Slashdot Mirror


Antarctic Ice Is Growing, Not Melting Away, At Davis Station

schwit1 writes "A report from The Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research says that Antarctic ice is growing, not melting away. Ice core drilling in the fast ice off Australia's Davis Station in East Antarctica by the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Co-Operative Research Centre shows that last year, the ice had a maximum thickness of 1.89m, its densest in 10 years. The average thickness of the ice at Davis since the 1950s is 1.67m. A paper to be published soon by the British Antarctic Survey in the journal Geophysical Research Letters is expected to confirm that over the past 30 years, the area of sea ice around the continent has expanded."

17 of 633 comments (clear)

  1. Welp, by James+Skarzinskas · · Score: 5, Funny

    All thanks to President Obama.

    1. Re:Welp, by powerslave12r · · Score: 5, Funny

      He solved the issue of Global Warming? Already?

      --
      Real men read Slashdot articles at -1, bottom up.
    2. Re:Welp, by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 5, Funny

      No. Al Gore did. Pres. Obama just gets the credit just like other people received the credit for "the internet." ;)

    3. Re:Welp, by Kjella · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, damn him here he was promising change and first thing he does is to halt everything and preserve the status quo. Politicans, you just can't trust them.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Welp, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, you should thank the Somali pirates. Now, I think we can all agree that, based on overwhelming evidence, piracy prevents global warming. There's UNDENIABLE PROOF for that. I mean, if you can't tell that correlation equals causation, well, you're just in denial, or being paid off. With the recent surges in piracy, how can that ice not grow? It is simple logic, stupid! Now, I know that the mainstream media will probably call them thieves and killers (because they are obviously in the pocket of Al Gore and Big Carbon Credit), but I'm going to call them what they really are: Heroes, righteous environmental crusaders, examples for all of us to follow. Somali pirates, I salute you!

    5. Re:Welp, by XavierItzmann · · Score: 3, Funny
      Well, in his nomination acceptance speech on June 3, 2008, Obama did say that his presidency would be remembered as:

      "the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal."

      Moses had nothing on this guy. He only parted one measly sea, let alone oceans.

      --
      The next pasture is always greener
    6. Re:Welp, by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Al Gore also invented general purpose computing. Why else do you think they call it an Algore-ism?

      --
      I hate printers.
    7. Re:Welp, by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      What the big stink anyway...the earth has only had ice at its poles for about 30% of its existence. It comes and goes with or without humans and has for millennium. Some are being a tad arrogant to think the human can affect such a chaotic large system.

      Why is he modded a troll?

      Arrogant human with mod points

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    8. Re:Welp, by Toonol · · Score: 3, Funny

      Slavery is a lot more appealing to people who envision themselves as masters.

    9. Re:Welp, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lets see, broad generalizations with no proof that attacks the "big bad United States" = positive mod-points. CHECK.

      Any response to his statement that asks him for proof, citations, of facts to back up his statement = negative mod-points. CHECK

      My pointing out this inconvenient truth = mod-troll. CHECK


      Welcome to the era of Obama where the facts don't matter, just your intentions. Fuck, even Carter wasn't this bad.

  2. how bout them apples by superwiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    inconvenient truth?

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  3. Oh boy! by Virak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Time for a mature, enlightened debate on climate change, by people with thorough knowledge of the field who don't parrot long-discredited bullshit at all! I do so enjoy these discussions. They're almost as intelligent as Slashdot discussions on economics.

  4. Re:People don't seem to understand by Idiomatick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait you actually worked in a research lab. I'm pretty sure here on /. that makes you biased. Since if you worked in a climate research lab you are pro-climate change. All them researchers are pro climate change so clearly your opinion is worthless.

  5. Headline more accurate than article?! by Greg+Lindahl · · Score: 4, Funny

    This must be a first.

  6. CORPORATE INTEREST NOT SCIENTIFIC ADVANCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ice core drilling is MURDER. These so called "scientists" are performing genocide against this ice in the name of "research". If these EVIL ACTS are really in the name of science, why then are our supermarket and service station cold boxes simply overflowing with DICED ICE-MEAT?

    Think about it - "cubed" ice is a multi-million dollar industry. Don't be fooled by the lies, FIGHT THE ECO-TERRORISTS!!!

  7. Re:Separation of Science and States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In science it often happens that scientists say, 'You know that's a really
    good argument; my position is mistaken,' and then they actually change
    their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really
    do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are
    human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot
    recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion.

    -- Carl Sagan, 1987 CSICOP keynote address

    Global Warming is 50% politics, 50% religion and 10% science.

    And yes, they certainly are giving it 110%.

  8. Re:Temperature by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 3, Funny
    Bloodletting and prayer are much more advanced than economics.

    We know for sure that:

    a) If there are N economists, there are N! explanations of what is happening, of which < 1 are probably correct.

    b) The more qualified an economist, the less likely his predictions are to be right.

    I would say climatology is in the same boat.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII