtual machine, with as much as possible being run as -NET byte code inside the VM, thus "hardware process isolation, but rather does everything in software". (= Everything is taken care of inside the .NET VM).

    Nonetheless, it's Microsoft we're speaking about.
    Count on them to royally both the final commercial product.
    The Singularity concept is interesting as a minimalist environment but :
    - some marketing people will decide that lots of windows' stuff has to be bolted to please the buzzword compliency (WINFS all over. Count on the resulting product being some awful siamese monstruosity of Singularity and Windows Server 2010 collided together).
    - the whole will be victim of it's own strategy. Microsoft's world has been so efficient at playing the lock-in game that anything that is not a perfect clone of Windows has little viability. The .NET idea is good conceptually. But once the cloud is up, count on thousand of subtle incompatibility because tons of legacy .NET applications rely on API not found on Cloud OS (either calling older APIs even if they shouldn't - like OLE/COM or Win32 - or calling some nonstandard specific microsoft extensions to the standard - the one that is often criticized by other .NET implementors like dotGNU or Mono).
    Even if it will probably marketed as such, the Cloud OS won't be able to run out-of-the-box unmodified copies of all the .NET applications some shop has.
    You'll have to wait until Visual Studio 2010, for Microsoft to release tools and environment that can force a software to be strict .NET compliant and not tap into some extensions that mainstream NT-based OS provide but Singularity-based OS don't.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  91. Re:Microsoft Cloud by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cloud computing OS, jumpin' jehosaphat, vapour ware becomes a reality, the mind boggles, a vapour OS, to run vapour ware applications all on vapour ware hardware ;D.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen