Central Anti-Virus For Small Business?
rduke15 writes "I'm trying to find a centrally managed anti-virus solution for a small business network, which has around 20 Windows XP machines with a Linux server. It is too big to manage each client manually. However, there is no no full-time IT person on site, and no Windows Active Directory server — just Linux with Samba. And the current solution with Symantec Endpoint Protection seems too expensive, and too complex for such a simple need. On the Linux server side, email is handled by amavisd and ClamAV. But the WinXP clients still need a real-time anti-virus for the USB disks they may bring to work, or stuff they download from their personal webmail or other sites. I'm wondering what others may be using in similar situations, and how satisfied they are with it."
It works well, you just need a windows server/workstation to push it to clients and for clients to get updates from.
It's also not very resource hungry.
I think 30 seats was around $1000
Both my university and workplace (of similar size to yours) use Sophos. They provide a number of centralised management tools, centralised update servers etc. Check them out, www.sophos.com.au.
Kaspersky Enterprise Space Security is comprised of components for the protection of Linux and Windows workstations, file servers and mail systems.
Samba File Servers are also fully supported!
More Information -- http://usa.kaspersky.com/products_services/business/open_space_enterprise.php
From clamwin.com website:
Please note that ClamWin Free Antivirus does not include an on-access real-time scanner. You need to manually scan a file in order to detect a virus or spyware.
This assumes that the users remember to scan everything before they run.
(I personally do the clamwin thing for my personal machine, haven't found anything yet)
In migrating from AVG free to AVG corp, the push never worked and we had to end up manually uninstalling on every workstation before we could push the corp version and have it actually work properly.. if we tried to push the newer version over the free version, it just disabled any sort up updates and made things worse
yes, free should never have been installed in a corp environment, but that's how it was when i was hired.. licensing was the least of my problems by far.
fair enough.. as much is i hated symantec 11, after they finally released several bug fixes and it was able to at least run without crashing a machine, it was quite good as far as disallowing removable drives on a per workstation basis, and reporting anything that was found on any machine. (it was also good about re- hijacking a homepage after a user went to a questionable site that changed the homepage to farmsex.com or what not. a simple "your homepage was highjacked" page was FAR better than the support calls i'd get at 2am about a horse doing something to a midget.)
just saying..
NOD32 works fantastically well, although the licenses are comparatively more expensive when compared to some of the competition that's in the 'same league' (Eg. Kaspersky)
I haven't used the remote administrator to manage NOD32 clients (We don't have enough here), but after scanning thousands of PCs, I can vouch for the quality of NOD32. It's anecdotal, but I concur with many of the online results which show NOD32 has near-perfect detection rates and very low false positives. We keep trying different scanners, but NOD32 seems to do the best job.
Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
I haven't used it since I'm in an office but since you mention a school, I hear good things about Windows SteadyState. Maybe for library computers or other kiosk-style machines.
In my personal experience, I found mcafee asap (mcafeeasap.com) the easiest to use in such a small business. This software has "agents" which report their status back to the mcafeeasap.com website, from which the administrator can monitor all pcs.
This idea is great for small companies. The implementation however had a few problems:
- Over time, I've installed all "agents" at least twice. They just stop working for no reason at random moments
- Some agents 'do' have a reason to stop: they think the license has expired, while it's definitely not.
- And mcafee is bloated + it uses mshtml for every single dialog and even for invisible actions like downloading updates. This eats cpu power.
.sig: No such file or directory
Thats like saying a house needs to be demolished because theyd like a new door
More like "soon their house will be demolished, better not invest in a new door now".
Within 2 years they probably have to migrate to Vista or Win7 anyway, they also need to buy and maintain AV software, why not invest in something else instead? Or at least look at alternatives and do the maths.
For our little business of around ~35 people, we use Trend Micro OfficeScan. You need to check out what it costs, but I can tell you it works well here. To uninstall/configure the program on each client there's a central password and every noticed virus gets e-mailed to the sysadmin. The program is very stable too, and doesn't noticeably slow the system down.
After having managed three major products in the past years (EPO + McAfee, Trend OfficeScan, SEP, on various directories ranging from 120 to 6000 boxes) I would definitely vote for Trend.
AV-Comparatives recently released their May 2009 Corporate AV Report, which sounds like it may be right up your alley.
It's fairly large, but reviews a large number of AV products with a corporate focus, contains lots of screenshots, and even grades them on their appropriateness for Small, Medium and Large networks. Sounds like it would definitely be worth a look in your case.
Since my company doesn't have the budget, I have tried to find something free but I failed, in the end I installed comodo av which is free, it can't be remotely managed, but it's far better than clamav, I've scheduled an automatic scan at 1pm during launch break, and it does automatic updates too, if you need to administer it remotely just install vnc on each client, 20 aren't that much
...then use group policies to push out AV updates automatically & lock down the desktops remotely and automatically. Samba is a half-cut replacement for a proper Windows Server when it comes to Windows workstations (sorry samba guys; samba is good, but ultimately lags far behind what it's trying to imitate)
Windows XP is only really so vulnerable to viruses because normally it runs in "everything as root" mode; which, if you had a proper Windows server you could change in seconds (not that you couldn't do this manually, but with AD it's automatic network-wide).
throw new NoSignatureException();
For a school setting, (and this is IMHO, so take it for what its worth), I highly recommend these tried and true protection mechanisms for a lab:
1: DeepFreeze with the enterprise console to allow updating when the lab is closed to the public or students.
2: Physical case locks.
3: BIOS set to disallow booting from anything but the hard disk, and each box set with a different password (the list kept somewhere safe)
4: An enterprise version of Norton Endpoint Protection configured to delete hacking tools (so someone can't load a popular serial number recovery program and have the organization's volume license keys to Office and other utilities.)
5: 1-2 cameras on the lab.
DeepFreeze isn't a silver bullet, but it at least makes people take an effort to bypass, even if they have administrative rights. The best advantage of this setup is that you can give users admin access to install whatever chat programs they use during a session, then a reboot cleans all their crap off.
First line of defence?
Group policy (Software restriction policy) disallowing execution of code from anything but the windows (excl %temp%) and program files directory. Including dvd drives.
Closest kids get is embedding applications within Word, or debug modes of VS.
"We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over." - Aneurin Bevan
They've disabled ALL USB access, and will terminate your user account if they find logs proving you tried using a USB device. As for AV, it is the users responsibility to keep the governments machines up to date on virus definitions...
Not all users need (or should have) the same software.
Not all users have the same preferences for the software they have.
You need 1 image per user. (Not an issue space-wise, but an issue maintenance-wise whenever someone wants something changed, there are updates to the OS/apps, etc.)