Slashdot Mirror


CueCat Patent Granted, Finally

RobertB-DC writes "Who could forget the :CueCat, the amazing device that would bring 'convergence' between the real world and the online marketing Utopia of the late '90s? Belo, the Dallas-based newspaper and TV conglomerate, spent millions of dollars on the project, only to be ridiculed from the start and eventually becoming a sort of poster kitty for the Dot-Com Bust. Well, the device's inventor and chief cheerleader, J. Jovan Philyaw, didn't forget. His patent application, in progress since 1998, has finally been granted. The story comes from a Dallas alternative weekly, since the local Belo paper is still smarting from its $40-million-dollar black eye."

184 comments

  1. Maybe I should take advantage of the situation... by netglen · · Score: 2, Funny

    and write the book ":CueCat for Dummies"? I'll be an instant millionaire!

  2. Schrodenger's cueCat by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, the cueCat was in a box (the patent office) and its state was unknown for years until someone finally opened the box and looked at it? I can only assume the cueCat was dead, but that assumption probably changed the outcome.

    First again?

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    1. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Funny

      First again?

      You assumed you were first, and by doing that, you changed the outcome.

    2. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess the cueCat is out of the bag... You know, I'm glad this is anonymous.

    3. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by anomaly · · Score: 1

      If I want a sermon, I'll go to church. If I want to be entertained, I'll go to the movies. NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.

      Every movie or TV show I've ever seen is preaching something - perhaps not something you or I might consider "religious" but it's preaching nonetheless.

      --
      But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
    4. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quantum decoherence is due to interaction with the environment. Looking has nothing to do with it. The term "observer" does not refer to the guy with the lab coat.

    5. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by precogpunk · · Score: 1

      I can only assume the cueCat was dead, but that assumption probably changed the outcome.

      Don't you know the cueCat has 9 lives?

    6. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by durnurd · · Score: 1

      If I want a sermon, I'll go to church. If I want to be entertained, I'll go to the movies. NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.

      Every movie or TV show I've ever seen is preaching something - perhaps not something you or I might consider "religious" but it's preaching nonetheless.

      Which is exactly what he's saying he doesn't like.

      --
      --Edward Dassmesser
    7. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by Scarletdown · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, it's still going to be a few hundred years before a movie such as Ass hits the big screen, or shows like "Ow! My Balls" begin to air on TV.

      Until then, you will have to be content with shows where the director cares that you care about Whose ass it is.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    8. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by c0nman · · Score: 1

      I guess the cueCat is out of the bag... You know, I'm glad this is anonymous.

      Wrong joke, sucka.

      hansamurai was referring to the Wigner's friend thought experiment while MajikSheff was referring to the "SchrÃdinger's cat" thought experiment.

    9. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by billcopc · · Score: 1

      You get your entertainment in church, and your sermon at the movies ?

      I guess that's not too far from today's reality... sad!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    10. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad someone gets it. Posting Anon to dodge the Offtopic mod.

      -Sheff

    11. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by griffjon · · Score: 1

      I have a cache of those things - with a bit of software they make great barcode readers! I've implemented a mini-library system using those plus Koha (an OSS perl library catalog system), and a low-cost inventory management tool using the cutcat, excel sheets, and SalesForce for an international fair trade NGO. Now if only that wasn't explicitly forbidden by the EULA...

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    12. Re:Schrodenger's cueCat by Megane · · Score: 1

      I've got a pile of those things too, and I've modded one or two of them to output plain ASCII. But now I've found two business-quality scanners, so they're less useful.

      One bit of advice if you want to use a CueCat (or other PS2-plug bar code scanner) with a PS2-to-USB adapter is that not all such adapters are compatible. out of half a dozen devices with that capability, two work, two do not work, and two produce gibberish that confuses Mac OS X and causes it to flip around between different applications.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  3. I already used this... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    ... to buy my flying car!

    Anyone thinking that getting a patent will make a broken concept work is naive.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:I already used this... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A method for interconnecting a user's location to a destination location on a network. The unique information is received at the user's location, which unique information has no associated routing information embedded therein. Network routing information is associated with the received unique information in response to receipt thereof. The user's location is then interconnected to the destination location across the network in accordance with the routing associated therewith in the step of associating.

      I smell a patent troll brewing...what better place than in Texas?

  4. I used one by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I declawed one with the software patch that stripped the 'encryption' to use it as a normal barcode scanner. It was great for a little inventory problem I had at work. I made an Access DB that kept track of LTO tapes by scanning a label on each box and tape. That way when I had to do a restore from tapes on hand all I had to do was pull up its label in the DB and it gave me the box and row number.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:I used one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      What happens when your Access DB is what needs to be recovered from the backup tapes? What then?

    2. Re:I used one by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      What happens when your Access DB is what needs to be recovered from the backup tapes? What then?

      He gets stuck in an infinite loop!

    3. Re:I used one by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I declawed 20 of them one by soldering a jumper that disabled the encryption at the unit. Most of them were easily hacked this way. I've got several still in use as Point of Sale barcode readers at a couple of customers.

      In fact I still have about 5 of them in their poly bags in the basement. I had more but fittingly, my cat peed on them.

      I cleaned out 5 radioshacks when they were trying to get people to take them.... please take them!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:I used one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had one. I thought of printing the barcode, scanning it back in, and then storing the coded-decoded pair in a lookup table. But then I realized I had no use for barcodes or a barcode scanner so I threw it out.

    5. Re:I used one by merreborn · · Score: 1

      There's a serious secondary market for those things. I used to work for a used book merchant. We had a half dozen of 'em, and used 'em to scan ISBN bar codes on the books we received for quick cataloging.

      You can pick up a "declawed" CueCat for $10. Most better barcode scanners *start* at $60.

    6. Re:I used one by afidel · · Score: 1, Informative

      It wasn't in the backup set, it was on my laptop. The only loss if the DB went tits-up was that I would have to go back to hand searching the boxes, it's not like deleting a row in the DB destroyed the tapes =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:I used one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That involves a bale of hay, 17 gallons of molasses, three left handed sporks, and a midget names Jerry.

    8. Re:I used one by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      I remember the radio shack bins outside when I was a kid full of things. I grabbed a couple and lost them over the years...

      Few weeks ago a buddy asked if I knew what "this" was... It was a CueCat...

      Now it hangs proudly ready to be soldered on my cork board next to the bills.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    9. Re:I used one by Tacvek · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is worth noting that there are two different basic types of CueCat declawing.

      The normal format for the CueCat is a long "encypted" string that contains three pieces of information, A serial number, information about the barcode type, and the raw barcode data.

      The first type of declawing merely makes the serial number be a sting of dashes or zeros. This was only really useful with the official software, as the unoffensive drivers that support the CueCat's native format normally ignore the serial number.

      The second type of declawing, which would be more accurately described as "fixing" (neutering) the CueCat, is a modification that results in the CueCat retuning just the raw barcode data in plaintext, followed by the enter key.

      (My understanding is that the CueCat always functions as a keyboard, in all modes, but the official software intercepted the output.)

      I vaguely remember that one configuration Code128 bar codes would not scan correctly, but they did work in a different configuration. Does anybody remember what configuration that was? I think it was either the neutered configuration, or the non-neutered configuration when using the official software.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    10. Re:I used one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What good is pr0n on tapes...?

    11. Re:I used one by nsanders · · Score: 1

      If only they made software and hardware to do this for you..

    12. Re:I used one by Blokus · · Score: 1

      No such thing as an infinite loop ... at least not yet.

    13. Re:I used one by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      No need to solder it, here's a site with drivers for just about every OS including a JAVA decoder if your OS doesn't have a specific driver =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    14. Re:I used one by afidel · · Score: 1

      Since my budget was $0 I got to improvise. It was a miscellaneous duty and they figured I could spend the time looking by hand when an old restore was needed, recent restores were done from snapshots on the Filer. The first time it took me 3+ hours to find all the tapes needed for a restore I decided to work smart instead of hard.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    15. Re:I used one by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You've been waiting 9 years to repost that, haven't you~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:I used one by BlueRaja · · Score: 1

      Please don't call it encryption - it was (*extremely* poor) obfuscation. I bought one of these at Goodwill for a quarter a few years ago - played around with it for a bit, learned Python by writing a program that took :CueCat input and looked up the corresponding ISBN code on Amazon... good times.

    17. Re:I used one by ichthyoboy · · Score: 1

      You solder your bills?

    18. Re:I used one by afidel · · Score: 1

      Did you not notice the quotes around encryption, I know it was no more useful than ROT13 but if I remember correctly the company made some DMCA claims when people started posting about declawing.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    19. Re:I used one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you think so? yesterday I deleted a record of an our employee, and he died! now, send this comment to other 17 stories in less than 7 days or.......

    20. Re:I used one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Once unlocked we found these a neat little device for amateur development. Although none of us had a working knowledge of databases at the time, we did manage to cobble up solutions for "inventory" management using Visual Basic.

      These may not have been practical applications, but they got us interested in databases/transactional development, with a focus on UI. The limitations of Visual Basic and Access lead us to discover Visual C++/MSSQL, and ultimately g++/mysql as a free alternative (the primary benefit to us being free as in beer, but it was also an introduction into "real" software freedom).

      Obviously the :CueCat was not the only influence that lead us down the path of software development, but the availability of an easy to to integrate and free piece of hardware played a huge role.

      Did any of you have similar experiences with the :CueCat or other hackable/programmable hardware as a child?

  5. Brilliant!! by TheDarkener · · Score: 4, Funny

    A barcode scanner at every normal person's PC that "allows" them to view advertisements on products they've already purchased? Count me in!

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:Brilliant!! by Rycross · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The idea would be that you could scan a barcode on an advertisements or articles to get more information on a product. The problem is that you need a special piece of hardware to do what a URL written down on the page could do.

      The basic idea isn't without merit, however. In Japan, they use barcode-like codes to encode extra information with advertisements. You could see a product that interests you, use your cell phone camera to take a picture of the code, and then have your phone load up the web site based on the code. The difference here is its more convenient instead of less.

    2. Re:Brilliant!! by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      It was more then just advertisements in practice. You could order items out of catalogs 'out of the box'.

      Much more if you made some changes.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Brilliant!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think it was before its time. Back then cell phones were not as ubiquitous as now, and they didn't do anything other than call people. Nothing like the wireless infrastructure of today. Imagine a small barcode scanner that could do the same task today. You could instantly do this with your iphone today and it would make a lot more sense. I still think this is a good idea with poor implementation. Too much though has to go into actually getting the data you want.

    4. Re:Brilliant!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone cannot do this as it is a fixed lens solution and can't capture a barcode clearly...buy a G1.

    5. Re:Brilliant!! by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      You know, that makes me think of the barcode reader Nintendo made for the Gameboy advance:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_e-Reader

      You could buy barcode cards to work with GBA connectivity to open things in Animal Crossing, among other things. It was about as successful as the Que Cat.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    6. Re:Brilliant!! by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      As I recall it was more than just that. In the Dallas Morning News, news articles had barcodes which you could scan and a window would pop up and load more relevant information from the Dallas Morning News website.

    7. Re:Brilliant!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A barcode scanner at every normal person's PC that "allows" them to view advertisements on products they've already purchased? Count me in!

      The original idea was to be able to scan barcodes from magazines to obtain information on products.

    8. Re:Brilliant!! by fprintf · · Score: 1

      No, but I have been toying with the idea of a UPC scanner that allows me to record nutrition facts for foods I eat during the day. So every time I bring out a twinkie, I scan the box, enter N twinkies, and it adds the fat, sodium etc. to my daily intake. For non-packaged foods, like salad or fruit or whatever, I'd have barcodes preprinted that I can just scan and indicate what serving size. This would make nutrition tracking much simpler than the FitDay and other web based tracking services.

      I the main problem is that UPC info does not carry nutritional information within it. So somewhere there needs to be a database of product identifiers and nutritional information.

      I think there are companies that do this with very expensive (~$180) handheld scanners, though I am not sure they incorporate the serving size for personal nutrition scanning.

      I have a CueCat (PS/2) version I picked up at Rat Shack and have never really used it. I picked it up because I knew someday I'd tinker a use for it.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    9. Re:Brilliant!! by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      It was about as successful as the Que Cat.

      You might be a bit confused as there was never any indication the e-Reader line lost money.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    10. Re:Brilliant!! by Zadaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you tried these? They stink out loud, and it's mostly because of the iPhone's camera, specifically the lack of a macro mode. I was completely unable to get a good reading from anything but a 2 ft wide QR code in bright light. And then it took forever to process it.

      My ancient (4 year old) Japanese phone recognized QR codes the size of a postage stamp in real time, even in low light. No need to take a photo, you activate the QR code reader, point your phone at it and the application will stop capturing when it finds good data.

      It's also important to note that it's not only used for URLs and marketing, but its an incredibly easy way to share contact info. Most Japanese mobiles recognize this kind of info and with a simple wave of your phone you can add someone's complete contact information to your phone. Just put it on the back of your business card.

    11. Re:Brilliant!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allows you to see advertisements on totally unrelated products half the time too. What a bonus.

    12. Re:Brilliant!! by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      It, too, like most Nintendo products, probably printed money.

    13. Re:Brilliant!! by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      It was about as successful as the Que Cat.

      You might be a bit confused as there was never any indication the e-Reader line lost money.

      It, too, like most Nintendo products, probably printed money.

      Or at least scans money....

    14. Re:Brilliant!! by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Radio Shack and IBM had cue codes in their catalogs. I have a USB cueCat with an IBM logo.

    15. Re:Brilliant!! by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      The difference here is its more convenient instead of less.

      Well, where's the fun in that? Silly Japanese.

    16. Re:Brilliant!! by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Hmm, actually, I just assumed it didn't make money because it disappeared from stores after a while. I'm actually happy if it made money, I thought it was a neat idea.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    17. Re:Brilliant!! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I thought it was against the law to print ephemeral data on paper. Was one of the primary positions of President Cyrus.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    18. Re:Brilliant!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also search the iTunes App Store for Barcode, NeoReader, and 2D Sense for at least three free QR readers, (note: One app, Neoreader I think, sends the result back to a central server before revealing it to you (despite decoding on the iPhone.) None are perfect as the iPhone isn't too good at macro focusing. For fun, I generated a few and was able to read them off the screen. But in the real world, YMMV. The only one I came across by chance (since they're not commonplace in the US) was about 1cm^2 in size and the iPhone was not able to get a good image to work with.

  6. Crap patent by russotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Clearly, this one got approved via the Patent Office's rule that "If you can't decipher the run-on sentence, approve the patent".

    Yeah, I know the patent rules pretty much require run on sentences, but Claim 1 here is ridiculous even given that.

    Best I can tell, Claim 1 covers doing a lookup of a code at a remote site and receiving something like a URL back, then following that URL. The code has to have been received before the user connected to the network.

    That is, if I set up a server which returns a redirect for "8972" of http://www.cat.example.com/ and "1513" to http://www.dog.example.com/ and I send you (via US mail) "8972", which you then enter at my site and get redirected to the cat site, the patented method has been used.

    1. Re:Crap patent by RayMarron · · Score: 2, Funny

      > That is, if I set up a server which returns a redirect for "8972" of
      > http://www.cat.example.com/ and "1513" to
      > http://www.dog.example.com/ and I send you
      > (via US mail) "8972", which you then enter at my site and get
      > redirected to the cat site, the patented method has been used.

      Are you saying that makeashorterlink.com and tinyurl.com (for example) are infringing on this patent? Holy vague claims, Batman!

      --
      ON DELETE CASCADE
    2. Re:Crap patent by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Seems to me your redirects are overly complicating things. The first 3 claims would appear to represent a URL. If I'm misreading then I'd still suggest that just having the domain servers translate the URL would be covered by the claim.

      And I think any software patent that can't be understood by a typical software developer (e.g. me) should be invalidated on the grounds that that's what patent law says!!!

    3. Re:Crap patent by timster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe their business plan is to sue tinyurl?

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    4. Re:Crap patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I know the patent rules pretty much require run on sentences, but Claim 1 here is ridiculous even given that.

      FYI - what we now call a run on sentence is a relatively recent concept.

      Go read anything that we would now call classical literature and you'll find sentences the length of paragraphs and paragraphs that go on for a page or two.

      The legal profession is one of the few places remaining where really long, yet grammatically accurate, sentences can still flourish.

    5. Re:Crap patent by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      MS Word's reading grade level calculator checks for run-ons and bumps the grade level up a bit everytime it finds one.

    6. Re:Crap patent by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You mean tinyurl.com?

    7. Re:Crap patent by russotto · · Score: 1

      Seems to me your redirects are overly complicating things. The first 3 claims would appear to represent a URL. If I'm misreading then I'd still suggest that just having the domain servers translate the URL would be covered by the claim.

      I hadn't thought of that, but I think you're right -- simply entering a URL into a browser, receiving a response from the domain name server, and browsing to that page as a result would appear to infringe claim 1. Even dumber than I thought.

  7. A day late and $40 Million Dollars Short by timpintsch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anyone know if I can still pick these up for free at Radio Shack? I remember having a stack of them but my Grandma threw them away because she thought they were pens that were defective. No, really, she did.

    1. Re:A day late and $40 Million Dollars Short by zidane2k1 · · Score: 1

      Probably not. The company that ran the advertising service (Digital Convergence) is long gone, iirc. (You could still find these on eBay, though.)

    2. Re:A day late and $40 Million Dollars Short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I still have a dozen cardboard boxes of them, including all PS/2 revisions and the short-lived USB versions, that I used to test my CueCat driver for Linux (here if you care about abandonware.)

    3. Re:A day late and $40 Million Dollars Short by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      I bought a USB one on ebay for just a couple of dollars. Works great, no special software needed. It pretends to be a USB keyboard.

    4. Re:A day late and $40 Million Dollars Short by doconnor · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing some recently at Active Surplus Electronics, the legendary Toronto electronics store.

    5. Re:A day late and $40 Million Dollars Short by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if I can still pick these up for free at Radio Shack?

      No, Radio Shack told all its stores to get rid of them years ago. Not just throw them away but literally destroy them, preferrably with a hammer. Seriously. My Google-Fu fails me but I'm certian I remember reading this info a few years back.

    6. Re:A day late and $40 Million Dollars Short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy modified ones at www.cuecats.com or E-bay. For free library software that works with these check www.getlibra.com or www.songstech.com. For free Point-of-Sale software (somewhat dated) check www.dhpos.com/pos.htm.

    7. Re:A day late and $40 Million Dollars Short by Merlin843 · · Score: 1

      They have not been available for over 12 years. I have been away from the shack for eight years. It was a couple of years before that when they were discontinued. I was able to get 7-8 of them which I still have.

  8. Preview! by Wescotte · · Score: 1

    Criminals will no longer break into a home and leave with nothing because there isn't anything worth stealing!

  9. I didn't get one by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 5, Funny

    The plastic bag that my copy of Wired came in had a big hole in it when it got to my house. The CueCat was either stolen or it fell out.

    /not really disappointed

    1. Re:I didn't get one by Stele · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps it became self-aware and clawed its way out. Did you ever think of that?

    2. Re:I didn't get one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny since my CueCat came in an entirely separate box.

    3. Re:I didn't get one by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Maybe what happened to me happened to a bunch of people, and that's why they started putting it in a separate box.

    4. Re:I didn't get one by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it became self-aware and clawed its way out. Did you ever think of that?

      at this level of (cough) evolution it could be :cuecat jesus in a few thousand years.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:I didn't get one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /not really disappointed

      You've just outed yourself as a Farker!

      / Slashy slashy

    6. Re:I didn't get one by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      The plastic bag that my copy of Wired came in had a big hole in it when it got to my house. The CueCat was either stolen or it fell out.

      Software wants to be free.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    7. Re:I didn't get one by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      So does hardware, apparently.

    8. Re:I didn't get one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd explain how I've got 4 but didn't get 'em from wired, or local stores or whatever -- enough other damn cats have already figured out that we're suckers for feline lost causes, so why not cue-cats, too?

      And all this time I just thought it was because my relatives all give me their computery discards.

  10. Still have mine.... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 3, Funny

    What do I do with the box of these that a frustrated Radio Shack manager gave me?

    I went in asking for one and he told me I can't have one unless I take his entire inventory of them. I ended up with dozens of them.

    On a side note, I then went to the bank and asked for a dollar, but they didn't give me a boxful of them... no fair...

    1. Re:Still have mine.... by UberMorlock · · Score: 1

      Actually, this sounds interesting to play around with, even though it wouldn't be remotely useful to me. I'll hop on over to my local Radio Shack this afternoon and see if they have any they'll give me.

    2. Re:Still have mine.... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Actually, this sounds interesting to play around with, even though it wouldn't be remotely useful to me. I'll hop on over to my local Radio Shack this afternoon and see if they have any they'll give me.

      I seriously doubt your local RatShack will have any left. They cleared them out like 7 or 8 years ago.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Still have mine.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I still had mine, I'm pretty sure I threw it out. I also got mine free from Radio Shack. I then went home and scanned a pack of Magic cards and told it to link to the Wizards of the Coast page. The next day they had a completely unrelated wizards site linked to the cards, probably for the Washington Wizards or something. Best product ever.

    4. Re:Still have mine.... by UberMorlock · · Score: 1

      Oh, well. I'll just have to keep an eye out on sites like Craigslist. Maybe I'll get lucky and be able to find one there.

    5. Re:Still have mine.... by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      Is it entirely too obvious that maybe you could sell them on ebay?

    6. Re:Still have mine.... by Klinky · · Score: 1

      ...or you could go to eBay if you really want one. There are plenty of homeless CueCats looking for owners...

    7. Re:Still have mine.... by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      I've seen them on sale from surplus sites like bgmicro and weirdstuff. I use mine to inventory my DVDs and Books(well, hoping to get started on the books real soon now.).

    8. Re:Still have mine.... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      What do I do with the box of these that a frustrated Radio Shack manager gave me?

      Whatever you do, don't open it! I opened mine and it was dead :/

    9. Re:Still have mine.... by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      Send me one?

    10. Re:Still have mine.... by JohnstonDJ · · Score: 1

      Librarything will sell you a USB cuecat for $15.

      You would be able to find one cheaper. However this is a guaranteed new one, and bets scouring the net for a cheaper one.

  11. Still have mine! by JungleBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Awesome! I still have a brand new unused CueCat in my desk drawer next to me right now! My ship has come in! ...I think. Wait, what's going on here?

    --
    "You never know when some crazed rodent with cold feet might be running loose in your pants."
    -Calvin
  12. Re:Maybe I should take advantage of the situation. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ummm....Most authors only get paid if their books actually sell...(Hence the reason JonKatz lives in abject poverty.)

  13. What now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've still got a few laying in my spare parts box, unhacked. Do I have to pay a patent fee to use them, now? ;^)

  14. i still have mine by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    it looks like a sex toy

    all its good for anymore

    i guess

    i said i guess!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i still have mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if your like the average slashdotter, you've never been able to use it. :D

    2. Re:i still have mine by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      And if your like the average slashdotter, you've never been able to use it. :D

      Sure he has. (I'll leave the rest to your imagination)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:i still have mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These things are great! I bought a couple on eBay a couple of years ago. Combined with http://www.upcdatabase.com/ they make for a fantastic way to catalogue DVDs, books, etc.

  15. Ah, CueCat... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who read the headline and then burst out laughing?

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    1. Re:Ah, CueCat... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      In related news, the inventor of the "rabbit ears" television antenna has finally been granted a patent.

  16. wrgawerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find my CueCat useful for LibraryTHing to where you just scan and go.

