Slashdot Mirror


Fictional Town "Eureka" To Become Real?

Zarath writes "The fictional town of Eureka (from the TV series by the same name) is going to potentially become a real life town as the University of Queensland, in Australia, plans to build a multibillion-dollar 'brain city' dedicated to science and research. The city, hoping to hold at least 10,000 people, is looking to attract 4,500 of the brightest scientists from around the world to live and work there. The city is planned to be built west of the city of Brisbane, in Queensland. While not funded by the Department of Defense (like the [city of the] TV series), the potential for such a community is very interesting and exciting."

44 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Slashlolcatz by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fictional Town "Eureka" to Becomes Real?

    They forgot to link to the image for this story.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  2. We already have one... by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but we call ours Los Alamos...

    1. Re:We already have one... by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      but we call ours Los Alamos...

      I thought, we call it "Silicon Valley" — and it didn't need government sponsorship to come into being...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:We already have one... by haystor · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd be betting on Los Alamos should the two ever go head to head.

      --
      t
    3. Re:We already have one... by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I thought, we call it "Silicon Valley" -- and it didn't need government sponsorship to come into being...

      Without DARPA taking the initiative with public funds, there would have been no basis for many of the private companies of Silicon Valley. Even the supposedly private companies that developed innovative solutions back at the beginning relied to some extend on government support, as the US recognized the need to stay ahead in the Cold War.

    4. Re:We already have one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, Silicon Valley is where we send all the losers who think that they're geniuses.

    5. Re:We already have one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah, just corporate welfare in the form of juicy defense contracts. Oh, did you think people just got together one day to build computers for which there was no commercial market from the goodness of their hearts? Oh, and what's this Internet thing all about? How did it start?
      Hmmm. I think you're an idiot. Go pave your own highway system to drive on too while you're at it.

    6. Re:We already have one... by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Without DARPA taking the initiative with public funds, there would have been no basis for many of the private companies of Silicon Valley.

      DARPA's money helped some, but it didn't cause the creation of Oracle, Sybase, SGI, HP, or Sun — the companies, which were developing even before Internet.

      Also, DARPA stopped funding Internet funding Internet long before the emergence of giants like Google or Cisco in the valley. Much as Statists would like to attribute good things to the State's intervention, they don't have many legs to stand on.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    7. Re:We already have one... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't forget Huntsville, AL (Cummings Research Park), and it's second in size compared to Triangle Research Park in North Carolina.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    8. Re:We already have one... by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      DARPA's money helped some, but it didn't cause the creation of Oracle, Sybase, SGI, HP, or Sun -- the companies, which were developing even before Internet.

      Who said the US government's role was limited to the Internet? None of those companies would have gotten anywhere without some of the advances at Bell Labs, which was kept going by government contracts.

      Much as Statists would like to attribute good things to the State's intervention, they don't have many legs to stand on.

      Your choice of terminology suggests that you're a libertarian nutjob. I wish you success in your return to the real world.

    9. Re:We already have one... by aero6dof · · Score: 4, Informative

      but we call ours Los Alamos...

      I thought, we call it "Silicon Valley" — and it didn't need government sponsorship to come into being...

      Hmm, I think you're forgetting that if you trace back further Silicon Valley has connections with the Space and Military programs - here and here. I think I'd conclude that there's a complex set of influences favoring the creation of Silicon Valley.

      But, hey, don't let me get in the way of a good "private industry is inherently more efficient" fantasy...

    10. Re:We already have one... by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative

      Back in the 1980's, the BBC produced a Horizon documentary, which covered the growth of Silicon Valley. The first company was Fairchild Semiconductor, which then formed many offshoot companies, and that tradition continued until there were hundreds of companies. In many cases, research funding was provided to the universities to solve various problems, which then allowed the students and staff to set up their own companies once the project was finished.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:We already have one... by seriv · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the nuclear weapons perspective, the knowledge is distributed, but only slightly; a great deal of the infrastructure for the production and maintenance of nuclear weapons lies in a few towns with DOE-funded national laboratories. There isn't a single point of failure exactly, but a great deal of arcane and classified knowledge rests in each spot on specific subjects, such as the design knowledge in Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore. A great deal of the needed nuclear materials are in just a few spots too, such as Oak Ridge (Y-12 describes itself as the "'Fort Knox' for highly enriched uranium"). Obviously, each of these spots have intense security, but if a few of these spots were really hit hard, the US's nuclear program would be crippled for a long period.

    12. Re:We already have one... by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Aye-aye-aye! Name-calling — how sad... Given the government's wonderful successes in education, highway upkeep, and pensions — wanting it to also expand into healthcare — whose mental faculties are we supposed to question?

      Anyone who has an "all-or-nothing" mentality. Anyone who points to a few government successes and concludes the government has a Midas touch for making things work is clearly an idiot. Anyone who points to a few government failures and concludes the government never does anything right is equally idiotic. Sane and rational people look at the specifics of a proposal and decide whether it's a good idea or not, rather than immediately conclude it's a good idea or a bad idea based on whether it involves government or not.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    13. Re:We already have one... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought they all worked at the Apple Stores.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    14. Re:We already have one... by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not that lack of legs to stand on has stopped them in the past. Gore invented the internet and now we find out thatMcCain invented the Blackberry!

      McCain invented fire.

    15. Re:We already have one... by dwarg · · Score: 3, Funny

      If I had mod points... I would kiss you...

  3. Birth rate by DrYak · · Score: 5, Funny

    A town entirely full of science geeks ?
    Well, at least they shouldn't expect a very high birth rate...

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Birth rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem with this city is that it is far too large. The largest that you can build a stable "brain" city is 5,000. After that point, interference from the various doomsday machines under its soil will make its imminent destruction more and more certain.

    2. Re:Birth rate by rmadmin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, they've found a very high rate of autism coming from the children in silicon valley. :(

    3. Re:Birth rate by Cryogenic+Specter · · Score: 3, Funny

      The problem really is that they will have to import women not the first aussie town to do that!!

    4. Re:Birth rate by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Informative

      Autism rates are up all over North America. Lots of research points to the ridiculous amount of cocktail vaccines that are now given to children. The drugs are approved in isolation but handed out mixed together and no one knows what happens when you combine them.

      Research points to no such thing. Anecdotes point to that. And unfortunately, since autism symptoms appear right around the same time that the vaccines are administered, you get a lovely case of post hoc, ergo propter hoc. Spreading out the vaccines is more likely to reduce the correlation by delaying the vaccines past the point where symptoms occur, and creating periods in a child's life where they are vulnerable to diseases that deafen, deform or kill them.

      The far more likely hypothesis is better screening (and in some cases, false diagnoses) increasing the observed rate. In many cases, one or both parents have a familial history of autistic symptoms, but the lack of a described and well known disorder during their childhood meant they were never diagnosed. The increased incidence in Silicon Valley is likely linked to this; tech geeks tend to fall on the autistic end of the spectrum, so a whole community of tech geeks marrying tends to increase the odds of autistic children.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
  4. Hmm... good idea... by abroadwin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...keep all of our best and brightest in one location. What could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:Hmm... good idea... by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...keep all of our best and brightest in one location. What could possibly go wrong?

      When the oil runs out, they'll be kicking the asses of the marauding biker gangs with their soy-powered roadsters?

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:Hmm... good idea... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Informative

      We already tried it, New Harmony, IN.

      They tried it twice. Once a group of 'doers' and no thinkers and again with a group of 'thinkers' and no doers. Both failed.

  5. welcome to 50 years ago by bornyesterday · · Score: 5, Insightful
  6. Australia the perfect place by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because it is fairly isolated. If it gets blown up, space-time torn, or radiated, there is less chance of contamination to other continents.

  7. Sounds like what the Soviets did by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the most interesting decisions in Soviet science was the establishment of Akademgorodok, an enclave outside Novosibirsk dedicated entirely to scientists (see e.g. Josephson's New Atlantis Revisited published by Princeton University Press). I don't understand why that wasn't more popular in Western countries. Maybe sciences move ahead when you give scientists peace, a sense of respect and dignity, and ability to manage their own work. Of course, generous funding is essential, lest it all go down the tubes.

    1. Re:Sounds like what the Soviets did by Chukcha · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Western countries didn't have Stalin's paranoia. Stalin moved so many scientists to Akademgorodok (Academic Village) in deep Siberia in order to segregate and more easily control them.

      Oh, and they did breed. Some of the smartest young Russians I've met were born and raised in Akademgorodok.

    2. Re:Sounds like what the Soviets did by DeadDecoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think we already have something like this to the degree that it can exist and they're called universities. I actually think this isn't a very good idea. The premise is that smart people are naturally gifted and if, herded into a small enclosure, will develop good things. The true value of smart people, however, is not the gadgets they can develop, but the education they can distribute to their surrounding communities. If the city does not train new minds, or allow the 'less intelligent' to be trained, then it will probably stifle the growth of intellectual resources. If it does do research and train you people who show sufficient academic prowess, then it's simply a university town.

  8. goodluckwiththat by owlnation · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So... you want intelligent people to move to Australia?

    This, being the same Australia that's introducing filtering and censorship to its entire Internet?

    Yeah, good luck with that... Oh, and enjoy your forthcoming Dark Age.

  9. Why is this a good idea? by Shaitan+Apistos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I haven't seen the show, so forgive me if the writers have handled my objections in some clever fashion in one of the episodes, but..

    I don't see the upside to this, it's easier now than ever before for people to collaborate remotely, negating much of the need for being in the same physical location.

    I do see a downside to this, putting all our intellectual eggs in one basket makes a pretty attractive target for terrorists, whether they be Islamic, Luddite, or some other group in the future that isn't particularly keen on progress or reason as a means of dealing with reality.

  10. In Soviet Russia? (Akademgorodok) by Moridineas · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sounds a bit like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akademgorodok except actually open and international. (also not in Siberia)

  11. Not entirely true by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought nerds preferred the cold dark of their parents basements or garages, to any kind of socialization?

    Not entirely true. Geeks love to be around geeks, and only get awkward in the general population. We nerds are highly gregarious whenever we're in friendly company.

    As an example go check out a gaming convention.

    BTW, I think this town sounds like a lot of fun. I'm probably not bright/geeky enough to be invited to live there, but it would be cool to visit. I'm betting it would be worth it just for all the little inside jokes you'd see around. I'll bet the graffiti alone would be worth it.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  12. Artificial towns fail by Kohath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Towns and cities are located and populated naturally. Towns are near a river or a port or an important crossroads. Or they grew up from nothing over the course of many decades. The people that live there settled there for natural reasons, usually related to jobs and opportunity.

    Towns can be created artificially. Almost every attempt to do it is a failure though. Success usually takes HUGE amounts of money and some other factor to draw people to the location. This one claims to have the money, but they probably don't have enough. And it seems to lack any other incentive to draw folks there.

    1. Re:Artificial towns fail by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, you couldn't just artifically make a city in the middle of nowhere and have it grow

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  13. They should make the city underwater... by Faw · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and let scientist do research in any field they want without goverment intervention. What could go wrong?

  14. Re:Eureka by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought nerds preferred the cold dark of their parents basements or garages, to any kind of socialization?

    Didn't you read the summary? They're "looking to attract 4,500 of the brightest scientists from around the world" for a city that's supposed "to hold at least 10,000 people". So obviously they're accounting for all the parents as well.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  15. you won't get a town full of smart people by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you'll get a town full of people who have a desperate and ego-driven need to be seen as smart

    kind of like joining mensa. anyone who needs that sort of attention and reinforcement is not exactly niels bohr

    the smart guys in any room are always low key and in the back, not attention whores

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  16. IQ not always additive by snspdaarf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Two of the smartest people I have ever met married and began cranking out kids. They now have one of the biggest collection of marginal morons you have ever seen. Nice kids, yes. Well behaved kids, yes. But they don't have the sense God gave a herd of cows. All I can figure is that the parents IQ waves were 180 degrees out of phase. Either that, or they are putting on one helluva show when company is around.

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  17. Re:Eureka by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    An amusing meme, but far from the truth. From a history of Los Alamos Lab :

    One resident recalled that "the Hill dwellers were amateur everything: hikers, riders, photographers, ethnographers, mineralogists, musicians, and artists-craftsmen in all assorted fields. Saturday nights they partied and square danced. Sundays they fished or exploited their hobbies."

    The parties were frequent and well attended. Resident Jean Bacher recalled that "Saturday nights, the mesa rocked... fenced in as we were, our social life was a pipeline through which we let off steam."


    Some of the most brilliant minds of the last century seemed perfectly capable of having fun together and blowing off steam. Maybe this time there will be more LAN parties than square dances, but people will figure out how to get together.

  18. it's not just that it was a customer by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Informative

    The first tenant at the famed Stanford Research Park was Varian, and the government was at the time Varian's only customer. Many of the other spin-offs were organized around government-funded research labs, many also at/near Stanford, the most famous of which was probably Engelbart's lab (which invented the mouse).

  19. Re:Eureka by mjwx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Saturday nights they partied and square danced.

    These are not the actions of normal people.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  20. But the two cases are not equivalent. by RustinHWright · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A.) You were promulgating a bit of disinformation that gets stronger every time it gets repeated in a public place.

    B.) You were creating an implied equivalancy between two "equally ridiculous", "equally false" public statements. Which isn't so nice when one of those statements not only isn't equivalently false but was, in fact, used as a key part of a still ongoing and successful campaign to establish and maintain the larger and equally false supposed equivalency between the level of lying and overall fraud between Democrats and Republicans.

    After years as a policy guy trying to change behavior through reason I came to the sad conclusion that behavior is, in fact, largely determined not by fact but by perception and that many of the most destructive false perceptions are those spread mostly under the cover of "I'm just joking", which is no different from the frat boy who hits one of the "nerds" in the face, knocking him down, and then claims that the nerd has no legitimate grounds to be angry, let alone fight back. After all, "I was just messing with you".

    Sorry, I have no opinion of nor much interest in your intent; I post in response to expected consequences. /. is still one of the biggest fora on the web and I reserve the right to cut down the damage that you'll do rather than limiting myself to only what *you* consider accountable behavior.

    --
    It's all about the information. And what we do with it.