Slashdot Mirror


A Sony Camera Running Linux

jonr writes "At the recently concluded Consumer Electronics Show, Sony presented the new camera from its Cyber-shot product line. The DSC-G3 comes with a Zeiss lens with 4x zoom, a large 3.5" touch display, and 4GB of internal memory. Most interesting is the camera's software that includes, among other things, face and scene recognition, based on Busybox and Kernel 2.6.11 for the Access Linux Platform. The camera also has built-in Wi-Fi."

209 comments

  1. Yeah but, by ehaggis · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Does it run...oh yeah...never mind.

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
    1. Re:Yeah but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...Does it run...oh yeah...never mind.

      Being from Sony, it does run a rootkit.

      And don't mod all the rootkit posts down, mod them UP. As a lesson to anyone out there even contemplating embedding malware into their products, Sony needs to pay for their bit of greedy asininity for a LONG time.

    2. Re:Yeah but, by pato101 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nice, that is not the only model which is running Linux. Actually, my own camera (eighteen months old) seems to be running Linux as well:
      http://www.sony.net/Products/Linux/Download/DSC-W90.html
      Here is a list of their products using Linux, as I understand:
      http://www.sony.net/Products/Linux/Download/search.html

    3. Re:Yeah but, by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Being from Sony, it does run a rootkit

      Proof needed. You can't go generalizing it for every single piece of hardware Sony releases.

      Is there any site/blog/whatever dedicated to make a list of these "rootkitted" products/models?

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
    4. Re:Yeah but, by Pepebuho · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can we build a Beowulf cluster of these?

    5. Re:Yeah but, by kmike · · Score: 2

      Yes it does, and surprisingly, so do many many more Sony products:
      http://www.sony.net/Products/Linux/Download/search.html

      Seeing that more than two dozen recent Sony cameras already run Linux ( http://www.sony.net/Products/Linux/Download/category14.html ), I find this new piece quite obsolete.

    6. Re:Yeah but, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      1. Everything Sony touches is evil.
      2. Everything Linux touches is holy.
      3. *head asplodes*

    7. Re:Yeah but, by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Linux has healed the unholy Sony!!!!!!!!!

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    8. Re:Yeah but, by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's simple. Sony has multiple personalities. Haven't you never noticed how they sold DVD drives that had features in them whose only use was to make it possible to rip the very DVDs Sony sold?

      I think it's pretty likely that the hardware guys at Sony are like most hardware guys: pretty cool (in geek terms). And that the media guys are just like most other media guys: crooks.
      Same think for marketing, management, and so on...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    9. Re:Yeah but, by donaldm · · Score: 1

      In Linux/Unix it rather difficult to hide a so-called root kit since all you have to do is type "ls -a" or "ls -la". Of course you really need to know what you are looking for such as files or directories called ". " (ie "." and a space) or something like that. Even an inocuous "." file or directory may be hiding some mallware however a little knowledge on this goes a long way. To make things easier there are some good root kit finders that you can download and run.

      If you have any Linux/Unix experience especially with the command line root kits are so easy to find (pun intended). Cleaning off a root kit in Linux/Unix is also easy and you don't need to become root, however if you work as root (ie. the Microsoft approach) then I have no sympathy for you since if you find a root kit you most likely have been "rooted" and I would strongly advise a re-installation of your OS and a good kick up the rear end ;-)

      On a more interesting note. Because Sony is using Linux then they have to provide the source. Hiding something in the kernel is not a good idea since if you are found out then the company that does this will find that the GPL has really sharp teeth.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    10. Re:Yeah but, by richlv · · Score: 1

      i'm wondering why upper level tech guys have missed an opportunity here.
      they could have created a decent hardware, average software to run on it... and create an oss project around that. advertise heavily.
      if they would have done that right, my last camera purchase would have went to them...
      instead it did go to canon, mostly because of chdk.

      --
      Rich
    11. Re:Yeah but, by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It is quite easy to root kit a linux system such that you could not find it with userland tools such as ls...
      There are plenty of pre made kits available to do exactly that, look for tools such as phalanx, adore and suckit, most of which will probably be available from packetstorm...
      Rootkits originated on unix not windows, that's why they are called rootkits and not administratorkits or systemkits...

      But sure, with the source code it would be easy to locate such a kit on an embedded device if one were present.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    12. Re:Yeah but, by k2r · · Score: 1

      > Rootkits originated on unix not windows

      Because most Windows users used work in Administrator-Mode there hasn't been any necessity for a windows-Rootkit until recently.

      > It is quite easy to root kit a linux system

  2. First by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    First post thet mentions a rootkit.

    --
    It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  3. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will it run *BSD?

    1. Re:But... by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      But does it run Windows?

      Ok, fine, I'm kidding.

      --
      Your ad here.
    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will it run *BSD?

      Well, some might think thats funny but the Panasonic BL-C10 does apparently contain some NetBSD, and there are many products that run BSD with no need for fanfare. That a camera uses Linux is perhaps interesting, but not really news on its own. Does the camera have no other redeeming features?

    3. Re:But... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, BSD only ran on toasters.

      There's an idea. Get rid of the 4GB flash and use bread as the consumable media.

      In paparazzi mode, imagine, "OMG! President O'Bama just appeared on my sourdough!"

    4. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but only on obsolete cameras.

  4. My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 4, Informative

    For busybox.

    So this isn't a new thing for Sony.

    There's even a URL at Sony's site for the code (of course). I forget what it was.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by Hairy+Heron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well of course it's not new, they are a well-known supporter and user of Linux.

    2. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Shh. Quite. The concept that a company can support Linux and DRM could cause some peoples on Slashdot heads to explode.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Funny

      DRM: because yes, it does run Linux!

      Take a picture of copyright material and watch the camera rm -rf itself. No refunds!

    4. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by Godji · · Score: 1

      Not quite. The Sony that makes TVs is not the same company as the one that sells music. They share little more than the name.

    5. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by Godji · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they have the source code for all the drivers (the kernele modules at least) they use in the thing?

      Now if only Linux had been GPLv3, we could actually demand the ability to run our own software on it.

      On a lighter note, imagine a Beowulf cluster of Sony point&shoot cameras! Ready..? Now imagine that same Beowulf cluster compiling Gentoo!!! I need to go to the bathroom...

    6. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not really, the concept of "tivoization" isn't exactly unknown in linux land. People frequently don't like it; but its existence is lost on nobody.

    7. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by poopdeville · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not quite. The Sony that makes TVs is not the same company as the one that sells music. They share little more than the name.

      Not true. Sony Corp. owns the Sony Group, and has a direct historical and managerial relationship with them.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    8. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by rahuja · · Score: 1

      Mine too. Code (for products shipped) available here: http://www.sony.com/linux redirects to http://products.sel.sony.com/opensource/

    9. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if only Linux had been GPLv3, we could actually demand the ability to run our own software on it.

      I assume of course that you're volunteering to re-implement all the GPL-2 code where the copyright holders can't be reached or aren't willing to all their code to be re-licensed.

    10. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by idontgno · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not true. Sony Corp. owns the Sony Group, and has a direct historical and managerial relationship with them.

      Nonetheless:

      Right Hand: "Left Hand, WTF are you doing"?

      Left Hand: "None of your business."

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    11. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by PuercoPop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that they are quite aware of it...

      You know that is the whole reason for the GPL3...

      for companies like TiVo that use GPL software but place DRM restrictions.

    12. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more like:

      Head: WTF are you doing left hand?
      Left Hand: The same thing you asked me before you became CEO of the Sony Corporation, boss.
      Right Hand: And we make electronics of varying quality!

    13. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by retchdog · · Score: 1

      The GPLv2 license, unless modified, includes a clause allowing re-licensing to any later version of the GPL...

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    14. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Linux had been GPLv3, Sony would have used *BSD instead. :-)

    15. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      My TV runs "uboot". It was odd, I'm just looking through the manual papers, and out come a GPL/LGPL notice... The English side doesn't say anything, the French side just mentions "uboot" where it says LGPL Software...

      Why does a TV need busybox/coreboot/etc?

    16. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Or maybe:

      Head: WTF are you doing left?
      Left Hand: *bitchslap*
      Head (shakes it off): Yeah, ok.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    17. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      To bootstrap the on screen interface that allows you to control the tv...
      To provide an interface for installing firmware updates...
      To provide software to decode digital video streams...
      A TV these days is a lot more than a dumb analog display device.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    18. Re:My 5 year old Sony TV came with a GPL notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...

      Now if only Linux had been GPLv3, we could actually demand the ability to run our own software on it. ...

      Wrong.

      If Linux had been GPLv3, at best then Sony would have done something like use *BSD or license OpenSolaris from Sun. Or maybe they would have sent even more money Microsoft's way. Because there's no way in hell Sony is going to make give away the inner workings of their camera to Panasonic and every last one of their other competitors.

      Welcome to reality.

  5. Year of the Linux camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    better than nothing..

    1. Re:Year of the Linux camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If everyone who buys this camera this year sets it down on top of a desk, it will be the year of Linux on the desktop!

    2. Re:Year of the Linux camera? by sdpuppy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I can just see what the little kids say now:

      "Daddy's camera's got a penguin on the screen when he starts it up!"

      Something like that happened a while ago when I got on on of those airplanes with a LCD on the back of each chair - they had to reboot the computer and the screen showed the boot sequence, including penguin. No, no no - this was the entertainment computer.

    3. Re:Year of the Linux camera? by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      You're still obligated to bypass it and run snort. Just saying.

      --
      Your ad here.
    4. Re:Year of the Linux camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      had to reboot the computer

      showed the boot sequence, including penguin.

      had to reboot... linux?

      Does not compute!

    5. Re:Year of the Linux camera? by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

      Once Linux is modularized enough so that it can load anything on-the-fly, and then even better, figure out how to hot swap itself to a new kernel without requiring a reboot even for that, THEN I will say that rebooting Linux is completely insane.

      But until then, it's just mostly insane. ^^

      --
      Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
    6. Re:Year of the Linux camera? by stiggle · · Score: 1

      My 9 year old car stereo has a waving pengiun at startup. Its an Empeg.

    7. Re:Year of the Linux camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rebooting the engines, please wait...

  6. Price by CannonballHead · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those interested but too lazy to click a link:

    The DSC-G3 costs about $500 in the U.S.

    1. Re:Price by xtracto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does it read SD cards? or are you still limited to the propietary overpriced sony stick pro duo?

      I refuse to buy any Sony for several reasons, and one of them is their use of closed propietary shit.

      Right now all my devices are "standardized" to use SD... heck, even Nintendo got it right!

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  7. Lame wifi by nwssa · · Score: 0

    Unlike competitor products from Nikon or Kodak that have their own Wi-Fi functions, the Sony camera works with AT&T hotspots so that external access point software isn't necessary.

    Useless outside of U.S. And in the U.S. limited (e.g. connecting to home wifi).

  8. Cool Link by olddotter · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the 90's a friend told me Linux would NEVER be used for embedded devices. Its fun to send him links like this. Fun in a very mischievous way.

    1. Re:Cool Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he said it would never be used on the DESKTOP, and of course he's still right.

    2. Re:Cool Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he said it [Linux] would never be used on the DESKTOP, and of course he's still right.

      My desktop computer disagrees.

      A few million other desktop computers might also have something to say on the matter.

    3. Re:Cool Link by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      I just asked mine and it said the same thing.

      It almost mentioned the Year of the Linux desktop was 2003.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    4. Re:Cool Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Panasonic Viera TV also has a GPL notice on the About menu, and a link for the sources (http://www.am-linux.jp/dl/DTV07U/). You can send your friend this one too.
      It's fun to point that out to friends who think they never used linux before.

    5. Re:Cool Link by internetcommie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in the future computers may weigh no more than 1.5 tons and 640K of memory is enough for anybody...

      For the last 9 years I've been doing embedded development; the last 7 years using a Linux desktop. Some of the devices produced by my company ran QNX until a couple years ago, but now it is all Linux. Email and those pesky "business applications" are still operating on Windows though. Rumour even has it the IT department is considering Vista.

      Despite a few glimples of sunlight we're still on the dark side...

    6. Re:Cool Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your friend was an idiot. In the 90s I worked for a company that was using Linux in embedded devices.

      He was wrong even as he made his prognostication. The fact that he remains wrong is unsurprising.

    7. Re:Cool Link by qoncept · · Score: 2, Funny

      He actually said Linux users would never have any luck IN BED, and would need to use devices to satisfy themselves.

      --
      Whale
    8. Re:Cool Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In the 90's a friend told me Linux would NEVER be used for embedded devices. Its fun to send him links like this. Fun in a very mischievous way.

      Dude, please stop sending links, OK I GET IT, NOW STOP!

    9. Re:Cool Link by pato101 · · Score: 1

      It almost mentioned the Year of the Linux desktop was 2003.

      Heh, I may be synchronized then.

    10. Re:Cool Link by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      In the 90's a friend told me Linux would NEVER be used for embedded devices. Its fun to send him links like this. Fun in a very mischievous way.

      You should post his email address...

    11. Re:Cool Link by Hooya · · Score: 1

      well, with this device, anyone using it to film porn is by definition a linux user getting lucky!

    12. Re:Cool Link by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? My camera is on top of my desk.

  9. Wi-Fi by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    I recently had some pictures taken at a local photographer's studio. All of the cameras in the studio had Wi-Fi. Once the pictures were taken, we were able to view them in another room immediately.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Wi-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im more interested in what the compression options are.

      Theres a SD card with built in wifi that will work on any camera, but by the time you upload some uncompressed 8 megapixel pictures your battery on the camera is dead.

    2. Re:Wi-Fi by nwssa · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes very convenient (especially for Professional shops where assistant can be doing photoshop or touchup work immediately and ship them off to the magazines/newspapers). Nikon innovated and got the patents for these a few years back.

    3. Re:Wi-Fi by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What does 'innovate' mean in this case?

    4. Re:Wi-Fi by Thalagyrt · · Score: 1

      Canon's pro line of DSLRs have had wireless transmitters available for a while as well, I believe predating Nikon's transmitters. I don't know Nikon's lineup all that well, so I may very well be wrong on that though.

      The wireless transmitter sits on the side of the 1D series, and the smaller body (5D, 40D, 50D, etc) transmitters take the place of the battery grip and don't provide extra battery power, same design as Nikon's wireless transmitters. Nikon has a better design on the battery grip though. :p

      I can't find any reference to Nikon having a patent on wireless transmission of photos from a camera, so if you could provide a document backing that up it'd be nice.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
    5. Re:Wi-Fi by MrMr · · Score: 1

      In business 'getting patents' is considered equivalent to 'being innovative'.

    6. Re:Wi-Fi by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Huh, a 10MP NEF is about 9MB which should take 4-5 seconds over 802.11g.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Wi-Fi by nwssa · · Score: 1

      innovated by realizing the useful potential for combining wireless with cameras first, then second finding the way to make it work. In hindsight this appears obvious, but then you need to ask yourself why didn't everybody start working on this 5-8 years ago. Certainly all the technology was in place. Just like the problems we face today exist because they aren't obvious but in 5-10 years when these are resolved the proper combination will be obvious (after we see it). Partly why demo's help sell a product - before seeing the demo the user doesn't understand how/why it would work but after seeing the demo functioning (even roughly with hardcoded pieces) it quickly becomes "obvious".

    8. Re:Wi-Fi by nwssa · · Score: 1
      here's one filed by Nikon in 2001 but not issued until March 4, 2008 that is a removable unit: 7,340,275

      Here's the only Independent claim:

      1. A wireless communication unit, comprising: an interface portion signally connectable to a main device, the interface portion including a connector portion having a shape that mimics a shape of a removable memory-medium-device, the connector portion being receivable by and connectable to a memory-medium-device-receiving-portion of the main device; a recording portion performing non-volatile recording; a wireless communication portion performing wireless communication; and a control portion transmitting information through the wireless communication portion to an external destination and generating a backup of the information in the recording portion, the information being inputted from the main device to the control portion through the interface portion, wherein the control portion automatically deletes the backup from the recording portion after transmission of the information in the wireless communication portion is normally terminated, when the control portion generates the backup of the information in the recording portion, wherein the wireless communication unit is a stand-alone unit.

      I believe Nikon came out with wifi camera's before Cannon.

    9. Re:Wi-Fi by nwssa · · Score: 1
      here's the earliest wireless camera I found: 6,535,243 filed in '98 by HP

      1. A method of managing image information utilizing a hand-held camera comprising the steps of: capturing raw image data representative of a subject of interest utilizing an imaging device of said hand-held camera; transmitting said raw image data to a host computer during a continuous session via a wireless link between said hand-held camera and said host computer; receiving, as an automated response by said host computer to said transmitting step, related image data at said hand-held camera during said continuous session via said wireless link; forming an image from said related image data on a display device of said hand-held camera, wherein enabling a display of said subject of interest on said display device is dependent upon operations at said host computer; and browsing stored image data that is stored in said host computer, where said browsing is controlled by operations at said hand-held camera.

      but as you can see, it's very limiting - round trip of camera sending image to computer and computer processing it before sending it back for display on the camera. So an obvious workaround would be to just do half it (camera -> PC) and patent infringement avoided. This patent might have seemed useful back in '98 when processing power on a small device (like a handheld camera) was not thought of the way to go. So HP seemed to miss this important fact and could/should have realized that processors would get smaller, faster, less-power hungry. I have found this subtle but important miscalculation happens all the time. Call it a design flaw in the patent.

    10. Re:Wi-Fi by Thalagyrt · · Score: 1

      Interesting, seems kind of random that HP would do that, they aren't very much at all known for cameras, and as far as I know never even put out a professional camera.

      I wonder if Canon has already gone into a licensing agreement with Nikon. I haven't heard anything about any lawsuits, and I don't think Canon would really want to lose business over this. I haven't been able to find an original release date for the Canon wireless unit, but at this point I'd be willing to bet money that you're right about Nikon beating Canon to the punch with it.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. Wi-Fi cameras by crow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember the story about Amtrak security forcing someone to delete the photos they had taken? With the preponderance of hot spots and more and more cameras supporting Wi-Fi, this would mean that the concept of deleting photos may soon be an anachronism (and none too soon).

    1. Re:Wi-Fi cameras by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Remember the story about Amtrak security forcing someone to delete the photos they had taken? With the preponderance of hot spots and more and more cameras supporting Wi-Fi, this would mean that the concept of deleting photos may soon be an anachronism (and none too soon).

      Is there any reason why you couldn't undelete them afterwards and render it an anachronism without Wi-Fi? Most of those data cards use FAT as I recall and file undelete operations are fairly trivial with that filesystem.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Wi-Fi cameras by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Remember the story about Amtrak security forcing someone to delete the photos they had taken? With the preponderance of hot spots and more and more cameras supporting Wi-Fi, this would mean that the concept of deleting photos may soon be an anachronism (and none too soon).

      That's a double edged sword.

      "Erm... I can't undelete it, it's already been put on the Internet and stored in three separate geographical locations over which you have no jurisdiction" may work with a security guard or it may wind up escalating the conflict.

    3. Re:Wi-Fi cameras by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It gets better. I ran across a service for my Blackberry called Qik that lets you stream video live from the phone, and saves the video to the site straight away.

      So, for example, if someone who had a phone with Qik was taping the BART shooting or something equally embarrassing to $powerful_group, even if security forced you to delete the video and took the phone, the video's already out there.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    4. Re:Wi-Fi cameras by PPH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not really. You just say "Yessir!" and delete the local copy.
      If they continue to pressure you, you just say, "Well, I hit the 'Delete' button. What more you you want?"

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Wi-Fi cameras by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Bound to be some pillock who won't do that, though. And I'm sure they'll be all over the news when that happens.

      (I'm also fairly sure that a lot of organisations will suddenly become a lot more jumpy about cameras)

    6. Re:Wi-Fi cameras by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      2 questions:

      If taking the picture is illegal, why is the AmTrak police officer forcing the person to destroy the evidence? (This should be coercion and quite illegal)

      If taking the picture isn't illegal, why is the police officer coercing the person to destroy their property?

      Don't let cops get away with shit they shouldn't be allowed to. (Relevant page by a lawyer with a very nice brochure)

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    7. Re:Wi-Fi cameras by sdpuppy · · Score: 1

      If they continue to pressure you, you just say, "Well, I hit the 'Delete' button. What more you you want?"

      OMG- why did I just think of the officer being the Terminator [Arnold] and then he does something rather gross to you while saying "deleted"

    8. Re:Wi-Fi cameras by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      Taking pictures in a train isn't illegal. Everyone just thinks in is. Same with any public place and people as well. You can snap away and you're perfectly within your rights to do so.

      --
      Your ad here.
    9. Re:Wi-Fi cameras by Tryfen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This happened to me.

      I was stopped & searched by the police on the London Transport System. I streamed it live to Qik via an N95 8GB.
      It was very interesting to see how quickly the video spread around.

      Qik - and other live streaming services - could be a very important part of our society. I dislike the idea of a panopticon - but I'd rather have one controlled by "us" rather than "them".

      --
      If a square is really a rhombus, why aren't all triangles purple?
    10. Re:Wi-Fi cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, its great because you can simply delete the files from your card and be done with the Nazis who are confronting you.

      dom

    11. Re:Wi-Fi cameras by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      It'd be fun to reply "Sorry, it's already on flikr" 10 seconds after you've taken the picture.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  12. The 'Smart' Camera Revolution by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The last decade heralded the smart cellphone revolution. Cellphones with more and more features including camera, bluetooth, wireless, PDA yada yada.

    I think what we are witnessing here is the beginning of the camera revolution. Smart cameras with wireless capabilities. Soon we shall see direct integration with social networks, ability to communicate over Skype etc. Innovation from the other end of the spectrum.

    --
    Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
    1. Re:The 'Smart' Camera Revolution by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be smarter to just merge phones with cameras completely? We have mobiles with cameras in them and cameras the size of mobiles that are now being equipped with wireless networking capabilities.

      Seems a small step to me.

    2. Re:The 'Smart' Camera Revolution by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      What we're talking about here is a $500 camera, which is a bit different from the cheap cameras they bundle with phones.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:The 'Smart' Camera Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What we're talking about here is a $500 camera..."

      That is cheap camera too.

    4. Re:The 'Smart' Camera Revolution by sdpuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      [imagine low end DSLR] Problem would be getting the nose-prints off the lens when you answer the camera.

    5. Re:The 'Smart' Camera Revolution by Fluffy+Bunnies · · Score: 1

      For a point & shoot, no it's not.

    6. Re:The 'Smart' Camera Revolution by he-sk · · Score: 1

      If you want a crappy camera phone, sure.

      Camera phones are a great invention, but the quality of the camera component is really at the low end. These includes better models like the Sony Cybershot series.

      You can make beautiful pictures with a phone if you keep its limitations in mind. Personally, my goal is always to make the picture look good on the phone display and not to care about viewing it on the big screen where artifacts and camera shake are more obvious.

      But bearing a breakthrough in miniaturization, camera phones will never offer the options that a real camera offers (including the better digital point and shoots), simply due to size constraints in the optics department.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    7. Re:The 'Smart' Camera Revolution by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      Not everyone points and shoots, though. A tilt-shift lens by itself costs more than two of these cameras.

      --
      Your ad here.
    8. Re:The 'Smart' Camera Revolution by Fluffy+Bunnies · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and 1Ds mark III is, what, ten of these and don't even get me started on medium format digitals. Nevertheless, at $500 this is among the most expensive point & shoot cameras there are (and ridiculously bad value for money, I might add). Apples and oranges, etc.

    9. Re:The 'Smart' Camera Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we're talking about here is a $500 camera, which is a bit different from the cheap cameras they bundle with phones.

      Though this 8.1 Megapixel Sony Ericsson Cybershot camera phone is a step in that direction. Though it probably needs a better lens and a better CCD to rival even $200 cameras.

  13. Will it support Linux client access? by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have been watching this happen over and over and over again. Companies developing their products to use Linux but turn around and not support Linux client access. I had stupidly picked up a wireless networked video camera that was known to run Linux on the inside and made a very stupid assumption that Linux client access would therefore be a no-brainer. WRONG! It was Windows only for client access... not even Mac could access it. That was the beginning of the eye-openers for me. It is sad and annoying... they take from the community and then don't give back.

    Personally, I just don't buy anything that has the Sony label on it any longer. Not Sony-BMG music, not Sony movies, not Sony games, not Sony cameras, not Sony TVs, not Sony anything else. Sony has burned this customer too many times for me to have any faith in them and so far, I see little changes in their behavior. Their computers are complete crap too, by the way. Sony once had astounding popularity as a name brand, but they have burned more bridges than my own to be sure. I know at least 50% of Japan is anti-Sony. It is amazing that they are still humming along as well as they are.

    1. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I know at least 50% of Japan is anti-Sony." Score 2

    2. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not true. Sony make great broadcast products and a couple of decent "prosumer" things. It's only their consumer stuff that is total shit.

    3. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony computers may be crap, but they're one of the only ones that are wall mountable. Not a big deal for a consumer, but for some businesses this is important now that MPC went under.

    4. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have been watching this happen over and over and over again. Companies developing their products to use Linux but turn around and not support Linux client access. I had stupidly picked up a wireless networked video camera that was known to run Linux on the inside and made a very stupid assumption that Linux client access would therefore be a no-brainer. WRONG! It was Windows only for client access... not even Mac could access it.

      Similar experience here. My computer uses capacitors made by Johanson Dielectrics, so I carefully picked a GPS that also uses capacitors from Johanson Dielectrics, figuring that meant they would work together, but the damned thing would not work with my computer.

    5. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Their new professional DSLR looks like a very solid product.

      Their compact cameras are overpriced and underperform compared to the competition.

    6. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by chappel · · Score: 1

      I have been watching this happen over and over and over again. Companies developing their products to use Linux but turn around and not support Linux client access. I had stupidly picked up a wireless networked video camera that was known to run Linux on the inside and made a very stupid assumption that Linux client access would therefore be a no-brainer. WRONG! It was Windows only for client access... not even Mac could access it.

      Similar experience here. My computer uses capacitors made by Johanson Dielectrics, so I carefully picked a GPS that also uses capacitors from Johanson Dielectrics, figuring that meant they would work together, but the damned thing would not work with my computer.

      I think it's more like you bought a computer that was made with capacitors donated in hopes of helping spread a better capacitor technology that's more freely available to the world, only to find out that the company arbitrarily made the computer such that it cannot be used with any other device made with those capacitors, therefore providing a strong dis-incentive for anyone to use a another product with those capacitors in them.

      Regardless, I WILL NOT purchase a sony product, in spite of once being very fond of them. I HATE their attempts to make things proprietary, their love for DRM, and their underhanded BS (Rootkits, etc). They can take their HDCP Blu-Ray High-Def crap and stuff it where /. won't let me say.

    7. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      It's not even that their broadcast products are "great" (and they are) it's that they're the 800 pound gorilla in that market and I'll wager it pays them very well, especially since they've been known for such things as selling a camera and having the power adapter *and* batteries as "optional extras", which makes sense if you only want the body (lens optional too in high end broadcast gear), but you can't half make a fortune on accessories.

    8. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by cusco · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Their security cameras are technically fairly decent, but physically crap. We've sent some of them back as many as four times for repair, and out of every dozen cameras at least one will come out of the box dead. Their quality control might be adequate for the consumer market, but for professionals who may have to be on top of a 40 foot lift to install a camera getting one with a bad NIC or power adapter or corrupt OS or PTZ motor (we saw all of those on one single job) they're not good enough. Additionally, they only can be viewed with IE.

      They're twice the price of an Axis camera, which doesn't have the quality control issues, who will do an advance replacement if there's a problem, who has intelligent tech support immediately available, whose cameras work with any browser on any OS. We only install Sony equipment under duress.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    9. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Yes, and a modified version of the Sony sensor is being used in the high-end professional Nikon D3x.

    10. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by Molochi · · Score: 1

      The HP Touchsmart has a VESA wallmount adapter.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    11. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      They can take their HDCP Blu-Ray High-Def crap and stuff it where /. won't let me say.

      Are we reading the same slashdot? If there's place /. won't let you even ==SAY== then I don't want to even try to imagine it. The goatse guy is traumatic enough, and they let you link to him in all his full color glory.

    12. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      It should. The camera supports OSX, but lacks any kind of OSX driver or software, which suggests that its using a standard unix tool for file transfer (this may require a lot of work). I wonder how customizable it is though. If I could set it up to say, upload selected pictures straight to a blog the moment I hit an open hotspot, that would be pretty cool. Depends on if it will support customization I suppose, if it lets me write my own bash scripts I really really want it.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    13. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      I remember back in 1985, we had professional grade Sony BVU 800 3/4 inch VTRs. Completely mil-spec, these were better than the ones the local TV station had. Ten years later, I got a flat screen CRT from best buy that was totally sweet.

      That was the last time I got anything good from Sony. A few years later, I bought another one of their monitors for my wife, which promptly fried. At work, we also bought Sony monitors which also all fried (or "crackled" in my case). Then of course, there is the root-kit disaster.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    14. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Wait, you know what cam this dood is talking about? Do tell!

    15. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by atrus · · Score: 1

      Their consumer quality has nose dived in the last ten years. Cheaper and faster is the name of the game. I do have some Sony equipment from their "good engineering, built like a tank" era. It sill works great. And it doesn't even restrict its self to mini disc and Beta :).

    16. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly haven't touched a VAIO notebook in a while. They are great machines. Also, Sony is respecting the GPL, so what are you bitching about? Maybe it's time you pull that cactus out of your ass. It will hurt, but leaving it there will just make you (and us) suffer more...

    17. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony is the MS of Japan and they have been trying to be monopoly for decades. Everything they produce like Mini Disk to memory stick and they tried really hard to make things incompatible with anyone else. The moment you buy Sony you are being limited by choice. Especially if you try to use a Sony device overseas.

    18. Re:Will it support Linux client access? by mowall · · Score: 1

      Additionally, they only can be viewed with IE.

      I'm pretty sure that's not true. There's an ActiveX mode and a Java mode. If you use the Java mode and have the appropriate plugin for Firefox or other browser, it should work fine.

      Also, if you just want video, you can use something like VLC to view the MJPEG stream. Something like http://ipaddress/image?speed=25 will do the trick.

      They're twice the price of an Axis camera, which doesn't have the quality control issues

      Yes, Axis cameras are excellent in many respects - and also Linux based. You can even go in and edit the control scripts.

  14. Will things like these help Sony? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    I hope developments like these can help SONY. In my opinion, SAMSUNG has of late, been chipping away at SONY's lunch [and market share] for a while now with interesting products on the home entertainment front.

    BusinessWeek even ran a story for SONY at SAMSUNG.

    Where did SONY go wrong?

    1. Re:Will things like these help Sony? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Sony got arrogant and assumed what ever they'd make, people would eat up. They felt they didn't have to listen to consumers or live in reality. And I say that as someone with a plethora of Sony products in my house, and a Sony VISA in my wallet. Sony is still a very good company, but they lost sight of what once made them a great company.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:Will things like these help Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Where did SONY go wrong?

      Right about where they started to CAPITALIZE all the company names.

    3. Re:Will things like these help Sony? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I hope developments like these can help SONY

      Why in God's name would you hope that?

      Where did SONY go wrong?

      For me it was when they rooted my computer.

    4. Re:Will things like these help Sony? by value_added · · Score: 1

      Sony got arrogant and assumed what ever they'd make, people would eat up.

      It's just as true that Samsung got better.

      Years ago, I worked at a Korean company (I was the token Caucasian). Samsung for me was just some Korean manufacturer of cheap knock-offs of high quality (a redundant characterisation at the time) Japanese consumer electronics. The company I worked for was making cheap knock-offs of American products so you could say I had a unique perspective on the subject. What was surprising (or not) was that my co-workers preferred Japanese brands, and Sony in particular.

      Either way, it was an interesting place to work for a number of reasons. Every Friday the entire company would sit down together for a communal 2-hour lunch. Plenty of fish heads and kimchi, of course, but everything else was first-rate. Hard to imagine that being done in an American corporation.

    5. Re:Will things like these help Sony? by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      And when everyone started using ball logos. Everyone is just so obsessed with balls these days. Uh, balls as in ball logos. That.

      --
      Your ad here.
    6. Re:Will things like these help Sony? by jon_cooper · · Score: 1

      Nice article from 2005 there mate. Stopped reading when I got to the bit predicting HD-DVD winning over Blu-Ray.

    7. Re:Will things like these help Sony? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      He forgot to capitalise BUSINESSWEEK though!

  15. Re:But can it run Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. It runs AWAY from Vista...

  16. imagine a ... by Beached · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    imagine a beowulf cluster of these things..
    oh sorry, should I be saying first post?

    So confusing

    --
    ---- aut viam inveniam aut faciam
    1. Re:imagine a ... by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      no, you should be saying soviet russia.
      or overlords.

      stuff like that.

  17. It doesn't meet minimum hardware requirements by davidwr · · Score: 5, Funny

    It only has 4GB of internal memory.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:It doesn't meet minimum hardware requirements by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Windows 98SE it is, then.

  18. Attention! Remove HARDHACK tag! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whoever tagged this hardhack...
     
    Why? A hardhack involves a hardware modification. This is not the case.
     
    Typical uninformed slashdot person.

  19. Nope, but still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

  20. I was going to buy a Canon by davidwr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are several Canon cameras that allow 3rd-party open-source firmware.

    If this can be flashed then it's worth a look-see.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:I was going to buy a Canon by kmike · · Score: 1

      You probably mean CHDK for Canon Powershot series cameras, which isn't firmware per se - it's a firmware addon, and you don't flash it into the camera, but load it separately from the inserted flash card. From here: http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK

      CHDK does not replace the original firmware, and does not make any permanent changes to the camera. Instead, it is loaded from the SD card, either at startup or using the built in menu.

      You are correct that it's open source indeed.

      I'm using it on Powershot A650 and its feature set is amazing. The killer feature is probably recording RAW files, but there are many many more cool things to explore.

      Just imagine the things possible to achieve with such camera if the firmware and specifications were open.

  21. GPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not GPS for geotagging? I'd much rater have this than Wi-Fi at a presumably similar cost to manufacturer.

    1. Re:GPS? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      GPS is actually really trick for cameras. Ars Technica has an interesting piece on the subject.

      Punchline is, GPS doesn't work well in devices that need to be turned on and off a lot, and most of the hacks used to make it work better are more suitable for cellphones than for cameras.

    2. Re:GPS? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Seems like the better thing to do is to sell a GPS device with a SD slot.

      You plug in your SD card, it looks at the time all the photos were taken, remembers where you were then, and appends the coordinates.

    3. Re:GPS? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Seems like the better thing to do is to have your image library software pull the track log from your GPS and tag the images for you. Why on earth would I ever want an SD slot in my GPS? Unless it was a navigation system like a Garmin Nuvi of course. But I want my GPS to be simple and above all as small as possible for the functionality (and price, heh heh.) I have a Garmin GPS12 that I have had for over ten years which is capable of performing recording the track log; I also have a (crappy) gopass bluetooth GPS with a lithium battery which I can use with my PDA. I'd use the GPS12 for this though; no fancy features, but very reliable and simple. Runs for a hell of a long time on 2500mAh NiMH AAs. I would like my cellphone to have GPS, but the battery life would be prohibitive for these purposes anyway. GPS just doesn't work like a camera no matter how much you might like it to.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. Re:But can it run Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    yes but the drivers for connecting the camera to itself probably wouldn't work

  23. I might be able to...... by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 1

    It might be able to use jffs2 or something similar, that way you have wear leveling for your SD media. I am not a Dev, but that would be a interesting feature. As far as I know exfat, fat 16 and fat32 have no wear leveling capabilities. Since its a fairly expensive purchase I'd assume you wouldn't want your files going poof one day because of SD card dying too quickly from too many rewrites. Just a idea, the other idea would be depending on just how much leeway your allowed, batteries, space constraints not being a issue, and if your have a constant wifi signal, you could have a script constantly upload your new files to a server. Maybe like a really tiny ftp server to upload the files. A great example would be if your out on a job with a wifi signal, have a server at home listen for a specific port and when the camera logs in automaticly check for new files.

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    1. Re:I might be able to...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SD cards have a controller chip on the card which handles wear-leveling and bad block management

    2. Re:I might be able to...... by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 1

      True, but what would you prefer, hardware leveling plus a file system that wasn't made to do media like this or hardware leveling plus software leveling with specific intent to help extend the medias lifespan?

      --
      Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    3. Re:I might be able to...... by pipatron · · Score: 1

      I rather have just the hardware leveling than both, since there's no way of knowing how that works, so you might as well end up moving the pieces back to the original place if you use an additional scheme on top, with an unknown underlying scheme.

      If you can get the complete wear leveling algorithm for your specific card, then it's a different thing.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  24. Sony and Linux by Rob+Y. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interesting that there was an article here just the other day about how Sony has no interest in making or selling Linux laptops or netbooks.

    I wonder why not. It's easy to forget that they use Linux in other products and even offer it on the PS3. So why not netbooks? Is it a matter of just avoiding the low-end, low margin segments of the market? It couldn't be any love for Microsoft, could it?

    --
    Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    1. Re:Sony and Linux by prozaker · · Score: 1

      it's because microsoft doesn't want linux on laptops that could have vista.

    2. Re:Sony and Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People expect laptops to behave a particular way. They expect them to act like a windows computer.

      No on really picks up a camara or console with a predisposition a particular UI. They don't expect to have IE or a Start Button or whatever. They don't expect it to be able to run software not controlled by sony.

      Consumers expect computers to run windows. Consumers don't think of consoles and cameras as computers. It's not really all that hard to see why sony makes the same distinctions that their customers do, even if they are kinda dumb and don't serve anyone's interest other than Microsoft.

    3. Re:Sony and Linux by indi0144 · · Score: 2, Funny

      7.. 7 is the new vista, it's working now on beta but on release that will be fixed.

    4. Re:Sony and Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They expect them to act like a windows computer.

      I don't put too much weight behind that theory unless by "Windows" you mean "easy." And by "easy" I don't mean familiar.

      I could go on to enumerate all that makes Linux on the desktop less than easy but I don't think its all that productive amongst groupies that can't ever see anything wrong with their favorite rock star.

    5. Re:Sony and Linux by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      A bit foolish really... Microsoft are a competitor to Sony... Windows will always be designed to operate with the xbox, not the ps3... And profit from sales of windows goes to fund the unprofitable gaming division.. Without such a massive up front investment, the xbox would never have been able to compete effectively against the playstation models.

      Really sony should be promoting linux on their computers, and promoting it's ability to interoperate with the ps3. Having a computer, a games console, a camera, a dvd player, a tv etc, all produced by sony, all running the same software and all seamlessly integrating would be a good selling point.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  25. My Sony Z series TV runs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even came with the full GPL license along with the manuals.

  26. snore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, linux on a crappy P&S digital camera!!

    The low numbered slashdot kooks just blew their loads!

    1. Re:snore by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      I'd have a retort, but I'm too busy putting Linux on my Roomba and hardhacking it to handle liquids.

      --
      Your ad here.
  27. Tech turn-on by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    ... Beowulf cluster of Sony point&shoot cameras! ... Beowulf cluster compiling Gentoo!!! I need to go to the bathroom...

    Tech turns me on too. But not like this!

  28. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    As an experienced engineer, I am going to have to agree (hint).

  29. Re:But can it run Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    2009! Year of Vista on Desktop!

  30. Re:Dad doesn't like it. Will never win the desktop by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Luckily, he understands cmd.exe and the SAM hash database perfectly, so he is all set...

  31. Any good? by Jamie's+Nightmare · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It runs on Linux? So what else? This doesn't mean it will be a good camera. If my previous experiences with Linux are any indication, it sounds to me like it will be slow as molasses, taking eight full seconds from "power on" to "ready to snap". Arstechnica has a better article with far less fanboy hype.

    --
    "When you see a unixer brainwashed beyond saving, kick him out of the door." - Xah Lee
    1. Re:Any good? by pato101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      My DSC-W90 seems to be running Linux as well(http://www.sony.net/Products/Linux/Download/DSC-W90.html). And from "power on" to "ready to snap" takes about a second.

    2. Re:Any good? by johannesg · · Score: 1

      It runs on Linux? So what else? This doesn't mean it will be a good camera. If my previous experiences with Linux are any indication, it sounds to me like it will be slow as molasses, taking eight full seconds from "power on" to "ready to snap".

      I suppose you will be modded "-1, we don't like your kind 'round here", but you are absolutely right, and it was also the first thing I thought: "how long will it take to boot?" It is already a problem on my current camera (Kodak), making it any longer is simply unacceptable.

    3. Re:Any good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Embedded Linux can boot instantaneous. Your desktop is slow because of all the hardware detection and drive checking that occurs.

      In a controlled environment (a given in embedded code) this is not necessary. Boot times would be measured in tenths of a second.

  32. OS for digital cameras by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    Just wait till a certain company hears about this! They'll come out with something that runs inside digital cameras.

    Oh, wait, the product already exists.

  33. I have no idea how this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The specs on the camera from the Sony website say that this camera only captures JPEG. Does anyone think that it would it be possible to change the source code so that it supported RAW capture?

    1. Re:I have no idea how this works by Fluffy+Bunnies · · Score: 1

      Even if it were possible, it would almost certainly take the camera several seconds to process the image.

    2. Re:I have no idea how this works by Tweenk · · Score: 1

      Raw images are the digitized output from the sensor with no processing applied. Processing speed is not the problem because there just isn't any. The bottleneck is the flash write speed. You'd have to wait a few seconds between photos while the camera writes the large raw picture. Better cameras just have some RAM to let you take more photos while they're writing to the card.

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
    3. Re:I have no idea how this works by Fluffy+Bunnies · · Score: 1

      I meant "process" in the more general, non-specialized sense. Considering this camera hasn't been designed to write those large raw files, there's every reason to expect it'll be very, very slow at it. A Canon G7 hacked to shoot raw takes approximately 4-5 seconds. Ricoh GRD (which was actually designed to shoot raw) could take over 10 seconds.

    4. Re:I have no idea how this works by Entropius · · Score: 1

      That's bizarre.

      I have an old Panasonic camera that spits out ginormous 20MB RAW files (12 bits per pixel, padded with zeroes to 16 bits, times 10 million pixels), and it writes one in about 2.5-3 seconds.

    5. Re:I have no idea how this works by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever thought of using lossless JPEG2000 or 16bpc PNGs for this? You might be shifting the bottleneck to the CPU, but still...

  34. Re:But can it run Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing can run Vista properly, not even PCs :)

  35. More to the point, by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can it run crysis?

    --
    Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
    1. Re:More to the point, by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      Brings a whole new meaning to point-and-shoot.

  36. Hacking for fun by phorm · · Score: 1

    I wonder what image manipulation software (if any) exists on the camera. If it was easily hackable, I could have a lot of fun doing things like a "randomly add elvis/JFK/ghosts in the background" easter-eggs :-)

  37. Re:But can it run Vista? by shoegoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    or more importantly, can it run Crysis?

  38. Sony's Caring Customers by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sony has no interest in making or selling Linux laptops or netbooks. I wonder why not.

    Both cameras and laptops require an operating system. For cameras, nobody cares what it is, as long as the thing takes pictures. As such, Sony has a free hand as to which OS to install. Laptops, are different. Customers care which OS is on their laptop. Customers (like it or not) want Windows on their laptops. If Sony doesn't provide Windows on their laptops, the customers will find another laptop vendor who will.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  39. Re:Dad doesn't like it. Will never win the desktop by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

    But not drag and drop. Forsooth, what is the magic box?

    --
    Your ad here.
  40. Just what I needed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is awesome. I can see it now, I buy a flash for the camera but it won't work. No problem, just post about it online, and ask someone to write a driver for it. Weeks later, someone named Hjonybjorg Drururbjong will have written one with a help file in fractured English.

    Oh, and what a great interface! Instead of point and shoot, you point and type "take -photo -focus=3.4 -fstop=2.2 -iso=800 | c:\usr\bob\Documents\photos\img000.jpg" and there you go!

    Linux is so AWESOME!!!!!!

    1. Re:Just what I needed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MCSEs should not attempt *nix comedy.

      Try dd if=/dev/ccd of=/mnt/sda/foo.raw

      If you are a wimp, you can use mkpict:

      mkpict -s /dev/ccd --flash 1 -f 3.4 -fs 2.2 --iso 800 /mnt/sda/foo.raw

    2. Re:Just what I needed! by FunkyRider · · Score: 0

      Typing path as c:\xxxxx shows your pathetic knowledge about computers. Not ever computer on this planet has a C drive so virus malware trojans can be easily installed into c:\windows

      --
      just wonder why there are so many anonymous cowards in this world....
  41. Mplayer on GPS devices :) by Rhabarber · · Score: 1

    Check these:

    NV-U2
    NV-U3 / NV-U3V
    NV-U94T / NV-U84 / NV-U74T

    http://assets.gearlive.com/blogimages/nuvos.JPG

  42. Imagine... by mustafap · · Score: 5, Funny

    a Beowulf cluster of these. Actually I don't need to; I live in surveillance UK :o)

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  43. aye, i agree by someone1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would be newsworthy only if a camera runs Vista!

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    1. Re:aye, i agree by chemisus · · Score: 5, Funny

      It appears you want to take a picture, allow or deny?

    2. Re:aye, i agree by Abstrackt · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be newsworthy only if a camera runs Vista!

      It would also be the size of a refrigerator.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:aye, i agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only because of the batteries it needs. A mains powered camer4a would be much lighter

  44. Pfffbt! by antdude · · Score: 1

    I can run Vista on 512 MB of RAM, but not nicely.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Pfffbt! by Siridar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can run Vista on 512 MB of RAM, but not nicely.

      That's not running Vista, friend.

      That's walking.

    2. Re:Pfffbt! by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I assume here "4GB of internal memory" refers to secondary storage, not RAM. The Vista install media alone would exceed that.

    3. Re:Pfffbt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but where are you storing it?

    4. Re:Pfffbt! by DanJ_UK · · Score: 1

      I can run Vista on 512 MB of RAM, but not nicely.

      That's not running Vista, friend.

      That's walking.

      No, that's barely crawling.

      --
      - Dan
  45. Does this have anything to do with... by Samah · · Score: 1

    Does this have anything to do with Sony's recent announcement of a $1.1 billion loss?

    --
    Homonyms are fun!
    You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
  46. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  47. the real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it blend?

  48. It is Tivoized? by computersareevil · · Score: 1

    Will owners be able to modify firmware/software to suit their own purposes as the developers of the included GPL software intended? Or is it Tivoized? TFA doesn't say.

    1. Re:It is Tivoized? by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      Judging by their use in Bravias,users won't be able to modify it.

  49. Kernel version by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 0

    I wonder why a kernel from over three years ago (and not seven?) Just curious about their decision making process for their choice.

    -------
    "Besides, I think ________________ sounds better than 'Microsoft, don't you?"

  50. One step closer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is one step closer to a concept product I have: the instant-submit camera.

    We've all heard stories of overzealous law enforcement officers, and security guards confiscating cameras because they think public photography is illegal because of 9/11, the USA PATRIOT act, or because they said so. Or maybe they just don't want the next Rodney King video on YouTube.

    My idea has been a camera with integral wi-fi that, upon a picture being taken, would instantly submit the picture over wi-fi to a sftp location on the Internet. If no public wi-fi is available, a nearby accomplice could be carrying a portable wi-fi/NAS device (laptop) that ad-hocs to the camera and serves as its storage device. Video would, of course, stream.

    Yes, I know camera phones could theoretically do it too, but some of us don't want all of our pictures to look like they were taken with a Connectix QuickCam. And [at least here in the USA] with cell phone carriers telling YOU what phones you get to use, don't expect to see it. Heck, I'm surprised American cell phone carriers offering phones with color displays.

    Yes, I also know that LEOs and security guards need to improve their behavior and not confiscate cameras or demand that photos be deleted, but that's not about to change. Plus, they're the ones with guns, tasers, batons, and no way to complain about them. And if they grab your camera from you when you're making the next Rodney King video, they win. Unless the camera wi-fi'd the evidence out of the pig's reach.

  51. Cameras that run Windows by tepples · · Score: 1

    It would be newsworthy only if a camera runs Vista!

    Does the version of Windows Mobile released along with Windows Vista count? I know of plenty of cameras that run Windows Mobile; most also have a GSM chip to act as mobile phones.

  52. But can it Tyme Crysis? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Can it run crysis?

    No, but it can probably time it.

  53. Another perfect platform for Tux Paint by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 1

    Snap a photo. Add some sparkles. 'nuff said. ;)

  54. Is it time? by feepness · · Score: 1

    To stop hating Sony yet?

  55. Re:But can it run Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh come on, not even the Eagle Eye project can run Vista

  56. Sony must still learn there lesson. by krischik · · Score: 1

    No, he is right. Just join any Symbian OS / UIQ 3 related forum and you will see that the Sony BMG incident is not unrelated. Sony Ericsson too treated the customer like shit.

    And the best part came when the discontinued there UIQ product because there where no demand for the kind of mobile phones.

    Read here: http://my-symbian.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38625

    Four forum pages of praise for the products and discontent for Sony Ericsson's customer service.

    As said in the heading: Sony must still learn there lesson.

    1. Re:Sony must still learn there lesson. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that related to rootkit? Fucking damn arse...

  57. No. by krischik · · Score: 1

    Read here: http://my-symbian.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38625

    Four forum pages of praise for the products and discontent for Sony Ericsson's customer service. Ahh, Sony Ericsson as the mayor shareholder let UIQ go bankrupt instead of rolling up the company properly. What is that for an attitude?

    So no, I only started to hate Sony.

  58. Re:Sony's Caring Customers by bopo_the_mofo · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking the same thing. A camera.... you push the button, it takes a picture. Operating system? Seriously, who cares? I mean... WHO CARES?
    Right... I'm off to see if there's any way I can install a mail server on my washing machine, or my toaster.

  59. All sony products run Linux by mrbill1234 · · Score: 1

    Actually - all SONY products with an embedded OS run Linux. Even the TV's, and most of the cameras. How do I know? Because I know! :-)

  60. finally! by A12m0v · · Score: 1

    Year of Linux on the Camera

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.