Slashdot Mirror


Lenovo's New ThinkPad Has 2 LCD Screens, Weighs 11 Pounds

ericatcw writes "With many users now used to having multiple monitors at home or work, you had to figure someone would try to offer a 'desktop replacement' laptop that offered the same. Lenovo is the first. Its new W700ds laptop will offer a 10.6 inch LCD screen in addition to the 17-inch primary display. The W700ds also sports a quad-core Intel Core 2 CPU, up to almost 1 TB of storage, and an Nvidia Quadro mobile chip with up to 128 cores. A Lenovo exec called this souped-up version of the normally buttoned-down-for-business ThinkPads the 'nitro-burning drag racer of ThinkPads.' There is even a Wacom digitizer pad and pen for graphic artists, who are expected to be the target market, along with photographers and other creative types who are willing to trade shoulder-aching bulk (11 pounds) and price (minimum of $3,600) for productivity enhancements." At the other end of the laptop size spectrum, Dell recently announced plans to launch a rival to the MacBook Air. Called "Adamo," it is supposedly "thinner than the MacBook Air," though further details will have to wait for the Computer Electronics Show in early January.

194 comments

  1. Not worth it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I use three monitors concurrently...when will Moore's law hit notebooks with monitors? /:)

    On a more serious note, I don't think I want to carry around an 11 pound laptop just to have an extra monitor.

    1. Re:Not worth it... by JazzyMusicMan · · Score: 1

      I didn't click the 'post anonymously' checkbox you stupid system!

    2. Re:Not worth it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      At least some of us know how to post while signed in

    3. Re:Not worth it... by iammani · · Score: 2, Funny

      May be the actual poster did /ducks

    4. Re:Not worth it... by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      When? How about at the point that VR glasses and head tracking become discrete enough to wear in an office environment, and when we figure a sensible way to not block the real world from the virtual one. At that point, we don't need monitors, because we can augment reality with as many screens (or screen-less documents) as we want, in any positions we want.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    5. Re:Not worth it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel Core 2 Q9100 - 45W
      NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M - 75W
      plus 2 LCD screens?

      i guess they might as well leave out the battery and just save some weight, since you're going to have to keep this thing plugged into the wall to use it.

    6. Re:Not worth it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're not getting any mod points with a comment like that anyway :>

    7. Re:Not worth it... by cbrocious · · Score: 1
      --
      Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
    8. Re:Not worth it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Resistance is futile"

    9. Re:Not worth it... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Definitely not worth it. 17" and 10"? Why not buy a 17" and another 17" or larger LCD? All laptops today support secondary displays. For the price of this laptop, you can buy 3 17" laptops, that weights a lot less, 3 separate LCDs, and a 16 gig usb drive to transfer files, One lappy for home, one for the office, and one for the car when you go to see customers, friends, or whatever.

    10. Re:Not worth it... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      a 16 gig usb drive to transfer files, One lappy for home, one for the office

      Carrying around a few files on a thumb drive works great for hosers like you and me maybe, but my wife tried for months to keep Thunderbird and a huge customer database synced between home and work, and it was just a nightmare. Granted, part of the problem was the Maxtor backup software, but still, it's a major pain. She eventually gave up and just carries a giant Dell laptop around.

      Of course now I get to hear about the crappy Alps touchpad driver and the general suckitude of Dell products, so it doesn't help ME any.

      ps: "Lappy"? What are you, four years old?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    11. Re:Not worth it... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An alternative scenario that would work for her is one laptop, an external LCD for the home, one at the office, and one in the car, and pocket the other $2k.

      Now, if she's that dependent on her Thunderbird data, she should be backing it up on a regular basis anyway. The loss of the data (drive failure, theft, etc) is more of a hassle than backing it up, right?

      " Of course now I get to hear about the crappy Alps touchpad driver and the general suckitude of Dell products, so it doesn't help ME any. "

      So buy her an external usb mouse, external keyboard, and external LCD, and you not only won't hear any complaints, but she'll really enjoy using two screens.

    12. Re:Not worth it... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Actually the notebook only weighs 2 pounds. The extension cord weighs 9 pounds.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  2. What's the point? by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess I'm missing the point of this. At work I plug my laptop into my docking stataion, with a 26" monitor attached (with the same setup at home - the two monitors cost far less than this silly laptop!). I *don't* want to lug the monitor around with me! If I have a desk where I work frequently, I can provide it a much bigger monitor. If I'm just walking around, I want my laptop to be as light as possible.

    Really, the more I think about it, the more I'm really just carrying my disk drive around. Maybe in a year or two I can just switch to carrying a poket-sized SSD around, and have desktops at home and work that boot off that.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    1. Re:What's the point? by chaossplintered · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe in a year or two I can just switch to carrying a poket-sized SSD around, and have desktops at home and work that boot off that.

      I do almost exactly that. I carry around a 32GB flash drive and I run Portable Apps off of it. Since my work, school, and home computer all use Windows, I basically have the Desktop wherever I go. The only difference is that my home computer actually has Firefox, Open Office, etc. installed, as opposed to using the portable version.

    2. Re:What's the point? by chaossplintered · · Score: 1
      That should say "the same desktop", but I'm sure you all knew what I meant.

      Right?

      Right.

    3. Re:What's the point? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seeing as you (admittedly) use your laptop primarily as a way to move your hard drive between fixed locations, this obviously wouldn't be very practical for you. I'd guess this is for people who tend to actually use their laptop regularly in remote locations, and would like more screen real-estate as many of us enjoy at the desktop. I think the point is, you get some of the benefits of extra screen space while still remaining fairly portable.

      Still, seems pretty gimmicky. Should be interesting to see how it does, though.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    4. Re:What's the point? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have you tried FEBE for Firefox yet? I am pretty much doing the same trick and FEBE makes it so easy to keep all my bookmarks, passwords, preferences, etc synced between the portable FF and the desktop. Great little tool to have if you are using multiple Firefox browsers.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:What's the point? by atraintocry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess I'm missing the point of this.

      Me too, unless it's "selling replacement batteries".

    6. Re:What's the point? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Why not carry a mp3 player with a separate work partition?

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    7. Re:What's the point? by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess I'm missing the point of this. At work I plug my laptop into my docking stataion, with a 26" monitor attached (with the same setup at home - the two monitors cost far less than this silly laptop!). I *don't* want to lug the monitor around with me! If I have a desk where I work frequently, I can provide it a much bigger monitor. If I'm just walking around, I want my laptop to be as light as possible.

      Seconded. Particularly with the new Dell Latitudes having docking stations with dual-DVI connections, I can have a couple of 27" LCDs' worth of screen real estate at home and at work, but still only have to carry around a couple of kilos worth of hardware.

      I really wish Apple had built docking stations for the new MB range. The lack of them was the single biggest reason I didn't buy one.

    8. Re:What's the point? by theaveng · · Score: 1

      The point is that if you are like my boss, you are literally never at your desk. He's always traveling somewhere and he carries a laptop with a 17(?) inch screen. It's huge. He'd probably love to replace it with a dual screen that increased his workspace 1.5 times its present size.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    9. Re:What's the point? by funfail · · Score: 1

      He's always traveling somewhere and he carries a laptop with a 17(?) inch screen. It's huge.

      Is it 11 pounds already? This one adds too much weight for a 10.6" screen.

    10. Re:What's the point? by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      This is sort of becoming another slashdot meme. "I guess I'm missing the point..." then follow on with the required anecdotal story. Well guess what? Not everybody works at a desk with a docking station. Different products serve different needs, at least a company other than Apple is trying to think out of the box. I'm not denying it can have flaws but let the product find its place otherwise if you don't have anything nice to say...

    11. Re:What's the point? by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      I do something similar - I have Windows XP installed onto my USB drive. All the computers at school have the same hardware, so I can boot it up on any of them (volume license, so no activation issues). If you used Linux, it'd probably boot on anything. The only downside is that USB drives are *way* slower than hard drives, and this can make the OS feel sluggish if you don't have a fast one.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    12. Re:What's the point? by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      I have a laptop and am a full-time student. I was carrying my laptop to class regularly for a while and then it hit me: duh, flash drive.I dont need to take my computer, if I know Im going somewhere with a computer, I jus tneed my flash drive with portable apps on it and Im good to go.

      I understand with some apps you cant possibly do this, but its nice that *I* can. I have a T60 that isnt bad to carry, but a flash drive is easier.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    13. Re:What's the point? by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      The new Macbook range has all the ports on one side, so it shouldn't be hard for a third party to design a docking station for it.

      I remember there being docking stations for the 12" Powerbook G4s, since they had all the ports on one side too.

      What would be really neat would be a docking station you can drop the laptop into vertically, but that will all depend on whether the machine is rated to operate in that position with the lid closed.

    14. Re:What's the point? by timeOday · · Score: 3, Informative
      My experience watching people use laptops around the workplace is that, outside of airplanes, they usually don't run on batteries. Mostly it's people moving their laptop to work in somebody else's office for a few hours, or giving a presentation, or taking notes at a meeting, and generally they are plugged in.

      I also have a good number of co-workers who choose 17" laptops. They are relatively big, but when it gets right down to it, it doesn't take them any longer to put those in a laptop bag and go somewhere than it does anybody with a smaller computer.

    15. Re:What's the point? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      I remember there being docking stations for the 12" Powerbook G4s, since they had all the ports on one side too.

      I've seen those things before. They're a fragile, kludgy, joke - and they sure as hell aren't going to let me hook up a pair of big screens to a MB. :(

      I will never understand why a company that prides itself so much on design, has such a passive-aggressive approach to cable management, spawning such inelegant and kludgy "solutions".

    16. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is obvious -- computers are now beginning to replace cars as "penis extensions". This is the laptop equivalent of driving a Ferrari. You may as well ask "What's the point of a car that will go 130mph when the maximum legal speed limit is 65mph." (My personal motto is that if your not traveling at twice the legal speed limit, you're just not trying!)

      Good luck fitting this monstrosity on an airplane tray table!

      But seriously, the only market for laptops this big is for people that do customer demos, which mean they will always be in a conference room somewhere and plugged in. If you needed to demonstrate software that actually required 2 monitors, this would be a godsend. That being said, I can't imagine they will sell more then a few hundred of these.

    17. Re:What's the point? by niko9 · · Score: 1

      Really, the more I think about it, the more I'm really just carrying my disk drive around. Maybe in a year or two I can just switch to carrying a poket-sized SSD around, and have desktops at home and work that boot off that.

      Oh! Oh! Even better: Think about a Nokia N810 like device with an SSD in it. You can use it as UMPC on the go, accessing the SSD as well, and plug it in to you laptop or desktop machine and use it as a mobile drive!!!

      An ARM CPU and Linux would make that happen...

    18. Re:What's the point? by Nimey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bookendz sells docks for Apple laptops. They may have released models for the new aluminum ones. I use one for my mid-2007 Macbook and it's not bad. It basically plugs into all your pre-existing ports and extends them out to ports on the dock. There's also a few extra powered USB ports.

      Actually, it's pretty good considering the limitations it has to work with -- Apple doesn't design their laptops with docking stations in mind (unlike Dell Latitudes), so Bookendz says you have to power off your Macbook before docking & undocking.

      That said, sometimes the ports apparently don't match up perfectly and I have to shut down and re-seat the dock to get the Ethernet jack to work.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    19. Re:What's the point? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Eventually I'm sure the space on an MP3 player will be adequate. Although I have to ask a related question - why should I carry an MP3 player with me and plug it into my home/car/portable stereo? Shouldn't I instead just carry a flash drive on my keychain, and plug it into an MP3 player build into my home/car/portable stereo?

      I don't know why car manufacturers, especially, can't seem to get this. It's got to be more expensive to add an iPod doc than build in the software for an MP3 player and add a USB slot! Only Acura seems to get this, sadly enough, though a couple of other have SD card players (I've never even seen an SD card, not sure why they can't just use USB). Other car makers need toget with on USB bus, or Acura needs to revert the terribly ugly looks of their 09's!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:What's the point? by lgw · · Score: 1

      This is the laptop equivalent of driving a Ferrari.

      No, *this* laptop is more like driving a dump druck. Sure, it's expensive and heavy and folds in odd ways, but the design sure seems odd for commuting!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:What's the point? by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

      I was recently at a presentation where one of the speakers demonstrated some Siemens PLM software - high detail 3D CAD models, stuff like that. One of the benefits they pointed out was that it ran well even on the demonstrator's laptop computer - you didn't need a big workstation to run it on.

      However, the demonstrator's laptop was a huge 17" desktop replacement thing.

      That's the market I see for these things - mobile workstations that let you run workstation software at client sites and trade show booths, without needing to muck around with carrying and powering a second monitor along with your laptop.

      Furthermore, computer companies derive some benefit from holding the "performance crown" even if it's with a product hardly anyone would buy. For example, you can load your computer with two $500 graphics cards or an "extreme" $1600 CPU but probably few people do. I think the idea is to get news coverage for your product line and demonstrate how cutting edge your product line is.

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    22. Re:What's the point? by lgw · · Score: 1

      What kind of loser has potential customers squinting at some tiny 17" monitor at a trade show booth? 40" monitors are for the secondary displays, and twelve foot projection screens capture the attention of passers-by.

      At a client site you want to bring a portable *projector*, not a monitor. That's a very specific product for a very specific need, and they're getting pretty good these days.

      Well, they certainly got their Slashvertisement with this stunt, but it's me with left a very bad impression of their design priorities.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  3. Needs More Symmetry by lobiusmoop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, that laptop in the article just looks lop-sided and ugly with the sidecar-screen pulled out. Once somebody does a triptych version, let me know.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:Needs More Symmetry by hey! · · Score: 1

      You may be right, but I think the design is functional. There are lots of ways this kind of setup would be very convenient.

      You could keep the document you are working on in the main screen, and your agenda or objectives on the small one. You could have a shared whiteboard in the main screen, and a webcam feed on the small screen. Or, if you were a PHB, you could keep the powerpoint slide you are working on in the main screen and the slide sorter on the side screen.

      That said, I don't think this is the best way to do it. I'd prefer a separate LCD unit with its own stand.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Needs More Symmetry by ninjackn · · Score: 1
      --
      [FUCK BETA 2.6.2014]
    3. Re:Needs More Symmetry by Daemonax · · Score: 1

      I myself would like to use this for working on projects, having an ebook or website open on the side screen so I can easily get information that I need for whatever I'm working on. Yes I can tab, or resize windows and stuff, but I think that this would be very convenient.

  4. The perfect laptop by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a huge fan of dead laptop batteries, burning hot pants, and scoliosis.

    This has to be the perfect laptop for me!

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    1. Re:The perfect laptop by chemisus · · Score: 1

      too bad its not sony, otherwise youd be looking forward to more than just a dead battery.

    2. Re:The perfect laptop by mstahl · · Score: 1

      Burning hot pants sounds kinda sexy. Sign me up!

  5. 11 pounds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did they just tape two laptops together?

  6. Too many moving parts by gzipped_tar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The secondary display pulled out at the side just looks so fragile to me. Especially when considering the cost of such a computer.

    On the other story, does the Dell "Adamo" has anything to do with Battlestar Galactica?

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    1. Re:Too many moving parts by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of Commander Adama.
      Slight difference.

      --
      home
    2. Re:Too many moving parts by lars_boegild_thomsen · · Score: 1

      Ahem - did you ever use a thinkpad? Remember that weird folding keyboard they once did? Might look fragile but it won't be. Thinkpads might be ugly as hell (actually I personally don't think they are), unsexy and clumsy but they are solid as a rock.

  7. A bit on the heavy side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Lenovo's New ThinkPad Has 2 LCD Screens, Weighs 11 Pounds "

    Maybe a car battery wasn't the best choice?

    1. Re:A bit on the heavy side by ElNotto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know you're reading Slashdot when 11 pounds is called "shoulder-aching bulk."

      Granted, it's one of the heavier notebooks on the market but if you would really see the benefit of dual screens when working in the field it doesn't sound all that bad -- just get a backpack case.

    2. Re:A bit on the heavy side by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      You're talking about a bunch of guys who still remember lugging their Osbournes around. Of course their shoulders are sensitive.

    3. Re:A bit on the heavy side by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      That's pretty much what I thought. Since when is 5kg "shoulder-aching bulk"? Well, assuming you haven't got some hideous degenerative bone disease or something.

      I used to hitchhike from where I went to university to my parents and back with an Osborne 1 (latterly a Compaq portable) and my rucksack. I wouldn't even class that as "shoulder-aching bulk".

    4. Re:A bit on the heavy side by theaveng · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow that was an obscure reference. I remember hearing the word "Osbourne" but didn't recall what it was (24 pounds): http://oldcomputers.net/osborne.html - Now if you had said "Commodore 64 portable" then I could relate (23 pounds): http://oldcomputers.net/sx64.html ----- The heaviest portable ever made was the IBM PC at over 30 pounds!!! Ouch.

      And finally the first laptop PC (12 pounds). It ran over 10 hours! Why don't today's laptops run ten hours? http://oldcomputers.net/ibm5140.html ----- And the Macintosh laptop. I like the image of a beautiful woman doing computer work *in her pool*. Yeah that would happen. Beautiful women don't use computers (ducks a spitball). http://oldcomputers.net/pics/macuser1189.jpg

      P.S.

      Free games: http://oldcomputers.net/games.html

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    5. Re:A bit on the heavy side by bignetbuy · · Score: 1

      Wow that was an obscure reference. I remember hearing the word "Osbourne" but didn't recall what it was

      Thank you for making me feel old. "obscure" reference...sheesh.

    6. Re:A bit on the heavy side by david@ecsd.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It ran over 10 hours! Why don't today's laptops run ten hours?

      My guess would be, judging from your links, is that the laptops of the olden days didn't have a disk driving constantly spinning, a processor that ran at about 4 mumble Mhz, and with a 640x200 display, it probably didn't require as much juice as the laptops nowadays.

      I miss my last laptop which could adjust the clock speed. I had it set up that the less juice there was, the lower the clock speed. I could regularly get 3 hours out of it--of course, that was running linux and not the disk thrashing Windows.

      <Aside>Seriously, what's going on? When I boot my laptop in Linux, I rarely see the hdd light flicker, but when I boot Windows, it's constantly lit up for the first five minutes, or so.

    7. Re:A bit on the heavy side by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      While I am quite comfortable toting an 85-pound rucksack, I can't imagine doing it just to carry a laptop to work. My 7-pound Macbook Pro is painful enough when you throw in a few project files and accessories-- it made me give up the messenger bag.

      For an 11-pound laptop, I would hope the power brick is built in along with the roller blade wheels to move it around.

      I saw some idiot in the airport with one of the 19" laptops... it just makes you wonder. The thing takes up the bulk of a rollerboard.

    8. Re:A bit on the heavy side by mstahl · · Score: 1

      That's 11lbs in addition to whatever you carry normally. I'm a strong guy and also in the target market (creative professional), but I don't think it makes me any less strong when I say this would be a major pain. I usually carry a sketchbook, pens and pencils, and a couple of small notebooks. I just don't have the capacity and if I'm on the road I don't need a second LCD. Soooooo I'm still wondering how well this thing will sell. Guess we'll see.

    9. Re:A bit on the heavy side by theaveng · · Score: 1

      If you're using Vista then it's caching files from the hard drive to memory in the theory that moving files to RAM saves access time. It doesn't really seem to work though.

      I have a Pentium 4 on both my laptop and my PC. I wish I could slow it down from the current 3000 megahertz, since I'm just downloading files (very non-CPU intensive), but alas Intel never thought to include that option. I would have to physically open alter the motherboard, and I have no desire to do that.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    10. Re:A bit on the heavy side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A decent rucksack distributes the weight over both shoulders and one's back using padded straps so it's not a surprise you didn't have any trouble. Most people carry their laptops in bags purse-style so all the weight is bearing down on one shoulder usually with a cheap unpadded strap.

      If the person isn't particularly young and/or fit, I can easily see how 5kg would be "shoulder aching"

  8. Thinner than Air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell recently announced plans to launch a rival to the MacBook Air. Called "Adamo," it is supposedly "thinner than the MacBook Air"

    Any company that makes manufacturing a laptop thinner than the Air a priority needs to be shot. Oh wait that's right, your average consumer is actually impressed by such retarded novelty, even when the resulting product is useless.

    1. Re:Thinner than Air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.
      Air was such a massive waste of time and money. (for Apple and the consumer)

      It is so horribly buckled, it isn't even funny.

      Shame on Apple for even making it. They lost some of the respect i actually had for them.
      Looks like Dell has as well now.

  9. Great! It runs Linux, right? by argee · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Not mentioned in the article, but surely it must run Linux, right?

  10. Dell's got the goods by yetijoe · · Score: 1

    I do find it interesting that dell has ditched the overly conservitive look... but maybe they are just figuring out that looks do sell. Then again this might be what you get when you Put a designer from Nike and a 25 year veteran from wireless industry in the room to build a computer (Ed Boyd and John Thode).

  11. The Point is... by argee · · Score: 1

    If you don't like it, don't buy it. Its like no one is forcing you to buy it, or lug it around. I am sure *somebody* will like it, and buy it. Man, its like saying that Chocolate Icecream tastes like shit. I suggest, then, you buy vanilla or strawberry.

    1. Re:The Point is... by Sethumme · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's perfectly valid to ask what the point of a product is. Not only does it invite answers that may describe a perspective not imagined by the inquirer, but it also raises the point that the product might not be worth the trouble to make if there is no interest in it.

      Sure, the OP doesn't have to buy it if he or she doesn't like it. But that doesn't mean the product has any value to anyone else either. If you decide to make ice cream that tastes like shit, and you can't answer the question of "what's the point?", then what will you have after you've spent $400,000 in research, design, production, packaging, and marketing just so you could sell your product to one *somebody*? Nothing but a big pile of (cold) shit. So the question remains, who needs a 4 grand laptop that weighs 11 pounds, and are there enough of these people for the product to turn a profit?

    2. Re:The Point is... by maxume · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, the proper analogy is that shit flavored ice cream tastes like shit.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:The Point is... by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      Oh is that how it works? All I have to do is not buy it??? Thanks you're a life saver...

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    4. Re:The Point is... by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      Or more specifically: that shit flavored ice cream tastes like shit flavored ice cream.

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    5. Re:The Point is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. Interesting idea, poor implementation. by Shag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1920x1200 main screen, and 720x1280 side screen... did it not occur to them to have 1200 vertically on both? Also, I'm kinda thinking that for this kind of money, I should be able to buy 2 laptops providing a total resolution in excess of 2640x1280, and whatever software I need to share the screen of one as a second display on the other... and have 'em weigh less, together, than this monstrosity. ;)

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Informative

      And that software would be Maxivista.

    2. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      I also don't get the idea of having two different sized/resolution monitors for a laptop/desktop.
      I can see where extending the desktop is useful on a single machine in the case of Windows, but when running a *nix it'd be just as useful to get two laptops (one powerhouse, one low end perhaps) and have X (Xdmx) extend the desktop across both machines.
      If the program can run as a cluster version as well on both laptops it would be completely cool. :-)

      --
      home
    3. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Synergy provides similar screen sharing functionality and it's opensource:

      http://synergy2.sourceforge.net/

    4. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by Shag · · Score: 1

      Yeah! That's the one I was thinking of, but it's been so long since I read about it that I forgot the name.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    5. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      Synergy is awesome! I actually do use 2 laptops connected with a crossover cable and synergy2. Really I could just switch keyboards, but with my little usb lasermouse is only plugged into one pc.
      Synergy shares keyboard and mouse between PCs, and it even allows you to copy and paste (although trying to use that feature will crash Netbeans), but there is no ability to drag a window from one desktop to another. I think it should be possible between systems running Xwindows, but the software is not even close yet.
      Two monitors is still better than synergy for a "bigger desktop". Two computers with two monitors has advantages as well (at least in terms of performance). Is there way to send an Xapplication from one display (say :0.0) to another without losing its state?
      Rohit

    6. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by Scoth · · Score: 1

      Synergy and Maxivista are aimed at two different solutions, though. Synergy shares the mouse and keyboard - it's a software KVM. The two computers run separately, with separate apps, etc etc.

      Maxivista actually sets up a virtual display adapter on the "host" and the "client" is connected as an extended desktop. It integrated into the multihead capabilities of the host. This lets you treat them as if it was two monitors on the same computer, dragging windows back and forth, etc. I think Maxivista can do the same as Synergy as well, but I mostly used it for the extended desktop functionality.

      I did at one time find a free competitor to Mv that worked (ZoneOS ZoneScreen, or something?) but I found it to be so slow as to be nearly useless.

    7. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      Or you could just run an X Windows Server on one of the machines, which is lightweight and designed for just this sort of use. That's the problem with MS Windows, and really Mac OS X too - they're intrinsically single-user single-machine systems. *nix is built from the ground up so either the number of machines or the number of users can scale effortlessly, at a low level. And that means that if you build properly on top of the low-level utilities, this stuff is trivial.

    8. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Maxivista at work to get three displays with my docked laptop. The laptop drives two displays, and I have an old laptop folded out completely with a cheap improvised stand for the third monitor. I can keep my e-mail inbox open on the small laptop display, and can work with two documents, like a schematic and a datasheet on the two other monitors.

      I like it so much now I want a similar setup for home, and so I'm looking at a getting a used tablet PC to use as a second, luggable display.

    9. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      I have a similar configuration to this, only reversed -- I have a 17" rotated to 1024x1280 on the left, and a 20" at 1600x1200 on the right. The extra 80 pixels on the left side are useful for the taskbar, system tray, etc., allowing a full 1200 pixels vertically for a screen-spanning app if I so choose. Those extra 80 pixels are not wasted, though I think most people would find it more useful if the extra space was on the left rather than the right (since most people expect the START button to be at lower left).

      My setup has a slight mismatch in the dot pitch of the two monitors, so everything is slightly larger on the 17", but that's life since I obtained the two separately.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    10. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by Daemonax · · Score: 1

      Uhh no thanks, that's proprietary from the looks of it. Synergy would be a much better option. http://synergy2.sourceforge.net/

    11. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by moonbender · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, while I've got a desktop and a laptop running Ubuntu 8.10 here, I'm pretty sure it'd take me at least two hours to set them up this way. Probably a lot more than that, with no guarantee of sucess. Because I don't think it's mainstream enough to be set up effortless or work out of the box, like X itself now mostly does. If I still had two Windows devices, it'd probably take me 10 minutes, with a reasonable chance of sucess and less time wasted if it doesn't work.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    12. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by Scoth · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, this is easy with, say, Distributed Multiheaded X. I think DMX has been integrated into the core Xorg build for some time now. It's one of the many things *nix has done for ages that Windows still takes addon software to do, and I'm not sure if Mac OS X has anything available to do it.

      Sadly, there are still many people stuck with Windows for work (I'm one of them) so if we need a solution for something like this, we have to look to the ugly solutions.

    13. Re:Interesting idea, poor implementation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, if you happen to like free software, Synergy: http://synergy2.sourceforge.net/

  13. Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by religious+freak · · Score: 1, Informative

    Am I the only one that has found this? I purchased a new Thinkpad ~6 months ago and it's terrible for a variety of reasons...

    I had great experiences with my previous two (IBM manufactured) Thinkpads.

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    1. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by FSWKU · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got a T60 that I bought about two years ago from Lenovo. Haven't had a single problem out of it. The only two bluescreens I've ever seen on it were related to the fact that I accidentally covered the vents and it crashed due to being too hot. Other than that, it's been a perfectly stable machine. I get around 4:30 with the 9-cell battery with the screen at full brightness and the wireless going (although constant streaming from, say, youtube, takes it to around 2:15. Who wants to watch youtube for that long, however?).

      Wait, I take that back. The optical drive doesn't seem to be worth a crap anymore, but since I so rarely use discs it's not much of an issue. I have an external that I bought so I could burn lightscribe discs anyway. Thinking of swapping the optical drive for another HDD soon (320gb in there now, with the stock 100gb going in the PS3, probably going to add another 320).

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    2. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by pthreadunixman · · Score: 1

      My T400 is great.

    3. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lenovo has always made Thinkpads, or at least has for a decade or more. IBM just decided to sell the rest of the business to them but let them use the IBM name for a few years.

      dom

    4. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by Andtalath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lenovo always did the manufacturing, it's just that IBM did the designs before.

