Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Discontinues Windows 3.x

rugatero writes "The BBC reports that, as of last Saturday, Microsoft is no longer issuing licenses for the 18-year-old Windows 3.x. Many here may well be surprised to learn that anyone still has use for the antiquated software, but it seems to have found a home in a number of embedded systems — including cash registers and the in-flight entertainment systems on some long-haul passenger jets (Virgin and Qantas are cited). Considering Linux's credentials as an embedded OS, this news could very well indicate the possibility of more migrations in the pipeline."

89 of 384 comments (clear)

  1. How dare they! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows 3.x is a lean, stable, functional, and secure OS! How could they do such a thing?

    1. Re:How dare they! by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Surprised? Surprised to learn that Win3.1 is still in use? I think the descriptor they're after is totally fucking gobsmacked so hard my gob flew across the room and bit me in the ass when I passed out and fell on it.

      --
      I hate printers.
    2. Re:How dare they! by Dwedit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now that's a ROFL.

      "WARNING - The system is either busy or has become unstable."
      An error has occurred in this application. Close / Ignore

      Windows 3.1 was full of random errors and crashes.

    3. Re:How dare they! by phyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder if Qantas is using 3.1 for its navigation system as well? It would go a long way to explaining their recent issues...

      --
      Don't point that gun at him, he's an unpaid intern!
    4. Re:How dare they! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Surprised to learn that Win3.1 is still in use?

      I've got an old Compaq Portable II, which has Windows 3.0 installed on it. It's got an 8MHz 286 CPU, and a whopping 1.5M of RAM.

      Now, surprisingly enough, it doesn't feel slow. Complex windows take a noticeable amount of time to draw, but it does have unaccelerated graphics (I don't mean 3D, I mean even graphics primitives in hardware - it's just an EGA card, which is a plain vanilla framebuffer). I can only imagine how responsive it would be on a more modern CPU...

    5. Re:How dare they! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I guess it would be like one of my first game I made in assembly (on a C64). It was a "snake" kind of game and as soon as I typed run the game was displaying the "game over" screen. The reason is the game was so fast I didn't even had time to see both "snakes" going straight into the wall.

      So I guess on a modern hardware, Win3.1 will be so fast the only thing you will see is a blue screen of death.

    6. Re:How dare they! by Tontoman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I came back from Australia two weeks ago, and Qantas entertainment system spent about half the time broken down. They even apologized for it in their announcement. Now I know why!

    7. Re:How dare they! by theaveng · · Score: 2, Informative

      It might work, but I doubt you could play movies on it. That's one of the problems I have with my Windows 98 laptop. Technically it can play amy movie I throw at it, but only the MPEG and Quicktime movies play at proper speed. The rest are like watching in slow motion (10 frames per second).

      >>>Windows 3.x is a lean, stable, functional, and secure OS!

      NONE of the DOS-based Windows (1,2,3,95,98/me) were stable. They were kludges sitting on top of an ancient DOS, trying to be a Mac-like environment.

      The only truly stable Windows were the NT-based ones (including XP) which were built from the ground up.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    8. Re:How dare they! by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, they're perfectly fine when single-tasking, and being used as a GUI framework for a kiosk app. And, because they take so little resources...

    9. Re:How dare they! by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The system is either busy or has become unstable" is a Win9x error, no?

      Windows 3.1's error of choice was the General Protection Fault... but it was better than the Unrecoverable Application Error of Windows 3.0...

      But, the bigger problem in Win3.x is running out of "resources," especially in Windows 3.0... while newer versions of Windows were still susceptible (I've actually successfully run a Win2k machine out of resources - it took a very, very buggy beta version of Opera that had serious resource leaks, and 16384 GDI handles to be used up (contrary to popular belief, there AREN'T unlimited GDI handles left over, as opposed to 200 for 3.x, but I did it,) 3.x's multitasking capability was hindered not by the poor cooperative multitasking model, but by the limited resources.

  2. That explains it by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Funny

    in-flight entertainment systems on some long-haul passenger jets

    Ahh, so that's what they ment by "Every seat is a window seat".

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:That explains it by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's not the sky, that's a BSOD.

    2. Re:That explains it by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm trying to find something funny to say about crashing, Windows and Qantas' recent in-flight incidents. I'm sure there's a joke in there somewhere...

      --
      I hate printers.
    3. Re:That explains it by jsse · · Score: 5, Funny

      That reminds me of a scary journey with Taiwan airline.

      My flight didn't offer on-seat TV, but overhead TV only displayed information such as course and weather. Sometime the information pages would switch to camera view displaying what looked like real-time images from a camera shooting below the airplane.

      It was good to look at, until it suddenly crashed, accompanyed by a loud sound that was probably caused by normal turbulence. Some passengers didn't know what was going on and started to scream uncontrollably.

      I recognized they familiar screen, and attempted to conform the coward by saying that "Don't worry, it's just WINDOWS crashing."

      More panic broke out, and the cockpit was in total chaos.

      BTW, talking about the scary part, I almost got arrested for causing terror in the air. Had I not repeated what it looks like a WINDOWS crashing in my laptop I'd still be in Taiwan prison.

  3. Re:Slashdot, where's the Obama story? by derfy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, it's news that matters, right now, so....

    Two weeks.

  4. China Airlines uses Linux on their in-flight by vovin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just in case you were interested China Airlines uses Linux on their in-flight.
    I flew another airline that also used Linux but I don't recall which one. It's not very often you get to see the boot up but in one case they rebooted the system after they landed and in the other my partners crashed when we were trying to change the default language.

    1. Re:China Airlines uses Linux on their in-flight by jrumney · · Score: 2, Informative

      I flew Cathay Pacific recently, and they were using Linux for their in-flight entertainment too (my screen was stuck in standby at the start of the flight, so I got to see it reboot).

    2. Re:China Airlines uses Linux on their in-flight by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think more use Linux then use Windows. Every airline that I have flew on internationally that had an in flight entertainment system(Delta and Continental for sure, probably others) used the same in flight entertainment system that was linux based. I got to see the penguin a lot when my system repeatedly rebooted on a flight from Atlanta to Munich..... Now that the companies saved money by going Linux, maybe they can invest it in some touch screens that can actually take abuse.

    3. Re:China Airlines uses Linux on their in-flight by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not very often you get to see the boot up but in one case they rebooted the system after they landed and in the other my partners crashed when we were trying to change the default language.

      Oh my God, that's terrible! My condolences for your loss, and I will never use Linux again.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:China Airlines uses Linux on their in-flight by 2Bits · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just about every in-flight or on-board system in China used Linux by now. Those in the subway (Shanghai), on the bus, on the train, etc. Sometimes, you are on a bus, the bus runs over a hole or a bump, it shakes too much, the system flickers, and then you see a Linux boot up screen. Boot up time is pretty short, from black screen to fully animated screen with sound in less than 15 seconds.

    5. Re:China Airlines uses Linux on their in-flight by mpe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I flew Cathay Pacific recently, and they were using Linux for their in-flight entertainment too (my screen was stuck in standby at the start of the flight, so I got to see it reboot).

      Probably because it's powered from the cabin bus, which is the dirtiest and least reliable power supply on the aircraft. It will also glitch by design when switched between external and internal power.

  5. Performance boost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Upgrading from Windows 3.x to Vista Ultimate should provide a significant performance boost for any application.

  6. Oh yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are all nice to you when you retire. "Have fun on the beach," they say. Then one day, when you are relaxing in your hammock enjoying your time off maybe sipping a gin and tonic, the phone rings. "It's Linus and the Mac fag," they say, "They're back." "No way, I'm out of the game," you say. Then Windows ME bangs on your door, his back riddled with bullet holes, you know now and then that the computing world needs you. Up in the attic, you grab a handful of floppies and your trusty 2400 baud modem. "Fuck it," you mutter.

