Slashdot Mirror


New Star Trek Trailer

roelbj writes "The full trailer to the next Star Trek movie is now available at the movie's official web site. The upcoming J.J. Abrams-helmed installment represents a changing of the guard, a reboot of the franchise, and a return to the original-series crew. It should prove interesting to see how Abrams' writing staff (Cloverfield, Lost, Alias) tackles the Star Trek universe and all the continuity and baggage that comes with it."

38 of 591 comments (clear)

  1. Uh oh by Aeonite · · Score: 5, Funny

    I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

    I fear something terrible has happened.

    1. Re:Uh oh by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Isn't using a Star Wars quote in a Star Trek thread a hanging offense on Slashdot?

      If it isn't, it should be.

    2. Re:Uh oh by wealthychef · · Score: 5, Funny
      Isn't using a Star Wars quote in a Star Trek thread a hanging offense on Slashdot?

      No, it's not, but using mutexes improperly is.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    3. Re:Uh oh by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Doesn't seem whinny?" Good, I hate when Kirk acts like a horse.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  2. Uneasy by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem I had after watching this trailer was that it looks like they're turning Star Trek into a mindless summer action flick. I like those movies as much as anyone else, but the franchise deserves something better than that.

    I also still think Kirk looks like a preppy douche, not a skilled (if overly testosterone-driven) starship captain. Rest of the cast still looks fine.

    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    1. Re:Uneasy by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem I had after watching this trailer was that it looks like they're turning Star Trek into a mindless summer action flick

      I caught the trailer during the opening of Quantum of Solace and must say felt the same way. Right from the Fast and Furious-like opening scene, through the brief flashes of sex and Spock getting all mad, it really seems like they're pumping it full of Summer Flick Formula(r). Someone mentioned this earlier in an older thread about the movie, but why is it that everything today has to be re-imagined as darker, more filled with violence and sexier? Ironically, that's how I felt about Q of S too -- it just wasn't fun anymore, and isn't that why so many of us put up with (nay, relished!) the carpet-on-a-rock aliens of TOS?

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    2. Re:Uneasy by Itchyeyes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dunno. Personally, I'll take "mindless summer action flick" over the complete cheese-fest everything Star Trek has been for the last decade. No offense intended to the Trek faithful out there, but I think a lot of them are blinded by their nostalgia for the series. Hold the Star Trek of today up next to something like BSG or Firefly/Serenity and the disparities in quality become pretty obvious.

      This new movie may not be the return to former glory that many were hoping for, but at least it's a departure from the path towards obscurity that the series has been headed down for so many years now.

    3. Re:Uneasy by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why? Because need a distraction! We need something mindless to watch that we don't have to think about because we do enough of that when we're out of the theatres. Thinking today is depressing, and we don't want to be depressed. We want to sit back and dream that the world is beautiful when it's not. We want to believe that we're just a few short technological leaps away from salvation, and we want to imagine ourselves in this "better world" -- a better world that doesn't involve us changing who we are, or sacrificing the things we want.

      So we throw a bunch of cast members together, make a bunch of stereotyped caricatures out of them so that we can all find at least one to identify with, and then send them off to wreck bloody vengance on the world because we're so sick of feeling powerless that the idea of fighting some righteous battle is very appealing. And of course they'll reward us in this fantasy world with sex, power, and a grand adventure.

      Yeah. They raped our childhood. Yeah, it jumped the shark. It's only because we're too afraid to dream of Utopia. We're too afraid to think that our neighbors aren't our enemies but could be our allies, our friends. We're scared of people who are differently colored than us, who think differently than us, and we know deep down inside that the world is not beautiful anymore and we'd better start picking sides now before everything falls apart.

      That was the genius of Roddenberry; He made a futuristic utopia that was still populated by people just as flawed, just as human as we were, but we worked together because there were BIGGER differences out there. Aliens bent on world domination. Space probes gone beserk. A new challenge every week that was so much bigger than something as petty as race and sex differences to unite everyone. And now that he's dead, nobody's got the guts to dream big anymore. So we fall back on what we know... The same old conflicts, the same old prejudices... And it's so much easier to identify with feeling righteous and wanting to be violent than it is to take the high road and endure conflict and tension to create mutually empowering relationships.

