Slashdot Mirror


Voyager Clue Points To Origin of the Axis of Evil

KentuckyFC writes "Cosmologists have been scratching their heads over the discovery of a pattern imprinted on the cosmic microwave background, the radiation left over from the Big Bang. This pattern, the so-called Axis of Evil, just shouldn't be there. Now an independent researcher from Canada says the pattern may be caused by the boundary between the Solar System and interstellar space where there is a sharp change in pressure, temperature and density of ions in space. Known as the termination shock, astronomers had thought this boundary was spherical. But last year, data from the Voyager spacecraft which have crossed the boundary, showed it was asymmetric. The new thinking is that the termination shock acts like a giant lens, refracting light that passes through it. Any distortion of the lens ought to show up as a kind of imprinted pattern on an otherwise random image. But the real eye-opener is that as the shape of the termination shock changes (as the Solar Wind varies, for example), so too should the pattern in the microwave background. And there is tentative evidence that this is happening too (abstract)."

73 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Why should we care? by cromar · · Score: 5, Funny

    It all sounds very interesting and important and technical, but what does it all mean? Dammit! What does it all mean, man?

    1. Re:Why should we care? by DamageLabs · · Score: 5, Funny

      It means that the end of the world is imminent.

      Quick, grab that towel!

    2. Re:Why should we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It means that in the next two to five years we can confidently expect the development and release of FTL travel, zero-point energy, a cure for mortality, replicator technology and hot green alien nymphomaniac bikini chicks. From Mars.

      Now do you care?

    3. Re:Why should we care? by scorp1us · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depending on the size and nature of the effect, all of our earth observations could be tainted. While observing simple things like galaxies with Hubble are barely affected, it could possibly upset the belief that the universe is expanding. If photons are being slowed as they cross the terminal shock boundary, it would make it look like the universe was expanding in all directions, which is a belief we currently hold. If the effect is strong enough, it could even tell us its expanding when it is contracting. Though in theory, you'd be able to tell along the axis on contraction that things were a bit off. However if the universe is static or near static, it would not be discernible.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    4. Re:Why should we care? by physicist_percy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Understanding the Cosmic Microwave Background is fundamental to our understanding of the Big Bang. In essence, the CMB is left over energy from the Big Bang itself. We initially thought that the CMB should appear uniform across the entire universe. Two major experiments showed that it was not, which left many scratching their heads. This most recent postulate may explain these results.

    5. Re:Why should we care? by MikeB0Lton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would like to think there are people scratching their heads trying to figure out what was here before the big bang, and more importantly where did that come from. Hopefully these CMB discoveries will move us closer to answering these questions.

    6. Re:Why should we care? by AgentUSA · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only if I hear about it in a Steve Jobs keynote.

    7. Re:Why should we care? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd prefer we aviod making Replicaters, thankyouverymuch.

    8. Re:Why should we care? by jandoedel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope, doesn't affect this. The speed at which a part of the universe expands depends on the distance from us. it's about 70 (km/s) / Mpc (google Hubble's Law) Which means that distant things fly faster away from us than closer things. But the effect this article talks about, affects both photons in exactly the same way, so it would have no influence on the measurement of Hubble's constant.

    9. Re:Why should we care? by jandoedel · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually, before the big bang, "here" (space) didn't exist yet. "before the big bang" (time) also didn't exist.

    10. Re:Why should we care? by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it means that we now don't have to worry about the inflationary theory, so it will be easier to solve the economic crisis with Obama bucks.

      Or something like that. But I'm no rocket surgeon.

      --
      Will
    11. Re:Why should we care? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The singularity, or big bang, is the lowest common denominator state of the mass/energy of the multiverse. This universe is an expression of one of many higher order patterns which the multiverse can assume. Entropy and gravity are expressions of the universes inevitable degeneration back to the singular state. "Before" the big bang, there was another universe, and "After" the big bang, there will be another universe. Although that is misleading, because time is just another spatial dimension, and all of these universes exist simultaneously, connected at the singularity. None of this is infinite, just incredibly large and complex.

      Understanding the shape of the multiverse is synonymous with understanding the laws of reality. Where the multiverse came from is beyond human experience, and not really a useful question to contemplate.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    12. Re:Why should we care? by Cowmonaut · · Score: 4, Funny

      Replicators as in StarTrek, not Replicators as in StarGate. Because in America, I totally need another way to get junk food conveniently without moving from my couch.