    Though the OLD system was actually a big huge bundle of adware, however considering that's gone down the tubes, it's now nothing more htat handy barcode scanner.

  17. An Idea with Potential by GospelHead821 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I understand why and how this idea failed, but I think that it had such a great deal of potential. Not for flashy things like electronics, but for mundane things like office supplies. Rather than digging around Corporate Express's web site or typing in a list of part numbers, how much easier would it be just to use the CueCat on a barcode printed in the catalog? I was kind of disappointed that the worthwhile, vaguely interesting applications for this technology never materialized.

    --
    Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
    Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    1. Re:An Idea with Potential by evilviper · · Score: 1

      how much easier would it be just to use the CueCat on a barcode printed in the catalog?

      Much more difficult actually...

      Opening the company website and typing in a short product code is pretty damn easy. And as an added bonus, it works on every computer out there... You don't need to carry around a big, bulky, barcode scanner, attach it to the computer you're using, install the software from CD, just to scan a bar code, and then remove it later.

      Even if you're only ever using it on a single computer, having a big bulky barcode scanner setting on your desk that you barely ever use isn't my idea of good product. Not to mention the added space taken up by a barcode on the page would probably be prohibitive, not to mention ugly, all to support very few die-hard regular shoppers.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:An Idea with Potential by bendodge · · Score: 1

      It failed because the producers bundled it with what their consumers considered to be a nuisance good - junk mail. Nobody I know of pores over advertisements often enough to want anything of the sort. Now, if they had just sold it as a cheap barcode scanner WITHOUT ENCRYPTION and provided some subscription service that housed a zillion barcodes from everything (Google?), then perhaps it would have fared better.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    3. Re:An Idea with Potential by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Opening the company website and typing in a short product code is pretty damn easy. And as an added bonus, it works on every computer out there... You don't need to carry around a big, bulky, barcode scanner, attach it to the computer you're using, install the software from CD, just to scan a bar code, and then remove it later.

      Well, I'm actually rather a fan of bar codes. Even if we geeks order OEM, odds are there's going to be a house barcode.

      I need a list of supplies. You can submit it either with the description, or product code. If it's a product code, barcodes reduce the need for manual entry and are less prone to error. It was a little different when the cuecats were out since 300dpi laserprinters were still the norm, and they are somewhat marginal when it comes to barcodes, but with now 1200dpi lasers are out, and inkjets at the very least do 600dpi for text, well, it's not too far fetched to implant barcodes in your purchase order.

      I'll agree it's somewhat moot since prior orders are often stored, and reordering is just a few clicks away.

      FYI, most barcode readers for PCs are just keyboard wedges. No special software or drivers needed. From time to time I pull out my old USB cuecat for projects.

      But I have to agree that the concept of barcode to url was actually rather spiffy. How often do you have to give someone a long cryptic url in hardcopy form, and have to transcribe 20 some odd characters. Tinyurl is handy, and by extension the cuecat url concept is also handy. Alternatively speaking, you can encode any text in, I believe it's called 3 of 9 barcode font. It doesn't offer checksums but it does offer encoding of text and symbols.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:An Idea with Potential by evilviper · · Score: 1

      barcodes reduce the need for manual entry and are less prone to error.

      Just barely... on both counts. And I've already listed the cons of barcodes which those benefits must balance against.

      FYI, most barcode readers for PCs are just keyboard wedges. No special software or drivers needed.

      I'm well aware. But you need some sort of software if you want it to automatically launch a web browser and visit a prescribed URL automatically when a barcode is scanned, as opposed to just dumping a number, or string of HEX in the window with focus.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  18. I was actually one of the first to hack it by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Geez I guess it has been that long. I was one of the first to figure out that it sent a coded mix of letters and numbers with the scanned barcode inside so that it could be hacked to function as a proper barcode scanner. I also was one of the first to get a certified cease and desist letter and a followup call by one of their attorneys.

    I still have a bunch of both the serial and USB versions wrapped and new... however now they would actually have proper legal grounds to prosecute so I won't be redistributing my code online again :)

    Never thought I'd see :CueCat come up again on the 'ole Internets.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      CueCat was developed pre-DMCA, and so was your code I would assume. You're not breaking their patent by replicating their method - and I assume you distributed code previously which did not result into a court-ordered injunction. No one brought full enforcement of their cease and desist and you never signed a settlement or agreement.

      In other words - you're totally clear.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    2. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by Warll · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the right of first sale cover this?

    3. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was certainly pre-DMCA... I still have the letter as a kind of geek badge of honor but I don't remember the exact reasoning or law they cited. I did run it past my families lawyer at the time and he said to take down my code and just call it a day. I was young and had no money so that was what I did.

      Basically it was about circumventing their software and making public the fact that each :CueCat had a trackable ID that was associated to you (Radioshack had to take your name, address, and phone# to get one for free) and it logged what products you scanned and I guess they planned on either selling that data or using it for marketing.

      I actually still have a pretty cool database app that catalogs CD's and interfaced with I think it was called freeDB for artist/track info. I was working on an ISBN version for my books but lost interest by then.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    4. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh, I actually found an article that explains it from 2000 and I even got a mention in it :)

      http://www.securityfocus.com/news/89

      I just found it now googling for what the legal basis was... I had never read it before... so I gotta thank you for making me curious!

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    5. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DMCA?

    6. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by Syberz · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I'm confused. I have one of those that I use to scan DVDs into my library so that I can print out a list of eveything I have and browse my collection.

      I bought the thing on ebay for 5$ not knowing what it was (I just wanted a cheap barcode scanner). Since the thing worked out of the bag, can I assume that mine was "declawed" beforehand?

      --
      ~Syberz
    7. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by Misch · · Score: 1

      There is a nice package out there called Readerware. It does lookups on major retailers on the web, and can scrape information out of their websites, or other sites on the net.

      Hasn't been updated in a while, but the scrapers still seem to work, and the barcode reader integration is really nice.

      (If you have a collection of DVDs, CDs and books and you want to file for insurance, being able to build a catalog like that is VERY nice.)

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    8. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'CueCat was developed pre-DMCA, and so was your code I would assume. '

      Yup but that only makes his pre-DMCA distribution of a circumvention device (his code) legal. They can't go back and prosecute him for what he did then.

      That doesn't mean they can't prosecute him if he distributes that same circumvention device now.

    9. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      The problem with your argument is that the output of a CueCat doesn't meet the legal standard for copyright.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    10. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      Well, if it makes you feel better... I accidentally (*whoops!*) dropped a plate of enchiladas in Jovan's lap once. Wow can he jump!

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    11. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'The problem with your argument is that the output of a CueCat doesn't meet the legal standard for copyright.'

      It is if the bar coded material the device is intended to read is copy protected. If his hack allows a user to copy the encoded material in a way the original encryption was intended to prevent then the DMCA would still apply.

      USING the hack would probably constitute fair use in most cases but distributing it would be a clear violation.

      P.S. IANAL but I play one on Slashdot.

    12. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CueCat was developed pre-DMCA, and so was your code I would assume. You're not breaking their patent by replicating their method - and I assume you distributed code previously which did not result into a court-ordered injunction. No one brought full enforcement of their cease and desist and you never signed a settlement or agreement.

      In other words - you're totally clear.

      Nope, CueCat was post DMCA; hence the obfuscation
      of the output - just like DVD w/CSS.

      No litigation was brought around after the letters however.

      Dave

    13. Re:I was actually one of the first to hack it by afidel · · Score: 1

      Huh, the thing being scanned is NOT a creative work, it is a fact and therefore deserves no protection under copyright law and hence not protected under the DMCA. I believe the guys behind the Cuecat tried to claim it was at one point and got shot down pretty quickly.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  19. JavaScript :CueCat Decoder by badc0ffee · · Score: 2, Informative

    Still available, a web page to decode the cat. http://www.logorrhea.com/cuecat/cuecat_decode.html

    --
    1011 1010 1101 1100 0000 1111 1111 1110 1110
  20. More useful than you might think... by HiVizDiver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A bit offtopic, but with the aforementioned "hack" to enable it as a more generic device, a friend of mine uses it to catalog his book, CD, and DVD collection. He has a whole spreadsheet for his books that tells him how many pages, how long it took to read, his overall "review" (couple of sentences) of the book, etc.

    A bit anal retentive? Yes, but I could see it being useful for making a record of just about any "collection" you had that already had barcodes on it.

    1. Re:More useful than you might think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Librarything.com sells them just for that purpose.

    2. Re:More useful than you might think... by HiVizDiver · · Score: 1

      LOL, Slashdotted!

    3. Re:More useful than you might think... by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      I used it together with a Python app that I wrote to do a book sale. Got it via eBay, very sweet.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    4. Re:More useful than you might think... by shsimko · · Score: 1

      Cataloging books is not anal retentive. *s* If you have a large collection (I have over 3000) a catalog is a necessity for insuring you don't buy a book twice and for insurance records. With the use of some inexpensive software and the cue cat, We got all my books cataloged in a day.

    5. Re:More useful than you might think... by HiVizDiver · · Score: 1

      I was referring more to the whole # of pages, time taken to read, review, etc., but I realize the way I wrote it doesn't necessarily clarify that. My friend has a similar situation, he's an avid reader, and it was the only way to get a handle on what he owned.

  21. I smell a lawsuit! by Teilo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm. This is the same thing the CompareEverywhere app for Android (G1) does.

    http://compare-everywhere.com/

    Is the patent broad enough to ace these guys out?

    --
    Mir tut es leid, Menschen daß Einfältigfehlersuchenbaumfolgendenaffen sind.
  22. Bringing Back Memories by Whafro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember being the first to publish the basic decoder for the CueCat... got a nice little writeup in Wired, which led to a nice little writeup from a Kenyon & Kenyon lawyer in the form of a C&D.

    Highlight of my sophomore year in HS: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7222&cid=835493

    Their patent claim is interesting -- launch a web browser when an item is scanned. Sounds like it shouldn't meet the non-trivial requirement to me, but I'm not in IP law anymore...

  23. Bad Summary by Zordak · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you look at the "Related Applications" section, I see something like a score of issued patents in this family, give or take a few. So this is not anything like the "real" :CueCat patent. This is a continuation-in-part, meaning they are adding new matter to the original application (some incremental improvement, usually). Apparently, these guys are intent on patenting every little incremental improvement they can think of for their famous failure. Why? Are they stacking their portfolio with an eye to future litigation? If true, that's the real story.

    --

    Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    1. Re:Bad Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly was the failure? It was a process, the device was a means to read which was required at the time, 10 years ago. This concept was way ahead of its time. Take a look at the applications around the space for Android, built into the E71, etc for decoding machine readable code.

      Dave

  24. Re:Fail2o!rs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your bot is fucked...fix it

  25. Re:Maybe I should take advantage of the situation. by netglen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh no! Are you saying that the book that I read "Writing Dummy Books for Dummies" was inaccurate on how much money I can make?

  26. Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    funny. I just found mine in an ancient box last night and drug it out to play with it. how timely.

  27. Does that mean... by Astadar · · Score: 1

    that no one else can _EVER_ make this thing again?

    *fingers crossed*

    Joking aside, I do see many practical applications for a device such as this, as long as the software that comes with it is better than the bloated, ad-ware infested stuff that came with the original.

    --Chris

    --
    --Coming up with something clever... please wait...
  28. I have a USB Cue Cat by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    It works great. The computer thinks it's a keyboard. When I swipe a barcode it types the digits and hits return at the end. Who needs software?

    1. Re:I have a USB Cue Cat by shaitand · · Score: 1

      That's because yours is already hacked. The originals used a simple encoding scheme to encrypt the output.

  29. Here's An Idea: Link Your Summery to Wikpedia! by gregbot9000 · · Score: 1

    That way People will know what obscure piece of tech trash you are rambling about.

    1. Re:Here's An Idea: Link Your Summery to Wikpedia! by 72beetle · · Score: 1

      Never heard of the cue cat? And you call yourself a geek?

      Hmph.

      --
      -Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music.
    2. Re:Here's An Idea: Link Your Summery to Wikpedia! by daeley · · Score: 1

      And you call yourself a geek?

      Never mind that, they're apparently unable to search Wikipedia without assistance!

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  30. Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new self-aware clawing CueCat overload.

  31. meow by EncryptedSoldier · · Score: 1

    the cuecat was awesome, I still have 2 of them, and I actually still use them. Such an awesome little gizmo! There are some cool programs out there that work with it too!

  32. Does it cover some technologies in use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a patent attorney, so understanding the legalese of these things isn't my strongest point - so I could be entirely mistaken. However, taking the abstract:

    "A method for interconnecting a user's location to a destination location on a network. The unique information is received at the user's location, which unique information has no associated routing information embedded therein. Network routing information is associated with the received unique information in response to receipt thereof. The user's location is then interconnected to the destination location across the network in accordance with the routing associated therewith in the step of associating. "

    Sounds very much like it would cover such things as the use of a mobile phone to read a barcode and compare prices online.. which I am sure I read about existing somewhere?

  33. Best review of a product ever.... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    "It fails to solve a problem that doesn't exist."

    I can't remember where I read that, but it sums up the entire thing perfectly...

  34. HOLY TOLEDO! by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    This is big.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  35. I got my cat! by argent · · Score: 1

    And I got one of the early ones that could be turned into regular scanners by cutting a trace.

  36. Finally decrypted mine by macraig · · Score: 3, Informative

    This news prompted me to drag out my two :Cats and decrypt the output on them, so I can finally use them as raw scanners. I dug out the copper trace to pin 10 of the Hyundai IC on both of them and, voila, it outputs raw numeric ASCII data whenever it spies a barcode. I've had archived details on how to do this for years, but never got a round tuit (those tuits are pretty scarce and hard to find in their own right). Turns out I Googled the part number on the PCBs and found several pages detailing the process for that specific PCB.

    1. Re:Finally decrypted mine by Misch · · Score: 1

      There's a bunch of round tuits out on the internets.

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    2. Re:Finally decrypted mine by macraig · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that I'll now have a beef with actually trying to use these things (aside from the obvious one with the serial number and phoning home... been there DONE with that):

      • the decrypted output simply ends with the final digit of the barcode.

      This will be less than ideal when trying to use it as a barcode input device into any sort of tabulation system (spreadsheet, database, etc.), since having it "terminate" the barcode sequence with a space, tab, carriage return, or other recognizable delimiter would greatly streamline the process. Perhaps there's a way of modding the critters to add that, too, but I'm not that devoted to my :Cats.

      This is a problem because, of course, the :Cats act as a phantom (inline) extension of the keyboard, and as such it's impossible (I think) to distinguish its output from that of the actual keyboard; if it were a separate device on a USB or other port, then there would be dedicated interfacing software that could be tweaked accordingly.

    3. Re:Finally decrypted mine by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually in that way the non-declawed ones are more useful because there are drivers that will decrypt their output and strip the serial sending the barcode data followed by a CR/LF (Windows, I assume the Linux drivers just send a CR).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Finally decrypted mine by macraig · · Score: 1

      Guess what? I musta been drunk with my modding success and not paying attention, because the decrypted ones do indeed add a carriage return! I'm totally psyched now. :-P

  37. BIOS settings needed? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember those, when they first came out, they seemed stupid. It solved a problem for an advertiser, but never solved anything for the end user. Doomed to failure.

    Plus, in the install instructions, it gave instructions on how to reset your BIOS settings if it wasn't recognized. You expect someone to reset BIOS settings to use something not really useful? Whatever.

    we used one at my last place, a 'declawed' one was a useful cheap barcode scanner for books.

  38. Re:Maybe I should take advantage of the situation. by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    You should have looked at the book next to it on the shelf, "Reading about Writing Dummy Books for Dummies". It explained in great detail that it's usually a bad idea.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  39. Sorry, But I Can't Un-Think This by ewhac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why do I get the feeling that the :CueCat could find new life as a support peripheral to some stupid new Facebook "application"? "Here are the barcodes from everything in my room! L0lz!!1!!"

    1. Re:Sorry, But I Can't Un-Think This by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      A fast way to Tweet "here's what I'm consuming right now".

      I can't help but feel that I just made the world a worse place.

  40. Classic Submarine Patent by laughingskeptic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It takes effort and attorney's fees to keep a patent idling for ten years. This is a classic tactic of ne'er do well patent attorneys used to keep 'before their time' ideas in the patent process until they can be used to make money. This has become a patent after 10 years for one of two reasons: 1) They think there is a big fish to extort/sue now 2) They are tired of paying attorneys

  41. I still use one by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    It's a great little barcode scanner for simple jobs. I keep track of books and DVDs with it. Where I work we have a rather sizeable library and we purchased a barcode scanner for the same purpose that cost upwards of $150 ... and it doesn't really work any better than the declawed cuecat.

  42. Just in time to rip off the Google G1 by PlugPlover · · Score: 1

    A hot feature of the G1 phone is the ability to take a picture of a UPC and go to web pages to find other places that item is on sale. This patent, for a handheld device that scans a bar code and then links to a website - just like the G1 phone - could result in huge moolah from Google.

  43. timeframe by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

    If the whole point of a patent is to give someone exclusive rights to their invention for a limited time, why do we have a system that takes 10 years just to get a patent at all?

    Are these excessive "patent pending" periods part of a ploy to lengthen the "limited time"?

  44. make hackers your target customers by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    I believe that the company would make some good money if they marketed the device to hackers and encouraged them to tinker and play with it by making it customisable and the software free.

  45. Useful for LibraryThing, actually by Selanit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can use a Cue Cat for zapping books into LibraryThing, the social book-cataloging site. It's a lot faster than adding everything manually, and it works even if encryption hasn't been disabled.

    I bought a USB model for a whopping 10 USD. Then I declawed it by severing the fifth leg from the left on the bottom of the microchip, using a pair of fingernail trimmers (full declawing instructions (pdf), scroll down to page 5). It works nicely in Windows and Linux, no drivers, and I can zap pretty much any barcode and get the actual text read out. It's surprising how often you can zap a barcode into Google and get highly relevant search results.

    So, basically, the company's business model may have been crap, but as a cheap barcode scanner their hardware ain't bad. Aside from the dumb encryption part, and the cat shape is silly.

  46. Are you ashamed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Few things are as pathetic as someone posting "Did I get first post?" when they did not, in fact, get first post.

  47. Hardware irrelevant, we do this in software now! by Eganicus · · Score: 1

    Delicious Library, Hold any CD, Book, VHS, DVD, UPC symbol in front of any webcam, built in, cell phone pic, and it organizes all your media. http://www.delicious-monster.com/ Written by a guy who never knew who he loaned stuff to. Gorgeous and lickable GUI. I think they patented the software... but a UPC?

  48. No hacks required by charlesnw · · Score: 1

    I'm very confused. I read several of the posts and they all mention having to declaw/hack the CueCat to make it work as a barcode scanner. Mine worked out of the box. I just plugged it in, grabbed the nearest barcode, scanned and got output to my terminal window. No hacking required, no drives. This was on Slackware Linux. I got mine from the local RadioShack. Am I missing something?

    --
    Charles Wyble System Engineer
    1. Re:No hacks required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Slackware driver included the decrypter.

  49. CueCat+ebay=pure profit by Palal · · Score: 1

    Aahh... this brings back great memories! Back in High School, a mate and I cleaned out a couple of local radio shacks, made minor hardware mods to the beasts, and sold them on eBay. This was a great entrepreneurial experience!

    --
    -Palal
  50. A CueCat Google 10 to the 100 submission by Lord+Satri · · Score: 1

    I submitted a project similar to, but much better of course ;-), than CueCat for Google's 10 to the 100 challenge...

  51. Still in use for librarything.com by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    The Cuecat is still tremendously useful for the folks at librarything. My wife has one and it has proven a real timesaver given we have about 2000 books or so on our shelves

    http://www.librarything.com/cuecat

    So perhaps in some instances it has a real and viable purpose?

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  52. Well, ummm, someone is probably STILL profiting... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    I'll never forget the day a few years back, when visiting a local Goodwill, and noticing that one of their "premium" items (the ones locked in a case, which folks with half an IQ point would recognize as being worth somewhere between dick and squat), was a Cuecat, for $2.75 no less. Even more ironic is that a few years earlier, they were being handed away for free at a Radio Shack.

    So keep an eye open, you might own a piece of nonhistory from a nonprofit (hah!) for a few bucks.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  53. Re:Maybe I should take advantage of the situation. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Really? I guess the movie had a different ending than the book.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  54. Actually, they have found a use. by dysmey · · Score: 1

    LibraryThing sells the :Cue:Cat for fifteen bucks to its users to make entering book info easier by scanning the barcode off the books. (Of course, for the really old stuff, you still need to type it all in.)

  55. Not a bad idea, but application? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    Digital Convergence didn't have a bad idea, but as seen with the various database software, they might have enjoyed better luck focusing on the a nitch first.

    Take their model.

    Q: What do I use this thing for
    A: To scan your soup cans
    Q: Why the fuck would I want to do that?
    A: To visit the website and so we can collect demographic information
    Q: Why don't you fuck off?

    Good idea as barcodes are everywhere, certainly handy, but for your average consumer, they didn't do this in the first place. They want to know more about their soup, they can type in the company name in google, no big deal.

    But you start talking to people about indexing their book, CD, or video collection, well, there you go! Consumer gets their DB, DC gets their marketing information. Then perhaps as a side one could index barcodes with company names.

    They also had a semi-decent idea promoting urls within broadcasts. The states doesn't use teletext, and that would be rather handy. But this was like the late 1990s. You sort of needed to have a TV with audio out, or a tuner/vcr with a free audio out. And who would want to make run from their VCR to their PC just to collect URLs?

    But as far as I can tell, Digital Convergence was just a company out to get venture capital and go bankrupt ASAP.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  56. They can be used for all sorts of things by brian2hand · · Score: 1

    No need to hard hack them, just do a search for, and download catnip, it decrypts the output and they can be used to read all sorts of barcodes. I got three of them a few years ago and they are great for inventory, etc. as well as cataloging items at home such as dvd's, cd's even tools and stationery if you print barcodes on them.

  57. I had one by Matt+Apple · · Score: 1

    I had one of these. Got it free from Radio Shack like everybody else. You took it home, plugged it in, installed the software and then you could scan a can of peas for instance and it would take you to delmonte.com ... And then you started to think why do I need this? The encryption on it was really lame. You could get around it with a soldering iron or a few lines of code(freely available on the web). They came in two flavors, PS2 and USB. They made great little barcode scanners for home cooked inventory systems.

  58. Could be Androids fault by gearloos · · Score: 1

    Is this because the EXACT finctionality of the cue cat is duplicated in the new G1 phone with varied programs like Shop savy? They scan a barcode then go online and give you the best prices from several big retailers.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  59. Selling Crystals as of 2003, under a new name by mikesum · · Score: 1
  60. Is he going to sue Android G1? by ashraya · · Score: 1

    Cuecat was a device that could scan a bar code and send you to a related website. Ditto Android G1. If someone has a patent on it, will they sue Google? Interesting thought

    Ashraya

  61. Re:"What I'm Consuming Right Now ..." by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
    Already been done.

    LibraryThing lets you auto-catalogue your book collection by typing in ISBN numbers or using a CueCat to scan the books, and there are a bunch of other sites that let you do similar things with CDs, DVDs or anything else that has a barcode.

  62. Broken Concept by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    Actually, this patent kinda sucks, because mobile hardware and software is getting flexible and robust enough to actually make CueCatish behavior useful.

    No, I don't mean "Oooh, an ad for Coke! I wanna go to their website now!"

    I mean "Shit, is this the right kind of semisweet dutch processed chocolate for that cake my wife is making? I'll IM the UPC to her and see... "

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love