Slashdot Mirror


13-Year-Old Trades iPod For a Walkman For a Week

BBC Magazine convinced 13-year-old Scott Campbell to trade in his iPod for a Walkman for a week and see what he thought. Scott thinks the iPod wins when it comes to sound quality, color, weight, and the shuffle feature. The Walkman, however, offers two headphone sockets, making it much easier to listen to music with a friend. My favorite part of the review is, "It took me three days to figure out that there was another side to the tape. That was not the only naive mistake that I made; I mistook the metal/normal switch on the Walkman for a genre-specific equalizer, but later I discovered that it was in fact used to switch between two different types of cassette."

67 of 354 comments (clear)

  1. Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by ls671 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    About giving him an 8 track cartridge tape ?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereo_8

    At least, there is only one side to those. I still remember listening to Pink Floyd "The dark side of the moon" and "Echoes" while cruising in my car. Even today, when I listen to it on more modern media, I still remember where the sound track would cut for a few seconds in the middle of a song in order to allow the player to change tracks. They did a fade-out in the middle of a song in order to make it sound more appropriated... ;-)

    8-tracks came before 4 track mini-cassette :

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini_Cassette

    For those who don't know 8 tracks, the tape is arranged in a endless loop so it was impossible to rewind the tape ;-))) I still have an 8 track recorder in the basement somewhere, I used to record my own tapes ;-)

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 4, Funny

      Always fun convincing people they needed to rewind an 8 track.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had a friend with an 8 track player in his Gremlin in High School. In 1994. It was not a chick magnet.

    3. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by swb · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hated the cut in the middle of songs, although I don't remember any "good" songs being cut, usually it was mid-album lamers that got cut.

      The upside to 8 track was the infinite play capability; critical for those 1970s pot smoking sessions when everyone got too mellow to get up and change the music. Of course this was also the downside, waking up at 4 AM to switch off the Nth playthrough of "Led Zeppelin IV".

    4. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by nolife · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not only were you listening to "Money" on Track 2 but you could probably also faintly here "Speak to Me" on track 1 at the same time through the bleed through.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    5. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      you could probably also faintly here "Speak to Me" on track 1 at the same time

      That was just 'the lunatic in your head' that you were hearing.

    6. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nevermind rewinding tapes, how about DVDs?

    7. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by ls671 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Be careful, we are the Asgards. We have been around for much longer than you can humanly imagine and we have already experienced all of what you are experiencing now ;-))

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    8. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had a friend with an 8 track player in his Gremlin

      Yeah, the guy who mutilated the gremlins in the movie got chicks too.

    9. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by NickyGotz22 · · Score: 2

      For the funny Stargate reference ill rescind my previously snarky comment. And i for one welcome our new geriatric overlords with their wondrous 8-track devices

      --
      Test me and I will chronicle your pain - The Archivist (Diablo 3)
    10. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is however possible, on both formats, for a loud sound like an kick drum hit to appear immediately before or after it actually is supposed to be heard, because the tape layers on the spool print through onto layers above them. When I used to do gun recordings with a Nagra 4-S you would always store the tapes "tails out" or FFwded to the end, so that any print through would sound after the actual sound, and would sound like an echo, rather than preceding the sound and ruining the attack.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    11. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you kidding? I still own a 1979 Monte Carlo with an 8-track that WORKS. I have only two left... one of them being The Eagles Hotel California.... the other being something I'm not proud of saying... :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    12. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by ScoLgo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't have an 8-track player - but I do leave several 8-track tapes strewn around my car interior.

      Best. Anti-Theft System. Ever. (YMMV)

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    13. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by definate · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I was a teenager, 8 years ago (2001-2002), instead of putting a CD deck in my car, I wanted to put my dad's old 8 track deck into my car. That way it would have been ironic, hip, and would have limited me to playing only his old 60s-80s 8 track tapes. Also, I had no money for a CD deck. Almost got it done, but lazy kicked in, and the 8 track deck needed to be repaired a bit, so I abandoned it.

      I went around trying to find somewhere which might have one for real cheap, like a pawn shop or similar. This was a pretty interesting thing to go around asking.