  7. I still have it. by arrenlex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Somewhere in our basement there is still an old machine which dual-boots windows 3.1 and windows 95A.

    It probably doesn't boot anymore, as it was having motherboard problems late in life, but a year or so ago I converted it to a virtual machine image under qemu. I can, within 5 minutes, boot a virtual machine into a legal copy of windows 3.1 that runs and contains useful applications that we don't have equivalents for.

    It's amazing that all this software still exists and is used by people, even after 18 years. Old tech is not as dead as you might think.

    1. Re:I still have it. by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On a funny level, I'm curious what you think is a useful application on windows 3.1 that we magically somehow don't have an equivalent of. What do you have in mind?

    2. Re:I still have it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      we have lumber cut optimizer which is not available for new platforms. it optimizes the number of boards the lumber cutting saw can slice for a given varying shape of wooden log.

    3. Re:I still have it. by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On a funny level, I'm curious what you think is a useful application on windows 3.1 that we magically somehow don't have an equivalent of. What do you have in mind?

      One word (well, two words really, but only one when smashed together like marketing people like to do): SkiFree.

      Sure you can get a 32-bit version that runs under XP and even Vista, but come on! That's nothing like playing it the way it was meant to be played - 16 bits, 100% CPU usage, and Windows 3.1. Everything else is just a poor copy.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    4. Re:I still have it. by Slisochies · · Score: 2, Informative
    5. Re:I still have it. by RichiH · · Score: 2, Informative

      > I'm curious what you think is a useful application on windows 3.1 that we magically somehow don't have an equivalent of. What do you have in mind?

      Although that is more a DOS than a Win domain, there are many old controller cards for machines, radio equipment, measurement solutions etc. Those things were custom-built. A few dozen to a few hundred might exist world-wide. The software is often even more restricted than simply 'I need OS foo'. You might need a certain serial port chip or whatever. Replacing those systems would often incur costs of six figures or more.

      A friend of mine works at Rhode & Schwartz where they have to support a lot of legacy systems. They keep old hard- & software around because _really_ large customers require it. One guy still uses DOS 6.1 for his daily work (development & maintenance) and he is _important_.

      Just think about all the 'OMG, we need Cobol people' stories recently.

    6. Re:I still have it. by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      PCI slots? Don't you mean ISA?

      On the other hand, you spent $200,000 on a piece of proprietary equipment that depends on a single piece of proprietary software? Being forced to keep win3.1 (you'l never be able to get a new copy legitimately) and a stockpile of antiquated hardware to run it on is the price you pay... Perhaps you should press for open specs and open code next time you buy a $200,000 piece of hardware, if your spending that much the company should bend over backwards to provide what you need...
      Or was it just a lack of forward thinking? Never thought about long term support for the equipment you bought?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  8. Incredible by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, I'm genuinely surprised at this. Considering how unstable 3X was, I'm shocked that anyone is using it for anything. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see DOS used in embedded systems, but 3X? Lots of people should have been fired a long time ago for going there in the first place.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Incredible by NJRoadfan · · Score: 2, Informative

      OS/2 1.3 lived on for many years in ATM machines. Unlike Windows 3.1x, it was considered the most rock solid 16 bit OS out there. What did a majority of the machines get replaced with?... oh Windows.

    2. Re:Incredible by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Informative

      Considering how unstable 3X was, I'm shocked that anyone is using it for anything.

      Unstable? Maybe to your average Joe Luser who, ignorant of computers, let programs install all kinds of crap in CONFIG.SYS, AUTOEXEC.BAT and WIN.INI... Or didn't know how to properly set paths, or any one of dozens of other ways to tune his machine. But to those who did know how to tune, and how to clean up after crappy installs, Win 3.X was very stable.
       
