Slashdot Mirror


Miro 2.0 Launches Today

soDean writes "Miro just launched their 2.0 release today. The free and open source HD video player and Internet TV features an all-new interface and an entirely rewritten UI engine, plus tons of new features and improvements — it's less of a collection of new stuff and more of a rethinking of the whole experience. You can download Miro 2.0 here for Linux, Mac, and Windows. Miro is developed by the Participatory Culture Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit, hell-bent on making Internet video more open and decentralized, along with a dedicated community of users, volunteers, translators, testers, and coders."

97 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Nice, BUT by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You also need to focus on the PUBLISH side. In particular, I would push a publisher for Musicians. Make it compete against MTV, etc.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Nice, BUT by moteyalpha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just installed this a few hours ago and it is a nice interface. The variety of what is free to download is amazing and they did a good job on making the interface intuitive. It will be a nice place for me to publish blender animation products and video tutorials of all kinds. Blender has a great tutorial on making tutorials and videos.

    2. Re:Nice, BUT by buswolley · · Score: 4, Funny
      I have one of thos einternet connections many just dream about..University BBone...ANyway, I got Miro and started to download content like a madman. 10-20 concurrent downloads all running at 1-10 megabit... It was great...

      Then the university admins cut me down to 56k modem speed for 2 weeks to teach me a lesson.

      Be careful with Miro. :P

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    3. Re:Nice, BUT by drDugan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There does need to be a push for publishers to adopt these technologies. Most traditional media outlets do not see how well this can work, and refuse to admit the technology is already robust and available, and better for the consumer than broadcast TV.

      New publishing services do exist: LegalTorrents.com (one of the default sidebar items in Miro) and focuses entirely on the publishing side. (Disclaimer: I work on LegalTorrents) - and there are many others too that work well with Miro.

      LegalTorrents is an online digital media community to discover and distribute high quality open-licensed digital media. Each Content Creator on the site has an RSS feed that integrates automatically with Miro. (Sidebar -> Add Feed) The real benefit here is that Miro will download and share new content in the background automatically from each feed, and you can watch/listen whenever you want.

    4. Re:Nice, BUT by protobion · · Score: 1

      Miro seems to be basically a RSS-client+Torrent Client+Broswer and a rudimentary player bundled into one. But wait, I use Google Reader, my browser plays videos, can download. I need a separate torrent client for non-video/music files anyway. And Video Search ? Google started searching video a long time ago. So why should Miro be an extra app running and not just a website that publishes video?

      First, I don't want to download everything I see. And that which I want , can be done with an easy Download link.

      I can see why an iTunes for Music is useful, but an iTunes for Video is just untenable with the sizes of video files (for download and storage).

      As I have felt before about version 1.0 , Miro 2.0 seems entirely pointless: Nothing new - what you've been doing all along anyway, just in a new interface with more RAM sacrificed.

      Maybe I am just not their target audience.

      --
      Essentia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    5. Re:Nice, BUT by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      I think what they're refusing to accept is that TV is now a commodity to be swapped freely online, rather than DRM'd, just like pages of text.

    6. Re:Nice, BUT by Xabraxas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point of Miro is to make it extremely simple to watch syndicated video. It's the combination of RSS, torrents, and video playback that make it useful and unique, not the technologies themselves. Before Miro I would search for torrents, download them, fire up my bitorrent client, download the video I wanted to watch and then when it was done I would start up my media player to watch the video. Now with Miro I just add a torrent feed for a specific show to Miro and set my automatic download and retention options and I never have to search for that show again, or download it manually, or jump from web page to web page, and the video interface is consistent across shows. I find it extremely useful and huge improvement over how I was doing things previosly. I've played with the newest version and it looks liked they ironed out all the issues that were bugging me from previous releases. The only problem I have now is my dark GTK theme which doesn't play nice with Miro now that Miro's interface has been altered with latest version.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    7. Re:Nice, BUT by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

      I wish that Thedailyshow and Colbertreport would work with Miro/torrent.. not everyone can stream those shows even at the lowest setting, and they are pretty ruthless about the limitation.. If miro would support TDS and CR, and be more forgiving, I'd use it.

  2. Build instructions by ChienAndalu · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since many distributions don't have it in their repositories yet, you might want to grab the source and build it yourself.

    1. Re:Build instructions by markdavis · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it is not for "OSX, Windows, and Ubuntu".

      It is for "MacOS, MS-Windows, and Linux". There, fixed that for you.

      Anyway, Miro is already in the repositories for Mandriva, SuSe, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, and Pardus... which probably covers about 95-98% of Linux users.

    2. Re:Build instructions by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      If you're going to correct someone, you should really get it right yourself. There was never any 'MacOS', and 'Mac OS' is so old now that I doubt more than a handful of companies make applications for it. 'Mac OS X' is the correct terminology. I'm also somewhat sceptical about that hyphen in 'MS-Windows'. Amending Ubuntu to Linux seems like accurate, useful information though.

    3. Re:Build instructions by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      MacOS is (and always has been) the name of the operating system Apple uses

      No. It's Mac OS - note the space, check the trademark, read the Wikipedia article, look at the image.

      MacOS is (and always has been) the name of the operating system Apple uses, it is the Macintosh Operating System. The current version is 10, which came after version 9, which came after version 8. In a marketing spiff, they often write the "10" as a roman numeral "X", but if you look in the code and such, it is 10. The subversions follow the "10", such as "10.1", "10.2", etc. It is also pronounced "Mac Oh Ess Ten" not "Mac Oh Ess Ekess".

      "OS X" is more of a brand than a version number now, with Mac versions and non-Mac versions. Among the Mac versions, it is more correct to say "Mac OS X version 10.4.11" than "Mac OS X version 4.11 or "Mac OS 10.4.11", making it quite a distinctly different naming system to the classic days i.e. the "X" belongs more properly with the OS brand than with the version.

      If you were to correct "OSX" to "MacOS' you would be implying that the software runs on classic Mac OS i.e. versions through to 9. If software runs only on one of the versions of Mac OS X then it is misleading to state "MacOS" (which means nothing) or "Mac OS" which is typically used to mean versions 1-9 specifically.

      Don't be sceptical about the "MS" in "MS-Windows". "Windows" are things that let light in, in a building or car. Or they are generic representations of program input/output areas on any computer screen.

      I wasn't 'sceptical about the MS,' I was 'somewhat sceptical about that hyphen.'

      "MS-Windows" or "Microsoft Windows" is the name of their OS (and always has been).

      I'm not familiar with any occasion on which Microsoft have referred to it as "MS-Windows." I can only find "MS Windows." You're probably getting confused with MS-DOS which does have a hyphen.

      "Ubuntu" is just one Linux distro. The software runs on Linux, not just Ubuntu.

      What part of me saying 'Amending Ubuntu to Linux seems like accurate, useful information though.' made you think I didn't agree with or understand that?

    4. Re:Build instructions by flitty · · Score: 1

      The only thing more mind-numblingly dull than excessive pedantry is being pedantic about the nomenclature of a corporation's operating systems trademark. JEEEEEsus.

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    5. Re:Build instructions by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >No. It's Mac OS - note the space,

      I have seen it written both ways for years. I don't think it matters all that much, but when there is no space, it is always cased the "MacOS" way, not "MACOS".

      >"OS X" is more of a brand than a version number now"

      Exactly - it is just lay-term, marketing stuff. Hip, kewl, non-technical common reference.

      >it is more correct to say "Mac OS X version 10.4.11" than "Mac OS 10.4.11",

      Well, we just agree to disagree. Saying "Mac OS Ten Version Ten point Four" is just redundant and silly to me.

      >you would be implying that the software runs on classic Mac OS

      Not really. If you just said "MS Windows", that doesn't imply it runs on 3.11 or 95 does it? If you just said "Linux", that doesn't mean it will necessarily run on Linux kernel 0.1 does it? It is just non-specific, and interpretation depends on the context. If you want to be specific, you add the version/rev to it: "Mac OS 10.3 and above", "MS Windows 95 and XP", "Linux 2.5-2.6/GCC 4.2", etc.

      >I'm not familiar with any occasion on which Microsoft have referred to it as "MS-Windows."
      >I can only find "MS Windows." You're probably getting confused with MS-DOS which does have a hyphen.

      Funny, for many, many years, I have seen it written both ways. I just searched and found lots and lots of occurrences. But, you are correct that it is far more common now to see "MS Windows" without the dash. I don't think it matters much, though. As for MS-DOS, I have often seen that written "MSDOS", too; but calling it just "DOS" would be completely incorrect, just like calling something "windows"; both are entirely too generic and presumptuous (which Microsoft loves, of course... just like "word" instead of "MS Word" or "office" instead of "MS Office" or "PC" instead of "X86 Machine" or perhaps they meant "X86 machine running MS-Windows" or did they just mean "Personal Computer").

    6. Re:Build instructions by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      I have seen it written both ways for years.

      Where have you seen Apple use "MacOS"? If you haven't, then it's wrong.

      I don't think it matters all that much

      Yet you went out of your way to correct someone else. If you're going to correct someone, isn't it better to be sure that you're it right?

      but when there is no space, it is always cased the "MacOS" way, not "MACOS".

      Who suggested it should be in all-caps?

      Exactly - it is just lay-term, marketing stuff. Hip, kewl, non-technical common reference.

      No, it's not a lay-term. What does the iPhone run? OS X according to Apple. Also, marketing != non-technical e.g. Apple can only market Mac OS X as UNIX because it has been technically certified as such.

      Well, we just agree to disagree.

      Then you disagree with Apple, whose opinion matters more than either of ours.

      Saying "Mac OS Ten Version Ten point Four" is just redundant and silly to me.

      That amy be, but it's the scheme Apple have gone with. Go to 'About This Mac' in the Apple menu and you'll discover that. Check System Profiler and you'll get the very similar "Mac OS X 10.5.6".

      Not really. If you just said "MS Windows", that doesn't imply it runs on 3.11 or 95 does it?

      No, but that's Windows, not the Mac. It is standard practice to differentiate between classic versions of Mac OS and Mac OS X by using "Mac OS" and "Mac OS X" because that's how they're branded.

      If you want to be specific, you add the version/rev to it: "Mac OS 10.3 and above"

      Then why did you initially 'correct' "OS X" to "MacOS" when you were in fact reducing the information available in doing so?

      Funny, for many, many years, I have seen it written both ways. I just searched and found lots and lots of occurrences

      Where? Has Microsoft ever used it? If they have, then fair enough, but I just tried Googling and despite me inputting "MS-Windows", it just returns hits for "MS Windows".

      but calling it just "DOS" would be completely incorrect, just like calling something "windows"; both are entirely too generic and presumptuous

      That would be one of the reasons its capitalise i.e. "Windows", not "windows" - if you're quoting, make sure you're quoting correctly, particularly when this all started with you correcting someone else.

      which Microsoft loves, of course...

      Would you say this is comparable to your use of the generic "MacOS" instead of the more specific "Mac OS X"?

      just like "word" instead of "MS Word" or "office" instead of "MS Office"

      Where do they do it, other than places where the Microsoft branding is already clearly visible? Even on their own site its called "Microsoft Office [version] [year]".

    7. Re:Build instructions by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      If people correct others, they should make sure they're right or just not do it. If it's boring, don't bother to reply to it. By doing so you mss out on the opportunity to mod us down for being off-topic.

    8. Re:Build instructions by s0l1dsnak3123 · · Score: 1

      If I was a tard, I'd say that it isn't Linux, it is actually GNU/Linux, and that Linux is only the kernel.

      But I'm not a tard.

  3. Problem with video players in Ubuntu by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't be alone in my problems with Ubuntu's media player. I installed Ubuntu in a VPC in order to be able to surf porn sites on my work computer and be undetectable in case someone tried to go through my cache. Things worked great except that I simply wasn't able to get video to work in the media player.

    It's not the end of the world. I can of course download static images, but sometimes it's more enjoyable to see porn in motion.

    Anyone else have the same problem? Does Miro solve this problem?

    1. Re:Problem with video players in Ubuntu by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      I don't think a VM is the right place to be trying to play videos.

    2. Re:Problem with video players in Ubuntu by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. I use VM's HEAVILY at work, but they have their uses and a desktop isn't one of them. Even when the proper drivers and such are installed, the "local" input and video capabilities of a VM are going to feel off. What I've found most useful for VM's is for servers, where there isn't going to be a local user anyways. Remotely, a VM behaves much like any other machine that's hidden away.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    3. Re:Problem with video players in Ubuntu by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you put as much effort into your job as you do trying to surf porn as work, you would be better at your job.

      Maybe if you put as much effort into your job as you do into getting trolled on Slashdot, you'd still be a failure.

  4. Miro + ??? by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The last time I tried Miro it installed something called "OpenCandy" on my system without my permission. I think I'll pass until the Miro developers realize who owns this computer....HINT: Me, not them, not opencandy, or whatever else wants to piggyback with the installer.

    --bornagainpenguin

    --
    Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
    1. Re:Miro + ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It appears "OpenCandy" is only available for Windows, so I believe Microsoft owns your computer.

    2. Re:Miro + ??? by oboreruhito · · Score: 5, Informative

      OpenCandy was removed from Miro two months ago after user complaints.

      Hi All,

      We're going to remove OpenCandy from our installer next week. Thanks for pushing back on this.

      We still think the core idea of open source projects promoting one another is a great one, and we'll continue to support and promote other FOSS projects whenever possible.

      ~Jesse

      Also from that post:

      OpenCandy is a a software recommendation engine that we added recently in order to suggest other free and open source software to our users. You can find out about the organization at www.opencandy.com.

      I wasn't aware that it permanently left their recommendation engine on the user's machine after running it. We'll look into that right now and fix it as soon as possible.

    3. Re:Miro + ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I uninstalled Miro last time because of its bad manners. It made connections to servers without me asking.

      It also didn't have a loop function. WTF?

      This time I got Skype spammed as soon as I opened the application. Coincidence? Four Skype spams in three years?

      Looks like it's going in the bin again.

    4. Re:Miro + ??? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      So open source isn't immune to adware.

      Proponents of Microsoft often cite their market share as being the reason for bullshitwares' authors' attraction to their OS.

      With only 1% desktop share, the last thing that needs to be associated with the word "open" is this kind of crap. Microsoft are the worst [citation not needed], but Apple are also bad. I haven't been this pissed since Sun tried to push Yahoo fucking toolbar into their garden-variety Java install.

    5. Re:Miro + ??? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      It made connections to servers without me asking.

      Umm, that's the whole point of it.

      It also didn't have a loop function.

      Please define "loop function" in a way that makes sense in this context.

      This time I got Skype spammed as soon as I opened the application. Coincidence? Four Skype spams in three years?

      My mailserver rejects several thousand spams per day. Yes: four spams is a coincidence (and not even a big one).

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  5. Sweeeeet by vandan · · Score: 1

    I'm all praise for Miro. After discovering it, my TV viewing dropped considerably. Channels like 'The Real News' provide unbiased, in-depth coverage of world events. Channels like Submedia / It's the End of the World as we Know it provide some nice activist news with a health sprinkling of comedy. Then there are some pretty nice documentaries. Oh, and then there's that tech babe with gadget reviews ( can't remember the name of the channel for the moment ). But anyway, both the quality and the quantity of Miro channels runs rings around what's available via free-to-air stuff AND pay TV. And there are no ads!

    1. Re:Sweeeeet by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Sumi Das?

    2. Re:Sweeeeet by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the scrolling news channels are only on in my house if the world sounds like it is going to end to sane people. The scrolling news started after 9/11 didn't they? Why are they still scrolling, hasn't the crisis passed?

    3. Re:Sweeeeet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Crisis passed? You mean the Never-Ending War on Terror? No, no, no... that's never going away.

  6. Ubuntu Names by chill · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fuck those stupid code names for Ubuntu! Put the damn version numbers up like normal people. Alliterative animal names are for 4 year olds. Get over them.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Ubuntu Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Awwww. Somebody is a sad salamander!

    2. Re:Ubuntu Names by FrostDust · · Score: 1

      Dude, they do have version numbers, doesn't mean they can't also be given nicknames.

    3. Re:Ubuntu Names by chill · · Score: 2, Informative

      The download section for Miro doesn't use the numbers, only the names and they aren't the only ones that insist on doing that.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    4. Re:Ubuntu Names by FrostDust · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I didn't RTA first. You're right, they should put up the version numbers as well.

    5. Re:Ubuntu Names by Aetrus · · Score: 1

      Um...Ubuntu does have version numbers, and they do put them up ^^
      Ibex is 8.10
      I'm sorry it's so confusing for you.

    6. Re:Ubuntu Names by chill · · Score: 1
      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  7. Hulu, Linux, Miro and Flash by chill · · Score: 1

    Hulu doesn't recognize that I have Flash 10 installed (64-bit) when run thru Miro. How do I tell Miro that I really do have Flash? It works fine in Firefox.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Hulu, Linux, Miro and Flash by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well according tot the article, streaming flash only works in Windows & OSX, by your post title I presume you're running some form of Linux. The exact quote is, "You can add streaming sites like Hulu to your sidebar (note: streaming with Flash only works in Windows and OSX)".

      This is unfortunate, although not a show stopper. Although it's probably coincidence I installed Windows in VirtualBox on my Gentoo based desktop just to stream Hulu to my Xbox 360 via PlayOn last night.

      Anyone know of an open source Hulu streamer (ideally one that supports UPNP for Xbox 360/PS3 support)? I've been serving local content over UPNP via fuppes (using their SVN releases, works great on the 360), but I doubt they'll be implementing Hulu support any time soon.

      --
      Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    2. Re:Hulu, Linux, Miro and Flash by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Well according tot the article, streaming flash only works in Windows & OSX, by your post title I presume you're running some form of Linux. The exact quote is, "You can add streaming sites like Hulu to your sidebar (note: streaming with Flash only works in Windows and OSX)".

      I'm guessing this is due to the slight differences in the way Flash is implemented on various Linux distributions, combined with Flash's EULA. Hopefully the Ubuntu developers will enable Flash when they do the build for the repositories. After all, if it works on Windows and OSX, it should work on Linux too.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    3. Re:Hulu, Linux, Miro and Flash by PetriBORG · · Score: 1

      More so, it seems that its embedding firefox in its window, and has a ~/.miro/mozilla directory, so why the hell doesn't it work?

      I've been looking around, and others seemed to have flash working in previous versions... Besides that, without flash support it really cuts down on the amount of legal media Linux users can use when it seems entirely reasonable to have it working.

      Now it looks like I'm stuck trying to hack their source, sigh.

      --
      Pete/Petri "damn, my chainsaw is clogged with 1's and 0's again." --clyde
  8. Re:be new here by sexconker · · Score: 1

    LOL @ post history.

    My internal Turing/Voight-Kampff tests are returning inconclusive results.

    (It's an actual human doing the posting, with way too much time on its hands or with the aid of some sort of notification bot - I call it Notiflor!.)

  9. HULU? by owlnation · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I notice they mention sites like Hulu and CBS on their site, but I assume this is only available to US residents? They cunningly don't mention any restrictions.

    Have they got round this, or is this content still blacked out for most of the world?

  10. BugZilla sucks! by chill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To any developers, please listen carefully.

    From and end-user perspective, BugZilla is a complicated, confusing, steaming pile of shit!

    As an end-user I shouldn't have to "create an account", "login" or anything else to report a damn bug. Especially from a link within the program itself. A brief bit of text outlining what makes up a good bug report is fine, but I shouldn't have to jump thru hoops just to say "X is broken, here is how to reproduce it, here is my config".

    For other developers, it is fine. For end-users, it is a nightmare.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:BugZilla sucks! by chill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Click the "Report Bug" link in Miro and you'll see the connection. It opens a link to their BugZilla form, asking you to create an account or login.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:BugZilla sucks! by chill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm perfectly capable of entering a useful bug report, but BZ is a pain in the ass. If you ask for end-user help, then you need to accommodate end user methods without trying to pretend you can turn them into developers.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:BugZilla sucks! by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to mention it is still another pain in the ass to have to register for a service that I only intend to use once.

    4. Re:BugZilla sucks! by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      In reality, people may respond to your bug weeks or months later, asking questions on how to reproduce it, etc.

      You need the login, but I agree that it's a pain to create a separate account. But view it this way: it's free software, all you have to do is create an account and log a bug.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    5. Re:BugZilla sucks! by richlv · · Score: 1

      from the end user perspective, bugzilla is the best system out there. guess what that makes of the other systems.
      it's absolutely annoying to see reports where developers want to get more information, but nobody responds because report submitting was anonymous. as a bug reporter, i dislike passionately systems that do not allow me to register so that i can receive notifications on any updates or questions to my reports.
      now what might be a middle ground - openid support in bugzilla (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:OpenID_Auth_Plugin). having that in upstream codebase and polished could help with the registering problem somewhat.

      --
      Rich
    6. Re:BugZilla sucks! by daveime · · Score: 1

      And then wait till they sell your address to a nice spam company.

      There should be no reason they'd need your email address unless I wish to receive digests of posts via email. Especially if it's a forum where I can easily bookmark my posts, and check for updates when I feel like it.

      How I wish you could just log in with a username and password, then set my preferences to "web only" ... and never have to give my email to yet another unknown quantity.

    7. Re:BugZilla sucks! by dkf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some open-source projects get all the bug reports they can handle despite the difficulty. Ease-of-use improvements in Bugzilla which increase the number of junk bugs reported by people who can't be bothered to put a little effort into it may not actually be helpful.

      More of an issue is the fact that if you allow anonymous submissions, you tend to get a problem with spam. It's not generally difficult to deal with spam, but it does take time to triage and squelch.

      OTOH, in the past I've fixed important bugs that were submitted anonymously and where I've never been able to identify after the fact who did the submission. I've also had some users mention to me that they never submit bug reports where they have to identify themselves in the process. Prohibiting anonymous submissions does mean that you miss out on some things.

      On reflection, I'd suggest that only large should accept anonymous submissions, since that at least saves effort for things that are reported properly. Large projects have to decide for themselves whether they value anonymous reports or spam-freedom more; I'm in two minds about it, depending on whether I'm dealing with spam or bugs at the time. If you do allow anon submissions, make sure you've got a mailing list set up to track all changes in the bug DB, since that makes it much easier to see trouble...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    8. Re:BugZilla sucks! by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Yeah but that doesn't mean you have to register first. A simple 'your email address here' field would do fine. (Registration and more advanced notification can still be there for developers and advanced users.)

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    9. Re:BugZilla sucks! by cerberusss · · Score: 2, Informative

      There should be no reason they'd need your email address unless I wish to receive digests of posts via email.

      Well, in the case of Bugzilla (which was what the GP was talking about), it's useful because the software notifies you when comments are made or questions are asked about the bug you logged.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    10. Re:BugZilla sucks! by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      What might work would be to have the app generate a GUID on login and when a bug is submitted, the app monitors the bug tracker and notifies the user when changes are made to the ticket or more info is required.

      I understand why registration is used but on the flipside, I have decided against reporting bugs because of the registration process. The above idea would fix that.

    11. Re:BugZilla sucks! by daveime · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, I'm not debating the usefulness of it ... I'm just saying that supplying your email should be an opt-in choice to receive those notifications, not a requirement simply to sign up for an account.

    12. Re:BugZilla sucks! by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Hmm I didn't think about that, good point.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    13. Re:BugZilla sucks! by dkf · · Score: 1

      What might work would be to have the app generate a GUID on login and when a bug is submitted, the app monitors the bug tracker and notifies the user when changes are made to the ticket or more info is required.

      Sounds massively overcomplicated to me. Bugs (should) have an ID anyway; the devs need something to track them by, and databases are great for generating such stuff. But a GUID is just nasty; too long to be a good identifier for human beings to use, and also not containing any real information. A URL to the webpage that tracks the bug works much better.

      I understand why registration is used but on the flipside, I have decided against reporting bugs because of the registration process. The above idea would fix that.

      No, it wouldn't. It just means that you've added more complexity with having another damn application or feature to debug! It also wouldn't work in a lot of corporate settings, where apps are strictly prohibited from doing anything like phoning home.

      As I wrote previously, anon bug reports are a painful source of spam, but they're also potentially valuable when you've got a large user community. Sometimes I guess there's no easy answer to the utility/abuse challenge.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  11. OT: Fuppes by British · · Score: 1

    Got a Fuppes + 360 question. How do you solve the problem of the MP3s randomly skipping to the next track, before the track is over? I'm otherwise having no problems running it

  12. I used to use Miro... by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

    I used to use Miro, for the better part of a year, and while I loved certain parts of it there were a few other things that eventually drove me away from using it. I got really tired of the odd crash, which while not a daily occurrence was still often enough to be quite irritating, and then also some videos just wouldn't play properly, and then there was the OBSCENE amount of RAM it used just idling in the background. I don't care what explanations the people over there kept coming up to justify why a glorified podcatcher was using ~150megs of RAM when minimized in the background doing NOTHING other than just checking some RSS feeds once an hour, that just irked me from day one and was a fairly major factor in why I stopped using it.

    Now, it's been maybe half a year since I stopped using it, and maybe this 2.0 release is the bees knees fixing this and that, but unless they've gotten that RAM usage down I'll just make do with letting GoogleReader let me know when i can go stream my latest episodes.

    1. Re:I used to use Miro... by drDugan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seems like no memory problem for me:

      http://i41.tinypic.com/jl5nb8.png

      on mac: 90MB "real memory", smaller than firefox at 101MB

    2. Re:I used to use Miro... by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      Miro 2.0 is a huge improvement in my opinion. It uses about 80MB on my system while downloading 7 torrents. It's also a lot more responsive than any previous version. I don't feel like I'm always waiting for the UI to respond anymore. The only complaint I have against the new Miro is that they GTK-ified the rest of Miro, which is a good thing, but they ripped out the GTK themed media controls of the previous versions and replaced it with iTunes-ish media controls. WTF?

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
  13. Why? by oboreruhito · · Score: 1

    I'm still trying to figure out how popular projects like Miro and Songbird really are, and why. How useful is mashing Web functions together with media to create some interactive behemoth? Why do people need these bloated apps for content discovery when browsing a Web site and running an RSS-supporting torrent client is at least as effective?

    Is it just the convenience of not leaving an app? If it's the interface, I understand even less - both are so cluttered, even with Miro's upgrade, and resource-intensive. Neither appears to have any meaningful integration with any media center software - MythTV can't even sync with Miro's library without a hack since Miro doesn't have much of a backend API - and neither has much of a 10-foot interface, so that kills it for me on a TV, which is the only place I'd watch anything more than a YouTube clip.

    1. Re:Why? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I think Miro and Songbird could be useful apps, but the web browser portion is simply bloat as it is IMHO. There is actual usefulness in software that will manage your song/video collection and fetch new podcasts for you. That's essentially what iTunes does (coupled with a very easy to use music store).

      I mean, I thought Songbird was a great idea: essentially an open source iTunes-like clone, but essentially starting with the Firefox codebase as a basis for that type of app still seems odd to me. Truthfully though, what I think would be beneficial to BOTH organizations (and what would somewhat justify including the HTML rendering portions), would be to arrange a cooperative agreement with Amazon.com or another retailer that sells plain MP3 tracks. Integrate them so that you could browse Amazon's catalog using an plugin for the media manager much like iTunes users can access Apple's store.

      Unfortunately I think both have a ways to go. Playing around with Miro for a month or two was what originally got me interested and watching/listening to podcasts, but after getting tired of Miro's quirks and less attractive UI, I eventually moved to iTunes instead (though I've been using Google Reader a lot lately now - particularly at work, as I can check for and listen to podcasts without installing any extra software on my workstation).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  14. UI is mouse centric. Prefer Freevo/MythTV style UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The UI is mouse centric.

    I like some of the features,
    but the UI is not useful on a media center,
    as it complexity prevents the use of an IR remote to control it.

    I look forward 3.0.

  15. Freedom is still better than non-freedom. by jbn-o · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I understand and concur about not wanting programs to install stuff you don't want, but I thought I'd mention that this is not as bad as having proprietary software do something similar. With proprietary software you have no option to edit anything to make it work as you wish, or get it edited for you by someone you trust. With FLOSS that option exists even if you choose not to take advantage of it. FLOSS actually respects your ownership by giving you everything you need to make the program behave as you wish. Proprietary software does not respect your position that you own and should control your computer. Whether you are willing to leverage software freedom to your fullest benefit is a completely different issue that is entirely in your control.

    As it so happens, the Miro team is a pretty nice and responsive bunch of people so I don't think you'll find Miro doing something so unexpected now.

    1. Re:Freedom is still better than non-freedom. by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the argument that we want to make is "Because when we fuck up your computer, you can still fix it". Shit happens, software isn't perfect.

  16. Re:Can I get Battlestar Galactica in HD on it? by Fallingcow · · Score: 4, Informative

    It heavily promotes a large number of legal video RSS feeds (many of them very good), however you can use any torrent (or direct download, I think) RSS feed you want with the program. So, find a BSG HD torrent RSS feed (I'm sure they exist several places) and you're good to go.

  17. Hell-Bent by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    More organizations need the term "hell-bent on" in their mission statement.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  18. Vuze is disappointing. by zymano · · Score: 1

    Most of the HD clips are just stinking movie trailers.

  19. Re:Nice, BUT Harken back to the CMC days... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    California Music Channel....

    Bring back in their former gory, or glory, Weird Al Yancovic and Elvis Costello... and some Blancmange...

    Go back full circle... Then, Thrillingly, they can sing Everyday they Write the Book, while Living on the Ceiling, hehehhe

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  20. Further "alternative"distributions name suggestion by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pedophile Panda?
    Sadistic Swan?
    Terrorist Turtle?
    Pirate Pinniped?
    Homosexual Hippopotamus?
    Republican Ram?
    Lesbian Lobster?
    Genocidal Gerbil
    Transsexual Termite?
    Homicidal Hummingbird?
    .
    .
    .

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  21. miro, a pretty neat idea by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It also tries to integrate your torrent downloads so that you can track them from Miro as well.

    I'm running this on a mac and it appears that there's still not yet a proper solution for a torrent client with RSS. UTorrent was recently released for mac but it lacks many key features of the Windows client such as the RSS feed. http://tvrss.net/ seems to be a good, clean torrent feed and you can key in search terms to make sure you're only getting one provider of the show at a time. Will probably work great on Windows.

    I'm a recent mac convert and am surprised to read other mac heads saying they preferred running windows torrent programs under wine or in xp under parallels rather than deal with the sucky offerings for mac clients.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:miro, a pretty neat idea by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      People like it but it does not support rss natively. Reviews say it used to be piss poor but is now very good and utorrent is late to the mac table but it's also good.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:miro, a pretty neat idea by vaporland · · Score: 1

      VUZE (Azureus) has a nice implementation for tracking and downloading programs you watch regularly.

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
  22. I use RSSOwl + BitTyrant + WMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I add the ATOM or RSS feed in RSSOwl, let BitTyrant open up the incoming torrents and open the result in whatever is associated with the file, usually this will be Windows Media Player (I tried several others, but I have to give MS a thumbs up on the design of WMP's interface). The only thing that could be made (slightly) more supple is to have RSSOwl automatically open torrents instead of requiring a click from me. But otherwise its pretty painless, and I don't see how having another application (especially one as heavyweight as Miro) for this purpose can be a good thing.

  23. Network settings? by argent · · Score: 2, Informative

    I open it up and what do I get, about 6 dialogs telling me it can't connect to servers.

    1. Don't connect without asking me, thanks.
    2. You apparently can't connect until I can set my network settings, I guess you don't use the OS proxies.
    3. You don't have any place to set the proxies.

    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

    1. Re:Network settings? by argent · · Score: 1

      1. Don't connect without asking me, thanks.
      2. Don't connect without asking me, thanks.
      3. Don't connect without asking me, thanks.
      4. Corporate policy and internal firewalls prevent me from bypassing the PAC file for my browser, if you can't handle PAC files, let me set a proxy for you manually.
      5. Don't connect without asking me, thanks.
      6. Really don't connect without asking me. I mean it.

  24. Re:Thank goodness. by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    1:) Looks like the go full screen by default when a video starts to play, which I think is different from the old version, but I didn't really use it much.

    2:) Thank you for Scam School

  25. w00t!!! by crhylove · · Score: 1

    Miro no longer requires Java! I'm all about it! This is day one though, so this is no endorsement.

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  26. OSX 10.4 ppc by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 2, Funny

    A modestly sized program, and easy to install. I told it to go catalog my media and it grabbed some pr0n it couldn't even play and some .ogg files from Wesnoth that I turn off the sound to avoid hearing. Then it crashed.

    Forced quit and tried it again. Watched a funny Onion spot and some bullshit propaganda called "The New World Order." Then it crashed again.

    Maybe I'll wait for 3.0

    --
    Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
  27. Re:be new here by buswolley · · Score: 1

    Interesting. I wonder. That is an interesting idea to replicate.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  28. Re:mehhh by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    I downloaded it to my older iBook....osx 10.3.9 When I try to start it...just bounces in the task bar for a bit...then, nothing.

    Not sure why it won't work.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  29. That's all very nice, but... by adolf · · Score: 1

    When can we see some integration between Miro and UPNP clients like the PS3 and Xbox 360?

    I'm fully appreciative of downloading torrents with my 6 down 1 up DSL, which peers in a typical torrent seem to like. I really do like Miro's interface.

    But the computer is in the computer room. And the TV and PS3 are in the living room. And while the computer monitor I'm looking at right now is rather nice, I'd rather watch TV on the 52" Samsung while sitting on my couch in the living room.

    When are these folks going to start bringing content outside of the PC, so people can sit somewhere more relaxing (or with more people) than in front of a PC?

  30. The Power of Television by ryanw · · Score: 1

    The power of television has been the ability to commercialize "free" entertainment. All you have to do is wait through the commercials during the show and you get the show for free.

    In today's work-flow, everything is "choose your own adventure". Jobs these days are so cut-throat that people have to make intense business plans around everything and look for places to be more effective. We make hundreds of thousands of decisions every day. Look at starbucks. It's not just "cream or sugar", you have like 500 options.

    Now with the internet TV, I get to choose and sort through hundreds of thousands of options again.

    Major network television is a chance for people to not make decisions, pick a channel and veg.

    Options are good, but I don't want to spend all my time looking at options when it comes to entertainment. Just let me plug in and VEG!

    1. Re:The Power of Television by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Options are good, but I don't want to spend all my time looking at options when it comes to entertainment. Just let me plug in and VEG!

      So what's the problem? It's not like TV is going anywhere.

      Or does the mere existence of other options interfere with your vegging?

      (For the record, some people appreciate the ability to cut down on their vegging-oriented entertainment, and still watch the one or two shows they actually like)

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:The Power of Television by ryanw · · Score: 1

      So what's the problem? It's not like TV is going anywhere.

      Or does the mere existence of other options interfere with your vegging?

      Well, the main problem is that the options of today require lots of fussing around eating up all the time that I allocated for vegging out.

    3. Re:The Power of Television by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Seems like a recommendation system (a la TiVo) would go a long way here. Rate the shows you like, use your spare bandwidth to download shows that people with your taste also enjoy.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  31. Re:be new here by compro01 · · Score: 1

    Nah, it's a real person with another primary account (I forget the name at the moment). That account was made solely for that joke, as the posting history can attest to. Every time he sees a "new here" reference, he switches accounts to post that.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  32. Editors Why? by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    One thing I like about iTunes vs Miro's selection is better variety and quality, and that's just for the free stuff. Internet video really doesn't do much good when the selection is, meh.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  33. Miro != decentralised by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you had a bad internet connection, or more likely, that a lot of people are trying miro right now, and you should wait 'til later. This is exactly what I dislike about miro (among few things I dislike about it, that is). They aren't REALLY trying to democratise or decentralise TV. Actually, they're centralising many independent producers in their own catalog of TV shows. I imagine, at some point in future, they'll probably start charging to have your feed published there in some more conspicuous way. Better than traditional top-down TV broadcasting, yes, but only by virtue of Miro not getting very far with its plans yet. It's the opposite of democratisation really.

  34. Not to worry by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    If you have an easy to use publisher type software, then it should allow small groups to make some interesting stuff. In particular, with this recession getting worse, I think that we will see 15-20% with the current formula. And if we were using the old formula from GD days, we are already over 20% unemployment. The point being that PLENTY of ppl will have time and computers to think about this. They will decide to do something new and different. If I can make a suggestion, put your competitors links on your site. Let ppl know that this is moving forward.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  35. Miro & tvRSS.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    How to setup Miro for automatic downloading of your favorite shows. I've been doing this for a couple of years now. Grab your feeds from tvRSS.net. Use the filters properly and will d/l only the episodes you want. Enjoy.

  36. How does it work with Comcast? by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    How does it work with Comcast's Torrent Disruption System?

    Anyone running Miro from a Comcast connection? Can the torrenting aspect be disabled?

    --
    I come here for the love
  37. Re:Further "alternative"distributions name suggest by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

    Karma-whoring Kangaroo?

  38. Re:Further "alternative"distributions name suggest by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Why settle just for 1 when you can have 2 distro names from that.

    Karma Kangaroo AND Whoring Wallaby.

    One can be the server version and the other a portable.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  39. Linux is not a platform by Burz · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...nor is it an operating system to most end users because the kernel + GNU toolchain do not provide services they need.

    With that said, the Miro project does NOT package software for other Linux-based distros. Look at their download page for crisesakes.... The non-Ubuntu releases are put together and distributed outside of the Miro project.

    And this says it all:

    For Miro bugs on Mandriva, use the Mandriva bug tracker.

    etc, etc.

    The authors do not directly support Miro outside of Windows, OS X and Ubuntu operating systems.