Slashdot Mirror


Math Prof Uncovers Secret Chord

chebucto writes "The opening chord to A Hard Day's Night is famous because for 40 years, no one quite knew exactly what chord Harrison was playing. Musicians, scholars and amateur guitar players alike had all come up with their own theories, but it took a Dalhousie mathematician to figure out the exact formula. Dr. Brown used Fourier transforms to find the notes in the chord, and deduced that another George — George Martin, the Beatles producer — also played on the chord, adding a piano chord that included an F note impossible to play with the other notes on the guitar."

177 comments

  1. I've heard there was a secret chord by syrinx · · Score: 5, Funny

    That David played, and it pleased the lord,
    but you don't really care for music, do you?

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by jollyreaper · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That David played, and it pleased the lord,
      but you don't really care for music, do you?

      Not, but it's the craptastic idle design that's really chapping my ass.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by parkrrrr · · Score: 2, Funny

      I came here to make exactly that post, and I find that someone's already done it. Kudos to you.

    3. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well played, shame most won't get the reference

    4. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by Wintermute__ · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wouldn't be surprised if quite a few did get it. Even younger music lovers might, that song has enjoyed somewhat of a revival the last few years. And well it should.

      It's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah...

    5. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by bonkeydcow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah cuase God knows, no one has seen shrek.

    6. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it's now generally attributed to Rufus Wainwright. Better than nothing I suppose...

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    7. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      It goes like this: the fourth, the fifth
      The minor fall, the major lift

    8. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by olclops · · Score: 3, Funny

      The baffled king determined to carry on a joke well past the breaking point.

    9. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by olclops · · Score: 1

      And before that people assumed Jeff Buckley wrote it.

    10. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I knew of it thanks to Sad Kermit.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    11. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by lordnabob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jeff Buckley was born to sing that song.
      Unfortunately, he died shortly after.
      Anyone else cringe when they heard that sublime work of Cohen used in a silly movie like Shrek?

    12. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      The only shreks I've ever seen around here had frickin laser beams attached to their heads!

    13. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by Rennt · · Score: 1

      I HOPE the reference wan't to shrek. Gee, kids these days.

      The original version was written and performed by Leonard Cohen in '84, though of course I'd forgive people for thinking the reference was to Jeff Buckley's '94 version, arguably better than the original. John Cale (velvet underground) did a version in '91 too.

      Rufus Wainwright, who recorded the shrek version, has gone on record saying he never would have touched the song if he had heard the Buckley version first - its that good.

    14. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by dreemernj · · Score: 1

      I didn't cringe when I heard it in Shrek. I cringed when someone referred to it as "a song written for Shrek" when I played it in my car :-(

      --
      1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
    15. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by syrinx · · Score: 1

      I HOPE the reference wan't to shrek. Gee, kids these days.

      Since you are apparently concerned: I had no idea it was in Shrek. I knew it was originally written by Cohen, and I also think Buckley's version is the best. :)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    16. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by twisting_department · · Score: 1

      It's clear to me that they used this instrument : http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=1O2eKIOIyBI

    17. Re:I've heard there was a secret chord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I came here exactly to find that comment, and found it, and was gonna make exactly the same comment you did - but you beat me to it. Recurses! Foiled again, again.

  2. Well, this isn't total crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Decent idle story. Not completely retarded, though still generally meaningless. I can appreciate this kind of stuff, instead of the utter crap idle started out with. I guess it's getting better.

    1. Re:Well, this isn't total crap by stormguard2099 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the problem is that /. designates idle to be full of crap. all of the good articles get shoehorned into other categories. For example, the article about how Heinlein responded to fans with a preformed checklist was under entertainment. Something like that is much better suited to idle and it would make the section worth reading.

      --
      http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
    2. Re:Well, this isn't total crap by sleeping123 · · Score: 0
      Parent could be written more simply:

      In this case, Idle is NOT pants.

    3. Re:Well, this isn't total crap by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is interesting, but the CSS used is still obnoxiously bad.

    4. Re:Well, this isn't total crap by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not sure about meaningless - it says ensembles can play chords that either don't exist or cannot be reached on a single instrument. That's quite an interesting observation that has a practical application.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Well, this isn't total crap by scotsghost · · Score: 1

      interesting for those who've never played in or directed an ensemble of musicians, maybe. for those who have, that observation is nothing new. practical application? jazz ensembles have practically applied that for the last century or so.

    6. Re:Well, this isn't total crap by oldhack · · Score: 1

      ...the problem is that /. designates idle to be full of crap. all of the good articles get shoehorned into other categories...

      Get out! What are these categories with non-crap stories? Damn, I must have been missing out.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    7. Re:Well, this isn't total crap by jonadab · · Score: 2, Informative

      Theoretically that depends on the instrument, although most of the major instruments in the standard western music tradition share some of the same limitations, not least that at any given time they are either well-tempered or else justly intoned for a specific key, not both, and certainly not justly intoned for multiple keys at the same time. It is possible to design an instrument that can overcome these limitations and, for instance, play just intervals in multiple keys. But it isn't usual.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    8. Re:Well, this isn't total crap by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      hmmm -- take a flute and a tuba. There are cords they can play together that neither can play alone. That is a big DUH!

      Musicians have known this for ages; nothing new here...so the 'discovery' in that context is meaningless.

      The fact that the good doctor was able to identify the cord is not meaningless in and of itself - and allows guitarists to relax and not go crazy trying to do something that is clearly impossible alone. Plenty of meaning there.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    9. Re:Well, this isn't total crap by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      I probably should have said pipe organ and sitar....

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  3. Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why didn't anyone just ask Harrison?

    1. Re:Umm... by capt.Hij · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They probably should have. Unfortunately the only way to ask him now involves a ouija (tm) board.

    2. Re:Umm... by jd · · Score: 1

      You can't play chords on an ouija board.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is dead.

    4. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't etc etc.

  4. great, now he can start working on by samsonov · · Score: 1

    the brown note... that should be some interesting math.

    --
    "You killed my yogurt!" --Fred Fredburger
  5. Simple Solution by SageinaRage · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Why didn't anyone just ask him?

    1. Re:Simple Solution by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Maybe they did and he wouldn't tell. Of course, like most /.ers, I didn't RTFA.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    2. Re:Simple Solution by neildiamond · · Score: 3, Funny

      Too late!

    3. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he is dead. Maybe someone could come up with a way to regenerate him and ask him the question. Although they would need to kill him again right after they got the answer, before he starts eating other people.

    4. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You want to talk to a human -- a musician -- when you could be performing a discrete Fourier transform? You must be new here.

    5. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      go ahead and ask him. see what he says.

    6. Re:Simple Solution by elrous0 · · Score: 0

      During the years that followed, Harrison's ego had grown far too large to be approached by a mere mortal man.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, there in no way later years George remembered that session...WAY too many drugs. Also, studio sessions often deviate from the written music as various tracks get laid down so it's likely he didn't really know or thought it was a simple chord and didn't remember or know about the piano.

    8. Re:Simple Solution by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

      Also, who said that all the instruments were played at the same time. Maybe in final editing it was decided that the starting chord needed something more and it was only at that point the piano was added. For all we know (nothing) the musicians may not have known themselves there was a piano added.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    9. Re:Simple Solution by jd · · Score: 1

      He probably knew about it, at least at the time, because the piano work was mentioned by John Peel prior to them playing on his show. (It's on the BBC recordings they released as a double CD some time back.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    10. Re:Simple Solution by mapsjanhere · · Score: 3, Funny

      well, it's a dead human, that ups the challenge

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    11. Re:Simple Solution by kandela · · Score: 0, Troll

      A bit hard. I hear he's sleeping like a log.

      --
      Conservation of angular momentum makes the world go round.
    12. Re:Simple Solution by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      He's just spending a few years dead for tax reasons.

    13. Re:Simple Solution by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      "He's dead, Jim"

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    14. Re:Simple Solution by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Ranking the options on the geek scale:

      Asking someone for the answer: Easy -, boring -, requires human interaction ----. Rating -40.

      Doing a discrete Fourier transform on a digital recording: Technical +, challenging +, mathematical +, cool +, involves a computer and no human interaction ++++. Rating 50.

      Getting the answer from the mind of a dead body: Technical+, extremely high challenge value ++, requires Nobel Prize Winning new breakthrough in science +++, requires an actual science lab outfitted with cutting edge technology +++, insanely cool ++, requires human interaction ----. Rating 30.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    15. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why is this a troll? Whoever moderated this thread: you do realise that "sleeping like a log" is a line from 'Hard Day's Night' right!?

    16. Re:Simple Solution by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Whoever moderated this thread are clearly philistines.

  6. So, having RTFA... by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

    Well, perfesser, what the frell's the chord?

    --
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    1. Re:So, having RTFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the brown chord: a chord consisting of all possible brown notes. This chord is very popular among the constipated.

  7. You've gotta be kidding me by timpintsch · · Score: 0

    I don't get it. Why do we get two Beatles-related items in one day, did we miss a Ringo birthday or something? Please, leave the idle stuff off the main page. You know its lame, we know its lame, since it is a complete waste of time, why let it be a complete waste of disk space, cycles and bandwidth?

    1. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one man's trash...

      be happy someone, somewhere, didn't have your point of view when approving DARPANET for federal funding.

      this is a site for nerds that hunger for news. not all nerds play video games, some play instruments, too.

    2. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by zn0k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't get it. Why did it take me less than 30 seconds to figure out how to make anything Idle related disappear from the index, even though I'd never tried before? Please, leave the pointless bitching out off the commends. You know it's lame, we know it's lame, since it is a complete waste of time. Why let it be a complete waste of disk space, cycles and bandwidth?

    3. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know its lame, we know its lame, since it is a complete waste of time, why let it be a complete waste of disk space, cycles and bandwidth?

      I assume that the "it" to which you refer is your comment.

    4. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you mean ARPANET, unless my networking class lied to me.

    5. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original name of the agency was ARPA, changed to DARPA in '72, changed back to ARPA in '93 and back to DARPA in '96.

    6. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, why are you here?

    7. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by JerLasVegas · · Score: 1

      Because hes not an anonymous coward....

    8. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My head just exploded with irony.

    9. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 1

      OMG! At first I thought I'd read, "why let it be a complete waste of dick space...." Made me go "HUH??"

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    10. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      When you get right down to it, why are any of us here?

    11. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Because he didn't WANT to make the Idle stories disappear from the index, he just wanted to find out HOW because GGP was bitching about it.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    12. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Geez, I don't know. Maybe for the same reason I beat up mythical monsters made entirely of pixels? Because it's fun. There's no cost/benefit analysis to be placed on fun (unless your idea of fun is CBA of course. I find accountants funny, in an elbow nerve-pinch sort of way.)

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    13. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Q: What to accountants use as contraceptives?

      A: Their personalities.

      (-:

    14. Re:You've gotta be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well because:
      a. some of us use AC
      b. I don't just want to not see it, it will bother me to know it still exists. I want to see it's head on a post and it's cold, dead body before my feet!

  8. This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Stories like this are actually interesting and have a math/science side to them, instead of being mindless humor that everyone has already seen elsewhere. This is something that a math teacher could show her students to make them interested, more so than all the silly posters and videos they used when I was going through grade school.

    1. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Looks like some crappy teeny-bopper who thinks he knows everything there is to know can't accept the truth that some opinions might differ from his.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd never heard of them before and found the whole idea that people couldn't figure out what chord he was playing rather interesting, and I have no real interest in music, either.

    3. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, who the hell likes the Beatles? Oh, wait, everyone does.

    4. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You've never heard of the most well-known band in the world? Are you 8 years old? Do you live in a cave? Are you from the distant past?

    5. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      That's a patent falsehood. You see, I despise the beatles.

      I know, I know. Shocking. I also think Led Zeppelin sucks, too. Further, I cannot stand Aerosmith.

      Combining all 3 of them is my own personal hell. Write it down, make a note of it. Someday, when I die, and I go "what the shit? God actually exists? oh man, this does not end well for me", and I sometime after God says "what the hell are you doing here", that's where I'll spend eternity. Listening to the Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Aerosmith, all sung to me by a billion evil spiders who look oddly like my ex.

      Now that I've been confronted with that imagery, I'm going to go find out how to live forever. Brb.

    6. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Come on, no one under the age of 50 even remembers when they were together. Deal with it, grandpa.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      You're not alone. I would also add the Rolling Stones to that list.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by DarkProphet · · Score: 1

      Well, not exactly shocking, but somewhat unusual. Are there any famous bands/artists from that period that you do like? For example, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised by your opinion if all you listen to is gangsta rap, urban beats, or some other tone-deaf no-talent tripe. I suspect that isn't the case though, so share -- since the Beatles, Led Zeppelin, and Aerosmith evoke such a negative reaction from you, what music does make you want to rock out, stick it to the man, and make babies*? :-)

      Note: 'Sticking it to the man' in the literal sense may fail to make babies.

      --
      What could possibly hurt the security of the American people more than giving our own government the ability to hide its
    9. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Pink Floyd (a little later, but still), The Who, Crosby Stills Nash and Young, and many many more. I also cannot stand the Rolling Stones (as the your sibling poster was able to point out and that I oddly agree with!) But I've been known to roll through youtube chaining a ton of hippy rock songs from time to time. I also tend to do this with punk (both old school and the stuff from the 90's, but the new stuff is a barrel full of crappy monkeys imo)

      All the same, there's a ton of music I dig. It's just those few bands, I can't stand 98% of the time. There are, of course, a few exceptions (paint it black is a good song, for sure), but other than that ... ick!

    10. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beatles is #3 in the charts of last.fm, and have been in the first position for some time. I am sorry but people still like the beatles...

    11. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I never said they didn't. But when somebody says "everybody" - you know, an explicitely inclusive statement - then I just had to point out that I did not. Which meant his statement is false.

      If the GGP had said "damn near everybody" or "almost everybody", then I wouldn't have said a thing, but everybody means everybody.

    12. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      There have been about as many Beatles releases in the last decade or so as there were in their career. With worldwide distribution. To not have heard of the Beatles is to have been completely absent from Earth.

    13. Re:This Is What "Idle" Should Be Used For. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Beatles... Led Zeppelin... Aerowhat?

  9. haha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha. math pwns the arts at their own game.

    1. Re:haha. by clone53421 · · Score: 1
      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:haha. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Black
      then
      white are
      all I see
      in my infancy.
      Red and yellow then came to be,
      reaching out to me,
      lets me see
      there is
      so
      much
      more and
      beckons me
      to look through to these
      infinite possibilities.
      As below, so above and beyond, I imagine
      drawn outside the lines of reason.
      Push the envelope.
      Watch it bend.

  10. Not Lost, just Secret by CelticWhisper · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Moody Blues have been in search of that little bastard since 1968. Can someone call them and tell them it was finally found?

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    1. Re:Not Lost, just Secret by parkrrrr · · Score: 4, Funny

      They wouldn't know what to do with it anyway. They're just singers in a rock & roll band.

    2. Re:Not Lost, just Secret by Abstrackt · · Score: 2, Informative

      The fact that your post got modded informative probably means someone missed the joke. ;) (I know, I know... Or they just wanted to give you karma...)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:Not Lost, just Secret by jejones · · Score: 1

      Hey, veteran cosmic rockers like them would know just what to do!

    4. Re:Not Lost, just Secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arthur Sullivan (of Gilbert and Sullivan) started his own search in 1877. http://math.boisestate.edu/gas/other_sullivan/songs/lost_chord/chord.html

    5. Re:Not Lost, just Secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Moody Blues have been in search of that little bastard since 1968. Can someone call them and tell them it was finally found?

      Every one of them has a been Good Boy and Deserves a Favor, so please do them one and tell them what it is.

  11. Hang on. by Khyber · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've always known there was a piano in the song. It's actually kind of hard to miss if you ever played one before.

    But then again, I do have hearing that's sharper than most. at age 26 I can still pick up about 25+KHz frequencies.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Hang on. by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      Does that mean 25 single frequencies in the kHz range? Or do you mean you can hear over 25 kHz?

    2. Re:Hang on. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I can hear frequencies above 25kHz. Just ran another test and so far I'm able to easily hear 28kHz tones. Get to about 30kHz and it's just pressure in my ears, no tone.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  12. Professor works a hard day's night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The professor was working like a dog on this.

  13. Offtopic sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I'm on time as opposed to a minute late, it is worth it.

    1. Re:Offtopic sig by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Not to mention over 800 miles...

  14. Re:So, having Googled... by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are like a million copies of this article verbatim and with the same picture. Here's his page http://www.mscs.dal.ca/~brown/

    and then find these:
    http://www.guitarplayer.com/story.asp?sectioncode=8&storycode=15819
    http://www.mscs.dal.ca/~brown/AHDNSoloJIB.pdf

  15. Mathematician Doesn't Realize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that the sheet music could be read.

    Cordially,
    Kilgore Trout

    P.S.: Enable Cyrillic morons.

  16. Not so secret by I'm+a+banana · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's a G7sus4 chord. It's never been a secret. http://guitar.about.com/library/blchord_g7sus46.htm

    1. Re:Not so secret by Progman3K · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a G7sus4 chord. It's never been a secret.

      Not really, the piano is playing a Dsus4.

      If it was as simple as you say it is then people would have been able to recreate it long ago and no one did.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    2. Re:Not so secret by chad.koehler · · Score: 1

      So, G7sus4 + Dsus4?

      a b c d f f# g

      ?

    3. Re:Not so secret by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      The guitars are playing an F with a G on top, the bass is playing a D at its second octave and the piano is playing the notes D-G-D across an octave...

      Beats me what that is called...

      But that's the point... A weird sort of dissonance that gives a signature sound.

      They were probably really high at the time.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    4. Re:Not so secret by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm trying to picture it in my head, and It seems like you could get all of the notes from a G7sus4 and a Dsus4 in one chord on a guitar. Those would be F, G, A, C and D. Such a chord could be played with a Barre chord all on the 10th fret with or without muting the low D.
      Maybe it sounds better with the piano though.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    5. Re:Not so secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no B's or F#'s in either of those chords. Suspended chords have no 3rd, "suspending" them to the 4th. G7sus4 = G C D F, no B... Dsus4 = D G A, no F#... Try playing G and F# together, without G being the root, or C and B together without C being the root. It will sound like a bad horror movie soundtrack.

  17. Just to wait for RockBand to have the song by 0x537461746943 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then we will know for sure. It is probably the red and blue chord.

  18. Right guy, right song, wrong story by jfengel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dr. Brown's work on the opening chord of Hard Day's Night is four years old. His paper is at:

    http://www.mscs.dal.ca/~brown/n-oct04-harddayjib.pdf

    (Note the "oct04" date in the URL).

    His recent work is on the same song, but it's not about the opening chord. It's about the guitar solo (which was actually a duet with the piano), which Harrison played an octave down, at half speed, and then sped up. Which he proved by noticing where the piano notes went from double-strings to triple-strings, as seen by tiny mis-tunings between the strings.

    It's pretty interesting work:

    http://www.mscs.dal.ca/~brown/AHDNSoloJIB.pdf

    (Note: slashdot is just reporting the article, which is new. But it comes from Dr. Brown's own school, so I don't know why they're reporting the wrong story, except to guess that the older story was a well-known mystery among guitarists.)

    1. Re:Right guy, right song, wrong story by cecille · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought his most recent work was on "In my life", trying to figure out who wrote it. I just think maybe he doesn't have too many results for that research yet, but people were interested, so they started talking about his old stuff too.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    2. Re:Right guy, right song, wrong story by kandela · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's a lot of work just on A Hard Day's Night. He must be working like a dog.

      --
      Conservation of angular momentum makes the world go round.
  19. So What's the chord? by jordan314 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article doesn't actually say what he thinks the chord was. I do music transcriptions (http://jordanbalagot.com/musictranscriptions.html ) and to me it sounds like G7 sus 4 / D. Or actual pitches: D1 G2 G3 C3 F3 G3. I do hear the F in there...If it's not playable on guitar it's possible the Beatles combined two recordings at once of different takes. They used all sorts of innovative recording techniques like that.

    1. Re:So What's the chord? by thedonger · · Score: 1

      I just closed the PDF of his math paper where he does state his theory of what was played by George, John, Paul, and George Martin. Harrison played (in tab notation, from low E to high E): x0001x

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    2. Re:So What's the chord? by thedonger · · Score: 1

      On a twelve string.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    3. Re:So What's the chord? by jordan314 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. After reading the PDF and looking at the article more closely I agree with him, the F was played on piano. The cymbal crash and the mixing obscure it but I'm glad that Brown agrees that someone is playing it and that I'm not going crazy.

    4. Re:So What's the chord? by Bazman · · Score: 1

      Beatles fans might find Alan Pollack's notes on every Beatles song ever very interesting. Try his comments on Hard Days Night

    5. Re:So What's the chord? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      It's a piano. No guitar has the 'punch' that a piano has. Listen to the song, put the bass up a little higher than normal. It REALLY stands out.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  20. The impossible note by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...adding a piano chord that included an F note impossible to play with the other notes on the guitar.

    There are no notes that are impossible to play on a guitar. However, you have to tune the guitar to a nonstandard, non eagbde like Led Zepplin did on a few songs (an example is Black Mountain Side on their first album.

    I have an incredibly hard time playing a B chord; I have to kind of fake it and not hit all the strings. But then I'm no virtuoso, it took me twenty years to learn Starway To Heaven.

    1. Re:The impossible note by 2names · · Score: 4, Funny

      And apparently even longer to spell it...

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    2. Re:The impossible note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with the other notes

      Those are the key words here. If you have X strings, and want to play X+1 notes in a chord, it's time to grab a piano. In this case, whatever strings were tuned to be capable of producing that pitch's F were in use for other notes in the chord.

    3. Re:The impossible note by tirerim · · Score: 1

      Sure there are. You can play at most six notes at once on a guitar; besides that, there are plenty of notes that are off the bottom of the guitar's range.

    4. Re:The impossible note by scaryjohn · · Score: 1

      I think the submitter meant the chord was impossible to play. I don't know squat about guitars, but the paper seems to say that since there were three F's played by everyone, Harrison couldn't have played them on his twelve-string. Else, there'd be an even number of F's. And everyone else's opening notes are accounted for. But three F peaks is consistent with the note being played on a piano.

      All the same, I'd hate to be playing the new Beatles Rock Band and have this song come up. "There isn't an octarine button on my controller!" Game over right out of the box!

      --
      One might ask the same about birds. What ARE birds? We just don't know.
    5. Re:The impossible note by LSD-OBS · · Score: 1

      Dude...

      --
      Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
    6. Re:The impossible note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you do a Fourier transform of a musical track, each instrument will leave a distinct footprint for each note it plays. (The foot print will slide up and down the frequency scale depending on the pitch played, but it will still look nearly identical.)

      I think the quote refers to the discovery of a foot print that clearly did not belong to any kind of guitar.

    7. Re:The impossible note by bfandreas · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. Starway to Heaven by Creme Brulee. Great band that. Did all the hits. It's a shit business; I'm glad I'm out of it.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    8. Re:The impossible note by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      According to the article, the chord Harrison played had the 1st and 6th string muted, which means he could easily have played the F on the 6th string 1st fret, in fact since he was playing the 1st fret C on the 5th string, he would have been muting the 6th string on the F. He was probably already getting the "thunk" of the F and just not letting it ring!

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    9. Re:The impossible note by Rary · · Score: 1

      "Sure there are. You can play at most six notes at once on a guitar; besides that, there are plenty of notes that are off the bottom of the guitar's range."

