Slashdot Mirror


Delete Data On Netbook If Stolen?

An anonymous reader writes "I have just moved overseas on a 2-year working holiday visa and so I picked up a netbook for the interim, an MSI Wind U100 Plus running WinXP. I love it to bits. But as I am traveling around I am somewhat worried about theft. Most of my important stuff is in Gmail and Google Docs; however, I don't always have Net access and find it useful to gear up the offline versions for both. Ideally I would like to securely delete all the offline data from the hard drive if it were stolen. Since it is backed up in the cloud, and the netbook is so cheap I don't really care about recovery, a solution that bricks it would be fine — and indeed would give me a warm glow knowing a prospective thief would have wasted their time. But it's not good if they can extract the HD and get at the data some other way. All thief-foiling suggestions are welcome, be they software, hardware, or other."

73 of 459 comments (clear)

  1. Whole Disk Encryption by seifried · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The answer to your problem is whole disk encryption, not trying to delete the data.

    1. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know it doesn't help the OP, but on linux-based netbooks it's trivial to re-install linux with whole disk encryption if you want to upgrade to Ubuntu anyway. I've been running this way on my primary laptop for over a year and haven't really noticed any performance degradation.

    2. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by grcumb · · Score: 5, Funny

      The answer to your problem is whole disk encryption, not trying to delete the data.

      Feh. Your so-called answer does not include the word 'thermite' or the phrase 'earth-shattering kaboom'. And you call yourself a geek?

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    3. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by mjwx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Feh. Your so-called answer does not include the word 'thermite' or the phrase 'earth-shattering kaboom'. And you call yourself a geek?

      Where's the ka-boom. There was supposed to be an earth shattering ka-boom.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      the part where the original poster said "Running WinXP" may not have made it all the way in.

      I despise answers that randomly suggest competing products without really answering the question. It's like "My lawnmower won't start" and "Well, if you had goats, then you could feed them a different feed to make them more motivated." Try to advertise less and answer the frakking question more, MMkay?

    5. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by someone1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If your lawnmower doesn't work, one answer would be: try goats.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    6. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by muckracer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Would also like to mention FreeOTFE (http://www.freeotfe.org). Unlike Truecrypt it happens to be Linux/LUKS compatible.

    7. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by shentino · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google did IIRC.

    8. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Moot. The word is moot.

      If you make more mistakes of that magnitude, you may be muffled and mutilated with a maddened moose.

    9. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Krneki · · Score: 4, Funny

      Easy solution.

      Install a Sony battery.

      Ka-boom.
      http://geeksaresexy.blogspot.com/2006/11/lithium-ion-laptop-battery-explosion.html

      P.S: It was made by a Gnome, so it might explode before it gets stolen.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    10. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by JustOK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Moot. The word is moot.

      That's open to discussion or debate and of little or no practical value or meaning;

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    11. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Funny

      The correct answer is truecrypt for Windows XP then simply encrypt the drive and voila! No password no data. But I can't think of any other way to totally brick it and still have it legal to travel with. After all customs tends to frown on C4, even if all you are doing is trying to teach thieves a valuable lesson in respecting peoples property.

      Of course if you really wanted to make them suffer you could keep a small DOS partition and have it set to load in case of incorrect password and then use a batch file to play slides of Goatse and Tubgirl and maybe a few choice selections from 2 girls one cup, while playing a wav file of that damned annoying frog full blast on endless loop, but I think you may risk getting arrested for crimes against humanity. But I'm sure after the thief was done throwing up and washing out his eyes with bleach a valuable lesson would be learned.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    12. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by KronosReaver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dependent on the total size of the data you want to store local copies of...

      .

      Buy a good flash drive and keep it on your key chain. Preferably an Ironkey ( www.ironkey.com ) or something similar that offers some serious hardware encryption along with other anti-theft features.

      .

      Use something like XMarks for Firefox so you can access all of your bookmarks, and even stored passwords if desired, without storing any of it on the netbook. Now simply treat the netbook as a public access PC. If it gets lost or stolen there isn't anything on it to worry about in the first place.

      Bonus for international travel is that you don't have anything on the PC for customs to nose around in, and no software making you look ""Suspicious"" just because you value privacy. Or better yet, you can just leave the netbook at home and use your flash drive on a PC at your destination.

      .

      Potential deal breakers - 1. If you need to carry around more than 8 or 16GB you'll have trouble finding a really good secure drive. Sure more than one drive would work but at some point multiple drives become silly. 2. If your one of those people who can never find their keys or is constantly losing flash drives this is probably a really bad idea.

    13. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would say to just ignore the whole hardware encryption and just encrypt the thumb drive with truecrypt. Save a few bucks on the thumb drive, plus you won't have to worry about finding larger sizes. I don't think there are any advantages to having hardware encryption.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    14. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or use an Apple notebook. Their products are constantly bursting into flames and exploding.

    15. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, they stole the Space Modulator. That's what causes the KABOOM!

    16. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by silent_artichoke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Billie Mays took it with him.

    17. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by sexconker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You often aren't able to run a live disc on any sort of public PC. Either there's no disc drive, you don't have access to the boot menu/bios, or you simply don't have physical access to the machine.

      Either way, running from a live disc and a flash drive won't secure shit. For all you know there could be a hardware keylogger. For all you know there's some guy in the back room watching split video signals from all the machines in the coffee shop. If you're going to be paranoid, at least be paranoid.

  2. Encryption by pyite · · Score: 5, Informative

    Encrypt the entire drive with TrueCrypt or something. Use a strong cipher and a very strong passphrase. The laptop is as good as bricked to anyone who gets it.

    --

    "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    1. Re:Encryption by man_ls · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whole-Disk AES via TrueCrypt is only BARELY above the "acceptable" threshold on a Core Solo. I cringe to think what it'd be like on an Atom. A better bet would be to use a container-hosted TrueCrypt volume, and set your My Documents folder into that volume.

    2. Re:Encryption by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your average thief will spend five seconds looking for porn to keep, then reinstall the lot. The crummiest possible encryption would satisfy 99% of cases.

    3. Re:Encryption by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your average thief will try to resell it as soon as he can. Most thieves are not interested in the loot as such but in the money they can get for it.

    4. Re:Encryption by drb_chimaera · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think he is referring to performance - theres a more than noticable hit on the performance of a netbook utilising full disk encryption (I read a couple of benchmarks suggesting it was in the region of 10-20%). YMMV as to whether its worth the hit for the security of what you want to store on the Eee

    5. Re:Encryption by Sodakar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      On N270 Atoms, whole-disk AES encryption works perfectly fine, and the only time I notice a slow-down is when I'm running a benchmark program side-by-side with a model that has an unencrypted drive. For regular browsing and e-mail (which is what the person asking the question listed as a qualification), it's a non-issue.

      As some others have posted, and what my local police have told me, the laptop will likely have been sold for cash in less than 24 hours. Unless you are being targeted specifically for something of significant value such as corporate IP, it's unlikely that anyone is going to spend the time to try to unencrypt your drive.

      But other threats still loom...

      If you plan on connecting to any network, you will expose your machine to any network-based threat, so you ought to harden your machine accordingly.

      Make sure you still have a strong password for your account login. If your machine is in hibernate, the crypto authentication prompt will stop them, but if your machine was sleeping, it'll return to the OS prompt.

      The one scenario where you're not protected at all is if the machine is powered on, logged in, and someone grabs it by force. I realize there are proximity-based USB dongles that will lock the screen when the remote adapter is beyond range, but this may be far too impractical to use. A USB security dongle sticking out the side is a quick recipe for a broken USB port...

    6. Re:Encryption by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wish I could make it deliver an electric shock, explode the battery or maybe a dye capsule, emit a foul-smelling and nauseating gas, or make a 911 call and report a fire at its location. Something along those lines. I don't expect thieves to be caught, so I want to somehow cause them harm directly.

      I once designed a car security system that would have stood a good chance of killing the driver. I heard a lot of arguments about why that was a bad idea, but I don't buy any of them to this day. If you try to steal my radio you're in for a shock and will need a tetanus shot. I don't care much for thieves starting with whether they survive the attempt to steal my stuff, and ending there too, I suppose.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    7. Re:Encryption by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 5, Informative

      My personal experience with a Inspiron 1520 is that whole disk encryption significantly reduces battery life, which is a real usability problem.

      Most likely, when I get back to the states (I only encrypted for some overseas travel anyway), I will decrypt it and move back to an encrypted truecrypt container for the small number of documents that are really sensitive.

    8. Re:Encryption by dnaumov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Full-disk truecrypt AES encryption is absolutely above acceptable on an Atom 330, the CPU is a hyperthreaded dualcore one, so the OS sees 4 CPUs and truecrypt operates on all 4. I get ~55 MB/s in the AES truecrypt benchmark and I am using it to fully encrypt several partitions. It works just fine.

    9. Re:Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Get a seagate momentus FDE and do pre-boot authentication.
      >encryption is done in hardware, on the drive, viola.

      Seagate momentus disks use string instruments for data encryption?

    10. Re:Encryption by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a Pentium 3 Mobile 1.7GHz Thinkpad and Truecrypt makes no appreciable difference in performance. Even during benchmark tests the CPU is only about 50% loaded, so the bottleneck is the HDD itself. 50% sounds like a lot, but keep in mind we are talking artificial benchmarks here. Real world performance is probably in the order of 5-10% when loading an app or large file.

      Truecrypt is by far the best option. Not only does it protect your data in case of theft or over-zealous customs staff, but you can wipe the entire disk instantly just by destroying the TC header (1 sector). Without the header you can't even do a dictionary attack, you would need to brute force AES which is basically impossible in the foreseeable future.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. a hack by binford2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    set up a scheduled task to wipe the drive unless you cancel it. Then don't forget to cancel it.

    1. Re:a hack by jbacon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a TERRIBLE idea... Like, HOLY SHIT terrible.

      Full disk encryption gets my vote as well - Truecrypt will do the job quite nicely, and relatively pain-free.

    2. Re:a hack by RsG · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a TERRIBLE idea... Like, HOLY SHIT terrible.

      Then your threshold for terrible needs adjusting. I'm sure I can think of something worse than what the AC suggested :-P

      For example: a small thermite charge, proximate to the hard drive platter. It's fused to go off if a particular peripheral isn't detected upon boot-up; you keep the peripheral "key" with you, perhaps attached to your regular key-chain. A thief tries to boot, and BOOM (okay, thermite doesn't "boom", but you get the idea) - no more HDD. Or netbook. Or whatever it happened to be on top of. Bonus points if the thief happens to have it on their lap at the time.

      Now that, ladies and gentlemen, is how you propose a terrible idea. Compared to this, a full disk wipe sounds positively safe and reasonable.

      (IMPORTANT: If anyone out there is stupid enough to take this suggestion seriously and implement this obvious deathtrap, I cannot be held accountable for any loss of property, organic damage or Darwin award nominations that result.)

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    3. Re:a hack by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a TERRIBLE idea... Like, HOLY SHIT terrible.

      Why? The laptop is a backup for online data. He can afford to throw it away and reload it next time he goes on line.

    4. Re:a hack by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Interesting
      OK, you want a TERRIBLE idea - how about trying to take your booby-trapped netbook through airport security?

      The OP says he's moved "overseas" so presumably some day he'll be travelling back to which ever country he came from, and I would guess that includes flying.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    5. Re:a hack by YourExperiment · · Score: 5, Funny

      The OP says he's moved "overseas" so presumably some day he'll be travelling back to which ever country he came from

      Not necessarily, he might have moved out of the U.K.

      (No flames please, I'm British :)

  4. Encryption by swmike · · Score: 2, Informative

    That is what encryption is for. Get truecrypt or other similar application and then the data won't be extractable by anyone without the password.

  5. Identity Theft or Physical Theft by MountainMan101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it's physical theft I would think they would bin the HDD or sell it "as is" without even looking at what's on it. Bricking it doesn't do a lot, you'd probably just replace the HDD anyway.

    Identity theft is more worrying. Why not encrypt the HDD with something like Fedora / Ubuntu offers - ie an encrypted /home or MyDocuments. That way the laptop won't log on for the thief.

    1. Re:Identity Theft or Physical Theft by BikeHelmet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What if it was already logged in?

      Ex: Someone grabs it at an internet cafe, while you're ordering something?

      I know everyone else is thinking the same thing, but I'll say it anyway - encrypt the entire partition, with a tool like TrueCrypt.

    2. Re:Identity Theft or Physical Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If a thief grabs it, they would inevitably tuck it under their arm (walking around with an open netbook would slow them down and make them easier to spot). So set the netbook to shutdown when the lid is closed.

    3. Re:Identity Theft or Physical Theft by cowbutt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (I'm aware that my suggestion doesn't deal with an already-logged in scenario. If anyone has an answer to that one, please, do reply with it!)

      Sounds like you need some kind of RF token and a receiver attached to the netbook; if the token goes out of range, the machine logs you out and/or shuts down. If push came to shove, I imagine you could bodge something together with a Bluetooth receiver and a Bluetooth enabled phone like BluePromixity does.

  6. Booby trap it? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is probably room in the case for a few ounces of C4 explosive, and a detonator. You might have a hard time getting it through customs though..... and you had better never drop the thing so the detonator goes off!!

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  7. Lojack for Laptops by zhiwenchong · · Score: 3, Informative

    Website: http://www.absolute.com/products/lojack
    FAQ: http://www.absolute.com/resources/public/FAQ/L4L-FAQ-E.pdf

    Costs $59.95/year for the premium package which supports Remote Wipe. Embeds itself in the BIOS/EFI. Supports XP and OS X.

  8. alpha particles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Carefully paint over the letters on the "T" and "E" keys with polonium-218 laced paint, then just remember to wear gloves when typing unless your name is something like "Frank" and your password is all digits.

  9. Truecrypt + fake account by dargaud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As others will have already said: use truecrypt. In addition, use two account: yours with a password, and another one (visible from the login shell) without password. Put a script in it that wipes the disk if anybody logs in it.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by Zebedeu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Image the disk, test, bitcopy. Obviously.

      The bonus is that you now have a ready-made image for your next netbook when this one is stolen.

    2. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by Pastis · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't have kids, do you ?

      You just gave a recipe for disaster :)

    3. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by tygerstripes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just be thankful there's no way of cramming buttered toast into a netbook.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    4. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've obviously not had a 4 year old play "Sandwich maker" with a laptop.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    5. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by batquux · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... you don't have kids, do you?

  10. Encryption and BIOS settings by orzetto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course full-disk encryption, as lots of people have already suggested, but since you want the thief's time to be wasted, remember to password-protect the BIOS and disallow booting from USB drives or external units. Same goes for GRUB if you were on Linux. That way the thief will not be able to resell the netbook.

    Yes, the thief could remove the BIOS battery, but he would have to tear the case open. If he knew how to open a laptop without breaking it, he has more skill than I would associate with a petty thief.

    You might also consider Adeona.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    1. Re:Encryption and BIOS settings by JSBiff · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Yes, the thief could remove the BIOS battery, but he would have to tear the case open. If he knew how to open a laptop without breaking it, he has more skill than I would associate with a petty thief."

      Did it ever occur to you that the thief might be part of a larger crime organization, which organization might have a few people with pretty advanced technical skills? Or, even if they aren't, it's entirely possible/probable that after the thief fences the stolen computer, it will end up in the hands of someone both unscrupulous, and technically saavy?

  11. Are you evil enough? by saynt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First, get truecrypt, that takes care of your data.

      Now then, If you have the spark of evil in you, here's the plan.

        1. Set up multi-boot config.
        2. Create a bootable partition that has enough OS on it to run the drive and network, name it something interesting like 'Confidential'.
        3. Get the BIOS flash utils for your netbook, create a corrupt bios image that will still pass muster enough to install.
        4. Set up a boot time process on the netbook that does a 'wget' from a web site that you control. If it gets a file, quietly flash the BIOS with what it downloads.

        If you ever get ripped off, move the nasty BIOS image to the file location on your web site and bask in the glow of pure wickedness...

        You can test this with a valid BIOS image, but don't look at me if something terrible happens, you're playing with fire here.

    1. Re:Are you evil enough? by saynt · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, but there are ways to get a reasonably high level of confidence that something will happen. Most flash utils that I've dealt with either do no checking on the image, which is awful, or simply check it for size, extension, or a basic checksum. I'm guessing that this is because the developers believe that only an insane person would try to flash a .jpg or whatever to their BIOS. Since this is one of a very few things that can actually make your computer unusable, you would think that they would take more care, but they don't. As for testing, most of the flash utilities that I've used give you at least two chances to confirm that you really want to perform the flash, usually the last one is after the new BIOS has been read in and, presumably, passed any checks being done. If you were very familiar with the flash program and had the fortitude, you could run the process right up to the point of no return and then say 'no', and I would be pretty confident that something bad would have happened should you have gone ahead...

  12. Quick'n'easy by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1) Set up two accounts. Your actual one behind a password and an unprotected one.
    2) In the unprotected one's startup, set it to delete all of your personal data.

    You'll never log on via the unprotected account. Therefore you'll never accidentally delete everything. Even if you do manage to, as soon as you're next near a net connection it sounds like you can pull it back anyway.

    Most casual thieves (sorry, your life isn't actually important enough that crack teams of ninja espionage winged monkeys will track you down and deliberately steal your data) will be perfectly happy to log on via the one account they can get on via and won't notice a suitably disguised process quietly cleaning everything sensitive off the machine.

    It's not perfect, it's not infallible but, honestly, your data really isn't worth the hassle of defeating it for the average opportunistic thief.

    You want to have more fun with them...

    Set a scheduled task on that account to open Firefox 3.5 every 15 minutes and go to an address on your own server where it promptly gives its geolocation info before more obviously redirecting itself to some apparent malware site. They'll assume your machine's just infected with malware while you and the cops are given constant updates on their location.

    Again, it's not perfect and most of /. could easily defeat it... But the average thief isn't a /. reader, they're just an opportunist who thinks they're getting something for free.

    1. Re:Quick'n'easy by Mistlefoot · · Score: 3, Insightful



      And while at Custom's, have the border guard try to log in to your computer. Have him "access" the second account, delete all the data and then discover that you find yourself in some foreign court charged with destroying whatever it is they claim you destroy.

      I do believe there have been cases in the US where people have been compelled by the courts to produce encryption keys for data on laptops they have tried to carry past customs. The poster does want to do this for protection while traveling "overseas". I wouldn't suggest entering some countries and claiming you just had a script delete everything on your harddrive - when their customs tried to log - but "you have nothing to hide - honest".

  13. On a netbook? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Funny

    The laptop is as good as bricked to anyone who gets it.

    Including the owner!

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  14. What do they want to steal? by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most casual thieves want the hardware to use, resell, or simply because it's pretty. They don't give a toss about your data unless they can get easy cash out of it.

    Encrypt the disk to protect your data. It doesn't even have to be very strong encryption but obviously good encryption is better if your CPU can handle it. You can save CPU cycles by only encrypting data that really needs to be kept personal.

    Personally I'd be tempted to have some kind of low trick on there just to fuck with their minds. Add a script like
    echo "GPS location tracking started..."
    sleep 13
    echo "Device location found and reported."
    read x

    There is absolutely no security in this but casual thieves are normally not too smart so might shit their pants.

    1. Re:What do they want to steal? by subreality · · Score: 4, Informative

      It doesn't even have to be very strong encryption but obviously good encryption is better if your CPU can handle it.

      AES is quite fast on 32-bit CPUs. There's no excuse for bad crypto.

  15. Take to it with a hammer! by syousef · · Score: 4, Funny

    Right now! No thief will ever get your data if you destroy it right now!

    Oh you wanted to use it in the meantime. Well that's different...

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  16. Why do they want your E-mail? by ogl_codemonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Firstly: You're not that interesting - nobody wants to read your E-mail, and the 'important' stuff (like your PGP keys) are individually passphrase protected, aren't they.

    Secondly: You're not that interesting - the thief either wants the device for themselves, or to fence it for $50 worth of crack (or food, depending on where you travel). If they want it for themselves - chances are they'll just wipe it with a clean Windows install (you even leave the registration key on that little sticker on the back, don't you...) to get past your login/resume password. If they don't whoever fences it will.

  17. Slow News Day - WTF? by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google: windows encrypted drive + "I'm feeling lucky".

    Here's what I got:

    http://www.truecrypt.org/

    I'm OK with "Ask Slashdot" being used to gather the collective experience of the techies that like to hang out off-hours here at /. - but.. this?!?

    Something that could be addressed by a moment or two spent at Google or even (god's sake) Bing is a WASTE OF HITS. But maybe that's the plan - get droves of angry techies to bitch about the lameness of the stories, delivering ad impressions?

    Crazy like a fox?

    I'm on to you, Cmdr Taco, if that is your real name!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by DiLLeMaN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have this "Disable ads" checkbox near the top of the page because I've been a good /.'er, you insensitive clod!

      Besides, ABP is for n00bs. Squid -- with some general blocking rules -- keep ALL my browsers on ALL my machines ad-free.

      --
      /var/run/twitter.sock is a twitter socket puppet.
    2. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by eggy78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realize that maybe it's obnoxious for you, but I actually clicked over to /. from my RSS reader to view this post because it actually sounded pretty interesting and it's the kind of thing I wouldn't normally think about. There are a lot of really sharp people here and there have been times where I've spent a long while searching Google for just the right solution to come up with nothing, and then a week or two later somebody on /. has the perfect answer. I, for one, really appreciate this kind of post. Plus it's not like you can't skip over it. That's what I do with at least 30% of the stuff that shows up for me. Of course, you're welcome to your opinion; I just thought I'd say that you're not speaking on behalf of everyone. Unfortunately, I don't have any great advice for the OP because I came here to learn something cool!

    3. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have it on good authority that neither one of them is actually a real cowboy or a taco. They built this house on LIES!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  18. Maybe I don't understand something... by jalet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but if you care about confidentiality of your datas once your laptop is stolen, and at the same time you store most of your datas on servers owned and administered by someone who is not you (the Google company in this case), then maybe you should think twice about what you do.

    --
    Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
  19. fencing by reiisi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All the more reason to use a Linux or BSD based OS.

    To the average thief or receiver of stolen goods, a netbook running an alternate OS is as good as bricked.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  20. fencing (repost) by reiisi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To the average thief, and to the average receiver of a stolen netbook, if the netbook boots an alternative OS, it might as well be bricked.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    1. Re:fencing (repost) by robthebloke · · Score: 3, Funny

      nah... they'll just think it's windows 7 :p

  21. paint a STOLEN FROM ... message on the front by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Use indelible paint, or burn it into the surface of the netbook's plastic case. However you decide to do it, make sure that it's obvious and can be seen by the user and everyone around them (incl. airport security people when they inspect the device). Have a message something like:

    THIS COMPUTER WAS STOLEN FROM <your name/phone number>

    In large, contrasting letters - for extra points write it in the language(s) of the countries to be visited. Not only will it draw unwanted attention to whoever tries to use it, but it will make the stolen item impossible to sell on errr, auction sites, where most of this stuff ends up.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  22. C4 by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would have recommended 10 grams of C4 explosives linked to a USB deactivation key for ultimate satisfaction, but you might have a few problems at airports....

    --
    Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
  23. encryption is not the answer by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But there is a free solution which is more like thermite.

    Encryption is wrong for netbooks because the Atom is a slow, single-core chip. It really can't afford the extra overhead.

    Encryption also won't do what the submitter asks: bricking the device.

    But ATA passwords will do this! Sometimes called "drivelock," these are firmware passwords you type when powering on a disk. If it doesn't get the right password, the disk will refuse to cooperate. Recovering the data from such a disk requires expensive equipment that almost certainly isn't available or worth the effort to the common thief. This solution meets the submitters requirement of bricking the device, and it also keeps his data safe.

    Disclaimer: There are many drives out there from major manufactures which have flawed ATA password implementations. Check and see if your HD is among the list of drives which are so flawed.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:encryption is not the answer by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Atom can only barely play higher-quality youtube videos. Any little thing will tip it over the edge. I agree that it is only a minor impact for most users. But Atoms are a different case.

      You should actually try it. I have an OLPC XO-1 (with a Geode processor -- even slower than the Atom) and full-disk encryption makes no detectable difference in performance.

      What you're missing is the fact that symmetric ciphers, which are actually what the bulk encryption is done with, are very fast. Even low-end processors are typically able to encrypt/decrypt *many* times faster than they can read or write data to disk/flash. And, actually, there shouldn't be any storage I/O involved in playing a youtube video, so even if full-disk encryption were slow, it wouldn't cause a problem with that.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  24. Before it's stolen by AlpineR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Simple. Cover the message with black duct tape. Nobody sees the message and nobody bothers you. But when the thief peels off the tape, they are DOOMED.