Slashdot Mirror


Colbert Wins Space Station Name Contest

As we speculated a couple of weeks back, it has come to pass. Reader mknewman writes to tell us that comedian Stephen Colbert has won the vote to have his name immortalized (or at least until it crashes) as the moniker on NASA's newest addition to the International Space Station. We can but wonder what NASA will do now. "NASA's mistake was allowing write-ins. Colbert urged viewers of his Comedy Central show, 'The Colbert Report' to write in his name. And they complied, with 230,539 votes. That clobbered Serenity, one of the NASA choices, by more than 40,000 votes. Nearly 1.2 million votes were cast by the time the contest ended Friday."

61 of 471 comments (clear)

  1. Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Nakor+BlueRider · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not mentioned in the article, but what brought this all up in the first place was the fact that "Xenu" was winning the write-in vote before he asked viewers on his show to write in his own name instead. Xenu is the galactic overlord from Scientology myth. Colbert asked his viewers to write in his own name, and the following day he had already passed Xenu on the write-ins. The show that evening, he declared himself the new galactic overlord.

    Incidentally, NASA reserved the write to call it whatever they want; they don't have to go with the vote.

    1. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by unlametheweak · · Score: 5, Funny

      Xenu is the galactic overlord from Scientology myth

      Xenu is NOT a myth! I take it you are not a Scientologist.

    2. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by FrostedWheat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Xenu is NOT a myth

      Your right, it's SyFy!

    3. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by schon · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's too bad..

      My information may be out of date, but at one time Scientologists were told they needed to have scientology-approved censorware on their computers, and one of the things that the banned words was "xenu" (apparently to protect the scientologists from encountering a website that would kill them.)

      It would have been hilarious if ever website that contained a reference to the space station would have been blocked.

    4. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by samkass · · Score: 5, Informative

      Incidentally, NASA reserved the write to call it whatever they want; they don't have to go with the vote.

      I suspect it's as likely to be named "Colbert" as Hank, the Angry, Drunken Dwarf is to become People's Most Beautiful Person.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    5. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by bonch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Naming it Xenu would have hurt Scientology, not helped it. Xenu is considered top secret by the Church of Scientology and its lawyers, and they sue people who post the texts--they forced Slashdot to remove a comment for the first time in its history. People wondering what Xenu is would look it up and find out about OT III. It would have been a great blow to have that out there. Thanks to Colbert and his mindless viewers who do everything he says, that won't happen, and the opportunity is gone.

      Consider me biased since I'm sick of Colbert's schtick, and I'm sick of his college kiddie fans who parrot everything he says and spam his videos to Digg.

    6. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Spaseboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it's important to remember all of the popular, positive attention Stephen Colbert has given to NASA over the years and science in general. He well deserves the name if for nothing else than for the great PR he brings NASA.

      Did you even know there was an addition to the space station before it was on The Colbert Report? I didn't.

      --
      "I don't want more choice, I just want nicer things!"
      -Jennifer Saunders as Edina Monsoon
    7. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Cynonamous+Anoward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Welcome my new sarcastic, wise-cracking overlord?

      --
      "The GPL is viral by design, like any good religion."
    8. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not to diminish Colbert's fame or anything, but just about anything trumps Scientology. I've got a broken toaster that I'd rather consult for spiritual advice.

    9. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by m.ducharme · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course, you can't run Linux on a toaster until you remove the Thetans.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    10. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Nimey · · Score: 5, Funny

      $DEITY help us all.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    11. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've got a broken toaster that I'd rather consult for spiritual advice.

      I don't know, toasters can be pretty annoying. But you're probably right.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't see why they wouldn't name it "Colbert". I mean, yeah, it's a joke, but it's also good publicity, and what harm does it do?

      I think if they don't, it's showing that the people running NASA are sticks in the mud and take themselves too seriously.

    13. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't see why they wouldn't name it "Colbert". I mean, yeah, it's a joke, but it's also good publicity, and what harm does it do?

      I think if they don't, it's showing that the people running NASA are sticks in the mud and take themselves too seriously.

      As someone else pointed out in a previous thread on this subject, serious organizations, especially ones with government connections, don't like to name things after people who are still alive.

      You see, if you name it after a person who has lived out their life, you can evaluate their entire life and make sure that they haven't done anything that you wouldn't want to be associated with. However, someone who is still alive might very well do something in the future (kill someone in a drunk driving accident, get caught with child pornography, shoot their wife, etc) that no one wants to be associated with.

    14. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by merreborn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins.
      It's not mentioned in the article, but what brought this all up in the first place was the fact that "Xenu" was winning the write-in vote before he asked viewers on his show to write in his own name instead. Xenu is the galactic overlord from Scientology myth.

      You make it sound as if this is a victory over scientology.

      On the contrary, as I understand it, Xenu is more akin to Scientology's satan, than their god -- not a name they'd be trying to promote themselves. The effort to vote for Xenu was almost certainly an action of anti-Scientology protesters -- "Anonymous" being a likely culprit, what with their recent activity and affinity for online stunts like this. (of course, any depiction of "Anonymous" as a cohesive group with any sort of organization or leadership is misleading -- Anonymous is more of a flash mob)

      The WP article on Xenu seems to support this theory:

      Critics of the Church of Scientology have used public protests to spread the Xenu secret. This has included creating web sites with "xenu" in the domain name, and displaying the name Xenu on banners, and protest signs.

    15. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by FleaPlus · · Score: 5, Informative

      As someone else pointed out in a previous thread on this subject, serious organizations, especially ones with government connections, don't like to name things after people who are still alive.

      You see, if you name it after a person who has lived out their life, you can evaluate their entire life and make sure that they haven't done anything that you wouldn't want to be associated with. However, someone who is still alive might very well do something in the future (kill someone in a drunk driving accident, get caught with child pornography, shoot their wife, etc) that no one wants to be associated with.

      Of course, not everybody follows that advice:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Stevens_Anchorage_International_Airport

    16. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by renimar · · Score: 5, Funny

      The airport to nowhere!

      --
      In other news, Microsoft Windows users are now covered under the Americans with Disabilties Act...
    17. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by justgosh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here is the domain and word list for the censorware. http://www.xenu.net/archive/events/censorship/wordlist.html

    18. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by feitingen · · Score: 4, Funny

      shoot their wife, etc) that no one wants to be associated with.

      The guy who named reiserfs should have thought of that

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank.
    19. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about people who believe in @DEITIES, you insensitive clod?!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  2. I'm shocked... by end15 · · Score: 5, Funny

    that my write in vote for Bigus Dickus didn't win... I thought I had the mobs support. Cheers, endxv

    --
    All glory to the Hypnotoad!
    1. Re:I'm shocked... by Quothz · · Score: 4, Funny

      that my write in vote for Bigus Dickus didn't win...

      What's so funny about Biggus Dickus? I have a vewy gweat fwiend named Biggus Dickus.

  3. Slight Exageration by Yankumi · · Score: 3, Informative

    I hardly think that a 3.3% margin of defeat is worthy of the adjective "clobbering".

  4. Not all bad by SoapBox17 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really naming it the "Colbert" room isn't as lame as if everyone voted for "i can haz space station" or something. Plus he may have actually raised public awareness of space programs a little bit. He certainly drove traffic to NASA's website. And if 200,000 people actually voted for him, you can imagine how many people voted for a "real" option or read some of the NASA content.

  5. What will the full name be? by bunratty · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Colbert Spaceport?

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  6. Not so fast... by memorycardfull · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the article: "NASA reserves the right to choose an appropriate name."

    1. Re:Not so fast... by memorycardfull · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed it doesn't seem odd at all. It is as if they are naming it exactly what they decided to name it prior to this false exercise in allowing people to vote on the name.

  7. Honorable Way Out for NASA by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Name it something else, but hang a signed picture of Colbert in the module. The fans are satisfied, a reasonable name can be applied, and Colbert gets a talking point for a show.

    But please, for the love of God, no dancing! Colbert dancing with that freaky grin always creeps me out.

    1. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by demi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would they need a way out? NASA had the chance to honor a scientist or engineer, but decided not to--Serenity doesn't honor anything but entertainment, and neither does Colbert, or Tek Jansen for that matter.

      --
      demi
    2. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

      They'll just affix it somehow with some massive brass balls.

    3. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by MiKM · · Score: 5, Informative

      I liked Serenity not because of the show, but because it fits well with the other two modules Unity and Harmony. If this were the first to be named, I'd definitely advocate honoring a scientists, but as sysadmin knows, having a consistent naming scheme is nice.

  8. Re:Uncritical media breaks democracy by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep, I guess the difference lies in "to kill hundreds of thousands of people".

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  9. My write in by arun84h · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wrote in "Candlejack", and apparently i was the onl

    1. Re:My write in by zaxus · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wish I had mod points. Best post I've seen in a long time. Candlejack! That's just bril

      --
      /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
    2. Re:My write in by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's with this "Candlejack" meme anyway? Every t

    3. Re:My write in by Ragzouken · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's kind of Candlejack to press the subm

  10. Moot / 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On a similar note, what will Time do if Moot wins the #1 most influential person of the year?

    http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1883644_1886141,00.html

  11. So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by StCredZero · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if he'd let it be named Serenity for a date with Inara Serra / Morena Baccarin?

    1. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why exactly does a married father need a date with a random actress?

      Apparently you've never been married.

    2. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by sc00p18 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh c'mon, dude!
       
      She's not a random actress, she's a Companion.

    3. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by g0at · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do these "marriage is so harsh" sort of jokes always get moderated as "insightful" rather than "funny" (or "overrated")? Sad.

    4. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I like engine girl. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by aetherworld · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do these "marriage is so harsh" sort of jokes always get moderated as "insightful"...

      Apparently you've never been married.

    6. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by quenda · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why do these "marriage is so harsh" sort of jokes always get moderated as "insightful

      The moderators are married. Marriage is OK, but there are two big points:

      • ladies: your man will never change. His faults will not go away when you marry.
      • gents: your wife will change.

      Just get a written agreement on everything before you marry. Work, kids education, number of kids, money, ... Including minimum frequency of sex. It may seem awkard, but it is so much easier that way.

    7. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Chousuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ahh, damn. Is it somehow possible to moderate the moderation of this post as +5, Funny?

    8. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As an unmarried slashdotter, let me say:

      My name is geminidomino, and I approve parent's message. Kaylee smokes Inara any day.

    9. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The woman would just ignore the contract. My ex-wife (like so many wives) had a wonderfully self-serving memory. I could have gotten it in writing, had her sign it, and held it right in front of her face--and she still would have denied ever agreeing to it. They ALWAYS change after you marry them. David Letterman has been with Regina Lasko for 23 years together. They have a kid, and have lived together most of that time. And he finally married her last week. And I guarantee you, she has already begun to change from the woman he knew a week ago.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by PriceIke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll be in my bunk.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  12. Re:NASA won by Loadmaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah! What the fuck have we ever gotten from NASA? Pretty pictures?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Spinoff
    http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/en/kids/spinoffs2.shtml

  13. Pronounced, of course... by ebbomega · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kohl-bear Spayss-pore

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  14. Re:don't trust to hope by owlnation · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which is a completely different thing than actually getting the space station module named after him.

    Why shouldn't it be named after him? After all, it makes sense. Bear in mind that there's a lot of people watch the Colbert Report who are not necessarily Space Nerds. But they are people who have political interests, and are active voters. Do you not think it would actually be a really really good thing to have them interested in what NASA is doing? And thus help fund other things?

    Colbert is great about generating publicity, the Colbert Bump is real -- so why not bump NASA? Who really cares what the craft is called if it will help NASA?

  15. Would have been "Ron Paul" by TheSync · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would have been "Ron Paul" if it wasn't a socialist space project!

  16. Mistake? by JustinOpinion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    NASA's mistake was allowing write-ins.

    Mistake? How so? It's pretty obvious that the purpose of the naming-competition was to get people involved and excited. To raise NASA's profile and garner some free advertising. By allowing write-ins, they opened the door for Colbert to advertise for them. And apparently he drove some 230,000 people to go check out the NASA site, maybe read some other NASA material, talk about NASA with their friends, and so on.

    I daresay NASA was quite successful in their effort to gain some publicity. Allowing write-ins was evidently not a mistake.

  17. Coal bear, except for the WGA strike by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is awful. I've heard him pronounce his *own* name different ways on his show.

    As I understand it, The Colbert Report is "the coal bear rapport" most of the time, but it was temporarily changed to "the coal bert report" during the first quarter of 2008 to signify the more improvisational format that the striking Writers Guild of America forced on Colbert. Likewise, The Daily Show got replaced with A Daily Show .

  18. Re:News from 2015 by Narishma · · Score: 3, Informative

    You clearly don't watch his show. He often talks about Nasa and space stuff. He even did a couple of interviews with astronauts aboard the ISS.

    --
    Mada mada dane.
  19. Racist comment by NiteShaed · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe the correct term is actually "damaged Cylon" you insensitive frakin' clod.

    --
    Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  20. Re:NASA won by Rigrig · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All right, but apart from the Pretty Pictures, Light-Emitting Diodes, Infrared Ear Thermometers, DeBakey's Ventricular Assist Device, Artificial Limbs, Aircraft Anti-Icing Systems, Highway Safety Grooving, Improved Radial Tires, Chemical Detection, Video Enhancing and Analysis Systems, Land Mine Removal, Fire-Resistant Reinforcement, Firefighting Equipment, Temper Foam, Enriched Baby Food, Portable Cordless Vacuums, Freeze Drying Technology, Water Purification, Solar Energy, Pollution Remediation, Better Virtual Software, Structural Analysis, Internet-Connected Ovens, Powdered Lubricants, Improved Mine Safety and Food Safety Systems, what have we ever gotten from NASA?

    --
    **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
  21. Re:Colbert wee wees on space program supporters by devjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's one way to look at it.

    On the other hand, I think it's an example of how quickly a large group of people can be mobilized when prompted by someone they like. It seems obvious you've not spent much time watching his program.

    Colbert, Stewart, and others prove that serious discussion can happen while laughing. I don't think for one second that Stephen was mocking NASA; he actually saved it from the prior leading write-in: Xenu.

  22. Re:Scientology and Scientologists... by Schemat1c · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...are the people behind nearly all that is evil in the world!

    Ah come on not all evil, leave some room for bankers and republicans!

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  23. Re:NASA won by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sometimes the direct route is not always the best route. The river meanders for a reason.

    --
    What?
  24. Re:Yes, a Mistake by brkello · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But Colbert != Stern. It's like saying you don't want something named Gandhi because you don't want it named Hitler.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com