Slashdot Mirror


Bringing Up Bill

theodp writes "Over at the WSJ, Bill Gates Sr. describes what it took to turn an unruly 12-year-old into Microsoft's founder and the world's richest man. This included throwing a glass of cold water in the boy's face when he was having a particularly heated argument with his mother at the dinner table. 'He was nasty,' says Libby Armintrout, Bill's younger sister. 'I'm at war with my parents over who is in control,' Bill Gates recalls telling a therapist, who told his parents that their son would ultimately win the battle for independence, and their best course of action was to ease up on him. The rest, as they say, is history. The accompanying Gates Family Album is also worth a look."

169 comments

  1. "at war with my parents over who is in control" by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Insightful

    His life achievements notwithstanding, obviously Bill never outgrew this mentality, from his "open letter to hobbyists" on the antics of Microsoft, especially from the 90s onward...

    1. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by derGoldstein · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is kind of tabloid territory here, but I am reminded of numerous accounts of "Bill Rage" in MS meetings. If you wanted to pitch an idea, you'd better be able to take on serious verbal abuse, sometimes simply because he didn't like the "name of one of the features" or because he didn't like some other minute aspect.

      There have been so many reports of this over the years that you could really see a pattern forming around his behavior, and people around him had to "adapt" to his eccentricities.

      For the most part, however, these outbursts didn't occur outside of closed doors. You don't see any videos on youtube with gates losing it in front of a camera.
      (not even in the pie incident, really)

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    2. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you wanted to pitch an idea, you'd better be able to take on serious verbal abuse, sometimes simply because he didn't like the "name of one of the features" or because he didn't like some other minute aspect.

      Yeah, and their stuff sucked a lot less back then, too. You wouldn't have seen Vista on Bill's watch; it took a Ballmer for that to happen.

      When a company no longer has someone at the top who is willing to call bullshit for what it is, that company is headed downhill.

    3. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't believe now we're resorting to personal attacks on /.

      Even if it's Bill... it's...

    4. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by derGoldstein · · Score: 5, Insightful

      WinME happened on his watch. So did MS Bob, Clippy, and every internet search initiative you can think of.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    5. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      True enough. But the failures were either quickly yanked from the marketplace (WinME, Bob) or not strategic in nature (Clippy).

    6. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by ameyer17 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Even if it's Bill... it's...

      Still not "news for nerds" or "stuff that matters"?
      How is this relevant?
      Especially since Bill Gates is semi-retired.

    7. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by derGoldstein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Was missing out on the Internet strategic?
      (and I cringe as I write this... Imagine an internet/web based on MS software...)

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    8. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Nope. Was a mistake (and a big one). But MS is far from the only "personality-driven" company to have suffered such.

    9. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by jamesh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Like him or not, Bill Gates is pretty high up in the list of people who had a large effect on the whole computing industry.As a nerd, and a parent, I'm interested in what makes him tick, so I don't make the same mistakes with my kids :)

      His parents must do all right at christmas/birthdays/mothers day/fathers day/etc though... maybe there's something in that.

      I wonder if, deep down, Microsoft Windows was just a way to rebel against his parents? eg "Fine then! I'm going to go and start a computing empire and make my products suckier and suckier and by the time people notice it will be too late for them to use anything else. And it be all your fault! :p :p :p"

    10. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Frnknstn · · Score: 1

      IIRC, MS Bob was designed by Bill's wife, so I think we can cut him some slack on that one. She's the one person Bill wouldn't challenge ;)

      --
      If it's in you sig, it's in your post.
    11. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Informative

      MS Bob was managed by his girlfriend who he later married.

      And actually the Search Doggy from Windows XP came from Bob

      http://toastytech.com/guis/bob.html

      Search Doggy was a very good dog, he always found my files when I lost them.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    12. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially since Bill Gates is semi-retired.

      I know a lot of us here don't like him, but isn't calling him semi-retarded going a bit far?

    13. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by stonewallred · · Score: 3, Funny

      At risk of being modded down, I liked WindowsME. Once I got an update disc from Gateway it never BSoD on me again and worked flawlessly for five years. Only when my Gateway died, did I switch, and then to Windows 2000. I just went to XP a couple of years ago. Call me technologically conservative or non-geek, but I would rather run a tried, proven and fixed system and benefit from being a real late adopter, than be cutting edge. Cheaper and more reliable my way.

    14. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by neuromanc3r · · Score: 1

      I can't believe now we're resorting to personal attacks on /.

      You must be new here...

    15. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And better yet, you never go full-retired.

    16. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      You realize he headed the Vista project?

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    17. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Search Doggy was a very good dog, he always found my files when I lost them."

      And very tasty, too.

    18. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can't believe now we're resorting to personal attacks on /."

      God, another AC moron.

    19. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Johnny+Loves+Linux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like him or not, Bill Gates is pretty high up in the list of people who had a large effect on the whole computing industry.

      I have to agree. The issue I have is how much warping and damage did he cause the computing industry by his desire to win and maintain his monopoly at all costs. I've heard the arguments before that if Mr. Gates hadn't been around that Steve Jobs would have been running the show. That is not an unreasonable argument. My belief is that had CP/M been chosen for the first IBM PC, we would have had a more inclusive community, and more competition based on merits of the software and not on back room deals with crap like per-cpu-licenses or not-allowing-other-OS-to-being-pre-installed, or locking-browsers-with-the-OS. I think that it was a serious mistake of the U.S. legal system not to have broken the Microsoft monopoly into at least 2 companies:

      1. The OS manufacturer
      2. The software vendor

      I believe that history has demonstrated that whenever the Microsoft OS has been threatened, they have resorted to using leverage from their other software to pressure people to stick with their OS (Ex. Microsoft Exchange, Office, etc). Similarly, whenever their software has been threatened they have resorted to using their OS to put pressure on people to stick with their software (Ex. the "hidden apis" that only Microsoft developers knew about in their OS that other vendors such as Wordperfect were not allowed to have or at least not until it was too late.) By breaking the company into 2 parts it would have forced each half to compete solely on the merits of their software and certainly led to more aggressive competition and less FUD crap ("Get the Facts" campaign). I can't help but wonder if campaign contributions had something to do with Microsoft not being split up.

    20. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by tsing9150 · · Score: 1

      MS Bob is a pure hormonal thing

    21. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by johneee · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Look at what happened with Apple when Steve wasn't there. (who apparently is even more of a tyrant than Bill)

      As someone who worked at Rogers told me once, "never underestimate the power of a megalomaniac billionaire for getting things done".

      --
      - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
    22. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      It took a Ballmer for what to happen? For a perfectly good OS, an improvement over XP in many ways, to be killed just by internet gossips who haven't even used the damn thing?

      It wasn't Microsoft's fault, it was shitty luck.

    23. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by hamburgler007 · · Score: 0

      Leave Clippy out of this.

    24. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs is known for exactly the same kinds of tantrums. Ballmer too. Maybe that's just the kind of person you have to be to dominate an industry?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    25. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by flydpnkrtn · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree with your sentiment on running a "tried, proven and fixed system" but Windows ME was anything but... it was still based on the broken hybrid DOS/Windows model (VXDs, cooperative multitasking... yay!), whereas Windows 2000 was essentially Windows NT 5.

      If you really wanted to stick with a "proven" platform you could have stuck with NT 4 SP 6a :)

    26. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by db32 · · Score: 1

      Bob/Clippy sadly must be forgiven. Melinda Gates was responsible for those atrocities. Do you think he would kill the pet project of the one he shares a bed with?

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    27. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like him or not, Bill Gates is pretty high up in the list of people who had a large effect on the whole computing industry.

      That's like saying imperial Britain had a large effect on the United States. It sucked so much that it incited a war for freedom and independence. I like that analogy if freedom means linux. 2009: viva la revolucion!

    28. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      Like him or not, Bill Gates is pretty high up in the list of people who had a large effect on the whole computing industry.

      that's a gross understatement. 80% market share says he had the largest effect on the computing industry.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    29. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by LordLimecat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats because the update disk contained windows 2000. Suprise!

    30. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by lordtoran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The computing industry is more than just end user desktops, you know.

      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    31. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between Bill and Steve at the company's helm are immediately visible in the official corporate mission statements of Microsoft under each.

      Under Bill, it was: "A computer on every desk and in every home, running Microsoft software."

      Under Steve, it is: "To enable people and businesses throughout the world to realize their full potential."

      You figure out what difference does it make.

      Oh, and by the way, ask yourself a question: if you had money to invest, would you rather give it to company with the former mission statement, or the latter one?

    32. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry?

      VisualBasic, Windows 95, 98, ME, ActiveDirectory, Bob, Clippy, win32 API, functionally useless APIs, forced backwards compatibility, intrusive and dangerous default system services, Internet Explorer, MSHTML, and on and on goes the list of half-baked, broken, and abusive technologies which we've had to work around for the past two decades. Policy at MS has always been "we're doing what we want, and don't care about you" with regard to their products; they're brazen, like an undisciplined IT worker is in making system changes.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    33. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by windsurfer619 · · Score: 1

      Mod +1 funny for obvious reasons.

    34. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Informative

      cooperative multitasking

      Huh? Windows used pre-emptive multitasking since Win95. Of course, you could still disable interrupts if you wanted to...

    35. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by flydpnkrtn · · Score: 1

      I still consider Win 95's model of "oh god bad stuff happened throw up a blue screen and tell the user to restart" cooperative, when compared to NT 4's preemptive style. At least in NT 4 when an app crashed and burned task manager could usually kill it...

    36. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I will give you Win ME, but I thought Microsoft bob was his future wife's idea. I'm not saying it's a good idea, but generally if your trying to impress a girl you will let her run with things.

    37. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue screen and cooperative multitasking don't have anything to do with each other.

      The blue screen is a crash. It can be an OS bug, a hardware defect or simply "nothing left to try" (e.g. missing a driver for the system drive).

      Cooperative multitasking is when the OS leaves it to the application to decide when the next process gets to run.

      It's actually EASIER to make a stable cooperative multitasking OS, than a stable preemptive one, because a cooperative OS doesn't need to worry about switching in the middle of a system call. You know programmers sometimes talk about "locks"? It's something that you have to get right, or the OS *will* crash - and seem do so randomly. In a cooperative OS, you don't need them. That's an entire class of crashes you don't have in a cooperative OS.

    38. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by mjh · · Score: 1

      forced backwards compatibility

      I certainly agree with most of the badness of the things that you cite except for the above. I think you have the direction wrong when you think of which way the force was for backward compatibility. It was not from MS to customers. It was the other way around.

      MS had no choice but to support backward compatibility. Their desire to survive forced them into this position. Had they chosen to abandon it, their customers would have left them. It was customer demand for compatibility that kept it around.

      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    39. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by bandmassa · · Score: 1

      Yes, Apple already "had" the web with hypercard, but were only seeing it as apps running on boxes, not a network distributed document model.

      --
      "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1
    40. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a Windows user. I thought BSOD was vaguely equivalent to a kernel panic... without protected memory, some part of the system realized it was in deep trouble, and the rest of your apps' memory could already have been spewed over, making recovery unlikely.

    41. Re:"at war with my parents over who is in control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at what Apple when Steve was there. Lost completely in the reality distortion so that he had to be sacked.
      On whose watch did OS 9 happen?
      Yes, and of course it had nothing to do with monitor-thrower!

  2. Eeeep! by Mnemennth · · Score: 1
    And I though the edition of Teen Beat with him on the cover that I stumbled across on the net was creepifying...

    mnem

    "There out to be a law against you coming around... you should be made to wear earphones..."

    1. Re:Eeeep! by alienunknown · · Score: 5, Funny
      You mean this one?

      Isn't he dreamy?

    2. Re:Eeeep! by Mnemennth · · Score: 1
      Oh, now you're just tormenting me...

      *Runs away to scrub his cachefile with bleach*

      mnem

      Fortunately, I keep my scales numbered for just such an emergency...

    3. Re:Eeeep! by alienunknown · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry. To show how sincere I am with my apology, here is a totally non-related picture.

    4. Re:Eeeep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone else have GlaDOS' voice reading it in their mind?

      I'm not sure if I'd want to know why GlaDOS had a picture like that readily available.

  3. Arm in trout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? Arm In Trout? That's gross.

  4. How is this news? by mikesd81 · · Score: 0

    How is this worthy of front page news? It should be tucked in Idle. It's nothing about anything break through or even cool. It's just....well...I'm not sure what it is.

    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    1. Re:How is this news? by derGoldstein · · Score: 1

      It's just....well...I'm not sure what it is.

      It's Sunday

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    2. Re:How is this news? by rednip · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really? How is this not 'news for nerds'? Love him or hate him, he's been one of the most important 'nerds' in the world for the last couple of decades. While I've have only gone over the summary; I believe that it's fairly clear that it's an frank account of his childhood. Also, most of the time when people think of 'nerds' the seem to believe that we're mild, or focused; when in reality we struggle with our 'gifts', perhaps more than most.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    3. Re:How is this news? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because it's a chance to look at Bill Gates (our 'enemy') from a side we've never seen him. A lot of us can probably even relate to him. If you read the article, you'll find out at least five things you didn't know about him, and if you are perceptive you will gain a new view of the man. It's an interesting article (though apparently not to you), that's why it's on slashdot.

      --
      Qxe4
    4. Re:How is this news? by palegray.net · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Believe it or not, there's an awful lot of nerds that honestly have no idea how Gates got his start. I'm old, but many people around here aren't.

    5. Re:How is this news? by derGoldstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with your take on why this is interesting, but I especially think the "our enemy" remark hits the nail on the head. If this was about Larry Ellison, it probably wouldn't have made it in. If the article were about Steve Jobs, it would have made it in for completely different reasons.

      Yes, he's very influential, but it's his *controversial* nature that makes this especially interesting.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    6. Re:How is this news? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have much less respect for Larry Ellison than I do for Bill Gates. Gates might have been difficult to handle behind closed doors, but Ellison is just outright arrogant all over, from ignoring San Jose Airport's landing restrictions (and eventually getting a waiver for them) to withdrawing a $115 million pledge to Harvard University just because they changed presidents. I have also heard from people who have worked at Oracle that Ellison is at least as difficult to work with as Steve Ballmer, and that Oracle's management cares much less about the technology than about the money even when compared to Microsoft.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    7. Re:How is this news? by derGoldstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I'd replace the word "respect" with "acknowledgment". The MS/WinTel strategies (if you can call them that) were effectively an implementation of organized crime behavior. It's been a while since it's been in the news, so people forget just how severe, and numerous, the allegations were.

      Here's a brief reminder.

      I wouldn't place the word "respect" in the same paragraph as him. This scale of abuse of power doesn't occur by accident.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    8. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Steve Jobs ain't no polyanna to work for either :P If anything, his fits, rage, pressure, and 'reality warping field' are legendary and well known traits. He alienated people. He rejected people sitting for job interviews because he considered them too square to work at Apple. He was fired from his own company for his behavior, for his mismanagement. He screwed over entire project-teams, even playing them off against each other inside the company. Just go watch "Pirates of Silicon Valley". Gates's claim to fame is his extreme competitive edge. That's not so bad. He was a card shark in college, a truly great negotiator, etc.

    9. Re:How is this news? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's pretty clear that organizations, even big ones, tend to reflect the personalities of their leaders - especially when those leaders have strong personalities. This is very visible with Microsoft, Apple and Google. They're very different companies and I think that's largely down to the way Jobs, Gates and L&S are as people.

      Microsoft and Apple are both pretty darn important, and I think Jobs and Gates have pretty darn similar personalities. They both seem to be hyper-aggressive, very controlling A-types who don't think twice about intimidating their "minions". I think that also sums up Microsoft and Apple as companies. So studying Gates can tell us more about the Microsoft of the 90s, which is an interesting topic for anyone in the tech industry.

    10. Re:How is this news? by El+Lobo · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's always Sunday for kdawson, friend.

      --
      It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
    11. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He made the OS that is there for the 90% of us who live in the Real World.

    12. Re:How is this news? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      But that article won't clue them in much other that mentioning that he dropped out of Harvard to co-found Microsoft.

      No mention there of things like Microsoft's first product MITS Altair BASIC (sold on punchtape for the iconic MITS Altair 8800), or how later Seattle Computer's QDOS was sneakily bought by Microsoft to be renamed as MS-DOS when IBM came knocking for an OS for it's new "IBM PC"...

    13. Re:How is this news? by CRCulver · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just go watch "Pirates of Silicon Valley".

      As entertaining as that made for TV movie was for people who already knew some of the history, I think it would be better to recommend the movie's source material, Paul Freiberger's Fire in the Valley . The movie strips the whole colourful story of 1970s Silicon Valley down to Gates and Jobs, leaving out the many other important personalities involved.

    14. Re:How is this news? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Right and jealousy doesn't enter into it all.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    15. Re:How is this news? by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I live in the Real World, and I moved on from Windows years ago. My employer doesn't even *have* a Windows machine (office runs on Macs and Linux boxes).

      I gave up on Microsoft after Win2K, and haven't looked back. Doing just fine, thanks.

    16. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from ignoring San Jose Airport's landing restrictions (and eventually getting a waiver for them)

      So why he is not in jail again? /sarcasm

    17. Re:How is this news? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1
      "Also, most of the time when people think of 'nerds' the seem to believe that we're mild, or focused; when in reality we struggle with our 'gifts', perhaps more than most."

      Amen to that! While I may despise his business tactics and products, I have to admit that he's certainly not stupid. Rather, I think he's hyper-competitive in a brilliant way. It has been said that he views the entire thing like a huge game, an MMORG... and he *hates* to lose, or (perhaps more importantly) feel like he's losing.

      --
      C|N>K
    18. Re:How is this news? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Well, the article does mention Jim Braman, but it doesn't mention John Opel, IBM's President, and friend to his mom, Mary Maxwell Gates. After all, the contract between Microsoft and IBM is what effectively transferred the monopoly between those two companies, so any relationship prior to that deal should be highly relevant to how Bill Gates got his start.

      The article also fails to mention that Bill's great-grandfather J. W. Maxwell was the original Founder (then-deceased), that his grandfather James Willard Maxwell was the President, and that his mom was sitting on the Board of Directors, of a prominent National Bank. For someone who gets started in business, one would think that having your family *being* the bank since its inception -- would somehow be useful -- or at least somewhat relevant -- I think (never mind the personal connection between John Opel and his mom).

    19. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this worthy of posting as a comment? It should be tucked in the recesses of your online journal. It's nothing about anything worthwhile or even cool. It's just....well...I'm not sure what it is.

    20. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you are not one of the 90% then?

    21. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your choice. My clients all run windows.

    22. Re:How is this news? by kullnd · · Score: 1

      Bottom line is that probably 80% of us don't have a choice in the matter. He did create the OS that drives business today, as stated in other articles one of the many reasons for that is business's do move slowly, they don't like to upgrade their business applications when they just work. The backwords compatibility that MS has maintained (until Vista, which they appear to be bringing back in Windows 7) has been a huge feather in their hat. Others in this post have knocked them for locking us into their systems with things like office and exchange, well, it worked for them didn't it... Pretty smart move from the business side of things.

      I would love to move away from M$, but I don't see it happening anytime soon. Open source is great, but face it, the applications available on open source for most business's are sub par at best.

      --
      +++ATH0 NO CARRIER
    23. Re:How is this news? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      An article on the turbulent teen years of a guy that's retired sort of fails the "news" part.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    24. Re:How is this news? by ctmurray · · Score: 1

      I liked the story as my wife and I have attempted to raise two brilliant daughters. It is challenging as they push the bounds of what the education system will normally allow. How to keep them from being bored. They can out think us and so your arguments have to be well considered when discussing limitations you try to put on some activity.

    25. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the article, you'll find out at least five things you didn't know about him

      What a foolish notion! Why, if everyone on Slashdot went around reading the articles their servers would be overrun with visitors!

      We'd have to create a whole new word to describe the effect, we could say: 'the server is "Slashdot-ed",' for example.

    26. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Difference is, Larry Ellison worked his way up from modest beginnings as the adopted son of Jewish immigrants, in a 2-bedroom apartment on the Chicago South Shore. He's earned his "arrogance". He wasn't born to millionaires with a gold spoon in his mouth.

      I'd accept a dictatorship under Ellison before I'd tolerate a democracy under Gates.

    27. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our "enemy?"

      Groupthink in its purest form. Seeing the world in such black and white concepts is indicative of a weak mind.

    28. Re:How is this news? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Good, I'm glad you caught that. How would you call the poor man who is portrayed as a borg in his picture on slashdot?

      --
      Qxe4
    29. Re:How is this news? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't place the word "respect" in the same paragraph as him. This scale of abuse of power doesn't occur by accident.

      You can still respect the skill of an evil mastermind who pulls something like this off. I definitely think his reputation for being evil in his business dealings is deserved, but I respect the skill and ruthlessness with which he did it. Or maybe "acknowledge" is indeed a better word.

    30. Re:How is this news? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Arrogance is never earned. It may be what drove him to reach the top, but it still tends to irritate a lot of other people. Before he got his waiver, his reason for violating the San Jose Airport's landing restrictions was essentially "I'm Larry Ellison." He essentially stated that he was above the law.

      Gates can be tamed, as shown by Melinda. I've read a couple of articles that suggest that she has helped a great deal to bring out his human side. I don't think Ellison can be brought down off his high horse without a lance through the eye.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  5. Bill Gates is an Inspiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    He has made more money and pissed off more self-righteous nerds than I could ever hope to. Bill Gates is my hero.

  6. My take on it by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He grew up in a family with a moderately oppressive mother and a caring yet distant father, who valued intelligence. He talked like a lawyer (he was one), and while he cared about his son, if you wanted his respect you needed to be able to verbalize a coherent and logical argument. These combined to be a powerful motivation for Mr Bill to try to learn everything about the world, since that's what it took to get respect.

    He was a smart guy. He scored a near perfect on his SAT, and went into Harvard.

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:My take on it by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      Those last two sentences... one can often have nothing to do with the other.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:My take on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not, but in Gates call, they are both true.

    3. Re:My take on it by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Intelligence is nothing more than the skill of comprehending quickly.

      --
      Qxe4
    4. Re:My take on it by palegray.net · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I disagree. While quick comprehension is important in life, the ability to synthesize new data from seemingly disparate sources (regardless of the time taken, many brilliant people "think slowly") has had a far greater impact on history.

    5. Re:My take on it by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Really? What brilliant people think slowly? If they are slow in coming to a conclusion, it's because they are considering a lot of things. Also, comprehension helps drastically with being able to synthesize new data from seemingly disparate sources.

      Either way, these are just skills that can be developed. Intelligence is nothing mysterious.

      --
      Qxe4
    6. Re:My take on it by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Reaction time is a pretty effective way to figure out how fast people can generally respond to or avoid some external stimulus, and no surprise that we all do this at roughly the same speed. Is this the speed of thought? Even the Michael Schumachers and fighter pilots of the world have pretty much identical reaction times to you or I. They are entirely average in that sense. None of us are super human, we are all just human. (I guess this is your point though?)

      A particular skill set can be developed for sure, no matter who you are. Some of us manage this because we have a keen interest in the subject matter, while others have a natural flare for it, interested or otherwise. There are also those that will never understand some particular thing or other, no matter how much effort is expended on it. I don't know why this is, we are all roughly equal in the brain department.

      How do you define intelligence anyway? For me at least, the brain is truly a mysterious and fascinating bit of kit. (And this whole mysterious also encompasses 'intelligence')

    7. Re:My take on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh, FFS. I have Aspergers and am disorganised beyond belief to the point where I have to automate payments to take care I don't end up in arrears. I had a crap father (have, but to me he's dead), but I rank in Mensa tests in the top 1% of the country. So IQ doesn't impress me much - it's EQ you need and starting with some money in your pocket isn't a bad idea either, something that wasn't exactly a problem for young Gates, but will be a HUGE problem for all the kids whose dads will be thrown out as a result of the crisis. How are they going to eat, let alone go to school?

      Anyway, I'm getting sick of the continued canonisation of those who have been consistently breaking the law and f*cked society for their own benefit as "enlightened" and "examples". I've seen people being listed as examples of good corporate coaching as well, where in reality they were simply screwing their customers left, right and centre (in some cases literally - whatever it took to get money). Knowing these peopel is a bit of an eye opener to the realities of what's behind an interview. I've seen someone interviewed in the FT who stated "modestly" that his Rolls was a economic investment because it served him so well over the years. He (and the journalist) just "forgot" to mention he's got more than one.

      Bleagh. If this is the sort of example you want to give to the world, no wonder it's in such a f*cking mess. Next up: how Bush's upbringing made him become president?

    8. Re:My take on it by palegray.net · · Score: 1
      You seem confused. First you ask for a list of brilliant people who think slowly. Einstein comes to mind, although he's an overused example. You then make the very valid point that this can be due to taking a large number of factors into consideration. This is followed up with an obvious statement regarding comprehension (it's difficult to use something in any context that you don't fully comprehend). Things get more difficult here:

      Either way, these are just skills that can be developed. Intelligence is nothing mysterious.

      This is largely false. People have a "hard limit" to the level of insight they are able to attain, particularly with respect to connections between multiple disciplines. This may be overcome to some extent through conditioning, but some people are simply capable of deeper thought than others.

      My original point is that all too often, entirely too much emphasis is placed on quick thinking. The ability to deeply analyze information is much more valuable in the long term when it comes to the advancement of human knowledge.

    9. Re:My take on it by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      i agree. i have only ever achieved average scores in sit down tests with time limits at uni. but on assignments i've rarely gotten less than 90%, i attribute this to the difference time i have to think about a problem (also to the retarded incomplete questions on many tests and the lack of anyone to quiz about it, but i digress). even the most difficult programming subject which was known to have an 80% fail rate on the firt try i scored 100% on assignment 1 and 120% on assignment 2 (bonus questions).

      i managed this working a full time job and doing the course externally, i did't even know any of the other students outside of the mailing list. i've seen this numerous times in the IT industry as well, the most talented guys often take that extra 20% time to get there but they deliever excellent results which often save rework.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    10. Re:My take on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh, FFS. I have Aspergers and am disorganised beyond belief to the point where I have to automate payments to take care I don't end up in arrears."

