Slashdot Mirror


Nationwide Domain Name/Yard Sign Conspiracy

robertjmoore writes "Everywhere I go lately, I see these lawn signs that say "Single?" and then give a URL with my town's name in it. Being a huge business intelligence geek with too much time on my hands, I decided to track down who was behind them and wound up uncovering ten thousand domain names, a massively coordinated and well-funded guerilla marketing machine, and the $45 Million revenue business hiding behind it all. Hot off the presses, these are my findings."

324 comments

  1. signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Those are all over SE PA. West Chester in particular.

    1. Re:signs by SputnikPanic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ditto for the suburbs of DC. It's like road spam.

    2. Re:signs by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      We should start a counter-campaign:

      Married?
      LincolnSwingers.com

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:signs by billcopc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Naw, because some asshat lawyer will steal the idea:

      "Married ?
      LincolnDivorce.com"

      And then we'll have to kill them.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    4. Re:signs by easyTree · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uhh, so it's all good, right?

    5. Re:signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple:

      "Dead ?
      LincolnMortuary.com"

    6. Re:signs by smilindog2000 · · Score: 1

      In Cincinati, I saw many yard signs advertising this adultery web site. Gotta hate yard spam.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    7. Re:signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, because some asshat lawyer will steal the idea:

      "Married ?
      LincolnDivorce.com"

      And then we'll have to kill them.

      You say that like it's a bad thing?

    8. Re:signs by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I've seen them all over in Nevada, Utah, and California. I checked out a couple a long time ago and decided it was some sort of affiliate spammer thing. That's about as far as my interest level went.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  2. Who you gonna call? by 1_brown_mouse · · Score: 1

    Oliver Stone?
    Amazing Randi?
    Da Po Lice?
    Agents Scully and Mulder? /Not single but still desperate for attention

    1. Re:Who you gonna call? by Enry · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ghostbusters.

      Duh.

  3. peh. by apodyopsis · · Score: 4, Funny

    yes, yes, yes, I'm sure you uncovered a conspiracy of epic proportions behind the dating sites, but this is /. and only one thing matters....


    did you get a date?


    why yes, I am new round here.. how did you know?

    1. Re:peh. by TheMCP · · Score: 1

      Well, I for one checked out one of those web sites and found that they discriminate against single gay people. I thought about reporting them to the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, but I haven't had the time to go file the complaint, and I figure if they don't think my money is as green as everyone else's, I'll take it to someone who does.

    2. Re:peh. by corychristison · · Score: 1

      why yes, I am new round here.. how did you know?

      Your UID.

    3. Re:peh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How do they discriminate? By assuming that a guy is looking for a girl and vice versa? I don't really see that as qualifying. That's like complaining because the boxes only let you choose "Male" or "Female" or because the age starts at 21 - what if I want an 18 year old!? nooes! And where's the "some high school" option? High school drop outs need love too!

      It's not like they're refusing to serve you anyway. They will help you find a girl, you just don't want a girl, so you don't need their service. It's like being pissed because Coldstone won't sell you soy ice cream. They'll still sell you regular ice cream, you just don't want it.

    4. Re:peh. by puto · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Well, you can have hetero only dating sites. Besides there are oodles out gay-dating sites out there. No need for you to get offended.

      I mean I am hetero and I am not turning in Out.com because it discrminates against me being a breeder.

      And as someone who spent several years slinging drinks in a gay bar on Bourbon Street, I can say gay guys generally are interesting in seeing the other person first.

      Gay men are very visual creatures and when you add booze they become super sluts.

      I was in a gatr bar recently and was kissing my girlfriend and the bartender refused to serve us because we were straight. That was discrimination.

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    5. Re:peh. by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I hope your girlfriend kicked the bartender's ass!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    6. Re:peh. by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "knock, knock"

      Hot women answers door......

      Hot Woman: "Hello?"

      Hot Guy: "Hello. The agency sent me, but I'm afraid there has been a mistake. I'm gay."

      Hot Woman: "What a waste. You don't know the half of it. So am I."

      Did I adequately address your point?

    7. Re:peh. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

      A date with conspirators, that is.

    8. Re:peh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ridiculously high UID.

    9. Re:peh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your seven-digit UID? :D

      _AC

    10. Re:peh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High school dropouts are just kind of outta luck.
      The dating site I've used only goes down to high school graduate, but does have an 'other' option. Unfortunately, women aren't very attracted to guys whose education level is "Teh Intarwebs!".

    11. Re:peh. by TheMCP · · Score: 1

      In my state, you can't have straight-only or gay-only dating services. It's illegal discrimination, and if one of these web sites was headquartered here, you could file a complaint against them for it. And should.

      And speaking as a gay man, if a gay bar here in Massachusetts refused to serve you for being straight, I would hope you would march to the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination and file a complaint, and if I saw it happen, I would offer to file a sworn statement to support your complaint and I would stop patronizing the establishment. Minority-focused businesses are not and should not be above the law. I have spoken with gay friends about this situation in the past, and while some felt it's a bit rude for straight people to "invade" a gay bar, everyone agreed that they should be served, politely.

    12. Re:peh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So there up in Jersey? I'm not going to RTFA but there all across Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Missouri as well.

  4. Conspiracy? by kalirion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do the yard signs read your thoughts and beam them to a satellite? Are they emitting high levels of gamma radiation? Are the dating sites linked to Al Qaeda?

    1. Re:Conspiracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      yes, yes, and YES!

    2. Re:Conspiracy? by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

      OMG it all makes sense now....Cheney is behind this and after we begin a war again his competitors lawn signs than he will profit off the immunity his company receives...

      it would have worked if it weren't for that meddling author.

      Now the first test for the Obama administration is whether or not he can find a solution and a strategy to combat those sign terrorists...and close the loopholes those dating sites are using to cheat their taxes.

  5. Don't tell me... by novalogic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Even singles sites are lonely enough to pay for some action... I thought I was the only one willing to pay out $100 for head...

    --
    --
    1. Re:Don't tell me... by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Wow. $100? I have seen Rossignol stuff used for less than $50!

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    2. Re:Don't tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even singles sites are lonely enough to pay for some action... I thought I was the only one willing to pay out $100 for head...

      What is your base price for the rest of the body?...

  6. but do they work ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone seriously got a date from one of these sites ? It seems Mr. Moore overlooked a vey obvious question in his research.

    1. Re:but do they work ? by alanshot · · Score: 1

      if you RTFA he states:

      "... I also found an unverified claim from a disgruntled ex-employee on ripoffreport.com that claims the company charges their customers from $3,000 to over $15,000 for their matchmaking services."

      So yes, if you go to the site and shell out big bucks, you can get a date. (at least according to one unverified disgruntled employee.)

    2. Re:but do they work ? by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      Being ripoffreport, "disgruntled employee" has a rather broad definition that could also often mean "customer who should have known better."

    3. Re:but do they work ? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Well, his research led to the very company that introduced me to my wife in 1998...though this seems like a better marketing method than what they were using back then, which was psychobabble about psychological testing combined with direct-mail postcards.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:but do they work ? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you're looking, I'm a big fan of plentyoffish.com. I'm a bit biased since I met my current girlfriend there. It's 100% free. Minimal (very very minimal) ads and ... I like it is all.

    5. Re:but do they work ? by alexandreracine · · Score: 1

      This is /. why would you be interested in a girl anyway?

      --
      No sig for now.
    6. Re:but do they work ? by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I dated a girl for about 3 months after meeting her through one of the dating service sites (after being on it for like 6 months). We really didn't have much in common, and though we're still friends, the relationship had to end.

      But I am convinced that between 60-75% of the "matches" you get are filler accounts. So in the time I was a member, I probably rejected/got rejected by 300 or so matches.. and spoke with 1 of them.

      Those sites do work, I know some people who met through one and are happily married.. but I believe the numbers of subscribers are phoney.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    7. Re:but do they work ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      However, considering this is an article about guerrila marketing, seeing you comment several times about how good they are is bound to raise suspicions ;)

    8. Re:but do they work ? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ok, here's a negative- they took me for $3100 for introductions contracted for that I never used because they required guys to buy in blocks of 36 introductions where they only required women to buy in blocks of 6.

      Of course, I haven't had contact since they closed their Oregon office a year after I got married....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    9. Re:but do they work ? by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      plentyoffish.com

      That sounds like the perfect site for me...people tell me I'm plenty offish all the time!

    10. Re:but do they work ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. There was even a lawsuit about fake accounts a while ago. From my own experience, I would say Match.com is still doing it. Last time I was on there (and I will never do it again because of this sleaziness), when I canceled my subscription it asked why and I checked off something like "nobody will talk to me" and I had an email from an attractive woman within an hour (after getting only 2 emails in a month). Mysteriously (sarcasm), she seemed to have no interest in emailing me directly (i.e. without Match.com) or talking on the phone.

    11. Re:but do they work ? by shermo · · Score: 2, Funny

      When you're retelling a story like this it needs to get better each time.

      So, the first reply should have stated the correct amount of $3100. However, by now, that number should be well in excess of $10,000.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    12. Re:but do they work ? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Informative

      well, if that's the attitude you take regarding your clientèle then maybe people should be warned about your business.

      generally, every business will have a few dissatisfied customers since it's hard to make everyone happy. but if there are dozens of customer complaints regarding the same company, then that's a pretty good indicator that they're either unscrupulous or just incompetent. so it doesn't have to be by a "disgruntled employee" for a complaint to have any merit.

      besides, another poster who met his wife through that agency already said that he had to pay $3600 for the minimum of 36 introductions (of which he only used 5) to use the service.

    13. Re:but do they work ? by Authoritative+Douche · · Score: 1

      heh. I read your reply too fast and thought the URL was plentyoafish.com

      Perfect for geeks

    14. Re:but do they work ? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      POF and OkCupid are ones I've been on before. OKCupid has a lot of questions for you to answer if you like to help refine your matches.

    15. Re:but do they work ? by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      connectingsingles.com is also a 100% free dating site (it's funded with google ads).

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    16. Re:but do they work ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On there too, haven't met a new girlfriend but I've made a few new female friends on there, great site!

    17. Re:but do they work ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you got married, was it through one of the introductions they provided? Is your mate worth $3100?

      Sounds like a deal if it really does work and you're happy.

    18. Re:but do they work ? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think she's worth the full $3600, plus the wasted dates with the 4 other women I met.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    19. Re:but do they work ? by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      Did either work out?

    20. Re:but do they work ? by alanshot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Being ripoffreport, "disgruntled employee" has a rather broad definition that could also often mean "customer who should have known better.""

      True. but either way it still means they took an insane amount of $$ (IMHO) from SOMEBODY, and that reinforces the suspected business model.

      So whether the report came from a disgruntled lackey that took the money, or the disgruntled customer that paid the money is irrelevant (for this discussion). Either way they are douchebags that are contributing to the litter problem in our country.

    21. Re:but do they work ? by bytta · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think she's worth the full $3600, plus the wasted dates with the 4 other women I met.

      I'll give you $4000 for her.

    22. Re:but do they work ? by PReDiToR · · Score: 2, Funny

      Every time I think of someone from Slashdot on a date I imagine this:

      I put on my robe and wizard hat ...

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    23. Re:but do they work ? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      connectingsingles.com is also a 100% free dating site (it's funded with google ads).

      Why didn't I think of that? Google Ads is the perfect way to fund your dating site, because people already have to fill in all their interests there. So Google will know what ads you'll be interested in. It's a perfect match!

    24. Re:but do they work ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we can all agree Girls generally have it easyer for picking up.

      So the types of Women who would pay for this service are going to be... well... *shudder*

      That's why men have to buy blocks of 36 it's to lock them in.

    25. Re:but do they work ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you realize that most of the other online dating sites will give you several months for that $100 that you're paying for one single date (And you don't have to buy it in $3600 blocks)

    26. Re:but do they work ? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The other online dating sites didn't exist when I was looking in 1996-1997-1998. Also, You Get What You Pay For to some extent- though today I'd suggest a young man go to eHarmony- they seem to provide close to the same level of service.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    27. Re:but do they work ? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      I've met people from OKCupid but not PlentyOfFish. I had the option to meed someone from POF but I had already met someone on OKCupid. I had a 9 month Okcupid relationship another 11 month one from Match.com and one now from OkCupid that's I've had for about 6 months.

  7. Guerrilla Marketing by apt142 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is extremely fascinating. I'm not quite sure how it becomes news for nerds. But fascinating none the less.

    1. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by MrSparkle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Guerrilla Marketing indeed. The article itself is a slashvert for the author's company. Nice.

    2. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is it news for nerds? The same reason you found it fascinating.

      Guy observes something odd related to his field of work.

      Guy notices more oddities, all related.

      Guy gets an itch to figure out what is going on, and scratches the itch.

      Guy keeps on scratching until he's completely satisfied.

      Seriously, what nerd hasn't done the same thing in their particular field of interest? Whether it's the grepping to find instances of an odd item in your logs, or statistical analysis to compare voting records by state to federal balance of payment figures, or figuring out how to make the pelvic actuators on your girl robot work properly, one thing all nerds have in common is sleuthing.

      Nerdhood, to me, is defined by inquisitiveness and a strong dedication to finding answers and increasing our knowledge. So yes, it's news for nerds, since we can all relate to the author's search for truth.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was a great read. I see the signs periodically in Minnesota, I used to live in Eagan and the first time I saw the signs they were misspelled as Eagen or Egan but a few weeks later they were fixed.

      Luckily (???) I'm already married so I don't have to worry about this stuff anymore.

    4. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's news for nerds because they're gobbling up space on nameservers. It does affect you.

      BTW, these signs are all over NE Ohio as well. I concluded it was some local get-rich-quick schmuck with a magic marker. Seriously interesting to find out that's not the case.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    5. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by budgenator · · Score: 0

      Yes but on /. he only rates a junior chipmunk badge, interesting but solidly entry level nerdom.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      Since when is this type of behavior for us restricted to our fields of interest?

      To me, we're monkeys to the monkey power. Curious as all hell and our biggest weakness is a problem to solve.

      To make matters worse, we subconsciously define almost everything interesting as a problem. And once we've done that...well, you might as well go make tea, cause we're not letting go until we've solved it.

      --

      Question everything

    7. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Since when is this type of behavior for us restricted to our fields of interest?

      Some of us have more (and wider) fields of interest than others.

      I notice things all the time that raise questions I'd like answers to... but the only ones I really dig into are the ones that interest me in general. I don't have time to solve all the problems I define, so I only obsess over the ones:

      (1) I get paid to obsess over
      (2) that are in my general fields of interest
      (3) apply to my general fields of interest as well as the particular field the problem occurs in.

      Of course, by looking at things in fields we don't know much about, we often gain insight into the fields we already have good understanding of... so most nerds, I think, enjoy expanding the fields of interest.

      But there's no way in hell I'll ever spend time tracking plotlines of daytime soaps in order to get insight into what their producers feel is view-worthy television, and by extension, what daytime TV watchers like to experience vicariously, and how I can use that information to pitch scifi shows and movies to my wife so she'll watch them with me.

      Oh crap. Now I'm going to need to do exactly that. Thanks a lot, buddy... there goes the weekend.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Its interesting, but why didnt he just fill out the form and see where he would be redirected to or wait for someone to contact him? I doubt they demand payment before revealing who they are or what they do. It seems like this is a manufactured mystery if not an ad for the author's own company.

    9. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by eln · · Score: 3, Funny

      why didnt he just fill out the form and see where he would be redirected to or wait for someone to contact him?

      Because he's already on 3 other dating sites, and his wife is starting to get suspicious.

    10. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...or figuring out how to make the pelvic actuators on your girl robot work properly...

      Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    11. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by Zarquil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whether it's the grepping to find instances of an odd item in your logs

      Guilty!

      or statistical analysis to compare voting records by state to federal balance of payment figures

      Guilty!

      or figuring out how to make the pelvic actuators on your girl robot work properly

      *GASP* Who told you?

      *SLAMS DOOR*

    12. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by Facegarden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is extremely fascinating. I'm not quite sure how it becomes news for nerds. But fascinating none the less.

      Maybe you're being sarcastic, but i really don't see why this is interesting, really. Upon reading the article, it seems to me the guy has the reasoning powers of a shrew - it was obvious to me after seeing just two identical signs with different addresses that this company must be doing this all over the place. The author makes it sound like it's some crazy complex conspiracy and blah blah blah. Hey, guess what!? BayAreaHelpWanted.com is also part of a similar situation! There is also SacramentoHelpWanted.com and a bunch others. Gasp! Someone is using location specific domain names as a way of appearing more local!

      Next he'll find out that the Shane Co. is not a local mom and pop diamond company, but a huge nationwide chain, with ads targeting specific areas (our ads only mention the 3 local stores, for example, and Tom Shane always makes himself sound so down to earth that he couldn't possibly be the head of a huge chain).

      Really, i'm surprised that anyone is surprised by how this works.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    13. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      Somebody give this guy a point. I swear this is the funniest thread I've ever read on /. My dog thinks I'm crazy laughing so much.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    14. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by maxume · · Score: 1

      You need to go spend a few minutes standing in the corner thinking about things.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    15. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by humphrm · · Score: 1

      >I'm not quite sure how it becomes news for nerds

      It's about paying to find a mate. Duh.

      --
      -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    16. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Guy keeps on scratching until he's completely satisfied.

      I'm pretty sure that's not how it works.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    17. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by Narpak · · Score: 1

      If this wasn't interesting we wouldn't be reading and posting about it.

      I'd go so far as to say that a Nerd that hasn't found his/her field of interest; and going totally nerdy on the subject is a very unfulfilled person. Personally it took me quite some time to find the subject which truly satisfied my inner nerd; though along the way I gained some nerdpoints in various fields. Giving me a broad understanding of in an assortment of technical, and political, trivia, but no depth in any. Only when I found my true calling was my inner nerd appeased.

      P.S. My Path to Nerdvana is to rewrite all classical literature; using the word Nerd as many places as possible without going all Marklar.

    18. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      ...or figuring out why there was a 75 cent billing discrepancy... http://www.amazon.com/Cuckoos-Egg-Tracking-Computer-Espionage/dp/1416507787

    19. Re:Guerrilla Marketing by Nethead · · Score: 1

      bu...bu...but he's MY friend in the diamond business!

      (I've bought a good number of items at Shane and will say they do have good service.)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  8. Re:Which URL? by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    StayOffOfMyLawn.com

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  9. missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think you missed the point. You were suppose to go to the URL to get a date NOT research the registration.

    1. Re:missed the point by Dekortage · · Score: 5, Funny

      This gives me an idea for a new set of yard signs: "Single? Bored? www.slashdot.org"

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    2. Re:missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This gives me an idea for a new set of yard signs: "Single? Bored? www.slashdot.org"

      Hey, Slashdot can cure the boredom, but not the singleness. Dating, at least for me, cured neither my boredom nor my singleness. On balance, /. wins.

    3. Re:missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we

    4. Re:missed the point by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder how secure the database is? Why not just hack into their servers and steal their database, then you'd have thousands of potential dates in every state to hit on, and since you know they're desperate (having submitted their info to one of the sites) you're chances are greatly improved. You could even call them pretending to be from the company and tell them you've found a perfect match for them, then set yourself up on dates with them! When you're all done, you could then sell the whole database to some other sleazy marketing company.

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    5. Re:missed the point by unifyingtheory · · Score: 0

      I see no www in http://slashdot.org/

    6. Re:missed the point by megamerican · · Score: 3, Funny

      These signs were a great way to break up with my girlfriend*. A few dozen Single? signs in her front yard gave her a pretty strong hint.

      *Girlfriend may or may not actually exist (this is /.)

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    7. Re:missed the point by Dekortage · · Score: 1

      True. I was saving three characters by including www. instead of http:/// -- but we could leave both off.

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    8. Re:missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know this was a group therapy site. Sure explains a lot.

      If you're a frustrated single males, paranoid, feel deep hate for reputable companies, communist tendancies or are otherwise dysfunctional... slashdot.org - visit us

      Kinda starting to sound like a concentration camp... Wait, is this some kind of a trap?!

    9. Re:missed the point by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      This gives me an idea for a new set of yard signs: "Single? Bored? www.slashdot.org"

      I've seen one that said:

      SINGLE?
      Pills + Booze = Eternal Sleep

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    10. Re:missed the point by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      How about,

      "Single?
      http://slashdot.org/ - Welcome Home"

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    11. Re:missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how secure the database is? Why not just hack into their servers and steal their database, then you'd have thousands of potential dates in every state to hit on, and since you know they're desperate (having submitted their info to one of the sites) you're chances are greatly improved. You could even call them pretending to be from the company and tell them you've found a perfect match for them, then set yourself up on dates with them!

      When you're all done, you could then sell the whole database to some other sleazy marketing company.

      Sounds pretty +5 interesting...

  10. Well done by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

    I was going to bitch about the submitter advertising his company in the summary but after reading the article, I say that he has earned it. I didn't much care about this company but the whole detective process was quite fascinating.

    Cheers

    1. Re:Well done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was going to bitch about the submitter advertising his company in the summary but after reading the article, I say that he has earned it. I didn't much care about this company but the whole detective process was quite fascinating.

      Agreed.

      What I'd like to see next is this guy taking out the "Crazy Fox" scam. Late-night TV commercials with the same video, namely a poorly-rendered CGI fox, talking about what an awesome home-based-business... yadda yadda yadda. The commercials are identical, except for a random number prefixed or suffixed to the domain name containing the string "crazyfox".

      It's obviously a pyramid scheme of some sort, but the mechanism of spamvertizing it is ultimately the same as that employed by the "randomaffiliatename"{singles|dating}.com scam. The only difference is that it uses TV commercials (which are probably the "thing" being "sold" by the people at the top of the pyramid) instead of lawn signs.

    2. Re:Well done by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I'm more concerned about the "send us your old and worn out gold jewelry ads".

      I miss the DeVry metallic zombie ads. I particularly liked it when ads inserted by the local cable company replaced them, but at the end of the block, you saw just a flash of the zombie at the end. AAH!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:Well done by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Those are great! I really like the one with the old woman who talks like she was hooked ... up... to ... a ... metronome.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    4. Re:Well done by ShaunC · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm more concerned about the "send us your old and worn out gold jewelry ads".

      Rob Cockerham recently tested out their scam by sending them a bunch of junk spray-painted gold. They sent him back a check! It was only $1 or so, I guess it's a consolation prize they send to anyone who bothers to mail in an envelope.

      Someone else tried it with actual gold and found that the prices they're willing to quote you (at least initially) are way below the true value, but if you complain about their offer, they'll make a reasonable one.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    5. Re:Well done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that the number prefixed to the domain name is so that they can figure out which channels and time slots result in the most hits for their website.

    6. Re:Well done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about time someone else noticed that bullshit. What suprises me is how long it's been going on without someone taking action to shut it down. (How it can get by and be considered legal is beyond me.) This type of fraud has been going on since 2000 or so. Also, it's not just the crazyfox, but it's also freecreditreport, freetriple, and almost anything that has free, triple, or crazy somewhere in it's name.

      Google IK9 and AP9 scams. They are all part of that enterprise of confidence shemes. It will provide the depth of how bad it actually is.

      And since you want to know what they do, I'll tell you as well. They do anything to get a credit card or bank account number. Once they have that, they peck away at it with a monthly service charge somewhere around $10 to $20. What does this "service" provide? From what most victims can tell, it provides absolutely nothing of benefit. The scammer's hope is that nobody notices it on the billing statement. And then when you notice the service charge and put those payments on hold, up pops up another "service" from under the umbrella corporation to tack on fraudulent fees. (And there's like 3000 or so of them.) You basically have to cancel any cards from scratch and start over again. (And sometimes they'll catch your creditors off-guard, and social engineer their way to your new card number. You really have to stay on top of it for a bit.) Also clear out any cookie or similar browser cache that may hold credit information, it's not beyond them to use Flash exploits in their banner ads. (Some of which have occasionally run on "trusted" websites like hotmail.)

      Word from the wise? A one time fee of about $10 from your own credit card company for your credit report beats any "free" deal these hucksters add onto via small print. Also never give your credit card number to any service that claims to be "free". (Unless it's one of those one-time-use cards that only has $20 or such.)

    7. Re:Well done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am convinced that is no old woman, but rather a 27 year old gay man dressed up like an old woman. Look closely next time.

    8. Re:Well done by jmanforever · · Score: 1

      "I'm guessing that the number prefixed to the domain name is so that they can figure out which channels and time slots result in the most hits for their website."

      Mod this AC up. He's got it right.

    9. Re:Well done by OutOnARock · · Score: 1



      Or so they can easily change the domain name without the expense of having to reshoot the commericial.

      So when they get one domain taken down, they just switch to a new domain name.

      I've wondered about what the scam behind these commericals were as well.

    10. Re:Well done by residieu · · Score: 1

      That's better than I'd have expected. I'd assume everything just got "lost in the mail." Take it up with the post office.

  11. Two things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, this guy gets my "Too Much Time On Your Hands" award for the week.

    Second, his methodical and unceasing pursuit really makes me hope he has his laptop stolen one day-- I'm sure the tale of how he tracks down the thief and recovers the laptop will certainly rival the P-P-Powerbook story in terms of entertainment value.

  12. Re:this story sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    McCain?

  13. Fines? by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now that we know who is behind putting up all these signs, apparently without permission, won't there be some huge fines coming up?

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Fines? by GIL_Dude · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was wondering. I don't know about the local statutes in all the areas where these folks operate, but at least in a few of them it must be illegal. In some, advertising may not be legal, in others it may be a littering offense - but it can't be something that is just allowed everywhere.

      It is probably just a low level annoyance for each property owner (what, they get a sign like this a couple of times a year each), and without knowing who to complain about it would be difficult to ever get a fine to anyone. Come to think of it, that blog isn't going to help most people find out who put that sign in their park, yard, school, etc. So there will probably be no practical effect from the disclosure of the parties responsible.

    2. Re:Fines? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In my city, a little old lady was arrested walking down main street placing more of these signs by none other than the chief of police. The signs stopped appearing for awhile, but apparently they got someone to replace her.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:Fines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some states (such as the one I live in) yes. If a sign that is advertising something and 'over' a specific size or in a specific area of the yard...

      Here in NC it is 50 bucks a pop. Even more if put in the right of way area (15 ft off the center of the street). Even more if NCDOT finds it. Is it enforced? Probably not. The only things that are allowed in that area is a mail box, traffic control type signage, lighting, grass, and signage to help sell a specific house. All of those things are subject to being torn up anyway. You are also subject to all maintainece in that area even though you do not 'technically' own it.

      Why do I know? Some idiot in my neighborhood decided to put up a 'drive slow children at play' in *my* yard. I was not about to get hit by a 150 dollar fine for someone elses stupidity. They didnt even find a nice spot for it. They just put it wherever they thought was a nice spot. It was gone within a couple of days by NCDOT... They didnt fine me luckily after I explained that one of my dip neighbors decided they liked it, but just not in their yard.

    4. Re:Fines? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Well...no. That's why they run it as a franchise. They have clueless idiots running around doing their dirty work.

    5. Re:Fines? by chakmol · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was wondering. I don't know about the local statutes in all the areas where these folks operate, but at least in a few of them it must be illegal. In some, advertising may not be legal, in others it may be a littering offense - but it can't be something that is just allowed everywhere.

      It is probably just a low level annoyance for each property owner (what, they get a sign like this a couple of times a year each), and without knowing who to complain about it would be difficult to ever get a fine to anyone. Come to think of it, that blog isn't going to help most people find out who put that sign in their park, yard, school, etc. So there will probably be no practical effect from the disclosure of the parties responsible.

      Yes, it's usually illegal, and often akin to littering. In my city, I went after the "Mattress Firm" across the street for putting 50 of them at a time by the public roadside advertising a sale. It took calling the city directory and finally narrowing it down to about 6 people who handle this. Repeated calls finally got the city to send a guy out, who took the signs the first time and went into the store to give a no-fine warning. The enforcement guy told me that first offense is usually free, 2nd one is $50 per sign, 3rd is $100 per sign. The store did, in fact, repeatedly replace the signs, so I kept after the city. I think they finally got their big fine because the behavior has stopped.

      That was an easy one, more or less, because the violator was obvious. Most "street spam" signs would be much harder to track and I'd tend to just let it go due to not having the time to pursue it.

      Apparently some people make a living just placing these signs for pay, as I have seen pickup trucks several times full of signs in the back. Not only are they littering for money, they are driving the trucks on grassy public areas, spinning out jumping the curbs, etc.

      http://www.causs.org/ has info about the legalities of all this. The Citizens Against Ugly Street Spam.

  14. It's disappointing to see. . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Funny

    the low percentage of signs advertising for asians.

    Mmmm, asian women. You can eat a lot because you never fill up!

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:It's disappointing to see. . . by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      Meh, just head to Macon, GA or Monroe, LA. When the cops in those towns feel that they need some good publicity, they bust the places to seem like they're "doing something." That being said, they probably finally ran some of them out of Macon for a long time...those places are getting notorious for human trafficking and smuggling...

    2. Re:It's disappointing to see. . . by mschuyler · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ha ha. I used to live in Macon. I worked at a B.Dalton--Bookseller store out at the Macon Mall. The cops busted us and stole 500 copies of the "Joy of Sex" because it was 'pornographic.' Naturally, every cop in Macon wound up with a copy. There was even a trial. It wound up in a 'hung' jury. Oh, man, minimum wage was fun.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  15. My garbage can is full of these signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These signs appear in my neighborhood about once a week in the wee hours of Monday morning. I usually remove about 10 of these signs from my neighborhood by 8:30 am. To date I have disposed of about 250 yard signs. It is illegal to post the yard signs on my property and my fellow home owners property without our permission. Thanks to your research our lawyers will be able to send letters to the proper people now.

    1. Re:My garbage can is full of these signs by cffrost · · Score: 1

      So now there's Neighborhood Sign Watch? I believe neighborhood watches are supposed to contact the appropriate authorities, not resort to vigilantism. In your case, please call your municipal sanitation department.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    2. Re:My garbage can is full of these signs by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Cleaning up litter on your property is vigilantism?

    3. Re:My garbage can is full of these signs by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      I too remove obnoxious advertising campaigns that abuse my neighborhood.

      I believe neighborhood watches are supposed to contact the appropriate authorities, not resort to vigilantism. In your case, please call your municipal sanitation department.

      I'm not sure where you're at, but I'm in the US. Here, it's government of, by, and for the people. I may call the government where the job is too big or too specialized for me, but I always start with the assumption that neighborhood problems are for me and my neighbors to solve. Don't you?

    4. Re:My garbage can is full of these signs by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Cleaning up litter on your property is vigilantism?

      Of course it is! Only the proper authorities should be allowed to clean up litter. Why, if everybody were to clean up litter whenever they felt like it, this country would turn into a huge mess.

    5. Re:My garbage can is full of these signs by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you're at, but I'm in the US. Here, it's government of, by, and for the people. I may call the government where the job is too big or too specialized for me, but I always start with the assumption that neighborhood problems are for me and my neighbors to solve. Don't you?

      Whoa, slow down there cowboy! If you aren't careful you'll have folks thinking that the government actually gets its police power from the consent of the people. Someone might think you have the crazy notion that the individual right of self defence is the root of that police power, and that we cede some of that power to the government to exercise on our behalf. Next thing you know they'll be thinking that the government cannot legitimately have a power or authority that an individual doesn't have in the first place - otherwise how could he have the authority to consent to a government use of the power? Dangerous thoughts you are having there.

    6. Re:My garbage can is full of these signs by eison · · Score: 1

      Why? You think you can't lift a finger without government to help do it for you? Pick them up and reuse them or throw them away yourself, don't make some government agency waste time and money driving out to do it.

      --
      is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
    7. Re:My garbage can is full of these signs by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Heh. I agree mostly. But I think people can easily get carried away if they don't think that line of reasoning through.

      Fairly exercising any power over others is difficult, especially power involving force. So except for circumstances where physical force is immediately necessary to prevent grievous harm, I think the necessary deliberation and due process is beyond that which a single mortal can usually achieve.

      Ergo, I consider my delegation of the use of force to my government basically irrevocable, despite all the inefficiencies involved there. Because otherwise, I'd sometimes have a hard time persuading myself that certain douchebags who needed a pounding shouldn't get it right then from me personally.

  16. Same pic, different names... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and I have seen the same picture come up with different names/ages printer under them... pretty safe to guess that they aren't from your town.

  17. It's an interesting story... by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

    High churn rates mean new customers have low, volatile expected lifetime values. This has a negative impact on the equity value of each customer, making it difficult to justify the valuation multiples seen by membership-driven websites in other verticals.

    ...but an English translation might be more accessible.

    1. Re:It's an interesting story... by gnick · · Score: 2, Informative

      High churn rates mean new customers have low, volatile expected lifetime values. This has a negative impact on the equity value of each customer, making it difficult to justify the valuation multiples seen by membership-driven websites in other verticals.

      ...but an English translation might be more accessible.

      People don't keep their memberships for very long. Because of that, the difference between your recruiting cost and your subscription price has to be wider than other membership sites.

      Better?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:It's an interesting story... by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      Translation:

      High churn rates mean new customers have low, volatile expected lifetime values.

      People don't stay on dating sites for long

      This has a negative impact on the equity value of each customer, making it difficult to justify the valuation multiples seen by membership-driven websites in other verticals.

      So you don't make that much money per customer

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    3. Re:It's an interesting story... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, since the author kindly provides a plug for his company's services, the translation is:

      If you can understand what these terms are, I can communicate with you professionally, and maybe you could use my services.

      If you don't understand these terms, I hope you enjoy this story.

      If you don't understand these terms, or only somewhat understand them, but feel like you want to use these terms to impress your bosses, you need my help. Contact me and we'll work something out.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:It's an interesting story... by EricWright · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you don't make that much money per customer

      Dude, did you SEE how much they were charging?!?

    5. Re:It's an interesting story... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Funny

      So they work on the Scientology model?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:It's an interesting story... by yenne · · Score: 1

      new customers have low, volatile expected lifetime values

      I guess dating is more dangerous now than it used to be.

    7. Re:It's an interesting story... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Heh, I had the exact same thought.

      "Oh, didn't work out? that's because you didn't do [insert BS routine here]. Why, yes, we can help you, for a suitable fee..." Rinse and repeat until the wallet is empty.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  18. nice by kingsteve612 · · Score: 0

    Awesome topic. I see those signs everywhere around my town as well. I live in a Minneapolis suburb. They're probably everywhere around the US in semi-major cities/suburbs.

  19. The "from the..." Department by D+Ninja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know I'm slightly off-topic here, but I really have to wonder about timothy's choice of department for this article. It is:

    from the tragically-yes-I'm-single dept.

    Now, I am not trashing people who are in relationships or who are married or anything else. Please do not take my response that way. But my question is - why is it so "tragic" these days if someone is single? It seems as if everybody spends much of their waking time thinking about whether or not they have a date Friday night and the never do something with their lives. I personally have a number of a friends (girls tend to be the worst offenders) that gain their self-esteem from whether or not they are in a relationship. That seems horrible to me (and a really crummy way to live).

    I don't know...mini-rant I suppose. I guess I just don't see what the big deal is about being single. Yeah, it *can* be lonely at times. But even people in relationships can be lonely. (On the flip side, I do know singles who can be alone, but their not lonely.) Being single offers so many advantages - your time is yours, your money is yours, you aren't tied down, and single people (especially ones who are content with that) tend to adventure a lot more.

    Why being single = a bad thing, I don't think I'll totally understand.

    Any response back from anybody here on Slashdot?

    1. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But my question is - why is it so "tragic" these days if someone is single?

      Because people in relationships find them so pleasing they dont know why anyone wants to be single. They like having someone and never being lonely.

      In reality, you can find fulfillment any way you like, but typically people prefer to couple up.

    2. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because like any animal, humans have a primary goal of reproduction? This will include protecting the offspring in a pair-bond. Humans are also generally social by nature. Therefore these things really are important to a lot of people.

      It's just an innate behavior, without which we would be extinct.

    3. Re:The "from the..." Department by SeanGilman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's more a statement of how the person saying it feels about being single. If you did not feel being single was tragic you would probably state it along the lines of "yes-I'm-single dept"

    4. Re:The "from the..." Department by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More or less agree since the logic is that if you're single, you're somehow worth less than someone who's with someone (i.e. you're a loser). Sort of like if a woman isn't married by 30, she's over the hill.

      As far as the money/time/etc is concerned, agreed, it is yours and it is great not having to worry about anyone bouncing a check, spending more than you had planned or a whole host of other things.

      The flip side, as you allude to, is that there are those times you want to spend it with someone, whether a football game, a movie or a simply walk in the woods. Then there's the whole human touch thing for those of us who are of the affectionate type. It's especially difficult when you work with a few cuties and your mind has lascivious thoughts of them throughout the day. Not good for work performance.

      Then again, dating is like combat so it's not necessarily an easy thing to do.

      But then, what do I know? I have an entire region of women who want nothing to do with me unless they want a problem solved.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that, quite frankly, one of the most painful issues with being single for geeks is when we have friends who constantly enjoy the pleasures of physical relationships. I, for one, have a friend who is constantly "pulling women from the bar" because "variety is the spice of life". Sure, he's always complaining to me that he will never find a good girl... But at least he's getting to have some fun in the sack.

      For us pragmatic geeks who think about consequences, consider other peoples feelings, and simultaneously have the same mammalian urges as our more risky, wreckless friends, it's clear how one can feel that being lonely is tragic. ... comming from a 24 year old virgin who has more experience writing in assembly than hacking into panties.

    6. Re:The "from the..." Department by jandrese · · Score: 1

      why is it so "tragic" these days if someone is single?

      Because you won't pass on your genes?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:The "from the..." Department by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Because evolution has hard wired us to want to procreate and pass on our genes? And for the vast majority of our existence on this planet, that has required a relationship? At least for the past couple hundred million of years.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    8. Re:The "from the..." Department by martyros · · Score: 1

      Because you won't pass on your genes?

      Unless he's 40, there's still plenty of time for that.

      Seriously, I dated two girls in high school,and then didn't date anyone until 27, when I met the love of my life. Now I'm really happy. The not-dating wasn't really on purpose, but it sure saved a lot of hassle and broken hearted-ness; and it meant that I had a solid 10 years to be really free to do my own thing. It probably also saved me from a highly sub-optimal decision: I'm not really that picky, and if I'd been dating someone reasonably OK at 25, I might have "settled" for that, gotten married, and missed out on something much better.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    9. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why being single = a bad thing, I don't think I'll totally understand.

      Any response back from anybody here on Slashdot?

      It's a geek thing. Most of us here on Slashdot understand. Most of them out there in the room with the big blue ceiling don't.

      It goes back to the 1960s, basically, ever since there were computers for us nerds to fuss over, there were nerds giving up mating opportunities in order to fuss over the computers.

      "[...] for a group of healthy college-age males, there was remarkably little discussion of a topic which commonly obsesses groups of that composition. Females. Though some led somewhat active social lives, the key figures in TMRC-PDP hacking had locked themselves into what would be called 'bachelor mode.' It was easy to fall into -- for one thing -- as opposed to the hopelessly random problems in a human relationship -- which made hacking particularly attractive. But an even weightier factor was the hackers' impression that computing was much more important than getting involved in a romantic relationship. It was a question of priorities. Hacking had replaced sex in their lives."

      "[Hacking] was a mission. You would hack, and you would live by the Hacker Ethic, and you knew that that horribly inefficient and wasteful things like women burned too many cycles, occupied too much memory space. 'Women, even today, are considered grossly unpredictable,' one PDP-6 hacker noted, almost two decades later. 'How can a hacker tolerate such an imperfect being?'

      Steven Levy, in his 1984 book Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution, describing TMRC hackers ca. 1965.

    10. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you just described my life :(

    11. Re:The "from the..." Department by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Lack of sex...

    12. Re:The "from the..." Department by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      Note to you: people in a relationship don't get worked up into a rant about being in a relationship instead of being single... You need to get some... The sooner, the better... For everyone. Cheers :)

    13. Re:The "from the..." Department by glwtta · · Score: 1

      In our culture procreation is regarded as the only worthwhile life goal - if you are not spawning, you have no worth as an individual, as far as society is concerned. The basis for this is biological; it's stupid, but whining about it is a waste of time.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    14. Re:The "from the..." Department by TheMCP · · Score: 1

      I think there are people - clearly including yourself - who are capable of being single and happy and fulfilled in their life, for whom a relationship is just a bonus. Then there are others who are, for whatever reasons, incapable of being single and happy, who live with constant misery from loneliness, and who are much much happier when they're not single.

      And those of us who are in the latter group get really offended when those of you in the former group try to make us feel guilty over the fact that we really want a relationship and are focused on making it happen.

    15. Re:The "from the..." Department by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      And those of us who are in the latter group get really offended when those of you in the former group try to make us feel guilty over the fact that we really want a relationship and are focused on making it happen.

      Touche. Guess I typically see it from the other way, "You're someone who's not in a relationship!!! WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU!"

      So...good point.

    16. Re:The "from the..." Department by sustik · · Score: 1

      > Sort of like if a woman isn't married by 30, she's over the hill.

      The existence of such a limit is not irrational. It relates to child bearing potential etc. However, consider the status of an unmarried 35 year old woman and an already divorced 35 year old woman. The society appears to view the former a loser while the latter not so much, if at all (religion may factor in in some locations). The difference objectively is that one had a failed relationship for sure.

    17. Re:The "from the..." Department by i+love+pineapples · · Score: 1

      Here, here. I'm single because I haven't found the right guy yet. I'd love to be in a relationship, but I refuse to settle for someone I'm not really into. Some people seem to think it's actually UNHEALTHY that I want a boyfriend, even though I'm obviously not desperate for one, nor do I feel my life is lacking because I'm unattached. I simply think it'd be nice to have someone to curl up with on the couch and watch movies, share nice dinners with, etc.

      I don't think there's anything wrong with people who prefer to be single, but I wish they'd stop thinking of me as a codependent loser because I'd like to be with someone.

    18. Re:The "from the..." Department by Rycross · · Score: 1

      I don't think that its unhealthy at all to want a relationship. Its perfectly healthy. I think its unhealthy to need a relationship. Relationships tend to be healthier if both parties feel like they want to be in the relationship instead of feeling like they need the relationship. I do think people should be happy with themselves, even if they are single and want a relationship.

      Its the difference between thinking "Yeah I'm single," and "OMG, I'm a single loser."

      A lot of guys, myself included, feel that today's society strongly portrays the latter view: if you're not in a relationship or having lots of sex, you're a loser. Having love and a partner is important, but there's a lot of other important things in life too. Focusing so intently on the relationship aspect, while evolutionarily desirable, is not the key to a happy life.

      At least in my opinion.

    19. Re:The "from the..." Department by Sebilrazen · · Score: 2, Funny

      In reality, you can find fulfillment any way you like, but typically people prefer to couple up.

      But every so often I need to switch hands and then it just feels weird.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    20. Re:The "from the..." Department by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Two of the last three weddings I've gone to, at the reception the bride was wearing a shirt that said "GAME OVER" and showed icons of a woman in a wedding gown with a big smile on her face, and a man in a tux, looking sad, standing next to her. Just a little observation, is all...
      and hey, how about a few pithy quotes:
      "It is a woman's business to get married as soon as possible, and a man's to keep unmarried as long as possible" -- George Bernard Shaw
      "In America, the only really happy folk are married women and single men." -- H. L. Mencken.

      Now, I don't happen to *agree* with those quotes or that shirt. But a lot of people do. There's a lot of societal pressure in the US for women to get married, because a lot of people see an unmarried woman as uncomplete. I think that's a crazy viewpoint, personally, but I have a lot of friends who feel that way, whether consciously or not.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    21. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, some people shouldn't pass on their genes...

    22. Re:The "from the..." Department by merreborn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why is it so "tragic" these days if someone is single?

      I believe the "moral" imperative to "be fruitful and multiply" comes from a desire of certain subgroups (mostly religious and ethnic in nature) to grow themselves. People born in to your church/ethnic group are pretty likely to stay loyal to it.

      From this simple goal come many other "moral" values: anti-abortion, anti-birth control, anti-homosexuality, anti-promiscuity, anti-interracial marriage, and anti-singlehood.

      However, the world in which these values formed is very different from the world we know today. A few centuries ago, with high infant and childhood mortality, a much higher birthrate was necessary to produce enough adults of childbearing age (the extra hands on the farm helped too).

      Today, childhood mortality is incredibly low meaning most children make it to child-bearing age. The threat of overpopulation, rather than extinction, is now looming. Additionally, birth control dramatically alters the consequences of sex.

      Our moral values are only slowly catching up, hence the intense clashes over abortion and homosexuality.

      In short, being single is "bad" because we still have yet to shed some antiquated moral beliefs that aren't nearly as applicable in the modern world as they once were.

    23. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really the sad truth of any relationship: women interact with men because they want something out of it.

      Housing, food, kids, security, lifestyle, status, you name it. Plain old money too. Many might say companionship or love or whatever but most of that is really just the emotional side of the things I just listed.

      It's not love but love of the status. Take away the status and the love would go too. Keeping that status is a problem they want to solve, being in a relationship with a man solves that problem, so they are really there only because you are solving some problem.

      It's no different than women who want you around because they're computer needs fixing. Cute outfits, bat the eyelashes, play dumb, coo and flirt and whatever while you fix the dust bunnies or "cup holder" and then it's a smile and thanks and out you go. They solved the problem, via you. They don't need you any more.

      Any relationship really boils down to this, to women estimating what you can do for them. If the number is good, they might explore it further. If the number is not good, then they look at the next guy.

      You can be ugly as hell, and as fat as the typical /. reader but if you have piles of money (which the women figures she can get into) or some other asset like status, then you're interesting and attractive and the flirt goes into attract mode. If you're that same guy and you have neither money or status, there will be no interest.

      Ladies, find a picture of some ugly dude. Headshot only; let's leave clothes out of this. Look at that face. Be honest. All things being equal, would he be more interesting if he had $5 to his name, or $5 billion.

      Yeah. That's it exactly. You're not actually interesting in him for who he is. It's the money.

      It's a sad revelation. Human beings have evolved so far and done so much but we're still stuck with this fickle system to determine who is valuable or not, and we depend upon it to advance the species.

      It's just pathetic.

    24. Re:The "from the..." Department by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Please do not take my response that way. But my question is - why is it so "tragic" these days if someone is single?

      It's not tragic that everyone is single. The people who say that would derive great pleasure from being paired up. Hence, it is tragic they cannot achieve their goals.

      Other phrases with the same structure abound: tragically I'm not rich; tragically I'm not handsome/pretty; tragically I'm manic-depressive.

      I don't really want to be rich (I would prefer to be rich, but I have higher priorities that I knowningly allow to block my becoming rich), so I wouldn't call it a tragedy.

      As for why not to be single, I always enjoyed being with someone. Hence, I am tragically single. Because I cannot fulfill my desire.

      Speaking of which, there are girls out there, correct? Anyone girls tragically single?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    25. Re:The "from the..." Department by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which, there are girls out there, correct? Anyone girls tragically single?

      Slashdot, dude, Slashdot...

    26. Re:The "from the..." Department by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The flip side, as you allude to, is that there are those times you want to spend it with someone, whether a football game, a movie or a simply walk in the woods. Then there's the whole human touch thing for those of us who are of the affectionate type. It's especially difficult when you work with a few cuties and your mind has lascivious thoughts of them throughout the day. Not good for work performance.

      It's interesting, you start by emphasizing human contact, yet wrap it up with sex - and blame the 'cuties' for forcing you to have lascivious thoughts.
       
       

      But then, what do I know? I have an entire region of women who want nothing to do with me unless they want a problem solved.

      The reason why is abundantly clear.

    27. Re:The "from the..." Department by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      No, evolution has, in the case of men for the most part, wired us up with a desire to bonk anything with boobs, passing on Genes is something we hope hasn't happened come morning.

    28. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wether you are single or not only matters if you think it matters. It certainly doesn't matter to me if you're single or not - unless you happen to be an interesting young woman, and I were single as well - and I doubt anybody else cares.

      It's only tragic because it's stereotypical for a nerd to be single. That actually most 'nerds' I know and have known are _not_ single - and have very good relationships at that, well, that's just the exception to the rule!

      And let's not forget, if we wouldn't constantly beat on the stereotypes and repeat the memes, this wouldn't be /.

      You must be new here!

    29. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dear Anonymous,

      I've been in the same boat as you and I found the following website with advice about love to be extremely useful: www.reuniting.info

    30. Re:The "from the..." Department by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Sounds like for you, sex is probably overrated. Concentrate more on finding a good person.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    31. Re:The "from the..." Department by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      comming from a 24 year old virgin who has more experience writing in assembly than hacking into panties.

      A well-placed roofie is the meatspace equivalent of a root exploit.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    32. Re:The "from the..." Department by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Why being single = a bad thing, I don't think I'll totally understand.

      Because most people don't like it. And because without that attitude, we might not be here.

      The biggest thing every person on this planet has in common is an unbroken line of ancestors going back millions of years. I don't want to give away too much here, but there's a strong correlation between relationships and babies. Being more happy in a relationship than out of one is, from the perspective of your genes, a survival trait.

      Sure, from your individual perspective, being single might be fine. But you aren't in charge of building human brains and bodies; your genes are. Until that changes, the vast majority of humans will always have the urge to pair up.

    33. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Coming from a 26-year-old geek who's not a virgin: don't worry about it so much, sex isn't all it's cracked up to be. It's fun, but it won't change your life or suddenly turn you into a different person. You're better off waiting to have sex with somebody you love than picking up some cheap lounge lizard, anyway, it's a lot more fun that way.

      The best thing you can do for yourself is just go out and do some more social activities. Join a club, find a gaming group, or something like that. (note: that list does not include bar hopping)

    34. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can be ugly as hell, and as fat as the typical /. reader but if you have piles of money (which the women figures she can get into) or some other asset like status, then you're interesting and attractive and the flirt goes into attract mode.

      As gender equality advances, this is becoming less the case as women increasingly have the opportunity to be just as shallow as men. In my sadly extensive experience, dumb guy with good looks beats skinny geek with money.

    35. Re:The "from the..." Department by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Slashdot, dude, Slashdot...

      I must be new here.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    36. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Coming from a 26-year-old geek who's not a virgin: don't worry about it so much, sex isn't all it's cracked up to be. It's fun, but it won't change your life or suddenly turn you into a different person. You're better off waiting to have sex with somebody you love than picking up some cheap lounge lizard, anyway, it's a lot more fun that way.

      As a 34 year old geek who only recently stopped being a virgin, I couldn't agree more. Yes, sex can be fun, but so can lots of other things. While I love my wife and can't imagine my life without her anymore, I can't honestly say that sex is really more fun than playing a good game with friends. There are lots of great ways to have fun.

      In fact, after my first couple of orgasms (never having been one for masturbation), I thought: is that it? This is what everybody's been raving about? IME it's best when you take your time, do it with someone you really love, and make it part of something bigger than just the act of sex itself. A quickie is nice, but so is reading a book or listening to a good song. So take your time and don't be too impatient.

      So why do other people constantly talk about sex and the joys of it? My guess: it's all they have. A lot of people lead surprisingly boring and empty lives, and then sex, even meaningless sex with a complete stranger, can be the highpoint of your day (week, months, whatever).

      So just keep focusing on what YOU like, and not what others like. And if you stay open and interested in other people, you'll eventually meet someone you want to start something beautiful with. And 30+ is a great age to start with serious relationships.

    37. Re:The "from the..." Department by mcvos · · Score: 1

      why is it so "tragic" these days if someone is single?

      Because you won't pass on your genes?

      Your brothers and sisters share many of those same genes. Hook them up with someone and let them do your work for you, so you can continue coding.

    38. Re:The "from the..." Department by skeeto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This line caught my attention in your essay,

      No longer is dating an activity to be pursued because one wants to find their 'one and only' but rather, dating is an investment in time.

      Like any statement that involves the phrase "these days", "nowadays", and "in this day and age" it is actually the opposite of what is stated. Dating today is probably more about finding the "one and only" than ever before.

      Case and point, after my grandfather died and we were sorting out his belongings I had the opportunity to look through some of his old books. I came across a book he had during his college days, the 1950's, that was about college study practices. It had what you would expect in it, good study habits, a disciplined schedule, etc. But the interesting part was that the sample schedule had set aside a few hours each week for dating. Along with that was a whole chapter on proper dating techniques where the entire emphasis was basically about efficiently finding a good mate.

      This was over 50 years ago and dating was really this cold interview where you were looking for someone worth your investment. From talking to my grandmother, it was common, and expected, for a person to date many people at once and never really enter into an exclusive relationship until a proposal for marriage. She said she herself was dating several men up until the day my grandfather proposed to her.

      And in the centuries before this arranged marriages were quite common, which is as far away from the "true love" thing as it gets.

      In conclusion, I would say that throughout the history of civilization, human coupling has been more about pragmatism than romance. Thanks to the luxury of modern life, we don't need to be so pragmatic, so there is more romance involved than any previous time in history.

    39. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, after my first couple of orgasms (never having been one for masturbation)

      Er...that's not normal. Your hormones are probably dialed down a notch or two. Not that there's anything wrong with that, heck, I wish I was like that.

    40. Re:The "from the..." Department by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      I've come to the conclusion that the anti-single message in American society (and I say this as someone with a fiance) is part of the enforcement of hamster consumerism (where you jump on a treadmill for the rest of your miserable life to pay for the debts you created spending on useless consumer trinkets).

      Men are encouraged to spend money on stuff (cars, for instance) to impress females, and women are encouraged to spend money on fashion, jewelry and makeovers to attract men.

      The advertising industry is aware of this, and thus goes to full court press to crush you if you are single. Not because they care whether you are single and they are adding to your misery or not, but because increasing your misery and insecurity gets you to spend more money. Thus the wheels of commerce turn.

      Now, of course when you are young, your hormones are doing half the job for them. You are looking for any advantage to satisfy this pressing physical lust that's haunting your days and nights. (Yes, women too, though not as obviously as the men.)

      Honestly, people would have happier relationships if they had some self-discipline and didn't buy into the idea that single people were pieces human garbage to be mocked and derided by their peers and the media.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    41. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, here. I'm single because I haven't found the right guy yet. I'd love to be in a relationship, but I refuse to settle for someone I'm not really into.

      Well, if your handle (I Love Pineapples) is any true indication, I can see how finding the right guy might be a challenge. I mean, who the fuck can measure up to a fucking pineapple! Even "Sausage Girl" would be intimidating, but pineapples! Holey Crap! Although I do sense a business opportunity in the online video arena...

    42. Re:The "from the..." Department by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Way to not only be an ass, but an incorrect ass at that. The vast majority of men have lascivious thoughts toward attractive women they're around at some point... that's natural. As long as you aren't dwelling on it, or harassing those women, there's absolutely nothing wrong with it. It's just like any other thought that goes in one ear, and out the other.

      The suggestion that this is the source of the GP's trouble with women is laughable as well, since, presumably, he has the good manners to keep these thoughts to himself, like most men do. Again, if you keep it to yourself, no one is going to care (or even know, for that matter). Women aren't the damn thought police, they don't sit around judging you by your unspoken urges (or if they do, it's because they're bitches who make assumptions and judge you by that).

      Finally, at no point in the GP did he "blame" the women he's around for "forcing" him to have lascivious thoughts. He merely observed that being around them causes him to have lascivious thoughts, and that it makes things more difficult for him... which is 100% true. There is no blame in that statement, just fact.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    43. Re:The "from the..." Department by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Way to not only be an ass, but an incorrect ass at that. The vast majority of men have lascivious thoughts toward attractive women they're around at some point... that's natural. As long as you aren't dwelling on it, or harassing those women, there's absolutely nothing wrong with it.

      I didn't say there was anything wrong with is - did I? Reading comprehension, get some.
       
       

      It's just like any other thought that goes in one ear, and out the other.

      The grandparent specifically states that the thoughts interfere with his work performance, which implies they don't go in one ear and out the other. Reading comprehension, get some.
       
       

      The suggestion that this is the source of the GP's trouble with women is laughable as well, since, presumably, he has the good manners to keep these thoughts to himself, like most men do. Again, if you keep it to yourself, no one is going to care (or even know, for that matter).

      Even if he keeps his thoughts to himself - his inability to control them implies an incomplete ability to control his behavior.

    44. Re:The "from the..." Department by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      I didn't say there was anything wrong with is - did I? Reading comprehension, get some.

      It's because I have reading comprehension that I was able to see you heavily implied that there was a problem with this.

      The grandparent specifically states that the thoughts interfere with his work performance, which implies they don't go in one ear and out the other. Reading comprehension, get some.

      Right back at you. The grandparent, to a person with actual reading comprehension skills, seems to be making a joke about that more than he's being serious.

      Even if he keeps his thoughts to himself - his inability to control them implies an incomplete ability to control his behavior.

      Bullshit. Nothing about ability to control thoughts implies ability to control behavior. Behavior is far, far, far simpler to control than thoughts, which require rigorous discipline if you want to keep them out. On the other hand, if the OP's parents taught him basic self-control (and it would seem they did, otherwise he'd be posting from jail after killing the first person he got mad at), controlling behavior is trivial. You just don't do it.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    45. Re:The "from the..." Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not suppose to hack into panties. They are an access point for which it is generally best to have explicit permission to connect.

    46. Re:The "from the..." Department by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      enjoy the pleasures of physical relationships

      A person who's good with working with cars enjoys a nice car. People who enjoy lots of physical relationships have to work on it and obtain knowledge and expertise to acquire them. I was a through and through computer geek but happened to date some women and there definitely is a lot of techniques, knowledge to be acquired to be skillful in obtaining stream of physical relationships. Just like hacking assembly, it is a skill.

      But, a relationship is important.

      One of the most important points is that the desperation is men decreases as they go older. In women, it increases. So, at 24 trying to date 20-24 year olds is going to be very hard and frustrating in a dating scenario. A good option is to find activities that women also partake in and get involved in. If you can't think of anything, then blame your parents - it is essential that you teach your children at least one such thing. Top choices are: a sport, a musical instrument, singing or drama or so on. Your XBox or Bluray or your home theater or your home network doesn't count.

      As you get older, you will find that there are enough desperate women who are desperate as you are. You will need to go through your social network to find them. If you're 24, then just worry about your career and skills - women could turn your life upside down if you're too desperate and some women takes advantage of you (unknowingly to the women as well since they are messed up or in a bad situation with weirdo ex-boyfriends).

      Physical relationships can feel hollow since there is a lot of faking to get something going on.

      It is a general rule of thumb that for a successful relationship, your partner and you must be about equal attractiveness. This doesn't imply that you're given an attractiveness score that's fixed - you can buy better clothes, get fit and get a better haircut etc). So, don't waste your time going after a girl that too pretty or be prepared to make it clear if you're not attracted to someone as stringing someone on is bad.

      Anyway, that is probably just cliches you've heard a million times before. Anyway, just to help out a younger geek.

      Finally, my favorite youtube song, BJ in a bar, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ4PdgWGYF0

    47. Re:The "from the..." Department by TheMCP · · Score: 1

      This is precisely the kind of thing that I find really offensive: the assumption that the fact that I feel I need a relationship means that there's something wrong with me and/or my self image.

      How dare you assume I have poor self image just because I feel I need a relationship? I happen to be a terrific guy with fabulous skills, intelligence, style, manners, and class, who just happens to need a relationship.

      The fact that I am single is proof that I am smart enough to look for a *good* relationship rather than settling for any random slob that might want me, and that I have enough self respect to suffer my loneliness until the right man comes along.

      If you feel societally pressured to not be single, that's your problem. Don't project your problems onto me.

    48. Re:The "from the..." Department by Rycross · · Score: 1

      Or maybe what you call "needing to be in a relationship" is what I call "wanting to be in a relationship." I'm not judgmental of people who find relationships really important, and I tried my best to be non-judgmental in my post as possible. But the fact is that there are huge swaths of people who use relationships to band-aid their own personal problems, and for these people, yes "needing" a relationship is unhealthy.

      Do you have a healthy self esteem? Can you go without a relationship without being insanely depressed? Do you go on lengthy pity-parties about being single? Can you be happy and have fun without being in a relationship? If you really believe all the stuff you posted about yourself and not settling, then you probably fall into my "healthy" category.

      There's quite a spectrum between thinking that being single is a fate worse than death and being rabidly pro-single. If you lean too heavily to the former, then yes that's unhealthy. I'm sorry if this offends you, but the former is usually a sign of low self esteem and depression. If that offends you, then maybe you need to re-evaluate why.

      As far as projecting problems, same goes for you. I'm not pressuring you to be single, and I'm certainly not saying that people who thrive in relationships should be happy with being single. What I'm saying is that single people who want relationships shouldn't feel like their a loser, or feel like they have to jump into a relationship to have worth or being generally happy. In your zeal to paint me as a jerk you completely missed the entire point of my post, and threw your own stereotype on top of it.

      And yes, I do think society pressures single people to be in a relationship, including those who really shouldn't. Some people thrive in relationships, some don't, and I'd rather society as a whole stop pressuring people into the wrong choices. Nothing good can come from trying to pound a square peg into a round hole.

  20. Thank You. by cadeon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been wondering the exact same things, but been too apathetic and lazy to do the work.

    This is genuinely relevant to my interests, and made my day better.

  21. BTW, those signs are illegal by sootman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you hate them as much as I do, visit this site for tips and contact your local code enforcement office.

    Legally, they are no different from litter. If you don't have a permit to leave something in a public place, it's nothing but trash. That said, the neanderthal assholes who post them might not be aware of that* and almost certainly won't be happy if they catch you taking them down, legally right or not, so be careful when picking up trash.

    * and I'm sure the assholes who SELL the signs never mention it, either.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:BTW, those signs are illegal by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I can't stand these damn signs either. I thought it was just a problem around where I live. They appear to be planted around intersections and exit ramps by someone leaning out of their car in the middle of the night. Since they are close to the curb I've had the urge to drive over them. As if the trash that blows off of lazy people's trucks wasn't bad enough.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:BTW, those signs are illegal by philspear · · Score: 1

      That said, the neanderthal assholes who post them might not be aware of that* and almost certainly won't be happy if they catch you taking them down, legally right or not, so be careful when picking up trash

      I don't know that they would be mad. The guys who are hired to plant the signs won't have any interest as to whether they work or not. Their boss tells them "Put all these signs up and I'll give you $20." If you followed them closely, picking up the signs right after, some of them might realize that whoever is paying them minimum wage might drive by later to make sure they weren't just being tossed in the trash, and they won't get hired again. But the point of the signs is that they are cheap and dispensable, no one is going to care if you collect 100 of them, there will be a million more tomorrow.

    3. Re:BTW, those signs are illegal by E++99 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you don't have a permit to leave something in a public place, it's nothing but trash. That said, the neanderthal assholes who post them might not be aware of that.

      I might be behind on my paleoanthropology, but were the Neanderthals big on lawn-sign marketing?

    4. Re:BTW, those signs are illegal by agrounds · · Score: 2, Funny

      I really thought I was the only one that got angry enough to actually yank the signs out of the ground. Thank you so much for that link! It's good to know I am not alone in my neurosis.

      I usually just pull them up and leave them on the ground because I don't want to get my car trunk dirty.

      I know what I will be catching up on tonight. Now if only we could destroy all the billboards too...

    5. Re:BTW, those signs are illegal by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Better yet, leave them there and write "SCAM" on them in indelible marker.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:BTW, those signs are illegal by sootman · · Score: 1

      Seriously, beware. Real business (usually) advertise in legit ways; it's the crappy little places where the owner will pay for the signs himself and put them up himself and he WILL get pissed if he sees you taking "his" property. I once got chased by the big scary-looking owner/manager of the local Sofas-4-Le$$ for picking up his crappy signs. If I had more spare time (I've got two jobs & a baby) I'd talk to the code enforcement office and see if they'd mind me printing up an official-looking magnetic sign to stick on my car and I'd pick them up all the time. And print up a handy 8.5x11 flyer to hand out to anyone who says "Hey! You're taking my sign!" Just a single page that says, basically, "Hey, dumbass, if you leave it on the side of the road, it's litter."

      That said, I did call code enforcement one time when a company put up 200 signs near one intersection--literally 50 signs along a half-mile stretch in each direction. I called and for that CE came out and they were gone by the time I got back home. CE hates them just as much as you do, there's just a lot. But taking them down DOES help. Unlike email spam, which can be sent for free, signs cost money and take time to plant, and if they're gone the next day that's a bad return on investment.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    7. Re:BTW, those signs are illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wanted to get a paintball gun to shoot those signs as I drive by - but then I'd be littering, too. (and possibly be mistaken for wielding a real gun, heh)

    8. Re:BTW, those signs are illegal by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Also, if you read the comments, there's one from someone who used the company, and per their description, it's basically a scam.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:BTW, those signs are illegal by chakmol · · Score: 1

      Real business (usually) advertise in legit ways

      I can almost hear the whining now from the flimsy street advertising "businesses": "Traditional advertising is TOO expensive. My little business can't afford it!"

      Well then I say your business model is fuc**d and you need to go away.

  22. Re:Slow News Day? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our massively-coordinated and well-funded guerilla marketing machine overlords.

    Is my understanding correct that all you want for Christmas is a PSP? (A PSP? A PSP?)

  23. Way to go Slashdot! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Nice prank.

    --
    What?
  24. Makes a change to political signs I suppose by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    I had actually seen a few of these in my local area, thanks for clearing up who they belong to anyway.

    The McCain-Palin signs are mostly gone, the Obama signs are mostly gone as well as of today. All of a sudden I'm seeing Fair Tax signs pop up.

    The amusing signs on my drive to work outside a (presumably) very right wing house expounding me to not vote for Obama as he kills babies (eg supports abortion) were still there this morning, though.

    And erm, is it a slow news day?

  25. Yep, in NC Too by Jamonek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the roads of NC we are starting to see more and more of these signs. Seems like you just can't get away from the Net

    --
    http://mc.jamonek.com - Minecraft Signature Generator
  26. Awesome! by glassware · · Score: 1

    Next, can you figure out what scam artist posted all of those "Real Estate Investor Seeks Apprentice 20k Per Month" signs last year? All the signs used to be identical, but they now show things like "Buy Foreclosed Houses" instead.

    1. Re:Awesome! by glassware · · Score: 1

      Oh... I didn't realize there was an answer already. Serves me right to ask without googling.

      http://www.cockeyed.com/citizen/nouveauriche/nouveau_riche_toc.shtml

    2. Re:Awesome! by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Now THAT is investigative journalism, even if it is technically amateur, it makes the Main Story link look like a joke. Cockeyed's treatment is thorough, insightful, extensive and objective.

      Well, objective except for the "If you put up sign spam, I don't want you in my community" part.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
  27. Not exactly a 'conspriacy' by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    But it is just another form of spam marketing. And as the article notes, the 'big national' dating sites are of little use if there are only one or two members within 200 miles of where you live.

    That said, maybe /. should start a dating site. :P

    1. Re:Not exactly a 'conspriacy' by RustinHWright · · Score: 1

      That said, maybe /. should start a dating site. :P
       
        Userfriendly got there first.

      --
      It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
  28. Re:Slow News Day? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, I understand the need for new and fresh content to keep the customers coming back, but an article about a dating site that uses town names from across America?

    Let's think this through:

    1. Anyone who wants to get more Obama can go to news.google.com and read through several dozen international news sources, as well as the Huffington Post and Fox "News", and get more than enough of the regular headlines.

    2. Slashdot, as a news aggregator, is finding slim pickins on the tech side, as Obamamania sucks the oxygen out of every other news story. Cool for us political wonks, not so cool for CowboyNeal & co.

    3. This really is a nationwide conspiracy. Every tiny suburb and exurb of Dallas is frequently spammed by these guys. I thought they were a local outfit, so it's very interesting to see the extent of their reach.

    4. The way the guy investigated is cool, and I'm sorely tempted to upgrade my own DomainTools.com account to "paid" status, now that I know that it really works.

    5. Last, but CERTAINLY not least, it's about a DATING SITE. Dating, as you may have heard, is part of the mating ritual of Homo Sapiens Solaris, aka "those of us who have emerged from our parents' basements". It involves meeting FEMALES, which is kind of an awesome concept when you think about it. Opportunities for +5 Funny moderations abound (deserved or not).

    I think the "Together Dating" guerrilla marketing behemoth, with its sign spam, is reaching the same shallow end of the gene pool that buys enough v1@g@ra to keep our inboxes full of e-spam. Pretty sad. Especially when there's a free dating site that almost certainly generates better results. But I guess some folks think, if you don't pay for it, it's not worth anything. Hopefully, those folks won't be asking me for a date.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  29. Together by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has been around since long before the web- this is just their latest marketing technique. I'm actually a somewhat satisfied customer- turned out to be a great way for a geek to get a family, just faxed them my commute map and they introduced me to a gal who became my wife two years later. It helped greatly that her apartment was halfway home on my commute.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Together by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But why not do subdomains, it has to be insanely cheaper?

      Almost every demographic I've listened to the radio in has *helpwanted.com. I doubt that people would mess up *.helpwanted.com, plus it'd be MUCH cheaper.

    2. Re:Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this one of those fake "chance encounter" things, where you know where someone will be and what they want in a mate, and you pretend not to know? I hope not!

    3. Re:Together by doconnor · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems to be that cost of printing planting these signs are much higher then the cost of a domain name, so it's no big deal to them.

    4. Re:Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Has been around since long before the web- this is just their latest marketing technique. I'm actually a somewhat satisfied customer-
      ---

      did they charge you $3000 to $15000?

    5. Re:Together by Broken+scope · · Score: 2, Funny

      Clearly, their marketing has invaded Slashdot.

      --
      You mad
    6. Re:Together by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      $3600 actually, and that's where the somewhat comes in. It came to prepaying $100 for each introduction, used or unused, in blocks of 36. I only needed 5- so you could look at it that I was taken for $3100.

      Women were charged significantly less- my wife bought in blocks of 6 instead of 36, and I was her 12th introduction.

      The cost included at that time "therapy sessions" which allowed you to discover and refine what you wanted in a mate. Given the gals I was introduced to- I was either confused or they weren't using that part correctly.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:Together by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope. In fact, if they still operate the same way, you get a phone # and a first name and a hint for what to talk about. And that's it. Meeting in person is up to you.

      However, I'm not sure they still operate the same way- this was ~11 years ago. And they closed their office in Oregon soon afterward.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:Together by asylumx · · Score: 5, Informative

      RTFA, it explains this (in my own words): The localized domains give the impression that this is a local shop so the perceived likelyhood of finding a match are higher.

    9. Re:Together by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The hell with printing them... Just the signs alone.

      The price of Coroplast has tripled over the last 24 months. I buy 4'x8' sheets of it for making cages for small animals. My price went from around $6 to over $25!

      Recycling election signs works nicely though...

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    10. Re:Together by demi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can see two or three minor arguments for using a top-level .com address: One is a result of your argument--among anyone who has a vague idea that domain names have to be purchased, they may have an understanding that it might be kind of expensive, and therefore it seems more "selective" than something which is obviously just a hierarchy. That is, the internal logic goes like this: "houston.dating.com" is just part of "dating.com", it's not special for houston, but "houstondating.com" is only for houston so there'll be a lot of locals in it. The second is that people actually just screw up subdomains to a surprising degree. People seeing a sign will remember the words "houston dating dot com"--they never remember dots or hyphens or anything like that. So they go home and type "houston dating.com" or "houstondating.com" in their web browsers and get your site. (In actuality, they often type "www.houstondating.com" as well, regardless if that's correct or not).

      --
      demi
    11. Re:Together by Gat0r30y · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To give the illusion that this is actually some sort of local organization?

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    12. Re:Together by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      That seems like a lot of money spent to find someone. But as long as your happy with what you bought, then it was a good buy.

      Guess the bonus for a female using the site, is that your going ot find a guy who has $3600 of disposable income. So, he should be able to blow some cash on you. lol.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    13. Re:Together by jschloer · · Score: 1

      just faxed them my commute map and they introduced me to a gal who became my wife two years later. It helped greatly that her apartment was halfway home on my commute.

      Now that is what I call true love. Seriously why hasn't someone made this into a romantic comedy about a dude who really needs to use the HOV to get to work and back? Maybe he needs to pick up his plucky yet adorable 5 year old(from a previous marriage) from daycare before it closes. And if he's late one more time his evil ex will take full custody. But somewhere along the way he finds love. The kid doesn't like the new girl and tries to sabotage the relationship. The ex gets frustrated and sabotages the new relationship making him late to pick up the kid, but the boy finally realizes that daddy's happy with his new girl and makes an impassioned plea to the ex about why he needs to have his father in his life, and why his father needs his HOV lover. Honestly someone call Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore. They haven't made a movie in a while. I'd love to take credit for that brilliant script idea, but true love just sorta writes itself...Fade to Black...

    14. Re:Together by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That seems like a lot of money spent to find someone. But as long as your happy with what you bought, then it was a good buy.

      Yes, in the end, I believe it was worth it. My little 5 year old is pretty happy to be alive too. Of course, had I known then what I know now about these dating sites, I would have argued with them and purchased a smaller block.

      Guess the bonus for a female using the site, is that your going ot find a guy who has $3600 of disposable income. So, he should be able to blow some cash on you. lol.

      That's assuming that the competition since then (it's been 10 years for me) hasn't drastically lowered the price.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    15. Re:Together by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? It's hard enough to just convince people that websites don't necessarily all have to start with 'www' and end with '.com', with something in between! Most people just don't understand "subdomains",...

    16. Re:Together by hellop2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      >(In actuality, they often type "www.houstondating.com" as well, regardless if that's correct or not).

      Yes, but they type this into google. So, if you can get your site to be ranked number 2, then you will get a lot of clicks. Because no one like to pick the one right off the top. You know, the store lights have been shining on it making it stale. Other people have touched it and crinkled the packaging.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    17. Re:Together by billcopc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess they went bankrupt because you scored on the first try.

      These places make money by keeping you coming back... "hitting it off" is bad for business.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    18. Re:Together by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      I was also sucked into this thing. I just moved half way across the states and wanted to meet new people and saw one of the signs. I told them I made $15k less a year then I really do and gave them a sob story about just getting out of college. I got 10 introductions for $1000. I still was hesitant but I figured I'd give it a shot.

      The problem is every match they gave me was such a outdoors person I did not find anything in common with them. Only two of them had a small interest in video games (rock band and mario). The two people I actually met with were...well...fat and that was my biggest fear about this, they dont let you see a picture of the person before you accept the introduction. I'm not asking for perfection, but if there is gona be any relationship they need to be semi-attractive.

    19. Re:Together by piltdownman84 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      $3600 is only 18 good nights out at the bar, so its relatively cheap in comparison. Plus if you found someone you end up falling in love with then thats priceless.

    20. Re:Together by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      Yes, they still work in the exact same way. The biggest problem I had with their services was the fact you have no clue what the other person looks like before you call them. I like to have a image in my mind of what they look like, also it prevents my expectations from getting to high before I meet them.

    21. Re:Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These also have to be disposable domains, as those roadside signs are illegal in many places. It's harder to prove who to prosecute with a domain name.

    22. Re:Together by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Chuch Lorre, is that you ?

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    23. Re:Together by demi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I usually reach right back in the google results in the hope of getting one with the freshest expiration date.

      --
      demi
    24. Re:Together by raehl · · Score: 5, Funny

      $3600 is only 18 good nights out at the bar, so its relatively cheap in comparison.

      There is something wrong with either where or how much you are drinking.

    25. Re:Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...for making cages for small animals.

      I won't ask.

    26. Re:Together by conspirator57 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      not in oversaturated markets. When these started springing up around DC with different neighborhood/town names in the same style I leaped to the conclusion the article draws. It is good to see it confirmed though. Additionally, since the geographical granularity is so hilariously fine, it seemed less than likely that non-transplant locals were behind it. (Of course it could have been non-transplant franchisees getting buffaloed by their franchise distributor.)

      Franchise distributors have a strong proclivity to assume your market is like the market where they come from and bully you into making decisions that are more valid for that market than yours. E.g. I knew a Blimpie franchise owner who was bullied by the franchiser into following a NY-NJ business model for a fast food restaurant: find an office building and rely on the building to supply the majority of your customers. The problems with this in the DC area are several, but here are two of the biggest:

            -most DC buildings are smaller than NY buildings (esp in DC itself due to the convention of not building higher than the Washington monument.)
            -due to lower population density and poorer public transit, parking is usually needed in DC whereas NY restaurants can ignore this, relying on foot traffic.

      These and others contributed to the failure of the franchise.

      As an aside, knowledge of how to sleuth out domain registration and correlation is somewhat de rigeur for most of us in the Slashdot audience, and as such should reduce the newsworthiness of the story.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    27. Re:Together by Miseph · · Score: 1

      "These places make money by keeping you coming back... "hitting it off" is bad for business."

      Not exactly, they make money by people coming to them, whether or not they ever come back is irrelevant as long as somebody comes in the first place. You could just as easily argue that if it actually works well then they will have MORE repeat customers... most people are well aware that most relationships don't work out, so they might be more likely to use it again on the premise that it worked as well as it possibly could anyway. Not to mention that one doesn't tell their friends to try things that don't work.*

      *With the notable exceptions of religion and politics

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    28. Re:Together by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't that worried about outside appearance as much as inside attitudes about certain bits of religion and politics, so it worked for me. Of course, I also had to put in a good deal to make sure the match was more correct. Then again, I expected the girls to be on the heavy side. Skinny girls have cheaper ways to get dates.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    29. Re:Together by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      This also works with dating sites. Gotta make sure the "date" is fresh and hasn't been handled by other prospective customers!

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
    30. Re:Together by hlopez · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is for middle of the line places. If you go out in Miami, LA or NYC. That might only be about 12 good nights at a bar or club. 400 dollar bottles are the norm at the happening places in these cities.

    31. Re:Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      $200 a night for going out!!! Where are you going the Russian Tea Room?! Especially considering the towns that this service is focusing on, $200 would make you the town high-roller and you should end up with some girl that is hot but dumb as a rock and will leave you the moment the money is gone or she finds someone richer!

    32. Re:Together by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, thats fine. Ask.

      We have a small animal rescue (wildlife and guinea pig) and "Cubes & Coroplast"(p) is about the best thing you can use for Guinea Pigs.

      Most store bought cages are criminally undersized for active, grazing, social creatures.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    33. Re:Together by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Expiration date? Is that something like a date with death? And don't tell me what you mean by getting the freshest.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    34. Re:Together by plover · · Score: 1

      As an aside, knowledge of how to sleuth out domain registration and correlation is somewhat de rigeur for most of us in the Slashdot audience, and as such should reduce the newsworthiness of the story.

      I still think it's newsworthy when someone uses nerd-like skills to reveal a secret. Sure, we've probably all done our share of reverse DNSing and whoising a few spammers and phishers, but most of us haven't uncovered a vast global conspiracy while doing so. I admire the guy for that bit of sleuthing.

      --
      John
    35. Re:Together by plover · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well, I RTFA. The guy addresses this point directly:

      In talking to a few colleagues about this fascinating business, I learned that most private equity shops shy away from dating sites for a number of reasons:

      • Dating sites are known for tremendously high churn rates (if your product works, your customers never have to come back; if it doesn't they see no reason to come back). This means dating sites have to keep a steady flow of new customers coming into the top of the funnel in order to survive, let alone grow revenue and profit.
      • High churn rates mean new customers have low, volatile expected lifetime values. This has a negative impact on the equity value of each customer, making it difficult to justify the valuation multiples seen by membership-driven websites in other verticals.
      • The need to keep more and more new customers coming in creates a necessity for massive marketing budgets that often involve aggressive affiliate marketing (i.e. paying third parties to bring you new customers). This further damages the perceived value of the user base to a potential investor or acquirer.
      • Like social networking, "online dating" is a natural monopoly (or, at best, a natural oligopoly). A dating site's quality is determined by the number and quality of matches it can provide a new user, which is directly tied to the size of its membership base. This makes it extremely difficult to enter the market.

      However, just because something isn't a great investment prospect doesn't mean it's a bad business. Many, many people have become obscenely wealthy in this industry (both online and offline). The technology required to connect two people is trivial, meaning your only real expense is the cost of customer acquisition. If you are part of the natural oligopoly, your product quality will be high and people will seek you out. This cycle lowers your costs and sends your margins skyrocketing.

      Furthermore, the online dating industry has made a lot of secondary players wealthy thanks to affiliate marketing. At times, online dating sites have paid as much as $100 per head for new paying customers, and routinely pay out at least a few dollars for new "free trial" users or other prospects. This means anyone with the power to herd single internet users can potentially tap into a strong monetization engine.

      --
      John
    36. Re:Together by humphrm · · Score: 1

      You guys are all high. I can go to Cal's in Chicago and drink 100 PBRs for $200.

      --
      -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    37. Re:Together by patches · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, sucks to be there....

      I can go out and pay $20 to get into a club, and drink all night for free in St. Pete FL

      --
      The worst part of being athiest.... You don't have anyone to talk to during orgasm!
    38. Re:Together by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      vast global conspiracy. feh.

      next thing it will be right- or left-wing. i mean they're charging too much for SQL queries... it's not like they're cooking up germ warfare agents. they're not even canning badly and accidentally creating botulism. sleazy, yes. evil, no.

      last i checked a $46 mil company with 500 employees does not qualify as vast.

      sure, 30 years ago you'd have a point, but inflation really tears down that amount until there's just the psychological remnant of "million"

      Number Two: "Don't you think we should ask for *more* than a million dollars? A million dollars isn't exactly a lot of money these days. Virtucon alone makes over 9 billion dollars a year!"

      whatev.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    39. Re:Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      As you mention, these are used for election signs. Remember any good elections lately?

      Prices may drop as early as this week...

    40. Re:Together by davidphogan74 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Guinea pigs are cute little mammals, but I am scared of the furry death.

    41. Re:Together by wiz_80 · · Score: 1

      (In actuality, they often type "www.houstondating.com" as well, regardless if that's correct or not).

      Arrgh! Why do people do this? My employer uses a web conferencing system whose url is like https://company.system.com./ At least half the time, somebody on the call is trying to get at https://www.company.system.com./ I didn't say the www, and I did say the https colon slash slash, but they just add the www anyway, because it's the web, right?

      Sure, being a web server in the domain it probably ought to have www prefixed, but that convention seems to have fallen by the wayside. Also, sub-domains never had quite so hard and fast a rule, at least in the application. I do wish they would add a rule so that www. is automatically removed from any requests, though.

      --
      " There is a rational explanation for everything. There is also an irrational one. "
    42. Re:Together by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      You can say that again, a bubble-search has got to be the geekiest way to find a wife.

    43. Re:Together by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      "Get laid before you expire!

      Dating for nerds!"

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    44. Re:Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $3600 is only 18 good nights out at the bar, so its relatively cheap in comparison. Plus if you found someone you end up falling in love with then thats priceless.

      Or 14 hoockers

    45. Re:Together by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      In Australia beer is about $10 a pint.

      and there is a 70% tax on premixed drinks.

      The government is trying to remove alcohol by cutting back the supply and driving the price up.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    46. Re:Together by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      It does not matter if they are on "the heavy side" but I think they still need to be attractive.

      The old saying goes, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" but you need to be able to see the person before you can make a judgment.

    47. Re:Together by Sturdy · · Score: 1

      Two words: SEO.

      Oh wait, that's one word. You could say the same thing about a unique domain vs. a sub-domain. Sub-domains feel longer and can confuse some people. ("Huh, I don't use w's?" "It's a web site?")

      A locally-named domain is easier to recognize, easier to type, more unique, etc. Even the fact that the name appears to be local makes it feel much more "friendly" to the person that sees the sign for the first time. The only challenge to either of these approaches is cities like Springfield, Auburn, Portland, or others that can be found in multiple states.

    48. Re:Together by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Still though, if you think about it, finding a worthwhile woman can be a difficult task. Finding a worthwhile woman who is interested in you and isn't already taken can sometimes seem rather impossible.

      I'm a big believer that being with someone doesn't necessarily make you happy.

      However, I'm happier now than I would have been without someone (though still happy). 3600$ is chump change to pay for something like that. That's the cost of a pair of cruises, or a couple of gaming computers, and I'd rather have my wife than any number of idyllic sea adventures or 3 years worth of gaming rigs.

    49. Re:Together by Chapter80 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Women were charged significantly less- my wife bought in blocks of 6 instead of 36.

      This is exactly why I signed up for the service posing as a woman. Cheaper.

      Unfortunately there's no checkbox for the ladies to check "Seeking Man Posing as a woman to get a better deal", so I had to resort to posing as a Lesbian.

      Wonder why I am still single.

    50. Re:Together by borroff · · Score: 1

      Guinea pigs are cute little mammals, but I am scared of the furry death.

      They just really startle me.

    51. Re:Together by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      As long as she doesn't talk, is there a problem with that?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    52. Re:Together by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      The funny thing to me is that I tried to push a concept for localized web businesses to get a business loan and was shot down because they didn't think users wanted to interact with local stores and people that lived near them. Even when I showed them my statistics from existing web businesses I run that show otherwise. Doh.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    53. Re:Together by A+New+Normalcy · · Score: 1

      About 1.5 years ago signs were appearing on the off ramps in my locale: "Apprentice wanted by local investor". I then saw identical 'hand written' signs in a community 120 miles away. Keep your BS detector set for a low trigger threshold.

      --
      ...Lorenzo / I'm into kinky crustaceans. I just discovered internet praWn.
    54. Re:Together by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Pics or GTFO..

      I'd pay money to see a McCain-Palin sign covered in droppings. :)

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    55. Re:Together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So as well as roadside sign spamming, they've moved on to working slashdot?

    56. Re:Together by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      I'm also a necrofiliac, you insensitive clod!

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    57. Re:Together by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, my experience predates both my involvement on slashdot *and* their roadside spamming.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  30. *Applause NOW* by Seakip18 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great primary research and very entertaining. Reminds me of the p-p-p-p-power book scandal. Gotta wonder if he had a slow day(s) with his business to do this.

    --
    import system.cool.Sig;
  31. Re original post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being a huge business intelligence geek

    Are you sure it had nothing to do with you being a single geek?

  32. They are in Dallas and Irving, TX too by azav · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DallasSingles.org, LasColinasSingles.org. Isn't it illegal to plop these signs on public land? I hate this crap.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:They are in Dallas and Irving, TX too by RustinHWright · · Score: 1

      Yes, afaik, it is illegal. These folks are running a business that is fundamentally dependent on, in effect, theft of services from whomever's land they put their signs on. Looks like their entire business model works only if they can continue to keep their cost of advertising lower than is true for those of us who, ya know, actually pay for it.

      In effect, they're spammers who've learned how to move their campaign to meatspace.
       
      Charming.

      --
      It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
    2. Re:They are in Dallas and Irving, TX too by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 1

      Yes they are illegal. Any sign posted in the public right of way without a permit is illegal (Excepting, of course roadsigns and the like, at least in Austin, TX, it is, and I assume most other places). I pull up these signs and have only seen a tiny number of them with permits (which were pasted onto the back). This also includes political signs, real estate signs, lost animal signs, and garage sale signs. I've found that the real-estate signs that get put up on weekends (and taken down by the same folks, apparently) are a great source for angle-iron. They're known as 'bandit signs', and I've filled up a 3/4 ton truck on a Sunday morning, and seen no difference the next weekend. It is usually up to code enforcement to ticket the offenders, but they are usually out doing things that the city council (often bandit sign offenders themselves) deem more important.

  33. I always thought they were NSA and CIA messages by HomerJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought secret agents about various towns would go to these websites and put in their "special" information. Then they could get secure messages back and forth. If someone else used them, they just got some boiler plate thing. I thought the whole thing was a vast government project. Like those CIA numbers stations.

    I'm disappointed to find out it's nothing more than spam for a "dating" site. Really kills my faith in conspiracy theories.

  34. And the sign said long haired freaky people.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the sign said long haired freaky people need not apply
    So I tucked my hair up under my hat and I went in to ask him why
    He said you look like a fine upstanding young man, I think you'll do
    So I took off my hat I said imagine that, huh, me working for you
    woah!

    Signs, signs, everywhere a sign
    Blocking out the scenery breaking my mind
    Do this, don't do that, can't you read the sign

    And the sign said anybody caught trespassing would be shot on sight
    So I jumped on the fence and yelled at the house, Hey! what gives you the right
    To put up a fence to keep me out or to keep mother nature in
    If God was here, he'd tell you to your face, man you're some kinda sinner

    Now, hey you Mister! can't you read, you got to have a shirt and tie to get a seat
    You can't even watch, no you can't eat, you ain't suppose to be here
    Sign said you got to have a membership card to get inside Uh!

    And the sign said everybody welcome, come in, kneel down and pray
    But when they passed around the plate at the end of it all,
    I didn't have a penny to pay, so I got me a pen and a paper and I made up my own little sign
    I said thank you Satan for thinking about me, I'm alive and doing fine

  35. Wow Long Story...excellent by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

    Excellent novel...I swear it reminded me of Snow Crash because of the immense detail.

    There is some crazy detail in this story and I must give credit to the author. You deserve a shiny metal for an article that long and well written....and excellently researched

    You might be the next Neal Stephenson of the spam novel world XD

  36. Yep, here too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are several of these in my town, which is technically not even an incorporated town. I figured it was something local to the NY/NJ area. I had no idea it went further than that.

  37. Each URL with their own IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * GlassboroSingles.com: 200.46.241.132
    * HaddonHeightsDating.com: 66.252.239.220
    * FifthAvenueSingles.com: 69.41.228.6
    * WindsorSingles.org: 66.252.239.220

    No wonder we're running out of IP4 addresses.

  38. oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Single? SlashdotSingles.org

    1. Re:oh no by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      Why did you include a question mark?

  39. What are you going to do with them? by icebrain · · Score: 1

    Are they the corrugated plastic ones with metal stands? Those make great target holders when you go to the range.

    --
    The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
  40. Re:Slow News Day? by E++99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dating, as you may have heard, is part of the mating ritual of Homo Sapiens Solaris.

    What?! I hadn't realized the human race had officially speciated by operating system!

  41. Good read... by skelly33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I enjoyed the read particularly because I've done similar witch hunts myself in the past and I think it would be beneficial for others to follow their nose similarly. I'm less interested in the entertainment from tracking a legitimate business however and more so in exposure of crime rings related to fraud, ID/CC theft, domain hijacking, etc. Those ones can be pretty vast in scale and very difficult to track down. Some of them put up impressive fronts too such as legitimate "ICANN Accredited" domain registrar services, etc. - but make no mistake, they're rotten to the core. If more people actively pursued and exposed these types of organizations perhaps we'd all be a little better off...

  42. Historical whois? by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Wow, I did not know that existed. This is probably the first time I've learned something from a /. article in months.

    Thanks!

  43. Re:Slow News Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Regarding number 4, don't waste money. netcraft.com and the manual pages for nmap and whois are all you need to do what he did.

  44. you mate, then reproduce by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    there exists people who also talk about "crotchfruit" with derision when talking about children, and act confused as to why anyone would choose to have kids

    well, people like that, and you who speak of pair bond formation in a mystified manner, are genuine oddballs

    fact is, a society that doesn't form stable mating pairs and doesn't raise children is a dying society. all other observations on the subject matter fall secondary to this undeniable fact. being in a relationship with the opposite sex often sucks, and having children certainly sucks, but there is simply no other way to contribute to your society in the most fundamental, biological of ways

    you don't have to form a pair bond with a member of the opposite sex, and you don't have to have children. both those choices are perfectly ok for you to take, and i have no problem with that choice

    but don't pretend that singlehood or childlessness is somehow the default choice for human existence, and don't act mystified as to what drives people to do these things. pairing up and having children is called keeping humanity and civilization alive, and its pretty hardwired into our psychology and biology, for obvious reasons: keep homo sapiens alive

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  45. Haven't seen them here, but by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

    ... this reminds me of all the "I lost 60 pounds in 30 days. Ask me how" signs I used to see all over the place.

  46. Re:Slow News Day? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    I think the "Together Dating" guerrilla marketing behemoth, with its sign spam, is reaching the same shallow end of the gene pool that buys enough v1@g@ra to keep our inboxes full of e-spam. Pretty sad.

    With 8-figure revenues, and $3k-$15k per customer, I'm not so sure.

    As for the "shallow end" of the gene pool... this is a dating service. A rather expensive one, at that ($3k-$15k per customer). The customers have cash (making the assumption that therefore they have *some* good genes), and they have difficulty finding a match on their own (making the assumption that they don't have the best genes for reproductive success).

    Seems to me that this service serves to increase the variability of good genes in the gene pool, since there are probably good traits that the most-likely-to-reproduce-successfully may be less likely to exhibit (or have the genes for).

    Lot of assumptions here, and I don't beleive that genetics determine so much of our personalities, etc... just a thought on the genetic implications of matchmaking services like this. Not that it really has anything to do with your point.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  47. Do they count as litter? by dmomo · · Score: 1

    They are on public property. Am I free to take them? Can I cover them with my own promotional stickers?

    1. Re:Do they count as litter? by RustinHWright · · Score: 1

      From the looks of it, yes. Go for it. According to TFA, which seems pretty credible to me, they don't pay to use the space. They don't even get permission, evidently. And it looks like they make a good deal of their money from data harvesting of a kind that's just a bit hinky anyway. Afaic, you're doing a public service by taking a chance to reduce the amount of mass-produced advertising that your fellow citizens are subjected to.

      --
      It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
    2. Re:Do they count as litter? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      They are on public property. Am I free to take them? Can I cover them with my own promotional stickers?

      Or better yet, can you charge the company for cleanup?

      Seriously I understand the need for yard sale signs. That's well and good. There usually are laws on how long you can keep them up.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  48. Re:this story sucks by grub · · Score: 1

    He has liver damage?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  49. How Much Did You Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the RTFM, inquiring minds want to know.

    1. Re:How Much Did You Pay? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      $3600. About $3100 of that was wasted, as I purchased a block of 36 introductions and only used 5.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:How Much Did You Pay? by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I wonder if there is an aftermarket for the ones you didn't use. I am sure that there would be some nerds out there willing to pay you a discount rate for the remainder :)

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    3. Re:How Much Did You Pay? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I'm not even sure my contract is still valid. I tried to sell them once (pre-E-bay and craigslist though) in a local classified add and only ended up getting myself a coffee date with a gay guy who didn't want to buy.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:How Much Did You Pay? by no1home · · Score: 1

      So now you have a little something-something on the side?

      --
      I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

      Persecutors will be violated!
    5. Re:How Much Did You Pay? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nope, never used the remaining 31 introductions, and my local office of Together got sold to something called Relationships NW, which went bankrupt a few months later.

      That was 8 years ago.

      So the only thing I got out of it was a very satisfying marriage and a little boy with CP who is happy all the time (in fact, that was his first word- happy- amazing that his mother and I, both of whom are very pessimistic people, have a child who is so happy).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:How Much Did You Pay? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 3, Funny

      $3600. About $3100 of that was wasted, as I purchased a block of 36 introductions and only used 5.

      Yes, most things you spend on toward a wedding are a ripoff, anyway. I bought two dozen oysters for our wedding night and at least three of them didn't work.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    7. Re:How Much Did You Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was 8 years ago.

      So the only thing I got out of it was a very satisfying marriage and a little boy with CP who is happy all the time (in fact, that was his first word- happy - amazing that his mother and I, both of whom are very pessimistic people, have a child who is so happy).

      MH42, that is a great story, and a nice development too - the boy whose first word is "happy"! You couldn't make it up. Best thread in the article. Thanks for sharing.

      See you around more often in JC's journal?

    8. Re:How Much Did You Pay? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Maybe. As time allows. Yeah, Christopher's been a pretty neat kid, even with some of his language problems (he's now 5 and in special-ed kindergarten). Over the weekend, he told me he wasn't a boy, he was a "ristoper".

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    9. Re:How Much Did You Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for the late reply. Yeah, kids never cease being pretty neat. Hope things go well for you all.

      On a side note, JC and his journal seem to be in a deep freeze for the first time in years? Whassup with that. I never posted much there, and now he's gone and quit, makes no difference anyway. Sure I'll just head on over to yours and zogger's.

      This article is about to go archive itself. If you drop me a reply here, I'll read it.

  50. I've seen these... by TerranFury · · Score: 1

    ...in Pooler, GA, a suburb of Savannah. (I was surprised to be sure; Pooler is more a loose federation of strip malls than it is a town, and I wasn't expecting to see anything like this that implies a communal identity.)

    Am I and this guy the only ones who've seen this?

  51. ROFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad the parent can't be modded up to +6 Funny

    1. Re:ROFLMAO by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      That would take negative two Funny moderations, since I score Funny as -3.

  52. They recruit sign posters via craigslist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I see the ads up every so often. They pay $1 per sign

    1. Re:They recruit sign posters via craigslist by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      Of course, I suppose you have to pay them $0.95 each to buy the signs that they pay you $1.00 each to plant...

  53. Yes, they do all that and more. by dfm3 · · Score: 1

    I confirmed this when I brought one of the signs home and, er, um, NOTHING TO SEE HERE- MOVE ALONG.

  54. Re:Slow News Day? by redscare2k4 · · Score: 1

    I wholeheartedly agree. I found specially interesting the amount of information that a particular individual with dedication and $10 bucks can uncover.

  55. Re:Slow News Day? by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

    I thought they were a local outfit, so it's very interesting to see the extent of their reach.

    You seriously thought it was local, and honestly didn't expect that they were simply working out where you were and putting that name in? If it's such a slow news period, then I patiently await the next /. article that discusses investigations into your naivety.

  56. Friend got scammed by db10 · · Score: 3, Informative

    .. I didn't believe him when he told me he paid ~$2500 for this.. He tried to get his money back after he realized that he wasn't getting any dates, with no luck. A fool and his money are soon parted my friends.

    1. Re:Friend got scammed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      A fool and his money are soon partying my friends.

      Fixed it for ya :-)

  57. Why the 7 extra characters? by raehl · · Score: 1

    Single? SlashdotSingles.org

    Slashdot.org works just fine.

    1. Re:Why the 7 extra characters? by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      Well, slashdot.org KEEPS you single.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  58. OKCupid by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    OK Cupid is also free and has a lot of personality tests to find people who think like you. I met my wife through that site.

    1. Re:OKCupid by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      So did I! Tell her to stop calling me.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  59. Pulling them up DOES help by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    Those signs cost about $0.50 each to print.

    Pull them up. You will increase their costs. Every little bit counts!

  60. Re:Slow News Day? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

    You seriously thought it was local, and honestly didn't expect that they were simply working out where you were and putting that name in?

    One of the other posters pointed out that it's not just city names, it's neighborhood names too. Like "LasColinasSingles", "LakeHighlandsSingles", and "OakCliffSingles". Those wouldn't show up in many city name databases -- you need eyes on the ground to know those names, and more importantly, where to stick the signs.

    My only disappointment in the article is that he didn't figure out where the army of locally-knowledgeable sign-planters is coming from.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  61. Check out the Alternatives to Marriage Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 54 and my sweet young girlfriend is 51, and we have no plans to marry, so we are considered "single" in the legal sense, which makes no sense at all since we've been committed to each other for the last 7 years.

    The org mentioned below wants to make things "equal" with those who have legal rights simply because they marry.

    The Alternatives to Marriage Project (AtMP) is a national nonprofit organization advocating for equality and fairness for unmarried people, including people who are single, who choose not to marry, cannot marry, or live together before marriage.

  62. Christian singles spammers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if these are the same people sending me "Christian singles" spam. I always think, sure, I'll fuck and dump your naive little Christian girls...

  63. Lenthy but worth the read by Conficio · · Score: 1

    While this is a lengthy article it is definitely worth the read.

    And yes I can confirm these signs are around I95 exits for years.

    --
    Busy helping non technical users of OpenOffice.org - http://plan-b-for-openoffice.org/
  64. I am intrigued by your ideas by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  65. People who do this are idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        Get it down on how it is really down.
      Get into Leykis 101 class idiots who pay for dates.
      His rule:
      1: Never pay more than 40 dollars per date, if you can make it 0 is the best.
      2: Never date single mothers.
      3: Never get a girlfriend.

      More on blowmeuptom.com

      stupid losers who pay for women.

  66. this makes me sad by NovaHorizon · · Score: 1

    I saw an ad like this ONLINE only ONCE for Twin Falls, Idaho.. and instantly came to the conclusion that domains were listed for tons and tons of cities... And you get paid to not figure it out till the second sign?! :x

  67. Crazy Fox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.cockeyed.com/citizen/crazyfox/crazyfox.php

  68. Nationwide group CAUSS.org removes illegal signs by TemporalTransient · · Score: 1

    Excellent research! These (and other) signs are illegal in 99% of our cities and towns. See http://www.causs.org/ CAUSS.org. CAUSS is a nationwide organization of citizens and code enforcement officers who remove illegal signs in their neighborhoods. CAUSS maintains national and state-based forums that are fairly active. There is quite a bit of research on illegal singles signs there - search for "single" and "dating". Bottom line: help Code Enforcement remove illegal signs in your city!

  69. $200 A NIGHT? by CPNABEND · · Score: 1

    Christ, buy a six pack and get a hooker!

    --
    My wife doesn't listen to me either...
  70. Re:Slow News Day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully, those folks won't be asking me for a date.

    I wouldn't worry about it, dude.

  71. It's illegal. by mochan_s · · Score: 1

    Regardless of how you feel about Together Datingâ(TM)s industry or its methods, you have to appreciate their tremendous, low-profile marketing machine and the data-driven technological infrastructure that supports it. This company brings in 8 solid figures of revenue every year using nothing but yard signs, some parked domains, and a firm grasp of the data that drives their growth.

    Every thing about this company is trivial and their main source of their income is directly related to the illegal sign placements. If they had to pay for posting of said signs, then they would function at a normal level. As the article mentions, everything else is trivial except for the illegal advertising.

    If you're willing to do illegal things and that has low probability of being prosecuted, then you can make lots and lots of money.

    Replace your company staff with illegal workers and thousands of dollars saved. Just multiply it by eliminating your competitors and you're into huge numbers.