      That's assuming it's a six-string guitar, and it's tuned normally, neither of which are necessarily valid assumptions. Especially considering George did not play a six-string guitar (although, admittedly, a 12-string isn't that much different from a six-string, it just doubles 2 strings exactly and 4 of them an octave higher).

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    10. Re:The impossible note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are in fact notes that are impossible to play on guitar. For example, on a 6-string guitar, it would be the 7th note! I think that's the point here - the guitar is known to be playing 6 notes, and a 7th (the F, not in the guitar chord) was played on piano (as part of a chord).

    11. Re:The impossible note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B is a note, bro. A chord is 3 notes. So maybe that's why you're having such a hard time. And playing B thrice as loud doesn't count.

    12. Re:The impossible note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no, You're still limited to 6 notes. Tune all you want, you can't hit a 7-note chord on a guitar.

    13. Re:The impossible note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my first time posting so please forgive me if I am a "Anonymous Coward".

      Non standard tunings have gone through waves of popularity over time. There are the open chord tunings (open E, A, G and D) that many slide players use. The drop D tuning DADGBE that Edie VanHaylen used in his more recent years, and even developed a piece of hardware that would let you switch from standard to drop D on the fly. Some people use special tunings to take the Guitar to a different place musically. When I first discovered DADGAD I found myself playing things on the guitar that I never played before (mostly by accident). Finially special tunings are used just because I can't play that chord any way, which may well be what happened in this case.

      Could go into partial capoing, single finger baring, and multi hand fretting, but it is getting late.

    14. Re:The impossible note by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, that explains it. It's kind of hard to play a seven note chord on a six stringed instrument!

      But since the Beatles had two guitar players...

    15. Re:The impossible note by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Some 12-string string sets double 3 and octave 3.

    16. Re:The impossible note by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      "You can play at most six notes at once on a guitar"

      This simply isn't true. It's trivial to play two notes on the same string at the same time by lightly resting a finger at certain points along the string, isolating two or more harmonics.

    17. Re:The impossible note by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      I wish Slashdot allowed editing.

      I wanted to add: if you'd like I'd be happy to upload an mp3 demonstrating it.

    18. Re:The impossible note by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      A note played on the lower strings of a 12 string may simply not register as two simultaneous notes, particularly on an old 4 track recording with lots of bounced tracks.

    19. Re:The impossible note by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Really? I do it a lot.

  21. Re:The Secret Chord? by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    They did that joke in the first post, dude.

  22. Well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new music math overlords.

    1. Re:Well, by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Its kinda late for that, Pythagoras was the original music math overlord

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  23. From Wikipedia by bgspence · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Opening chord

    "A Hard Day's Night" is immediately identifiable before the vocals even begin, thanks to George Harrison's unmistakable Rickenbacker 360/12 12-string guitar's "mighty opening chord".[12] According to George Martin, "We knew it would open both the film and the soundtrack LP, so we wanted a particularly strong and effective beginning. The strident guitar chord was the perfect launch"[8] having what Ian MacDonald calls "'a significance in Beatles lore matched only by the concluding E major of "A Day in the Life", the two opening and closing the group's middle period of peak creativity'".[13] "That sound you just associate with those early 1960s Beatles records".[14]
    Listen to the opening chord (helpinfo)
    Analysis of the chord varies, with it being described as G7add9sus4,[13] G7sus4,[15][16] or G11sus4[12] and others below.
    The exact chord is an Fadd9 confirmed by Harrison during an online chat on 15 February 2001:[17]
    Q: Mr Harrison, what is the opening chord you used for "A Hard Day's Night"?
    A: It is F with a G on top, but you'll have to ask Paul about the bass note to get the proper story.
    According to Walter Everett, the opening chord has an introductory dominant function because McCartney plays D in the bass; Harrison and Martin play F A C G in twelve-string guitar and piano, over the bass D, giving the chord a mixture-coloured neighbor, F; two diatonic neighbors, A and C; plus an anticipation of the tonic, G -- the major subtonic as played on guitar being a borrowed chord commonly used by the Beatles, first in "P.S. I Love You" (see mode mixture), and later in "Every Little Thing", "Tomorrow Never Knows" and "Got to Get You into My Life" (in the latter two against a tonic pedal).[18]
    Film of the Beatles performing "A Hard Day's Night", shows both John and George gripping a Gm11 in 3rd position, not an Fadd9. The Fadd9 is used during the chorus and is the chord form used for the outro fade out.[citation needed]
    In contrast, Alan W. Pollack interprets the chord as a surrogate dominant (surrogate V, the dominant preparing or leading to the tonic chord), in G major the dominant being D, with the G being an anticipation that resolves in the G major chord that opens the verse. He also suggests it is a mixture of d minor, F major, and G major (missing the B).[19] Tony Bacon calls it a Dm7sus4 (D F G A C), which is the dominant seventh (plus the fourth, G).[20] (For more information regarding chord functions see diatonic function.)
    Everett points out that the chord relates to the Beatles' interest in pandiatonic harmony.[21]
    Dominic Pedler has also provided an interpretation of the famous chord, with the Beatles and George Martin playing the following:
    George Harrison: Fadd9 in 1st position on Rickenbacker 360/12 12-string electric guitar
    John Lennon: Fadd9 in 1st position on a Gibson J-160E 6-string acoustic guitar
    Paul McCartney: high D played on the D-string, 12th fret on Hofner 500/1 electric bass
    George Martin: D2-G2-D3 played on a Steinway Grand Piano
    Ringo Starr: Subtle snare drum and ride cymbal
    This gives the notes: G-B-D-F-A-C (the B is a harmonic). One of the interesting things about this chord (as described by Pedler) is how McCartney's high bass note reverberates inside the soundbox of Lennon's acoustic guitar and begins to be picked up on Lennon's microphone or pick-up during the sounding of the chord. This gives the chord its special "wavy" and unstable quality. Pedler describes the effect as a "virtual pull-off".[22]
    Jason Brown, Professor for the Faculty of Computer Science at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, whose research interests include graph theory, combinatorics, and combinatorial algorithms, announced in October 2004 that after six months of research he succeeded in analysing the opening chord by "de-composing the sound into original frequencies, using a combination of computer software and old-fashioned chalkboard." According to Brown, the Rickenbacker guitar wasn't the only instrument used. "It wasn't jus

