Slashdot Mirror


Hippies Say WiFi Network Is Harming Their Chakras

Anti-Globalism writes "A group of hippies is complaining that a recently installed WiFi mesh network in the UK village of Glastonbury is causing health problems. To combat the signals from the Wi-Fi hotspots, the hippies have placed orgone generators around the antennae." Although there have been many studies that show no correlation between WiFi and health issues the hippies say, "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man."

24 of 432 comments (clear)

  1. Shut up! by fucket · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can't own the electromagetic spectrum, man.

    1. Re:Shut up! by n0dna · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I can. But that's because I'm not a penniless hippie." /futurama

  2. "Orgone Generators" by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 5, Informative
    FTFA:

    One man has even begun making orgone generators, which use crystals, semi-precious stones and gold to purportedly put out positive energy to combat the negative vibes flooding the town from the Wi-Fi base stations.

    Elsewhere:

    Orgone Generators change negative energy from microwaves, TV's, cell phones, computers, fluorescent lighting, automotive wiring, large electrical structures, high voltage lines and step-down electrical transformers, etc. into pure or positive life energy.

    Positive Orgone is also known as Chi(China), Prana(India), and Ki(Japan).

    The basic and simplified theory of how the orgone devices work is that the negative energy is attracted into the device by the organic component and then it gets bounced back and forth between the resin and suspended metal particles. Crystalline structures within the mix cause the energy to get organized and re-radiated as a positive, clean energy.

    Oh yes, these sound like reasonable people.

    1. Re:"Orgone Generators" by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 4, Funny

      nah, I don't want to pinch them to wake them up... I want to give them a bloody good bitch slapping and tell them to get a job

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    2. Re:"Orgone Generators" by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Note to self: Convert doomsday device to look like a hippy "good-vibe" machine.

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    3. Re:"Orgone Generators" by LoadWB · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have to call shenanigans on the whole "negative energy" thing.

      For one example, take a microwave oven. You put something in, turn it on, and the item cooks. That is an exhibit of POSITIVE energy flow. If you put a hippie in the microwave, the magnetron emissions does not suck the life energy out of the hippie, the hippie's life energy is released from its oppressive corporeal representation into the next higher plane. Ergo, another positive energy transfer! Come on, hippies... we are talking technology-assisted ascension!

      And TVs, radios, etc. POSITIVE energy. In all cases we are using technology to enhance nature, similarly to the way hippies use crystals, precious metals, and *ahem* herbs to enhance nature.

      Or at least that is how it works in my head.
      --
      Free Waterfall, Jr.: "We taught a lion to eat tofu!"
      Lion, sickly and emaciated: *cough* *cough*
      --
      Lur: "Ohhhh, there must've been something bad in the hippie I ate..." [/futurama]

    4. Re:"Orgone Generators" by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure that before they made those claims, they consulted all the sages they could find in yellow pages.

      No way man, experts and sages have all been paid off by Big WiFi.

       

      Incidentally, does anyone else find it ironic when hippies loudly proclaim that pot is harmless and then show signs of serious paranoia when they explain that it is only illegal because of some complicated conspiracy?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    5. Re:"Orgone Generators" by profplump · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're probably just trolling, but I'm in the mood for an Internet argument, so I'll bit anyway.

      Microwaves aren't new. There's a good deal of microwaves floating around the universe (including at ground level on Earth) from natural sources. And there have been both mobile and fixed location broadcast microwaves in use for decades, at much higher power levels than WiFi installations. Not to mention all the nuisance sources of microwaves like, you know, microwave ovens. A typical household microwave puts out almost 1 kW -- even if you assume 99% of that is contained in the appliance, it's still 10 times more power <I>leaking</i> than a 6dbi omnidirectional WiFi transmitter (legally) intentionally emits.

      Moreover, we actually <i>have</I> studied the interaction of microwaves with the human body. First, there's about a 10 dB reflection loss at the human-air boundary at WiFi frequencies, and attenuation inside the body is about 2 dB/cm. Therefore there is very little interaction beyond the first couple of centimeters, assuming the signal is strong enough to overcome the reflection losses in the first place. And guess what those microwaves do when you interact with them -- I know it's tricky, because science hasn't caught up with the human body -- but studies suggest that a typical interaction involves energy transfer via polarization in molecules with a strong dipole moment. Which, you know, is a lot like what happens to the flesh-like materials you might try to heat with a microwave oven.

      So in summary, you can sense microwave fields. If they are sufficiently strong, you should be able to detect them by the heat generated when you absorb the EM energy. Not that you'd be able to distinguish microwaves from infrared radiation, or from simple conduction, but you could detect the presence of an energy source.

      Also you example of "in the past, some people didn't believe new, poorly understood science, but most people believe what is now well-established science" doesn't really support the idea you're trying to defend -- that the totally invented beliefs of hippies might be true in spite of science. It's possible for totally invented beliefs to be true -- even a broken clock is right twice a day -- but the "in spite of science" part makes it hard to take them (or you) seriously.

    6. Re:"Orgone Generators" by notnAP · · Score: 5, Funny

      All energies that take wave form are positive.

      And then, they're negative.

      And then, they're positive.

      And then, they're negative.

      And then, they're positive.

      And then, they're negative.

      And then, they're positive.

      And then, they're negative.

      And then, they're positive.
      ...

      Some make these transformations wicked fast.

  3. Re:That's odd... by Torodung · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you're a moron, you're not really a hippie. You're just a moron who acts like a hippie.

    You should know that! I'm starting to wonder if you should turn in your Hippie card and "tea set." ;^)

  4. Million-dollar idea for somebody by Tsar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. Buy a couple hundred acres in the National Radio Quiet Zone and build a resort/spa/retirement community for all the well-heeled electromagnetophobes.

    2. Quietly buy up as much of the valley as you can, then support campaigns to get Blue Cross and Medicare to cover electromagnetic hypersensitivity.

    3. Profit.

    I'd do it, but I don't believe I could live with myself. Especially if I had to give up ubiquitous broadband.

    1. Re:Million-dollar idea for somebody by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not that quiet there. The coordinator of the zone has been very cooperative with ham radio operators and other users. It's only necessary for the coordinator to protect their radio-astronomy project, not to shut off RF entirely.

  5. Commant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    FiWi connectians doesn't mess up your ability to think, you knough.

  6. Re:Very sensitive people? by topham · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Assuming for a moment it's true; are you aware of the inverse-square law?

    Get this, working on an antenna broadcasting at several hundred thousand watts is worse than sitting 2ft from a 1 watt (at most) transmitter...

  7. Residents, not hippies by bornwaysouth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is not a bunch of hippies doing the complaining, it is the residents. They have little use for the WiFi, which has been used 422 times in 6 months. I suspect the locals know exactly what they want. Maintaining jobs and a way of life, which draws on 5000 years of hocus pocus. Orgone generators are right in there as a mix of crystals and gold and romanticism.

      As for the headaches? Quite genuine reporting I'd say. My father told me that a satellite receiving station near where he worked was found to generate a wide mix of ills in the 3 months following its official opening. This was not published because it would have embarrassed the Minister. Due to a cock-up in parts supply, they faked the opening and it sat idle but impressive whilst headaches abounded.

    Headaches occur, and people want causes assigned. It's a matter of opinion whether it is better to blame an aerial or a spell cast by a witch. Just so long as the majority have a good laugh in the pub in the off-season. Witchcraft is a bit like Royalty. A good historical reason for people to kill each other, but really just a useful source of tourist dollars these days.

  8. Re:That's odd... by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These hippies apparantly would much rather not live with the pollutants they are absorbing, but they have no reasonable recourse.

    Considering how long radio, TV, cell phones, and other RF sources have been pumping out just as much juice through their bodies/karma/astral-selves, I'm finding it hard to be sympathetic for them. Shades of Don Quixote....

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  9. ob: south park quote by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Funny

    hippies... hippies... they say they want to save the world, but all they do is smoke pot and smell bad.

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  10. Re:That's odd... by LoadWB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    True. I have known a lot of hippies who love TV, radio, and even cell phones. So what is so oppressive about WiFi versus the rest of this?

  11. See "Bad science" by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's worse than you realise. This is being led by people who have a vested interest in peddling FUD - one of the "protestors" claims to run an independent consultancy on EMC, but actually runs a company that sells tinfoil hats and so on. (See the Ben Goldacre Bad Science columns in the Guardian for information). The real issue seems to be that Glastonbury has a small but vocal number of people who don't want the town to develop, and want to stop anything that might make it more attractive to small businesses.

