Slashdot Mirror


Smart Immigrants Going Home

olddotter writes "A 24-page paper on a reverse brain drain from the US back to home countries (PDF) is getting news coverage. Quoting: 'Our new paper, "America's Loss Is the World's Gain," finds that the vast majority of these returnees were relatively young. The average age was 30 for Indian returnees, and 33 for Chinese. They were highly educated, with degrees in management, technology, or science. Fifty-one percent of the Chinese held master's degrees and 41% had PhDs. Sixty-six percent of the Indians held a master's and 12.1% had PhDs. They were at very top of the educational distribution for these highly educated immigrant groups — precisely the kind of people who make the greatest contribution to the US economy and to business and job growth." Adding to the brain drain is a problem with slow US visa processing, since last November or so, that has been driving desirable students and scientists out of the country.

168 of 770 comments (clear)

  1. Can you blame them? by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The American dream used to be a house in the country. Now it's a house in another country.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Can you blame them? by thesolo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The American dream used to be a house in the country. Now it's citizenship in another country.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Can you blame them? by Fallingcow · · Score: 5, Informative

      No joke. If not for my friends and family (primarily the former) I'd already be in Canada or Ireland. As it is, I'm hoping things get better, because if they don't then staying here will have been a huge mistake. Certainly staying here means not having kids, unless we get our collective head out of our ass and create a non-retarded health care system. Probably means a lower standard of living regardless--and I'm not just talking about income.

    3. Re:Can you blame them? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If not for my friends and family (primarily the former) I'd already be in Canada or Ireland.

      I hear this a lot, and I always feel compelled to ask: why do you think Canada would want you? I have no idea how Ireland feels about immigrants from the US, but I know for a fact that Canada does not have a big sign at the border that says "Come on in and take jobs from Canadians".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:Can you blame them? by hajus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Canadian economy is heavily linked to the US. Being a USian living in Canada, I see Canadian officials on the news constantly saying how the affect of the US economy is at fault for Canada's economic woes and explaining why economic bailouts for Canada won't work work unless the US also bails out their banks (before the US bailout). When the Canadian dollar hit above par with the US dollar, they were explaining how it could not last, because it was caused by the US dollar falling, and the Canadian dollar would not stay above the USD for long and was destined to come down as well (and eventually so it did) because of the respective and connected economies of the two countries. If you think coming to Canada will save you from the possibility of a failed US economy, I think the Canadian govt. would disagree with you.

    5. Re:Can you blame them? by home-electro.com · · Score: 3, Informative

      When was the last time you'd been at the border?

      Just so you know, Canada takes 200000+ immigrants every year. Like green card kind of immigrants, not H1B.

      So year, consider this a sign "come and take if you can"

    6. Re:Can you blame them? by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bubba, get back under the porch, you're embarrassing all Americans.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:Can you blame them? by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find it bizarre that the US and Canada don't have something similar to the Schengen agreement in Europe (in Europe you have the right to work in any country that's an EU member if you are a citizen of an EU member country). It seems that the US and Canada just have the free trade agreement but no freedom of movement agreement.

    8. Re:Can you blame them? by Coryoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find it bizarre that the US and Canada don't have something similar to the Schengen agreement in Europe

      I suspect Canada would be open to such an agreement, but would require that it be reciprocal, and allow Canadians to travel and work in the US. I'm guessing that this is the sticking point. The US seems happy with the free trade agreement because Canada honours it, and the US simply ignores it whenever it is inconvenient for them (see the soft wood lumber dispute).

  2. There's plenty of room. by raehl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact of the matter is that intelligent foreigners exist. They can work here, or they can work there. The question, then, is it better if they work here or there?

    The answer is obvious - we want them here.

    As for 'room' for American citizens, if you can't compete with a guy who was born in India, with all your American-born advantages, he's either just plain smarter than you, or just plain works harder than you. Either way, he deserves your job, and the American company hiring him shouldn't be saddled with your either less-intelligent or less-driven self just because the more qualified candidate was born in the wrong spot.

    1. Re:There's plenty of room. by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with this. If someone is willing to do your job for less than you are, or is able to do a better job at the same rate, then they should get the job over you. However, in many cases, the people they are hiring aren't necessarily better at the job, or better motivated. In many cases the only deciding factor is how cheaply they will work, regardless of whether they are getting sub-standard results out of the employees. No customer likes tech support from overseas, yet many companies provide this, simply to decrease operation costs. The customers are unhappy, but the business makes more money in the long run.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:There's plenty of room. by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Precisely. I can compete with Indians that live around the corner. They have to pay the same taxes (mostly), and they have comparable expenses. If technology continues to shift from the United States to India, however, American technology workers are screwed.

      As long as all of the truly bright people in the world come to the U.S. to work then the U.S. will continue to have a long-lasting advantage over the rest of the world. When that stops happening, then the U.S. economy is really headed for trouble.

    3. Re:There's plenty of room. by ejtttje · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree, and I'll add this assumes the foreign graduates can get the visa and work permits needed to stay in the US. The harder we make it for them to stay, the more go back to their homes.

      For anyone who complains about competition from foreign workers for US jobs, consider if they go home, they will be assisting or starting competing companies there. Then it's just *your personal* job that has competition, its the *entire company*, and if the foreign company wins out, *all* the jobs get laid off.

      It is by far in our best interest to try to keep all the best and brightest here in our country... we should only be so lucky to have such a draw...

    4. Re:There's plenty of room. by joeflies · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that you ignore the fact that the H1-B's arent' competing with you on the open market. The h1-b must work there, or leave the country within 10 days if they can't find a new position.

      So the H1-B's are working here with a neck in the guillotine - work hard, accept the conditions, and take the pay they are given or go home. They don't have a choice of finding another job they may be highly qualified for without having to get a sponsor.

      So employers fill these slots with employees who will work longer and work cheaper in order to stay in the US. Does that really sound like you have a fair shot of getting that job just because you're more qualified.

    5. Re:There's plenty of room. by Teckla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As for 'room' for American citizens, if you can't compete with a guy who was born in India, with all your American-born advantages, he's either just plain smarter than you, or just plain works harder than you.

      Oh my God, you're such an insulting ass. And you got modded +5 for it! Unbelievable.

      Even if H-1B workers are good for the U.S., which is debatable, it doesn't matter in the long run, because American companies will continue to offshore work because of the cost of living in the U.S.

      It simply does not matter if an American is equal to, or better than, a foreign counterpart, because the American has an insanely high cost of living and cannot hope to compete wage-wise with someone that lives in a country with a low cost of living.

      The H-1B debate is pointless. Americans are too expensive, even H-1B's living in America are too expensive. The trend will be to continue to offshore the work in order to leverage lower costs of living elsewhere.

    6. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you ever actually worked with creating software? Lower cost developers equals far worse code equals shitter software equals products that end up not being able to compete. That means you have to shut down.

      Want an example? Look at some of the projects Motorola closed recently. Wanna know why it was closed down? They added a lot of "cheap" workers that produced code that honestly was offensive to anyone with a proper education / proper knowledge of software.

      Lowering costs often means something gotta give, only when you can produce with the same quality but at a lower price can you continue to compete.

    7. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone knows companies hire foreigners on H1B's because they generally work for less money.

      Then give them Green Cards so they can work freely for any employer, and let a real market set the wage, not the bogus Department of Labor "prevailing wage" number that's required for the H-1B. Give 'em green cards so that they can stay (and continue to pay taxes) here, rather than threatening to kick 'em out after 3 or 6 years.

      I want to compete on an equal footing. But if the US would prefer to concentrate on accomodating the needs of companies who hire low-skilled agriculltural workers, so be it. If the US would really rather get the income taxes from people who make $12K/year rather than $120K/year, so be it. If the US really wants its high-tech immigrants to GTFO, then fine, we'll go back home, and take our minds - and what they produce - with us. Who is John Galt?

    8. Re:There's plenty of room. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It simply does not matter if an American is equal to, or better than, a foreign counterpart, because the American has an insanely high cost of living and cannot hope to compete wage-wise with someone that lives in a country with a low cost of living.

      And so what's the answer? We have several possible ways to fix this, which do you prefer?

      -Reduce the American standard of living via increased immigration to correct the high cost of labor?
      -Increase the global standard of living via offshoring to correct their low cost of labor?
      -Cause stagnation via protectionist policies, then wait for other nations to pass us by on their way to a higher standard of livin and eocnomic vitality?

      In all seriousness, if we open the gates to immigration, we'll reduce the cost of American labor and thus be more competitive from a labor standpoint... and if we do it via naturalization instead of stupid H1-B and other temporary visas, we'll get to *keep* the best and brightest here. If we continue to offshore jobs that we cannot compete with on labor costs, we'll raise the standard of living overseas and help level the playing field.

      The truth of the matter is that the US standard of living is unsustainable, we've only kept it high so long by leveraging limited natural resources (like fossil fuels) and borrowing.

      An adjustment will happen, and the US standard of living will become more like the rest of the world's... but the question is if we can help ensure that this is by elevating the SoL outside the US, or if it will be simply a reduction in the SoL in the US. I know which I'd prefer (both for selfish and humanitarian reasons).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    9. Re:There's plenty of room. by Jurily · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As long as all of the truly bright people in the world come to the U.S. to work then the U.S. will continue to have a long-lasting advantage over the rest of the world.

      Maybe you should fix your educational system so you'd have smart people on your own. Of course that means you'd also have to pay real wages to teachers, fire the incompetent ones who are unable to learn anything new, but have laid low long enough so you can't fire them legally, etc.

      Oh, and actually teach the kids to think for themselves. In short: I don't see that happening anytime soon.

      P.S. Do any of you find idiotic as well, that kids should learn everything at the same age, regardless of talent, abilities, potential and personal interests? For example, I've learned English from Cartoon Network, and by the time I got to English class at age 14, I was laughing at my teacher's horrible accent. Yet I still had to sit there for four years.

    10. Re:There's plenty of room. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If someone is willing to do your job for less than you are, or is able to do a better job at the same rate, then they should get the job over you.

      I'll accept that once I can do the same thing to a guy in switzerland.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    11. Re:There's plenty of room. by keeboo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Another good question is why we aren't putting the money we put into these people into our own citizens; citizens who will be much less likely to sneak off and leave the hand that fed them out to dry.

      Ohh... Poor Uncle Sam.

      Let's say a guy gets his education in his home country. It was paid somehow, perhaps the local government paid for him, or perhaps he's indebted. In either case, it's not a trivial amount of money.
      Then the guy goes to the U.S. to work. The U.S. did not pay a dime for his education, nor any other expenses he/his_parents/his_country had with him during his whole life. The U.S. did not invest in him, he came ready and is immediately productive.
      Will the U.S. take the less qualified people and educate them? Sorry, no. Instead the U.S. cherry picks the best, for free, at the expense of the rest of the World.

      And what if he never returns, what about his home country losing a highly qualified person? Well, that's just too bad.

      And the U.S. won't be giving anything for free. No way, the guy's going to work his ass off (or else), he'll pay the same taxes as the locals but will have less rights.

      If there's a parasite in this history, it's not the foreign guy.

    12. Re:There's plenty of room. by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe you should fix your educational system so you'd have smart people on your own. Of course that means you'd also have to pay real wages to teachers, fire the incompetent ones who are unable to learn anything new, but have laid low long enough so you can't fire them legally, etc.

      Oh, and actually teach the kids to think for themselves. In short: I don't see that happening anytime soon.

      I'm American, and I can't tell you how much I share this desire for a better pubic educational system for the US. I would very much love to see the average US citizen be able to think for himself, rather than just absorb all the crap thrown at us through too many advertisements every day. If you're an average American (at least, this is my impression from what I see as stereotypes), your computer is Windows, your cable and Internet are Comcast high-speed (which isn't that fast on an absolute scale), you bought your car because either (a) it looks nice or (b) you heard that it's environmentally friendly, you work from 9 to 5 five days a week for a middle-class paycheck. And this little bubble is pretty much your life. It's safe. There's no need to think for yourself; the companies you pay monthly for their services have already done that for you.

      Screw that. I wanna make my own decisions about stuff I do and buy!

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    13. Re:There's plenty of room. by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why couldn't you?

    14. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't wait for the first wave of immigrant technical workers to reach middle-age. I'm going to laugh my ass off when they start complaining about competition from younger, smarter, harder-working people. I can't wait until they have to visit the chiropractor 2 to 3 times a week for their chronic neck and back pain from all the time they spent hunched over a computer. It'll be amusing when they are completely screwed by the companies they helped build and divorced by their spouses for years of neglect.

      I'm guessing that the ones that go back to their countries of origin will be the lucky ones. They'll probably go back to a more "humanly" paced culture that believes that families really do take care of each other instead of farming the old folks out to some Dickensian nursing home.

      As long as the U.S. maintains its dominance in the world there will always be some country where the young people will long to be a "corporate tool". Buy hey, I'm not bitter. No, just wiser.

    15. Re:There's plenty of room. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

      -Cause stagnation via protectionist policies, then wait for other nations to pass us by on their way to a higher standard of livin and eocnomic vitality?

      [Citation Needed]

      Citations:

      http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Protectionism.html
      For you Austrian school folks (God, I can't believe I'm linking to Mises to support my position): http://mises.org/rothbard/protectionism.asp
      For the interventionists, a counterpiece by Krugman, saying protectionism has a place... provided that other means fail: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/01/protectionism-and-stimulus-wonkish/
      Another piece:http://www.morganstanley.com/views/gef/archive/2007/20070126-Fri.html

      In the news, another danger of protectionism (as was seen in the great depression): http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/world/world/general/wto-fears-protectionism-domino-effect/1449424.aspx

      The risk is that we adopt protectionist policies, and other nations adopt them against us -- but not with eachother. Thus we get left behind in the expansionary economies the other nations will go through. This is the problem that Krugman misses... protectionism globally will reduce the impact of economic problems in each country on the whole, only if the protectionism is directed to all trading partners. If the EU, for example, raises protective barriers agains the US, but not the rest of the world, we've got problems. Please note that this is in re: protective trade restrictions; subsidies (like the stimulus package) are another form of protectionism, that by nature are partner-agnostic, and I think this form of protectionism is what Krugman refers to.

      However, we're discussing labor protectionism, which is a slightly different beast.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    16. Re:There's plenty of room. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      High cost and low quality are not mutually exclusive.
      See: thedailywtf.com, and Monster cables

    17. Re:There's plenty of room. by snaz555 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because the swiss have some sort of problem with a foreigner just waltzing into their country and taking a job when they've already got swiss that can do it.

      As a scientist with a PhD and in your early 30s (i.e. with about 10 years' experience) you would:
      1. Fly to Switzerland and stay up to 90 days without a visa if you're American/Canadian
      2. Find employment in your field.
      3. Have the employer obtain a specialist visa.
      4. Work ten months.
      5. Get an unlimited "C" work permit/visa.

      With a "C" visa you're no longer tied to that particular employer but can move freely on the labor market.

      Much easier than if you're an Indian PhD who wants to work in the U.S. - or a Swiss one for that matter. H1Bs are far more restrictive, and there is nothing like the Swiss "C" visa for when you're somewhere between H1B and permanent residency (at 48months IIRC). You also won't have to jump through silly administrative hoops, like go back to your home country to apply for the visa. And the Swiss will be nice, polite, and actually helpful at the border and immigration offices. As opposed to the snarling, incompetent, rude, bottom-of-the-barrel idiots you encounter here. If there's something wrong with your application or paperwork they will helpfully suggest how to correct it. Again, very different from U.S. government standards.

    18. Re:There's plenty of room. by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are so many choices these days when it comes to almost any purchase that we take shortcuts. Economists call this imperfect knowledge. The basic idea is that doing the proper research to find the very best tool at the very best price is too expensive. Sure, my Stanley tool might cost a $1 more than your superior Irwin tool, but my Stanley tool was good enough and I get to spend my time using the tool instead of doing research. My time is far more valuable than the money I might have saved getting precisely the right tool.

      In the case of you and your cat's paw you probably enjoyed doing the research. You are interested in tools and woodworking and so the trade off is worth it. I can guarantee it that there are lots of other choices that you make based entirely on marketing. You probably haven't done a comparative analysis on dental floss, for example, or window cleaners, or shoes. You haven't visited every restaurant in your area and tried every dish so that you can be sure you are getting the best deal for your money. Heck, there are probably some things that you eat on a regular basis that you wouldn't touch with a barge pole if you knew how they were made.

      What's more, if you would have spent more time looking you probably could have gotten the exact same good cat's paw, by the same manufacturer, at a much better price. At some point, however, you decided to give up your search for perfection, and you settled for a tool and a price that was "good enough."

      That's just economics. The basic premise is that everyone makes the choices that have the lowest opportunity costs. If someone makes a different decision than you would make that simply means that they have different priorities. Gathering information about purchases has an opportunity cost as well. That time could be spent on something else.

    19. Re:There's plenty of room. by synthespian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know what I think? By any standards, Americans have it too easy: houses are too big (compare them to any European), cars waste too much fuel, credit is too easy, etc.

      Think about it: anybody who's got to compete with you has to at least bilingual, be up-to-date with everything you know (that is, read your books, read your papers), spend shitloads of money doing it that, etc.

      I've heard US American presidents for decades preach about the free market. Well, there's free market and globalization for you - you get to rub elbows with Indians, etc. You don't like it? Tough it out.

      But what I really expect your government to do is just to trample on the WTO's rules of trade and put forward a protectionist program, that is: to really come across once again as the jingoist nation full of B.S. that you are, one in which the rules apply to everyone else (for instance, the rule of international law), but not to you.

      You guys have it easy. Stop complaining.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  3. Re:visa's by Orome · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's also the fact that many of them get scholarships/fellowships/teaching assistantships from US universities. Essentially, American taxpayer money has gone into funding their education, and because of idiotic political reasons they are going back. Of course the layman just sees them as taking up a job, and won't see the fact that
    a) They could create more jobs
    b) A US-educated immigrant going back is a net loss (in terms of taxpayer money) for the country.

  4. Nice -- more of what we already knew by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just have to wonder how much more of this erosion of the U.S. the U.S. is willing to accept and permit? H1-Bs and lowering of wages, offshoring and outsourcing services are all great ways for companies to increase their bottom lines. But when EVERYONE is doing it, these companies ultimately create poor and unemployed customers! This is not sustainable.

    People constantly ask "so protectionism is the answer?" Right now, yes it is!

    It seems that everyone and every entity is seeming short, fast turn-around and ever-increasing bottom lines using "growth percentage" as a metric for success and viability. (Reality check! In no part of the universe is growth a sustainable metric!!)

    1. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by sledge_hmmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your whole post just seems like a random rant not terribly relevant to the article.

      If anything what the article does say that a fifth of the Chinese and nearly half the Indians that left actually entered on temporary visas (such as H1-Bs).

      It's these people that help add value to the economy by developing technology, starting companies and driving innovation thus creating jobs. So they are a necessary part of the solution to increasing American competitiveness in the 21st century.

    2. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by hazem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It seems that everyone and every entity is seeming short, fast turn-around and ever-increasing bottom lines using "growth percentage" as a metric for success and viability.

      This kind of thinking is a systemic problem and not just in the job market.

      Consider the mortgage foreclosure issue. For a single bank making a foreclosure decision, it makes perfect sense to foreclose a bad loan, realize the loss, and then recover the value by selling the property. This is even okay to happen "regularly" as long as it's a relatively minor level of activity. But once you reach (as another posted pointed out) a "tipping point", this behavior that's good for an individual suddenly becomes extremely detrimental to everyone.

      This was magnified by an unwillingness by the banks to re-negotiate the raise in rates on adjustable rate loans. Again, on a case by case basis, it makes sense for the bank to "stick to their guns" and force the consumer to pay the higher rate. But doing this to too many people will cause a large number of them to foreclose. That just refers back to the previous paragraph.

      With too many homes in foreclosure, values of entire neighborhoods drop and people are stuck with homes that aren't worth what they owe. Many walk away leaving the banks with properties they can't sell in neighborhoods that are devalued.

      The short-term case of chasing the profit prevented the longer term view of seeing that what they were doing was destroying the market. And now, after so much damage, they're being forced to do the very things they should have been doing in the first place - negotiating rates to help keep homeowners in their homes.

    3. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Let me start by saying that your username is apropos.

      I just have to wonder how much more of this erosion of the U.S. the U.S. is willing to accept and permit? H1-Bs and lowering of wages, offshoring and outsourcing services are all great ways for companies to increase their bottom lines.

      First, there is nothing wrong with outsourcing. Hell, I outsource my lawncare to a neighborhood kid. You do know that outsourcing is substantively different than offshoring, right?

      But when EVERYONE is doing it, these companies ultimately create poor and unemployed customers! This is not sustainable.

      You're right it's not sustainable; eventually those unemployed people find jobs that are either more productive and valuable to society, or they find employment doing something else... at a price more in line with what the work is worth. There is no inherent reason an artificial restriction on labor (tight immigration policy) should be allowed to prop up wages... in the long run, this results in a smaller market for goods.

      In re: offshoring, I'm sure we completely disagree, but from a humanitarian perspective, it's far better to lift some people out of abject poverty in developing nations than it is to slightly increase someone's already-high standard of living in the US.

      People constantly ask "so protectionism is the answer?" Right now, yes it is!

      Yes, we have a surplus of labor right now. And that's painful for some. But protectionism is not the answer. It lengthened and deepened the great depression, and it will do the same thing now. Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it.

      It seems that everyone and every entity is seeming short, fast turn-around and ever-increasing bottom lines using "growth percentage" as a metric for success and viability. (Reality check! In no part of the universe is growth a sustainable metric!!)

      Except, perhaps, the universe as a whole. Joking aside, why should economic growth not be sustainable long-term? Seriously? It's not like it's constrained by physical goods or anything... it's an intellectual construct that doesn't have absolute limits. I fully agree that "short-termism" is a flawed way to assess economic vitality of a company, and country, or an economy. But I disagree that growth is not sustainable. Consider that every trade transaction, in theory, represents economic growth (economics is not zero-sum, in case you have no knowledge of economics).

      At any rate, protectionism is not the answer, now or ever. It only serves to reduce economic vitality... and this is especially so if other nations retaliate (which they surely would). If you had your way, we'd lose the benefit that all these immigrants, etc, would bring to our future economy. You want to talk about being motivated by short-term profits? You sir, with your talk of protectionism, are doing exactly that.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First they enter the U.S. and depress wages. Then they leave the depressed wages in their wake. Meanwhile, the U.S. has fewer "smart" people getting such degrees and training and will take some time before a bounce back can occur.

    5. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tragedy of the commons

      I've been posting that link quite a bit, because it has been very, very appropriate in so many threads lately, and I've found--much to my surprise--that many people (not you, I'm betting you already knew of it) don't properly appreciate it.

    6. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by naoursla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If profits were being driven down by competition that would be fine. The real problem is the wealth created by these improvements in labor allocation are going to a small percentage of the population. A large economy needs a lot of people creating and consuming. When wealth becomes too concentrated, you get a small number of people consuming and a large number creating. The large numbers creating quickly run out of things to create because the few with all of the money can't consume enough. That causes part of the economy to die (people dropping out of participation in the economy) and shrink.

    7. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh good god. Pick an industry and grow it "forever" and see where it takes you. Real estate? Fast Food? Cell phones? Even securities? Every market can saturate. The saturation of the securities market is what led to the creation of these risky-mortgage based securities -- they needed a new market to grow in.

      Why are you limiting the discussion to specific markets, first of all? Why not general economic activity? Saturation of capital in a market (like the securities market) can be bled off if other markets are more profitable... this is the basis of almost all investment. The securities problem of mortgage-based assets was not due to saturation, it was due to improper valuation of those securites, making them more attractive than other investment alternatives.

      Furthermore, saturation of supply in a market is simply a supply issue... this doesn't mean that the market can't continue to grow.

      And one thing I failed to mention that I wish I had (not that it adds much to the argument) is the still present trade deficit. We are buying more than we are selling. What we are selling is largely to ourselves in decreasing numbers. The poor are getting poorer.

      Agreed. And this is because it is too expensive to produce goods here, because labor is too expensive. More on this below.

      We do need protectionism. We need to protect our assets. We once had the strongest agricultural production and now we don't. We once had the strongest manufacturing and now we don't. We once has the strongest technology development and it is rather doubtful that we can wear that badge any longer. What do we have then? The most "rich people?" We do still have a high concentration of wealth but that concentration is confined to less than a percent of the population and a non-existent middle-class.

      Agricultural production -- we're still one of the strongest, if not the strongest, in the world. Agricultural products remain one of our biggest exports. Manufacturing -- this industry has died because labor is too expensive here. Technological development -- this is dependent on 'innovative spirit' and cheap labor, both of which are stimulated by immigration -- immigrants tend to be risk-takers, which innovators by nature also are.

      We do still have a high concentration of wealth but that concentration is confined to less than a percent of the population and a non-existent middle-class.

      Yes. But protectionism feeds into this. There is no middle class because there aren't good jobs. There aren't good jobs because labor is too expensive. Labor is too expensive because the cost of living is too high. The cost of living is too high because we've leveraged unsustainable resources (natural resources and credit, to be specific) to inflate the standard of living. Solution: Reduce the standard of living so US labor is competitive, either by attrition (which protectionism will cause) or via immigration (which will create a larger market for US goods).

      The problem with protectionism is that while it may maintain our standard of living as long as we have lots of natural resources and credit from other nations, it's not sustainable. We'll only be able to correct the trade imbalance if we all become poor (and thus globally competitive).

      If we open the immigration doors, we increase the availability of cheap labor, which benefits most of us. Sure, it'll be painful until we're able to develop competitive local manufacturing, and until the waves of immigrants are economically strong enough to function as a market for our goods... but the alternative is to slowly stagnate while the rest of the world passus us by. Protectionism left China in the dust for decade after decade... only a loosening of that protectionism allowed them to raise their standard of living. Let's not follow the same path.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by rossifer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um, the CRA is a red herring.

      The loans covered by CRA tended to have the same risk profile as other bank loans.
      "liar loans", "no income, no assets loans", etc. almost entirely came from institutions not covered by CRA.

      The rest of your list is not any better.

      You completely missed Christopher Cox's incompetent regulation of financial institutions at the SEC, Alan Greenspan's ill-advised attempt to keep spending up by keeping interest rates near zero for most of a decade, Bush begging Americans to "keep spending" after 9/11, and the real original seed of the current disaster, which was a series of moves to deregulate banks that occurred during Bush I and Clinton leading to the creation of credit default swaps, the securitization of debt, and all sorts of other really bad ideas.

      But it was nice of you to try to make Bush look a little less incompetent. The worst president in history still needs a kind word every once in a while.

    9. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by TheSync · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just have to wonder how much more of this erosion of the U.S. the U.S. is willing to accept and permit? H1-Bs and lowering of wages,

      US real total compensation per hour has doubled since 1970. Real hourly earnings aren't up much over that time, but that is because our additional compensation is going into 401k plans, health insurance, and more paid sick time. It is going there because tax policy makes it preferable for your employer to pay that compensation rather than paying you wages, having your wages taxed, and then you pay for them.

      Note that real disposable income actually rose the last four months.

      People constantly ask "so protectionism is the answer?" Right now, yes it is!

      Protectionism is a false promise, it supports unsustainable and inefficient businesses at the expense of consumers. I work for a US company in an industry that earns 1/3 of its revenue (that's $10 billion dollars) in exports. So go ahead, put me out of a job!

    10. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh good god. Pick an industry and grow it "forever" and see where it takes you. Real estate? Fast Food? Cell phones? Even securities? Every market can saturate.

      I can prove you wrong with one word:

      Porno.

    11. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by TheSync · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And one thing I failed to mention that I wish I had (not that it adds much to the argument) is the still present trade deficit. We are buying more than we are selling. What we are selling is largely to ourselves in decreasing numbers.

      Actually exports have been rising (until 2009) as well as imports: see here. And keep in mind that those $3 trillion in imports are still pretty small compared with the $13 trillion domestic, non-imported US economy.

      On the other hand, a global trade war would risk the $1.8 trillion in US exports and all of their respective jobs (my industry makes 1/3 of its revenue from exports), so let's not mess around with that! Plus it would raise prices on basic consumer goods, which would affect the poor the worst!

    12. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by twostix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What a joke that first link is. Truly. Some vague hand waving, a distortion of numbers and a couple of meaningless graphs can convince some people of anything. It (intentionally I'll assume given the source) also misses the obvious, if it's going to include "benefits" it'd better include the enormously inflated cost of health care! Oh it doesn't? Then it's less than meaningless, it's misleading.

      In 1970 my father, a lowly mechanic purchased a nice house (on 70% of his wage), supported a wife and raised three children in a solid middle class household.

      39 years later his son, a white collar computer programmer raising three children and supporting a wife can't afford to buy a house on 100% of his wage in ANY POPULATION CENTRE. Functionally lower-middle class, one car not two, not to mention working twice as many hours and getting half the benefits!

      And yet ivory tower pseudo-intellectuals such as yourself will assume to lecture to us with the help of awful graphs and twisted and distorted 'truths' that we work less for more than people did thirty years ago.

      What a joke.

      And why would tariffs put you out of a job? Tariffs affect imports not exports.

      And holy shit of course 'real disposable income' increased in the last four months, half a million people are losing their jobs a month, people aren't buying things so prices on luxuries MUST come down. It's called a recession! You seem to have a flimsy grasp on real economics. Or an agenda to drive. Gee I wonder which.

      Ideological fanatics such as yourself, who don't have a firm hand on reality, just the dogma in your minds are selling your own countries out for no reason what so ever. And China and India and other developing countries will *happily* allow that to happen, then see if they're so ready to be so open with their borders when they finally hold the upper hand.

      You people are little more than an updated version of the 20th centuries Useful Idiots. How the Chinese must laugh at the west.

    13. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, that's why it takes two people working instead of one, like it did in 1970, to keep an average household above water.

      Not really. Back in 1970, most families that had a car at all only had one, we generally lived in much smaller houses, etc, etc. People want more stuff.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  5. Re:Let them go by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's about time we make some room for real US citizens.

    Presumably, most of those people originally wanted to become "real" (is there any other kind?) US citizens as well, but realized they have to jump through too many hoops for it to be worth it.

    (or do you mean that "real US citizen" is a White Protestant guy with Anglo-Saxon lineage?)

    Of course, you can have those guys working in engineering, physics or biotech fields in US - preferably as citizens - or you can have them working on thermonuclear warheads, delivery systems, and biological weapons in China or Russia. Your pick.

  6. Tipping point by bindo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the end ....

    my feeling, in 30 years this moment will be viewed as the tipping point, the moment in which america stopped being the siphon of the worlds best minds.

    For the first time in history the melting pot hasn't managed to retain the best.
    Those people will bring a BIG BOOST in their respoective countries ruling intellighentia.

    lots of sour grapes here, but have no one else to blame ....

    1. Re:Tipping point by SIR_Taco · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, a melting pot would retain the heaviest, which the US has quite well

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    2. Re:Tipping point by cjb658 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, at least we still have the most guns.

    3. Re:Tipping point by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, this has probably not so much to do with the US itself, and more with the countries many of you immigrants come from.

      I'm Swedish, and for various reasons a disproportionate number of Swedes tend to move abroad; not just academics and other highly skilled people, but "ordinary" people too. There is very little debate about it, and no screaming about "brain drain". The reason is that the vast majority eventually return. It may take three, or five, or ten years, but most come back and bringing with them more skills and experience, making it a net win for the country.

      Similarly, as large countries like China and India become places where a middle-class life is attainable and normal, so will more people return home eventually where they would have settled abroad permanently before. It's not that the US has become less attractive, but that people's own home countries have become more so.

      The US can and should adapt to this in two ways: first, recognize that a temporary immigrant is still valuable for the country even if they leave after some years. Second, encourage more of their own citizens to likewise move abroad for some period in order to build their skills and benefit in the same way that other countries do. While Swedes are disproportionately likely to live abroad, US citizens seem anecdotally disproportionately unlikely to do so. You seem to have a whole slew of arbitrary barriers, like the double income taxation when living abroad, that conspire to keep normal people from relocating for a few years.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:Tipping point by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or it could just be a made-up story on a slow news day, which is usually what these "brain drain" stories are. They take 6 months worth of statistics, and extend it out 50 years from now to come up with these "scary" conclusions.

      In any case, I doubt the hyperbole is called for, eh? It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine.

  7. Re:Let them go by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's nothing special about the foreigners. We can make more.

    You can't make more Foreigner, AND THEY ARE TOTALLY SPECIAL!

    You're as cold as ice if you don't think so! Man, these head games you are playing really make me hot blooded...

    Fortunately, they are still alive, well, touring, and rocking, so we don't need to make more.

  8. Re:Get-Out-Sourcing? by vk2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you think this will mean jobs in India and China will get outsourced to a broke white boy like me now?

    Your burger flipping skills are of no use; Indians generally are vegetarians and those who eat meat prefer chicken and/or lamb. Off course you could learn to cook chat items and open your own dhela on chowpati.

    --
    No Sig for you.!
  9. Re:Good riddance by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm tired of the smell of curry.

    Then you, sir, are tired of life.

  10. and why do we care? by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Our educational system has become so damned expensive that only people who don't live here can seemingly afford it. So it makes sense... As to why the visa system is clogged... Maybe the economic hard times have hit government offices partially responsible for it as well? Oh, what sweet revenge. -_- More seriously though, what difference does it make how well we educate people (either people who stay or leave?) if the environmental conditions necessary for real progress are absent? Our intellectual property system has gutted any hopes of "desirable individuals" doing much of anything besides occupying a desk. The medical field is screwed because people are too afraid of litigation to actually practice medicine at less than a 6000% markup on procedures, which is literally killing people who can't afford it anymore. The lawyers are the only ones in this country that are well-off anymore.

    It's no wonder people are jumping ship... Some people looked down the length of the bow and see a giant iceberg in front of the USS Our Future. An iceberg made almost totally of greed, because we couldn't look farther than the end of our damn noses as the social problems we're facing. And leaving is the smart thing -- how long until Canada starts patrolling its borders to keep illegal immigrants from the United States out? Probably not long.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:and why do we care? by SIR_Taco · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Honestly we, Canada, are quite content with the fact that you preach such crazy patriotism to your kids at a young age and we don't have any worries.
            We're taught more to come up with our own views and opinions of the world and the country itself (through school and society). And from looking around, myself, I feel that I live in a country that is much less off-the-wall (so to speak) than the rest of the world. I was not told through school and/or society that I need to worship Canada like it's a second/first religion, however I would put my life up for this country in a heart-beat if it were ever threatened.
            You can't force anyone to love a country, but you can let them.

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    2. Re:and why do we care? by Quetzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... As to why the visa system is clogged... Maybe the economic hard times have hit government offices partially responsible for it as well? Oh, what sweet revenge. -_-

      I know you are kidding, but the visa system has always been clogged. So I would say the government continues to operate at the same level of efficiency as before. :-)

    3. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I am living in Brazil, and while I got a visa to work here, we have in the same data center three other WHITE ANGLO AMERICANS working illegally, as far as the Brazilian immigration laws are concerned. (They are under a company contract, so as far as Brazilian taxes they are fine)

      So, I don't think we will see the Brazilian DHS hunting my poor fellow citizens here and deporting them. But, many of the American brightest are already leaving, not only by individually emigrating, but also by being transferred overseas, as IBM for example is moving part of their American development team to San Jose dos Campos, a high-tech university town in Sao Paulo state. I mean: moving the WHOLE team, with their families, pets and furniture to a neighborhood where IBM got some houses bought.

      Why I would stay in the US and risk getting laid off because some stupid Financial Officer messed up with the stock of the company, if I can be in Brazil, Australia, New Zeland, China or any other of the places still barely touched by the world depression?

      See, World Bank forecasts a GDP growth of 3 to 4% for Brazil this year, and a GDP growth of 8 to 9% for China. Meanwhile, we in the US will LOSE 4 to 5% of our GDP.

      Brazil and China are not very friendly towards foreigners. If the immigrants don't blend fast in to their respective local cultures they are usually ostracized. But, they are very kind and friendly people if you adapt to them, so why not to adapt?

      Any empire gets to the stage where it begins to fall to pieces. Rich countries built by immigrants, become emigrants' countries. Life goes on.

      I am becoming a Brazilian myself. And I don't even see me going back to the US soon, at least not to live there. Santa Catarina, Sao Paulo, Parana and Rio Grande do Sul (the Brazilian South states) are great places to work and live. I won't be in Rio de Janeiro or Bahia or Recife, for example. Those places are very violent and poor. But here where I am living, in Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, I got a high quality of life, comparable to the US, and for half of the price tag I would have to pay at the cheapest American city.

      See, I am an American expat, and I don't feel bad at all. I am tired of American cities crowded with criminal gangs, and lots of people living in the welfare, in ghettos, barely making it for living. You see those in Miami, NYC, Detroit, Chicago, Houston, Atlanta, pretty much everywhere.
      I feel much better, and safer, here in Santa Catarina than I used to feel in Miami Beach.

      So, why not to leave the old USA and live overseas? I see many smart people doing that, and I see lots of stupid people staying behind, so why not to follow the smart?

    4. Re:and why do we care? by Cimexus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Insightful comment (haven't got any mod points unfortunately though).

      I feel the same way about my home country (Australia). Australians deep down are quite patriotic, but it is a quiet, learned patriotism, rather than the overt 'God bless America' flag-waving culture you see in the US. If you asked us, we wouldn't say we were patriotic. But most would, as you say, defend it to the death if there was a real threat. Life is just too good here to give up easily, it truly is one of the world's best places to live (Canada is nice too BTW from what I've seen) :)

      I'm qualified to talk about this distinction I think, because my wife is in fact an American who has just recently permanently moved here to Australia with me. (Incidentally she's well educated, a good example of the brain drain out of the US). I've also spent a lot of time in the US myself, both for business and pleasure.

      I think the US a wonderful country with some of the friendliest people you will find anywhere. But the first time I visited I could not BELIEVE the awful, tacky, in-your-face patriotism. Flags from every freaking house (here, flags are pretty much just for government buildings etc). HUGE flags on the side of highways and stuff for no apparent reason (why? seriously, why?). In a way, the US displays its national symbol so much and so often that it loses it's importance and meaning I think. Here, we treat our flag with a great deal of respect and use it only for official occasions. And I think it is more symbolic and meaningful because of that.

      So I think your last comment "You can't force anyone to love a country, but you can let them", is a perfect summation. In most countries, people come to love their country gradually and deeply, because they genuinely think it's a wonderful place. In the US though it does seem as if patriotism is more ... indoctrinated into people.

  11. Re:I guess they ran out by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess they ran out of secret documents and technology to steal

    Yep, they've just found out that they can themselves engineer better stuff than they can steal from the U.S. today.

  12. Rest of the World by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Our new paper, "America's Loss Is the World's Gain"...

    Shouldn't that be "America's Loss Is the Rest of the World's Gain"? I know you insist on calling us aliens and think we use strange units like metres and kilograms but we are all part of the same world.

  13. Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by Shivetya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    simply tells smart immigrants to wait for a real change before coming back or planning to stay.

    I work with 1 H1B and a few naturalized immigrants who all are very well educated (masters for two of them) and their drive is well beyond what the average "American" I see today. They still want it all. The difference is that they are willing to sacrifice and work for it.

    When schools allow dummies to pass because it isn't fair to hold them back, when schools don't celebrate their brightest because it offends, when doing grunt work on your path through the job market is for losers, what can you expect? Fortunately there are still more of us than them. The problem is that very little is being done to encourage more of those yearning for success who will work for it instead we are now seeing more who expect everything to be done or handed to them.

    Reverse brain drain? It will get worse as some of OUR brightest go overseas to excel.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I work with 1 H1B and a few naturalized immigrants who all are very well educated (masters for two of them) and their drive is well beyond what the average "American" I see today. They still want it all. The difference is that they are willing to sacrifice and work for it.

      And with the H1-B, we show them the door instead of welcoming them to stay. These are the people that we should be encouraging to naturalize... hell, we should scrap H1-Bs completely, IMO, but raise the immigration cap for those wishing to naturalize.

      The US's great economy in the past was built on the shoulders of risk-taking, hard-working immigrants, and now we want to shut the door to protect "our" jobs? That's a recipe for economic stagnation.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I know I shouldn't feed the trolls... but you're kidding right?

      The US's great economy in the past was built on the shoulders of the SLAVES of THIEVING immigrants, and now we want to shut the door to protect "our" jobs? That sounds about right.

      Slavery aside, which is mostly a straw man to my argument...

      Cheap labor has been crucial to economic growth in the US. Typically this was immigrant labor in the past. Now we've reduced the flow of cheap labor to a trickle, and it's killing our economy.

      We should welcome hard-working and bright immigrants with open arms... not bar the gates against them simply because they are foreign or different. Competition for jobs will improve the US workforce. It will free up labor to do more valuable jobs.

      I agree offshoring is a problem for the US economy, but it's a complex issue, and the reasons I think it's a problem are not because it causes some Americans to lose jobs. That's simply an effect of the overpricing of US labor.

      The problem with offshoring is that we don't export much to developing nations. If we had a manufacturing base (impossible with our high labor costs, though environmental restrictions are another problem[1]) then creating jobs and wealth in developing nations would be a good thing. But since the only thing we export really significantly is entertainment, we're shit outta luck.

      The answer to this is not protectionism. It's the opposite -- reduce our labor costs so we can export to the countries we offshore to. Then we both benefit.

      [1] I don't advocate reducing environmental restrictions. Instead we need to make sure our trading partners have equivalent restrictions, so we're all on an even playing field.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  14. This is bad strategy. by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think a lot of Americans don't realize why America became the superpower it is.

    For thousands and thousands of years, the way to increase your nation's power was to go and invade the other nation, subjugate them, and take their stuff.

    The problem is that's a pretty expensive way of going about things. The answer?

    Immigration!

    Why fight through the world subjugating people when you can just open up the gates of immigration and the best, brightest and hardest working of the other nation's populace will voluntarily and at their own expense subjugate themselves?

    Much cheaper and more effective than invasion!

    1. Re:This is bad strategy. by saiha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The issue in the US though is instead of going into development of high-tech fields, Americans have been going into management of those fields. In my biased opinion in general becoming a generic MBA is easier than engineering/science so if eng/sci is being filled by immigrants, natives will go the other route. When the immigrants leave with all our IP all we are left with is paper pushers.

      We (meaning America) needs to start churning out more home-grown techies. We still want to encourage immigration though.

    2. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      all the while you are watering down your own culture and what made the nation great. If US immigration policy was based purely on skills and letting in the "best & brightest", that wouldn't be as big of a problem. Unfortunately, US immigration policy is based more on importing mass poverty than it is brainpower. We don't need to import some uneducated Saharan refugee to slice up cattle at 1/3 the old market rate and then allow him to bring his entire family over later on under a 'family visa'. We have enough shmucks that can do that. Unfortunately for the employers, they're not dumb enough to work at bargain basement prices.

    3. Re:This is bad strategy. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In my biased opinion in general becoming a generic MBA is easier than engineering/science so if eng/sci is being filled by immigrants, natives will go the other route. When the immigrants leave with all our IP all we are left with is paper pushers.

      Gee, I don't know... maybe instead we could encourage them to stay? That way, *they* become Americans, and suddenly, we don't have a shortage of Americans with eng/sci backgrounds.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:This is bad strategy. by swb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We need to end the cheap (H1-B) labor for engineering.

      If businesses "need" more engineering labor than the market has available, they need to pay for it, just as they would for marketing or management. Instead they suppress the salaries by importing cheap labor from overseas.

      We also need to undo some of the cultural bias we have for "management" and stop treating management as some kind of aristocratic/Mandarin class entitled to special wages & privileges above the common people.

    5. Re:This is bad strategy. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thus they are *labor* not immigrants and many cannot simply "stay". If they were actually immigrating to be citizens and engineers, chances are the wages they would paid would be lucrative enough to get Americans to do the jobs since the immigrants would have the same chances at other jobs as Americans (eg, if engineering doesn't pay, do something else instead of being brought here because you are an engineer).

      No, it would increase the supply of skilled labor, thus reducing cost of labor across he board for those skilled positions. The immigrants would get paid less, and non-immigrant (native/already naturalized labor) would also get paid less.

      I think this is necessary if we want to fix our economy long-term... reduce labor costs to make them more in line with global labor costs. Reduce our standard of living to more sustainable levels (unless you want to keep borrowing from China to support your SoL).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:This is bad strategy. by LaskoVortex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think a lot of Americans don't realize why America became the superpower it is.

      You skipped the part where we landed in a relatively uninhabited continent and exploited its natural resources for 200 years.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    7. Re:This is bad strategy. by SageMusings · · Score: 4, Insightful

      most of the Indians I have worked with lately have exaggerated (read:lied about) their work and education levels.

      Allow me to wreck my karma: You got modded down but I completely agree because I live this hell every day. We do a lot of outsourcing and have had many immigrant coders here on visas. To look at these guys on paper you'd think they were the second coming of Turing. In actual productivity and lines of useable code, it's been a cruel joke.

      Damn right they lied on their resumes and education. What's the worth of an Indian degree? No doubt there must be some jewels that come from those institutions somewhere. Someday I may meet one.

      Immigrant brain drain ? Puleeeze. We are quite fond of saying 90% of developers suck. Well, that applies to immigrants, too. I don't see this supposed exodus as a reason for concern. If anything we may reach a point where companies start to invest closer to home again........nah, that ship sailed years ago.

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    8. Re:This is bad strategy. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You demonstrate an unsurpassed lack of understanding of macro-economics.

      If the labor is expensive, than pray thee, how do you make american products compete in the international market? There is a reason why global markets are flooded with China-made products. They are cheaper than competing products of similar quality.

      Productivity. It's not the cost of labor but the cost per unit of production. If an item is labor intensive then the cost of labor is a significant input and you will look to lower your production cost by seeking cheap labor. This is general an item that requires little skill to produce. OTOH, if you can produce a lot of products or a high value product with your labor, the cost of the labor is less important. In many cases, this requires a skilled labor pool that is not easily replicated by simply moving a factory.

      China produces a lot of goods because they can be mass produced cheaply with a lot of labor; and labor is easy to get rid of when demand drops. China is just starting to see the social costs it faces as a result of its economic model; from both the downturn and competition from other places that are even cheaper. That's nothing new, it happened to the US, Japan and Korea as other countries became cheaper sources of labor; and companies moved to more those places or went up the food chain to higher end products and automation to become more productive.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  15. They will lead a better life "at home" by bogaboga · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A colleague of mine decided to return to Africa. The money he collected over seven years in the USA would enable him live a better life in his homeland.

    A mansion, with a swimming pool and three maids only costs him about 900 dollars to maintain. The respect he would get from the community would be greater and he'll have a chance to eat fresh "organic" fruit.

    All in all...good for them...I wish them all the best.

    When the economy picks up, I will welcome them to the mighty USA.

  16. Protectionism by Legion_SB · · Score: 5, Funny

    Adding to the brain drain is a problem with slow US visa processing, since last November or so, that has been driving desirable students and scientists out of the country.

    I like my protectionism like I like my women: passive aggressive!

    --
    'a';DROP TABLE users; SELECT * FROM DATA WHERE name LIKE '%'... if you're reading this, it didn't work.
  17. Re:This is good news, folks! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

    American jobs should be going to AMERICANS, not foreigners.

    You miss the point. Those people wanted to become Americans. Now they do not want to, anymore. Wonder why is that?

  18. Re:visa's by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's also true that any US Educated person, immigrant or not, going to some other country is a net loss. The US person leaving is a bigger net loss, since most likely their tuition didn't contain the astronomical international student fees.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  19. Much ado about nothing... by jeko · · Score: 4, Informative

    The temporary H1-B visa was supposed to be good for seven years. The average age at which H1-Bs come to this country is fresh out of college, so 22-23 years old plus seven years is about thirty.

    All this says is that the H1-B visa program is working as advertised.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Much ado about nothing... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All this says is that the H1-B visa program is working as advertised.

      And it shows just how stupidly designed the H1-B visa program was in the first place. These people are precisely the types we want as citizens. It should never have been temporary in the first place. It should have been designed to be a fast track to a green card. Instead it was designed as a way to put artificial leverage on these people to keep them under the thumbs of their corporate employers - in direct contradiction of traditional american values like being the "land of the free."

    2. Re:Much ado about nothing... by sbeckstead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I really wonder how many of you still know what the word "Free" means or how to apply it.

  20. Can you blame them? by deodiaus2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, there are two major factors.
    1) Given the current recession, the number of jobs have fallen off. That and there is pressure to hire an American over someone on a visa. Plus, maybe the foreigners don't want to pay our debt due to all of the bailouts and "Economic stimulus".
    2) Xenophobia is alive and well. Even if there were no 9/11, there was a fear of foreigners in the US. Be it left over hostiles from the Cold War, hatred towards Mexicans and South Americans for taking "good jobs" from Americans, Native Americans wanting their land back, or African-Americans wanting a piece of the American Dream and compensation from slavery, there are build up resentments which have been under the surface.
    Whenever you evaluate a strategic game or a problem, you can see it by seeing it from the opponents point of view.

  21. Great! by xplenumx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Training foreign students served two purposes. First, so we have an opportunity to hire the best and brightest. Secondly, so we can expose them to our culture. What better way is there to bring about change in a country than to train some of their top academic leaders? This is how you bring human rights to China and reduce corruption in Mexico.

  22. Immigration/Emigration problem by technomom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The next time you complain about immigration into the USA, consider how much worse things will be when people no longer even want to come here. Worse, that American citizens start leaving for greener pastures. That day may be coming.

    If we have an "immigration problem", it's generally a sign of a healthy economy. It's when we have an "emigration problem", that you know things will be really rough.

  23. Wait a minute... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you saying my immigrant coworkers who aren't planning on leaving are stupid? That seems both rash and mean. You take it back!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  24. If the playing field were level, ... by BillAtHRST · · Score: 5, Insightful

    then things might be different.
    As it is, the H1B program has merely managed to feed the "fat cats" without improving the lot of US citizens.
    By all means, encourage immigration of hard-working, talented, intelligent people.
    But allow them to control their own destinies and compete without handicapping them or US citizens by institutionalizing a system that unfairly depresses wages for all.
    Maybe we've just reached a sort of equilibrium here, where US wages have stagnated while the rest of world's has grown.

    1. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      H1-B wages are not the problem. By law, an employer is required to pay H1-B at least as much or more than the US market average for the given position.

      It's the job insecurity that H1-B entails that is a problem.

    2. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by hibiki_r · · Score: 5, Informative

      The H1-B program is evil, but even if anyone that qualified for an H1-B could ask for a green card instead, it'd still be painfully slow. Let's look at the Green Card process. How long does it take for people who have jumped through all the hoops to get one?.Take into account that, depending or where you come from, it could have taken close to a decade to get to this step:

      https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC

      I-485 processing times, the last, step in the process: It takes over 9 months for people seeking asylum, And close to two years for employment-based applications. Someone with an October 2007 filing date probably has another year or two left, given the flood of applications they had that summer.

      So it's not just the H1-B process that is slowing people's mobility. The H1-B's trying to stay, and that work for companies willing to jump through all the hoops for them, have flooded the Green Card process anyway.

    3. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      H1-B wages are not the problem. By law, an employer is required to pay H1-B at least as much or more than the US market average for the given position.

      It is only a violation if you get caught. There is, and always has been, exactly $0 in the government budget for enforcement of the wage parity requirements of the H1B program.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By law, an employer is required to pay H1-B at least as much or more than the US market average for the given position.

      are you just stating the law or do you really BELIEVE this is how the real world works?

      I can assure you, the two are disjoint in almost all h1b salaries.

      do you ever wonder WHY HR wants to keep salaries secret?

      well, sometimes its not always a secret and the truth does get out.

      foreign workers are underpaid BY PLAN. not by mistake or by accident.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  25. Re:I can't for the life of me work out what would by radtea · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...have made them want to leave..

    I've worked in the US twice, the first time in the early '90's in southern California, the second more recently in New England. Both times I felt like kissing the soil of my native country upon return.

    Individual Americans are some of the most decent people I've met. Collectively, though, you people scare me.

    The change between the early '90's and post-9/11 was striking, from the crazy stuff on TV (Glenn Beck pronouncing that 'security' is the most important thing to any American, when once upon a time it would have been something called 'liberty'), fast-food places with signs announcing that they only hired legal American citizens, and of course the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which temporarily stripped people like me from having access to Habeas Corpus protections.

    On the surface, everything was the same. Underneath, the picture was not pretty.

    The team I worked with was mostly non-Americans, from both the Far East and Europe, and most of them were highly educated and wanted to stay, but I could never figure out why.

    On the good side, like Churchill said, Americans will always find the solution to the problem... after they've tried everything else.

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  26. H1B's leaving by gravos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, one thing that no one ever bothered to mention is that they might be leaving BECAUSE they can't find good jobs here. A lot of the kids at the university I went to had to go back to their own countries after graduation, not because they wanted to, they love America. They can't find an employer willing to put up with all the BS that uncle sam requires so they can become citizens.

    Barriers to entry never help anybody. Uncle Sam, tear down this wall.

    1. Re:H1B's leaving by Udigs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, one thing that no one ever bothered to mention is that they might be leaving BECAUSE they can't find good jobs here. A lot of the kids at the university I went to had to go back to their own countries after graduation, not because they wanted to, they love America. They can't find an employer willing to put up with all the BS that uncle sam requires so they can become citizens. Barriers to entry never help anybody. Uncle Sam, tear down this wall.

      I guess you feel like the 4 or 6 years they spent in the university were too much trouble then, too? Or should we just hand out degrees to anyone who wants them? Of course not. It's the same deal with citizenship. The US doesn't just "hand it over" because it MEANS something. Just like it takes time and energy to get a degree, I think it's reasonable to expect something from those who want to be a part of the most powerful nation in the world.

    2. Re:H1B's leaving by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you think this just means that America will have fewer people but those people will be risk takers (and one suspects heart breakers too). Plus, they will be the lucky half of the risk takers. Plus they have a Masters.

      Sounds pretty badass to me.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:H1B's leaving by truesaer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We're talking about employers here. They're often not willing to spend years and tens of thousands of dollars working on getting their employees green cards. The US system requires extensive work by the employer, not just the individual.

      And frankly, US citizenship is not so valuable that it should be dramatically harder to obtain than an EU, UK, or Australian citizenship. But it is.

    4. Re:H1B's leaving by californication · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The U.S. unemployment rate is rising, meaning there are fewer and fewer jobs available. You may be willing and able to contribute and pay taxes, but so are about 20 million other people in this country.

    5. Re:H1B's leaving by QuasiEvil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or it's the ones who are forced to take the risk because more stable employment isn't interested in them as candidates...

    6. Re:H1B's leaving by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also, having a lot of education does not make one highly skilled. Especially younger workers without much experience thrown at jobs that treat technical people as commodities.

      Some of the best engineers I've known are highly educated people from China or India. However, some of the worst engineers I've met were also highly educated people from China or India...

    7. Re:H1B's leaving by SnapShot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish I had karma points. Excellent post.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    8. Re:H1B's leaving by M1rth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Reverse is also true: a large number of US workers are consistently being looked over for being "overqualified" after being dumped onto the market in favor of more and more H1-B's the past few years.

      Consider the following: if you are married, if you have more than 5 years experience, you are more likely to (a) be fired and (b) be passed over for a "new grad" or H1-B.

      Why? Benefits and pay grade. H1-B's at companies like Microsoft have been the latest in a series of BELL-like maneuvers (look up Continental Can Co. and the "Bell Plan" if you want to understand how insidious this kind of behavior is) by major US firms.

      Up until they started announcing layoffs, Microsoft was pushing for more and more H1-B's. It's not that there weren't very qualified US workers applying for those jobs, but that they didn't want to pay the market wage for people with real experience when they could pay the H1-B's less AND get away with forcing the H1-B's to work 80-90 hour weeks because they wouldn't have family back home to complain about it.

      --
      If you can read this sig, congratulations, you have your glasses on!
    9. Re:H1B's leaving by Tassach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      THIS... after 20 years in IT, I've worked with a lot of H1B's. My experience has been that the bell curve of ability among immigrant workers seems to be inverted -- they tend to be either insanely talented or completely incompetent, with very little middle ground between the two.

      Standard disclaimers about confirmation bias and limited sample size apply.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    10. Re:H1B's leaving by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder if this is because of H1B hiring tendencies. Employers either go with H1B workers because they can't find someone as highly qualified locally as the foreign applicant; or because they want cheap labor.

      (granted it's not cheap to go through the H1B process, but if you've got a marginal worker who has to go through a mess of bureacracy to change jobs, you've essentially got indentured labor that you can exploit)

    11. Re:H1B's leaving by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 5, Funny

      Filter your candidates for luck, you don't want unlucky people working for your company. Dump half the applications at random. Success!

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    12. Re:H1B's leaving by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if your company sucks, so you only end up keeping the unlucky candidates?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:H1B's leaving by javiercero · · Score: 2

      "An infant born in America will grow up in an American cultural environment, and will have American probabilities for growing up to be a decent person. An adult immigrant from another country is a much larger risk, and many would show up just because they couldn't succeed in any other country either. You do not want to let those people in. It's ok to be selfish."

      Yeah right you are not an American. And I am the queen of Sada. LOL.

    14. Re:H1B's leaving by ziphnab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An infant born in America will grow up in an American cultural environment, and will have American probabilities for growing up to be a decent person.

      I'd hate to break it to you, but the rest of the world is a big place, and while you might consider yourself moraly superior to large parts of the world, that world (usualy people in that same large part that you feel superior to) considers what you feel is a 'decent person' to be a guntoting fanatic that's loud obnoxious and has an inflated sense of selfworth because he has been indoctrinated from birth that the US of A is the best.

      I'm not American

      And, like my neighbour, I also am the queen of Sheba

      --
      --- Sometimes even music cannot substitute for tears. --Paul Simon, Cool Cool River
    15. Re:H1B's leaving by SomeKDEUser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Has it occurred to you that some people don't care much for nationalities at all? That for them, it is basically administrative hassle you go through?

      And that doesn't make them bad people, on the contrary: they probably just don't believe there is much of a link between geology and human qualities...

    16. Re:H1B's leaving by Cormacus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Citizenship != Permanent Residency

      And are you suggesting that the "diversity visa lottery" expects something from the people who win visas? </heavy sarcasm>

      How about we instead give those highly trained individuals who have completed advanced degrees here the ability to stick around and work so that they have the opportunity to contribute to the USA?

      PS - if you were trolling, good job. You got me.

      PPS - if you really believe this, . . . you may not have personal experience with this issue. Or you're a jerk.

      --
      Mon chien, il n'a pas du nez. Comment scent-il? TrÃs mauvais!
    17. Re:H1B's leaving by EvilNTUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am not an American, and I wasn't referring to any kind of superiority or fear of terrorism. This is about risk. Risk increases with uncertainty.

      An infant has a probability distribution equal to infants of American parents, because it just came into being. Adult immigrants have motives and all kinds of selection pressures, even if their home country is better than America. (Of course, unscrupulous prospective immigrants might take advantage of their infant, but that's another issue.)

      For example (and I am NOT saying this is reality), immigrants may be more likely to be losers because being unable to make a living in your own country is a strong motive to move abroad. On the other hand, skilled people may want to move to America to get better salaries.

      Immigration policies must be based on an honest study of the motives of all types of prospective immigrants. This also doesn't mean that the current policy is perfect, but simply opening up all borders in the name of some ideal could be disastrous. Making naturalization hard is a legitimate idea for finding the most motivated people.

      Notice that open borders wouldn't really be good for the countries you think I look down on either. Every person who could leave would do so, leaving the least capable parts of society in their home country. The third world would never recover. The best way to help those countries is to give the smart people a reason to build up their own country instead of escaping to industrialized nations that already have environmentally unsustainable populations.

      In the mean time, I think your country (assuming you're American) has every right to pick and choose those it lets in.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    18. Re:H1B's leaving by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but how many of these 20 million people are as highly educated and motivated as the poster above? Not very many.

      People like this Anonymous Coward are going to get a job. They are very employable. The question is whether they are going to work in the U.S. and pay U.S. taxes (and mortgages), or if they are going to take their expertise elsewhere and compete against Americans somewhere where the cost of living is much lower.

      The real problem that the U.S. has with outsourcing is that several countries have built up enough expertise in their own countries that they can actually compete with the U.S. I can compete with Indians and Chinese if they have to come to America to get the really good jobs. If the good jobs move overseas, however, because we won't let these highly educated people come here, then we are truly screwed.

  27. Re:Good riddance by carlzum · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm tired of the smell of curry.

    Oh no! The summary said PhDs and business managers were leaving, so I wasn't worried. But if the restaurant proprietors are going we have to act now. This is America, you can have your doctors and scientists, but for the love of God, don't take our food.

  28. Re:visa's by saiha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sometimes its a loss, sometimes it isn't. Sometimes it is only a short term loss.

    A US citizen who will probably return to the US will probably be a short-term loss with a long-term gain. A foreign citizen may bring American ideals to their home country which, barring obesity, is probably a good thing. They may also spread a view of Americans that isn't from Jerry Springer.

  29. Immigrants by russlar · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Ey took our jerbs!

    --
    Anybody want my mod points?
  30. Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by jeko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, for the billionth time, we don't mind competing on quality. No, for the billionth time, we're not racist. No, for the billionth time, we don't mind the competition. On the contrary, my heart goes out to the H1-Bs I work with because I know they don't have any good choices.

    In the most brutal stark terms, H1-Bs are hired specifically because they don't enjoy the same political and legal protection that native workers do. They get paid less, worked like indentured servants, and disposed of like kleenex. I've actually heard one manager scream at the H1-B team he employed "If you're awake, you're working for me!"

    This is why you don't see the IT market flooded with French, Canadian or Australian workers, but rather see the market flooded with people from countries struggling with poverty and political horrors.

    These poor people are exploited here precisely because the conditions in their home country are so horrific. My heart goes out to the women H1-Bs I've worked with, because I've seen the haunted look in their eye when they speak of home. I once cornered another H1-B over a hideously unethical stunt he pulled to shift the blame away from his own screwup to another, more junior engineer. He robbed my righteous thunder when he got a desperate look in his eyes and pleaded with me, "Look, if he gets fired he can just get another job. If I get fired, they'd make me go back..."

    For the billionth time, if we need this talent, then let's do the right thing by these people and offer them citizenship. If we're not prepared to do the right thing, then we shouldn't be using them as scabs to break the back of American labor.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by mooingyak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's easy to behave ethically when your ass isn't on the line.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  31. Extremely misleading article by hemp · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article is extremely misleading and makes you think that these companies may have been started by people that came to the US on H1-B visas

    They never break out the number of immigrants who come to the US on H1-B visas that start technology companies (H1-B is of course a temporary non-immigration visa).

    Google was started by Sergey Brin who was a Jewish immigrant from the Soviet Union whose family immigrated to the US when he 6 and Larry Page of Lansing Michigan.

    Andy Grove of Intel fame was a Jewish refugee who fled post WWII Europe to the US (Gordon Moore was born in San Fran and Robert Noyce born in Iowa however, where the actual founders of Intel).

    Pierre Omidyar of eBay of course is a Frenchman who moved to this country with his family when he was 6 years old.

    Yahoo! founded by David Filo ( cheese head from Wisconsin) and Jerry Yang who came to this country with his family when he 10 from Taiwan.

    None of these people came to the US on work visas.

    This article is reprinted by Business Week & Wall Street Journal every year close to the May deadline for H1-B visas.

    In May, there will be an article about how the 85,000 visas were snapped up in one day due to "shortages" amongst technology and science workers and how we need to have unlimited H1-B visas to fix this problem.

    --
    Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    1. Re:Extremely misleading article by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article is extremely misleading and makes you think that these companies may have been started by people that came to the US on H1-B visas

      They never break out the number of immigrants who come to the US on H1-B visas that start technology companies (H1-B is of course a temporary non-immigration visa).

      However, they DO break out the percentage of returnees that are H1B/temporary - 1/5th of chinese and 1/2 of the indians. That means that 4/5ths of the chinese and half of the indian returnees had green-cards or full citizenship.

  32. Management? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 5, Funny

    They were highly educated, with degrees in management...

    So that's our plan for destroying the world!

  33. Colleges are getting gutted as well by Dhrakar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is also important to note that for many colleges and universities, foreign nationals make up a large portion of the student body _and_ the faculty in several departments. As these highly talented folks go back, they leave big holes in the departments they leave behind. I think that if all the FNs left our petroleum engineering, for example, department the place would be a ghost town.
       

  34. Re:visa's by Quetzo · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, at least while I was a grad student, an (F1) student visa was only able to get you a 1 year apprenticeship after graduation. No way to apply for residency.

    If the company you apprentice with for a year decides to keep you on, they sponsor an H1B visa that allows you to apply for residency.

    The process of actually getting residency is horribly convoluted and takes between 5 and 8 years to complete. Not to mention all the shyster lawyers out there (yechh).

  35. It should be a two-way street by jeko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a basic matter of fairness, if Indian and Chinese citizens are going to be free to work in the United States, then US citizens should be free to work in India and China.

    The problem is they're not. Some out-of-work disgruntled geek published an article looking into this a while back. The Indian consulate just laughed at him when he inquired about being allowed to work in India, while the Chinese representatives haughtily told him that Chinese jobs were for Chinese citizens.

    They can't have it both ways. The Indians and the Chinese cannot argue that their citizens should be allowed to compete world-wide, but that jobs inside their own borders are only open to native citizens.

    It's not just faulty logic. It's raging hypocrisy.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:It should be a two-way street by mochan_s · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember that slashdot article.

      But, the guy who wrote the article had no intention of actually getting a job in India or China. He was just trying to get somebody to say something stupid at the consulate.

      Actually, if you work for a Chinese company, they will put out a press release to the local media that their company is so great that even American want to work for them (it did happen! though it was for a student who was working at a Chinese factory - not really for wages but for experience).

    2. Re:It should be a two-way street by thej1nx · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or instead of hypocrisy, it is sheer xenophobia and mis-information at work. Clueless much? Apparently Indian companies do hire non-Indians. http://infotech.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1832596.cms Obviously, these folks did apply for a work permit and got one. Thing is, that most US citizens are generally only all talk about actually going to India to work. Just empty talk. It is a third world country. Period. Even if you were earning well by Indian standards(which most foreigners working in India do) you will still be dealing with mosquitoes, scorching Indian heat in summers, dirt, grime, infections, what not. India is all fun to visit as a tourist, but living there when you are a US citizen? Forget it. Think of queues 4-5 hours long, for almost everything. Indians are used to this "way of life". You as a pampered, spoiled US citizen are not. You will start cribbing about the dirt from day one. Your body has never encountered the diseases and bacterias flourishing there. Indians have developed a natural immunity. You will either have really watch what you drink and eat, or fall sick constantly. And the country is mostly conservative. Your chances of a relationship with a membership of the opposite sex are remote, unless she is interested in hooking onto your US citizenship as a wife. And all this, when your pay is in the upper brackett, allowing you to afford an air-conditioner at home at least, a car, good medical care, to compensate for some of the things you took for granted in USA. Such high-paying jobs are scarce. Being used to the US life, you are just not really in a position to survive on an actual average Indian salary. So far, it has been unthinkable that any average american would want to work in India for long-term, unless he was being ordered to, by his employer, or unless he was unaware what he was getting into, or unless he was a glutton for punishment, or all of above. If you are still game, get an Indian company to hire you first. If you are a good bargain for the value they will get, then business is business. There is no real bias against foreigners, especially if they deal with software export or US clients, in which case you might be even desirable for interfacing with their US clients. They will sponsor your Indian work permit. The procedure involved lots of red-tape but not impossible either. I personally know tons of Japanese folks working in India for example, for Indian companies that deal with Japanese companies. But please tone down the misinformation and xenophobia. It is becoming too much an american stereotype.

  36. it's pretty much common knowledge by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Informative

    PhD students in the sciences and engineering do not pay for their education. Nearly 100% of them are funded in one way or another, whether it's fellowships, research assistantships, or teaching assistantships.

    1. Re:it's pretty much common knowledge by manastungare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      +1 for Trepidity.

      I'm a Ph.D. student in Computer Science. I have been fully funded all through my academic career here in the US at Georgia Tech and Virginia Tech. The same is the case with many (but not 100%) students getting Masters and Ph.D.s in Computer Science that I know of. There usually are a few paid assistantship positions that require security clearance, but most basic and applied research is not confidential.

      The funding isn't just a giveaway, of course -- I have to work for it and show results in return for the money from the NSF. As a symbiotic advantage, I get an advanced degree in the process.

      Empirical evidence, though, and I don't know where I might find a citation for you.

  37. Slow visa processing is old by OFnow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Suggesting that slow visa processing began last November is just silly. That has been old news for years. Getting to the US to give a class, lecture, concert, or to go to school is much much more difficult than it was before Bush, and before 9/11. It's really bad for the US, for innovation, and for everyone, really, but it is old news.

  38. Re:good riddance by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah I saw that commercial too. The Germans always make good stuff.

  39. Re:Let them go by Fourpole · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Presumably, most of those people originally wanted to become "real" (is there any other kind?) US citizens as well, but realized they have to jump through too many hoops for it to be worth it.

    I don't know about that. I live in a city with a high number of educated workers on a visa, and I know a lot of graduate students that will be looking for work on a visa. With a couple of exceptions, they are all pretty adamant about maintaining their citizenship and staying here on a visa only. The reasons vary, but most of them don't want to give up that part of their identity.

    Of course this is all anecdotal, but in my experience the majority of the educated immigrants are here for the education and job opportunities, not to stay here permanently.

  40. Re:good riddance by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everyone knows that the Germans invented everything important

    Like those ShamWow towels! :D They're made in Germany, and you know the Germans make good stuff. Just ask Vince! He won't steer you wrong. :)

    --
    Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  41. You must be a liberal arts major :-) by jeko · · Score: 5, Funny

    I conclude that you pulled that figure out of your ass.

    Most people start college at 17 or 18. Eighteen plus four equals twenty-two, at least it does in my corner of the universe. I know I graduated college at twenty-two. Twenty-two or twenty-three plus seven years lands you in the neighborhood of thirty, again, for most values of thirty.

    Does the math work differently when it comes out of your ass? Perhaps you don't realize it's not customary to take seven years to finish an undergrad degree?

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  42. Re:Let them go by mooingyak · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's nothing special about the foreigners. We can make more.

    Well, not exactly. THEY can make more. If we make them, they're not foreigners.

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  43. Why don't we ... by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... give them their PhD and their citizenship at the same time? If someone came here from another country long enough to earn their PhD, they've already worked here for somewhere around 5-7 years. Why do we make it more difficult for them to stay longer?

    Add to that the fact that most grant funding agencies only give grants to citizens, and it isn't hard to figure out why so many people who come here for their PhD from other countries end up leaving afterwards - they finished their PhD and then ran straight into a career roadblock of no fault their own.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  44. Completely Untrue by sanman2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's a fiction that's been repeated endlessly, like an urban myth. There are indeed managers from Western countries who live and work in India. Look at IBM, Cisco, Accenture -- they have plenty of Western managers there onsite in India. I had a friend at IBM whose division was being downsized, and IBM offered him a chance to resettle in India. He didn't take it, but obviously you can indeed work there, if you choose.

  45. Hey! Smart people! by Eil · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get back on my lawn!

  46. Stupid visa tricks by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My cousin from El Salvador wanted to come to the US to attend school to get an education degree. She would have been a great teacher, especially for dealing with kids who needed bilingual help. She applied to school a year after 9/11, and her student visa was delayed, delayed, delayed, so she ended up staying in El Salvador and working in HR at a recruiting firm in El Salvador.

  47. Smart Americans going home too... by californication · · Score: 2, Funny

    as they are laid off, so what's your point? I have several colleagues with a master's and years of experience getting laid off. It's not as if U.S. citizens are getting preferential treatment when it comes to who gets laid off and who doesn't. There's an oversupply of highly qualified people and less demand for these professionals. If we're losing bright people, it's because right now we don't have jobs for them.

    The fact that these highly qualified immigrants are going home is exactly why U.S. citizens SHOULD get preferential treatment when it comes to laying off or hiring people; because while an immigrant can just up and leave to their previous country, we as Americans are STUCK with this country. How many Americans have support networks outside of the U.S. that they can turn to when times get worse? It is in our best interest that this country succeed, but this country can't succeed when it invests time and money in foreign students and employees who will just up and leave when the going gets rough.

  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. Plumbing Jobs by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool, more jobs for Real Americans, like plumbing and stuff. That's like software, right? Putting stuff together and running stuff through it.

  50. Probably a French Romantic Poetry degree... by jeko · · Score: 2, Funny

    On average, teenagers in America get their drivers license at sixteen. The minimum legal age to get your license in America is sixteen. Therefore, since sixteen is the average, half of them must have received their license before it was legal to do so.

    How's that Moliere paper coming?

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  51. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, this.

    Give them back all of the management grads.

    See if we can export some of ours too.

  52. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alaren, you are absolutely correct. I'm a former academic who still has many connections and the biggest group that seems to be leaving are recently minted MBAs and B-school grads. Those are fields that just aren't doing well in an economic downturn.

    My wife of 21 years was a PhD student in Math and an immigrant from Eastern Europe when we met. Her experience opened my eyes to a population and situation that I barely knew existed. So many Americans believe that immigrants "just take a test" and they're instant citizens. Many more believe all the racial and ethnic stereotypes about intelligence and science and math skills (or lack thereof). Too many believe they take more than they give.

    I can barely imagine what it's like for a young person with talent who comes to America to try to better herself. I've walked with such a person for a couple of decades now. My grandparents were also such people, coming from war-torn (WWI) Italy to be shepherds and steelworkers and shirt-makers and railroad workers. Their sons fought in WWII. All their sons and daughters became proud and successful Americans and thanks to the Labor Unions that are now under attack from American "conservatives", became productive members of the US middle class.

    I was one of those "liberal arts students who scored higher on verbal and lower on math" that Alaren mentioned. My wife is a mathematician in a field I can hardly understand, and my daughter, now an undergrad who gets her looks from her Mom (thank god) is pretty well-rounded. She wants to be either a mathematician or a novelist. It would not suprise me if she became both.

    I get a sick feeling when I hear Americans talk down immigrants, legal and otherwise. They are as important to the formation and future of our country as the Founding Fathers.

    We have to remember, the Pilgrims (you know, the guys with the funny hats and buckled shoes from Thanksgiving) were immigrants, every one.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  53. Problem is loss of people, skills - not loss of IP by Geof · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When the immigrants leave with all our IP all we are left with is paper pushers.

    The value of so-called IP is nothing beside the value of the skills, human relationships etc. for creating and developing ideas. Those who think innovation means resting on the creativity of 10, 20, life plus 70 years ago are doomed from the start. Creativity and innovation are activities, not artifacts. A focus on the frozen ideas of "IP" diverts attention from the real issues. The problem is not that the smart immigrants are taking American ideas away: it is that they are taking themselves.

  54. Re:This is bad strategy. India/GM-Canada/GM-EU by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like to listen to The World, from BBC/NPR... In today's audio...

    http://www.theworld.org/node/24849

    "Delhi-based economic journalist Paranjoy Guha Thakurtha tells anchor Lisa Mullins why India's economy is managing some growth while many neighboring economies are slipping."

    But, what did *I* learn today? (this is from memory, and some of it my own adding...)

            India's economy is set or on track to grow some 3-5% this and next year, even though the rest of the (industrialized) world is stagnating. Why? India's economy is not nearly as integrated with the rest of the world as is the US', Japan's, Korea's, UK's, etc.

    Some 1/3 of Indians go to bed starving, but some 2/3 of "Americans" are classed as "overweight". Indian make of some 1/3 of the world's IT force, yet India's own domestic infrastructure is ~ or http://www.theworld.org/node/24850

    I learned:

    "General Motors and Chrysler produce nearly a quarter of their North American vehicles in Ontario. So they're asking Canadian taxpayers to pitch in almost a quarter of the money that the companies say they need to stay afloat. The World's Jason Margolis has more."

    So,
            Canadians produce around 25% of GM's cars, and GM wants Canadians to ante up (help out) with some 20% of the money GM needs. Including benefits, Canadian GM workers earn about $49/per hour! But, effective take-home pay is about $25/hour. Canadians, understandably, are concerned that GM or other US-carmakers will get them to sign on to a Canadian-citizen-funded auto industry bailout program, then take the money to less-expensive Asian areas, or back to the US.

    Interesting report...

    ---

    And, here:

    GM Europe 'could run out of cash'
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7922186.stm

    ----

    GM Europe 'could run out of cash'
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7879372.stm

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  55. Temporary pain for later gain? by emagery · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Granted, it hurts to lose educated people from an economy that is in desperate need of new industry (as opposed to new services and new debts) ... but ... America isn't the whole of the world, and the world as a whole has real problems. Educating these people and then dispersing them to the wind like this... it may hurt right now, but what if they take seed in places of the world in greater need of educated people... places with runaway population growth, terrible environmental records, and similarly unsustainable practices? Heck... beyond that, after a taste of democracy, who is to say all these people going back to their less tolerant homes won't also foment cultural reforms (not that our model is picture perfect right now, but...) It's a notion, anyways

  56. How the he** am I supposed to run a business... by gillbates · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I have to pay employees enough to buy a house?

    Look, I've got about 10 H1-B's working for me, and I'm saving a good half a million over hiring American workers. How am I supposed to afford a second house in the Bahamas? Honestly, you whiners are killing me here.

    And my daughter wants a Lexus when she turns 16. Hmm, I've got an open position, and I can hire an American or H1-B... Tell me, honestly, that you'd tell your daughter she'll have to drive a 2 year old Camry because Daddy hired an American!

    You people, such whiners. I tell you, these guys could teach you a lesson or two. Work less than 60 hours a week? Sure, FOR SOMEONE ELSE! Go ahead and try to leave - I can replace you in a week.

    It's sad, but some of you reading this probably don't realize its satire. Hopefully I'm not bringing up bad memories of past employers for any of you.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  57. Brains leave to go home by cttnpckn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last week I worked for a company that has their roots here. Now the whole company is moving to India (back to where the owners are from). They have laid off all the American workers and are taking the indian workers home with them. They say that they aren't selling enough of their product here and they can sell their product in those countries back home. So, here we are: where we cannot afford to buy the products that the Indians can afford. The emerging markets are growing and our markets are not. The problem here isn't that we are loosing brain power. The problem here is that we are loosing our whole market. Of course in 10 years this might settle itself out somewhat but what will be left? Lots less than if we had controlled the money system in the first place. The problem is that corporations want something for nothing and then we are all left with lots less. The problem was that the derivative market was printing so much money no government could hope to keep up. Ultimately we rise and fall together (owners and workers), (foreign and american) and we really can't pretend that any other system will work. We have to control thieves, double check the integrity of the products that are sold. We have to keep a careful eye on how those products are produced so we don't kill our planet trying to sustain this crazy consumption lifestyle that we have created. There is no easy answer here.

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. But that's the point... by BlueCoder · · Score: 2, Informative

    You sound like some company taking advantage of H1B visa applicants. The whole theory of H1B is that they do go back home.

    The goal is to raise the quality of life for the world. To create jobs and worldwide economic success. Our chief export should be success.

    Just watch ten or twenty years from now when the tech companies using H1B applicants and the ones shipping jobs offshore find out that they created their own competition. Competition that is very hungry and aggressive. Competition that will one day be hiring the top 10% of American talent. Not because it's cheap but because of greater demand of genuine skills and talent.

  60. It is a shame... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Just great about the US though.

    We can't seem to keep the LEGAL immigrants we want...the educated ones, that followed the laws, and contribute to the system. Instead, we are stuck with the ILLEGAL ones, that...well......generally are the opposite of the aforementioned legal ones.

    *sigh*

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:It is a shame... by tsm_sf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, treat them both the same way and see how far it gets you.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    2. Re:It is a shame... by ag0ny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It probably has something to do with the fact that after 9/11 the USA has become increasingly police state-like.

      Before 9/11 happened I was looking forward to go back to the US and see NYC (I liked Massachusetts). Then the planes hit and the towers fell, and after the initial scare passed your country went irrationally paranoid about security.

      I decided not to set foot on the US again until your government came back to its senses. You know, I don't like to be treated as a criminal by default when visiting a foreign country. I assume this is part of the reason why those people are leaving.

      It seems that now things might start to change (hopefully for good).

    3. Re:It is a shame... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's why I moved back to Canada and decided not to work in the U.S. again, even though I have had a number of calls and offers to come back in the short time I have been away (even in this recession). It leaves me feeling a bit down since I really liked living there in Saint Louis; the first city I have really been home sick over. It drove me crazy that it was such a pain in the ass to get a green card even though I spent all told 7 years there on work visas. I kept my nose clean, at worst I got two parking tickets which I paid, and contributed time and money to a local non profit group that tries to take care of various issues the old blues musicians in town run into (the one's who are poor because of the way they were ripped off on royalties by the same recording companies trying to sue single mothers). Meanwhile I keep hearing how congress wants to grant immunity and green cards to all those who have been living there for more than a couple of years illegally.

      Another thing, many Americans don't realize that working on many/most of the various work visas means you have a month to back up and get out of America if your job ends, something that does kind of wear on you after a while... especially in a slowing economy. That is, knowing you might have to not only look for new work if your job ends, but also new work in a different country while still being away (not as easy as if you are there), and finding a new home in a different country and all the moving issues around that. I left the middle of last year from the U.S. (I quit, I didn't get laid off) because of all of those kinds of issues.

      "Give us your poor, your tired, your huddled masses longing to be free..." maybe that is more true than I thought. If I am not poor or longing to be free, if I don't need welfare or government assistance, maybe that's the reason it is so hard to get a green card if you are a computer professional. I should have applied for welfare. Ha! That's it! If I ever do go back to work in the U.S. I'll swim across the border... that way I might have a better chance of getting a green card. When the economy goes south, you want to keep the good minds since they are the ones most likely to help you get it back on the road. The reverse brain drain is a case of the U.S. having its cake and finding out what it's like to want to eat it too.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    4. Re:It is a shame... by morcego · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are not kidding there.

      Yesterday I went to the USA Consulate to get a tourist visa for my daughter. She is going to Disney World in June.

      Anyway, I was stuck inside an open area, with the temperature almost at 100 degrees, for 2 hours. Without a place to sit. Yes, there were some wooden benches, but way too many people. Some of the other applicants were there for 4+ hours. All the visa officers were behind bullet proof glasses, and talked to us using something that passes for a mic/speaker. And when, because of that, I could not understand what the visa officer was saying, I've got insulted by him.

      I mean, c'mon. I was there to give the USA money (tourism is still one of the best sources of income for a country, last I checked). And I've got stuck on an open warehouse-like area, got treated like I was trying to visit someone at the jail, got insulted and, to add insult to injury, had to pay to have the passport mailed back to me by our local equivalent of FEDEX, at DOUBLE the normal rate for that service.

      Interesting enough, the local people that works at the consulate (ie: non-visa officers) were all very nice and helpful. However, the USA citizen working there were treating me like crap. But my 13yo daughter wants to visit Disney World. I know I, for one, will take my vacations somewhere else.

      --
      morcego
  61. NYT: India's protectionism is a great success by walterbyrd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kinda funny, I think. We are so constantly lectured that the US should not have any "protectionist" policies against India, because protectionism never works.

    March 1, 2009

    India Maintains Sense of Optimism and Growth

    India's trillion-dollar economy remains a relative bright spot, some say, in part because the country's bureaucracy and its protectionist polices have kept it insulated from the fallout of the global downturn.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/02/business/worldbusiness/02rupee.html?_r=1&ref=world

     

    1. Re:NYT: India's protectionism is a great success by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But yet, that's just a facade to hide the fact that India has these gigantic problems:

      Overpopulation--India has 1.1 billion people, just too much for a country of that size.

      Disparity between rich and poor--there are gigantic slums in almost every major city in India, where people live in extreme squalor and the potential for a huge number of deaths from disease is very real.

      Pollution--because of all this high-density human activity, pollution in various forms is still a very serious problem.

      Cultural strife--because of the gigantic number of cultures on the Indian subcontinent, cultural strife is a very serious problem. (We forget only Pakistan and Indonesia have more Muslims than India, despite the 80% Hindu majority.)

      India will have to come to grips with all four of these problems if they are to be a major partner with the rest of the world.

  62. No problems with H1B VISA workers by magamiako1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The US could compete if the cost of getting an education here was much cheaper. The problem is--it isn't.

    I have no problems with the foreign workers themselves. They, like us, are trying to make a good living. And they do a good job at that.

    But they have a much lower cost of education. Doing a quick google search brings up the following URL on the education cost in India.

    http://prayatna.typepad.com/education/2005/07/what_does_a_uni.html

    While the above cost may be amazingly expensive in India, you could quickly pay all of that cost back by scoring a job in the United States. The average cost of a similar education in the US is sometimes as much as 10 times that, even higher if you attend a private university.

    It's not that American workers are underskilled or underqualified, it's that the cost of entry into the same field of work is significantly higher than these foreign workers. The cost of something like a PhD is even much higher than a simple bachelor's degree.

    And people wonder why you can't find "quality American workers".

  63. H-1B program is hurting US STEM education by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been teaching IT courses for the past 13 years. The drop-off in enrollments, beginning in 2001, has been remarkable.

    Talking one-on-one with students, I have found that the prospect of losing a job -- or of not being able to get one in the first place -- because of competition from lower-paid employees both here and abroad is causing students to switch careers away from IT. And who could blame them? Working hard to earn a degree only to have the job market flooded by lower-paid employees is discouraging.

    This indirect effect of hiring H-1B employees is one that doesn't get much discussion. Maybe it is time that it did, because we are losing the ability to compete technically with European and Asian countries.

    Danny Clarke
    Instructor, math and computer science
    Truckee Meadows Community College
    Reno, Nev.

    http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=334764

  64. US tech was stronger before the flood of h1bs by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The US tech industry was built, and grew explosively, before the flood of h1bs. Now we are supposed to believe that only Indians are capable of understanding technology.

    Is there any real evidence to prove that h1bs have been all that helpful to US technology? When did msft start all hiring so many h1bs? Right after XP and before Vista wasn't it? Banks have been hiring tons of h1bs, and they are all just doing great aren't they?

    There are plenty of highly qualified US tech workers, many of whom are unemployed, why is so critical to keep flooding the market with h1bs?

    1. Re:US tech was stronger before the flood of h1bs by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is there any real evidence to prove that h1bs have been all that helpful to US technology? When did msft start all hiring so many h1bs? Right after XP and before Vista wasn't it? Banks have been hiring tons of h1bs, and they are all just doing great aren't they?

      Rose-colored glasses, you must have. Remember that XP was a buggy steaming pile of dung when it was released, too.

      As for banks, that has nothing to do with engineers or coders, that has to do with top-level decisions and deregulation.

      Keep in mind that Citibank's core software was developed in India long before any of this shit hit the fan.

      Correlation !- causation, and it's either ignorant or disingenuous of you to link either MS's crapware or ting fiasco with H1B employees.

      There are plenty of highly qualified US tech workers, many of whom are unemployed, why is so critical to keep flooding the market with h1bs?

      Please read any number of the posts above that explain why increasing the labor supply is important to maintaing the US economy in the long run.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  65. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Labor unions are under attack because they've gone from organizations that were concerned about worker health and safety to parasites that exist only to suck as many concessions for the industries they deal with. So, not only are the companies hobbled with an over priced work force, they are crippled to how flexible they can be with respect to adopting new technology or simple things as job duties. You have to look no further than the UAW and its contracts with the US auto makers. To their credit, GM and Ford do operate some efficient world class factories. The problem is that NONE of them are in North America because of the UAW. On top of it all, they take dues that are meant for collective benefits for the workers and use that to support political parties that the workers may or may not support.

    I have relatives that are or were UAW auto workers and it is unbelievable how slack their jobs are or what nonsense the hard core slackers can get away with.

  66. Re:This is good news, folks! by shanen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gee, you'd think those slimy foreigners could love us for something besides our money, eh? Damn those socialists, and give my regards to your wife. Maybe she loved you for something besides your money, eh? We can always hope.

    Yes, that's an insult, but I can't yet decide how stupid you are. Would you be worth having as a /. foe?

    Just in case you aren't an idiot, I'm curious why you are so desperate for money? I currently earn about three times my expenses, and I've become rather spendthrift these years. I really can't imagine what I'd do with more money, and I don't think I would work any harder or better if I was making somewhat more or less money. Now when you get up to the level around $1 million/year, it just seems ridiculous to me. I actually think most people would find that downright demotivating and just quit working.

    Or maybe the key factor ("problem" from your perspective?) is that I enjoy my work and I'm in no hurry to retire, even though I can see that age coming up pretty quickly...

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  67. True, but... by weston · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, it would increase the supply of skilled labor, thus reducing cost of labor across he board for those skilled positions. The immigrants would get paid less, and non-immigrant (native/already naturalized labor) would also get paid less.

    Thus decreasing the economic advantage of pursuing science or engineering as a career, especially relative to law, management, or finance.

    Thus leading to fewer US natives pursuing an education in these fields...

    Which is fine, more or less, I suppose. Deciding to import your technical talent is one way to do things, as long as you have more money than everybody else.

    The problem is what happens when these other places can afford to keep their talent at home... while, in the meanwhile, we've let the cultivation of domestic talent languish.

  68. Re:man, where to start by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right off the bat, the US is at a critical tipping point for such things as just plain water availability. It's in the headlines, read up on it, we CAN'T support very many more people just from that single reason. We can barely maintain what we have now is huge areas of the nation. And don't negate the seriousness of this either or think it isn't a factor.

    This can be addressed by changing how we use water, how we approach development, etc. This is not a problem without solutions (pardon the pun) -- restrict development in water-limited areas. Reduce water consumption (I did mention reducing standard of living, and egregious consumption is part of that -- I also mentioned the unsustainable natural resource use, which water is part of).

    Next, in a fast shrinking economy, dumping more labor into the pool further exacerbates the jobs-available situation, it doesn't create more jobs by having more people looking for jobs, and startups are by the zillions and are almost all failing, because of point one, a fast declining labor market that is also reeling from being too much in debt.

    The economy needs to be retooled. Increasing the labor pool also increases demand for consumer goods -- and reduced wages will enable us to competitively manufacture consumer goods (especially as fuel and energy costs continue to rise globally).

    Another facet is we have no affordable housing, especially at entry level, even with price drops, housing is becoming more and more untenable in the ownership arena. We have gone from 10 year mortgages to now 30 year mortgages and even interest only mortgages, ie, a fancy way to say a renter forever but delude yourself you are even going to be an "owner". The places with affordable housing have no jobs, places with still decent jobs still have extraordinarily skewed housing prices. And all other costs of living keep going up, food prices for example from commodities skimmers and parasites are a big one there as well.

    The affordable housing issue will sort itself out, if we have the contraction that is needed. It'll be painful... but note that the intense inflationary period we'll be going through in the next decade will wipe out a lot of the housing pain. We need to pay the piper.

    As to protectionism, way back when we had a true smaller constitutional government and government was funded mostly from sane import and export tariffs, we built the largest and most fantastic industrial base and ag base ever seen on the planet. Once we stopped that, and let those thieves at the Fed and the other bankers and wall street traitors run the economy, it all went to shit. FAILURE to protect the indigenous middle class and purposefully leading them on to "invest" in your casino stock lies and fiat credit based liars currencies is exactly what caused the first great depression, and now they did it fucking again, the great huge ripoff version two plus they want to be PIAD via more tax payer debt as a REWARD for their fraudulent policies.

    Ah, here is where your true nature shines through. Let me give you hint -- first, the global economy is very different than it was in the 1800s. Just advances in transportation have changed the very nature of how economies work. Never mind the fact that the economy went to shit plenty of times before the institution of the Fed, of income tax, etc -- the Fed was created BECAUSE the economy went to shit so often.

    And our labor isn't expensive, it was just about perfect for a robust middle class until around 25 years ago when this huge ripoff got in high gear. It was fine before the greed merchants decided to go whole hog and destroy it all for SHORT TERM GAINS. Our FATCAT SALARIES at the top are the only "too expensive" labor we have, along with a government make work busy work create a million new regulations a year jobs program that is 5 or 10 times bigger than

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  70. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by javiercero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With my condolences to the Monty Python:

    Damn right. Besides weekends, what has organized labor done for us?

    OK, OK...

    Besides weekends AND vacations, what has organized labor done for us?

    Hum, what... OK

    Besides weekends, vacations AND paid leave, what has organized labor done for us?

    Really? No kidding... OK

    Besides weekend, vacation, paid leave AND fair salaries, what has organized labor done for us?

    For real?

    Besides weekends, vacation, paid leave, fair salaries AND safe working conditions, what has organized labor done for us?

    What? Really... OK OK

    Besides weekends, vacations, paid leave, fair salaries, safe working conditions AND retirements, what has organized labor done for us?

    Huh? come on... OK OK

    Besides weekends, vacations, paid leave, fair salaries, safe working conditions, retirement, AND medical coverage, what has organized labor done for us?

    Yeah... what a bunch of dicks!

  71. I'm an immigrant who left by Nyenyec · · Score: 2

    I worked for 6 years at a US research institute on an academic H1B. I got a new job offer and would have loved to stay but couldn't get a commercial H1B (lost in the H1B visa lottery: my chances were 1 in 3).

    So I moved to Switzerland last year. I'm still working for an American company, but I won't pay any taxes, buy products or use services in the US any more. And a US citizen still won't have my job, it went overseas.

    If the US decreases the H1B cap even more, you'll see more stories like this. You can't keep jobs in America this way.

  72. Can hardly blame them by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The INS Dehumanization of Foreigners Act is to blame. OK, so I joke, but having worked on a project in the US for a few years (before returning home). Here's my experience of the visa process.

    First I was on an L1 as an intracompany transferee. I wasn't cheap to my company either - they did indeed pay the prevailing wage, and on top of that, a substantial international service allowance that paid all of my living expenses and then some (the ISA was something like double my actual basic living expenses). Since they are a big firm and have many people working in many different countries, they have a whole department that looks after people on international service. This department does things like visa paperwork. They are very experienced with it.

    However, my visa application was refused (section 224g IIRC, "insufficient information") and the US Embassy demanded that I go and have a visa interview at the embassy. The ream of paperwork, incidentally, was filled out just like they had been doing successfully for some months - but they explained to me that every so often the embassy staff changes, and some new footling jobsworth rule changes, and they just start bouncing applications. I was just unlucky enough to hit a staff change. So I go up to London, where you have to line up outside the embassy at the crack of dawn for a good hour or so. Then you have to line up to get a delicatessen style ticket. Then you sit down and wait, while they call numbers.

    You can't read a book while they are doing this - the numbers are called in seemingly random sequence, and you just know after your initial experience already with the embassy if you are reading, and miss your number, they won't call it again and you'll get sent home to repeat the experience some weeks later. So you sit and get bored. If you do decide to read, they have these "newspapers" around called something like "Going USA". The first half of which bizarrely seems to be dedicated to how terrible your own country is, how great the USA is, and what a good time your country folk are having running gas stations in Florida. The second half of the "newspaper" is dedicated to how they aren't going to give you a visa anyway.

    Anyhow, after 4 hours, my number came up. The guy asked me a single question - what are the dates of service with your company? I told him. He said, "That's great, you'll get your passport back in about a week". They could have asked me that over the phone and saved me a completely unproductive day (and a great deal of expense). Now I have no quarrel with the guy who did the "interview" at the embassy, he was perfectly courteous and polite. But the whole bureaucratic machine is a red-taped mess.

    I had a second run-in with the Embassy's bureaucratic machine again when my visa got extended. It was actually approved by the INS in the United States, all I needed to do was if I went back home on a trip, was to get the new visa stuck in my passport. The Embassy literally had nothing to do other than print the thing as it was already approved. There was another form to fill in for the Embassy (which merely duplicated all the information the INS already had when they approved the new visa), so I filled this in, sent it and the paperwork from the INS in the USA to the Embassy. They refused my new visa! My new pre-approved visa! Why? Because the form was out of date. So I downloaded the new form off the Embassy website and it was...exactly..the..same....as...the...one I sent, apart from the date at the bottom. Exactly the same. This bureaucratic stupidity cost me another couple of days as the new paperwork had to make yet another round trip.

    Now I'm not singling out the USA here. My current next door neighbour is Albanian - she's very smart, has an engineering degree, and fluently speaks English, German and French (and of course Albanian). But the British embassy treated her like a liar and criminal - they were deliberately extremely unpleasant, rude and aggressive to her face (and indeed, she wouldn't have come here if it wasn't

  73. Smart immigration / trade policy by z80kid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You demonstrate an unsurpassed lack of understanding of macro-economics. If the labor is expensive, than pray thee, how do you make american products compete in the international market?

    You don't compete.

    The only way you can reasonably compete with someone in a third world country who lives in a plywood shack and eats a bowl of rice a day is if you are willing to live the same lifestyle.

    In an International economy, money is a bit like water. It's always going to roll down to the low points. While it's true that this has the advantage of raising the standard of living at the low end, it also decreases it at the high end. This is why there are borders and tariffs - to build a dam between economies that regulates the flow.

    I've seen more than a few sentimental references to that poem on the statue in NY harbor. That poem was put there during the immigration boom of the early 20th century. Recall that during those years, we had low wages and abuse of workers on a massive scale. We tried to patch it then (and ever since) by running in circles passing more and more regulations on business. By nature, regulations limit freedoms and cost money to enforce. It could have (and still can) be done another way.

    The real problem was that jobs and applicants are a supply and demand market. The demand for workers was finite, but the supply was unlimited. So a worker's value (to the company) was near zero. In a more balanced economy where the labor supply was closer to demand, employers would have had to make some reasonable concessions. But they were under no such pressure.

    What's needed is a sensible trade and immigration policy - one that balances immigration with the job market, and prevents us from competing openly with countries who do not share our standard of living. Yes, it's true that prices would go up without cheap imports. But wages would hold too and we would have a balance.

  74. You are misinformed by mario_grgic · · Score: 2, Informative

    At least people can get US citizenship, they only need to live and work in the states 3 years.

    Compare that with say Germany where you have to live 8 years and you may never get citizenship.

    Or Switzerland, where people in your community vote on you and if you should be allowed to get citizenship. So don't piss your neighbors off ever.

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  75. Poor hiring is irrelevant to immigration. by raehl · · Score: 2

    I've been party to both positive and negative foreign worker experiences.

    I've had the privilege of working with a lot of extremely qualified, foreign-born engineers. Some from Europe, some from Asia. They're no different than American workers - you have to interview effectively to make sure you hire the best people. If you don't hire the best people, you're going to get bad people. Of all the foreign workers I've worked with, only one has not been worth his salary.

    So if the foreign workers your company hires are a waste of money, shame on your company for having a poor interview and review process. But that has nothing to do with immigration - a nice talking kid from US engineering college could do just as much exaggeration and get hired at the same company.

    On the strongly negative front, we outsourced part of a project once. Needed it done ASAP. Contracted a company in India to do it. Waste of money. Got zero value out of it. Just couldn't do effective management/quality control over half the globe and 12 time zones.

    Anyway, if your company is hiring unqualified employees, that's a hiring problem, not an immigration problem.