Slashdot Mirror


The Wackiest Technology Tales of 2008

coondoggie writes "Despite the daily drumbeat of new and improved hardware or software, the tech industry isn't all bits and bytes. Some interesting things happen along the way too. Like floating data centers, space geekonauts, shape shifting robots and weird bedfellows (like Microsoft and Jerry Seinfeld). What we include here is an example of what we thought were the best, slightly off-center stories of 2008."

97 comments

  1. Wow.. by Anrego · · Score: 3, Informative

    This sounded interesting.. but just really didn't hold my attention. Most of the stuff fell under one of two categories:

    1) stuff which is cool, but that I already knew about ..
    2) stuff which wasn't really all that interesting

    Additionally the little blurb of info the give on each was fairly dry .. .. and they have (at least for my browser) added some annoying anti-"just view the print version" stuff..

    AND GET THE HELL OFF MY LAWN!

    1. Re:Wow.. by syousef · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree, it was a boring slideshow...but what did you expect?

      IT and science aren't known for their amazing comic value (well unless perhaps you consider quantum mechanics - I'd call that stuff wacky). The wackiest things I see in IT are management decisions, particularly when they ask for something without a clue what it will take to build, then set a ridiculous time line. It's even wackier when a senior manager has a revelation and you realize that he's missed something big and lost the plot altogether. What isn't so much fun is explaining why a particular project won't work as intended, or trying to talk someone out of shooting themselves in the foot before losing their attention.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:Wow.. by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 5, Funny

      (well unless perhaps you consider quantum mechanics - I'd call that stuff wacky)

      -Hey Electron, what are you doing? You'd better not be eating my Christmas cookies!
       
      -Nope, I'm over here!
       
      -Hey, my cookies are gone! Damn it Heisenberg, isn't there any way to compensate?
       
      -Judging by the size of your microscope, I'd say someone's compensating!
       
      Yep, the Subatomic Sitcom practically writes itself.

    3. Re:Wow.. by clickety6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      IT and science aren't known for their amazing comic value

      What about the Ig Nobel awards?

      http://improbable.com/

      This year's chemistry prize was split between two teams of doctors. One team discovered that Coke is an effective spermacide. The other team discovered that it is not.

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    4. Re:Wow.. by db32 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Two atoms are talking and one of them looks sad.
      Atom 1: Whats wrong?
      Atom 2: I lost an electron
      Atom 1: Are you sure?
      Atom 2: I'm positive.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    5. Re:Wow.. by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Informative

      You missed the obvious 22 clicks of ad revenue. I want my wasted time back, and I stopped on slide 4.

    6. Re:Wow.. by tendrousbeastie · · Score: 3, Funny

      A neutron walk into a bar and orders a drink.

      "How much is that?" he asks the barman.

      The barman replies "For you, there's no charge"

  2. A slide show by techno-vampire · · Score: 5, Informative

    I tried to RTFA and found that the article was nothing but a stupid slide show with a vapid paragraph of comment for each. Unless there's a link to the complete text, there really isn't anything worth looking at.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:A slide show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes that website is awful. Everything on the page is grabbing for attention and it's quite hard to use. One of the worst sites I've seen in ages.

    2. Re:A slide show by aaron+alderman · · Score: 2, Funny

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:A slide show by fractalrock · · Score: 1

      It doesn't even show up for me. FF w/ noscript.
      Doesn't sound like I missed much...certainly not enough to turn off noscript to account for the poor site design.

    4. Re:A slide show by bugnuts · · Score: 3, Informative

      Would've been a much better article if it didn't force use of javascript and didn't force you through some 30 pages of crap. 3 pages of crap would've sufficed.

      Interesting how the delivery mechanism is so hated by many techies, but so loved by others. /luddite

    5. Re:A slide show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes that website is awful. Everything on the page is grabbing for attention and it's quite hard to use. One of the worst sites I've seen in ages.

      Annoying ads, like flash ads from places like doubleclick.net?

      Noscript - block flash ads
      Adblock - block ads from domains, useful for ad sites e.g doubleclick.net.

      Firefox + Noscript + Adblock = Less ads.

      I actually find other browsers annoying because I then realise how many ads I was missing out on.

    6. Re:A slide show by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Just like it's annoying how some websites will use javascript to show you a Word document, or a PDF. I have to enable the website's domain in NoScript just to see the content of the document. Just give me a link to download the document!

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    7. Re:A slide show by unitron · · Score: 1

      Firefox + Noscript + Adblock = Less ads.

      If you have them blocked, how can you know if there are any there or not?

      Either way, since ads are discrete, countable units, it's fewer ads, not less.

      Which leads to less annoyance caused by ads.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  3. Floating Google Data Center? by mail2345 · · Score: 1

    Really, do they need so much capacity that they have to resort to the ocean?

    1. Re:Floating Google Data Center? by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 1

      Imagine how many libraries of congress that is!

    2. Re:Floating Google Data Center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Really, do they need so much capacity that they have to resort to the ocean?

      Water has an incredible Specific Heat Capacity. Just as a quick guess, the idea would be to use the water as a giant heatsink.

  4. How did this get approved for the main page? by VinylRecords · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There isn't anything relevant or newsworthy in the entire piece that was the subject of this post.

    The 'article' is merely a slide-show with some of the most poorly written reporting I have ever encountered. News today is usually infotainment and not information anymore and this is a prime example. Even entries to this piece that should be newsworthy are presented so awfully that I could barely muster the willpower to proceed to the last slide.

    Networkworld.com ... never visiting this website again.

    1. Re:How did this get approved for the main page? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      News today is usually infotainment and not information anymore and this is a prime example.

      Not only that, it's not entertaining. Even rank amateurs can do better, as this InFauxmercial shows.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:How did this get approved for the main page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Masochist.

    3. Re:How did this get approved for the main page? by theredshoes · · Score: 1

      I thought the Esther Dyson story was interesting to read a lot of the other stories I had come across before. Except for the Coke thing, that is just plain stupid, I think I killed some brain cells just perusing the article.

    4. Re:How did this get approved for the main page? by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sunday night + Something vaguely criticizing Microsoft == Slashdot Front Page

    5. Re:How did this get approved for the main page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....because if it isn't busy stroking Microsoft, it's all an anti-Microsoft conspiracy.

    6. Re:How did this get approved for the main page? by lorenlal · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was one thing in that slideshow that caught my attention: Sprint losing customers.

      Now, that's not a shocker here. I've certainly suffered through some poor phone customer service with them, and some poor coverage problems. They've seemed to embarked on a company wide effort to change that, but I can only hope for their sake that it's not too late.

      Of course, AT&T with the iPhone is probably quite a draw.

      I will say this for Sprint: The biggest difference I noticed between them was that Verizon phones were ridiculously more expensive if you had to replace one in the middle of a contract.... Other than that, one's a sweet potato, and the other's a yam.*

      *To those of us who aren't US Americans,** sweet potatoes are commonly called yams. Yes, I know there's a difference, but our grocers don't seem to.

      **See Ms. Teen South Carolina for that reference.

    7. Re:How did this get approved for the main page? by drspliff · · Score: 1

      All the comments we /.ers left in dismay have been deleted for some reason.

      Networkworld was already far down on my list of reputable IT news sites, and has slipped even further today.

    8. Re:How did this get approved for the main page? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      Sprint is currently the only carrier that doesn't have a shiny new consumer smart phone too. AT&T has the iPhone, T-mobile has the G-1, Verizon has the Blackberry Storm, Sprint has some cute new commercial where a VP tells people to come into the store and learn how to use the crappy phones Sprint sells. :-)

         

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    9. Re:How did this get approved for the main page? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      It's supposed to kill sperm, not brain cells. You must have used it wrong.

  5. Even those with the attention span of a goldfish by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 4, Informative

    Would get bored with the article.

    Even the slides were boring.

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
  6. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Idle

  7. Favorite Error Message of 2008 by j-stroy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had this (jpg image of my bios) displayed after a hardware failure. "Hard Dick Mode - Enhanced". I ROFL'D heavily, it was even better than the server msg "There has been an error, the error was sucess!"

    FYI m200 tablet with nvidia chip, The graphics had some lines in it, and the factory driver would bsod.

    1. Re:Favorite Error Message of 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your BIOS got corrupted or something. Some of the letters are incorrect:

      '@' = 'P'
      'C' = 'S'
      'f' = 'v'
      'b' = 'r'
      'd' = 't'
      'e' = 'u'

    2. Re:Favorite Error Message of 2008 by j-stroy · · Score: 1

      That was the first thing I noticed too. Although, the same letter would appear differently depending on the word it was in. It is a cumulative offset for only some of the character table. I did reflash the motherboard bios and the video bios and do a clean xp install, but same problem. It did make me curious about where the character table actually sits, in the motherboard bios or in the video chip.

    3. Re:Favorite Error Message of 2008 by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      You, my friend, have WAY to much time on your hands...

    4. Re:Favorite Error Message of 2008 by g0at · · Score: 1

      To me it looked as though everything were transcribed from handwritten notes by someone with no command of English.

      If you envision all the words printed out onto paper in shoddy penmanship, it is easy to envision similarities between some of those characters.

      -b

    5. Re:Favorite Error Message of 2008 by manolete · · Score: 1

      Not only time...

    6. Re:Favorite Error Message of 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 4th bit of some memory chip is malfunctioning. The characters are offset by dec. 16 in the ascii table. This will also cause stripes in graphics mode. You could fix it by locating the defective chip and replacing it and/or checking the traces to the GPU. That will be a lot of work though.

    7. Re:Favorite Error Message of 2008 by j-stroy · · Score: 1

      thank you anon for that! sounds fun. i will check the mb closely, its apart already ;) i do love that m200, used it every day for 4 years for cg and it still pulled its weight! the screen swivel was seizing up a bit so it could have been motherboard flexion as the cause. a good thing if i could revive it, i can solder pretty fine. the 1440x1050 12" screen is good, *feh* to the 1280x800 widescreen fad.

  8. Wacky? by aaron+alderman · · Score: 2, Funny

    These tech stories are as wacky as those ads by Microsoft featuring Jerry Seinfeld.

    1. Re:Wacky? by knails · · Score: 1

      I thought those were wacky. Was I the only one who liked them?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it" -Voltaire
    2. Re:Wacky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

  9. Who cares? by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Might as well talk about Vegetarian Vampires, African-American KKK members, Atheist Christian Pastors, or Dotcom CEOS worth billions who still live in their Mom's basement. It just makes about as much sense as this story.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Who cares? by shirin2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I liked the content on this site. Would like to visit again. http://www.aamarbangla.com/

    2. Re:Who cares? by genner · · Score: 1

      Might as well talk about Vegetarian Vampires

      I think fark.com had an article posted about that the other day.

    3. Re:Who cares? by operagost · · Score: 1

      You forgot about Wookiees on Endor.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  10. Re:Even those with the attention span of a goldfis by MikeUW · · Score: 1

    Would get bored with the article.

    I don't get it - was there something more to that sentence?

  11. So then tangent? by rich90usa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, as a suggestion, because it looks like people are going to complain about the article, why not shift the direction of the comments to user stories of their own wacky technology tales?

    1. Re:So then tangent? by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      pffft. Why contribute anything interesting when we can all just winge about how lame idle is?

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
  12. New Here by be+new+here · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, I be new here!

    --
    I got some bad grammar
  13. On slashdot people use the subject line... by PachmanP · · Score: 4, Funny

    to start there sentences.

    --
    You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    1. Re:On slashdot people use the subject line... by MikeUW · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Er...I was hoping to get modded funny. But now I think maybe your post is funnier.

    2. Re:On slashdot people use the subject line... by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Funny

      Their.
       
      Congratulations you're qualified to work in an Indian call center!

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:On slashdot people use the subject line... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know, every time I call tech support the guy is saying "there" and not "their", except when he's supposed to say "their", then he says "there".

      And those apostrophes they put in "its" are really annoying too. A misplaced apostrophe sounds like nails going down a chalkboard.

      Anyway, those are my two principle complaints.

    4. Re:On slashdot people use the subject line... by Whiteox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had one guy use 'they're' once. And he kept repeating it until I stopped him and explained the difference.

      Old Get Smart routine
      "It's the Craw!"
      No! Not "Craw' it's 'CRAW'

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    5. Re:On slashdot people use the subject line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in an Indian call centre, you insensitive clod!

    6. Re:On slashdot people use the subject line... by jdevivre · · Score: 1

      Anyway, those are my two principle complaints.

      If only you had written:

      Anyway, those are my too principal complaints.

  14. Pah! Imposter! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're not a patch on the real New Here. That guy's posted exactly the same comment (and subject) over 200 times in the last 5 years.

    You've done it.... twice. And you couldn't even maintain consistency for those two comments.

    Pah, imposter I say. (I won't even get started on your grammar.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Pah! Imposter! by aaron+alderman · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you are saying he is new here?

    2. Re:Pah! Imposter! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you are saying he is new here?

      Hmmmmnm, their post contained poor grammar / punctuation, repeating an old joke (badly), offtopic & didn't read the article....

      They've obviously been around long enough to absorb typical slashdot culture!

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    3. Re:Pah! Imposter! by enharmonix · · Score: 1

      (I won't even get started on your grammar.

      Lest anyone else gets started on your punctuation... ;)

    4. Re:Pah! Imposter! by Zwicky · · Score: 3, Funny

      (I won't even get started on your grammar.

      Lest anyone else gets started on your punctuation... ;)

      It was awfully nice of you to provide the closing parenthesis for him.

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
  15. It's 'their', by AndrewNeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    not 'there'.

    1. Re:It's 'their', by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh right -- this is slashdot.
      I meant "Was their something more to that sentence?"

    2. Re:It's 'their', by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wrote:

      not 'there'.

      I think you meant:

      not 'there.'

       
      Zing!

    3. Re:It's 'their', by pairo · · Score: 1
    4. Re:It's 'their', by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of a grammar nazi?

    5. Re:It's 'their', by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best cascade of fail to be seen around here in awhile

    6. Re:It's 'their', by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Hey dummy, that should be; "Ever herd of a grammar Nazi?"

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:It's 'their', by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      Ugh, thank god. As a programmer I could never bring myself to put punctuation inside quotations, even though I was taught that was "correct".

      scientific and technical publications, even in the U.S., almost universally use logical quotation (punctuation outside unless part of the source material), due to its precision.

      And the reason why in the late 1900s I was taught the wrong way to punctuate?

      The American rule is derived from typesetting

    8. Re:It's 'their', by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Ugh, thank god. As a programmer I could never bring myself to put punctuation inside quotations, even though I was taught that was "correct".

      I think the Dutch way also usually puts punctuation inside quotation marks, but even as a kid that felt wrong to me. I'm glad to see I'm not the only one. I'm even more pleasantly surprised to see that wikipedia example with punctuation both inside and outside the quotes. Sometimes the quote ends in a period, but it's also the last part of my own sentence.

  16. Let's make a deal... by Dzimas · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone caught submitting slide shows featuring minimal content smeared over 43 colorful but vapid pages should be punished. I recommend death by stoning, preferably using a truckload of rusty 486s and a pallet or two of 14" monitors instead of boulders. As for the clever soul who deemed the content on the front page, I can only assume he/she/it is blind and suffering the after-effects of a decades-old untreated case of syphilis.

    No. Wait. This must be a sign that slashdot has been secretly acquired by Condé Nast. I anxiously await the premiere issue of Linux Vogue. Sigh.

  17. Hai by rickyrocks · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hai ! This is a nice site and great article.When i am reading this article then i know so many new things from your site.Thanks for that Ricky Bulimia News and Discussion Forum

    1. Re:Hai by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Spammers on /.? Bizarre way to start the week.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  18. My last disaster by Whiteox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Since the site is humdrum I'll tell you my wacky tale.

    I bought 2x1 GB sticks of ram for an XP box I'm currently using. This was a replacement for 2x512MB sticks.
    Booted fine up to a point, then seemed to hang just before the logon screen.
    Kernel dump crash and I rebooted. About 5 mins later the desktop loaded and nothing would work to well.
    I grabbed a linux disk and did a memtest and stick#2 failed miserably on test#6.
    So I replaced it (after testing it) and it booted fine.
    Unfortunately I had missing icons, shortcuts pointing to the wrong exe, directx errors and I lost the ability to cut/paste into Thunderbird and OO.org3. Other minor annoyances.
    I rebuilt the desktop and got a few icons back but still haven't resolved the other issues. A chkdsk showed minor HD damage - all fixed.
    Reinstalled some apps - Driectx, Nero etc, tried to update with Sp3 again which crashed.
    So what I worked out was that the bad ram was read by the kernel at some time during/after boot and 'wrote' corrupted info onto the drive and consequently stuffed up my XP. All my files are intact and it looks like a complete reinstall before xmas. Unless I can work out how to rebuild the registry.
    It's crazy that one bit of bad ram can cause such problems.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  19. That's steel not brass... by Unending · · Score: 1

    The little blurb about people stealing brass from bomb ranges showed empty steel casings in the picture

    1. Re:That's steel not brass... by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      Personally, I found it even more hilarious when copper thieves tried to steal copper parts from live electric power lines, and unsurprisingly found that it held (GASP) live current. Ha ha ha, you silly copper thieves, when will you ever learn?

  20. Re by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

    ally?

  21. The Gates/Seinfeld thing. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While discussing the Bill Gates/Jerry Seinfeld ad spots Microsoft ran a few months back, we chanced upon perhaps the real thinking behind it. . .

    Universally hailed as a magnificent failure, we wondered exactly how with Microsoft using all the expertise of the P.R. giant, Waggener Edstrom, and the quarter-billion dollars spent on the project, such a thing could be possible. How could, with those kinds of resources, anybody achieve such a catastrophic P.R. failure?

    Then we realized, "No. It wasn't a failure at all. It was a brilliant success!"

    Here's the logic:

    After the self-destruction of Vista, Microsoft was in free fall. Investors were mightily distressed at Balmer's ineptitude. And so, as happens when huge corporations are desperate, they went to Waggener Edstrom for a rescue plan.

    The P.R. firm sat down and worked out the psychology and set up the following three act show: Act I involved subtle media manipulation presenting Balmer as the idiot he is, the weak link responsible for Vista's failure. This has been accomplished.

    Act II involved running a bunch of ads which were designed to do two things:

    1. Make sure that people knew that Gates was still involved with Microsoft; that he'd gone walkabout, but was still there in the wings.

    2. Show Gates being a hopeless geek. --He was portrayed as an awkward fool who couldn't act and had no screen presence. The whole series left you feeling painfully embarrassed and despite yourself, kind of sorry for him. --Think about that! When EVER has the world felt sorry for Bill Gates? But investors don't want him to be a charismatic actor. They want him to be a hopeless geek/genius who will rescue their share values.

    Now, act III involves the placement of the upcoming Windows 7 in the public conscious, which, surprise, surprise, is getting lots of positive response and sympathy, general good-will and a collective hope that it won't suck. (At least from the general population; Slashdotters are a breed apart.)

    Not a bad bit of P.R. work. Sneaky and manipulative, playing on those hidden aspects of the human mind to achieve its objectives. That's why Microsoft pays Waggener Edstrom 250 million dollars a year. The most powerful advertising happens when you think it isn't working.

    -FL

    1. Re:The Gates/Seinfeld thing. . . by g0at · · Score: 1

      Now, act III involves the placement of the upcoming Windows 7 in the public conscious, which, surprise, surprise, is getting lots of positive response and sympathy, general good-will and a collective hope that it won't suck.

      1. "conscious" is an adjective. Perhaps you mean "conscience".

      2. I do not see a logical connection between "acts I and II" and "act III". My understanding is that Windows Vista is widely perceived as garbage, and simply therefore, people bent on Windows will be optimistic about its successor.

      b

    2. Re:The Gates/Seinfeld thing. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are both confused and the word he should have used is "consciousness".

    3. Re:The Gates/Seinfeld thing. . . by unitron · · Score: 1

      Re:The Gates/Seinfeld thing. . . (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 15, @02:54PM (#26123399)

      I think you are both confused and the word he should have used is "consciousness".

      What he said.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  22. That's a tad far fetched. by jcr · · Score: 1

    Occam's razor leads me to conclude that the Seinfeld/Gates ad campaign was a failure, not a step in some grand plan.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:That's a tad far fetched. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Occam's razor leads me to conclude that the Seinfeld/Gates ad campaign was a failure, not a step in some grand plan.

      Occam never studied marketing, whereas the guy I was discussing this with spent a well-compensated 20 years in the field. In any case, Occam's razor contains a serious logical flaw, (bonus points if you can work it out), and should be used far less liberally than it usually is.

      --To get an idea of just how devious P.R. firms are, research the way cigarettes and razor blades were sold to women. (And be sure to ignore the blatantly false representation offered by such popular and award-winning television nonsense as, "Mad Men"). --And cigarettes and razor blades were early on in the evolution of psychology. People tend to feel very offended and threatened when they learn just how much of their thinking is automatic in nature and thus easily manipulated. Free will? Possible, but rare, and certainly not likely when people retreat into denial rather than look at unsettling truths.

      -FL

    2. Re:That's a tad far fetched. by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Occam's razor leads me to conclude that the Seinfeld/Gates ad campaign was a failure, not a step in some grand plan.

      I don't think Occam's razor has ever applied to Microsoft. Things that look like genius strategic moves turn out to be blind luck, while things that are absolute disasters emerge from what appears to be their most insightful thinking.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  23. zzzzzzzz by marxz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    slide 1, slide2, slidzzzzzzzz... zzz sn..gfffhk muh? wuh? good thing I needed a sleep anyway

  24. Desperation and bloodlust by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. "conscious" is an adjective. Perhaps you mean "conscience".

    Ha ha. Right you are! --The funny part is that I had it right in my first draft but switched it around on a sleepy whim because I mixed it up with the idea of Pinocchio's cricket, which just sounded weird.

    2. I do not see a logical connection between "acts I and II" and "act III". My understanding is that Windows Vista is widely perceived as garbage, and simply therefore, people bent on Windows will be optimistic about its successor.

    Public opinion is a fickle thing, and in Microsoft's case, it was out for blood. Humans are Dog Pack creatures, and when somebody so despised goes down, their demise can be met with a bloodthirsty sort of glee from the public unless something is done to trigger a different kind of emotional response. With the recent public warming toward Linux on all those millions of cheap new netbooks, and the hostility the world was feeling for being strong-armed into buying Vista, I can understand the motivation behind Microsoft to invest heavily in a public relations fix. Spending that kind of money all in one shot smelled to me of desperation.

    -FL

    1. Re:Desperation and bloodlust by g0at · · Score: 1

      (The thing about conscious vs conscience is a pet peeve of mine, because so many people use it as you did while firmly believing that it is acceptable as a noun, and such usage always grates on me.)

      You're right about the bloodthirsty dog pack phenomenon, but I'm not convinced that the Seinfeld/Gates foray achieved anything to counter it. To my view, it simply reinforced the notion of Microsoft being out of touch with popular taste and sensibility, and further evidence that they are wildly trying to do something without a solid understanding of what they're trying to do or how to properly do it (q.v. historical Windows, Zune, etc.)

      -b

  25. Public Relations and the state of Psychology today by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Normally I'd agree with you wholeheartedly, except in this case Microsoft handed control over to the second largest P.R. firm in the U.S., which certainly doesn't share Balmer's abysmal understanding of the business world and MS's customer base.

    The more I learn about big gun Public Relations and just how advanced the science of psychology is today, --and just how little of this remarkable knowledge is recognized by the general public, the more astonished and skeptical I become about pretty much everything represented in the mainstream media. (Fun fact: Hill & Knowlton, the P.R. firm which sold congress the war in Kuwait, and many say Bush Senior's election, by arranging for the Kuwaiti ambassador's 15 year-old daughter to pretend to be a humble peasant and sob before congress re-telling the completely false tale of how Iraqi soldiers wrenched babies from incubators in Kuwaiti hospitals. . , Hill & Knowlton which went on to sell more false atrocity stories to keep the guns rolling in the Bosnian conflict. . . Well, guess who ran Obama's campaign?)

    It's a funny old world. . .

    -FL

  26. firefox+adblock+noscript.. by tedrampart · · Score: 1

    .. didn't even load the slideshow.. but reading these comments, it doesn't seem worth the "allow temporary permissions" option.

  27. Ninnle Linux is NOT on the list! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...thus proving that it's neither wacky nor a joke, despite the Naysayers here on /.

    Ninnle on the desktop...the way of the future.

  28. F minus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terrible.

  29. DWTF by elistan · · Score: 1

    If you want a dose of wacky technology stories (or, at least, wacky IT stories) you need to visit with the Daily WTF (Worse Than Failure) at http://thedailywtf.com/

    I'm not sure where you'd go for wacky science/engineering stories though. Some website called "slashdot" or something like that, probably.

  30. How to un-block via Adblock by Khopesh · · Score: 1

    Whitelist networkworld.com/slideshows like this:
    @@|http://www.networkworld.com/slideshows/*

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  31. Those are, on principle, by A+New+Normalcy · · Score: 1

    my two principal complaints.

    --
    ...Lorenzo / I'm into kinky crustaceans. I just discovered internet praWn.