Slashdot Mirror


Kremlin-Backed Nashi Admits Cyberattacking Estonia

An anonymous reader writes "Russia's Kremlin-based youth movement Nashi admits being responsible for 2007 cyberattacks against Estonia. An interesting point is that when you DDoS the systems, it's not the fault of some people who want to crash it but instead the systems' for blocking their users due to technical limitations. So if I shot someone to death it's not my fault for shooting them, but theirs instead because of technical limitations of their body."

181 comments

  1. Ummmm by yerktoader · · Score: 1

    Yeah, so now I can take care of all those pesky drivers out there....Wait, what?

  2. Justice by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least we can count on the Russian prosecutors to investigate and extradite those responsible in a timely manner.

    1. Re:Justice by Threemoons · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      *sound of canned laughter*

      He's here all week, folks, don't forget to tip your server! Try the fish!

      Seriously, if the Russian thug-ernment is behind these asswipes, what makes you think they'll face any consequences?

    2. Re:Justice by Abreu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Could someone explain what was the point on admitting guilt? It takes away all the fun of the conspiracy theorists!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    3. Re:Justice by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I wonder, if one of them comes to the US will the FBI put them in jail like they did Dimitri? Nah, that only happened because he and his company produced software that pissed Adobe off. Now, if these guys had chracked Sun or Microsoft they'd be in deep shit!

    4. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You need to fix your sarcasm detector.

    5. Re:Justice by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I am all for punishing the bad guys and everything, but how would US authorities have jurisdiction over an attack that happened on Estonia from Russia? Can they prove that it crossed American networks?

      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    6. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I typed out a humorous (to me) reply to this, previewed it, and then thought the better of submitting it.

      Is it strange that someone sitting in the American Midwest actually felt real fear of Russian power - enough to self-censor communications?

      Or am I just exceptionally cowardly? :)

    7. Re:Justice by djupedal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've obviously never heard of anyone admitting guilt whilst having a loaded Kalashnikov pointed at the back of their head...

    8. Re:Justice by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      I am all for punishing the bad guys and everything, but how would US authorities have jurisdiction over an attack that happened on Estonia from Russia? Can they prove that it crossed American networks?

      Maybe on the theory that they were enemy combatants against a U.S. ally?

    9. Re:Justice by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This was bad enough that there was talk that it could trigger NATO's common aggression pact: that when one country from NATO is attacked, all countries in NATO have to react as though they had been attacked. Needless to say, it didn't get there, but this was seen as a very serious test of the NATO alliance. I don't think that any prosecution will result from this, but this was taken very seriously by all members of NATO, including the US.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    10. Re:Justice by spacefiddle · · Score: 1

      er. he didn't say anything about extraditing them to the US, you know... i'm sure Estonian law enforcement would be the ones who get to handle this, our World Police badge notwithstanding...

    11. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the Putin Youth we're talking about here. Who's going to threaten them?

    12. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, you suck dude.

    13. Re:Justice by Shihar · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure you are just a coward.

      If Russia has the capacity to send out hit squads and kill every single anti-Russian flame, troll, or well reasoned point, the rest of the world should pretty much just surrender now and welcome our new Russian overlords.

    14. Re:Justice by Slumdog · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never heard of anyone admitting guilt whilst having a loaded Kalashnikov pointed at the back of their head...

      Wait, this was classified. Who told you?

    15. Re:Justice by Slumdog · · Score: 1

      welcome our new Russian overlords.

      Haven't these guys pwn'd the internet several times through a flood of news every now and then when someone somewhere was "evacuated" by ingenious means? They have the power to dominate news outlets at will, all they do is find a clever cold-blooded way to set off the process, and then it enters your psyche.

    16. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, just like the USA would extradite US citizens to Russia if they were accused of committing crimes there?

    17. Re:Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NATO - Not At The Office

    18. Re:Justice by ryszard99 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Their parents?!

      --
      -- $_='ab-bc ratvarre';tr"'a-z'"'n-za-m'";print
    19. Re:Justice by sqldr · · Score: 0, Troll

      On a general basis, the only people who are ever extradited from Russia are hot blondes who like to use their physical appearance to get the fuck out of Russia and get a passport in a civilised country.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    20. Re:Justice by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      To the conspiracy theorists, Nashi is really a cover operation that is being blackmailed by the Greys, the Masons, and the Illuminati.

      Or something like that...

    21. Re:Justice by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Skylarof and Elcomsoft made their software in Russia and broke no Russian laws. When Skylarof treveled to the US to give a speech, he was arrested and jailed for months. I see little difference here.

    22. Re:Justice by lupinstel · · Score: 1

      That is only what THEY want you to think.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
    23. Re:Justice by Glothar · · Score: 1

      In New Russia, post cancels you.

      [/required]

    24. Re:Justice by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      I believe NATO invokes section 5 in case of a "conventional attack". Otherwise US and NATO as a whole is in perpetual war with Russia, China and all others not in NATO and not allies of US. Since informational attacks are considered espionage...

    25. Re:Justice by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      But still. A US based company claimed damages and filed the "complaint".

  3. Doing them a favor by just_another_sean · · Score: 5, Funny

    An interesting point is that when you DDoS the systems, it's not the fault of some people who want to crash it but instead the systems' for blocking their users due to technical limitations.

    Absolutely, Nashi was doing them a favor by pointing out the flaws in their systems. I think Estonia should reciprocate and offer them high paying jobs in their IT Department. While slightly misguided these Nashi kids are obviously gifted. Put their talents to use for good and I'm sure nothing could possibly go wrong.

    --
    Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    1. Re:Doing them a favor by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Actually give some credit. Pulling of a DDOS, without lots of money, is quite hard (and even when you have money, there are lots of dumb ways that won't work, such as buying bandwidth somewhere and have a server-farm do the ddossing).

    2. Re:Doing them a favor by malkir · · Score: 1

      All they did was distribute a tool to the kids who used it willingly...it's like asking a zombie to bite you, 'please sir, may I have another?'

    3. Re:Doing them a favor by Jurily · · Score: 1

      I think Estonia should reciprocate and offer them high paying jobs in their IT Department.

      And hang them as a war criminal on their second workday.

    4. Re:Doing them a favor by vishbar · · Score: 1

      Plus (this being Russia after all) how many of them had connections in the Russian Business Network and, perhaps, a couple of botnets at hand?

      --
      Ride the skies
    5. Re:Doing them a favor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's kind of sad really, they only managed to scrounge up 800mbits?

    6. Re:Doing them a favor by aurispector · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This being Russia and all, I wouldn't believe a word of it. The Soviet Union collapsed and the KGB took over. If the RBN had a hand it was probably at the request of the government. Welcome to the new cold war.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    7. Re:Doing them a favor by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Or reciprocate by indirectly pointing out flaws in Russian IT sites.

    8. Re:Doing them a favor by kayditty · · Score: 0

      no, it's not hard to pull off a "DDOS" (in this case it's a DoS, and mayne not even distributed, but probably so). it doesn't cost money at all. it takes patience, though, if you don't already have access to the resources necessary.

    9. Re:Doing them a favor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if I shot someone to death it's not my fault for shooting them, but theirs instead because of technical limitations of their body.

      Bad analogy. DDoS is only communication - it's at least theoretically possible to ignore it gracefully.

      Better analogy: if I keep on ringing on someone's doorbell, and it drives them mad and they shoot themselves, it's their fault for not removing their doorbell, or installing a fingerprint-recogniser that doesn't ring the bell for my prints, or some other option.

    10. Re:Doing them a favor by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

      I don't see a /s

    11. Re:Doing them a favor by Talla · · Score: 1

      Better analogy: if I keep on ringing on someone's doorbell, and it drives them mad and they shoot themselves, it's their fault for not removing their doorbell, or installing a fingerprint-recogniser that doesn't ring the bell for my prints, or some other option.

      Except that for the analogy to be analogous, there would have to be 10 000 people lined up in front of all the entrances to your house. It doesn't matter what kind of filter you have at the door, because most of the visitors you actually do want will never get there.

    12. Re:Doing them a favor by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember that a legal view of the goodness or badness of an action takes into account the intent of the perpetrator. So if you accidentally destroy the world you can get away with it but if you deliberately spit on my sandwich in order to destroy its value to me then you go to jail. The law is not just a list of fixed rules to refine the definition of, its also about whether a court can be persuaded that you are an asshat or not. At least this is true in the UK legal system which does not have a constitution to distract it.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  4. Well technically by duckInferno · · Score: 2, Funny

    due to cryogenics and the strong possibility of future revival, it's pretty difficult to shoot somebody to true death -- only legal death :)

    --
    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  5. EULA for bullets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    By accepting this bullet into your body, you agree that the user of this bullet, that any damage, implicit and otherwise done to you, is not responsible for any damages.

  6. Talent.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when did script kiddies become talented?

  7. That is the same argument for DeCSS by erroneus · · Score: 1

    People have made the same argument regarding CSS and the use of DeCSS. Many times I have heard "It is the fault of the media companies in that they used a very insecure lock!" I think the "bullet in the face" rationale is a lot more dramatic and illustrates precisely why the "it's their fault for being weak" argument is wrong, but I think it is important to realize that many of us here have used the very same argument in the past.

    1. Re:That is the same argument for DeCSS by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This isn't like taking a hammer to a lock and saying "the lock was too weak". This is leaving the keys in the lock - how can a lock with the keys in it stop anyone?

      CSS cannot work. it must leave the keys or the DVD won't play.

    2. Re:That is the same argument for DeCSS by giorgist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hang on hang on ...

      Can I keep my money safe on my front lawn ?
      There is a point where you have to prove you have invested a reasonable amount of effort to protect your slef. You can't ask the goverment to protect you when you have done your part.

      There is a balance somehwere in between and depends on the society. In the US you are expected to bare arms. In japan you can use a paper door (point exadurated for dramatic effect)

    3. Re:That is the same argument for DeCSS by CannonballHead · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bare arms? So, fistfights == reasonable amount of effort to protect myself? :)

    4. Re:That is the same argument for DeCSS by Al+Dimond · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The main argument for the use of DeCSS is that people have a right (regardless of what the government says) to decode the media they own. I think most people claiming that right claim it regardless of how hard it is, and regardless of disapproval for other actions of media companies in general.

      On the other hand, the hackers involved controlled a botnet and ordered a DOS attack. They justified it only as retaliation for other actions by Estonia, and in the way you describe, which is indeed a very weak argument.

      I'm not saying that arguers on /. never use arguments like the one you mention, but what you say is hardly the principle justification for use of DeCSS.

    5. Re:That is the same argument for DeCSS by jandersen · · Score: 1

      This is leaving the keys in the lock - how can a lock with the keys in it stop anyone?

      So if you go out and leave your door unlocked it is OK for me to go inside and have a look around? And read your letters and stuff?

      Using somebody else's property without their permission is basically a form of theft (although perhaps the legal term is something else), whether it is taking their car for a drive, putting your rubbish in their bin or entering their property without permission - even if you don't take anything away. That is what all this privacy talk is all about: my space is mine, and I decide who I want to share it with.

    6. Re:That is the same argument for DeCSS by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      So if you go out and leave your door unlocked it is OK for me to go inside and have a look around?

      No, but if you leave the key in its lock you can't consider it locked. DeCSS is a lock with its key permanently inside it. Such a lock is useless.

    7. Re:That is the same argument for DeCSS by Gerafix · · Score: 1

      Actually it's like if you sell me a DVD... so I own it... and I can't use it because the "key" only works when it wants to. Manufactured defects will always be worked around if warranted.

    8. Re:That is the same argument for DeCSS by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Accept those analogies fail to show how computers work. The are only true if computers work like the things in the analogy.

      When a computer asks or request someone to do something, how do you blame the person doing it?
      Computers are built on the assumption that what they allow is what they intend to allow. It can't be any other way.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:That is the same argument for DeCSS by geekoid · · Score: 1

      that analogy fails, epically.

      What if I was outside my house yelling that I was there and people should come over?
      Then you come over and ask if you could come in, and I said yes. Then should you be allowed in? yes. yes you should.

      Of course, if I say You need a password to get in, and you just beat me up and go in, you are trespassing.

      With computers you must let people know, in some reasonable manner, that you don't want them to join your network. That HAS to be the way they work.
      No News, is good news.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:That is the same argument for DeCSS by jandersen · · Score: 1

      No, but if you leave the key in its lock you can't consider it locked. DeCSS is a lock with its key permanently inside it. Such a lock is useless.

      That is a different scenario - when you buy a thing, naturally it is yours and there shouldn't be a lock on it in the first place and nobody has the right to tell you how to use it. I mean, if you buy a knife, it is up to you whether you want to use it to open bottles and tighten screws, even if that goes against the intentions of the seller.

      But everybody knows from context and whatever, that another person's home belongs to that person and that entering without permission is wrong.

    11. Re:That is the same argument for DeCSS by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I fail to see your point then. When I buy a DVD, I own that DVD. DeCSS is the "lock" that is supposed to keep it locked up from ME, not some random stranger. DeCSS is like someone else putting a padlock on YOUR home (except the key is in the lock).

  8. To quote: by XaviorPenguin · · Score: 0

    ..." it's not my fault for shooting them, but theirs instead because of technical limitations of their body."

    That's right, if I die, it is my fault for not being born Superman.

    --
    Friends help you move...
    REAL Friends help you move dead bodies... ^_^
  9. Aggression by Renraku · · Score: 1

    Sounds like signs of aggression to me.

    Maybe this should warrant a strongly worded letter from the UN?

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Aggression by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Sir,

      I must tell you that I STRENUOUSLY OBJECT to the SARCASM inherent in your post.

      Please be advised that you will not receive another warning to tone down the sarcasm.

      If your sarcasm levels remain high with regards to the UN, we will be forced to send another letter EVEN MORE STRENUOUSLY OBJECTING THAN THIS ONE responding to your sarcasm.

      Have a wonderful, love-filled day.

      Yours forever,
      UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:Aggression by Hillgiant · · Score: 1, Troll

      Fuckit. Let's just invade. Finish the job Regan started back in the 80's.

      --
      -
    3. Re:Aggression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. As the WWII has shown, the biggest economic stimulus a government can deliver is a war. A nuclear winter is going to make us all RICH!

    4. Re:Aggression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Souns like terrorism to me.

      Maybe US should invade Estonia or at least bomb them to stone age?

      Uh, what?

    5. Re:Aggression by geekoid · · Score: 1

      close, he should of had the people in charge of trhe various agencies removed. He even had the opportunity to do so. Sadly the people behind the man didn't really care about anything after the point. Many of those same people where on Bush's team when they invaded Iraq.
      Apparently there followup hasn't got any better.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  10. Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Stories like this are guaranteed to bring out the Russian nationalists... The Estonians deserved it, Nashi is a misunderstood organization, or that it was really just completely normal operation with no nefarious intent. It's always fun to read the ideological contortions used to justify crap like this.

    All I can say is that Russia is acting like a local thug - swinging around its energy club, demanding internatiol recognition and tribute from its vassal states. Not to say that this is a bad way of achieving its goal, but it certainly puts the Kibosh on some historians' argument that the fall of Russian Communism signaled the end of autocratic and thuggish regimes. Instead, this tells me that nationalism (in its ugliest form) is alive and well across the world (including in the US, btw), and that we're in for a whole lot of fun not seen since the dawn of the last century.

    Woo.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    1. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mind you it's just a guy who happens to be a member of Nashi, not all of Nashi or the Kremlin that's responsible. But hey, guilty by association, right? Just like Obama is pals with terrorists, right?

    2. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Hey, Rush is a Republican, therefore all Republicans must be loud-mouthed, ignorant bigots... yep, it works for me!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Uhhhh.... Nashi is sponsored by the Russian government. Its explicit goal is the purging of fascist elements from Russian zones of interests. It is habitually violent, xenophobic and nationalistic. A small, scripted DDOS is actually pretty benign for Nashi's MO. If Estonia wasn't an independent country with close ties to NATO, there would have been a hell of a lot more physical violence coming from Nashi.

      And while you're right that guilt by association is a cheap way to judge people, past experience says that this operation quite likely met with approval at all levels of the organization. In that sense, it's quite like the Russian Government: very few things happen that aren't blessed or encouraged in principle by the head brass.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    4. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 1

      A ha, but Nashi wasn't responsible. Some dude from Nashi was.

    5. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Russian nationalists bring out the story! Wait...

    6. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

      All I can say is that Russia is acting like a local thug - swinging around its energy club ...

      Dude, if they have energy clubs, I'm not even going to try stopping them. I mean, DAMN....

    7. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by rhizome · · Score: 1

      A ha, but Nashi wasn't responsible. Some dude from Nashi was.

      By that standard, Nashi can never be responsible for anything.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    8. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that organizations would be completely useless concepts. I understand that an organization does not do anything on its own (being a theoretical concept and all), but your parent post takes that sophistry a little far.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    9. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that standard, Nashi can never be responsible for anything.

      It can if it adopts a policy to take certain actions, or if someone in a leadership position tells one or more members to take such actions. Nashi is then responsible for those actions.

      If a Nashi member decides on his own to write and launch a DDoS script, Nashi bears no responsibility. Any more than my employer bears responsibility for my opinion on this topic.

    10. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Right. And Nazi's were not to blame for exterminating the Jews. Some dudes that were Nazis were doing all the exterminating. Can't blame the Nazi's for that, can you?

      If Russia prosecutes the people responsible, eh, maybe I'll buy that Putin's little fascist youth gang doesn't deserve to be maligned. Of course, seeing as how Nashi, err, people who happen to be a part of Nashi regularly meet in groups to perform various illegal acts with a wink and a nod from the state and don't get prosecuted, I am willing to put my money on no one suffering any consequences inside of Russia.

    11. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Funny, I thought that this story will bring bring Estonian nationalist. The only country in Europe that honors nazy SS veterans (http://www.webplanet.ru/news/security/2007/05/02/eesti.html).

      To the point of DDOS attacks. Guy admitted responsibility for DDOS attacks in May 2007 (http://www.webplanet.ru/news/security/2007/05/02/eesti.html in Russian, babelfish is your friend) , where he said that he did it with group of Moldavian hackers. Moldova is an independent nation about 500 miles away from nearest Russian border. I know it is Slashdot and 2 year old news are still new but messing up with geography is just too much.

    12. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that sense, it's quite like the Russian Government: very few things happen that aren't blessed or encouraged in principle by the head brass.

      What is your source to make such comment? How do you know how these decisions are made and approved? Are you part of Russian bureaucracy or top brass yourself, or may be you are from intelligence community? I think you know nothing, and this is just another example of bigotry, prejudice and stereotypical judgment.

    13. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      I read. Do you?

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    14. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by StarkRG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Basically Russia is just doing what the US has for the past 60 years only on a smaller scale.

    15. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you read? Being literate is hardly an argument. What do you read? Remember, I asked this question in previous post. How do you know how these decisions are made and approved? Do you read reports on structure of the Russian government? Or some sort of research about how it operates or Fox news 5 minutes snippet? On what are you basing your claims?

    16. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its explicit goal is the purging of fascist elements from Russian zones of interests

      Correction: its explicit goal is the purging of anyone they label "fascist" from Russian zones of interest. For example, the entire anti-Putin Other Russia coalition, including Kasparov, was labeled "fascists" and "extremists" by Nashi. In general, they apply the label to anyone who is in opposition to the existing regime.

    17. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh.... Nashi is sponsored by the Russian government. Its explicit goal is the purging of fascist elements from Russian zones of interests. It is habitually violent, xenophobic and nationalistic.

      A highly nationalistic and xenophobic group has been tasked with purging fascist elements? does anyone else see the problem here?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    18. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The USA is certainly also an imperialist country with long-standing world domination ambitions, but I don't recall it being involved in a large-scale genocide within the last 60, or even last 100 years.

    19. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, lets get things straight. "Other Russia" are not faschists and extremists. They just ass clowns.

    20. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    21. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by StarkRG · · Score: 1

      You're right, only small-scale ones.

    22. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      I read. Do you?

      Not me, I just look at the pictures.

    23. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. And Nazi's were not to blame for exterminating the Jews. Some dudes that were Nazis were doing all the exterminating. Can't blame the Nazi's for that, can you?

      If Russia prosecutes the people responsible, eh, maybe I'll buy that Putin's little fascist youth gang doesn't deserve to be maligned. Of course, seeing as how Nashi, err, people who happen to be a part of Nashi regularly meet in groups to perform various illegal acts with a wink and a nod from the state and don't get prosecuted, I am willing to put my money on no one suffering any consequences inside of Russia.

      And Godwined! you loose.

    24. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A highly nationalistic and xenophobic group has been tasked with purging fascist elements? does anyone else see the problem here?

      Ahh, there's a bit of a fundamental problem there... See, it's a sort of collective schizophrenia in average Russian mentality.

      On one hand, there's this traditional yearning for the "strong hand" and strong state, which is almost inevitably at least moderately nationalist; add to that the large influx of immigrants - legal and illegal - from Middle Asia states to Russia after the collapse of the USSR (the ones who "stink" and "speak funny" and "steal jobs" and "commit the most crimes" - I'm sure Americans especially can spot the similarities here with something they're familiar with) - and that nationalism easily transforms into xenophobia and racism.

      On the other hand, every kid in Russia knows that "USSR won the war" (WW2, of course, or rather the "Great War for Fatherland" - that's Eastern Front 1941-45). And that the enemies in that war were "nazis" and "fascists" (all of them and at the same time - including Finns and all other collaborating nations), and that they were evil because they were racist and wanted to kill lots of people in Russia and Eastern Europe as untermenschen. So apparently racism is bad, and of course "nazism" sounds pretty close to "nationalism", and they were often conflated especially in the USSR.

      The end result is what we observe: an effectively fascist pro-government organization which itself uses "fascist" as a derogative term for all its political opponents.

    25. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Stories like this are guaranteed to bring out the Russian nationalists...

      Didn't take long, did it?

    26. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      On one hand, there's this traditional yearning for the "strong hand" and strong state, which is almost inevitably at least moderately nationalist; add to that the large influx of immigrants - legal and illegal - from Middle Asia states to Russia after the collapse of the USSR (the ones who "stink" and "speak funny" and "steal jobs" and "commit the most crimes" - I'm sure Americans especially can spot the similarities here with something they're familiar with) - and that nationalism easily transforms into xenophobia and racism.

