Slashdot Mirror


VLC 0.9.9, The Best Media Player Just Got Better

Matt Asay points out a recent update to VLC as they narrow in on a 1.0 release. Already a favorite of many, the open source project has made great strides in recent history towards really solidifying the position as best-in-class. This update, 0.9.9, fixes several display bugs and sees some definite performance improvements. "If you've yet to try VLC, do so. Whether you just want to play media files or also want to convert them, VLC can handle just about anything you throw at it. When all other media players fail, whether on Windows, Linux, or the Mac, VLC will almost always deliver. You can download VLC media player 0.9.9 here. It's open source, but that's not why you'll want to keep using it. You'll use it because it's better than its proprietary peers — by a long stretch.

87 of 488 comments (clear)

  1. Better than mplayer? by Murpster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Color me skeptical.

    1. Re:Better than mplayer? by Bashae · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a Windows user. I prefer Media Player Classic to VLC. It just works better for me.

    2. Re:Better than mplayer? by Murpster · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've never found any videos or audio files mplayer doesn't play. I can use command lines and not have to be burdened by some silly GUI with mplayer (but it has a GUI for people who are keyboard-impaired). It has that super-useful -dumpstream feature for saving audio files off of the net which streaming sites make difficult for people to save. It lets you convert files between different formats, separately rip out the audio or video parts of a movie, or replace the audio track to a movie (or add audio to a silent video). How much of this does VLC do?

    3. Re:Better than mplayer? by skinlayers · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry... though I appreciate VLC, I think its far from the best media player. My vote would go to the numerous incarnation of MPlayer. From Xbox Media Center to SMPlayer on Linux and Windows to MPlayer OSX Extended on Mac OS X, MPlayer has always been able to play whatever weird codec or container I toss at it. Meanwhile, every time I've attempted to use VLC (mainly on OS X) I've become frustrated by hangs and crashes... Maybe I'll hate this version a little less?

    4. Re:Better than mplayer? by whiledo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ditto. For those few times when MPC won't play something or has a problem playing it smoothly, I fire up SMPlayer.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    5. Re:Better than mplayer? by Etrias · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not sure why this guy got modded Troll. Case in point, I got the most recent BSG DVDs and tried to play them on everything I had. VLC didn't work beyond the root screen. Windows Media Player failed. Intervideo DVD player crashed every time. It wasn't until I loaded the K lite codec full that I could get it to play...and only on the Media Player Classic frontend.

      Don't get me wrong, I use VLC for most all other things, but they don't include proprietary codecs with the program. You can get them, but they don't always work.

    6. Re:Better than mplayer? by Mooga · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know I'm going to be hated, but VLC simply lacks a USABLE GUI. Give me Media Player Classic (MPC) with klite codec pack any day over VLC. I've tried to get used to VLC and I can't do it. I will give Mplayer a try though. I've use it in a Kubuntu VM and the experience is iffy at best...

      --
      ~ Mooga
    7. Re:Better than mplayer? by queequeg1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      +1. Media Player Classic has been so good on difficult files that if it fails, I generally just give up (on the assumption that figuring out how to play such a difficult file will be more trouble than it's worth).

    8. Re:Better than mplayer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure why this guy got modded Troll

      Probably ignorant knee-jerk Microsoft hatred (someone assuming Media Player Classic is a MS offering. It isn't.)

    9. Re:Better than mplayer? by TerranFury · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. Does it rescale video decently now, or is it still a pixelated mess (see, this worked fine in old versions, and then, somewhere along the line, it got broken. "It was ffmpeg's fault," but somehow mplayer didn't have the same problem)? And when you use it to transcode, does it produce MPEG-2 output that is correct-enough to be played by... any other player? 'Cus it hasn't yet in any version I've tried previously. And how about subtitles; does it handle them correctly now?

      (VLC has an identity crisis. Once upon a time, it was supposed to be for network video streaming. Now it's competing as yet-another-general-purpose-media-player.)

    10. Re:Better than mplayer? by eball · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, VLC has a bad habit of only using its own codecs (even when "Use System Codecs" is selected), so if they don't cover what you need, or there are better ones out there, you're not taking advantage of that.

      My preference is for MPC, particularly the one bundled with the CCCP (cccp-project.net). MPC works wonderfully for pretty much everything, and what it lacks in interface is more than made up for in features. And the CCCP version is customized to run as smoothly as possible with the codecs it comes with (plus, if there's anyone I trust with getting the most out of my videos, it's the geeks of the anime encoding community behind the CCCP).

    11. Re:Better than mplayer? by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I got the most recent BSG DVDs and tried to play them on everything I had. VLC didn't work beyond the root screen. Windows Media Player failed. Intervideo DVD player crashed every time. It wasn't until I loaded the K lite codec full that I could get it to play...and only on the Media Player Classic frontend.

      Sounds worse than DRM!

    12. Re:Better than mplayer? by Shark · · Score: 4, Informative

      The switch from vxWorks to QT was a pretty heated debate. And I think our side lost...

      They had fairly good reasons for it, but it still makes me unhappy. I'm not complaining though, it made me switch to mplayer which is a lot nicer to me after some tweaking.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    13. Re:Better than mplayer? by Khyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try Zoom Player. It comes with the CCCP pack and much easier to use than VLC, looks better, may not have some of the same functionality but for playback it's unbeatable. Also, the scroll-wheel zoom in/out feature rocks.

      VLC still has issues on my machine where I'll hit the spacebar to pause, then hit it again and the file will 6 out of 10 times start playback at half speed.

