Slashdot Mirror


Secondlight, Microsoft's New Surface Prototype

Barence writes "Microsoft has literally added another dimension to its touchscreen table technology Surface. The new table projects an image through the table itself, so that any translucent material (such as tracing paper or perspex) held above the Surface screen displays a different image to what you see on the table's display. This means you can have a satellite image of a town on the table, and have the street names projected on to a piece of paper that the user holds above the map. Or you could have a photo of a car, with the tracing paper displaying images of its innards."

183 comments

  1. first post! by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 0

    so how is it any different from the Surface? anybody can put a paper with different stuff on top of a lit up table.

    1. Re:first post! by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 1

      rtfa and things became clear.. Thanks Bill! (say hi to Melinda for me, will ya?)

    2. Re:first post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, _I'll_ say "hi" right now.

    3. Re:first post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forge an email from the man your dad's dating and include innocuous links which really go to goatse and last measure. That'll fix him.

  2. How long by andreyvul · · Score: 1

    until it's patented?

    On another note, will it run Vista Embedded?

    --
    proud caffeine whore
    1. Re:How long by Divebus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Any 3D viruses for it yet?

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    2. Re:How long by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they're presenting it then you can be assured that it is already patent pending.

      Which means its been in the lab for about 2 years already.. so in another 8 it might be on the market - but it'll be (more) boring by then, so it won't.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've been blocking video projectors with objects to annoy my teachers for years. I claim prior art!

    4. Re:How long by Fourier404 · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...since when did companies routinely invest in research and then give the results away for free, unless there was some other way to make money off it?

    5. Re:How long by Threni · · Score: 1

      > On another note, will it run Vista Embedded?

      Only if you want to wait 30 mins to copy a few hundred meg of data off a DVD!

    6. Re:How long by MiKM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sure some of the technology they developed for this is deserving of a patent (I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to patent some trivial/frivolous stuff, though). Patents aren't always bad, even for big corporations.

    7. Re:How long by capnkr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Look at the pic with TFA. There, behind the pretty flowers, revealed only by use of the Magic Translucent Paper, are what appear to be....
       
      Frickin' sharks with frickin' lasers on their frickin' heads!
       
      Apparently, Dr. Evil Ballmer has some type of plan to make MILLIONS off of this new technology...

      --
      "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
    8. Re:How long by MadnessASAP · · Score: 2, Informative

      I dunno, the actual technology seems really simple. But on the other hand it is rather innovative and I'ce never seen it before. Anyways it's a hell of alot more deserving then alot of the other patents that get handed out these days.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    9. Re:How long by JoCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, but there are some pop-ups.

    10. Re:How long by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      did you even RTFA? oh wait this is quantumG....

      this is pretty cool stuff, it allows the user to display an image on the table of say a building, and different people (say engineers working on different sections like plumbing and electrical) can throw on their own parts of the plans to see if they are going to conflict and to easily show others. having actually worked on large projects where one of the biggest hurdles is inter discipline co operation i can see a real use for this.

      if this was apple developing it i'm guessing you'd all be masturbating over it by now.....

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    11. Re:How long by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      You pretend to know me and then allude that I like Apple?

      Wow.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    12. Re:How long by tsa · · Score: 1

      Yeah this is the first interesting original innovation I have seen from MS in the past 25 years or so. Very neat stuff.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    13. Re:How long by MrMr · · Score: 2, Informative

      My guess: since the dawn of time
      Apparently they only stopped doing so in 1623.

    14. Re:How long by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      Not really. In their advertisments they talk-about ordering your food from "the table".

      Why?

      I'd much rather order my food from the cute college girl wearing a decolletage-displaying shirt. Not THAT'S innovation.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    15. Re:How long by durnurd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except, of course, every time you come in, you have to enunciate "honey Mustard, not honey Roasted", and she still can't find the Honey Mustard Chicken button on the cash register, even though you're staring right at it, and you've ordered it before, and you've seen her press it before.

      I'll take the table.

      --
      --Edward Dassmesser
    16. Re:How long by Filopopulus · · Score: 1

      Since Xerox PARC.

    17. Re:How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if this was apple developing it i'm guessing you'd all be masturbating over it by now.....

      If this can give me 3D porn, I don't care if apple is developing it or not. It's good to see Microsoft doing something useful for once.

    18. Re:How long by Svippy · · Score: 1

      In that case, I hope it doesn't come with voice recognition, cause we all know how well Microsoft is doing at that. Then you'll probably get something completely different than honey Mustard/Roasted, I'm afraid.

      --
      Clicked pie.
    19. Re:How long by et764 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, the actual technology seems really simple. But on the other hand it is rather innovative and I'ce never seen it before.

      A lot of good ideas seem really obvious in retrospect. They're the kind of things that make you go, "Huh, why didn't I think of that?" Being a good inventor is about having the insight to think of those simple things no one else has thought of yet, actually going and and doing them, and then demonstrating how they are useful. Probably if it doesn't seem simple in retrospect, it won't be that useful either.

    20. Re:How long by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      3D images... pop-ups... porn sites... Oh, the possibilities!

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  3. Right... by complete+loony · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So... it can display a second image that is completely invisible unless I hold a piece of paper in front of it.

    Is it just me or does that sound kind of silly?

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    1. Re:Right... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Neat trick but who's going to use it?

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:Right... by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Seriously. I like the idea of doing research for the sake of research, and I would probably respect this more, except Microsoft keeps representing it as
      1. The coolest thing they have ever come up with.
      2. The future of computing.

      and it is neither, it is just cool research. It's so cute the way Microsoft has gotten all senile and out of touch in its old age.

      OK, off to do laundry now. When will they make a robot that does my laundry for me? Now THAT will be progress.

      --
      Qxe4
    3. Re:Right... by Perseid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That was what I thought when I first saw a computer mouse. Do I expect this will revolutionize computing? Maybe, but probably not. Does that mean it's not cool? Naw, it's cool and my inner geek wants one. It's good to see Microsoft is indeed trying to make new stuff. That's more than we can say about them a lot of the time.

    4. Re:Right... by Swizec · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK, off to do laundry now. When will they make a robot that does my laundry for me? Now THAT will be progress.

      It's called a washing machine.

    5. Re:Right... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe it could be profoundly useful.

      Expand the size to that of a conference table or put it up as a white board(as shown in the episode of SNL with the fake Sarah palin skit) and grab a team of engineers to brainstorm and manipulate UML and other diagrams in real time in front of a live studio audience(shareholders: "ooooh! ahhhhh!")

      Sure beats dry-erase markers or e-mailing small-ass graphic files back and forth.

    6. Re:Right... by Swizec · · Score: 1

      In future you could perhaps have a two layer table by default, each layer being touchscreen and so on. This would make for something very useful.

      Or maybe this technology could be built on and improved and you'd get a 3D map interface right on your "desk". How cool would THAT be!?

    7. Re:Right... by snowraver1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's talking about a folding machine, and it would truly be a great invention. Just dump in the laundry and out comes a folded pile. Bonus if it sorts socks!

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    8. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...who's going to use it?

      Perverts.

    9. Re:Right... by Swizec · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's called a wife.

    10. Re:Right... by afidel · · Score: 1

      If 3D map technology is ever perfected it will be not from Redmond but from Carnegie Mellon. If you've ever been to Pittsburgh you'd understand why =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    11. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The demo video they showed of a piece of paper acting as a window into a hidden image was kind of cool, until you realize the same effect could have been accomplished with software alone.

    13. Re:Right... by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Microsoft research does a lot of cool research stuff. The rest of the company, not so much.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    14. Re:Right... by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I like the idea of doing research for the sake of research, and I would probably respect this more, except Microsoft keeps representing it as

            1. The coolest thing they have ever come up with.

      But in a way it *IS* the coolest thing they ever came up with.

      Most of what they sell they got from someone else one way or another.

      Most of what they patent is prior art that just hasn't been challenged yet.

      Most of what they show in their R&D web pages is nonsense.

      Maybe they can get the cost of this thing down to the point where millions of homes will have to have one. If so it might be the most "from scratch" thing they've ever done.

      Although something tells me that someone will respond to this with a link to something similar that was around in the 70's.

    15. Re:Right... by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, come on. The potholes aren't THAT deep!

    16. Re:Right... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. It may very well be the coolest thing they've ever come up with. After posting I realized I should have said, "They think it's the coolest thing around." I've heard new college graduates tell me excitedly, "I'm working with the microsoft tablet!" as if it were the end of the world. To which I think, "So what? I've written my own proxy server and RPC library." Which I think was just as cool as being a tester for someone else's ideas, and (to me) was twice as interesting.

      Basically I think we were both making the same point: Microsoft R&D is so sad that they get excited when they come out with a product that *might someday* come out and be useful.

      --
      Qxe4
    17. Re:Right... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Hehe.. again. Microsoft didn't invent surface technology. It's been around since the 60s.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    18. Re:Right... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Funny, but I was referring to the fact that you can have two roads that appear to be parallel but are really separated by a hundred or more feet vertically =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    19. Re:Right... by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you considered the Total Cost of Ownership?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    20. Re:Right... by Seven_Six_Two · · Score: 1

      Perverts? What's the point in having a very expensive pornography table that you have to hold flimsy paper over? You not only lose the use of your hands, but you also lose the advantage of being able to keep your perversion to yourself. Are you going to hide your Secondlight table between your mattress and boxspring? Now if they can make a table that can project 160,000 incrementally different images to 160,000 discreet depths(appx 30/inch), I would totally buy one. Who hasn't dreamed of watching a feature film on a piece of paper, while slowly walking backwards. They're revolutionary!

    21. Re:Right... by Swizec · · Score: 1

      Have you considered the Total Cost of Ownership?

      If a wife costs too much there's still mum or a sister. Point is, a man never really has to do laundry, there's always someone to do it for him :P

    22. Re:Right... by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would suspect it can handle an image with a great number of layers, where the user could pick any one to be the layer that is projected through the first surface onto the upper surface. As quickly as a Photoshop type programs can manipulate layers, there are some real organizational uses for this. Any time you have a large group of people who need to schedule something complex together, being able to piecemeal copy many bits of information onto someone's basic instructions is handy, and that could certainly include paper.
            For example, if you run a business, you are probably going to print employee schedules at least now and then. Imagine if a trainee employee wants to know who the most experienced fellow employee available is if he runs into something above his training. You could flick through the other schedule layers while they are projected onto his schedule, letting him make a few notes on his copy.
              If there's already some printing on his copy, then what he adds by tracing will end up lined up with it if the rest is still lined up, so this prevents a lot of minor mistakes, such as copying a schedule change into the wrong box. In the same way, just about any minor change could be made swiftly, and with a reduced error rate, IF that change only needs to be copied by a few people. Obviously, if the same change or info needs to be added to 50 people's notes, it's faster in most cases to just tear up the old copies and reprint, but in a complex business the typical weekly meeting results mostly in changes that are simple and/or needed by only a few employees, so for a well organized business, where major changes don't often come up in short range planning, this will be useful. For less well organized business which buy it expecting it to help, when they make massive readjustments to policies and schedules just a few days out, this system won't help after all, and they are likely to be disappointed.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    23. Re:Right... by draxbear · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this is just the marketing spin renaming of the failed subliminal message implant feature...

      At least, I hope it's failed... :)

      --
      --- I've completed diagnosis of your problem and can classify it as a YOYO...You're On Your Own
    24. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom and sister are pathetic... get outta the basement.

    25. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could do it with just the current projection, with John Lee's headtracking. :)

    26. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope... Silly for me too

    27. Re:Right... by ami.one · · Score: 1

      Where can i get 'pay per use' / SAAS ?

    28. Re:Right... by patcpong · · Score: 1

      I'm currently at the PDC and the way they revealed Secondlight was as part of a number of other MSR presentation in the keynote. They definitely stressed Azure, the various cloud services, and Windows 7 a lot more than Secondlight in particular. Being a slashdotter of course I didn't RTFA so maybe TFA maybe it sound the way you said.

    29. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you want is a Siemens Shirtman:

      http://www.gizmohighway.com/robotics/robot_iron.htm

      I have one... very nice too!

    30. Re:Right... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In this particular instance.. it's called a maid.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    31. Re:Right... by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Multitouch technology

      Microsoft : build it into a table, 2nd stage build a bigger table

      Apple : build it into a tablet, 2nd stage build it into a handheld ...says it all really about the market they aim at

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    32. Re:Right... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Thing is, I don't think any of this is something that couldn't already be done with the original surface technology.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    33. Re:Right... by MrMr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bonus if it sorts socks!
      Fixed that years ago: choose the kind of socks you like best and standardize. I can now even throw away a single sock without looking for the other one...

    34. Re:Right... by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Except that the table MS built had nothing to do with touch - it uses several cameras that are inside a box, right below the glass table-top, which track & triangulate motion on/above the glass. The 'surface' is simply a boundary...there is no touch sensitive grid such as used on the iPhone etc.

    35. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Try Folding@Home...

    36. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..Of the wife or the washing machine ?

    37. Re:Right... by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      not so silly really it's a work in progress.

      I wouldn't be surprised if they were attempting to get a real 3d projection floating above the desk.

      Microsoft have more than enough resources to throw at a project like this, even if is a dead end, who else would do it?

      if you were from 1908 you would be amazed at what has been achieved in 2008 so what will we have in 2108? have we pretty much peaked now or would we be amazed at what technology is in use in 2108?

      working 3d display technology who here wouldn't want it?

    38. Re:Right... by jedie · · Score: 1

      here is a very frightening video of the thing in action. be sure to turn up your sound

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irT_Ek4BQRc&feature=related

      --
      "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
      http://slashdot.jp
    39. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dude, this is slashdot. Wife? Oh that inflatable doll sitting in the corner. Gotcha.

    40. Re:Right... by Thyamine · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? This is the best tool ever for a DM.. no more having to have players draw maps, but you can do all sorts of interesting things with showing one image and hiding the other. Brilliant!

      Note: mostly funny, but sort of serious

      --
      I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
    41. Re:Right... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Bonus if it sorts socks! Fixed that years ago: choose the kind of socks you like best and standardize. I can now even throw away a single sock without looking for the other one...

      Or if you're a university student you can just be that guy that wears sandals all the time. Bonus points if you smell like a barn.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    42. Re:Right... by Inda · · Score: 1

      You know, I did this years back. I bought 20 pairs of black socks, threw out my old ones.

      How do you manage usage? I mean, some socks get worn, and hence washed, more than others leading to greyness. I have now have 40 socks in various shades of grey.

      Actually, I don't really care but thanks for reading.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    43. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it means you will be able to see the image 'in the air' without noticing where the light is actually coming from (its coming from the projector below)
      Now if you put a piece of paper through the image, only then would you notice the light is hitting it from below.
      just like the film Iron Man, where Robert Downey Jr plays with his prototype, except i dont think we'll be able to physically manipulate the object (such as turn it around or throw a piece of it in the trash)

      Hope that clears up the confusion

    44. Re:Right... by ericmeow · · Score: 1

      Holding the piece of paper is a little silly I agree, but what if they had 2 screens. The flat table and another screen a little bit above the table and angled toward the user to display the second image. Then they could put a generic image on the bottom screen like a map and the angled screen could be a zoomed in image of that map. So you could drag your finger across a zoomed out map and see the streets in the area you're touching. I think there's alot of things that can be done with this outside of holding paper.

    45. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But don'f forget a "wife" or "girlfriend" (or potentially the pirated version, "slave") is multifunctional. While buggy, it still provides these core features:
        - doing the laundry
        - cleaning
        - vacuuming
        - doing the dishes
        - ironing yo' shirts
        - making food
        - sex

    46. Re:Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this were about Apple or Google, you'd be cleaning your cum off your monitor right about now. Whenever a Microsoft article appears on slashdot, replace "Microsoft" with "Apple" or "Google", and see if you still think that the product sucks.

      And the reverse: Whenever you see an Apple or Google article, replace "Apple"/"Google" with "Microsoft" and see if you still think that the product is the best thing since sliced bread or not.

    47. Re:Right... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      So, parallel to one another, but in a plane not parallel to sea level, eh? I've been on roads like that elsewhere, too. Pittsburgh is famous for potholes, though.

      If you really want to see crazy hillside streets, visit Eureka Springs, Arkansas sometime. No two streets intersect at 90 degrees. Most of the walking traffic in town involves staircases between different sidewalks, and some shops have entrances off of those staircases. There's a hotel with seven ground floors, and a church one enters through the bell tower.

  4. Hooray! by Centurix · · Score: 5, Funny

    A bigger ass table!

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:Hooray! by dwarg · · Score: 2, Funny
    2. Re:Hooray! by z0idberg · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it! My ass table just isnt big enough anymore.

      Sure I could exercise, but why bother when they can just make a bigger ass table?

    3. Re:Hooray! by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1
      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  5. I dont mean to be rude, or anti progress.. but... by moniker127 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    WHO. GIVES. A. DAMN?

  6. awaiting SilveLife by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Microsoft's flash competitor mmorpg that works on tracing paper

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  7. Somehow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone, somewhere will make porn out of it.

    1. Re:Somehow by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Think "X-ray vision"

    2. Re:Somehow by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      You're doin' it all wrong!

      You're supposed to link to the relevant xkcd strip when you say stuff like that. Even if it's just to annoy Randall Munroe [|:)+<

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  8. yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    booooring

  9. Re:I dont mean to be rude, or anti progress.. but. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everyone on Slashdot except for you.

  10. So how does this benefit anyone? by MikeUW · · Score: 1

    So essentially what they've invented is a hardware implementation of what I can already do on any ordinary screen: superimpose one translucent image on top of another.

    Can anyone suggest how this is really advantageous, other than perhaps the novelty aspect of it?

    1. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by andreyvul · · Score: 1

      It's advantageous for Microsoft: Ballmer can afford to throw Aeron chairs if enough people buy the Surface.

      --
      proud caffeine whore
    2. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's what I want to know.

      Clearly I'm missing something obvious, but other than looking cool, is there any practical advantage to this?

      It would seem that the very thing that makes it look cool -- that "added dimension" -- is also going to mean that the way in which the images are superimposed varies depending on where you're standing. The only way the roads in that "road map" idea would be in the right place is if you were hovering directly over the table -- except you'd be blocking the projector, and it still wouldn't be right towards the edges of the table.

      I mean, I get the point of Surface itself. I do. What I don't get is what value this other layer has over doing the same thing in software.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    3. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by mwoliver · · Score: 1

      I am a data network guy, but I was thinking that this would be useful for an architect. Imagine that you are showing a draft of a building elevation to a customer, and by sliding a sheet of tracing paper over it, you can reveal more detail, or even let the customer sketch changes they desire on the tracing paper! As a customer, I think it would great to sketch what I am thinking rather than trying to explain it in words to the designer or architect.

      If I can think of that, surely there are some real market research folk who can think of even more and better angles.

      This is very neat tech.

      --
      Mike O, KT2T
    4. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Yes, drawing on top of the image absolutely sounds like an awesome application. I wonder when they'll allow you to actually draw on the screen with a stylus, or maybe even your finger? They could call it, oh, a "touch screen". Maybe one of the products that uses such technology of the future will be from Microsoft and will be called "Surface" after the interface. ;-)

    5. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all the images that can be superimposed on each other are stored in the same file then it should increase the paranoia budget at DHS etc as well as sales for Georgia Pacific etc. :P

    6. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by nacturation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only way the roads in that "road map" idea would be in the right place is if you were hovering directly over the table -- except you'd be blocking the projector, and it still wouldn't be right towards the edges of the table.

      The projector projects from under the table using alternate frames on the surface. By applying current or not, the surface is either translucent or transparent, thus the second image projects through while the first remains on the table surface itself. If you're standing directly over it, you're in a perfect spot to see it and nothing gets blocked.

      The cool thing about not doing it in software is that you can have the extra layer be a piece of translucent plastic on top of the surface... or you can hold it a few feet up. The second projector can then focus on where you're holding it to project a sharp image. If you do this in software, you'll end up holding a blank, unlit object while the second image is superimposed on the surface, obscuring the main image and negating the benefits of a third dimension. Because of the alternating frames and the second projector, you see an unimpeded original image on the surface and an unimpeded second image on the object you're holding.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Microsoft isn't sure either. That's what 'research' is for. It's an interesting idea, let's implement it, hey that's cool. Mmm - is it useful?

      It *may* be that users work quicker and better with physical objects than user interface elements on the screen. It may be that people just like playing with it because it is cool, and this aids problem-solving/productivity in some way.

      At the moment, my gut feeling is with you - it's very cool, but probably not particularly useful. But I may be wrong.

    8. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      it doesn't.

      with a little bit of software, a thin tablet PC can easily work as this second display. add some spatial sensors so it know where on the table it is and how high and now you have something that will kick this things butt.

      place your head over the display, you will see the glare of the projector that will wash out the main display.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Again, I seem to be missing the point -- what are the "benefits of a third dimension"?

      I realize I can hold a piece of paper above the table, which shows an alternate projection. Why would I want to, when I can just drag a virtual piece of paper around the table?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    10. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm somewhat dubious about the utility of this as well, but I think your particular objections are misplaced. The Surface is rear-projection, so there is no blocking of the projection. Also, you can lay the tracing paper, or what have you directly on the table, which eliminates the registration problem (thought it does obscure the main image. It basically makes a "magic lens" - but we've been doing that in software for years. This seems like a rather over-engineered version...

    11. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      How about for board games where you want to be able to view your position without having it on the table for everyone to see? If the device is able to sense that you're holding Alpha team's HUD and not Bravo team's it could show you only your map view rather than the opponent's. I'm sure there's other possible benefits, but the beauty of technology is that if it's possible, someone will come up with something really cool and then everyone will shift their thinking to "Why would anybody want to be restricted to a two-dimensional surface?"

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    12. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by et764 · · Score: 1

      I mean, I get the point of Surface itself. I do. What I don't get is what value this other layer has over doing the same thing in software.

      If you were to do something like this purely in software, you'd just have a flat image on a flat screen, with no tactile feedback when you touch it. This way, you can interact with the computer by moving and manipulating actual physical objects. Instead of saying "Touch here, then slide your finger across the table" you can say "Pick up this paper and put it where you want it." I think moving the actual paper will be a lot more intuitive to people.

    13. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      practical advantage?
      am I the only one who thought of using this to display pictures of women with(out) clothes like 'naked Maya' :)

    14. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by mwoliver · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing out the technological elitism of /. patrons. Without having any data to back it up, I am not uncomfortable stating that those folks who are meeting with architects to hash out building elevation details or what-not would be more at ease sketching on a sheet of paper with a pencil than trying to grasp a stylus and do the same with a pressure-sensitive tablet or screen. Oh yeah, they would probably find it easier to use a rubber eraser. Then again, who cares about making the customer feel comfortable, right?

      *sigh*

      --
      Mike O, KT2T
    15. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      And it's obvious who cares about a sense of humor -- not you. ;-)

    16. Re:So how does this benefit anyone? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      you want to be able to view your position without having it on the table for everyone to see?

      I think they'd be able to see the tracing paper, and I think the point you're hovering it over would give them a clue.

      And I think this could be done much more easily, maybe even cheaper, with separate screens for the HUDs.

      And I'm pretty sure that

      If the device is able to sense that you're holding Alpha team's HUD and not Bravo team's

      That's not part of it. Not that you couldn't add that with RFID or something...

      the beauty of technology is that if it's possible, someone will come up with something really cool and then everyone will shift their thinking to "Why would anybody want to be restricted to a two-dimensional surface?"

      If it's possible -- and it's a good idea, and there isn't already something better.

      For example: It's possible to buy a laptop with two hard drives (configured for RAID), a 19" display, and otherwise specs to rival any gaming desktop. But I doubt it sells much -- it's ridiculously more expensive, there are better options in the pipe (I have a solid state drive), and I can't really imagine a situation where there's a point to having a laptop, but a 19" beast like that wouldn't be too bulky.

      A better example: The CueCat. It's absolutely technically feasible, probably even cheaper now. But we certainly don't say "How did I ever live before I had a barcode reader on my computer?"

      The technology is undeniably cool, and apparently possible. But until someone comes up with a use for it which is not only cool, but actually worth the expense, and not possible to do in some cheaper/better way, it's still pretty pointless.

      Of course, this is why we do research, and build prototypes -- to find out which of us is right. I can't imagine anyone will find a use case -- but maybe they will.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  11. Re:I dont mean to be rude, or anti progress.. but. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you really that disgruntled with your own life? you sound like a lonely little loser.

  12. My company by Datamonstar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is actually laying off people as a result of the supposed economic crisis and yet still wasting away resources on Surface. We're wasting money on this crap because our new manager wants to be all "trendy" and make us look like some sort of cutting age IT outfit. I'd rather us keep on doing what we already do and have been highly profitable at instead of wasting time and money on this type of toy product and ruining people's lives in the process. There were some people who found out they were loosing their job by watching the evening news, but we still have enough money to buy and maintain electronic tables. Horrible.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    1. Re:My company by mewshi_nya · · Score: 1

      Odd thing:
      One of the first things I was taught in management is that, if you, for example, displace workers by increases in efficiency, then you put them to work elsewhere - NOT fire them. It's crazy, I know.

      Offtopic to this post, but still, I wanted to say.

    2. Re:My company by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every good employee you have is an already selected and prescreened applicant for other jobs you might need done. He or she is already familiar with the company, knows many of the other employees, and you've already completed a bunch of paperwork on them. If he or she were lazy or inefficient or crooked, presumably you would have fired them, not waited until there was an excuse to lay them off. When you lay them off, they go elsewhere, and then when you need another job done, you have to pick from a bunch of unscreened applicants, fill out new paperwork, train somebody in the basics of your corporate culture, and re-incur a lot of costs you already paid once. Doing a lot of layoffs is basically committing to shrink for months after the cause of the layoffs ends, months in which a smart competitor may grow. Something like increases in efficiency should mean your company will grow, and therefore need more people in the long run. Layoffs there are the same as betting your increased efficiency won't, by itself, improve your bottom line.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    3. Re:My company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The relevance of your diatribe to this article is? Your manager is an idiot for buying stuff the company doesn't need? Thanks!

    4. Re:My company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're wasting money on this crap because our new manager wants to be all "trendy" and make us look like some sort of cutting age IT outfit.

      Needles and sutures, oh the pain, they had to cut and sew people like garments!

    5. Re:My company by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      I have the impression that these layoffs were in the planning already, the current crisis is just a very welcome excuse.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    6. Re:My company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he or she were lazy or inefficient or crooked, presumably you would have fired them, not waited until there was an excuse to lay them off.

      Here in the UK it's pretty much impossible to fire someone for being lazy or inefficient so a downturn is always a convenient excuse to clear out all the employees you'd rather not have.

  13. Italians might use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a concerned citizen concerned that Italians might use this powerful technology to communicate with our CHILDREN and implant their nefarious ICES on them. I support freedom of speech but as long as there are italians, there will have to be some reasonable limits and this technology from Microsoft is just too powerful. Think of the children, falling haplessly into the hands of the Italians with their nefarious ices! Bah!

  14. What's the advantage over doing it in software? by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems pointless to me.

    If this functionality is useful, why couldn't you just have the software display a rectangle that you can drag across the screen that affects what is displayed within the rectangle?

    Then it's always available regardless of whether you happen to have a nearby supply of tracing paper with the proper translucency characteristics.

    And then it's equally visible with the main image, from all angle and lighting conditions, because it is in fact the main image.

    Actually I don't understand why you'd only want street names displayed only with a small rectangular area, rather than toggling them on and off across the entire image.

    1. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I gotta say you don't seem very imaginative. Think in terms of open source. This may be MS developed, but it will very easily make it into the hands of very creative independent developers. I'm by no means a programmer, let alone a creative one, but here's one quick example

      There are plenty of cases when I'm playing with Autocad on a project and could use a sketch immediately on paper, nothing fancy, just something hard copy to bring to the next room or building for confirmation with a teammate. I wouldn't have to publish to DWG or DWF or wait for him to load Autocad or even type a email. I can simply trace what is on the screen. Maybe its just the way I work, but also printing some of my stuff is a pain in the ass.

      Also what about games? This is also a multitouch surface, and here's the chance for a limited viewport within a bigger pictures.

      There are so many possibilities that I am truly excited for this down the line. Never put down a new way of data manipulation, because it just might change the way you work.

    2. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Wait, I'm confused.

      What about Surface didn't allow tracing before?

      All this provides is a completely separate view for the tracing paper. From your description, it sounds like if you had that, you could just print it, no problem -- and you could trace either way.

      It's not about whether it's open source or not. It's about whether there's any point at all. I get why Surface is cool -- I really don't get this.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    3. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by Inertiatia · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking... why not just lay the second image over the first in an optional way, with software keeping to two images separate?

      What's the benefit of this? (Unless of course you've been desperately waiting for something like this to come along so that you can finally make use of the 50 tons of tracing paper you got a really good deal on and rationalize its purchase to the wife/husband/pet.)

    4. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Suppose the table is displaying an organizational chart. You might want to display details for one branch to that branch's supervisor, but omit all the details for another branch. You could want this for legal reasons, i.e. employee privacy, or just to focus on the part the supervisor needed to know.

              When I was in the army, for a time I was with a maintenance troop. There were dozens of vehicles, many of which were duplicates, and those vehicles normally loaded lots of tools and parts. There might be five vehicles equipped for servicing HUMVEEs, and two sets of two for swapping out tank engines, and only one vehicle for small arms repair. There might be a type of tool only carried on one of those vehicles, and another type that there were two sets of it on every single vehicle. We drew plenty of branching tree views, which told the NCO responsible for a certain section, what vehicles he or she had, what soldiers with what job descriptions were supposed to be on board, what shop tools mounted, what personally issued weapons, toolboxes, and camping gear went on each truck or tracked vehicle, right down to what camoflage screening (by shape and pattern, it comes in diamonds and hexes, and in desert, snow, eastern woodland, and probably twenty other color combinations, plus it all has poles, patch kits, and so on), how many full cans of what lubricants, how many sheets of gasket material or 3/4 inch UNC lagbolts were supposed to be on them. Being able to tap a few keys, and show the guy responsible for ordering drums of transmission fluid just what the last inventory had shown, unit wide, for that item only, and what vehicles were short, would have made his job a lot easier.
            And the Army likes tracing paper. The underlying idea being that a map with a bullethole in it is still a good map, while the fancy electronic device with a bullethole in it is now a paperweight. You could extend this principle to a lot of work outdoors, at heights, or in dirty conditions.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    5. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      Seems pointless to me.

      If this functionality is useful, why couldn't you just have the software display a rectangle that you can drag across the screen that affects what is displayed within the rectangle?

      Ok, this is what kills me. Someone adds a new perspective on technology and interfaces and people run to yell how it doesn't matter because THEY don't understand it or see how it could be useful or see past today's use of techonology to imagine applications for it.

      The examples given are 'basic', but the potential is actually quite powerful in terms of future interactivity.

      Even in this concept, think of a display that 'projects' additional images past the main display. So the computer could 'show' you something without disrupting the onscreen image.

      So imagine holding a sheet of paper and have information appear on it as a secondary display while working with the surface imaging technolgy.

      Next imagine a white model with a texture laid on it when you are working with the surface computer interface.

      The concept of a 'seeing' computer is basically what surface brings, now add that in a two way fashion so that instead of just infared vision, it can also project images beyond the 'surface'.

      Heck holding something that has an image on it and the computer responding to what I am doing with it is quite a handy and simple concept but powerful with where it could lead.

      Back to the Surface technologies and a simple concept to be practical in some of the 'cute' applications it is used for now:

      The Surface computer can already let a person order drinks and pay for them by seeing the selections, it can also see the drinks sitting on the display, and it can now also see how full the glass is, to send your wait-staff to your table sooner to refill your drink.

      Now add a drinking glass that the surface can display images on to label your drink so people don't mix up the glasses after getting up for karaoke, dancing, or whatever you might do. Or maybe add advertising to the glasses so that the drinks are cheaper.

      Again this is off the top of head simple ideas, but just a step into a new interactive world MS is making happen. When it comes to UI expertise, MS has some people that really are the leaders in the world and their work inside MS pushing these concepts into products, even if just 'test' or limited use products at first are at least getting these ideas out there for people to work with, build on, and think about. (Unlike their multi-touch UI work done in the late 90s that didn't get any public acknowledgments.)

      The people inside Xerox in the 70s had a heck of a time getting their ideas out in the world for people to play with and build on, and your 'attitude' about this technology is the same opposition many of the Xerox people faced.

      The first person to use a mouse or even a silly pen on a screen were also mocked by people that didn't think it would lead anywhere, and in their 'daily' technology it didn't do much for them.

      Interactive projected content with an interactive seeing system has a lot of possibilities, and is also why the infrared 'seeing' surface technologies are not something as simplistic as multi-touch that people often misrepresent it to be.

      The Mouse took almost 20 years before its usefulness became a reality in mainstream computing and the pen another 15 years, but someone had to start somewhere...

    6. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Nah.. Groundtroops wouldn't be the ones to benefit from this that much..

      This stuff would be at the local command, with sensors giving accurate realtime data. One could zoom in and see all soldiers and vehicles overlaid atop satellite surveillance maps.

      With that, one could SEE the battlefield realtime... It would be a sight to see. And one then would have the ability for UWB viewing of camera data on vehicles and those soldiers with cameras. I get goosebumbs thinking of this sort of pervasive implementation....

      --
    7. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by naoursla · · Score: 1

      It seems that a large part of Surface is "physical computing". Surface already interacts with different physical devices you place on the table. This is just adding another aspect.

      Is it useful? I don't know. A piece of paper is probably more responsive than a software interface and it is more intuitive to use. Want to see the other layer? Put down a piece of paper. Want to see it in two places? Put down two pieces of paper. Want to get rid of the other layer? Pick the paper up.

    8. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by blankinthefill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From TFA: "Using an infrared camera, the secondary "display" can also be used as a multitouch surface. What's more, it can display video." In conjunction with the part where you can use the TRANSLUCENT MATERIAL (doesn't HAVE to be PAPER)to see inside of something who's outsides are displayed on the main screen (ala their car example) I could actually see this being pretty damn useful. Besides, many many many things are invented that don't seem useful until someone thinks outside the box with them, then wallah, magic shit happens! Honestly, I could see this being useful for a number of things right now, and I'll be the first to admit that I am not really a very good innovator.

    9. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by MrMr · · Score: 1

      why couldn't you just have the software display a rectangle that you can drag across the screen that affects what is displayed within the rectangle
      That's an excellent idea. We could even make it show dynamically an enlarged inset of the scene for closer inspection and give it a cool name like magnifyier.

    10. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      it can now also see how full the glass is, to send your wait-staff to your table sooner to refill your drink

      Sounds like this advanced restaurateur simulator is reality at last!

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    11. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I can simply trace what is on the screen. Maybe its just the way I work, but also printing some of my stuff is a pain in the ass.

      Printing is more of a pain in the ass than tracing it by hand? Who's your IT guy?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    12. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by naoursla · · Score: 1

      I believe you are thinking of a different Microsoft technology:

      http://photosynth.net/

    13. Re:What's the advantage over doing it in software? by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      I loved that game...

      BTW, Here is a thought for people:

      When is the last time your computer could see what you were doing outside the computer, and assist you with it?

      It seems small at first, but really is a huge UI construct making the jump to reality.

      Seeing how full a drink is may not break the UI glass ceiling, but for the demonstration market these devices are launched in is a no brainer use of its technologies.

      Next imagine the world poker championships where the table is automated, and your two white cards never leave your fingers, yet you can hold and view them like real cards, or even with real cards, and the table can watch how you are playing... (And people thought Win3.0 Solitaire was the dope.) :)

  15. new warning stickers by Speare · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Do not stare into table with remaining eye."

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  16. Glyph Tracking by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like pretty standard form of glyph tracking, similar to those outlandish "magic boards" the news networks seem to like playing around with to beguile the audience with more of the shiny.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Glyph Tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no glyph tracking at all. The display toggles the view and the surface itself is toggling between transparent and translucent.

  17. Re:I dont mean to be rude, or anti progress.. but. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's bitter beacuse he's dyslexic, and to add insult to injury he name himself "moniker" when he meant to type "monkier".

  18. what about by XLR8DST8 · · Score: 1

    a touchscreen chair? what, the prototype was destroyed before testing could be completed?

  19. HOW FRIGGING COOL!!! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now, I can display one image on the large-format table, while I struggle to manually hold a 36" x 48" piece of frigging tracing paper a few inches over it, thereby rendering the tracing-paper image impractical, and the other image invisible!

    Damn! Why didn't I think of that?? I would be RICH!!!

    Rich, I tell you!

    1. Re:HOW FRIGGING COOL!!! by fyrewulff · · Score: 1

      No, you can set the paper directly onto the table.

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    2. Re:HOW FRIGGING COOL!!! by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you can set the paper directly onto the table.

      And use a transparency, allowing you to see the bottom image as well. Not that this seems incredibly useful to me in the described application, but it could become an interesting capability.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  20. Didn't they have one of those by RustinHWright · · Score: 1

    on Lost in Space? It even wrapped everything in tidy plastic bundles.

    --
    It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
  21. MOD PARENT UP! by religious+freak · · Score: 1

    That was f'in funny!

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  22. Direct link to vid... by religious+freak · · Score: 1

    You can find it in TFA, but if you're like I usually am and don't read it... there is a video, just to let those interested know...

    http://research.microsoft.com/sendev/video/SecondLight.wmv

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  23. I know this! by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is Unix!

    1. Re:I know this! by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      Unix would never lower-itself to the indignity of being run on a "big ass table". LINK - www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZrr7AZ9nCY

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  24. Come on guys.... by Idiomatick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its fucking cool technology. Don't let fanboyism ruin this. Its a big table, its expensive. But its still fucking cool. Have you forgotten you are nerds? Who gives a shit how useful it is? Aren't people always arguing pro research that isn't about making a buck. Now when 'evil' microsoft does something all nerds like (making cool shit without having purely profit in mind) what happens? You bash it? I expect better :S

    1. Re:Come on guys.... by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      You gotta start somewhere. Linux wasn't built in a day, either.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    2. Re:Come on guys.... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      The multitouch they made was great. But this one... uh, I really fail to see either the cool factor or the usefulness.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    3. Re:Come on guys.... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      Maybe there's no usefulness at this moment, but my guess is that if enough geeks spend some time with it, there will be all sorts of useful, cool things that nobody, not even the designers thought of. This is the way of things.

      Look at some of the early attempts to hack game consoles... now there are lots of things you can do with a modded console... avoiding region restrictions, home media servers, and storing your games on hard drive instead of loading disks come to mind.

      Just give it time.

      The first generation of anything is usually clumsy and overpriced, but as it becomes commoditized, you'll see tons of uses nobody's thinking of right now.

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    4. Re:Come on guys.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the Surface cool? Sure. Is it cool that they are able to project something through the table without displaying it? Yes, but...

      I'm all for research that isn't tied to a profit margin (I do it myself), but I'm still less impressed if you can't come up with at least some vaguely plausible use for it. I have no love for MS, but MSR does some interesting research - my dubiousness about this is rooted purely in the technology.

    5. Re:Come on guys.... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Except that, usually, the ideas about the potential uses come before their realization. People who hack consoles know what they intend on doing before beginning. With this technology, I really don't see a single interesting application. The whole point of screen was to not need paper anymore. Why put it back ?

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    6. Re:Come on guys.... by skeeto · · Score: 1

      Its a big ass table

      There. Fixed that for you.

    7. Re:Come on guys.... by jerzee · · Score: 1

      Its fucking cool technology. Don't let fanboyism ruin this. Its a big table, its expensive. But its still fucking cool. Have you forgotten you are nerds? Who gives a shit how useful it is? Aren't people always arguing pro research that isn't about making a buck. Now when 'evil' microsoft does something all nerds like (making cool shit without having purely profit in mind) what happens? You bash it? I expect better :S

      Exactly, geeks and Hackers sometimes just make stuff hppen as a proof of concept for later work to be built upon (or not).

      But could you just imagine this:

      Your kid is surfing porn, you walk in, he throws down a sheet of paper to cover the area he's been viewing and voila he's been hard at work on his calculus the entire time. Or you are at a work, conducting a meeting viewing porn on a sheet of paper while the rest of the staff is looking at boring/drab stat charts showing costs vs revenues.

      Seriously though, let MS do all the leg work on this, someone will reverse engineer it/open source it and we can all reap the benefits. Just look at Linux, it takes bits and pieces from other OSes that is liked and incorporated it into itself eventually and now it has many advantages over all the other OSes out there (and there is more than just Windows and OSx). Let this be just another thing that some BIG company (MS) starts that we (the people) will benefit from the Open Source Community and reverse engineers get to work on it.

  25. what about tent surface prototypes by heroine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Making computer screens out of $10,000 coffee tables for $2,000,000 home refinancers is so 2006. It's time for tent screen prototypes for the renters.

  26. How about Doctors? by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 1

    I don't know who would use it... how about Doctors?

    Imagine a multi-layer X-ray of a patient, which you can move in and out of, just by moving your fingers... very useful. Especially during an operation. Remember, this is just the "first attempt".

    1. Re:How about Doctors? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you don't need this technology to do that. The original surface interface already supports that.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:How about Doctors? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you don't need this technology to do that. The original surface interface already supports that.

      So do current, boring, 2D monitors. It's called layering. Happens every time you do a CT or an MRI. Hell, if your eyesight was good enough, you could do it on an iPhone.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  27. Congrats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After years of reading slashdot this was the first message i actually lol'd

  28. Alternate Site? by networkzombie · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is there another Slashdot that has intellectual people exchanging intelligent ideas about new products and developments in society? I would very much like to visit that site. This one seems to be the karma whoring, Microsoft bashing, +5 funny site. It is very boring and predictable. TIA.

    1. Re:Alternate Site? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      What intelligent ideas do you want? Basically most people are saying what they think about the thing, or telling what they think through humor. I said what I thought, then got modded down, but whatever.

      If we just sat around talking about the specifications of the thing, that would be boring. You can only say it once. Sometimes there's just nothing interesting to say. Make the conversation what you want it to be....what interesting do YOU have to say about it?

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Alternate Site? by networkzombie · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I was thinking that this pulls computing out of the display. It even pulls computing out of the touch part. You could have a chip in your pocket that the system reads and transforms any room you walk into a themed 60s room. You could have it detect people in a theatre so when they stand up the movie display correctly on them so they don't block your view. You could eliminate flexible screens and flexible paper by displaying on a recognizable material, recognized by the manner in which it is held. I could get on the subway and read the New York Times on a napkin because my thumb and forefinger are positioned correctly. Board meetings would never be the same. No more projectors, no more passing out stapled reports. Although very rudimentary, this is a step towards developing a holodeck. I was most impressed by the ability to track gestures at a distance. This is a giant leap towards eliminating the mouse and keyboard. Screw the touch screen. I want the computer to interpret anything I touch. Did you watch the demonstration?

      http://research.microsoft.com/sendev/video/SecondLight.wmv

      I'll get modded into oblivion. It is taboo to speak imaginatively and positively about a Microsoft product on Slashdot.

    3. Re:Alternate Site? by networkzombie · · Score: 2, Funny
      What intelligent ideas do you want?

      Any would be a good start.

      Basically most people are saying what they think about the thing, or telling what they think through humor

      Which I find overly predictable. Although the topics may be news for nerds or stuff that matters, the discussions are only karma whoring, Microsoft bashing, and +5 funny. I'm frustrated because Slashdot used to be filled with posts from engineers. Slashdot used to be the Scientific American of discussion groups. Now it's like Digg only geared towards Microsoft bashing rather than the Apple fan site that is iDigg. I understand that people don't like Microsoft, I just find it more difficult each day searching though the +5 funny or the M$ posts trying to find the intelligent content of days past.

      Linux Rocks! There... Mod me up.

    4. Re:Alternate Site? by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

      You could change your settings to downmod anything funny and upmod anything insightful, informative, or underrated... that might reduce your time wastage although it won't create insightful or informative posts out of thin air.

    5. Re:Alternate Site? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      See? That's pretty good and imaginative. Learn to present your thoughts clearly and organize them into paragraphs and you'll get modded up.

      --
      Qxe4
    6. Re:Alternate Site? by networkzombie · · Score: 1
      True, but a scarce few of the funny posts are just too damn good to miss. Where else would I learn about RFC 2324? Or find links to Emily Postnews to get authoritive answers to my really important questions?

      http://foo.ewu.edu/jefu/other/netiquette/emily-postnews.html

  29. Well specifically because it's from MS by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    A great many people on this site don't want to believe MS could do anything cool or useful or innovative. Thus when they do produce something, it has to be hated on. If this was coming from Google, I'd give good odds that the grand parent would be gushing over how cool it was and all the neat things it could do.

    That is, unfortunately, one of the things you'll get in the Slashdot comments. People let their bias of the source influence their appraisal of the technology. MS is the big evil, so their stuff gets hated on even when, or perhaps especially when, it is the only stuff that can do it.

    1. Re:Well specifically because it's from MS by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Not all of us are haters.

      I use their ideas on how I can make it for myself, cause Ill know I cant afford it. Thinking how I could implement it in Open Source stuff, here's what I come up with.

      You need 2 projectors with a infrared tracking system. I'd use a wiimote for basics, and its cheap. Now, take the table and mount the 2 projectors inside pointing up. Now, here comes the tricky part: how do we display both images? Simple: Polarization. We put a horiz on projector 1 and a vert on projector 2. Big deal..right? We have 2 images polarized. Now, we need a spinning polarized filter so it tricks the eyes as they say to see 2 images.

      Problem: In order to get decent framerates from these surfaces, we need to spin at 2x the framerate for 1. If we want 30fps on the table, we need a 60fps spinning filter. Ok.. 60fps*60 = 3600RPM. Damn. That's why they used a polarized lcd screen, because it can just do 60Hz or higher natively without spinning stuff.

      Yeah. Expensive.

      --
  30. Hold on a sec by achenaar · · Score: 1

    If they can send out an image that the isn't picked up unless there's a piece of paper on it, how far are they from sending out *lots* of images, each of which is only visible on a specific medium?
    Once that's down, surely you just make lots of layers, "addressable" by their properties, i.e. which image each layer will display, and you've got 3d no?

  31. D&D! by sckeener · · Score: 1

    Is it wrong of me to immediately think of D&D and this technology?

    Since the picture can move with the paper, I can imagine having goblins pop out of no where when I toss a bunch of 1x1" pieces of paper on to the table. Then using the motion sensor part of this tech, the images move with the paper around on the terrain already displayed on the table.

    I know my wife would prefer this table to having a projector permanently over our dining table.

    --
    "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
  32. IR Sensors make the paper irrelevant by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is cool technology, but if it can sense the location of IR-reflective objects on the table it doesn't need to actually project anything onto the paper. You could simply lay a frame on the table so it could sense the corners of the frame, then composite the image onto the display as if the frame was a sheet of paper. Then the transparency of the paper can be handled in software, you don't need the special surface, and you can have as many "sheets of paper" as you want.

    Projecting onto objects above the table is cool, but not super practical. The "IR Mouse" is really more interesting.

    1. Re:IR Sensors make the paper irrelevant by fikx · · Score: 1

      The key difference with how they are doing it is it scales.....no matter how many people join in, performance doesn't take a hit. two images are always being projected at all times and you can have two people or hundreds moving their 'windows' around and the setup doesn't see any difference. the trick with altering one image based on a moving IR pointer is different, but the basic example scales to as big of a group as you want.

      --
      AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
    2. Re:IR Sensors make the paper irrelevant by argent · · Score: 1

      The key difference with how they are doing it is it scales.....no matter how many people join in, performance doesn't take a hit. two images are always being projected at all times and you can have two people or hundreds moving their 'windows' around and the setup doesn't see any difference.

      Even over a large table, I don't see how having more than three or four people sweeping sheets of paper around to view the secondary image is going to be in any way practical. What kind of application are you thinking of where you would have enough people using it to make an extra compositing step noticable, considering that the load from compositing a dozen translucent windows on my pitiful G4 Mac mini was negligible?

    3. Re:IR Sensors make the paper irrelevant by fikx · · Score: 1

      the part of the video that caught my eye was the picture of a car with design details on the other layer...I can see a corporate version of this big enough for 4-8 people to sit or stand around and review a object and the design details underneath....or a map and property details underneath for planning a facility or several other similar uses....even tying the office in the New York to the LA office with each group reviewing things at one with no limit on who can come in an explore the layers...active interaction would still be a resource or computing limit, but just examining the info on this screen can handle any number of people or groups of people without having to fight for the PC's attention.
      Whenever I see any collab system it is usually harder and harder on the PC underneath as more people step up to it...this one is just one of the very few that doesn't. could be useful.

      --
      AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
    4. Re:IR Sensors make the paper irrelevant by argent · · Score: 1

      The overhead of compositing even ten or twenty such views is negligible. Really. A decent PC from 2002 could do that much. If it's got the computing resources to render the image in the first place it's not going to be overloaded with any credible number of viewers.

      Multiple locations is irrelevant, since you will have a complete PC at each location anyway.

  33. Effing Amazing by supertrinko · · Score: 1

    apparently you guy's just see this as a cheap party trick, do you realize how this will revolutionize the desktop, gaming, and computing in the future, using this same technology and the laws of refraction, you can have a truly 3d desktop, it brings computing out of the monitor and onto the... 'surface', for instance, i saw them demonstrate a short cylinder with the words 'Hello World!' scrolling around it, now if you can't tell what that means for gaming, there's something wrong with you and you should be ashamed to call yourself a geek/nerd, whatever you may be

    --
    If it rhymes it must be true.
  34. Bill Ozymandias - Head of Microsoft Research by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

    Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair.

    And then take this sheet of tracing paper and look at these other works!

    DESPAIR!!!

    --
    -=Bang Bang=-
  35. Sweet! It's about time. by fatandsassy · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting to upgrade my current Microsoft Surface Table for forever - can't wait to pick this one up!

  36. MS Odyssey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just like the Magnavox Odyssey I had as a kid.

  37. Where is Lunix R&D? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why isn't the Research and Development for Teh Lunix working on stuff like this?

    Oh, that's right... no funding. Doh! Hoisted by our own FOSS petards.

  38. It was at Siggraph by spitzak · · Score: 1

    This was displayed at Siggraph.

    I think it is enormously clever, while at the same time enormously useless.

    It was pretty obvious that they had no way to know where the paper was, so they mostly demonstrated it as an x-ray into the image that was on the screen. I do not see any reason why the paper's location could not be determined by the touch detector, however.

    I would think any practical use could be done by software moving a virtual "paper". One thing this would do is allow the papers to overlap.

  39. Eliminate the sorting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The already have a little device that eliminates that step: sockclips. (Not intended to be a commercial endorsement.)

  40. Re:Come on guys, let's all shill for Microsoft.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Its fucking cool technology. Don't let fanboyism ruin this." If you're a nerd then you should damn well know better than celebrate anything Microsoft does with respect to their "intellectual property" advancement. What makes you think that profit isn't the motive here? Intellectual property in the very least is future leverage against competing technology and will very likely be wielded by this company against competing technology.

  41. It doesn't matter who did this... by bollox4 · · Score: 1

    It could have been Sun, IBM, Xerox, etc., it honestly doesn't matter. The response to the product here in Slashdot of all places says enough. There are enough people on this topic alone who can see the benefits. So, it doesn't matter who came up with the idea really. Sometimes you've just got to roll with it.

  42. Shiney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Less TV-tables and more graphics cards that'll do Bioshock with ray tracing please Lolosoft. If I want a touchscreen table, I'll go watch next-gen.

    Alright, so maybe I do want touchscreen wallpanels.