Slashdot Mirror


How To Store Internal Hard Drives?

mike writes "I have been ripping all my movies and TV shows for easy viewing through a media PC. Because I would rather not rip everything again I'm looking for a simple backup solution. I'm considering a hard drive dock and several internal hard drives to use as 'disks' to back things up every once in a while but I don't know what the best way to store internal drives would be in the meantime. Could they sit together in any empty box and be OK, or would a number of externals be worth the slightly higher cost with fewer worries about storing them in the meantime?"

66 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Take your pick by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Any clean, dry, vibration-free storage is good for removed internal drives.

    Yeah, they come in a nice box with antistatic bag and desiccant... what's wrong with that? Certainly the manufacturer likes this setup.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  2. At the very least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You should store them in the plastic containers they came in: http://www.ixbt.com/storage/scsi2005/roundup/fujitsu-pack.jpg These plastic boxes are anti-static and the bumps provide a modicum of shock absorbance. You might also want to add a (fresh) silica pack to prevent moisture from building up.

  3. Easy solution by nhtshot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Buy a cheap used box from a local shop.

    You can get P4 class boxes for around $100.

    Stuff it full of drives, set up software raid and keep everything there.

    In addition to providing a nice place to store backups, you can also use it for primary storage. I assume since you're ripping video that this is an HT-PC.

    I prefer not to have a bunch of loud HDD's in my HT-PC. Put that crap in a closet.

    1. Re:Easy solution by yincrash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      make sure your closet doesn't overheat.

    2. Re:Easy solution by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2, Informative

      +1 - relatively cheap (just paid $350 for 3 1tb drives and a sata controller for a 2tb raid-5 array) and easy to do.

      Just remember to use a redundant raid - remember the 0 in raid-0 indicates how much data you'll still have if you suffer a failure

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:Easy solution by cuby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Low reliability end energy inefficient. A P4 burns more or less 60w in idle. A drive easily use 15w. If the power supply has an 50% efficiency... that is perfectly normal for old cases. If you have 3 disks you use (60+3*15)*1.5= 157.5 w. Add more 20w to motherboard, memory and stuff and you get almost 180W in idle. This is a LOT after one year.

      If you are not still convinced. Try to imagine how to recover the raid array after one disk dies... Search the net and you'll find a lot of people that was unable to recover arrays because they used cheap hardware.

      Because of this I discarded NAS and similar solutions. I have external hard drives and I plug them as I need using USB. Put them away from kids, sun and humidity and they will be fine.

      --
      Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
    4. Re:Easy solution by durval · · Score: 2, Funny

      make sure your closet doesn't overheat.

      Nope. An unpowered hard-drive has MUCH greater tolerance to temperature than a powered one. Unless you are planning on keeping them powered up in your closet, that is... :-)

      --
      Best Regards,
      Durval Menezes.
      I have never met a computer that didn't like me.
    5. Re:Easy solution by berashith · · Score: 5, Funny

      cool...
      after a failure in a RAID 0 , you have 0 copies of data.
      after a failure in a RAID 1 , you have 1 copy of your data

      no wonder RAID 50 is so good!!

    6. Re:Easy solution by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My guess is that if the suggestion is to get a cheap used pc and stuff it full of drives, and raid them together, that the intention *is* for them to be powered on. Otherwise, why bother with the used machine? Just get a drive toaster as suggested elsewhere.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:Easy solution by Sandbags · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's actually far more important for the temperature to remain relatively constant (a 10F degree range or so) than it is to remain under a certain temp. your closet isn't going to get anywhere near 158 degrees, or more than 40 below zero... Even when spinning HDDs are acceptable up to quite uncomfortable for human temperatures! at idle the range increases quite a bit. However, a poorly insulared closet could fluctuate 30 degrees or more, and on a daily basis, that couold cause a lot of damage. Keeping your PC powered on helps maintain HDD life by keeping a slightly more contact temp (this used to be to avoid chip creap in the old days, but now it's about the PS and HDD).

      Also, 300G shocks are within the "normal" range for a non-spinning disk. Shock absorption is not a requirement unless you plan to ship it. I think it was Seagate who used to have a commercial where they froze a HDD in a block of ice, played hockey with it, then thawed it out and it worked...

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  4. Do you plan on using the disks on a regular basis? by wiplash · · Score: 5, Informative

    If so, it might be smart to install/store them in inexpensive, standard USB disk enclosure caddies. That way, when you do need to go back to your archive, you can pop 'em into your USB port and they're ready to go straight away! And if you go for one of those book-style enclosures, it makes for a neat way to store them too.

  5. How about... by rednip · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why don't you try a box and use magnets as packing peanuts? Be sure to leave them in a hot, humid place, like a shower, and never every spin them up

    Dry, cool, and individually placed in anti-static bags, just be sure to spin them up every so often.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    1. Re:How about... by goffster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget to irradiate with X-rays to remove any bacteria.

    2. Re:How about... by Barny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, you can get better density if you use the original foam packing that they come with, the only problem is if you spin them up in it you will cook the things, I solved this by lining up a big 3" drill bit and driving it down through all the drives and attaching a fan to the end, keeps em cool.

      Or (if you want a real solution) you could, I dunno, get an old army ammo case from your local disposals store (we have em called Aussie Disposals), cut the same packing foam used to ship (as joked about above) and fit about 20 drives in a nice tin safely and bullet proof :)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
  6. Static bags and a cardboard box by TinBromide · · Score: 5, Informative

    At work, we would routinely have to deal with 5-10 hard drives a day and probably would order 40-60 a month. We stored them in anti-static bags in a bankers box. While that's not the exact brand we used (we bought them in 100 packs), its similar. During the few years we used those bags, we did not lose a single drive to storage loss. There were drives that were DOA or died during processing, or were dropped, but we never pulled a drive that was working the previous time only to discover that it was dead when we pulled it.

    As for hookup, you have a couple of options. If you are going to do casual use, you can get an esata dock. It doesn't have a fan, but for all but the most intense use, it should be sufficient for transfering files and weekly backups. If you're looking for more, go with sata sleds (again not the brand I used, but similar), you can screw your hard drives into those and if your sata controller supports it, hot swap the drives. You can also buy extra sleds so that you can swap out your drives without having to handle the internal drive.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    1. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

      Aluminum foil is not a good choice for anti-static material.

      Mainly, it's too conductive. For a hard disk it's not that big of a deal, but suppose you used it on a motherboard. You'd have an exploded lithium battery.

      In a hard disk, I can imagine an unlikely scenario where a charged capacitor on the board killed another component through the foil.

      Anyway there's good reasons that anti-static material is only slightly conductive. At 1000+ volts it is plenty conductive, but at lower voltages, it's more like an insulator.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're looking for more, go with sata sleds (again not the brand I used, but similar), you can screw your hard drives into those and if your sata controller supports it, hot swap the drives. You can also buy extra sleds so that you can swap out your drives without having to handle the internal drive.

      Forget sleds, go trayless. There are a variety of trayless sata racks available from a couple of different manufactureres, including multi-disk designs. I have them in all of my systems, they work great in windows and linux.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Static bags and a cardboard box by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And I don't even get that fancy -- I just store them in a cardboard box. (Make sure it's not the shiny cardboard; that can hold a static charge.) So long as the logic board components aren't touching anything conductive, which you can ensure well enough with a layer of cardboard between 'em if you're paranoid (I don't bother) all should be well. Note: my oldest working IDE HD dates to 1991. My oldest of any type dates to 1986. The only ones I've lost in storage are Conners, which have always had a problem with losing data if they sit around doing nothing for several months.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  7. Off site backup! by MathFox · · Score: 4, Informative

    Professionals keep (at least) one off-site backup. You could rent a private locker in a bank or some other organization or make an online backup deal. I do use (two) USB disks for backups. They are pretty portable, fairly robust, plug in nearly every computer, have decent speed and good capacity.

    --
    extern warranty;
    main()
    {
    (void)warranty;
    }
  8. Re:Take your pick by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Informative

    And use one of these to plug them in when needed.

    Any solution that has the drives unpowered is preferable - no point in spinning a drive 24/7 when it's used for backup 5 minutes a week.

  9. ick, softraid by Benanov · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless it's one known for its ability to work on various and sundry drives (as opposed to identical ones), and probably built into whatever OS OP is running...don't recommend softraid.

    Controller card/motherboard goes, or enough drives go and all his data's gone.

  10. Keep in mind by maclizard · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whatever route you choose, keep in mind that hard drives as a whole have terribly high failure rate (about 1 in 8 fail in my experience). Also, regardless of your chosen media, be sure to research the lifespan of your storage. If you are looking for long term (more than a couple years) and dependability you are going to be spending more than you would on a cheap raid box.

    As much as I HATE to say it, magnetic tape is the ONLY storage media that has not failed me yet.

    1. Re:Keep in mind by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is magnetic tape practical for home backups? Last time I checked, it wasn't. Hard drives offer the best value and reliability I have found for personal backups. Certainly they are far easier and more reliable than burning DVDs.

      I would forget about RAID, and instead make your goal to have 3 separate copies of your files on 3 sets of hard drives. One set on hard drives is the live data that you use on your home server. The other two are backups, and you alternate between them, backing up with whatever frequency you deem sufficient. If at all possible, keep one set of drives off site by taking them to work or a friends' place, then swap them after each backup operation.

      Write scripts to simplify your backup process, so that it takes as little effort as possible. (I use a simple rsync command.)

  11. Re:Take your pick by rackserverdeals · · Score: 5, Informative

    Newegg has Hard Drive Protectors http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817990010

    I've just stored drives in anti-static bags for some of my test systems when I upgrade drives and want to keep the old drives for messing around with. Haven't run into any problems.

    --
    Dual Opteron < $600
  12. WiebeTech anti-static storage box by paulievox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like these guys: http://www.wiebetech.com/products/cases.php It's an anti-static, somewhat shock-mounted plastic case for 3.5" drives. I've got about a dozen stacked in a rubbermaid box. It eliminates the stress of the drives banging into each other, even in anti-static bags. I've never dropped a drive inside one of these, but i'll bet it'd survive a modest height.

  13. RAID 1 by Calmiche · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually had the same problem. I've got my entire 1,000+ Movie DVD and 400+ Television collection ripped to hard drive for use as streaming media to a media PC. I've been working on it for about 4 years now.

    I ended up buying and setting up a bare-bones computers with RAID capabilities. Get a big tower with plenty of cooling. I originally used your same method. I purchased hard drives and external hard drive enclosures. This was cheaper than building pre-made drives. I especially like Vantec enclosures. However, I had a couple of drives go bad over the years. After some experimentation, I found that underpowered drives tend to loose data.

    Now, I use the aforementioned RAID 1 solution. Originally I used 400gb drives but now I'm up to purchasing 1-TB drives. I've only had 1 drive go bad in the last 3 years and it was easily replaced with no loss of data. You could probably use Raid 5 just as easily, but my first setup didn't support it so I defaulted to Raid 1. The extra controller cars also used to be cheaper for RAID 1 but the costs have since equalized.

    For the moment, I would advise against the 2TB drives. Many have serious slowdown problems and the cost/storage ratio is to high. 1.5tb drives are looking better and better.

    Just remember good cooling! This may be the most important factor. Hot hard drives last a MUCH shorter time. I REALLY like Thermatake icage bays. They change 3-5.25" bays into 3-3.5" hard drive bays and have a really nice 120x120 fan on them to keep the drives cool.

    If you buy a hard drive a month you can get some enormous storage capacity really quickly without breaking the bank. I'm up to 8TB right now. (16TB of drives).

    1. Re:RAID 1 by JayAEU · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's some collection you have there...

      Anyway, in a situation like yours, I'd have opted for a proper 4+ drive NAS like the ones offered by Qnap, Synology, etc.

      Cooling is not an issue with those cases, since they're designed with cool drives in mind from the beginning. The air flow is optimized and driven by a large-diameter slow-spinning fan in the back.

      As for cool drives, I found the Western Digital RE2 GP series to be really good. They spin slower than other drives, but they also stay a lot cooler and thus consume only a fraction of the power other drives do. In addition, they're designed for 24/7 operation, so you probably won't have them die on you after a few months of usage.

    2. Re:RAID 1 by josath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, high drive temperature doesn't really hurt that much. Being too cold is much worse than being too hot. Google has crunched the numbers on tens of thousands of HDDs running at different temperatures, and they found that drives that were kept coolest actually had higher failure rates. The 'sweet spot' of most stable temperatures is actually 35-45 C (95-113 F). Drives running in the 15-25 C range experienced massively higher failures than even the drives running at 50C.

      --
      sig? uhh, umm, ok
  14. my recent solution by pak9rabid · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just recently addressed this problem myself. My solution, although a little pricey compared to just stuffing an old box with hard drives, was to get one of these guys and put 5 1 TB drives into it. I have it running in a software RAID5, backing up everything from my server (media, subversion repository, etc) via a nightly cron job rsyncing between the server disks and the enclosure. So far it's been working like a charm.

  15. Point Missed by travisd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The OP already has the online storage covered. This is regarding using HDD's for offline (not spinning) storage. Even if they're not being accessed and are physically separate from the primary storage, you still are subject to wear (spinning platters) and things like power surges.

    Putting the dries back into their orignal enclosures, or perhaps an "OEM Pack" piece of foam (with anti-static bags) may be the best option. Better, consider putting the whole mess into a media-rated fire-safe.

  16. Rotate the backups! by wiredog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do a backup, drop it in the safe deposit box at the bank, take the other one out. Next quarter, rotate them.

    1. Re:Rotate the backups! by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An awful lot of effort to store (in the article in question) movies and TV shows he'll probably never watch again.
       
      I've never understood the packrat mentality with movies and TV shows... I know people with literally thousands (tens of thousands?) of hours of TV shows and movies - what's the point?

  17. eSATA and 'books' by mollog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1Tb external 'books' are enclosed, store and look like books, can be labeled like books, and can be unplugged and plugged in like they're removable media. And they're not that expensive.

    --
    Best regards.
    1. Re:eSATA and 'books' by lxs · · Score: 5, Funny

      You label your books? What are you? Some kind of librarian?

    2. Re:eSATA and 'books' by LordEd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ook!

    3. Re:eSATA and 'books' by Forge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another point to consider. Internal hard drive connectors (ATA, SCSI and SATA) were not designed for frequent connection and disconnection. And as such can cause problems. Also the circuitry on the bottom of the drive is quite fragile, vulnerable to scratches, moisture and static.

      Even really rely cheap USB/SATA shells ($10 or less) would work well for the scenario described.

      Or you can just grab some of these bags if the budget is really tight.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  18. TPBB by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 5, Funny

    The pirate bay backup(tm) offers a free and easy 4 step method to backup most movies/tv shows.
    1) create .torrent of all your movies
    2) upload to TPBB(tm) trackers
    3) seed
    4) In case of catastrophic harddrive failure/house being nuked from oribt, re-download all your movies

    Advantages of TPBB over conventional backup methods
    *Off-site - the backups are held of site in multiple unsecured locations
    *Distributed - these locations are distributed across multiple contents
    *Unlimited storage - You can even backup more content than your hard drive has space for
    *Content Filtering - TPBB will filter out boring content, ensuring just worthwhile movies are kept

    **Please consult your lawyer before using TPBB as we are not responsible for any legal disputes in your jurisdiction.

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    1. Re:TPBB by ianare · · Score: 2, Funny

      Real men don't use backups, they post their stuff on a public ftp server and let the rest of the world make copies.

      - Linus Torvalds

  19. Amazon S3? by plams · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They don't guarantee you don't lose your data, but it's probably more safe than what you can come up with yourself.

  20. Re:Take your pick by Aladrin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You could attach a metal handle and call them 'wedges' a la Dollhouse.

    The scene where he 'saves' the wedge from calling, they show the back of the drive and they're SATA. Hehe.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  21. I'd add a couple additional comments by arete · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only big advantage of the externals is that the connectors are a bit more robust, so if you're going to plug/unplug them a LOT, you're a bit better off.

    But for maximum longevity you should take 'vibration free' seriously. That is, you shouldn't lay a drive on a hard table, because when you set it there there's a surprisingly large impact. Set it on a layer of bubblewrap or foam, instead.

    If you have humidity issues, I believe you can collect desiccant packets from other things and bake them on low heat to 'refresh' them (bake out the existing humidity) Ideally do this baking with good ventilation.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  22. Re:Point Missed by nhtshot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you need to back up, turn on the machine.

    When you're done, shut it down.

    Offline storage at it's finest.

  23. RAID5 - you're not as protected as you think by danpritts · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe not directly relevant to the OP's question but since I see a bunch of folks mentioning using RAID, i thought i'd chime in about RAID5 survivability.

    RAID5 protects you against one failure in a stripe. if you lose a drive, that's a failure. If you have a read error on a particular sector, that is another failure, and your data is gone.

    the probability of a read error *somewhere* on a 1TB drive is actually quite high.

    So, you lose a drive, you go to rebuild, you find you have a read error and can't get your data.

    This can mean a few things.

    1) lose a particular bit of data. Maybe you don't care, if you're archiving DVDs you'll probably cope just fine. If it's important data you'll be sad.

    2) can't rebuild your RAID. Some RAID controllers will just give up if they get a read error during a rebuild, so then you have to back up the recoverable portion of your data (probably the vast majority), rebuild the RAID, etc.

    I don't know how the various software RAIDs cope with this. I had this happen with a dell/lsilogic hardware raid card.

    In my case, the read error was not something i noticed when i backed up and restored the data onto a new raid, but the parity didn't match so it wouldn't rebuild. It very well may have been on an unused portion of the filesystem.

    solutions/mitigations:

    1) scrub your RAID5's regularly. this process checks everything over and fixes any errors while you still have a full RAID5 set. This will reduce your chance of failure greatly.

    2) use RAID6. it adds an extra drive's worth of redundancy.

    3) use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parchive or some similar additional layer of redundancy.

    You should also consider running an OS that supports ZFS (FreeBSD, OpenSolaris, Nexenta). It has additional data checksumming that can help. ZFS has software raid built in.

    Several good blog posts on this subject here:
    http://blogs.sun.com/relling/tags/mttdl

    He talks specifically about Solaris & ZFS, but the reliability stuff is generally applicable. RAID-Z is basically equivalent to RAID5; RAID-Z2 is basically RAID6.

  24. Re:Take your pick by Chief+Camel+Breeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have contacts at the European Southern Observatory where the security copy of their archive is on disconnected hard-drives. Based on in-house tests, they reckon that the drives last very well provided that they are spun up at least once per year. If they are left unpowered for longer than that they tend to die.

  25. Free anti-static bags by toppavak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A great way to get free anti-static bags is to order samples from semiconductor companies like TI and Analog Devices. They'll send you free stuff wrapped up in decently sized anti-static bags. Great for if you only have a couple drives to store, but if you need 10, for example, just go ahead and buy some.

  26. My approach... by raw-sewage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have two home-built servers: one is an always-on, live NAS; the other is a backup server that I power on only to do backups (or restores if it comes to that). First rule I go by: always use the slower 5400 RPM drives, such as the Western Digital "Green" or the Samsung EcoGreen. For both media streaming and backup purposes, these hard drives are still plenty fast. The biggest benefit, though, is that they use less energy (particularly important if your system is always on), and don't get as hot, making cooling much easier (which usually also translates to quieter).

    My live server is currently 4 x 1TB drives in RAID-5, using Linux software RAID. (I know RAID is no substitute for backup, but I still consider it "quasi" backup. But I also have real backup.) This system is fairly un-interesting: it's your typical DIY NAS.

    The backup server is housed in the Norco RPC-4020. For $300, you get 24 SATA hot-swap bays. That price is hard to beat. I haven't filled this case up with drives yet, and I have plenty of physical space going forward. The hardware is just some unused spare components I had lying around. Extra SATA ports are provided by the Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 (which works fine in "regular" 32-bit PCI slots).

    This, IMO, is a pretty simple set up. I just power up the backup server whenever I need it, and turn it off when I'm done. I don't care about performance, since backups are always run as a batch job (typically over night).

    Before I bought that Norco case, I was just using individual drives with a Thermaltake BlacX SATA-to-USB hard drive docking station. This is cheaper, just slightly less convenient. I did order 50 "zip lock"-style anti-static bags for $13. I ordered them from staticbags.com ("GRC Enterprises" was listed on my invoice). After I copied data to the drive and put it in an anti-static bag, I just added it to the stack of drives I had on my bookshelf. The Norco case definitely looks better! :)

    All in all, I consider my system fairly robust. It's only semi-secure against my stupidity, and since its all housed in the apartment, does not safeguard against fire. But since the media rips are just copies of DVDs I actually own, my insurance policy becomes the ultimate backup.

  27. RAID is not a backup solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    RAID is used as redundancy against hardware failure, not as a backup solution. If one of your drives fails in a RAID 1, sweet, you've not lost your data. However, overwriting all your data with crap will leave then you with two drives of crap. Where's your data now?

    TFA isn't asking about hardware failure in a way that RAID would be the correct answer.

  28. Re:Take your pick by linear+a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't forget to migrate to a new (set of) drives every 5 years or so. Drives get bigger and in my experience you can collapse 4-5 into 1 after that period. This assumes you end up with lots of drives. This also refreshes your copies of the data. Sidebar - watch out for your O/S silently converting long file names to 8.3 filenames if your filepathnames are too long (esp. if you lengthen the filepathname somehow).

  29. One simple word by azav · · Score: 4, Informative

    Drobo.

    Http://www.drobo.com.

    I have 2 of them and one has saved my butt.

    After losing 7 hard drives behind a cheap surge protector after a lightning strike, I now have serial APS surge protectors and a 4.5 TB Drobo.

    Format it for 8 TB and you can swap drives in and out as you need to move up in storage capacity.

    It's pretty brainless to use. You just plug it in and let it do its job. Get the fast SATA drives.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  30. Bare Drives + Quick Install eSata Enclosure(s) by woboyle · · Score: 3, Informative

    My solution to this is to store my stuff on bare sata-2 drives (1 - 1.5TB @ $0.10USD / GB). I have a couple of eSata enclosures which offer tool-less installation - just a thumb-latch, and slide the drive in/out (about $50USD). So, I keep the bare drives organized on a shelf, and can plug one in as desired in about 30 seconds. Cheaper than tape, and just about as cheap as single-layer DVD-R discs, plus each 1TB drive will hold about 250 SL or 125 DL DVD's worth of data. Since the cost / GB is about the same for the newer 1.5TB discs as for 1TB discs of the same speed, I am getting the bigger drives these days. Each drive is about the size of a small paperback book.

    If you want to back up one of these, with the eSata connection to the computer you can back up a TB from disc to disc in about 4 hours. That's a collection of a couple hundred feature-length movies.

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  31. Re:ask mom by freakmn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Plug it in at your mom's house, rsync your local fileserver with that one every night at 4am.

    But what happens if the fire spreads upstairs? With heat rising, that's likely to happen.

    --
    warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
  32. Using hard drives as removable cartridges by dlapine · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you'd just like to store your data off the PC, and you need "unlimited" storage, get a sata hot-swap mobile rack, a bunch of drives and presto!

    Specifically, this is what I use.

    Get one of these - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817994057 and install it. Its' hot swap, and tray-less, so it treats the sata drives like cartridges. It's about $25.

    Find out if your motherboard supports sata hot swap - if not, you'll need one of sate card that can do hotplug, try this - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816132003. It works and it's about $25 as well.

    Then determine your storage needs- 1TB drives can be had for as low as $75, but that's for relatively cheap drives. The better ones are about $100. 1.5TB drives are available for $130. The 2 TB still command a premium price at $280.

    I'd recommend the 1.5's.

    Buy a few of them, just like you would buy tape cartridges. Geek tip- if you buy several(4-5) drives at once from Newegg, they ship them in a styrofoam shipping thing, that has slots for 3.5" drives and works wonderfully as shelf container. You keep the anti-static bags the drives are shipped in, and put them on the drives before stowing them in the styrofoam form.

    There, you now have the equivalent of a tape drive and cartridges, for all of $50 for the "drive" and cartridges at the price point you want. Unlike cheap tape, you get sata speeds, no vendor lock-in, and your data on a medium that is universal.

    All that being said, you have do your backups as if the drives were tape cartridges- that implies a cartridge (drive) rotation system, data stored redundantly on multiple cartridges, regular backups and verification, etc. It won't do you much good if you don't follow the proper backup steps. Here's a guide to doing it properly- http://www.structuredsolutions.net/whitepapers/Tape%20Backup%20Procedure.htm

    It is a nice piece of kit, however. It's up to you to use it properly.

    --
    The Internet has no garbage collection
  33. Re:Take your pick by lefiz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use internal drives like this as backups for my server at work. After I run the backup, I put the drives back into the antistatic bag and store them in a safe deposit box in the vault at my bank. I have a piece of foam in the box so the drives don't sit directly on the metal box. The box costs ~$100 a year, and is a dry, safe, secure, off-premise storage location.

  34. Re:Take your pick by zerocool6900 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually "wedges" was coined in the book Mother of Storms by John Barnes to refer to people's extracted memories.

    --
    Some people never learn...no matter how many times something happens to them.
  35. Re:Take your pick by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Interesting

        For old drives that I pulled from servers, I just stuck them in a cardboard box on the floor of my office. When I needed an old small drive for something, I'd pull it from the box. :) I wasn't confident in wiping them to sell or dispose of, so staying in my control was safer. Hey, they were old, they weren't worth anything to sell anyways.

        Except for the drives that already had stickers that said "bad sectors" or "clicks", they usually worked years later.

        The static bag and desiccant isn't a bad idea, but it's not always necessary. Now, if they were in a very dry static or high humidity environment, I'd definitely want them stored that way.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  36. Re:Take your pick by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, because clearly, I'm the only person who points these things out. Hard drive or not, it's a little far-fetched that if you're a huge evil organization storing copies of people's brains, you're not keeping backups somewhere, or you're using small, easily damaged media where horrible things happen if it's destroyed. I can suspend disbelief for scifi, but not common sense.

  37. Re:Take your pick by TurboNed · · Score: 3, Funny

    And you know that there are no backups somewhere how?

    They image someone's "mental state" onto a drive and obviously there's no backup at that moment, but then he files it into the library or whatever and then backups are made.

    I know this is what happens because I just made it up.

  38. Re:Take your pick by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the "wedge" refers to the slice of the brain contained on it and not the hard drive itself.

    As with other things, the nomenclature shifts such that the device is referred to by its content or function. For all intents and purposes, if the drive only contains the wedge, the drive becomes the wedge made manifest.

    Compare how you tell someone to "put in the movie" without regard to the medium on which it is stored (VHS tape, DVD) or the player (VCR, PS3). The storage material is immaterial; only the material stored upon it matters in casual parlance.

    There's also how we hold on to some obsolete terms such as "dialing a phone" even when it is done on a keypad instead of a spinning rotary dial (even in science fiction, you have the DHD (Dial Home Device) which only ever spun rotary style on the animated Stargate Infinity). And though "don't touch that remote" has largely supplanted "don't touch that dial" for TVs, we still talk about "rewinding" video even when there is no spool of tape to be rewound, and probably will for a very long time to come.

    The terms were coined in reference to the mechanism, but they stick around because it was never about the mechanism, only the effect.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  39. Re:Take your pick by Bakkster · · Score: 4, Informative

    Any clean, dry, vibration-free storage is good for removed internal drives.

    Yeah, they come in a nice box with antistatic bag and desiccant... what's wrong with that? Certainly the manufacturer likes this setup.

    Yeah, that should be good enough. The three things that are going to kill a drive are:
    1) Physical damage. Keep them in a box in a safe place where they won't be dropped or crushed.
    2) Static electricity. Especially with exposed components, and the possibility of hundreds of volts of static between two points in a room, keep it in a anti-static bag.
    3) Humidity. No brainer, just keep a dessicant in there for long periods of storage.
    As others have stated, simply running the drives occasionally will prevent the internals from having issues. As far as environmental issues, though, these should be the only three things you need to watch for in storage.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  40. Re:Take your pick by dredwolff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, if you're going to store them for a long time (years) without running them, you'll probably need to keep them cold.

    I hear (from someone that kept HD's on a shelf for years) that the oil will run out of the bearings if the drives are left sitting for years, causing the platters to freeze up when they were turned on.

    Admittedly, this is old information, and who knows what the new drives do (maybe they have better seals?) and I'm not even sure that keeping them cold will help, spinning up the platters for 15 minutes once a week might work too.

  41. Re:Take your pick by ajlitt · · Score: 2, Funny

    [citation needed]

  42. anti-static bag by kai6novice · · Score: 2, Informative
  43. Simple solution with hard drives. by Embolism · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a CentOS 5 Server running Web, email, and video server for my house. For backups I bought a USB external enclose that holds 4 drives. It automatically spins them down after (IIRC) about 20 minutes of non-use. Backups run on cron, I check it once every six months.

  44. SSD by Plekto · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been dealing with this for clients for several years now - most of whom deal with AV and photography. Stuff that absolutely must remain intact at any cost.

    For a while we used RAID - and RAID 1 and similar redundant options do work well enough. And we debated Blu-Ray. But the final solution seems to be solid state drives. They look to be stable enough once written to actually qualify as suitable for archival purposes. This comes as all hard drives seem to be suffering from poor quality lately. I just know that some of the companies are flat out lying to us in their white sheets based upon how many data failures I have witnessed in the last couple of years.

    They aren't exactly inexpensive, but they do work better for this than a hard drive.

  45. Re:Take your pick by babyrat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The ultra paranoids should watch the mythbusters episode where the water pressure prevented the manual windows from rolling down.

    Curiously enough, they submerged a battery and a door and the power windows still worked underwater.

    http://mythbustersresults.com/episode72