      I think Windows 3.X got a bad rep because, unlike vanilla DOS systems, you actually had to know what you were doing to set everything up properly. Few people bothered.

    3. Re:Incredible by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It also taught me a lot: getting stuff working in the first 640K, installing hardware pre plug-and-play (IRQ and DMA settings), etc. Just like CP/M before it, Win3.11 was partly responsible for me becoming a geek.

  9. Re:Slashdot, where's the Obama story? by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, and all nerds by now know that when it comes to governmental issues, the president no longer matters. A new CEO for General Electric however...

    --
    I hate printers.
  10. Damn it! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was finally getting my config.sys and autoexec.bat files optimized. I suppose I could try putting Vista on my 33 MHz 486 (don't worry, it's a DX) ...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Damn it! by misleb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude! I finally broke the 640k conventional memory barrier with QEMM386. You should try it!

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    2. Re:Damn it! by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suppose I could try putting Vista on my 33 MHz 486

      Yep, just be sure that the turbo button is pressed on if you want to be able to move the mouse around.

  11. Ahh, 3.11 -- best Windows ever? by mattytee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Windows for Workgroups 3.11 gets my vote as the best OS Microsoft ever released, warts and all.

    Reliability, ease of configuration, scriptable network installation (remember how you could just toss all the install files in a directory?), and I miss those good old PIFs.

    Unlikely though it sounds, I ran a physical window manufacturing plant on Windows 3.11 with some DOS machines too -- all on 10base2 ethernet at 2Mbps. Bus topology and thin coax -- I still have nightmares where a NIC dies somewhere between the data entry machines and the Paradox (for DOS) server.

    The glass cutting optimizer was maybe the highest-uptime box I've ever seen, and it lived in a terrible environment of dust and glass shards and extreme heat and cold. Windows 3.11, we hardly knew ye!

    1. Re:Ahh, 3.11 -- best Windows ever? by mattytee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wasn't the coax itself limiting speed, it was the NICs. NC2000s only supported 2Mbps.

  12. ATM machines by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OS/2 1.3 lived on for many years in ATM machines. Unlike Windows 3.1x, it was considered the most rock solid 16 bit OS out there. What did a majority of the machines get replaced with?... oh Windows.

    And as I've said in earlier stories, that's a bummer.

    Here in California we still have two types of Bank of America ATM machines. The older models, with the amber monochrome screens, I am told still run OS/2. The newer ones, with the color LCD screens, run Windows, and they are MUCH slower than the old ones and their interface is much less streamlined and intuitive.

    Now I ask you: It's an ATM machine. What was gained by the transition? The new ones allow you to do some fancy things -- such as setting preferences, so you can hit a "Quick Cash" button and get a predetermined amount with one keypress -- but most folks are just trying to get money out of the things and never spend the time to configure their own preferences. Really the only benefit of the new machines was the ability to show color ads during the transaction, but otherwise the OS/2 software was perfectly capable of handling the required operation (and even more so).

    Sometimes I wish more applications developers had experience with the embedded systems world. Know what I mean?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:ATM machines by cgenman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They also use the windows default sounds... Incorrectly! The ATM's use the "Error Beep" to confirm proper operation. After years of conditioning, it drives me nuts.

      At least do a little legwork.

    2. Re:ATM machines by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Now I ask you: It's an ATM machine. What was gained by the transition?

      If they are like the color BofA ATMs I've seen in Northern California, they play full motion video ads, which are maybe not what customers want, but presumably very significant to banks.

    3. Re:ATM machines by phantomcircuit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ever notice that the part that is slower involves you looking at an advertisement?

      Me thinks that is not a coincidence.

  13. In other news... by FlyByPC · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Ford announces they are discontinuing production of Model-A parts. Wright Aircraft and Bicycle Company is also rumored to be considering scaling back licensing of its iconic Wright Flyer, citing loss of market share to "those new-fangled planes with landing gear and ailerons."

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  14. Ah, the memories... by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Funny

    I still remember the first time I used a PC running Windows 3.11... I was in my early teens. I recall it was during a party at my uncle's place. I played with it just a bit, but it was enough to make a very strong impression on me. The interface, the usability, those things led me to make me a very important choice. That day I swore to myself: when time comes to get my own computer... it must be a Macintosh.

  15. Entertainment? Win3.1? by StreetStealth · · Score: 4, Funny

    How would an in-flight entertainment system even run on Windows 3.1? What kind of entertainment would you be viewing?

    Playing Cinepak-compressed video at 15 frames per second in 8 bit color? Maybe playing Minesweeper?

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
    1. Re:Entertainment? Win3.1? by rhyder128k · · Score: 4, Funny

      I used to have to masturbate to material of that quality, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    2. Re:Entertainment? Win3.1? by residieu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Minesweeper's overrated, Skifree was the real thing.

  16. Re:Slashdot, where's the Obama story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And nerds everywhere rejoiced. Finally people on /. are getting laid.

  17. And that's the crux of the matter, specific use by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WfWG 3.11 with specific, well-engineered apps? Great.

    Any MS OS with bloaty, ill-conceived apps from a multitude of vendors, many of which don't play nicely with each other? (I'm looking at you, Netscape and Hewlett-Packard!). Not so much.

    I've little doubt that even though there will be no new licences issued by MS, there will continue to be pockets of it in production systems for another decade or two.

  18. Re:Deep in the bowels of MSland.... by EnglishSteve · · Score: 3, Funny

    "We had a good run team." One of them says as they walk off into the sunset.

    I totally read that as "walk off into the usenet". Heh.

  19. Re:Slashdot, where's the Obama story? by philspear · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait... what obama story? Did something happen?

  20. Re:Foolish Linux idealogues by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Either spend a whole lot of time and money getting it ported over to an operating system that doesn't cost any money to license, or spend a whole lot of time and money getting it ported over to an operating system that doesn't scale with your existing hardware base, costs money, and can be end-of-lifed like the operating system it is replacing. In that view, Linux looks pretty good.

    I think the part that you're missing is that windows 3.x is no longer aquirable for these applications, and as such new hardware will need to be re-engineered for a newer operating system. In this case, a free and unencumbered OS might be the right way to go... either Linux, BSD, or FreeDOS.

  21. Just watched Windows 3.1 start by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2

    I just watched Windows 3.1 start up a couple of weeks ago. The town where I live had an e-cycling day where you could recycle a variety of electronics for either free or only a nominal fee. So, I fired up my old 80386/25 DX (with an installed 80387 co-processor) just long enough to do a "format /u c:" and then dropped it off for recycling along with a bunch of other old computer junk I had accumulated over the years (full length, 8bit monochrome video cards, lots of various ISA cards, a few 10-base T NICs along with some co-ax cable and such).

    I still have a "true blue" IBM PC/AT (6MHz 80286) with a full height 30 MB hard drive and dual 5.25 inch floppies that I decided to hang onto just in case it actually becomes a collector's item. And, in the same vein, a still shrink wrapped copy of Windows/386 (5.25 inch floppies for installation media).

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  22. Re:Slashdot, where's the Obama story? by overcaffein8d · · Score: 2, Funny

    yeah, i hear he's just really a figurehead

    --
    Those of us who think they know everything annoy those of us who do.
  23. Hmm, coincidence? by BlindSpot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The place I just started working at decomissioned their old point-of-sale software only a couple months ago. They still have to use it for reporting and I was asked to troubleshoot their printer the other day, so I had them start up the software and print something, and there was the unmistakable look-and-feel of a Win3.1 app. <shudder> Well now I know why they had to decommision it! (It was running under Win95 though.)

