>And nothing on Wikileaks invalidates any of the work done at CRU or any other climate research institute.
As soon as I read the email of two scientists planning to delete all data requested under FOIA or the UK version of that law, yes, their work became invalidated.
>As such when I carry I carry a little Kel-tec.380. Fire's the same projectile as the 9mm Luger (less power charge behind it though, but still decent energy delivery) but it fits nicely in my front pocket with no wardrobe adjustments.
I had that gun. I shot ballistic gel with it and the penetration was good.
Then I put a leather jacket in front of it. Penetration went down to 4 inches in 10% ballistic gel.
You should consider the kel-tec 9mm as a replacement option, and with all pocket pistols, use FMJ instead of JHP.
Not really. My neighbor has a Serbu Super Shorty he wears in a CC rig (shoulder holster with ammo and handgun on the opposite side), and it is perfectly concealable.
>Yet periodically we see attention whores showing up in Slashdot articles and crying that we will run out of uranium, a statement which is so obviously wrong that it is hard to explain by incompetence and bordering on the realm of malice.
The same people that write these articles write the same articles proclaiming we are running out of oil within ten years.
We've been running out of oil for over 100 years and running on that same prediction.
A screenshot is better than nothing, which is what we have now.
I mean I could post a story right now stating that CompUSA did the same thing for me before and it would be totally untrue. Yet it could seemingly pose as a front page article as we see above.
Well, they actually screwed up because of the lack of resolution once already. There was an article and a dupe about it, but I can't remember/I'm too lazy to look up any of the keywords to find it.
2.07 Obsolete Tests and Outdated Test Results. (a) Psychologists do not base their assessment or intervention decisions or recommendations on data or test results that are outdated for the current purpose.
(b) Similarly, psychologists do not base such decisions or recommendations on tests and measures that are obsolete and not useful for the current purpose.
6 men chucking rocks plus a van is a clear disparity of force scenario. A rock being thrown has been treated as "assault with a deadly weapon" in the past. So no, I'm not out of my mind. Just consider what could have happened if those rock chuckers decided to be more aggressive.
Maybe I'm a CCW permit holder, reserve deputy, and graduate of 3 handgun shooting schools.
Or maybe I'm just an internet tough guy.
But 6 guys in a van vs 18 rounds of.40 and 13 rounds of 357SIG before reloading both guns means that van and occupants would have a very bad day if they decided to assault me.
Also, if your aim sucks with iron sights that bad where you couldn't hit moving targets, try using lasers. Sharks are optional.
Time for this guy to get a conceal carry permit, a handgun, and most importantly, the training to know when to use the above. Online we defend ourselves with munitions known as anonymity and encryption. In real life we use body armor and small arms.
To the Congress of the United States: I transmit herewith a list of the sites, locations, facilities, and activities in the United States that I intend to declare to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), under the Protocol Additional to the Agreement between the United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the United States of America, with Annexes, signed at Vienna on June 12, 1998 (the ''U.S.-IAEA Additional Protocol''), and constitutes a report thereon, as required by section 271 of Public Law 109-401. In accordance with section 273 of Public Law 109-401, I hereby certify that: (1) each site, location, facility, and activity included in the list has been examined by each department and agency with national security equities with respect to such site, location, facility, or activity; and (2) appropriate measures have been taken to ensure that information of direct national security significance will not be compromised at any such site, location, facility, or activity in connection with an IAEA inspection. The enclosed draft declaration lists each site, location, facility, and activity I intend to declare to the IAEA, and provides a detailed description of such sites, locations, facilities, and activities, and the provisions of the U.S.-IAEA Additional Protocol under which they would be declared. Each site, location, facility, and activity would be declared in order to meet the obligations of the United States of America with respect to these provisions. The IAEA classification of the enclosed declaration is ''Highly Confidential Safeguards Sensitive''; however, the United States regards this information as ''Sensitive but Unclassified.'' Nonetheless, under Public Law 109-401, information reported to, or otherwise acquired by, the United States Government under this title or under the U.S.-IAEA Additional Protocol shall be exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5, United States Code. BARACK OBAMA.
----- Amusingly, it is addressed to Congress. Which means it would have been leaked PDQ regardless.
Slashdot Mirror
>And nothing on Wikileaks invalidates any of the work done at CRU or any other climate research institute.
As soon as I read the email of two scientists planning to delete all data requested under FOIA or the UK version of that law, yes, their work became invalidated.
If you read the article, someone has.
I know, I just come here for the stellar conversations.
>As such when I carry I carry a little Kel-tec .380. Fire's the same projectile as the 9mm Luger (less power charge behind it though, but still decent energy delivery) but it fits nicely in my front pocket with no wardrobe adjustments.
I had that gun. I shot ballistic gel with it and the penetration was good.
Then I put a leather jacket in front of it. Penetration went down to 4 inches in 10% ballistic gel.
You should consider the kel-tec 9mm as a replacement option, and with all pocket pistols, use FMJ instead of JHP.
Not really. My neighbor has a Serbu Super Shorty he wears in a CC rig (shoulder holster with ammo and handgun on the opposite side), and it is perfectly concealable.
The trick is to learn how to dress when carrying.