      Hollywood is a mirror... It shows us at our best, and at our worst. You will be missed, Gene.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    4. Re:Uneasy by TrekkieGod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One thing to be careful about is that there needs to be 2 captains of the Enterprise _before_ Kirk...

      They've already said there's no mention of Robert April. I'm actually not very mad about that. April was never cannon (he was introduced in the animated series). A bigger continuity flaw in the trailer is the fact that Kirk can drive a stick. He had serious problems with it in "Patterns of Force."

      Then again, continuity flaws are everywhere. I may not like them, but I've learned to live with them. What really pisses me off is the entire stupid scene with kirk driving and destroying a vintage automobile in that trailer just so they can show what rebel of a kid he was is uber-lame. I would be annoyed at that scene if I saw it in any movie, not just Star Trek.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

  3. Sorry, but... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "It's dead, Jim."

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  4. another quicktime update by ufpdom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could this be available in something other than requiring me a update in software to my machine?

    --
    There's no Freedom like UFP-dom
  5. Re:Fuck Star Trek, Here Comes Watchmen! by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    No silly, it's about watches.

    Quis custodiet ipsos chronos?

  6. Re:scantily clad people by sl0ppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Watching that trailer it seems like they've made an effort to sex-up trek

    have you seen the TOS?

    seriously.

    star trek had scantily clad women in almost every episode, with barely veiled (for the time) bouts of kirk scoring with every single one of them. even TNG had commander "horndog" riker.

  7. Star Trek Continuum by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 5, Funny

    I still think the best continuation of the Star Trek Universe is Boston Legal. It's got Kirk and Odo and Quark and even Seven of Nine a couple of years back.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  8. Both franchise shared the same fate. by DrYak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't using a Star Wars quote in a Star Trek thread a hanging offense on Slashdot?

    As both franchise got similarly raped by dubious quality prequels :
    No.
    It's just horribly deceived StarWars fan's way to share their pain with soon-to-be-wanting-to-"unsee" StarTrek fans.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Both franchise shared the same fate. by TrekkieGod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As both franchise got similarly raped by dubious quality prequels

      I had some hopes for this movie, because I like JJ Abrams. Now that I've seen the trailer, I can't help but agree with you. Holy crap, what is so hard about making good star trek movies? They have so much background to choose from, finding the right story should be easy.

      Actually, I know what the problem is. They see the fanbase as a bonus, not as the target demographic. We have these people who are going to see the movie no matter what, so might as well aim for a completely different demographic. This way we get the other people AND the trek nerds!!!

      We need to start boycotting this shit. If they don't start making good trek to bring us back, at least it might cause them to stop making trek altogether. That would be an improvement.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    2. Re:Both franchise shared the same fate. by niktemadur · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Both franchises got similarly raped by dubious quality prequels.

      The Star Trek franchise lost me a long time ago, but I'm genuinely intrigued by this new film. At this point in time, a project helmed by JJ Abrams has far more potential than any other overseen by Lucas.

      Consider how Abrams has surrounded himself with hardcore trekkies and genuinely takes feedback from them, while Lucas insisted on being the sole "intellectual author" of his prequels, giving us the unsightly spectacles of lil' superboy Anakin, baby Greedo and that infamous Gungan.
      Another great difference is dialogue and filming itself, Lucas "can write that shit but sure as hell can't say it" and puts acting on a secondary plane, too busy visualizing how to fill the green screen. In contrast, Abrams has a keener eye and ear for these things.
      Better still, Abrams is aware that he has something to prove here, voluntarily put himself in an uncomfortable position as a creative challenge, and I can respect that.

      Bottom line, I'll pay money to see this prequel (as most of us here will) and will reserve criticism for afterward.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    3. Re:Both franchise shared the same fate. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now that I've seen the trailer, I can't help but agree with you.

      And there's never been a targeted trailer? They do this all the time, making a more action-oriented trailer for showing before an action movie ("Quantum of Solace") that makes the movie look more "summer blockbustery" than it really is. There's nothing saying this movie can't be the Star Trek we know and love and are hoping it will be. A later trailer may show the character aspect of the movie. Obviously you expect action in this movie and the trailer says, "Yep. There's action." It was being shown to a James Bond crowd (among others). It doesn't mean the whole tone of the movie is going to be like Transformers (which I liked by the way) as opposed to "Star Trek: TMP". I'm willing to give Abrams the benefit of the doubt for now. It looks cool, and it looks fun. Maybe it will be a lame piece of fluff. But at least wait until you see the movie before writing it off as crap. Ya never know. It might be good.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:Both franchise shared the same fate. by TrekkieGod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, I mean the way the 4th series ended. Nonsensical, totally unfinished and chopped off at the knees.

      Oh, we agree there.

      I had really gotten into the 4th series: it had finally found itself and developed into a good story. Compulsory watching in my house. Then someone dragged it out back and shot it through the head because the fans didn't just deserted it, but threw shit pies at it every chance they got

      No, that's not quite what happened. Everyone deserted it before it had become good. You can't expect people to watch crap for years while they get their stuff together. By the time they did, few people were watching to realize they had gotten better, and it was just too late to get the ratings up, so it got canceled.

      Blame the whole, "let's make trek new and sexy, and very much unlike trek. In fact, let's drop the Star Trek name from the series, and just call it Enterprise, and drop the orchestral theme song...let's make it completely unlike trek!" mentality that was the beginning of Enterprise for the desertion. Like I said, if they had started the series with the type of writing they had in the fourth season, nobody would have complained.

      And now here you are getting all judgmental and suggesting the same, based on a 2 min clip of a film not even released yet.

      No, I was the one who was looking forward to it, despite all the bad things I kept hearing about it. Did you see the stupid car chase with young Kirk in that trailer? What is the point of that? It's a lame attempt to show what a rebel Kirk was in his childhood. Woohoo!

      That type of scene is a sign of lack of story in any movie. They're trying to make a summer action flick to attract the non-trekkies, instead of making a good Star Trek movie. Same problem they had with Enterprise (in the beginning).

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    5. Re:Both franchise shared the same fate. by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you want good Trek, watch Battlestar Galactica. What made Trek good in the first place was that it tackled issues of the day in a sci-fi environment. That was the only way they could even show something like the first interracial kiss, or having a Russian as a good guy alongside Americans. BSG does just that. It talks about modern problems through the sci-fi setting. The reason BSG is so good now is that they didn't worry about the canon from the original cheesy show. They just took the premise and ran with it.

      Star Trek is outdated and needs a kick in the ass to be good sci-fi again. This movie probably won't be a resurgence of what made the original great, but neither would a movie based completely off of Star Trek canon.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  9. ---GO BACK--- by ErkDemon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought that the film's ---GO BACK--- slogan and logo (with the "zing" through it) was intriguing - but then I realised that it was just a site navigation button.

  10. Quicktime? Seriously? by FSWKU · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Karma be damned, this has to be said.

    Why the hell are almost ALL new movie trailers hosted by Apple, with each requiring Quicktime. And why does every new trailer seem to REQUIRE me to update to the latest version of that bloated, memory-gobbling, unwanted startup service inserting, file association stealing, iTunes pushing crap just to play a damned VIDEO? I'd rather have a larger filesize and get a standard-ish format like DivX than have to use this crap just to shave off some bits on the encode. I already have PROPER h.264 support on my system, so just let me download the damned trailer and watch it with something that's NOT QUICKTIME. The implementation Apple uses for that isn't even compatible with the standard, for crying out loud.

    This story really needs to be tagged with "fuckquicktime"

    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    1. Re:Quicktime? Seriously? by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Informative

      Good News Everybody! This will very soon cease to be the case.

      HTML 5 specifies a <video> element. Firefox 3.1 will support this, with the Ogg Theora codec included out of the box.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:Quicktime? Seriously? by k1e0x · · Score: 4, Informative

      Good News Everybody! This will very soon cease to be the case.

      HTML 5 specifies a element. Firefox 3.1 will support this, with the Ogg Theora codec included out of the box.

      Yep, it's impressive too. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Har-PRP4X9U
      http://www.double.co.nz/video_test/test4.html

      Nothing to do, just use Firefox and "it just works(tm)".

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  11. VLC by DrYak · · Score: 4, Informative

    works nicely with VLC under linux too (that is with native linux opensource codecs as FFMPEG. No evil closed source QuickTime DLLs required).

    mplayer also does a nice trick impersonating a quicktime plugin.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  12. Something wrong with the movie by prakslash · · Score: 4, Informative

    So, there is something wrong with the movie, I think.

    In the trailer, we see Kirk racing his motorbike and seeing the Enterprise being built.

    Wasn't it built in Earth orbit, you ask?

    Well, I think they got *that* part right. According to the Original Series Dedication Plaque, the Constitution Class Enterprise was constructed at San Francisco Fleet Yards on Earth and in Earth orbit. According to the Star Trek Encyclopedia, the orbital facility and starbase featured in ST: TMP was San Francisco Fleet Yards. According to the novelization of ST: A Flag Full of Stars, the San Francisco Fleet Yards also had facilities on Earth.

    So, if Kirk was racing his bike in the San Francisco area, he *could* have seen the enterprise being built.

    But.. I say, he still couldn't have!!

    You see, Enterprise was built and launched in 2245
    Kirk was born in 2233.

    He would have been only 12 years old at the time they show him racing his bike and seeing the enterprise being built.

    1. Re:Something wrong with the movie by Imagix · · Score: 4, Informative

      And he grew up in Iowa.

    2. Re:Something wrong with the movie by glwtta · · Score: 4, Funny

      I noticed something wrong too: if you watch the trailer closely, you'll notice that it looks like this movie is shit.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  13. It's Alive, Jim! Alive! by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It has run its course, move on.

    Dude, have been to the theater lately? Everything is recycled. Old movies, old TV shows. foreign movies, comic books, video games... The biggest blockbuster last summer was the third installment in franchise that started out as a theme park ride. (Not a very good one, either.) Martin Scorsese not only recycled a Hong Kong action flick, he won an Oscar for doing it!

    For some reason, it's much harder to get an expensive movie or TV production greenlighted if it's totally original. It has to be a copy of something else. The original doesn't even have been successful!

    Look at Battlestar Galactica. The remake only caries over the barest elements of the premise and a lot of not very important details. Creatively, it would have made more sense to start from scratch. But no, in order to get made, the series had to be based on a older series by one of TV's most notorious hacks and ripoff artists that barely lasted a single season.

    Like they say on the show, "It has happened before, it will happen again!"

  14. Hard to understand the bitterness here by greg_barton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm 38 and I've been watching Star Trek since I was five. The first text I remember reading and understanding were the credits to TOS. By the time I was seven I could tell you the entire plot of a TOS episode by watching the first ten seconds, max.

    I thought the trailer was frikkin' awesome. I don't understand the bitterness and disappointment. And I'm not a trek fanboi, either. I stopped watching the series' about one season into Voyager and missed most of Enterprise.

    All of this bitching about continuity being broken and stuff going against canon: jesus christ, who cares? It's fiction, people. It's not immutable.

  15. Re:scantily clad people by hondo77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but are tits really the answer...

    Stop right there. Tits are always the answer.

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  16. Tried not to, really by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Aeonite's defense, he did try to find an alternative to using a reference from another space movie. Honest. I actually saw him out combing the desert.

  17. Trailers in easy-to-download format. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    From here.

  18. Here comes trouble by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's hope Spock doesn't go on a rampage, opening up aliens heads with his finger to steal their psychic powers.

  19. Star Trek, Year One: Starfleet briefing by ErkDemon · · Score: 5, Funny
    " Is everyone comfortable? I've called you all to this emergency "Starfleet Ultra" meeting to resolve a number of crises. This meeting is, of course, not taking place. Standard security measures have been taken, and I encourage you all to speak freely during the discussion period. Let me explain the purpose of this meeting, and the crises in question.