  24. Craptastic by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Speaking of craptastic, I
    see that the narrow com-
    ment field is still in place.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  25. Nobody thought to look at the frequencies?!?!?! by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

    So let me see if I got this straight: for 40 years Beatles fans have been fighting over what combination of frequencies were used in this chord, but not one of them thought to check what frequencies were being used in the chord until now?

    For non-EEs out there, a Fourier transform is a basic algorithm to translate from the time domain to the frequency domain. Any audio program or player or graphic equalizer that displays the frequency spectrum instead of the actual wave coming out the speakers is using this transform. The idea that nobody thought to look at that display for 40 years is a more than a little absurd.

    1. Re:Nobody thought to look at the frequencies?!?!?! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Graphic equalizers often cheat, actually.

      I think the problem is a little more interesting than the story makes it out to be. As you point out, you should be able to recognize the overall chord pretty easily with an FT, but it's not quite as trivial to figure out who's playing what. For that you have to analyze the ratios of the harmonics, which turns into a nasty little decomposition problem when you've got more than one instrument playing the same note.

    2. Re:Nobody thought to look at the frequencies?!?!?! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      When involve ins a 'religous' war no one likes to check for any fact, it might mean they're wrong.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Nobody thought to look at the frequencies?!?!?! by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      That was basically my mathematician husband's response to this article: "Wait, if they weren't using a Fourier transform to figure it out before, what on earth were they doing?"

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    4. Re:Nobody thought to look at the frequencies?!?!?! by GetAssista · · Score: 1

      Guitar post-note spectrum is quite different from piano one. No problem in telling them apart in any sound editor with decent spectral view, given not that many notes played

    5. Re:Nobody thought to look at the frequencies?!?!?! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Very different if you play one, look at it, then play the other. A little more difficult if you have a recording of a couple of guitars and a piano all playing multiple notes simultaneously.

  26. The exact chord is an Fadd9 confirmed by Harrison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The exact chord is an Fadd9 confirmed by Harrison during an online chat on 15 February 2001:[17]

            Q: Mr Harrison, what is the opening chord you used for "A Hard Day's Night"?
            A: It is F with a G on top, but you'll have to ask Paul about the bass note to get the proper story. "

    quoted
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Hard_Day%27s_Night_(song)

  27. Is that bag-pipe tuning or something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to a nonstandard, non eagbde

    eagbde is pretty darned non-standard. Standard 6-string guitar tuning is ebgdAE high to low.

    1. Re:Is that bag-pipe tuning or something? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Oops, massive brainfart!

    2. Re:Is that bag-pipe tuning or something? by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      I bet EAGBDE sounds better. In whichever order. /troll

  28. What chord did George play live then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did George just play the G7sus4 chord in concerts?

  29. If he'd just waited for Beatles Rock Band... by ajd1474 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    he'd know the mystery chord is most probably "the green button".

    --
    I refuse to have a sig... dammit!
  30. Oblig XKCD by Falconhell · · Score: 1

    Ah grasshopper, one day you will be ready to leave

    www.xkcd.com/339

  31. What about live performances? by brouski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What did he play in concert?

    --
    Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
    1. Re:What about live performances? by Khyber · · Score: 1
      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:What about live performances? by zen-theorist · · Score: 1

      Only if someone had taken a picture of him playing it live..

  32. It's all in the algorithm by null+etc. · · Score: 1

    This would have been a great test for Direct Note Access software. http://www.celemony.com/cms/index.php?id=dna

  33. Do you suppose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it be done better by education? Seems like musical constipation is from not being able to push sheet to the bar. I call it the Guitar Hero Effect: for those that cant recite, simulate in stupidity. It's like hearing non-tuned guitars play a song; it gives fiber for when a real song follows.

  34. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, the important question, will they name it after him - the Brown note?!

  35. no shit, a piano? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure what the BFD is that Professor Mathematics determined that some of that chord is played on a piano.
    Any one with a decent set of ears can hear that...

  36. He looks so relieved! by redshirt · · Score: 1

    He found the Brown Note.

  37. Not impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not impossible: 12 string guitar with modified/alternate tuning. Tuned properly it could have been an all-strings open strum.

  38. Hasn't anyone just watched the song being played? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've learnt a lot of songs just by watching how the song was played live. Must be an old film of the Beatles playing it somewhere. Just got to watch what George was playing at the time.

  39. Mystery? Yeah sure buddy... by vga_init · · Score: 1

    I find the premise of this story too difficult to believe. Anyone with a decent ear can hear what is going on; close your eyes and listen to the song, and you will hear beyond a doubt the twelve string and also the piano. There is no mystery there, and careful listening would allow anyone to pick out individual notes in the chord--musicians do this all the time, to the point of memorizing chord sequences by ear and what notes they contain. Also, one second on youtube showed me live footage of Harrison actually playing the opening chord on camera. I call the whole thing BS, though it's cool that the guy actually analyzed the signal mathematically.

  40. I call it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'I think I've found a new note in between B and C, I always knew it was there. I'm gonna call it howards note' - Howard Moon from the Mighty Boosh

  41. Re:So, having Googled... by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

    Joke? No, thanks...

    --
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
  42. What? by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

    George Harrison had a band?

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  43. I know one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The seventh note in a chord.

  44. Mweb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi all,
    I played on this particular guitar in England, a few years ago. It was tuned in C major. So the F is just under your finger in that case, nothing special.

  45. Pride Goeth Poof by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    "...an F note impossible to play with the other notes on the guitar."

    For every tuning? Every string is independent and can be tuned to any note. Nor does a given string position require that the normally used string be installed there. And just because it's a 12 string doesn't mean the secondary strings have to be tuned to the note, octave, or any given relationship since they're equally independent. All 12 positions can be filled with any string and that string tuned anywhere within the range in which it maintains its harmonics and their combined tension is balanced by the neck tension.

    That's all true, correct and academic. The following is an educated guess and attempt, but practical.

    Using normal guitar tuning (EADGBE):
    Middle finger, second string, third fret.
    Index finger, third string, second fret.
    Ring finger, fourth string, third fret.
    Little finger, fifth string, fourth fret.*
    Thumb on first string, third fret.
    Roll wrist with knuckles towards tuning keys and put side of index finger across sixth string, first fret.
    The last line requires a bit of flexibility, especially to hold. Since it doesn't have to be sustained beyond that one chord, it can be forced. I contend that's exactly what Harrison is doing because the opening chord is slightly sharp, as though being stretched or the tremlo bar pulled, and such forcing will bend the neck back, sharpening the notes.
    The central part of the chord (up through *) is fairly well known. Hold the finger positions and slide up 4 frets. Most recognizable uses are Jimi Hendrix's Purple Haze and Foxy Lady.
    That was by experience and ear. Had they given the actual notes I could have cheated and used any of several fretting programs that let you put in a series of notes and a tuning and gives back one or more fingerings.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  46. Nominate this guy for an Ig Nobel award by Megane · · Score: 1

    Immediately! This is exactly the sort of thing the Ig Nobel folks are looking for.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  47. I think by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

    All the folks saying you can't play a 7-note chord on a 6-string guitar should familiarize themselves with harmonics.

    http://www.harmony-central.com/Guitar/harmonics.html

    The harmonic series is a mathematical definition, generally used when talking about frequencies. The harmonic series is important in musical applications because most instruments (including guitar) produce sounds that contain harmonic frequencies. The natural frequencies of the string mentioned above form a harmonic series.
    A frequency is harmonic if it is an integer multiple of the fundamental frequency. The fundamental is the first harmonic (although it's generally referred to as the fundamental). The second harmonic is two times the frequency of the fundamental, the third harmonics is three times the fundamental, and so on. So with a fundamental of 100 Hz, the second harmonic is 200 Hz, the third is 300 Hz, the fourth is 400 Hz, etc.
    Rather than working with numbers, you can think of the harmonic series in terms of musical intervals. The first harmonic is the fundamental. The second harmonic is an octave above. The third harmonic is an octave and a fifth above the fundamental. The fourth harmonic is two octaves above the fundamental. The fifth harmonic is a another major third higher, the sixth is another minor third higher, and the series continues.