    The local paper (Fosse Way) published this story without the slightest critical analysis whatsoever. As someone who has worked on, inter alia, the EMC Directive, I wrote to them asking whether the person complaining of headaches had taken part in a blind test. Perhaps needless to say, the letter has not been published and indeed I've had no acknowledgement of it.

    BTW, they do not have a "way of life which draws on 5000 years of hocus pocus". The Glastonbury thing dates back to no more than the 19th century: it's as fake as Druidism in Wales. Glastonbury is just a small town in Somerset that used to make its money from the leather industry till it went bust under Thatcher. Now it's a retirement suburb, the most Conservative part of the district. Currently a few protestors are trying to stop the demolition of the old factory buildings to put up an industrial estate - the old buildings cannot be brought up to modern standards and are a complete eyesore.

    Why do I complain about this? Because I live in the part of Somerset that is a net contributor of taxes to keep the residents of Glastonbury from having to have industry and jobs, that's why.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  12. Re:Yeah ... by cliffski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem with wifi health scares is the same as with nuclear health scares. Regardless of whether the pro-wifi and pro-nuclear groups are right or wrong, they are terrible at public relations. In both cases, the default response to public health concern is a derisory snort and the tendency to talk down to the people raising the concern as though they are idiots. People who do not work as engineers or biologists are not idiots, as you find out when you have to employ said people for more money than you earn to fix your plumbing or do your accounts. They are just not privy to the same understanding of the relevant issue as you are.

    The same problem occurred big time in the UK with the MMR injections. The state talked down to concerned parents and treated them like idiots, the net result of which was to make them even more determined that there must be a scandal and a cover-up. Talk sensibly about the health risks of wifi (such that they exist) and show how such things have been tested independently and shown to be of no concern, and you will win-out. Laughing at anyone who raises concerns may make geeks feel smug, but it's a losing strategy and always will be.

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
  13. Re:That's odd... by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I seriously doubt that if their were a scientifically founded protection for EM radiation, these people wouldn't use it."

    It's called a Faraday cage, you could probably get one made in the shape of a pyramid and kill too birds with one stone.

    "If I have to listen to people complain about second hand smoke so much that I feel like a goddamned leppar then why can't I complain even the least little bit about electromagnetic radiation?"

    You can complain all you like, just don't expect anyone to listen until you have robust scientific evidence like the second hand smoker's do. I'm also a smoker and I'm willing to act reasonably by smoking outside. However when a second-hand smoker waves their face while walking past a leppar colony on a smog filled street I feel justified in telling them to wear a gas mask if they don't like it.

    Same deal for EM radition, either put up the evidence or STFU and let me use my mobile.

    Disclaimer: I saw Woodstock on the news when I was 8-9yo, had hair down to my arse in the 70's. The Hippie ideal of maximum freedom and minimum harm is still very appealing to me. I'm simply unwilling to ignore human nature and throw out the philosophy of scientific skepticisim. Unlike any "other way of thinking" it is demonstratably usefull to me beyond a healthy body and control of my emotional state (not that I have either:). One of scientific skepticisim's prime uses is to judge claims from others against what you "know" (eg: does EM radiation harm anyone?).

    Like Yoga in wich the rituals can be useful for a healthy mind/body, scientific skepticisim is also a usefull skill that can be taught, of course you then have to work at it for a while before you see the benifits. The hardest part of that "work" for a good skeptic is accepting that you cannot "know" anything but you can have scientific evidence that goes beyond reasonable doubt.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  14. No known "Health issues" by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    as if modern medicine is able to fathom full extent of physiological and psychological issues of homo sapiens sapiens ....

    something not being known yet doesnt mean it doesnt exist.

  15. Too much pot? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "headaches, dizziness, nausea, severe tiredness, brain fog, disorientation and loss of appetite, loss of balance, inability to concentrate, loss of creativity"

    Sounds like they have all the symptoms of smoking way too much pot.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  16. Re:That's odd... by BB_Cat_3k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Western system are based more on Roman law than Cristian commandments. That book tells us nothing either unique or original, and its followers are (statisticly) among the least moral definable groups there are. Seriously, what moral system DOESN'T teach - Personal responsibility, treating others with love and respect, not being a greedy, selfish twit. Without that book as a moral guide, I am still to the wiretapping and telling the companies to charge more for less and everything else you mentioned.