    First we have the unfortunate case of James T. Kirk. As we all know, Kirk is the youngest ever graduate of Starfleet, and has been used, intensively, in all our promotional materials for the last three months. Unfortunately, it seems that our Mr Kirk was not all that he seemed. As you know, Kirk managed a perfect score in what was supposed to be an unwinnable simulation, by hacking the computer. What you don't know is that a subsequent investigation revealed that Mr Kirk also passed all his other assessments, including his psychological assessments, the same way. His actual scores show Kirk to be emotionally unstable, over-excitable, prone to megalomania and paranoia, and he appears to have an obsession with knives and "fucking green pontang". He even lied about his name, his middle name isn't Tiberius, it's Timothy. He's a fraud, and a complete liability to Starfleet.

    This brings us to problem number two. Spock. As we all know, Mr's Spock's mixed-blood heritage is regarded as an affront both to conservative Vulcan society and to right-wing Earthers. He doesn't "fit in" in either society, which is why his father decided to put him into Starfleet in the first place. Spock has limited social skills that make him a liability as a crew member. He was befriended by Kirk for his computer expertise, and now he ought to be facing criminal charges alongside Kirk. Needless to say, the prosecution of the "mixed-species" son of the Vulcan Ambassador would be deeply embarrassing, and would play into the hands of separatist elements on both sides. We can't afford to let this happen.

    This brings us to problem number three, the USS Enterprise.
    Four weeks ago, in EarthDock, in a standard post-mission checkup, a pile of ... detritus was discovered at the bottom of a Jeffries tube. Broken glassware. Specifically, broken whisky bottles. It now appears that the Supervising Engineer originally in charge of the Enterprise's construction, Scott, was suffering from intermittent alcoholic blackouts during construction, and was systematically falsifying the engineering certification paperwork. I'm afraid that the Enterprise cannot now be considered safe for further deployment.

    Along with these three disasters, we also have a number of more minor personnel problems, for example, one Doctor McCoy, who killed fourteen people in Starfleet Medical last year. McCoy had a breakdown a few weeks after disconnecting his father's life-support systems, and ran amok in the intensive care ward, screaming "I'm a murderer not a doctor!", and pulled twenty plugs before someone stopped him. Only six survived. Do I see some murmurs of recognition? Yes, we managed to keep the "Killer McCoy" episode out of the press, but I see that some rumours have managed to spread through the ranks, nevertheless. McCoy has responded to therapy, and is declared fully rehabilitated, but he still has a tendency to repeat his psychologist's assigned mantra "I'm a doctor, not a murderer" under times of stress, and we don't quite know where to put him. Too many people have heard the rumours. We also have a certain Officer Uhura, who ... I see some of us around the table are blushing ... seems to have taken her training as "communications specialist" rather too much to heart, and seems to have been "communicating" with rather too many higher members of the command structure, with the obvious attendant security implications. We've also scraped together a list of other minor "problem" personnel. You each have a copy in the folder in front of you. None of those folders will leave this room.

    Now, my proposed solution is to solve all these

  20. Re:Fuck Star Trek, Here Comes Watchmen! by ionix5891 · · Score: 5, Informative

    windows people who dont want to install that apple crapware

    1. get quicktime alternative ( http://www.free-codecs.com/download/quicktime_alternative.htm)
    2. open this url http://movies.apple.com/movies/paramount/star_trek/startrek-tlr2_h.640.mov

    in vlc player

  21. Nah... boycotts are too passive... by denzacar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How the hell are they gonna know we are boycotting? And why should they care?
    SOMEONE will pay for the tickets. SOMEONE payed to see "The Hottie & the Nottie" for fuck's sake.

    And since actually gathering money to pay for more of what fans like (Remember Enterprise donation gathering?) does not work - maybe a more pro-active approach is required?

    I propose packages of dead cats and live cockroaches.
    Second batch should have an additional payload of microwave popcorn and small metal objects - for when they start microwaving their mail.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens