Slashdot Mirror


Chimpanzees Exchange Meat For Sex

the_therapist writes "A team from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, studied chimps in the Tai Forest reserve in Ivory Coast and discovered that chimpanzees enter into 'deals' whereby they exchange meat for sex. Among the findings are that 'male chimps that are willing to share the proceeds of their hunting expeditions mate twice as often as their more selfish counterparts.' They also found this to be 'a long-term exchange, so males continue to share their catch with females when they are not fertile, copulating with them when they are.'"

313 comments

  1. Same behavior in humans too by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We formulized it and called it marriage though.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Except the chimps don't seem to exhibit the signs of buyer's remorse.

    2. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wrong.

      Marriage is so that human females can continue to be fed while no longer having to put out.

    3. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Jangchub · · Score: 4, Insightful

      +5 funny? That's robbery. +5 insightful.

    4. Re:Same behavior in humans too by PachmanP · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We formulized it and called it marriage though.

      Nah men formalized it and called it prostitution. Women started thinking about how to get more and put out less and that's how we got marriage.

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    5. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A great day for proponents of e everywhere.

    6. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Gorobei · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nah men formalized it and called it prostitution. Women started thinking about how to get more and put out less and that's how we got marriage.

      Actually, it was probably the other way around: men formalized marriage in an effort to stop women sleeping around. Stability of the tribe, and all that (alpha males still get to sleep around, beta males get a better chance of their kid actually being theirs, the rest have no illusions.)

      Sometimes I wish I could forget everything I've read on primate and avian mating patterns, it would make my life so much easier.

    7. Re:Same behavior in humans too by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ....and there is really only one reason to take a girl out on a date....

      Because otherwise it gets really boring at the restaurant waiting for your order to arrive?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    8. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Narpak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps they created marriage to stop the spread of STDs. Maybe, back in the days, they tried the free sex approach and discovered that syphilis and others were a bit of a bitch. A free-sex society don't work quite as well if you don't have prevention like condoms available.

      Though as you mentioned, could also be that rulers insisted on monogamy from their mates to ensure that any offspring came from the right father. Always hard to confirm parentage if you don't have access to at least a basic lab.

    9. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Ain't that the frickin' truth... :(

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    10. Re:Same behavior in humans too by fractoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Always hard to confirm parentage if you don't have access to at least a basic lab.

      Not if you trace maternal bloodlines.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    11. Re:Same behavior in humans too by fractoid · · Score: 1

      What does 2.18 have to do with anything?

      If you mean e as in MDMA then no, it has the opposite effect, makes you huggy and friendly and not at all randy.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    12. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Small tribes and isolation prevented any bad repercussions for free sex.

      In my 50 years of experience there are three types of women
      * Those who hate sex (common and really sad- seems to last decades)
      * Those who are extremely promiscuous (uncommon but more common than you think)
      * Those who enjoy sex and are reasonably or totally monogamous (uncommonly for a decade, rare for a lifetime)

      Based on actual experience, if you are not afraid of loss, the best partner is a couple days a week and then the rest of the time you do guy stuff. A full time wife/girlfriend can be stifling unless you make them your life. I've done it both ways multiple times. I prefer the fwb and free time. Since I have extra meat to share, it works. I've been in three ~decade long relationships and ended up gutted emotionally every time. After I quit that, I was much happier. But I do envy friends who made it work. Having a girlfriend, then wife from 16 to 26 was probably awesome and changed me since I never did the club hunting thing. But it was stupid to marry before I was on good financial footing. And once you marry/get a girlfriend, you can't do what you have to do to get set financially.

      If I was religious, it would have been a lot easier. Religious girls *will* drop you after you and they are in in love-- because a) god comes first and b) "they are going to be in heaven alone for eternity while you are in hell and it makes them sad."

      Worldwide (citation needed but exists), women leave men at a higher rate when the last born child reaches 5 years old. Regardless of culture, religion, or other factors. The theory was that genetically that is when the child can gather it's own food and walk around and there is something genetic about it. And that it is better to have children by multiple mates in order to maximize the odds your genes survive (for both sexes- but they use different strategies to achieve the goal-- I've read up to 10% of children's dna do not match their fathers in many areas, so that's another strategy- happened to at least one friend of mine).

      The only problem is the damn legal system currently punishes men way out of proportion. I've even heard of men required to pay child support for children that were not theirs (they'd paid for a couple years and THEN found out the ex had been lying-- so do a quick paternity test when your wife asks for a divorce and save yourself some grief).

      We all want to love and be loved in return-- and really, almost completely separate from that we want red hot noogie. In fact, the argument over who should take out the garbage gets in the way which is why some of the most incredible sex is with people you only see to get it on with. But (in my experience), you still have to know them well- the anonymous stuff never worked for me. Too cold.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    13. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Rei · · Score: 1

      We formulized it and called it marriage though.

      Of course, if he shares his catch with another male chimpanzee instead of a female, he'll have to pay the gift tax and won't have legal recognition of their adopted young.

      As we all know, the gays are going to zap us with lightning. (Yes, that's a real commercial that's been airing on TV in several states)

      --
      I believe Bird-Person can arrange that.
    14. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Gorobei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doubtful on the STDs: most animals use the "free sex approach" with minimal effect on fertility (actually, if an STD makes individuals infertile, that encourages sex with multiple partners.) Also, small breeding populations are not much affected by STDs: everyone is exposed, virulence is low. STDs go wild once you have big cities and travel (jets, wars, or pilgrimages, etc.)

    15. Re:Same behavior in humans too by martinX · · Score: 3, Funny

      My theory was that marriage was invented by mobs of ugly men. Or maybe by alpha males that were just plain shagged out and wanted a reason to cut down on the number of wives.

      Either way, it works for me!

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    16. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Gorobei · · Score: 1

      Part 1 of your theory seems basically correct. The people stoning women to death are basically mobs of ugly men without wives.
      Part 2 is a bit more problematic: how did they need to cut down of wife-count if marriage hadn't been invented?

    17. Re:Same behavior in humans too by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      But due to genetic differences we have to use carbohydrates instead.

    18. Re:Same behavior in humans too by YttriumOxide · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and there is really only one reason to take a girl out on a date....

      It's comments like this that lend a strong argument as to why the stereotype of geeks never having girlfriends exists. Sex is great, and I enjoy it immensely, but I'd never consider it the "one reason" to be with a girl. It's great to share your thoughts with someone, have them share theirs with you; someone to laugh with, cry with; someone to look after you when you need it and give you the chance to look after them when they need it. My compatibility with a girl on ALL of these things is what I'm looking for when I go on a date with a girl, not just whether she'll put out at the end of the night.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    19. Re:Same behavior in humans too by troll8901 · · Score: 5, Funny

      and there is really only one reason to take a girl out on a date....

      To bribe them to set you up with another girl?

    20. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So prostitution IS the oldest profession on earth.

    21. Re:Same behavior in humans too by sehlat · · Score: 1

      Nah men formalized it and called it prostitution.

      Men did formalize it as prostitution, but what they're purchasing is the right to walk away after they've "done the deed."

    22. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Monsuco · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I wish I could forget everything I've read on primate and avian mating patterns, it would make my life so much easier.

      I can't count the number of times I've thought the same thing... No wait I can.

    23. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Ragzouken · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It was a joke. He's not fishing for a lesson in humanity.

    24. Re:Same behavior in humans too by quenda · · Score: 1

      yes, mod parent +1 bleedin' obvious, +1 SNAG, but -1 "whoosh".

    25. Re:Same behavior in humans too by julesh · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... I never did the club hunting thing ...

      You mean like this, right?

    26. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Plutonite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Worldwide (citation needed but exists), women leave men at a higher rate when the last born child reaches 5 years old. Regardless of culture, religion, or other factors. The theory was that genetically that is when the child can gather it's own food and walk around and there is something genetic about it.

      I'm sorry, but this is nonsense, you cannot use statistical inference in something like this, because the world is too small, and the factors too many. When you say "regardless of other factors" you have no idea how bad that sounds. "Other factors" considered by the survey, maybe, not in the real world. A single unkown factor, like intelligence of the father, or what the parents like to do on weekends, or relationships between jobs, can completely skew this thing one way or the other.
      Also, the theory makes sense only to the extent of primates. Human beings maintain social status in a variety of ways, so the child reaching age 5 does not really mean much on its own. And yes we do have instincts to care for our offspring's welfare even when they are adults. I think it's more about people getting bored with each other, whether or not they have kids. Other studies have shown this too. The magic number is 4 years.

      I never did the club hunting thing.

      You didn't miss out on much. There are some great people who go clubbing to dance..etc with their friends. Very few 'nice' girls go to clubs to get picked up. They don't have to, and they don't want to. I've been approached by women in clubs, every half decent guy has.. and those women were always garbage. Or on a rebound. That sounds mean, but I'd be lying if I told you otherwise. And I live in DC so we party a lot.

      But (in my experience), you still have to know them well- the anonymous stuff never worked for me. Too cold.

      Congratulations, you are a decent human being who actually has feelings. Please collect your badge at the door, or pick up a free t-shirt from the table near the exit.

    27. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Plutonite · · Score: 2, Funny

      Last line was ugly. I meant to say:

      Congratulations! You are a gentleman. Join our exclusive club! We party on Saturdays, and only get intimate with people we really like!

    28. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      While I'm with you in principle, there's actually little need to be romantically and/or sexually involved with a life partner. So, living with a close friend can easily be the emotional part. Actually, this has several advantages, since you get the benefits of a long-term relationship and can still be quite free to do as you please with both sex and other stuff.

    29. Re:Same behavior in humans too by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe I spent too much time at college, but I'd change your list quite a bit:

      • Women who are promiscuous their whole lives or a significant portion of it. Usually because of jacked up things that happened to them earlier in life.
      • Women who are promiscuous when they're young then grow out of it. The promiscuity is more sexual exploration. They then get tired of the downside of that lifestyle.
      • Women who are pretty much monogamous. I've never been able to figure out this group; maybe because I don't interact with many of them on a deep enough level (not because I chase floosies but because these girls always seem to be in relationships). IMO, these women seem to be better at reconciling what they want from men and what they get from men. These are the girls with out-of-town boyfriends who will stay faithful over months of separation. They just seem to be more well-adjusted to me (maybe that's some sexist streak in me).
      • A really small percentage who truly don't like sex. They're just not obsessed with it like men are. And, for you ladies who think there isn't a difference count the number of strip clubs (male- or female-catering) in your town. Again, I'm not implying that I'm some sort of stud, but that men perceive the difference in sex drives that way. Frigid means a girl who wants sex less than you do.
      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    30. Re:Same behavior in humans too by F34nor · · Score: 3, Funny

      A slut sleeps with everyone, a bitch sleeps with everyone but you.

    31. Re:Same behavior in humans too by HanzoSpam · · Score: 1

      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."

      I have to say - I absolutely love your sig!

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    32. Re:Same behavior in humans too by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Sex is great, and I enjoy it immensely, but I'd never consider it the "one reason" to be with a girl. It's great to share your thoughts with someone, have them share theirs with you; someone to laugh with,"

      That's what my friends are for.....when I want fun, good conversation, comraderie, I hang with my friends. If I want to get laid...I go out with a chick.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    33. Re:Same behavior in humans too by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Very few 'nice' girls go to clubs to get picked up. "

      What exactly is your definition of a 'nice' girl??

      If by nice girl, you mean one you can't fuck....then what use is she?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    34. Re:Same behavior in humans too by kklein · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've read up to 10% of children's dna do not match their fathers in many areas, so that's another strategy- happened to at least one friend of mine

      Ugh, I can't say anything, but I really suspect this has happened with my brother's youngest. His wife got weird about the time he was born and then left him a little over a year later, out of the blue. The kid doesn't look like anyone on our side of the family, and has personality traits (like athletic ability) that neither side has. She cheated on him a bunch of times while they were dating, and then twice (that we know of) since they got married (they are, of course, divorcing now).

      It's rough because, emotionally, he's already a wreck, and he has done most of the raising of the youngest and is a very proud parent. We all love that kid to death. But still... I just don't think he's "one of us."

      I've decided to keep my mouth shut. Kid needs a family no matter what, and we like having him around. He shouldn't be punished for his mom being a dumb slut.

    35. Re:Same behavior in humans too by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "As to the subject at matter...is this really surprising??

      Quite often I've taken dates out to a nice steak dinner....and there is really only one reason to take a girl out on a date....

      As for marriage...dude, you never marry them, it cost you half your shit when you want to upgrade to a newer model."

      Wow...modded to hell.

      Hehehehe...I guess there are many more women lurking around slashdot than we originally thought.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    36. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Swizec · · Score: 1

      You know I'm the same way, but the only thing I seem to find are women not that great for sex and very great for mooching all my attention and not giving any back. Maybe I'm just a whimp though.

    37. Re:Same behavior in humans too by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Men did formalize it as prostitution, but what they're purchasing is the right to walk away after they've "done the deed."

      Well, it just goes to show you, as a guy...you pay for 'it' always. One way or another, you pay to get laid.

      Just that if you choose the marriage route, you pay MUCH more...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    38. Re:Same behavior in humans too by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Who was it that said, "I don't pay women for sex, I pay them to leave after it"?

      I don't remember if it was something on TV or a quote by a real person but it fits in just right.

    39. Re:Same behavior in humans too by EmotionToilet · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hehehehe...I guess there are many more women lurking around slashdot than we originally thought.

      You mean there are two!?!?

    40. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      syphilis

      The Syphilis became dangerous only "recently". The primitive form of Syphilis caused rash and gave an immutity agaist other forms of Syphilis. It spreaded through skin contact and shared sleeping mattresses.

    41. Re:Same behavior in humans too by YttriumOxide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah, but that's when you simply go for the "best of both worlds" and have an open relationship. I'm currently single, but when I had a girlfriend, I'd have sex with her, and also my close female friends. She had sex with me and her close friends (both genders). Now that I'm single, I still have sex with my close female friends, but it's a different sort of situation to actually having a girlfriend.

      (for reference, we didn't break up because of anything sex related - that side of our relationship was very healthy; we broke up because we had very different views on children (I want them, she didn't))

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    42. Re:Same behavior in humans too by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In my 50 years of experience there are three types of women
      * Those who hate sex (common and really sad- seems to last decades)
      * Those who are extremely promiscuous (uncommon but more common than you think)
      * Those who enjoy sex and are reasonably or totally monogamous (uncommonly for a decade, rare for a lifetime)

      Well, logically it seems obvious: either people hate sex or they don't. Either people are promiscuous or they aren't. Either they are monogamous or they aren't.

      So you missed out people who aren't monogamous, but aren't promiscuous. As well as people who are monogamous and promiscuous (which in my experience are more common, simply because non-monogamous people are less common as a whole).

    43. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite often I've taken dates out to a nice steak dinner....and there is really only one reason to take a girl out on a date....

      You insensitive clod - she was a vegetarian!

      As for marriage...dude, you never marry them, it cost you half your shit when you want to upgrade to a newer model.

      Oh, you mean like upgrading from Windoze 3.1 to Vista?

    44. Re:Same behavior in humans too by sgt+scrub · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone on /. claiming to have had sex with a female without providing meat? Sounds like there are some serious philosophical questions to be avoided in this thread.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    45. Re:Same behavior in humans too by SupremoMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      So prostitution IS the oldest profession on earth.

      Hardly, if there was meat involved then it would have to be hunter or fisherman.

    46. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very well stated. Another point to mention is how many men break up with women verse the number of women who break up with men. I'm willing to bet that women end relationships at a much higher rate then men.

    47. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem is the damn legal system currently punishes men way out of proportion. I've even heard of men required to pay child support for children that were not theirs (they'd paid for a couple years and THEN found out the ex had been lying-- so do a quick paternity test when your wife asks for a divorce and save yourself some grief).

      I'd suggest doing a quick paternity test soon after the child is born. Have him/her taken for "shots". Afterall, if she is sleeping around, your health (STDs) are on the line. If she's faithful, there's nothing to hide anyway.

    48. Re:Same behavior in humans too by sharp-bang · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's comments like this that lend a strong argument as to why the stereotype of geeks missing the punchline exists.

      --
      #!
    49. Re:Same behavior in humans too by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's because they keep their women silent.

      Or maybe it's because female chimps are satisfied with what they have, instead of constantly demanding more and more like little bitchy princesses! (sigh). No I'm not bitter. I just have this gnawing pain in my gut until I can feel the bile rising-up into my mouth. Or maybe it's just indigestion. Anyone have a tic-tac?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    50. Re:Same behavior in humans too by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      So, you don't get laid much then I take it?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    51. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      What exactly is your definition of a 'nice' girl??

      Sweet, smart, and sexy ;)

    52. Re:Same behavior in humans too by NeverNow · · Score: 0

      Like everyone else said, you can do all that with a friend, even a male one. You are underestimating the role of sex in shaping human relationships.

    53. Re:Same behavior in humans too by ErkDemon · · Score: 4, Funny

      And in breaking news, researchers have discovered that rich guys who regularly walk into bars and buy everyone drinks tend to make more friends, be surrounded by more friendly women, and consequently seem to get laid more often than those lone researchers who sit all alone in the darkest, emptiest corner of the bar all night clutching a single drink and taking research notes for their anthropology thesis without actually ever talking to anybody or even making eye contact - Dammit.

    54. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      The chimps aren't entering supposedly monogamous relationships, though.

      This more of a "friends with benefits" situation.

      Which we also do. Well, by "we", I mean humans in general, not slashdotters (obviously).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    55. Re:Same behavior in humans too by bostongraf · · Score: 1

      So, if the female chimp gets tired of the male chimp and boots him, does the female chimp get half of the male chimp's meat for the rest of her life?

    56. Re:Same behavior in humans too by TrekkieTechie · · Score: 1

      If I was religious, it would have been a lot easier. Religious girls *will* drop you after you and they are in in love-- because a) god comes first and b) "they are going to be in heaven alone for eternity while you are in hell and it makes them sad."

      So far, I have had the opposite experience. I am nonreligious and I married a religious (Christian) girl. She had a hard time with our relationship at first, but (apparently) the Bible does tell believers to stay in relationships with non-believers, I assume out of the hope that we'll be converted.

    57. Re:Same behavior in humans too by jacqdesign · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't resist making a comment... I think your comment is actually an example of why geeks don't have a girlfriend. A non geeks requirements for a girl are far less. Will they have sex with me? Yes. Do I want to have sex with them? Yes. Boom they got a girlfriend. Meanwhile here you are, the geek, wanting a girl to do that and have thoughts to share, similar sense of humor, to take care of you etc. That's a much longer requirement list to have out of the gate.

      Having said that, your approach is probably the more rational one by far, and more satisfying when you do get the girlfriend, but geeks go for quality, not quantity. Non geeks, it's all about quantity till you hopefully find that quality.

      I wanted to comment with something funny about how I have tried to buy many women a good steak dinner for that same reason, but somehow evolution clearly affected women faster then it did me. I kept trying, not very many women were buying. Sometimes evolution sucks.

    58. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we had very different views on children (I want them, she didn't))

      Clearly she's the smart one. That's too bad; everything else you said sounded so good.

      You actually almost described why I don't wish to get married. I don't want children. If I wanted children, I would get married in order to provide a stable/traditional home environment for them. Since I don't want children, marriage represents a large risk with no gain as compared to an arrangement like what you describe. To have all of that simplicity and then want to complicate it just to satisfy an urge to reproduce ... well, sorry to hear you broke up.

    59. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Livius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That only gives you half the parentage.

    60. Re:Same behavior in humans too by arekusu_ou · · Score: 1

      You realize you can have all that with someone who's not your mate. Even a platonic female friend.

      And even then, there's friends with benefits to cover that last aspect missing from regular platonic friendship.

    61. Re:Same behavior in humans too by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      You realize you can have all that with someone who's not your mate. Even a platonic female friend.

      It's not quite the same as a relationship though - with a relationship, there's an extra feeling of responsibility that encourages the "taking care of each other" thing that goes a step beyond what you have with even your closest friends. (to me at least)

      And even then, there's friends with benefits to cover that last aspect missing from regular platonic friendship.

      Of course that's true, and I clarified that point here

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    62. Re:Same behavior in humans too by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      A non geeks requirements for a girl are far less. Will they have sex with me? Yes. Do I want to have sex with them? Yes. Boom they got a girlfriend.

      I take a different train of thought to that - I'd say "they got someone to have sex with", not "they got a girlfriend". If I want to have sex with a girl, but am not interested in having a relationship with her, I won't take her out to dinner, I'll just ask, "Hey, would you like to get together for some casual sex sometime?" (generally prefaced with some comments about my assumption she's been eyeing me up recently or whatever - I'm not in to the whole "sex with strangers" thing, but I'm quite fine with casual sex with people I know). Generally the answer is no, but it's yes more often than you might expect if you've never tried it.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    63. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aka prostitution

    64. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Joebert · · Score: 1

      In the beginning stronger men just slept with women any time they wanted, but eventually other weaker men figured out they could team up with the women to fight off the stronger man. Woman were happy not to be forced to have sex with the stronger men on a whim and agreed to have sex with weaker men in exchange for continuing to team up with them against the stronger men.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    65. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      You are very lucky. Because the bible actually says a lot about not having mixed marriages-- Search for "equally yoked" but I wouldn't share it with your wife. It might save you from some of the pitfalls tho.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    66. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an ass -- that is why your relationships did not last.

    67. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair, I left out the category who just has no interest (men and women).

      If there is not resentment or emotional damage in the relationship, a hormone issue is often behind lack of desire.

      When I went on hormones, it was like a lightswitch. Suddenly I had lust again, I could think straight, I stopped having night sweats, I started getting restful sleep, and I was a lot less emotional (I was becoming estrogen dominant). Since then I've furred up too.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    68. Re:Same behavior in humans too by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1

      Marriage was invented to allow poor people to have a chance at reproduction and a relationship; before marriage the elite would have enormous harems and the poor had little.

    69. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Sex is great, and I enjoy it immensely, but I'd never consider it the "one reason" to be with a girl. Absolutely! Sex is great, but having someone to cook, do laundry, and clean toilets for you is even better! ;-)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    70. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you are saying-- the study I read (can't find a darn link after googling for a few minutes) indicated that having a child postpones the split for 4 to 5 years each time the couple has a child. When couples finally stop having children, the study found that break rate rises world wide- independent of culture and other factors.

      I'm a broken human being-- codependent and amnesiac of apparently severe abuse by a stepfather (can't remember very much before the age of 8.) But I'm reasonably self aware and well adjusted and keep working on self improvement.

      And I want to share the few bits of knowledge and happiness I've gleaned to maybe save the next generation some grief and give them a bit more happiness and good sex so I was pretty blunt and open.

      The party crowd seems to be young-- partying seems to tear people up so they can only do it for a couple decades. I skipped and *miss* the partying phase because I married young and was a nerd (lots and lots of dnd, married sex and sf movies instead of clubbing). Every party group I stumble on now seems to be on the edge of breaking apart- and you really do not see a lot of old people in clubs.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    71. Re:Same behavior in humans too by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Actually I have to agree, yet concede that the original poster has a point...sorta.

      Dating is defintely about mating. There are lots of girls I was friends with, less that I have had sex with, even fewer that I would have called a mate (really only the current one, and one 10 years ago). However,females I am not interested in sex with, I am not looking to date either. So sex is fundamental to mating, and only with sexual interest is "dating" going to happen..

      That said, there isn't much difference between dating and going out with a friend so really... this is just a semantic circle jerk.

      In any case, I think that what I see in this study is the same thing thats missing from the males you speak of (I was one of them for a while, I think many of us are at one point or another), is that these relationships are based on giving and sharing. We may look sideways at a man who tries to buy a woman gifts to win her affection, and rightfully so, but not because he is taking a totally incorrect action.

      I see it as about fairness and sharing. Why would a woman, chimp or human, want to be with someone who was too selfish? Whether you are in a more "traditional nuclear" arrangement with a man who works and a woman who stays home and cleans and cooks... would you want to be a man who works all day for wage, supports his wife, and comes home to a messy house where she sat around and played video games all day? How about being a wife who keeps a spotless house and watches the kids, who takes all the money for himself, and blows it at the strip bar?

      How about being the spouse who works full time, with a spouse who works part time, makes 1/3rd the money, gets home early, and still wont pick up some slack by cooking a meal a few nights a week?

      The point is, everybody wants equity, everyone wants to feel both useful and appreciated. It seems that wanting to be with a sharing person is fairly fundamental. Its a quality that comes from empathy with others, and I think is why many single guys note that guys who have a woman are great at getting another... being in that sort of relationship builds your emotional skills, and that shows.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    72. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but that's when you simply go for the "best of both worlds" and have an open relationship.

      Let's be fair here, though. These are a huge minority, and requires everyone involved to share similar values. More often than not people are simply too insecure to deal with "their [wo]man" doing a physical act with someone other than them. There are still those that would rather cheat than be honest with themselves and their partner and go open.

      Of course "best of both worlds" is better, once you cast off tired old nonsense ethics and hangups about what amounts to a simple matter of biochemistry and physics. With the advances in birth control and disease detection/prevention there really is no reason for the world to regard sex any differently than anything else pleasurable to be shared amongst people. There's too many incentives (ego, matchmaking industry, scandal = fun) for that kind of enlightenment to catch up to the huddled masses.

    73. Re:Same behavior in humans too by bruised1 · · Score: 1

      I'm a polyamorous female who enjoys sex (with people who know what they are doing) but is not promiscuous. I'm a member of a large tribe of primarily poly/bi folks and most of the females fit my profile. According to your qualifiers, we are not women. Interesting.

    74. Re:Same behavior in humans too by try_anything · · Score: 1

      Marriage? How about dating? Sometimes you buy her dinner, sometimes you get laid. If one stops happening, the other stops too.

      This quote really cracks me up, though:

      He told BBC News that the direct link between success in hunting and reproduction highlighted by this study could "help in our thinking about humans".

      If he had never previously recognized these patterns in humans, it's a safe bet he hasn't been putting them into practice. The poor guy must be really devoted to his research. Or his chimps.

    75. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Chriscypher · · Score: 1

      A slut sleeps with everyone, a bitch sleeps with everyone but you.

      "And the whores get angry when the sluts give it away for free."

      --
      "You have liberated me from thought."
    76. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Sigh* You sound just like my son.

      -Jocasta

    77. Re:Same behavior in humans too by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone have a tic-tac?

      That depends.

      How much sex will it buy me?

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    78. Re:Same behavior in humans too by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Let's be fair here, though. These are a huge minority, and requires everyone involved to share similar values. More often than not people are simply too insecure to deal with "their [wo]man" doing a physical act with someone other than them. There are still those that would rather cheat than be honest with themselves and their partner and go open.

      Unfortunately that's true - it seems to differ quite a lot in different cultures though. In both Sydney, Australia and Amsterdam, Netherlands, it was much easier to surround myself with like-minded people than here in Hannover, Germany - although it's not entirely impossible fortunately, it's just a matter of talking to people openly and seeing how they respond.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    79. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I've been polyandrous for a few years in my life. It was nice. Tho it never reached the level of a "tribe", we had a stable group of people in different houses around the city that had multiple partners but were closed to ourselves. The difference between polyandry and cheating is whether folks know about it or not.

      Polyandry is rare and if I addressed all the rare groups, my list would have been 5 pages long.

      I think polyandry was great. It's not stable long term but without oppressive support from society sticking people in bad relationships, neither are common relationships. Most men have a lot more jealousy issues than they can handle.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    80. Re:Same behavior in humans too by ajshankar · · Score: 0

      From an evolutionary standpoint, monogamy favors low quality men and high quality women at the expense of high quality men and low quality women.

      Given the quality threshold required to have multiple wives, monogamy thus benefits most men and few women.

      High quality men suffer because they are unable to have additional wives, even though they could support them.

      Low quality women suffer because they cannot become the second or third or nth wife of a high quality man, even if that would improve their situation.

      Low quality men benefit because they are much more likely to marry than in a polygamous situation, in which their potential wives would instead be the nth wives of high quality men.

      High quality women benefit because they can be the only wives of high quality men, whereas in a polygamous situation they would have to share their husbands with additional wives.

    81. Re:Same behavior in humans too by msoori · · Score: 1

      it all Starts with a dinner date... even for Chimps!

    82. Re:Same behavior in humans too by verbalcontract · · Score: 1

      I've decided to keep my mouth shut. Kid needs a family no matter what, and we like having him around. He shouldn't be punished for his mom being a dumb slut.

      MY WIFE DID WHAT?!?

      In all seriousness though, maybe pop on the AC next time you need to spill family secrets? :)

    83. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. If you're not going to have sex, what's the point of the life partner?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    84. Re:Same behavior in humans too by kalirion · · Score: 1

      A non geeks requirements for a girl are far less. Will they have sex with me? Yes. Do I want to have sex with them? Yes.

      "Far less"? I have yet to find a girl that fulfills that first requirement!

    85. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem is the damn legal system currently punishes men way out of proportion. I've even heard of men required to pay child support for children that were not theirs (they'd paid for a couple years and THEN found out the ex had been lying-- so do a quick paternity test when your wife asks for a divorce and save yourself some grief).

      The court has to represent the best interests of the child. While it may seem unjust that a non-parent has to pay child support, the alternative would be for the child to suffer for the sins of the mother.

      There is a good discussion of the subject here.

    86. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The only problem is the damn legal system currently punishes men way out of proportion. I've even heard of men required to pay child support for children that were not theirs (they'd paid for a couple years and THEN found out the ex had been lying-- so do a quick paternity test when your wife asks for a divorce and save yourself some grief).

      Not good enough. Any indication that you believe this kid is yours, and treat them as your kid is acceptance of parental responsibility. Test the kid at birth, and don't sign the birth certificate until after you get the results. No exceptions.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    87. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Mom... Is that you?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    88. Re:Same behavior in humans too by bruised1 · · Score: 1

      My objection was more about your wording. Your original statement assigned every woman--in your experience, and possibly total estimation--into one of three groups. It's possible that polyandry, practiced in a polyfidelitous setting, is the least strong polyamory sub-model. There are only a couple of examples of this in my extended tribe, so I really can't say. I have observed polyandry practiced much more often in non-fidelitous relationships and they seem to work fine. In my tribe, folks tend to be in their 30s (I'm 37) but there are folks in their early 20s and in their 40s and 50s. Quite a few long term partnerships exist and, of course, many are fledgling. The thing is, even when a romantic partnership breaks, the folks involved usually remain close friends and sometimes they are fwb. This commitment of caring and support equals stability to me. Maybe it's a matter of the model? A certain fluidity (no pun intended) can exist in a large group primarily made up of poly, bi folks who are not poly-fi. Many of us practice the "primary/secondary/tertiary" method but the lines tend to be pretty blurry. A note on jealousy--most of us experience it and acknowledge it's an important thing to work through. We just don't see it as the deal breaker so many others seem to. I hate it when I feel jealous, but I have learned to identify WHY exactly the situation causes me to feel that way...and then work w/ the folks involved to make things better. Later, I usually feel silly *lol* It's not for everyone.

    89. Re:Same behavior in humans too by jacqdesign · · Score: 1

      haha, ya, that one is tough enough, I'll admit that. Course I say that, junior year on in HS I didn't have too much trouble and am now married. But there are times that you have to play the numbers a lot just to get those 2. Course that was my point, the more and more reqs you add on, the curve of females eligible gets sharper and sharper. :)

    90. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's because female chimps are satisfied with what they have, instead of constantly demanding more and more like little bitchy princesses! (sigh). No I'm not bitter. I just have this gnawing pain in my gut until I can feel the bile rising-up into my mouth. Or maybe it's just indigestion. Anyone have a tic-tac?

      Ha!

      For some reason this reminds me of the other day when I was watching some house finches. It's their breeding season now. Male house finches try to impress females with the brightness of their red plumage, with their singing, and also with gifts of food. I saw one male go after a female, standing on a branch and singing vigorously. The female seemed to appreciate it, or at least listen. Then the two flew down to where the bird seed was, and the male picked up a seed and gave it to the female. Aw, how sweet. Then the female started chirping, and the male regurgitated a previously swallowed seed for her. Uh kinda gross, but still sweet. Then the male flew back up to the branch, the female followed him, and started chirping and fluttering her wings with the same vigor the male had been singing with. The male dutifully coughed up another seed. Then the female continued her demand for food, getting more and more animated as the male desperately tried to regurgitate more food. I could see his little belly and throat undulating with the effort, but nothing came up. She wouldn't let up, though, so he flew down to the seed, ate one, flew back up, and coughed it up into her mouth. She finally seemed satisfied, and flew down to the seed and got some for her own damn self.

      Sound, perhaps, familiar? Yeah I thought so. Gave me a self-aware laugh. "Birds and the bees" indeed. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    91. Re:Same behavior in humans too by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

      and there is really only one reason to take a girl out on a date....

      To bribe them to set you up with another girl?

      Bragging rights. He is secretly monosexual.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    92. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      A tic-tac is made of the very stuff that created your indigestion in the first place, if that is your problem.
      How about not eating crap? I'm just saying... ^^

      If it's not indigestion, it's not processed traumata (my guess), coupled with strong repression.
      I recommend letting loose, and confront yourself, until you explode. After it, all your gnawing pain will be gone.
      If not, write me, and I'll pay you $100! (If yes, how about you paying me $100? ^^)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    93. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      What the... Either you are a good troll, or just WTF man... ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    94. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      They represent the best interests of the child within certain confines. After all, they're pegging one innocent, unrelated person with the costs (the non-father husband) instead of another innocent, unrelated person (Joe Blow millionaire up the street).
      <hyperbole>The latter would be able to provide far better for the child, so why doesn't the court order him to pay?</hyperbole>

      Punishing an innocent is wrong, even if it in the best interest of another innocent. Opening the door to that logic means any abuse can be justified if it is committed on behalf of a child's "best interests."

      Lots of cases of judicial abuse to "protect the children" here.

    95. Re:Same behavior in humans too by access.name · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot.

    96. Re:Same behavior in humans too by BigMarv · · Score: 1

      Irony is complaining about a sexist comment and referring to women as "girls" in the same sentence.

    97. Re:Same behavior in humans too by greenarrow7 · · Score: 1

      No, it's the fact that the comment was rated as '5 Insightful' that is worrying, implying that a lot of slashdotters learnt something new to them from it.

    98. Re:Same behavior in humans too by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they created marriage to stop the spread of STDs. Maybe, back in the days, they tried the free sex approach and discovered that syphilis and others were a bit of a bitch. A free-sex society don't work quite as well if you don't have prevention like condoms available.

      Though as you mentioned, could also be that rulers insisted on monogamy from their mates to ensure that any offspring came from the right father. Always hard to confirm parentage if you don't have access to at least a basic lab.

      Actually, the way I understand it there have been societies who were very promiscuous and had very little trouble with STDs. That is, until they were forced by Christian morals to become less promiscuous. Because the STD viruses now had much more difficulty propagating to new hosts, they became more virulent and started causing terrible illnesses, whereas before when everyone was doing everyone the viruses never had difficulty finding new hosts and never needed to be particularly virulent in order to propagate to new hosts and survive, so they never caused any noticeable illness.

      So no, I don't think that marriage was created to stop the spread of horrible STDs. Social behavior in humans is something that has been going on for millions of years, only recently have modern humans become self-aware enough to "try" new ways of behaving. I believe what you term "free sex", otherwise known as rampant promiscuity, was the norm for a good long while, up until the advent of modern societies and organized religions.

      Amusingly, most people forget that in the Old Testament there is plenty of non-monogamous behavior, namely polygamy (multiple wives). It's only in the New Testament era and henceforth that monogamy became the norm.

    99. Re:Same behavior in humans too by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Interesting points all.

      Just so much of it, assumes WANTING a permant mate....that is good if you want kids, but, if you're not wanting to have kids, I don't see any need to get married. That way, when you get tired of one chick....drop her and get another one. That way, things never get boring...and you don't get nagged, which I cannot stand at all.

      But to each his own...different schools of thought and all.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    100. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by 'Keep your mouth shut' you mean 'post my family's life story on slashdot'
      Just translating from Idiot to English for the folks here.

    101. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it floats, flies or fornicates, rent it. It's cheaper in the long run.

    102. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Her behavior was a direct test of making sure that the male could help in the feeding of the chicks after they mate. If he couldn't, or wouldn't be willing to do that, he wouldn't be of much help.

      --
      Why is this even on SlashDot?... Why is this even on Slashdot?...Why is this even on Slashdot?
    103. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Yes the behavioral significance was obvious. It was still funny.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    104. Re:Same behavior in humans too by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I said the same thing when I was single. For me, and I just picked up our marriage license last night, it was that I found one that I liked alot, we showed no signs of wanting anything other than eachother, and it just made the most sense financially, so we talked about it and decided to get married.

      You are right to an extent but also, I do think we are somewhat wired to look for the qualities of a good mate when it comes to attraction. Sure you may not WANT to get married and have kids, but... its not like you don't want the person who you would choose to do that with if you chose to do that with. Especially for a woman. Sure we have options now, but for most of the time that humans have been living, medical alternatives to pregnancy were not around, still many choose not to use them for various reasons... overall it makes good sense for a woman to choose a mate who she COULD settle down with, even if thats not her plan.

      Even for a short term thing, isn't someone who is sharing and looks out for your needs along with their own a more pleasant person than one who is out for #1 and good luck to the rest? Its like all those silly bits of manners, holding doors, etc. Its more about being aware and looking out for others than it is just about making yourself look good.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    105. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It was still funny.

      Absolutely. I would have gotten more dates in school if the girls were impressed how well I could puke! Lucky birds....

      --
      Why is this even on SlashDot?... Why is this even on Slashdot?...Why is this even on Slashdot?
    106. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Nancy....

    107. Re:Same behavior in humans too by pfleming · · Score: 1

      Dude, turn in your geek card. We'll wait.

    108. Re:Same behavior in humans too by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      No women I know have a problem with being referred to as "girls"... perhaps in some English speaking cultures that may be considered sexist, but not anywhere I've lived (and right now, I don't live in an English speaking country).

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    109. Re:Same behavior in humans too by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Meh, I've got a platinum geek card thanks very much. Professional software developer with interests in mediaevalism, sci-fi and linguistics.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    110. Re:Same behavior in humans too by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      "Far less"? I have yet to find a girl that fulfills that first requirement!

      Honestly, it's just a matter of asking. When I was young, I always thought I'd have that problem - then one day, while a little drunk, I just went up to a girl and asked directly. She said yes... Personal experience since then shows if you do it right, that method has about 5% success rate, which may sound low, but 1 in 20 aint bad, and it's pretty easy to ask 20 girls a night!

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    111. Re:Same behavior in humans too by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Correct, though throwing in GHB in the mix can fix that.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    112. Re:Same behavior in humans too by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was probably the other way around: men formalized marriage in an effort to stop women sleeping around.

      I have a feeling that our sexual habits are what differentiated the species. For example, I suspect that Chimpanzees became immune to AIDS, but we became more monogamous. Marriage is such an emotional thing that I suspect it's primarily instinctual; and the formalization is just a way that we express what we're programmed to do.

    113. Re:Same behavior in humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....and there is really only one reason to take a girl out on a date....

      Because otherwise it gets really boring at the restaurant waiting for your order to arrive?

      "Insightful"?!? Guys, you HAVE a problem!

    114. Re:Same behavior in humans too by eam · · Score: 1

      Sorry. You just married the wrong female.

  2. Wow by mc1138 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I need to head to the closest butchers shop!

    1. Re:Wow by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I always thought there was something monkey-like between Sam the butcher and Alice... This just confirms it.

    2. Re:Wow by schon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I need to head to the closest butchers shop!

      First, you might want to make sure that zoophilia isn't illegal in your state. :)

    3. Re:Wow by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I need to head to the closest butchers shop!

      Before you drop too much on premium cuts, remember the article said the ones who gave meat gifts had twice as much sex. You might want to think about how much you have now and do the math before deciding if that's worth it. ;)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Wow by pieisgood · · Score: 1

      and thus, AIDS was born.

      --
      Eat sleep die
    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curse you, arithmetic, CURSE YOU!!!!

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm....2x0=0. Damnit.

    7. Re:Wow by Plutonite · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hello! Are you a mean person? You must be the mean person everybody's mother told them about when they were little. I'm going to scribble down in my slashdot diary, that slashdot devs have provided me with, that you are a mean person; so that I don't forget.

    8. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This concept does not work in urban areas. Most women don't know what to do with a dead cow or parts of a dead cow. Therefore use a restaurant or if you really want a token, buy some take way. That is the human equivalent for meat.

  3. chimpburger by rookworm · · Score: 1

    MMM.... I love chimp meat.... definitely fuck someone for that!

    --
    The toad can't burp - and for some reason can't fart either, so it swells up and eventually explodes. --Anonymous Coward
    1. Re:chimpburger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear there is an auction of Michael Jackson's junk. Maybe if you fuck him he will let you have bubbles.

  4. Hmm by EkriirkE · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd rather use MY meat for sex.

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's cool, but don't you want a partner?

  5. Damn by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

    I've tried the exchange method before... the woman took my money, and gave me nothing in return... what the hell are the male chimps doing differently?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not living in their mom's basement.

    2. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Meat, not money. Meat.

    3. Re:Damn by fractoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      For the last time, kid, that was a charity worker not a hooker in a nurse outfit!

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    4. Re:Damn by steelfood · · Score: 1

      And it wasn't rent that they were paying for with their money.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  6. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that a banana in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

  7. Humans call it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going to a restaurant.

  8. I wonder how well this would work.... by Daemonax · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is a vegetarian girl that I'm interested in. I wonder if I'd get sex in exchange for an offering of meat?

    1. Re:I wonder how well this would work.... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Give her to me instead, I'm vegan but willing to offer my meat. Atleast if she looks good.

      I could cook her some tofu wok with mung bean sprouts, roasted seeds and stuff like that to though ..

      Excessive amounts of alcohol may work on vegans to.

    2. Re:I wonder how well this would work.... by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      As long as the meat is made out of tofu.

      In related news, PETA is taking donations to reeducate these chimps into changing their lifestyle.

    3. Re:I wonder how well this would work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife is a vegetarian. If I offer her my meat, I get sex. Does that make me less evolved?

    4. Re:I wonder how well this would work.... by McNihil · · Score: 1, Troll

      Vegetarians are not as good in bed. Remember there is always something ferocious with a chick that can down a good helping of a steak or two.

    5. Re:I wonder how well this would work.... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      by the time you drink the alcohol you won't be worried it was fined with isinglass?

    6. Re:I wonder how well this would work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a trade-off between sexual prowess and the stinkiness of the pussy.

    7. Re:I wonder how well this would work.... by martinX · · Score: 1

      Personally, I buy beer that hasn't been clarified by anything, let alone piscean bladders.

      (Unless it's "Treadmill",the mighty lager, with the world's first great taste of fish! Obscure Monty Python reference there)

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    8. Re:I wonder how well this would work.... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Most beer around here is supposed to not be filtered with any animal biproducts.

      Most wine is, but for whatever reason most "cider" (which over here most often mean wine based drink mixed with aromas, sugar, colors and preservatives) is claimed to be ok to which I find somewhat weird and doubtful but ..

      Sorta all hard booze is ok though, though not things like carmine, dairy, snakes and such in them of course.

      But most shots and drinks would probably be ok, kinda all beer over here, most cider and pre-mixed drinks (such as bacardi breezer), most wine won't.

      Though with things like bacardi and other sugar based products you may have an issue with the sugar canes refined using bone char.

      But then, most vegetarians don't care much or know about the issue (which would also involve gelatine and egg-white), and some vegans know that life won't be lived perfect and accept that and try to do what they can when they can.

      We are still better people ;)

    9. Re:I wonder how well this would work.... by McNihil · · Score: 1

      Troll??? I can see it being flamebait... but troll??? Oh right this is slashdot... 95% haven't had any... sorry.

    10. Re:I wonder how well this would work.... by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      Try slaughtering a cow in front of her for optimal effect. "If we weren't meant to eat them, how come they're made of food?"

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
  9. Stuff rock stars by Centurix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Butchers get all the chicks.

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:Stuff rock stars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn that Laser Wolf!

    2. Re:Stuff rock stars by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      "Laser Wolf?!? You're a fegala?"

      "I'm a lonely man, Tevye!"

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    3. Re:Stuff rock stars by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Guess that explains the song about Pete in Fallout 3. He just keeps chop'n that meat.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  10. Similarities.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, who here is gonna argue against THESE similarities between chimpanzees and humans?

    Common ancester? That's unpossible...

    1. Re:Similarities.... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing for or against a common shared ancestor between us and chimps, however ...

      There are plenty of over evolutionary reasons why the same behavior is found in different species. The common ancestor portion is probably the least likely reason of them all.

      Completely unrelated species separated by thousands of miles and millions of years often share similar features simply because those are useful features in certain situations. The idea that both species probably evolved from the same single cell organism has nothing to do with it.

      I've you're going to be all gung ho about evolution, try to be a little more educated about it instead of trying to be so obviously anti-creationism, it doesn't help, it just makes people who support evolution look like religious fanatics, which I for one can do without.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  11. Re:not suprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish... but it seems that only hot chicks ever ask me to fix their computers *sigh*

  12. NOT News . . . seen Bonobos by Mr.Ziggy · · Score: 5, Informative

    This behavior has been quite well documented in bonobos, which until recently were considered chimps or dwarf chimps. I'm not sure what makes this article newsworthy, except that we all like to read about meat and sex...

    Try reading a copy of "The Hunting Ape" by Stanford... It's fascinating in covering hunting and culture in apes (including trading food for sex).

    From what I've read, I'd also disagree with the article that meat is so valuable to their diet. They LOVE meat, but other research suggests that the amount of energy expended on hunting compared to what they gain in protein/food is a net negative. Hunting is also high risk and includes getting injured in the process.

    1. Re:NOT News . . . seen Bonobos by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This behavior has been quite well documented in bonobos, which until recently were considered chimps or dwarf chimps. I'm not sure what makes this article newsworthy, except that we all like to read about meat and sex...

      What makes it newsworthy is that despite what they used to be called, a Bonobo or Pigmy Chimpanzee is not a Common Chimpanzee. The article only says "chimpanzee" but quotes from scientists using the same term makes it obvious they're using the common name for common chimpanzee otherwise they'd specify.

      The part where the male gives the female meat but doesn't have sex until later (yet still averages twice as much sex as selfish males) sounds interesting, and maybe is news for a zoologist too, but I don't know.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:NOT News . . . seen Bonobos by khallow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From what I've read, I'd also disagree with the article that meat is so valuable to their diet. They LOVE meat, but other research suggests that the amount of energy expended on hunting compared to what they gain in protein/food is a net negative. Hunting is also high risk and includes getting injured in the process.

      If they're using meat as a currency for reproduction, then it becomes a very valuable part of the diet. And supplying meat sounds just like the typical display of fitness ritual common to many animals' reproductive behavior.

    3. Re:NOT News . . . seen Bonobos by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Chimps are quite close. Frankly, humans should be called "pans" rather than "homo" due to the similarity.

    4. Re:NOT News . . . seen Bonobos by fractoid · · Score: 1

      It's like that story a while back about monkeys getting more play when they steal pumpkins from a farm than when they get the exact same pumpkins from wild plants. It's the display of prowess that pulls the chicks, not just the food.

      First you get da powah, DEN you get da money.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    5. Re:NOT News . . . seen Bonobos by martinX · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought being high up in the chess club was a worthy display of prowess. Seems it wasn't. Who knew?

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    6. Re:NOT News . . . seen Bonobos by Lloyd_Bryant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From what I've read, I'd also disagree with the article that meat is so valuable to their diet. They LOVE meat, but other research suggests that the amount of energy expended on hunting compared to what they gain in protein/food is a net negative. Hunting is also high risk and includes getting injured in the process.

      What about the protein gain for the female, exclusive of the male's effort? A higher protein diet would be a big survival advantage for pregnant/nursing females, as well as for developing offspring.

      So the balance may be against the hunter (he has to not only hunt the meat, but also gather other food to offset the net energy loss from the hunting), but may improve the survival probabilities of the female/offspring, which would in turn improve the chances of the male's DNA surviving.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I had one once. It sucked.
    7. Re:NOT News . . . seen Bonobos by Nutria · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd also disagree with the article that meat is so valuable to their diet. They LOVE meat, but other research suggests that the amount of energy expended on hunting compared to what they gain in protein/food is a net negative. Hunting is also high risk and includes getting injured in the process.

      They might need meat for the same reason we do: essential amino acids, vitamins, minerals and fat that their fruit/plant diet either lacks or is deficient in.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    8. Re:NOT News . . . seen Bonobos by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 1

      The behavior is interesting because it is shown with common chimpanzees as well. Bonobos use sex for EVERYTHING (greeting, conflict resolution, etc.) and never form permanent relationships, therefore the behavior in that species is not really newsworthy.

      Bonobo Social Behavior

  13. I thought sex WAS the exchange of meat... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...at a high rate of give and take.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  14. Bonobos by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can believe this is a new discovery for the Common Chimpanzee. But for their close relatives the Bonobos, I saw documentaries decades ago showing not just the long term pair-bonding/mating-behavior related food-giving described in TFA, but outright prostitution. As in a male chimp comes up to a female with a banana in his hand, kinda tugs on her, she reacts neutrally, he hands her the banana and tugs again, they go off and have sex. And lest you hold on to the notion that this was still mating-related behavior, the sex in question was oral.

    Ah, Bonobos. Gotta love those crazy nympho primates. I could be wrong but I think the Common Chimp is closer to us genetically, but I think the Bonobo is closer to us psychologically. I was going to say socially, but I don't know many human societies where genital rubbing is used as a greeting or where orgies break out whenever they acquire food.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Bonobos by suricatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you ever find such a human society, can you let us know? Thanks.

    2. Re:Bonobos by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you ever find such a human society, can you let us know? Thanks.

      If websites that require a credit card don't count, then I'm still looking my friend. Still looking.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Bonobos by Mistlefoot · · Score: 1

      I doubt this is new at all. Maybe a new discovery. Basically, lazy chimps, or (weak chimps) that cannot acquire more food then they need get laid less often then hard working chimps (or strong chimps), that easily get more food then they need. Isn't this what evolution is based upon? The strong get laid, procreate and the weak don't get laid and don't procreate?

    4. Re:Bonobos by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt this is new at all. Maybe a new discovery.

      Um well yeah, obviously it's news in the sense of us discovering it, not that chimps suddenly started doing it.

      Isn't this what evolution is based upon? The strong get laid, procreate and the weak don't get laid and don't procreate?

      Sure, but not every animal or mammal for that matter used food gifts to express that strength to a mate, and we didn't know chimpanzees did, as tfa says. And it isn't necessarily the case that the ones that share are getting more meat, they might just be more generous. Not necessarily a bad trait for females to select for! Though sexual selection throws a weird kink (giggity) in the basic "survival of the fittest"... Sometimes it seems more like a female thinks "gee if you can survive like that, you must be healthy!" like in for example peacocks. :P

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Bonobos by yali · · Score: 5, Interesting

      male chimp comes up to a female with a banana in his hand, kinda tugs on her, she reacts neutrally, he hands her the banana and tugs again, they go off and have sex.

      Part of what's new about this finding is that the chimpanzees are engaging in a long-term exchange, not just an instantaneous trade like in your bonobo example. The male chimp gives the female some meat now, and at some point later in time she mates with him.

      This is interesting because the ability to engage in long-term exchanges requires some pretty sophisticated cognitive machinery that isn't necessary for an instantaneous trade. You have to keep track of who you have active deals with and what the running balance is, and you have to be sensitive to cheaters (and have an effective response, like ostracizing them) lest you get exploited. Evolutionary psychologists think that humans have special cognitive adaptations to help us manage long-term exchanges. This study appears to present evidence of similar abilities in other primates.

    6. Re:Bonobos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs evolution?

      Ah, Bonobos [wikipedia.org]. Gotta love those crazy nympho primates. I could be wrong but I think the Common Chimp is closer to us genetically, but I think the Bonobo is closer to us psychologically. I was going to say socially, but I don't know many human societies where genital rubbing is used as a greeting or where orgies break out whenever they acquire food.

        I know a lot of humans who wouldn't mind being short and hairy all over to get into a society like that!

    7. Re:Bonobos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ever find such a human society, can you let us know? Thanks.

      Well, I've never seen it quite so "spontaneous", and definitely not amongst people that don't know each other well, but I'm happy to say I surround myself with good friends that are quite open to having sex with their good friends. Strangers from outside the group aren't generally accepted, but becoming a member of the group generally just means hanging out with us for a few weeks and not being an idiot. I will greet the females in this group of friends with a long passionate kiss, and genital rubbing isn't uncommon. We've had a few orgies after meals, so that's probably the closest to the Bonobo story...

      Yep - life is good.

    8. Re:Bonobos by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1
      Bonobos and chimpanzees are the same distance from us genetically; chimpanzees/bonobos branched after they both branched from our common ancestor.

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    9. Re:Bonobos by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      banana... oral

      Well, that's usually how I eat a banana.

      I had once tried the other hole, but the banana just refused to enter, and got squished instead. Even leaving the peel on didn't help, it just burst open.

      If you want something else than oral sex, use a harder fruit instead, such as a cucumber.

      Or a potato, if really nothing better is available.

    10. Re:Bonobos by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      This is interesting because the ability to engage in long-term exchanges requires some pretty sophisticated cognitive machinery that isn't necessary for an instantaneous trade. You have to keep track of who you have active deals with and what the running balance is,

      Do you? If I buy a girl chocolates, does it really make her start doing mental accounting or does she just think "what a nice guy" and have a general warm fuzzy feeling about me?

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    11. Re:Bonobos by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      And those two things are basically the exact same thing. The only difference implied is the accuracy, but other than that, these two things are the same.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    12. Re:Bonobos by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong but I think the Common Chimp is closer to us genetically, but I think the Bonobo is closer to us psychologically.

      Chimps and Humans are the only species that wage war. Chimps are remarkably violent, and will sometimes kill just for the sake of killing.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:Bonobos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you do seem very proud of yourself. You've taken the opportunity several times in this thread to make sure we know this.

    14. Re:Bonobos by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Similar, not the same -- a small difference makes all the difference. You've taken a fairly elementary piece of evidence and made a very specific hypothesis from it.

      The data that's missing from the observation is how quickly the females notice a change in a male's behaviour and how quickly they react to this.

      HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  15. This is NOT NEWS! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0

    A similar study found chimpanzees trading food for sex clear back when I was a teenager. This is about 20 years late to be "news".

  16. Oldest profession? by Anenome · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Damn, we call it the 'oldest profession' and had no idea just how far back it went :P

    --
    "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
    1. Re:Oldest profession? by adavies42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      actually there was an article last year about some researchers who taught chimps to use money (plastic "task reward" tokens exchangeable for food). they promptly invented prostitution.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    2. Re:Oldest profession? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, it's a long trip down a deep black hole; I believe it started with something called "The Big Bang".

    3. Re:Oldest profession? by Radoslaw+Zielinski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actually there was an article last year about some researchers who taught chimps to use money (plastic "task reward" tokens exchangeable for food). they promptly invented prostitution.

      I looked for some reference for this... here it is, on page #2.

  17. And by shellster_dude · · Score: 3, Funny

    All the hottest chimps get fat. Seems like a bad system to me.

    1. Re:And by PFritz21 · · Score: 1

      They're eating proteins, not carbs...

    2. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they burn off all their energy bumping uglies.

    3. Re:And by XantheKnight · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness though, being fat is far more effective reproductively than being skinny. At least before the modern times. Possibly this is why so many early human cultures had a proliferation of those Wilendorf Venus figurines - of hugely fat women.

      Not only is being fat a physical marker of a successful organism (i.e. one that is more than able to provide for itself - regardless of whether the calories came from its own hunting/gathering or were gifts from males/others), it also marks that one has the means/ability to provide for many children. This makes it more likely children from this mother will survive-- not starve to death. If you were looking for a mate with whom your offspring were most likely to survive, suddenly it seems logical you'd choose a fattie.

      Fat = successful organism.

    4. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno. It's still a pretty contentious issue as to whether those Willendorf figurines were meant to be actual depictions of women during that era or not. Perhaps the obesity (or pregnancy as argued by some) was simply meant to indicate the carver's yearning for more rather than to depict an object of desire.

      If you were a male seeking a mate in a hunter-gatherer society, I would think that you would be a bit wary of an obese female. Why? She is likely associated with a male who is able to provide her with such a bounty and chances are, he is the jealous type.

      Given the scarcity of resources at the time and the likelihood that women had less of an opportunity to become overweight, I would surmise that obese women were few and far between in hunter-gatherer societies and were likely guarded by their partners not because they were obese (and consequently desirable), but because of the two year-old mentality (IT'S MINE) these men likely had.

      rp

  18. Cheese Burgers are better...maybe. by Shard.Oglass666 · · Score: 1

    Even Ford Fairlaine intuitivley must have known, when he promissed to slam a cheese buger down his girls throat.

    1. Re:Cheese Burgers are better...maybe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's certainly a lot of pussy to be found at I Can Haz Cheeseburger.com.

  19. Bubbles by qpawn · · Score: 0

    I always wondered why Michael Jackson had daily deliveries from the butcher.

  20. Great Headline! by ChengWah · · Score: 0

    I mean, that's how it's done, right?

  21. Plank institute? by CorvisRex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Begin Rhetorical Question>> The thing that confuses me... the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology? Evolutionary Anthropology would be pretty low on my list if I was going to list things associated with Max Plank. Why on earth did they name an Anthropology Institute after a Theoretical Physicist? Don't get me wrong, Plank is one of the great names in physics, and one of the most brilliant men to have lived in the 20th Century... but Anthropology?!? Is there some connection between evolution and Quantumn Mechanics I seem to have missed in all those years in College? End Rhetorical Question

    1. Re:Plank institute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's named after Max Planck the porn star.

    2. Re:Plank institute? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Germany has quite a lot of Max-Planck Institutes. Name association.

      I at least got to work at a particle-physics Max Planck Institute, so it was appropriately named.

    3. Re:Plank institute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Max Planck Society is the basic research organization that exists parallel to the universities in Germany. Used to be called Kaiser Wilhelm Society but was renamed after the war.

    4. Re:Plank institute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a number of Max Plank institutes in Germany for various subjects. I was at one for a while, travelling with a Math Professor, At the time, the building contained two: Math (MIS), and Evolutionary Anthropology, which was moving to another building. (Which was interesting for me, as my degrees are in Mathematics and Anthropology.)

      There are actually a whole lot of them.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck_Society

    5. Re:Plank institute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This naming is due to a founding organsisation, the Max Planck Society. The Max Planck Society funds differnt areas of research. There are many Max Planck research institutes in Germany that focus on different topics of research, mostly but not limited to natural sciences. For example, there are MPIs for cell biology, microbiology, astronomy as well as social sciences etc..

    6. Re:Plank institute? by aqk · · Score: 0

      YOU IDIOT !
        Didn't you know?

      It's named after Max Planck, the CHIMP!

  22. Max Planck Institute Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too was once a hardcore geek, intensely focused on the science and methodology of getting a girl to go out with me to the exclusion of all other thought, so I can relate. The nerds at the Max Planck Institute have my total sympathy and I know what they're going through and why they are unable to focus on the particle physics stuff in favor of this stuff.

    They just need to relax and be themselves, actually ask a few girls out (shower and brush teeth first, obviously) and realize that it's not the end of the world if the first dozen or so say no. The joy of a fantastic newfound experience will happen eventually guys, just hang in there!

    1. Re:Max Planck Institute Nerds by aqk · · Score: 0

      Yeah....

      Brush teeth, shower, ...
        and before going out the door, make sure you have a big T-bone steak snugly strapped to your belt.

  23. Monkey Business by Rollgunner · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always wondered where that phrase came from...

  24. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sex, now there's something Slashdotters don't know about.

  25. So, what your are saying is that... by Extremus · · Score: 1

    ... chimpanzees exchange meat for meat?

  26. They just have to very careful by memorycardfull · · Score: 4, Funny

    about exactly how they word their craigslist ad when they do it.

  27. Isn't this survival of the fittest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems an objective way to see if a potential mate has the capability of bringing home the bacon (sorry for the pun), thereby being a good indicator on whether the male could provide for a family that would result from copulation (unless they have safe sex ;) ).
    If the male chimp doesn't have enough to share, he isn't probably very good at getting food - and you wouldn't want to propagate those genes. Did they check whether the chimps that shared the most also gathered the most?
    So why is it being made to sound like prostitution, when it clearly is more like survival of the fittest - the female bangs the best male?

    1. Re:Isn't this survival of the fittest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I suppose the young girls who marry very rich old men are also doing survival of the fittest?

  28. We're much better than that by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    ...we throw in some flowers. Maybe a show.

    rj

  29. It's just chimp's equivalent of dating by thenewguy001 · · Score: 1

    Sometimes you go on a date, pay for an expensive meal, and the chicks put out. Sometimes they don't. Looks like it works the same in the chimp world.

  30. It's hard out here for a Chimp! by Essef · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... with apologies to Hustle and Flow.

  31. Let me guess... by hyades1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Vegans exchange cucumbers and cheese tacos.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegans don't eat cheese, meathead.

    2. Re:Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Vegans exchange cucumbers and cheese tacos.

      Cheese? Really?

    3. Re:Let me guess... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      I see the relevance of cucumbers, but cheese tacos? Aren't they way to squishy for sex?

    4. Re:Let me guess... by cadu · · Score: 1

      tofu 'cheese' tacos

    5. Re:Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheese tacos? Vegans?

    6. Re:Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheese isn't vegan.

    7. Re:Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it would have to be a tofu taco. Vegans don't eat cheese. I'm not knocking Vegans, I like tofu.

    8. Re:Let me guess... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      If they're anything like you, they probably eat a lot of shit, though.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    9. Re:Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheese is an animal product. Vegans do not use animal products.

  32. Not new by vadim_t · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was an article some years ago about monkeys (not sure if chimpanzees or not) being trained to use money.

    Researchers taught them that discs of metal could be exchanged for food and such things. They got all sorts of interesting behaviors out of it, including the monkeys attempting to fake the money.

    One uncomfortable discovery was discovering that some of them were actually using that money to pay for sex.

    This seems even better than this one. Food for sex is a straightforward exchange. Tokens that can be used to obtain food for sex is more complicated, and shows a deeper understanding.

    1. Re:Not new by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I'll have to try and find said article.

      This new stuff, though, is also showing that they're willing to give food NOW if they know they'll get sex LATER. Combine the two and you get the head chimp paying a salary to his "secretary" chimps so he can bone them when they go on heat.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    2. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Capuchin monkeys were observed paying for sex:

      http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/05/magazine/05FREAK.html

    3. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ugh, dude. Here's the link that doesn't require registration

    4. Re:Not new by Rabbitbunny · · Score: 5, Informative
    5. Re:Not new by XantheKnight · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I mean, genetically, reproduction is the most important thing in life for a living being. So how do people find it so strange that we continue to pay a high premium for access to sex?

      Poo-pooing prostitution (the idea) seems so ridiculous in this light. It's a great idea for both parties. (Again, not in the modern world however... thanks to marginalisation of the sex trade).

      Fundamental rule of economics: everything is worth what its buyer will pay. Hardly surprising that one of the first things a chimp tries to buy is sex. I forget Maslow's hierarchy of needs, but isn't it something like... food/water, shelter, SEX?

      Makes sense to me.

  33. I always laugh.... by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    when ppl speak of women putting out so little. Back in my 20s and 30s, most of the women that I dated wanted sex every night (a couple pushed for sex 2-3x a day) and gripped that the guys that they used to date were horrible in bed. They said that they quit putting out because THEY were not getting satisfaction. It was even more so with divorced women. I suspect that more guys need to change.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:I always laugh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Back in my 20s and 30s, most of the women that I dated wanted sex every night(a couple pushed for sex 2-3x a day) and gripped that the guys that they used to date were horrible in bed."

      Of course they put out when you're dating, you dumbass. And of course they're gonna tell you how great you are while everyone else is horrible.
      We're talking about marriage.

      Dates and girlfriends put out plenty, wives put out just enough so you don't leave. If you must have a wife, it's best to keep a girlfriend handy.

    2. Re:I always laugh.... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A woman whose body works well (no endometriosis, abuse issues, etc.) can climax every 2 to 3 minutes for an indefinite period.
      The best a man can do is either edge forever, or train themselves to climax without ejaculation (came close but never succeeded myself but some do).

      One huge piece of advice... get a massage table ($300). So much better than a bed. Soooooo much better than a bed.
      You can adjust the height by inches (so you hit the right spots inside her) and instead of doing push-ups (every frikkin muscle in the body except the inner ear) for an hour, you are only screwing (so mainly abs, gluts and triceps). It is marvelous for all parties concerned.

      Because of our weak egos, ladies do well who push those buttons. I can see when they are pushing my buttons and it still feels good.
      Ladies in their 40's who didn't have something go wrong, like sex as much or more than younger women. I was married and monogamous most of my 20's so I don't have a lot of comparison in that age. In my 30's they wanted sex but a lot seemed to be screwed up by their previous relationships. In their 40's they knew what they wanted and went for it. I wonder what the 50's and 60's will be like.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    3. Re:I always laugh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best a man can do is either edge forever, or train themselves to climax without ejaculation (came close but never succeeded myself but some do).

      You're just not trying hard enough. Just don't stop after you climax. I can go two or three times easy without stopping. I've read somewhere that guys go soft after climax but that just doesn't happen for me. Possibly i'll lose that ability one day (i'm 33 now) but for now... w00t.

    4. Re:I always laugh.... by Swizec · · Score: 1

      I'm a guy and quit putting out to my women every day for the same reason. Then with time I get dumbed down to their standard. Then we break up.

      Ah the cycle of boredom. Magnificent no?

    5. Re:I always laugh.... by pnutjam · · Score: 2, Funny

      wrinkly...?

    6. Re:I always laugh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Very interesting about the endometriosis and female plumbing in general contributing to the overall ability to satisfy a woman sexually. I can probably say the most if not nearly all men and women alike fail to consider that the reasons that we have cliche diagnosis of PMS are directly related to satisfaction in bed.

      It's almost akin to suggesting that we shouldn't even bother to attempt to bed a gal (with the intent of a long term relationship) until such time as we've made an attempt to determine if she has any female plumbing issues.

      Now this is an overt generalization of what you had posted but it does make some sense. All you hear these days is ads targeted at males looking for a bigger meat. But not the other way around. Very seldom do we hear ads that target women to suggest to get endometriosis, cysts, and other down under issues delt with in the pursuit of a good climax.

      My wife for example was recently diagnosed with a cyst and mild endometriosis. The cyst was removed and BANG. Not only better joy but also a bun in the oven. We had been trying for a while to have kids.

      It's almost a selfish act to consider that we don't look to female plumbing as part of the overall issue UNTIL we attempt to procreate for reasons other then recreation.

      The correlation may be weak and unscientific here. But, never the less compelling...

    7. Re:I always laugh.... by syousef · · Score: 1

      I was married and monogamous most of my 20's so I don't have a lot of comparison in that age. In my 30's they wanted sex but a lot seemed to be screwed up by their previous relationships. In their 40's they knew what they wanted and went for it. I wonder what the 50's and 60's will be like.

      Prediction: They'll be frustrating because you'll increasingly have trouble getting it up.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    8. Re:I always laugh.... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Because of my HRT, the more likely prognosis is nice performance and then I get diagnosed with prostate cancer and then I go to zero performance and all kinds of low hormone emotional problems.

      Men should generally get their hormones checked-- male "menopause" hits in the 40's but affects some men in their 20's and 30's now that we have so many estrogen like chemicals floating around in our environment.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:I always laugh.... by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the 50's and 60's will be like.

      Viagra

    10. Re:I always laugh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      train themselves to climax without ejaculation (came close but never succeeded myself but some do)

      Thanks for letting us know.

  34. My conclusion: by terbo · · Score: 1

    Our behaviors aren't really all that advanced, as humans, and
    in order for us to get much further we are going to have to
    acknowledge that, instead of build bigger and better in order
    to please some part of ourselves that is afraid to grow..

    --
    If you're interested in facts I'll tell you what they are and I'll give you sources - Chomsky on The Big Idea
    1. Re:My conclusion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can start by not hitting the 'enter' button prematurely.

    2. Re:My conclusion: by fucket · · Score: 1

      That's what she said.

  35. Interesting... by Mish · · Score: 1

    I'm having a BBQ next weekend, what kinds of meat are they offering?

    1. Re:Interesting... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I'd be more interested in finding out how you managed to invite female chimps to your BBQ. Whatever works for you...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  36. For human males, the key is to avoid Marriage trap by echtertyp · · Score: 3, Funny
    The BBC article is mostly interesting for how closely chimp behavior is to human behavior--who knew chimps were so much like us, socially?

    For us humans, the key thing (at least for males) is to avoid the marriage trap. Outside of marriage, the resources-for-nookie exchange holds true at market rates. Imbalances are corrected by the laws of microeconomics.

    But once locked in a marriage contract, a human male MUST provide resources under penalty of law, while the female is not obligated to do...anything. The predictable result is the epidemic of sexless marriages in the U.S. and other developed countries.

    So, just beware the marriage trap. It's like signing an oil futures contract where you're required to deliver oil at $12 a barrel, indefinitely. You'd be a fool to sign either a $12/bbl oil contract, or a marriage contract.

  37. Maybe it's not an EXCHANGE by Chienne+Folle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find it interesting that the author of the BBC article is assuming that the male chimps are trading meat for sex. The original article goes on to state that female chimps don't hunt, so they can't obtain meat on their own. When the male chimps donate meat to the female chimps, they don't just get more sex, they also increase the chances that the female chimp will take in enough protein and calories to bear a healthy baby.

    Humans look at the male chimp's giving the female chimp meat as "trading" meat for sex, but there are a lot of other constructions that could be put on that behavior. He could just as easily be trying to assure that his offspring will be healthy. Or trying to assure the health and well-being of a female that he's come to care about.

    The original article says that people had tried to find meat-for-sex exchanges in chimps before and failed, because they didn't give the animals enough credit for long-term planning. They looked to see if Chimp A gave meat to Chimp B, then had sex with her two minutes later, and they didn't find that. The current researchers succeeded because they took a longer-term view and counted meat-giving and sexual activity over time. But it's possible that they're still not giving the animals enough credit -- what if the meat-giving isn't trading meat for sex but is something else entirely?

    Observations of primate behavior will never tell us anything until we learn to just report what we see the animals doing, then think of every plausible reason why they might be doing that, rather than assuming that the animals aren't capable of doing what we do.

    --
    Middle-aged professional woman still plays computer games. Film at 11.
    1. Re:Maybe it's not an EXCHANGE by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      Ahh... yes. And the reason that guy is taking you out to dinner is because he's interested in the long-term survivability of your (future) offspring.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    2. Re:Maybe it's not an EXCHANGE by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Quite right. Even scientists fall prey to anthropocentrism sometimes; esp. when it comes to a species that is so close to ours.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    3. Re:Maybe it's not an EXCHANGE by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Wait wait wait ...

      You mean ... correlation is not causation??!

      Obviously you're new here.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:Maybe it's not an EXCHANGE by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      This is an interesting observation. Why assume that a long term strategy is for a short term gain? Getting sex is definitely a short term gain, whereas ensuring healthy offspring is definitely long term. Do we even know if Chimps have a sex drive outside of procreation (as in Bonobo style enjoyment for it's own sake)? If the Chimps are waiting to have sex until the female is in oestrus it doesn't sound like it's related to enjoyment of the moment...

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    5. Re:Maybe it's not an EXCHANGE by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

      What you seem to be getting at is that it's not meat-for-sex, it's love or "caring." It's just romanticism that stands in the way of realizing that caring is just the biological/cognitive implementation of a long-term meat-for-sex behavior.

      --
      For great justice.
    6. Re:Maybe it's not an EXCHANGE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you seem to be getting at is that it's not meat-for-sex, it's love or "caring." It's just romanticism that stands in the way of realizing that caring is just the biological/cognitive implementation of a long-term meat-for-sex behavior.

      It's not just romanticism, because caring can be, and more often than some bitter slashdotters may think are, mutal for both men and women. IMHO, a better conclusion to this study is that emotional-bonding-with-material-support evolved in chimps and humans as an improvement over immediate transactions like meat-for-sex. In addition to encouraging more support for the next generation, it can also provide additional emotional benefits (both humans and chimps are complex emotional beings and signficant emotional problems can harm them in a number of ways).

      One should also note that in chimp group dynamics it's not always the strongest male that's the alpha. It can just as easily be that a more physically average, but popular, male is in charge and the strongest male in the group is somewhat marginalized because he's too selfish or mean for the others to tolerate as leader. So perhaps this has as much to do with social standing as reproduction, though the two can be linked in both chimp and human populations.

    7. Re:Maybe it's not an EXCHANGE by Chienne+Folle · · Score: 1

      Obviously you're new here.

      *laugh* It's true -- I am; I joined all of about three days ago.

      I used to be a Social Psychology professor, and I would hammer on "correlation is not causation" -- with all kinds of obvious and silly examples -- all semester, and at the end of three months, some students STILL hadn't gotten it.

      I'm glad I'm not the only voice crying in the wilderness, though. :-)

      --
      Middle-aged professional woman still plays computer games. Film at 11.
  38. Not really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sex is good exercise. Though, being a slashdotter, you might not know that.

  39. Get down girl, go 'head get down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I ain't sayin' she a gold digger...

  40. Chilled monkey brains! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ah dessert! Chilled monkey brains!"

    (Because, after all, anything that thinks about sex so much must be delicious!)

  41. Re:For human males, the key is to avoid Marriage t by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having a good marriage is probably 25% likely.

    But here's the problem....
    Hubby or Wife asks spouse for sex and is rejected. Ego hit. And unavoidable.
    Enough ego hits, and you just don't WANT to risk another rejection. Deadly Embrace condition.

    Meanwhile, the guy or lady you see on the sly only at lunchtime on thursdays is there for *one* thing. If you are not feeling well, you cancel it in advance and no rejection. That sex is *incredible* over a long enough period. No rejections, no ego damage to your sex drive. And then the idiots split up with their spouse and go into a "real" relationship with their sex partner and over 75% are split up within 12 months.

    Sometimes I think we should marry our spouse and then we and our spouse find other sex partners. Maybe not the first child bearing marriage but any second or third marriages.

    Women and men lose their sex drives for a particular person (re: Calvin Coolidge's famous rooster discussion with his wife).

    However- if you are a man and lost your sex drive big time- GET YOUR HORMONES checked. A lot of men find they are down in the 200's to 300's and should be in the 500's . As a testicular cancer survivor (16 years! Woo woo! would have been dead 2 years earlier because no cure), this hit me when I was 43. I got treated and turned back the clock to like I was a mid 30 year old again.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  42. Re:Not new - Article link by Plantain · · Score: 0, Interesting
    --
    No, but I did throw granola at a deaf person once
  43. Don't be to kind with chimpanzees by MikeOtl67of · · Score: 1

    Think twice next time you think to feed that funny chimpanzee you just met, you might regret it.

  44. So...in other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Males are providing for females and makes their chance of survival go up and then the females wants to have those genes?

    or

    Males buy sex from females with meat?

    Tough one...

  45. Any chimp who offers meat for sex by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Any chimp who offers meat for sex is too lazy to masturbate!

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  46. Then the monkeys found Craigslist by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    And let me tell ya, the erotic services section suffered when the chimps started typing ads.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  47. Chimpanzees Exchange Sex For Meat by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    There are two stories here. The johns are trying to get laid, so it suggests sex for pleasure, which is rare among animals. And the hookers suggest they are willing to barter for food instead of working to acquire it directly.

    Maybe a third story, which is they are somehow able to come to an agreement over each party's responsibilities without using words, giving researchers hope that someday they will be able to visit hookers without fear of finding a cop instead.

  48. Re:Chimpanzees Exchange Sex For Meat by kaliann · · Score: 1

    I'm not really seeing how it necessarily implies sex for pleasure. There is nothing in the behavior that cannot be explained by selection pressure for increased number of offspring.

    The male gives the female food today and then has the ability to mate with her twice as often in the future, thereby increasing his chances of fathering her offspring.

    The female accepts the food from a male capable of hunting and bartering and gains high-value calories that she otherwise would have limited access to (TFA mentions that female chimps have less success hunting). Her offspring are likely to be fitter due to her improved nutrition and the higher chance of being fathered by a fit male.

    Many species have behaviors that amount to "I protect/provide food for you long term, and I have better chance of mating with you." Stallions have their mares. Lionesses provide meat to their pride and have the right to the sperm of the the strongest male available: the badass who fended off everyone else.

    This article shows a cognizance of the value of a specific act (providing meat) and the acceptance of a long term obligation/bond. Pleasure doesn't need to enter into it.

  49. Re:ask mrs obama by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

    she knows what a monkey does for sex. she has two kids.

    A monkey? In the White House? You're probably thinking of the previous occupant.

  50. And to think... by WSOGMM · · Score: 1

    People think we're so much superior than other animals when our advancement is marked by easier ways to get our impulsive 'needs'.

  51. 2x0? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Mmm, nope. There goes the hope of the meat industry to beat the credit-crisis!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  52. Different behaviour by jd · · Score: 3, Informative

    The point of TFA is that outright prostitution does NOT exist. Giving meat does not produce results there and then and does not guarantee them in the future. It's not a pay-to-play deal.

    What is observed with chimps is something far more interesting, as it shows an awareness of delayed gratification on the part of the males and of long-term strategies by the females.

    Basically, meat is nutritionally high-value food compared to anything the females can get otherwise. This means that giving meat to the females improves the health and strength of the females. The female doesn't reward the male for the meat, but rather rewards the male for superior long-term care and support.

    In other words, it's not an exchange, nothing is being bartered, and no individual gift by either side is connected in any way to any individual gift by the other. Instead, it looks much closer to long-term strategies by both sides where a move might be planned weeks or months in advance.

    To compare chimps with bonobos is like comparing (theoretically intelligent) economists with stock market day-traders. I'd argue the chimps are actually smarter than economists, as chimps have fewer housing bubbles and the meat supply doesn't go bankrupt as often.

    For all the primitiveness of the exchange, this indicates an extremely high level of intelligence that is beyond a fairly large percent of the human population. Humans do NOT do well on delayed gratification.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  53. One night in Bangkok by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    Chess players shouldn't supply meat. Nor potatoes. They're expected to supply Gemsafe source code instead.

    (Sorry really couldn't resist...)

  54. Re:Chimpanzees Exchange Sex For Meat by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    I'm not a biologist, but sex for pleasure == any time the female is not in estrus. Just about all mammals only mate when the female is fertile.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  55. Groundbreaking discovery... by NeverNow · · Score: 0

    If you RTFA in its entirety, the point basically is that marriage is a form of long-term prostitution. Did they really need to study chimpanzees to find that out?

  56. Hmm ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I hope, by that, they weren't referring to boobs.

  57. "Chimpanzees Exchange Meat For Sex" by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

    What's the difference?

  58. Touch my monkey! by StreetChip · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would you like to touch my monkey? Touch him! Touch my monkey!

    --
    LeoPolus Web Design: http://www.leopolus.com
    1. Re:Touch my monkey! by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Change the channel. I've seen this edition of "Sprockets" before.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  59. Does not compute. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Ahh... yes. And the reason that guy is taking you out to dinner is because he's interested in the long-term survivability of your (future) offspring.

    The argument is that the point of a sex drive is that it takes care of such things automatically without you realizing what is going on. You can bounce around through life believing you are an autonomous, choice-driven being when the exact opposite is usually the case.

    People are machines. Only the lucky ones who realize this have a chance of growing beyond the boundaries of the operating system.

    -FL

  60. was anyone thinking by nimbius · · Score: 1

    what i was thinking??

    fat hooker monkey...nobody tell 4chan, but feel free to use the phrase as a derogatory remark.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  61. What about homosexual monkeys? by AppleTwoGuru · · Score: 1

    What do the "gay" monkeys do? This researched only talked about the male monkeys having sex with females. Is homosexual activity amongst monkeys not normal that someone would not show research on it? Do the gays monkeys just exchange meat and sex in all sorts of ways? What happens when groups of monkeys, male and female get together for a meat and sex orgy? I would hate think if whole families of monkeys just get it on. And if the monkeys would engage in Humanality (like Beastiality, just in reverse.) I think after this point, the meat and sex issue get a little obscured.

    1. Re:What about homosexual monkeys? by bratwiz · · Score: 1

      "What do the "gay" monkeys do?"

      Tubesteak.

  62. Re:-jcr by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    oh sh*t, one of the chimps has escaped the jungle study group and has started trolling as -jcr, perhaps he'll find some vowels for his nick the next time he hits the keybaord...

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  63. I got some meat... by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    I thought that sharing meat was the same thing as having sex?

    All lewdness aside, is it really an exchange? Perhaps the sharing food establishes a relationship that makes them mate more. Or maybe frequent mating makes them more likely to share meat because they grow fond of one another.

    Either way, I wish this worked on my wife. Sigh, I knew I should have married someone who looked like a monkey.

  64. Nope, no "deal" by ErkDemon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Actually, the BBC summary is wrong.

    Chimpanzees enter into "deals" whereby they exchange meat for sex, according to researchers.

    ... is, actually, almost the opposite of what the researchers found. They'd initially been trying to find evidence supporting that hypothesis, and had failed, because they'd found no evidence of any such transactions taking place.

    What they did find was that, "amazingly", chimps who were generous with their food, and shared it whether a female was up for sex or not, ended up getting laid twice as often.
    There's a whole range of possible reasons for this: it might be that females with high-meat diets get horny more often than those with dietary deficiencies, it might be that males who tend to share tend to be the better hunters, and therefore more physically fit and perhaps more attractive, it might be that by sharing, a chimp gives the impression of being more successful at hunting whether they are or not, it might be that males who show themselves to be more interested in long-term nurturing relationships are seen as better ones to have children with than the unreliable stingey ones ... and so on.

    If we're going to anthropomorphise for a moment, I guess it means that wealthy, generous, "playboy" chimps who enjoy sharing their wealth with those around them and invest in long-term friendships have less trouble mating than those who don't have spare meat to share, or who hoard what they have for themselves.

    I think that the anthopologists might like to make a study of two interesting concepts that appear to be relevant, here, but which seem to have eluded them:

    1. "Making Friends", and
    2. "Being Popular"

    It's possible that the chimps might be more adept in these social skills than the anthropologists watching them.

    1. Re:Nope, no "deal" by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      You make a good point but there is more to it than that. If you read the article closely, you discover that the male chimps in the study seem to share with one specific female chimp (the article mentions pair-bonding).
      I have seen several of these studies and they all seem to conclude that all behavior is entered into with a "what's in it for me" attitude.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  65. A whole new meaning... by bmwEnthusiast · · Score: 1

    to bringing home the bacon. :)

  66. There's your missing link. by singingjim1 · · Score: 0

    That settles the "humans came from apes" debate. It's the same in the primate world as in the human world: you always end up paying for it one way or another. Primate prostitution. An older profession than we could have even imagined.

  67. Latin name "pan" for good reason by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The 19th century researchers were "shocked" by the super-sexuality of the various chimp species. (as if humans are substantially different)

  68. That's 'cause they're chimps by The+Man · · Score: 1

    If they had the higher reasoning skills of humans, they would recognise that meat and sex are both perishable. The correct trade is to exchange unneeded meat for gold, which can later be exchanged for meat when your hunt comes up short. Sex? Who needs that? The survival of the species is irrelevant to the individual.

  69. Yeah, that's always worked for me too. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Take her to Morton's. The Filet Mignon is killer.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  70. Pimpanzees! by Seriousity · · Score: 1
    --
    This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
  71. here goes my money again... by darrenkopp · · Score: 1

    congress will probably find the need to regulate this also....

  72. Meat currency by Quietust · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they got the idea from Kingdom of Loathing?

    --
    * Q
    P.S. If you don't get this note, let me know and I'll write you another.
  73. So in essence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he gives her some of his meat, he gets to give her his meat.

  74. Summarized in a single sentence: by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Your girlfriend wants steak.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  75. Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give them a month and they'll be as smart as most of the black race.

  76. Evo-psych BS by skinfaxi · · Score: 1

    Chimps are also known to be violent, to rape, kill other chimp tribe members and their own infants, and to eat each other. That explains everything about human sexual relationships, right? No? Their conclusions (and many of the comments here) say much more about the evopsych researcher/slashdot commenter than about chimps or humans in general.

  77. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  78. Not very common! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A woman whose body works well (no endometriosis, abuse issues, etc.) can climax every 2 to 3 minutes for an indefinite period.

    I'm sleeping with a woman like that right now (she's 29) but she's the first woman of that type I've experienced in my 20 years of bangin' and 13 sex partners. The next-most-similar woman only climaxes 2-3 times before being tapped out (she's 37), therefore I don't think it's a very common thing! Interestingly, they both have similar anatomy where it counts, and all of the sexually "ordinary" women I've been with are completely different.

    One huge piece of advice... get a massage table ($300). So much better than a bed. Soooooo much better than a bed. You can adjust the height by inches (so you hit the right spots inside her) and instead of doing push-ups (every frikkin muscle in the body except the inner ear) for an hour, you are only screwing (so mainly abs, gluts and triceps).

    It's true that any position that doesn't tire us out makes us much better performers! With Miss Unlimited Climax, a key thing is the shape and size of her body letting me move the right way without getting tired. I have to say, with heavier women, it's impossible to find the same efficiency. I'm a slim, light guy, and it's been a problem for me that *almost all* single women within dating range for me age-wise are overweight. Lots of women with pretty faces that I would just never want to be naked with. It just sucks.

  79. It's not all fun and games by kaliann · · Score: 1

    Agreed, but there is no evidence that sex out of estrus is happening here.
    From TFA: "This is a long-term exchange, so males continue to share their catch with females when they are not fertile, copulating with them when they are."

  80. The real scoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of the intelligent design practioners, isnt this what they practice. But substitute meat for money. There are similarities between chimps and humans believe it or not.

  81. Evidently not trading meat for sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they continue trading during unfertile periods, and only copulate during fertile ones, they are trading meat for descendency, not for sex. Human inclination bias in the interpretation of results.

  82. Well that settles it. by JonDorian88 · · Score: 1

    So I guess that makes it, without a doubt, the oldest profession in the world...

    --
    The 14'th amendment was was created to be an option.
  83. Obligatory Spamusement reference by Kelson · · Score: 1

    And it's the first strip too: Give Her More Meat.

  84. Really good insight: absence is key to hotness by echtertyp · · Score: 1

    The phenomenon you describe (split, then the new becomes not so new anymore, split again) is something everyone should understand. The key is to not get locked into a 24/7 situation at all. People need space.

  85. Obligatory #2 (I think) - Soviet chimps by aqk · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Ivory Coast, chimps trade sex for meat!

      ?? uhh.. (redundancy alarm rings) Wait- that didn't make much sense.

      OK- Let's try again:

    In Soviet Ivory Coast, chimps trade meat for YOU!

    Well... better, but still needs improvement...

  86. Hmmm... by Sparx139 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they haggle?

    --
    Our culture doesn't get smarter, it just finds new ways of being retarded.