Slashdot Mirror


Alarm Raised On Teenage Hackers

Arno Igne writes to tell us that the number of underage participants in "high-tech" crimes has risen steeply in recent history. Reporting children as young as 11 swapping credit card details and asking for hacks, many are largely unskilled and thus more likely to get caught and arrested. "Communities and forums spring up where people start to swap malicious programs, knowledge and sometimes stolen data. Some also look for exploits and virus code that can be run against the social networking sites popular with many young people. Some then try to peddle or use the details or accounts they net in this way. Mr Boyd said he spent a lot of time tracking down the creators of many of the nuisance programs written to exploit users of social networking sites and the culprit was often a teenager."

53 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish we had a term to describe that... something that notes the fact they are younger, and simple in their skills... Maybe "script kiddies?"

    1. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but in this case they're doing it for lolz. I suggest lolkiddiez.

    2. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by kdemetter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah , this is really worth a 'nothing to see here , move along'.

      I mean , this is nothing new . It's been that way for over a century.

      I don't like that they track down the 'creator's of those nuisance programs ' , though . Programming these things is a fun way of learning how it works.

      They should be going after the people who USE it for malicious purpose instead.

      I mean , maybe we should just lock up the creators of the Windows API , because you can really do some damage with that.

    3. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was a term for them long before "the internets" were flooded with them.

      In the olden days of BBSs, we used to call them "ruggies" which was short for "rug rats". But "script kiddies" is even more accurate of a description, seeing they are basically just following along a "recipe" for cracking something.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    4. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Rasperin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No reason to go after the guy who makes rifles, hand guns, etc. Go after the guy who used it to murder people.
      No reason to go after the guy who makes vehicles. Go after the guy who used it to run someone off the road.
      No reason to go after the guy who makes whiskey. Go after the guy who used it to beat someone with.
      Your argument goes both ways sir.

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    5. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by roguetrick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I had a friend get caught for credit card fraud in middle school. The days of AOL were full of script kiddies. This stuff is old news.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    6. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by The+Gaytriot · · Score: 3, Funny

      No reason to go after the guy who makes whiskey. Go after the guy who used it to beat someone with.

      What? Beat him with the whiskey?

      I just accidentally my friend with the whiskey.

      --
      Srsly u guys. U guys, srsly.
    7. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you'll agree that hacking and phreaking is different than some n00b using scripts to commit electronic crimes. Hacking something just for the sake of doing it, to learn how it works and to poke around in forbidden space, is different than stealing credit card numbers so you can buy the latest ecksbawks game.

      Hacking is still illegal, but but it's not necessarily malicious, like stealing and using someone's credit card number.

    8. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by jlarocco · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh... and no reason to go after the person who creates the virus. Only the person who uses it against others.
      No reason to go after the guy who makes pipe bombs either. Just the guy who uses them.
      No reason to go after the guy who makes the full-auto conversion kits. Just the guy who applies them to the off-the-shelf weapon.
      No reason to go after the guy who makes the fake passports. Just the guy who uses one.

      Makes sense to me. Most things are legal until you use them to do something stupid.

    9. Re:Gosh, underage hackers with no skill? by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Move to one of the states in the link I provided and you can.

      Step 1. Fill out ATF form 4 (which includes fingerprint card and $200 tax.)
      Step 2. Wait 1 week to 6 months for approval and buy NFA item when the ATF grudgingly accepts that you aren't a felon, insane, or for some other reason not allowed to own Title 2 hardware.
      Step 3. Don't profit (Full auto: nothing makes a paycheck disappear faster.)

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
  2. "Underage"? by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At what age does high-tech crime become legal then?

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:"Underage"? by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ha! good point.

      I guess once you are 18 you are no longer too young to go to a federal prison.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  3. This is new? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Script kiddies have been around since the AOL days. Hell, I myself got a juvenile laugh out of punters (remember those? God, the AIM clients were so terrible back then) and other "progs".

    Mostly I imagine the vast majority of this stuff nowadays is myspace-related. Probably kids trying to break into someone else's myspace page because they're little drama whores like that.

    1. Re:This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I survived the eighties one time already. The early days of the Ma Bell breakup coincided with dialup BBSs. Now, there were any number of long-distance companies (MCI, Sprint, whatever) that had dialup portals (since they could be hard-switched for some reason), and they gave their clients six-digit identifier pins. So basically any kid with a modem and half a brain (yes, half a brain, since a full one would realize the trouble) could commit wire fraud, and some of us did. Once you got on those BBSs, what would you talk about?

      Then there were the glories of carbon-transfer paper and the mall dumpsters (away from the food court ones). Dumb kids + tech = felonies ahoy! It's been like that for decades.

    2. Re:This is new? by oatesy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I agree...in fact I'm almost ashamed (no I am) to say that my first major experience with "hacking" was on my friends myspace pages. But it doesn't help that great movies like Hackers make young kids think that they can get with Angelina Jolie if they are just good at hacking. I blame society and the movie industry.

    3. Re:This is new? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yea, what bunch of sensationalized garbage. i'd expect this from FOX news, but not from the BBC.

      teenagers have always been mischievous, and all hackers start as teenagers. most hackers grow out of malicious/immature behavior by adulthood, so naturally most phishers/crackers/virus writers/script kiddies/etc. are going to be teenagers.

      heck, it's our teenage rebelliousness that motivates us to try new things. even though teenagers can be mischievous, it's usually pretty harmless stuff. when i was a in elementary school and junior high i used to write trojans, progs/punters/scrollers, mail bombers, etc. that's what motivated me to learn how to program. and i'm sure there are many others out there who were the same way.

      it's the script kiddies that grow up to become spammers that we need to worry about. they cause the most damage and are a much bigger nuisance and societal problem than mischievous teenage hacker-wannabes. greed-driven malice is much more dangerous than curiosity-driven mischief.

    4. Re:This is new? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      But it doesn't help that great movies like Hackers make young kids think that they can get with Angelina Jolie if they are just good at hacking.

      Oh? You didn't get your turn with Angelina Jolie? I'll e-mail Bob and tell him to put you at the front of line.

    5. Re:This is new? by skeeto · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, man. Mentioning AIM punters brings back the old memories of being a script kiddie myself. I had a nice collection of those things as a kid.

      I remember finding out about an exploit where IMing someone a certain 5 digits followed by a semicolon instantly crashed their client. I would go into one of the chat rooms, make grandiose false claims (such claiming to be a "super genius"), and then use it on anyone who disagreed with me. A moment or so after I would do it, everyone would see my target silently wink out of the chat room. The client locked up and froze before even showing the IM window I had sent, so the victim had no idea what was going on.

      Letting an idiot 12-year old wield that power was like throwing gasoline on a fire.

  4. Using kids by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are cases of Immigrant smuggling where the drivers were juveniles because juveniles are much more difficult to prosecute.

    That's how I'd operate if I were a fraudster - have the kids to the dirty work and give them a cut. There are hordes of bored shithead suburban kids who would love to be "elite haxxors" and they would most likely avoid prosecution the first time.

    1. Re:Using kids by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep. This is how a lot of the G's do drug smuggling and some other 'dirty' work of running a gang -- get the underage kids to do it. They get busted, they won't do time, and therefore it's a lot harder to get them to squeal. Ya gotta keep 'em separated!

      Of course these aren't your average run-of-the-mill parent-fearing suburban kids either. They're usually the problem-case kids.

    2. Re:Using kids by corerunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and, suddenly, that Offspring track makes complete sense. I must have been too young at the time.

      --
      "Don't hate the media, become the media." -Jello Biafra
  5. I forget the term... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I forget the term, but there are laws on the books that state that if you are a landlord, and you continually have tenants who engage in criminal activity that the authorities can confiscate the house. It is a slow process, but the point is that if you own the property that you have some responsibility in insuring that it isn't being used for purposes that are harmful to society.

    Apply that to social networking sites and...

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:I forget the term... by cdrguru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apply to ISPs also. Problem is today that most ISPs actively shield users on their system which engage in malicious activity.

      The answer is always they will not cooperate without a court order. Of course, if the police ask nicely they cooperate without a court order. But after a system is broken into unless there is at least $25,000 in provable damages you aren't going to get anyone in law enforcement interested. And that is just the beginning.

      So if someone is downloading child porn, the police are right there on that. If they break into your system and cause hours of downtime nothing happens. This can be considered to be tacit encouragement. Helping the folks learn about computers. Roughly the same way that gangbangers learn about automatic weapons.

