Slashdot Mirror


Obamas Give Queen Elizabeth an iPod

Ponca City, We love you writes "What did the Obamas give Queen Elizabeth II on Wednesday when they arrived at Buckingham Palace? An Obama aide reported the queen was given an iPod loaded with video and photos of her 2007 trip to the United States, as well as songs and accessories. She also received a rare songbook signed by the composer Richard Rodgers. The gift issue had come up after Prime Minister Gordon Brown visited the White House last month. Mr. Brown gave Mr. Obama a pen holder carved from the timber of an anti-slave ship, receiving in return a DVD box set of American movies, igniting a torrent of criticism in the British press. According to news reports, the queen gave the Obamas a silver-framed signed photograph — a gift she gives to all visiting dignitaries."

130 of 649 comments (clear)

  1. It's not an iPod by u38cg · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's an oiaeuooPod.

    (RP joke, for the humour impaired).

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
    1. Re:It's not an iPod by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if it's Royal, surely it should be a "we"Pod rather than an iPod or onePod?

    2. Re:It's not an iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Umm, no, he's making fun of how the royals pronounce vowels (the clue is RP = Received Pronunciation, look it up on wikipedia)

      Or maybe IHBT...

    3. Re:It's not an iPod by jabithew · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you've just written tomorrow's 'Sun' headline.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    4. Re:It's not an iPod by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's also the sound a horny Ewok makes.
      Maybe the original poster is a Star Wars geek with sexual issues.
      Of course, I doubt the Queen wants her leg humped by an Ewok.

    5. Re:It's not an iPod by JPLemme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish there was a "± 0 Confusing" mod point...

  2. its England by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 3, Funny

    And its good to be Queen...

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
  3. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems kind of 'tarded to give a 70+ year old woman an ipod with a tiny screen filled with speeches she is very unlikely to agree with (not that he would even be aware of her political leanings.)

    I would have given her a gift of pictures of her during the WW2 blitz on London, showing her changing tires and working along with the rest of the people under siege by the Germans and put this into a classy montage. I would want to honor her good qualities, and there is plenty out there. For one of the richest women in the world, I'm certain trinkets are not high on her shopping list.

    Seriously, Obama is a sad amateur. Camacho was a smarter president.

  4. Problem with DVDs was... by Zarhan · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that the Region 1 DVD's didn't play in Brown's Region 2 player. On his next visit Obama will give him a modding kit.

    1. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People still pay extra for players that enforce regions, and give that "Operation Not Permitted" crap when you want to skip through the menus?\

      I was surprised the first time I saw that ... glad I'm boycotting Sony.

    2. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll bet he hasn't even looked at them since. They're sitting in a big cupboard labelled "gifts from foreign dignitaries".

      I'd also be surprised if the PM had a non-hackable player.

    3. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even less problem than the region coding. I've not seen a TV that can't handle a 60Hz signal in the last decade. Nor have I seen a DVD player that can't output PAL60.

    4. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by RDW · · Score: 5, Funny

      Rumours that Station X at Bletchley Park is to be re-opened in order to decrypt 'important data received on disk-based media from a high level US government source' remain unconfirmed. In other news, the Obama Administration has not yet commented on the suggestion that all gifts intended for European dignitaries for the duration of the recession were bulk-purchased in the Circuit City closing down sale.

    5. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm guilty of buying a region-enforcing Pioneer at Best Buy. I had just blown through two $25 generic players in two years and was willing to pay more so that I wouldn't have to buy a new one and hook everything up yet again in another year. Plus, Pioneer seems to "get it" and will play formats like DiVX.

      That aside, just look at this page to make sure the player you are about to buy has an unlock code.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by rlp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...that the Region 1 DVD's didn't play in Brown's Region 2 player. On his next visit Obama will give him a modding kit.

      and an NTSC-compatible television and power converter.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    7. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by ari_j · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had actually pictured the Obamas on Air Force One on the way to England...

      Michelle: So, Mr. President, did you remember to pack the first-edition Walden that I wrapped for the Queen and put on your desk this morning?

      Barack: He removes his iPod earbuds, and we hear the music softly before he presses 'pause' on the iPod resting on his lap. I'm sorry, honey, what were you saying?

      Michelle: I was just checking to be sure you remembered the gift for the Queen. You know what happened last time.

      Barack: .......

      Michelle: Barack?

      Barack: I ... hm. He picks up the iPod and examines it. Do you think that Her Majesty likes Earth Wind and Fire?

    8. Re:Problem with DVDs was... by n1ckml007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh god, I think you're asciing for trouble.

  5. heh heh by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How much does custom firmware that will change its function to a logic bomb in the mysterious future cost? Or is that a standard feature in the iPod firmware, available to the federal government at any time? ;)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. who cares? by castironpigeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are there really not enough issues in the world to get worked up about that people are arguing over a freakin' gift exchange?

    --
    mmmm...forbidden donut
    1. Re:who cares? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I a huge politics junkie and it horrifies me what stories the public latches onto when their very futures are at stake. I only assign 1/4 the blame to the messenger. The other 3/4 goes to the public whose mouse clicks and channel selections have indicated to news outlets what their audience wants to see.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:who cares? by db32 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know.... Reading that article made me sick (even beyond the normal slashdotters aren't supposed to read the articles thing). We can't have positive foreign relations with Britain because the POTUS didn't give a government visitor fancy enough gifts? That is pretty unbelievably shallow and self absorbed media coverage even by American standards.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    3. Re:who cares? by virg_mattes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The flip side of this idea is that I spent a few minutes of attention on this story, and it was mildly entertaining. I spend quite a bit more time on important issues, but that doesn't mean there's absolutely no room at all in my life for a bit of fluff on occasion. Even if it took an hour for me to debate this with some random loonies on MSNBC, that would still mean I spent less than one percent of my "news attention span" on it for this week.

      Virg

    4. Re:who cares? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I don't get is why these exchanges (which happen constantly) were never reported when Bush was in office. What makes them "news" now when they weren't "news" a year ago?

    5. Re:who cares? by onefriedrice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are there really not enough issues in the world to get worked up about that people are arguing over a freakin' gift exchange?

      So... it's only proper to talk about something when it's convenient for democrats? One of the things Bush was most criticized for was how America's image was being tarnished globally, but now that Obama is in, we can't talk about that? I see...

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    6. Re:who cares? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Insightful
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    7. Re:who cares? by sycodon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect because Bush and his team observed protocol and gave appropriate gifts.

      Diplomacy is built on protocol. It is what allows two parties that would just as soon kill one another to be in the same room and rationally discuss issues. It prevents people from being unintentionally embarrassed and ensures that everyone pretty much knows what is going to happen.

      Sure, between G.B. and the U.S. it is just a matter of formalities, but protocol is still important. That Barry apparently has such disdain for, is ignorant of, or that his campaign staff is handling protocol is telling.

      He wants to change the world so that everyone "likes" us again. But if he can't even get something as inconsequential as an appropriate girft right, how is he going to pull it off with those not so friendly countries?

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    8. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      From http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/ask/20070508.html regarding the queen's visit to the White House in 2007:

      President and Mrs. Bush gave Her Majesty a bronze statuette âoeHigh Desert Princessâ with a personal inscription on the bottom of the base. It is a replica of the original life size statue that is located in front of the National Cowgirl Museum and Hall of Fame in Ft. Worth, Texas.

      President and Mrs. Bush gave The Prince Philip an exclusive sterling silver eagle box by Tiffany & Co. with personal inscription on the inside lid.

      President and Mrs. Bush gave Their Majesties a leather presentation box filled with a collection of documents from the National Archives. One of the items was a copy of an original letter from President Roosevelt to her father, King George, written in 1938. There were also photos from previous royal visits and a DVD of the footage from the Queenâ(TM)s visit to the United States when she was Princess Elizabeth in 1951.

      Their Majesties gave President Bush a sterling silver oversized plate by William & Son with gold seals including: the Presidential seal, the Royal seal and a center seal with the star of Texas surrounded by roses. There was a personal inscription on the back of the plate. They gave Mrs. Bush a gold and crystal clock with the Royal seal by William & Son.

      The Office of the Chief of Protocol assists the President and First Lady in the selection and presentation of gifts to foreign leaders.

      I can hardly say that gift is any more elegant.

    9. Re:who cares? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure whether or not your are trying to agree with me. But I think your examples shows a great deal of thought and proper protocol. The letters from previous era shows a great deal of thoughtfulness of a personal nature.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  7. Had to be ... by KwKSilver · · Score: 4, Funny

    Had to be an iPod, not a Zune: Her Majesty has far too much gravitas to run around "squirting" people.

    --
    If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
  8. The iPod will be taken apart ... by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After all, would ANY government allow one of their top people to accept an electronic gift without it being checked to make sure it's not bugged? That would be a serious security lapse.

    1. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You remember that warehouse at the end of Indiana Jones where they store the Ark Of The Covenant ?

      The Queen has a similar warehouse where all the presents the monarchs have been given over the last 300 years or so are stored, this I-Pod is never going to be used.

    2. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Ragzouken · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I heard it was going to be examined by top men.

    3. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The queen regularly discusses political matters with the prime minister. The prime minister is not required to do anything she says, but by talking to her has access to a person who has talked to his predecessors and has therefore considerable knowledge. So the queen does have some informal power, and tapping into these conversations could in principle be interesting for a foreign power.

    4. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by nojayuk · · Score: 5, Informative
      "The queen has no role in the security status of her government."

      She has a face-to-face meeting with the Prime Minister, the senior elected official of Her Majesty's Government once a week to talk about Britain and he Commonwealth, its current state and its place in the world. She receives a box of State papers every day to work through -- as Head of State she signs off on all treaties and international agreements negotiated between the UK and other countries.

      She's been doing this for more than fifty years now, day in day out, week in week out. She's heard everything, the good news and the bad. Apart from the anodyne Christmas address to the nation she keeps her mouth shut about it, as it is her duty to do so.

    5. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by jabithew · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Queen owns the government, she is not part of it. Hence, Her Majesty's Government, as well as Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    6. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure the queen does not really know about any important political or defense issues, but
      the Royal family itself is a national security issue.

      The last the Brits need is foreign spooks eavesdropping on their first family's dirty laundry. Think of the blackmailing possibilities!

    7. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      The iPod will be taken apart ...

      It's OK; they would have had to take it apart anyway to replace the battery at some point.

    8. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by AndersOSU · · Score: 2, Funny

      agreed.

      The blackmail-the-royals market needs to remain a domestic business.

    9. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by thirty-seven · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, she might. She has a weekly meeting with the PM. No-one knows what they talk about but I'm sure some of it will be sensitive, especially what is technically her army is fighting a war.

      Indeed. Winston Churchill said, after the fact of course, that King George (Queen Elizabeth's father) was one of the very, very few people with whom he would discuss all the secret plans and his thoughts about the war.

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    10. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by hajus · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the commonwealth states (that used to be part of the British empire), there is the queen's representative, the governor general. The governor general is the one that dissolves parliament when a minority government loses a vote of confidence and then a new parliament election has to take place. At the end of 2008, the governor general in Canada locked the doors of parliament rather than allow a new election, which was within her power. The office is not an elected office, but is appointed, and then authorized by the queen of England. So the queen wields some small power in all the countries that are part of the British commonwealth, rather than just England.

    11. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by mike2R · · Score: 4, Interesting

      heh, take a glance over a British military forum someday. I *think* they're mostly joking, but it seems to be the general group fantasy to receive orders from The Palace to march on the House of Commons with bayonets fixed :) The current government is not popular in military circles, to put it mildly; if Gordon Brown says to the Queen "you and what army", she'd have a ready answer..

      No I'm not being serious.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    12. Re:The iPod will be taken apart ... by dadragon · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Queen of England (United Kingdom actually, there hasn't been a Queen of England since Queen Anne) has no power in Canada. The Queen of Canada does. Yes, they are the same person, but they don't have to be.

      The Queen of the United Kingdom doesn't appoint our Governor General, the Queen of Canada does, on the advice of the Canadian Prime Minister and Privy Council.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  9. Brown responded... by langelgjm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr. Brown gave Mr. Obama a pen holder carved from the timber of an anti-slave ship, receiving in return a DVD box set of American movies, igniting a torrent of criticism in the British press.

    Brown, commenting on the matter, said: "I've already downloaded most of these on the Pirate Bay."

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    1. Re:Brown responded... by ubrgeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Her Majesty, commenting on the matter, said, "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame."

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    2. Re:Brown responded... by rgo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thnk yu for mking me spit my c0ffee sir!
      Yu 0we me a new keybrd!

  10. Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a good article here

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/abolition/royal_navy_article_01.shtml

    It's actually an incredibly cool story.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    1. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by mspohr · · Score: 3, Informative
      This is actually a more complex story. The Royal Navy first started by supporting and defending the slave trade in 1562. The Royal Navy was very 'entrepreneurial' in those days.

      In 1632 King Charles of England gave out charters to support the slave trade. Up to three million Africans had been transported in British ships since 1650, and at the end of the 18th century Britain was dominating the trade, with an average of more than 150 slave ships leaving Liverpool, Bristol, and London each year. This made Britain very rich.

      There were people who realized that the slave trade was an abomination against human rights and they started a campaign against it. By 1807, Britain was forced to outlaw the practice and the Royal Navy had to enforce the new law but this was difficult because of the huge profits. The slave trade continued through 1880.

      In light of the wealth that Britain received from the slave trade, it probably would have been more appropriate for Gordon Brown to give Obama a gift made from a slave trade ship (this gift would be less hypocritical but probably would not be appropriate). Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      And I seriously hope we never do, not because I agree with slavery, but because I disagree with being held accountable for something that someone did 200 years ago.

    3. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by jabithew · · Score: 5, Informative

      I see that you, along with all romantics, have entirely neglected the role that Africans themselves played in the slave trade. Slaves traded across the Atlantic were bought from African dealers. I have yet to see any Afro-Americans demanding apologies from Africans, let alone reparations.

      Britain was one of the first nations to abolish this hideous practice (by democratic choice, not "force"), before any African nation did, and Britain did more than most to bring an end to it. Even after the Atlantic slave trade was brought to a halt by the British and later American navies, innocent Africans were being sold into slavery by Africans to Arabs. Yet still Britain seems to have the majority of the blame for the slave trade forced upon it. This seems deeply unfair to me.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    4. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by CmdrGravy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree and since the British government is unwilling to make reparations I as a British citizen am more than happy to do so on their behalf.

      Obviously all the people actually involved are dead now so there is nothing I can do for them so it's their ancestors I feel I must recompense.

      I have a simple formula, all we need to do it work out the average yearly income of American African Americans and the average income of Africans to get a figure of how much worse off the African Americans are. Then multilply that by the average lifespan of an African American and the number of them who can prove their ancestors were slaves.

      I'll accept payment in gold bullion.

    5. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have yet to see any Afro-Americans demanding apologies from Africans, let alone reparations.

      Because they don't have any money. That's what it's all about at the end of the day. I've yet to understand how giving money to the descendants of slaves repairs the damage that was done by the slave trade, but there you go.

      My bloodline includes Native American, Polish, Jewish and German ancestry (typical American mutt here I suppose). When do I get my rent check for this nice continent my ancestors "gave" you? When do I get my check from Germany for all the damage done to my Polish and Jewish ancestors? When do I get my check from the British and Americans to make up for Dresden?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Britain has yet to seriously discuss reparations for the damage done to Africa from the profits they made in the slave trade.

      Britain has already paid Africa for the slave trade, at a fair price agreeable to both parties. Who do you think the British bought all those slaves from in the first place?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    7. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Inda · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clap. Clap. Clap.

      I knew this. I spout it occasionally. No one likes to listen, especially my black mates after they start their chip-on-the-shoulder rants. People can't seem to understand that a small handful of English would have been easily overrun by masses of Africans. Without the help of the Africans, the slave trade wouldn't have happened.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    8. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obama is not descended from slaves! I know this is true of most black Americans, but it is NOT true of Obama! He has no more relationship with the slavery than any of you cube-dwelling white boys!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    9. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by krunk7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's what it's all about at the end of the day. I've yet to understand how giving money to the descendants of slaves repairs the damage that was done by the slave trade, but there you go.

      I can explain this for you. I know they don't really teach this in schools in as much detail as they should.

      Slavery was not fully abolished, technically, until 1865. Now, that sounds like a long time ago. Over 100 years. But what happened after that? Well for 100 years, blacks were not allowed to go to the same schools with whites, they weren't allowed to live by whites, they weren't allowed to meaningfully interact with whites, they're vote was actively negated through Jim Crow laws, and they weren't even allowed to drink the same water.

      Let me repeat that lest the math was not clear, they were actively and openly oppressed, exploited, violently attacked by both private vigilanties and law enforcement, and disenfranchised until 1965 . That means if you're 43 or over, you were alive then. It also means your parents were almost assuredly alive and could either tell tales of fighting for or against the Civil Rights movement unless you're very young.

      What does this mean really? I'm sure the response is "Well, I didnt' do any of that!". This is true, but the entire American society did that. Laws aren't passed by individuals, they are passed by nations. Widespread discrimination of that calibar is not commited by individuals, it's sanctioned by states. And so, it is society that owes a debt.

      It was not African American's Great Great Great Grandparents that were shoved into ghettos, educationally marginalized, disenfranchised, and openly, violently opposed. Those who experienced this first hand are still alive today as are those who perpetrated these grave crimes against humanity.

      The audacity to presume that in less than one full generation 300 years of this stature of oppression would simply *poof* disappear. Do you really think that all the fathers and grandfathers who were so sure that blacks were less than human in their teens, 20's, and 30's all of a sudden did a 180 and changed their attitudes? It takes more than 1/2 a generation to repair that kind of dehumanization.

      And to compare this to Dresden. Are you completely daft? Are you truly that ignorant of the difference (not in a hateful sense, but in the literal sense of igorance)? Dresden was a single event in a war that spanned a few years. The decendents of dresden were not stripped of their heritage, educational opportunities, and identity. Forced into slavery, shoved into ghettos, hanged from trees, and treated verbally and physically like animals for 15 generations .

      Just ponder that for a moment. Just think of the significance, of the impact that has on a culture. I am amazed that the black community is so forgiving. That the sons (literally) of those our nation abused so egregiously are not absolutely raving with desire for revenge. That they're recovering so quickly economically, educationally, and culturally.

      No, it is not one individual that owes a debt, the entire country owes a debt.

      Now, I don't think monetary reperations are the right way to make amends. Mainly, because the harm is nigh incalculable. But if it were possible to guarantee a free ride to every black child to a first class college to give them the opportunity to pull their communities out of the ghettos that our nation put them in then that might be a good start. Of course, we probably can't afford that either.

      The solution is not easy, nor is it simple, nor is it cheap. But your indignation is misplaced, misguided, and misinformed.

    10. Re:Royal Navy anti slavery actions by krunk7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, that's not a good start, because you are still choosing to give special treatment to some selected group. You are attempting to make up for past (or even ongoing) injustices by creating more injustice. Personally, I don't regard that as a particularly good idea.

      The reason for this is the same as the one below.

      So the person who isn't from a disadvantaged socio-economic class gets punished if he winds up with the same scores as someone who is and is competing for a limited resource? How the hell is that fair?

      There's no punishment here. As I stated before, a child that manages to obtain an 80th percentile score when he went to a school that didn't even have a book for him to study has proven far more work ethic, persistence, and dedication to academia than his counterpart with the same score that wen to a school for which the only cause of poor performance is his own lack and shortcomings.

      Please pay attention to this next part: Grades alone have never been the sole determining factor of a student's admittance . A student with a 3.8 but a long list of extracurricular activities, community service, and sports is often chosen over the 4.0 student with nothing else to show. Why is it so absurd to recognize the diverse achievements of low income students as well?

      There's no "target". The concept is one of local responsbility. You may disagree with that concept and think the system should be more centralized -- that's fine, but to make the analogy with Jim Crow and imply that it's done deliberately doesn't seem particularly honest to me.

      Education is already centralized to some extent. Federal monies and state monies support schools, just not to the degree that local property taxes do. I'm not proposing a complete paradigm shift, but a change in degree.

      And yes, it is absolutely intentional. The high income neighborhoods with a more direct access to the law makers push very hard to maintain the status quo. And these laws have the same end effect on that population's participation in education as jim crow did on their participation in government.

  11. Silly by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, who cares who gave who what? Seriously? I mean, if you made a *major* boo-boo and gave Obama some racist memoribilia or something, then you're an idiot, but otherwise who cares? You're talking negotiations over the future of countries, anyone who reads anything into the gifts is clearly desperate for news or clearly focusing on the wrong things.

    Have the governments of the two countries seriously got nothing else better to waste their money on than gifts for other nations? Sure, bring something along but keep it simple. A couple of bouquets for the missus and a bottle of special wine or something to enjoy over dinner one night. Anything else is asking for a cock-up because it'll have been made from the ship that X's father fought against in war Y or something. And, trust me, nobody British really cared what gift was received/given the last time the US president and the UK prime minister met. Nobody. The press obviously had nothing else better to report, or were feeling snubbed themselves. They don't even care that Churchill's bust was moved in the Whitehouse... really... we don't have American presidents lining 10 Downing Street, so why should the American's have anything similar? So long as it was done respectfully (i.e. they didn't kick it down the stairs after drawing a moustache on it), who cares?

    Personally, I think the Queen's gift is the worst out of all those listed (in all the linked articles) anyway - it's too imperialist and overbearing... a signed photo... "Look, I have given you something cheap and readily available to remind you that you were once in my presence". Urk.

    1. Re:Silly by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Queen's gift is a diplomatic one ... she gives the same gift of the same cost, to everyone, regardless of how important they are and regardless of what they give her in return, no one is snubbed, overvalued, undervalued, or insulted ....

      The giving of gifts is done for purely diplomatic reasons and the cost of the gift given by the British PM is limited, any gift given to him over that same cost is owned by the government not by the current PM ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    2. Re:Silly by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would agree with you except every day for the last 8 years we heard about Bushisms. Just because Obama is your guy (not you personally, just in general) shouldn't mean that you quit pointing out the idiotic things that he does.

      Obama has already had plenty of Obamaisms (basically anytime he isn't in front of a teleprompter), yet I don't see people like Olberman leading off their show with them they way he did with Bush.

      All I want is consistency from people.

    3. Re:Silly by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've probably seen them all, but I don't see them as the lead off news stories anymore.

      Video of him tripping all over himself.

      Quite a few random quotes.

      More videos. Some already covered and includes some Biden classics.

      I think these things are funny and bound to happen when you have the media attention that any sitting President would have. I thought many of the Bush ones were funny too. What I disagree with is attacking Bush for every verbal trip up while gushing all over Obama when he does the EXACT same thing on a fairly regular basis.

    4. Re:Silly by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite a few random quotes.

      Can't see the videos at work, but I was really expecting more from that link. Seriously is that the "cream of the crop" of "Obamaisms"? A couple things that were politically unwise, using the wrong name for a town, making factual errors... the one about eating waffles mirrors a similar event with Bush which was one time I was actually proud of our last President's answer!

      Those are nothing like Bush-isms where he would invent new words, mangle the pronunciation of words, butcher common sayings beyond recognition, or abuse grammar and randomly re-arrange words such that what he says either makes no sense ("food on your family") or is the opposite of what he wanted to say (he never stops thinking of ways to harm the US). The closest thing I see in that list of Obamaisms is where he implies he sees fallen heroes in the audience, which is pretty funny, but Bush was spouting gut-busters all the time.

      Look, I'm all for fairness and not giving a free pass to any President, and all Presidents make gaffs. But this is not the EXACT same thing. He is more like Reagand, Bush Senior, or Clinton. The reason Obama's gaffs don't get as much coverage is because they are not on the same order of magnitude. Bush was more like Dan Quayle, and not since Quayle has there been someone in that high a position with so much unintentional humor coming out of their mouths.

      Maybe this will change. It's been only a couple months, of course. But still, if you really really honestly truly can't see any difference between Bush's speaking ability, and, well, basically everyone else who's ever held the office then something is really honestly truly broken in your brain. That link is very disappointing (and I really was hoping for more; I'll have to check out the videos later I suppose) as a way of equating the two.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  12. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If he had really wanted to put two seconds' thought into it, he would have gotten something for her dogs ... either the corgis or the labs. She's absolutely nuts over her corgis (same as every dog lover :-)

  13. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The real owners are the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians, theyre an irrelevancy. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You dont. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you.. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. Theyve long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the statehouses, the city halls. Theyve got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media companies, so that they control just about all of the news and information you hear. Theyve got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want; they want more for themselves and less for everybody else.

    But Ill tell you what they dont want. They dont want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They dont want well-informed, well-educated people capable of critical thinking. Theyre not interested in that. That doesnt help them. Thats against their interests. They dont want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table and figure out how badly theyre getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago.

    You know what they want? Obedient workers people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork but just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, reduced benefits, the end of overtime and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And, now, theyre coming for your Social Security. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back, so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? Theyll get it. Theyll get it all, sooner or later, because they own this fucking place. Its a big club, and you aint in it. You and I are not in the big club.

    -George Carlin

  14. RIAA? by LatencyKills · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmmm. Is there a copyright issue here (assuming that all the music on the ipod was not open source)? Can I legally hook an ipod to my computer, load it with music from my iTunes, and give the ipod away? How is that any different from making copies of CDs that I own and giving those copies away?

    --
    Jealously hoarding mod points since 2007.
    1. Re:RIAA? by furby076 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you have proof he did something questionable? I can buy an iPod, and buy music from Applie iTunes (or some other legal source) and then give it to someone as a gift. it's done all the time. So if you don't have proof that he pirated music we need to get you modded down.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
  15. american movies by simonbas · · Score: 3, Funny

    "igniting a torrent of criticism in the British press"

    Where can I find that .torrent?

  16. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, I really do think Corgi owners are a fun lot, and Corgis are some of the nicest dogs around. As the poster said above , The Queen of England is not exactly a simpleton, a slouch or unintelligent. I find someone so entitled has gotten down on all fours like the rest of us and she has done a lot more for her country, I believe, than Obama ever will.

    See her first telivised christmas address in 1957.

  17. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ERROR: ")" expected. Found EOF

  18. Sync off only one PC? by Shadow_139 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So will she have to fly to the US and sync with Obamas PC to load new song onto them since apples DRM only allow the device to sync with one system without loosing data?

  19. Hilarious. by Sj0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just find it hilarious, it seems like the criticisms of the US personified.

    "Here's a rare and incredibly symbolic gift, a pen case made with wood from anti-slave ships."-British

    "lol heres 2 fast 2 furious" - US

    --
    It's been a long time.
    1. Re:Hilarious. by icebrain · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's indicative of Obama's naivete and complete lack of experience with regard to foreign policy. IIRC, he also blew off an official state dinner with Brown saying he was "too busy", and dismissed the US-UK relationship as "nothing special", and sent back the bust of Churchill that had been at the White House for quite a long time. Oh, and the DVDs came with a couple of Marine One helicopter toys, too.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    2. Re:Hilarious. by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Don't say anything negative about our black president. The nation's delicate sensibilities can't handle it."

      You must be seeing different media than I am.

      I'm constantly seeing criticism of Obama and his administration and his policies.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    3. Re:Hilarious. by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      dismissed the US-UK relationship as "nothing special"

      Given that "special" was used as double-speak meaning things like one-sided extradition treaties, and us following the US into a dubious war, I'm fine with that...

    4. Re:Hilarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "He doesn't have the leisure time to think about all of the nuances of foreign relations..."

      Then just what the hell is that army of 500 staffers that accompanied him on this trip for? Also, is anyone slightly disturbed by the fact that apparently no one in the new State Dept can correctly translate English to Russian?

      On the matter of outrageous bonuses for failed AIG leadership, why aren't we hearing about Franklin Rains cleaning up at Fannie Mae while he was simultaneously setting off a global recession?

      I think the more probable answer is that The Obumbler is really just a pretty suit who gets carted out to read a message from a teleprompter whenever The Man Behind The Curtain feels compelled to address the people. I can't help getting the feeling that everything we're seeing is just an illusion, that we were sold up the river long ago, and that glitches are finally starting to appear in the Matrix, metaphorically-speaking.

    5. Re:Hilarious. by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the matter of outrageous bonuses for failed AIG leadership, why aren't we hearing about Franklin Rains cleaning up at Fannie Mae while he was simultaneously setting off a global recession?

      Because that's a bile of BS Republican misdirection. Nevermind the 1:60 ratio between assets and liabilities that investment firms were taking on, nevermind the complete lack of oversight from the SEC, it's all the fault of FM/FM and the CRA.

  20. The Queens Gift by howman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's fairly poignant the fact that she gives everyone the same gift, a silver framed picture of her... Pretty much says, 'you ain't shit better than anyone else, but I am da bomb.'

    --
    flinging poop since 1969
    1. Re:The Queens Gift by GregNorc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or it could be to avoid situations like those that arose when Brown visited the USA.

      If everyone gets the same gift, no one will feel slighted. The leader of a major superpower or a tiny island nation being treated the same? That's actually a pretty smart political move.

  21. Mix Tapes by i_ate_god · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember back in the day when you used to give mix tapes to girls to show them how amazing you were?

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
  22. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The summary doesn't even mention that the DVDs that Obama gave Brown were encoded for the USA, and therefore wouldn't play on DVD players in Britain. Come on, Obumbler! You're eye-poppingly wealthy and you now have an army of people to pick out gifts on your behalf. Can you please send them somewhere besides Wal-Mart 30 minutes before you're supposed to meet a head of state? Sad amateur, indeed. What should we expect, though, from someone who's been taking instead of giving his whole life?

  23. !iPod by FTWinston · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everyone knows that the queen doesn't have an iPod, she has a wePod!

  24. Title is wrong by Late+Adopter · · Score: 4, Informative

    President Obama was unable to meet with Queen Elizabeth, since she passed away a while ago. Instead he met with HM Queen Elizabeth II. I know it sounds pedantic, but they are different people.

    1. Re:Title is wrong by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think from the context, we can figure out which one they mean. When you read a tabloid headline that says "Prince Charles Admits To Yet Another Fuck-up," do you actually have to wonder whether they're referring to Charles Stuart or Charles Windsor? Besides, saying "Elizabeth II" over and over again in headlines would appear even more stupid. "Elizabeth II to visit U.S." would elicit a collective response of "...as opposed to Elizabeth I, who has been dead for 400 years?" It would be a constant, and needless, distraction from the intended communication.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  25. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Inda · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think a nice gun would have been more fitting for Her Royal Highness.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  26. Like there's something better? by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are there really not enough issues in the world to get worked up about that people are arguing over a freakin' gift exchange?

    This just in...Israel and Palestine are fighting. More at the top of the hour...

    A lot of people are pissed about Government bailouts. News at 11.

    The economy sucks. More to come.

    Don't complain. At least this is "new" by comparison to the rest of the shit that keeps getting dredged up day after day.

    1. Re:Like there's something better? by nyctopterus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Err, for precisely that reason? If it's not new, is it news?

  27. God Save The Queen? by hitnrunrambler · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope out of consideration for the rich history of British music that it included some of the classics...

    like the Sex Pistols http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_Save_the_Queen_(Sex_Pistols_song)

  28. Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims!!! by cornercuttin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    first, he gives the British PM a stack of DVDs (ultra lame). next, he gives the queen of england a friggin ipod (i'm sure she is really suave on computers...probably has a 24" iMac all modded out).

    maybe next Obama will show up in Japan with some 20" rims for the PM there. "Runnin on dubs!!!"

    this is so embarrassing. i would've expected it out of President Bush. i bet he got the queen a handgun (big ol' desert eagle), and he probably got Tony Blair a shot-glass set. but Obama? why is he pulling this crap?

  29. She should have gave him Northern Ireland . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Ah, Mr. Obama, I've been expecting you."

    "You seem to be handling all the troubles in the world, right now. One more shouldn't be a problem for you, please accept my gift to you of Northern Ireland."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  30. If the British press can't find something... by EWAdams · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... to bitch about America over, they will pull something out of their own ass. The last time the British press was polite and respectful towards America was D-Day.

    There's a recession on, people. Do you really expect Obama to be handing out diamond necklaces? How's that going to look?

    Also, both sides know perfectly well that whatever they give, the other side won't be allowed to keep it as a matter of anti-corruption policy. Every single gift given to an American president goes straight into a vault. So there's no point in giving anything really expensive.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
    1. Re:If the British press can't find something... by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
      The last time the British press was polite and respectful towards America was D-Day.

      Actually, it was the day before D-Day. On D-Day itself, the coverage ran something like 'Thank God, they're all in France now.'

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:If the British press can't find something... by greysky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Every single gift given to an American president goes straight into a vault. So there's no point in giving anything really expensive.

      Yes and no. Take a tour of a presidential library sometime. It's facinating to see what gifts other nations gave our presidents. I recently visited the Clinton library, and the gifts there ranged from unique pieces of art, to one of the bikes Lance Armstong rode in the Tour. Some gifts had little monetary value, others were of immesuarbale worth. But they all personified either the person that gave the gift or the people that person represented. Bush 43 would frequently give handmade cowboy boots with big "W"s on them. Rarely are state gifts about the recipient - they are about the giver, and are also symbolic of the relationship between the two parties. So if you think about it, a box set of DVDs is actually quite symbolic, and not necessarily in a negative way, as is the iPod. What's more American than a portable music player these days? And don't say "a failing bank kept afloat with public funds" -- the UK already has those.

  31. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by o'reor · · Score: 2, Funny

    OTOH, the Obama administration has looked so clueless so far about that "new dog for the White House" business, it probably wouldn't be a good idea...

    --
    In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  32. Is Obama's personal player known as... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... iPod One ?

  33. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by pisto_grih · · Score: 3, Informative

    yeah, its 2009, we have multi-region players in this country. Have had them for years. In fact, my first budget player was multi-region. No codes or chips required.

  34. Re:Wow by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dude, DEAL. This site is American which will obviously bias coverage. I often visit British news and entertainment sites and I don't cry about all the stories covering entertainers and personalities I've never heard of. I simply skip them.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  35. Why not more practical gifts? by east+coast · · Score: 5, Funny

    Chief Lincoln of the Americas offers you Construction in return for Invention and 126 gold!

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  36. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2, Funny

    Still bitter McCain lost I see...Too bad we didn't elect that political prodigy Sarah Palin.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  37. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well said, I have had the pleasure of meeting Her Majesty, and I can tell you she is no simpleton. She is an intelligent witty person, who actually has a "can do" mind.

    People forget that in WW2, she drove ambulances carrying injured people to the Hospital. She is a trained mechanic, and does actually know more about cars and engines than most normal people.

    She even has a blackberry, which she uses to keep in touch with her grandchildren. Talking of Grandchildren, Remember Princess Beatrice once said "she is lucky to have a cool grandmother"

    She is a charming, intelligent and lovely person, and one of the things that makes me as a Brit, feel proud.

    God Bless you maam.

    --
    Have a nice day!
  38. Re:Wow by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 5, Funny

    Achievement Unlocked: "Posting Anti-America-Centric comment and mentioning that there are global readers that don't give a fuck!"

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
  39. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

    People forget that in WW2, she drove ambulances carrying injured people to the Hospital.

    She was on the allied side, despite the fact that her real surname is "Achtungschweinhund Hollenstollen Von Saxe-Koburg Gutenberg".

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  40. You are wrong by Xest · · Score: 2, Informative

    Queen is just a hereditary title and can be used like any other title including social titles like Mr, Dr, Sir, Mrs and so on.

    Using the term Queen Elizabeth without specifying which Queen Elizabeth is no less correct than referring to someone called Paul who is a Dr. as Dr. Paul. The only reason you'd want to specify is if there were multiple Dr. Pauls you could be referring to, but seeing as the summary quite clearly points out he met a living Queen there is no room for ambiguity and so there is no need to refer to her as Queen Elizabeth II.

    Using Queen Elizabeth is merely an informal way of referring to her.

    If you were writing a book on English Queens then yes, you would be wise to use Queen Elizabeth II to make it clear who is being referred to. As we're talking about someone visiting the living Queen of England, no, there is no need.

  41. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mr Brown does not have ur 733t h4kk1n sk1lz.

    What am I on about? He doesn't have any skills, the fat Scottish twat.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  42. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry to answer myself again, but I believe she has an iPod already.. since 2005... a 6GB iPod mini.

    Its pretty well known actually (google queen ipod).

    Not sure what she uses it for, but if i remember rightly, she (or maybe Prince Philip) are avid podcast listeners.

    --
    Have a nice day!
  43. Commander in Chief of the military by fantomas · · Score: 2, Informative

    The queen has no role in the security status of her government

    The Queen is Commander in Chief of the UK military..

  44. Obama's not playing by the rules... by icebrain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not the gifts themselves that are the issue... it's the symbolism, if you will.

    See, diplomacy is a game, of sorts, and it's heavily dependent on symbolism. Things like gift exchanges, summit meetings, state dinners, and all that are mostly useless from a practical standpoint... but it's part of the game. They're the rules; to be taken seriously you have to at least play along with them and pretend that you care. It's like Christmastime at the office; you go to the parties and you buy little gifts for each other, not because you really care about everyone or want to hang out with them, but because it smooths things over and is just part of office politics.

    Obama's not playing by the rules. And while the gifts and all that aren't really a big deal, he's committing a diplomatic faux pas--toward his country's closest ally, no less. What makes this (and similar small diplomatic blunders) ironic, and what the European press is starting to make noise about, is that everyone thought Obama would be better at international relations than Bush. True, he has yet to start any wars; but flubbing even the basic, petty, easy stuff like state dinners and symbolic gift exchanges with your closest allies and your historical and powerful military/economic rivals (China and Russia) certainly isn't getting off on the right foot.

    It's like the new guy showing up at the office Christmas party with PBR and dollar store gag gifts for the exchange when everyone else brought drinkable wine or liquor and a $15 gift... then cutting loose a giant fart and laughing loudly about it. Sure, it doesn't really affect business operations, it's just a stupid little party. But now everyone's looking at him kinda funny and thinking "hey, we thought he was cool, but this guy's a bit of an ass." In other words, it may not be harmful, but he certainly isn't doing us any favors.

    --
    The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    1. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

      It's like the new guy showing up at the office Christmas party with PBR and dollar store gag gifts for the exchange when everyone else brought drinkable wine or liquor and a $15 gift... then cutting loose a giant fart and laughing loudly about it. Sure, it doesn't really affect business operations, it's just a stupid little party. But now everyone's looking at him kinda funny and thinking "hey, we thought he was cool, but this guy's a bit of an ass." In other words, it may not be harmful, but he certainly isn't doing us any favors.

      Dunno about you, but I'd definitely rather go to a party with that guy there than the regular boring same ole same ole.

      In other words, Lighten up Francis. It's a frigging gift, not a speech. No wonder this world is so screwed up.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Funny

      See, diplomacy is a game, of sorts

      No kidding. I hear it's pretty cutthroat, too.

    3. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by viper34j · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obviously you missed the entire point of the post you replied to...

    4. Re:Obama's not playing by the rules... by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's like the new guy showing up at the office Christmas party with PBR and dollar store gag gifts for the exchange when everyone else brought drinkable wine or liquor and a $15 gift... then cutting loose a giant fart and laughing loudly about it. Sure, it doesn't really affect business operations, it's just a stupid little party. But now everyone's looking at him kinda funny and thinking "hey, we thought he was cool, but this guy's a bit of an ass." In other words, it may not be harmful, but he certainly isn't doing us any favors.

      Um, actually, I think an iPod pre-loaded with content that the queen finds entertaining (show tunes, video of her appearances) is quite relevant and a tasteful gift.

      Compare and contrast this with GW Bush's near sexual assault of the German president trying to give her a "back rub". Obama has a long way to go before he stoops to Bush's level of diplomacy.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  45. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by icebrain · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't even understand the controversy. 25 DVD's is a pretty damn good gift. Maybe the Brits don't understand that, in the U.S., giving exquisite gifts to politicians is a MAJOR no-no (unless you're Ted Stevens, of course). I'm surprised they even gave him that much. A U.S. politician couldn't accept anything in excess of $335 in value as a gift from a foreign leader.

    It's pretty much standard here that diplomatic gifts aren't kept by the President; they're accepted on behalf of, and given over to, the American people. I'd imagine that it's pretty much the same in the UK; "suitcases full of cash and rare art" would be state-to-state gifts that just happen to be presented by/to individuals acting as representatives to their people.

    Diplomatic gifts aren't really supposed to be personal anyways. The pen and case aren't for Obama to take home and use for paying his bills; they'll most likely be displayed for a little while, possibly used to sign some kind of treaty or trade agreement with the UK, and eventually filed away in a box somewhere. It might eventually go on display at whatever Presidential library Obama builds, but would remain the property of the United States and just be loaned to said library.

    --
    The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
  46. Re:But this is a video iPod by mhall119 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wasn't trying to say this gift was redundant, I was trying to say that an iPod isn't a "retarded" gift for the Queen, as the original poster seemed to think.

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  47. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by squoozer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I am broadly anti the monarchy I have to agree with you that the Queen does do the British people proud. She is a fantastic ambasador for the country (when she leaves the hubby at home) and I believe that unlike just about everyone else in power in Britian she actually earns the money she gets. The rest of the royal family can go jump for all I care though. Charlie Boy is loosing the plot more and more each day and his two sons are spoilt little brats. When the Queen finally leaves office I think it will be the beginning of the end of the British monarchy.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  48. Re:Not Silly by EmperorKagato · · Score: 2, Informative

    Impeach him for what?

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  49. Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree mostly, but wanted to add that another big component of showing respect in gift giving is thoughtfulness of the gift chosen - the pen holder carved from an anti-slave ship is an obvious example of this.

    Consumer electronics and media gifts like iPods and DVD's are what you give when your out of ideas. They do not show a good level of understanding of the person you are giving the gift to, although at least the iPod was loaded with pictures of the queens visit... but like all electronics they are ephemeral things, not really gifts to last or provide deeper meaning as you said.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by jabithew · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a Brit, I probably shouldn't say this, but I thought the pen was a fantastic gift. The symbolism worked on so many levels. Much like the Resolute desk.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    2. Re:Problem is lack of thoughtfulness by Lars+T. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It was an iPod with video and photos of her 2007 trip to the United States. How thoughtless.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  50. Re:Maybe Japan's Prime Minister will get 20" rims! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    first, he gives the British PM a stack of DVDs (ultra lame). next, he gives the queen of england a friggin ipod

    The DVDs and iPod are not the gifts, they are the packaging. The real value of these gifts is of the content that's on them -- examples of the artistic and cultural outputs of the United States, which have been exported to the world.

    That most of this culture is available to anybody with $300 to spare is not an indictment of Obama's stinginess, nor of America's, but a celebration of our egalitarianism.

  51. Why is everyone ignoring... by Bloopie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why is everyone ignoring the "rare songbook signed by the composer Richard Rodgers"? That could be worth far more than the iPod. Compared to that, the iPod would be a side gift. But that's what the media is focusing on because it's more sensational.

    1. Re:Why is everyone ignoring... by Tuoqui · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, the songbook is the real gift. The iPod just shows he knows the Queen is tech-savvy and it gives her something to listen to the music on :)

      Technically its not the media that is the judge of the gift exchange but the participants themselves. If the Queen likes the iPod and the songbook and Obama likes the silver framed picture then its all good.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
  52. Re:Not Silly by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right, because his predecessor was sooooo much better at this sort of thing, huh?

    Spare me your sour grapes, and suck it up. Apparently your candidate lost, and now all you can do is complain about very unimportant and petty things, that's sad.

  53. Re:Not Silly by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 2, Informative

    It goes to show the lack of class in the man and his administration. The two gifts mentioned from the British were classy gifts, and were well thought out.

    The gifts from the Obama administration don't have a clue what class is.

    Expect more of the same until we impeach and fire this clown of a president.

    I am not entirely sure what you are saying? Do you not recall Bush? The tool that gave Angela Merkel (the prime minister of Germany) a back massage at a meeting? How about the time he winked at the Queen of England? Or when he addressed a room full of donors by saying something to the effect of: "Quite an impressive room of people here, the haves, and the have mores...". The same guy who got us involved in two wars and ushered in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

    And YOU have the gall to call Obama a "clown of a president" who needs to be impeached? Seriously? If you were marked troll, I would have let your comments go and not even read your post. The fact that somehow, you ended up listed as insightful absolutely astounds me. Given the stark contrast of character between the two men, a grass roots community organizer vs. a man who shirked his military duties, you must need a wheelbarrow to carry your balls around in.

    Finally, as a general rule, anyone who finds a need to use the term "class" in the same context you did in your post typically has none themselves.

  54. It was a thoughtful gift by drig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Obamas gave the Queen a rare signed songbook by Rick Rodgers, or Rodgers and Hammerstein fame. Rodgers is one of the greatest American composers. The iPod was filled with his music. It was a thoughtful, expensive, classy gift.

    --
    Citizens Against Plate Tectonics
  55. Re:The "Anti Slave Ship" is worth about a klan hoo by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
    In 1783 the war of independence wrought control of America away from the Empire. The empire then wasn't getting any economic perks from slavery, and the states had pushed the empire out of the americas.

    How strange, then, that the plantations in the West Indies that supplied Britain's vast appetite for sugar and rum were even more reliant on slave labour than those on the mainland. And how strange that the Caribbean colonies did not become independent, nor did the newly-formed United States take any action to free them from the Empire. And how strange that even so, the British Empire did indeed abolish the slave trade and then slavery itself, and command the Royal Navy to seize all slavers wherever they might be found.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  56. Re:Which iPod? by DavidTC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obmama didn't 'give her an iPod' at all.

    Obama gave her a signed Rogers (Of Rogers and Hammerstein, who the queen loves,and considers the a song from Oklahoma her and her husbands 'song') songbook.

    It was an absurdly good gift. Personal, and yet historic enough that it can be displayed with a bunch of other historic things.

    He also gave her a bunch of footage of her trip here that was filmed. He presented this to her within a video iPod.

    And everyone trying to make an issue of this is a giant moron.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  57. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by Jiro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The amusing part is that since Obama's black ancestry is from modern Africa, but his white ancestry is from the US, he's a descendant of slaveholders, but not of slaves. Giving him something from an anti-slave ship may not be as positive as it seems.

  58. Re:All hail Lord Brown! by jabithew · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is the same. In fact, if MPs wish to accept a gift personally, they have to pay its full market value. That includes the Prime Minister. There was a funny story at the start of Blair's first term; President Chirac sent him some rare and expensive French wine as a birthday gift. As Ian Hislop commented at the time;

    He's basically sent Blair a large fine.

    The Daily Show thought it was bad too, it wasn't only the British media. It won't affect relations between the US and the UK, but it does show a lack of awareness of the world on the part of the Obama administration.

    --
    All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  59. Re:Obama Policies Will Bankrupt USA Tsarkon Report by OMGcAPSLOCK · · Score: 4, Funny

    By all accounts the Queen is actually into gadgets. She even has a Wii.

    I assume that would be the "Royal Wii"?

  60. Re:Reprehensible Morality by gknoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're a white person that didn't grow up in an urban slum in the United States, you owe a hell of a lot to a bunch of dead slaves and their survivors who have been not allowed to create the generational wealth that you benefit from.

    May I ask what benefit I (and my ancestors) have derived from slaves, given that they were poor German, Polish, and Irish immigrants from the late 1800s? What generational wealth? While I feel that slavery was despicable, I do not feel that I have benefitted from it in any measurable way. I'm curious why you simply say "white people", also.

  61. Re:Reprehensible Morality by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't stand this argument.

    If you're a white person that didn't grow up in an urban slum in the United States, you owe a hell of a lot to a bunch of dead slaves and their survivors who have been not allowed to create the generational wealth that you benefit from.

    ...

    If your society was enriched by the enslavement or destruction of another, you don't owe them something, you owe them everything. Not only due to the wealth that was robbed from them, but by the moral obligation to right a wrong. It's doubtful that any person could untangle the horrors societies have done to another, and come up with some dollar figure, but that still doesn't excuse your kind of attitude.

    I don't particularly care what argument you can or can't stand - the basic fact of the matter is the people that actually need to be punished have been dead for generations. I do not want to be held accountable for their actions because I am not accountable for the actions of others, especial others that I have never met or had a chance to influence.

    If reparations had any basis or validity in law, why stop at slavery? Can I get reparations please for the generations of brutality and oppression my ancestors received at the hands of the English when they occupied Wales? How about the deaths of several of my ancestors at the hands of the Catholic Church - please hand over your cheque book Mr Pope, I think I'm owed money.

    Get real. Stop living in the past.

  62. Nixon - Kruschev gifts by herbertchapman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a fairly apocryphal tale of Kruschev visiting the US, and taken to a trade fair extolling the virtue of free enterprise. President Nixon supposedly provided a gift of a model of a fully stocked all-American General Store of pioneer vintage, explaining that his parents were shopkeepers and how such stores were the bedrock of American values. Kruschev's reply : "All Shop keepers are thieves !" Can't help but admire his comeback, whatever your politics. Wonder what he gave Nixon ?