Slashdot Mirror
Teacher Sells Ads On Tests
Tom Farber, a calculus teacher at Rancho Bernardo high school in San Diego, has come up with a unique way of covering district cuts to his supplies budget. He sells ads on his tests. "Tough times call for tough actions," Tom says. The price of an ad on a Mr. Farber Calc test is as follows: $10 for a quiz, $20 for a chapter test, and $30 for a semester final. Most of the ads are messages from parents but about a third of them come from local businesses. Principal Paul Robinson says reaction has been "mixed," but adds, "It's not like, 'This test is brought to you by McDonald's or Nike.'" I see his point. Being a local business whore is much better than being a multinational conglomerate whore.
Perfect place for Cliffs notes ads, eh?
"Next test, use our notes and suck less!"
*snicker*
A Human Right
I mean - if we can get businesses to supplement education funds in any way that is not a rise in taxes, why not?
I think we could put ads on School Buses and more of this type of stuff - sure, have some oversite, but lets get some money where it belongs without forcing businesses and citizens to raise taxes.
-- I really need to bleed off some of this
I put my copyright notice next to every answer.
Doesn't work so well on the scantron forms though.
Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
These carry more value than just the money they bring in. They are encouragement that a kid's efforts in calculus (and education in general) are valued by the parents and local businesses.
Face it, the general message a well behaved student without academic problems gets is that they are the last people to spend money on.
t
If people weren't so hell bent on not paying taxes we wouldn't have this problem. I hear people say "I don't have kids, why should I pay for school tax"
Guess what? You went to a school? You PAY for a school! Otherwise, go live in a third world country.
Did you know that in California it takes a 2/3rds majority to raise taxes but only a 51/49 vote to spend more money??? Now we're having massive teacher and police layoffs because republican assholes and cheating democrats aren't willing to man up and pay their dues.
I love paying taxes.
I use them to buy civilization.
If you can't be bothered to support your schools well enough that the teachers can print out tests, then you shouldn't be pissed the instructor is having to subject your child to ads to be able to afford to print the tests. This isn't even the teachers getting a (well deserved) raise, this is about not having the supplies that directly contribute to your child's education.
Ads on tests. Bad prescedant? Yes.
Can't be bothered to do anything for your child's education outside taxes? Worse prescedant? Yes.
If you have three Pepsis and drink one, how much more refreshed are you?
This is a great idea! Young people LOVE taking tests and the next time they go past Bennys Burger(TM) they are guaranteed to think that is THE place to go! Soon methods like trying to associate your brand with cool music or a sports star will be history.
Sponsored by Bennys Burger Inc(TM).
This is Rancho Bernardo? That's not exactly the inner city. Maybe charge $2 more per seat at the football games and have a properly funded Calc class.
I wonder if you could take out an "ad" with certain calculus notes buried within it...like having the Ideal Gas Equation or Hooke's Law as a tiny part of a graphic... ^_^
____
~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey
This test brought to you by CDABCCDACDBBACCADBC and the bonus question is 42.
"To err is human, to mod Funny divine."
While not a bad idea, the implementation could be much better...Picture this test:
1) McDonald's $2 Big Mac contains two all-beef patties that are cylinders of height 0.5cm and diameter 5cm. Burger King's $3 whopper contains two beef-like substances that are cylinders of height 0.3cm and diameter 4.5cm. How many more times valuable is the Big Mac versus the Whopper, assuming a sandwich's value is directly proportional to the amount of beef (or beef-like substance) in it?
2) A Subway Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki 6" sub contains 250 kcal of lean, healthy energy. A Wendy's Baconator contains 975 kcal of thigh-hugging and gut-enlarging fat. If all the energy of these sandwiches were put into a 100kg person climbing a ladder, how much higher would the 100kg person have to climb in order to use up all the energy (assuming all energy spent is put into the potential energy from climbing)?
The possibilities are endless! We'd never have to worry about education funding again!
Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
Before you get angry at this, think about the present state of public schools. When I was still going to school about 3 years ago, I was in a public school district that had to cut basically everything that wasn't absolutely essential due to a budget crisis. The schools were in shambles, and teachers had no supplies to do anything. One of my science teachers wanted to send a team to do Science Olympiad, a competition that involved performing experiments, taking tests, and building contraptions. The thing is, due to the budget cuts, the schools wouldn't pay for it. So, out of his own generosity, (teachers don't get paid much to begin with), he paid for all the supplies and the fees to go. This wound up probably costing him into the thousands, just to send his students to a competition. Many teachers don't have the materials they need to teach what they want to teach. If selling a space at the bottom of a test will give them a small relief to be able to buy materials and such, I think this is an excellent idea.
I know I should really hate that he's doing this, but I don't. It's kind'a nice.
Sure beats what my EE lab prof did... he stapled McDonald's applications to a final and shouted "None of you will ever be electrical engineers! Yer' gonn'a need that last page..."
Man, what a bastard.
This is so utterly wrong that I honestly feel sick. If this is happening, then it means that society as a whole has failed at one of its three primary purposes. Capitalism has gone from a financial model to a political one, and now a societal one.
"People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
As soon as I can download cut-out overlay patterns from Adblock...
I'd say that this *IS* terrible, and that your response proves it.
Schools, first and foremost, shouldn't be a profit centre. Secondly, they shouldn't be even thought of in terms of profit/loss, or fiscal sustainability. If you're going to put financial terms on a school, then it is a cost centre, plain and simple. You put money into it because you need it, not in order to get money back out of it (directly).
Of course, you need to justify your costs. Boards are set up for that--"We need this much money for these educational tools and programs, and this is how it will get used." That's the price of living in a money-driven economy.
Putting ads on educational materials creates so many more inadvertent lessons: Society doesn't value education; your only important role in life is as a consumer; knowledge is only worthwhile if it has direct practical benefits; the list goes on.
"I don't mean full on advertising like blaring announcements between classes with videos to boot, but maybe corporate funded text books..."
There is no difference. There is NO DIFFERENCE between corporate funding of books, ads on exam papers, and non-stop ads over the PA system, except for volume.
The thing to keep in mind is that companies don't buy ad space out of the good of their hearts--they do it because they can make a profit, and the way they make a profit is by getting the viewer (i.e. the students or their parents) to buy their product.
Besides which, advertising in schools is generally illegal in the US--the vending companies have managed to circumvent it, as have the dirtbags at Channel 1. The result is that parents are fighting, and in some cases winning.
"People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
I hope it gets modded down.
I agree with your cause, but not your method. Post a new story with information about the trial, as there are lots of people here (I imagine) that want to hear about this. Posting a comment in a story that doesn't relate is going to reduce your audience, not increase it. You can even post your story anonymously if you wish.
"If because of your teachers' responding to budgetary shortfalls you are developing a calculus, ZAPP'm, with...
Ad-Subtract?
Now, Deluxe Edition: Add-Subtract"
Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
Actually, since I'm an economics major, I want to have a paper on this exact topic at some point:
All these programs, like health care, welfare (when used PROPERLY), education (up to and include university), have a HUGE economic impact on the US.
If we get the kind of return prison rehab programs get (1.70-3.50 dollars saved for every dollar spent), then we can VERY easily regain our edge by just investing PROPERLY in education.
We don't invest properly in education, i know, bizarre concept!
Comparing schools of today with the schools that existed 30 years ago is completely unfair. Consider the dramatic changes in society over the last 30 years: how many schools in 1971 had computers in them? Or internet access? Now computers are needed in schools because nearly every existing job requires them. So there is a huge increase in needed expenditures for schools that did not exist 30 years ago.
Also consider the dramatic changes in students over the last 30 years. Many more students now arrive at school hungry and unprepared to learn than in the 70s. So now schools have begun providing breakfast programs and remediation for students who are far behind where they need to be.
Finally, perhaps one of the biggest increases in costs has come from staffing expenditures - both in salaries and in benefits (health care costs have skyrocketed). Although teacher salaries are still low (considering the education needed to get a position as a teacher), they have improved over the last 30 years. So my point is that direct comparisons between schools of today and the schools of the 70s is completely unrealistic and ignores huge societal changes that have impacted the role of school in society.
For your point on the test scores, I would suggest reading the Manufactured Crisis by Berliner & Biddle. They point out many of the problems with using test scores over a long period of time to "prove" or "disprove" educational improvement.
The reason for the introduction of the public school system was that private enterprise manifestly could not provide universal education (which, for better or worse, was and is deemed a public good). I don't think that things have changed so much that you could guarantee that universal education could be maintained without government interference of some kind (at least a law stating that all citizens must have some level of education).
So which is it, Mr. Libertarian nutjob? Should government do away with any requirement for education of its citizenry? Or should it just let private industry fail to provide the necessary service to achieve it? If the first, what is your solution to the sizable number of people whose parents don't deem education worthwhile enough to invest in? If the second, what has changed between the late 19'th century and today that makes you believe that private enterprise can achieve universal education? Or do you just want a return to "separate but (un-)equal" school systems using a tiered system of private and (due to money migrating away to private schools) crappy, underfunded public schools?
That is all.
I don't see how the school board or the PTA could let it come to this level. There are many other ways to raise money for schools, our teacher in 6th grade would sell bagels for .50 during break using profits to cover shortfalls in class expenses. That was back in 1993 so these problems are only getting worse. I think that his method got the point accross, but he must have exhausted any other way of getting the money. If anyone has a serious problem with his solution they should step up and help this school raise the funds in a better way.
A water tank on West Street has shutoff valves produced by Wilson Valve Company, which leak water at a rate given by the formula:
r = w * .0001/sec
where w is the volume of water currently in the tank. If the tank is filled to its full capacity of 8000000 liters at the beginning of the week and left alone for a full month, how much water would be saved by using shutoff valves from Morrison Valve Company, which have a leak rate of only (r = w * .000025/sec)?
Bow-ties are cool.
Google only indexed published material that (except in the case of error) is intended to be publicly available. When turnitin stops indexing the unpublished material that students submitted in private as part of their eduction you can have your analogy back.