Slashdot Mirror


Palm's webOS Root Image Leaks Out

Kohenkatz writes "As noted in PreCentral.net's forums, the 'webOS Reset Doctor' has been leaked. It includes the webOS root image. From the article: 'Code-inclined individuals on the PreCentral forums have already cracked open the ROM and are getting an unfettered glimpse at the Palm's new platform, which, for the layman, means it should open the doors for some crazy Pre hacking and possibly hint, by way of unfinished / unused code, at what's to come for the platform — and, if we're really lucky, maybe someone will be able to look at this and move us one step closer to an unlocked Pre that could jump onto Verizon's network. Amusingly, you also get to see all the comments left by the devs in the code, guaranteeing a few good chuckles from others who can relate.'" People have already uncovered icons for MSN and AOL, as well as references to the Palm Eos, a rumored successor to the Centro line.

176 comments

  1. also found in the root image by rootofevil · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    1. Re:also found in the root image by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      upupdowndownleftrightleftrightbastart

      Hmmmmm..didn't work.

  2. Will this make be an iPhone killer? by stavros-59 · · Score: 1

    The benefits of a real smartphone with the convenience of a monopoly provider doesn't quite do it for me.

    1. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by thered2001 · · Score: 1

      More likely a Pre killer.

      --

      If your only tool is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail.

    2. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Not until you can develop Pre apps in something other than Javascript/HTML/CSS...

    3. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by pushf+popf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At the risk of being branded a heretic, if I wanted a crappy computer with a tiny screen and keyboard, I'd buy a Sinclair.

      Why does every chunk of plastic in the world want to be my computer?

    4. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      Will this make be an iPhone killer?

      The benefits of a real smartphone with the convenience of a monopoly provider doesn't quite do it for me.

      Doubt it. You can't kill stupidity - general crowd will always go for style over substance. The best Palm can hope for is getting the geek crowd that actually understands why Pre is better, but even they can frequently be swayed by the "ooooh - shiny".

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    5. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not until you can develop Pre apps in something other than Javascript/HTML/CSS...

      Like what? Objective-Crap? Puh-lease. JS/HTML/CSS is a bold choice - but makes perfect sense. You have all the web developers and all the flash developers who are already trained in it and you can develop on ANY platform you want - so a lot easier to get apps created faster. Now if only they would release the SDK!!!!

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    6. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by rho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is the Pre better? Can you give specific examples?

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    7. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by hax0r_this · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Keyboard, multi-tasking and a much more open development model. To name a few.

    8. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At the risk of being branded a heretic, if I wanted a crappy computer with a tiny screen and keyboard, I'd buy a Sinclair.

      Why does every chunk of plastic in the world want to be my computer?

      Because you can't put your computer in your shirt pocket and take it with you everywhere you go. It's not about trying to be your computer. It's about having a device like your computer with you at all times.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    9. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why is the Pre better? Can you give specific examples?

      OK here are a few examples of top of my head:

        * Faster CPU
        * Better memory handling
        * Multitasking (that works!)
        * Keyboard
        * Ability to link quick launch to any button
        * Standard, easy to develop for platform
        * Ability to develop for on ANY OS instead of being locked in
        * No big-brother having absolute power over approving your apps
        * No app kill-switch
        * Universal search
        * Ability to sync music to multiple sources
        * Ability to buy music directly on handset

      I can go on....

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    10. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You have all the web developers and all the flash developers who are already trained in it

      You're wrong, Flash developers are trained only in Flash and most of the time don't even know how to use it correctly. Anything else scares them to death and claim the world don't understand them.

      Erm, What do you think ActionScript is???

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    11. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by rho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The keyboard, to me, is a wash. Some like it, some like the iPhone's virtual keyboard. It's a matter of preferences.

      As for the others, they're potential benefits. Open development model? Linux has that, but it didn't help it take the world by storm. Multi-tasking? Sure, I suppose it would be better in some theoretical sense, but you're making a judgement based on brochure bullet-points. That's why I asked for specific examples. Is it a better email platform? I don't know. Better casual gaming platform? I don't know. Better music player? I don't know. Better development platform? I don't know.

      We don't know because it's brand new and we don't know much about it, and certainly don't know anything long-term. The iPhone is a known entity, with a decently long track record, and therefore we know the pros and cons. With the Pre you can assume a bunch of benefits from the bullet-points, but they're just guesses.

      I say this as a satisfied Blackberry user, so I'm not fanboying the iPhone.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    12. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by pushf+popf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's about having a device like your computer with you at all times.

      I have a device like my computer with me at all times when I want to be near a computer.

      It's my computer.

      If people only realized how much crap they've been programmed to "need", there would be riots in the streets, complete with pitchforks and burning torches.

      Nobody really cares if you buy an iPhone or anything else as long as it ensures that you'll pay them $50/month forever, for a "data plan".

      Just for an example, most of the Northeast US has great water. A lot of it is some of the best water on the planet. We still buy it @ $1+/bottle and it's a huge industry based on nothing except marketing-created need.

      Has anybody besides me noticed that the goal of almost every business is to get you to pay them every month for something you don't need and never new you wanted until they decided for you?

    13. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      I like having (most of) the power of my computer in the palm of my hand, wherever I go. I enjoy being able to browse the web, play a quick game or send some emails as I'm waiting for a table or out on a smoke break.

      If you don't like this sort of thing, then don't buy one of these. May I recommend the JitterBug.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    14. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by pushf+popf · · Score: 1

      If you don't like this sort of thing, then don't buy one of these. May I recommend the JitterBug.

      I know it was intended as a small poke, but a small light single-purpose device that performs flawlessly is miles ahead of a complex expensive device that does a bunch of stuff poorly.

      Just to make things clear, I'm not a Luddite, and actually like (and develop) really cool technology. I just find it amusing that people will just about drool over the capabilities of a small device that wouldn't make it as a kids toy if it were full-size.

      Call me when it has excellent voice and/or thought recognition and a non-intrusive wide-screen HUD with a good refresh rate.

    15. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by OverZealous.com · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      This is a clear, level-headed response to the general "fanboy" problem, for any product line.

    16. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      I would definitely prefer a keyboard over the iphone's virtual keyboard.

      Multi-tasking is potentially useful. Stat-tracking applications and IM-applications in the background could be handy. Hopefully someone will take the initiative to provide these for use.

      However, I'm not that optimistic about the open development model. Apple has immense momentum going with Itunes and the Appstore. The more open development model is more attractive for those who just want to put out a nice useful tool for the public good. But I think that most of the developers who can be incentivized by making money will prefer the large audience of the appstore/itunes, and the proven revenue channel that it provides.

      Buyers like that the iphone appears to have an app for everything(per Apple's ad-campaigning). They might not realize that other phones offer apps that are banned or unsupported on the iphone, but they don't care until they're made aware of these possibilities. They just know that the iphone has apps out the wazoo, and the palm pre has a mere fraction of that. If they can't sell the Palm Pre to a huge audience, the developers might stick to pitching to the larger iphone audience...which in turn results in less apps for the Palm Pre. But who knows? Perhaps they'll develop for the Palm Pre anyway because of how hard it is to get noticed amongst the competitive glut on the iphone.

    17. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multi-tasking? Sure, I suppose it would be better in some theoretical sense, but you're making a judgement based on brochure bullet-points.

      I take it you've never experienced the pain of trying to run an IM program on an iPhone... Phone call? Oh, disconnected. Want to play a game? Disconnected. Want to turn the screen off? Disconnected. You can only control music through the double-tap home button, so no picking a specific song.

      Seriously, you think multitasking is only some vague, hand waving, fairy dust 'possible' benefit? Seriously?

    18. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely agreed. The Pre is bringing out all the people who can't afford an iPhone (or can't switch to ATT), and can't get their job to give them a Blackberry, yet don't have the self awareness to realize they don't really need either. The response is so "me too", and Em Ellel's defensive, reaction posting in this thread confirms it.

      (anonymous since I moderated)

    19. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Old97 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess you aren't familiar with the iPhone 3Gs yet. Compare that to the Pre in terms of speed. Also, consider real speed an not theoretical (i.e. CPU) speed. The iPhone 3Gs has more than just the CPU doing its processing. At work we have a Pre user. He's now wishing he had an iPhone 3G (not even the newest one) because the Pre is so much slower.

      Please explain what you mean by "better memory handling" and try to compare iPhone 3Gs with the Pre, not last year's models.

      Isn't the "standard easy to develop platform" Javascript and HTML5 running on Webkit. That's what iPhone 1.0 launched with in 2007! Objective C is for folks who want native speed. That option (native code) is not yet supported for Pre developers.

      "Ability to develop for ANY OS"? How is that? If it's Javascript and HTML5 it will also run on the iPhone and Android. So what is special about Pre?

      "No big-brother" and "No app kill-switch" are security vulnerabilities that can endanger more than the device itself. It's a shared network. Ever use a PC? Do you like how any there is not way to be sure as where your applications really come from? Let's see how well that works out.

      "Ability to synch music to multiple sources" - You can do that with an iPhone if you really want to. The iPhone is a USB mass storage device. Tell us about how the Pre does it automagically.

      What do you mean by "Universal search"?

      The ability to buy music directly to the handset is part of iPhone 3.0.

      Keep going on, please.

      --
      Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    20. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Ever use a PC? Do you like how any there is not way to be sure as where your applications really come from? Let's see how well that works out.

      So you would prefer that Windows and OS X refuse to run any applications not specifically approved by Microsoft or Apple? That would do wonders for innovation.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    21. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by rho · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you think multitasking is only some vague, hand waving, fairy dust 'possible' benefit? Seriously?

      I only use my phone for one thing at a time, so yeah. Your main complaint seems to be with using IM clients, which I care not a whit about. I don't know if this is possible on the iPhone, but can you talk on the phone and look up addresses or phone numbers? Or peruse Google Maps? If you can't because of a lack of multi-tasking, then yeah, I agree it's a compelling and important feature. If you can, I'm not so sure it's a valid complaint.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    22. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Call me when it has excellent voice and/or thought recognition and a non-intrusive wide-screen HUD with a good refresh rate.

      In the meantime you'll... what? Lug around a big-assed laptop (big-assed netbook) that does way more than you need?

      If a phone can provide ready access to text-based communication, basic reference materials, and simple knobs on a remote computer (along with making phone calls), it has replaced my need to lug a full computer around. If it can play some games and run some basic apps too, then it's just gravy. If it's only a mediocre phone, it's still miles ahead of a simple phone that does nothing but make calls flawlessly. For starters, only carrying one device is worth it alone. But also, the secondary features have surpassed the ability to make calls as the primary function. Phone calls are practically obsolete in many scenarios. I can go days without even using my phone as a phone, since it has provided me with more convenient forms of communication. (Show me how any of that is because of marketing.)

      So let me ask you: Why does a device have to be the second coming of Jesus before you'll consider it? It takes more than saying "I'm not a Luddite" to actually not be a Luddite. It seems to me that you're resistant to the adoption of the non-phone features of these new devices as the primary function of the device. Don't think of them as general purpose computers. Hell, many of them aren't even marketed that way. Instead look at the way they can make your life easer... Starting by helping you ditch that man-purse that you carry your current computing device around in.

    23. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since there is no Flash in the Pre there is also no ActionScript. You can go back do some scripting now....

    24. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      As an iPhone owner who knows many other iPhone owners, let me say that I don't know anybody who likes the iPhone virtual keyboard. Many people tolerate it, or don't mind it, but nobody likes it.

      There are two reasons that the iPhone is doing so well against the Blackberry (which held a seemingly unapproachable dominant market position before). The main one is that Blackberries don't have end-user friendly plans. Carriers charge a hefty "blackberry fee" that is far and away more expensive than the iPhone plan. The second is that Apple is the first company to successfully deliver on the integrated phone/music player experience. (Which has a lot to do with leveraging their virtual monopoly on music players into the phone space)

      Palm isn't going to get anywhere by catering to geeks. They're not even going to get anywhere with geeks by catering to geeks. Without mainstream users, they won't attract mainstream developers. Without apps from mainstream developers, even geek users will choose the phone with the apps over the phone they would enjoy the most as a geek toy. A Phone+Contract is too big of an investment to buy anything other than a tool that gets the job done. (Yes there are exceptions to this generalization)

      What is Palm bringing to the table that Google didn't when their new platform tanked? If they want to succeed, hopefully (for them) they are focusing on the end user, and not on the developer. Like Apple and RIM did.

    25. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Let me pick the items out of your list that matter to the average end-user for you:

      * Keyboard

      Yeah, that's it.

      The rest of those things look nice on a spec-sheet, but the average user doesn't actually care (or even notice) any of them.

    26. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Old97 · · Score: 1

      I would prefer Windows and OS X refuse to run unsigned applications - if there was an application signing process in place. Microsoft tried this some years ago, but it was too late. People were used to running unsigned apps.

      I'd prefer it if Apple handed it's application signing process to a trusted but disinterested third party, but frankly, it really doesn't bother me that much. Phones have always existed to be participants in shared infrastructure. The relationship between the PC and the Internet barely existed until about 15 years ago so the horses were out of the barn before people realized what a problem malware would become.

      --
      Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    27. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      Since there is no Flash in the Pre there is also no ActionScript. You can go back do some scripting now....

      ActionScript is ECMAScript - just like JavaScript. Its the same fracking language, you dodo.

      My point is that if you know how to do ActionScript - you know how to do JavaScript, and JavaScript IS included. I did not realize I needed to spell it out here.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    28. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by James+McP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Multitasking is a big, big benefit, assuming you're an internet-over-phone user. (And really, that's the target market. Not iphone users, net-phone users.) Right now if I surf the net on my phone it takes 5-10 seconds after I hit a link for a simple page to render and up to 30 seconds for an image laden one. I'm twiddling my thumbs (literally) in the meantime. With the WebOs I can fire up three or four web instances to cycle between loaded content, open up a game or use another app and get the web pages later.

      In a concrete example, I can have the turn-by-turn voice navigation system giving me directions while I GoogleMap for restaurants, pull down restaurant reviews, and send messages to friends saying where to meet. (The GSM one coming out later this year will let you use internet and voice at the same time, the CDMA one can't, but that's a technology limiter)

      The WebOs will have more open development than the iPhone simply because there is an O'Reilly book on programming for the WebOS that is already in production (http://my.safaribooksonline.com/9780596802097), the SDK has been rolled out to a small group of 3rd party developers with more on the way (http://developer.palm.com), and 3rd party apps are around at launch. Compare that to the release of the iPhone SDK (SDK? What SDK? We don't need no stinking SDK. Local apps are redundant. Oh, wait, here's an SDK. And an App store.)

      Many of the others that are "better" is a matter of opinion that will have to be determined by person by person (aka the market). Basing it on bullet points and other reviewers, most of the stock apps are about on par with the iPhones. Some are a bit better, some a bit worse. Some, like the PIM, are not quite as good as the older PalmOS in some ways but have other features that trump everything else. E.g. support for synching multiple calendars with color coding identifiers is wonderful, the accordion-fold time compression is another good idea, but not having ways to categorize contacts or memos is a step backwards.

      Much of "better" will come down to how well the concepts mesh with the way people work and/or think that they'll use the device.

      Note that I am totally jonesing for a Pre but I'm waiting 'til a) my Sprint contract is up in August for the extra discounts and b) Docs2Go is released b/c I have something like 200,000 words worth of text documents I authored on my Centro and the existing memos app won't meet my need.

      --
      I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
    29. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have an HTC Fuze, before you make massive changes to its software stack it blows hard. It does more or less the same stuff as the iPhone and then some (for example it's got a hardware keyboard, and multitasking) but the iPhone has one thing that no other phone has, the sexiest interface. Even the TouchFlo 3D II snuck unto the new software image is chunky at best and when you are multitasking the experience can be like computing by postcard. Just see what the phone interface performance is like with Age of Empires running in the background... I suspect this is the only reason Apple doesn't want to get involved in it; the only major objection I can think of is the mechanism for application switching, which no one has gotten right yet that I've seen.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      LOL. You either do not get it or playing stupid. [...] Now I know you are just putting me on. "Native speed", ROTFLMAO [...] And people still fall for that load of crap.

      The only thing I can say for certain, after watching slashdot's Pre/iPhone wars over the past week, is that the introduction of the Pre has not reduced the global number of cellphone-comparing supercillious pricks. In fact, it's created a whole new class of them, to join their Android and iPhone brethren.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    31. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by iluvcapra · · Score: 1
      I know I complained about this at the end of the other thread, but I might as well come clean... With an iPhone you get
      • $199 price at the counter, without having to deal with the rebate chicanery. AT&T may be inept, but they've never made me chase a rebate for an iPhone.
      • Records video
      • 8 gigs more storage
      • OpenGL, and not only that, but OpenGL on the hardware, and not only that, but in the API for developers, too.
      • A nationwide chain of stores that will replace your dead phone with a new one, in person, no questions asked, and otherwise provide free tech support.
      • Bigger screen, thinner profile, identical weight.
      • Good construction. I'll withdraw this comment when I see the demo video where the Pre is dropped on a street from 4 feet repeatedly, and then put in a rock tumbler with keys, and comes out still operating and the screen unscratched.
      • Docks with my clock radio. And just about any other clock radio, stereo system...

      The whole "you control what the hardware does" thing is overrated. All I and most people want is music and games and clear voice, we really don't care how it achieves that. The fact that most people are willing to buy a subsidized phone that entails them to a contract, essentially leasing the phone in everything but name, strongly implies to me that "owning" a cellphone as opposed to merely paying for the convenience of carrying one isn't an important issue for most people.

      I'm not sure what your beef is about "native speed." Objective-C compiles to assembly, and that's what the iPhone runs your software on. It's just always going to be faster, just like on WinCE, or JITed Java.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    32. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      The whole "you control what the hardware does" thing is overrated. All I and most people want is music and games and clear voice, we really don't care how it achieves that. The fact that most people are willing to buy a subsidized phone that entails them to a contract, essentially leasing the phone in everything but name, strongly implies to me that "owning" a cellphone as opposed to merely paying for the convenience of carrying one isn't an important issue for most people.

      If you read my original comment, that WAS pretty much the point. Pre could never outperform iPhone with average people - the best they can do is to win over power users and geeks who actually value being able to use their devices in the way THEY want.

      I'm not sure what your beef is about "native speed." Objective-C compiles to assembly, and that's what the iPhone runs your software on. It's just always going to be faster, just like on WinCE, or JITed Java.

      My "beef" is that it is an absolutely meaningless term in this context. Everything on any platform reduces to machine code. Just because it is compiled here rather than there does not make it faster. Yes interpretive languages tend to be slower than compiled, but as you pointed out there are many ways to bridge the gap (JIT!) or even outperform compiled code. It is the specific implementations make it faster or slower and if you have lots of bloat, no amount of compiling will save you.

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    33. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Old97 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let's see, you think that the difference between June 6th and June 8th (or 19th if you count ship dates) is playing "catch up" You must know a lot about product development.

      When you don't know an answer to a question your response seems to be different forms of "LOL". Are you nervous and insecure? Moving out of your Mom's basement and getting a job might help your self esteem.

      Do you think JS/HTML/CSS means web pages? Well I didn't say that, but what is a web page if not an HTML document with or without JS and CSS? Also, why does WebOS use a webserver these applications or did you miss that part. Also, you don't seem to understand the importance of HTML5 - especially for implementing RIA's that work off-line. HTML5 gives you standards based local persistence among other things. It's kind of important.

      Re: native apps and native speed - Do you understand what an Objective C (or C) compiler outputs? It's machine language for the processor(s) that will execute it. That's different from let's say Java which compiles to byte code for a virtual processor. That's even more different than something that interprets(compiled or not) markup language and script. In the later 2 cases you have at least one layer of interpretation between you and execution and you have less access to the OS's APIs. Whatever access you do have will not be portable so it has the disadvantages of interpretation without the portability. Do you know of any hotspot or JIT compilers for HTML or JS?

      "Universal Search", aka Spotlight is part of iPhone 3.0. It can do more though since it can access your iDrive too.

      Tell me when Pre or Android start running Flash. Tell me why I'd want to.

      I doubt that you've ever spent any time using or evaluating an iPhone. I'm not sure you've spent much time in the adult world from what you've written.

      --
      Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    34. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      Let's see, you think that the difference between June 6th and June 8th (or 19th if you count ship dates) is playing "catch up" You must know a lot about product development.

      I do, having worked on a number of large product releases and I can tell you that looking at the ship dates in this case means jack. See, I pay attention to news, and Pre specs been around IN PUBLIC for quite some time. Do you really think no one at Apple paid attention - hell, they tried to sue Palm to stop them - did not work out well for them tough? I am sure 3GS was planned for a while, but the fact that specs are near identical to Pre does not seem coincidental.

      When you don't know an answer to a question your response seems to be different forms of "LOL". Are you nervous and insecure? Moving out of your Mom's basement and getting a job might help your self esteem.

      No, not nervous or for that matter insecure. Just when people make silly statements it just makes me laugh. The basement thing in this one particularly tickles me.

      Do you think JS/HTML/CSS means web pages? Well I didn't say that, but what is a web page if not an HTML document with or without JS and CSS? Also, why does WebOS use a webserver these applications or did you miss that part. Also, you don't seem to understand the importance of HTML5 - especially for implementing RIA's that work off-line. HTML5 gives you standards based local persistence among other things. It's kind of important.

      What does that have to do with your claim of iPhone 1.0 supporting HTML5(proposed in 2008) in 2007 again?

      Re: native apps and native speed - Do you understand what an Objective C (or C) compiler outputs? It's machine language for the processor(s) that will execute it. That's different from let's say Java which compiles to byte code for a virtual processor. That's even more different than something that interprets(compiled or not) markup language and script. In the later 2 cases you have at least one layer of interpretation between you and execution and you have less access to the OS's APIs. Whatever access you do have will not be portable so it has the disadvantages of interpretation without the portability. Do you know of any hotspot or JIT compilers for HTML or JS?

      Also, again, you do not seem to understand, the Pre SDK uses JS/HTML/CSS - but its running of a web server - it does have access to the OS API.

      Compiling does make things faster when you go bit-for-bit, but in this case it is actually just makes things heavier and more bloated and as a result slower. Why do you think Apple contends that iPhone cannot handle more than one application at a time? Because they are using a desktop OS approach on a mobile device. A lighter app approach greatly reduces the memory and cpu requirements.

      Also, just because you asked, of course there are plenty of ways to pre-compile ANYTHING. Hell, back in the day we used to pre-compile perl scripts to speed them up.

      "Universal Search", aka Spotlight is part of iPhone 3.0. It can do more though since it can access your iDrive too.

      Like I said, they are trying to catch up. Only 10 years behind and gaining fast ;-)

      Tell me when Pre or Android start running Flash. Tell me why I'd want to.

      I do not know what that means. But Pre is supposed to have Flash soon, and I think Android already has it. iPhone would have it, but Apple did not allow it (something about fear of competition).

      As to why, because there is a lot of flash content online that is cool. For one, you can view ALL of YouTube and not just things Apple deems ok. For other, there is a lot of other content out there.

      I doubt that you've ever spent any time using or evaluating an iPhone. I'm not sure you've spent much time in the adult world from what you've written.

      Man, your keen insight continues to crack me up.

      Just for the record, I have an iPhone and have used it for a while, as I developed apps for it.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    35. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      As for the others, they're potential benefits.

      No they are real benefits.

      Open development model? Linux has that, but it didn't help it take the world by storm.

      Microsoft Windows has an open development model too (open in the sense that anyone can develop and deliver apps for it without having to obtain microsoft's permission first.

      Further, the LACK of an open development model on the iphone is one of the developer communities BIGGEST gripes with it. Apps that people WANT to own, want to write, and in some cases even have already written, are not readily available because apple said "No".

      Multi-tasking? Sure, I suppose it would be better in some theoretical sense, but you're making a judgement based on brochure bullet-points.

      Uh no. Its better in the sense that when I'm using the iphone and switch from one app to another, and back again, the original app has to to start from scratch. Multitasking is not a theoretical benefit.

      The lack of multitasking has constrained iphone applications in very real ways.

    36. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The main one is that Blackberries don't have end-user friendly plans. Carriers charge a hefty "blackberry fee" that is far and away more expensive than the iPhone plan.

      Maybe outside the USA, but T-Mobile's BlackBerry plan for individuals (without the enterprise server connectivity) works out cheaper than AT&T's iPhone plan.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    37. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would prefer Windows and OS X refuse to run unsigned applications

      nobody cares what you think, you fucking tool.

    38. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do both if you are on 3G or WiFi, but not on Edge.

    39. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so what's the need to refer to Flash, then ActionScript if you are talking about Javascript? And no, ActionScript is not the same of ECMAScript, there are significative differences.

    40. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Hi. I like it. Now you know someone. I don't like the extra space taken up by a physical keyboard. I also had a bb from work, and I did not like that keyboard, I was quicker on my regular phone. I prefer the iPhone keyboard, I don't do much typing, and I like that it takes up no space, no physical space anyway.

    41. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by rho · · Score: 1

      Further, the LACK of an open development model on the iphone is one of the developer communities BIGGEST gripes with it. Apps that people WANT to own, want to write, and in some cases even have already written, are not readily available because apple said "No".

      That explains why there's nobody developing for the iPhone, I guess. Oh, wait.

      Uh no. Its better in the sense that when I'm using the iphone and switch from one app to another, and back again, the original app has to to start from scratch. Multitasking is not a theoretical benefit.

      Yeah, I hate that when I jump out of Bookworm on my iPod Touch it destroys my game. Oh, wait, it doesn't.

      What you're describing isn't multi-tasking.

      I hear a lot of "Everybody hates the iPhone," but nothing to back that up. Customers like it. Developers like it. Even if your complaints are 100% valid (they're not), it doesn't seem to affect the iPhones popularity. I suspect it has something to do with the iPhone's overall delivery of features and service and ease of use. Those are very hard problems that Apple is quite good at solving. "Open development" and "multi-tasking" will not solely serve as silver bullets to compete with the iPhone.

      But you believe what you want.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    42. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by vux984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That explains why there's nobody developing for the iPhone, I guess. Oh, wait.

      "Oh wait" for what? The iphone is the best device of its kind on the market right now, so its doing well. Nobody denies that. The closed devlopment model still sucks.

      What you're describing isn't multi-tasking.

      Uh. I didn't describe anything. If you want an example of app that doesn't work on the iphone... how about oh something really complex... like an alarm clock. Sure I can use the alarm clock app that the iphone comes with. But if I were to obtain a 3rd party alarm clock app, unless it was the current app, its not running, and the alarm doesn't go off.

      Or maybe I don't like waiting seconds for my stock tracking app to update AFTER I launch it. Maybe I want it running in the background keeping itself up to date so when I flip to it, I don't have to wait for it to startup and connect to the server to download the current data. To me, that few seconds of pointless wait time is a few seconds too many.

      I NEVER EVER used the media player in my previous cell phone because it took 5 seconds to start.

      The reason I like the iphone is that i push itunes and its there, ready to go. Apple =gets= the importance of multitasking and responsiveness; it just hasn't figured out how to preserve a level of responsiveness while letting 3rd parties do what they want -- why can't it run 3rd party apps with a cpu quota at a lower priority level to ensure the core platform is "always on top and responsive"? for example?

      "Open development" and "multi-tasking" will not solely serve as silver bullets to compete with the iPhone.

      For sure. I never said they were. I merely said they were more than 'brochure bullet points'. Like 16 scene modes and 14x digital zoom on a camera... features that fillout the spec sheet but add zero real capability.

      Open development appeals directly to me as a programmer. That's a real feature.

      Multitasking is a real feature too that enables an entire class of apps that 3rd parties simply can't do on the iphone.

    43. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was halfway a poke.

      The other half was what a great idea that a cell phone whose primary purpose is actually to be a phone! Bonus that it's easy to use and has no pesky contracts to lock you in.

      There's nothing wrong with wanting a phone to actually be just a phone. For people that want that, something like the Jitterbug is a great option.

      Take no offense; just a light poke.

    44. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      At work we have a Pre user. He's now wishing he had an iPhone 3G (not even the newest one) because the Pre is so much slower.

      In what manner? The different videos that I've seen show that the Pre is much faster when it comes to web browsing.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    45. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      That last post was not supposed to be from AC.

      I know it was intended as a small poke, but a small light single-purpose device that performs flawlessly is miles ahead of a complex expensive device that does a bunch of stuff poorly.

      Just to make things clear, I'm not a Luddite, and actually like (and develop) really cool technology. I just find it amusing that people will just about drool over the capabilities of a small device that wouldn't make it as a kids toy if it were full-size.

      Call me when it has excellent voice and/or thought recognition and a non-intrusive wide-screen HUD with a good refresh rate.

      It was halfway a poke.

      The other half was what a great idea that a cell phone whose primary purpose is actually to be a phone! Bonus that it's easy to use and has no pesky contracts to lock you in.

      There's nothing wrong with wanting a phone to actually be just a phone. For people that want that, something like the Jitterbug is a great option.

      Take no offense. It was just a light poke.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    46. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the speed issue depends on where you are. Today I ate lunch with some coworkers in St. Charles, MO and one of them mentioned that I bought a Pre. About half of the 8 guys at lunch have iPhones. One of the guys mentioned how great it would be to get an iPhone because of the 3G speed and the other 4 iPhone owners laughed simultaneously. "3G on the iPhone is a joke, it takes forever to load web pages or do anything meaningful" one of them said. So my Pre got passed around and a few of the guys said they'd rather have the Pre than the iPhone (3Gs or not)... but then again the grass is always greener on the other side.

    47. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by rho · · Score: 1

      The iphone is the best device of its kind on the market right now, so its doing well. Nobody denies that. The closed devlopment model still sucks.

      As I pointed out earlier, Linux has an open development model. It's pretty well relegated to specialty niches, such as servers. I suggest that "closed development", whatever that means, may have benefits that outweigh the poor-mouthing of indignant nerds.

      Uh. I didn't describe anything

      You described apps starting from scratch. That is not a fully accurate picture.

      why can't it run 3rd party apps with a cpu quota at a lower priority level to ensure the core platform is "always on top and responsive"? for example?

      Ask that question from the standpoint of Apple, who needs to sell a lot of iPhones. Here's a hint--my old Palm didn't multi-task either, and it still crashed a lot.

      Open development appeals directly to me as a programmer. That's a real feature.

      A lot of programmers don't give a shit. Some of them are making a living not giving a shit about it. Who's right? Better question: who's more right?

      Multitasking is a real feature too that enables an entire class of apps that 3rd parties simply can't do on the iphone.

      I accept that. But I'll frame the underlying question in another way--do these new classes of apps add to the experience of the iPhone, or do they merely tick checkboxes on some geek's wishlist? Here's another hint: most people are willing to wait a few seconds for their stocks to update, because they're not depending on their iPhone to daytrade.

      I get where you're coming from. But I suggest that your deeply held concerns may be orthogonal to Apple's.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    48. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Do you know of any hotspot or JIT compilers for HTML or JS?

      You mean like http://www.mozilla.org/projects/tamarin or http://webkit.org/blog/214/introducing-squirrelfish-extreme for JS?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    49. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      There are PLENTY of times this matters... looking stuff up while on the phone, looking up a phone number for an e-mail... texting on and off with a friend while playing a game... you may only need one function at a time, but you might want the phone to be able to keep track. My Treo does this SOMEWHAT (maddening though is that it can't keep a web browser doing what I left it doing when anything else happens -- it loads the page all over again from scratch, which sucks if you're typing something or browsed to a certain spot)... I don't know if the iPhone can.

    50. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      But I'll frame the underlying question in another way--do these new classes of apps add to the experience of the iPhone, or do they merely tick checkboxes on some geek's wishlist?

      Yes. They do.

      The part of the reason built in iphone apps are so 'good' is that they are not restricted in terms of multitasking the same way 3rd party apps are.

      Its not a 'checkbox on a meaningless feature list'.

      Building a device that has multi-tasking and an open development platform doesn't make it 'better' than the iphone, but they ARE features that would genuinely improve on the iphone in a very real way. They aren't abstract BS like, to reuse my previous example - more digital zoom on a camera.

      Ask that question from the standpoint of Apple, who needs to sell a lot of iPhones. Here's a hint--my old Palm didn't multi-task either, and it still crashed a lot.

      And my first digital camera was crap compared to my second, but that didn't make the second camera the pinnacle of digital cameras. My 3rd digital camera was even nicer. Similiarly, the fact that the iphone is worlds better than the previous devices doesn't make it the pinnacle of technology.

      As I pointed out earlier, Linux has an open development model.

      And as I pointed out earlier, Windows has an open development model too. Hell, even OSX has an open development model. Its part of why these were as successful. And as for linux, it wouldn't even be a niche market if it was a closed model.

      The iphone is like facebook apps... wildly popular now, but they'll be a forgotten memory sooner than later.

    51. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Old97 · · Score: 1

      If you've indeed worked on large projects and if you have followed Apple very much you'd know that they plan far ahead and tend not to be distracted. They've been releasing hardware refreshes to the iPhone on a predictable twice a year schedule since it's release. Palm knew when the next refresh would be and pretty much what it might include and planned their announcement date in hopes of stealing some of Apple's thunder.

      Tear downs of the Pre show that Palm uses many of the same components as the iPhone and is similar in it's design - with Palm's own twists and innovations added. However, one thing Palm did not duplicate is the Powervr chip. Apple was reported to be licensing this chip in 2008. It's iPhone software is off-loading a lot of processing to it which is part of why the iPhone 3Gs is twice as fast as it's predecessor yet it's CPU is only 50% faster. (Doubling RAM helped too.) So the evidence is that the new iPhone's design started in 2008. Now tell me again how this was playing catchup to Palm? Tell me when Palm is going to catch up with Apple.

      BTW, I have no problems with the Palm Pre and I'm interested in seeing how it evolves. I also hope Palm can get the capital it will need in order to compete with the bigger players.

      Native code is not necessarily heavier or more bloated and it certainly is not slower. Bloat depends on the libraries and run-time support you've linked in and their granularity. Careless developers do not always pay attention to that. If Native code is slower it's because most application programmers are not capable of writing as good code as the elite folks who write JVMs, JITs and JS. Nevertheless, if you are that good and are willing to hand optimize, your code will likely be faster.

      Speaking of bloat, compare the run time footprint of Java with C or Objective C. You'd see that Java requires a lot more memory. I primarily program in Java these days(last 10 years) and I appreciate it's relative portability, but with Java, don't expect to squeeze a major application into 64k. I used to write a lot of assembler when CPUs were slow and memory tight. Surely you agree that we use languages like Java, C#, JS and Groovy for productivity. Their speed is good enough, not better. If speed were the only criteria then we'd have stayed with assembler or C.

      Work on HTML5 began in 2003. Early adopters of the draft specifications include Sproutcore - the open source javascript framework/libraries Apple used. It's key features have been in use far longer than you think. Take a look at it's rate of adoption amongst all the browser vendors especially device browsers from Apple, Opera and Google.

      The rapid improvements in JS speed combined with HTML5 along with open standards like H.264 (also used in iPhone and others) make Flash and Flex unnecessary for all but the more esoteric requirements.

      I disagree with you interpretation of why flash is not on the iPhone. Adobe does not compete with Apple. I think part of it is philosophical and part of it is payback for Adobe's past treatment of Apple. Apple has embraced open standards in a big way (webkit, BSD, JS/HTML5, etc.) because it does not want the software vendors to be able to control it's destiny, but that's an old story.

      --
      Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    52. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by rho · · Score: 1

      The iphone is like facebook apps... wildly popular now, but they'll be a forgotten memory sooner than later.

      I suspect you are utterly wrong about that. If you're so sure you should short AAPL.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    53. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I suspect you are utterly wrong about that. If you're so sure you should short AAPL.

      1) I don't think either facebook or iphone apps are going anywhere in the immediate future.

      2) I said iphone apps are a passing fad. Not apple.

      3) Before iphone apps go they will be superceded with something else. As an example of a closed development platform, consider the NES. When was the last time someone wrote something for the NES? Just because the NES is long dead, and nobody writes nes apps anymore, Nintendo is doing just fine, with its business model of releasing successive closed platforms. But each one dies when they move on.

      Contrast that to something like the PPC Macs, which will have a thriving community for years to come, thanks to the fact that anyone can write and release software for it long after apple has moved on.

    54. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      There was something that just occurred to me though... What if I'm developing for the Pre and don't want anyone to have my source code? You can obfuscate it, but that really isn't going to make reverse-engineering more than annoying. The handset's filesystem is wide-open, so anybody could swipe and reverse-engineer the app you wrote (this is already happening to the shipped apps.)

      Can you deploy your app in some kind of bytecode? Even then, though, bytecode disassemblers (at least for Java, dunno about JS) are very good, and people can still open up their phone and take away all your static resources... Interesting problem. As someone that dabbles in iPhone software, the whole feature of the app store making it impossible for crackers to pirate your app, let alone reverse-engineer, is a major draw. It's really what makes the low prices work.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    55. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pre will decimate the iPhone. No, it's not because the Pre can multitask or has a keyboard or has 12 apps available (yeah, 12! No more hunting though thousands of apps to get what you want!).

      The reason the Pre will kill the iPhone can be summed up in one word - NASCAR! The Pre had NASCAR on it. Yeah!

      So all you iPhone/Blackberry fans can keep your phone with thousands of applications and I'll be kickin' it NASCAR style with my Pre!

    56. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by James+McP · · Score: 1

        However, one thing Palm did not duplicate is the Powervr chip. Apple was reported to be licensing this chip in 2008.

      Palm didn't duplicate the VR, that's what Texas Instruments is for. Palm Pre uses the TI OMAP processor, which is the ARM Cortex A8 + PowerVR SGX integrated together. See that "Power VR" part? Yeah, the Palm Pre's out today and has essentially the same chip that the 3GS will use next week.

      Which means at the moment, AFAIK, the Pre has the most powerful mobile phone CPU on the market. The Pre leapfrogged the existing iPhone models and the 3GS will be matching the Pre. Who was first? Meh, not worth arguing since I don't really think a week makes a big difference either way but the Pre is not in any way at a technical disadvantage to the 3GS.

      Go read a few reviews. The Pre is generally seen to perform comparably to the 3GS with similar battery life. Not identical, given the differences in apps and usage patterns, but close enough that neither is clearly ahead of the other.

      Well, until someone starts selling extended Pre battery packs.

      --
      I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
    57. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Old97 · · Score: 1

      Fine if you say so, but Em's point was that the iPhone 3Gs was playing catch up. It's not catch up since they were both released at about the same time and were both in design at about the same time. It's competition, not catch up in the case of these two. Software is likely to be the deciding factor. Also, Em seems to be hyper emotional about what to me are just interesting devices. Saying someone is stupid, laughing or making unsubstantiated qualitative assertions are poor ways to make a point and are counter productive if your aim is to persuade anyone.

      I read several reviews and thought they were funny since they didn't have an iPhone 3Gs to actually compare them to. I expect the iPhone 3Gs to be faster primarily because it's software has had more time to mature. Frankly, though I don't care. I don't work for either company.

      The one Pre user I know tells me he regrets his choice because he feels it is slower than the iPhone 3G (not s) models he tried - no benchmarks, just perception. I don't know, the grass is always greener elsewhere.

      To me the Pre looks like a good choice for people who want something like an iPhone but with a keyboard. I'm not sure Sprint versus AT&T would be a deciding factor though. If the Pre is offered by Verizon it may be very successful, provided Palm can remain capitalized well enough to compete with much bigger companies.

      The guy next to me at work has a Blackberry Storm. He's happy, but he's not into music or video playback, games or internet browsing much. The only really unhappy smartphone users I know have or had phones with Windows CE.

      --
      Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    58. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      How is that different from decompiling a binary?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    59. Re:Will this make be an iPhone killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The iPhone is a USB mass storage device.

      Actually, no it is not.

  3. Post "first post!" by jimbudncl · · Score: 1

    I was trying for Pre "first post!", but my existential metaphysical co-processor had a meltdown.

  4. It doesn't work that way by schnell · · Score: 3, Informative

    If we're really lucky, maybe someone will be able to look at this and move us one step closer to an unlocked Pre that could jump onto Verizon's network.

    I thought people would eventually learn this after all the discussion of "why can't I move my iPhone to Verizon?" In the US, Verizon and Sprint use CDMA. Each phone has to be developed for each specific network. AT&T and T-Mobile use GSM, the worldwide standard where phones can be "unlocked" and moved to other networks (as long as the phone support the frequencies used by those networks). So don't hold your breath waiting for a Verizon Pre.

    --
    "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:It doesn't work that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      As you just answered yourself.. Sprint and Verizon use CDMA. The Pre being on Sprint means that it jumping to Verizon is very possible and is in fact nothing like the iPhone.

    2. Re:It doesn't work that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing fundamental about CDMA preventing the switch to verizon. Indeed, in europe, GSM uses CDMA as its underlying protocol, rather than the noisy, wasteful, fail-intolerant TDMA it used to use.

    3. Re:It doesn't work that way by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Sprint absorbed Nextel, which isn't CDMA or GSM, but is iDen. They are phasing it out, but last year I got what turned out to be a Nextel phone from Sprint since CDMA doesn't interfere with radios as much.

      iDen is similar to GSM in terms of interfering with radios.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    4. Re:It doesn't work that way by park3r · · Score: 2, Informative

      I read that the Palm Pre will hit Verizon in about six months .

      While you're right about moving phones between carriers, it doesn't seem to matter in this case.

    5. Re:It doesn't work that way by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Wrong... Verizon and Sprint are CDMA. All you have to do to put a Sprint phone on the Verizon network is for Verizon to activate it.
      What I don't get is why is everyone so hot for it to move to Verizon.
      Sprint is several hundred dollars a year cheaper for the same plan. I have had no problems with converage on Sprint and there network is actually pretty fast.
      As far as customer support I have not had any issues with them.
      I wonder how much of the Sprint hate is left over and how much of it is current. And don't the people on slashdot know that Verizon is infamous for taking functionality out of phones and putting their own crappy slow interface on them? Sprint is actually pretty open about what you can install even on their feature phones.
      When I asked Verizon about installing Opera mini on one of their Razors I was told that you couldn't. Of course the sales guy might have been an idiot.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:It doesn't work that way by Kohenkatz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Verizon will let you use ANY device on their network that conforms to the CDMA specifications. See http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/27/verizon-wireless-opens-network-to-any-apps-any-device-in-2008/ This most likely includes the Pre, even without any modifications.

    7. Re:It doesn't work that way by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

      Uhh, and the Pre is sold by Sprint, thus nuking your point (from orbit).

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    8. Re:It doesn't work that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, this is not completely true. They wouldn't let me have a Sprint Touch Pro. I knew several people that did it while their *228 loophole was open. They told me that Sprint phones won't work on Verizon (we all know that's untrue). I had completely reprogrammed the phone with all of VZW's info. I went through all sorts or techs for a period of 2 weeks until I got so disgusted I left VZW and went to Sprint. I know that others have been more fortunate than me and have successfully activated other carriers phones on VZW. I wish everyone luck in doing this but have a backup plan in case VZW won't play ball with you.

    9. Re:It doesn't work that way by M+Moogle · · Score: 1

      There is already an effort to get the Pre working on Verizon in fact - see here: http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=1487090&page=1&pp=15&highlight=palm+pre

    10. Re:It doesn't work that way by _merlin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, but with the US CDMA networks (and, incidentally KDDI in Japan, the Korean CDMA networks and the recently-decommissioned Australian CDMA network), the subscriber identifier is hardcoded into the handset, and the home network identifier is stored in the handset, but can usually be changed. With GSM/UMTS, the equivalents of both pieces of information (IMSI and home network) are stored in a removable SIM card (in Europe, it's mandatory for it to be replaceable, but I've heard that some devices on T-Mobile USA like automated weather stations have it soldered onto the board).

      So to switch networks with a GSM/UMTS handset, you need to "unlock" the handset (tell it to accept a SIM card with a different home network to the one that it's "locked" to) and then swap in a new SIM, and it should all be good, provided the handset can tune the frequencies you need.

      But with a CDMA handset, you need to "unlock" the phone (convincing it to allow you to change the home network identifier), and change the home network identifier. That's the easy part. You now need to get the subscriber identifier out of the handset and convince the new carrier to register it for you. They're usually very reluctant to do this - they want to sell you a locked-down handset with their customised firmware.

      So while technically incorrect - you actually can switch networks with a CDMA handset - his point still stands - it's practically impossible due to the pigheaded attitude prevalent at the carriers.

    11. Re:It doesn't work that way by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      Definitely agree with this. I have a few friends that actually left verizon due to their nazi tactics on their phone. They had preinstalled banners and color schemes that the user was just flat out not allowed to change without hacking it all up. Back then there wasnt much knowledge on getting into the razrs to do it either. So they all left and went to either att or sprint.
      I have sprint and have never had any issues with them, also like the fact the phones are not really locked down at all, I can do pretty much whatever I want with mine. It also helps that a sprint plan compared to an att plan is almost 40/mo cheaper with a corporate discount that just about anyone working for a large corp can get, and thats just a regular talk+text plan

    12. Re:It doesn't work that way by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      I thought people would eventually learn this after all the discussion of "why can't I move my iPhone to Verizon?" In the US, Verizon and Sprint use CDMA. Each phone has to be developed for each specific network. AT&T and T-Mobile use GSM, the worldwide standard where phones can be "unlocked" and moved to other networks (as long as the phone support the frequencies used by those networks). So don't hold your breath waiting for a Verizon Pre.

      Just to add to the whole "You Are Wrong" reply crowd - you are wrong - but it is still very hard to transfer handset between Sprint and Verizon. They use same system and people (including myself) used to transfer handsets from Sprint to Verizon all the time - took come hacking (change home network ids and roaming lists), but its not technically impossible and with Verizon being notorious for never having any decent recent handsets, it was a necessity. But a number of years ago Verizon decided to be nasty and they now whitelist their own phones, so that when you try to activate a non-Verizon phone they refuse to. Its not a technical limitation - just a business stupidity on part of Verizon. I never understood it either, as they claim to loose money on handsets, so providing service without providing the handset should benefit them, no....

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    13. Re:It doesn't work that way by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      What I don't get is why is everyone so hot for it to move to Verizon.

      I've owned Sprint phones, Verizon phones, and currently AT&T phones. I can tell you this about Verizon:
      .
      Their service sucks - stupidity, bordering on maliciousness
      Their handset selection sucks - they never have anything decent or anything recent
      They love to cripple what little they DO have.
      They are expensive compared to others.
      .
      All that said, I'd switch back to Verizon in a heartbeat if they had a decent phone (and Pre seems like a great phone).Why? Because unlike AT&T or Sprint, their service actually works everywhere, including places AT&T seems to think no one goes to - like inside buildings. When I had Verizon I used to make fun of all those people looking for signal, cause I could always take out my handset and get decent reception. Now I am one of the clowns who are forever searching for signal. Sad, really, but hey, I have a nicer handset.....

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    14. Re:It doesn't work that way by CompMD · · Score: 1

      Also, some time ago, Verizon publicly declared they will permit any compatible CDMA device on their network.

    15. Re:It doesn't work that way by terrymr · · Score: 1

      I've even had companies that sell rebranded sprint service refuse to activate a sprint branded phone on their network, claiming the system they use to activate phones with the sprint network won't accept ESNs from sprint branded phones.

    16. Re:It doesn't work that way by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Everything you said is true.

      One caveat, Verizon doesn't seem to cripple the newer blackberries, although they are dog slow about approving OS updates. Any BB put out in the last year that has a full GPS is usually unlocked for other mapping applications. Ditto with mp3 ringtones and bluetooth functionality.

      And unlike other Verizon phones, you can get a dev license from RIM for 30 bucks and write your own code without asking mother-may-I.

    17. Re:It doesn't work that way by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      But is the Pre a compatible device to Verizon's CDMA or will take some little change like the difference in T-Mobile 3G and ATT 3G?

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    18. Re:It doesn't work that way by Alex+Zepeda · · Score: 1

      If it's anything like the Razr2 I'm using, the voice stuff will work just fine with minimal fuss. The CDMA standards define a common way of provisioning voice service over the air. Punch up the right magic number (*228 + frequency) and you'll connect to Verizon's over the air programming and get the proper roaming list. The data stuff will need to be configured in a more phone specific manner.

      --
      The revolution will be mocked
    19. Re:It doesn't work that way by CompMD · · Score: 1

      If memory serves me right, T-Mobile and ATT use different bands for 3G data (one is in the 800MHz band, the other 1.8GHz). I believe Verizon and Sprint both have EVDO running in the 1.9GHz band, but don't quote me on that.

      Back in the day I didn't have trouble moving devices between Sprint or Verizon, but that was back in the day.

    20. Re:It doesn't work that way by Christophotron · · Score: 1

      One caveat, Verizon doesn't seem to cripple the newer blackberries, although they are dog slow about approving OS updates.

      Just curious, do blackberry phones have a similar dev/hacker following that HTC phones do? I'm thinking you can just flash whatever ROM you want to the phone and hack it all up if you want. Install the latest and greatest. I do this on my ATT Tilt and the haxors have managed to get the best parts of the newest TouchFlo phones to work on this older handset. I flashed away from the stock ATT rom and am never going back, so I could care less if ATT ever updates their crappy software.

      If blackberry is anything at all like this then I may give it another look when I buy my next handset. I had this preconceived notion that blackberries were locked-down and apps had to be signed, and I will not buy any phone that lacks an active hacker community. Palm Pre may be an option, nokia is blech, iphone lacks keyboard and multitasking, android looks promising, and blackberry may be cool but I know little about it.

    21. Re:It doesn't work that way by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Blackberry executables are signed with a key you buy from RIM, verizon has nothing to do with it. I'm reasonably sure there are some dev roms out there, though.

      New OS versions leak all the time, and if your model is the same as another networks, you usually can use that one instead.

      You can download the java codebase right off, along with emulators. I keep meaning to get a dev key, but I've enough on my plate already and most of my itches are scratched by existing free apps.

  5. Amunition for Apple? by thered2001 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this will help Apple launch a legal assault regarding the Pre's ability to masquerade as an iPod?

    --

    If your only tool is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail.

    1. Re:Amunition for Apple? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I really doubt that they will launch any legal assault.
      Palm probably has a patent on syncing a PDA device with a PC or some such thing. Apple will at best just change the software so it doesn't work or will leave it. Other devices already sync with iTunes and Apple makes money when you buy music so why bother with a law suit?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Amunition for Apple? by EXrider · · Score: 1

      The BlackBerry Desktop software has allowed you to sync iTunes libraries with crackberries for a while now.

      --
      grep -iw skynet /etc/services
    3. Re:Amunition for Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet Palm is dying for Apple to sue. Prohibiting Palm's device from syncing to iTunes when Apple has a competative product... I smell anti-trust...

    4. Re:Amunition for Apple? by _merlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doesn't work the same way at all. iTunes produces an XML file detailing the contents of its library. The Blackberry (and, incidentally, Nokia) synchronisation software reads this file. You need to install a separate application from the handset vendor and use it to synchronise your music (iTunes is blissfully unaware of your Blackberry/Nokia). The Pre is a different kettle of fish - it masquerades as an iPod so iTunes will handle the synchronisation with no additional software.

    5. Re:Amunition for Apple? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I don't think there is any chance of Apple suing Palm over this. It's much more likely that they will release a 'security update' to iTunes which 'accidentally' causes it to reject the Pre.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Amunition for Apple? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      I really doubt that they will launch any legal assault.
      Palm probably has a patent on syncing a PDA device with a PC or some such thing. Apple will at best just change the software so it doesn't work or will leave it. Other devices already sync with iTunes and Apple makes money when you buy music so why bother with a law suit?

      You can't sync DRMed music from iTunes to Pre - so I doubt sales on iTunes is much of a motivator (non-DRMed music on iTunes store is a lot more expensive than on their competitors like AmazonMP3)

      More likely knowing Apple's big brother mentality, they will do it in the Microsoft fashion - just introduce little changes that will break the Pre functionality and claim ignorance.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    7. Re:Amunition for Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't sync DRMed music from iTunes to Pre - so I doubt sales on iTunes is much of a motivator (non-DRMed music on iTunes store is a lot more expensive than on their competitors like AmazonMP3)

      iTunes doesn't sell DRMed music anymore, and they seem to still be doing brisk business...

    8. Re:Amunition for Apple? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      iTunes is moving to or already has moved to all DRM free music and they still do sell a good amount of it. I did say they might block it in software but I see no chance they will block it in court. They could loose, it will cost money, and really could be some nasty PR for them. It could even push interest in anti-trust.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:Amunition for Apple? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Apple would be VERY foolish to take legal action against Palm. Palm can BURY Apple in mobile patents.

      --
      Good-bye
  6. Unlocking it for verizon by keeegan · · Score: 3, Informative

    What does the phone's rom have to do with this? I've unlocked sprint treos for verizon. You just have to reprogram the prl on the cdma chip. No firmware/OS modification involved. Has something drastically changed, or does the op just not understand?

  7. Intiguing comment? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Amusingly, you also get to see all the comments left by the devs in the code, guaranteeing a few good chuckles from others who can relate

    Really? How many people could relate to finding just one comment in an assembly language module?

    MOV 1750 # RIP JSB

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Intiguing comment? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Me, but only because I saw it mentioned in a book (Code Complete?) as an example of a bad comment.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Intiguing comment? by mobilesteve · · Score: 1

      My guess is that comment makes reference to the fact that Johann Sebastian Bach died in 1750

  8. "for the layman"? by blcamp · · Score: 2, Funny

    [...] which, for the layman, means [...]

    A layman wouldn't know what anything on this website would mean, much less TFA.

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
    1. Re:"for the layman"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [sig]
      The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
      [/sig]
      The problem with toryism is that they never run out of other people's money. - AC

    2. Re:"for the layman"? by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      Basically it doesn't mean much for the layman. The iPhone has been hacked over and over many times. Developers/hackers/uber-geeks alike now have another cool piece of software to rip apart and discover and then make cool mods & bolt-ons. It's just a lot of fun. If you are only into using the phone for its intended purpose then this will be of little value to you.

  9. Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by Qubit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cracking open the ROM is nifty and all (although it might cause issues for you later if you want to develop on the platform), but what I still want to know is where are the Palm Pre Linux kernel sources?.

    I've looked all over the Palm sites and even Googled for it, but I haven't come up with anything but speculation. I can't believe that they're using a prebuilt kernel from TI, so what gives?

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
    1. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 0

      So basically you are assuming its Linux based? Everything I have read suggests it is not.

    2. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Uh, what have you been reading then? Wikipedia seems to think it is and so does everything else I've read about it. Can you give even one source which suggests it runs something else?

      The real question is whether it runs X11 like the Nokia 770/N800/N810, allowing it to run unmodified desktop apps.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have you read anything about it? The root image is linux. That's a fact. You can verify it yourself if you want to.

      The Pre is the first Palm device to use webOS, the Linux based platform that replaces Palm's previous Palm OS. Developed from scratch for use in mobile phones - whereas Palm OS was originally designed for PDAs - webOS is capable of supporting built-in first party applications, as well as third party applications.

      webOS is a completely new operating system based on Linux.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by piquadratCH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If it isn't Linux based, I'm wondering what stuff like this does in webOS.tar

      ./lib/modules/2.6.24-palm-joplin-3430/kernel/net/
      ./lib/modules/2.6.24-palm-joplin-3430/kernel/net/wifi/
      ./lib/modules/2.6.24-palm-joplin-3430/kernel/net/wifi/sd8xxx.ko

      So, yes, it's Linux based.

    5. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      If you're citing wikipedia as a source, you're doing it wrong.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm not citing Wikipedia as a source, I'm pointing out that Wikipedia, which does cite sources (including one for 'Linux-based' in the first paragraph) states that it is Linux based. I am also asking for a single example from the the grandparent's 'everything I have read', that provides a counter-example.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by marol · · Score: 1

      The real question is whether it runs X11 like the Nokia 770/N800/N810, allowing it to run unmodified desktop apps.

      From a glance, it looks like drawing is done via directfb.

    8. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that mean they're obliged to release their source anyway (or will be, when the item ships)?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and the pre has shipped.

      I think currently, Palm is violating the GPL for the kernel, webkit, and probably others.

    10. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by Qubit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doesn't that mean they're obliged to release their source anyway

      That's pretty much the assumption I was working on... :-)

      (or will be, when the item ships)?

      According to Wikipedia it has already shipped: Available: June 6th, 2009 (Sprint Nextel).

      That's why I've waited until now to ask for the kernel sources!

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
    11. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by zlogic · · Score: 1

      GPL demands the sources available to be available to paying customers. The customers are free to upload them to The Pirate Bay, but if they don't, the only option to look at them is to buy the device. A lot of router and modem manufacturers provide GPL'd sources on an included CD.

      Now if Palm doesn't include the sources or provide a link to download them, it's a different story.

    12. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. The GPL says that source can be provided on demand. I wonder if anyone's asked them?

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    13. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      Just following up here, the image contains /usr/lib/ossinfo/Open Source Information.pdf, which contains the following:

      For instructions on how to obtain a copy of any source code being made publicly available by Palm, Inc. (âoePalmâ) related to software used in
      this Palm mobile device ("Device"), you should send your request in writing to:
      Palm Inc.
      Attention: Open Source Compliance
      950 W. Maude Ave
      Sunnyvale, CA 94085
      USA

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    14. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Kernel sources =/= OS sources.

      Just because it runs the Linux kernel doesn't mean all their code must be GPL.

    15. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      I refer you to a comment I made downthread.

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    16. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      They're not required to put the source on the web, just to provide it when requested. (And even then, only by paying customers, i.e. customers who have the compiled version.) Have you called up someone at Palm and requested it yet?

    17. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by Qubit · · Score: 1

      The GPL says that source can be provided on demand. I wonder if anyone's asked them?


      From: Qubit
      To: pdn@palm.com
      Subject: FOSS used in the Pre?

      Hi,

      I've read a lot about the Palm Pre in the media and it sure looks like
      a slick device. I currently have a Treo650, and while it's actually
      humming along pretty well I think could be convinced to upgrade to the
      Pre. I probably wouldn't switch for a few months, as I would have to
      go though a little hassle of changing carriers, but the advanced
      features of the Pre would certainly make my life a lot easier!

      From what I read on Wikipedia and in the first chapter of the O'Reilly
      webOS book, the Pre runs on an embedded Linux platform and leverages a
      number of FOSS programs like WebKit. I'm really interested to hear
      what changes you've made to WebKit and the Linux kernel for the Pre
      and if you use any other FOSS software on the system. Does Palm have a
      website where I could read about these changes and download source
      files?

      Thanks,
      -- Qubit

      If this doesn't garner any replies (I might try a few different email addresses @ palm), I'll write a snailmail letter to Palm directly.

      As I am not yet in possession of a copy of their webOS it's true that they could politely turn down my request, but I hope that they'll just post a copy of their modifications up on their website somewhere. It's not like it's an onerous task to throw up a read-only repo. Heck, I'm sure that GitHub or Gitorious would be more than happy to host the FOSS code changes that Palm made.

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
    18. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably a typo....

    19. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      For instructions on how to obtain a copy of any source code being made publicly available by Palm, Inc.

      That doesn't mean they will. I could offer a million dollars to any genuine seventeen legged dog that walks past and my money would be safe.

      Put it another way: if they decide not to make any source available, then the phrase "any source code being made available" equates to curly-E.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    20. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by Qubit · · Score: 1

      Have you called up someone at Palm and requested it yet?

      Yes (see my post up in the thread).

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
    21. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      You might also want to try opensourcequestions@palm.com as listed here.

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    22. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      And if they decide not to, I'm sure the FSF will have a nice quiet chat with them. They've even made it easy for them by listing in the Open Source Information pdf every single open source (be that GPL, Apache, AFL, MIT, BSD, whatever) licensed software they're distributing, along with the license text for that software.

      To me it looks like they've done their homework and will publish in time; I wouldn't be surprised if source code came in the public SDK when it lands. Until then, the GPL at least can be satisfied on demand.

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    23. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by Qubit · · Score: 1

      @RegularFry, thanks for the other email address -- Palm just got back to me:


      From: Opensourcequestions
      To: Qubit
      Subject: RE: FOSS used in the Pre?

      Hello [Qubit],

      Many thanks for the email.

      We are in the process of preparing the packages and our modifications
      to upload them to our open source web site - http://opensource.palm.com./

      The specific page where the packages will be posted is:
      http://opensource.palm.com/packages.html. For now, the page says
      "Coming soon" but we expect to have the packages ready and uploaded
      in about 2 weeks.

      All the best,
      Palm Open Source Team

      It sounds like they're acting in good faith here. One could theoretically be a stickler and say that they aren't providing the sources now, but considering how long it could take to send them snail-mail and then get back a printout or CD of code via media mail, I think that 2 weeks isn't half bad.

      If they haven't posted anything on the site in 2 weeks I'll post something on my blog and then try emailing them back again.

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
    24. Re:Cool, but where are the kernel sources? by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      It sounds like they're acting in good faith here.

      That's my impression too. They've really not got anything to lose by doing it right, and judging by just how hackable the root image is, I think at least the engineers know they can make a lot of hackers *very* happy with the Pre as long as marketing don't screw it up.

      A week ago I was torn between an iPhone and the Pre. Having read through the precentral thread, there's just no contest. As soon as it gets to the UK, I'm ditching my provider ahd getting a Pre. There not being a public SDK was previously an issue, now it's not.

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
  10. Please God no by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    People have already uncovered icons for MSN and AOL

    Where's the DMCA crew when you need them?

  11. title and summary conflict by alfal · · Score: 1, Informative

    The title and the summary of this article aren't in total agreement (one says Reset Doctor, other says root image).
    The Reset Doctor wasn't leaked, its available on Palm's site: http://kb.palm.com/wps/portal/kb/common/article/32759_en.html
    The WebOS root image is what I would consider being leaked.

    1. Re:title and summary conflict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, considering the root image was just sitting in the Reset Doctor, inside some archives, unencrypted, is that really a leak?

      Palm's n00bness is quite apparent, Apple would've encrypted that root image.

    2. Re:title and summary conflict by wbo · · Score: 1

      Actually Palm has a history of providing unencrypted ROM images for their devices and explaining how to create your own ROM dumps from a device especially to registered developers. There are also numerous tools designed to allow people to customize these ROM images and install them on their devices some of which are supported by the device manufactures.

      I doubt releasing the root image for the Pre was unintentional and I highly doubt Palm will do anything to discourage people customizing the root image and adding their own applications.

  12. Who really cares about the Pre? by not-quite-rite · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I love that it has a Linux based operating system. The hardware looks kinda nice.

    But it's coming into an already crowded market. Competing with the iphone is not going to be easy. At least the iphone comes from a background of an integrated product line. Ie Buy MacBook for computer, Ipod for music, Iphone for telecoms.

    Palm doesn't have that. It's got a proprietary version of the operating system. Only runs on one(maybe two with Pixie) piece of hardware, and is competing with very well established lines of smart phones and feature phones(ie anything with S60, WinMo, Blackberry etc)

    If Palm had released it 5 years ago(or maybe when it bought BeOS), I would care a lot more.

    Android is my bet, as I should be able to concentrate on hardware upgrades, and not having to learn another crappy software interface. I want a good operating system that works on multiple hardware platforms-and not WinMo(I said "good" :P )

  13. CDMA means cdmaOne or CDMA2000 by tepples · · Score: 1

    There's nothing fundamental about CDMA preventing the switch to verizon.

    In North America, a "CDMA" network is one that runs Qualcomm's cdmaOne (IS-95) protocol stack or its successor, much as "TDMA" used to refer to D-AMPS even though GSM used TDMA modulation.

  14. It's the network by tepples · · Score: 1

    What I don't get is why is everyone so hot for it to move to Verizon.

    Probably because the people who complain live in areas where Verizon is perceived to provide a more reliable signal than Sprint. Might it have something to do with the scores of network technicians portrayed in Verizon's television ads?

    1. Re:It's the network by eln · · Score: 1

      Probably because the people who complain live in areas where Verizon is perceived to provide a more reliable signal than Sprint. Might it have something to do with the scores of network technicians portrayed in Verizon's television ads?

      That's why I won't use Verizon...if all their techs are busy following that one guy around, how are they ever going to find time to fix the network?

    2. Re:It's the network by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I vote for the ads. Frankly Verizon is the least geek friendly carrier out there. I don't like AT&T because of their politics involving things like community Fiber and Wifi. Anyone remember what they did in New Orleans? After the hurricane they offered the police the use of one of their buildings until New Orleans started to work on a community WiFi system then kicked them out. Or their statements on net neutrality?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  15. But Why? by Paul+Carver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    jump onto Verizon's network

    Is Verizon really that lovable? I know all the iPhone haters are quick to point to AT&T as the worst cell phone carrier, but is there really so much love out there for Verizon?

    For every AT&T phone I've had that supported bluetooth I've never had any trouble moving ringtones and pictures on and off the phone directly from my computer. I had heard that Verizon pretty much always disables features like that in order to force you to use their fee based options. I've never understood how someone who dislikes AT&T could have any love for Verizon.

    I totally understand people rooting for the underdog, but loving Verizon and hating Sprint I just don't understand. Every time a new smartphone comes out it seems there's a huge clamor to use it on some carrier other than the one who's got an exclusive deal for the new phone.

    Are there really any wireless carriers out there that are super awesome great companies who just unfortunately only offer crap phones?

    1. Re:But Why? by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 1

      Verizon is hateable, not lovable.

      You cannot move ringtones so easily at all. You could use BitPim (which some Verizon workers even recommend), but thats almost a hassle. The only other way is to save the ringtone as a sound and as a ringtone, as sounds can be emailed and then resaved onto the new phone as a sound and/or ringtone.

      Basically everyone's complaining cause verizon's current smartphone selection sucks....two touchscreens and an ancient blackberry. People that have verizon (and get the huge corporate discount, like me (30% off)), don't want to switch and would rather complain and try to port a phone over from sprint.

      Most of the east coast also loves having Verizon. because the quality is the best over here (anywhere else, not so much).

    2. Re:But Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AT&T doesn't provide anywhere near the same humor value that Verizon does.

    3. Re:But Why? by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      Where I live AT&T's signal is almost nonexistent. Since my cell is my home phone as well, that makes it a non-starter for me.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    4. Re:But Why? by Svpernova09 · · Score: 1

      After spending 5+ years as a loyal AT&T Cellular customer, we (the wife and I) switched to Sprint. We also used our cellphones as our home phones and when we bought our first house, we found out inside the house is a dead zone. We live in Memphis, so it isn't like we're out in the mountains or anything. I can walk to the end of my driveway and get a full signal with AT&T, but as soon as I go inside, it's a paper weight. After 3 conversations with reps and supervisors over the phone, and visits to local stores, they ended up giving us a break on our last 3 months bill. I'd love an iphone, but not at the expense of not being able to use it at home.

    5. Re:But Why? by blahbooboo · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of cell phone coverage issues are actually related to the cell phone. I found that a few Sprint phones i had were AWFUL, then would be sitting next to other people with spint whom had great reception.

      I started researching signal strength on my next Sprint phone purchase, result the quality has been INCREDIBLE and I never get dropped calls.

      Look to the phone as well as the cell phone tower for your troubles

    6. Re:But Why? by krzy123 · · Score: 1

      I can add/remove ringtones/pics from my phone over bluetooth just fine. I have a LG Venus on verizon.

    7. Re:But Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Up until a couple of days ago, Sprint was a super awesome company with only crap phones. I love them, and everyone who I talk to that has them loves them too. I'll take mediocre customer service (face it, you get it with all the carriers) and a low bill, thanks.
      I just priced out a Pre data plan yesterday:
      • Family plan, 2 lines - that's 2 Pre's
      • 1500 shared minutes, plus free nights/weekends, plus unlimited in-network calling
      • unlimited text messaging
      • unlimited data
      • $130/month

      The iphone is slick and cool, but the monthly price premium is just not worth it.

    8. Re:But Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T-mobile for the most part - nice company with crappy phones and 3G coverage sucks if that is important for you.

    9. Re:But Why? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Ringtones arent really an issue on Verizon for me either, but i have a HTC 6700 Pocket PC.

      --
      Good-bye
    10. Re:But Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon are controlling, anti-competetive asses. Almost none of their phones have wi-fi (including the Storm, which - it's said - had it removed at VZW's behest) because they want to trap you on *thei* network.

      I bought a Verizon phone (because my then-GF had a VZW phone as her only one, and we could talk on the same network for free), one with a keyboard and decent display, only to find that if I wanted to use their network to access my *own* IMAP server I'd have to pay them $20 per month extra for the privilege.

      F Verizon.

    11. Re:But Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically everyone's complaining cause verizon's current smartphone selection sucks....two touchscreens and an ancient blackberry.

      I think you're confusing Verizon with Sprint. Verizon got the Storm and will be getting the Tour (9630) in a couple months. The Storm has some issues but you can hardly claim it's ancient.

      Sprint, on the other hand, has not had much luck landing a new Blackberry in some time.

    12. Re:But Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon SUCKS beyond all imagination. I recently moved to a house which had, oh no! - a "DEAD ZONE". But, their lies -- I MEAN -- commercials show a couple moving into a house in a dead zone with "the network guy" and his geek cronies following behind telling them "its OK! you're covered!" BULL FUCKING SHIT. The secretary of the CEO of Verizon Wireless actually told me "there are plenty of other carriers,sir. maybe you should investigate the others and make a move to one of them that does work". This is the world's "largest" wireless carrier. They do not give one shit about you as a customer. All they want is your money each month. If you cant pay, wont pay or dont wish to pay anymore -- they dont give a shit. They'll tell you not to let the door hit them you in the ass on the way out. You know what is great, though? I am on the verge of developing a product which will need dedicated 3G access. Guess who is NEVER going to get my business??? You got it. The verizon fuck heads. And people wonder where customer loyalty has gone? hahahahahahha! Idiots.

    13. Re:But Why? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, unless - like me - you live in a 1xRTT area for Sprint. Even EDGE is faster, and I'm in an AT&T 3G area.

    14. Re:But Why? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      They didn't think to recommend something like zBoost to keep your as a customer?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    15. Re:But Why? by yoden · · Score: 1

      You heard wrong; you've been able to freely transfer ringtones on most verizon phones since pretty much forever. I have heard they've been changing their store around this year though, so we'll see what happens...

      --
      Computers can make otherwise intelligent people stupid, much like slashdot.
  16. What legal theory? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this will help Apple launch a legal assault regarding the Pre's ability to masquerade as an iPod?

    Sega, Chamberlain, and Lexmark tried and failed to block Genesis-compatible game cartridges, LiftMaster-compatible garage door openers, and Lexmark-compatible toner cartridges in U.S. court, both before and after the DMCA. So I wonder what legal theory Apple might use for this.

  17. Has palm published GPL modifications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume the root image indicates modifications to GPL source, like Webkit.
    Have they published the changes?

    1. Re:Has palm published GPL modifications? by Qubit · · Score: 2

      I assume the root image indicates modifications to GPL source, like Webkit.
      Have they published the changes?

      WebKit is not GPLed. Their main page states that they are an open source project (their words) with portions available under BSD and LGPL licenses.

      Palm doesn't have to release anything if they use BSD code in their software stack. If they use LGPL code then I believe that they have to release their changes and provide a method allowing the end user to replace the LGPLed library with a different library. I'm no lawyer, so I'd suggest that you look at the license for the details.

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
  18. Good for developers by StreetStealth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This could actually be very good for developers versus the iPhone.

    The plan is, from my understanding, that the WebOS SDK should allow devs to build capable but high-level apps in a Javascript-style environment (though I'm pretty sure these things are still compiled). Thus a lower barrier to entry than even the iPhone, at the expense of more intensive system-level access.

    If Pre homebrew software doesn't require firmware modification like the iPhone does (does the Pre even need to be jailbroken?), that goes a long way toward legitimizing it to a mainstream audience, giving potential Pre developers two possible avenues for development.

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
  19. Re:That's what he said you halfwit by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Actually it was a miss aimed reply. I was replying to the grandparent message but I must of hit the wrong reply tag. My bad.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  20. Re:Ta3o by ArcherB · · Score: 1

    Someone please mod parent down and do not click on link (unless you are into that sort of thing)

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  21. What's so great about webOS? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    Why is the Pre better? Can you give specific examples?

    OK here are a few examples of top of my head:

    Here's my deal:

    For roughly ten years, I've used devices with the old PalmOS (v3-v5). That period is now coming to an end - and after all the bad design decisions they've heaped on in order to let developers continue to work with the same assumptions they used in 1996 (i.e., m68K device with all storage in RAM) the old platform is just a mess.

    Now, when looking at the options I've got to replace my old Treo at some point, I'm not liking my options. iPhone isn't a great option for someone who likes to use their phone as a portable computer (what can I say? Sometimes I'm out somewhere with some time to kill, and I want to hack some code...) - Android or webOS could be possibilities, but the primary development models for these devices (i.e. target a VM for the Android, or write a web-style application for webOS) don't seem like a good fit for an embedded device.

    The history of PalmOS is one of the things that makes me very hesitant to get a Pre without being very sure they've got their heads screwed on right with regard to the OS architecture this time around. PalmOS was a good design - for a handheld in the late nineties. Where they went wrong was sticking with that model after it stopped making any kind of sense at all. The combination of PACE (as the primary means of running applications on the device) and NVFS is an affront to everything that's decent in the world.

    So I really gotta repeat the earlier question: what's so great about webOS? The idea of an OS where you write apps in HTML, CSS, and Javascript sound hideous to me, frankly...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  22. Palm's history with ROM images by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    Actually Palm has a history of providing unencrypted ROM images for their devices and explaining how to create your own ROM dumps from a device especially to registered developers. There are also numerous tools designed to allow people to customize these ROM images and install them on their devices some of which are supported by the device manufactures.

    I doubt releasing the root image for the Pre was unintentional and I highly doubt Palm will do anything to discourage people customizing the root image and adding their own applications.

    That was a whole different era. Since then Palm has been restructured a half dozen times, and fallen quite hard from their former glory as the #1 handheld platform. The new devices have all kinds of features the old ones didn't - features that some people won't want you to use with complete liberty. I don't think you can take it for granted that they'll continue playing by the rules they followed in the days of POSE and copilot.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  23. Best signal coverage by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I keep on hearing from various sources (anecdotally) that Verizon has the best signal coverage, at least in my area. That probably has something to do with it.

    And some people may want to try and move their phones because they can. :)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  24. Not so good for developers by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    AJAX? Really? Didn't we go through this once already with the iPhone?

    Why don't we try asking ourselves this: Why are cell phone companies (handset manufacturers AND carriers) so terrified of putting real, honest-to-God *NIX-powered cell phones in the hands of consumers?

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Not so good for developers by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

      AJAX? Really? Didn't we go through this once already with the iPhone?

      Nope. Apples and oranges.

      WebOS has much more in common with MacOS's locally-executed, compiled Dashboard widgets than the remotely-hosted, AJAX-based "web apps" of the iPhone's days prior to its SDK.

      --
      Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
  25. What's The Point? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    What would be the point of putting a Pre on the Verizon network? The whole reason people wanted to put their iPhones on T-Mobile is that they could get it so much cheaper.

    But with Sprint being cheaper than Verizon, and Sprint phones being able to roam on Verizon's towers, why would anybody want to move their Pre to Verizon? That'd be paying extra for absolutely no reason.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:What's The Point? by lannocc · · Score: 1

      But with Sprint being cheaper than Verizon, and Sprint phones being able to roam on Verizon's towers, why would anybody want to move their Pre to Verizon?

      Because Sprint service is not available everywhere Verizon is.

  26. Sprint Coverage = Verizon Coverage by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Sprint and Verizon hardware roam on each other's towers. I just switched from Verizon to Sprint, and have not noted any difference in coverage anywhere.

    I can see no point in activating a Pre with Verizon. That's just paying more for the same thing you already have.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  27. Mojo/Dojo by bgspence · · Score: 1

    Mojo is just Palm's mobile version of Dojo. If you want to see more of the foundation of the Javascript programming environment just checkout http://dojocampus.org/

    It's not Palm's Mojo, but it will give you a good start on how you will do Mojo development.

    Mojo will sure be an iPhone killer, nothing like the limited SDK on the iPhone. How can you compare Cocoa programming to HTML5 and Dojo Javascript. :)

    Looks like what Apple offered first on the iPhone, write Web 2.0 apps and profit. But, they don't seem to have plan B. Its Web 2.0 all the way.

  28. Has anyone of Pre phone owners asked for source? by hubert.lepicki · · Score: 1

    Do you know if anyone of Palm Pre owners had asked Palm for sources of their modified versions of GPL software they use?

    If yes, where did you publish it? ;)