Slashdot Mirror


Dead Parrot Sketch Is 1,600 Years Old

laejoh writes "Monty Python's 'Dead Parrot sketch' — which featured John Cleese — is some 1,600 years old. A classic scholar has proved the point, by unearthing a Greek version of the world-famous piece. A comedy duo called Hierocles and Philagrius told the original version, only rather than a parrot they used a slave. It concerns a man who complains to his friend that he was sold a slave who dies in his service. His companion replies: 'When he was with me, he never did any such thing!' The joke was discovered in a collection of 265 jokes called Philogelos: The Laugh Addict, which dates from the fourth century AD. Hierocles had gone to meet his maker, and Philagrius had certainly ceased to be, long before John Cleese and Michael Palin reinvented the yarn in 1969."

276 comments

  1. so that's what killed it by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Old age.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:so that's what killed it by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And what does John Cleese have to say about this?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:so that's what killed it by duguk · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:so that's what killed it by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You think that story is funny, you should hear the one that Biggus Dickus told just before last weeks crucifiction! It was to die for...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:so that's what killed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if MP got this from yesterday's Fark... just like samzenpus did.

    5. Re:so that's what killed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if MP got this from yesterday's Fark... just like samzenpus did.

      Not all of us read Fark on a regular basis.

    6. Re:so that's what killed it by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. The rest of us Fark on a continual basis.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    7. Re:so that's what killed it by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA (yeah yeah), you'd see how fracking OLD Cleese is! I was shocked.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    8. Re:so that's what killed it by mlievore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So Does this mean that we have used all possible jokes and are just starting over again?

    9. Re:so that's what killed it by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      And what does John Cleese have to say about this?

      He'll probably laugh his ass off, and then sit down and write a mini-series about two hard up comedians, who resort to stealing common gags from the Classics, and make a fortune . . . and nobody knows that jokes are millenniums old.

      Imagine Manual trying to read his ancient Greek script . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    10. Re:so that's what killed it by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't know what John Cleese has to say about it, but Jorge of Burgos sure seems pissed.

    11. Re:so that's what killed it by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I've got the fark and /. feeds to come up on my homepage.

      I was going to say something about numbers, but damn; 3 digits. Is your fark account that low too?

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    12. Re:so that's what killed it by DittoBox · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think that word means what you think it means...

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    13. Re:so that's what killed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You think that stowy is funny, you should heaw the one that Biggus Dickus told just befowe last weeks cwucifiction! It was to die fow...

      There, fixed that for you.

    14. Re:so that's what killed it by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2, Funny

      Er, yeah, whoops. Long week.

      Long, shitty week.

      I'll just go back and edit my post.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    15. Re:so that's what killed it by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Never logged in at Fark. Funny.

      I actually go over there in bursts, or quanta. Sometimes... months pass.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    16. Re:so that's what killed it by uberjack · · Score: 1

      Imagine Manual(sic) trying to read his ancient Greek script . . .

      I'm sorry, the original poster is from Barcelona.

    17. Re:so that's what killed it by Petrushka · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since neither this article nor any other report I can find actually gives the reference for the joke, those wanting to look at critical editions can find it under Philogelos 18. Here's my literal translation:

      Someone met an academic and said, "The slave you sold me died." "By the gods!" he said. "When he was at my place he didn't do anything like that."

      I can't reproduce here the text for those who can read ancient Greek, as Slashdot won't allow non-Roman alphabets. Here's a transliterated form, though (minus the diacritics):

      scholastikôi tis apantêsas eipen: ho doulos, hon epôlêas moi, apethane. ma tous theous, ephê, par' emoi hote ên, toiouton ouden epoiêsen.

      I don't understand why the article talks as though the joke has just been discovered. There have been at least three critical editions in the last 50 years, and a few translations.

    18. Re:so that's what killed it by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Its funny because its true :)

      Someone call Cleese, I want to see this sketch series.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    19. Re:so that's what killed it by slideshow+bob · · Score: 1

      "It's just a flesh wound!"

    20. Re:so that's what killed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for yourself. It's been so long since my last fark that my budgie has run down the curtain and joined the choir invisible ...

  2. Never the same again by VinylRecords · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow those plagiarists...what next are you going to tell me that the Holy Grail movie was based on ancient stories as well? Or Life of Brian? Are you telling me that Jesus wasn't an original character?

    1. Re:Never the same again by LordEd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you telling me that Jesus wasn't an original character

      No, but he was nailed to the perch...

    2. Re:Never the same again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but Polly wasn't able to come back as a zombie 3 days later before being miracled into wine and crackers.

    3. Re:Never the same again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ahh blasphemy humor. It never gets old. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to get my a keyboard that isn't swimming ing Coke.

    4. Re:Never the same again by forkazoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow those plagiarists...what next are you going to tell me that the Holy Grail movie was based on ancient stories as well? Or Life of Brian? Are you telling me that Jesus wasn't an original character?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mithras#Mithraism_and_Christianity

    5. Re:Never the same again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, but Jesus eventually got back up and starting flying around again (up to Heaven, anyway).

      I guess that means he was just pining for the fjords all that time...

    6. Re:Never the same again by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Now I have coffee splattered all over my keyboard.

    7. Re:Never the same again by david.given · · Score: 1

      No, of course Jesus wasn't original --- the whole concept is a blatant ripoff of Monty Python. Hey, it's on TV, it must be true...

    8. Re:Never the same again by Cow+Jones · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but Polly wasn't able to come back as a zombie 3 days later before being miracled into wine and crackers.

      Sweet Zombie Jesus!

      /farnsworth

      --

      Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
    9. Re:Never the same again by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it wasn't just the Mithras that was copied from--and it wasn't just Christianity that copied from other religions for that matter. the story of Noah's Ark found in Judeo-Christian & Muslim literature seems to have been adapted from the Epic of Gilgamesh from Sumerian legends dating back to the 17th century BC.

    10. Re:Never the same again by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I haven't read that link yet, but Religulous has several examples of pre-Christian religions that have many ideas copied by Christianity.

    11. Re:Never the same again by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? The parrot's not dead!

    12. Re:Never the same again by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Then there's the wonderful claim that the Christian bread and wine sacrifice as the 'body and blood of Christ' is actually an even older Egyptian ceremony involving the 'death cookie'. This was described in hysterically funny illustrations in one of the tracts by Jack Chick, which are great entertainment.

    13. Re:Never the same again by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      From a theological and historical perspective, the story of Jesus is not new even to Christians or Jews, since his coming was foretold by Jewish prophets hundreds and thousands of years beforehand (which he cited periodically).

      These stories were well-distributed and told commonly so I've never seen it as strange that anyone else would tell similar ones.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    14. Re:Never the same again by Scoldog · · Score: 1

      Are you telling me that Jesus wasn't an original character

      No, but he was nailed to the perch...

      Ah, Jesus and those fish tricks of his

      Was it a silver perch or a jungle perch?

      --
      This space for rent
    15. Re:Never the same again by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "the story of Noah's Ark found in Judeo-Christian & Muslim literature seems to have been adapted from the Epic of Gilgamesh from Sumerian legends dating back to the 17th century BC."

      This claim is often bandied about, but there's absolutely no evidence to support it, and a significant body of contrary evidence such as an even older written account (2300 BC) of a flood in Akkadian, a Semitic language that is the root of both Hebrew and Aramaic. This is a far more likely source of the Biblical flood story than a later document written in a completely unrelated language, especially given the fact that various other elements of the Old Testament are now known to be Akkadian in origin.

      NB: it's very likely that both the Akkadians and Sumerians were writing down their own versions of much older oral traditions rather than one having influenced the other, either directly or indirectly.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    16. Re:Never the same again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because of course most of the OT was put together during the Babylonian exile, and the exiles wouldn't have been exposed to Gilgamesh much.

    17. Re:Never the same again by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

      Hundreds, maybe - thousands is somewhat improbable given that the 'exodus' myth is generally placed at only 1300 BCE or so.

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    18. Re:Never the same again by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      It was Hermes not Farnsworth.

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    19. Re:Never the same again by ErkDemon · · Score: 1

      Are you telling me that Jesus wasn't an original character?

      Actually, some of the stories do seem to be borrowed from older tales about other characters.

      And the business with haloes seems to be lifted from depictions of the "rogue" pharaoh Akhenaten, who attempted to convert the Egyptians to the then-heretical idea of monotheism. The disk behind the head (sometimes with rays) is a symbol for the Sun, with its associated themes of death and rebirth. There seems to have been some cultural crossover between Akhenaten's religion and early Judaism, to the extent that with some aspects of the modern bible, its not totally clear whether Akhenaten's lot nicked them from Judeism, or whether Judaism nicked them from Akhenaten's priests. Ancient Judaism wasn't necessarily monotheistic. That aspect got emphasised at a later revision. Since the Jesus story was told partly as the fulfilment of a prophesy, the story lived up to expectations better if certain older themes (particularly to do with his conception, birth and death) occurred within the narrative.

    20. Re:Never the same again by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Gotta love how you position your view of historical accounts by throwing 'myth' in the sentence.

      That said, the Exodus is hardly the beginning of the stories foretelling of the coming of a Christ.

      In fact, the Exodus itself is frequently cited as such a foretelling.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    21. Re:Never the same again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, Jesus was pining for the fjords?!

  3. Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull history by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a Classics major as an undergrad, I'm always happy to see these kind of stories. There was some wicked humour in the ancient world that is still hilarious today, from the political jibes in the plays of Aristophanes to the obscenities of Petronius' Satyricon. It's a pity that most people would never think about reading them, because one tends to assume that old literary works are dry and serious.

  4. What's worse... by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's worse is that only only did they blatantly copy the Greeks parrot sketch, but they even copied (with some minor alterations) a humorous tale about a wandering preacher in The Life of Brian. Really, the Monty Python crew knew no shame.

    1. Re:What's worse... by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      *not only, oops.

    2. Re:What's worse... by philspear · · Score: 1

      I believe they also stole the story of King Arthur for Holy Grail. They also ripped off a real life story of a pundit historian getting killed by a mysterious stranger on horseback. The victim's family didn't get a dime, and they made a mockery out of a tragedy.

    3. Re:What's worse... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... and they made a mockery out of a tragedy.

      Isn't that the definition of comedy?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:What's worse... by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      Apparently they also snaked the meaning of life from the bible:

      Try and be nice to people, avoid eating fat, read a good book every now and then, get some walking in and try and live together in peace and harmony with people of all creeds and nations.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    5. Re:What's worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pffft. Standard Hollywood stuff. Someone writes a reasonably successful book, they make a movie about it. The shocking thing is that the author didn't turn up and sue them for copyright infringement and royalties.

    6. Re:What's worse... by philspear · · Score: 1

      Well, not a specific tragedy at least.

    7. Re:What's worse... by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 1

      I am appalled how history is allowed to lampoon and plagiarize our lord John Cleese

    8. Re:What's worse... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      What exactly is a non-specific tragedy?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:What's worse... by philspear · · Score: 1

      I feel the need to point out this was a joke, but there would be a difference between making fun of one actual murder like "Ha ha, Joe the Plumber got shot through the butt and bled to death!" and other types of comedy, like a movie where a fictional character named joe gets shot to death in a humorous way.

      If Monty python had been making fun of a real guy who got chopped down while giving an interview, that would be kind of disrespectful to the family.

      Not sure why this needed so much clarification...

    10. Re:What's worse... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      The parable of the Good Samaritan is a non-specific tragedy that Jesus told to make a point about an event that probably never happened in those exact details but whose basic jist was realistic and poignant.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  5. dead? by nblender · · Score: 5, Funny

    That joke's not dead... It's pining for the fjords...

    1. Re:dead? by Slicebo · · Score: 1

      Parrots can't drive.

    2. Re:dead? by thepotoo · · Score: 1

      Captain Obvious, is that you? Since when do you post to Slashdot?

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    3. Re:dead? by KnightStalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must be new around here.

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
  6. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll have to check them out when I have time.

    What I find really interesting is the graffiti from those times. Stuff about elections, dirty jokes (which you'd still find funny today), and so on.

  7. The Best of Hierocles and Philagrius by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    You can read more of their jokes at Google Books.

    Seriously, I saw these guys in their prime on the "Ranting from Rome to Apulia" tour. Fucking hilarious stuff. They really took a turn for the worse when that pussy Constanine brought in Christianity, though. It was just never the same for comedians in the Empire with those holier-than-thou types in charge.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:The Best of Hierocles and Philagrius by jfengel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So... that book is dated 1920. Is there any actual news here, or did some guy just finally connected the gag to the dead parrot sketch and report it to that distinguished journal, The Telegraph?

  8. Manditory Link by Zymergy · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218
    THIS.... is an Ex-Parrot!!

  9. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What? They had humour prior to the 1960s? Seriously, deep inside me I believe that people hardly made or said anything funny back then. I'm sure lots of people feel the same way.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  10. in soviet antiquity, by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    joke predates you!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:in soviet antiquity, by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      In Ostrogothic Russian Steppes, joke reads you!

      --
      The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  11. Not the same joke by KeithIrwin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Umm, those aren't the same joke at all. Just because they both involve selling and dying doesn't mean that they're the same joke. The premise of the older joke is that the man who sold the slave is saying something in a surprised manner which is obviously true. The contrast is between his surprise and the understanding of the audience for the joke that he shouldn't be surprised (since obviously the slave hadn't died before he sold it).

    The joke in the Monty Python sketch is that the parrot was dead when it was sold. The humor comes from the absurdness of the idea that someone could be sold a dead parrot without realizing it. The joke is furthered by the sales clerk's obviously futile attempts to claim that the parrot isn't dead and the colorful language used to attempt to convince the clerk that the parrot is dead. This is not at all the same joke. The premise is completely different, as is the type of humor involved. The Greek one is ironic humor. The Monty Python one is absurdist humor.

    1. Re:Not the same joke by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah yes, now that the joke is properly explained it may now be classified as extra humorous.

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
    2. Re:Not the same joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's not what's funny about it and whoever modded you up is a complete idiot. Congratulations.

    3. Re:Not the same joke by Cornwallis · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean posthum[or]ous

    4. Re:Not the same joke by Prosthetic_Lips · · Score: 1

      Amen to that!

      The only people that could think that they are the same joke are those that have not read the joke, or have not seen the MP sketch. Around here the latter number is nearly zero, so you people need to RTFA.

      Wait, another joke talked about drinking, so the MP sketch about Bruces must be a blatant rip-off, also. Zheesh.

    5. Re:Not the same joke by avandesande · · Score: 2, Funny

      The part that ties them together:

      "And now time for something completely different!"

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    6. Re:Not the same joke by baKanale · · Score: 1

      John Kerry? Is that you?

    7. Re:Not the same joke by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      While you are indeed correct, anal retentiveness has no place in humour...

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    8. Re:Not the same joke by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Umm, those aren't the same joke at all. Just because they both involve selling and dying doesn't mean that they're the same joke. The premise of the older joke is that the man who sold the slave is saying something in a surprised manner which is obviously true. The contrast is between his surprise and the understanding of the audience for the joke that he shouldn't be surprised (since obviously the slave hadn't died before he sold it).

      The joke in the Monty Python sketch is that the parrot was dead when it was sold. The humor comes from the absurdness of the idea that someone could be sold a dead parrot without realizing it. The joke is furthered by the sales clerk's obviously futile attempts to claim that the parrot isn't dead and the colorful language used to attempt to convince the clerk that the parrot is dead. This is not at all the same joke. The premise is completely different, as is the type of humor involved. The Greek one is ironic humor. The Monty Python one is absurdist humor.

      Certainly, the jokes are different, but there is a thread of commonality between the two. After all, the Greek one can be read as if the vendor is trying to avoid blame for the dead slave, for fear of giving a refund. The elder joke isn't a full sketch like the Monty Python version, so it's impossible to say that's the only reading. But, it is certainly possible to see both jokes being about a vendor trying to avoid blame and a refund for the fact that something he sold is dead.

      Personally, my favorite from that old collection is the one about the Barber, the Pedant, and the bald man who go camping in the woods. I may use that at some point.

    9. Re:Not the same joke by brkello · · Score: 1

      And is true with all jokes, if you explain them in that way they cease to be funny.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    10. Re:Not the same joke by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      While you are indeed correct, anal retentiveness has no place in humour...

      I guess it's true if all you know are fart jokes.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    11. Re:Not the same joke by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is because humor is transmitted through comedrons, known in quantum physics circles as the "Odd Particle". Any attempts to observe or analyze them will affect their paths, effectively negating them.

      I've also got a 'silly string'-based theory, but the bastards at Geneva won't let me touch their equipment to test my theories.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    12. Re:Not the same joke by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      Yes it is!

    13. Re:Not the same joke by hobbit · · Score: 1

      Yes, but being about humor and being humorous are not the same thing; this article is the former, not the latter.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    14. Re:Not the same joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great comment. The parent is explaining how this is a non-story. Normal sensationalist media trying to grab attention by forcing a comparison of two things that are only slightly related and calling the more popular thing a sham.

      What it boils down to is the person who wrote the story is probably a comedic idiot. Comedy is an incredibly nuanced and detail driven art. People think anyone can do it but most people can't channel their way through a joke to save their lives.

      I think this needs to be taken more seriously. You can't pass off history or anthropology in a story without expert opinion weighing in. The same thing should be true for comedy. If it did not jump out at you immediately that these jokes had only vague and passing resemblance to each other then consider yourself not worthy to judge.

    15. Re:Not the same joke by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Monty Python is treated as more absurdist than they really were by American audiences. A lot of the objects of their humor were aspects of British life, politics and culture that would be recognizable to viewers in the UK, particularly at the time. Which is why British comedy moved on decades ago (The League of Gentlemen, Little Britain, The Catherine Tate Show, and the brilliant That Mitchell and Webb Look.)

      When an American geeks constantly recycle the same handful of Monty Python routines, it's depressing. It's humor-by-algorithm: if it was funny once, the memory of the experience of that humor displaces the actual spontaneity and discovery of new sources of humor in a kind of compulsive repetition, which I think is meant more to reassure geeks than to amuse them.

    16. Re:Not the same joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think somebody's come for an argument!

    17. Re:Not the same joke by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some humor needs killin'.

    18. Re:Not the same joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The South Park version of the sketch (the “Dead Friend Sketch”), though, is closer to the original Greek.

    19. Re:Not the same joke by pngmangi42 · · Score: 2

      You ever heard the comparison between analyzing humor and dissecting a frog?

      --
      I tried to walk into Target, but I missed. --Mitch Hedburg
    20. Re:Not the same joke by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

      You can't pass off history or anthropology in a story without expert opinion weighing in. The same thing should be true for comedy.

      I believe they asked Graham Chapman's opinion, sadly he refused to comment.

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
    21. Re:Not the same joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am in my 50's and I definitely remember a Lil Abner (by Al Capp) Saturday morning newspaper cartoon where the world's funniest jokwe was invented and used by the Allies against the Germans. This would have been in the late 1960's. So, Python possibly ripped that one, too.

    22. Re:Not the same joke by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Monty Python was OK, but for even tighter Brit humour you want to watch Brass Eye.

    23. Re:Not the same joke by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't!

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    24. Re:Not the same joke by Lost+Race · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're probably right that as social commentary and topical political satire, Monty Python is pretty generic and disposable, outdated and long since superceded by more relevant acts. But their unique genius in juxtaposing the silly and ridiculous with the serious, dignified and refined is ageless and universal. I re-watch the Flying Circus episodes every five years or so and they continue to be hilarious. Perhaps foreign stereotypes of English personalities help to accentuate the absurdity.

      As in all comedy performance, it's not what they do but how they do it that is so special. In the late 1960s Cleese, Idle, and Chapman were at the peak of their ability and worked brilliantly together, creating art that (IMHO) will last forever.

    25. Re:Not the same joke by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actual it is two particles; which creates an Odd Coupling.

      Boo Yeah.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    26. Re:Not the same joke by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      When an American geeks constantly recycle the same handful of Monty Python routines, it's depressing. It's humor-by-algorithm: if it was funny once, the memory of the experience of that humor displaces the actual spontaneity and discovery of new sources of humor in a kind of compulsive repetition, which I think is meant more to reassure geeks than to amuse them.

      Oh be quiet, Dennis, we haven't got enough mud.

    27. Re:Not the same joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your humor snobbery is distasteful. Please shut up and let people laugh at whatever they find funny. You're not better than them because you don't (or no longer) find funny the things that they do.

    28. Re:Not the same joke by process · · Score: 1

      Although I agree that the absurdness of the parrot being dead upon purchase is a valid point I like to think there is something more to it. It's also a great commentary on salesmanship and marketing. The amount of excuses and counter arguments the clerk comes up with really points out things that could be concieved as valuable sales traits in the context of todays capitalist world. Selling it as a 'Norwegian Blue' in the first place also supports this view.

      Then again, I could just be a commie reading too much into it ;)

      To the point of comparing it to the original joke, I'd say it's similar, but hardly plagiarism.

      --
      computers let you make more mistakes faster, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila.
    29. Re:Not the same joke by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      In the late 1960s Cleese, Idle, and Chapman were at the peak of their ability

      You may be right about Idle (whose last big project was the hilarious, but milking it Holy Grail Musical) and Chapman, but I think Cleese did his best work later. I thought A Fish Called Wanda was actually Cleese's best work (late 80's). He managed to create the same ironic, dry, juxtaposition into a coherent -- but always hilarious -- storyline (the latter is something Python never managed to do...every movie felt like a series of sketches strung together with an overall theme...or sometimes without one entirely.)

      I also notice you don't include Terry Gilliam, who went into the more surrealist bent post-Python with works like 12 Monkeys or the dystopian comedy Brazil.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    30. Re:Not the same joke by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I bet your a snob about other things, aren't you? You're anti-elitist if anyone looks down their snoot at you, but you're quite happy to make fun of people who like the Ernest films.

      And if you don't make fun of people who like the Ernest films, then you're just an idiot.

    31. Re:Not the same joke by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      your=you're, to save you the trouble.

    32. Re:Not the same joke by Eil · · Score: 1

      I was quite a fan of Monty Python in my teen years. I could recite all the famous sketches line-for-line and always made a point to watch the Python movies when they aired on TV.

      A few years ago, I decided to watch every episode of Flying Circus and... it was actually rather disappointing. Not because the troupe weren't fine actors with witty dialogue or even that too much of the material was related to current events and English politics, but rather two things that were ultimately beyond the Pythons to control:

      1) I, like many others, grew up on the more polished versions of their popular sketches. The original sketches were necessarily performed in front of a live audience with little rehearsal so many of the minor details of the sketch that would be perfected later (especially timing) are missing. Although there are a few sketches that they never could reproduce as well as the originals.

      2) Monty Python's brand of humor was something new and unusual when Flying Circus originally aired. It was so successful that it was heavily borrowed-from and copied in the 80's and 90's by many comedians and comedy writers. So when someone like me who grew up in the 80's and 90's watches it, it doesn't seem all that original.

    33. Re:Not the same joke by khallow · · Score: 1

      Either a troll and/or a pointless stereotype about some group that the author may or may not understand. Not very interesting or insightful. That's my take.

    34. Re:Not the same joke by mattwarden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, but did you see the Monty Python sketch where the elitist Brit trashes American cult humor in a way that smacks of "I knew the band before they made the big time and sold out"?

    35. Re:Not the same joke by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      It's depressing if they limit themselves to Monty Python and never explore newer comedies or create their own humor.

      However, when people quote Monty Python, they're doing something social. They are connecting with other people in recalling a shared experience of appreciating a comedic performance, and identifying with one another as being able to appreciate that experience. For humor to strike a chord, it must relate back to one's worldview. In celebrating a comic moment from Monty Python, the celebrators are also communicating about a mutual understanding of the world. I don't think the quoting is meant to be a fresh expression of humor, rather it is about forming human connections.

  12. Better link... by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Informative

    A 419-baiter got some Nigerian scam artists to record themselves doing the sketch as well. I actually like this one better!

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
    1. Re:Better link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Good link! Highly recommended to watch. Skip the first 60 seconds of explanation if you like.

  13. Patented humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's the same sketch, only there is no parrot but a slave, the slave is not dead in the shop and consequently not nailed to the perch. But otherwise, really the same thing.

    1. Re:Patented humor by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What if I told you the slave were nailed to a crucifix? That's kind of like a perch.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Patented humor by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but was the slave nailed to the perch too?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  14. Suetonius made me change my mind. by vlad_petric · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's what I thought too, until I read Suetonius' Twelve Caesars... The amount of trash in it makes it particularly entertaining.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Suetonius made me change my mind. by MagikSlinger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Twelve Ceasars made me realize that political muck-raking has existed for as long as humans could say "Oog pals around with Neanderthals!"

      Claudius got a mild thumbs down from Suetonius, which lead to Robert Graves to "correct the record".

      Also Emperor Tiberius was the original Michael Jackson.

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    2. Re:Suetonius made me change my mind. by yams69 · · Score: 1

      Also good is "The Secret History" by Procopius, particularly the part about the empress Theodora. She makes Madonna look like a prude....

    3. Re:Suetonius made me change my mind. by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      Also Emperor Tiberius was the original Michael Jackson.

      There's a good quote about translating that passage from Latin. I think it's from Gore Vidal, but am not sure.

      Tiberius, Capri. Pool of water. Small children ... So far so good. One's laborious translation was making awful sense. Then ... fish. Fish? The erotic mental image became surreal. Another victory for the Loeb Library's sly translator, J.C. Rolfe, who, correctly anticipating the pruriency of schoolboy readers, left Suetonius's gaudier passages in the hard original. One failed to crack those intriguing footnotes not because the syntax was so difficult (though it was not easy for students drilled in military rather than civilian Latin) but because the range of vice revealed was considerably beyond the imagination of even the most depraved schoolboy. There was a point at which one rejected one's own translation. Tiberius and the little fish, for instance.

  15. Mandatory question by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    So.....

    what does this mean for copyright of the Parrot Sketch?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Mandatory question by dargon · · Score: 1

      and..., if there is a living relative to complain, could the Python's be punished under the DMCA? Afterall, ancient greek is pretty much the same as a nearly unbreakable form of encryption isn't it ;)

    2. Re:Mandatory question by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      Don't know. Try ask Disney!

    3. Re:Mandatory question by studpuppy · · Score: 1

      Umm.. that we now have found Prior Art, and can prove the Monty Python patent application should be declared invalid?

      --
      The last time I wrote code, it was Morse
  16. Re:Thanks for the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    But how do we read the content of the book, cocksucker?

  17. So what does this mean? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2

    Are they implying Monty Python stole the joke or that it has just been done before? It seems like a pretty strait forward joke and I can see it being reinvented. Either way it was a damn funny sketch.

    1. Re:So what does this mean? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      most jokes have been repeated for 1000's of years.
      People observe the same human behavior and make jest of it.

      The specifics may change(slave -> Parrot) but the humor is the same.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:So what does this mean? by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

      Palin didn't steal the joke. He based the sketch off of a mechanic at a local garage. To paraphrase an interview (I believe from the Aspen Comedy Festival), you could go into the garage with your door missing and relate the story of how it fell off. And the mechanic would reply, "Those cars'll do that, they're new." Tantamount to today's meme: It's a feature.

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
  18. You're no fun by fm6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just for that:

    Venn ist das nurnstuck git und slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die flipperwaldt gersput!

    1. Re:You're no fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Das macht überhaupt keinen Sinn. Die Wörter haben keine Bedeutung und es ist auch nicht lustig, jedenfalls nicht ohne den Rest der Geschichte.

    2. Re:You're no fun by bunratty · · Score: 5, Funny

      Die flipperwaldt gersput? Bwahahahahahahahaha! Clunk!

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    3. Re:You're no fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully even German people aren't so dumb that they misunderstand it when they're being called "idiot".

      Oh, speaking of which, you're an idiot.

    4. Re:You're no fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Das macht überhaupt keinen Sinn. [...]

      [...] Oh, speaking of which, you're an idiot.

      The GP is an idiot, indeed: In German, the phrase "das macht keinen Sinn" doesn't make any sense, because the idea of "creating sense" or "generating sense" has never been existing in German language. The correct translation of "that doesn't make sense" is "das ergibt keinen Sinn" ("that doesn't lead to anything making sense").

      I always have to vomit when I hear the crowds, err, my fellow Krauts talking about "Sinn machen". But this, of course, doesn't hinder the majority of them to use this Anglicism. A disease.

      The fun part, my CAPTCHA is "strafe".

    5. Re:You're no fun by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Funny

      oh yeah well:

      Der ver three peanuts, valking down dah strassel, and von vas... assaulted...

      peanut.

      Take that!

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    6. Re:You're no fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only +5?

      Should be +999999. That was so funny it's fa

    7. Re:You're no fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always have to vomit when I hear the crowds, err, my fellow Krauts talking about "Sinn machen".

      Es würde Sinn machen, deswegen einen Arzt aufzusuchen. Häufiges Erbrechen ist ungesund und kann zu sozialer Isolation führen.

      Der Ausdruck "Sinn machen" ist weit verbreitet und objektiv nicht falsch, auch wenn er für ältere Generationen ungewohnt sein mag. Dein Versuch, einen Unterschied zu "Sinn ergeben" zu konstruieren, scheitert an der offensichtlichen Schwierigkeit, eine andere Übersetzung zu finden, obwohl eigentlich genau die selbe Übersetzung zutreffend wäre.

    8. Re:You're no fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wachbirnen!

    9. Re:You're no fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always have to vomit when I hear the crowds, err, my fellow Krauts talking about "Sinn machen".

      Es würde Sinn machen, deswegen einen Arzt aufzusuchen.

      Danke für den Tip, das werde ich in 2009 vielleicht tun. (For all people less advanced in German: the last sentence has as bad an Anglicism. ;))

      Der Ausdruck "Sinn machen" ist weit verbreitet und objektiv nicht falsch,

      There is no such thing as being "objective" in language.

      auch wenn er für ältere Generationen ungewohnt sein mag.

      I'm not of an older generation. ;)

      Dein Versuch, einen Unterschied zu "Sinn ergeben" zu konstruieren, scheitert an der offensichtlichen Schwierigkeit, eine andere Übersetzung zu finden, obwohl eigentlich genau die selbe Übersetzung zutreffend wäre.

      There's no need to look for a translation other than the one known for centuries. While the apt translation for the English "make" is "machen" (depending on context, of course), in the context of "making sense" its best translation is "Sinn ergeben".

    10. Re:You're no fun by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Jeez, I was just making a joke. No need to have a flame war over German semantics. Between two ACs, yet!

    11. Re:You're no fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez, I was just making a joke. No need to have a flame war over German semantics. Between two ACs, yet!

      We can't possibly be Germans--otherwise we would have died instantly on your joke. ;)

  19. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was much younger I was turned on to the classics after reading Lysistrata. Quick synopsis from Wikipedia:

    Led by the title character, Lysistrata, the story's female characters barricade the public funds building and withhold sex from their husbands to end the Peloponnesian War and secure peace.

    The euphemisms and innuendo are killer, especially to a young teen :)

  20. Re:Thanks for the link by elrous0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    With you eyes, of course.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  21. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a Classics major as an undergrad, I'm always happy to see these kind of stories. There was some wicked humour in the ancient world that is still hilarious today, from the political jibes in the plays of Aristophanes to the obscenities of Petronius' Satyricon. It's a pity that most people would never think about reading them, because one tends to assume that old literary works are dry and serious.

    Nah. If this story has taught me anything, it's that if there's anything worth reading in those old sheepskins/tablets/papyrii, some modern comedian will steal it and repeat it, saving me the trouble of figuring out all the obscure cultural references from 3000 years ago.

    I'm kidding. I think.

  22. Is it really surprising? by socz · · Score: 1

    When compared to Monty Python, why are people complaining? I'm no literary expert but isn't there a finite amount of themes anyways? And every story is just a variation of those themes?

    Interestingly enough, that's one of the ideas/themes in Watchmen, nothing ever ends and will continue to repeat.

    --
    My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  23. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    That's because the only people you have known from that earlier time were all older and humorless by the time you met them. Comedy has been around since the the dawn of civilization, when Ugg the caveman first discovered comedy after eliciting laughs with an accidental fart joke.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  24. dead friend sketch by fermion · · Score: 3, Funny

    That is disappointing. It means the sketch where Eric brings Kenny back to the friend store to complain that he is dead is not even a original tribute. It is just a more direct rip off of the original work that the Pythons inadvertently ripped off from. Will the inhumanity never end!

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  25. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, Euripides' Electra is one of the funniest plays in all existence simply for the recognition scene. Everyone should read the Oresteia and then read Euripides. Heck, that scene is hilarious even if you haven't read the Oresteia. Euripides mercilessly parodies a variety of literary conceits which are still used today. It is almost like Euripides had access to TVTropes.com

  26. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing funny before 1960? Just read the Bible. "Behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces, even the dung of your solemn feasts; and one shall take you away with it." That's hilarious.

    But, ahem, seriously, read some Georges Bataille for stilted stuffy stuff that is still hilarious.

    http://www.greylodge.org/occultreview/glor_010/solar.htm (probably NSFW, but is just text).

  27. What Killed the Slave...? by penguin_dance · · Score: 5, Funny

    He read the World's Funniest Joke of course!

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
  28. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by jbeaupre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the more interesting sermons I ever heard in church was around humor in the bible. Our preacher had a PhD in archeology, knew several dead languages, etc. So he was able to provide context for jokes that people people treat as dry and serious today. Apparently Jesus had a better sense of humor than people give him credit for.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  29. What about Python? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does that mean Python was blatantly ripped off from an ancient programming language for some obscure mainframe which makes reference to ancient greek comedy in it's documentation?

  30. The Best Rendition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just revisiting the 419eater website due to yesterday's news about a woman being scammed for $400k and came across this version of the sketch (scroll to near the bottom of the page)

    http://www.419eater.com/html/bigman2.htm/

  31. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by fermion · · Score: 1

    I know this a joke, but the 60's are typically considered the time when the current style of let's say impure humor began. Though I have never heard any of the albums, I hear Redd Foxx was quite the controversial figure. I often look back to the style of the time and think how could people tolerate that bubble gum pop, or was everyone on psychedelic drugs back them, but then I think of miles davis or Duke Ellington and realize that there were some people who wanted to push the envelope, not just make the money. And, of course, Richard Pryor started in the 60's.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  32. No it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh wait, wrong sketch.

    1. Re:No it isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is.

    2. Re:No it isn't. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I'd like to make a complaint!

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  33. Pining for the fjords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know... As a Norwegian, I feel insulted by your accusations!

  34. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Threni · · Score: 1

    So why has it taken sarcasm so long to catch on?

  35. April 1 by DrWho520 · · Score: 1

    I could have sworn it was November...

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
  36. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    Any examples? Was Jesus a pervert?

  37. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words: Lenny Bruce

  38. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by colmore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Also: 60s pop music was a lot more than the 50 or so songs that have been endlessly repeated on your local classic rock station and in movie soundtracks.

    We think we have a memory of decades from before we were born, but we just have some editor's sleezy commercial take on the time. Really getting something approximating a feel for another time takes actual work and research.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  39. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    HUGE masochist.

    The whole whipping, forced labour(carrying his cross), crown of thorns, getting stabbed with a spear, nailed to the cross and then being heaped with public ridicule was planned.

    y'know the whole religious ecstasy thing? Self flagellants in ye olden times? Yes. You can come closer to Christ when you're whipping yourself. *cough*

    Of course, they were supposed to come and take him down again after a while, not leave him there on the cross. Stupid careless tops =\ You don't leave your bottom unattended when they're in bondage. Just asking for trouble.

  40. Scrollshop skit by pillowcase1 · · Score: 1

    Do you have 101 ways to start a fight? By some Spartan fellow who's name eludes me for the moment...

  41. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

    I had a professor like that in college, he was a Lutheran Minister and an archeology PhD. He made the Bible hysterical.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  42. Re:Thanks for the link by Sinbios · · Score: 1

    I think GP is trying to point out that your link doesn't actually contain the main text of the book.

    --
    Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
  43. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Jesus had one joke in the bible..."Peter, you are the rock upon which my church will be built." Peter=petros=rock. HAHA Oh that Jesus always cracks me up!

  44. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by quarterbuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apparently even Jesus had a sense of humour. "Peter you are my rock" is probably the most famous pun in the world (Peter = rock).

    --
    http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
  45. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone should read the Oresteia and then read Euripides.

    How about a few links then? Learning ancient Greek so I can digging through historical liturature ain't on my bucket list.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  46. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the 60's are typically considered the time when the current style of let's say impure humor began.

    If you believe that, I have a humorous assortment of bridges to sell you.

    Off color humor has always had a following, it's just that, from Victorian times until recently, the lettered public would never admit to such a thing, let alone allow it to be said in mixed company (e.g., when ladies were present). You can bet money that bawdy jokebooks were passed around behind closed doors at the private men's clubs, though. Also, you'd probably be able to find coarse language and crude humor wherever the "lower class" gathered as well - it's just that "those sorts of people" would never be let near something as dignified as literature, radio or television. (What if an impressionable young woman heard?)

    That said, you don't have to dig very deep to find it, if you're looking. Heck, Shakespeare is a great source for double entendre, insults, and all manner of "impure humor". "The bawdy hand of the dial is now upon the prick of noon", anyone? We recently had a story where they revealed that the world's oldest recorded joke was a fart-joke.

  47. Related Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    In related news, the RIAA is suing John Cleese for copyright infringement on behalf of the estates of Hierocles and Philagrius.

  48. Sketch, Skit... by nschubach · · Score: 1

    I read the title in the feed and thought we were talking about a drawing instead of a skit. (yes, I know there are multiple meanings for sketch... but in context it can be confusing.)

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  49. New sketch by Yetihehe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Customer: I want my money back, this joke is old!
    Salesman: Well, it wasn't when I have told you it.
    Customer: It was, greeks were telling it 1600 years ago!
    Salesman: I won't give your money back then, warranty has expired long ago!

    --
    Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  50. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Applekid · · Score: 1

    So why has it taken sarcasm so long to catch on?

    Probably because sarcasm was never funny. ;)

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  51. There's nothing new under the sun by WgT2 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
  52. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

    60s pop is a lot better than 70s, 80s, 90s, or 00s pop.

    --
    "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  53. Oh Crap! by akunkel · · Score: 0

    I am pretty sure that Ancient Greek Copyright Law is immortal!!

  54. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Phurge · · Score: 1

    here's a painting from a pompeii brothel you might like: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/90/211691819_59a1c5345b.jpg

    --
    I'll see your hokum and raise you a boondoggle.
  55. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

    Like inhaling farts and sleeping with corpses, it is an acquired taste.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  56. Similar Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not the same joke but they are more similar than you realize. Both versions have a buyer complaining to a seller about a defective purchase. In both cases, humor comes from the absurd argument the seller gives for why it's not his fault. The differences are mainly in the nature of that argument.

    "It never died for me, so it must be something you did!"

    versus

    "It's not dead at all!"

    They're different, but similar.

  57. Re:Thanks for the link by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blank Reg: This is a network linker. It's a bit out of your league, idn'it, Paula?
    Paula: So, whatch'll you trade for it?
    [Blank Reg offers her something]
    Paula: What's that?
    Blank Reg: It's a book!
    Paula: Well, what's that?
    Blank Reg: It's a non-volatile storage medium. It's very rare. You should 'ave one.
    Paula: Stuff it!

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  58. old joke by Dr.+Tom · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I think the old joke should have been, "Hey, that slave you sold me is dead!" (not died in service; that's different, and less of a joke).

  59. Did Monty Python violate GPL? by snikulin · · Score: 1

    We might even get some money from those capitalist closed-joke pigs.

  60. It's older than that, folks. by Millennium · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ovid had a humorous poem about a dead parrot long before this play was ever written, complete with the long-winded and repetitive description of exactly how dead the parrot is which characterizes Monty Python's sketch.

    This was itself a parody of a poem by Catullus, lamenting the death of his lover's "sparrow." The quotes are there for a reason; it's the term he used, but modern poets would probably have used a more, err, feline term to catch the nuance, if you know what I mean (wink and a nudge, say no more, say no more).

    Monty Python was made up of some extremely erudite people; even Sir Not-Appearing-In-This-Film actually corresponds to someone from Arthurian legend (and bonus points if you can tell me who). No doubt they drew inspiration from the Ovid poem too, among others, and is there really any problem with that? It's friggin funny.

    1. Re:It's older than that, folks. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      the long-winded and repetitive description of exactly how dead the parrot is which characterizes Monty Python's sketch.

      Which also characterizes many other Monty Python sketches, from the Cheese Shop to the Bookstore (Charles Dikkkens with three k's anyone?) to a soldier having every limb hacked off and insisting he can still fight.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    2. Re:It's older than that, folks. by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Monty Python was made up of some extremely erudite people

      Not just erudite, smrt and wise too. Oh wait, I'm being repressed!

      http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=o76WQzVJ434

    3. Re:It's older than that, folks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone wiser than me once differentiated the difference thus wise. Talent borrows. Genius steals. I think maybe it was a cello player, but I am but indifferent honest. My employer has rubbed off on me, just a bit.

  61. Re:so that's what killed it.. Find that parrot's D by davidsyes · · Score: 1
    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  62. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    And yet, is is still pop... another word for "the crap that the common retard likes". ;)
    Maybe the 60s are the only time, when "pop" could be called "underground" music. Unfortunately, it did not stay that way.

