Slashdot Mirror


User: amori

amori's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
18
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 18

  1. Re:Not to mention... on iPhone Jailbreaking Still Going Strong · · Score: 1

    Reading this article I somehow recalled the 'good old days' with the Palm Vx. I suspect it might have something to do with the Palm Vx thumbnail Slashdot utilizes. IMHO the Palm Vx had an elegant and simple user interface for the 90's. It had an appstore (one from Palm, another from Handango and so on), and interestingly enough (although the Vx was not a phone) users did not have to 'jailbreak' the device. Am I the only one feeling nostalgic ?

  2. Re:Job's got it right.... on Three Mile Island Memories · · Score: 5, Informative

    TMI wasn't caused by a computer failure but the accident was made vastly worse by an error of computer design. Specifically, TMI-2 had a terrible user interface.

    See, See. UI is important!!!!

    I'm a nuclear engineer and I think the use of the term UI for the control room is somewhat 'simplistic'. I personally think a major issue was over design in a certain area (redundant alarms), and lack of safety systems that would prevent the core from melting even with a LOCA in place. It was two hours after the shutdown when the fuel melting began at TMI-2. This was a scenario where the operators couldn't understand what was happening. Now from an operator's perspective (who sits in the operator room) you're not looking at a "UI" in the traditional CS sense. Here is an image of a control room: http://www.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/v38_1_05/images/a11_controls_full.jpg The events leading up to the disaster started on the secondary side (non-core) leading to a LOCA (Loss of Coolant Accident). For those unfamiliar with the term "secondary side". The secondary side of a Nuclear Power Plant is similar to that of any power generating plant, meaning the secondary side does not contain the reactor core.

  3. Depends on Microsoft Asks Fed For Bailout · · Score: 0

    Depends: Can we file bankruptcy. Can we separate the good Microsoft and the bad Microsoft ? Will good Microsoft be sold off to Swedish "The Pirate Bay" firm.

  4. Re:How do you compete with free? on Google Launches Free, Legal Music Downloads in China · · Score: 0

    Perhaps that might actually force other countries to adopt this new business model. Google to Music Industry: Look this model works in China, on the other hand pirates are wrecking sales elsewhere, we recommend you adopt our Chinese model everywhere, this way can turn "free sales" into a profit. Works for Google, works for the consumer.

  5. Re:Web standards on Microsoft's New Multiple-Browser Tester · · Score: 0

    "However, the current build only has support for IE". Question being does Microsoft intend to support other browsers ?

  6. I wonder on Cheap Scanners Can "Fingerprint" Paper · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Taping my fingertips...

  7. Re:Chuck'em out on What To Do With Old USB Keys, Low-Capacity Hard Drives? · · Score: 4, Informative

    A) Install USB linux on one of them. They come in handy when repairing computers. B) Pass them to close friends, or colleagues at work, they'll give it to their children. C) Give it to your neighbor.

  8. Re:Actual Explanation ... on US Forgets How To Make Trident Missiles · · Score: -1

    Sounds a whole lot like Internet Explorer.

  9. Re:No on Emulation Explosion On the PS3 Via Linux · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The trend post-2007 is that the losses have decreased, and if 51 represents the value for first quarter 2009, then they're headed towards their largest profit margin on the PS3 yet.

  10. Re:cell programming on Sony Makes It Hard To Develop For the PS3 On Purpose · · Score: -1

    Mature insight !

  11. Re:And the point is on DIY 1980s "Non-Von" Supercomputer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What else do you imagine ? I'm guessing you have one heightened sense of imagination, which I would probably associate with a gun totting Republican, who also happens to be a linux fanboy, and wishes to bring Linux into a subject that has nothing to do with it.

  12. Re:And the point is on DIY 1980s "Non-Von" Supercomputer · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Normally I wouldn't reply to that but funny you bring it up: My computational cluster runs Linux (personal and at work) and it has a lot of memory, hence my original post. You can't do much with a supercomputer without a decent amount of memory. And Dell ? Who uses Dell.

  13. And the point is on DIY 1980s "Non-Von" Supercomputer · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    "Mine only has 31 nodes, so I could use it as a way to store roughly half of the phonebook in my cell phone." I think I'll pass this one up.

  14. Re:Final transmission: on Nuclear Subs 'Collide In Ocean' · · Score: 1

    Sub # 1 to Sub # 2: "No, you move !"

  15. Re:Legal implications on Reverse Engineering a Missile Launcher Toy's Interface · · Score: 1

    Wonder if our missile defense system can handle this ?

  16. Yucca Mountains on What Happens To Code From Failed Projects? · · Score: 2, Funny

    It just sits and waits for an approval, so it can be given a decent burial within the Yucca Mountains.

  17. Verifying Analysis Tools on Pieces Coming Together For NASA's New Spacecraft · · Score: 1

    "the flight of Ares I-X will be an important step toward verifying analysis tools and techniques needed to further develop Ares I, NASA's next launch vehicle." A prototype I see. Makes sense. It's not an easy task to model and compute everything given the state of supercomputers. Helps to know some old school validation still works.

  18. Re:The problem allegedly being.. on IEEE Says Multicore is Bad News For Supercomputers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Earlier this year, I had access to a large supercomputer cluster. Often I would run code on the supercomputer (with 1000+, 100, 10, 2 CPUs), and then I would try running it on my own dual core machine. Benchmarking the 2 CPUs for comparison purposes. More than anything, just the manner in which memory was being shared or distributed would influence the end results, tremendously. You really have to rethink how you choose to parallelize your vectors when dealing with supercomputers vs. multicore machines. As a researcher, I've found that I don't necessarily have the time to rewrite my code for both scenarios. I think this too might factor in heavily ...