  24. Re:Darn by kv9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The bootup was significantly faster than my vista today (am downgrading to XP today;

    you misspelled upgrading.

  25. Re:why does it automaticly mean linux? by cheater512 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can you imagine Vista, running on the back of every seat in a A380?

    Super computers are heavy you know, and have you seen Vista's power usage?
    The jet needs the engines for flight you know.

  26. win 3x on Stress test machine in wafer fab by danwat1234 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to work at ON Semiconductor in Gresham OR, and they have win3x on a wafer stress testing machine as of 2008. Its an old machine, but still perfectly good because as the feature sizes get smaller with Photolithography, stress testing is the same (as far as testing the flatness of the surface). So yeah, there are still uses for that OS I suppose.

  27. Re:Slashdot, where's the Obama story? by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, they finally caught him.

    --
    What?
  28. Re:Darn by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Informative

    You still need a copy, which is sort of the problem, but DOSbox supports Win3.1

  29. Free the code! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They could release the code, but I guess they can't give the core of Vista away...

  30. In modern machines... by master_p · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...Windows 3.1 installs so fast, that I can hardly see anything other than the reboot option, after installation.

    And the GUI is so fast, and so snappy, sometimes I have to do things twice just to check if the action has been done.

    Of course, the GUI system in Windows 3.1 was only one layer (Win32 drawing directly to the frame buffer), while todays systems are 7 or 10 layers before a pixel is actually drawn on the screen.

  31. Re:America discontinues Republicanism 1.0 by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bush 6.5??? He had to have been an early alpha or there are some serious flaws in the system genera... oh nvm

  32. Sad... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can still run Windows 3.11 on DosBOX (complete with a working Microsoft BOB install! Really!). What am I going to do now? :-(

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  33. Re:Those kids these days! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...then what's that?

  34. Election have ended by DrYak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot, where's the Obama story?

    No sorry. The election is over. /. will now resume its usual regimen of trolls about petrified naked Natalie Portman and welcomes given to our latest overlords-du-jour.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  35. XP by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wait, I thought Microsoft had been trying for the past year to bury Windows XP - and now we find out they were still selling 3.x all along?

    Does this make sense to anyone?

  36. Re:Those kids these days! by marcosdumay · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And the three-finger salute realy restarted the machine by that time. No soft restart (learn that Linux!), no set of options (learn that XP!), and was never ignored (learn that crashing Vista!), just a restart, managed by the BIOS, the way IBM meant it to be!

    Now, all you kids get out of my lawn!

  37. Why discontinue a software product? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems to me that it's somewhat silly to actually "discontinue" a software product. After all, it's software. It's not a physical product. It's something you can download, and it seems somewhat nutty to not accept coin for it if asked.

    There are exceptions when you don't want a prior product like XP to compete with a current product, say vista, but win3.1 is some of those cases where there is really no threat of it competing with a current generation product.

    I'm not saying that microsoft shouldn't abandon support for win3.1. Far from it, only it seems to make little sense since win3.1 was used on a number of systems, and if you lose your drive and for some reason simply have to have that legacy system operational, there is some wisdom is keeping the product available for purchase. Otherwise you run into some questionable situations where you "need" win3.1 but can't buy it.

    IBM for example at one point offered PC DOS 5.0 as a free download. It was a commercial product but by 1998-1999 it had NO commercial value. According to wiki you can get PC-DOS 2000 (Chinese Edition) for free. They seem to understand the value of this being a vital port of legacy systems, and make it available. Microsoft offers a ton of files from their dos distribution available.

    That's my only bitch, if you need it, the only solution is hunting around for it, or pirating it.

    ftp://ftp.boulder.ibm.com/software/dos/

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  38. Me too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The sad part is that now only get turned on by pixelated women.

    1. Re:Me too! by ciderVisor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pixilated women: helping ugly guys get laid since 1927.

      --
      Squirrel!
    2. Re:Me too! by ciderVisor · · Score: 2, Informative

      'Redundant' ? 'Pixilated' has a different meaning to 'pixelated'.

      --
      Squirrel!
    3. Re:Me too! by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Funny

      helping ugly guys imagine they're getting laid...

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    4. Re:Me too! by ciderVisor · · Score: 2, Informative

      *sigh*

      'Pixilated' != 'Pixelated'

      Maybe next time, I'll hold up a sign saying "Did you see what I did there ?".

      --
      Squirrel!
    5. Re:Me too! by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, pixilated. Nothing like wimmin' hopped up on flavored sugar and booze. Damn, but I love Halloween!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  39. Re:Those kids these days! by syousef · · Score: 2, Informative

    Win3.1 did not have BSOD!

    Informative????? Try incorrect!!!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEsK7TZhomE

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  40. Re:Slashdot, where's the Obama story? by johannesg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait... what obama story? Did something happen?

    Yeah, it was quite unexpected: after his highly successful second term, during which he finally managed to get rid of the national debt and negotiated some pretty decent peace terms with Australia, everybody thought he would take the position of ambassador to the Chino-Russian Mars colony. Instead he is opening a chocolate shop in Belgium, together with his wife.

    Gee, were you in a coma the last 8 years?

  41. Re:Slashdot, where's the Obama story? by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if we tell everybody that Obama use *nix, McCain is a kernel hacker and Sara Palin is CowboyNeal real mom? W00T!

    --
    Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
  42. False glitches by CustomDesigned · · Score: 4, Funny

    I flew across the US with my daughter, and I immediately turned off the in flight "entertainment" system on our seats. Well, I turned the brightness and volume all the way down - you couldn't actually turn the dang things off. The attendants kept walking by, seeing our screens dark, and without talking to me, rushing to the front of the cabin to announce, "Please be patient, we need to reboot the in-flight movie system." This happened about 6 times before they finally figured out that I was turning them off on purpose.

  43. Re:America discontinues Republicanism 1.0 by sorak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I prefer Bush Vista

  44. Adult by Mathness · · Score: 2, Funny

    The BBC reports that, as of last Saturday, Microsoft is no longer issuing licenses for the 18-year-old Windows 3.x

    They don't have to anymore, Windows 3.x is now an adult and Microsoft is not required to pay child support any longer.

    Some may say it is harsh to just kick it out on the street, to fend for itself. But it will be interesting to see how well Windows 3.x does on its own, will it be flipping burgers or will it be working in IT?

    Personally I hope it isn't jelous of its younger siblings who gets all the attention, otherwise we could end up with a messy OS gone postal.

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  45. Re:Slashdot, where's the Obama story? by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Instead he is opening a chocolate shop in Belgium, together with his wife.

    Watch your language!

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  46. Re:Which windows are we talking about again? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2, Informative

    NONE of the DOS-based Windows (1,2,3,95,98/me) were stable. They were kludges sitting on top of an ancient DOS, trying to be a Mac-like environment.

    Wait, are you talking about MS Windows or X Windows?

    Yes.

  47. Re:Slashdot, where's the Obama story? by johannesg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Instead he is opening a chocolate shop in Belgium, together with his wife.

    Watch your language!

    Oh yeah? Well, Belgium you too! ;-)

  48. my flight was running linux by oudzeeman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was on a flight recently and there was trouble with the in flight entertainment. They tried rebooting it twice, and we all got to watch our seatback screens booting linux complete with a penguin in the upper left of the screen during the boot.

  49. what about another 10 years of XP? by jriding · · Score: 2

    so it takes 18 years to stop selling Windows 3.X but only 8 years to stop selling XP???? what gives?

    --
    love the taste, hate the texture
  50. It lives on! by dakameleon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even in Vista, the spirit of Win3.1 still lives on in the Add Font dialog box!

    (Anyone know if they've updated that yet in Windows 7?)

    --
    Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.