>Yet periodically we see attention whores showing up in Slashdot articles and crying that we will run out of uranium, a statement which is so obviously wrong that it is hard to explain by incompetence and bordering on the realm of malice.
The same people that write these articles write the same articles proclaiming we are running out of oil within ten years.
We've been running out of oil for over 100 years and running on that same prediction.
>*Knock Knock* Hi, its the rest of the world here at your door, we'd love for you to come out and visit sometime!
But whenever we do, you guys tell us to go home! Is that because of our obsession for things that go boom, or some other issue?
>Enjoying having XP favor Core0 heavily with that new 4core cpu you'll get
lern2processaffinity
>not to mention that you need XP64 to even use a quadcore..
Wrong.
>and XP64 is buugggyy
lern2update
Damn. I'm saving that post for future use.
The leader of the Jedi is no mere Knight.
A screenshot is better than nothing, which is what we have now.
I mean I could post a story right now stating that CompUSA did the same thing for me before and it would be totally untrue. Yet it could seemingly pose as a front page article as we see above.
No, seriously, I'm not a troll. I want verification that this was done.
Or it didn't happen.
Wait, you read the articles? I just come here for the stellar conversations.
Well, they actually screwed up because of the lack of resolution once already. There was an article and a dupe about it, but I can't remember/I'm too lazy to look up any of the keywords to find it.
SSD drive. Problem solved!
>a web browser should never, and I mean NEVER, need half a gig of memory to view my open tabs
Hmm. 512MB of ram should be enough for any web browser?
If it bothers you that much though, just go to your about:config page and edit the
browser.cache.memory.capacity
key to however much ram you think your browser should use.
>Not if Amazon remotely turns off non-drm files reading. Man, they can actually erase books remotely, they can't turn off a feature?
They have. Read up on when they deactivated the text to speech feature.
Well, how about ATMs? They count!
I can understand your concern about the automatic teller machine machines though.
Another point worth noting is that even the APA doesn't condone the use of 'outdated' tests, which the Rorschach would certainly qualify under:
APA ETHICAL PRINCIPLES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS AND CODE OF CONDUCT http://www.apa.org/ethics/code.html
http://www.apa.org/ethics/code.html#2.07
2.07 Obsolete Tests and Outdated Test Results.
(a) Psychologists do not base their assessment or intervention decisions or recommendations on data or test results that are outdated for the current purpose.
(b) Similarly, psychologists do not base such decisions or recommendations on tests and measures that are obsolete and not useful for the current purpose.
...signed up for the Mobile Infantry! Service Guarantees Citizenship!
Klendathu delenda est!
Would you like to know more?
Well a double-dumbass on you, sir!
6 men chucking rocks plus a van is a clear disparity of force scenario. A rock being thrown has been treated as "assault with a deadly weapon" in the past. So no, I'm not out of my mind. Just consider what could have happened if those rock chuckers decided to be more aggressive.
>Never owned a gun or shot a gun I take it?
Maybe I'm a CCW permit holder, reserve deputy, and graduate of 3 handgun shooting schools.
Or maybe I'm just an internet tough guy.
But 6 guys in a van vs 18 rounds of .40 and 13 rounds of 357SIG before reloading both guns means that van and occupants would have a very bad day if they decided to assault me.
Also, if your aim sucks with iron sights that bad where you couldn't hit moving targets, try using lasers. Sharks are optional.
Time for this guy to get a conceal carry permit, a handgun, and most importantly, the training to know when to use the above. Online we defend ourselves with munitions known as anonymity and encryption. In real life we use body armor and small arms.
Yes, Obama accidentally the document.
Here is the document blurb:
To the Congress of the United States:
I transmit herewith a list of the sites, locations, facilities, and activities
in the United States that I intend to declare to the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), under the Protocol Additional
to the Agreement between the United States of America and
the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of
Safeguards in the United States of America, with Annexes, signed
at Vienna on June 12, 1998 (the ''U.S.-IAEA Additional Protocol''),
and constitutes a report thereon, as required by section 271 of Public
Law 109-401. In accordance with section 273 of Public Law
109-401, I hereby certify that:
(1) each site, location, facility, and activity included in the
list has been examined by each department and agency with
national security equities with respect to such site, location, facility,
or activity; and
(2) appropriate measures have been taken to ensure that information
of direct national security significance will not be
compromised at any such site, location, facility, or activity in
connection with an IAEA inspection.
The enclosed draft declaration lists each site, location, facility,
and activity I intend to declare to the IAEA, and provides a detailed
description of such sites, locations, facilities, and activities,
and the provisions of the U.S.-IAEA Additional Protocol under
which they would be declared. Each site, location, facility, and activity
would be declared in order to meet the obligations of the
United States of America with respect to these provisions.
The IAEA classification of the enclosed declaration is ''Highly
Confidential Safeguards Sensitive''; however, the United States regards
this information as ''Sensitive but Unclassified.''
Nonetheless, under Public Law 109-401, information reported to,
or otherwise acquired by, the United States Government under this
title or under the U.S.-IAEA Additional Protocol shall be exempt
from disclosure under section 552 of title 5, United States Code.
BARACK OBAMA.
-----
Amusingly, it is addressed to Congress. Which means it would have been leaked PDQ regardless.