      I went into this kind of music pawn shop, which had heaps of old things, including old record players, however it was more focused on that sort of indie niche. I walked in and asked the person running the store if they have an 8 track player, especially for a car. There was this old druggie raver looking guy standing behind him looking at records. When I asked about the 8 track player, he turned around and said "Hey man, that was funny, I thought I heard you asking for an 8 track player", at which point I looked at him and said "I am", he looked back with a freaked out yet blank face and said "Whoah". He then proceeded to stare at me after that last thought. All I can think was that I caused him to have some sort of an acid flash back, which he experienced for the next 30 seconds.

      Either way, I still got a pile of 8 track tapes and no 8 track player. Probably for the best, I now have a good car, with a good deck, and I like things which aren't shit, now. Though the old bomb (1981 Ford Falcon XD) was awesome for jumping over train tracks, going 200kph, drifting around dirt corners, shredding my tyres and similar.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    14. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by tchristney · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously you are clueless as to the nature of the 8-track. Everyone knows that in any random assemblage of 8-track tapes, there is a 90% chance of finding Meat Loaf's Bat out of Hell.

    15. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by ls671 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right, it was a chick magnet in 1972 although ;-)

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    16. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 3, Informative

      I _wish_ it were that cheesy. No, it's (dramatic pause....) Elvis "Aloha Hawaii"..... *hangs head in shame*

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    17. Re:Hehe he ain't seen nothing yet... by tygerstripes · · Score: 2, Funny

      This only works within the confines of the M25. Unfortunately, metaphysically, the M25 encompasses all of humanity.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
  2. On the plus side... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sony's audio cassette devices didn't manage to contain any rootkits...

    1. Re:On the plus side... by MrMista_B · · Score: 3, Informative

      You don't need iTunes to put music on an iPod, either.

    2. Re:On the plus side... by Yosho · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not quite sure what your point is. You don't need iTunes to put music on your iPod, either.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    3. Re:On the plus side... by binkzz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Really?

      Could you suggest a program I could use instead of iTunes?

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    4. Re:On the plus side... by Yosho · · Score: 3, Funny

      Could you suggest a program I could use instead of iTunes?

      Sorry, I'm stumped. :-(

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    5. Re:On the plus side... by rdnetto · · Score: 2, Funny

      dd ?

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  3. Gotta love them cassettes.. by powerslave12r · · Score: 5, Funny

    The sound of, say, Metallica's Garage Inc on tape is way better than on mp3. Cassettes are beautiful. They are durable, unlike CD/DVDs, and I have 25 year old cassettes that still work. They are hardware, tangible mechanical form of music. And there's just something about it that no CD/DVD/MP3s can match. And then there's the cover art sitting on an actual cover. Man I miss those days.

    --
    Real men read Slashdot articles at -1, bottom up.
    1. Re:Gotta love them cassettes.. by EvanED · · Score: 5, Funny

      And there's just something about it that no CD/DVD/MP3s can match.

      Like the ability to get wrapped around the heads in a crappy/broken player? ;-)

    2. Re:Gotta love them cassettes.. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Funny

      And there's just something about it that no CD/DVD/MP3s can match.

      Hmm. In a pinch, audio cassettes can do double-duty as impromptu teething devices for your toddler, and still play music afterwards. Is that it?

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:Gotta love them cassettes.. by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:Gotta love them cassettes.. by dotgain · · Score: 2, Informative
      You're thinking of helical-scan tapes like VHS, even then it would only happen if the tape or head somehow got sticky. These decks have dew sensors to stop them from operating if build up on the spinning head drum is likely.

      4 track audio actually wrap around the capstan and pinch-roller, the tape is only 'dragged over' the head, meaning crap on the head can scratch the tape surface, but there's not really any way for it to tangle there. Any sticky crap on the capstan/rollers would cause the tape to adhere to the, and any problem with the take-up reel (like too much dirt in the cassette) would cause slack to build up after the rollers, which would go for quite some time before being detected in shoddier tape decks. A good tape deck will notice the take-up reel not "taking-up", and shut down. Autoreverse decks seemed to be the worst for chewing in my experience. Auto cassette decks were also quite bad, it's hard to clean them with anything other than a cleaning cassette - I always preferred the manual approach of running the tape deck while rubbing the moving parts with clean paper soaked in isopropyl.

    5. Re:Gotta love them cassettes.. by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Funny

      Like the ability to get wrapped around the heads in a crappy/broken player? ;-)

      Not to advocate cassettes, but at least they didn't get scratched in stupid CD trays that eject and retract at all the wrong times, like when you're halfway through changing the CD and rebooting. Then you try to rescue the CD from being scratched as it's jammed halfway into the closing tray, only to have the tray try to eat your fingers too.

    6. Re:Gotta love them cassettes.. by Pentium100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Man this is just wrong. Yes, tape has a higher fidelity than your standard 128 kbps mp3. But not for long. You'll lose most of the highs from ambient electromagnetic interference over the years, unless you store it in a lead box or something.

      Depending on where that MP3 is written, after some number of years the cassette may sound bad and the MP3 might be unplayable.

      I wouldn't exactly call them durable either. You've never had a tape eaten by a bad deck? Or a little brother that decorated his room with the tape?

      It's also very easy to damage a CD. It's easily scratched, CD-Rs don't like sunlight (and UV rays) and degrade faster than a tape. Tape, eaten by a bad deck can usually be saved. A broken CD cannot be fixed, however it's likely that the cassette you sat on contains a tape that can be moved to another shell.

      I've got 80 year old 78's

      I have one record that's 94 years old :)

      Anyway, cassettes are usually more durable and last longer than CD-Rs.

    7. Re:Gotta love them cassettes.. by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Best part, you can use them to trade music with your friends, just like the Metallica guys did before they got famous.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    8. Re:Gotta love them cassettes.. by karnal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with your comment (and I'm not picking on you, just stating a point) is that most people today who would burn a CD probably have another copy of the data at home. So, the tedious effort of repacking a tape just to play it again (I know I've had the pleasure of doing this....) is actually quite substantial when compared to smashing a CD-R of your favorite music and then spending all of 5 minutes burning a new copy.

      I still have yet to convince my wife that she should not use pressed CDs in her car. First, they can be stolen. Second, as you state, a scratch will destroy them. One of these days she may learn her lesson on this - I typically don't care for the type of music she'd buy to listen to in her car, so I typically won't grab her CDs and put them out on our media server.... oh well.

      --
      Karnal
  4. And I though that switch.. by WarwickRyan · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..was there to make my C64 games load faster...

    1. Re:And I though that switch.. by WarwickRyan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ActionReplay with the fastload. Man was that good. Especially with the 1541 (3mins to 10 secs).

  5. Low-slung... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It comes with a handy belt clip screwed on to the back, yet the weight of the unit is enough to haul down a low-slung pair of combats.

    Pull your pants up and wear a belt! You damn kids

    1. Re:Low-slung... by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seriously, these things were made for the '80s! Back then, you needed your friends to help you put on your pants because they were so tight! If you ate too much during the day, you would need the paramedics to cut you out of your pants at night! You could clip a brick of lead to your belt loop and your pants would remain firmly in place.

    2. Re:Low-slung... by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps it's because I'm quite bright, but apart from the metal switch, I never had any of those questions when I first picked up a tape deck.

      Maybe because tape decks were in common use when you were a kid, and you saw them being operated?

      I'm not sure it's fair to call kids "spoiled rotten" because they see the superiority of current technology over what was in use years/decades before they were born. Kids may have a hard time imagining life without iPods and the Internet, but many young adults have a hard time imagining life before TVs and telephones were in every house. Many of us have a hard time imagining life without electricity, automobiles, or indoor plumbing. Insofar as this kid is spoiled, we're all spoiled.

    3. Re:Low-slung... by tbird81 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps it's because I'm quite bright, but apart from the metal switch, I never had any of those questions when I first picked up a tape deck.

      Yes, you're very smart. Pat yourself on the back.

  6. Surely you are trolling. by jwietelmann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess they're durable as long as you don't listen to them much. The mere act of playing a cassette degrades it. And then there's the sound quality issue. Comparing cassettes favorably to mp3 is one thing, but to CD/DVD? Seriously?

    1. Re:Surely you are trolling. by hardburn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Worse, the mere act of not using a cassette degrades it. Not even vinyl can say that. It just degrades in an analog way that will leave the tape technically playable for a long time. But it also starts with signficantly worse quality than either CDs or vinyl and goes downhill from there.

      I can understand the nostalgic property of vinyl to a certain degree, but longing for cassettes is just pathetic.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    2. Re:Surely you are trolling. by powerslave12r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here we branch out into technically superior and characteristically superior. I liken it to an old car. All those posting here about head being coated (which can be cleaned real easily, the joy of listening after that exercise!) and cassettes needing re-spooling or degrading with use need to look at it this way. All these very things make an album on cassette a thing. Not a song that can be copied in no time and you never getting to feel it.

      You can argue that mp3s appeal to the ear only as opposed to cassettes (or even vinyl for that matter) that appeal to the ears, eyes, touch and if you're weird like me, then even taste and smell.

      Of course, you have your cover flow, but how can that compare to a piece of paper with art printed on it.

      And btw, stop using "Troll" so loosely. Not everything you disagree with is trolling.

      --
      Real men read Slashdot articles at -1, bottom up.
    3. Re:Surely you are trolling. by dangitman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here we branch out into technically superior and characteristically superior.

      If you like the audio characteristics of cassettes, a digital audio file can reproduce every single flaw and bit of distortion. You could even apply filters to make brand new CDs sound just like an old cassette.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:Surely you are trolling. by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just curious, you didn't write up your experiment, did you? My old prof would probably be interested in reading.

      Also, are you sure that the CDs were "worse" at reproduction on absolute terms, or that the analogue recordings simply induced distortions that you found pleasant, like tube-induced second harmonic distortion? It's almost impossible to do double-blind audio analysis with analogue v digital, because analogue always gives itself away with noise, and I've read that subjective listeners often cannot tell the difference between analogue and digital for most program material if the digital is noised up, or if needle pops are added, or if programs like string-heavy orchestral programs are given even-harmonic distortion.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    5. Re:Surely you are trolling. by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree, I think you're failing at Nyquist, because the HF response of analogue cassette was nowhere near what a CD can do, and by the sampling theorem, a waveform under half the sampling freq is reproduced perfectly -- I hope you don't labor under the impression that the signal comes out of the speakers steppy, because it doesn't. I think the best high-end you could get out of a player was a 2 inch machine running at 30 ips, and even then you're only going to be able to squeeze 30-40 kHz bandwidth out of it, most of which is going to die in your amp and monitors. I will grant that induced dither has the effect of mushing up the high-end transients, particularly on earlier recordings that didn't used noise shaping, and this doesn't particularly cover strong-3rd-harmonic sustained-envelope sounds, like strings.

      But in theory your issue could be addressed if you were to listen to some masters at 96k or 192k, or a 3 Mhz DSD record, and some people report these recordings having being "airy-er" or having "more space in between the instruments," and being able to describe the space in terms of which instruments are sitting in front of others, etc. But, a lot of this is more dependent on miking, and again, nobody has ever been able to get the "warmth" that a good phono or tape recording had. I think the consensus at this point is that it was induced distortion, and didn't actually reflect the signal inputting to the system.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    6. Re:Surely you are trolling. by hardburn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Digital sampling works great however for modern largely electronic music. It's a shame that you can't really get analog recordings anymore... I miss real sound.

      And yet, classical and jazz listeners were the first adaptors of CDs way back when, and are likewise the first/only adaptors of SACD.

      Out of curiosity, did you ever happen to listen to the Telarc 1812 Overture? This was one of the earlist digital recordings, but was set to vinyl. The cannon blasts were said to leave pieces of woofer all over the living room floor.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    7. Re:Surely you are trolling. by RockWolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      You could even apply filters to make brand new CDs sound just like an old cassette.

      A webcam microphone recording of the track being played through $5 Walmart speakers under a pillow, then downsampled to a 32kbps wma file should do the job.

      /~Rockwolf

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
  7. That was pretty metal by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 4, Funny

    As I listen to Dëthklok, I marvel at a radio that would have a Metal/normal equalizer preset.

    That would be pretty metal.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  8. Boombox by ei4anb · · Score: 4, Funny

    and for next week's assignment have him carry around a ghettoblaster ;-)

  9. Was that really written by a 13 year old? by RawJoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Either he writes well or I was an idiot when I was 13.

    --
    ?
    1. Re:Was that really written by a 13 year old? by moose_hp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My favorite part is:

      Furthermore, there were a number of buttons protruding from the top and sides of this device to provide functions such as "rewinding" and "fast-forwarding" (remember those?), which added even more bulk.

      Emphasis mine.

      That part sounded more like a nostalgic review rather than from someone who see the functionality for the first time.

      --
      DON'T PANIC.
    2. Re:Was that really written by a 13 year old? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to mention the missing apostrophe! What an illiterate little fuck.

    3. Re:Was that really written by a 13 year old? by rantingkitten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doubt it. Looks to me like the reporter gave the kid the Walkman, let him play with it for a week, asked him questions about his experience, and then wrote the article from the viewpoint of the kid. A 13 year old would not say "remeber that?" in reference to things he is seeing for the first time.

      This isn't really uncommon practice in the journalism world. My sister was interviewed by an Isreaeli reporter shortly after the rocket attacks a few months back, because of her status as an American and her proximity (she was a few blocks from where the rockets struck). The reporter synthesized all her answers and thoughts during the interview and wrote the article as though it had been written by my sister. It gave the whole article a sense of first-person immediacy, instead of the dry descriptions of a reporter who wasn't there.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  10. RTFM? by PFritz21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't read the article yet, but did the reporter give the kid a manual for operating the Walkman? If so, the kid could have resolved some of those issues by reading it. If not, then I understand his confusion. CD's have been the standard for physical media since the early 90's, and manufacturers probably stop making cassette tapes for new albums when he was 3 or 4. CD's are, after all, one-sided.

  11. But could he... by ninjagin · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... figure out a rotary-dial phone?

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    1. Re:But could he... by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see why not. There's only one official way to use a rotary dial phone. Dialing by fiddling with the receiver "off hook" switch was a pain, and only for those cases where you had to make a call when somebody put one of those locks on the rotary dial.

      It's not at all physically obvious why casette tapes should have "sides". The answer is in the physical property of the media. The speed with which the magnetized tape passes the head determines the strength of a signal. One of the trade offs of the technology is that higher speed and overall tape length. Having two sides to the tape allowed the overall tape length to remain manageable while doubling the capacity of the cartridge.

      Likewise with the "metal" button. His guess was actually quite clever, and not too far off the mark. "Metal" here is a ridiculous piece of jargon; all tapes use metals or mixtures of different metal compounds bound to a plastic substrate. "Metal" tapes have a mixture with different recording and playback characteristics than the older iron oxide tapes. How the hell is anybody supposed to infer that from a label on a button?

      Judging from the picture, they game him a beat up old tape player. It's no wonder it didn't sound so good. He was quite observant to note that some of the sound problems he heard were a result of weak batteries driving the motors, which might be worse on an old device. The quality of the tapes he used could also be an issue. Old, worn out tapes would sound bad, and new tapes that weren't recorded properly in the first place could have problems too.

      Back in the day, a really good "walkman" type tape device with a decent set of portable earphones and a good quality tape could actually sound acceptably good. Maybe not audiophile quality, but then again you'd be taking your life in your hands to walk around with anything "audiophile quality" on conspicuous display. Even today people listen to their MP3 players using earbuds. I would say that a portable tape player with everything in tip-top shape and a pair of decent over the ear earphones would give an iPod with stock earbuds a run for its money in terms of sound.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:But could he... by ninjagin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A friend of mine had to teach their kid how to use the "phone without buttons", recently. Let's just say that it's non-obvious, and much more so than I expected.

      Your points are good, but leave off one interesting bit about cassette players -- not all of them were especially good at matching the same tape speed. I had a sony that would play just the tiniest bit faster than it should, mucking up the pace and tone of the recording. Oddly enough, the sanyo it replaced had a speed control so that you could adjust for that.

      Finally, he never got to listen to two of my favorite cassette bands -- "de-magnetizer" and "head cleaner" -- what's a cassette experience without 'em?

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  12. How could you tell? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd like to introduce to my friend, h|tler:

    <h|tler> HOW THE FUCK CAN YOU TELL THAT I'M 13 BY LOOKING AT WHAT I'M WRITEING????????????????

    (From http://bash.org/?14207)

    The slashdot filter had me remove a bunch of question marks. Yes, there are even more in the original.

  13. Re:modern walkman? by jackspenn · · Score: 2

    I agree the Sony MP3 players are much better in terms of features like FM radio, bluetooth headphone support, easy to upload and change music as well as use to store other files like your resume. It is also cheaper for the size of storage and options you get.

    --
    Respect the Constitution
  14. Funniest Quote by porcupine8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm relieved that the majority of technological advancement happened before I was born..

    Aw, that's cute. We'll see what he says when he's forty and he gives his kid an iPod to play with.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  15. Re:not so naive by paimin · · Score: 2, Informative

    FYI, there's actually 4 tracks on a cassette tape. Each side has two tracks for left and right, and they are interleaved from top to bottom: left side 1, right side 2, right side 1, left side 2.

    --
    Facebook is the new AOL
  16. Re:I call BS by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not the writing style of an average 13 year old, but the average 13 year old, or even average much older person doesn't get to write articles for the BBC.

  17. Wait, what? by ChinggisK · · Score: 3, Funny

    That was not the only naive mistake that I made; I mistook the metal/normal switch on the Walkman for a genre-specific equalizer, but later I discovered that it was in fact used to switch between two different types of cassette."

    Wait wait wait. They had actual METAL cassettes? Like, made out of metal?

    The scary part is that I'm being completely serious. I'm only 21 but I had a Walkman for a few years before I got my first CD player, I always wondered about that switch but since I never saw a cassette made out of metal I assumed the same thing he did, that it was being genre-specific.

    Now one of the great mysteries of my life is solved.

    1. Re:Wait, what? by ProteusQ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Vegeta99 is right about the sound quality. (I don't know about the chemical composition of the tape-- it's probably on Wikipedia, but I can't be bothered to look it up. ;) The cases were always plastic, of course.

      Metal tapes were a lot more expensive than regular tapes, and you could only buy them at specialty stores, such as Musicland. If you were going to create a master mix and then duplicate it on a cutting-edge dual-cassette deck, you would create the master on a metal tape ($4 to $5 each in mid-80's currency IIRC) and then duplicate it onto a normal tape (either something like a decent mid-level Maxell or, if you had no money, cheap POS tapes [made from recycled scraps] which were sold at Walgreen's). The normal tape would go into the Walkman; if it chewed that up, you were OK. However, if you were a poor student, you made do with what you had. Rule Of Thumb: the cheaper the Walkman, the more likely it will eat your tapes.

      If your tape did get eaten, you had two choices:
      1) toss it
      2) get out a screwdriver, take the case apart, and try to respool the tape without twisting or pulling too hard. [The more you paid for your tape, the more likely this option was.]

      Tapes were also _the_ way to listen to your music in a car. And a professionally recorded tape played for the first time sounded almost as good as a CD does, so it's not as if we were total philistines! ;)

      All that said, we Walkman users would sometimes look despairingly at our 60-cassette case of tapes and dream of the day when a small, lightweight object would hold all of those songs at once. And now it's here!

      It will take someone older than me to explain that whole 8-track thing, though...

  18. Doesn't this say more about today's kids? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find it disturbing that, according to the article at least, this particular kid had problems working out for himself that a cassette tape is two-sided and what half of the controls on the Walkman do.

    As a kid, I can remember taking some bits of machinery apart to clean or service them, and just to see how they worked. (For example, my parents were in the clothes-making/tailoring trade and I frequently messed about with old sewing machines to fix them or clean them.) I also got into electronics at a fairly young age and knew some basics about car mechanics.

    It seems a shame that kids these days don't get the chance to (or are just not interested in) take things apart just to see how they work - from my perspective, I developed an "engineering brain" from a really early age that has served me well throughout my career.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Doesn't this say more about today's kids? by eu_virtual · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, not everyone from your generation did that. Just because this particular kid doesn't do that kind of stuff, it doesn't mean kids these days are not interested.

  19. You listened with a friend?! See you in court!! by Hohlraum · · Score: 2, Funny

    Listening to a walkman with a friend constitutes a public performance. You have not acquired the proper license for for said performance. You now owe the RIAA $80,000 for infringement.