Antarctic Ice Is Growing, Not Melting Away, At Davis Station
schwit1 writes "A report from The Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research says that Antarctic ice is growing, not melting away. Ice core drilling in the fast ice off Australia's Davis Station in East Antarctica by the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Co-Operative Research Centre shows that last year, the ice had a maximum thickness of 1.89m, its densest in 10 years. The average thickness of the ice at Davis since the 1950s is 1.67m. A paper to be published soon by the British Antarctic Survey in the journal Geophysical Research Letters is expected to confirm that over the past 30 years, the area of sea ice around the continent has expanded."
All thanks to President Obama.
inconvenient truth?
Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
Time for a mature, enlightened debate on climate change, by people with thorough knowledge of the field who don't parrot long-discredited bullshit at all! I do so enjoy these discussions. They're almost as intelligent as Slashdot discussions on economics.
Wait you actually worked in a research lab. I'm pretty sure here on /. that makes you biased. Since if you worked in a climate research lab you are pro-climate change. All them researchers are pro climate change so clearly your opinion is worthless.
This must be a first.
Ice core drilling is MURDER. These so called "scientists" are performing genocide against this ice in the name of "research". If these EVIL ACTS are really in the name of science, why then are our supermarket and service station cold boxes simply overflowing with DICED ICE-MEAT?
Think about it - "cubed" ice is a multi-million dollar industry. Don't be fooled by the lies, FIGHT THE ECO-TERRORISTS!!!
In science it often happens that scientists say, 'You know that's a really
good argument; my position is mistaken,' and then they actually change
their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really
do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are
human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot
recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion.
-- Carl Sagan, 1987 CSICOP keynote address
Global Warming is 50% politics, 50% religion and 10% science.
And yes, they certainly are giving it 110%.
We know for sure that:
a) If there are N economists, there are N! explanations of what is happening, of which < 1 are probably correct.
b) The more qualified an economist, the less likely his predictions are to be right.
I would say climatology is in the same boat.
Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII