Slashdot Mirror


Old-School Keyboard Makes Comeback of Sorts

CharlotteShma writes "Some old writer once said that in order to keep going, he needed to hear the scratch of the pen on the page. Some self-proclaimed keyboard aficionados would make the same argument for computer keyboards. Is it possible that the old 'clicky' keyboards are making a comeback? Now that we've replaced the old buckling springs with rubber domes, our keyboards are only getting quieter and quieter. According to the people at Unicomp Inc., all keyboards made since the early 1990s are, frankly, no good. They still use and produce vintage IBM Model M keyboards in their small factory in Lexington, Kentucky. The IBM Model M keyboards are ugly, built like tanks, and, most importantly, have a spring under each key which clicks when you press it." Not sure what's ugly about them — most other keyboards are ugly, when you shut your eyes.

84 of 519 comments (clear)

  1. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not sure what's ugly about them most other keyboards are ugly, when you shut your eyes.

    WTF kind of sentence is that?

    1. Re:Nice by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What you get when typing away on a typewriter and thinking about the ugly people you had sex with.

    2. Re:Nice by sgt+scrub · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is /. There isn't even Ugly Sex for some of us. Sigh.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    3. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some?

    4. Re:Nice by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      WTF kind of sentence is that?

      It's the kind that uses a metaphor... apparently instead of proper punctuation.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    5. Re:Nice by dubbreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why I always type with the lights off.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:Nice by hipifreq · · Score: 2, Informative

      Disregard the complete lag of regard for grammar in the summary! I think what they meant is that new keyboards SOUND ugly - hence the ugly when you shut your eyes

    7. Re:Nice by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait wait wait, do you mean to tell me there's no hope? Ever!? Where's a suicide booth when you need it?

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    8. Re:Nice by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Funny

      I never metaphor I didn't like.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    9. Re:Nice by geobeck · · Score: 4, Funny

      You young whippersnappers and your Selectrics! When I was your age, my 'laptop' was a 40-pound Remington on which I could only type 45 words per minute without jamming the hammers. My 42 nano-baud 'modem' was an envelope and a stamp which the mailman walked uphill through eight feet of snow to deliver.

      But boy oh boy, that keyboard had sound! You always knew when everyone in the office was typing up a storm; you had to shout a conversation, which cut down on unnecessary chit-chat. And you couldn't be a lightweight either. Five days a week on a Remington gave us all forearms like Popeye and a grip that would make a longshoreman wince.

      So get yer new-fangled Selectric offa my lawn, kiddies!

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    10. Re:Nice by Kjella · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, you can't take away hope. You got to leave room for some myths and legends about the slashdotter who got laid once, presumably by a girl too drunk to realize in a disused lavatory with a sign that said "Beware of the Leopard". Of course some got to take it too far and come up with such absurd things as girlfriends and wives, offspring or even girls on slashdot which puts them way into the land of fairies and unicorns. Keep it believable people.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  2. I dunno about audible feedback.... by Starayo · · Score: 3, Funny

    But I'm too used to using LCD miscellany on my logitech G15. If I can't see my ethernet traffic when I glance down I get rather confused. >_>

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:I dunno about audible feedback.... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was over at a friend's house and he had one of these newfangled keyboards, and I gotta say I was impressed. Much nicer to have that info there than cluttering up screen real estate.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:I dunno about audible feedback.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Newfangled? I used to have an Apricot computer (which shipped with Windows 1.04) which had a small LCD (40 columns, 2 lines) on the keyboard and ran a calculator, a notes program, and a few other things. The notes program, as I recall, allowed you to store notes in the keyboard and then send them as a stream of characters to the currently-running program. I can't remember the exact specs of the computer, but I'm fairly sure it was an 8086 with no hard drive and probably no more than 640KB of RAM. Certainly not what you'd call 'modern'.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:I dunno about audible feedback.... by Rynor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Have to say, I really like my Logitech G15 v1, it's so much better compared to the orange looking v2 that has different keys which don't type nearly as well.
      Not to mention the LCD, which is great as well.

    4. Re:I dunno about audible feedback.... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know whether it's the audible feedback, or the mechanical feedback, but I've got a pair of old Focus FK2000 and FK2001 keyboards on my computers.
      Maybe not quite an IBM Type M, but I can type about 20WPM faster, and with fewer errors, on one of these "clicky" keyboards than any of the crap rubber button ones.

      They feel like you're typing in Jello. Seriously.

      Something with a good solid thunk when I hit a key makes an incredible difference to my typing.

      But, I've played the piano for 25 years, so it could be the mechanical feel of them, rather than the actual click. But either way, I hate cheap keyboards....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    5. Re:I dunno about audible feedback.... by Schemat1c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Something with a good solid thunk when I hit a key makes an incredible difference to my typing.

      But not good when you have to type while others sleep. Some of us need the quiet keyboards or have them bashed over our heads at 2am.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    6. Re:I dunno about audible feedback.... by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>>don't know whether it's the audible feedback, or the mechanical feedback,

      The only noise I need is my television in the background. I don't need mechanical feedback but simply watch the text flow across the screen. Perhaps it's because I grew up with a Commodore 128 and Amiga 500 with their relatively-quiet keyboards, and therefore I don't feel the need for noise.

      In fact, noise is annoying - reminds me of my old manual typewriter. Ick.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:I dunno about audible feedback.... by supernova_hq · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just take some of those cardboard trays that hold 144 eggs and glue them to the ceiling (covered in felt). That will work as a sound insulator and your mother will be able to sleep much more soundly.

    8. Re:I dunno about audible feedback.... by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The C128 and Amiga actually had quite nice keyboards. They had a good feel, although quiet. My current keyboard (Kensington from the early 2000's) is pretty close with regards to that feel.

      I did own a Model M keyboard at one point and thought it had a good feel also, but the clicking was a bit annoying. To each their own, eh? In some ways I wish my PC keyboard had the layout of the C128, with " being on Shift-2 instead of next to the Enter key.

    9. Re:I dunno about audible feedback.... by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Informative

      But not good when you have to type while others sleep. Some of us need the quiet keyboards or have them bashed over our heads at 2am.

      ABS's M1 keyboard is a mechanical switch keyboard that provides the important tactile feedback, but supposedly does not produce those auditory clicks according to Tech Report's recent review.

      I don't know how important the audible clicks are, but a quiet option exists.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  3. Don't fall for it! by Yamamato · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clearly IBM is in a conspiracy with the people attempting to sniff your keystrokes!!! http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/26/1947246

    1. Re:Don't fall for it! by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i imagine a spring keyboard would be harder to sniff, the main sound in a rubber sheet keyboard is the key striking the bottom plate, which results in a different strike position for each key giving a different sound. with a spring keyboard the primary sound is the spring assembly in each key, so the difference in sound should be less.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  4. Responsive by airos4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have my Unicomp and I love it. There's nothing that gives you the same feedback in the fingertips as you type as a nice clicky board. My wife, on the other hand, hates it because - the bedroom is next to my office, and she can hear me at all hours of the night typing away. But... totally worth it.

    As a bonus, I honestly feel that I get less cramping and fatigue when I'm typing happily on this rather than the crap you get most times today. Not sure if there's anything to back that up with, but I graduated from a Microsoft ergo keyboard to this and I'm far happier now.

    --
    I wish there was a choice that said "Factually Wrong -1" when I mod.
    1. Re:Responsive by Zeio · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a Unicomp as well. There is nothing like it. They also make a quiet version, which has the same curved keyboard typing area and all the keys in the right places, but doesn't make the ka-klang when typing. This is good for when you don't have an office or have kids next door at home.

      My typing WPM goes way up on the ka-klang style Type M clones because the feedback is exacting, there is a pressure-release feel when the button is actuated and a sound for feedback.

      I'm not saying cheap Chicony style or freebie Dell style are horrible, but the ka-klanging boards and that layout for keys seem optimal and if you happen to have very large hands, the pitch between keys is ideal for a lot more than the dainty handed typers.

      For the longest time I was loyal to IBM for Thinkpads largely due to the adherence to a proper properly pitched keyboard with proper tactile feedback.

      Also, IBM made a "compacted" Type M. It was black, has all the nice features but has a much smaller footprint. I think I have the FRU somewhere.

      IBM Black compact 104 clickey with curvature: FRU 37L0814 FCC ID: E8HKB-5323 MODEL: KB-3923

      Dell also gave for some time with the Dell 1550 machines and machines from that era a ka-klanger keyboard that was excellent. Its much larger like the Type M, its black and it ka-klangs.

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    2. Re:Responsive by wordsnyc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Dell AT-101W used Alps keyswitches. You can find lots of them on eBay.

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
    3. Re:Responsive by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As I recall, the original Type M keyboard (aka the 1391401) had a list price of about $400. For just the keyboard.

      And yes, I still have mine.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  5. Odd that we're seeing this again by esobofh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is this company sponsoring slashdot?

    Anyway.. there is definately something about feeling, but it's only really about what you are used to. I prefer a fujitsu 8725, a modern cheap-ass keyboard to more exensive ones, simply because I am used to it.

    --

    ----------------------------
    Esobofh - Currently drinking fresh mango juice.
    1. Re:Odd that we're seeing this again by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting

          I was wondering that too. What do you have to do for that kind of advertising? Actually, it was NRP who did it first, but still, either they dumb lucked into a lot of advertising, or they paid some decent money to advertise that they make ancient keyboards.

          They've been making keyboards quieter because they used to be very loud and hard on your fingers. Then again, I learned to type on a mechanical typewriter, so for the first several years that I used PC's, I pounded on the keys, and went through a keyboard about every 6 months. If I start typing really fast (I'm usually somewhere just above 100wpm), I start pounding like I'm on the mechanical typewriter again. People usually laugh at me, and then I have to stop and ask why they're laughing.

          Lately, I've been nice to my keyboards. The lettering wears off before the keyboard fails. Who needs lettering anyways? I've thrown a few away because the alignment marks on "F" and "J" have worn off. It's hard to touch type with a mouse, when you have to look to realign. :)

       

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:Odd that we're seeing this again by athakur999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you buy a brand new keyboard for less than $5, then yes $69 is expensive.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    3. Re:Odd that we're seeing this again by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, it is to me...That's ten days worth of food.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Odd that we're seeing this again by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Informative

      Less, if you exclude the phone and light bills. It doesn't seem like a big deal to me. I got a roof, fridge, stove, hot water, and a computer. The weather's nice, and the beach is close by. Am I missing anything? And no, I don't get near McDonalds. Not after I saw the inside of their ice cream machine. Besides, they're very expensive.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Odd that we're seeing this again by Bobartig · · Score: 2, Funny

      When you consume 24x your healthy intake of cholesterol, and you have a heart attack, even though you're trim and skinny. That's when. Yes, it happens.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    6. Re:Odd that we're seeing this again by WCguru42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but that argument makes no sense. That's like saying why would someone complain about spending $69 dollars on a cup of starbucks (I know, what are you doing at starbucks, you should be at dunkin donuts). Just because it's not out of monetary range for most people does not mean that it isn't overpriced as hell.

      --
      "Educate the mind but never at the expense of the soul."~Blessed Basil Moreau
    7. Re:Odd that we're seeing this again by jack2000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Woah, properly formatted sentences. With indentation no less!

    8. Re:Odd that we're seeing this again by Lehk228 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it's not over priced at all. that $5 keyboard is wired up as a sheet of plastic with conductive paint running circuits and contacts and a rubber sheet with conductive rubber pads to complete the contacts when pressed, plus a cheap plastic key and a frame.

      a unicomp model M has over 100 individual spring switches and every key is actually a separate key and removable key cap. the board inside is an actual circuit board and the chassis design keeps spilled liquid off the board and allows it to run out the bottom through channels.

      so it's more like complaining that a cup of gourmet coffee is $8 when you could scoop parasite infested water from a drainage ditch for free.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  6. Yes by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Good to here. I was trained as a touch typist, and quiet keyboards have screwed with my accuracy. I know I had an ancient IBM keyboard with the heavier, clicking keys and after a few attempts, I managed to get upwards of about 70wpm (in high school, I topped 80 a few times). On the newer keyboards I think I get stuck around 60wpm, mainly because errors count against you, and old-fashioned typing is as much about *hearing* mistakes as feeling them.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Yes by psnyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think QWERTY screwed up our typing more than lack of clicking. You and I type about the same (70wpm) but the errors you and I experience would probably be reduced had we learned a layout made with our fingers and language in mind, such as Dvorak.

    2. Re:Yes by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder if the benefits of audio-tactile feedback are lost on those who learned to type on later mushboards. I cut my typing teeth on manual typewriters,* where the vertical travel and the "clack" are an inherent part of what it means to register a keystroke. If you're used to having the appearance of a character on a screen as your only feedback, those other forms are little more than arbitrary bells and whistles.

      *That's the kind that doesn't have an electric motor, kids.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:Yes by Chemicalscum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is typed on an IBM Model M keyboard manufactured on 21 Oct 1988. I found out that fact by turning the keyboard upside down. It sure is goddam heavy.

      I got it in Feb 1989 with an IBM PS/2 30-286. This is its fifth computer in twenty years and it is still going strong. My wife who is a touch typist loves it and she considers any other keyboard substandard.

    4. Re:Yes by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bzzzz. Dvorak is NO faster than Qwerty.

      Really. Go ahead and show us a non-biased study to prove me wrong. You won't find any.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:Yes by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      But it's not his fault. The evil capitalist bastards put the bastard keys in the wrong place to ensure the net bastard present value of their evil future profit bastard streams. The evil bastardingly evil doing bastards!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Yes by psnyder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "As of 2005, writer Barbara Blackburn was the fastest English language typist in the world, according to The Guinness Book of World Records." She would only use a Dvorak.

      It's interesting to note that places on the internet put a QWERTY keyboardist, Stella Pajunas-Garnand, at 216wpm, but I can't find out how this was recorded, who witnessed, and what parameters were taken into account (eg: accuracy, word base, over what period of time, etc.)

      From my own dealings with The Guinness Book of World Records (on a completely different topic) I know they're very careful about having representatives witness the event and recording the conditions.

      I only have one non-biased study to show you.

      But that's not what convinced me that Dvorak is faster and less error prone. What convinced me is because I have studied both layouts for myself and know that the fingers have to physically move a much smaller distance with Dvorak. I know that there are less awkward digraphs, etc. I know that the bottom row takes the longest to type from and that's one thing Dvorak avoids.

      Even if you disagree with the study above, or you find no sufficient studies exist, find out for yourself. Look up how and why different layouts were/are made. By the way, QWERTY was designed to stop typing jams (by keeping hammers apart), Dvorak was designed specifically with ergonomics in mind.

      There are even more ergonomic layouts than Dvorak, as you'll find if you study that 2nd website I linked. They find a full optimisation to be a kind of XBUL layout. Colemak is another very ergonomic layout. And they even test what the worst layout for English could be.

      Anyway, if you're really interested, find out for yourself. If not, keep using QWERTY. I still do. It's silly to get emotional over a keyboard layout. But it's interesting to think about optimisation.

  7. An audible keyboard is like audible links by Daimanta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They suck. I do NOT want to have sounds in my environment if it is not neccesairy. I simply hate the standard behavior of IE to produce audible feedback each time I click a link. I know I clicked the link and I know I pressed the key and I do not need the confirmation in the form of a click. I am not a retard and I do not wish to be treated like one.

    The IBM model M is dead, game over and it won't be missed.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:An audible keyboard is like audible links by anagama · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mine was born on Nov. 6, 1989. Despite your pronouncement, it ain't dead yet.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:An audible keyboard is like audible links by scubamage · · Score: 4, Funny
      Different strokes for different folks. I love my IBM model M keyboard, and the thing is still going strong though its using an adapter to fit. I like the feel, I like the sound, I like knowing I can pick up my keyboard and whack a sales guy if they really do go one step too far one day - and actually do some damage that'd justify the assault charge.

      Obviously the model M is gone, but the keyboard isn't. And judging by the other posts, the keyboard is missed.

    3. Re:An audible keyboard is like audible links by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to agree with you. I still have one at work... collecting dust. It got too annoying even for a seldom used legacy system and was replaced. Huge, clunky, noisy.

      Some people enjoy the sound of vinyl and tubes over CDs and transistors. Some people enjoy the sound of a metal hammer on a mechanical typewriter. More power to them, but I think the hype over this antique is more than a little overblown. You would think God himself typed the 10 commandments on one.

    4. Re:An audible keyboard is like audible links by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I do NOT want to have sounds in my environment if it is not neccesairy. I simply hate the standard behavior of IE to produce audible feedback each time I click a link.

      Good thing Windows doesn't make a clicking sound every time you press a key. This is more like the physical click of a mouse button.

      I don't think most folks want the click for the sake of the click. Mostly we want the feel given by buckling spring switches. If I were deaf, I'd still prefer my Model M to spongy quiet keyboards.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:An audible keyboard is like audible links by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 2, Funny

      If there had only been an Aramaic layout and an impact printer that accepted stone tablets...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    6. Re:An audible keyboard is like audible links by jgtg32a · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot to mention the most important part, after you hit the salesman the keyboard will still work.

      Actually I've heard that after those M keyboards get the blood of salesmen they actually make you type faster.

  8. I have several of the old ones by reboot246 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The keyboard I use weighs nearly five pounds. It has a great action and I can type for hours without tiring. When it eventually quits working I have several more waiting to replace it.

    No, you can't have one . . . . . . . for any price.

    1. Re:I have several of the old ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How much does it weigh after you clean it?

    2. Re:I have several of the old ones by reboot246 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't really "clean" it. Every once in a while I just tilt it up and eat all the crumbs. It's called "break time"!

    3. Re:I have several of the old ones by reboot246 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. They're built like tanks.

      But the best part is no Windows keys!!!

  9. they are pretty good by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2, Informative

    By a coincidence, I just received a new keyboard from them on Monday. It feels much like the IBM Model M I'm typing this on now, but the keys feel 'looser' - there is a little more back and forth wobble on the new Customizer keyboard from Unicomp than there is on my Model M. Too soon to tell yet whether I will find it distracting or not; the new keyboard is on my game machine at home and I don't use it as often as my I use my work machines.

  10. Comeback? They never went away by sokoban · · Score: 3, Informative

    This news is about 12 years old. They have been in Lexington, KY using the same old equipment that IBM used to make the Model M keyboards.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:Comeback? They never went away by Yamamato · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but this slashvertisement for Unicomp needs to be posted routinely, apparently.

  11. Quality, or neophobia by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Frankly this sounds more like neophobia and/or nostalgia than a legitimate concern about keyboard quality.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  12. On thing mechanical typewriters had by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (and some older keyboards had as well):

    A mechanism to absorb the energy exerted on the keystroke.

    Without that the energy ends up being dissipated in the muscles, tendons, and (especially) joints of the hand.

    This is one of the factors leading to repetitive stress injuries and perhaps also accelerates arthritis.

    I'd like to see a keyboard design that "catches" the key after it's pressed far enough to be detected as a "press" and consumes the energy.

    If it does it by making a sound (especially if the sound has a one-to-one correspondence with the detection of the keystroke) it also provides feedback. All the better for typing accuracy.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:On thing mechanical typewriters had by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure what you're suggesting here. Can you clarify?

      When the finger is moving on the key and the key hits a sudden stop the finger is also suddenly stopped. Much of the momentum of the finger/hand/whatever ends up violently compressing the tissues of the joint and skin, dissipating the energy of motion there and damaging the tissue.

      Not a lot of damage on any given keystroke. But with a LOT of keystrokes it adds up.

      An energy absorbing pad would decelerate the finger more gradually and dissipate the energy mainly by heating (or whatever) the pad rather than crushing the finger's tissues.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:On thing mechanical typewriters had by bhtooefr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ah, in that case, you probably want a Topre Realforce. It uses a rubber dome for cushioning the blow when bottoming out.

      But, ideally, you won't bottom out at all. A good mechanical keyboard will give you at least tactile feedback at the point of actuation, allowing you to begin releasing the key right then.

  13. I could live without the audio... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But the tactile feedback of buckling springs is absolutely perfect. Also the nigh-invulnerability, the beverage-spill-drainage holes on later models, the resistance to stickage even after spills, the removable/cleanable keycaps, the correctly shaped enter key, lack of extraneous doo-dads, pretty much everything about them. /hugs my Model M. Seriously, I really just did, because I love it so much. I also have one at home that I love. And they don't even mind, because Model Ms are secure in themselves and not prone to jealousy.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  14. Das Keyboard by taucross · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a Das Keyboard, based on the original Model-M design. Definitely recommended if you're sick of typing into a soggy sponge.

    There is something incredibly satisfying about solving a particularly complex problem, and hitting "enter" for a crunchy click. No other keyboard satisfies my lust for tactility the way this one does.

    --
    "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
    1. Re:Das Keyboard by bhtooefr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cherry, actually, and the Cherry design is nothing like the Alps design.

      But, the Das III has some nasty, nasty quality issues. Myself, I use a ($50 new) Ione Scorpius M10, which has the exact same switches as the Das II and III. It has nasty quality issues, too, but they're not as bad as the ones on the Das III, and apparently not as frequent. And the board is $80 cheaper.

  15. My model M rules by ericferris · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am still using an IBM model M keyboard made in 1985. It doesn't have the Windows key, which is one more reason for me to like it.

    You cannot beat the touch of a model M, and the tactile feedback helps me limit the number of fat-finger typos.

    One downside of a model M is that the clicky noise might annoy coworkers in open space offices. But I have few complains. Complains are generally going like this:

    Cow orker: "Eric, your keyboard is sure loud".
    Me; "Yup."
    Cow orker: 'Err..."
    Me: "Heavy too. All metal. Feel this."
    Cow orker: "Wow. At least three pounds".
    Me: "Almost five, actually. And reliable, too. You can wield it as a baseball bat, whack someone's head, clean up the brain bits from the bottom, and it's still good for years of service."
    Cow orker: (Gulps, retreat hurriedly.)

    See why I love it?

    --
    Fantasy: http://ferrisfantasy.blogspot.com/
  16. Admitted keyboard snob here by subreality · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the 90s, I got used to typing on an NMB mechanical keyboard. Back then, clicky was taken for granted, and "quiet" keyboards were the unusual ones. And then one day, it finally broke and started typing gibberish...

    Over the course of many years, I went through a bunch of the sucky membrane keyboards, always buying the least-bad one I could find, but my typing speed and accuracy were never as good as when I was on my old NMB. I just recently came across one, and snagged it, and it's really eye opening how much more pleasant it is to type on this one. The sound is satisfying, a light click instead of the Model M "chunk", but it's the touch that really matters. There's a subtle resistance, and then falling away just as the key makes contact, and then a hesitation and snap loose when it breaks.

    I never did get into the Model M (now Unicomp) craze. They're too loud, and the spring pressure is way too high. The NMB mechanism is very light, but very tactile. My fingers feel like they're just brushing over the keys, instead off banging on them.

    The only thing I don't like about this one is that the \ is in the wrong place, to the left of the backspace instead of under it. I'd be in heaven if I could find a keyboard with similar touch and an IBM-standard layout. Anyone know of one? Das Keyboard III is looking like a likely contender, but I'm reluctant to drop that kind of money without being able to test drive it first.

    1. Re:Admitted keyboard snob here by subreality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remapping won't fix this. This is the kind of deformed keyboard where the enter key is an L shape extending to where the \ should be, and the backspace is only a standard width key, instead of a double-wide.

      Unless your remapping software is way cooler than mine is... :)

  17. Re:Matias by couchslug · · Score: 2, Informative

    "I found the Matias Tactile for my Mac a few years ago, and was willing to shell out the $100 for it. Have never regretted it, either."

    Tactile feedback improves performance and accuracy. There is good reason aircraft controls and switches are designed to provide it.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  18. Re:Max Headroom by MrEricSir · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's certainly better than the keyboards in Naked Lunch...

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  19. Best. Keyboard. Ever. by lax-goalie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd been looking for an adapter to use an old IBM keyboard with my Mac. I'd never liked "squishy" keyboards, or ones with short key travel, and Apple keyboards seem to get squishier and shorter as time goes by. Then I found the Unicomp. My fingers are happy now.

    The only downside is that you need to do a little prefs-setting and key swapping to put the option and command keys in the right place, but that's no big deal.

    Get one. It's 70 bucks well spent.

  20. Re:Yay! by scotts13 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use an Apple Extended Keyboard II (ADB) with a Griffin iMate adapter. Terrific keyboard; it should be, costing $169.00 originally. Funny thing is, the power key, removed from current Apple keyboards, still works on the latest Macs.

  21. The Model M is much more than a keyboard by szquirrel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a geek badge of honor. I own a few and I love them like my children (okay not really, maybe like my pets) but part of that comes from the effort I put in to scrounge them and clean them up myself. I do like the feel of typing on a Model M but what I love is the feeling of gravitas (figuratively and literally, it's really heavy).

    Vintage hardware is neat but most of it is of no practical use today. Is there any other part of a 20-year-old computer that you could still use for day-to-day tasks? A Model M lets you feel old-school without actually having to live in the bad old days of floppy disks and 300 baud modems.

    I type on my wife's Mac keyboard and it's fine. I type on a rubber dome keyboard at work and it does the job too. Maybe I would feel differently if my job required pumping out hundreds of thousands of words very quickly, but for most people (and, I suspect, most Model M owners) that's not the case.

    Nostalgia is fun. It's okay to have a "throwback" keyboard if that's what you want. Not every technological choice we make has to be justified by greater efficiency or superior ergonomics. Relax and feel the Model M love.

    --
    Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
  22. Model M = LART tool by Bob+A+Trollmuncher · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah the classic model M, the only keyboard you could beat a user to death with, then sit down and use it delete their account.

    --
    come to the dark side, we have penguins.
  23. Re:Maybe more ergonomic? by trouser · · Score: 2, Informative

    Typing this on an original MNK, the crown prince of keyboards, accept no spurious imitations.

    --
    Now wash your hands.
  24. It depends on what you learned to type on . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    . . . well, that's at least my opinion, after three decades of touch typing. I learned to type back in my teens in the 70's on my mom's Underwood mechanical portable. It was a model that you see international corresponds and sports reporters lugging around in old movies. It had a light touch, but you got a certain feel for full motion of the stroke. It just felt right. Like when I do a full motion backhand in tennis, and I just know that I hit it right.

    My high school had an IBM punch card machine, electric, of course, which I used to type out FORTRAN II programs. It had a small footprint, and the keys didn't have much motion at all. It just didn't feel right.

    On the other hand, those Teletypes, for the time sharing BASIC system, with the round keys, and the crisp, light touch, and just the right amount of motion were great.

    In the meantime, I have typed on all types of varmints and critters, whether I had a choice or not. I don't care about the noise, for me, it's the feel. And I believe that's because of that good old Underwood portable.

    Oh, and to disappoint typewriter aficionados, I was never really impressed with the IBM Selectric.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  25. NOT Indestructible by immel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Despite popular belief, IBM did not design the Model M as a melee weapon with keyboard functionality. Rather, it is a keyboard with melee weapon functionality, as required by their DoD contract .

    Also, although legendary for their durability, they are not indestructible. A few well-placed armor piercing rounds from an anti-material rifle or a single high explosive antitank charge are often sufficient to disable one.

    -Proud owner of a 1986 IBM Model M (pulled from a pile of keyboards scheduled to be scrapped).

    --

    10 Bits= $.25
    100 Bits= $.50
    110 Bits= $.75
    1000 Bits= 1 byte
  26. Comeback? Ugly? by steevithak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What comeback? I never stopped using buckling spring keyboards. The defective non-tactile feedback keyboards that come with most computers go straight into the recycle bin in my office.

    And ugly? I think whoever wrote that left a "to me" off the end of the sentence. They do not seem ugly to me. To me they look pretty much like any other keyboard, a flat thing with lots of little rectangular keys.

  27. Re:This is awesome! by value_added · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I learned to type on a royal manual typewriter and I still miss the action in some ways, but the IBM selectric had the greatest action of all time, this article gives me some hope for the future!

    My own opinion as reinforced by comments on Slashdot whenever the subject of keyboards comes up is that anyone who hasn't learned to type on a manual typewriter, or was taught or otherwise learned to type correctly, doesn't know what what they're talking about and most likely doesn't type very well.

    That said, your comment is interesting for two reasons. First, it's a reminder that while the effort required to type on manual typewriter is wholely uncessary in this day and age, it did offer the opportunity for one to actually develop good technique and strength in one's fingers and hands. Both are required for efficient and fast typing. When I see people using those so-called ergonomic keyboards, I imagine someone sitting in a bean bag chair whining about their back problems or complaining that sitting in an unpright chair is just "too hard".

    Secondly, the IBM selectric did probably offer the best "action" of any keyboard. Musicians understand that term, and evaluate their instrument based on that criteria. What they don't do is complain about the time and effort required to develop strength and good technique, or the ergonomics of playing. They just play, and do so effortlessly for hours on end. On the other hand, what is an ideal "action" for one person may not be the same as for another, so it's unrealistic to expect people to agree on One True Keyboard.

    Given that most keyboards today suck, I think we're all stuck making compromises. I have strong hands and fingers but prefer a very light action. If given the choice between an IBM Model M and my Thinkpad, I'd opt to use my Thinkpad. For anyone that doesn't already know how to type fast and accurately, that choice would be absurd.

  28. I love my Model M/Unicomp keyboard by monk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I started working at my present company, they had an old Unicomp keyboard lying around that no one else wanted to use. I was happy to give it try. I love the way it feels to my fingers and it definitely improved my typing speed and accuracy. I'm a heavy emacs user, and I appreciate that the Ctrl key is as solid and responsive today as it was months ago. This is the first keyboard I've had that could stand up to heavy coding and writing.

    The noise made me feel a little self conscious at first but my neighbors are used to it, and the guy in the next cube tried mine out and ordered his own. He's as happy with his as I am with mine, but he ordered the Mac caps to switch out.

    I run an Iogear USB/DVI and switch between three Linux boxes, a Mac Pro and a Windows XP box and all work great with the Unicomp as well.

    --
    [-- Trust the Monkey --]
  29. They're right by AntiSol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    aah... the 'click click click' that goes with posting on slashdot...

    The day I can't connect my genuine 1980s Model M to my PC is the day I give up PCs.

    Of course, this will never happen: In 300 years time, my great-great-great-great-great-great grandchildren will be squabbling with each other over who gets the great family heirloom - the indestructible and still fully functional Model M. The family Jet will collect dust and the collection of sportscars will go unnoticed as all fight singlemindedly for custody of the great Model M.

    ...That's *IF* I decide to be generous, and don't have it buried with me...

    The Model M is the greatest keyboard ever, and no other keyboard could ever possibly live up to it. Simple fact, case closed. If you disagree, it means you're not qualified to make a judgement.

    It's great to see that someone is still producing them - perhaps the 5 Model M's I've been hoarding as spares are superfluous...

    Actually, they *are* superfluous; not because Unicomp is still making them, but because they are Utterly, totally, completely indestructible. This is a keyboard which can easily be used as a murder weapon. This is a keyboard of such impressive durability that when you throw your keyboard at the wall in a fit of rage, the wall gives way rather than the keyboard. If NASA had the sense to use Model M keyboards as heat shielding for the space shuttle, we'd still have Columbia. In the distant future, archeologists will only be able to speculate on the possible function of most of man's inventions, because they'll have trouble reverse-engineering the heavily-decayed skeletons of cars, planes, computers, and other artifacts. The Model M won't suffer this problem, because they'll just dig them out of the ancient ruins and plug them in.

    An alternative theory of mine is that they won't have to speculate on the nature of the Model M, because it'll be their religion.

    I have spilt coke, coffee, orange juice, cigarette ash, tomato sauce, sweat, blood, and tears into my model M. You don't even have to stop typing to turn the keyboard upside down and shake the liquid out - you just keep typing, firm in the knowledge that the coffee will dry up sooner or later, and that will happen long before it will do any kind of damage to your Model M.

    Model M keyboard owners do not fear burglary by armed intruders, or even raids by SWAT teams, because they know that a thrown Model M is far more deadly than an armalite ar-10 carbine gas powered semi-automatic weapon, and far more bulletproof than that piddly body armour those soldiers wear.

  30. Re:5001 by RetroGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is no meta key, and it bothers me because my thumb tends to hit ALT because the meta key moves everything over. So the spacebar is smaller.
    The bottom row is:
    CTLR ALT SpaceBar ALT CTRL

    --

    - - - - - - - - - - -
    I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  31. Re:Nice KB by Mista2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to admit my favourite keyboad is Apples current aluminium full wired keyboard.

    The keyboard chassis does not flex or creak like a plastic one, it is slim, so is really only as big as it needs to be, and I find the fact it is so flat means I don't have to arch my fingers so much and the keys don't require much effort to push them, but enough travel that accidental presses are rare.
    It's also easier to clean than a regular keyboard, simple wipe down with an antistatic cloth with a little LCD screen cleaner on the cloth takes care of marks and finger grease of the keys very easily.
    Also having no Windows key appeals to me. "clover-leaf symbol" is much more OS agnostic 8) and tons of Funtion keys that are easily mapped to useful things.

    I just wish the USB ports were powered or USB2 8( or the wireless option included the full key layout with the number pad etc.

  32. Yeah, yeah... by jra · · Score: 3, Funny

    Five miles. In the snow. Uphill. Both ways.

    I have a Model M on my office desk, and one here at home -- S/N 3111818, dated Jul 87.

    They're nice to type on -- I type much more faster and more accurately on one than on any other type of keyboard -- and they're also handy if someone breaks into your house. They deflect bullets up to a .38, and you can commit homicide with one, if necessary.

  33. if anyone has doubts about the "high" price by viridari · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The keyboard that I'm typing on now is an IBM model M from 1984. That's right; 25 years of very hard use & abuse, and it's still doing fine.

    I've slaughtered lesser keyboards provided to me by employers. Now I have a model M at the office (much newer; it's only twenty years old) and doing fine.

    $70 for a brand new one with a USB connection and the extra "Windows" keys is a steal.