    Oh, and in my personal taste, the music of the 60s was just horrible. But that's my POV. ;)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  63. links for the lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://google.com/
    http://amazon.com/
    http://gutenberg.org/

    these things are old enough there are lots of translations available. go nuts.

    oh look. Project Gutenberg has Electra:
    http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/14322

  64. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They forgot the safe word to stop the session.

  65. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you, Masked Man!

  66. welcome to /. by ethicalBob · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow.. arguing over a python sketch...

    If there was EVER any doubt about slashdots denizens, this pretty much clarified the situation.

    Picard or Kirk, anyone?

    --
    Politics will sooner or later make fools of everybody... - Dick Armey
    1. Re:welcome to /. by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow.. arguing over a python sketch...

      Better than arguing over a python script, eh?

      Har-de-har-har

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    2. Re:welcome to /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SISKO! :)

    3. Re:welcome to /. by MissedJokeGuy · · Score: 1

      Picard.

    4. Re:welcome to /. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Kirk.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  67. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jesus, only somebody with complete lack of humour can find that funny.

  68. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You realize he was called Peter because he was 'like a rock', not because it was his name, right? His name was Simon.

  69. All jokes are old by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a short-story where all jokes were found to come from an extraterrestrial (alien) source that was using them to conduct psychological experiments on humans.

    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
    1. Re:All jokes are old by Opyros · · Score: 1

      The link just gives me a 404. But am I correct in assuming the short story is Isaac Asimov's "Jokester"?

    2. Re:All jokes are old by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

      Got it in one! The link I posted was, on the day I posted it, a copy of that story. Sorry it's down.

      Summary is here, of course.

      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
  70. idiot gradstudent sketch by Dr.+Tom · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    One Dr. to another: "Hey, this graduate student you sent me is an idiot!"
    Reply: "No, no, he's an idiot savant."
    O: "Idiot savant? He doesn't know any math, and he can barely tie his shoelaces!"
    R: "Yes, but he's an expert an something."
    O: "What would that be then?"
    R: "Well, I dunno, but I'm sure he's a total genius at something.
    You just need to find out what it is."
    O: "He's not a genius, he's a flippin' loon! He thinks Europe has a President!
    He thinks lites are lit by little golden fairies."
    R: "Well, he's probably a musician then. Have you tried him in front of the keyboard?
    Graduate students really love that."
    O: "This is a molecular biology lab! Well, I guess I could get him to interpret A, C, G, and T as C, G, A, and b-flat. But look, the point is, I needed somebody with technical skills! This graduate student is a complete imbecile who knows nothing useful whatsoever!"
    R: "Naw, he's just hungry. Give him a soda and some donuts and he'll be off proposing hypotheses all day long."
    O: "You're a loony. Did you go to the same undergraduate school he did? Can you read? No wait, don't answer that, I don't care."

    etc.

  71. Not the same joke at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The punchline of the original joke was that the slave had never done that sort of thing before...likening the death of the slave to simple disobedience or other unpleasant but recurring behavior a slave might have.

    In the monty python sketch....there was no punchline (as they had a distaste for punchlines). And further, the premise is that the bird was dead when it was sold, which should have been obvious at the time...though you also have the shopkeeper insisting that the parrot is still alive even though it is obviously dead.

    These two sketches are not related at all, IMO, let alone "the same joke." They are just a bit similar in that one person owns something that is dead, and wants his money back.

    1. Re:Not the same joke at all by DiegoBravo · · Score: 5, Funny

      >>They are just a bit similar in that one person owns something that is dead, and wants his money back.

      I just have my new laptop, Vista is now dead. I want my money back. Where is the joke?

    2. Re:Not the same joke at all by geekoid · · Score: 1, Informative

      no, it's the same joke. The differences are minor and the humor is the same.

      Oh, and MP disliked ending. The Parrot sketch is full of punch lines.

      Much like the "Whose on first" Sketch the Abbot and Costello made famous.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Not the same joke at all by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I'd say the joke in that one is Vista.

      (ba dum pish)

    4. Re:Not the same joke at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that the ancient Greek joke isn't very related to the Monty Python sketch. There is one point in the Monty Python sketch where they might have been able to use the ancient Greek joke. Namely when the pet shop owner finally acknowledges that the parrot is dead but before he agrees to have it replaced, he could have said something like - "I don't know how that could have happened. That parrot never did that while we had it." In that case it would have been similar to the Greek joke, but it would have stretched the Monty Python sketch a bit out of it's flow.

    5. Re:Not the same joke at all by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      Where is the joke?

      Well, you're the one that paid for Vista...

    6. Re:Not the same joke at all by Frater+219 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Namely when the pet shop owner finally acknowledges that the parrot is dead but before he agrees to have it replaced, he could have said something like - "I don't know how that could have happened. That parrot never did that while we had it." In that case it would have been similar to the Greek joke, but it would have stretched the Monty Python sketch a bit out of it's flow.

      Yes, it would -- because the funny part of the Monty Python sketch is that it's basically about trying too hard.

      The shopkeeper is trying to convince the patron that everything is all right, that he doesn't need to make a fuss. He is a bit of a cheat in that he sold a dead parrot as a live one, but likewise the customer is a bit of a fool for buying it. But by the middle of the sketch it is clear that the shopkeeper is merely trying much too hard to recuperate a failing social situation: the patron is not going to be fooled again, and the shopkeeper's desperate, inventive, and doomed attempts to maintain a polite and friendly atmosphere, while continuing to insist that nothing is wrong (that the parrot is alive) are much of the humor.

      For the shopkeeper to admit that the parrot is dead, as in the Greek joke, would be to spoil the scene.

      (I get the sense that many Python fans think the sketch is about the patron's widely-quoted rant. I disagree.)

      A lot of Monty Python is like that: the humor is in how a perfectly ordinary and unfunny event becomes an outrageous farce after something goes very wrong, because someone in the situation simply refuses to admit that anything is out of the ordinary. It's all about how pretending that everything is okay makes you into a total buffoon.

    7. Re:Not the same joke at all by Gorobei · · Score: 2, Funny

      A lot of Monty Python is like that: the humor is in how a perfectly ordinary and unfunny event becomes an outrageous farce after something goes very wrong, because someone in the situation simply refuses to admit that anything is out of the ordinary.

      This is the core of all good theatre. Slapstick is easy, but everything else requires actors denying, then accepting, reality.

      Groundhog day would have sucked if BM had just immediately accepted his situation.
      The Terminator would have sucked if Sarah Connor initially believed Reese. Or the cops believed, etc.
      The entire Faulty Towers series.

      Heck, 80% of all jokes are about this: the puchline is always someone denying or explaining the reality of the situation. E.g.:

      "Bob, thank god you found me - robbers took everything I had, stripped me naked, and tied me to this tree!" Bob sez, while removing his pants: "well Vern, this just ain't your lucky day."

    8. Re:Not the same joke at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the monty python sketch....there was no punchline (as they had a distaste for punchlines).

      Hmmm ... I think you're confusing distaste with lack of aptitude.

    9. Re:Not the same joke at all by kdart · · Score: 1

      The joke is when you take it back to the store and they tell you "it's not dead!". ;-)

      --

      --
      The early bird catches the worm. The worm that sleeps late lives to see another day.
    10. Re:Not the same joke at all by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Yes, it would -- because the funny part of the Monty Python sketch is that it's basically about trying too hard.

      So where does the Cheese Shop sketch fit in? Trying too hard or subtle political commentary?

      Many people love Monty Python just for the absurdity and fail to appreciate the undertones and historical reasons for the sketches. On the other hand, fish-slapping is pretty amusing!

    11. Re:Not the same joke at all by Bill+Drury · · Score: 1

      This version is not the same joke, but the same idea as the parrot sketch was used in Hancock's Half Hour, a popular 1950's BBC radio show, where pompous Tony Hancock returns his tortoise, which hasn't moved since he bought it, to conman Sid James (of Carry-On fame). THe same aguament takes place. It wont touch its lettuce, Sid says it's hibernating etc etc. Eventually Hancock points out that when he examined the shell carefully, he discovered it was empty. I think Sid suggests it went for a walk. The Python boys must have listened to Hancock as it was the most popular (as well as being clever) comedies of the 50's - when they were boys. It's not easily found on Google which presumably explains why I've never heard it mentioned on those legion of python documentories. Bill

    12. Re:Not the same joke at all by hey! · · Score: 1

      Obviously, it's a trying too hard joke. Instead of trying too hard to get out of trouble, it's trying too hard to please when there is no possibility of pleasing.

      In any case, not everything that is absurd is funny. The absurd becomes funny when you recognize that while a situation is absurd, it is also familiar. IT's funnier if it makes you squirm a bit.

      As far as the fish slapping thing, American humor hasn't quite caught up because American hasn't accumulated the same depth of cultural cruft that Britain has. There's nothing like tradition to make the absurd look normal. Still, we're catching up. We might not have much Morris dancing, but we have Civil War reenactors.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re:Not the same joke at all by master_p · · Score: 1

      >>Where is the joke?

      On you?

    14. Re:Not the same joke at all by ErkDemon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's not dead ... it's waiting for a hardware upgrade.

      Q10: What does "Windows Vista Capable PC" mean?
      A10: Microsoft defines a Windows Vista Capable PC as: "A new PC that carries the Windows Vista Capable PC logo can run Windows Vista. Some features available in the premium editions of Windows Vista - like the new Windows Aero user experience - may require advanced or additional hardware."

      In other words, a new "Windows Vista capable" PC is officially certified by Microsoft as being capable of running Vista ...
      ... apart from any parts of Vista that may turn out not be capable of running on that machine's hardware.

      Those parts won't work, obviously.

    15. Re:Not the same joke at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was dead when you got it, but Microsoft insists that it is still alive. I dearsay it is an unlaptop.

    16. Re:Not the same joke at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke was on you when you bought Vista.

    17. Re:Not the same joke at all by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      >>They are just a bit similar in that one person owns something that is dead, and wants his money back.

      I just have my new laptop, Vista is now dead. I want my money back. Where is the joke?

      The joke is on you.

  72. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny

    If this story has taught me anything, it's that if there's anything worth reading in those old sheepskins/tablets/papyrii, some modern comedian will steal it and repeat it, saving me the trouble of figuring out all the obscure cultural references from 3000 years ago.

    You'll be sorry when you hear Dane Cook's new routine on how the dudes at the BK Lounge always put too much garum in his meal of emmer loaves and saltpetered kale, brah. You'll be sorry!!!

  73. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His name was Simon, Jesus renamed him Peter because he would be metaphorical rock that the church would be built on.

  74. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by tzot · · Score: 2, Informative
    Start here.

    Generally, browse the Project Gutenberg without any feelings of guilt or worries of lawlessness ;)

    --
    I speak England very best
  75. Ditto... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ditto. I've always been a big fan of CP. By which I mean Captain Picard, naturally. Yup.

    1. Re:Ditto... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi there. Why don't you have a seat?

  76. Norwegian Blue Parrot by kisak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course part of the absurd humour in the Monty Python sketch is that there are no parrots in Scandinavia. But Monty Python probably should have expected this story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1958285/Monty-Python's-dead-parrot-did-exist.html. Basicly, Norwegian parrots did exist 55 million years ago, even though it is not known if they were blue...

    From the link: Michael Palin was amused when told about the discovery, saying: "All I can say is that it just shows that nothing is original."

    --

    --- guns don't kill people, people with guns kill people ---

    1. Re:Norwegian Blue Parrot by HBI · · Score: 1

      Graham Chapman was credited by Cleese with coming up with the Norwegian Blue parrot reference. Initially, Cleese intended it to be a toaster the guy was returning. Palin was working it with Cleese because he was so excellent at that type of role.

      So, I suggest that we ask Graham Chapman about the parrot thing. Unfortunately, he is extinct as well.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  77. So when do the lawsuits start? by markana · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that somewhere, a lawyer is looking for the descendants of Hierocles and Philagrius to bring a copyright suit against the Pythons. And you just know that the Media companies are going to start lobbying Congress to extend copyright to at least 1600 years:

    "See, just look at this blatant example of intellectual piracy. This cannot be allowed to happen to American artists..."

    1. Re:So when do the lawsuits start? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Did the book have any mice in it? You can't get copyright altered without Disney involved, and they've certainly modified copyright law to protect their franchise on Mickey Mouse.

  78. Amores II-VI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case anyone was wondering.

  79. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by tzot · · Score: 1
    Peter's name was Simon. Peter ("Petros", masculine for "petra") was the nickname given to him by Jesus, exactly because "petra" means "stone".

    There's humour in there, but no cracking jokes.

    --
    I speak England very best
  80. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by tzot · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had a professor like that in college, he was a Lutheran Minister and an archeology PhD. He made the Bible hysterical.

    I assume he was hard of hearing, because the Church ordered professors to "find a way to make the Bible historical".

    --
    I speak England very best
  81. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha ha, you go to church! ha ha ha! That is funny!

  82. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

    How about a few links then?

    Google it. The second item listed when I googled Euripides' Electra was the complete text.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  83. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by JoshJ · · Score: 1

    You might be on to something. Whenever I hear Dane Cook, I'm sorry I heard him.

  84. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    Or here http://gutenberg.net.au/ with some worries of lawlessness depending on which country you are in, but no feelings of guilt.

  85. Where the python joke? by plopez · · Score: 1

    there has to be one.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  86. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Wow, you find that hilarious? In the same era I'd say the pinnacle of humour was P.G. Wodehouse, but other than that I find that there's little humour that has travelled intact through the ages. I feel the same about music, in popular music that is (classical music has travelled intact).

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  87. The rumours of my death are greatly exaggerated. by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

    I just had a little nap ok!

  88. After all these years... by Jim+Madison · · Score: 1

    The punchline of the original joke was that the slave had never done that sort of thing before...likening the death of the slave to simple disobedience or other unpleasant but recurring behavior a slave might have.

    In the monty python sketch....there was no punchline (as they had a distaste for punchlines). And further, the premise is that the bird was dead when it was sold, which should have been obvious at the time...though you also have the shopkeeper insisting that the parrot is still alive even though it is obviously dead.

    These two sketches are not related at all, IMO, let alone "the same joke." They are just a bit similar in that one person owns something that is dead, and wants his money back.

    ...now you are going to ruin the joke for me?

    --
    Hey democracy lovers, add Quorum as a c
  89. It is the same joke! by jlowery · · Score: 1

    Time's up.

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
  90. Yes, but by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

    What is the difference between a duck?

    1. Re:Yes, but by snakeplissken · · Score: 1

      What is the difference between a duck?

      one of its legs is both the same!

  91. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comedy has been around since the the dawn of civilization, when Ugg the caveman first discovered comedy after eliciting laughs with an accidental fart joke.

    He was eaten by a dinosaur. Come on, don't you know your world history?

  92. Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Dead parrot comedy was filmed in Britain.

    Hierocles and Philagrius were ancient greeks

    The parrot was a Norwegian blue

    So whathas this got to do with the recording industry association of America?

  93. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google it. The second item listed when I googled Euripides' Electra was the complete text.

    So why didn't you post the link you found instead of just bragging about it? Sheesh! People are getting so flippin' lazy.

  94. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by tm2b · · Score: 1

    I remember reading a story (perhaps apocryphal) about some hieroglyphics being found that roughly translated to a father and son talking: "Where are you going?" "Out." "When will you be back?" "Later."

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  95. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

    You need to read some Oscar Wilde and Mark Twaine!

  96. Re:Thanks for the link by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    I see links for "Download" (as PDF) and "View plain text" to the right. Otherwise the scanned page images don't appear to load for me either.

    Ah, I also have scripting disabled for Google. If scripting is enabled, I find the on-page content inaccessible, though my client-side stylesheet might be partly to blame for that. (I have not downloaded the PDF.) Anyway, try disabling Javascript with the NoScript plug-in and try again.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  97. BBC made the same mistake by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Informative

    These two sketches are not related at all, IMO, let alone "the same joke."

    To be fair, the BBC made the same mistake, and my reaction when I saw it on the Beeb's site was the same as yours. The big difference is that on slashdot, you can post a correction. It'll get buried in hundreds of weak attempts at humor, and nobody will ever see it, but at least it's there. The Beeb doesn't really have a place for this sort of bad-analogy-correction. Mistaken facts, they'll correct (which is one way they're superior to Slashdot--the fact that they actually have functioning editors is another), but I wouldn't expect to see any corrections for a more abstract error of this type.

  98. In sharp contrast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Pope/Michelangelo sketch is a mere 435 years old. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paolo_Veronese#The_House_of_Levi

  99. Vietnamese co-workers not impressed by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    While working on the shop room floor in Silicon Valley, my Vietnamese co-workers not impressed by my 'original' riddle entry in a lunch room intercultural joke contest:

      What animal walks on four legs in the morning, two legs at noon, and three legs in the evening?

    They all thought that answer was pretty lame. I just told them that it was a really old joke in the West and could probably use a little work. The answer (as any scholar of ancient Greek can tell you) is: A man. As a baby, he crawls on all fours, as an adult, he walks on two legs, and as a elder, he hobbles with a cane.

    At least you aren't going to get ripped apart for not knowing the answer!

    1. Re:Vietnamese co-workers not impressed by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      not impressed by my 'original' riddle entry in a lunch room intercultural joke contest...I just told them that it was a really old joke in the West

      Don't confuse riddles with jokes.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Vietnamese co-workers not impressed by ErkDemon · · Score: 1

      They were probably more familiar with the "Tommy Lee" version of the joke.

  100. The Jests of Hierocles and Philagrius by pikine · · Score: 1
    Here it is, in Google Books, page 21, #18.

    A certain person meeting a pedant said, "The slave you sold me died." "By the gods," replied the other, "he never did such a thing when he was with me."

    Looks like the book itself, as archived by Google, is from 1920, so this is really not news.

    --
    I once had a signature.
  101. Nothing new under the sun by mitzip · · Score: 1

    Just goes to show you that there is nothing new under the sun.

    --
    http://www.tstg.org
  102. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by paintswithcolour · · Score: 1
    " It's a pity that most people would never think about reading them"

    Most classicists wouldn't even consider reading some of this stuff either until about 70 years ago. When it comes to books like Suetonius and Petronius the reputation from stuffy is well deserved. I think there are still untranslated sections in the Loeb of De vita Caesarum. And Satyricon (and to an extent all the Ancient novels) was heavily sidestepped because of its strong homosexual content - and when it was studied, it was only through some bizarre Christian/Freudian moralising framework.

  103. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see why you post as AC...

  104. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by saforrest · · Score: 1

    Apparently even Jesus had a sense of humour. "Peter you are my rock" is probably the most famous pun in the world (Peter = rock).

    Dude, he was called Peter (Petrus in Latin, Cephas in Greek, both meaning "rock") *because* the J-Man said he was his rock?

    This is like saying that Snoop Dogg appearing in music videos with a canine companion is a clever pun.

  105. outerspace broadcast by yaar · · Score: 1

    intergalactic death joke.

    --
    "Nothing in education is so astonishing as the amount of ignorance it accumulates in the form of inert facts." - Henry A
  106. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I guess, then, that he needed Moses around to get him out of the bondage.

  107. You are a party pooper, Sir by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    You are a party pooper, Sir. You don't happen to read Slashdot too, by the way?

  108. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it the 'the most famous' or 'the oldest' thing is always credited to the Greeks or Babylonians? Is that also why American kids suck at Geography?

  109. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by RichiH · · Score: 1

    You missed a very good chance to tell me the names of a few good books there.

  110. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Boronx · · Score: 1

    They did take him down after only a couple of hours.

  111. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He forgot his safeword.

  112. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by RichiH · · Score: 1

    tvtropes.ORG -- the .com is run by a generic URL squatter arsehole.

  113. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Abreu · · Score: 1

    PeterÂs name was Simon. He was nicknamed Peter by Jesus and the rest of the gang, and at the end Jesus asked him to be the founding rock of the Church.

    But considering that Simon was a rough, tough, bad tempered fisherman who was also not the sharpest tool in the shed (read his passages in the gospels, its all there), I think he was named "rock" as a joke.

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  114. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by initialE · · Score: 1

    "Simon, you are a rock. No, I take that back, you are the rock. In fact, you are so much the rock that I'mma call you Rock from now on."

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  115. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

    What? Sarcasm has caught on? Never...

    --
    One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  116. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

    The safe word was actually a phrase - "Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?"

    The problem was that Eli wasn't listening at the time.

    --
    One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  117. Copyright Issues by dm42 · · Score: 1

    In other news... John Cleese and the producers of the Monty Python "Dead Parrot" sketch have been served with a copyright infringement notice from one Caesar Publius who claims that his great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather, Hierocles, was the copyright holder of the work and that the Hierocles estate is owed 400 Trillion dollars under the draconian copyright legislation passed by the Ancient Greek senate that calculates damages on an inflationally adjusted basis from the time the work was created, not when the infringement took place. The American copyright lobby has filed an amicus brief on behalf of Mr. Publius which states that the forward looking Greeks knew the importance of protecting intellectual property.

  118. Re:Thanks for the link by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

    That's from Max Headroom, kiddies. Probably the most prophetic TV show ever.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Headroom_(TV_series)/

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
  119. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by ErkDemon · · Score: 1

    Heck, that scene is hilarious even if you haven't read the Oresteia. Euripides mercilessly parodies a variety of literary conceits which are still used today.

    So, not stuffy at all, then.

  120. Humour is sometimes in the eye of the beholder by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
    If someone says, "You are my rock, and I shall call you Petra, and upon your rock shall my church be built" then that's not necessarily humor.

    Okay, if you say it in a funny voice and pull faces and make hand gestures and grab your crotch on "rock" (or pronounce it "wok") then it might be funny, but that's down to the the delivery, not the material. With the right delivery and timing, reciting the Ten Commandments could probably have people crying with laughter, but that doesn't mean that the TC is an example of intentionally humorous writing.

    Metaphor is not automatically funny. It's not necessarily meant to be funny. It's often simply meant to make a reference to something having properties normally associated with something else.

    Hypothetical:
    Lets suppose that someone in 400BC had written a play in which a hard-bitten soldier snarls at someone, "You're an arsehole and you stink of shit". It might be written as a totally cold, venomous line. But put that same play on in 2008, with a director who is determined to prove that the Greeks knew how to write jokes, and the same line get delivered with a theatrical flourish and an arch pause in the middle that turns the ending into a punchline: "you sir are an arsehole ... [pause for effect] ... andyoustinkofshit!". The actor delivers it as a joke, the audience accepts the heavy theatrical cues that signal that it's supposed to be a joke, and they laugh.

    Frankly, if someone back in 400BC had written the screenplay for "The Godfather", and we dug up the text now, then university drama groups would be delivering the play with nudges and winks to get laughs, professors would be saying how the whole thing was full of obvious sexual allusions to kissing rings and sleeping with fishes, and the thing would end up being presented as a timeless example of bawdy comedy.

    (sigh)

  121. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

    He did that too. I learned more about the ancient world in that class than in any other two or three history classes. He treated the Old Testament as what it is from an archaeological/historical prospective. One source among many for the history of the Hebrews and surrounding cultures. A remarkable feat for a man who also regarded as a source of divine wisdom. He did all of this in a way that also showed some of the humor of the original authors; and how stuffed up (or plain wrong) some of the later translators were.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  122. Re:Thanks for the link by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    I particularly like the bit in that episode where people are rioting in the streets because there's no television signal. Seems to me that it would be good for excerpting for the analog cutoff February 2009:

    Formby: We're going to go critical if we don't act soon.
    Edwards: We're going to have riots out there. We should distribute emergency video players immediately!

    Janie Crane: Without regular picture transmissions, thousands are swarming the streets, desperately buying black-market tapes from video vendors.

    Formby: My god, they could lobotomize the network. Without television, this city would be ungovernable!

    Edwards: Chaos out there! People are in a panic, fighting for old video recordings!
    Ashwell: Personally, I'd rather watch a smoke alarm.

    Edison Carter: It's starting to happen. Their world's gone away. Without their TVs, what is there for them?

    And those are just the quotes I can find on-line (also available as MP3s). This needs to have a DVD release tout de suite.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  123. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    Sorry, no dirty jokes. And the jokes he told tend to fall flat today, which is why people misinterpret them. For example, there's the phrase something like "a rich man getting into heaven is like a camel going through the eye of the needle." The eye of the needle was an actual passageway in Jerusalem. Camels could go through, but only on their knees. So by analogy, that's the way for rich men to get into heaven.

    Not very funny today, but he made his point a humorous way back then.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  124. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you give him any money?

  125. Re:Classics, not just stuffy rhetoric or dull hist by Leafheart · · Score: 1

    When I was 16 our theatre group in school performed Lysistrata. You know, walking among the audience with a fake hard-on and pass close to your grandparents (I was the Atheniense(sp?) ambassador), really made me blush. But the text is priceless.

    --
    --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"