Slashdot Mirror


Project OXCART Declassified From Area 51

An anonymous reader sends this excerpt from the LA Times: "... the myths of Area 51 are hard to dispute if no one can speak on the record about what actually happened there. Well, now, for the first time, someone is ready to talk ... Colonel Hugh 'Slip' Slater, 87, was commander of the Area 51 base in the 1960s. Edward Lovick, 90, featured in 'What Plane?' in LA's March issue, spent three decades radar testing some of the world's most famous aircraft (including the U-2, the A-12 OXCART and the F-117). Kenneth Collins, 80, a CIA experimental test pilot, was given the silver star. Thornton 'T.D.' Barnes, 72, was an Area 51 special-projects engineer. And Harry Martin, 77, was one of the men in charge of the base's half-million-gallon monthly supply of spy-plane fuels."

58 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. How they could have kept this secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Write a book on gayness in area 51 and sell it on amazon.

    1. Re:How they could have kept this secret by Nasajin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pffffff... The gay bomb was declassified years ago.

    2. Re:How they could have kept this secret by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2

      Oh, gawds! I was hoping that article would be a stub with no references or citations, but alas, it's true!. Sadly, my government was really that stupid!

      ugh.

      I'm leaving now.

    3. Re:How they could have kept this secret by rarity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well I guess that the gay bomb might not have worked out considering that it could potentially booster the morale of the enemy troops and eagerly protect their loved ones.

      Well, it worked in Sparta. And you didn't mess with the Spartans

  3. Re:I WANT TO BELIEVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They've been cleared to not talk about the aliens.

  4. The A-12 is better known as the SR-71 by Inominate · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For those unfamiliar, the A-12 is more commonly known as the SR-71. It's not exactly the same aircraft, the SR-71 being the later development, but anyone looking at an A-12 would immediately recognize it as an SR-71.

    1. Re:The A-12 is better known as the SR-71 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The A-12 was a successor to the U-2 and precursor to the SR-71. The A-12 project ended in '68. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_A-12

    2. Re:The A-12 is better known as the SR-71 by jhesse · · Score: 5, Informative

      A-12: CIA-flown single-seater
      SR-71: Air Force-flown two-seater

      --

      --
      "I have also mastered pomposity, even if I do say so myself." -Kryten
    3. Re:The A-12 is better known as the SR-71 by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      What? Every source out there lists the SR-71 as a single-seater plane, with a few two-seater planes existing for training purposes. The A-12 was the designation for the CIA version, while SR-71 was the official designation of the final plane. Not to mention that I highly doubt that the CIA actually flew those planes. The SR-71 might have been flying recon for the CIA, but I just don't know many test pilots in the CIA.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    4. Re:The A-12 is better known as the SR-71 by Loadmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/barrier/machines.html

      Relevant text:

      The two-seat SR-71 was developed in the early 1960s by the U.S. Air Force as a strategic reconnaissance aircraft.

    5. Re:The A-12 is better known as the SR-71 by jhesse · · Score: 2, Informative

      I refer you to:
              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SR-71#Specifications_.28SR-71A.29
      Where it says:
              Crew:2

      (not going to bother to look up the primary sources)

      --

      --
      "I have also mastered pomposity, even if I do say so myself." -Kryten
    6. Re:The A-12 is better known as the SR-71 by jhesse · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The book "Skunk Works" by Ben Rich discussed a lot of this.
      Basically, they hired AF pilots (on loan or retired). This stuff was all very top-secret and the CIA didn't want it to be widespread knowledge in the Air Force.

      They did this for the U-2 program too, which was a CIA initiated aircraft.

      --

      --
      "I have also mastered pomposity, even if I do say so myself." -Kryten
    7. Re:The A-12 is better known as the SR-71 by cvos · · Score: 4, Interesting
      This video about the secret history of silicon valley explains some of the technology behind electronic warfare, radar imaging, and secret air force planes. The content relevant to this article appears around the 30min mark.

      E.T. believers will find nothing interesting, however military computer geeks will find it orgasmic.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTC_RxWN_xo

      --
      I'm just here for the sigs
    8. Re:The A-12 is better known as the SR-71 by jshackney · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sled Driver is pilot-centric.

    9. Re:The A-12 is better known as the SR-71 by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, I had just shot those and tried to make a photosynth of them. It didn't act as advertised, but at least all the photos ended up online. I didn't have them anywhere else to link to, or else I would have linked directly to the cockpit photo, which shows two distinct cockpit windows.

          How about this...

          USAF Diagrams of the pilot and RSO seats

          Photo of the RSO seat (the rear seat)

          It's not to argue the point though. There were 13 1-seat A-12 and 32 2-seat SR71's built.

          And just to keep things interesting. Here's a M-21 with a D-21 drone

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  5. Re:I WANT TO BELIEVE by Trailwalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    The answer is in Area 42, but you must bring your own towel.

  6. It's all bollocks! by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any aliens sufficiently advanced to be able to travel to Earth from another planet, would be able to hide themselves......

    Nuff said

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
    1. Re:It's all bollocks! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is true - they are adept at disguising their ships as hub caps, lamp shades and dustbin lids. Advanced technology in their ships also causes all photographs to come out blurry.

    2. Re:It's all bollocks! by Machtyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apparently, you don't know much about the ship full of salesman, accountants, military, and public phone cleaners.

    3. Re:It's all bollocks! by craagz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd say, they'd be so advanced, they wouldn't bother landing on Earth.

      On the other hand, if they do land, they'd be busy attacking and not hiding.

  7. Spy Plane Fuel. . . the horrible truth by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    " . . . half-million-gallon monthly supply of spy-plane fuels."

    That's no mean trick. They condensed the stuff from the souls of mutilated cattle. The bovine victims stark terror at being lifted up into a saucer (in reality an airship coated with radium paint and filled with below-zero-ground state Helium) crewed by airmen dressed as alien "Greys" increased the fuel's specific impulse by nearly 30%.

    1. Re:Spy Plane Fuel. . . the horrible truth by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny

      increased the fuel's specific impulse by nearly 30%

      That would make that fuel-development program much more successful than the borane fuel the Air Force was looking at the B-70 program.

      BTW your joke didn't "Whoosh" because it was going supersonic. More like "BOoooooommmm!"

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  8. OXCART by bcmm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always found the name "OXCART" creepy, because of the famous von Neumann quote "I am not sure that the miserable thing can work, nor that it can be gotten to the target except by oxcart", referring to the weight of the atom bomb.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:OXCART by bcmm · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oppenheimer quote, rather. Got confused as it was reprinted in a book about von Neumann.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    2. Re:OXCART by LenE · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are referring to the YF-12A, which did fly and successfully launch an air-to-air guided missle, while flying at mach 3.2 at 74,000 feet, hitting a target drone flying at 500 feet altitude. Amazing, given the state of electronics and guidance technology at the time. Hell, all of the technology for the A-12 / YF-12 / SR-71 is still amazing today.

      Anyway, the YF-12 was acknowledged and publicized so it could be used as a cover for the similar A-12 and follow-on RS-71 planes. It wasn't much of a stretch to think that we had ever-faster interceptors, but a stratospheric, Mach 3+ spy plane? That was science fiction. The RS-71 was re-named the SR-71 after Lyndon Johnson flubbed the name on live television. They changed all drawings and documents for the program, an amazingly expensive waste of tax-payers dollars, just so that no one would have to correct the Commander in Chief.

      -- Len

  9. Re:I know too much by GreenTech11 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Notice how there were no pictures in the article? They have been possesed by aliens and now they are going to spread the alien around the world! I'm off to Alaska, cause aliens are cold blooded

    --
    Laughter is the best medicine, except if you have a broken rib.
  10. I believe it by schmidt349 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you were a government agency in charge of secret weapons testing, what better cover could you possibly come up with than implausibility? It may not have fooled the Soviets, but it sure fooled the American public. Nowadays Area 51 is usually mentioned in the same breath as JFK and Elvis' retirement community.

    It would be interesting to check the Soviet archives and see what they thought was going on in Area 51.

  11. Re:I WANT TO BELIEVE by bcmm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real conspiracy theory is that that is where the USA tests it's illegal weapons. After all, the U-2 was developed there to be used for illegal overflights, and it's existence was only discovered because the Soviets shot one down (and only then after denials coming right from the top). Seen that way, it starts to look reasonably likely that much worse things have been developed there.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  12. Harry Martin Typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think there was a typo in the article, it reads:

    "And Harry Martin, 77, was one of the men in charge of the base's half-million-gallon monthly supply of spy-plane fuels."

    I think it is suppose to read:

    And harry MARTIAN #77 was one of the little green men in charge of the base's half-million-gallon monthly supply of flying saucer fuel."

  13. Oh bloody hell by WindowlessView · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who cares about Area 51? Everyone knows the Stargates are in Cheyenne Mountain and antarctica.

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
    1. Re:Oh bloody hell by WindowlessView · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thank you Sheldon. Now stop hogging the wi-fi.

      --
      Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
  14. Regardless by Dyinobal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Regardless of what comes out it won't really change anything. The Area 51 mythos is to ingrained for conspiracy buffs to give it up. After all if Area 51 was just a secret government facility for planes, then what about everything else that was a cover up/conspiracy.

  15. Re:Good thing they kept it so secret by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 4, Funny

    If the Kremlin had learned what our prototypes looked like at that point, the russian economy probably would have been much stronger, they never would have embarked on those economic reforms that backfired, and they eventually would have won the cold war.

    I'll say. We were fucking working on OX CARTS.

  16. Re:Good thing they kept it so secret by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh yeah, and also it was very important that they keep the events there secret up until now. Some might ask why the hell you would need to keep it secret almost 50 years later, about a decade after the plane itself (not the prototype, the actual plane) was mothballed. But those people who would ask that are unamerican commie bastards.

  17. Re:I WANT TO BELIEVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But, beware of the Aliens in AREA 69; they taste funny.

  18. Re:I WANT TO BELIEVE by Mozk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that the Area 42 over in Base 13?

    --
    No existe.
  19. Re:Good thing they kept it so secret by icebrain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...or (more likely) it was just stamped with a standard 50-year classification, and nobody wanted to be bothered to declassify it earlier. See, they don't know how long in advance things will have to remain classified, so they pick an arbitrary number far enough ahead that it won't release while it could still put our people and operations in jeopardy.

    --
    The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
  20. Re:Good thing they kept it so secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Geez, you just felt like ranting, right?

    Do you seriously question the need to conceal the nation's highest technology from other governments?

    Lying to the public is obvious. You need to lie to the public because the public aren't the only people listening. The intelligence agencies know that anything said to the public in general is also being said to foreign agencies. It doesn't work to print a story in the local paper describing what's going on with a byline to make sure no one tells the Russians.

    Drugging the pilot also serves an end: they gave him sodium pentathol to ensure that he was telling them all he knew, and didn't leave anything out, consciously or otherwise. This has as much of a use to reveal something the person didn't even realize they were concealing (mental block) than it does at trying to catch someone in a conscious lie.

    Forcing civilians to sign a NDA: that should be self-evident. We're dealing with the most secret technology at the time, obviously the government is going to use legal tools to help ensure that it stays secret as long as possible.

    The SR-71 was still in official operation late into the 1990s, the official service record is from 1964 to 1998. This year, about 10 years after it was retired, is about the right time I would expect the government to start talking about that plane. A government will only discuss its technology in public when that technology is no longer the best or would not be a threat if another government had it. I think it's fair to assume at this point that if another air force came at us with an SR-71, that we would be able to shoot it down.

  21. business as usual for conspiracy theorists by garutnivore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So we have guys who were actually working at Area 51 and say there were no ETs or ET technology there.

    Will this debunk any conspiracy theory?

    No.

    The axioms upon which the conspiracy theories are established will be protected. The theorists will interpret reality so as to protect their cherished axioms. The theorists will just say that these men are part of the cover up and that their declaration is in fact proof of ETs at Area 51.

    1. Re:business as usual for conspiracy theorists by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not meant to debunk any crazy theories. Despite the self-importance that conspiracy theorists like to ascribe to themselves, the government really doesn't give a damn what they think.

      The reason this information is being released is because it's classified status has finally expired, and a few of the people who worked on these projects are happy to finally be able to tell others about them. That's it, that's all. Put yourself in their shoes. If you were part of the development team for the SR-71, you'd feel some justifiable pride in being part of the project, and would want to share the information with others. It's human nature, not some complex CIA plot to get rid of conspiracy theorists.

  22. I'm quite sure they knew the gist of it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, it wasn't any secret among the American public (the non consparicy nuts that is) for some time that it is a flight test facility. The Soviets likely had an easy time telling that from satellite shots. So they likely had no trouble figuring out this was a testbed for US planes. By the secrecy surrounding it, they probably had no trouble figuring out it was for secret planes.

    As for the specifics, I imagine not unless they got a spy in there. All the projects that have so far been declassified in terms of secret craft, like the U2, were quite effective at being secret from the public during their development.

    I imagine if one were allowed complete access to the classified American records of the facility you'd discover that yes, it is just an aircraft testing facility that has worked with lots of neat planes.

  23. Conspiracy Theorists' Wet Dream..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why is it that conspiracy theorists love to believe that:

    1. All unidentifiable flying objects are of extraterrestrial origin?

    2. Highly-Secure (as opposed to 'secret') military installations have alien bodies and extraterrestrial spacecraft?

    3. Mysterious animals in the Pacific Northwest are all Sasquatches.

    4. Unexplained technologies are of extraterrestrial origin.

    It's amazing how people sometimes refuse to acknowledge that there is an EXTREMELY SLIM CHANCE that any of these have actually occurred, yet continue to claim that they happen all the time.

    Just because something cannot be explained in now way validates the fantasies of conspiracy theorists.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  24. Because if two people know, it's not a secret by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Basically what it gets down to is the more people who are in on something, the more likely information leaks out. Now as with any large government bureaucracy, when you involve another arm of the government, you get even more people than just those you needed. I mean if you go to the Air Force and secretly hire away some pilots, well then very few people even know that anything has happened, and all they know is that the CIA wants some flyboys. If you have the AF run it, well now you have all kinds of additional people who know about it.

    A big part of keeping secrets is compartmentalizing information, and restricting access to the minimum amount of people.

  25. Nothng new here by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most of this info is in Ben Rich's book, "Skunk Works". The story doesn't have much if any new information. The SR-71 story is well known, and there's one at the Museum of Flight in Seattle. (They have the engineering documents for it, too, which can be seen on request.) Most of the stealth aircraft were tested at Area 51.

    There are other sites "near" Area 51. Jackass Flats was a well known nuclear test area in the 1950s. (You can't really hide atmospheric nuclear testing.) The Sedan crater, from a nuclear test, is in that area. It's interesting to look at the area in Google Maps. There are all sorts of little abandoned installations in the Nellis Bombing Range area.

    Back in the 1980s, the Lockheed Skunk Works ran a small ad in Aviation Week. It said only "If you missed out on this one (picture of U-2) and on this one (picture of SR-71) how'd you like to get in on the next one? Lockheed Skunk Works, Burbank, CA." That's how you got into stealth aircraft.

    There's still a big USAF black budget, and it doubled during the Bush years. The question is whether much useful is coming out.

    1. Re:Nothng new here by MrKaos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's still a big USAF black budget, and it doubled during the Bush years. The question is whether much useful is coming out.

      If the US was operating the SR-71 Blackbird, an aircraft that is using 25% of it's engine power, to *cruise* at mach 3 almost 40 years ago I would have little doubt that it's replacement is at least twice as fast. One thing is for certain I doubt we will know what the actual capabilities are for another couple of decades.

      This replacement aircraft is allegedly the SR-91 Aurora. I recently watched a documentary by a reporter from a Jane's Defence Weekly who showed weather satellite image of a 'doughnut on a rope' contrails starting at Groom Lake, extending across the United States, over the Pacific Ocean and out of camera range of the the satellite. The conjecture is that the aircraft has been in service for many years and powered by Pulse Detonation Engines. Estimates from an examination of the photo suggests the aircraft was moving at roughly Mach 8.

      The development budget was apparently concealed in the budget for the B-2, who knows if it's true but I'd say that the existence of the SR-91(?) Aurora(?) if far more likely than little grey men. Then again who really knows anything in super secret compartmentalised spy world, I'm just a geek who'd one day like to see the technology involved. Here are some more links for those interested.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  26. See, there WERE UFOs at Area 51 by jonwil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone who saw a U2 or SR71 or F117 or other "black" aircraft flying around in the airspace near Area 51 would not have recognized what it was unless they has a security clearance. Ergo, to the general public, all of these "black" aircraft would (at the time they were being tested at Area 51 and before the public knew about it) have been Unidentified Flying Objects.
    Whether there has ever been aliens at Area 51 is another matter altogether.

  27. Re:Anyone else dissapointed? by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Area 51 was the fuel for imagination, the "what if" moments that it gave rise to

    It stopped being fuel for my imagination right about the time I turned 14, and realized that most of the theories were complete garbage.

    If you want to fuel your imagination, buy yourself a telescope and gaze into the heavens. The universe can inspire more awe and wonder than any crazy theory made up about a nondescript patch of desert in the middle of the US.

  28. Hidden revelations from the article.. by homesnatch · · Score: 5, Funny

    The truth comes out, but was hard to find in the article...

    Colonel Hugh 'Slip' Slater, 87, was commander of the Area 51 base in the 1960s. Thornton 'T.D.' Barnes, 72, was an Area 51 special-projects engineer. Xorbz Blazzeet, 179, from the Orion system was dissected and stored in an Area 51 freezer for 16 years. And Harry Martin, 77, was one of the men in charge of the base's half-million-gallon monthly supply of spy-plane fuels.

  29. Re:I WANT TO BELIEVE by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that the Area 42 over in Base 13?

    I think it's in base 10 (decimal), actually.

  30. Re:I just find it amazing by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Satellites in a predictable orbit are much easier to shoot down than the Blackbird (it was done last by an F-15 in 1985). For that reason alone, I am sure the SR-71's that are 'mothballed' are far from retired.

    The real problem with satellites is that the predictable orbit allows the enemy to hide his shit when they're overhead.

    And I think it more likely that the SR-71 is retired, and that there is "something else" available. The fact that all the airframes are accounted for and only the few NASA airframes are airworthy pretty much makes it unlikely they're still being used. If you look at the history of the multiple retirements of the SR-71 at the AIr Force's request, it becomes fairly obvious that there is something else. All the noise about how "we have no replacement" seems to come from congressmen, who despite their hamfisted attempt to insert themselves into the "classified" military budget process, are really a bunch of dumbass rubes who would spill the beans, so it's unsurprising the DoD has done what they could to keep them out of the loop.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  31. Re:I know too much by vishbar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Joke's on you. They made an alien governor up there.

    --
    Ride the skies
  32. Re:Area 51 or area 51A? by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Funny

        I have been cleared to state, there may or may not be an Area 51A. I cannot confirm nor deny the designation, purpose, or location, should such a location exist.

        I hope that clarifies things for you.

        Our next statement on the issue will come in 50 years.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  33. Re:I WANT TO BELIEVE by bakes · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about area 34? That's where the government keeps its huge stash of porn mags...

    No, that's Area 69.

    --
    Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
  34. Re:I WANT TO BELIEVE by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, that's Area 69.

    Actually that's two areas.

  35. Re:I WANT TO BELIEVE by Timmmm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Woosh.

    The joke is that 6*9=42 in base 13.

  36. Re:I WANT TO BELIEVE by bcmm · · Score: 3, Funny

    where are all the "your base" jokes? am i missing something?

    That is an old, obsolete meme; we've moved on and support for the meme was officially withdrawn last week. According to current plans, you still have a couple of years to use "Hot Grits", however, before that one is EOLed.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  37. Re:I just find it amazing by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 2, Informative

    there is "something else" available.

    Yes, there is. A high/low mix of Predator and Global Hawk UAVs provide real-time intelligence with a loiter time. Rather than blowing by a target at Mach 3, UAV surveillance gives the ability to observe a target for a long period of time. I suspect if there's a secret reconnaissance aircraft in the U.S. inventory it's a stealth UAV, something like the DarkStar concept only my guess is it's scaled up to have endurance similar to Global Hawk.

    --
    Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.