Slashdot Mirror


Dell Closes Ireland Plant; 2nd Largest Employer

Wide Angle writes in with a PBS report on tough economic news from Ireland: Dell announced that it will relocate its manufacturing plant in Limerick, Ireland to Lodz, Poland. "Dell's announcement... is a severe blow to the Irish economy, which has been hit hard and fast by the global economic crisis. Dell is Ireland's second-largest corporate employer and the country's largest exporter. Nineteen hundred shift workers will lose their jobs. ...Dell's closing is not a result of the economic downturn, but of a pattern all too familiar in the United States — corporations' perennial search for cheaper labor. Since 2000 several companies, such as Procter & Gamble, Intel, Gateway, and NEC Electronics, have moved manufacturing jobs from Ireland to China, Eastern Europe, and elsewhere. When Poland joined the European Union in 2004, it became an attractive place for companies to set up manufacturing plants. ... However, Ireland has managed to maintain and attract... 'knowledge-intensive jobs.' Google's European headquarters are based in Dublin, and Facebook announced late last year that they would locate their international headquarters there. But the overall economic picture for Ireland is bleak."

91 of 494 comments (clear)

  1. There once was... by Foldarn · · Score: 3, Funny

    There once was a man from Nantucket...

    1. Re:There once was... by lymond01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Being from Nantucket, I don't get the joke. I even read the article (imagine that) to see if there was some reference. In fact, being a native of Nantucket allows me to charge you 50 cents for each use of the word "Nantucket" (it's actually $3000, but we divide the royalties up amongst the entire population -- 50 cents is just my cut). However, if you can pull some strings to get us our own statehood (which we've tried for before) or our own nuclear missile base (from "Boston Legal"), I'll let my 50 cents slide.

    2. Re:There once was... by Foldarn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Originally it was an innocent joke. Now it's just a really vulgar limerick! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_once_was_a_man_from_Nantucket

    3. Re:There once was... by gnick · · Score: 5, Funny

      There once was a company called Dell,
      Who saw their costs starting to swell,
      Labor in Lodz
      Attracted their jobs,
      So they told the Irish, "Go to hell".

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    4. Re:There once was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just for the record, the correct pronunciation of Lodz in Polish is something like Woodge.
      Cheers!

    5. Re:There once was... by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe I can help.

      The correct pronunciation of the word "Woodge" is something like the Polish pronunciation of "Lodz".

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    6. Re:There once was... by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dell, as they moved away, laughed,
      "To pay your wages we'd be daft."
      On pink slips they wrote
      A rude little note
      "Dude, you're getting the shaft!"

    7. Re:There once was... by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 5, Funny

      And when the Lodzians wanted their pay,
      Dell ran numbers and told them 'no way'.
      They moved to Myanmar --
      like all industry stars --
      where the workers get eight cents a day.

      But labor still cost too much wealth.
      (For some workers were older than twelve!)
      Dell's great business plan,
      could not involve man:
      They were modeled on magical elves.

      So Dell finally settled in Congo.
      Every PC they now make, as you know,
      is constructed on skimp
      by two apes and a chimp.
      (And the chimp's job security is low.)

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    8. Re:There once was... by Trapick · · Score: 4, Informative

      The town's name is "Limerick". Most common limerick? You guessed it, man from Nantucket. It wasn't all that funny, but that's the joke.

    9. Re:There once was... by bytethese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Must be green slips then huh?

  2. willingness to relocate by bugs2squash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps Eire should have factored in that companies agile and willing enough to relocate once to Ireland would likely be sufficiently agile and willing to move to follow the sun again.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everyone in Eire with half a brain knew this was coming anyway...
      Those relatively low tech manufacturing jobs were only ever going to be useful as a means of bootstrapping ourselves into a properly high tech economy.
      Not sure the government knew this, but everyone smart working in tech did.

    2. Re:willingness to relocate by spun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is what happens when capital and goods can freely cross borders but people can't. Capital will simply chase poverty in a never ending circle around the globe. When one poor, desperate country starts to get wealthy, corporations will simply move to the next one, and let the first slip back into poverty.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is what happens when capital and goods can freely cross borders but people can't. Capital will simply chase poverty in a never ending circle around the globe. When one poor, desperate country starts to get wealthy, corporations will simply move to the next one, and let the first slip back into poverty.

      So what's the solution? If you get rid of the restrictions on people moving you destroy national sovereignty and identity. If you get rid of free trade/adopt protectionism you drag the economy down a few pegs and probably destroy at least as many jobs as you save.

      I hate what we've become but I'm at a loss for how to fix it. Ideas?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You say "destroy national sovereignty" (and all of the restrictions therein) like it's a bad thing.

    5. Re:willingness to relocate by bugs2squash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that Irish citizens could move to Poland if they wanted to.

      Besides, what you say is to be applauded, eventually the corporations will move around to even the poorest contries. Then the only way they will be able to make themselves poor again is by waging war or grossly mismanaging their governments (per the US model).

      --
      Nullius in verba
    6. Re:willingness to relocate by Eunuchswear · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is what happens when capital and goods can freely cross borders but people can't.

      Both Eire and Poland are in the EU, free movement of people is guaranteed. If the Dell workers want to keep their jobs they can just move to Lodz.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    7. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're speaking in English, call it Ireland.
      If you're speaking in Irish, call it Eire.

      Don't mix and match in what was probably an attempt to sound intelligent and learned.

    8. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see how dropping restrictions on people moving will necessarily destroy national sovereignty or identity.

      If you tell a Government that they can't control how many people cross their border is that not by it's very definition a restriction on national sovereignty?

      How would it help anyway? How many Americans would really want to move to India when their job gets outsourced? How many Irish would want to move to Poland? Leaving aside the lower standard of living (compared to the US) in most places where jobs are outsourced what about language and cultural barriers?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So Ireland should just do whatever EU leaders want? If the rest of us in europe were given a vote, I doubt Ireland would have been the only one to reject it.

    10. Re:willingness to relocate by Skrynesaver · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not to spawn a pointless off-topic flame war or anything, but at least we have a constitution and so the population gets to vote on it. If the Lisbon treaty, which isn't a constitution, were put to a plebiscite throughout Europe Ireland wouldn't be the only ones rejecting it, in fact support for the European project is probably higher in Ireland than anywhere else in Europe.

      Anyway, back on topic, it's a shame for the people in Limerick where the plant was sited, however the jobs going are the assembly line jobs, Dells European planning and management structures remain in Ireland for now.

      --
      "Linux is for noobs"-The new MS fud strategy
    11. Re:willingness to relocate by lee1026 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Problem is, the number of poor countries that are stable enough to invest in is not large, and once a country becomes a wealthy, it rarely slides downwards very far. Thus, this should end relatively soon, as soon as corporations run out of countries.

    12. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You say "destroy national sovereignty" (and all of the restrictions therein) like it's a bad thing.

      You see restrictions where I see freedoms. Globalization has already created a race to the bottom for labor and environmental standards. Will our freedoms and rights be next in line? Will the United States be forced to adopt European restrictions on free speech? Will Europe be forced to adopt Islamic restrictions on free speech? Will the United States, Finland, Switzerland and Norway be forced to adopt stricter gun control laws?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    13. Re:willingness to relocate by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      On the downside, they had to interact with the Irish.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:willingness to relocate by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agreed. The Dutch voted against the constitution the first time (which was a surprise to the government, especially since they invested million in a semi-propaganda campaign) and weren't given a vote for the revised treaty because the government feared a rejection again.

      Democracy 2.0. Give people a vote if you think they'll agree with you, take the vote away when you fear disagreement.

      --
      It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
    15. Re:willingness to relocate by Idiomatick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well they are both part of the EU so gp is wrong you can move from ireland->poland for free.
      Secondly, It is a GOOD thing that business' chase poverty! Something shitty happens to a country and big countries move in which will act to save their asses. Ireland will not become poorer than Poland because of this, as the summary says they are retaining higher paying post-secondary jobs. This could be rewritten to show how ireland is moving up in the world. Now they don't NEED the Dell jobs (atleast not as much as Poland does). This if left unfettered causes an equalization of wealth. Which is a fair thing, a good thing unless you happen to currently live at the top.
       
      We on /. like to bitch about India stealing our jobs but really they need them more than we do. Think of it like global charity except they have to earn the money.... and it is involuntary. Try to see some of the good :/

    16. Re:willingness to relocate by rgviza · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh like citigroup buying a spanish highway construction company with 7bn euros in bailout money from our taxes?

      http://www.thestreet.com/story/10450514/1/citi-to-buy-spanish-highway-operator.html?puc=_tscrss

      Here's the day they got our bailout check. Note the dates:

      http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN2636427520081126

      Yeap we paid for it. Be pissed, very pissed.

      I can't believe regulators aren't all over them for this. What are we paying them for? What good is all this bailout money doing if they are just using it to buy foriegn companies instead of saving the jobs of the people that effing paid for the bailout? Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. That bailout money did NOT come from Europe.

      Here's the layoff announcement of the US employees:
      http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/154130/citigroup_layoff_could_decimate_it_jobs.html

      grrr

      -Viz

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    17. Re:willingness to relocate by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Eire and Poland"?

      Why half pedantic?

      You mean Eire and Polska I guess. Or as most of us know then, Ireland and Poland.

      --
      http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    18. Re:willingness to relocate by Bertie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually Limerick's at least as much of a poverty-stricken dump as many places in Poland, and stuff like this will only make it worse.

