Slashdot Mirror


Command Lines and the Future of Firefox

Barence writes "Mozilla has revealed how it plans to integrate plain text commands directly into future versions of Firefox. Dubbed Taskfox, the move sees Mozilla's Ubiquity project become part of the browser itself, allowing users to type commands directly into the address bar. You can, for example, type 'map cleveland street london' to bring up a Google Map of that location, or 'amazon-search the great gatsby' to find that book on Amazon, without visiting the website directly. 'The basic idea behind Taskfox is simple: take the time-saving ideas behind Ubiquity, and put them into Firefox,' the Taskfox wiki claims. 'That means allowing users to quickly access information and perform tasks that would normally take several steps to complete.'"

70 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. slashdot-search idle interesting by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Funny

    0 results found

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:slashdot-search idle interesting by hclewk · · Score: 3, Funny

      sudo make me a sandwich

    2. Re:slashdot-search idle interesting by Bassman59 · · Score: 4, Funny

      sudo make me a sandwich

      Zap, you're a sandwich.

    3. Re:slashdot-search idle interesting by Daimanta · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are a sandwich and you're in a dark room. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    4. Re:slashdot-search idle interesting by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      sudo torch! sudo torch!

      dammit, it's not worki

      You have been eaten by a grue. Game over.

    5. Re:slashdot-search idle interesting by ailnlv · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hello hclewk, welcome to NetHack!  You are a chaotic female human Sandwich.

                            -------
                            +.....|
                            |.....|
                            ......|
                            |....d|
                            |...*@+
                            - -----

      hclewk the Sandwich              St:16 Dx:11 Co:14 In:9 Wi:15 Ch:10  Chaotic
      Dlvl:1  $:0  HP:14(14) Pw:4(4) AC:4  Exp:1

    6. Re:slashdot-search idle interesting by fedxone-v86 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Beautiful! I didn't know /. allowed posting screenshots.

      --
      (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
    7. Re:slashdot-search idle interesting by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Zen master then responds, "Where's my change?"

      The hot dog vendor replies "change comes from within."

  2. screenshots by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, they have actual screenshots of the commandline interface. Who would have thought that was possible.

    1. Re:screenshots by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      You joke, but the interface is all that's new here. You can already do what the summary suggests using bookmark keywords - it is a useful feature, actually. I don't know how well-know it is, but basically you make a bookmark with a keyword for the address bar and a wildcard in the URL.

      For example, if you make a bookmark with the keyword 'map' and the address 'http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&q=%s' (note the '%s' wildcard) you can then type 'map cleveland street london' straight into the address bar just as the summary suggests. All that they seem to be suggesting is having it come up in a 'floating' context box like the AwesomeBar rather than actually open in the tab.

    2. Re:screenshots by mirshafie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Many browsers have keyword searches, and most of them handle these much more robustly than Firefox with their ridiculous "bookmark keywords" (argh). Check Konquerors search manager to see how it should be done :) However Ubiquity is much more than keyword search. An ubiquity script can take input from several variables, and in several steps.

    3. Re:screenshots by patro · · Score: 5, Informative

      You joke, but the interface is all that's new here. You can already do what the summary suggests using bookmark keywords

      Not exactly. With Ubquity you get instant feedback during typing, so you don't have to wait for the page to load with all the bells and whistles, you see only the relevant part of it.

      So it's quicker and more convenient than keyword bookmarks.

    4. Re:screenshots by IAmGarethAdams · · Score: 2, Informative

      However Ubiquity also gives you a natural language interface for command line pipes, "do this and then do that" for example things along the line of "Find cheapest flight from London to Las Vegas first 2 weeks in June and add to my calendar"

    5. Re:screenshots by patro · · Score: 3, Informative

      Go to the address bar and type 'amazon-search the great gatsby'

      Have you tried Ubiquity at all? It has completion on the commands too.

      E.g. for accessing wikipedia I don't have to write "wikipedia". "wi" is enough.

    6. Re:screenshots by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not bashine Ubiquity (I actually REALLY like it), but you don't have to type "wikipedia" in the address bar either. 98% of the time "wiki " is all you need.

      Note: this also works for other sites such as imdb.

  3. Official bookmark shortcuts by Saul+Bash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, basically, a bunch of officially-included bookmark shortcuts.

    1. Re:Official bookmark shortcuts by inviolet · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, basically, a bunch of officially-included bookmark shortcuts.

      Opera has had this for ages. It is truly sweet to be able to type "g Argle Fargle" into the address-bar to do a google-search for "Argle Fargle" without ever touching my mouse. There is also 'z' for Amazon search, 'a' for Ask.com, 'b' for bittorrent, 'y' for Yahoo, etc. etc. And you can add your own.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    2. Re:Official bookmark shortcuts by master811 · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, it's oh so much more than that.

      Watch the video, it explains everything, and looks like a very cool feature with a LOT of potential.

      http://labs.mozilla.com/projects/ubiquity/

    3. Re:Official bookmark shortcuts by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Informative

      But you cannot select an image on a random web page and say "email this to $contact", and have it compose a mail in Gmail for you.

      If Ubiquity did nothing but that, it would be worth installing. And the more of it gets integrated in Firefox, the better.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  4. Already doing that by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With keyword search, there's dozens of websites I don't have to "visit" to use. This just seems like a more intelligent version.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  5. Doesn't it do this? by qoncept · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've typed "imdb back to the future" in the address bar and had the page I wanted come up right away. Same with "wikipedia donkey punch". What's new?

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:Doesn't it do this? by Tom9729 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The difference is that right now it's probably relying on Google's "I'm feeling lucky" feature.

    2. Re:Doesn't it do this? by patro · · Score: 4, Informative

      Same with "wikipedia donkey punch". What's new?

      With Ubiquity you have suggestions and instant preview, so if you type "wi donkey punch" you see other possible matches too (the film with the same name, etc.) with previews without having to go to the site.

    3. Re:Doesn't it do this? by IAmGarethAdams · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, it does do that.

      But what if you type "Find cheapest BA flight from London to Las Vegas first 2 weeks in June and add to my calendar"?

      Wouldn't it be neat if it actually did what you typed? Check out their site for examples of things you can *do* with Ubiquity rather than just things you can *find* with I'm Feeling Lucky

  6. Hasn't this been in there for ages? by Benjo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Search keywords have been in firefox for ages. I.e. right clicking on a search box in an arbitrary web page and turning it into a address bar command. I've used it to do all the examples in the summary.

  7. So how long before... by laing · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How long will it be before they start selling "placement" services? Mozilla is non-profit but they could use the money to fund development.

  8. I would very much like... by Greg_D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... for Mozilla to keep their filthy commands out of the address bar. They could easily add that to the search plugin bar without any problems. I had enough trouble last night when I was trying to troubleshoot a neighbor's internet connection issues and Firefox would repeatedly send the perfectly valid address (http://192.168.1.1) I was inputting off to a google search, which of course would return a blank page, since the ultimate trouble was the cable modem, not the router nor the connection to the router.

    There needs to be a gigantic "FUCK YOU, LEAVE ME ALONE, LET ME SURF THE WEB AS THE FLYING SPAGHETTI WEASEL INTENDED" button in the settings.

    1. Re:I would very much like... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

      I recommend they call it the "damned dirty apes" button.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:I would very much like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That sounds like a lie. I just tried what you said in FF3 and there was no problem. ip address, with or without a preceding http:// takes me to wherever it points, no google search.

      Are you sure you're qualified to handle one of these machines?

    3. Re:I would very much like... by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Informative

      For me if the address doesn't resolve I get a "Page Load Error".. It must be a problem on your end (and I don't see what it has to do with the address bar anyway).

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  9. That sounds like it should be an add-on by bjdevil66 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Screenshot from article

    The idea is interesting, but wouldn't this be better served as an add-on? That would keep Firefox true to it's add-on roots, IMO.

    1. Re:That sounds like it should be an add-on by RobBebop · · Score: 3, Informative

      Okay, so it's taking some getting used to but the Vimperator plug-in is pretty awesome. They implement Search-Replace better than Firefox, though it'll take some getting used to before I get C-i C-o instead of searching for the mouse and clicking on the Back and Forward buttons.

      I love what they do with bookmarks, though. Instead of mousing over the bookmark buttons that I usually have taking up real estate on my taskbar I just type ":bmarks! xkcd" and it automatically opens my favorite web comic. Plus, I can easily envision renaming my webcomic bookmarks as "comic " so that I can open them with one sweeping ":bmarks! comic" and then just C-n with "d" through them until I've consumed them all.

      Good stuff. Mod parent up. Vimperator is an excellent tool.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  10. Re:works great by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ok but when it comes back with "You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike" I'm out of here...

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  11. In the beginning by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the beginning operating systems only had command lines.
    Then the GUI replaced the command line.
    Then the browser replaced the operating system.
    Then the browser got a command line.

    1. Re:In the beginning by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean browsers will get a punch card interface?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:In the beginning by Fallingcow · · Score: 4, Funny

      God creates dinosaurs
      God destroys dinosaurs
      God creates man
      Man creates dinosaurs

      Dinosaurs eat man
      Woman inherits the Earth

  12. Emacs by Aceticon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Firefox is gonna be like the Emacs Operating System ... only bigger

    1. Re:Emacs by patro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firefox is gonna be like the Emacs Operating System ... only bigger

      Yep, Emacs already has this.

  13. Return of the command line by Roadmaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    over the past 20 years I've been amazed at how the IT world first started scorning command lines (IE the rise of Mac, Windows and GUIs in general) only to come back to them (IE Mac OS X / spotlight / Quicksilver, Windows / launchy, smart address bars, and the increasing amount of people who started using Linux with Ubuntu and are nwo flocking to the command line).

    This just proves what i'd known all along: command lines are more efficient, and although the learning curve might be a bit steeper, they just kick ass for things you have to do repeatedly. You of course learn the commands and then whiz by all those people whose motor skills barely allow them to use the mouse, yet they insist in their clickety-clickety ways.

    Many operations are easier with a GUI but getting rid of the command line altogether (mac OS 1.x-9.x, I'm looking at you) is/was never a good idea.

    1. Re:Return of the command line by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This just proves what i'd known all along: command lines are more efficient, and although the learning curve might be a bit steeper, they just kick ass for things you have to do repeatedly.

      I would say it differently: command lines are better or more efficient for some things. Trying to do those things with a mouse may make it easier for people who don't know how to do the same thing in a command line, but someone using a command line can sometimes do the same thing more quickly and easily. On the other hand, some things are better handled by those clickety-clickety ways that are used by people who favor a GUI.

      I'm not sure we're disagreeing, but your post seems to focus on how it's a bit silly to try to get rid of the CLI, but without recognition that it's also silly to try to get rid of the GUI.

  14. Re:Sounds like AwesomeBar 2.0 by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because new == bad

    We know.

    No, seriously, at least give it a chance to be useful. Your prejudgment seems unwarranted, unfounded, and unnecessary. I know I'll at least try it out before either ignoring it or destroying it.

    --
    Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  15. But it already does this by Tet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uhhh... how is this news? I've been doing that with Firefox for ages using bookmark keywords. So I have w foo to look up foo on Wikipedia and p foo to look for python documentation about foo for example. That could easily be expanded to do imdb searches, etc if I wanted to. It's reasonable to claim the interface for setting up these searches could be improved, but the functionality is already 99% there.

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  16. The article doesn't explain why this is necessary by Matt+Perry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    type "map cleveland street london" to bring up a Google Map of that location, or "amazon-search the great gatsby" to find that book on Amazon

    Users can already do that with the search text field. Example1. Example2. This new feature doesn't appear to bring any new value to the user over what is already provided.

    I'd really like to see Mozilla spend one release where they stop working on new features and focus solely on fixing bugs. The results of such an effort would be more valuable to the end user.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  17. What's next, an email client and html editor? by schwit1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Firefox should be focused on 3 things: speed, security and standards. Everything else should be user-controlled with add-ons.
    .

    If I wanted bloat I would use IE.

    1. Re:What's next, an email client and html editor? by Richy_T · · Score: 2, Insightful

      unneeded integrated features have more overhead than uninstalled add-ons.

  18. Too Late by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Funny

    You are eaten by a grue.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  19. Do it right by hwyhobo · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would be nice, but not as "let me guess half way what you want as you type in the address bar" kind of thing. Much of that is there already. If you want to add a real command line, then create an add-on with multi-line commands, some logic built-in, perhaps piping. In other words, do a "bashy" thing.

    While we're at it, why not allow execution of scripts written in this new language? Now, that would be cool.

    --
    End anonymous moderation and posting on /.
  20. Nice Sanboxing - NOT! by macs4all · · Score: 2

    Does anyone else see this as a BIG (like ActiveX-sized) security hole???

  21. sudo rm -rf / by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oops, I deleted the Internet. Sorry.

  22. Firefox Redux? by Millennium · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When Firefox was created, it was a spinoff of the Mozilla project for people who wanted 'just a browser' with extensions to fill in the rest.

    Part of me wonders if it's time to do that again: spin something new off of the Firefox project for people who want 'just a browser' with extensions to fill in the rest. Firefox has done a lot of good, just like Mozilla before it, but it seems to me like it's starting to suffer from the same bloat-over-standards problem that made the original project necessary in the first place.

    Maybe this is a cyclic thing; I don't know. Perhaps it's just plain going to be necessary to do this every few years: when a Mozilla browser gets too large, a lean child project emerges, eventually takes over, bloats up, and another lean child project emerges, and so the cycle continues.

    1. Re:Firefox Redux? by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

      Was that a mushroom period?

      The Mozilla suite was the replacement for Netscape, Firefox was a project started later on by a group who decided that the focus and methodology of the Mozilla suite was broken.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  23. Re:Sounds like AwesomeBar 2.0 by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 5, Funny

    Any feature added to computers since 1978 is bad. Anything that allows normal humans who haven't dedicated their lives to understanding the machine to use a computer is evil. The interface was perfected when it was arcane and required years of study to use effectively. Everything since then is simply a conspiracy between Intel and Microsoft to make money.

  24. Even better by RulerOf · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope it stops suggesting porn when my friends and family use my computer.

    --
    Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    1. Re:Even better by RulerOf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ahh yes I know there's a plug-in that'll give you the same features as IE8's InPrivate, but what I'd rather do is just block anything that matches some keywords or domains (like "pr0n" or "*.pr0n.com") from showing up in my awesome bar/history.

      Those things are right in your face when you use a browser, but if I can filter out certain things deep in a configuration setting or my registry, that'd be gold. Mainly, I want to be able to "show" someone a website without having to hammer out a URL really fast.

      [rant]WRT other accounts, I've got plenty of computers that other people could (and do) use for general web browsing/what have you, but I've gotten sick of explaining to people who simply can't fathom how profiles personalize computers for their users that I don't want other people using mine and logging out of websites like myspace or facebook or igoogle and so on... It's like getting in your car and finding all the seats and mirrors moved around, but apparently I'm the only person I know who gets royally pissed off by that kind of stuff. [/rant]

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
  25. I was so excited, for like ten seconds by holophrastic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was excited, thinking that the command-line was back, and I could ditch this horrible mouse interface. But then I read that it's only for skipping common search interfaces. Big deal.

    What I wanted, what I want, what wolud actually get me to switch from IE to FF, what I need is to be able to control the browser from a command-line interface. I want to type something like "add favourite 'my favourite recipes' in 'food links'" and "go back" and "favourite 'my favourite recipes'" and "new tab 'live.ca'" and "close all other tabs".

    I don't care about search. There's already as many serach bars as I want, and smart address bars, and ISP searches. Already if I serached for "amazon magic beans" I'd get a listing with the expented book about jack from amazon. I don't need fancier searching. I don't have trouble searching. I have trouble with slow interfaces to vast feature sets within browsers.

    "stop loading images"
    "javascript off"
    "deny cookies"
    "accept cookies"
    "read privacy policy"
    "view certificate"
    "disable flash"
    "maximize"

    Hell, what I want is the windows key to pull up a generalized command-line interface, either to the OS or to the current application. I'm sick of long drop-downs, fly-outs, ribbons, menus, and checkboxes. I can type faster than I can click -- and who's ever heard of clicking without looking?

    1. Re:I was so excited, for like ten seconds by Chad+Birch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have a look at Vimperator. It's slow to get started (much like vim itself), but very efficient once you get it. Make sure you read the help/manual so you realize all the commands possible.

      --
      Sturgeon was an optimist.
    2. Re:I was so excited, for like ten seconds by pohl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some things are very easily communicated by pointing & grunting. ("Please pass the salt", for example.) Other things are very hard to express by pointing & grunting, and require the expressiveness of compose-able grammatical elements. Your experience with the most crude machine and command set has blinded you to the latter.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  26. Re:Already exists? by Kamokazi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well Firefox is doing it, therefore it is innovative and cool and must be newsworthy. No one cares about us Opera users. We're such a minority.

    But this does appear to be more robust than that. I use the hell out of it in Opera. It's really nice that you can set up custom ones, too.

    --
    As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
  27. i know... by esme · · Score: 2, Funny

    let's call it phoenix, so it can rise from the ashes of firefox?

  28. Ahem by zash.se · · Score: 2, Informative

    Like vimperator?

  29. what happened to firefox being a bare bones base by Jessta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mozilla has revealed how it plans to integrate plain text commands directly into future versions of Firefox. Dubbed Taskfox, the move sees Mozilla's Ubiquity project become part of the browser itself, allowing users to type commands directly into the address bar.

    ummmm...what happened to firefox being a bare bones base that you'd add your own addons to?

    --
    ...and that is all I have to say about that.
    http://jessta.id.au
  30. *yawn* by AvitarX · · Score: 2, Informative

    I typed both these into the search box and got the results.

    I am not convinced this gains anything.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  31. Stupid, stupid by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not just BUNDLE SOME FUCKING PLUGINS, rather than ignoring the whole plugin-based architecture you've set up?

    If you could do it just fine as a plugin, bundle the thing instead of removing the feature of not having it

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  32. I just can't resist...I'm sorry by reashlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Take opera into address bar type g hello world search google for hello work. type w WW2 Search wikipedia for WW2 go to anything that has a search function, right click and Create search. Find a "keyword" that makes sense. New command added. Has been like that for years.

    1. Re:I just can't resist...I'm sorry by DragonTHC · · Score: 2, Informative

      it is nowhere near as cool as ubiquity.

      you don't have to even type full commands.

      you highlight an address, press shift-space, and type map

      it gives you a list as you type of the possible variables.

      press enter opens a google map with that address mapped. way more cool than simple one letter shortcuts.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
  33. PEBCAK by kaiser423 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Problem Exists Between Keyboard And.... Your neighbor must have some weird setting, or you just weren't typing it in properly (with the http and all).

    I've done tons on intranet and modem/router troubleshooting with firefox, and I never, ever had it take a properly valid address and shove it into google search. Sometimes if I mis-type, it will try to append a .com, but never google search it....

  34. Uninformed bullshit by Norsefire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm really liking the uninformed bullshit about this being bookmark keywords with a GUI. Do you have a keyword to go back? Home? Forward? Stop? Restart firefox? Act as a calculator? Check next Tuesday's schedule in google calandar instantly? There is a tonne of things ubiquity can do and while it's true some of it's functionality can be mirrored by keywords I would like to see a keyword bookmark that allows you to do "add lunch with jim tomorrow" to your google calandar.

  35. Re:Just tried it..... by IAmGarethAdams · · Score: 2, Informative

    No. As their example video shows, you don't even need to open a new tab.

    For example:

    Select the text "Mozilla is just trying to reproduce Google";
    Shift-Space (open Ubiquity);
    type "twit can you believe how dumb this slashdotter is: this"

    Ubiquity tweets the message and puts your selected text as "this"

  36. Re:Sounds like AwesomeBar 2.0 by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I assume you're joking, but that elitist bullshit attitude is what I've spent most of my career defeating. My side will win in the end because we have the popular support.

  37. Irritating by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There were no GUI's when I started playing with PC's. I had to learn how to do everything from the command line. Then, they created GUI's which I learned to use. Then, they created Windows, thereby making all those cool GUI's obsolete. Then, I finally learned Linux, making Windows obsolete - still with GUI's. Now, they are returning to the command line, except, I have to learn how THEY WANT IT DONE. Balls. I don't need this crap. It's not so much that you can't teach an old dog new tricks - but the damned dog's days are numbered. He isn't going to waste them learning yet a new way of doing stuff.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br