    13. Re:Why should we care? by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It means that in the next two to five years we can confidently expect the development and release of FTL travel, zero-point energy, a cure for mortality, replicator technology and hot green alien nymphomaniac bikini chicks. From Mars.

      If I'm immortal, what need do I have for hot green alien nymphomaniac bikini chicks? I'd be popping saltpeter pills and working on time travel science (since all the other super-science would be done, and being assured that I'd see the future via immortality, only the past would be of interest).

    14. Re:Why should we care? by MikeB0Lton · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If it is beyond our experience, and not something to contemplate, how has your answer been derived? You said it as though it is fact, but it has not been proven. I am still stuck at the "something from nothing" question.

    15. Re:Why should we care? by AtomicJake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      actually, before the big bang, "here" (space) didn't exist yet. "before the big bang" (time) also didn't exist.

      Your evidence, Watson?

    16. Re:Why should we care? by physicist_percy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I good start would be "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene. Very well written for the non-scientists.

    17. Re:Why should we care? by CraftyJack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suppose we could always dumb it down, call it the universe's "missing link", get it a History channel special and a few articles in New Scientist.

      Or we could just say that if it doesn't interest you enough to give it a five-minute read, you can just move on.

    18. Re:Why should we care? by fataugie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or ones that get released from the space shuttle and re-enter the atmosphere to land and drive home.

      I prefer the South Park treatment, Trans-Am, big Boobie girl wearing a jaunty hat.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    19. Re:Why should we care? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Funny

      I totally need another way to get junk food conveniently without moving from my couch.

      Go away! I'm 'bating!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    20. Re:Why should we care? by GNious · · Score: 2, Funny

      I read it as "a cure for morality", and though to myself .."yes, that could actually be nice."

    21. Re:Why should we care? by psydeshow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Replicators... because in America, I totally need another way to get junk food conveniently without moving from my couch.

      Not to mention "Build Your Own Cheetos" and "Any-color Any-texture M&Ms". We don't just want junk food, we want designer junk food that we can design ourselves.

      It helps remind us that we are special snowflakes.

    22. Re:Why should we care? by jonfr · · Score: 2, Informative

      The current robot mission (New Horizon) to Pluto should provide better answers in the future. The New Horizon mission is going to reach Pluto in 2015, so it should be at the boundary at 2020 or 2025, I am not sure about the exact date in that manner. But it is somewhere along those years.

      http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/

    23. Re:Why should we care? by SQLGuru · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's obvious why....I'm the center of the universe.

      Assume the universe is infinite. If I look left, there is an infinite distance between me an the restaurant in that direction. If I look up, same thing, infinite distance. Right, down, forward, backward, same thing. The center of something is defined as the point where the distance between all opposing points is the same. Therefore, I am the center of the universe.

    24. Re:Why should we care? by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Informative

      A replicator (ST) could be used to make a replicator (SG).

      Correct me if you have an encyclopaedic knowledge of startrek, but self-replicating machines only seem to have featured in the form of the mines in DS9.

    25. Re:Why should we care? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Having someone modded 'Troll' calling another person racist for not liking green skin... ...actually, makes a sort of sense.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    26. Re:Why should we care? by scribblej · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We get "something from nothing" all day long, sir.

      Here's some things to read about for fun:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particles
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation

      Of course, the 'somethings' we get don't stick around for long, but (I am not a physicist!) I think that phenomena similar to this is how most physicists account for the big bang.

    27. Re:Why should we care? by hamburger+lady · · Score: 3, Insightful

      asking whether time and space existed 'before the big bang' is like asking what's north of the north pole.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    28. Re:Why should we care? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think Tubal-Cain's choice of the spelling on the word implies its disambiguation.

      Or it's a typo.

    29. Re:Why should we care? by Ogive17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why couldn't there be time before the big bang, it just happened to have been erased when the singularity was formed.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    30. Re:Why should we care? by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 2, Funny

      Goatos?

  2. So? by nicolas.kassis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does that mean that to get a clear view we need space crafts beyond the boundry?

    1. Re:So? by JamesVI · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it means that you need to characterise the distortion so that you can remove it from images taken inside the solar system. The same way that you characterise atmospheric effects to make corrections to images take by ground-base telescopes.

    2. Re:So? by Ioldanach · · Score: 4, Informative

      Does that mean that to get a clear view we need space crafts beyond the boundry?

      Not necessarily, we just need glasses. Knowing our observations are being altered by what is in effect a lens is the first step. Once we know the actual shape and properties of that lens we can mathematically apply alterations to our observations to correct for the distortion and end up with representations of our galaxy, other galaxies, and the background photons and radiation of the universe with much more accuracy than ever before.

      Of course, stationing observatories beyond the field would be the best option, much like observatories like Hubble that are outside our atmosphere are better than ground-based telescopes. It is possible that not everything is actually making it through this lens, so even applying corrections won't yield a 100% perfect picture.

  3. Wikipedia by Lunoria · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wikipedia says the Axis of evil is "Cosmic anisotropy, an uneven temperature distribution of the cosmic microwave background radiation" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anisotropy#Physics

  4. too (abstract) by OglinTatas · · Score: 2, Funny

    I tried to understand this, but it was too (abstract)

    1. Re:too (abstract) by Mr+Z · · Score: 5, Informative

      Short version: You know how stars twinkle because of the Earth's atmosphere? Something similar happens at the boundary of the solar system. The difference there is that the boundary is due to the solar wind as opposed to an atmosphere.

      The actual distortion is similar to the ripples of light you see on the bottom of a swimming pool due to ripples in the surface of the water. Because the surface is uneven, the light gets bent unevenly and bunches together in some places and spreads out in others. So, instead of even lighting across the bottom of the pool, you see a pattern of light and dark areas.

      Same thing's happening to the cosmic background radiation. It should be evenly distributed, but instead it's brighter and darker in places, and they think it's due to the uneven surface of the termination shock.

    2. Re:too (abstract) by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It should be evenly distributed, but instead it's brighter and darker in places, and they think it's due to the uneven surface of the termination shock.

      However, in a paper linked from the first article there is a second effect that optical phenomena at the termination shock won't account for: there appears to be a preferential handedness of spiral galaxies, and the handedness exhibits itself along an axis that is close to the Axis of Evil.

      Furthermore, while this paper on optical effects is interesting and suggests some directions for more research, the author's own thoughts on what specific phenomena might be causing the distortions are, using his own term, "speculative."

      Other than the asymmetry of the termination shock it is by no means certain that any of these phenomena exist (that is, that they are not artifacts of the instruments or the analysis), which is the typical state of affairs in leading-edge science, so it'll be interesting to see how the truth unfolds over the next few years.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    3. Re:too (abstract) by JustinOpinion · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't think that's quite right. You are describing small-scale fluctuations in the "surface" of the termination shock. But the main effect being considered in the scientific paper is a large-scale anisotropy in the termination shock.

      The termination shock (TS) is usually assumed to be spherical: the sun emits supersonic solar wind in all directions; the point at which this solar wind is slowed by the interstellar medium should be the same in all directions. But what if it's not? The paper considers what effect a termination shock shaped like a "prolate ellipsoid of revolution" would have on an otherwise isotropic (at large scales) cosmic-microwave-background (CMB).

      They quickly calculate that a prolate TS could lead to the observed quadrupole in the CMB. The authors suggest that the coupling between TS and CMB may be due to refractive index effects (basically as if the solar system is inside a gigantic lens), or possibly differences in scattering at different parts of the TS. Either way, some types of light reaching us should have a corresponding signature of the anisotropy.

      Note that this isn't the first time the CMB had to be corrected. A very significant dipole in the full-sky map has to be removed to account for the relative motion of our planet in the galaxy, the motion of our galaxy with respect to the rest frame of the CMB, etc.

      The authors end their paper by mentioning that if this effect is real, then small-scale fluctuations in the surface of the TS may also affect the smaller-scale fluctuations we see in a map of the CMB. Those fluctuations are normally thought to be an imprint of the randomness in the early universe. The authors suggest that the fluctuation spectrum may be altered by, or possibly even totally an artifact of, ripples in the TS. But as the authors note this is very, very speculative at this point. (We've been mapping the CMB for many years and the maps seem roughly consistent, so any time-varying rippling in effect would have to be subtle and/or slow...)

    4. Re:too (abstract) by radtea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The two observations mentioned in the first article don't seem to rule it out.

      But the termination shock has zero influence on optical photons.

      The handedness paper is looking a ordinary optical images of spiral galaxies within 172 Mpc and asking, "is there any axis where if we look one way we see mostly left-handed galaxies and if we look the other way we see mostly right-handed galaxies?" Since we are in the middle of the distribution a preponderance of a particular handedness will show up as more left-handed in one direction and more right-handed in the other.

      This is ordinary optical astronomy of the crudest kind: they literally look at digital photos of a few thousand galaxies and say, "Yep, looks right-handed to me..." They've done a nice job of blinding that data by randomly mirroring the images so observer bias can't affect the results.

      While heliopause can plausibly affect the CMB due to changes in ionization, it cannot do the same to optical frequencies, and certainly not to a degree that would change the apparent orientation of spiral galaxies without also radically changing the apparent distribution of spiral galaxies, to the extent that we would have noticed it ages ago.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  5. A week too late. by geckipede · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would have been nice to find this out before ESA launched their shiny new Planck telescope to study the CMBR.

    Perhaps Planck2, or whatever the next model is called, will have to travel outside the solar system to get a clear view. If so, we'll be waiting for a very long time for results from it.

    1. Re:A week too late. by jandoedel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it just means there's an extra factor that influences the images Planck will make. We just need to find out what the influence is of this extra factor, and then delete that factor from the images Planck makes.

      Planck can make the images now, and we can compensate for the Axis of Evil afterwards.

    2. Re:A week too late. by geckipede · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of the effects that Planck is looking for are extremely subtle, weak signals. I'm not sure how signal and noise compare in this case, but if they're comparable we will have to hope that heliopause effects are predictable enough to be cancelled out. One of the major objectives of Planck is to look for remnant signals resulting from gravity waves shortly after the inflation phase, and this could be not just weak but a localised signal, so small scale features of the heliopause may matter in this case.

    3. Re:A week too late. by huckamania · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gee, I can't see how being able to map out the boundary of the Solar System we live in could be beneficial to science. We should all crawl back into our caves and shine our clubs for the coming Ice Age.

  6. Now we just need to wait... by Xerolooper · · Score: 4, Funny

    until Voyager returns from the edge as Vyger and answers all our questions or are we in an alternate timeline now?

    --
    "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    1. Re:Now we just need to wait... by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Funny

      until Voyager returns from the edge as Vyger and terminates the carbon unit infestation that's preventing contact with the creator

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Now we just need to wait... by mdm-adph · · Score: 2, Funny

      Funny, I had always just assumed that movie was in an alternate timeline... >_

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    3. Re:Now we just need to wait... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

      carbon unit infestation

      There are shampoos that'll fix that.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  7. Axis of Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has anyone checked Iran, Iraq and North Korea for traces of this radiation?

  8. I'm not getting it by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Funny

    So does this mean torture's ok and waterboarding might prevent the heat death of the universe?

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:I'm not getting it by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So does this mean torture's ok and waterboarding might prevent the heat death of the universe?

      Get over yourself, you twat, whoever you are. That was funny.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  9. Changing shape? by mc1138 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So if it's changing shape, and distorts light, does that mean that it voids a majority of data we get from long range observations?

  10. Note to scientists: by TrevorB · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Be careful what you label your anomalous data. It may come back to be your new theory.

    Try explaining to Americans why "The Axis of Evil" won out over conservative theory. Give the genius who thought that term up another grant... ;)

  11. Fascinating stuff by Fuji+Kitakyusho · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have been following the Voyager updates with some interest over the past couple of years. I find it astounding that we are still managing to get useful data from these vehicles which were launched back in the 70's. Certainly, they have exceeded their design mission, and only advances in large aperture radio coverage here on earth have allowed continued communication. To put this in perspective - the one way light time from earth to both vehicles is now on the order of about 30 hours! Interestingly, the vehicles are adorned with a message to prospective lifeforms who would encounter the spacecraft long in the future - a "golden record", which is technology long since obsolete here on earth during only the short 30 year span of the mission. Food for thought.

    1. Re:Fascinating stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interestingly, the vehicles are adorned with a message to prospective lifeforms who would encounter the spacecraft long in the future - a "golden record", which is technology long since obsolete here on earth during only the short 30 year span of the mission.

      Yet still probably the most appropriate technology for the mission, unless you have a fool-proof way of describing to someone who doesn't share any languages with you how to quickly build a Bluray player.

    2. Re:Fascinating stuff by Tisha_AH · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Way back in the 80's I was taking a receiver design course at George Washington University. My lab partner was involved in the continual design of more sensitive receivers to listen in on the voyager craft.
      It led to interesting discussions about how the pace of receiver design (sensitivity, noise floor, selectivity). At the time we were learning the state of the art, the folks at the research labs were pushing the limits further and further. It warms my heart to realize that 25 years later they are still making significant advancements.

      What it will take to monitor the weakening transmissions from the Pioneers and Voyagers five years from now doesn't exist today. Kudos to everyone involved in the process.

      --
      Tisha Hayes
    3. Re:Fascinating stuff by baKanale · · Score: 4, Funny

      a "golden record", which is technology long since obsolete here on earth

      Tell that to the audiophiles.

    4. Re:Fascinating stuff by eples · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to be pedantic, but one-way is 15 hours currently.

      --
      I'm a 2000 man.
    5. Re:Fascinating stuff by machine321 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I find it astounding that we are still managing to get useful data from these vehicles which were launched back in the 70's.

      Why? I still drive a vehicle that was manufactured in the '60s.

    6. Re:Fascinating stuff by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      What it will take to monitor the weakening transmissions from the Pioneers and Voyagers five years from now doesn't exist today.

      It appears they stopped trying to contact the Pioneers. They couldn't detect any signals on the last tries. Whether this is due to signal weakness or hardware failure is unknown. They are around the threshold of detection even if they still broadcast.

      Even if they received a signal, the probes no longer generate enough power for any of the sensors to work properly. Thus, they can no longer "sniff space". At best, the signals could be used to check the actual trajectory against predictive models for gravity-related studies. But the signals may be too weak for that also.
           

    7. Re:Fascinating stuff by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm more impressed that we can still get signals from the thing. The radio only emits 20 watts. By the time the signal reaches earth, it's been attenuated to 0.00000000000000001 watts. Being able to grab that signal is equivalent to reading morse code transmitted by an ordinary light bulb 200 million miles away!

    8. Re:Fascinating stuff by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why? I still drive a vehicle that was manufactured in the '60s.

      Yes, but how many times has it been serviced since? How many parts replaced?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  12. Re:Why Axis of Evil? by FTWinston · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well yeah, there was the 'silly political reference' - but most importantly, the pattern implies that the universe, which should be anisotropic, has a shape. In fact, according to measurements of the Axis, the entire universe is pointing in a particular direction (the 'axis' part). And that goes against a helluva lot of cosmological theory, hence the 'evil' part.

    It is left as an exercise for the user to determine why the word 'of' was included in the name.

  13. Epoch Fail by mbone · · Score: 3, Informative

    I hardly know where to begin, but the physics, as described in the original post, is wrong. I am going to read the article now, but just remember that Arxiv articles are not peer reviewed before they are posted.

    1. Re:Epoch Fail by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

      I took a cow to church one Sunday. After, I asked it what it thought. It said it was Moooving.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  14. And it should be easy to test by StevenMaurer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just like the bottom of a swimming pool, the uneven pattern should change over time as the termination shock fluctuates.

  15. Re:Shouldn't? by Chelloveck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    just shouldn't be there.

    Sorry, but that's religious talk. Science revels in unexpected results.

    Nah, that's good and scientific.

    Religious: "According to my faith, that shouldn't be there. So it's not. la-La-LA, I can't HEAR YOU!"

    Scientific: "According to my theory, that shouldn't be there. But it is. So what's wrong with my theory?"

    There's not necessarily a conflict between "shouldn't be" and "unexpected". It's "unexpected" because it "shouldn't be".

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  16. Re:Shouldn't? by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scientific: "According to my theory, that shouldn't be there. But it is. So what's wrong with my data?"

    Fixed

    --
    Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
  17. Re:Voyager by eqisow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not that the Voyagers aren't tough, but saying that is a disservice to the Mars rovers, many of which have kept going long after their original missions were complete. No, none of them have lasted as long as either Voyager, but the environmental factors aren't really the same either.

  18. Re:Voyager by earlymon · · Score: 4, Informative

    I completely agree - and it's worth noting that we're talking about a spacecraft launched in 1977 - so it's flying tech is even older.

    Not only that - our ground tech is truly incredible.

    The power received at an earth antenna is 1e-16 watts - imagine finding and holding that signal in the cosmic background noise!

    http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/didyouknow.html

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  19. Re:Why Axis of Evil? by ChangelingJane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It also seems kind of silly to call the data "evil" when it's the current scientific model that is at fault. The name almost implies, "Damn it, universe! Do what we want you to do!"

  20. Axis of Evil? by Xaroth · · Score: 2, Funny

    I could've sworn that 'yaw' was the axis of evil.

  21. Re:Why Axis of Evil? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    newspaper industry...its just that people have gotten a hold of a buzz word or phrase that they know will make headlines so they run with it no matter if it makes sense or not.

    Let's test that theory: start a rumor that Michael Vick is starting a website called "slashdog".