Slashdot Mirror


Command Lines and the Future of Firefox

Barence writes "Mozilla has revealed how it plans to integrate plain text commands directly into future versions of Firefox. Dubbed Taskfox, the move sees Mozilla's Ubiquity project become part of the browser itself, allowing users to type commands directly into the address bar. You can, for example, type 'map cleveland street london' to bring up a Google Map of that location, or 'amazon-search the great gatsby' to find that book on Amazon, without visiting the website directly. 'The basic idea behind Taskfox is simple: take the time-saving ideas behind Ubiquity, and put them into Firefox,' the Taskfox wiki claims. 'That means allowing users to quickly access information and perform tasks that would normally take several steps to complete.'"

30 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. slashdot-search idle interesting by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Funny

    0 results found

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:slashdot-search idle interesting by Bassman59 · · Score: 4, Funny

      sudo make me a sandwich

      Zap, you're a sandwich.

    2. Re:slashdot-search idle interesting by ailnlv · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hello hclewk, welcome to NetHack!  You are a chaotic female human Sandwich.

                            -------
                            +.....|
                            |.....|
                            ......|
                            |....d|
                            |...*@+
                            - -----

      hclewk the Sandwich              St:16 Dx:11 Co:14 In:9 Wi:15 Ch:10  Chaotic
      Dlvl:1  $:0  HP:14(14) Pw:4(4) AC:4  Exp:1

    3. Re:slashdot-search idle interesting by fedxone-v86 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Beautiful! I didn't know /. allowed posting screenshots.

      --
      (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
  2. Official bookmark shortcuts by Saul+Bash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, basically, a bunch of officially-included bookmark shortcuts.

    1. Re:Official bookmark shortcuts by inviolet · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, basically, a bunch of officially-included bookmark shortcuts.

      Opera has had this for ages. It is truly sweet to be able to type "g Argle Fargle" into the address-bar to do a google-search for "Argle Fargle" without ever touching my mouse. There is also 'z' for Amazon search, 'a' for Ask.com, 'b' for bittorrent, 'y' for Yahoo, etc. etc. And you can add your own.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    2. Re:Official bookmark shortcuts by master811 · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, it's oh so much more than that.

      Watch the video, it explains everything, and looks like a very cool feature with a LOT of potential.

      http://labs.mozilla.com/projects/ubiquity/

  3. Doesn't it do this? by qoncept · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've typed "imdb back to the future" in the address bar and had the page I wanted come up right away. Same with "wikipedia donkey punch". What's new?

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:Doesn't it do this? by patro · · Score: 4, Informative

      Same with "wikipedia donkey punch". What's new?

      With Ubiquity you have suggestions and instant preview, so if you type "wi donkey punch" you see other possible matches too (the film with the same name, etc.) with previews without having to go to the site.

  4. Hasn't this been in there for ages? by Benjo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Search keywords have been in firefox for ages. I.e. right clicking on a search box in an arbitrary web page and turning it into a address bar command. I've used it to do all the examples in the summary.

  5. I would very much like... by Greg_D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... for Mozilla to keep their filthy commands out of the address bar. They could easily add that to the search plugin bar without any problems. I had enough trouble last night when I was trying to troubleshoot a neighbor's internet connection issues and Firefox would repeatedly send the perfectly valid address (http://192.168.1.1) I was inputting off to a google search, which of course would return a blank page, since the ultimate trouble was the cable modem, not the router nor the connection to the router.

    There needs to be a gigantic "FUCK YOU, LEAVE ME ALONE, LET ME SURF THE WEB AS THE FLYING SPAGHETTI WEASEL INTENDED" button in the settings.

    1. Re:I would very much like... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

      I recommend they call it the "damned dirty apes" button.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
  6. That sounds like it should be an add-on by bjdevil66 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Screenshot from article

    The idea is interesting, but wouldn't this be better served as an add-on? That would keep Firefox true to it's add-on roots, IMO.

  7. Re:works great by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ok but when it comes back with "You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike" I'm out of here...

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  8. In the beginning by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the beginning operating systems only had command lines.
    Then the GUI replaced the command line.
    Then the browser replaced the operating system.
    Then the browser got a command line.

    1. Re:In the beginning by Fallingcow · · Score: 4, Funny

      God creates dinosaurs
      God destroys dinosaurs
      God creates man
      Man creates dinosaurs

      Dinosaurs eat man
      Woman inherits the Earth

  9. Emacs by Aceticon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Firefox is gonna be like the Emacs Operating System ... only bigger

  10. Return of the command line by Roadmaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    over the past 20 years I've been amazed at how the IT world first started scorning command lines (IE the rise of Mac, Windows and GUIs in general) only to come back to them (IE Mac OS X / spotlight / Quicksilver, Windows / launchy, smart address bars, and the increasing amount of people who started using Linux with Ubuntu and are nwo flocking to the command line).

    This just proves what i'd known all along: command lines are more efficient, and although the learning curve might be a bit steeper, they just kick ass for things you have to do repeatedly. You of course learn the commands and then whiz by all those people whose motor skills barely allow them to use the mouse, yet they insist in their clickety-clickety ways.

    Many operations are easier with a GUI but getting rid of the command line altogether (mac OS 1.x-9.x, I'm looking at you) is/was never a good idea.

  11. Re:screenshots by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Informative

    You joke, but the interface is all that's new here. You can already do what the summary suggests using bookmark keywords - it is a useful feature, actually. I don't know how well-know it is, but basically you make a bookmark with a keyword for the address bar and a wildcard in the URL.

    For example, if you make a bookmark with the keyword 'map' and the address 'http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&q=%s' (note the '%s' wildcard) you can then type 'map cleveland street london' straight into the address bar just as the summary suggests. All that they seem to be suggesting is having it come up in a 'floating' context box like the AwesomeBar rather than actually open in the tab.

  12. Re:Sounds like AwesomeBar 2.0 by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because new == bad

    We know.

    No, seriously, at least give it a chance to be useful. Your prejudgment seems unwarranted, unfounded, and unnecessary. I know I'll at least try it out before either ignoring it or destroying it.

    --
    Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  13. The article doesn't explain why this is necessary by Matt+Perry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    type "map cleveland street london" to bring up a Google Map of that location, or "amazon-search the great gatsby" to find that book on Amazon

    Users can already do that with the search text field. Example1. Example2. This new feature doesn't appear to bring any new value to the user over what is already provided.

    I'd really like to see Mozilla spend one release where they stop working on new features and focus solely on fixing bugs. The results of such an effort would be more valuable to the end user.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  14. What's next, an email client and html editor? by schwit1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Firefox should be focused on 3 things: speed, security and standards. Everything else should be user-controlled with add-ons.
    .

    If I wanted bloat I would use IE.

  15. Too Late by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Funny

    You are eaten by a grue.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  16. Firefox Redux? by Millennium · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When Firefox was created, it was a spinoff of the Mozilla project for people who wanted 'just a browser' with extensions to fill in the rest.

    Part of me wonders if it's time to do that again: spin something new off of the Firefox project for people who want 'just a browser' with extensions to fill in the rest. Firefox has done a lot of good, just like Mozilla before it, but it seems to me like it's starting to suffer from the same bloat-over-standards problem that made the original project necessary in the first place.

    Maybe this is a cyclic thing; I don't know. Perhaps it's just plain going to be necessary to do this every few years: when a Mozilla browser gets too large, a lean child project emerges, eventually takes over, bloats up, and another lean child project emerges, and so the cycle continues.

  17. Re:Sounds like AwesomeBar 2.0 by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 5, Funny

    Any feature added to computers since 1978 is bad. Anything that allows normal humans who haven't dedicated their lives to understanding the machine to use a computer is evil. The interface was perfected when it was arcane and required years of study to use effectively. Everything since then is simply a conspiracy between Intel and Microsoft to make money.

  18. Even better by RulerOf · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope it stops suggesting porn when my friends and family use my computer.

    --
    Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
  19. Re:screenshots by patro · · Score: 5, Informative

    You joke, but the interface is all that's new here. You can already do what the summary suggests using bookmark keywords

    Not exactly. With Ubquity you get instant feedback during typing, so you don't have to wait for the page to load with all the bells and whistles, you see only the relevant part of it.

    So it's quicker and more convenient than keyword bookmarks.

  20. I was so excited, for like ten seconds by holophrastic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was excited, thinking that the command-line was back, and I could ditch this horrible mouse interface. But then I read that it's only for skipping common search interfaces. Big deal.

    What I wanted, what I want, what wolud actually get me to switch from IE to FF, what I need is to be able to control the browser from a command-line interface. I want to type something like "add favourite 'my favourite recipes' in 'food links'" and "go back" and "favourite 'my favourite recipes'" and "new tab 'live.ca'" and "close all other tabs".

    I don't care about search. There's already as many serach bars as I want, and smart address bars, and ISP searches. Already if I serached for "amazon magic beans" I'd get a listing with the expented book about jack from amazon. I don't need fancier searching. I don't have trouble searching. I have trouble with slow interfaces to vast feature sets within browsers.

    "stop loading images"
    "javascript off"
    "deny cookies"
    "accept cookies"
    "read privacy policy"
    "view certificate"
    "disable flash"
    "maximize"

    Hell, what I want is the windows key to pull up a generalized command-line interface, either to the OS or to the current application. I'm sick of long drop-downs, fly-outs, ribbons, menus, and checkboxes. I can type faster than I can click -- and who's ever heard of clicking without looking?

    1. Re:I was so excited, for like ten seconds by Chad+Birch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have a look at Vimperator. It's slow to get started (much like vim itself), but very efficient once you get it. Make sure you read the help/manual so you realize all the commands possible.

      --
      Sturgeon was an optimist.
  21. Stupid, stupid by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not just BUNDLE SOME FUCKING PLUGINS, rather than ignoring the whole plugin-based architecture you've set up?

    If you could do it just fine as a plugin, bundle the thing instead of removing the feature of not having it

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All