      Most people would end up in arrears without automated payments. If yu class that as "disorganised beyond belief", then I suspect your Aspergers is self-diagnosed, and you're actually entirely normal but want to feel special.

    11. Re:My take on it by Foofoobar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He was a smart guy. He scored a near perfect on his SAT, and went into Harvard.

      ... and while at Harvard, he realized that EVERYONE there was smart and scored a near perfect score on their SAT's. Making him average. So he dropped out. Giving further insight into his psyche; if he has ACTUAL competition, he will quit the game.

      This further lends itself to Microsoft' philosphy as a whole. They bought up or destroyed all competition with their monopoly wherever they could so there was no competition. Now that open source and Apple and Google are in town and ganging up on them, they are not having such a good time of it.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    12. Re:My take on it by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      This is largely false. People have a "hard limit" to the level of insight they are able to attain, particularly with respect to connections between multiple disciplines. This may be overcome to some extent through conditioning, but some people are simply capable of deeper thought than others.

      No, it is actually true. Do the research, I have. When it comes to the brain, there is no such thing as 'natural' talent that makes it possible for one person to achieve things other people can't. You are probably basing your statement on your perception of the world around you, and what others around you tend to believe, which means it is based on anecdotal evidence and hearsay.

      I can go farther than that. If you want to expand your brain power, or accomplish something with your brain, I can tell you how to achieve it.

      --
      Qxe4
    13. Re:My take on it by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1
      i think you may be wrong with this one here:

      When it comes to the brain, there is no such thing as 'natural' talent that makes it possible for one person to achieve things other people can't...If you want to expand your brain power, or accomplish something with your brain, I can tell you how to achieve it.

      you can't ever be einstein (most probably) and you can't tell me anything to make me acheive what einstein did.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    14. Re:My take on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given his success, it's far more likely that he was smart enough to see the timing in the industry was critical for what he set out to do.

    15. Re:My take on it by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is you want to discover relativity? You can't do what Einstein did because he already did it; just as you can never do what Lewis and Clark did. So yes, you are right: you can't ever achieve what Einstein did. No one can, no matter how intelligent they are, but that is besides the point.

      What is it that you actually want to do? You haven't even asked for anything real.

      --
      Qxe4
    16. Re:My take on it by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Alot of people saw the timing. He saw the timing was right to steal DOS and sell it to IBM, steal the idea for Windows from Apple and market it as his own, steal the idea for the spreadsheet and market it as his own etc etc.

      Not that smart... just a thief who can see others brilliance and mimic it.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    17. Re:My take on it by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... and while at Harvard, he realized that EVERYONE there was smart and scored a near perfect score on their SAT's. Making him average. So he dropped out.

      Given that not everyone from Harvard ends up earning a dew dozen billion dollars eventually, I'd say that he did prove his point by dropping out, no?

    18. Re:My take on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And DROPPED OUT, and DUMPSTER DOVE FOR SOFTWARE, and BOUGHT A SYSTEM FROM ABC COMPUTER OF SEATTLE called QDOS, short for Quick and Dirty Operating System. He then gave it to IBM who FIXED IT FOR HIM, pulling 5000 bugs out of 8000 lines of assembly language ...nearly every line had a bug. Because of competition laws IBM needed him to have it, so they GAVE IT BACK TO HIM! He then made billions from it, and by stealing other peoples ideas. The list is really long. If you start saying "WHO?..." I will start rambling, like Stac Electronics, and Borland, and Apple, and HP, and IBM, and .... I said it was long! He is less than half a step from criminal behaviour every time!

    19. Re:My take on it by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Given that not everyone from Harvard ends up earning a dew dozen billion dollars eventually, I'd say that he did prove his point by dropping out, no?

      Making money is not proof of intelligence. Berny Maddof made billions. Is he as smart as Bill Gates? Or are they both thieves?

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    20. Re:My take on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Intelligence is nothing mysterious."

      Really? You should publish your thoughts. I see a nobel in you future at least.

    21. Re:My take on it by tzanger · · Score: 1

      I can go farther than that. If you want to expand your brain power, or accomplish something with your brain, I can tell you how to achieve it.

      Do tell. I've been interested in this very thing (natural limits of intelligence) for a while. I personally believe that everyone more or less has the same potential for learning and comprehension, but that personality and upbringing tend to either curb or enhance the individual's ability. Essentially if you're told you can't do something often enough as a young'un, you tend to believe it and create your own "cage."

    22. Re:My take on it by flydpnkrtn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... and while at Harvard, he realized that EVERYONE there was smart and scored a near perfect score on their SAT's. Making him average. So he dropped out. Giving further insight into his psyche; if he has ACTUAL competition, he will quit the game.

      Dude he dropped out of Harvard to start Microsoft.... him and Paul Allen saw the Altair as "it's go time." It wasn't some three year old pouting because he was suddenly in the presence of people who were also smart (although being smart isn't necessarily the key to getting into an Ivy league school...)

    23. Re:My take on it by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree with you completely. People limit themselves: once they believe something is possible, they start seeing ways to achieve it.

      The first thing is to define your goal. Saying, "I want to achieve my intelligence" is kind of an empty goal, what do you really want to do? Increase your ability to notice things? Increase your score on the IQ test? Impress your friends with how intelligent you are? These are all different goals and you will go about achieving each one differently.

      So since you didn't specify any area in particular you were interested in, lets discuss musical ability. If you want to quickly learn how to play the piano for example, there are abilities and skills you need to learn. One of the first things is basically symbolic comprehension, which is interestingly a skill that helps with learning math and a second language as well. You will need to learn to see notes written on the page, and be able to instantly correspond that with the key to press down on the piano.

      Some students have counter-productive habits that really slow down the process of learning this. For example, some students, instead of trying to read the music, they will wait until the teacher plays for them, then remember what the song sounds like, then play it from ear instead of from reading. Learning to recognize what your counterproductive habits are and eliminating them will speed your learning process dramatically. Those students will not begin to make real progress until they begin to make an effort to read the notes written on the page.

      After that, there are a number of things to learn, like phrasing, getting the rhythms tight, learning technique, etc. Most students try to learn these independently one at a time, and it really hinders their progress. What would help them is to first of all have a target, what they are trying to get to, and second of all have a method to determine how close you are to that goal.

      In music, this is done by developing your ear. Before you play, you have to imagine what you want the music to sound like when you play it. If you can't imagine perfectly at first, that's ok, your imagination will improve as you go along. Then you need to listen to the sound that actually comes out of the keyboard when you play. This will tell you how far you are from the goal, and as you compare the sound coming out of your fingers to the ideal sound you hear in your mind, your mind will automatically start coming up with ideas to improve your playing. Your playing will improve dramatically, and it will sound more natural than if you tried to learn all the elements independently. If you want to speed it along, you can do so by actively listening and trying to figure out what the biggest difference is between the sound in your mind and the sound from your fingers. Find your biggest problem and eliminate it first.