      MPC has issues with subtitles.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re:Better than mplayer? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Its a bloody video player man. It goes without saying that the OUTPUT is GRAPHICAL. Why wouldn't you want to USE a GRAPHICAL user interface to it?

      I can almost forgive elitism in some avenues, but this is just making your life more complicated for no good reason.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    15. Re:Better than mplayer? by Khyber · · Score: 4, Informative

      Using VLC for HD video, especially 1080p video, is horrible compared to Zoom Player. Most anime I get now is in high-def, and VLC has issues with keeping up with the video when I skip to points - it takes about 10 seconds for VLC to catch up and display the video. Zoom Player is instantaneous. MPC isn't as fast but you don't get the annoying compression blocks like VLC gives you when skipping around a video file.

      Also, on VLC, when I try playing an MP3, I have to reset the damned EQ every time the song changes - that gets annoying as hell.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    16. Re:Better than mplayer? by EdZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      "MPC has issues with subtitles.

      Could you elaborate on this? The main reason I use MPC is that it has far and away better support for subs (via directvobsub) than VLC. Maybe you have something configured wrong?

      As for mplayer: it comes pretty close, but the lack of a user interface (When I have to google for an appreciable amount of time and dig out the build number just to find out how to change the volume in increments you've got user interface issues), the occasionally out-of-whack subtitile support, and lack of support for .mkv Ordered Chapters, means it's just not an effective everyday player for me.

    17. Re:Better than mplayer? by Zerth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because I'm watching a movie, not the graphical interface.

      I'd rather hit the volume up button on my keyboard instead of waggling the mouse until the overlay pops up and then wait while it blocks part of the movie until it fades again.

    18. Re:Better than mplayer? by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ctrl-Up/Dn works fine for me.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    19. Re:Better than mplayer? by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Media Player Classic was great, but it's no longer updated and has several security flaws that are un patched. You can run a Secunia offline scan (download the scanner) and it will give you all the details about this.

      VLC is far superior to Media Player Classic. It can play almost anything. It has a problem with WMV's that are encrypted or require a codec download (usually a virus if p2p.) On Mac, it can play encrypted DVDs too. Add the playlists for Shoutcast and you have tens of thousands of audio and video channels.

      You can merge streams such as two axis video cameras into a single display. You can overlay things. You can record it to disk or re-stream it. You have many effects such as motion detection and motion blur which when set to max, is pretty nice for CCTV use.

      And with VLC, you don't have to hunt for CODECs like you do with WMPlayer.

      It's really worth trying out.

    20. Re:Better than mplayer? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Informative

      I used to be a bigger fan of VLC, but on a lot of videos, I've recently had problems where after I hit pause, video will continue for 5-10 seconds before it finally pauses. Also, with a lot of videos I would get audio but no video for the first 5-10 seconds of playback.

      It also gave some audio stuttering on some videos that played back fine in MPlayer.

      MPlayer's biggest drawback is the fact that without some sort of frontend, it's UI stinks. SMPlayer solves that problem though. I've started to really like SMPlayer.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    21. Re:Better than mplayer? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you mean wxWorks?

      VxWorks is an embedded operating system, not a graphical toolkit...

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    22. Re:Better than mplayer? by Freultwah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After forking, the last update dates from December 10, 2008 and it is a strong sign that it is, in fact, updated. There are also another fork that specialises in home cinema, hence its name Home Cinema.

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/guliverkli2/

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/mpc-hc/

      Also, why hunting for all the codecs when you can just as well download the current ffdshow from, say, afterdawn?

    23. Re:Better than mplayer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree VLC needs some serious GUI changes. Especially the ability to play a DVD without bringing up a giant options screen!

    24. Re:Better than mplayer? by UnrefinedLayman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I experienced this with BSG Razor on DVD; it would not play properly in VLC or Media Player Classic on Windows, or VLC on Mac OS X. It played fine on Apple's DVD player. This is because of the way deleted scenes are included in some DVDs: rather than having two full copies of a film on the disc, they have the original copy and the deleted scenes, and if you choose to play the DVD in the unedited/director's-cut/whatever mode, then those scenes get spliced into the playback of the original. It's that splicing that causes the trouble. Whoever invented it should eat a back of dicks for breaking something that everyone believed worked just fine.

    25. Re:Better than mplayer? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because some of us don't want to be toaster operator and use VLC for it's real power. Video streaming. The whole reason that VLC was even made. To make it really easy to stream video and audio. I can make channels and stream live feeds. I do that here in the office.

      Streaming from a server that I can control from the command line or web interface. Having a GUI on everything is not an advantage, most of the time requiring a GUI is a hindrance.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    26. Re:Better than mplayer? by Tomun · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't you mean wxWigdets, formerly wxWindows ?

    27. Re:Better than mplayer? by whiledo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From what I heard, it sounds like VLC on Mac is a lot better than VLC on Windows. Partly because of differences in the actual program/UI on the different platforms. The other reason is because there are more competitive apps on Windows than there are on Mac, so the whole "best media player" tag is more likely to draw in Windows users to the comments so they can disagree with it.

      Disclaimer: This is all what I've gathered reading the thread. Luckily, I don't have a Mac.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    28. Re:Better than mplayer? by Smauler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seconded for ZoomPlayer. VLC used to be my default player, but it kept occasionally crashing to desktop, and it had laggy controls sometimes. Mediaplayer classic used to be my default player until I started using Vista64, and I couldn't get it to run at all most of the time.

      ZoomPlayer just seems to run everything I throw at it, has a decent interface, and has no lag on controls etc.

    29. Re:Better than mplayer? by Tacvek · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem's I've found with VLC over MPC, is that VLC does not support the Windows interface for media control buttons on keyboards.(Rather minor, but when watching something full screen, having a working hardware play/pause button is nice.)

      Vlc seems to lack a rewind feature, requiring me to try jumping back with the scrolling bar.
      Unfortunately, the VLC build's I've used tend to crash when using the bar to jump.

      How ever, VLC does have some nice features. It is willing to stream video from certain types of online services, and save the raw stream to my harddrive. It can transcode video. It is perfectly happy to start playing a video I'm downloading through another means (as long as the download is linear), and not have any issues as long as it does not catch up to the most recently downloaded bit. (I've had VLC downloading streaming video before, and run another instance of VLC on saved file. That has it's uses. If I pause the video, or if the window I'm watching the video in crashes, it won't impact the streaming).

      I have also found that VLC does tend to play a few files that nothing else will. There are very few files like that, but I've seen one or two.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    30. Re:Better than mplayer? by Rary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem's I've found with VLC over MPC, is that VLC does not support the Windows interface for media control buttons on keyboards.(Rather minor, but when watching something full screen, having a working hardware play/pause button is nice.)

      But VLC does provide keyboard control using regular keys. The spacebar is your hardware play/pause button. Yes, if you've got media control buttons, it would be nice to be able to use them. But VLC's way of doing things works even for those who just have a plain old regular keyboard.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    31. Re:Better than mplayer? by Rary · · Score: 5, Informative

      The fact that I can't do simply things like watch a video in a VIDEO PLAYER is prof that VLC needs a GUI re-write.

      • Set VLC as default for selected file type in preferences, then double-click file.
      • Open VLC, then drag file onto VLC window.
      • Right-click file, select Open With, browse to VLC executable.

      These are just a few completely standard ways (ie. they don't require you to know anything about VLC in particular, just general Windows usage).

      VLC's GUI isn't the best out there, but I find it difficult to believe that anyone on Slashdot could actually be unable to figure out how to watch a video in VLC.

      MPC is great. I used to use it, but now I use VLC for a number of reasons. If you prefer MPC, that's cool. But to say that VLC's GUI is "100% BAD" and in need of a complete re-write is just silly at best, and your attempts to paint VLC as completely unusable for basic tasks is ridiculous.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    32. Re:Better than mplayer? by Knara · · Score: 2, Informative

      MPCHc has a Vista64 build now, fyi.

    33. Re:Better than mplayer? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Every install of vlc I've ever done on any OS immediately worked with nearly everything that was playable by at least one other program.
      Exceptions:
      1. DRMed Windows Media Audio/Video
      2. Some audio codec used in a 3gp file I have

      DVD video is so easy to play on so many things. I've never had a problem with it in vlc. It's CSS and MPEG-2, not some weird and exotic combination of brand new codecs.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    34. Re:Better than mplayer? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a capability that was in the DVD specification from the beginning, but historically it's rare enough that not everyone bothers to implement it. *decides to try his copy of Razor when he gets home*

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    35. Re:Better than mplayer? by Fallen+Seraph · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, where to begin. First of all, you can bind the hardware play/pause keys in the settings. The option's there, I know, I use it. Second, not only does it have rewind and fast forward, but you can set the amount as well. Seriously dude, look at the hotkey settings once in your life. You can make long, medium, and short jumps using different key combos and set exactly how many seconds you want it to jump with each.

      Has any Windows user here other than myself even used VLC in the last year? Their interface was completely redone and is very similar to mpc now...

    36. Re:Better than mplayer? by Guspaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      By default, MPC's internal subtitle support is disabled. So I'd suggest taking a look at your settings.

      MPC's author is the same guy who wrote directvobsub, the defacto standard for ASS/SSA subtitle rendering; sub support is generally better than every other renderer out there. Competing sub renderers are things like libass (used by mplayer), which is horrible and incomplete (useless for anything but basic subs).

    37. Re:Better than mplayer? by evilviper · · Score: 3, Funny

      Its a bloody video player man. It goes without saying that the OUTPUT is GRAPHICAL. Why wouldn't you want to USE a GRAPHICAL user interface to it?

      An yet your TV/DVD/etc. lacks a GRAPHICAL user interface, even though it performs all the same functions.

      Yes, horror, you must find the right button to turn the volume up, or change the channel. Clearly, dragging a mouse cursor around the TV screen would be a vastly superior UI...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    38. Re:Better than mplayer? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Case in point, I got the most recent BSG DVDs and tried to play them on everything I had.

      That's why you should have just downloaded AVIs from BitTorrent. You get better resolution, too, since you can get 720p HD versions, at only about 1GB per episode.

      I have no problem playing AVIs from BitTorrent on mplayer or VLC.

    39. Re:Better than mplayer? by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, I would want to use VLC if I want to skip that annoying FBI warning or the mandatory unskippable movie previews before the main feature.

    40. Re:Better than mplayer? by deke_kun · · Score: 2, Informative

      AC is especially hilarious today. MPC is an open-source, mplayer-based gui media player for windows. It takes it's name from its appearance which is similar to the "classic" versions of windows media player.

    41. Re:Better than mplayer? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>VLC is far superior to Media Player Classic.

      VLC crashes and dies on corrupted files a lot more than media player classic, and if you are unfortunate enough to install the VLC plugin for firefox, it'll kill firefox with it. This is with an older version, but IMO it is just not worth the effort.

      Actually, the biggest issue with VLC is its shitty playlist support (awkward autorepeat options) and the fact that if you double click a video to go to fullscreen, it'll go back to windowed on the next item in the playlist, but still act like it's in fullscreen mode.

    42. Re:Better than mplayer? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whoever invented it should eat a back of dicks for breaking something that everyone believed worked just fine.

      I'm curious... how many dicks are in a back, exactly?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    43. Re:Better than mplayer? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not true. Media Player Classic is a Windows only application based on Microsoft's DirectShow.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Player_Classic#DirectShow.2C_QuickTime_and_RealPlayer_architectures

      Media Player Classic is primarily based on the DirectShow architecture, and therefore automatically uses installed DirectShow decoding filters. For instance, after the open source DirectShow decoding filter ffdshow has been installed, fast and high quality decoding and postprocessing of the DivX, Xvid, H.264 and Flash Video formats is available in MPC.

      MPC provides DXVA beta support, for newer nVidia and ATI video cards when using an H.264 or VC-1. This provides hardware-acceleration for playback.

      In addition to DirectShow, MPC can also use the QuickTime and the RealPlayer architectures (if installed on the computer) to play their native files.

      MPlayer is based on libavcodec

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPlayer#Legal_issues

      Most video and audio formats are supported natively through the libavcodec library of the FFmpeg project. For those formats where no open source decoder has been made yet MPlayer relies on binary codecs. It can use Windows DLLs directly with the help of a DLL loader forked from avifile (which itself forked its loader from the Wine project).

      The combination of CSS decryption software and use of formats covered by software patents places a fully-functional MPlayer in the legal bind shared by most open source multimedia players. In the past MPlayer used to include OpenDivX, a GPL-incompatible decoder library. This has since been removed, making MPlayer itself completely free software. Usage of patented codecs in free software however is a still pending potential problem affecting FFmpeg, MPlayer and similar software when used in countries where software patents apply.

      The difference being that you can pretty much always find two or three DirectShow codecs for any particularly any audio or video format, and usually one of them is really good. With something like mplayer either a file works or it doesn't. If I want to watch a movie, I don't want to have to write a codec and give it away for free as part of something like mplayer. Also MPC has a nice clean user interface and you can just install filters to do advanced stuff. Last but not least DirectShow has GPU acceleration

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DirectX_Video_Acceleration

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  2. VLC is OK. by c0l0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    VLC is an OK media playback application. I, for one, never understood why someone would prefer it over using mplayer. It's got all the nice libavcodec improvements first, and is the perfect example of unintrusive UI design (note that I'm talking about the CLI-only `mplayer`, not `gmplayer` or any other graphical front-end).

    --
    :%s/Open Source/Free Software/g

    YTARY!
    1. Re:VLC is OK. by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Admittedly a command line is pretty much the only thing that could be more minimal than the VLC interface, but you're probably in a fairly niche market if you find a CLI media player to be the most intuitive. Each to their own and all that, though.

    2. Re:VLC is OK. by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      why someone would prefer it over using mplayer

      On Mac machines. VLC is one of those rare applications that works best on Macintosh. My personal preference for it stems from the clean GUI, the working DVD support, and the fact that it will actually play full-screen on your second monitor while still letting you work on the first monitor in other applications.

      It's also a fine player on Windows and Linux - though not as compelling as those platforms have other very good choices.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:VLC is OK. by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Informative

      mplayer plays almost everything I've thrown at it. It even handles corrupt files pretty well. VLC dies a horrible death if the file is corrupt, even with just a few bytes being messed up in a header.

      mplayer gets my vote for being the BEST player out there, not only because it supports most everything, and has an unintrusive UI as the parent post pointed out, but also because it doesn't hang and crash when it runs into data that isn't perfect.

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    4. Re:VLC is OK. by Microlith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the perfect example of unintrusive UI design (note that I'm talking about the CLI-only `mplayer`, not `gmplayer` or any other graphical front-end).

      That doesn't strike me as being an unintrusive UI, so much as the omission of a visible UI. That's intrusive in its own right, since it leaves you fumbling for controls until you read the manual and memorize the keys.

      Unintrusive UIs would probably be what VLC/Quicktime use on OS X, with a control set that fades in and out if you move the mouse, in addition to the keyboard actions.

    5. Re:VLC is OK. by gzipped_tar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Be sure to grab some BASH completion scripts for MPlayer's startup command line parameters. Most distros have them maintained as packages.

      The CLI is fine, but I don't like reading its manpage *every* darn time...

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    6. Re:VLC is OK. by Sj0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sort of surprised at the arguments.

      Both VLC and mplayer are so insanely good, so much better than any alternatives, that it's kind of like arguing about whether you should drink belgian beer or german beer compared to drinking raw sewage.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    7. Re:VLC is OK. by YttriumOxide · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unintrusive UIs would probably be what VLC/Quicktime use on OS X, with a control set that fades in and out if you move the mouse, in addition to the keyboard actions.

      Don't forget support for the apple remote... that's one thing (out of several) I really love about VLC actually - sitting back on my couch and watching movies/TV with the ability to control it from the apple remote (which regardless of ones thoughts on Apple products in general, is a very nice little remote just for the simplicity). It's actually pretty much all I ever use the remote for as well, since I'm not much of an audiophile and FrontRow is just useless to me.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    8. Re:VLC is OK. by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      VLC is an OK media playback application. I, for one, never understood why someone would prefer it over using mplayer.

      I used mplayer for years, I tried a windows binary, didn't like it much. The command prompt is horrible in windows, and all of the GUIs I've found just didn't work all that well. VLC was a nice slim media player, worked well with any file I threw at it (like mplayer), it had a nice playlist I could drag and drop files onto, and it was easy to use. Same thing on my mac.

      In linux I use mplayer for everything, but linux is more command line based, I'm used to it. I know how to quickly navigate a linux system with the command line. There isn't some fancy windows explorer or finder that I want to integrate nicely with on linux so mplayer works just fine for me in that situation. But seeing as how most people use windows or mac, VLC is very easy to install and will play just about anything, it's kind of obvious why most people would use it.

    9. Re:VLC is OK. by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I still use the non-GUI mplayer to play videos, even if I click on them. The arrow keys and other controls are just easier to navigate the video than the clicky controls. And if I'm watching the video full-screen (which is usually) there's no room for the GUI controls anyway, so why even bother?

    10. Re:VLC is OK. by generica1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I also only used the Apple Remote with VLC until I found this little tool: http://gravityapps.com/sofacontrol/

      I am a happy registered user of Sofa Control, which allows you to program your Apple Remote to pretty much do anything. And it highly extends/replaces the Front Row functionality without borking it up if you still want to use it, while simultaneously taking over "full control" of the remote away from Front Row. You can even use it to remotely control Safari which I imagine might come in handy (presentations etc).

      Yup, Sofa Control + Apple remote = useful. Sorry for the off-topic-ness.

      --
      JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP IRRIGATE
  3. Re:Saying your the best will only lead to a letdow by Murpster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Using "your" for "you're" and accusing someone of bragging when a third party says it's the best also makes you look like a jerk.

  4. Not so hot for hi def content by HardCase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    VLC has been a non-starter for me because I can't use better performing codecs for high definition content. The internal codec doesn't approach the performance of several other codecs. I'm sticking with Media Player Classic for my XP system. It's a much better player.

    By the way, does anybody else feel like the story's headline looks like it came straight from Digg?

  5. Fine we can just change it then. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    "VLC: Best media player for jerks!"

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Fine we can just change it then. by AndrewNeo · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Yeah, well, the jerk store called, and they're running out of copies of VLC!"

  6. Depends on my OS by esocid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in fedora I use mplayer. In vista/xp I use VLC. WMP and WMPC would crash occasionally no matter what, and never seemed to load all codecs properly. Arguing which one is better is like driving a car in reverse and blindfolded...it just doesn't make sense.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  7. Revert interface to 0.8.6, or use OSX GUIfor win32 by Hadlock · · Score: 5, Informative

    VLC peaked at version 0.8.6. This was the last version to use the "correct" user interface on windows. That version was a very easy to use interface that looked like it had been designed after 1995. The 0.9 and forward versions have a poorly designed interface that looks like they ripped off the Mosaic interface for Win 3.1
     
    VLC has an amazing GUI (Especially at full-screen mode) for OSX, and the linux version isn't far behind. I don't see why VLC for WIN32 has to be so awful, considering that Win32 is by far their largest audience.
     
    VLC hasnt added any significant functionality since 0.8.6 so while I'll check out recent releases, until they fix the awful interface that is on all the 0.9.x series, I'm sticking with that. Yes, I am aware that 0.9.x is skinnable, but there is no true "classic" skin for the 0.9.x series.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  8. Eh... by Facegarden · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Eh, VLC is okay. I've found it to be more processor intensive when decoding MKV's than Media Player Classic - to the point where the old PC i repurposed as a media center can play 1080p movies just barely smoothly in media player classic, but it chokes if i need to use VLC (media player classic has options for choosing an audio stream but never actually shows more than one stream! grr).

    I also HATE that VLC doesn't let you click on the frame to pause. Nothing happens when you click on the frame, so why not pause! Having to navigate to the little pause button every time is lame.

    ALSO hate that even in full screen, the progress bar stays small, so I don't have much resolution when i want to skip back a little.

    So yeah, best player ever? meh. It's nice, and i love all the transcoding features etc. is has, but that's not media playing, that's something else. As a media player, VLC is just ok.

    -Taylor

    --
    Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    1. Re:Eh... by clone53421 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I also HATE that VLC doesn't let you click on the frame to pause. Nothing happens when you click on the frame, so why not pause! Having to navigate to the little pause button every time is lame.

      Spacebar pauses.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Eh... by Facegarden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course it does, but generally i keep my keyboard stowed when using my Media Center. The mouse is small so I keep it with the remotes

      Well, http://wiki.videolan.org/Mouse_Gestures then...

      From your link:

      left : Short time skip backward (10sec by default)
      right : Short time skip forward (10sec by default)
      left-up : Faster
      right-up : Slower
      left-down : Go to previous entry in playlist
      right-down : Go to next entry in playlist
      left-right : Play/Pause
      right-left : Play/Pause
      up : Volume up
      down : Volume down
      up-down : Mute Volume
      down-up : Mute Volume
      up-right : Change Audio track
      down-right : Change Subtitle track
      up-left : Enter fullscreen mode
      down-left : Quit VLC

      Hmm... They do ALL that and they can't add
      "Single click: Play/pause"? Lame. I mean, obviously not everyone cares but it works REALLY well being able to click to pause in MPC. Gestures? Gestures are like the red-headed stepchild of interface methods - they are weird and people don't like them. Meanwhile, *clicking* the mouse, the thing it was designed to do, does nothing. I find this highly irritating.

      And even if there is some way to force it, or make it work, or open some config file and change a line, why the hell isn't it standard!? It works well and fits right in where there is currently NO interface feature. It seems dead obvious to me and its simple things like that that make me question a project. Forget about pausing, who uses VLC and doesn't wish the trackbar expanded when you went full screen? I have a nice 1920x1080 TV and the trackbar is only like 600px wide. WTF? Try scrolling back 60 seconds in the godfather on a 600px wide trackbar 'cause your friend distracted you on a good part. That's damn tough, 60 seconds is only 3 pixels! if it were 1920 wide it would be 10px - tough but 3 times easier! I mean if this were a beta that would be fine but VLC has been around forever! I know they're still not at v1.0 but gmail is still in beta, so that's not always in indicator.

      And the fact that it's more processor intensive than MPC? How many people are working on VLC that they can't even match MPC? MPC even streams better over a LAN at my place, which is funny because VIDEO LAN CLIENT should be better!
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    3. Re:Eh... by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 2, Funny

      up up down down left right left right b a start

      --
      Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
  9. VLC OS X by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always had bad experiences with VLC on Mac, no matter which version. Converting videos to mpg, mp4, or anything else I try results in unreadable files.

    While I donno if others are experiencing the same issues, it's disappointing that it's been consistently unreliable for me.

  10. The most important question is... by CAFED00D · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did they make a better desktop icon yet?

    1. Re:The most important question is... by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did they make a better desktop icon yet?

      Why? The orange cone icon on the task bar clearly says "Caution: Porn playing!"

  11. Re:Revert interface to 0.8.6, or use OSX GUIfor wi by TypoNAM · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I too absolutely hate the new QT interface and I want them to bring back the ability to use the wxWidgets interface that was used in 0.8.6 releases. Apparently the wxWidgets interface of VLC is no longer maintained, therefore they dropped it in the 0.9 releases. Because of this I still continue to use 0.8.6 on my machines. :(

    --
    This space is not for rent.
  12. VLC did save me once recently.. by rongage · · Score: 3, Informative

    I will say that VLC did just recently play a DVD that none of the other DVD players I have (mplayer, xine, etc...) wouldn't even touch. Heck the other players would crash and burn badly - even lsdvd had troubles with this one DVD - the Dark Knight.

    What I don't like about VLC is how there is absolutely nothing intuitive about what combination of codecs will work on a transcode. With a recent example, I could get MPEG2 video to encode into a mpeg container or an avi container, but I couldn't get any audio to go into the same container at all. Using mpga would crash the program where using mp2a would go through the motions but you would end up with no audio in the output.

    If you find that you need "support" of any sort for VLC, good luck with that. I have found in many cases that the forums are unmonitored and the IRC channel folk ignores people with real questions.

    I just don't think that VLC deserves the title of "the best" in anything.

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
  13. VLC crashes a lot by TheLink · · Score: 2, Informative

    Recently I tried to play a DVD, and vlc crashed on me after a few seconds.

    I thought maybe I needed the latest version, so I downloaded the latest at that time v0.9.8a, and while it seems they have finally made the subtitles look better, it crashed too.

    Media Player Classic and Windows Media Player had no probs playing it.

    I also never managed to get VLC to remember the deinterlace setting I pick (I tried the various filter and stupid obscure config stuff found on google and still it didn't work).

    Overall I have a bad impression of VLC. Best to only use it if the other players can't play it.

    p.s. if you are using Media Player Classic, avoid the haali media splitter crap. It causes crashes and instability[1], especially if you are using it with other stuff like windows movie maker (which someone found out the hard way - not me fortunately).

    [1] http://www.afterdawn.com/software/video_software/codecs_and_filters/haalimediasplitter.cfm

    --
  14. VLC is illegal in the US by Todrael · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd love to use VLC legally in the US, but that doesn't seem like it'll happen any time soon.

    VLC FAQ

    1. Re:VLC is illegal in the US by rrohbeck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who the fuck cares?
      This is one of those laws like "Thou shalt not smoke pot" or "Thou shalt not have sex before 18" (at least around here.) No victim. No harm. Not enforceable.

  15. Re:Until... by Microlith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Until VLC plays video's in RAR file without having to decompress them manually

    What the hell does this, and why?

    What insane reasoning do you use to stick a video file inside a RAR (or any other compressed archive for that matter?) Jamming a compressed file into a compressed container usually results in a file size increase. I would stop complaining that VLC doesn't support something insane, and try to justify why that behavior is in any way valuable and -not- insane.

  16. In less sensation, personal terms... by whiledo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've finally settled on a Windows combination that has both significant geek appeal and even more significant wife-acceptance-factor (though really, that's not much of an issue since my fiance has a geek mindset, too):

    • Pre-built PC with a combo BR/HDDVD drive, HDMI out to plasma. great bluetooth keyboard and mouse came with it, along with a very nice windows media center remote.
    • Vista (no, really! It came with the PC and was fine once I got SuperFetch turned off)
    • SageTV Media Center + SageMC UI + SageTVLauncher (kill off stupid Windows Media Center annoyances) + LM Remote Keymap (take full control of what I want my non-learning remote to do)
    • Media Player Classic - for the <1% of videos that for some reason won't play in SageTV
    • SMPlayer - for the <0.1% of videos that for some reason won't play in SageTV and won't play well in MPC

    All of this for really not that much cash. The PC was almost a grand a year ago when I bought it but of course you could get the same specs for much cheaper now. I wanted a dedicated machine because I knew I was much less likely to mess that up than my primary machine. SageTV was $80. I donated $20 to the LM Remote Keymap people because it was such a useful tool. I just wanted something that would work and could play blu-ray/hd-dvd (that was before BR won). And one that I wouldn't have to spend hours on due to quirky hardware problems because I'd built it myself.

    I also needed something beefy enough to handle HD mkvs and whatever else might come out in the next few years. My old repurposed machine started to skip a bit on the HD.

    So there you have if, whether you cared to know or not. Just posting this because it might help someone else who has gotten really sick and tired of trying to cobble together various apps and front-ends and wireless keyboards and mice and just want something that works reliably and smoothly while they're sitting on the couch with a remote.

    --
    Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
  17. CCCP and Mplayer by jameskojiro · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only way to go Comrade!

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  18. Media Player Classic Homecinema by JakFrost · · Score: 5, Informative

    VLC (VideoLAN Client) media player was good up to the 0.8.6 releases and after that it took a bit of a tumble in design and lost popularity because of its tendency to crash or freeze at any minor error or corruption in the media files.

    Media Player Classic Homecinema stepped in and took the reigns after that. This player includes internal decoder filters for MPEG-2 (DVD), MPEG-4 (XviD, DivX), H.264 (Blu-ray), and VC1 (Blu-ray) along with audio decoders for AC3 (Dolby Digital), DTS (Digital Theater Systems), AAC (Advanced Audio Codec), etc. It also includes native support for MKV (Matroska) and AVI (Audio Video Interleave) file formats.

    The most important feature of MPC-HC is the hardware accelerated DirectX Video Acceleration (DXVA) decoder filters for the H.264 and VC1 Blu-ray codecs allowing this player to leverage ATI, nVidia, and Intel graphics cards to handle the work load with complex 720p and 1080p movies. The difference in CPU usage goes from 70-100% on software decoding with dropped frames to 5% on DXVA decoding and no dropped frames, of course this is relative to the CPU being used.

    DXVAChecker is the best tool to use to determine if your video card and latest drivers support hardware acceleration. It will list the list of video streams that are accelerated such as MPEG2, WMV9, VC1, H264 along with DXVA1 (XP DX9) or 2 (Vista DX10) for the version along with the resolution such as 720x480, 1280x720, 1920x1080 that is supported.

    FFDshow Tryouts is another codecs to look into is that is based on libavcodec and ffmpeg-mt (multi-threaded) and handles pretty much all audio and video codecs in software using CPU decoding and includes a lot of filters for audio 2.0->5.1 up-mixing, real-time AC3 encoding for surround sound, noise filtering, and video filters for noise, sharpening, and subtitle support.

    CoreAVC Pro codec is the most efficient software and hardware nVidia CUDA accelerated H.264 (Blu-ray) decoding. In hardware CUDA mode it users ~15% CPU to perform decoding and in software mode it users 50-70%, relative to the CPU being used of course. This codec a bit more efficient than FFDshow in software but a lot better in CUDA mode, nVidia video card required.

    Haali Media Splitter is the preferred splitter for MKV (Matroska), MP4, and AVI files. This is the recommended splitter for these file formats over the internal splitters that usually come with the players.

    MPlayer Media Player is also a complete alternative that now has hardware acceleration support for nVidia video cards with the latest SVN releases.

  19. MPC Homecinema by Knara · · Score: 4, Informative

    Media Player Classic was great, but it's no longer updated and has several security flaws that are un patched.

    There's a current and very good fork called Media Player Classic Homecinema, you just needed to do a very small amount of research.

    1. Re:MPC Homecinema by Briareos · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's "current" as of September 2008..

      O Rly?
      *cough*

      np: Autechre - We R Are Why? (WAP72 12")

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    2. Re:MPC Homecinema by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Informative

      You really shouldn't need any codec downloaders or codec packs.

      MPC-HC has integrated a good deal of libavcodec (same library used in mplayer, ffmpeg/ffdshow, VLC, xine, gstreamer/totem, etc.) Out of the box, MPC-HC should play back virtually anything you throw at it. It also has integrated subtitle support that is superior to directvobsub. After all, the author of MPC is the same guy who wrote directvobsub, and MPC can render the subs at native screen-res, which looks quite nice.

      Personally, though, I install three things for media playback:

      1) MPC-HC: eed a player, and this one is great.

      2) Haali's Splitter: This Matroska (MKV) splitter is better than MPC's own, but I primarily use this to get Haali's Renderer. It does accurate two-pass bicubic scaling, and supports buffering of raw uncompressed data (good for handling CPU spikes). Supported by MPC.

      3) ffdshow-tryouts: This fork of ffdshow is widely regarded as the successor to ffdshow. This will provide all the codec support that MPC-HC might be missing, since MPC-HC focuses on the mainstream codecs rather than the more esoteric ones. I tend to use ffdshow as the default codec in order to use some of the ffdshow filters. Primarily, deband, which I desperately wish somebody would port to mplayer, and the occasional other filter like yadif deinterlacing or perhaps an unsharp mask.

      Of course, since I'm a Linux user, these days I just use smplayer. Unfortunately, smplayer is extremely buggy, and mplayer/smplayer have rather limited support for DVD menus via libdvdnav. And again, I'm flabberghasted that nobody has ported ffdshow's deband filter to mplayer; it's an enormous quality improvement on pretty much every video, and has absolutely no negative impact on level of detail.

  20. Re:Until... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Many of the "content release teams" will make their official releases in multipart RAR format.

    Apparently, Usenet is now for the "1337".

    The end result is that even if you get such releases via BitTorrent, there's still a good chance they're distributed as multipart RARs. A video player that can play such files lets you view the video in its "seedable" form.

    Of course, I just simply stop seeding such content much earlier than I normally would. If someone wants me to seed, they should make it EASY for me to seed by having the "seedable" form equal the "viewable" form.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  21. A warning about VLC and privacy - album art by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe it's resolved since then, but if VLC wasn't concerned about its users then I wasn't going to waste more time on their behalf either. Album art downloads tend to do Google searches and download the first image returned. For at least some releases of VLC, this gets triggered for videos as well as audio. The end result is, every time I watch a video that I have on my local network, VLC advertises the fact that I am watching it. To the largest data mining company ever, Google. Unencrypted for anyone to see.

    I posted a question to VLC forums, they seemed very unconcerned about this.

    Somehow I enabled album art download. I don't remember doing it, but I am told it is off by default in every release so I did it, as opposed to VLC doing it automatically, so it's not necessarily a big deal. but I don't remember turning it on and had no way to know it was on until I got "out of disk space" errors and went looking for things to delete.

    Anyway, more details here and read for yourselves.
    http://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=55288&p=182407

  22. Re:Ogg Frog! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You want the best media player? Go with the Frog. Ogg Frog, that is. vlc? They can't get their mutexes right, so who knows what else they got wrong. iTunes? Sure, if you don't mind the fact the stale buffer bugs when you're ripping CDs.

    Ummm, excuse Mr. Crawford, errr...Ogg Frog, but, um, your website says that Ogg Frog hasn't been released yet. Furthermore, your website hasn't been updated since 2005. I think perhaps Duke Nukem Forever has a better chance of being released before Ogg Frog.

    -- Just some guy who's been wondering when you'll release the damned thing

  23. Correction by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not vxWorks. WxWidgets, the former WxWindows, a cross-platform GUI toolkit.

  24. It's Video LAN Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    It seems everyone misses the point of this player.

    Did you know you can stream VLC content to a) the screen obviously b) the network and c) to a file in another format? (and probably more)
    Did you know you can create custom GUI's for VLC?
    Control it via http?
    Plays DVDs,Capture Cards,Network streams and files? (and probably more)

    I always thought they used the mpc engine as the player and just added on the rest of the goodies.
    I figured if VLC couldn't play it, it wasn't worth looking for alternatives.

    Right now VLC (on XP) is streaming cable TV to my network. I'm currently watching that stream on my Linux box. I use an Ipod touch to control VLC from a (customized) http interface. I use Prism to display the same http interface for mouse control.
    Sure i could use MythTV, but I enjoy the tinkering. ooo I might just have to go make VLC to some DVRing.
    Thanks VLC

  25. NOW SEEKS IN FLV FILES! by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm surprised that this isn't listed as one of the improvements anywhere.

    That was what made Miro a PITA. Miro is based on VLC for playback support. It is now going to be USEFUL for me! Fantastic.

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  26. Holy shazbot batman by ADRA · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of polishing your knob in an article about how good you are, why not just TELL US what features makes the product so innovative than say 0.9.8, or 0.9.7, etc..

    In terms of the poster's 'I'm the best' position, I'd say they fall flat in that regard as well.

    1. For windows nothing can beat Media Player Classic. Nothing. It has just enough GUI to do what it was designed for, to play videos. It has all the configuration you'll ever need in the background, and if you don't it generally works out of the box for 90% of the things you want.

    As for codecs, you have several options on how to get all the needed codecs, and you can bet that a large number of them support DxVA (where applicable) out of the box, which means you have a fast low overhead media player that plays pretty much everything you throw at it.

    For Linux, that's a different story. Linux's equivalent of DirectShow(The decoding pipeline for media content) is gstreamer, but it suffers from a serious lack of adoption. We have Totem, but lets admit that if there's anything you need outside of the totem defaults, you're screwed.

    The alternative is to use all-in-one-package media players. The obviously suffer in that if the codec / format / playback feature you're looking for isn't supported by the player, the whole stack becomes useless. But, this is sadly exactly what you're stuck with. Our options are: VLC/Xine/Mplayer and gui variants thereof.

    VLC is fine, but its never had specifically good support on my hardware, and there are -many- videos that fail to play where other players can.

    Xine is why software developers should never be put in charge of UI design. The UI stinks so badly, that the only time I ever open it is when all other players fail to play properly.

    Mplayer is probably the most codec compatible player out there, but then again, there's no GUI for people to interact with. Unless you're a keyboard/command line nazi, you'll most likely decide that there's no point in Mplayer without one of its many available front-ends. I've tried a few over the years, and the only one that (finally) met my happy path requirements for > 80% of the time was SMPlayer. It is a great frontend to Mplayer, and gets my thumbs up. It keeps the complexity of selecting appropriate devices within the preferences if I really care to tweak them, but the out of box experience is also pretty good.

    For anyone reading this post who is actually a contributor to these projects, PLEASE try to focus on supporting a pipelined system like gstreamer, or writing codecs that can be plugged in willy nilly instead of monolithic all-in.

    I think a real winner on linux would be:
    1. A user interface akin to SMPlayer, in terms of its toolbars, layouts, config (in general)
    2. A container/codec glue that is well understood and powerful enough to support codecs, overlays, user input, etc.. I think gstreamer is this tool, but maybe it needs work on the input side of things *shrugs*
    3. A set of simple codec/container implementations with simple APIs so that they can be plugged into any pipeline without gratuitous hacks. Ideally, these implementations could be interchangeable and upgradable without requiring recompilation of their glue layer

    Ack, that's about it.

    --
    Bye!