      Remove the bit about the USSR and you can replace "Russia" with "Australia", "US", "Britain", "Thailand" or "Japan" and your statement remains true, other nations I haven't listed, this seems to be a global phenomenon. We have a similar problem in Australia, we've had it for a while but used to keep the nutbars in check, don't know what happened but the checks are gone now. I was just commenting on the obvious humour of an organisation with fascist tendencies calling all their enemies fascists. I should have used the word contradiction but my brain wasn't fully awake when I commented. Thanks for the explanation anyway.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    27. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The USA is certainly also an imperialist country with long-standing world domination ambitions, but I don't recall it being involved in a large-scale genocide within the last 60, or even last 100 years.

      Look up Eisenhower's Holocaust.

    28. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can if it adopts a policy to take certain actions, or if someone in a leadership position tells one or more members to take such actions. Nashi is then responsible for those actions.

      And this is precisely the point. FTFA:

      "Yesterday, however, Konstantin Goloskokov, a "commissar" in the youth group Nashe, which works for the Kremlin, told the Financial Times that he and some associates had launched the attack"

      Commissar sounds very much like a leadership position, and he did tell his associates to launch the attack. Even if he acted without direct authorisation from his superiors, he used his position of leadership within Nashi to use Nashi's members and resources to launch the attack in Nashi's name. So Nashi must indeed bear some responsibility. And since Nashi works for the Kremlin, the Kremlin must ultimately take responsibility for the actions that Nashi takes, even those actions of which it is unaware and has not ordered, such as the DDOS attack in question. "Guilt by association" is an entirely inappropriate description for this situation - it's simply responsibility following up the chain of command, precisely as it should. If the Kremlin cannot keep Nashi on a leash, then it should not support them.

      Saying that, it didn't need this incident to prove that the Kremlin isn't above political thuggery. A great many of their recent actions have demonstrated that very well, and indeed quite forcefully at times. I have no doubt that the Kremlin fully supported this attack, even though they couldn't directly order it themselves.

    29. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

      A lot of interesting claims there. Xenophobia? Violence? Past operations? Met with approval?

      Sir, I have to say: [citation needed]

    30. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'fascist' does not mean the same thing in Russia... You see, because Russia won the Great War against fascists, they are the #1 fascist opposers. That means that anyone who opposes Russia is a fascist.

      Logic is fun, isn't it.

    31. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh.... Nashi is sponsored by the Russian government. Its explicit goal is the purging of fascist elements from Russian zones of interests. It is habitually violent, xenophobic and nationalistic.

      So, if Nashi's explicit goal is the purging of fascist elements, and the last sentence that I quoted is true, when will it start purging itself?
      I think you meant to say "Its stated goal" rather than "Its explicit goal".

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    32. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed. Estonia had to choose between two evils in WWII. They chose the one that didn't draft their young men at 5 am with the help of thugs and dogs, and the one who didn't sent their older men to Siberia.... just because (Both incidents occurred in my family in Estonia). Nazis were no picnic, but they were better than the Russians.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    33. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

      Yeah, people who throw others in gas chambers en masse are better indeed.

    34. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      And what did the Estonians know of this in WWII? Back then, what you knew was local, plus some radio and newspaper reports, heavily censored and controlled. What you did know with a certainty was what was done to your friends and relatives by occupying Russians. Given a choice between two devils, can you blame anyone for choosing the one who might at least free you from the one standing on your neck? And by the way, google up how many people Stalin killed. Compared to him, Hitler was an amateur. Stalin didn't restrict himself to killing Jewish people, although he killed plenty of them too. An equal opportunity murderer was Mr. Stalin.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    35. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      To be technically correct, the "enemies" actually DID kill A L-O-O-O-O-O-O-0-T of people.(please note the 7 O's on the word lot, referring to more than 26000000 Russian nationals killed)

    36. Re:Waiting for the Russian nationalists... by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Facts are facts. Violence breeds violence.
      The other fact is that there are people that actually honor NAZIS. And there are Estonians that actually ran those deportations.

  11. Sociopaths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times have we seen the fomenting of sociopathic hackers not blow up in the faces of the employers?

  12. Putin's cronies need to be put down by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    An interesting point is that when you DDoS the systems, it's not the fault of some people who want to crash it but instead the systems' for blocking their users due to technical limitations. So if I shot someone to death it's not my fault for shooting them, but theirs instead because of technical limitations of their body.

    It's the "I'm not touching you I'm not touching I'm not touching you" defense!

    By that logic, we should just go ahead and nuke Russia now. It's not really our fault that they don't have a viable missile defense system.

    1. Re:Putin's cronies need to be put down by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      I was thinking it was more of the "well she wouldn't have been raped if she wasn't dressed so skimpily" defense.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:Putin's cronies need to be put down by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

      US has a viable defense system? that's news

  13. Sounds good to me. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I think Estonia should reciprocate and offer them high paying jobs in their IT Department.

    Sounds like a great idea to me.

    They could help build the country's new IT infrastructure at the Viru site.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  14. There's analogies, and then there's analogies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    So if I shot someone to death it's not my fault for shooting them, but theirs instead because of technical limitations of their body.

    Or if the US caused the economic collapse of the Soviet Union, then it was their fault because of the the technical limitations of their communism.

    I don't like Russia and how it acts, but if you're going to talk about Russia you've got to bring in their viewpoint. The Soviet collapse and economic disaster is seen as capitalist invasion, which has been beaten back from the gates of Moscow by Putin of the KGB.

    It could have gone differently, but we were happy to let them sink, and we skipped numerous opportunities to encourage and support and demand democratic change alongside market reform. Bush let Putin do what he wanted as long as Putin backed Bush's Iraq policy. It was a poor trade and it's going to continue to cost us.

    1. Re:There's analogies, and then there's analogies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Soviet collapse and economic disaster is seen as capitalist invasion, which has been beaten back from the gates of Moscow by Putin of the KGB.

      By whom? The opinion in Russia is, largely, that Russia was brought down by incompetent leadership, and that Putin is not a miraculous exception. Except not many people are quite ready to oppose him, because it is not very safe.

    2. Re:There's analogies, and then there's analogies by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      By whom? The opinion in Russia is, largely, that Russia was brought down by incompetent leadership, and that Putin is not a miraculous exception.

      Yeah, that's why Putin's approval ratings went through the roof when he came to power.

    3. Re:There's analogies, and then there's analogies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money from high oil prices were what boosted Putin's ratings. Now oil prices are down, their rash invasion of Georgia caused international investors to pull out, and so Putin is finding himself less popular and less powerful.

      He is a populist, like Chavez in Venezuala, Berlusconi in Italy, and former-President Bush in the US (at least, for his first 6 years). They say rabble-rousing, get-tough, strong-man-going-to-fix-everything bullshit. They loudly and proudly disregard the law and institutions as a hindrance to the divinely inspired leadership of their ubermenschen selves. They angrily promote 'patriotism' (== loyalty to themselves) and intolerance of dissent. All praise our great leader. All follow is glorious vision.

      It's an old game and they blatantly follow the standard playbook. The results are predictable: It works as long as your luck holds (e.g., oil prices are high), and then your failures to listen to dissent or make unpopular choices result in failed policies that eventually catch up to you; your democracy and institutions are in ruins; and the people turn on you as aggressively as they supported you. Of course, by then you might have consolidated enough power that there is nothing the people can do.

    4. Re:There's analogies, and then there's analogies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if I shot someone to death it's not my fault for shooting them, but theirs instead because of technical limitations of their body.

      Or if the US caused the economic collapse of the Soviet Union, then it was their fault because of the the technical limitations of their communism.

      If that is so, then the US economic collapse is the world's (esp.China's) fault, for loaning US too much money too fast.

    5. Re:There's analogies, and then there's analogies by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I fully agree with your assessment of Putin and his clique, but for one thing: "Putin is finding himself less popular and less powerful". This is wishful thinking. In practice, I didn't notice that much when talking with the people. There is certainly some more discontent than there used to be, but he's still far from being unpopular, unfortunately. A few years of the economic shithole Russia is in now may change that... or may not. Judging from our history, the people have way too much patience for that sort of thing. Then of course Medvedev is at least formally in charge now, so if things go really bad, Putin can just kick him out at the end of the term with some harsh words about failure, and get another round of applause.

    6. Re:There's analogies, and then there's analogies by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Actually, people KNOW that the economic catastrophe in Russia was orchestrated by the very same people that will be running US in this crisis.The result of the 90's were the oligarchs. The lawlessness that they rose on. Putin is viewed as the bane of oligarchs.
      Talk about the irony.

  15. Thats cool and all, but by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    there is already a guy in custody who has been convicted and tried for this one in Estonia. The so called, youth movement Nashi, are publicity whores and their technological acumen is limited to shit you can learn on a farm.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
    1. Re:Thats cool and all, but by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

      They must be pretty good media whores to get on slashdot and get a reaction out of you.

  16. the new murder defense!?? by ssintercept · · Score: 1

    "...if I shot someone to death it's not my fault for shooting them, but theirs instead because of technical limitations of their body."

    that made me spit coffee at the monitor...
    only johnnie cochran could pull off that defense.

    --
    "You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."-- Fred Hampton
    1. Re:the new murder defense!?? by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Well... what if shootings were so ridiculously common that only a fool would venture outside their home without a bullet proof vest? So then I shoot you in the chest for no readily apparent reason but you were too stupid to put on your vest that morning. I claim to the jury that I figured you were wearing a vest so I didn't expect any harm, therefore it's your fault for forgetting your vest that day...

      Nope, still doesn't work (I really did try though). It would be impossible to convince the jury that I shot you just because I felt like it rather than to maim or kill you. Especially since the fact that there is no reason to pull the trigger if I am so sure you have the protection to walk away unscathed. Likewise, if they truly believed that the sites they were attacking were properly defended, there would have been no reason to attack them in the first place.

    2. Re:the new murder defense!?? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Lazlow: Hello caller, you're on Chatterbox.

      Caller: Yeah, hi, love the show, love hearing people's opinions. That's what made this country great: people. And opinions. And stuff. Most of all guns. I hate it when people whine about "guns kill people". Guns don't kill people, death kills people. Ask a doctor, it's a medical fact: you can't die from a bullet! You can die from a cardiac arrest or organ failure or a major hemorrhage -- a small piece of metal ain't the problem! Besides, I only use my machine gun in the safety of my own home or car, I ain't hurtin' nobody. And countries that don't have guns ain't American.

      Lazlow: You know, that's a really good point: Countries that don't have guns aren't American... You know, if more people had guns there'd be less shootings in this country.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:the new murder defense!?? by ssintercept · · Score: 1

      finally!

      i knew someone else would see the funny!

      --
      "You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."-- Fred Hampton
  17. Obligatory by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Funny

    In soviet Russia:
    1. Attack victim
    2. Blame victim
    3. ????
    4. Profit

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Obligatory by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      In soviet Russia:
      1. Attack victim
      2. Blame victim
      3. ????
      4. Profit

      Gaaaahhh! Are you crazy? Those two memes have never been combined before! We have no idea how your post will be moderated! Is there some way you can delete it before they notice?

    2. Re:Obligatory by billius · · Score: 1

      Oh god, nooooo, it's being moded over 9,000!!!!!

    3. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a mod point left, but I can't find the "-1 complete idiot" mod. So, take this as a virtual bitch slap, and never post again.

    4. Re:Obligatory by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it work this way?:

      In Soviet Russia:
      1. Profit
      2. ???
      3. You

  18. Logical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So if I shot someone to death it's not my fault for shooting them, but theirs instead because of technical limitations of their body."

    In Soviet Russia...

  19. Works two ways... by uffe_nordholm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the Kremlin wants any appearance of being "fair" (please notice I am not actually accusing them of this, I am jsut hypothesising...) then they can't object if the rest of the world retaliates, and DDOSes them to such a degree they themselves choose to shut down all conenctions between Russia and the rest of the world.

    For after all, what were the Russians upset about? A statue of some WW2-hero was moved. What does the rest of the world have to get upset about? Well, a number of East-European countries were left without heating gas in the beginning of January, to such an extent that even Germany felt it. Since this seems to be a recuring "phenomenon" why shouldn't Russia find itself DDOSed off internet once a year?

    I am quite sure that Georgia (the country, not the US state) could very easily find reason to DDOS Russia. And I seem to remember Poland having been left without heating gas a few years ago, so even they would have perfect reasons to DDOS Russia.

    If the Kremlin really think DDOSing someone is the way things work in the world, they jsut might find themselves further up the creek than they would want to be... For even those countries not affected by Russias slightly beligerent foreign politics could easily turn a blind eye to any illegal matters going on inside their borders, as long as the target is inside Russia.

    1. Re:Works two ways... by TrueRecord · · Score: 1
      "I am quite sure that Georgia (the country, not the US state) could very easily find reason to DDOS Russia."

      They did DDOS the Russian news sites

    2. Re:Works two ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For after all, what were the Russians upset about? A statue of some WW2-hero was moved.

      Kiddo, it was a grave of 9 men who died in WWII under this statue. Their remains were excavated with bulldozers, moved, lost and mixed up during the move. As Russian I felt the same as American would do feel about desecration of Arlington cemetery. If it is No Big Deal for you I pity you. That was a reason for people outrage that over spilled and become ugly.

    3. Re:Works two ways... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      Kiddo, it was a grave of 9 men who died in WWII under this statue. Their remains were excavated with bulldozers, moved, lost and mixed up during the move.

      Probably in that order, too - lost, then mixed up, right? I guess a guy in your TV box told you that?

      Here's what actually happened: the remains were indeed extracted, carefully separated, and moved to a predesignated place along with the monument. Both the monument and the grave are fully intact at the new place. Unfortunately, quite a few Russians aren't aware of that, because the state-owned TV channels showed photos of the statue's feet alone standing on the pedestal, claiming that the rest was sawn off and dragged away (and then the bit about mix-up of remains, etc). A day later, people on the Net recognized the TV picture - it was actually a photoshopped pic produced several months before that by some Russian blogger as a warning and protest against the impending move.

      By the way, during the reburial, Estonians did DNA analysis on the bones, and determined the names of the people who were actually buried on the site (until then, their identities were unknown). For four of those, after their identification, their Russian relatives have asked to turn over the bodies, which was done.

    4. Re:Works two ways... by bioluminescence · · Score: 1

      Oh, really? Do you work for the Russian government by any chance?

    5. Re:Works two ways... by bioluminescence · · Score: 3, Informative

      The remains of the dead soviet soldiers were excavated by specially trained team (not by bulldozers) and were moved to a military cemetery (and not lost, and mixed up). What's wrong with you russians? Your lying is pathological.

    6. Re:Works two ways... by TrueRecord · · Score: 1

      No, if you know languages , you are able to watch things from both sides which enables you to capture a more truthful idea what goes on.

    7. Re:Works two ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curios, how DNA identification is possible? Is there DNA database of all the people from the former Soviet Union?

    8. Re:Works two ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That presumes that the additional language learned provides some usefully high percentage of Truth that can be sifted out from the propaganda.

      Until yesterday, all Russian sources on the Estonia hack attacks blamed Estonia 100% for everything.

      How much do you trust the official Russian media's line on Georgia to not change over the next few years?

    9. Re:Works two ways... by TrueRecord · · Score: 1
      There are a whole world of Russia and Russian language which is not limited by central channels. There are news sites,forums, imageboards, irc, jabber rooms, ru wikipedia etc. Different people with different opinions. With all that eyes that watch the people get any information on anything.The central channels cannot tell you everything though because they are supposed to be for all and moderate. But who cares if you've got internets :-)

      The Georgians hired a prepaid PR agency (whose stuff went on line unchecked) which could deceive western public and which is impossible in the East due to the overwhelming unbelief of anything in Russia.

    10. Re:Works two ways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello Anonymous Liar. Or at best, victim of liars.

    11. Re:Works two ways... by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      The parent post is exactly why I blame both Estonian government and Russian minority.
      Estonians FAILED to communicate. Really, miserably failed. And they are failing every day. And therefore basically alienating those people.
      There are better examples in the Baltic states.
      Estonia fails at communication and Latvia fails at education. Lithuania succeeds at both, mostly due to a millennium of integrating different nationalities into the sate successfully.
      The reason for failure? The ruling elite believes that those people are obliged to listen to them, and therefore they, the govt, does not need to do anything about it. If they made an effort, or even acknowledge the fact that they need to communicate better, a lot of issues would go away.

  20. Obviously by TrueRecord · · Score: 0, Troll

    Any decent man pinged those Estonian Nazi bastards who made that show with the monument and bodies of the fallen soldiers.

    1. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The momument was not what you could really describe as something good. Some years ago only veterans gathered there to celebrate World War II victory - and they bothered noone, really. Then these later-to-be Nashists came and started burning Estonian flags and waving Soviet Union flags there. That caused the problem that ended with relocating the momument (to military cemetery, where it really belongs, not by a trolleybus stop where it used to be). Some Russians started being idiots there, and some Estonians, too. Some peed on the monument. If it's a war memorial, it shouldn't be treated like that. That's why I think relocating was a good idea. And I, for example, wouldn't want to be buried under a bus stop. That would be an insult to me, but that's what Soviet officials did.

      Anyway, the Bronze Soldier represented two things to Estonians. Of course everyone knew that it was erected to celebrate victory over Nazis. Nobody argued that. But the fact many Russians forget is that it also reminds the Estonians the Soviet occupation. Think - you are liberated from Germans by Russians and you are happy for that. But then the liberators occupy you. Is this liberation?

      By the way, the monument is designed by an Estonian sculptor. The Bronze Soldier looks down with a sad face. It is said that the sculptor did it on purpose to show the shame of the "liberator" (because of the genocide by Soviet Union against Estonian citizens [Russians living in Estonia at that time, too]). So if you praise the old Soviet Union, always remember that the monument doesn't do it. It shows the shame.

    2. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, Russia did the same with a number of WW2 monuments the same and next year. Some were even demolished. And when other countries asked what they were doing they replied that it was their business, not others'. But they still thought Estonian monument was not Estonia's business.

    3. Re:Obviously by TrueRecord · · Score: 1

      because of the genocide by Soviet Union against Estonian citizens

      I think you don't really know what genocide really is playing the words so lightly.

      It's true Estonian was occupied but Estonian was German ally in WW2. Don't you know that the whole Europe was divided by those who won? Estonian as a trophy was taken by the USSR with their natural desire to move off the border. After that war it was so natural. The Estonians could as well complain about the winter or rain.

    4. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that proves my point why the Bronze Soldier should have been and was moved. If you were beaten up, would you like a picture of that in your bedroom for the rest of your life?

    5. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the Soviet terror? Mass deportations and killings? Does that sound like a warm summer breeze to you?

    6. Re:Obviously by TrueRecord · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bronze Soldier should have been and was moved

      I cannot help but disagree.

      Oblivion revives fascism. Contrary to Germans these days, part of the Estonians are not ashamed of their Nazi past, not ashamed of their role in assisting them maintaining the concentration camp on their territory. They arrange the marching of SS veterans, they raise monuments to the people that fought against the Soviets for fascist Germany. Some one should say them to stop doing like this.

      If you were beaten up, would you like a picture of that in your bedroom for the rest of your life?

      It's true if Estonia is for Estonians. But about 30 % of the population are Russians. So, there should be some consensus before taking rush actions which was missing.

    7. Re:Obviously by TrueRecord · · Score: 1

      Imho, purposely exaggerated. Besides, rather mild comparing with what had been done by Nazi on the Russian territory.

    8. Re:Obviously by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      It's true Estonian was occupied but Estonian was German ally in WW2.

      Bullshit.

      Estonia got raped first by the Soviets in '40, then raped by Germany from '41 to '43, then raped again by the Soviets in '44 and beyond. They were a tiny country caught between two fanatical behemoths. They didn't *want* to be "allied" to either one, and neither of their conquering masters ever treated them, or any of the other Baltic states, as a "friend". They weren't "allies" of either, they were *victims* of both.

      After that war it was so natural

      Ah yes, of course, might always makes right, doesn't it?

      The Estonians could as well complain about the winter or rain.

      Yes, strange isn't it, how people who are denied their freedom just always want to whine and complain about that? In fact, it seems to be an almost universal gripe. Silly them.

      But you don't have to worry any more about those pesky Estonians, Ivan, they're safely in NATO now, as happy as clams, along with Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, and Romania. Nothing to worry about anymore!

      PS: So sorry, but no, you can't have them back.

    9. Re:Obviously by andot · · Score: 1

      It's true Estonian was occupied but Estonian was German ally in WW2.

      This is plain and simple lie. How could Estonia have been German ally? There were soviet bases in Estonia since 1939. And Estonia was occupied in June 1940 by Soviet Union. You should know that Germany attacked USSR on June 22, 1941. This is one year later.

    10. Re:Obviously by andot · · Score: 1

      It's true if Estonia is for Estonians. But about 30 % of the population are Russians.

      90% of the russians in estonia are colonist from soviet union and their descendants. If you know how china is assimilating tibet, this was the same thing russia wanted to achieve in baltic states.

    11. Re:Obviously by Max_W · · Score: 1

      Red Baltic Riflemen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latvian_Riflemen , Georgian, Ukrainian and Baltic political elites, lead by the Georgian Ioseph Dzhugashvili (Stalin), Ukrainians Khrushchev and Brezhnev, Pole-Lithuanian Felix Dzerzhinsky were the founders and ideological force of the Soviet Union.

      Red Baltic Riflemen, among which there were a lot of Estonians, killed about 2 million Russian peasants, who revolted against the communist collectivization. Here is the map of the Red Baltic Riflemen battles against Russian peasants in 1917-1920 http://www.russia-talk.com/latyshi.htm

      What we see now in Georgia, Ukraine and Baltic states is the nostalgia of the political elites to return back from the small agrarian backwater republics to rule again the Eurasia.

    12. Re:Obviously by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

      Don't be so bitter. Your claim that Russia wants those states back is silly. Nobody in Russia wants them. I think people are more happy now that the government doesn't have to waste money on them.

      As far as being in NATO, it's a false sense of security. Who is really safe with so many nuclear weapons all around?

    13. Re:Obviously by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

      source on statistic plz

    14. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oblivion revives fascism. Contrary to Germans these days, part of the Estonians are not ashamed of their Nazi past, not ashamed of their role in assisting them maintaining the concentration camp on their territory. They arrange the marching of SS veterans, they raise monuments to the people that fought against the Soviets for fascist Germany. Some one should say them to stop doing like this.

      Estonians are not ashamed of their lust for independance, it's an unfortunate coincidence that in order to fight for it they had to support Germany. Celebrating your countrymen that struggled to try to maintain their freedom is not something that should be discouraged just because they happened to do it in a SS uniform.

    15. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google, fatass.

    16. Re:Obviously by bioluminescence · · Score: 1

      So it's O.k. to deny Soviet crimes in the Baltics? Read more "Pravda", russian boy.

    17. Re:Obviously by tankadin · · Score: 0

      "In Estonia, most live in Tallinn (36.86% of city's population are Russians) and the major eastern cities of Narva (86.41% of inhabitants are Russians) and Kohtla-JÃrve (69.68% of inhabitants are Russians). Overall, Russians make up 25.78% of Estonia's population (35.45% of the urban population and 5.90% of the rural population)." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Baltic_Russians

    18. Re:Obviously by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

      What crimes? If you don't like the way Stalin treated you then go cry to Georgia.

    19. Re:Obviously by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      Don't be so bitter.

      Huh? I'm as happy as a clam about the current situation myself. I'm not Estonian or Eastern European, so I don't have those bitter memories they have in my country's, or my own, recent past. I'm smug about it, maybe a tad too much, but certainly not bitter.

      Your claim that Russia wants those states back is silly. Nobody in Russia wants them. I think people are more happy now that the government doesn't have to waste money on them.

      Now who's being bitter? :)

      You went to an awful lot of trouble to take and hold those countries, but now that you can't keep them, you say you don't want them? Yea, right.

      it's a false sense of security

      You could have fooled me. As soon as those Eastern Europeans got out from under Mother Russia's boot, what's the very first thing that they did? Oh right, they ran to NATO's door and yelled "We want in!". Maybe you should ask *them* about "false security".

      Who is really safe with so many nuclear weapons all around?

      Its worked exceedingly well for the *last* fifty odd years. As long as NATO has at least as many nukes as Russia, I don't see why it won't continue working for the next fifty, at least.

  21. Full Metal EULA by mjwx · · Score: 1

    By accepting this bullet into your body, you agree that the user of this bullet, that any damage, implicit and otherwise done to you, is not responsible for any damages.

    Mod parent up.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  22. Re:so full of Baltic-brownish stuff... by bioluminescence · · Score: 1

    There is pretty much no nazism in the Baltic states. It's a Russian government/media created myth.

  23. that's russia for you by unity100 · · Score: 1

    there has never been a democratic period in russia's entire history. they dont have any understanding of it.

    1. Re:that's russia for you by TrueRecord · · Score: 1

      Push your democracy where it belongs, let the world live a peaceful and happy life.

    2. Re:that's russia for you by Max_W · · Score: 1
      They cannot do this. Try to understand their position too. The industrial countries are situated geographically in the places where there are no resources. But they do need the access to cheap resources in immense quantities. Otherwise hundreds of millions of skilled, well educated people will not be able to live on such small piece of land, which we call the 1st Industrial World. Have a look at this: http://strangemaps.files.wordpress.com/2006/11/africa_in_perspective_map.jpg

      At the same time the satellite TV, the Internet, and some other developments bring education to the parts, which were less developed historically. People in these parts can now themselves organize their society, production, distribution, etc.

      But what will the 1st World industrial civilization do? It is only natural that their try to protect their livelihood, namely the access to the cheap resources. They need tools for this.

      It is an effective tool to destabilize young societies, which indeed still make a lot of mistakes understandably. But they seem to get it already. A new way should be found. Instead of destabilizing and trying to impose the governance, a chance should be given to the co-development. At least it will reduce the problem of illegal immigration into the 1st World.

    3. Re:that's russia for you by TrueRecord · · Score: 1

      I understand their motives just fine. Unfortunately I don't have any magical powers to bring them back to senses and to make them look at things with my eyes and to make them understand that the ultimate value imho is not silly words but life and peace.
      I am used to attending to my own business and not poking into other people's business. And I think such attitude is right. But I sometimes think that the world has gone crazy and I cannot do anything about it. It really annoys me.
      Personally I would not kill anyone for resources or money (I'd rather die or make money some other way), but they made war (ultimate evil imo) for money and resources and those responsible go free and are thought to be decent and respectable men. It's beyond me.

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. it's hate-week already? by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

    Wow, every time anything involving Russia is posted here, the pseudo-nerds of slashdot rise together in harmony to cry bitter flames against everything Russia and its people. What's really weird is that these people try so hard to pass off as intelligent in every other article but come Russia, they resort to using old and stale stereotypes to justify their hatred. There really aren't many Russians posting here to defend themselves against this crap, sadly.

    Here's some things to think about for your next hate week:

    - Russia didn't "invade" Georgia. It intervened when Georgia invaded a sovereign country (South Ossetia) and started throwing civilians under tanks and executing Russian peace keepers. Russia pushed Georgia out of Ossetia and into Georgia and left. There is no occupation.

    - The reason some people in eastern Europe were left without heating in the winter is because Ukraine didn't pay their bill. Simple business. Ukraine's constant tantrums at the end of the year every time Russia phases out Ukraine's old Soviet discounts should be a hint to other countries to stock up on some reserves or diversify their suppliers.

    - Putin hate is getting OLD and most of it is completely baseless. Just because a country elects a leader you disagree with doesn't mean there's a dictatorship. Polonium and other assassination claims are conspiracy theories like demolition in WTC. There's no proof that the Russian government is responsible for them. At least pick something legitimate to complain about.

    - Russia's a huge country with a lot of neighbors. There are a lot of interests and factions in play. Every time a journalist dies, it doesn't mean Putin is behind it. Blaming him for not hiring body guards to follow every journalist around is also lame.

    - Russian media isn't censored. Can you even read or speak in Russian to tell that it is?

    - Soviet Russia jokes were only funny when Yakov Smirnoff did them. You just butcher them.

    - Estonia's a free country and can do what it pleases in its own borders. Touching that memorial is a touchy subject with Russians because so many of their family members lost their lives in WW2 (20 million including guys from other Soviet countries like Ukraine). While riots and this alleged ddos'ing isn't right, you can't blame them for feeling insulted. And before you cry about Stalin's annexation of Baltic states, know that Stalin was Georgian. Even though Russia did keep Baltic states under its control during the next 50 or so years, your average Russian had no say in it, so insulting Russians is completely uncalled for. It was a Russian who gave independence back to those stats, too.

    - Vodka and other stereotypes are boring. There are people who are alcoholics just like in every country and there are people who drink casually. Yeah, some people could lower their alcohol consumptions but I don't see how their health is any of your concern or why you feel it gives you the justification to insult them.

    Take it easy. Know that everything isn't in black and white, and stop hating.

    1. Re:it's hate-week already? by u38cg · · Score: 1
      Sometimes things look the way they do because, well, that is the way they are. South Ossetia is not a sovereign country, it would like to be. Russia had no reason to be there without a UN mandate. Why has Russia issued everyone in South Ossetia Russian passports? Ukraine say they did pay their bill, and that is not sufficient reason to cut off half of Western Europe. Take them to the WTO like evry other civilised country. As for Putin - you don't buy polonium in a chemist's shop and you don't use it to send a message without authorisation from pretty high up. What has he done about it? Oh wait, there's no proof. Maybe because there was no realistic investigation? The rest of the developed world is a pretty huge place too, yet by and large the streets of London are not littered with the corpses of journalists. Why is that? Censorship? You do not have a credible opposition media, with very limited exceptions. I can't beleive in a country the size of Russia you can't find enough people that are interested in hearing a contrary viewpoint. I agree about Soviet Russia jokes. As for drink: people are responsible for themselves but Russia's alcohol problems are a public health issue, not an individual one. What is your average male life expectancy?

      Lastly, I don't really see why you're so keyed up about this. We're not "hating" Russia or anything close to it. We're expressing our opinion on this like anything else, and if you don't like it, maybe a long hard look in the mirror before presuming that we are the ignorant ones here.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:it's hate-week already? by Max_W · · Score: 1

      About 20000 people are murdered in the USA each year, more than 10000 are murdered in the UK. Just by doing simple statistics there should be the journalists among these tens of thousands hapless people. Or at least bloggers. People are being shot practically every day as guns are omnipresent.

      Still only 1 or 2 names of killed journalists are in the media spotlight. Exactly those who were killed literally in close proximity to the Kremlin buildings.

      When the resources were practically free of charge no one cared for Russia. Nowadays when people in South America, Africa and Asia got education en mass and realized that they can have money in exchange for oil, natural gaz, metals, crops, etc., the resources are not dirt cheap anymore. Russia with its immense resources is becoming interesting again, even to the former Soviet republics.

      The Soviet Union was founded and run by the Georgian (Stalin, Beria), Ukrainian (Khrushchev, Brezhnev), Baltic (Dzerzhinsky, the father of the red terror) political elites. These republics have separated (with additional territories) when oil cost USD 3.- per barrel. Now they realize that they have made a mistake, because Russian are becoming rich now and they - poor. Like Jack in "LOST" they say: "We should go back". They want again to rule Eurasia. That is why it is so loud.

    3. Re:it's hate-week already? by gnarlyhotep · · Score: 1

      Why are you engaging extreme nationalists with logical debate? There's no point in it, you cannot convince them, you cannot stop them and you certainly cannot win.

      It's like the old maxim about wrestling a pig. You get dirty and the pig likes it.

    4. Re:it's hate-week already? by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

      A lot of the times things look they way they do because someone presents them a certain way. That doesn't make it true. Especially if the person presenting it has some bitter bias.

      Just because Russian peacekeepers were there doesn't give Georgia the right to roll in their tanks and start killing civilians and peacekeepers in Ossetia. And South Ossetia IS a sovereign country. Russia had EVERY right to be there as the citizens of a sovereign country asked them to be there. It issued South Ossetian passports because some people had family members in Russia and wanted to travel to see them. Nobody FORCED them to take passports. What kind of argument is this, anyway?

      Ukraine said they paid their bill but saying something doesn't suddenly make it come true. When a country stops paying and starts siphoning off your gas (even admitting to it) you have no choice but to shut it off, or by the time things get settled in some WTO, billions of dollars of gas will be stolen. Your little implication that Russia is not a civilized country really shows how bitter you are.

      Your Putin argument is really lame. You're claiming that just because you can't buy polonium at chemist's shop then it must've come from Putin. Do you even see how ridiculous that is? As far as an investigation, there was one by Scotland Yard and they couldn't find any credible evidence to link Russia to prompt Russia to do an investigation of their own.

      What's happening with some journalists is sad, but without proof you can't go around accusing the government of doing this. There is credible opposition media, but you're right, you can't find enough people that are interested in hearing a contrary point because most people just don't care for it. An ideal government in Russia is one that keeps the country stable and leaves the citizens alone. Putin provides this, so for that he has a lot of support. The opposition usually wants radical change, and in case you missed Russia's history, everyone is tried of changes.

      Russia's alcohol and demographic problems are Russia's problems.

      I'm keyed up about it because it's disheartening to read so much hatred. You're calling me ignorant but all of your arguments are based on speculation, hearsay, stereotypes, and just complete misinformation, so by your own suggestion, perhaps its time you invested in a mirror, then?

    5. Re:it's hate-week already? by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

      Translation of gnarlyhotep's comment: "Only my opinion is right and if you try to argue it, you're an EXTREME nationalist."

    6. Re:it's hate-week already? by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Get you facts right, man!
      - S. Osetia is a breakaway region. There were peace-keepers. Mutually agreed peace-keepers. The first to launch a massive military attack were the Georgians. The attack was provoked by a lot of issues. Two of those: a militant Georgian president and Russian "nudge" on the rebel side. The main Russian point is if Kosovo can have independece, then those should have independence too. That is what they meant by saying that Kosovo independence is a dangerous precedent.
      - Ukraine issue is a simple one. Money! They payed for the gas, but they payed late and needed to pay the interest that was outstanding by the terms of the contract. After that they simply decided to use some of the transit gas to power the turbines AND THAT is WHY Russia cut the gas. It was a political move to force Ukraine to sign a contract based on a formula, same as all other countries DO. Please note, that the "MOST HATED COUNTY" by russians , as per the article, had no ISSUES with gas supplies! Even Georgia got supplied with their energy needs by Russia!
      - As for that guy, what's his name. Damn shame that he dies that way. Do you really think that people in russian special agencies are THAT stupid!?!?!? Polonium is a traceable chemical. Getting it into UK is quite hard, except when local MI6 can transport it without any issues. Or are we mislead about the quality of MI6, by James Bond movies? In any case, it would have been much more productive if they would have taken down Berezovski instead of this nobody. And since there was so much publicity about it, it is highly unlikely.
      - In Russia main TV channels are state run or symathetic. In fact there are more independent newspapers in Russia then in US! You can basically get any viewpoint that you wish when you are at a newstand.
      - The lives of the journalists are lost moslty by hands of mob members, that have corrupted officials in their ranks. And a lot of deaths of journalists are due to revreling the corruption by the mob. Least likely will a journalist be killed for exposing the elected officials. And there are a lot of mobs operating in Russia.
      - Russia, in fact, is a country that acknowledges that there are issues on that front. However, not only Russia has that problem. A finnish person may outdrink a russian any day of the week.(No offence to finns ment) There are a lot of countries that have bigger drinking issues, then Russia, i have seen them first hand. Russians are known, however, to be quite loud when they drink. So the main issue is NOT the drinking, it's the fighting when drunk. And unfortunatelly you still can buy a toxic bottle of vodka in russia. And that is the biggest killer of young men, not the amount of alcohol, but quality.

  26. Re:so full of Baltic-brownish stuff... by stophatingalready · · Score: 1

    Latvia holds annual Nazi parades honoring Latvian SS officers.

    Estonia was trying to erect a monument honoring Estonian Nazis, but a bunch of Jews and Europeans complained until those plans were scrapped.

  27. Nashi brides??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I loved the "find your perfect ukrainian bride" advertisement on the rss feed for this story? Do the brides come from Nashi as well ?

  28. Re:so full of Baltic-brownish stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [citation needed]

  29. In another words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A communications disruption can mean only one thingâ"invasion.

  30. Re:so full of Baltic-brownish stuff... by bioluminescence · · Score: 1

    Many Baltic Waffen SS "volunteers" were actually conscripted after February 1943, even though Nazi propaganda claimed that they had consented to join the legion. However, prior to that some Latvians and Estonians actually did join these divisions as volunteers but not for Nazi ideals but because they wanted arms and financing to liberate their country from the Soviet occupation that began in 1940. Therefore, amongst themselves they referred to their divisions as the "Latvian Legion" and "Estonian Legion" (in a fight for national self-determination) rather than as Waffen-SS fighting for Hitler. (From Wikipedia)

  31. Re:so full of Baltic-brownish stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some dude who is a little crazy was trying to erect a monument honoring Estonian Nazis but the government took it down. By the way, an example of Estonians fighting for the SS. Can't exactly remember where it happened but it went like that: when battle with Russians was won at that place, the Estonians turned their weapons around and started shooting Germans. Estonians on both sides fought for themselves. The ones fighting in Soviet uniforms wanted Germans off and then to turn against Russians and the ones fighting for SS... Well, the same.

  32. Seems like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too much William Gibson.