      Hope this helps. I've spent a lot of time trying to understand how to improve ability in different areas, so if you want to discuss any particular skill in more detail, I'd love to.

      --
      Qxe4
    24. Re:My take on it by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry - I didn't know you were in Bill Gates's head. It's incredible that you know that for sure. Obviously you do, otherwise you wouldn't phrase it as fact.

      Ass.

    25. Re:My take on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill should have had his ass whipped for disrespectful little smart-ass.

    26. Re:My take on it by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Dude he dropped out of Harvard to start Microsoft....

      Microsoft didn't start overnight. He dropped out because for the first time in his life, he felt competition. And when he did drop out, his father told him that he was going to do something with his life or go back to school. And so Bill decided to do computers and asked daddy for a loan.

      It wasn't a decision, it was a response to daddy's threat. And he was AFRAID to go back to school.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  7. Perfect Qualities For.... by maz2331 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It sounds like the perfect qualities and personality for conquering an industry. Maybe we should be glad that he stayed out of law, or we could have ended up with a real control-freak president here.

    1. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by sortius_nod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not sure whether to mod you insightful or funny, so I'll just post... I really think this is quite a valid opinion.

      I'm probably the first to despise Bill for his tactics with regards to computers, but I can only imagine what it'd be like if he was a politician. Makes me kind of thankful that he stayed with stealing other people's software...

    2. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by RichM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It sounds like the perfect qualities and personality for conquering an industry. Maybe we should be glad that he stayed out of law, or we could have ended up with a real control-freak president here.

      Please, don't go giving him ideas.

    3. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If a control freak was president he would be very unhappy. Being president there is way to much entropy and with the checks and balances you do not have full control. So you need to get congress to go along with your ideas, the same with the judical system, and many of them do not like the fact that you are in power and will fight you every step of the way. Then you have a general population who will determine if you get an other term or not. Or to replace the people in congress with the guys who hate you. A controll freak would not be happy there as they have little control of what they do.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by Dekker3D · · Score: 1

      no, but a control freak with a mind like gates' would probably change that to give him more control.

      don't forget: he may not have been the brightest of them all (mac stole the lead in visual operating systems, afaik), but he is smart. he would probably have found a way to gain more control either way. do consider yourself lucky he's a geek :P

    5. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      thats why they are not presidents, but the powers behind the throne, so to speak...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    6. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty tired of you people lionizing Bill Gates. He did not conquer an industry: IBM did. Gates was just there with a (shitty) OS and the contract to use it. He's an extremely savvy and asute businessman who would have behaved differently if he didn't make promises to his shareholders.
      Yeah, yeah, and he's The Richest Man in the World. Does he have as much power as did Pharaoh? All sound and fury...

    7. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by meyekul · · Score: 1

      Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal.

                                                                                      - T. S. Eliot

    8. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      If he was a politician, he probably wouldn't get very far because of his looks. Look at Ross Perot and Dennis Kucinich.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    9. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      While you're at it, take a good look at Landslide Lindon. Not exactly what you'd call a movie star, was he?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    10. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      The concern should not be that someone like Bill - a power hungry control freak - become President. For someone like Bill, every step up to the Presidency would be a stepping stone to the Presidency.

      And, in all likelihood, the Presidency would be a stepping stone to more power, in and of itself. The office of President wouldn't be important to him; sure, it's more prestige than whatever it was he did before, but it's not the true power he's looking for (not on its own, at least).

      Back-room deals with industry types, politicians, and bankers would likely garter him more power, but ultimately, he'd be looking towards a coalition of those people to form a "new" government centered around himself, much in the same way that Bill gamed the computing industry: a single-seated throne of power where all decisions fall from the top, whether they're good for anyone or not - as long as they sound good and maintain his grasp on power.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    11. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a jealous loser. Wait, so does the rest of slashdot.

      You can't walk 2 blocks anywhere in the entire united states without bumping into someone who uses Microsoft software...

      They are and will always be remembered as the pioneers in computing(software mainly). MS won. Long time ago. Get over it.

    12. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      we could have ended up with a real control-freak president here.

      Please, don't go giving him ideas.

      You do know that Bill has been cosying-up to Tony Blair, getting himself knighted, and been popularising his image with youth by getting on stage at charity music events etc., just like politians attempt to do now and then, right?

    13. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true, a leader can circumvent checks and balances with paranoia, fear, and religious mumbo-jumbo. Remember the last president of the United States? He did it, and he was semi-retarded.

    14. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Only for a short period of time though (4 to 5 years), then it bites them back. That and the democratic party back in 2004 took the stupid move of putting John Kerry for the election (A Liberal Senator from a Liberal State), Who was too left for for most Moderate votes, so it went down do you vote for the Evil you know or the Evil you don't know. The Religious Mumbo-Jumbo wasn't really that big of an influence, It was mostly after the 2004 elections where the polls stated the Reason people voted for Bush was for "Moral Beliefs", which really as much Religious but fears of Gay Marriages. The only laws that focus on Religious beliefs are a couple of middle of the road Abortion Laws that get pushed up and down when ever there is a party change, which usually make their supporter go horay for their side without affecting a significant number of the population.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    15. Re:Perfect Qualities For.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being president there is way to much entropy and with the checks and balances you do not have full control.

      Didn't the Patriot Act and FISA fix all that?

  8. PR by csk_1975 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ah, the old human interest story. So which particular PR company is being paid to humanise the face of Gates? And why?

    1. Re:PR by Bushcat · · Score: 1

      Dunno why the parent is marked as a troll. They're not being paid to humanise the face of Gates, they're being paid to remind the world that Gates Sr exists, because Gates Sr has a book published next week.

  9. Humanize?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading this, this makes me understand why Gates is an asshole, not make me feel sorry for him.

  10. Honestly, I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would I have been better off growing up the son of a wealthy parents? I feel like most of my life thus far has been spent catching up to where the wealthy are right out of college. Sure, it's not exactly comparable -- time has given me more experience and perspective than almost any 22 year old -- but were all those years of figuring out how to afford to do what I wanted to do really beneficial to me? I've been reasonably wise in hedging my bets and am now able to afford trying to create and sell software on my own, but did being poor give me anything worthwhile or is it just fate's way of giving me (and others like me) the shaft?

  11. I guess the point of this would be by rastoboy29 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess ultimately Bill Gates, is just this guy, you know?

    1. Re:I guess the point of this would be by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess ultimately Bill Gates, is just this guy, you know?

      Good to hear it from his brain care specialist.

  12. Ah The Power of the Celebrity by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I always think its funny when I hear or read interest pieces on a Celebrity's life. Bill Gates, according to the article synopsis, was a fiercely independent child, possibly even a brat, that was at odds with his parents. How many people in the world are there like this? And yet, its Bill that we write and read and care about because Celebrity drives and organizes social patterns....In the words of Robert M. Pirsig:

    "Celebrity is the Dynamic Quality that primitive social patterns once used to organize themselves. That gives celebrity a new importance.

    None of this celebrity has any meaning in a subject-object universe. But in a value-structured universe, celebrity comes roaring to the front of reality as a huge fundamental parameter. It becomes an organizing force of the whole social level of evolution. Without this celebrity force, advanced complex human societies might be impossible. Even simple ones.

    ...

    It was crazy. People going over Niagara Falls in a barrel and killing themselves just for the celebrity of it. Assassins murdering for it. Maybe the real reason nations declared war was to increase their celebrity status. You could organize an anthropology around it.

    ...

    Even a policeman's uniform is a kind of celebrity device so that you will do what he says without questioning him. Without celebrity nobody would take orders from anybody and there would be no way you could get society to work.

    ...

    Money and celebrity are fame and fortune, traditionally paired as twin forces in the Dynamic generation of social value. Both fame and fortune are huge Dynamic parameters that give society its shape and meaning. We have whole departments of universities, in fact, whole colleges, devoted to the study of economics, that is fortune, but what do we have that is similarly devoted to the study of fame? What exactly is the mechanism by which the cultures controls the shapes of the mirrors that produce all these different images of celebrity? Would analysis of that mirror-changing force enable the resolution of ethnic conflicts? Phaedrus didn't know..."
    - Lila, Chapter 20, Robert M. Pirsig.

    ... And so Bill Gates is a big enough celebrity to have his personal life dug into by the media. His social patterns and examples will be passed on from generation to generation. Funny, I would rather have Larry Wall be in a role that big instead....

    1. Re:Ah The Power of the Celebrity by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on citing a pretentious anthropology text, but you really could have made your point without it.

    2. Re:Ah The Power of the Celebrity by JuzzFunky · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I didn't find the story interesting because he is a celebrity per se, I found it interesting because he has been a very sucessful business man.
      I too would like to be successful in my business and would like to know about the personal qualities that made him so.

      --
      Unexpect the expected!
  13. Still, Mommy got him going by dltaylor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some of us remember when M$ was just producing crappy CP/M-80 compilers and assemblers. How crappy? It took me years to get out of the habit of writing "&array_name[0]", instead of "array_name", since C80 didn't use the latter correctly. (I understand that about version 6 of the M$-Windows "C" compiler they finally got it working; 5 didn't handle "if ((do_input) && inb())" correctly, since it would do the inb() first, at least in some circumstances).

    After IBM was stupidly (as it turned out) snubbed by Digital Research, Mary Gates happened to meet an IBM exec at the club, and when he mentioned that they were looking for an operating system for little computers, she made the connection between him and Bill.

    We all have her to "thank", first for bearing him, then for putting him into position to bully us.

    1. Re:Still, Mommy got him going by lamapper · · Score: 1

      After IBM was stupidly (as it turned out) snubbed by Digital Research, Mary Gates happened to meet an IBM exec at the club, and when he mentioned that they were looking for an operating system for little computers, she made the connection between him and Bill.

      History is littered with startups that were created only after the business the principals were working for failed to see the potential in a product.

      A couple of the well known ones are Xerox and Novell. So many new products and markets came out of Xerox, its just amazing. Seems like they had difficulty thinking outside the box and marketing new products.

      I was not aware that Mary Gates met an IBM exec at the club and introduced Bill to him. I should not be surprised. It is often who you know, as much, if not more than what you know. Granted you still need to be proficient enough to successfully do the work, but often you simply do not get that opportunity without someone making the introduction.

      --
      Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
    2. Re:Still, Mommy got him going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Took you years to get out of that habit? Boy, are you stupid.

    3. Re:Still, Mommy got him going by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some of us remember when M$ was just producing crappy CP/M-80 compilers and assemblers. How crappy? It took me years to...

      ALL early PC products had problems. The early adopters were fairly forgiving of such because they knew they were trading time for money (cheaper machine). Early Apple II's leaked so much radiation that they couldn't legally call them "comsumer products". The first TRS-80's crashed quite often. Etc.

      After IBM was stupidly (as it turned out) snubbed by Digital Research, Mary Gates happened to meet an IBM exec at the club, and when he mentioned that they were looking for an operating system for little computers, she made the connection between him and Bill.

      It's not quite that simple. IBM *did* offer CPM on it's PC's along with MS-DOS. CPM just didn't know how to play the game as well as Gates. Gates was an avid poker-player and knew how to sacrifice in the short-term for longer-term gain. CPM's team didn't seem to understand this, going for the early buck. Microsoft's patience has paid off for it many times. True, when you have spare cash, you have the luxury of waiting more than other companies.
           

  14. Cute ^^ by LunarEffect · · Score: 1

    He looks so much like his dad ^___^

  15. i beg you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spare me the details...

  16. Another Excerpt: Young Bill's First Demo Disaster by theodp · · Score: 1

    Why Bill Gates stays so calm on stage whenever Microsoft's product demos run into trouble: He had plenty of experience with such things, starting at an early age. Young 'Trey' managed to persuade employees of the City of Seattle to come to his parents' house for a demo of his and Paul Allen's Traf-O-Data software, but the first live demo of his system failed. So how did Bill react? He ran into the kitchen, shouting on the way, 'Mom! Mom! Come and tell them that it worked!'

  17. I know the PR company, Ballmer and associates by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Do you really think they need a PR Company to humanise BillG face? When you have THIS replacing you at the company, you will look good compared to him no matter what you have done.

    http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/exec/steve/

    Similar thing happened to SJobs, when he got fired from the company he founded. Ask the people who were around him in 1980s, he wasn't _that_ loved. Hugely respected, admired but not liked. Of course, BillG wasn't fired, that is one difference. IMHO, if he tried to make a NeXT like revolution at MSFT, that bald guy would really, really fire/replace him somehow.

  18. it figures :) by rs232 · · Score: 1

    Of course the slideshow isn't viewable in Firefox.

    It's a debatable point as to whether Gates ever actually grew up. He is famious for yelling "That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard" at his underlings. It would expalin his total lack of a moral compass in his business dealings.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:it figures :) by IvyKing · · Score: 1
      Slideshow works on Mozilla running on Solaris/Sparc - betcha that you don't have Flash installed.

      I also wonder if Bill ever grew up.

    2. Re:it figures :) by rs232 · · Score: 1

      "Slideshow works on Mozilla running on Solaris/Sparc - betcha that you don't have Flash installed"

      Or a combination of noscript and a customized userContent.css file.

      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
  19. Alright....... by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

    In addition to the freaking picture of MS founder(s) laying on the table next to amiga now I have the freaking picture of not well-aged father of the MS founder and the other MS founder.. now what? is this news for nerds site? sorry, no

    --
    - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
    - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    1. Re:Alright....... by ZosX · · Score: 1

      What picture of him laying next to an amiga? If you are talking about the teen beat spread, there were no amigas around then as the picture was from like 1983 or something.

  20. high functioning Aspergers .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "Oh, FFS. I have Aspergers and am disorganised beyond belief to the point where I have to automate payments to take care I don't end up in arrears. I had a crap father (have, but to me he's dead), but I rank in Mensa tests in the top 1% of the country. So IQ doesn't impress me much - it's EQ"

    That an interesting point, some others have suggested that Gates displays the symptoms of an Aspergers sufferer.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  21. I for one.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Really don't care. He's an arrogant prick and i really don't care that he came from some privileged family that taught him early to bend the rules, cheat, lie and steal. He should be taken out back and shot instead of making him out to some 'geek hero', which is is not.

    Now, a story about Woz's childhood, that would be interesting.

    Ya, mod me down, i cant help it that i despise the man and doing it wont change my mind.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:I for one.. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He should be taken out back and shot instead of making him out to some 'geek hero', which is is not.

      Yeah, he is. Just because you hate him doesn't mean plenty of people don't admire what he's been able to accomplish. I don't always agree with the man's methods, but the fact remains that what he's done is damn impressive.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    2. Re:I for one.. by ultranova · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, he is. Just because you hate him doesn't mean plenty of people don't admire what he's been able to accomplish. I don't always agree with the man's methods, but the fact remains that what he's done is damn impressive.

      Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot also managed to accomplish a lot. That doesn't make them worthy of admiration, thought. And while Gates hasn't killed anyone (AFAIK), the only thing he accomplished was building an empire at the expense of everyone else, which is what these other "great men" also accomplished.

      Simply because a villain is successful doesn't make him any less a villain, or any more worthy of admiration. And Gates is a villain.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:I for one.. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. You just compared Bill Gates to brutal, genocidal dictators. You officially have no sense of perspective. Good day.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    4. Re:I for one.. by mgblst · · Score: 1

      He is not an arrogant prick, at least not misplaced arrogance that you see all the time. He is a very powerful man, sure he may have got their by abusing his monopoly, but he had to get there first.

  22. Yet another puff piece... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trying to put a soft human side to the person who stole innovation and profits from the PC industry, who used illegal leveraging of a monopoly to build his wealth.

    1. Re:Yet another puff piece... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if he got his wealth using some pretty dirty tactics, a very respectful amount of money of his is going to good causes.

    2. Re:Yet another puff piece... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      It's like saying (though to a lesser degree) that Hitler was a nice guy: he enjoyed art, architecture, and beauty. He was a bit of a nerd, and looked down on - just your average nerd, not the high-functioning type. And he just wanted to be accepted; truly, he was just misunderstood!

      (Duly note the sarcasm.)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Yet another puff piece... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but at least he is not a complete arsehole like Scott McNealy and Steve Jobs!

    4. Re:Yet another puff piece... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      a very respectful amount of money of his is going to good causes.

      .
      It is not his money to give away. That money was stolen using illegal leveraging of Microsoft's monopoly. If Bill wanted to be a humanitarian, he should return the money to those from whom it was stolen.

  23. Softcard introduced Bill to IBM by Jecel+Assumpcao+Jr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The IBM people saw that business people using the Apple II normally had a Z80 Softcard from Microsoft with CP/M and several Microsoft tools and applications. They decided that their machine should have this as well.

    In their meeting with Bill, they were shocked to find out that CP/M belonged to a different company. Bill Gates immediately called Gary Kindall and told him he was sending some very important people to talk to him. The IBM people went to California and when things didn't work out they came back to Seattle and Bill promised to supply an OS himself.

    Don't trust me on this - see what the people actually involved said about it:

    http://www.pbs.org/nerds/part2.html

  24. Malcolm Gladwell's "Outliers" by slagheap · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gladwell's latest book "Outliers" has a chapter about Bill Gates. Overall the book is about how a certain very few people are able to have outrageous success. The standard American story of this is that through hard work and determination that anything is possible. Gladwell points out that in most cases it requires a lot more than grit and determination it also requires being in exactly the right place at exactly the right time with exactly the right skills. (I know... duh. Right? But it is a good book).

    For Bill Gates... he went to a wealthy private school whose Mom's organization decided to buy a computer terminal in 1968! Bill would have been one of a handful of teenagers in the world who had access to a computer in those days (and one that didn't require punchcard programming at that.) Later he and Paul Allen were able to get access to U. of Washington computers late at night. As a result they got jobs programming during high school.

    I don't remember all the details, but Gates (and a similar story for Bill Joy of Sun) had lots of very unusual, very lucky situations along the way that led to him being a young very skilled programmer at a time when virtually no other people in the world would have had that level of experience (10,000 hours).

    He was a smart, tenacious kid, but Microsoft wouldn't have happened if he hadn't had access to that terminal when he 13 years old.

    --
    First against the wall when the revolution comes
  25. Outliers by TrekkieTechie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For another perspective on Bill's success, and a deeply interesting look at success in general, check out Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers .

  26. Me for two. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ya, mod me down, i cant help it that i despise the man and doing it wont change my mind.

    Mod you down? Hardly! I wholeheartedly agree with your take on that sick twerp.

    OS's were set to become huge regardless of who happened to be at the switch. There was a requirement for them, a vacuum in the world which needed filling, and so here we are. That we happened to get a power-mad creep at the front of the parade is just bad luck. (Though, in a game which is heavily biased toward psychotic jerks rising to the top, chances are if it wasn't him, it would have been somebody like him.)

    -FL

  27. No, hes not by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Troll

    He is a cut throat business man with shady practices, not a 'geek hero'.

    If he was actually sitting there helping code the products, i might change my stand, but he wasn't/isn't, so he's just yet another overpaid suit

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:No, hes not by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except he did, at one point, help code the products.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    2. Re:No, hes not by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Helped steal code, i agree. I doubt he could have coded out of a wet paper bag, even back in the Altair days.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. He was an asshole then... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    and guess what? He's an asshole now.

    This reminds me of the scene in the current "Crank 2 - High Voltage" movie where the action stops at one point and we're treated to a replay of a video of Chev Chelios as a young boy being brought on a TV show because he's such a rotter even at that age.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:He was an asshole then... by Arimus · · Score: 1

      and guess what? He's an asshole now.

      He's a rich asshole now. Subtle but important difference, and off the top of my head can't think of many rich business people who aren't.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  30. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, especially here, who friggin cares?