    5. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by file-exists-p · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am the proud owner of a 570e, T41p, T61p and X61s. And indeed, the T61p is the most Lenovo of the four, and it sucks (huge and hot). The X61s is wonderful (netbook sized and amazing keyboard, CPU, HD, screen and linux compatibility) but it seems that it was IBM designed.

      One of my relatives just bought a T400 and his comment was "pretty cool, but the keyboard sucks a bit" ... Knowing that one of the main reason to buy a Thinkpad was the quality of the keyboard, this is bad.

      Now, maybe the expensive ones are better ? People do not seem to complain about the X[23]00, do they ?

    6. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one that has found this? I purchased a new Thinkpad ~6 months ago and it's terrible for a variety of reasons...

      I had great experiences with my previous two (IBM manufactured) Thinkpads.

      No, they are terrible, and the quality is increasingly getting worse. T500 is worse than T61 etc.

      T500: Look at the way the battery doesn't quite fit the battery slot, the cd/dvd drive is not well fitted either. Furthermore the palm rest below the keyboard doesn't feel as ruggy as a T43. And why is the black border around the widescreen versions not the same size all the way round?

      I use a T500 all day and had to use a T42 the other day and honestly the T42 feels like a much better product.

    7. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by LaurensVH · · Score: 1

      I'm very happy with my X301, and I'm typing this on a T43p. I can't say I feel the T43p is significantly better or worse engineered. However, I haven't had the X301 very long...

    8. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by owlstead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just bought an SL300 and it's great, if not for the screen and the touch-pad (which is a bit of a drag, because they are very important parts of a laptop I suppose). It also has some problems with the WiFi software and Vista (maybe I'll install the XP software that came with it, or Linux).

      The keyboard however is fine by me. The only complaint I have about it is that it is slightly too loud, and the Fn key is completely to the left, where I expect to find the key. Otherwise it is a brilliant thing, with easy to reach enter, backspace and cursor keys and two large shift keys. It seems that this 700 thing has got the same keyboard, and a numpad as well, which my 13.3" wide screen laptop obviously misses.

      I haven't got too much experience with stinkeypads, but it surely feels and stinks like one :). This message was typed on the wonderful keyboard.

    9. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by bignetbuy · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are the only one. My T60 and T61p both run circles around the Dells or Toshibas on the market today.

    10. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by David+at+Eeyore · · Score: 1

      I am now on my second R61, (upgraded to faster CPU and better graphics card), ans find them to be quite stable and well equipped for business/development use (am not a gamer, but watch DVDs occasionally)
      The quality of build is not as bad as it could be...

      --
      "Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups" seen on someone's blog...
    11. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by Pinckney · · Score: 1

      I own a R61, which is also large and heavy, although it seems to run cool enough. If I wanted a netbook, though, I'd buy one. For me, it's definitely a desktop replacement; I picked it because I like the keyboard.
      I've not had any problems with the hardware yet, either.

    12. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by SocialEngineer · · Score: 1

      I own a T400, and think the keyboard is actually pretty good. Haven't had a problem with it yet. What specifically does your relative say about the keyboard?

      --
      "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
    13. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your relative to phone Lenovo and claim that the keyboard is damaged.

      The new T400 and T500 somehow manage to ship with good keyboards, they screwed up on the earlier ones. No recall, but that's your typical Chinese saving face by trying to pretend nothing happened (since the bad keyboards DO work and are not a risk to anything but the ThinkPad brand anyway, and if Lenovo cared about the brand, the ThinkPad SL would not exist).

    14. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have a different concept of great than me. If the screen sucks, the touchpad stinks, wifi is busted and the OS doesn't work, I would call that anything but great.

    15. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      Winstron did manufacturing on the R and X Series, Great Wall (one of Lenovo's biggest competitors when they bought IBM) did manufacturing on the T series.

    16. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that has found this? I purchased a new Thinkpad ~6 months ago and it's terrible for a variety of reasons...

      (shrugs) I have a T61p that I love (it's about a year old now?). It replaced an old (c2002) Toshiba Tecra. My T61p is the 15" 1680x1050 display, 3GB of RAM, and a Centrino Duo CPU running WinXP Pro.

      They're still very solid units.

      I don't care much for some of the ThinkVantage software, but I've learned to put up with its quirks. (They really need to sink some funding into fixing up that software.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    17. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I have an R60 for about 2 years now. When I first got it, it had problems coming out of sleep, but after downloading some updated drivers they went away. The only other complaint I have is that apparently it's limited to 2GB of memory, so no upgrades for me (I bought it with 2GB). But I guess that's what you get when you buy the low-end of the Thinkpads.

    18. Re:Since Lenovo took over, Thinkpads suck by file-exists-p · · Score: 1

      It seemed that he does not like the "touch" of it, with that impression that the whole keyboard moves down when you press a key. Cheap laptops tend to do this, but not the thinkpads I own.

  14. Why? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why? I see this word a lot in laptop threads. It's in the luggable monster threads like this one and its often in the netbook one too. I would have thought the answer was obvious, really. What I have trouble understanding is how people can fail to understand that not everyone has the same computing needs.

    If you still don't understand, use the following guide:

    Need as much power as you can get in a portable bos? Get one of these.

    Need great portability but not much CPU? Get an eee or whatever.

    Need something in between? Get a laptop.

    Need a laptop which can be run over bay a tank while under water? Get a toughbook, etc...

    And so on. If you're on /. and still can't see how other people still have different computing needs, then hand in your geek card on your way out.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
    1. Re:Why? by XMode · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please can you come and explain that logic to my boss.. Ans can you also include the following.

      Need large amount of computing power than you never need to move, BUY A DESKTOP.

      All our work desktops are slowly being replaced with laptops. No one ever moves them. They stay setup, open, on people desks, over the weekend.. I'm surprised that the cleaners haven't stolen a few buy now.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Most laptops do use a lot less power than a desktop though...

    3. Re:Why? by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

      Need large amount of computing power than you never need to move, BUY A DESKTOP.

      Absolutely. I'm also tired of discussing this with my friends. A desktop with the same specs as a laptop is usually around half the price. Ok, more than half at the low-end, but less at the high-end. I just don't see the point of spending double the money on something that provides no advantage at all.

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Where do you work?

    5. Re:Why? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      They stay setup, open, on people desks, over the weekend.. I'm surprised that the cleaners haven't stolen a few buy now.

      If your boss is unresponsive - talk to your cleaners. I'm sure "something" can be done about it.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    6. Re:Why? by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      This is way off topic I know, but I just found it interesting that the GP misspelled 'by' as 'bay' and you misspelled it as 'buy'. Not trying to be a pain or pick on you, just thought it was a neat coincidence that you both typo'd the same word in different ways.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    7. Re:Why? by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      Need large amount of computing power than you never need to move, BUY A DESKTOP.

      Try telling that to the unwashed masses.

      No one likes lugging a computer around, especially when they're uncertain as to when they'll need it. The shame is that people don't understand how undesirable it is to lug a laptop around... and when they realize it, they won't admit it; after all, who wants to admit that they've wasted X/2 dollars?

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    8. Re:Why? by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      It's hard to have a voice-activated Google-Earth-running warstumbling device that's *not* a reasonably powerful laptop.
      I don't mind lugging my laptop in my oversized backpack. :)

    9. Re:Why? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Partly because nobody cares enough to design/buy desktops which are more efficient. Granted it won't be as good as a notebook, unless you build a desktop out of notebook components (which is also possible) but a little care goes a long way. In fact, a well-built desktop itself won't use that much more power as its equivalent laptop parts,but the display will, and it'll be difficult to find a 20" desktop LCD which consumes as little power as a 14 or 15" laptop display does.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    10. Re:Why? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The power savings are probably eaten up by the higher initial cost of the hardware and the increased repair costs (though granted, a laptop that never moves may be no less reliable than a desktop). Ditto the added costs when the users start demanding external monitors/keyboards/mice when they get tired of being hunched over the laptop for hours a day.

  15. nutty by Eil · · Score: 1

    Okay, a dual-head laptop is just an insane idea. But then again, the Thinkpad has a long history of crazy features in the product line. Good to see Lenovo is keeping up the tradition.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go do some hacking on my T60.

  16. 128 cores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    128 cores! Fuck yeah!

    1. Re:128 cores by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think we should make a system of rating computing power that's applicable to a CPU or GPU and is measured in Internet Penis Inches. Then you can settle graphics card debates by saying "This one is rated at 6.3Epeens and this one is 7.2Epeens" and be done with it.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:128 cores by Rufus211 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought they were normally called 3dmarks, but I guess Epeens would work.

    3. Re:128 cores by BOFHelsinki · · Score: 1

      Indeed! The "128 cores" (in reality the shader ALUs that Nvidia calls "Stream Processors") caught my attention too. And this from Computer World. *sigh*

      More weirdity in there: "Why two screens? Most people are using two monitors at their desktop. [...]," said Wes Williams, worldwide product marketing manager for ThinkPads.

      Uh, I'd think this Lenovo manager has very small values for "most people".

    4. Re:128 cores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a terrible idea.
      I'd still be below average!

  17. From the PC Pro article: by atraintocry · · Score: 1

    The metallic-black "Adamo" laptop will reportedly be thinner than the MacBook Air, although it's unclear whether it will be as light.

    Sure, it depends on whether or not they loaded Vista onto it.

    (kidding)

  18. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now can they make it not look like a pile of shit from 1996? Thanks, the management.

  19. They would be lots better off by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    even given your scenario, to put the same amount of effort into a more-portable external monitor! If it's reasonably thin and light (the whole point), then it can go in the bag with your laptop.

    I know of NO good reason that it should actually be built-in. That adds unnecessary weight and complication, and reduces flexibility.

    1. Re:They would be lots better off by iocat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you ever tried to carry an extra monitor around with you? It's a massive pain the ass. Power supplies, stands... it adds up, quickly.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    2. Re:They would be lots better off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At one job, I had a Dell XPS laptop with a 17" widescreen, and I also carried around an external 17" widescreen along with a full-sized bluetooth keyboard and mouse. While that may seem like a PITA, it was very nice to be able to setup my full workstation anywhere I went, be it work, home, my in-laws, or at school (while I was taking classes after work). It all fit in my bag just fine, and I made no compromises. If it was too heavy, I could have always switched to a bag/cart combo, but it never reached that point.

    3. Re:They would be lots better off by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Hello... did you read what I wrote?

    4. Re:They would be lots better off by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Negatory!
      Slashdotters can't read!

    5. Re:They would be lots better off by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered why someone hasn't built a portable LCD screen yet. The way I figure it, take a laptop screen, and have a protective cover that unfolds into a stand. Even better would be to figure out some clever way to manage the cables (retractable?) so you can pretty much grab it and go. Maybe put a battery in it. If done right, you'd have something smaller than the MacBook Air that you could fold up and throw in your laptop bag, then you could have dual screens while on the road. I'd buy one.

  20. Looks a tad flimsy. by jcr · · Score: 1

    I'd be real nervous about someone bumping into that extra display.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  21. How funny and stupid of Dell by Cannelloni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's funny and amazingly bone-headed Dell should mention the MacBook Air. *All it does is shift the focus to Apple's offerings!* It's not hard to build a thinner laptop than the MBA, several manufacturers have already done that (Sharp, Sony, LG). The challenge is to build something *better* than the MBA, with an operating system and application software package that equals it. Dell can probably build a super-thin Alamo, but if it ships with Windows Vista, it's still useless.

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    1. Re:How funny and stupid of Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no fan of the Air, but it can hardly be compared to a netbook. I don't see people dog piling on anyone that mentions the ultraportable thinkpads, vaios, or porteges.

    2. Re:How funny and stupid of Dell by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      That's because they are all very sensible machines. This one is not.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    3. Re:How funny and stupid of Dell by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Why not? Apple doesn't make a Netbook, so if you want an ultraportable that runs OSX the Air is your only choice (other than a Hackintosh I suppose).

  22. Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by Cannelloni · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The Lenovo W700ds has got to be the stupidest concept ever. Who would buy a lumbering beast like that, with a styling that might have been moderately cool back in 1993? I don't get it. This is proof the PC industry is dying. *Even uglier* than the 17" HP Pavilions.

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    1. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by DMalic · · Score: 1

      Okay, link us to the prettier example of the dual screen notebook with all the same features.

    2. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by owlstead · · Score: 1

      A Thinkpad is a Thinkpad, so they are designed to look like Thinkpads. I've just bought one that has the same timeless design. Never mind, the laptop (an SL300) is great, save the 13.3 inch screen, which is rather worthless. I hope for Lenovo's sake the screens of this new thing fare better.

    3. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      Then again, why not just use Expose and Spaces, or something similar implemented in Windows or Linux?

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    4. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      I've had two Thinkpads, a T22 and an X31, from the time when they were built by IBM and not the Chinese company Lenovo. I had to use Windows at the time, so IBM seemed the way to go. They were well built but the total antithesis of good design. I wouldn't call black, square and plasticky "timeless". I call it "butt ugly". But for people who don't care about how things look and feel, or aesthetics, or user-friendliness, then fine, go for it.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    5. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by DMalic · · Score: 1

      Firstly, Windows just doesn't have anything to compete with Mac or Linux in that vein. I've tried a good ten or so different virtual desktop managers on Windows, and every single one had some sort of problem that kept me from using it. Dual monitors are effective when you're trying to work with several apps *at once*, not just categorize all the stuff you're running. You can, say, work on photoshop while observing IM/MIRC, or you can have several difference office apps open and move data back and forth seamlessly. It sounds like you're an Apple user - OSX is better geared towards one window not taking up the whole screen than Windows, but nothing can quite approach the real deal implemented in hardware. Not to mention the joy of running two screens with elegant window management software =)

    6. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but for me personally, a laptop should be reasonably small and portable. 11 pounds (5 kg) is just not portable. I would put my money on a good external display, but to each his own.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    7. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call Thinkpad design "butt ugly" but utilitarian. That's what I like about the design. I hate all the rounded corners and extra plastic that most laptops come with now. I couldn't care less about some stupid inlaid design on the lid with a glossy finish. Some HP's actually come with a shammy cloth so you can get rid of fingerprints. That's just stupid. The thing is meant to be handled. Who wants to spend time "waxing" their laptop.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    8. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Butt ugly, if carried on long enough and backed up by functional quality, can also become iconic.

      Obviously, you don't understand design.

    9. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never thought Thinkpads were particularly user-friendly either, but they are well designed. They convey the same kind of "professional tool" image as a Hilti power drill, and the design conveys that image coherently (which is important). (Incidentally, while's Hilti gear deserves the stellar reputation, they do spend a lot of money on design for aesthetics as well as ergonomy.)

      They are analogous to early Functionalism in Architecture. It's hard to get universally unpleasant looks when you have a clear idea and follow it coherently. The really butt fugly laptops tend to have a mismatched hodge-podge of different design ideas fighting each other, or forms with a false or ridiculous function to them.

    10. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Mind you, the SL300 has a "piano" finish. I could have done without *that*. Especially the combination with a fingerprint reader is rather stupid :)

    11. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      Laptops should be built out of metal, not plastic. The plastic near the right hinge of my old Thinkpad T22 broke after a year or so, the X31 developed cracks around the edges (OK, it was possibly impact damage) and many plastic MacBooks - the old model, not the unibody aluminum one - have cracks (the top case is replaced by Apple under extended warranty.) OTOH the metal MacBook Pros will take hard use. I saw one that hade been run over by a car and still worked, though the screen was cracked! So, metal it is.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    12. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by DMalic · · Score: 1

      Preface: I've taken computer & monitor with me to LAN parties and such, and it's quite a pain. This laptop isn't competing with other laptops - it's competing with carrying a 17" laptop *and* a monitor with you. When you think about all the pain that entails, it can add up.. This could mean being able to continue working in a hotel room, and with reasonable productivity, too.

    13. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The Lenovo W700ds has got to be the stupidest concept ever. Who would buy a lumbering beast like that, with a styling that might have been moderately cool back in 1993? I don't get it. This is proof the PC industry is dying. *Even uglier* than the 17" HP Pavilions.

      No, this is why the PC industry will continue to thrive. You can buy giant, lumbering beasts like this. You can buy small, inexpensive netbooks. You can buy cheap desktop replacements. You can buy a laptop with a 20" screen, or even built in RAID. You can buy high end ultra-portables. You can buy high powered gaming laptops with quad core processors and the latest GPUs. You can buy a water proof, hardened laptop that is designed to take tons of abuse and keep working. You're not limited to a handful models with certain feature sets at carefully picked price points like with Apple. You have a choice, and you can buy the laptop that best suites your needs and price range with the features you want. It's obvious that this Thinkpad is positioned to be a low volume niche product, so just because you don't want one doesn't mean someone else doesn't.

      Also, I do realize that styling is subjective, but I consider the Thinkpads with their no nonsense, utilitarian styling to be some of the best looking laptops out there.

    14. Re:Haha, that Lenovo is insanely ugly! by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      Laptops should be built out of metal, not plastic.

      I disagree. Strictly metal cases transfer heat to your lap much more effectively than other materials. They are also prone to electrical problems like arcing. Newer thinkpads utilize carbon fiber and magnesium alloy.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
  23. Numeric Keypads by crossmr · · Score: 1

    The W700ds is so wide that it boasts a separate numeric keypad, a rarity on laptop keyboards.

    They don't really have to be. I'm sitting here looking at my Dell M1710 and there is so much wasted space on this keyboard. 1)It's a gaming laptop, and what gamer doesn't have their own mouse? the touchpad could have been tossed. 2)there is a good 1 3/4 - 2 inches worth of space on both sides of the keyboard. Its flanked by 2 tiny air vents, but those could easily be repositioned/reshaped, and if the keyboard was moved to the left, you could make a pretty convincing case to fit a keypad in there.

    1. Re:Numeric Keypads by ZiakII · · Score: 1

      What gamer doesn't watch dvds on a plain or train ride? What gamer doesn't surf the internet in a library or class. The typical gamer can not operate their computer only using a keyboard. I can understand the argument they should just bring a mouse with them, but lets face it, people aren't going to do it.

    2. Re:Numeric Keypads by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Even without removing the touchpad, the keyboard could still be moved over and a keypad added, however I don't pack my laptop without my mouse, and empty space on this thing is more than enough room to use as a flat surface for my wireless mouse. I've had to do that a time or two because the touchpad just drives me nuts.

      Not that this laptop would last long enough to watch a movie (if you have a power port that is a different story) most gaming laptops really don't get 2 hours battery life regardless of what they tell you.

    3. Re:Numeric Keypads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What gamer doesn't watch dvds on a plain or train ride? What gamer doesn't surf the internet in a library or class. The typical gamer can not operate their computer only using a keyboard. I can understand the argument they should just bring a mouse with them, but lets face it, people aren't going to do it.

      but they are. the key pad sucks so much on most laptops, on top of the fact that as we advance into new technologies, innovative design gives birth to portable mouses that just make sense. look at the logitech VX nano, now there's a sexy piece of tech right there.

    4. Re:Numeric Keypads by dstar · · Score: 1

      I've _got_ a laptop with a keypad (Toshiba Satellite L355D-S7829), and the keypad is a mistake, because it means the keyboard is off-center from the screen -- the centerline of the keyboard is ~1/3 of the way in from the left.

      When I bought it, I thought that the keypad was really nice, but after having used it for a couple of weeks, I think I'd much rather have a larger, centered keyboard rather than the keypad.

    5. Re:Numeric Keypads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For reasons I cannot imagine, Dell was slow to adopt full keyboards on their 17" laptops, lagging well behind HP and others. IIRC, the 17" Vostro was the first Dell laptop to have the separate numeric keypad, and now the high-end Precision 17" laptops have full numeric keypads, too. Other than using the same keyboard components as a 15" laptop, I don't see a good reason why any 17" laptops were manufactured without a full numeric keypad - there's enough room on every model I've seen.

      - T

    6. Re:Numeric Keypads by someoneOtherThanMe · · Score: 1

      I, for one, would love a laptop keyboard with full normal arrow, home/end etc keys. I couldn't care less for the numeric pad.

  24. Multi-screen laptops by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they will be as successful as multi-turreted tanks.

    1. Re:Multi-screen laptops by moonbender · · Score: 1

      And that's not the only thing the two have in common!

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  25. Disgusting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...That thing is just gross...

  26. Why is this being posted? by guacamole · · Score: 1

    I thought it was against slashdot's policy to make porn posts.

  27. Ha ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My EEE 901 totally 0wns your Lenovo whatever-its-called.

  28. Would it work on a smaller chassis? by theanorak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As other commenters have mentioned, it's about the trade off.

    I guess I'd fit into the target market, as I'm a graphic designer and video editor, so more screen and more power are always nice. But I can't see me ever going larger than the 15.4" screen laptop I have now.

    Why? Because, as nice as a bigger screen/more screens would be, it would guarantee that I couldn't do anything until I reached my destination unless I carried a smaller laptop as well. The laptop I have (Dell D820) is awkward on planes unless travelling business class or above, as it's slightly too big to fit on a tray table comfortably. Ditto for train travel (in the UK) -- even at a "table" seat (2 pairs of seats facing, separated by a small table) it's necessary to have the laptop uncomfortably close to the edge of the table so as not to use all of the table space belonging to the person opposite.

    It seems to me that the extending display tech would be more suited to a smaller laptop -- if it can be made to work -- so you can have portability but still have a sizable working desktop when you have the space.

    --
    === Ask yourself if it's really necessary...
    1. Re:Would it work on a smaller chassis? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Until you can fold a screen, you will probably never use a larger than 15 inch screen. Maybe if you have a tablet design you may opt for 17 inch (I think these separate tablets are nice, but having a good touch screen in the future is probably easier to use).

      You'll probably better off asking the client or whoever you travel to to put a nice big screen ready. The current laptops can drive quite high res external screens.

      This new laptop from Lenovo is what I call a "luggable". It's not a laptop at all since you don't want ever to place it there. It's just a computer you can put in your car to work at multiple places. The maximum distance to lug this thing around should be around 20m. I don't even see this one being used on the couch.

      Good thing is, you can put it next to you in the car, since thieves will probably not be able to steal it due to the size and weight :)

  29. virtual desktop by julian67 · · Score: 1

    The more I think about it the more it looks like A Microsoft version of the virtual desktop.

  30. Other pics here by tubeguy · · Score: 2, Informative
  31. It's a trap by DynamiteNeon · · Score: 1

    I used to own an older Inspiron from Dell which was huge. You will hate it the first time you have to take it thru an airport screening.

    It was an ok machine, but way too large to really be considered a "lap"-top.

  32. 11 pounds is 5kg by xaxa · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'll save everyone else having to look it up.

    1. Re:11 pounds is 5kg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot. Where are your significant digits. 5.0 kg!

  33. NO! by denzacar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the other story, does the Dell "Adamo" has anything to do with Battlestar Galactica?

    Noooo!

    Its named after the first man Our Lord God created. Not some imaginary character on some space-robots TV show.
    You insensitive heathen clod.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  34. Thinner and lighter yet by quaero_notitia · · Score: 1

    In another story, a new company designed a notebook call the "airgo". They claim that the $67,000US "airgo" is as thin as 2 pieces of notebook paper and weighs even less than 2 sheets of tissue paper. Unfortunately, their only demonstration model blew away during the unveiling when unfolded in 40MPH winds. It was never recovered. Even worse, company officials say that their design plans were stored on the device.

    --
    -- Wondering how long until the internet becomes fully corporatist, like television.
  35. bwahahah by Rikiji7 · · Score: 1

    u-s-e-l-e-s-s

    --
    slashwhat?
  36. On an airplane by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1
    Imagine the hilarity, when you unfold this monster on an airplane - obscuring the display of the laptop next to you.

    "Excuse me while I whip this out."

  37. Yo Dawg... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I heard you like screens, so we put a screen in yo screen so you can work while you work.

    --Xzibit

  38. Souped up by kingramon0 · · Score: 1

    Lenovo exec called this souped-up version of the normally buttoned-down-for-business ThinkPads the 'nitro-burning drag racer of ThinkPads.'

    So they make soup for you too? I think you meant "suped up", as in, supered.

  39. 11lbs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "shoulder-aching bulk (11 pounds)"

    Ha! You pussies should talk to a photographer or two about shoulders.

  40. Try Microsoft's utility. by RulerOf · · Score: 1

    There's a Sysinternals utility called Desktops that is quite an excellent tool for that.

    Even on Linux or OS X, I don't use the multiple desktops features much at all, so take my recommendation with a grain of salt if you like.

    --
    Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    1. Re:Try Microsoft's utility. by DMalic · · Score: 1

      I originally set up KDE to switch desktops with 0 lag / delay by moving the mouse to the corner of the screen. I could also drag windows from desktop to desktop. That's what I'm looking for =) Haven't found it on Windows yet, and looking at Russinovich's tool, it doesn't offer the options I want. Doubt I'll find ever find it.

    2. Re:Try Microsoft's utility. by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that limitation as well with the Desktops tool. I just close the window and reopen it on desktop 2 if it's really necessary... but I haven't used the tool in months (though I have it running :P).

      IIRC, it has something to do with the way window management works in Windows. With X or OS X, the window manager tells the application what the window should do, where as on Windows, the application tells the window manager what it's doing.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
  41. Why stop there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck everything, we are doing FIVE screens!

  42. dell didn't announce anything by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1

    From the FA: "Dell is refusing to confirm official details of the laptop, which will reportedly be unveiled at next month's Consumer Electronics Show."

  43. vpenis.sh by scream+at+the+sky · · Score: 1

    dan@sober: ~
    $ cat bin/vpenis.sh
    #!/bin/sh
    export LC_ALL=C
    echo `uptime|grep days|sed 's/.*up \([0-9]*\) day.*/\1\/10+/'; cat /proc/cpuinfo|grep '^cpu MHz'|awk '{print $4"/30 +";}';free|grep '^Mem'|awk '{print $3"/1024/3+"}'; df -P -k | grep -v '(1k|1024)-blocks' | awk '{if ($1 ~ "/dev/(scsi|sd)"){ s+= $2} s+= $2;} END {print s/1024/50"/15+70";}'`|bc|sed 's/\(.$\)/.\1cm/'

    --
    I wish I was a neutron bomb, for once I could go off...
  44. Missing one thing by Casandro · · Score: 1

    Today people don't buy multi-screen setups because they are multi-screen. They buy them in order to get more pixels. There used to be times when you had a high resolution monochrome display and a low resolution colour one, but those times are over.

    So if you want to make something usefull, make the rims as thin as possible. And _please_ make it symmetrical. At that price I would expect a little piece of mechanics which automatically extends the sidescreens when you open the laptop.

  45. I have something very similar by svunt · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have a really sweet desktop machine with 2x24" monitors, and my desk has wheels, making it roughly as portable as an 11lb laptop.

    1. Re:I have something very similar by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wheels? Awesome! Strap an outboard motor to the back of it and then it's even more portable. The other solution requires a car. :)

  46. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... does it run OpenSolaris?

  47. Dual monitor handhelds/UMPC? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

    What I *would* like to see is a dual monitor handheld. Something like the Nokia N810, but with a second monitor (and much better specs, at least in the RAM department). Then I can carry around a very usable "laptop" in my pocket :)

    --
    Luke-Jr
    1. Re:Dual monitor handhelds/UMPC? by MaxVT · · Score: 1

      Nintendo DS? :)

  48. well I hope that works out better for them by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    than the Compaq Evo

  49. There is a mistake on IBMs page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Integrated WACOM palm rest digitizer and pen

            * 128 cm x 80 cm palm rest digitizer

    If a I buy one, and I don't get the 1.28 x 0.8 meters WACOM, should I sue them??

    http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=an&subtype=ca&appname=gpateam&supplier=872&letternum=ENUSAG08-0919

  50. Yay, even more low-quality displays. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Instead of getting a panel manufacturer to make AFFS/S-IPS displays, we get this?

    $3600 might actually be worth it here, but there is nothing one can do to TN to make it any better.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  51. Second display in the wrong place by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    Put it down where the keyboard is, make it touch-sensitive (replacing the keyboard at need by displaying a customized keyboard image which matches the current task / application set) and w/ an option to rotate the whole thing 90 degrees and use it as a full-colour ebook reader and I'm interested (so long as the whole thing is as small, thin and light as the X61T).

    Optionally provide a way to slip a keyboard on / off and engineer the hinge to so that it can be closed w/ the keyboard in place --- but even though I purchased a wireless keyboard for my Fujitsu Stylistic, I never use it.

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.