Slashdot Mirror


Hippies Say WiFi Network Is Harming Their Chakras

Anti-Globalism writes "A group of hippies is complaining that a recently installed WiFi mesh network in the UK village of Glastonbury is causing health problems. To combat the signals from the Wi-Fi hotspots, the hippies have placed orgone generators around the antennae." Although there have been many studies that show no correlation between WiFi and health issues the hippies say, "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man."

76 of 432 comments (clear)

  1. That's odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've been saying hippies are harming my wifi network for years. Damn hippies.

    1. Re:That's odd... by UncleTogie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn hippies.

      *I'M* a hippie, you insensitive clod!

      THOSE hippies, however, are morons.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    2. Re:That's odd... by Torodung · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're a moron, you're not really a hippie. You're just a moron who acts like a hippie.

      You should know that! I'm starting to wonder if you should turn in your Hippie card and "tea set." ;^)

    3. Re:That's odd... by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These hippies apparantly would much rather not live with the pollutants they are absorbing, but they have no reasonable recourse.

      Considering how long radio, TV, cell phones, and other RF sources have been pumping out just as much juice through their bodies/karma/astral-selves, I'm finding it hard to be sympathetic for them. Shades of Don Quixote....

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    4. Re:That's odd... by LoadWB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True. I have known a lot of hippies who love TV, radio, and even cell phones. So what is so oppressive about WiFi versus the rest of this?

    5. Re:That's odd... by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I seriously doubt that if their were a scientifically founded protection for EM radiation, these people wouldn't use it."

      It's called a Faraday cage, you could probably get one made in the shape of a pyramid and kill too birds with one stone.

      "If I have to listen to people complain about second hand smoke so much that I feel like a goddamned leppar then why can't I complain even the least little bit about electromagnetic radiation?"

      You can complain all you like, just don't expect anyone to listen until you have robust scientific evidence like the second hand smoker's do. I'm also a smoker and I'm willing to act reasonably by smoking outside. However when a second-hand smoker waves their face while walking past a leppar colony on a smog filled street I feel justified in telling them to wear a gas mask if they don't like it.

      Same deal for EM radition, either put up the evidence or STFU and let me use my mobile.

      Disclaimer: I saw Woodstock on the news when I was 8-9yo, had hair down to my arse in the 70's. The Hippie ideal of maximum freedom and minimum harm is still very appealing to me. I'm simply unwilling to ignore human nature and throw out the philosophy of scientific skepticisim. Unlike any "other way of thinking" it is demonstratably usefull to me beyond a healthy body and control of my emotional state (not that I have either:). One of scientific skepticisim's prime uses is to judge claims from others against what you "know" (eg: does EM radiation harm anyone?).

      Like Yoga in wich the rituals can be useful for a healthy mind/body, scientific skepticisim is also a usefull skill that can be taught, of course you then have to work at it for a while before you see the benifits. The hardest part of that "work" for a good skeptic is accepting that you cannot "know" anything but you can have scientific evidence that goes beyond reasonable doubt.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:That's odd... by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So that would be a bit of an impractical grid to put around you, now wouldn't it ? A metal wire every 15 centimeter seems a bit ridiculous.

      Not really. Hippies are known to sit inside pyramids or yurts while realigning their chakras or whatever it is they do. Wire your Faraday cage into that so that they can meditate on an RF-free zone.

      Of course there will be no observable phenomena from being inside or outside the grid so selling them a faraday cage that doesn't in fact block cell phone radiation would not be discovered any time soon.

      Well, apart from the fact that the hippie's mobile phone would show 'NO SIGNAL'.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    7. Re:That's odd... by joss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > (oh and there is obviously a difference between Christians and hippies, for starters the fact that Christians actually have a purpose and generally act very sensibly)

      Really ?? You must know better quality Christians and lower quality hippies than I do. Or, maybe you don't actually know any hippies, you just assume that the stereotypes from South Park etc are reasonably accurate.

      --
      http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    8. Re:That's odd... by dov_0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's NEW to their environment, so they respond with the basic and common human idiocy of fear of the unfamiliar or unknown.
      Then again, their brains are probably so fried they wouldn't know reason and sense if they fell over it.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    9. Re:That's odd... by dov_0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Really ?? You must know better quality Christians and lower quality hippies than I do.

      So who's stereotype of Christians do you go by?

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    10. Re:That's odd... by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Informative

      A metal wire every 15 centimeter seems a bit ridiculous

      No it doesn't; chain link fences and chicken wire are both smaller than that.

      (oh and there is obviously a difference between Christians and hippies, for starters the fact that Christians actually have a purpose and generally act very sensibly)

      No more so than hippies, really. Christians just have more social inertia.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:That's odd... by Raffaello · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yet the vast majority of Western legal systems are based on Christian principles.

      This is really not true. Stealing is considered wrong in both non-christian and christian societies, so having laws against stealing is not evidence of a specifically christian legal system. Similarly murder, adultery, etc.

      This is the broken argument that religious apologists always trot out. The fact is that religious people are no more likely to be moral than others (and probably quite likely to be less moral - see next paragraph). People share common moral values whether they are christian or not.

      On the down side however, christians are responsible for numerous and well documented heinous atrocities specifically due to their religion (crusades, inquisition, witch burning, annihilation of heretics, etc.).

      On balance, christianity has been a net cause of significant evil in the world. For more detail see Dawkins The God Delusion

    12. Re:That's odd... by Stachybotris · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, given the number of cordless phones and other devices operating in the 2.4 - 5.6 GHz range, it's clearly not the frequency (or even density) of the energy that's harming them... It's really the 802.11(a|b|g|n) protocol that's making them suffer!

    13. Re:That's odd... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Christians actually have a purpose

      Here's someone who didn't hear about the closing of the Coliseum...

      Love, Nero. ;-)

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    14. Re:That's odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So who's stereotype of Christians do you go by?

      The only accurate one: George Carlin's.

    15. Re:That's odd... by cyphercell · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're right. The symbolism of eating crackers to protect yourself from a goat-man that lives in a lake of fire is vastly less crazy than using pyramids to protect yourself from invisible electromagnetic radiation (which at least exists).

      Out of curiosity, why is it that a literal interpretation of the earth's age is okay (maybe not on your part), while a literal interpretation of communion is barbaric?

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    16. Re:That's odd... by BB_Cat_3k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Western system are based more on Roman law than Cristian commandments. That book tells us nothing either unique or original, and its followers are (statisticly) among the least moral definable groups there are. Seriously, what moral system DOESN'T teach - Personal responsibility, treating others with love and respect, not being a greedy, selfish twit. Without that book as a moral guide, I am still to the wiretapping and telling the companies to charge more for less and everything else you mentioned.

    17. Re:That's odd... by evandrofisico · · Score: 2, Informative

      Einstein didn't studied alchemy, Isaac Newton did in the 17th century, when matter structure was far from know. During Einstein lifetime the basis for modern chemistry (excluding quantum chemistry) were already known, and rudimentary atomic theories were largely accepted among the scientists of the time.

    18. Re:That's odd... by Xabraxas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yet the vast majority of Western legal systems are based on Christian principles. Do you complain about the fact that you can't steal your neighbour's car when you need a ride somewhere? Do you complain that you can't kill them because you don't happen to agree with their lawn decorations?

      Western government and law is based on the principals of the enlightenment. The enlightment was a backlash against religion. Only murder and theft are commandments and also laws. Half of the other commandments have to deal with believing in God and only the Judeo-Christian God. If the ten most important laws in the Judeo-Christain belief system are barely represented in any Western country's laws how do you presume that they are based on Judeo-Christian principles?

      That 2000+ year old book that you so easily discount teaches a few basic things very strongly:

      - Personal responsibility.

      - Treating others with love and respect.

      - Not being a greedy, selfish twit.

      It also contains horrific things. A lot of children's books offer moral value but that doesn't make me believe in talking elephants just as I don't beleive in the resurrection or other fairy tales in the bible.

      These three seem to be commonly espoused here on /., but suddenly when they come from a source with the word "religion" anywhere near it, they're a bad thing?

      No one is disparaging those values, just religion. You don't have to disparge those values to disparage religion. There are so many other things that are ridiculous.

      f it doesn't make sense to use this book as a moral guide, maybe we should all be telling the government to wiretap the whole country, bitching that they don't raise my kids for me, telling communication companies that they need to charge more for less, and drop all connections outside their network to 512 B/s, and get a job paying a billion a year as the CEO of a company that sells guns to 12 year olds so they can kill their parents when they get grounded.

      This is exactly like your previous statement and I see similar statements like it a lot from religious people. Somehow you people think that throwing out religion means throwing out liberty, responsibility, and prosperity. You are the one who is being insulting. It's insulting to people like me and others who don't believe in fairy tales to be told that because we don't believe we're against everything you consider moral. I don't need God to tell me not to kill somone or steal from someone and quite frankly I think it's sad that you do.

      Get a life, you hypocritical bastard.

      Oh the irony!

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    19. Re:That's odd... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firstly that book is not 2000 years old. Its about 1600 years old.

      Secondly its *only* 1600 years old. Some concepts of basic British law do predate Christianity. And then the basic concepts of freedom which were first enshrined in the Magna Carta were there *despite* the Christian King of the time.

      Thirdly that book tells us that blind people and other disabled people will not go to heaven, its wrong to eat shellfish, you can stone bald people, and more importantly is the main cause for bigotry against me. For everything good in there there's a conflicting bit of madness. On the whole the general teachings of the Jesus character are good but you need to throw away the whole of the old testament and St Pauls letters to the Corinthians since he was a born again rabbid nutter. Oh yes get rid of the Book of Revelations, surely that's mushroom inspired!

      But basically yes it does teach

      - Personal responsibility
      - Treating others with love and respect
      - Not being a greedy selfish twit.

      But also that you should be a complete arse to anyone who's gay or transgendered, oh yes, and put women in their places. So I'm screwed on three counts. The are plenty of other religions that teach the good bits without the fuckwittery.

  2. Shut up! by fucket · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can't own the electromagetic spectrum, man.

    1. Re:Shut up! by n0dna · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I can. But that's because I'm not a penniless hippie." /futurama

    2. Re:Shut up! by sesshomaru · · Score: 2, Funny

      Jrrr: Hear me out. There are many good reasons to eat: Hunger, boredom, wanting to be the world's fattest man. But not revenge. Are we no better than they? Besides, Leela's my friend.

      Lrrr: (mumbling) Is this true, Earthling?

      Leela: (mumbling) Yeah, it is.

      [He takes her out of his mouth.]

      Lrrr: Leela's garbled words have opened my eyes.

      [The crowd cheers and Leela spits out and pokes Jrrr, who giggles. Waterfall Jr. holds the mic and strokes his hair.]

      Waterfall Jr.: OK, that's a start, that's very Earth-friendly. Now everyone join hands. Join hands, please. I'd like to lead you all in some swaying. Come on, pay attention. [The audience is not impressed.] I said do it! Yeah...

      Lrrr: Is he your friend too?

      Jrrr: No.

      [Lrrr eats Waterfall Jr. He pokes his head out of Lrrr's mouth.]

      Waterfall Jr.: This is not happening.

      [Lrrr swallows him and everyone cheers and applauds. Lrrr clutches his stomach.]

      Lrrr: I think there was something funny in that hippie.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  3. "Orgone Generators" by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 5, Informative
    FTFA:

    One man has even begun making orgone generators, which use crystals, semi-precious stones and gold to purportedly put out positive energy to combat the negative vibes flooding the town from the Wi-Fi base stations.

    Elsewhere:

    Orgone Generators change negative energy from microwaves, TV's, cell phones, computers, fluorescent lighting, automotive wiring, large electrical structures, high voltage lines and step-down electrical transformers, etc. into pure or positive life energy.

    Positive Orgone is also known as Chi(China), Prana(India), and Ki(Japan).

    The basic and simplified theory of how the orgone devices work is that the negative energy is attracted into the device by the organic component and then it gets bounced back and forth between the resin and suspended metal particles. Crystalline structures within the mix cause the energy to get organized and re-radiated as a positive, clean energy.

    Oh yes, these sound like reasonable people.

    1. Re:"Orgone Generators" by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 3, Insightful

      FTFA:

      One man has even begun making orgone generators, which use crystals, semi-precious stones and gold to purportedly put out positive energy to combat the negative vibes flooding the town from the Wi-Fi base stations.

      I am just sitting here wondering how long it is going to take someone to just pinch them all... surely there would have to be at least a few bucks in gold there. If not, it'd still be fun to pinch them and place them all around the town in people's gardens, on shop roofs, etc.

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    2. Re:"Orgone Generators" by ubernostrum · · Score: 2, Informative

      Martin Gardner's essay "Wilhelm Reich and the Orgone" is highly recommended reading on the topic (as is, well, pretty much anything he writes debunking pseudoscience).

    3. Re:"Orgone Generators" by mofag · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well from the description it seems unlikely that the orgone generators interfere to any practical extent with the wifi so good for them! If building a few pretty sculptures turns the bad harmful wifi into good life-enhancing wifi then I'll have one too. Perhaps they could partner with Cisco to market value-addded hippie-friendly wifi?

    4. Re:"Orgone Generators" by mofag · · Score: 2

      Hey Gandalf, its no wonder they call you "the grey" - you can be quite mean at times.

      Actually I thought you meant pinch the hippies to wake them up. Only later (time dilates) did I realise you were referring to burglary.

    5. Re:"Orgone Generators" by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 4, Funny

      nah, I don't want to pinch them to wake them up... I want to give them a bloody good bitch slapping and tell them to get a job

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    6. Re:"Orgone Generators" by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Note to self: Convert doomsday device to look like a hippy "good-vibe" machine.

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    7. Re:"Orgone Generators" by LoadWB · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have to call shenanigans on the whole "negative energy" thing.

      For one example, take a microwave oven. You put something in, turn it on, and the item cooks. That is an exhibit of POSITIVE energy flow. If you put a hippie in the microwave, the magnetron emissions does not suck the life energy out of the hippie, the hippie's life energy is released from its oppressive corporeal representation into the next higher plane. Ergo, another positive energy transfer! Come on, hippies... we are talking technology-assisted ascension!

      And TVs, radios, etc. POSITIVE energy. In all cases we are using technology to enhance nature, similarly to the way hippies use crystals, precious metals, and *ahem* herbs to enhance nature.

      Or at least that is how it works in my head.
      --
      Free Waterfall, Jr.: "We taught a lion to eat tofu!"
      Lion, sickly and emaciated: *cough* *cough*
      --
      Lur: "Ohhhh, there must've been something bad in the hippie I ate..." [/futurama]

    8. Re:"Orgone Generators" by Nethead · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is a strong connection between LSD and BSD. (and yeah, I've abused both.)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    9. Re:"Orgone Generators" by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure that before they made those claims, they consulted all the sages they could find in yellow pages.

      No way man, experts and sages have all been paid off by Big WiFi.

       

      Incidentally, does anyone else find it ironic when hippies loudly proclaim that pot is harmless and then show signs of serious paranoia when they explain that it is only illegal because of some complicated conspiracy?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:"Orgone Generators" by profplump · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're probably just trolling, but I'm in the mood for an Internet argument, so I'll bit anyway.

      Microwaves aren't new. There's a good deal of microwaves floating around the universe (including at ground level on Earth) from natural sources. And there have been both mobile and fixed location broadcast microwaves in use for decades, at much higher power levels than WiFi installations. Not to mention all the nuisance sources of microwaves like, you know, microwave ovens. A typical household microwave puts out almost 1 kW -- even if you assume 99% of that is contained in the appliance, it's still 10 times more power <I>leaking</i> than a 6dbi omnidirectional WiFi transmitter (legally) intentionally emits.

      Moreover, we actually <i>have</I> studied the interaction of microwaves with the human body. First, there's about a 10 dB reflection loss at the human-air boundary at WiFi frequencies, and attenuation inside the body is about 2 dB/cm. Therefore there is very little interaction beyond the first couple of centimeters, assuming the signal is strong enough to overcome the reflection losses in the first place. And guess what those microwaves do when you interact with them -- I know it's tricky, because science hasn't caught up with the human body -- but studies suggest that a typical interaction involves energy transfer via polarization in molecules with a strong dipole moment. Which, you know, is a lot like what happens to the flesh-like materials you might try to heat with a microwave oven.

      So in summary, you can sense microwave fields. If they are sufficiently strong, you should be able to detect them by the heat generated when you absorb the EM energy. Not that you'd be able to distinguish microwaves from infrared radiation, or from simple conduction, but you could detect the presence of an energy source.

      Also you example of "in the past, some people didn't believe new, poorly understood science, but most people believe what is now well-established science" doesn't really support the idea you're trying to defend -- that the totally invented beliefs of hippies might be true in spite of science. It's possible for totally invented beliefs to be true -- even a broken clock is right twice a day -- but the "in spite of science" part makes it hard to take them (or you) seriously.

    11. Re:"Orgone Generators" by Nursie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seriously weird folks.

      If you want to read more about "Orgone" and the crackpot that came up with it, look up Wilhelm Reich.

      I have a wireless router under my bed, near the head end. Strange how I'm not suffering from the "illnesses" these idiots are claiming.

    12. Re:"Orgone Generators" by niiler · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I have a crazy relative who is just fine around these things until he notices them. He's great around traditional 60 W lightbulbs (powered by AC voltage at 60 Hz), but show him an LED, say the green one that turns on when you turn on certain devices, and he is being poisoned. He often leaves the house to avoid E&M fields, and because it's so cold outside, takes a plugin space heater with him (giant extension cord and all).

    13. Re:"Orgone Generators" by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only reasonable way to test your hypothesis would be to actually STICK a hippy in a microwave. Better still for an adequate statistical sample, perhaps 100 would be better. Then, maybe another 100 with their Orgone generators and see if there is a different result.

      It's really a no-lose experiment.

      --
      -Styopa
    14. Re:"Orgone Generators" by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2, Funny

      They've got a job. Building Orgone generators!

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    15. Re:"Orgone Generators" by notnAP · · Score: 5, Funny

      All energies that take wave form are positive.

      And then, they're negative.

      And then, they're positive.

      And then, they're negative.

      And then, they're positive.

      And then, they're negative.

      And then, they're positive.

      And then, they're negative.

      And then, they're positive.
      ...

      Some make these transformations wicked fast.

  4. Million-dollar idea for somebody by Tsar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. Buy a couple hundred acres in the National Radio Quiet Zone and build a resort/spa/retirement community for all the well-heeled electromagnetophobes.

    2. Quietly buy up as much of the valley as you can, then support campaigns to get Blue Cross and Medicare to cover electromagnetic hypersensitivity.

    3. Profit.

    I'd do it, but I don't believe I could live with myself. Especially if I had to give up ubiquitous broadband.

    1. Re:Million-dollar idea for somebody by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not that quiet there. The coordinator of the zone has been very cooperative with ham radio operators and other users. It's only necessary for the coordinator to protect their radio-astronomy project, not to shut off RF entirely.

    2. Re:Million-dollar idea for somebody by anaphora · · Score: 2, Funny

      This place can't be real. If they don't have the internet or radios, how would we have heard about it?

    3. Re:Million-dollar idea for somebody by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does it matter though? You just need to convince punters that it's a radio quiet zone.

  5. Commant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    FiWi connectians doesn't mess up your ability to think, you knough.

  6. Re:Very sensitive people? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're not. It's been tested far more than something like this deserves. Their problems always magically disappear the second they're put into a double blinded test.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  7. Re:Very sensitive people? by topham · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Assuming for a moment it's true; are you aware of the inverse-square law?

    Get this, working on an antenna broadcasting at several hundred thousand watts is worse than sitting 2ft from a 1 watt (at most) transmitter...

  8. Re:Very sensitive people? by tsa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes I am aware of the inverse square law. My point was that if the hippies really suffer from what they claim, they must be very sensitive to electromagnetic radiation in the microwave range because WiFi usually transmits using even less power than a mobile phone. So if they use mobile phones but say they suffer from the WiFi radiation they're likely to be affected by somethning else. I should have written it down more clearly though.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  9. Residents, not hippies by bornwaysouth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is not a bunch of hippies doing the complaining, it is the residents. They have little use for the WiFi, which has been used 422 times in 6 months. I suspect the locals know exactly what they want. Maintaining jobs and a way of life, which draws on 5000 years of hocus pocus. Orgone generators are right in there as a mix of crystals and gold and romanticism.

      As for the headaches? Quite genuine reporting I'd say. My father told me that a satellite receiving station near where he worked was found to generate a wide mix of ills in the 3 months following its official opening. This was not published because it would have embarrassed the Minister. Due to a cock-up in parts supply, they faked the opening and it sat idle but impressive whilst headaches abounded.

    Headaches occur, and people want causes assigned. It's a matter of opinion whether it is better to blame an aerial or a spell cast by a witch. Just so long as the majority have a good laugh in the pub in the off-season. Witchcraft is a bit like Royalty. A good historical reason for people to kill each other, but really just a useful source of tourist dollars these days.

    1. Re:Residents, not hippies by zoney_ie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it's a bit worse than people simply attributing existing ills to some piece of technology. It would seem that people, if they think something will make them ill, can indeed make themselves ill to some degree, or at least be convinced that they are ill (which from their perspective, is much the same thing - or even worse, as real cures won't work on the latter). It's the reason that a lot of the superstitious stuff can actually seem to work at times, and why it's quite important not only to combat such nonsense, but act in an understanding way to those who've fallen for it. The peddlers of superstitions require a sterner approach though.

      It's certainly not all a bit of a laugh. At the very least such superstitions do give rise to troubles of the mind (which lets face it, usually result in a poorer physical condition too).

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    2. Re:Residents, not hippies by debruce · · Score: 2, Informative

      sounds like something an orgone generator could have easily cured because 1) due to parts shortage the station was OFF and 2) it was a RECEIVING station.

  10. Re:As reasonable as the morons who wont eat ham by Chalnoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is why you cure ham. This process is very common all across Southern Europe, and works quite well to disinfect the product. Basically, the restriction against eating ham only cropped up just because there was an unusual ancient tribe some thousands of years ago that didn't raise pigs. Somehow they got this practice into their holy books and, well, the rest is history.

  11. ob: south park quote by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Funny

    hippies... hippies... they say they want to save the world, but all they do is smoke pot and smell bad.

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    1. Re:ob: south park quote by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

      hippies... hippies... they say they want to save the world, but all they do is smoke pot and smell bad.

      Compared with Geeks who drink black coffee and smell bad.

  12. See "Bad science" by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's worse than you realise. This is being led by people who have a vested interest in peddling FUD - one of the "protestors" claims to run an independent consultancy on EMC, but actually runs a company that sells tinfoil hats and so on. (See the Ben Goldacre Bad Science columns in the Guardian for information). The real issue seems to be that Glastonbury has a small but vocal number of people who don't want the town to develop, and want to stop anything that might make it more attractive to small businesses.

    The local paper (Fosse Way) published this story without the slightest critical analysis whatsoever. As someone who has worked on, inter alia, the EMC Directive, I wrote to them asking whether the person complaining of headaches had taken part in a blind test. Perhaps needless to say, the letter has not been published and indeed I've had no acknowledgement of it.

    BTW, they do not have a "way of life which draws on 5000 years of hocus pocus". The Glastonbury thing dates back to no more than the 19th century: it's as fake as Druidism in Wales. Glastonbury is just a small town in Somerset that used to make its money from the leather industry till it went bust under Thatcher. Now it's a retirement suburb, the most Conservative part of the district. Currently a few protestors are trying to stop the demolition of the old factory buildings to put up an industrial estate - the old buildings cannot be brought up to modern standards and are a complete eyesore.

    Why do I complain about this? Because I live in the part of Somerset that is a net contributor of taxes to keep the residents of Glastonbury from having to have industry and jobs, that's why.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:See "Bad science" by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know its bad science but I am not sure that it hinders Glastonbury's business. Every other shop sells crystals, mystic books, figurines that will improve yoir fertility and so on. It could even aid business, someone will cash in on the idea that Glastonbury is protected by Orgone generators to sell ones you can take home to protect your own environment.

      As religions go its not that bad. Nobody calls for death to those who use the wrong type of crystal or prefers herbalism to energy fields.

  13. Re:Very sensitive people? by Rennt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've done maintenance work on these antenna's, and the safety warnings are no joke. Worksafe regulations forbid you from hanging in front of the drum unless the powersource has been isolated. A couple of people are killed every year because they didn't follow guidelines and had their internal organs cooked.

    Having said that, wifi (radio frequency radiation) has nothing to do with this kind of high power directed microwave radiation and is completely harmless - just don't get them confused.

  14. Re:Very sensitive people? by Nethead · · Score: 3, Funny

    Er, how about us hippie broadcast engineers? I know not to climb a FM tower while it is live and I know not to touch an AM tower and the ground at the same time (you have to jump to the tower to change the light blubs :)

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  15. Re:Yeah ... by cliffski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem with wifi health scares is the same as with nuclear health scares. Regardless of whether the pro-wifi and pro-nuclear groups are right or wrong, they are terrible at public relations. In both cases, the default response to public health concern is a derisory snort and the tendency to talk down to the people raising the concern as though they are idiots. People who do not work as engineers or biologists are not idiots, as you find out when you have to employ said people for more money than you earn to fix your plumbing or do your accounts. They are just not privy to the same understanding of the relevant issue as you are.

    The same problem occurred big time in the UK with the MMR injections. The state talked down to concerned parents and treated them like idiots, the net result of which was to make them even more determined that there must be a scandal and a cover-up. Talk sensibly about the health risks of wifi (such that they exist) and show how such things have been tested independently and shown to be of no concern, and you will win-out. Laughing at anyone who raises concerns may make geeks feel smug, but it's a losing strategy and always will be.

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
  16. Re:As reasonable as the morons who wont eat ham by profplump · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, modern pork is leaner that it's ever been. Roasted pork tenderloin, for example, is significantly less fatty than roasted mutton (about 22% fat by caloric content, vs. 42% for mutton). I use mutton as an example because it's not outlawed by any (non-vegetarian) dogma, and is a typical foodstuff in places where pork is not allowed. Even ham is comparable in fat content to mutton.

    Second, it doesn't require refrigeration to cure pork into ham. Traditionally preservation is the reason for curing meat in the first place. The fact that it can also be used to change or enhance flavor is a secondary usage, at least before refrigeration.

    Third, in places where people don't have access to refrigeration, extra dietary fat is probably not a bad thing. It's not like dietary fat is fundamentally bad -- you need a good deal of it to be healthy -- like most things it's only bad in excess. And I can virtually guarantee that people who live without ready access to refrigeration don't eat enough meat to be worried about too much dietary fat intake.

  17. Re:Receptionist by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've discovered, on several occasions, that a visible ham radio antenna will cause large numbers of problems with the television sets and hi-fi systems of my neighbors, even when the antenna has never been connected to a transmitter. Many of the complainants are intelligent people, but the logic center of their brain shuts down when they see an unusual antenna.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  18. Re:Was interested until... by captjc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't insult The Onion by comparing them Fox news. The Onion is America's finest news source.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  19. What about the sun? by Fross · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those hippies are going to be royally fucked when they realise the huge ball of incandescent gas at the middle of our solar system is the largest electromagnetic transmitter within several billion miles. How are they going to fix THAT one?

  20. No known "Health issues" by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    as if modern medicine is able to fathom full extent of physiological and psychological issues of homo sapiens sapiens ....

    something not being known yet doesnt mean it doesnt exist.

  21. Re:Very sensitive people? by Detritus · · Score: 2

    A couple of people are killed every year because they didn't follow guidelines and had their internal organs cooked.

    Cite? I've heard these sea stories for decades. The only factual reports of injuries that I've read involve RF burns and increases in rates of cataracts.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  22. Re:Very sensitive people? by dastasha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I served a four year apprenticeship repairing and aligning 100 watt UHF power amplifier modules on a daily basis, among other RF devices. All this was done on a test bench at approximately groin level. Despite the warnings I received at the time, it certainly has not affected my ability to reproduce. I have three normal children to prove this. The closest I ever came to injury from electromagnetic radiation was the odd RF burn on my fingers.

  23. Re:my body is my property: don't rape me by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everything generates EM radiation, even your own body.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  24. Re:As reasonable as the morons who wont eat ham by bytesex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But chicken is about as 'unsafe' as pork, yet the whole friggin' world eats chicken.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  25. Re:Ironic by coastwalker · · Score: 3, Informative

    The UK is being cited as the cause of the delay in eradicating Measles from Earth because a medical quack decided that he would fake evidence that the triple MMR vaccination caused autism. The gutter press got hold of it and screamed "save the children" thereby convincing concerned parents everywhere to not vaccinate their children. I'm hoping a few of them will die of measles in order to help sharpen up peoples discrimination between nutjobs and science. I'm perfectly happy for the people of Glastonbury to do without the 21st century but I strongly object to their invocation of psudo science and trickery to condemn the rest of us to their unenlightened state. These people are wrong and should be told so in VERY large letters.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  26. Re:Very sensitive people? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's the cool thing about science - nobody cares whether you believe it.

    Try googling for 'rf double-blind' or if you'd like an actual journal article, here

    In short, there was no correlation.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  27. Sorry, no way. by snspdaarf · · Score: 2, Informative

    My office has several microwave links, and I have seen birds perched on the feedhorn of an open grid parabolic antenna for several minutes without dropping dead. Granted, that is not the center of the beam. Maybe their feet are just cold.

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  28. Someone Call Cartman Already by maz2331 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bring in Cartman to fix the situation.

  29. Too much pot? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "headaches, dizziness, nausea, severe tiredness, brain fog, disorientation and loss of appetite, loss of balance, inability to concentrate, loss of creativity"

    Sounds like they have all the symptoms of smoking way too much pot.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    1. Re:Too much pot? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dunno about loss of appetite... if one of the symptoms had been "munchies", then that would have clinched it.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  30. Re:Ironic by gregbot9000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I go to college, I'm used to pseudo science and trickery. It seems every professor I've had the last two semesters was bent on convincing the class that far left ideology is correct, and the best way to prove this was by assigning reading completely devoid of fact and unrelated to class.

    With that in mind, this story and that doctor don't surprise me at all, and go to the root of the problem. It ask questions I am still trying to answer: How do people hold a philosophical belief yet purposefully fake evidence to support their claim and yet not question the claim itself? If the only evidence supporting their claim is false information created by them yet is used by them to support it how do they not question their belief structure?

    I was assigned a book to read in my sociology class that was little more then subjective rhetoric and purposely set up situations to justify policy decisions. The authors concern was the good of society. What good could come from acting on false information? Information that more objective studies in my economics class had proven to be completely false through rigorous documentation. If goal is helping society and beliefs are shown to not coincide with that goal, why do people chose their beliefs over their goal?

    The goal of the doctor was probably to help people and he probably believed vaccines caused autism so he faked information that will more likely hurt people. His goal of helping people has failed miserably.

    Same with these "hippies." Is it just human nature to value opinion over fact? How can we address this problem?

  31. Re:Ironic by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The problem is that non-vaccination doesn't just affect the children of idiot parents. There are some children who can't have the vaccine because of allergies.

    This wasn't a problem in the past because the level of vaccination was so high that there was herd immunity. The virus couldn't spread because the odds of someone with measles passing it on to someone else, then on to someone else and so on were incredibly low.

    Personally, I'd tell parents that they can't attend state school without a vaccine certificate. You either have a measles jab, or you homeschool them.

  32. Re:Very sensitive people? by TechnicolourSquirrel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Their problems don't disappear at all in a double-blind test. They just fail to correlate with the actual presence of the signal. Often their 'problems' become exacerbated and they send themselves mentally into a crisis because of their belief that they are being subjected to RF, even though it happens to be off in that part of the test. These trials usually end up with a significant number of people dropping off due to such 'crises'. Mind you, the symptoms of the 'sensitives' are actually real and can be life-threatening, so they should absolutely be taken very seriously and they never 'disappear'. They just aren't caused by what they are convinced they are caused by.