      Ireland has seen a lot of development and increased prosperity over the last while, but things like this show how transient that can be if you're too dependent on outside sugardaddies providing that prosperity. It's easy come, easy go for the organisations providing the jobs - if somebody else turns up with a bigger development grant and a workforce with lower wages, moving won't cost them a thought.

      The trick is to take the inward investment and use it to build up your skills base so that ultimately you can stand on your own two feet, but that's a whole lot easier said than done. Places like Taiwan have done it rather beautifully, and Estonia, financial troubles apart, seems to be on the right track, but it's tough.

    19. Re:willingness to relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To a "recruiter" in Bangalore, the United States looks like one homogenous entity with few cultural distinctions among locations. I tried to explain to a recruiter why I would not be interested in Salt Lake City Utah (e.g., relocating there from San Diego California where I already had a mid-career level job), but she could not understand the basic issue (Salt Lake City being a place where a person of my ethnicity, social idiom, and core beliefs will be less comfortable.)

      Would the story be different if Dell were an Irish, or even a UK company? Why can't HP compete?

    20. Re:willingness to relocate by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Both Eire and Poland are in the EU, free movement of people is guaranteed.

      Free movement of goods, money and companies is guaranteed. Free movement of people is certainly not.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    21. Re:willingness to relocate by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, local governments usually give huge tax breaks to corps looking to set up shop - so you lose that ability to bank "found" money and foster local industry growth.

    22. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The sooner we get rid of the petty tribal "us vs them" mentality we get from all the imaginary lines we've drawn on our globe, the better.

      Those imaginary lines are a lot more important than you think. My country guarantees me several freedoms that other countries (or even the UN Declaration of Human Rights) don't provide for. You'll have a hard time convincing me of the wisdom of getting rid of those "imaginary" lines.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    23. Re:willingness to relocate by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Funny

          [in a heavy Indian accent]

          CSR: Thank you for calling [company] technical support, my name is "Bob", and how may I service you this fine morning.

          Customer: What?

          CSR: Good morning, and how can I be helping you.

          Customer: Morning? It's 9pm. Where the hell are you?

          CSR: We are in ... uhhh ... New Jersey.

          Customer: I'm in New York, and it's 9pm here.

          CSR: Oh, I am begging of your forgiveness for my incorrectness in that statement, we are in the other New Jersey.

          Customer: What?

          CSR: We are in New Jersey, India.

          Customer: {sigh} Ok, I'm having a problem with my some-computer 5100.

          CSR: I am very sorry that you are having discomfort with your "some-computer 500", how may I help you resolve this issue.

          Customer: No, a some-computer 5100, not a 500.

          CSR: Oh, I am begging your forgiveness [balls up some paper by the handset] there must be line noise. So you have 50 some-computer 100 that are not working. I will have to transfer you to large business support, please hold [hold music]

          Customer: WAIT!!

          Ok, that sounds funny and all, but I swear I've had so many variations of that call, ONLY with off-shore call centers. It's not a matter that they're in India, it's that the people I always end up get have poor training, terrible phone skills, and an equal American in the position should be fired. Since the companies farm out the work to the cheapest places, they're hiring the cheapest employees too. Now, the American call centers seem to be reserved for the highest level technical folks, who have years of experience, and know what they're doing. It's just a nice added advantage that they speak English well. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    24. Re:willingness to relocate by Manchot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Both Eire and Poland are in the EU, free movement of people is guaranteed.

      That's easy to say, but not so easy to do. Consider the following:
      1. Moving usually incurs a huge cost, both in terms of time and money. When you're moving out of the country, those costs are multiplied.
      2. Moving is stressful, and most people don't like forcing that on their family.
      3. The social costs are high. You'd be leaving your friends, most of your family, and basically everyone you know behind. There's a reason that most people live within driving distance of where they grew up.
      4. You'd have to learn Polish.

      So yeah, while you're "free" to move, you're only free to do so if you're willing to accept all of the above. I think that point #3 is the most salient one, simply because humans are social beings and while the social costs aren't easily quantified, they're easily the dominant factor for most people.

    25. Re:willingness to relocate by Time_Warped · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When my hi tech job was out sourced I eventually found work as a store clerk at about 55% of my previous wages. So I basically stopped buying everything but food. In a typical year at my old salary I might have spent $8000 or more on Computers, TV's, Clothes, DVD's Etc. In 2008 I spent under $500 on consumer goods. A few DVD's 2 Computer Games, some underwear. I only eat out at places with a dollar menu, and when I do I almost always spend $4 or less. So by reducing my salary by 50% I now by 80-90% less "Stuff". Sounds like a great plan for economic meltdown to me. If you want to get Golden Eggs, you have to buy the goose some corn. You cheap twit!

    26. Re:willingness to relocate by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's called Global Economic Equilibrium. I agree that this migration should end (eventually), but I wouldn't say soon. The main factor will be if a nation losing jobs will still retain enough capitol to create new ones in their place.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    27. Re:willingness to relocate by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What we do now is offset this drain on the economy (overall inefficiency) by outsourcing a lot of the production which allows you to actually purchase the products you want and need.

      And when you outsource all of that production and gut the middle class whom is going to be left to buy your products? Playing devils advocate here but I've lived in an economically depressed region my whole life and I have yet to see any benefits come to my region from free trade. What I have seen is a lot of jobs shipped to Mexico (thank you NAFTA) and very few jobs coming into town to replace them.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    28. Re:willingness to relocate by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You say "destroy national sovereignty" (and all of the restrictions therein) like it's a bad thing.

      You see restrictions where I see freedoms. Globalization has already created a race to the bottom for labor and environmental standards. Will our freedoms and rights be next in line? Will the United States be forced to adopt European restrictions on free speech? Will Europe be forced to adopt Islamic restrictions on free speech? Will the United States, Finland, Switzerland and Norway be forced to adopt stricter gun control laws?

      What really bothers me about governments and large organizations in general is that they fail to understand the saying, "no matter how far down the wrong path you have travelled, turn back." Governments almost never say "this sounded like a good idea at the time but it's just not working, things are getting worse, time to abandon this idea and try something else." If they do say that, it's over the course of decades or sometimes centuries even though the knowledge of better solutions (or at least that this solution isn't working) has been around for a long time.

      I wish there were some type of initiative/referendum that citizens could use to challenge laws, not because they are unconstitutional or otherwise legally invalid, but because they have failed to deliver the results that were promised. If there were a way to get rid of otherwise legally valid laws that can be objectively proven to be counterproductive, not because enough voters put enough pressure on the legislators to repeal the law, but because at least one citizen can rigorously prove that it has failed, this would represent real progress.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    29. Re:willingness to relocate by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      eems like by preventing jobs from leaving the country, the company itself may not earn as much, but you've saved jobs within your own country. That's in my eyes, and anyone who is not a shareholder in said company and selfish, more important. Assuming that the company is going to use the money it saves to reinvest in your home country is not a sure thing to me.

      Here's the problem. Assume a company employes 50 people making widget X. It costs the company Y$ so they sell it for Y$ + % profit. Widget X is used by the whole country.

      Now, it's suddenly cheaper to make widget X in another country, so the company moves its operations. By doing this the 50 people lose their jobs, but now the entire country gains the use of widget X for a lower price than before. For a short time it sucks for those 50 people, but in aggregate society is paying less for an item which frees up more money for investing that one hopes would lead to jobs that would hire back those 50 people + more.

      If you don't let the making of widget X move (or tax it so it's like it didn't move) you continue to support an inefficiency. The entire economy now supports this inefficiency for the perceived benefit of 50 people, when in the long run it's better for the whole economy and probably for those 50 people to lower the price of widget X.

      It can be argued that this cycle is not one that can go on indefinitely, but it's a cycle that has risen the standard of living around the world for quite a long time.

    30. Re:willingness to relocate by bnenning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Free Trade worked, Mexico, America, and Canada would be doing better today then they were in the early 1990s

      Citation needed. If protectionism worked, North Korea would be the wealthiest nation on earth.

      Yes, it's class warfare. But the war is over, and the middle class has lost.

      Yeah, just look at all those homeless people huddling in Apple Stores.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    31. Re:willingness to relocate by ardle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not sure the government knew this, but everyone smart working in tech did.

      I'd say that the government put it on their "let's not think about that" list and concentrated on making money before the bubble burst.

    32. Re:willingness to relocate by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Informative
      You mean Eire and Polska I guess. Or as most of us know then, Ireland and Poland.

      There is actually a good reason to use the Irish name here: it makes it clear that you refer specifically to the Republic of Ireland, not to the island of Ireland as a whole.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    33. Re:willingness to relocate by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those imaginary lines are a lot more important than you think. My country guarantees me several freedoms that other countries (or even the UN Declaration of Human Rights) don't provide for.

      No. YOU (and I, and any Slashdot reader from a modern Western democracy) have granted certain rights to our governments in exchange for them making certain aspects of our lives easier and safer. The governments of the world have no actual rights they can ever grant us, only rights they can (try to) take away.

      Now, I will agree with you that many cultures do not hold dear many of the freedoms we normally take for granted... But that has more to do with fear and ignorance than the position of any given line on a map... Simple example, radical Islam and Evangelical Christianity. Both want scarily similar restrictions on personal freedom, but only one (the last eight years in the US aside) uses the mask of national sovereignty to lend itself some pretense of legitimacy.

    34. Re:willingness to relocate by contrapunctus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought Europe was more restrictive than the US in terms of free speech (didn't some guy in Austria go to jail for denying the Holocaust?)

    35. Re:willingness to relocate by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cut him some slack man, we may be slashdotters, but we're still mainly american. And you know how well that bodes for our expertise in geography.
      Hell, I myself thought he was talking about the lake, not the country.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    36. Re:willingness to relocate by boteeka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now, it's suddenly cheaper to make widget X in another country, so the company moves its operations. By doing this the 50 people lose their jobs, but now the entire country gains the use of widget X for a lower price than before.

      Wouldn't it be nice if it were true? Sadly, the truth is that probably the price would stay where it was, and the profit % would increase. Everybody in the company's management happy.

    37. Re:willingness to relocate by gkai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, I do not believe this is true, even if it is the standard economic explication of relocalisation.
      What I believe is that relocating jobs to to cheaper places is akin to thermodynamics: there is no global increase, but a leveling...and as long as a non-equilibrium exist, it can be exploited to produce work, i.e. enrich the ones that have the decision power and are not trapped in one legal system - i.e. large supra-national conglomerates.

      So what we have now is middle class of western countries getting slowly poorer, a slow creation of a new middle class in some non western countries, and a very few world "elite" getting richer quite fast. Income ratio between the most and less wealthy in western nation is spreading steadily since the 70ties...

      Imho, the standard of living around the globe (for western world) has been increasing mostly because of 2 things:
      - technical progress and cheap energy: one average man hour can produce much more goods that it used to...but this is leveling lately (energy less cheap because it is no longer in infinite supply, technical progress lacking a new revolution, electronic is maturing, and biotech/nanotech not yet), and it is a potential source of unemployment.
      - using the demographic growth for a global credit: the debt of today will be paid by the people of tomorrow...which will be more thus will have to pay less...
      There is no more demographic growth in western countries, and it is levelling up fast globally - fortunately because here too we are getting closer to hard limits. In fact, demographic decrease and/or population aging means that people of tomorrow will be less for sharing the debt created by more people today - oups.

      The pyramidal scheme is collapsing...and, as always in those case, I fear that the end result will not look pretty...

  3. Shorter commute by motek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I suppose it is only reasonable. Now all these Poles who already work there will have much a much shorter commute. Good for them.

    --
    I would like to die like my grandfather did - sleeping. And not screaming in terror, like his passengers.
  4. Not the first time .. won't be the last by bossanovalithium · · Score: 2, Interesting

    AOL was in Dublin for a long time, and they moved to Waterford, and then Waterford lost out. Soon the only tech place in Dublin will be eBay - if they count?

    1. Re:Not the first time .. won't be the last by D4MO · · Score: 2, Informative

      Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Symantec, Oracle, Yahoo, Havok... I'm sure there's more...

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    2. Re:Not the first time .. won't be the last by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 2, Informative

      IBM is in Ireland too.

      --
      It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
  5. The Race to the Bottom by HockeyPuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We the consumer, demand cheaper priced products, why should we be surprised when manufacturers look for methods of reducing their costs? You don't exactly see them firing up manufacturing plants in Tokyo or Manhattan.

    It's a Global Economy, get used to it.

    1. Re:The Race to the Bottom by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We the consumer, demand cheaper priced products, why should we be surprised when manufacturers look for methods of reducing their costs? You don't exactly see them firing up manufacturing plants in Tokyo or Manhattan.

      Corporations also demand more profit. Reducing costs helps that bottom line. Whether moving manufactoring locations ends up positive on that bottom line or not isn't always clear at the outset.

      It's a Global Economy, get used to it.

      It's been a global economy for decades. That's not the change.

  6. That's fine by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's fine as long as you have a job to pay for it. If all the manufacturing and knowledge based jobs end up in the cheaper locations then can the Western Economies keep going. I know that many economists say that it is the beginning of the service economy, and we can all be rich in the west by buying and providing services for each other but I am rather skeptical. If a whole country consists of PR teams, lawyers, restaurant owners and so on can they really "generate" enough money to be able to buy their "real" things from cheap overseas sources?

    1. Re:That's fine by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The distinction between "manufacturing" and "service" jobs is somewhat artificial. Every step in the manufacturing process is a service. Finding raw materials is a service. Getting them out of the ground is a service. Refining them is a service. Transporting them from place to place is a service. Assembling them together into a finished product is a service. Making the machines to do so is a service. All of these are services; "manufacturing" is simply a convenient shorthand to describe those services whose end result is an assembled physical product, as opposed to the many other services whose end result is not.

      Thus, the fact that we have a service-based economy is not in and of itself a problem, provided that our services are sufficiently valued in world markets to purchase the manufactured goods we need as well as the other necessities and wants of life. It is a problem ONLY if our skills, or the products that are created using those skills, are no longer sufficiently valuable to earn us the kind of living we want, in which case, the obvious remedy (which scales up) is to learn new skills.

    2. Re:That's fine by mark72005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's fine as long as you have a job to pay for it. If all the manufacturing and knowledge based jobs end up in the cheaper locations then can the Western Economies keep going.

      I hope the textile industry never moves out of the united states.

      I don't see how the US economy can keep going if all the woolen mills and shirtwaist factories shut down and take their jobs overseas.

    3. Re:That's fine by bugs2squash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I guess one of the criticisms leveled at geeks is that they think they know everything...

      So in that spirit, here's my "expert" analysis of world economic matters !

      Isn't manufacturing computers just a service ? If you were Martha Stuart, you'd just get up early and grind-up the sand from the beach yourself to make your own CPU.

      To my mind there's scant economic difference between a janatorial service and a manufacturing "service".

      Furthermore; a janitor's job has to remain local and the janitor must be retained to keep the place sparkly, as opposed to a one-time manufacturing process for a durable item.

      Janitors are an extremely high-value service, that's why so many of us have a personal computer built for us but don't have our houses cleaned for us.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    4. Re:That's fine by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is (to quote a certain big eared Texan) that "giant sucking sound" which is of course all your money going out while almost none of it ever comes back. Those countries in the third world like India and China simply aren't going to buy enough of your "services" to come anywhere close to balancing out. And frankly basing so much of our future on things that can be copied for almost nothing like that "IP" crap is a recipe for disaster. From what my friends who are from there or who have gone their for business tell me NOBODY buys actual movies, software, games, etc. It is pretty much ALL bootlegs.

      Hell we don't really make anything here anymore. Our electronics, our durable goods, hell even the clothes on our backs are from overseas. Do we even make the bullets for our military anymore? What are we going to do when the world doesn't want any more dollars because the fed cranks them out by the truckload? Frankly all this globe hopping helps no one but the giant multinational corporations, who can simply walk away when your country hits the skids. And as for learning new skills? How are you going to compete with someone in India who can get a masters degree for 20K when yours costs 150k+?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  7. Good for Poland by exhilaration · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Poland has very high unemployment rate, one of the highest in Europe, and is also one of the poorest countries in Europe.

    I realize that this sucks for Ireland but Poland is in far worse shape and needs the jobs just as badly if not more.

  8. Re:Numbers seem odd by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

    The population of Ireland is somewhere around 6 million - what does every *else* do there?

    Farm potatoes and brew Guinness.

  9. Make 'em pay by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact is, since China has the unfair advantage of near-slave labor, the rest of the world as a whole needs to have stiff import tariffs to equalize this imbalance.

    This really shouldn't be completely about the "world economy" and if it can be done cheaper in China, "why not"? It is completely fair to take into account other factors such as China's complete disregard for workers rights and environmental issues, not to mention truth in labeling with regards to all the poisons they put in food products.

    Make 'em pay, it's the only way to get their attention.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Make 'em pay by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's just as completely "fair" to say "the hell with the rest of the world, we'll just make them locally".

    2. Re:Make 'em pay by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The fact is, since China has the unfair advantage of near-slave labor, the rest of the world as a whole needs to have stiff import tariffs to equalize this imbalance.

      Yeah! Because stiff tariffs worked out so well in the past.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    3. Re:Make 'em pay by IanHurst · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "China has major human rights problems, but coerced labor in its manufacturing sector isn't one of them. They do seem to be responding well on environmental issues recently, and they took the consumer health / quality errors very seriously."

      Thank you. Waving your hands at "Chinese slave labor" as a way to dismiss competition really grates at this point. Xenophobes: would you at least get your anti-China biases into the 21st century? Ain't slave labor at all. Employment in China is overwhelmingly voluntary, with wages set by more or less the same market forces as ours in the West.

      Chinese WANT manufacturing jobs because they're EASIER and pay BETTER than the farm alternatives. Time to step out of the 1980s, guys. If you want to complain about Chinese, the current fashion is to rail against "Mercantilism". Read up on it and get back to us after that. Christ.

  10. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having spent over an hour and a half on the phone with Dell Canada on Monday just to get a quote (and a quote for twenty computers I might add), I'd say there is such a thing as "too cheap".

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  11. POTATO FAMIN! by 0racle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scares them, doesn't it. But they didn't learn; you don't put all your potatoes in one basket.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  12. Less taxes. by diskis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The 10 year discount is up. That's why they are moving, and Dell isn't the only corporation doing this. Ireland has a low corporate tax, and discounts it even further for the first 10 years a corporation operates there.

    1. Re:Less taxes. by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The enticement at that point is that it's probably cheaper to stay there than move the entire operation, which means either disrupting shipments for a while or paying for 2 locations for a while. You have to be able to save a significant amount of money elsewhere to justify it. And you have to do either guarantee that savings, or do it in the short run to have it make sense.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Less taxes. by tmosley · · Score: 2, Informative

      So lower taxes don't work because they are moving to avoid paying higher taxes?

      Great logic there, comrade.

  13. Re:Numbers seem odd by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Farm potatoes and drink Guinness.

    There. Fixed it for ya.

  14. This calls for an Irish Limerick by GPLDAN · · Score: 4, Funny

    There once was an old man of Esser,
    Whose employment prospects grew lesser and lesser,
    It at last grew so small
    He had no job skills at all,
    And now he's a college professor.

  15. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't wait to see what happens when our economy takes such a nosedive, and unemployment becomes rampant that companies start moving jobs here since our labor is so much cheaper than china, india, taiwain, etc...

    Actually our economy won't get that bad but a lot of economists were talking about what $200-$300/bbl oil would do to free trade. At a certain point it will become more expensive to ship goods than to just produce them here at home. The various economists and talking heads all disagreed as to what that point was but all agreed that it would happen sooner or later if oil prices had kept skyrocketing.

    Of course the economic meltdown has dragged oil down but how long is that really going to last?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  16. Re:Numbers seem odd by Deag · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well the Republic of Ireland is closer to 4 million (the north is part of the UK). There is about 2 million working I believe. 4 million - children - old people easily gives you that.
    It says corporate employer so that rules out all public jobs. And in Ireland that means most education and health.

    Most major companies would only have one major location in Ireland, so even the big ones are a few thousand. So it is easily believed. You'd only need a 1000 companies employing 2000 people to employ the whole country including the public workers.

    Ireland would be the equivalent of a medium metro area in the US. Not many of those have many corporate employers employing more than 5k people I would guess, maybe Detroit?

  17. Re:There once was...here are the funny bits: by hierophanta · · Score: 5, Funny

    There once was a man from Nantucket
    Whose dick was so long he could suck it.
    While wiping his chin,
    He said with a grin,
    "If my ear were a cunt, I could fuck it."


    --- and here is the extended version of the original ---

    There once was a man from Nantucket
    Who kept all his cash in a bucket.
    But his daughter, named Nan,
    Ran away with a man
    And as for the bucket, Nantucket.


    part 2:

    But he followed the pair to Pawtucket,
    The man and the girl with the bucket;
    And he said to the man,
    He was welcome to Nan,
    But as for the bucket, Pawtucket.


    part 3:

    Then the pair followed Pa to Manhasset,
    Where he still held the cash as an asset,
    But Nan and the man
    Stole the money and ran,
    And as for the bucket, Manhasset.

  18. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's called rural-sourcing, and it's why "import" cars are now made in places like Ohio and Alabama instead of Japan and Germany.

    dom

  19. Re:I don't care who slaps together my inspiron by snowraver1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    RAmen to that! I RAGE when I have to call 1 800 India support. I hate the scripts they use, I hate the thick accent, and I hate having to be somewhat civil when all I really want to say is "get someone that can actually speak english on the phone". It's terrible when you call with a pretty good idea of what you want, but due to the communication barrier, you can't be sure what you are asking for, is what you will get.

    How many times have you had to clarify something, three times, to the person on the other end, and after that, are still unsure if they have a clue what you want?

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  20. Re:Numbers seem odd by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually they're not the second-largest corporate employer. That seems to be an incorrect inference on the part of the Washington Post, because the Dell Ireland website claims they're the second-largest *corporation*.. and the metric for that could easily be something other than employees, i.e. revenue. Of course, 1900 people isn't their entire Irish workforce either.

    There are _definitely_ larger employers in Ireland. 1900 people at a single factory is enough to sustain a mid sized factory town of about 30,000 people (1/3 of Limerick). I know because I've lived in one. And I'm certain Ireland has a handful of towns that size and larger.

    But just to grab some random Irish companies out of a hat and look them up: Eircom has 6,500 employees. Bank of Ireland has 16,026.

  21. Re:Global Economy == Global Poverty and Ruin by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're kind of assuming that:

    1. People in the West won't find new jobs to replace the ones that left
    2. People in developing countries somehow are only capable of making things for export

  22. Europeans, be happy by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Dell shut down all their plants in America and shipped them to China. Your plant is remaining in Europe. Personally, I have quit buying Dell.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  23. Hey guys I am from Poland by rewter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey guys I am from Poland and guess what? I can more or less speak english and even know how to post on Slashdot.

    And there's more. We do embedded software and hardware here, we know Linux and it's been that way for years already.

    So it's not different compared to where you live. And as for dell, easy come easy go. They won't stay here longer than 3-4 years and eventualy will continue moving east.

  24. Who cares? by PinkyDead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, maybe that's a little blase, but there are two points that have to be considered here:

    1. Ireland is not nor never has been a manufacturing country. Sure there have be some manufacturing companies such as Dell, but essentially Ireland is a combination of a strong agricultural and tourism in rural areas with technological and financial bias in the urban areas. Dell is nice to have, and I feel sorry for those that have lost their jobs in Limerick - but it is not a core industry, even if it is a core employer.

    2. Ireland has been growing at an incredible rate over the past 10 years, far faster than anyone could possibly hope to adapt to. Looking at the government's actions over this period, they have acted like lottery winners, squandering the growth to create an ever-burgeoning public sector. Coincidentally, the National Competitiveness Council in Ireland established that our competitiveness has deteriorated by 32% over this period. This loss as well as others is a good wake up call - and an opportunity to regroup and establish a firmer foundation for the future.

    It is also important to note that Dell is not leaving Ireland - they are closing their manufacturing plant. Ireland's corporate tax rate is still extremely attractive to US companies.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  25. Parallels by g8oz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like Bush, Micheal Dell did not forget Poland.

    Thank you I'll be here all week.

  26. The basic problem by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The basic problem is that "free trade" never is.

    "Free trade" concerning commodities that are easily made (or grown) in an area, like tropical fruit towards northern climates, is one thing.

    "Free trade" based on paying workers shit wages, or based on the fact that one country (*coughmexshitcocough*) has absolutely crappy evironmental protection laws while their neighbors don't, doesn't - it temporarily drives down "costs" while ensuring that the environment gets ruined and poverty is taken advantage of.

    The solution is "fair trade" instead - place tariffs on any and all imported goods from countries whose labor protection and environmental laws are inferior to our own, such that the cost to produce them there and them import is the same (or better yet, slightly more expensive) as doing the production either here, or in a country with proper worker and environmental protection standards. If the USA/Canada/European countries would do that, then the countries with shit worker protection and environmental laws will have to fall in line and we can actually get things addressed.

    1. Re:The basic problem by u38cg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The funny thing is, none of these people have to work for low wages or as sweated labour; they are quite free to spend their days scavenging rubbish dumps for scraps of food. It's hardly taking advantage of someone to pay them the going rate as opposed to letting them starve in the streets.

      Your proposal is to take us back to the 1930s, which, if I might remind you, didn't work out so well. It took a long time to unwind the economic impact of protectionism. Imposing these standards on trading partners removes any point in trading with them - so all your manufacturing jobs will come back onshore. In turn, wages will go through the roof, as will inflation in general. In turn, your trading partners have to match the new, higher wages, which is even harder for them to do. Problem.

      On worker protection: the country with the least worker protection laws in the world is the United States. Yet bizarrely, you also have some of the highest standards, because you are held to them by the free market. Countries with notional but unenforced safety regimes, such as China, don't do so well at actually protecting their workers.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  27. The USA is not much different by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Informative
    The individual states are really countries in their own right since they can make their own laws, taxes etc. USA is very much equivalent to Europe in that both are federations. US federal law can override state laws and destroy the sovereignty of states so it is very hard to say that we don't already have a picture as to how things might pan out.

    As for Globalization, well USA is the current global top-dog expecting many other parts of the world to behave as it sees fit. We're probably a long way down this track already.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  28. Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the young. by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bad examples serve a purpose.

    Let the 'unskilled laborers' fight over the shit jobs that are uneconomical to move overseas.

    The wage for those jobs will naturally be low.

    Life's a bitch. Thanks for playing...better luck next reincarnation.

    The fair consequence of never developing skills is subsistence living.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  29. Re:as soon as corporations run out of countries. by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some areas of Africa are currently stable. If I'm not mistaken Kenya is relatively stable, hence why Google seems to be interested in it. Also in France when we call a hotline it doesn't go to India but Tunisia or Morocco, French-speaking countries that have been fairly stable over the last few decades (Tunisia has nothing to envy regarding stability these days). So it's not all that bleak for Africa, mind you there's more to Africa than starving kids, guerilla wars and genocides, but there's many reasons why most of it will be the last to experience what Poland or China have just experienced, one reason being you can't really just put a big computer chip factory in the middle of Mali.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  30. Re:Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the youn by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Correct, but keep in mind this paradigm does not just apply to unskilled labour. "Skilled" jobs such as programming, tech support, design etc. also naturally seek jurisdictions were labour costs are lower.

  31. Democratic Deficit by meehawl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the voters in the USA had had to vote yes in each State under plebiscite to amend the US constitution *or* to agree to accept new member States then I doubt it would have grown much.

    And the USA did not have European conservatives fronting the funding for proxy anti-Federalism parties within the USA.

    --

    Da Blog
  32. Re:Unskilled laborers act as a warning to the youn by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Life's a bitch. Thanks for playing...better luck next reincarnation.

    So let's have the government hold a gun to your head, take the fruits of your labour and distribute them to unskilled labourers. That should be okay, since life's a bitch and you might have better luck next reincarnation, right ?

    Or we could try to make the life a little less of a bitch to everyone, including those unskilled labourers.

    The fair consequence of never developing skills is subsistence living.

    The fair consequence of being an arrogant jerk is to get whatever fate you callously wished upon those you considered lesser beings.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.