    2. Re:I forget the term... by internerdj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apply that to the internet and... We get exactly what we need right? You may not enjoy social networking sites but what if someone used slashdot in a crime? Or wikileaks? Seriously is that the presendent you want set?

    3. Re:I forget the term... by Alarindris · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I highly doubt that. I used to be a landlord in a rough area of town. We'd see cops there at least once a day. There's no way in hell they can expect a landlord to police. A landlord collects money (only sometimes) and maintains the ground and is in charge of repairs, not law enforcement.

    4. Re:I forget the term... by conteXXt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Think "Grow Houses" Up here in Canada. If a landlord knowing keeps renting to a grower the house can and will be forcibly cleaned up at considerable expense to the owner and the owner may also be held criminally responsible. Different laws/country though.

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    5. Re:I forget the term... by bloodninja · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apply to ISPs also. Problem is today that most ISPs actively shield users on their system which engage in malicious activity.

      This is the real answer. Nobody is going to go for MS Windows being too easy to compromise, and nobody is going to go for Myspace (websites generally are not held to real-company laws). However, ISPs that host computers doing phishing, spaming, DDoSing, botnet herding, or other malicious activity should be shut down. I don't care if the computer doing the malicious activity is a compromised Windows machine or not, if the owner is aware or not, or if the owner approved of the ativity or not. Hit the ISPs, let them hit the users, and only then will the users demand a secure OS and secure applications.

      --
      Lock the wife and the dog in the boot of the car.
      Return one hour later.
      Who's happy to see you?
  6. Ummm... by Corpuscavernosa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    many are largely unskilled and thus more likely to get caught and arrested.

    Problem solved?

    --
    We figured out a long time ago that it's easier to elect seven judges than to elect 132 legislators.
    1. Re:Ummm... by dontmakemethink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      many are largely unskilled and thus more likely to get caught and arrested.

      Problem solved?

      More like problem created. When 16-year-old criminals discover exactly how much less severe the punishment is for them than 18-year-olds, they all have the same thought: "Crap! I've got less than 2 years to get good at this!"

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
  7. Jobs for Kids by colganc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if kids had some kind of job if they would be less likely to steal or break the law.

    1. Re:Jobs for Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?

    2. Re:Jobs for Kids by Legion_SB · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if kids had some kind of job if they would be less likely to steal or break the law.

      I totally agree, but prostitution is illegal!

      --
      'a';DROP TABLE users; SELECT * FROM DATA WHERE name LIKE '%'... if you're reading this, it didn't work.
  8. Oh no, 11 years old trying to hack social sites! by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The whole of western civilisation is DOOMED!!

    Or at least until the kid stumbles across some p0rn links or pictures of drunk 18 year old girls and quickly forgets all about his l337 hacking attempts.

  9. Was AOL invented in the 1960s? by davidwr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Script kiddies have been around since the AOL days.

    I didn't know AOL predated the moon landing.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  10. 25 by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 4, Funny

    Never trust anybody over 25!

  11. if you can't or won't by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    find a flaw in the system, the flaw will be found by someone else

    the nice thing about kids being the perps is that there is no more nefarious purpose than "i did for the lulz". do you really think if these teenagers weren't loudly and clumsily exploiting security holes that someone else with much more nefarious purposes is not expoliting the same security holes quietly and discreetly?

    consider kids hacking websites to be that website's security research division. the flaws are found, the flaws are fixed, everyone makes out better. thank god for loud dumb scrit kiddies

    seriously, script kiddies are a blessing. they provide incentive to harden your website, incentive that some websites don't have and apparently need

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:if you can't or won't by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A good analogy might be immunisation. The script kiddies present the network with a weakened form of potentially dangerous attacks, so that it can learn to defend itself. I'm not sure where Jenny McCarthy comes in, but I'm sure I'll figure out a way to make that happen.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:if you can't or won't by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, trading stolen credit card information is "doing it for the lulz" and has no nefarious purpose.

  12. been around for a long time by systematical · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I got my first computer when I was 10 around 95-96, within a year I discovered that I could pretend to be someone else by setting up a somewhat legitimate email account and sounding official. My friend and I would email tripod users, geocities users etc... posing as someone who offered free web services. Eventually we would get passwords to their accounts, change the password, and vandalize the web page (eventually we got tired of doing of this, i think we discovered girls around age 12). I didn't learn that this was called phishing until I was in high school. On the plus side it forced me to learn HTML (I wanted my vandalizing to look good), which eventually lead to a career in web development. Hopefully these delinquents can be saved too.

    1. Re:been around for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      you son of a bitch! i have been looking for you for a long time!

    2. Re:been around for a long time by systematical · · Score: 2, Funny

      you must have operated a hanson site back then, that was the primary target.

  13. Fraud was common when I was a kid by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I grew up in Socal. Many people I knew would beige box 900 numbers to get time on a local BBS. Several got all sorts of gear, mostly paintball crap, through credit card numbers gained through dumpster diving. These were mostly 16-17 year olds doing the deed, with some doing it younger, but it's harder when you can't drive.

    The temptation was huge but I managed to not give in. Heck, the temptation still is huge. Why work hard when you can make a few thousand in a few minutes? Oh yeah, because it's wrong. Sigh.

  14. Script Kiddies have been around longer than that by yttrstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to be one, way back in about 1986 or so on my trusty little Commodore 128. Back in those days there were a few pretty incredible bulletin boards that had vast (dozens!) libraries of little tools and wrappers mostly written in bourne...(I think, this was 22 years and 7,000 joints ago, so pardon the fuzziness with some details)

    I didn't really know a damn thing about shell scripts or programming (remember when they were different things?) in those days, but I knew how to change permissions on a file and execute it. And I had some vague knowledge of the basics of how computers talked to each other. And I got into all *kinds* of trouble. It was truly bitchin', and I don't regret a thing.

  15. Parents? by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This probably boils down to parents that are clueless. "But he was only playing on his computer!"
    So parents need to be educated that there's more you can do with a PC and an Internet connection than browse and play WoW.

  16. Re:Oh no, 11 years old trying to hack social sites by Rorschach1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back when I was a kid, it was those skills that we had to develop to GET the pr0n! When the biggest source was a local BBS with a reasonably vigilant sysop, we had to get creative. It taught me a little about social engineering... like if you registered with a totally unpronounceable foreign name, the sysop would just validate you without a phone call because he didn't want to mispronounce it.

  17. Wargames anybody? by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, this has been how it is since the early 80s. 25 years ago it was the teenagers who were war-dialing and breaking into time-sharing systems. They're the ones who've got free time for it. As you get older you get into college or into a job and you've got a lot less free time for messing around like that. It only makes sense, then, that school kids would be one of the two major groups doing this (the other being those adults for whom this kind of crime is their job).

  18. Kids swapping KNOWLEDGE! by droopycom · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow!! This is indeed dangerous:

    "people start to swap malicious programs, knowledge and sometimes stolen data."

    Where did they find the KNOWLEDGE in the first place ?

    We need to fight at the source, find the KNOWLEDGE dealers and arrest them!

    We need to make the fight against KNOWLEDGE a national priority, nominate a KNOWLEDGE tsar or something!

    Will somebody think of the children!!

    1. Re:Kids swapping KNOWLEDGE! by thepotoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The education system is waaaaay ahead of you, buddy.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    2. Re:Kids swapping KNOWLEDGE! by Hillgiant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you don't talk to your children about KNOWLEDGE, who will?

      --
      -
  19. Hackles raised over teenaged alarmists by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mr Boyd said he spent a lot of time tracking down the creators of many of the nuisance programs written to exploit users of social networking sites and the culprit was often a teenager."

    Get off my law... HEY GIMME MY PANTS BACK!

  20. Way overdue for another Operation Sundevil? by Phizzle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember back in late 80s, things were getting out of hand with newbie kiddies just getting into hacking and phreaking and playing with credit card numbers and phone codes. They were creating too much noise that made investigations of bigger fish more difficult. So law enforcement folks got credit companies to bankroll Operation Sundevil, put up a sting BBS (Phoenix Fortress) and captured a tonn of minors, most of who had files with phone codes and credit card numbers because they shotgun downloaded everything that seemed "cool". There are a bunch of honeypot sites and rooms popping up now getting ready to reel in the next crop.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  21. Re:Targetting them, due to their own idiocy. by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's why they're called /b/tards.

  22. Wonderful! by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This means that law enforcement will spend all their time going after this low-hanging fruit, and the public's fear will be assuaged because of all the "hackers" that are getting put in juvie - while the real troublemakers are left completely alone.

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk