Slashdot Mirror


IE8 Update Forces IE As Default Browser

We discussed Microsoft making IE8 a critical update a while back; but then the indication was that the update gave users a chance to choose whether or not to install it. Now I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes in with word that the update not only does not ask, but it makes IE the default browser. "Microsoft has a new tactic in the browser wars. They're having the 'critical' IE8 update make IE the default browser without asking. Yes, you can change it back, but it doesn't ask you if you want IE8 or if you want it as the default browser, it makes the decisions for you. Opera might have a few more complaints to make to the EU antitrust board after this, but Microsoft will probably be able to drag out the proceedings for years, only to end up paying a small fine. If you have anyone you've set up with a more secure alternative browser, you might want to help check their settings after this."

311 comments

  1. Death to IE6! by mnslinky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's to the end of IE 6 and all the hacks needed for site to render correctly!

    1. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nope... Many corporations built their intranet around IE6 and changing browser will break it. Rather than spend buckets of money revamping their intranet, they are just more likely to keep going with IE6...

    2. Re:Death to IE6! by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      I'll drink to that!

    3. Re:Death to IE6! by qmaqdk · · Score: 0

      Their mistake. Don't say we didn't warn them.

      --
      My UID is prime. Hah!
    4. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It amazes me how when firefox has a new version, everyone downloads it with a warm and fuzzy feeling that it is going to be an improvement. However, whenever IE has a new version, people are so reluctant to download it that MS now has to force the public to upgrade.

      Way to go Microsoft!!! If your users are uncomfortable with upgrading, force them anyway.

    5. Re:Death to IE6! by suso · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that they don't care if you warned them. They just want to keep making money.

    6. Re:Death to IE6! by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I say go ahead and break the websites. They were all broken the minute they went browser specific.

      Granted, the fact that the HTML protocol could be interpreted two different ways indicates that it's not entirely Microsoft's fault... this time.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:Death to IE6! by sgbett · · Score: 1

      Anecdotal I know, but of 20k visitors I got last month ~80% still on IE6... I'm not holding my breath.

      --
      Invaders must die
    8. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sometimes you don't have a choice. Depends on the products you bought and when those vendors update their product and/or when you can afford to upgrade to the newer version. Money doesn't grow on trees, and you can't control other organizations schedules. I know of where I speak on this. Work in the health care industry some time.

    9. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      80%?
      What's your website, an IE6 fan club?

    10. Re:Death to IE6! by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are correct, however this is true only in the short term. The whole argument of "We're saving money by not switching." will only hold water for so long. Eventually there will come a point at which their enforcement of IE6 will prevent them from being competitive. While everyone else is moving forward with new technologies that allow them to do more (and more securely) they'll still be stuck with applications that depend on ActiveX and open them up to attack. Also, if enough people are using IE8/Firefox outside of work (or more importantly enough management-types) their frustration with the older browser will eventually leak into the workplace, and there will be a push to upgrade intranet apps to get with the times. Change does happen in the corporate world, it just happens slowly.

      --
      God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
    11. Re:Death to IE6! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's to making websites run on Lynx. They're invariably far faster, usually far more readable, far more usable for those with visual or manual problems, far lighter in bandwidth, and require far less testing for a variety of standards-violating clients.

    12. Re:Death to IE6! by quickcel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you kidding? Death to the best browser around? Help us save IE6 and sign the petition! http://saveie6.com/

    13. Re:Death to IE6! by pizzach · · Score: 1

      I know I am being lazy, but does IE8 natively support xhtml, yet? It seems like the perfect chance to get their rendering right without breaking compatibility with old websites if they only correct it for xhtml. I mean, really...how many corporate websites do you think use xhtml and depend heavily on Microsoft?

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    14. Re:Death to IE6! by mnslinky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I help develop for a health care website, which is used internally by large clinics, etc, in Minnesota. With a strong, persistent insistence on clients switching from IE to Firefox, we've got from ~97% of users using IE to this month's stats showing 48.4% using IE, 50.8% using Firefox. We've also been pushing notices that IE6 has been EOL'd by Microsoft, and given links to upgrade to IE7. this has seen that 48.4% of IE users to be split with 20.3% of total users using IE7 and only 28.1% still using IE6.

      IMHO, it's been a quite successful campaign. I'm not a huge fan of IE, in general, but it's far easier to code for IE7 than IE6.

    15. Re:Death to IE6! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I say go ahead and break the websites. They were all broken the minute they went browser specific.

      It is not and never has been about breaking websites, but about breaking the covenant with the customer. And that covenant is "I will take your money." When you start to interfere with the taking of money, your business suffers. Hence the runaway success of the monopoly-pumped IE6.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many large corporate environments have not deployed IE 7 and will probably not deploy IE 8 for a very long time. As a web developer it's frustrating when my clients have to look at stuff in IE 6 since I haven't had it in years. Thank you VMWare.

    17. Re:Death to IE6! by kerohazel · · Score: 1

      I love that site. :D

      Hopefully none of the many knee-jerk, sarcasm-oblivious mods will mod you troll for that.

      Best part: "Compatible with IT departments that fear changes".

      --
      Skype is too convoluted... Now I'm reverse-engineering the Kyoto Protocol.
    18. Re:Death to IE6! by penguin_dance · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not just about having built their intranet around IE6. A lot of (really large) companies I have done contract work for are still using Windows 2000 as their OS and you can't run anything newer than IE6 with that. I think when XP came along, they decided not to upgrade, but just wait until the next version of the OS came out. Then Vista came along....

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    19. Re:Death to IE6! by pallmall1 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I know I am being lazy, but does IE8 natively support xhtml, yet?

      NO. And the lack of support just proves what a bunch of liars there are at Microsoft.

      --
      3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    20. Re:Death to IE6! by A12m0v · · Score: 1

      For how long? They can't keep on running Windows 2000 and Windows xp for ever.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    21. Re:Death to IE6! by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 1

      Boy, I thought that the MSDN and Technet would've had a higher percentage!

      --
      God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
    22. Re:Death to IE6! by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 2

      The humour in this has not gone unnoticed by me, but you're also right. A website that doesn't work is Lynx is not really a website at all.

    23. Re:Death to IE6! by gewalker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, he said 20K visitors. There is NO way that an IE6 fan club has that many visitors.

    24. Re:Death to IE6! by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Nope. IE7 has been a critical update for ages. Anyone still using IE6 has completely abandoned the critical update treadmill. You're stuck with them and their shitty browser until their machine is replaced.

      What this actually means is all your IE7 users will convert to IE8.

    25. Re:Death to IE6! by andy19 · · Score: 1

      Assuming people are using Windows XP or higher. At my workplace, everyone is using Windows 2000. IE6 all around. As a web developer here, it's painful...painfully painful.

    26. Re:Death to IE6! by SuperDre · · Score: 0

      You forget that most of the users are just 'dumb' customers who don't know jack about upgrading, and for their own safety it's best to force a new browser. That's a common thing about a lot of techpeople(slashdotusers), they think they are the regular people.. Also, MS has more people to think of than the creators of FF..

    27. Re:Death to IE6! by Wintermute__ · · Score: 2

      Sometimes you don't have a choice. Depends on the products you bought and when those vendors update their product and/or when you can afford to upgrade to the newer version. Money doesn't grow on trees, and you can't control other organizations schedules. I know of where I speak on this. Work in the health care industry some time.

      Been there, done that. Hopefully won't have to again any time soon. Industries I prefer to avoid as an IT worker: Healthcare, Education, Government. Also, watch out for Law offices and Accounting firms. Strange politics at those places.

      But, back on-topic: many industries have these broken (or at least fragile) apps, from 3rd party vendors or otherwise.

      IT shops with apps like that should be managing patches for their users, whether with something like SUS or whatever manual process suits their environment. Allowing automatic updates is just asking for it.

    28. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For how long? They can't keep on running Windows 2000 and Windows xp for ever.

      What on earth makes you think that? Of course they can.

    29. Re:Death to IE6! by ivucica · · Score: 1, Insightful

      and you can't run anything newer than IE6 with that.

      Correction:

      "and you can't run any newer IE than IE6 with that."

    30. Re:Death to IE6! by ivucica · · Score: 1

      They can, until 2038.

    31. Re:Death to IE6! by ivucica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Real problem is they're forcing their browser to be default system browser, in place of Opera, Firefox, Chrome - whichever is your default. Y'know how aforementioned browsers (and older IE) ask you if you want them to be the default? The /. summary makes point of forcing IE8 as the default.

    32. Re:Death to IE6! by MrMunkey · · Score: 1

      Don't forget all the 3rd party apps that have a "web GUI" that requires IE6. They're the only reason our hospital doesn't upgrade. I'm not holding my breath waiting for vendors to upgrade their crap off of IE6.

    33. Re:Death to IE6! by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They also won't remember that you warned them. They'll remember that somewhere along the line, IT oversaw this intranet for them. It worked for a while, then something broke. Even if they're aware that this is related to IE6 (probably not), nobody will remember who made that call, especially not the idiot who said "let's just go with that blue E internet thingie."

      They'll just know that IT made it, and it broke after a few years.

    34. Re:Death to IE6! by julesh · · Score: 1

      Change does happen in the corporate world, it just happens slowly.

      _Glacially_ slowly. Sometime around 2004, my company was looking at a possible technology it could build that would have been designed for corporate intranet helpdesks, and would have depended on some fairly low-level stuff. We'd figured we could make it work in IE5 and Mozilla 1.2, which were both old technology by then and the most popular versions of browsers, according to most stats, were even newer than these. We figured we'd be fine with most companies, so started work on development.

      Our initial attempts to market it brought little interest. It was only when we started looking into it in more depth that we realised most of our potential customers were running Netscape 4, a browser that had basically (as far as the rest of us were concerned) been superceded not long after it launched seven years earlier, and which was so fundamentally broken that we knew it had no chance of ever being able to support the kind of application we were developing. The project was abandoned.

    35. Re:Death to IE6! by julesh · · Score: 1

      It amazes me how when firefox has a new version, everyone downloads it with a warm and fuzzy feeling that it is going to be an improvement. However, whenever IE has a new version, people are so reluctant to download it that MS now has to force the public to upgrade.

      The difference is in the customers, not the software. People who are comfortable upgrading software typically upgrade whenever they get the chance... and have, as a rule, upgraded IE to firefox (or opera or safari or whatever). Only people who are nervous/ambivalent about upgrading stick with IE unless they have a good reason.

    36. Re:Death to IE6! by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure if this is quite what you mean, but in IE7, if you put an XHTML DOCTYPE tag at the top of a page, IE7 will render the page closer to correctly than it does without a DOCTYPE (I assume it renders it in the completely-broken IE6 mode).

    37. Re:Death to IE6! by pizzach · · Score: 1

      Really? I just assumed IE ignored the slashes in self closed tags like by rendering in quirks because xhtml is similar enough to html. My bad my bad. I'm still going to cry in a corner about implementing flash tags in xhtml though.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    38. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the only reason I update my firefox is because it complains every time I start it. On what seems a daily basis, firefox will report that it has an update for me to install. If I do not install the update, it continues to tell me until I do install. Additionally, this notification comes in the form of a window which requires my acknowlegement before allowing me to continue on with whatever I was actually trying to do.

      Now don't get me wrong I'm sure this behavior is customisable and I could get rid of the stupid notifications, but the default behavior for firefox appears to be "annoying". In contrast Microsoft's browsers update themselves through windows update. When a new update is available I get a balloon that could care less if I've read it, and I update when I want to. Even by making it a critical update Microsoft isn't forcing its users to install the new version, they're just putting weight behind a recommendation to increase the security and functionality of your IE browser.

    39. Re:Death to IE6! by TheCycoONE · · Score: 2, Informative

      IE7 and 8 do not natively support xhtml, they treat the document as SGML and apply SGML rules to it. This means that namespaces, MathML, etc. cannot be supported by that browser, and that it will not fail on invalid content as an xml parser should.

    40. Re:Death to IE6! by brunascle · · Score: 1

      He means serving it with the application/xhtml+xml content type, rather than text/html.

    41. Re:Death to IE6! by rawg · · Score: 1

      Why don't these corporations have a SSB (single site browser) for their web apps? Then they can use IE8 or whatever they want and still have the SSB for their apps. Is there a SSB that is IE6?

      --
      The above is not worth reading.
    42. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do some testing on your corporation of your IE6-only apps in IE8. We found they all worked flawlessly. IE8 has 3 rendering modes: IE5/6 IE7 and IE8, and in the 'intranet zone' it often defaults back to IE5/6 for just that reason. IE7 didn't provide corporations any upgrade path for IE6-only apps but IE8 certainly does and we're evaluating moving our large corp to it.

      See this for some javascript you can pump into the browser title bar to see what rendering mode IE8 is using, for all our intranet apps it defaulted to IE5/6.
      http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc288325(VS.85).aspx

    43. Re:Death to IE6! by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      Correction:

      "and you can't run any newer IE than IE6 with that."

      Point taken. However, I've only run across ONE company (a software manufacturer) that has browser besides IE loaded (Firefox). But even then, you can't upgrade it or install add-ons without being an admin. Fortunately it DOES mean I can run my version with my preferred add-ons and widgets from my USB drive.

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    44. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Here's an idea...

      DON'T USE FLASH!

                                               

    45. Re:Death to IE6! by JoelisHere · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, he said 20K visitors. There is NO way that an IE6 fan club has that many visitors.

      or do they... http://www.saveie6.com/

    46. Re:Death to IE6! by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      I help run a financial services (bank) website that gets about 25K visitors per day. Our IE %s for the last week:

      7.0 64.50%
      6.0 27.34%
      8.0 8.12%
      5.5 0.04%

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    47. Re:Death to IE6! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      IE7 and 8 do not natively support xhtml, they treat the document as SGML and apply SGML rules to it. This means that namespaces, MathML, etc. cannot be supported by that browser

      IE doesn't treat the document as SGML, it treats it as HTML tag soup with all its quirks (e.g. it parses <i><b></i></b>), and "with extensions". Among those extensions is XML-like namespace processing. So, yes, proper MathML (and SVG) can actually be implemented as a plugin for IE8.

      It will not fail on invalid content as an xml parser should.

      Does any browser on the market today fail on invalid XHTML? (by "fail" I mean refusing to parse the page and render it)

    48. Re:Death to IE6! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It amazes me how when firefox has a new version, everyone downloads it with a warm and fuzzy feeling that it is going to be an improvement. However, whenever IE has a new version, people are so reluctant to download it that MS now has to force the public to upgrade.

      People who use Firefox generally understand the concept of updating software. Folks who use IE, en masse, don't even know that there's a difference between "Internet Explorer" and "web browser"; in fact, they might not even realise that IE is an application as such - how many times in your life did you hear, "and then I clicked on the blue Internet icon"? Making the former group update is easy - roll out a bunch of new features, including stuff only a geek would truly understand the meaning of and care about (such as 100% ACID3...). It's much harder for the latter group.

    49. Re:Death to IE6! by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The summary calls this a "new" trick, IT IS NOT! They pulled the exact same shit when IE7 came out, trust me. I do tech-support for friends (who know nothing about computers). During one month (when they pushed the update), 90% of the people I helped (I always install firefox for them) phoned and said "What the hell happened to my bookmarks?!?". The first time it happened, it took me a while to figure out that they were not using FireFox, but that their keyboard-shortcut was now bound to IE7!

      Microsoft thinks their browser is the best, or at lest good enough for everyone, but when you upgrade an unused program and end up wrecking another one, YOU FUCKED UP!

      This is definitely the kind of thing that Opera needs to bring to the EU's attention.

    50. Re:Death to IE6! by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      You forgot the people who know nothing, have had a friend install firefox and enable automatic updates in windows. Those are the people that suffer. Trust me, I had 90% of my "friendly tech support" clients phone me in a frenzy asking where their bookmarks went when Microsoft pulled this same crap with IE7.

    51. Re:Death to IE6! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Nope... Many corporations built their intranet around
      > IE6 and changing browser will break it. Rather than
      > spend buckets of money revamping their intranet, they
      > are just more likely to keep going with IE6...

      That's fine, as long as they only have to access their own intranet sites and nothing else.

      But given the difficulty of keeping multiple versions of IE around (it's much harder than with, say, Firefox), not very many web developers are still testing with IE6 at this point. IE7 will be headed the same direction in the near future, at which point browsing the web with IE6 will become increasingly an exercise in frustration, much like trying to browse with IE5 is now.

      With IE5, it's a royal pain just to get to a search engine, look for a more recent version of IE, download, and install it. Really, try it. Trying to actually use it as your regular browser is just futile. In another year or two, IE6 will be like that. Unusable.

      We just did a major website revamp here, so I tested in IE7 because it's still current. We'll stick with this design revision for a while now, and just change the information on individual pages as necessary. But the next time I do a design reorg, I *won't* still be testing in IE7.

      My recommendation for "our intranet app is IE6-only" sites is to deploy an alternate web browser (perhaps Firefox) for regular web browsing, and keep IE6 around just for your intranet only. Take the IE6 shortcut off the desktop and replace it with a shortcut that directly opens your intranet in IE6, plus another that opens Firefox for actual web browsing.

      But, you know, you can do what you want. You can try to browse the web in IE4 if you want. Just don't expect to actually, you know, *work*.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    52. Re:Death to IE6! by jonadab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > IE7 and 8 do not natively support xhtml, they treat the
      > document as SGML and apply SGML rules to it. This means
      > that namespaces, MathML, etc. cannot be supported by
      > that browser,

      Actually, it's theoretically possible to still support those things without fully embracing all the other XML rules. It won't make the purists happy, but it can be done.

      > and that it will not fail on invalid content as an xml parser should.

      I consider completely failing on all invalid content to be an undesirable characteristic in a web browser and contrary to the basic principle of graceful degradation that the web is built on. If a browser sees an element it does not recognize, it should just treat it as a generic element (comparable to span) and go on. This allows webmasters to go ahead and use new features before every web browser that's still in use supports them (which can take a decade or more).

      A web browser is not a validator. That isn't its purpose. Web developers need to know how to use a validator, yes, but the web browser shouldn't be it.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    53. Re:Death to IE6! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Sometime around 2004 ... most of our potential customers were running Netscape 4

      Yeah? In August of 2005, we finally stopped using a particularly mission-critical piece of software that ran on DOS 6. No fooling.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    54. Re:Death to IE6! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > It amazes me how when firefox has a new version, everyone downloads it
      > with a warm and fuzzy feeling that it is going to be an improvement.

      Actually, this is no longer quite true. It's still true for the _majority_ of Firefox users, but if you've been paying any attention at all you know that the Mozilla folks have been fretting and stewing no end about how a lot of people (a small percentage, but enough to get their attention) are still using Firefox 2.

      > However, whenever IE has a new version, people are so reluctant to
      > download it that MS now has to force the public to upgrade.

      Different user base. Most (almost all, until recently) Firefox users are technically inclined and like to try out new software. These are what we in the IT industry call "power users". Most IE users are what we call "end users", and as a general rule they do not want the software on their computer to change, EVER, because it might mean they might have to learn something new or different, and that is, to their way of thinking, only slightly less undesirable than having surgery without anesthesia.

      If Firefox market share continues to grow, a larger and larger percentage of users will not upgrade in a timely fashion.

      If you ask web developers what we think about IE8, we're all very pleased about it, because it means we will eventually be able to stop working around IE7's inadequacies. (How soon depends on what percentage of end users we're willing to hork off, but having IE8 on Auto Update helps, a lot.)

      I'd be less pleased if this purported change in default-browser policy turns out to be true, but one rant about it on a blog doesn't exactly have me frothing at the mouth because, you know, people rant about stuff like this and then turn out to be getting their facts slightly wrong about six times out of seven.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    55. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a joke right? Please tell me that's a joke...

    56. Re:Death to IE6! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      That website bothers me. It frightens me because I'm worried some idiot might think it's serious or, worse, actually agree with its deranged logic.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    57. Re:Death to IE6! by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does any browser on the market today fail on invalid XHTML? (by "fail" I mean refusing to parse the page and render it)

      Yes. But it actually has to be served as XHTML, and the vast majority is not.

      There is a popular misconception that an XHTML DOCTYPE means the page is interpreted as XHTML, this is incorrect. All the DOCTYPE really does is turn off quirks mode in IE, the actual content-type of the page (which is sent in the HTTP response header from the server) is virtually always served as text/html.

      In order to have a page truly interpreted as XHTML, it needs a content-type header of application/xhtml+xml, and this will indeed break rendering and display an XML parsing error for the most trivial of errors. And of course IE6 doesn't support application/xhtml+xml, so this is not a viable option unless you want to start serving different versions of your page based on the browser.

      Thus the situation we have today, is that everyone writes "XHTML style" HTML (ie, self-closing tags, everything lowercase, quoted attributes, etc), but it's actually interpreted as poorly formed HTML by the browser. (ie, <br /> is technically not valid HTML) Luckily browsers are extremely forgiving of poorly formed HTML.

      A couple links on the subject:

      http://www.autisticcuckoo.net/archive.php?id=2005/04/08/doctype-declaration-and-content-type-headers

      http://hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    58. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but a picture is worth a thousand words

      want to talk about efficiency? a website that is down loads the fastest of all!

    59. Re:Death to IE6! by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      but a picture is worth a thousand words

      Depends on the picture. Unless your site is flickr, can you honestly say that most of the image tags don't deserve an empty alt attribute?

      want to talk about efficiency? a website that is down loads the fastest of all!

      Nah. The average web pages is likely to load in a much shorter time than it takes an unresponsive server to time out.

    60. Re:Death to IE6! by sgbett · · Score: 1

      /jealous

      most of my users come from N3 which probably explains a lot :/

      --
      Invaders must die
    61. Re:Death to IE6! by TheMightyFuzzball · · Score: 1

      Death to badly designed intranets then...

    62. Re:Death to IE6! by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      And we're also about 15% Firefox! Pretty amazing in my book. And this is in a rural, "downstate" area; quite surprising really.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    63. Re:Death to IE6! by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      For the anally retentive:
      "content type" == MIME type

      --
      $ make available
    64. Re:Death to IE6! by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      and you can't run anything newer than IE6 with that.

      Correction:

      "and you can't run anything newer than IE6 with that without losing your sanity."

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      $ make available
    65. Re:Death to IE6! by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Too damn bad for them. I'm no longer wasting my time supporting a browser that's now TWO major versions out of date, never mind being almost a decade old. I'm sticking with jQuery's approach of the current version of all major browsers, current-1, and current+1 (latest beta, typically). I may stick a warning on the site that only shows in outdated (current-2 or order) versions, but it doesn't make sense for me to waste a massive amount of time fixing problems that are only visible to a rapidly-shrinking market-share that's outside of my target demographic anyways.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    66. Re:Death to IE6! by Firehed · · Score: 4, Informative

      Validate! If you write valid (X)HTML and CSS, IE7 gets pretty close to the mark and IE8 seems to get it spot-on outside of some newer, often browser-specific CSS properties (text-shadow, -X-border-radius, etc). Hell, even IE6 seems to render more accurately if you have a doctype tag and code that validates against said doctype. Your code won't pass validation without a doctype tag.

      Re: XHTML flash - if you MUST use it, http://validifier.com/.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    67. Re:Death to IE6! by Firehed · · Score: 1

      What sort of SSB apps even exist for Windows? I'm aware of Fluid.app on OS X, but that uses the default system rendering engine, which is whatever version of Safari you have installed (well, technically the version of Webkit that your install of Safari uses, which might as well be the same thing). AFAIK, doing the same thing on Windows would be based off the currently installed version of IE; I'd assume that packaging IE6 in a Windows SSB would violate some sort of redistribution clause in the EULA. You'd be ok with Webkit or Gecko as both are open-source, but if your site ran properly in either of those rendering engines then you wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    68. Re:Death to IE6! by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      Yeah?

      We still have about 60,000 DOS systems deployed.

      Of course, we call them cash registers.....

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    69. Re:Death to IE6! by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Microsoft put itself in that situation. Safari and Firefox (and I'd assume Opera, I honestly don't know a damn thing about it) render to the same standards, plus support some sort of conditional stuff for upcoming standards (see: -moz-border-radius; -webkit-border-radius. Also note that they have slightly different syntaxes right now since the standard isn't finalized). As time moves forward they've come to also follow additional, newer standards, but that doesn't present an issue for backwards compatibility.

      IE6 and IE7 both fail to render according to standards correctly, as we all well know. That means that on the corporate side, if you have apps that have been designed around this lack of standards-adherence, your stuff may well break in a future version as the browser suddenly follows the standards that it once ignored. Thankfully IE8 includes its fallback "compatibility" mode which will render standards-compliant sites according to standards*, and will use fallback modes for sites that don't adhere to the standards. This does a fantastic job eliminating that "will my app break if I make this upgrade?" concern, which is the primary reason that would stop corporate upgrades.

      As far as home users that haven't upgraded yet - it's relatively safe to assume that most of these users never upgrade anything (despite many being security patches, etc) due to indifference, rather than avoidance. I'd bet a very large portion of home IE6 installs are on XP SP2 or earlier, with a number of unpatched security vulnerabilities. They probably disabled auto updates because they were annoyed by the dialog boxes and have been unknowingly sending out zombified spam for years.

      *In my testing, this has always been the case, except for a select few newer CSS properties. As all of these add a little polish to the page but don't in any way affect layout (text-shadow, -X-box-shadow, -X-border-radius, @font-face, etc), this is fully a non-issue. Javascript libraries completely eliminate cross-browser scripting issues (through their own hacks as-needed, I expect), so it's not even on my radar as a concern.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    70. Re:Death to IE6! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Does any browser on the market today fail on invalid XHTML? (by "fail" I mean refusing to parse the page and render it)

      Mozilla Firefox, since about forever. Having the entire browser window be a yellow screen of death is a fairly well known issue as Firefox's entire UI is rendered from the XML-based XUL (which allows fun things like nesting it via chrome://browser/content/browser.xul) and an error in some XUL file means the GUI isn't valid XML anymore.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    71. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      User: Your site is all messed up @#!$
      Tech Support: (Walks user through setting up Firefox as default browser)

    72. Re:Death to IE6! by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      It amazes me how when firefox has a new version, everyone downloads it with a warm and fuzzy feeling that it is going to be an improvement. However, whenever IE has a new version, people are so reluctant to download it that MS now has to force the public to upgrade.

      People upgrading Firefox do that because they want to have better web browser. People upgrading IE (or not) make the decision based on whether they know the distinction between Internet and web browser, and whether their custom intranet solutions works with new IE.

    73. Re:Death to IE6! by ivucica · · Score: 1

      I'm not in touch with any big corporations here in Croatia, but I rarely run into places that DON'T have an alternative browser installed.

      • Zagreb Computer Association: check
      • Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing: check
      • XV gymnasium*: check
      • my game company: check

      Besides, you CAN (or in the past you could) install Firefox without admin privileges.

      And, Firefox stores addons in your user profile (usually C:\Documents and Settings\ivucica\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\ ...) so I don't see how that's possible. I had problems on Faculty**, those looked like admin-caused-problems, but I googled and I found out that I just needed to delete some files in the profile. And addon installation then went perfectly. Besides, I remember that in highschool I was installing Firefox without admin privileges (just told it to install into ...\My Documents\) so I don't really see why everyne is making a fuss out of "not being able to install Firefox".

      Only reasonable explanation I can think of is policy of not being able to run anything outside of C:\Program Files (I saw such setups). But in programmer's environment, you can get Firefox. And admin would have to closely monitor you to stop you from using it.

      Of course, running from USB drive is an alternative if you carry your USB drive around all the time -- I don't :)

      * type of school

      ** here it's a subunit of university, not a name for staff

    74. Re:Death to IE6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if presented with any valid XHTML 1.1 page, IE (at least up to version 7) doesn't display it at all, instead asking the user to save it to disk.

    75. Re:Death to IE6! by Zonnald · · Score: 1

      If by idiot you mean unable to read the numerous notices that the site was put up as an April fool's joke, then yes you should be worried.

  2. Nothing changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IE remains the biggest security problem in Windows (besides user stupidity).

    If webpages can override the render engine in IE8 then IE8 is only as secure as the worst render engine.

    1. Re:Nothing changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, the rendering engine isn't exactly the most vulnerable part of a browser. What was the last scurity vulnerability stemming from the rendering engine ?

      Also, it's not like you can add different rendering engines, is it ?

    2. Re:Nothing changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, it's not like you can add different rendering engines, is it ?

      No but the different 'modes' in IE8 use different rendering engines. It wont matter how secure the new standards compliant one is if any website can force you to use a different one.

    3. Re:Nothing changes by williamhb · · Score: 1

      IE remains the biggest security problem in Windows (besides user stupidity).

      If webpages can override the render engine in IE8 then IE8 is only as secure as the worst render engine.

      Hmm, seems a little like saying that a slightly sour aftertaste is the biggest problem with strychnine (besides death).

      In any case, web pages can already call up any number of plugins the user probably has installed, already making browsers only as secure as the worst plugin (Adobe Reader being the popular culprit of the moment). The users who aren't savvy enough to be able to switch the browser default almost certainly aren't savvy enough to know which of their installed plugins are flawed.

    4. Re:Nothing changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you retarded? There's more to a browser than the rendering engine, and the rendering engine wasn't the cause of the security flaws.

    5. Re:Nothing changes by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      That depends on how the alternative rendering is done, surely?

  3. Nothing new here by linux_geek_germany · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't that surprise me a bit at all?

    1. Re:Nothing new here by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure it was accidental. Nobody at Microsoft would notice this because they all use IE (by law).

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Nothing new here by Threni · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because you've not installed IE8 yourself and discovered the `article` to be pure BS. I use Ubuntu, and didn't get around to installing IE8 until I've put Ubuntu 9.04 on my box (which works great, thanks), but when I got around to installing IE8 it was relatively painless and didn't make itself default over Firefox, but I'm forced to assume that TFA was written by some sort of fucking idiot or a liar. It's that which should not be surprising.

    3. Re:Nothing new here by tgd · · Score: 1

      Its not accidental, its a made up troll story that wasn't verified by Slashdot editors before posting.

      And I've seen plenty of Firefox browsers (and Google homepages) while walking the halls at Microsoft.

    4. Re:Nothing new here by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      I had no problem installing IE8 on my XP machine. I do have one problem with IE8. It crashes.. Often.. Even when I'm just typing in a new web address it will crash on occasion. It's not my computer because I never see any other program crash including Firefox 3.X which I will often have up and running for days on end. I even tried removing IE8 and re-downloading/re-installing it and the problem still shows up. Luckily I only use IE8 in cases where I have to use IE. Otherwise I'll just use Firefox.

  4. Whooooooooosh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They're having the 'critical' IE8 update make IE the default browser without asking

    There's nothing wrong with this tactic. Firefox does the same thing to me in Linux.

    1. Re:Whooooooooosh! by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's nothing wrong with this tactic. Firefox does the same thing to me in Linux.

      Firefox makes IE 8 your default browser in Linux? That's kinda odd.

    2. Re:Whooooooooosh! by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

      I know, but don't feel bad - I get people all the time.

    3. Re:Whooooooooosh! by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I let Vista install all 300MB of collective updates last night, including IE8, and it did not change my default from Chrome.

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    4. Re:Whooooooooosh! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Firefox makes IE 8 your default browser in Linux? That's kinda odd.

      Every distribution is a little bit different. In Gentoo, you choose your own default browser. In Fedora, Firefox asks you the first time it runs if you want it to be the default browser, and the default is yes. In Debian, Firefox is not available in the package list. I don't happen to know what distribution has Firefox making IE8 the default. Probably one of the ones I've never used, like Lycoris or Linspire or something along those lines.

      HTH.HAND.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  5. this wasn't my experience by lambent · · Score: 5, Informative

    i updated IE8 manually on like 20 machines yesterday. it asked every time. it didn't kill my default browser selection.

    it there something i'm overlooking, like does automatic updates apply it and not ask you? am i missing something from TFA?

    1. Re:this wasn't my experience by Briareos · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, there is one question during IE8 setup whether to use some (listed) default settings or the change those settings - maybe setting it as the default browser is one of those defaults?

      It didn't override Firefox being the default browser in my XP installation, at any rate...

      np: Can - Mother Upduff (Anthology (Disc 2))

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    2. Re:this wasn't my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm three for three with it setting IE8 as default ... two manual installs week or three back and one automatic a couple days ago.

      On the other hand, I don't really care either.

    3. Re:this wasn't my experience by LurkingOnSlashdot · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wasn't my experience either. I upgraded my home machines and my office computer to IE8 and do not recall that it became my default browser.

    4. Re:this wasn't my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I updated it on 3 machines and it asked every time. Obviously the OP doesn't know what he is talking about.

    5. Re:this wasn't my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While my anecdotal evidence is a very small pool since our peoplesoft installation won't support IE8, I can confirm that our experience is that windows update includes it as a critical update but it explicitly prompts you about the update (similar to Genuine Advantage? ... oh whatever it is that attempts to ensure your legit) AND I just double checked and Firefox is still my default browser.

    6. Re:this wasn't my experience by wjousts · · Score: 1

      I manually downloaded IE 8 on my home computer (Vista) some time ago and it didn't try to set itself as the default browser automatically. It may have asked the question during install, I don't remember for certain.

      Maybe the automatic update from Windows Update works differently?

    7. Re:this wasn't my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I've upgraded a few computers too and it asked every time as well. I did a manual upgrade though so perhaps in the auto updates it does it differently???

    8. Re:this wasn't my experience by rexbinary · · Score: 0

      Same here, I updated to IE8 from Windows Update as a Critical Update and it plainly asked if I wanted to make IE8 my default browser or keep my current default browser.

    9. Re:this wasn't my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      np: Can - Mother Upduff (Anthology (Disc 2))

      No one cares, dude.

    10. Re:this wasn't my experience by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      i updated IE8 manually on like 20 machines yesterday. it asked every time. it didn't kill my default browser selection.

      it there something i'm overlooking, like does automatic updates apply it and not ask you? am i missing something from TFA?

      I just updated to it yesterday as well. Automatic Updates most definitely asks (I had said no previously, making it show up as optional and not selectedby default in the list of available updates to be installed) and most definitely explicitly asks you whether or not you want to make it your default.

      This is a silly story. Also, remember that IE8 and Firefox are both more secure than Safari, with 0 exploits found so far to get past their own security and the Vista sandbox (see pwn2own from this year and analysis by its victor), so don't include that in the list of "more secure alternate browsers" if you're using Vista.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    11. Re:this wasn't my experience by sharkey · · Score: 1

      TFA mentions that it was done through Windows Update, but I didn't see whether it was an atuomatic update or not.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    12. Re:this wasn't my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The only thing worse than Microsoft fanboys is dumbasses who write and later post to Slashdot with clear lies and bullshit. The only way what is discrubed in the article could have happened is if they were clicking to fast and missed the giant screen asking them if they want to set IE8 as the default browser. Yeah, it's checked by default so clicking to fast will make it become default.

      Guess what other browser asks and defaults to yes... oh yeah, every fucking one.

    13. Re:this wasn't my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      neither was it my experience. the ie8 install wizard clearly asks whether or not ie8 should be made the default browser. ie8 will become the default browser only for dumbf**** who just go through the wizard clicking "next" without reading any options.

    14. Re:this wasn't my experience by pmarini · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry guys, but if all of you have been upgrading to IE8, it means that the previous IE version is not there anymore, so how can you all say "IE8 didn't become the default browser"... what is it now, a zombie set as default?

      --
      Can I put a spell on those who can't spell?
      Your wheels are loose and they're losing their grip, good you're there.
    15. Re:this wasn't my experience by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      It's just the usual Slashdot anti-MS FUD. One person somewhere probably didn't notice the 'Make browser default' option/dialog box, and it's clearly an epidemic. (I just now installed it on my 2k8 box, and it doesn't even prompt you to change the default until you run IE once) This line just says it all:

      "If you have anyone you've set up with a more secure alternative browser, you might want to help check their settings after this."

      Obviously, a browser that's been out for like a month must have a plethora of security issues, as it was made by Microsoft. Their prescious Firefox gifted to them by the Mozilla Gods is pure and untaintable, as always...

      That's just ignorant fanboism, no matter which way you look at it. Assuming something will be a certain way without giving it a chance to show you what it can do. IE8 may be just as crappy as 6, but it has yet to prove itself either way. I've got a long list of tech companies I dislike or at least distrust, but I will give their product a fair shot, and give credit where it's due. Case-in-point: Intel. Sleazy, monopolistic bastards that produced sub-par CPUs compared to AMD for years. But their current Conroe/Core and subsequent architectures are amazing products.

      I actually keep my less computer-savvy relatives and friends on IE. The amount of time I spend cleaning spyware is less than the amount of time I would spend explaining why certain websites don't work (and anything serious NOD32 picks up). And FF is far from immune to spyware...it will still let stupid users download and run executables.

      And for the record, I'm an Opera user. I switched when FF was in version 2, because Opera was the faster browser by a pretty wide margin. I like FF3 just fine, it's speed is essentially identical to Opera...but I am just used to Opera's featuers so I stick with it for now. I guess the reason I am defensive about IE8 is the fact I see Microsoft focusing very hard on security, and doing good things like staying web-standards compliant, yet they recieve almost no credit for it, while at the same time I see people turning a blind eye to any issue with Firefox, or coming up with excuses for them, no matter how severe.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    16. Re:this wasn't my experience by PhuFighter · · Score: 1

      This is a pretty lame statement. If you're upgrading *anything* from version x to version y, why the heck would you expect the old version to still be around? If IE 7 is your default browser and you upgraded to IE8, of course, the default is going ot be IE8 and not IE7. I upgraded 3 machines for IE8, and the default browser on all the boxes is still FF. What a lame story.

    17. Re:this wasn't my experience by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I upgraded my work machine yesterday, and just now checked to see whether Firefox or IE8 was the default; Firefox is still the default.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    18. Re:this wasn't my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. I just installed it today, and it behaved like a perfect gentleman by asking permission before penetrating and taking over my computer.

    19. Re:this wasn't my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is indeed an option of the IE8 setup to set it as your default browser. If you choose the custom setup option, you can choose whether or not to make it your default browser. However, if you just click next on every screen with no regard as to what they actually say (which should never be done with MS software anyway) , the IE setup will set itself as the default browser.

      So basically, anyone with the capacity to read will not have to worry.

    20. Re:this wasn't my experience by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Automatic update will do an automated install including changing the browser. Running Windows Update manually will prompt you.

    21. Re:this wasn't my experience by LionMage · · Score: 1

      Same here on a Vista 64 system last night. IE8 showed up as an "Important" update for me, not critical -- only XP users will see it as a critical update. I chose a custom install, and was indeed prompted every step of the way; I just had to click on the appropriate radio buttons, or an occasional checkbox, to get what I wanted. Once complete, none of my settings were altered.

      One annoying thing I noticed about PrivBar is that both the x86 and x64 versions seem to behave differently after the upgrade to IE8. Checked Aaron Margosis' blog, and one of the latest comments on this blog entry describes the problem, and the author of PrivBar actually responded to the comment with news that he's working on a new version that works around the IE8 "bug":

      It's a bug in IE8 -- it doesn't show the title of toolbars, which is where PrivBar puts the username. I'm testing an updated version that puts all the info in the button.

      One of the most useful things about PrivBar, besides providing a visual indicator of which version of IE you're using (32 or 64 bit) and what your privilege level is, is that it displayed the user ID the process is running under. That's really important from a security standpoint.

    22. Re:this wasn't my experience by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

      Just installed it here myself. When it indicated what the default settings were, it clearly stated that setting IE as default was one of them (about third or fourth, of five). Hence I selected "Custom", and then (eventually) told it to leave Opera as my default browser.

      It later asked whether to import my bookmarks and RSS subscriptions from Opera, and claimed that it had though I didn't check. I only use IE for Windows Update, I don't really care if it has my Opera bookmarks or not.

  6. More secure alternative browser? by CubicleView · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you have anyone you've set up with a more secure alternative browser

    Is it not a bit early to be deciding which browsers are more secure than IE8?

    1. Re:More secure alternative browser? by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is it not a bit early to be deciding which browsers are more secure than IE8?

      No it isn't, unless you believe in miracles. This isn't really Microsoft's fault but for every hacker who says "lets target Firefox and try to capture bank details" there are 100 trying to do it for IE.

    2. Re:More secure alternative browser? by derGoldstein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How was this modded troll? It's a fact of life, and he even added "This isn't really Microsoft's fault" which most slashdotters wouldn't have bothered with.

      IE is the primary target for browser hacking, and will remain so as long as its market share is anywhere in the vicinity that it is now.

      The best thing you can do at the moment is install Firefox *and* Chrome *and* Opera and try to dedicate types of sites to each browser.
      I usually assign Google properties to Chrome, highly compliant sites to Opera, and everything else to Firefox.
      (This may sound paranoid, or just overkill, but I have to develop/test on multiple browsers anyway so for me it's also a way to get to know them better.)

      I'm not suggesting that everyone should install every browser, but at the very least install Firefox and make it the default, because they patch it early and often, and it's very good at maintaining itself (updating when you restart, checking for plugin updates, etc.)

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    3. Re:More secure alternative browser? by Tei · · Score: 1

      If is not a fullrewrite of IE,we must expect basically the same level as the infamous "IE6".

      Here is a application, with some poor design decissions, that will never be safe, if not with a fullrewrite, with different design guidelines.

      --

      -Woof woof woof!

    4. Re:More secure alternative browser? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make Firefox more secure than IE, it makes the security vulnerabilities in IE more significant.

    5. Re:More secure alternative browser? by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I use Firefox for browsing, but I use a dedicated browser for banking (though epiphany is still Gecko, it's mostly so I can clear the cache of important stuff without clearing my Firefox cache.)

    6. Re:More secure alternative browser? by derGoldstein · · Score: 1

      Normally I'd argue that Firefox *is* more secure, but I'll take a different approach:
      Who said Firefox was more secure? The question is how to reduce the chances of getting hacked, and by installing additional browsers you're making yourself a moving target. It's a form of security by obscurity. You can take this to the extreme if you want to: Use Opera by default. Once you reach a site that doesn't render properly, switch to Chrome. If that doesn't work, try it in Firefox. If it doesn't work in Firefox, you should avoid that site anyway. Work your way from the least-used browser to the most.

      In real life, however, I'd rather go with the browser that gives me the best experience, performance, *and* security, which at the moment (and the foreseeable future), is Firefox.

      It's exactly as Chrisq said above. If you want to make it a numbers game, you're welcome to, but you'll still end up with the same result in terms of security: don't use IE.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    7. Re:More secure alternative browser? by Smidgin · · Score: 1

      Is it not a bit early to be deciding which browsers are more secure than IE8?

      That depends if you want to be fair, or if you want to be realistic.

    8. Re:More secure alternative browser? by Jens+Egon · · Score: 1

      How was this modded troll? It's a fact of life, and he even added "This isn't really Microsoft's fault" which most slashdotters wouldn't have bothered with.

      Obvious flame bait, that.

    9. Re:More secure alternative browser? by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      because they patch it early and often, and it's very good at maintaining itself (updating when you restart, checking for plugin updates, etc.)

      Huh. That's why I stopped using it. I thought it had been taken over by RealNetworks.

    10. Re:More secure alternative browser? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Is it not a bit early to be deciding which browsers are more secure than IE8?

      Well, I don't have actual data on that yet, but I know which way I'd lay odds.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  7. Does anyone fact check here? by Avagadro's+Number · · Score: 5, Informative

    I installed IE8 through windows update in Vista and it asked me if I wanted to set it as the default browser. I clicked no and Firefox is still my default. If you use the full auto install it will make it the default browser. Of course, if you do the full auto install with any Microsoft product you deserve any pain that results.

    1. Re:Does anyone fact check here? by timmarhy · · Score: 1, Funny

      fact check? your new here right?

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    2. Re:Does anyone fact check here? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Deserve? Hell no. There's a reason that people want to have another browser. With Windows systems you can be almost certain that they've explicitly replaced IE with another one. So Windows update should definitively not mess with that setting. Especially not with an update.

    3. Re:Does anyone fact check here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waddaya mean OF COURSE??!!

      If adobe reader is set to automatically update does that mean it gets to change any setting it wants?

      "Your version of Adobe Reader has been updated. Also, we took the liberty of installing the full version of Adobe CS4 on your machine. You now owe us $4000."

  8. If you check the "Custom Settings" it doesn't. by jarodss · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you let the IE install do it's thing automatically then it sets itself as default.

    Anyone not choosing to customize IE's install deserves to have it supplant their settings.

    1. Re:If you check the "Custom Settings" it doesn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone not choosing to customize IE's install deserves to have it supplant their settings.

      So, anyone who's not all that computer-savvy - people like my parents (retired), my grandmother (90+, but still interested in new things, like computers!), my aunt/uncle (got their first computer last year), my sister (has been using computers for ages but regards them as a means to achieve an end, not an end in itself) etc. all deserve for this to happen?

      Poppycock.

    2. Re:If you check the "Custom Settings" it doesn't. by owlstead · · Score: 1

      "Anyone not choosing to customize IE's install deserves to have it supplant their settings."

      Why? This is an upgrade, not a new install. Personally I don't think it should change the settings from the previous browsers. Although I know that this is not the way most software behaves, it should be.

    3. Re:If you check the "Custom Settings" it doesn't. by jarodss · · Score: 1

      Anyone who's not computer savvy is probably using IE as default anyway. And if they aren't using it as default then someone who is computer savvy can easily fix it for them over the phone.

    4. Re:If you check the "Custom Settings" it doesn't. by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But that's the point. Those people (grandma/grandpa) are already helped by others and set to work with an alternate browser. Now if this is true (that MS automatic update set to "install updates automatically" and it makes IE8 default), then all that hard work is lost.

      I don't know about you, but I can count at least 10 computers (other than mine) I have set FF to be default browser. I don't think its fair to undo that work (if this article is true, which I doubt).

    5. Re:If you check the "Custom Settings" it doesn't. by Vicegrip · · Score: 1

      The problem is that this is going to change my paren't computer to use IE after they've been using Firefox for years. This is yet another in a long list of Microsoft annoyances.

      At this rate I'm going to have to write a script that forces the browser to be Firefox at every reboot.

      --
      Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
    6. Re:If you check the "Custom Settings" it doesn't. by dragonjujotu · · Score: 1

      I must seriously be the odd one out... I did the upgrade for IE8 but it never asked if I wanted to set it as default... Of course I haven't run IE8 yet either...

      --
      Yes, I am obsessed with ellipses.
  9. IE8 on Vista, not the default by PunditGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just checked to make sure -- Firefox is still my default. No surreptitious shenanigans.

    Is this an XP thing? TFA didn't say which OS he was running.

    1. Re:IE8 on Vista, not the default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I installed on XP and Vista, both 32-bit and if you use custom settings there is an option to set it as default. I'm betting most slashdot users don't go for "express config" when it comes from MS, so no one is having the prob around here.

    2. Re:IE8 on Vista, not the default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm running XP and Firefox is still my default after upgrading to IE8 via windows update.

  10. FUD by Z_A_Commando · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have several machines, all running several versions of Windows (XP & Vista in both 32- and 64-bit varieties) and I have not seen IE8 automagically installed through Windows Update on them. I have Windows Update set to automatically install updates without asking and the result is exactly what happens with IE7 when you get it off of Windows Update: An installer screen pops up asking if you'd like to install IE8 now, would like to wait, or don't want to install it at all, ever. All have updated to Office 2007 SP2, which was released to Windows Update the same day.

    However, I can't speak to what happens when you have IE6 installed on your XP machine and this update comes across the wire. I dropped IE6 over a year ago. Still, I doubt such an upgrade would be forced like this. Also, when I did choose to install IE8 on a machine that has Firefox as the default browser, after the restart, Firefox was still the default. This article is simply FUD. Furthermore, what's wrong with replacing a less standards compliant browser with a more standards compliant browser? Provided you don't change the default browser of course.

    1. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only switches if you choose the Express Settings, which lazy people do.

    2. Re:FUD by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      The payoff is in those who don't read sites like Slashdot.

      I've personally installed Firefox on 5 or 6 computers in the past year. Now, those people are going to go though the update process, and have IE set to default. Even if they eventually figure it out, there's a good chance they'll use IE8 without realizing it - and see what makes it different from Firefox. So it gets a chance to show that its UI is finally not 5 years out of date.

  11. SOP for all Microsoft products by GaryOlson · · Score: 4, Informative

    Service packs for Visual Studio are no longer available on our WSUS server for this reason [after some hard political battles and beating Security over the head with a clue bat]. Visual Studio service packs change all your file associations from non-VS applications to Visual Studio. The Computer Science 101 students' heads all exploded when foo.java opened in Visual Studio 2005 instead of Notepad++.

    Microsoft has a long history of forcibly breaking your operating environment.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    1. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What do you mean "your" operating environment? Windows is theirs!

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    2. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "Personal Computer" with "Non-Personal" software.

    3. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by owlstead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a reason why I hate Microsoft at times, and Visual Studio installs are definitely one of them. First it goes and update your entire system, restarts a couple of hundred times and then it messes up your file associations. And of course you can be assured additional fun if you work at a company that does not have internet connections on their development PC's.

      Compare that with an Eclipse inst^H^H^Hunzip.

      Anyway, the whole idea that a single source file should open in an IDE is flawed. Let IDE's open workspaces and projects, but single files (many of them just containing fragments of code) that I want to view (promptly if possible) should *NOT* open in an IDE, and especially not in VS.

      That said, VS itself is getting better. But it starts off by annoying the hell out of possible switchers.

    4. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, the applications, utilities and libraries may be theirs, but anything that is written into my own hard-disk, specifically pertaining to my own user preferences, is mine.

      Well, not mine really--I don't use Windows.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    5. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by derGoldstein · · Score: 1

      VS is "tentacle software", just like Office. Whenever I can avoid installing either of them, I do.

      But you're right about the extent of the VS install absurdity. And if you add the WinSDK and a few other gems you're installing more software than the entire OS. Windows with VS installed along with its sibling add-ons is effectively a different version of the windows you initially installed.

      The funny thing is, that if the *only* MS software on your computer is the OS, then it's a pretty good OS (I'll get killed for this, I know). It's when you start adding their other miracles-of-software-engineering that it becomes a house of cards.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    6. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have installed Visual Studio 2008 twice in the past week - zero reboots needed each time, and the only file associations it monkeyed with was .cs. No network connection in either case here either.

    7. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by julesh · · Score: 1

      I have installed Visual Studio 2008 twice in the past week - zero reboots needed each time, and the only file associations it monkeyed with was .cs.

      They must have improved it somewhat recently, in that case. When I installed VS2005 Pro a couple of weeks back after an XP reinstall, it took without asking (highlighting indicating file types that were previously associated with a different application on my system): addin, asa, asax, ascx, ashx, asm, asmx, aspx, bsc, c, cpp, cs, css, cur, cxx, datasource, disco, dmp, dsp, dsw, dtd, h, hpp, hxx, i, ico, idb, idl, ilk, inc, lic, lst, mak, master, mdmp, mdp, mk, ncb, odh, odl, pal, pch, rc, rc2, rct, rdlc, res, resx, rgs, s, sbr, sdl, settings, sitemap, skin, sln, snippet, snk, srf, suo, tlh, tli, user, vb, vbproj, vcp, vcproj, vcw, vdp, vdproj, vscontent, vsi, vsmacros, vsmproj, vspolicy, vspolicycache, vspolicydef, vsprops, vspscc, vsscc, vssettings, vssscc, vstemplate, vsz, wsdl, wsf, xdr, xsc, xsd, xsl, xslt, and xss.

      It also added itself to the "open with" list but didn't change the default for: asp, bmp, hta, htm, html, js, txt, vbs, xml.

    8. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recent versions of VS do not restart your computer. What a load of bullshit.

    9. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by owlstead · · Score: 1

      No, but possible updates do. The latest version I've run is VS 2008, but only the express version. I don't remember what the verdict was of that. AFAIK VS still requires your OS to be rather up to date, have the latest IE and all. Maybe this is reasonable for you, but sometimes you don't want to update your computer just to install an IDE.

      Of course, if everything is completely up to date, you may not have to restart your computer (anymore). My first personal install of VS was on a company laptop 5/6 years ago, still running Win2K. That cost me a couple of hours - straight from 8PM to 2.30AM to be precise (I had a C#/.NET lesson in the morning).

    10. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The Computer Science 101 students' heads all exploded when foo.java opened in Visual Studio 2005 instead of Notepad++.

      Sounds like you've got some slow students if they couldn't ignore VS2005 and open a text file in the editor of their choice. In my experience, when Information Security gets "hit over the head with a clue bat", their response is "Okay, we'll ignore your vulnerabilities for now, but first sign of trouble, and we take your machine(s). And we won't be inclined to be nice about data you didn't back up. Have a nice day".

      Microsoft has a long history of forcibly breaking your operating environment.

      So do malware writers.

    11. Re:SOP for all Microsoft products by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      I can't put VS2008 on the student systems. The majority of the textbooks just finished updating from Visual Studio 6 to Visual Studio 2005. We'll see what is available in 2011.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  12. Some info about this by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was actually "released" from the IE8 team for precisely my opposition to this action.

    The day I found out I no longer had to show up to Redmond, the sun was low in the sky and the light mist that always seems to hover over the Puget Sound area was turning into a cold drizzle. The drizzle would eventually become snow and we'd have two days straight of spring snow.

    I pulled my Fiat into the parking lot and was met by two of my teammates. They were waiting to warn me of the incoming news of which they had only heard the very basics. I was to be fired and marched out. It was to make an example of me and to impress on the remaining team members not to rock the boat. IE8 would take over as default browser, no matter what any ruggedly handsome senior developer thought.

    My manager met me in my office and handed me 6 cardboard boxes. He thanked me for the years of work I had put in, and was sorry that things had reached this point. The my sentence was handed down from above, and he had done his best to lobby on my behalf. But he didn't share my feelings about the default browser action.

    I took down my patent cubes and unopened boxes of shipped products. My books were packed up into the cardboard boxes and I took a few paper clips and pens as mementos. My final official act was to grab two bottles of Talking Rain. Raspberry and Lemon Lime. And with these, I walked with my manager and security guard to my tiny, snow-covered car.

    The decision to do this with IE8 came as a product of much deliberation. It is no accident. They took action against me personally because I had the audacity to speak out. I always heard about their anti-competitiveness, but didn't really understand its reality until that snowy day.

    1. Re:Some info about this by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Gee, thanks. Now I am going to be morose all weekend.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    2. Re:Some info about this by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      When do we get to see the Michael Bay fire-and-explosions sequel where the One Man rappells down the office building, smashes the window to get in using auomatic fire, to retrieve the red stapler he left behind, showing them EXACTLY what he thought of the decision by putting a yellow post-it note on the manager's door (with URL link of slashdotter's opinions)?

      Excellent post, btw.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    3. Re:Some info about this by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Don't worry to much about it, he's probably lying, or making some kind of joke referance. I havn't seen Talking Rain bottles in the MS coolers for ages... it's been cans only in the free beverage coolers for years. They even had special cans for Vista release and such.

    4. Re:Some info about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microwhoosh.

  13. Making it a critical update was a favor by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IE6 is a plague on the internet development world. If it gets rid of that, wonderful. Making it the default browser, that's classic Microsoft. Actually, that's the new, desperate to hang on to market share in the face of shrinking revenue Microsoft.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Making it a critical update was a favor by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      IE6 is a plague on the internet development world. If it gets rid of that, wonderful. Making it the default browser, that's classic Microsoft. Actually, that's the new, desperate to hang on to market share in the face of shrinking revenue Microsoft.

      My first thought when IE8 came out for all Windows versions was that MS was feeling the pinch from the other browsers, and wanted a chance to recapture some market share.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    2. Re:Making it a critical update was a favor by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      IE6 is a plague on the internet development world. If it gets rid of that, wonderful.

      I don't think this will get rid of it. Limited users who have their updates "pushed through" by IT will likely still run IE 6.

      I am one of those users and IE 6 is still here. Thank goodness for Portable Firefox.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  14. works on my computer by RingDev · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not that I saw. I remember seeing an explicit "Make IE8 your default browser?" dialogue show up. I'm not sure about XP, but on Vista 64, it behaived exactly as I expected it to and did not change any settings that I didn't tell it explicitly to do.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:works on my computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same for me Google Chrome is still my default browser. It asked me several questions about how I wanted it configured and I distinctly seen the choice to set IE 8 as default or leave my current default.

    2. Re:works on my computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The guy was probably clicking "next, next, next, next" and missed the option to NOT make it the default browser.

      I've noticed Firefox and Opera ask you TWICE. Once when you install it, and once after you first start it (or forever if you leave "don't ask me again" unchecked).

    3. Re:works on my computer by alChandler · · Score: 1

      It behaves the same way on XP. It asks politely and moves on.

    4. Re:works on my computer by jsiren · · Score: 1

      The guy was probably clicking "next, next, next, next" and missed the option to NOT make it the default browser.

      This was probably phrased as
      "[ ] Check if IE8 is already the default browser"

      --
      Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
    5. Re:works on my computer by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so do I. And when I didn't check it? Lo and behold, it didn't make itself the default browser. Gah, FUD is bad, mmmkay, whichever direction it comes from.

    6. Re:works on my computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm staring at screen that says:

      Do you want to make Internet Explorer your default browser?

      ( ) Yes
      ( ) No
      [x] Import settings from my other browser after setup has completed

  15. You fucking suck... Slashdot by GF678 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm yet another person who installed IE 8 via Windows Update and it did NOT forcibly set itself as the default browser.

    Seriously Slashdot, do you even bother to vet your troll articles anymore? Do you realize how embarrassingly pathetic this one significant site in the tech world has become?

    1. Re:You fucking suck... Slashdot by OhPlz · · Score: 1, Funny

      I try to think of Slashdot as a humor site. It helps.

    2. Re:You fucking suck... Slashdot by GF678 · · Score: 1

      Actually now that I think of it, you're right. It does help, but only a bit. :)

    3. Re:You fucking suck... Slashdot by wcb4 · · Score: 1

      You're obviously new here. Slashdot has never bothered to vet articles. Trust me, I've been around a while

      --
      I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
    4. Re:You fucking suck... Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand your disappointment in slashdot. However, do you really need to use obscenities on a public forum for something as trivial as this story? How childish are you?

    5. Re:You fucking suck... Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obscenities are not childish, you childish motherfucker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111!!!

    6. Re:You fucking suck... Slashdot by Jamie's+Nightmare · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I still can't believe this story wasn't posted by Kdawson. I had to triple check.

      --
      "When you see a unixer brainwashed beyond saving, kick him out of the door." - Xah Lee
    7. Re:You fucking suck... Slashdot by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      This is a discussion site; not a vetted information source. If you want the truth, go find the Dali Lama. If you want to discuss technical stuff, regardless of the veracity and accuracy of the original article, hang around and enjoy yourself.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  16. Vista/IE8 bug by clickclickdrone · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm holding back installing it as there's still a bug (apparantly) that stops media sharing working with WMP11 when you install IE8 on Vista.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Vista/IE8 bug by glennpratt · · Score: 1

      Link?

    2. Re:Vista/IE8 bug by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      I installed it ages ago and my media sharing works fine. I think that at worst you might have to re-enable it, but YMMV.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  17. small fine? by anonieuweling · · Score: 1

    Have them drag the issue on in the EU. It may take a while but the sums are slightly over average in size.

  18. Firefox does the same. by Little_Professor · · Score: 1

    On a default install on Windows, Firefox also makes itself the default browser without asking. Very annoying, particularly as I use Seamonkey as my main browser.

    1. Re:Firefox does the same. by Vitani · · Score: 1

      That's a little different as you are choosing to install Firefox, where as IE8 is cited as a "Critical Windows Update"

    2. Re:Firefox does the same. by Saint+Gerbil · · Score: 1

      And Safari for Windows.

      And its automatically ticked when anything updates.

    3. Re:Firefox does the same. by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Um, yes, almost any software does that. The number of people using two browsers at the same time must not be that high, and not doing so will cost you the competition.

      If FF 3.5 comes out and is installed as an update (or, upgrade) I would be pissed off as well if it automatically installed itself as default, EVEN if you did the auto install.

      Updating/upgrading and new installs are not the same thing. That said, I find it annoying as well, because I never switch directly to new software, I tend to give it a few test runs first.

    4. Re:Firefox does the same. by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      The last Firefox -update- did the same thing here.

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    5. Re:Firefox does the same. by Vitani · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but Little_Professor wasn't arguing updates vs updates :o)

  19. Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It asks you in the damn installation wizard if you'd like it to be the default browser. I know the Slashdot crowd is all anti-Microsoft, but can we please not fight FUD with FUD?

  20. wrong by LurkingOnSlashdot · · Score: 1

    If it were actually true that MS forced you to switch to IE8, even temporarily until you switch back to FF, that would be major news! But as seems to be the case here, the author is just making shit up.

  21. FUD by sherriw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I agree that making it default _without asking_ is a shady move on Microsoft's part, I'm sure what the payoff is for them versus the negative response many people will have. Those users who have a non-IE browser as default will notice the switch and will switch it back, these are the users who are actively choosing which browser to use anyway. The people who don't care what browser they are using, are probably already using IE. So what do they accomplish, other than reaffirming to the non-IE people the rightness of their choice?

  22. As Machiavellian as this seems... by Assmasher · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...we know that most people (sadly) are using some version of IE currently; ergo, if they install IE8 and it makes itself the default, this is good for a variety of reasons entirely related to security (and good for the rest of us as the last thing I need is more zombies out there spamming me night and day.)

    Now, most people who have an alternative browser installed do so because they are 'aware' of the realities of modern web surfing and make an intelligent choice accordingly. These people are being inconvenienced by this because they've got to set their browser back to being the default (often this is simply a case, using Mozilla as an example, of starting up their favorite browser and it saying "Hey, don't you want to use me all the time" and they choose "yes, make yourself my default browser." Inconvenient, annoying, suspicious, yes - a real problem for these people? No...

    The last group are the (imho) very small minority of web users who've been lucky enough to have an informed web user install an IE alternative for them, but they themselves do not know what the fuss is about. These are the people actually getting screwed by this. They may end up with IE8 until their good Samaritan revisits them to right this terrible wrong.

    Ignoring whatever the actual motives for this decision at Micro$oft was, I personally think the good outweighs the bad. It would still be nice to smack the guy who green lighted this in the face though, wouldn't it? :)

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:As Machiavellian as this seems... by Assmasher · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Note to self - never presume again that a slashdot article is fundamentally accurate...

      --
      Loading...
    2. Re:As Machiavellian as this seems... by Guido+del+Confuso · · Score: 1

      I want to smack "I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property" in the face. Not only is his username simultaneously shit-eatingly smug and simplistically moronic, invariably the stories he submits are overblown propaganda designed to further his blatantly anti-corporate agenda.

      Note to the editors: Please, please give this jackass his own section or something, so we can filter him out. I'm really tired of seeing him trying to whip the Slashbots into a circle-jerk frenzy.

      Mod me down if you want. I'm being dead serious here.

    3. Re:As Machiavellian as this seems... by Nevyn · · Score: 1

      we know that most people (sadly) are using some version of IE currently; ergo, if they install IE8 and it makes itself the default, this is good for a variety of reasons

      What are you smoking? If they upgrade from IE6 to IE8, and IE6 is the default ... they don't need to change any settings!

      The only time doing/not-doing this matters is when the user has specifically set firefox/whatever to be the default instead. Of these users there will be the users who "know what they are doing", and will probably have done the non-automated install, so will either not experience this or set it back immediately. And there will be the users who had someone fix their computer for them (likely the much bigger group), and they will almost certainly just get forced into using IE8 just knowing that "everything is different".

      It seems reasonable to assume that this action was done purely to force the later set of people to switch and thus. make their "using IE" and "people who love IE8" stats. better. This would be annoying, but tollerable, from a small developer. From a convicted monopolist people should go to jail, not that I think they will get punished.

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    4. Re:As Machiavellian as this seems... by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      You do realize that this is the default behavior of Firefox when installed with defaults? Yes?

      Also, IE8 will supplant IE 6 and IE7, not earlier versions like 5.5, so what are you smoking? ;)

      --
      Loading...
  23. Didn't override FF3.5 being the default. by wiredog · · Score: 4, Informative

    On a WinXP SP3 box here at work.

  24. Bollocks by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes in with word that the update not only does not ask, but it makes IE the default browser.

    When I looked at my XP box the other day, there was a bubble notifying me of available updates. I checked to see what it was and all there was was IE8. So I unchecked the box, told it never to ask again, and that was the end of that. So why the FUD ? Can't you even configure windows properly ? Please stay away from Linux.

    1. Re:Bollocks by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Are you truly this stupid, or do you just play an idiot on slashdot?

    2. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I unchecked the box, told it never to ask again, and that was the end of that. So why the FUD ? Can't you even configure windows properly ?

      I think you missed the point of the article (and discussion), even though it turned out to be somewhat inaccurate...

  25. Not a problem here by glennpratt · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just allowed a handful of computer at work to install the update. All of them asked before installing and none of them changed the default away from Firefox.

    Somebody needs to explain this.

  26. Hijack by dennis_k85 · · Score: 0

    Actually it was a major $%^$ing pain in the butt to change firefox back to the default browser after IE8 hijacked it.

    --
    cd pub
    more beer
    1. Re:Hijack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really. When you launched firefox and it said that it was not your current browser, would you like to make it the default, "OK" or "Cancel" clicking that "OK" button was that big a "$%^$ing pain in the butt" that you feel the need to whine here? Really?

  27. Bullshit by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, you can change it back, but it doesn't ask you if you want IE8 or if you want it as the default browser, it makes the decisions for you.

    This is not entirely true. When you install IE8, it asks you whether you'd like to do an Easy install or if you'd rather do a custom install. The Easy install does indeed set IE8 as the system's default browser, without asking. However, if you do the custom install, it does ask, and it honors what you tell the installer to do.

    Even if your default browser setting does get hijacked, the very next time you launch Firefox, it'll let you know it's not set as your default browser, and it's one click to change it back. Not a big deal at all, other than if you're running unattended installs on critical systems which require Firefox to be the default browser for some reason.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  28. People who are to stupid... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    ...to be able to put their preferred browser back to the default browser because IE8 has forced itself in its place are probably too stupid to keep their virus checkers and anti-spyware software updated as well. Therefore the fact that IE8 is possibly less secure than Firefox, Opera, etc. is a moot point.

    I suggest those same people focus on getting a little less stupid and learning a bit more about their computers - by default Firefox will tell you if it's no longer the default browser (I don't use Opera or any other browser so can't comment on those) so if IE8 makes itself the default, then just start Firefox up and answer the "Do you want Firefox to be your default browser?" question with a "Yes".

    Wake up people - big companies want you to buy and use their stuff! So get some common sense...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  29. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Installed IE8 via Automatic Updates and it is not my default browser.

    Slashdot has become a sensationalist tech news site. Sorry Slashdot: I've got no time for jibba-jabba.

  30. FUD by wcb4 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I allowed the install of IE8 on 2 of my personal machines yesterday. Both of the still have Firefox as the default browser. Vista and XP. Who is complaining that its switching their default browser? What's the setup?

    --
    I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
  31. How much difference would it actually make? by williamhb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How much browsing is done through the "default browser" setting anyway? Maybe the occasional click of an email link. Surely most of the time, however, browsers are invoked directly by double-clicking the icon of your usual browser, rather than through invoking the Windows default browser setting. And most browsers have an automatic pop-up asking you if you want to set them as your default browser, with "yes" pre-checked (as well as "run this check every time"), so most non-techy users would very quickly end right up back with their old browser setting again, just through their habit of saying OK without thinking very much.

    1. Re:How much difference would it actually make? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      How much browsing is done through the "default browser" setting anyway? Maybe the occasional click of an email link.

      Although I agree with most of your post, I would extend this to any link in any program, and there are a lot (on help pages, about boxes etc. etc.).

      But starting up your favorite browser and click "make default" again should indeed do the trick. Of course, if other browsers were nice about installs/updates, this popup should never ever have to occur, at all.

    2. Re:How much difference would it actually make? by Rinnon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are SIGNIFICANTLY overestimating the general public, leading me to believe you have never worked in a technical support call center. Remember how when you install Windows, it gives you an Icon at the top of the start menu that says "Internet" and then if your default changes, that icon changes? Surely, those of us in know laugh at this as a potential problem, but I can't count the number of people who claim they have "lost" their browser or (more commonly) they can't open Outlook, and instead Outlook Express is opening, and they don't know why. And do you think the average user is going to click on the "custom" button when installing IE8? Are you kidding? That "custom" button to them, means "crazy details I'm not supposed to touch"; but just because they don't know this and that about computers, doesn't make them any less deserving to not have their settings pulled out from underneath them. They're the ones who really suffer from things like this. Not us on Slashdot, who spend 20 times more time typing up the complaint than actually fixing the issue. ~2 Cents

    3. Re:How much difference would it actually make? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are SIGNIFICANTLY overestimating the general public, leading me to believe you have never worked in a technical support call center. Remember how when you install Windows, it gives you an Icon at the top of the start menu that says "Internet" and then if your default changes, that icon changes?

      No, I just don't know that many people who can be bothered to go into the Start menu when the recognisable icon of their usual browser is right there on the desktop.

    4. Re:How much difference would it actually make? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      You are SIGNIFICANTLY overestimating the general public, leading me to believe you have never worked in a technical support call center.

      No, I haven't. And every day, I say a little thankyou to some unseen force for that small mercy.

    5. Re:How much difference would it actually make? by ArcCoyote · · Score: 1

      Umm... the default browser setting determines what comes up for the start menu's Internet icon? That's almost always how I launch Firefox.

  32. Wasn't true in my case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have an XP virtual machine (SP3) that I use to VPN into work.

    Just yesterday I installed the update with IE8 on it.

    Firefox 3 was still my default browser after the update.

    When I opened up IE8, it did ask me if I wanted to change IE8 to be my new default, but it did so in a totally clear manner that made it easy to decline.

  33. Not an uncommon practice by CodingHero · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems that Microsoft takes the heat for forcing its products to be the default browser/media player/whatever, but whenever I get an iTunes/QuickTime update, QuickTime doesn't give me the option of choosing whether or not it is the default media player and proceeds to take over my machine. Furthermore I, like many posters before me, was given the option during IE8's install process of whether or not I wanted it to be the default browser. Of course I do custom/manual Windows updates. Perhaps those who use Express update are met with a different result?

    1. Re:Not an uncommon practice by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised your comment hasn't been met with the usual Apple-fanboy defense for this one, "Oh, wait, remind me when Apple was convicted of abusing its monopoly? Oh wait, you can't! *smug*", like it's apparently okay to ride roughshod over user preferences unless that condition is met.

  34. MS Tactic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the guy who posted this thread is a MS employee - goading us to install IE8 by trying to get our backs up ;)

  35. possibly this was by-design by derGoldstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's conceivable that it only makes itself the default under certain circumstances. Maybe if you have auto-updates "fully" turned on (where it doesn't even ask, it just installs), it'll make it the default.
    I don't want to sound troll-ish but it's likely that people who have auto-update set to "download-and-install-automatically" aren't the more savvy set, and therefor MS thought they could get away with it (I almost added "and I don't want to sound like a conspiracy-theorist", but this is MS, it's *expected*).

    I can even see MS apologists taking their side here, something like: "look, you probably installed Firefox on your parent's computer to protect them from IE hacks, not because of usability, but IE8 makes very significant improvements and you know that it will be kept patched on a system that automatically installs updates from MS"

    To me this seems to be a designed tactic.

    --
    Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    1. Re:possibly this was by-design by gaspyy · · Score: 1

      Or maybe, just MAYBE, the article itself is a troll. It's not like it hasn't happened before.

    2. Re:possibly this was by-design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is far from the first time Microsoft or any other company has decided that one of the default install options is to set their product to be the default for a set of file/link extensions. Is it really EVIL, or any of the other hate monger words that might be associated with it, to have their no questions asked install follow the age old tradition of making their product the product of choice for your system?

    3. Re:possibly this was by-design by initdeep · · Score: 1

      no

      on first run is when all of the questions come up, so even if you have your updates set to auto install, you'll still get the setup screen on first run.

      basically the person who wrote the "article" is a fucking moron and full of shit, but hey, it's slashdot, so why would anyone think the summary isn't correct.....

    4. Re:possibly this was by-design by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You tried, but no cigar. My anecdote: XP Pro SP3, all auto-updates, upgraded to IE8 and left Firefox 3 as my default browser. I call troll on the article itself, from my anecdotal.

    5. Re:possibly this was by-design by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I don't want to sound troll-ish but it's likely that people who have
      > auto-update set to "download-and-install-automatically" aren't the more savvy set

      I would have said the reverse, since that's not the default setting, and home users never change the defaults. Therefore, people who have it set up that way are most likely people who did so deliberately, presumably for security reasons.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  36. You sure? Which OS? by c0p0n · · Score: 1

    Because I downloaded & installed the update yesterday on my Vista laptop and it did ask, and honor my answer (no).

    --

    Your head a splode
  37. This is NOT true. by Zoson · · Score: 1

    Someone is fibbin' here. And it aint Microsoft.
    This update is still not required. I bypassed it this morning as usual.

  38. Not accurate by DanJ_UK · · Score: 1

    Ok now even I'm not going to let this one slip, what's going on /.?

    --
    - Dan
  39. IE 8 didn't force itself on me but... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Funny

    It did throw a chair at me when I said to leave me default as Firefox.

    1. Re:IE 8 didn't force itself on me but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA! Ballmer's never gonna live that down. Glorious.

      I want someone to make a cheesy flash vid of someone giving ballmer some bad news, followed by a shot outside the microsoft building with every window being broken by a chair flying through them one by one.

      Microsoft: We break Windows, in more ways than one.

  40. It does not change the slightest thing at all by scheuri · · Score: 1

    As far as I recall correctly IE7 was supposed to be forced on Windows (XP) as well and was IIRC shipped with Windows Vista.
    Now IE8 is forced by Windows Update

    Now how is this going to change ANYTHING at all if millions and millions (okay, not that many, but you get my point) of pirated (and even not pirated) copies of Windows XP will not be updated...ever.

    Remember the near uprising when windows 98 was not supported anymore. While I was "what, you still use that" thousand of people still were "Hey, I am using this...it just works...I never touched it".

    Why is this different?

    1. Re:It does not change the slightest thing at all by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      It's not the pirated versions of XP that you should care about, it's the machines all running corporate images of XP that matter.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
  41. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    And in turn by the third. Apparently I am the first one smart enough to do so anonymously.

  42. Am I the only one? by stumblingblock · · Score: 1

    ...that had IE8 listed as "important" rather than critical? And the install ASKED me if I wanted to make IE my default browser?

  43. Re:Damn! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    There you go confusing slashdot with penthouse again.

  44. Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you give "I don't believe in Imaginary Property" credit? He doesn't believe in copyright.

  45. Re:Damn! by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

    Never mind, I was waiting to be Bel-Aired.

    --
    Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
  46. You must be new here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "editors" are either too lazy, stupid or dishonest to fact-check.

  47. It's true by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

    Actually it's true. The last batch of updates on my XP laptop included IE8. I have updates set to notify me before installing, but if I was using the default settings I would have had IE8 thrust upon me without so much as a buy-or-leave. (I declined, as it happens - I have IE8 on my other machine, so might as well keep a native IE7 for test purposes.)

    1. Re:It's true by spiffyman · · Score: 1

      FYI, I'm pretty sure you mean a by-your-leave. Although your original makes for an interesting study in customer service.

      --
      So you can laugh all you want to...
    2. Re:It's true by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      If your computer thrusts IE8 upon you with a "By your command", then you should start worrying.

    3. Re:It's true by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      I don't know how it functions with an automatic update, but when you are manually initiating the update process IE 8 presents you with an interactive window—including an install/don't install option. Unless they really went to the effort to write a different installer for automatic mode, you wouldn't have had it thrust upon you.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    4. Re:It's true by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      I meant what I wrote. "By your leave" seemed rather old-fashioned.

  48. Same here by Xest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Installed on Vista 64.

    I think what TFA actually means to say is:

    "I got really click happy and just blindly clicked my way through the IE8 install without looking and it made itself my default browser, how dare it!"

    1. Re:Same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I got really click happy and just blindly clicked my way through the IE8 install without looking and it made itself my default browser, how dare it!"

      .Yes, how dare it. There are two pertinent user settings here:

      1) The aforementioned default setting, and
      2) The don't bug me about "1)" setting again

      Using automatic updates to push people (or nag or trick them) is bad software. A pop-up dialogue might as well be a pop-up ad. You set your browsers to supress those, why does microsoft use the update mechanism to override your preferences? As far as "click happy", I can't speak to the latest Windows update, but upon installing Foxit on Windows, I swear to have read every dialog and unchecked the "install toolbar" boxes. Nonetheless, the toolbar was there. It doesn't matter what you click-happy click if the software disregards your choice.

    2. Re:Same here by BigDXLT · · Score: 1

      Vista 64 here as well, and IE8 never took over Opera as the default browser. I can't remember for sure, but maybe the "make IE8 the default browser" check box might have been checked by default? Those evil bastards! Surely this constitutes an antitrust lawsuit?

  49. BREECH by asdfndsagse · · Score: 1

    This is against the settlement. It has to ask before setting its self as default. More Microsoft bullshit.

  50. Here is a Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do people continue to use windows! If we all switched to a unix based OS we wouldn't have to deal with microsoft at all. I say this as I am using the forced, only choice IE7 browser at the college I am working at. Even if I hack the password to install FireFox they reimage the machines every week or so.

    Schools and colleges need to break away from the microsoft corportate machine and start using free software (as in speech).

  51. Wrong wrong wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, while ie8 is a critical update, it does not "force itself" onto one's system. Like all previous incantations, it asks before it actually installs, with the general eula that you have to agree to to install, and options. Second, after restart, firefox was still my default browser on all four of the odes I tried (two vistas on two different machines, two xps on another two machines) launching ie8 gives you configuration options, one of which is to import favorites from other browsers, to set as default browser, etc. On none of the systems did I take over as default browser, and all were installed through microsoft updates.

    Thanks once again, slashdot, for publishing untrue microsoft banter.

  52. Get a grip... by yodleboy · · Score: 1

    I call bullshit. I just installed the IE8 push from windows update this morning. On first launch one of the questions was "do you want to make internet explorer your default browser". I said no. A quick test just now by clicking a link in an email and also opening a local html file shows that FIREFOX is still my default browser.

    I find it likely that some moron just clicked through the screens and didn't read them. The default answer to the default browser question is of course "yes". Failure to read the screen is not a sign of a vast conspiracy to take over your internet experience...

  53. The install you offers options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the options while installing IE 8 offers quick setup or custom

    With the custom setup you can uncheck the option of using it as default browser.

    I did that, and keep using firefox as my default browser

  54. funny thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the funny thing is. IE8 has "do you want to make internet explorer your default browser" as a huge glaring option in the middle of the screen when you install it.

    firefox hides it away in the bottom corner and tries to make it look like a branding logo, and defaults it to on. yet nobody says anything about that.

  55. It wasn't forced on me by flibbidyfloo · · Score: 1

    I don't know who is being forced to get IE8 without windows "asking", but it asked me this week, and I declined with no problems.

    I have automatic updates (critical only) turned on, and it didn't download automatically. I ran a manual "Windows Update" two days ago to see if there were any optional driver updates for me and it listed IE8 in the "critical" section, but I was able to untick the check box right there. It simply warned me that I might be at risk if I don't download critical updates, but went ahead and skipped it with no other complaints.

  56. Just not seeing it. by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

    I just did a fresh install of XP SP1 (adding SP2 & 3 myself) on a system last night and I have run Windows update several times. Once I was current, IE8 did show up as a critical update, but with it's own install routine (just like IE7 did). I was asked in the first dialog if I wanted to help improve IE8 by sending data back to MS. On this opening dialog of the install routine was a "Do Not Install" button. The next page of the dialog was the click through license, which I also could have rejected. After rebooting the system my default browser was still FF, not the new IE8. Once I ran IE8 there was a first run wizard and the third page of that was "Choose Your Settings" and IF I selected "Express Settings" there was a list of things that would be done, one of those was make IE8 my default browser, another was something called "Smart Filter". This option was not selected by default, neither was the "Custom Settings" option. I chose the custom settings and one of those was to change my default browser. Again, NOTHING was selected by default, there was no "click through", I had to make a choice in order to proceed. Did they want to be my default, yes, but the options were not forced on me, preselected or concealed in a sneaky manner, it was all spelled out in plain simple language. The only way to get your browser switched against your will is to ignore the short list of things that will be done in the "Express Settings" option.

    Just to make sure I was remembering correctly I ran Windows Update on another system this morning, and got the same exact experience. I also note there is a small download to block IE8 from being installed, it is at http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=21687628-5806-4ba6-9e4e-8e224ec6dd8c.

    I'll continue to use FF as my browser, but I know my phone will start ringing soon and I want to be ready for questions from my non-geek friends, so I'll take the new browser on my personal system and see what the new features are. As for the headline of this article, it does not match up with my two experiences in the last 24 hours. Maybe I'll set up another XP box and let the browser get pushed to me via automatic updates, but I bet the install routine is the same...

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  57. IE 6 will love on for many people...even th by MoldySpore · · Score: 1

    Actually, as a part-time web developer, I can tell you that I constantly have to model sites and re-code portions of things done by other developers to be compatible with IE6.

    There are enough people out there still running IE 6 for it to matter to most companies that want web content generated that it be compatible with IE6 and old versions of Outlook (if it is HTML E-mail) like 2003 and earlier.

    I despise this, and look forward to the day I don't have to convert PNG's back to JPG so that the colors look right in IE 6. But this isn't the answer. You can easily uncheck the option to install IE8. I did. I refuse to even see the icon for IE on my computers (I disable it in "Program Access and Defaults").

    --

    "I hope you know how very lucky you are to know me, because I am so incredibly incredible."

    1. Re:IE 6 will love on for many people...even th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would kill to have Outlook 2003's HTML support in Outlook 2007. Outlook 2007 is completely crippled.

    2. Re:IE 6 will love on for many people...even th by brunascle · · Score: 1

      Outlook 2007 switched from using IE's rendering engine to MS Word's, so actually you've got it backwards. As bad as IE's rendering is, it's light years ahead of Word's.

  58. Microsoft Choice Guard by bigbigbison · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I didn't experience any issues updating to IE8 but I did experience MS hijacking my firefox search and homepage when I installed their Live stuff.

    I restarted my computer after installing the latest updates including the Live stuff and when I restarted Firefox, the addons window popped up with something called "Microsoft Choice Guard." With a name like "choice guard" it sounded like spyware to me and I was basically right.

    It turns out that if you aren't paying attention MS will install this http://help.live.com/help.aspx?market=en-us&project=wlinstallerv3&querytype=keyword&query=draug_eciohc

    This isn't going to win MS any friends...

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  59. IE8 _ No Web Outlook :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the lab at work, I updated one of the machines to IE8 and noticed the forceful change of my default browser.(I hate changes without any interaction like this.) Then when i went to access our Outlook Exchange server via IE8, what do you know...Almost every time I try and create a new email it logs me out. Just annoying.

  60. no by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

    no, it does not make itself default if you uncheck the box during install. just like firefox.

    --
    Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  61. Major companies still forcing IE6 by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    I'm working on a project where some of the customers, major companies, insist that we deliver the extranet IE6-compatible, because that's what they use. Even if it's a big turd, even if it's basically not supported anymore. We have to spend a lot of time and money on supporting this complete crap.

  62. By The Numbers by westlake · · Score: 4, Informative
    when firefox has a new version, everyone downloads it with a warm and fuzzy feeling that it is going to be an improvement. However, whenever IE has a new version, people are so reluctant to download it that MS now has to force the public to upgrade

    Browser Version Market Share

    IE 7 44.5%
    IE 6 17.5%
    IE 8 4.3%
    IE 5 0.04%
    IE 5.5 0.03%

    Firefox 3.0 20%
    Firefox 2.0 1.8%
    Firefox 3.1 0.18%
    Firefox 1.5 0.15%
    Firefox 1.0 0.06%
    Firefox 3.5 0.01%

    So call it 50% of the web for IE 7 and IE 8.

    Net Applications tracks hits to e-commerce and other mass market websites.

    It's not looking at techies. It's looking at guy who watches Fox News and does his shopping at K-Mart.

    The geek lives in a bubble.

    He believes what he wants to believe.

    1. Re:By The Numbers by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      The geek lives in a bubble.

      He believes what he wants to believe.

      That's because deep down, we all want to be Fox Mulder.

    2. Re:By The Numbers by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      The geeks' stats are not accumulated by Net Applications because we use NoScript addon with Firefox.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    3. Re:By The Numbers by Lennie · · Score: 1

      It all depends, where you look, how you look at it, etc.

      In Europe Firefox 3 has the largest browser-version share. Firefox 3 alone
      is larger than IE7 and IE8 combined. IE6 (7.1 %) is actually keeping IE
      from loosing thair top position. But Firefox is at 43.02% and IE at 44.7%
      and IE is loosing.

      But if you look at IE in the Netherlands for example where I life it's at 71 % and
      hardly declining, geez. scary.

      http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-eu-daily-20080701-20090502

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
  63. Re:Retarded and False by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your claim is retarded and demonstrably false.

    Yet you fail to present anything to support your own claims. Name calling doesn't count, by the way.
    If Slashdot is such a shithole then why do you waste your time here?

  64. No - you are full of... by Oldstench · · Score: 1

    ...shit. When I installed the update, it asked me if I wanted to make it my default browser, which I chose not to do.

    Please get your facts straight before you bash MS, that most hated of companies.

  65. Even with the express settings... by joetomato · · Score: 1

    Even if you choose the Express Settings option, it does tell you that it's going to change the default: http://www.geeksmack.net/uploads/ie8_screens/wizard_settings.jpg Notice "Default browser: Internet Explorer" under the list of default options that will be selected.

  66. Re:first post by kokojie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Fourth anonymous idiot you mean

  67. Quick Launch icons by ApproachingLinux · · Score: 1

    Haven't installed IE8, but I do know that they like to make sure that their icons are where they want them to be. I changed the name of my Quick Launch icon for Outlook to "email". After i did that, almost every time i do a Windows Update, i get an extra icon in my Quick Launch bar for Outlook -- with the words that they want to be on it (i forget what they are). i guess they can't tell that i already have an icon for Outlook ...

  68. I installed it... by tubeguy · · Score: 1

    ...and couldn't surf afterword. Borked Chrome too, but Firefox is OK. Hell if I know what happened. I'm still connected to the network, settings didn't change, but can't get out with IE8 or Chrome now. Windows rocks! ;-)

    1. Re:I installed it... by tubeguy · · Score: 1

      I do of course have Debian, Vector and DSL boxes, this is just fun time stuff.

  69. Not really a new tactic for Microsoft by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    This might be a "new tactic" in reference to browsers, specifically, but its hardly new to Microsoft. I've frequently had Windows updates switch default associations back to Windows bundled components (Media Player most recently).

  70. Whatever by SeanBlader · · Score: 1

    As long as it means the end of support for IE6 and IE7 then I don't care what the hell they set as the default browser, Firefox and Opera are going to check on startup anyway so Microsoft's tactics aren't going to last long.

  71. Antitrust? by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

    You know what I don't get? Why is Microsoft being slapped with all sorts of antitrust lawsuits for IE, but Apple that not only "bundles" Safari with every system they sell but also has little support for competition, is in the clear? Someone sue them!

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.
    1. Re:Antitrust? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      You know what I don't get? Why is Microsoft being slapped with all sorts of antitrust lawsuits for IE, but Apple that not only "bundles" Safari with every system they sell but also has little support for competition, is in the clear?

      It's because Microsoft attained a monopoly illegally and because of that, they are having some harsh regulations to make it more fair for competitors now.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  72. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IE8 is more secure. Unless you have actually removed all traces of IE from your system (99.9999% have not), even if you don't use IE at all it would still be wise to update.

    As for the default browser... A bit annoying, but it's not a big deal.

    *Opens Firefox*
    "Firefox is not set as your default browser. Would you like to make this your default browser?"
    *clicks yes*
    Done.

  73. No different than any publisher by Soubrause · · Score: 1

    Every time you install any new software it takes default over certain file types why is a browser any different. if you don't want IE8, next time you open your previously default browser it will check this and you can set it back. Even my mom knows to click the orange fox instead of the blue E when she wants to "get on google"

  74. You Sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just updated to IE8 this morning, and Firefox is still my default. Perhaps this was a minor glitch that was corrected between the original poster's update and now?

  75. Latest Patch by Armaron · · Score: 1

    I installed the updates on my two pc's and on neither did the standard browser change. I'm still happily using Opera 9.64. :)

  76. You just proved his point! by pavon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    By those numbers, only 6.5% of IE users are running the latest version. Even if you include IE7 you get that only 73.5% of IE users have upgraded to a browser released in the last three years.

    On the otherhand, 91.4% of Firefox users are running the latest stable version or a beta version. And if you include FF2 (released the same month as IE7) 99.5% of firefox users have upgraded to a browser released in the last three years.

    Firefox users are far more likely to upgrade to the newest version than Internet Explorer users are, which is what he was claiming.

    1. Re:You just proved his point! by dintlu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's been my experience that Firefox automatically downloads updates and installs them when I restart my browser. Firefox users are up to date because *they don't have a choice.*

      Now, who was complaining about MS forcing an update?

    2. Re:You just proved his point! by pavon · · Score: 1

      No, it only does that for point releases (security updates & bug fixes). It has never automatically installed a new version. This is the same behavior as Windows Update.

    3. Re:You just proved his point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have both firefox 1.5 and 2 loaded on different machines, they have never updated to version 3 automatically.

    4. Re:You just proved his point! by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you want that bug/security fix, regardless of browser? I thought so. How about that major update? Gonna hold off on that one till it's a little bit more stable/faster/whatever? Hey, I guess you had the choice with FF. IE8 doesn't give you a chance. There's the difference.

    5. Re:You just proved his point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I recall, there was no automatic update between Firefox 2 and firefox 3.

    6. Re:You just proved his point! by snilloc · · Score: 1

      First, there's a preference to turn off automatic updates in FF. Second, even automatic updates only get executed if you're running as an admin account. Why somebody would routinely run a web browser (even FF or Opera) as a privileged user is beyond my comprehension. That is a security break waiting to happen.

  77. Anyway to filter by submitter. by pavon · · Score: 1

    Is there anyway to filter stories by submitter? I know you can exclude stories by particlar editors, but don't know about submitters. This is the third story that 'I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property' has posted that has been not just inflammatory but a flat-out lie.

  78. huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have not experienced this alteration in default browser.

  79. Gee, my PC must be broken by thethibs · · Score: 1

    I just updated a little-used laptop with about three months' worth of patches and upgrades, including IE8.

    The default browser is still firefox. Obviously, there's something wrong with my configuration.

    --
    I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.
  80. Enterprise versus consumer by benwaggoner · · Score: 1

    This probably reflects that a lot of IE installs are on managed desktops where IT picks when the browser is updated. Firefox doesn't play in that market.

    I imagine that consumers with IE installed upgrade at a rate a lot closer to the Firefox rate.

    It's probably more an issue of the IE number capturing from two big demographics, while Firefox only frone ones of those.

    Were Firefox to ever get big in the enterprise, it'd only get updated on the standard corporate image refresh cycles too.

  81. Re:first post by node+3 · · Score: 1

    first post

    You must have Windows auto-update turned off...

  82. sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares, it's not the end of the world, if this is all you can find at fault, get a life!!! All you need to do revert your old browser back. Idiotic no life fool.

  83. Don't let IE fuck up your Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disable iexplore.exe and install it in a sandbox: xenocode

  84. IE8 Update Forces IE As Default Browser?????? by al0ha · · Score: 1

    As many have probably discovered by now; this is false. You can choose during install if you wish IE 8 to assume control as the default browser, or not. Of course you must also choose the installation for those who are curious about what is actually happening.

    --
    Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
  85. simply isn't true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i upgraded ie7 to ie8 via windows update. the default browser (firefox3) never changed.

  86. Not a new tactic by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 1

    > Microsoft has a new tactic in the browser wars. They're
    > having the 'critical' IE8 update make IE the default
    > browser without asking.

    From my perspective, that was not unexpected - not least because Microsoft is not interested in taking into account how its customers want to use their own computer(s); but also because Microsoft has a history of nasty business tactics, not delivering what it promises, and even lying to its own staff.

    Do you in all seriousness think that Microsoft is trustworthy?

  87. Hearts and Minds by erik.martino · · Score: 1

    They have obviously given up on winning the users hearts and minds. The only option left is brute monopoly force.

  88. Not Cool by mikechey · · Score: 1

    I work in an IT dept and we noticed this the other day when we were pushing out updated for our users. We are instructed to avoid the new browser until we can guarantee that everything we use is compatible with it but with Microsoft making this recent change it is likely that users will upgrade without knowing anyway.

  89. fuck off ie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf, I cant make Firefox my default browser at all now, it keeps switching to IE8 ARGHH!!!!!