Slashdot Mirror


Delete Data On Netbook If Stolen?

An anonymous reader writes "I have just moved overseas on a 2-year working holiday visa and so I picked up a netbook for the interim, an MSI Wind U100 Plus running WinXP. I love it to bits. But as I am traveling around I am somewhat worried about theft. Most of my important stuff is in Gmail and Google Docs; however, I don't always have Net access and find it useful to gear up the offline versions for both. Ideally I would like to securely delete all the offline data from the hard drive if it were stolen. Since it is backed up in the cloud, and the netbook is so cheap I don't really care about recovery, a solution that bricks it would be fine — and indeed would give me a warm glow knowing a prospective thief would have wasted their time. But it's not good if they can extract the HD and get at the data some other way. All thief-foiling suggestions are welcome, be they software, hardware, or other."

330 of 459 comments (clear)

  1. Whole Disk Encryption by seifried · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The answer to your problem is whole disk encryption, not trying to delete the data.

    1. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know it doesn't help the OP, but on linux-based netbooks it's trivial to re-install linux with whole disk encryption if you want to upgrade to Ubuntu anyway. I've been running this way on my primary laptop for over a year and haven't really noticed any performance degradation.

    2. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by grcumb · · Score: 5, Funny

      The answer to your problem is whole disk encryption, not trying to delete the data.

      Feh. Your so-called answer does not include the word 'thermite' or the phrase 'earth-shattering kaboom'. And you call yourself a geek?

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    3. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by mjwx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Feh. Your so-called answer does not include the word 'thermite' or the phrase 'earth-shattering kaboom'. And you call yourself a geek?

      Where's the ka-boom. There was supposed to be an earth shattering ka-boom.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by sofar · · Score: 1

      not really, a serious alternative exists:

              not store any data at all locally, which is generally faster and uses less battery power etc. (than whole disk encryption).

      Since he doesn't care about losing the system, not having any data on it would guarantee that he'd never lose any real data. Whole disk encryption would just invite him to store "some" data on the netbook.

    5. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      Well, you see, a the fourth failed attempt to decrypt the data would cause an earth shattering ka-boom ;)

      --
      signature is pants
    6. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by rapiddescent · · Score: 1

      GPP doesn't mention what level of risk there is with having a weee pc from being stolen; however my own Asus Eeepc 904hd (fedora 10) has only the /home partition encrypted using in-built truecrypt. It's all configurable from the installation process (anaconda) - actually, it's just a checkbox when you configure the disk layout. This doesn't slow the performance noticeably but gives me a little reassurance that if it's stolen then it'll just be over-written with windows and sold on.

    7. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      the part where the original poster said "Running WinXP" may not have made it all the way in.

      I despise answers that randomly suggest competing products without really answering the question. It's like "My lawnmower won't start" and "Well, if you had goats, then you could feed them a different feed to make them more motivated." Try to advertise less and answer the frakking question more, MMkay?

    8. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by someone1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If your lawnmower doesn't work, one answer would be: try goats.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    9. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by muckracer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Would also like to mention FreeOTFE (http://www.freeotfe.org). Unlike Truecrypt it happens to be Linux/LUKS compatible.

    10. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      except that he says that sometimes he doesn't have internet access so he DOES have to store things locally. I guess a different alternative would be to have a usb thumbdrive for that, but then that may get stolen.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    11. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by shentino · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google did IIRC.

    12. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      Whole disk encryption makes the data unusable. But to truly brick it you need a laptop/notebook where there is a bios password that lock the hard disk and cannot be CMOS resetted.

    13. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      the part where the original poster said "Running Linux" may not have made it all the way in.

      Fixed that... This is /. we can't acknowledge anything other than linux. Zombies say "mmmm brains".. /.ers say "mmmm Linux"

      FYI the Irish have a law against Blasphemy so I will appraciate it if you never mention that product again or I'll be forced to sue you.

    14. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by KazW · · Score: 1

      The poster was asking for alternatives, last time I checked, Linux runs Gears and Firefox... Can we say mute point? If you're going to say OS migration might not be an option to the user, blah, blah, blah... The OP already stated all data is backed up onto the cloud.

      Feel free to post a rebuttal, but really, what's the point?

      --
      Geeks don't grock information, they grep it.
    15. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Moot. The word is moot.

      If you make more mistakes of that magnitude, you may be muffled and mutilated with a maddened moose.

    16. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by mrphoton · · Score: 1

      I have the same problem, I use fedora 10, on an samsung NC10 with an atom processor. I just ticked the encrypt file system box on the install. I do not notice any noticeable slow down due to the disk encryption overhead.

    17. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Krneki · · Score: 4, Funny

      Easy solution.

      Install a Sony battery.

      Ka-boom.
      http://geeksaresexy.blogspot.com/2006/11/lithium-ion-laptop-battery-explosion.html

      P.S: It was made by a Gnome, so it might explode before it gets stolen.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    18. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by hattig · · Score: 1

      Maybe he should just set a login password for Windows XP instead of automatically logging in to the desktop. That, and a BIOS password.

      They'll wipe and reinstall Windows XP before faffing about getting the current install working.

      I mean, if my netbook is stolen, I will certainly know that they'll wipe ubuntu off fairly quickly because it'll be different, and there's a password page.

      However a good point is made - Remote Wipe is a nice service to offer for netbooks and laptops as well as mobile phones. Of course it is made possible for the latter because as long as it can get a signal, it is contactable. My Linux netbook only activates wireless AFTER I've logged in (any reason for this?) so it's unlikely ever to receive a remote wipe request.

    19. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by JustOK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Moot. The word is moot.

      That's open to discussion or debate and of little or no practical value or meaning;

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    20. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Funny

      The correct answer is truecrypt for Windows XP then simply encrypt the drive and voila! No password no data. But I can't think of any other way to totally brick it and still have it legal to travel with. After all customs tends to frown on C4, even if all you are doing is trying to teach thieves a valuable lesson in respecting peoples property.

      Of course if you really wanted to make them suffer you could keep a small DOS partition and have it set to load in case of incorrect password and then use a batch file to play slides of Goatse and Tubgirl and maybe a few choice selections from 2 girls one cup, while playing a wav file of that damned annoying frog full blast on endless loop, but I think you may risk getting arrested for crimes against humanity. But I'm sure after the thief was done throwing up and washing out his eyes with bleach a valuable lesson would be learned.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    21. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      Clearly you haven't thought this through completely. Humans are making progress towards nano technology. The solution here is to first have the laptop inject the thief with nano-probes and enslave them to be your personal drone. Think of the envy you'll get by having your new drone serve drinks at LAN parties. You'll get to keep all tips that don't fall off the drone from wear and tear. Also if the drone is cute, that's an extra bonus!

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    22. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by KronosReaver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dependent on the total size of the data you want to store local copies of...

      .

      Buy a good flash drive and keep it on your key chain. Preferably an Ironkey ( www.ironkey.com ) or something similar that offers some serious hardware encryption along with other anti-theft features.

      .

      Use something like XMarks for Firefox so you can access all of your bookmarks, and even stored passwords if desired, without storing any of it on the netbook. Now simply treat the netbook as a public access PC. If it gets lost or stolen there isn't anything on it to worry about in the first place.

      Bonus for international travel is that you don't have anything on the PC for customs to nose around in, and no software making you look ""Suspicious"" just because you value privacy. Or better yet, you can just leave the netbook at home and use your flash drive on a PC at your destination.

      .

      Potential deal breakers - 1. If you need to carry around more than 8 or 16GB you'll have trouble finding a really good secure drive. Sure more than one drive would work but at some point multiple drives become silly. 2. If your one of those people who can never find their keys or is constantly losing flash drives this is probably a really bad idea.

    23. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by omegakidd · · Score: 1, Funny

      boom goes the dynamite.

    24. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by ammorais · · Score: 1

      While your suggestions may stop a consistent number of thief's from accessing data, they are pointless to a more determinated thief that want's to access data. BIOS passwords and simple Windows XP login passwords are just not good enough, as they are easily breakable.

      While I'm answering this, I may also give a suggestion. Encrypt the drive, or if you are worried about performance, simple create a new partition for your documents, encrypt it, ad if you want seamless integration mount it as Documents And Settings Folder. Also I suggest changing your password to a strong password.

      Advertising: You can use a program that I've wrote for strong password generation.
      http://sourceforge.net/projects/kpgen/

    25. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by mopower70 · · Score: 1

      Possibly, but if you're using Windows, avoid Pointsec like the horrific technological plague that it is. I've had to completely rebuild my machine 3 times in 6 months because it crashed and corrupted files beyond recovery. And to top it off, it corrupted every single file that was open at the time of the crash (including files accessed from network shares) making them completely useless on install. I had to restore the machine AND all network archives from backup.

    26. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      TrueCrypt claims to do whole-system encryption for Windows, and is mostly open-source. I haven't tried it myself, though (I use Linux).

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    27. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would say to just ignore the whole hardware encryption and just encrypt the thumb drive with truecrypt. Save a few bucks on the thumb drive, plus you won't have to worry about finding larger sizes. I don't think there are any advantages to having hardware encryption.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    28. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Fuck. The correct english word is fuck. Remember to stress that fricative for best effect.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    29. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by isama · · Score: 1

      I tried it once in a VM, It worked quite well, and the first time encrypting is not too slow :)

    30. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by ammorais · · Score: 1

      I guess your reply to my comment is also to the article.
      Let me see if I've get this strait. So what are you saying is that he might not worry about the data and that his post is useless, so no form of protection is needed because all thieves are drug addicts that just want some quick drug money.

      Really constructive and helpful you answer.

    31. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      My Linux netbook only activates wireless AFTER I've logged in (any reason for this?)

      Probably that your wireless network manager is something like wicd and is running in userland. Most modern distros use a userland wireless manager so that users can switch to a different wireless net without having to log in as root or provide root credentials.

      You could do some poking around in the BIOS and see what you can find... Dell laptops have an option in the BIOS, for example, to set a hard drive password. This encrypts the mbr on the drive, preventing it from being read without supplying the password, and works across different operating systems. The hard drive can't be removed and put into a different computer, nor can it be put into a USB caddy to try to read the data from a different operating system: it'll still ask for the password. While it's possible to read the geometry from the drive and build an unencrypted MBR that'd let you recover the data, it's more trouble than it's worth, and virtually guarantees that the system will be wiped to start fresh.

      Couple a hard drive password with a power-on password in the BIOS, and you've got a completely useless netbook to anybody who doesn't have the passwords.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    32. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by crashumbc · · Score: 1

      and he specifically stated he works on stuff without net access sometimes...

      p.s. you do know cell phones and by extension "netbooks" don't work well in most buildings? right?

    33. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by ChemFrk · · Score: 1

      Thermite != KABOOM. Honestly...you call yourself a geek and you've never made thermite? A little iron oxide powder (rust), a little aluminum powder, and some activation energy.

    34. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by MooUK · · Score: 1

      I preferred the ka-boom.

    35. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or use an Apple notebook. Their products are constantly bursting into flames and exploding.

    36. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, they stole the Space Modulator. That's what causes the KABOOM!

    37. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair, when one says "netbook" a geek automatically thinks "linux" rather than "windows."

      It's similar to the way that when one says "compact car" a gearhead automatically thinks "Yaris 2-door" rather than "Mercedes C-class"

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    38. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by True+Vox · · Score: 1

      Yes. Yes they did.

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
    39. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by proslack · · Score: 1

      Personally, I use Folder Lock, it is inexpensive and allows you to selectively encrypt entire folder trees using the Blowfish (256b) algorithm. Easy to install (even on USB) and it doesn't hog resources by encrypting every file, only those you want it to. The software can also erase your tracks when you close it.

      --


      Floating in the black seas of infinity without a paddle.
    40. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by True+Vox · · Score: 1
      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
    41. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by falckon · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, you can just leave the netbook at home and use your flash drive on a PC at your destination.

      It's not a good idea to trust a host PC. It could easily copy the data off of your flash drive at the point when it's plugged in, not to mention the potential for keyloggers logging your online passwords. One solution to using an unfamiliar host PC is to carry with you a linux live CD such as Knoppix. Running this live CD and using your USB key will keep your data safe. Your passwords will also be safe from software keyloggers, but hardware keyloggers exist (although these could be visually checked for).

    42. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1
    43. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by True+Vox · · Score: 1

      Least anyone get the wrong idea, Truecrypt IS Linux compatible. it's just not LUKS compatible.

      --
      "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
    44. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by silent_artichoke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Billie Mays took it with him.

    45. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by jtev · · Score: 1

      Ok, so in response to a post about Ubuntu, which IS trivial to install, you bring out Linux From Scratch, which, admitedly is not. Because it is intended to be quite configurable, by people who know what they are doing, who are experts with Unix and Linux, and who want something that gives them maximal configurability. Talk about a canard. The vast majority of Linux distros are trivial to install or reinstall, and you have to go looking for ones that are not.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    46. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      Your nuclear option has merit, but as for C4, he asked for something that would brick it, not vaporize it.

      All you need is some sort of a catch that connects the CPU directly to the power supply. Or possibly a conductive gel packet that bursts on a command, preferably right on top of the SSD. Though I don't know how you would fit that in there.

    47. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by crazyvas · · Score: 1

      It's like "My lawnmower won't start" and "Well, if you had goats, then you could feed them a different feed to make them more motivated."

      For a second there, I thought this was an off-topic post talking about Ubuntu forums.

    48. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by mlts · · Score: 1

      TrueCrypt is very good at this. The price is right too.

      Two caveats:

      If you can, carry a copy of the recovery CD with you. If for some reason, some program overwrites part of the boot track, you still have access to your data. Since TC stores the volume key on the boot track, if some utility or DRM system decides to write there (it shouldn't but a lot of them do to "individualize" the PC), it may make the TC volume completely unrecoverable without the recovery media. Each volume uses a different key, so you can't use a recovery CD from your desktop; you need to use the recovery media for that machine. This isn't just an issue with TC, other FDE (full disk encryption) programs might have parts overwritten, so its advisable to keep a recovery CD just in case.

      Second, use a long passphrase. The days of using "passw0rd" or "letme1n" are long gone.

      As for the dreaded inspection at airports, my advice would be to have two users (regardless of OS). The first user is one you are logged into when you pass the laptop to be inspected, and this user is a limited user (no access to sudo, not in the Administrators group). The second user is where you do all your work and have your home directory with your files. In most cases, someone inspecting stuff through an airport is more concerned that the laptop is a laptop and not anything nefarious.

      If you want a "self destruct" feature, consider PGP or another FDE utility that supports cryptographic tokens like the Aladdin eToken. PGP has the ability to use a cryptographic token before booting, and if someone makes too many attempts at the smart card's password/PIN, it will either have a longer and longer delay between allowing attempts or lock out for good and permanently block access. TrueCrypt offers smart card support, but not for boot encryption, only mounted volumes. Of course, until you are completely convinced the cryptographic token is working, keep a backup passphrase so you can have access just in case.

      For anti-theft protection, some laptops (don't know about netbooks) offer the ability to install Absolute Software's Lojack for Laptops into the BIOS. This way, should someone steal the netbook, completely zero out the drive and install a new copy of Windows, Lojack would silently install itself and phone home, allowing the stolen laptop to be traced by IP.

    49. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      Maybe the point was very quiet- subtle, if you will?

    50. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Well, if you add a little sodium phosphate to the mix and seal it up good (letter bomb), when it is exposed to air you get a baby kaboom....

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    51. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by mlts · · Score: 1

      One quick addition:

      Call your insurance company and see if you can get a rider for the netbook. Most rental plans and homeowner plans cover some computer equipment loss, but having explicit coverage of a computer against fire, theft, accidental microwaving, and other woes goes a long way to mitigate the loss of the hardware.

      Theft still sucks since you are out your equipment, but at least you should be able to buy a new one when home with a good insurance plan. Always remember to get a police report if it does get stolen, because without it, you almost are certain to be not able to file a claim.

    52. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      Since its XP, how about just an encrypted folder, and put the important stuff in that folder.

    53. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by harrkev · · Score: 1

      You need to raise the joke net a little higher. It just flew right over your head.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    54. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by sexconker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You often aren't able to run a live disc on any sort of public PC. Either there's no disc drive, you don't have access to the boot menu/bios, or you simply don't have physical access to the machine.

      Either way, running from a live disc and a flash drive won't secure shit. For all you know there could be a hardware keylogger. For all you know there's some guy in the back room watching split video signals from all the machines in the coffee shop. If you're going to be paranoid, at least be paranoid.

    55. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      P.S: It was made by a Goblin, so it might explode before it gets stolen.

      Fixed that for ya

    56. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by monkeySauce · · Score: 1

      You're both wrong. It's a moo point.

      As such, it's more appropriate that the muffling and mutilation come from a mad cow.

    57. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Miseph · · Score: 1

      That just raises the new question of: what were you doing with the lawnmower!?!?!?!?!?!

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    58. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "As for the dreaded inspection at airports..."

      I gotta ask, unless you're dressed like a Taliban, do that many people have experience with being stopped at airports and having to actually physically fire up your laptop to submit it for inspection?!?!?

      Is this seriously a common problem some people are running into on a constant basis?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    59. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      I think this nullifies the original intent of the query. The MSI Wind U100 doesn't have a DVD drive and carrying an external would pretty well destroy the point of being as portable as possible. On-disk encryption is probably the best bet considering whatever this guy is carrying is probably not worth keyloggers or other problems. If the netbook is infiltrated by virus or malware then so be it. However, he'll probably notice any hardware interface that would install a keylogger as he's looking right at the netbook.

      If he wants to obliterate the data then whatever he does has to specifically target the areas he wants to delete (a partition of the drive) and be triggered by X amount of failed logins or some similar tactic.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    60. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by quixote9 · · Score: 1

      I'm a grey-haired quasi-respectable academic, and I get asked to boot up my laptop almost every time. Oh, and I'm white.

    61. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Krneki · · Score: 1

      /duel

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    62. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      I had a conversation about my laptop with my insurance agent, (State Farm), and the equipment is only covered under homeowner/renter policies if they are in the home or apartment. As soon as you begin carrying them you need a personal articles policy to cover them. I THINK mine is $24/year for my Macbook, but it stays at the base rate up to $2500 in equipment.

      Talk to your insurance agent to find out for sure. It's better safe than sorry.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    63. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      "As for the dreaded inspection at airports..."

      I gotta ask, unless you're dressed like a Taliban, do that many people have experience with being stopped at airports and having to actually physically fire up your laptop to submit it for inspection?!?!?

      Is this seriously a common problem some people are running into on a constant basis?

      I once had one airline security guy demand that I fire the laptop up, and another slightly down the line get mad at me for doing just that, didn't I know that I just had to open it up for them to see? This occurred in Australia, BTW.

    64. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by ChemFrk · · Score: 1

      I think you're talking about white phosphorous. Sodium phosphate (mono-, di-, and tri-baisc)is a boring old salt, useful as a buffer at neutral pH. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_phosphates

    65. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Oops, my bad. You are correct I was thinking of white phosphorous. Although plain sodium would probably do the trick also.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    66. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by ChemFrk · · Score: 1

      Only in the presence of water :-) If you want that route, pick one of the lower elements from that column...potassium or cesium (the latter being hard to get)

    67. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I thought that sodium when exposed to air would ignite, and when immersed in water would explode.
      But I will defer to you seeing your name is ChemFrk...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    68. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Forget thermite. You should rig it with a mechanism that releases a couple kilograms of chlorine trifluoride under pressure into the drive assembly if you don't type the all-clear password within ninety seconds of bootup and every two hours while the system is running.

      That, or antimatter.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    69. Re:Whole Disk Encryption by jtev · · Score: 1

      Joke? It read like a troll to me. And, yeah yeah, I know, don't feed the trolls, but whatever.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
  2. Encryption by pyite · · Score: 5, Informative

    Encrypt the entire drive with TrueCrypt or something. Use a strong cipher and a very strong passphrase. The laptop is as good as bricked to anyone who gets it.

    --

    "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    1. Re:Encryption by man_ls · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whole-Disk AES via TrueCrypt is only BARELY above the "acceptable" threshold on a Core Solo. I cringe to think what it'd be like on an Atom. A better bet would be to use a container-hosted TrueCrypt volume, and set your My Documents folder into that volume.

    2. Re:Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Get a seagate momentus FDE and do pre-boot authentication.
      encryption is done in hardware, on the drive, viola.

      Just make sure you get one of the FDE drives that does AES CBC not AES ECB.

    3. Re:Encryption by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your average thief will spend five seconds looking for porn to keep, then reinstall the lot. The crummiest possible encryption would satisfy 99% of cases.

    4. Re:Encryption by tehfly · · Score: 1

      Sure, I can agree that the data is unreadable, but that particular laptop is hardly bricked by it. You can still switch out the harddrive or boot from a USB stick. (afaik bricked means you can't use it anymore)

    5. Re:Encryption by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your average thief will try to resell it as soon as he can. Most thieves are not interested in the loot as such but in the money they can get for it.

    6. Re:Encryption by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      They make netbooks with VIA processors, which have encryption functions built into the processor instruction sets.

      I'm not sure if truecrypt would take advantage but if it did it would help immensely.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    7. Re:Encryption by drb_chimaera · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think he is referring to performance - theres a more than noticable hit on the performance of a netbook utilising full disk encryption (I read a couple of benchmarks suggesting it was in the region of 10-20%). YMMV as to whether its worth the hit for the security of what you want to store on the Eee

    8. Re:Encryption by Sodakar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      On N270 Atoms, whole-disk AES encryption works perfectly fine, and the only time I notice a slow-down is when I'm running a benchmark program side-by-side with a model that has an unencrypted drive. For regular browsing and e-mail (which is what the person asking the question listed as a qualification), it's a non-issue.

      As some others have posted, and what my local police have told me, the laptop will likely have been sold for cash in less than 24 hours. Unless you are being targeted specifically for something of significant value such as corporate IP, it's unlikely that anyone is going to spend the time to try to unencrypt your drive.

      But other threats still loom...

      If you plan on connecting to any network, you will expose your machine to any network-based threat, so you ought to harden your machine accordingly.

      Make sure you still have a strong password for your account login. If your machine is in hibernate, the crypto authentication prompt will stop them, but if your machine was sleeping, it'll return to the OS prompt.

      The one scenario where you're not protected at all is if the machine is powered on, logged in, and someone grabs it by force. I realize there are proximity-based USB dongles that will lock the screen when the remote adapter is beyond range, but this may be far too impractical to use. A USB security dongle sticking out the side is a quick recipe for a broken USB port...

    9. Re:Encryption by rvw · · Score: 1

      Encrypt the entire drive with TrueCrypt or something. Use a strong cipher and a very strong passphrase. The laptop is as good as bricked to anyone who gets it.

      Use a passphrase that's easy and quick to type. Easy to type doesn't mean it has to be a bad password. My guess is that nobody cares about your documents, unless you work for some government or big company, or unless you're a celebrity. So an 8 or 10 character long password is good enough, and nobody will even attempt to break it.

    10. Re:Encryption by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      Encrypt the entire drive with TrueCrypt or something. Use a strong cipher and a very strong passphrase. The laptop is as good as bricked to anyone who gets it.

      I'm really curious as to how it's "as good as bricked" to anyone who gets it? Seems to me, with this solution, a simple reformat/reinstall of the OS would make the computer 100% usable. Is this not the case? I'm not familiar with the netbook in question, so maybe it's impossible to reinstall the OS on it... but if it's like a normal computer, trashing the drive does not in any way, shape or form brick the computer.

      Care to enlighten us as to how a scrambled hard drive bricks a computer?

    11. Re:Encryption by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Don't you love it when technical terms find their way into popular culture? Nowadays when people say "my laptop was bricked by hackers" they probably simply mean their screen is all smudgy.

    12. Re:Encryption by reiisi · · Score: 1

      As in, requires the receiver to "fix" the machine to use it. (In this case, an OS re-install is the way it would be fixed, but the average computer user doesn't really know for software or hardware.

      --
      Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    13. Re:Encryption by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wish I could make it deliver an electric shock, explode the battery or maybe a dye capsule, emit a foul-smelling and nauseating gas, or make a 911 call and report a fire at its location. Something along those lines. I don't expect thieves to be caught, so I want to somehow cause them harm directly.

      I once designed a car security system that would have stood a good chance of killing the driver. I heard a lot of arguments about why that was a bad idea, but I don't buy any of them to this day. If you try to steal my radio you're in for a shock and will need a tetanus shot. I don't care much for thieves starting with whether they survive the attempt to steal my stuff, and ending there too, I suppose.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    14. Re:Encryption by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 5, Informative

      My personal experience with a Inspiron 1520 is that whole disk encryption significantly reduces battery life, which is a real usability problem.

      Most likely, when I get back to the states (I only encrypted for some overseas travel anyway), I will decrypt it and move back to an encrypted truecrypt container for the small number of documents that are really sensitive.

    15. Re:Encryption by dnaumov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Full-disk truecrypt AES encryption is absolutely above acceptable on an Atom 330, the CPU is a hyperthreaded dualcore one, so the OS sees 4 CPUs and truecrypt operates on all 4. I get ~55 MB/s in the AES truecrypt benchmark and I am using it to fully encrypt several partitions. It works just fine.

    16. Re:Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Get a seagate momentus FDE and do pre-boot authentication.
      >encryption is done in hardware, on the drive, viola.

      Seagate momentus disks use string instruments for data encryption?

    17. Re:Encryption by Mark+Trade · · Score: 1

      With that solution, you have no control over your passwords that might end up in unencrypted swap or temp files. Anything but whole-disk encryption is just encoding.

    18. Re:Encryption by hattig · · Score: 1

      Most netbooks use single-threaded, single-core Atoms.

      Indeed this is something that the VIA based netbooks probably do better because of Padlock, if Truecrypt takes advantage of it.

    19. Re:Encryption by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

      Encrypt the entire drive with TrueCrypt or something. Use a strong cipher and a very strong passphrase. The laptop is as good as bricked to anyone who gets it.

      Use a passphrase that's easy and quick to type. Easy to type doesn't mean it has to be a bad password. My guess is that nobody cares about your documents, unless you work for some government or big company, or unless you're a celebrity. So an 8 or 10 character long password is good enough, and nobody will even attempt to break it.

      in that case, I think that a passphrase is in order. Luckily, truecrypt does not limit the password to 8 characters, so any geeky book title will do.

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    20. Re:Encryption by DriveMelter · · Score: 1

      The Wind does have a way of installing internal USB components but is apparently a little short of space. http://forums.msiwind.net/hacks-and-mods/wind-mod-internal-port-usb-hub-and-sdhc-card-reader-t5896.html

    21. Re:Encryption by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a Pentium 3 Mobile 1.7GHz Thinkpad and Truecrypt makes no appreciable difference in performance. Even during benchmark tests the CPU is only about 50% loaded, so the bottleneck is the HDD itself. 50% sounds like a lot, but keep in mind we are talking artificial benchmarks here. Real world performance is probably in the order of 5-10% when loading an app or large file.

      Truecrypt is by far the best option. Not only does it protect your data in case of theft or over-zealous customs staff, but you can wipe the entire disk instantly just by destroying the TC header (1 sector). Without the header you can't even do a dictionary attack, you would need to brute force AES which is basically impossible in the foreseeable future.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:Encryption by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      For Windows XP, an 8 - 10 character password is no more secure than a 7 character password, and a 14 character password is only twice as secure as a 7 character one. You need 15 characters to stop people from being able to break it.

    23. Re:Encryption by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

      And don't forget to write the passphrase somewhere on the netbook or you'll forget it :)

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    24. Re:Encryption by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Or that ecryptfs Private folder :-)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    25. Re:Encryption by maxume · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you have a handle on things so this might be redundant, but be aware that this mode of operation has the potential to create in-the-clear temporary copies of the encrypted documents (so depending on what sensitive means, it may not be appropriate; I encrypt financial documents in container file so I don't have to worry about casual browsing of them in case of loss/theft, not to protect them from mean guys with bricks).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    26. Re:Encryption by maxume · · Score: 1

      You can also just disable LM hashing if a longer password sounds annoying:

      http://support.microsoft.com/kb/299656

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    27. Re:Encryption by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      >Get a seagate momentus FDE and do pre-boot authentication. >encryption is done in hardware, on the drive, viola.

      Seagate momentus disks use string instruments for data encryption?

      Clearly you have not read the Cryptonomicon. You should know that cryptography is all derived from studying musical instruments.

    28. Re:Encryption by WarlockD · · Score: 1

      No points but I agree. We run PointSec here and just did a test on a Dell Mini 9 and it runs fine, even with office.

    29. Re:Encryption by Rigrig · · Score: 1

      I realize there are proximity-based USB dongles that will lock the screen when the remote adapter is beyond range, but this may be far too impractical to use. A USB security dongle sticking out the side is a quick recipe for a broken USB port...

      If it has bluetooth you can use BlueProximity with your phone(or any other bluetooth device), instead of a specialised dongle.

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    30. Re:Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm not sure what you were doing wrong there, but the veteran testers at Tom's Hardware found that TrueCrypt whole disk encryption reduced battery life just by 1% for AES.

      http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/truecrypt-security-hdd,2125-11.html

      Battery Runtime Test Passed

      Our MobileMark 07 testing was conducted with a Dell Latitude D610 and a 9-cell battery. It resulted in a 1% runtime decrease for AES and 3% for AES-Twofish-Serpent. The same percentage decreases should also apply to smaller batteries.

    31. Re:Encryption by teh_commodore · · Score: 1

      How many articles have there been ridiculing someone from some company or government agency that lost some data? OP did say it was for work, afterall. If he worked for me, I'd give him a raise for caring.

      Maybe we're not afraid of the 'average thief' anymore, we just don't want pretentious slashdotters talking shit about how that would have never happened to them because they have X software on Y OS on Z hardware bla bla bla. And since we do all talk shit, maybe we're the people to ask for a solution.

      or maybe not.

      --
      --"insert clever quote here"
    32. Re:Encryption by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Really? What's wrong with Truecrypt? I use LUKS on my IBM T23 with no problems. I used whatever cipher was default (in debian), I think it's AES.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    33. Re:Encryption by Hatta · · Score: 1

      an encrypted truecrypt container for the small number of documents that are really sensitive.

      Make sure none of your apps save temporary files in an unencrypted location and turn off swap if you can. Modern operating systems are complex enough that it's hard to ensure that no unencrypted data ever ends up where it shouldn't. If you really want to avoid full disk encryption, I'd put a VM inside that container and use that for sensitive work. That way nothing unencrypted can leak out.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    34. Re:Encryption by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Those came out in 2007. So if the battery is the OEM battery, it's at the end of it's service life and sucks because it sucks, not because the encryption is using too much CPU.

      Try getting a new battery.

    35. Re:Encryption by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      As in, requires the receiver to "fix" the machine to use it. (In this case, an OS re-install is the way it would be fixed, but the average computer user doesn't really know for software or hardware.

      So then, you're saying it's not bricked with this method? Bricking very specifically implies that the machine literally becomes as useful as brick. That's why it's called "bricking." If it still boots and can be reinstalled, it's not bricked.

    36. Re:Encryption by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Really? What's wrong with Truecrypt? I use LUKS on my IBM T23 with no problems. I used whatever cipher was default (in debian), I think it's AES.

      Same here except Fedora on an n280 (eeePC 1000he). I 'only' get 5.5 hours battery rather than the 9 ASUS's marketing department claims. I figure that means LUKS adds 1 hour of battery life. ;)

      If there's a battery problem here, it's Adobe Flash Player - that sucker will turn my fan on to sit in an idle loop.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  3. a hack by binford2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    set up a scheduled task to wipe the drive unless you cancel it. Then don't forget to cancel it.

    1. Re:a hack by jbacon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a TERRIBLE idea... Like, HOLY SHIT terrible.

      Full disk encryption gets my vote as well - Truecrypt will do the job quite nicely, and relatively pain-free.

    2. Re:a hack by RsG · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a TERRIBLE idea... Like, HOLY SHIT terrible.

      Then your threshold for terrible needs adjusting. I'm sure I can think of something worse than what the AC suggested :-P

      For example: a small thermite charge, proximate to the hard drive platter. It's fused to go off if a particular peripheral isn't detected upon boot-up; you keep the peripheral "key" with you, perhaps attached to your regular key-chain. A thief tries to boot, and BOOM (okay, thermite doesn't "boom", but you get the idea) - no more HDD. Or netbook. Or whatever it happened to be on top of. Bonus points if the thief happens to have it on their lap at the time.

      Now that, ladies and gentlemen, is how you propose a terrible idea. Compared to this, a full disk wipe sounds positively safe and reasonable.

      (IMPORTANT: If anyone out there is stupid enough to take this suggestion seriously and implement this obvious deathtrap, I cannot be held accountable for any loss of property, organic damage or Darwin award nominations that result.)

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    3. Re:a hack by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a TERRIBLE idea... Like, HOLY SHIT terrible.

      Why? The laptop is a backup for online data. He can afford to throw it away and reload it next time he goes on line.

    4. Re:a hack by socceroos · · Score: 1

      I'll take one of your openmoko phones off your hands if you're offering.

      Back on topic, having to re-build the OS because you forgot to stop the cron job would be an almighty PITA.

    5. Re:a hack by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I haven't bought the phones yet. I was looking for people who want to collectively buy a pack. Are you in Melbourne? If not then shipping may cancel the advantage of buying in bulk. I have created a journal entry for people to express interest through.

      Back on topic. Yeah I suppose so, especially with windows. I can netboot netbsd pretty fast.

    6. Re:a hack by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      You don't have a DVD case somewhere with all your systems backed up into with a known good build? Really? What the hell kind of geek are you?

      I've got disk images on my server, and DVD hardcopies in a disc case for every computer I own (more than a few). Anytime one of my systems goes down, gets funked or catches a cold, I pop in a DVD and reboot. Half an hour later I'm rebooting into my fully configured and installed OS of choice.

      Combined with a little intelligent partitioning you can make restoring a known good OS childsplay. I put aps and data on 2 separate partitions with the OS on a third. The only real downside is the sometimes tricky business of balancing disk usage. Win XP makes that about as hard as they can, because aps don't respect proper user directories. However it's not impossible and not even hard for a geek.

      On to the subject at hand, I'm gonna throw in my 2 cents for Truecrypt also. I've been using it for ages and it's a beautiful thing. As to making it safe on a laptop that may be stolen, a friend of mine did this. Move all sensitive data to one drive/partition/directory (your choice), encrypt the hell out of that unit. Now write a shell script that nukes that unit if a certain key combination isn't pressed within X minutes of log in. Include a prompt that waits for input if you want to be fail safe. Problem solved. Now if you ever lose track of the laptop, and someone attempts to access it, all the important info will be encrypted to start, and erased most likely. This also foils most attempts to extract the HDD and read it with another machine as the data is safely encrypted in a junk file that no one but a pro will recognize. If you throw in a few other "junk" containers as decoys, you're pretty safe. No one is going to apply the horsepower required to even begin cracking the key, even assuming they find the correct file to unlock

      For added fun, you can use a duress password which can be set to trigger any number of fun events. From formats to lock outs to fake data.

      I'm not paranoid, I'm just careful. I don't think anyone is out to get me, nor do I think the data on my computer would be worth the effort of getting, but I'm damn sure going to make it REALLY hard, just in case. (also, I'm spiteful)

      That being said, I liked the thermite idea. It might be a pain to travel with, somehow I'm thinking the airport guys are going to have a problem with even a small thermite charge. You could go EMP, but I'm not sure you could fit the power verter and the coil into the netbook... maybe a full sized laptop...

    7. Re:a hack by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Interesting
      OK, you want a TERRIBLE idea - how about trying to take your booby-trapped netbook through airport security?

      The OP says he's moved "overseas" so presumably some day he'll be travelling back to which ever country he came from, and I would guess that includes flying.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    8. Re:a hack by YourExperiment · · Score: 5, Funny

      The OP says he's moved "overseas" so presumably some day he'll be travelling back to which ever country he came from

      Not necessarily, he might have moved out of the U.K.

      (No flames please, I'm British :)

    9. Re:a hack by Photo_Nut · · Score: 1

      What happens when you forget about the hack that you put something highly combustible in your device and try and take said device through the airport TSA checkpoint? I suppose if the answer is that the theif takes said device through TSA checkpoint then it's funny, but what if the theif sells the device to some unsuspecting victim?

      Setting up a netbook to be a bomb is not just a bad idea, but it's likely to be illegal in many ways.

      A good idea might be to put a keylogger which uploads to a web site into the netbook. Get your theif to give you their passwords and information, then use that information against them.

    10. Re:a hack by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42...

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    11. Re:a hack by timias1 · · Score: 1

      That begs the question would Thermite even show up as a suspicious substance in a airport Xray? It is not a nitrogen-based explosive, and the components of it are not exotic, heck it would probably look like a laptop battery on an Xray.

    12. Re:a hack by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a great product idea. The submitter says that he has the data backed up remotely, so he doesn't mind if the hard drive is trashed. Why not make a disposable hard drive? One that can be "booby trapped" similar to what the parent suggests, however it could be contained inside the hard drive. So you have a hard drive that is manufactured to be completely sealed and if the security is breached an acid wash destroys the platters inside the hard drive without destroying the laptop itself (or at least its case). All you would need to do to fix it is replace the hard drive with a new one restored or ghosted from the remote backup.

    13. Re:a hack by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Easy. If he's running Vista/Win7 (and he's not) he can schedule the task to bring up a box that says "Wipe HDD?". If he clicks any buttons a passkey is requested (otherwise, 15 seconds later it goes away). If the wrong passkey is entered the drive is wiped.

      Though I 100% agree. Truecrypt is the answer.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    14. Re:a hack by RsG · · Score: 1

      Dear FBI.

      Regrettably, I have no working computer systems of any kind, as there have been a number of mishaps with my Thermowipe prototype, versions 1 through 25 inclusive.

      I am now the proud owner of several lovely portions of melted plastic and metal slag, which I will thank you kindly to take off my hands. You can collect them from the local fire marshal's office, along with the remains of my desk, chair and cat.

      Thanks!

      R

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    15. Re:a hack by RsG · · Score: 1

      The only problem with that I see with the Thermite solution is getting through airport security with those bomb sniffing devices.. otherwise I like! :)

      The only problem you can see with having a high temperature incendiary that close to your danglies is getting it past security? The only problem?

      In the hopes that you'll avoid adding your name to the short list of surviving Darwin Award winners, might I suggest asbestos long-johns and a ceramic codpiece?

      (Oh, and airports might not be the problem people think in this case. Most of the security is in place to stop a person from boarding with an explosive, not an incendiary. I'm not at all sure the bomb dogs are trained on Thermite, or anything chemically similar to it.)

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    16. Re:a hack by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Although, I know it's probably meant to be a joke. I don't see what's the problem. The person asking /. said he could get that data from the network.
      Therefore, you can stick to the plan of wiping out, ok, not the whole hard drive, but perhaps a partition where you put your off-line sensitive data. In case, you make the mistake of not disabling the script, you just need to get access to the internet, and download it again from whatever your repository is.
      For the trouble of asking here, outrageous answers should be expected. That doesn't make them unfeasible.

    17. Re:a hack by socceroos · · Score: 1

      That doesn't work if the HDD is removed though.

    18. Re:a hack by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I'll take one of your openmoko phones off your hands if you're offering. Back on topic, having to re-build the OS because you forgot to stop the cron job would be an almighty PITA.

      I am looking at placing an order soon. Please reply to my journal if you are still interested.

  4. Encryption by swmike · · Score: 2, Informative

    That is what encryption is for. Get truecrypt or other similar application and then the data won't be extractable by anyone without the password.

  5. Identity Theft or Physical Theft by MountainMan101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it's physical theft I would think they would bin the HDD or sell it "as is" without even looking at what's on it. Bricking it doesn't do a lot, you'd probably just replace the HDD anyway.

    Identity theft is more worrying. Why not encrypt the HDD with something like Fedora / Ubuntu offers - ie an encrypted /home or MyDocuments. That way the laptop won't log on for the thief.

    1. Re:Identity Theft or Physical Theft by BikeHelmet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What if it was already logged in?

      Ex: Someone grabs it at an internet cafe, while you're ordering something?

      I know everyone else is thinking the same thing, but I'll say it anyway - encrypt the entire partition, with a tool like TrueCrypt.

    2. Re:Identity Theft or Physical Theft by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      (I'm aware that my suggestion doesn't deal with an already-logged in scenario. If anyone has an answer to that one, please, do reply with it!)

      I suppose you could always hope they shut down the computer and can't get back in, but that's a pretty bad plan IMHO. :P

    3. Re:Identity Theft or Physical Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If a thief grabs it, they would inevitably tuck it under their arm (walking around with an open netbook would slow them down and make them easier to spot). So set the netbook to shutdown when the lid is closed.

    4. Re:Identity Theft or Physical Theft by cowbutt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (I'm aware that my suggestion doesn't deal with an already-logged in scenario. If anyone has an answer to that one, please, do reply with it!)

      Sounds like you need some kind of RF token and a receiver attached to the netbook; if the token goes out of range, the machine logs you out and/or shuts down. If push came to shove, I imagine you could bodge something together with a Bluetooth receiver and a Bluetooth enabled phone like BluePromixity does.

    5. Re:Identity Theft or Physical Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You could just use something as simple as a screensaver password. After a few minutes of not using the machine, they would need the password to get back to your session.

      There would be no way for them to run any tool to brute force the password or anything, without rebooting the machine. But then if they reboot the machine, they have to decrypt the drive again.

    6. Re:Identity Theft or Physical Theft by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could always hope they shut down the computer and can't get back in, but that's a pretty bad plan IMHO. :P

      Automatic session time-outs?

      But that's not the problem. If someone has physical access to the machine encryption is at best a roadblock, not a solution. All important files should be recoverable from recent backups. The encrypted data should be set to automatically delete after 5 or so incorrect password attempts, so in the event of theft and the thief wants access to your data then they will run the risk of deleting it. This can be worked around easily by using a separate OS though, so the only real way is to have the disk wiped by a device that is not connected to the OS and can be activated by remote but at this level of paranoia, why is data leaving a secure facility on a laptop of all things and not under armed guard.

      But with most laptop thefts, the thief will sell it to the nearest pawn shop who will get the closest unscrupulous geek to install a new OS.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Identity Theft or Physical Theft by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      Encrypting just /home is a bit of a half-arsed attempt. What about any files that get copied to /tmp? Better is to use Fedora and create a fully encrypted machine (except a tiny /boot partition, which it won't let you encrypt and which needs root permissions to write to anyway).

    8. Re:Identity Theft or Physical Theft by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      What if it was already logged in? Ex: Someone grabs it at an internet cafe, while you're ordering something?

      If you're *lucky enough* to have the thief keep it on and keep it logged in, then there is a chance you can remote back into it.

  6. Nuke it from orbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's the only way to be sure.

    1. Re:Nuke it from orbit by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      Or you could invent laser emitting diodes. Burn out the retinas of any unsuspecting thieves.

  7. Booby trap it? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is probably room in the case for a few ounces of C4 explosive, and a detonator. You might have a hard time getting it through customs though..... and you had better never drop the thing so the detonator goes off!!

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    1. Re:Booby trap it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is probably room in the case for a few ounces of C4 explosive, and a detonator. You might have a hard time getting it through customs though.....

      I doubt it. The security theater at the airports I've seen only exists to inconvenience and intimidate, it would be pretty easy to for someone of average or greater intelligence to get knives, bombs, or other improvised weapons though.

  8. Lojack for Laptops by zhiwenchong · · Score: 3, Informative

    Website: http://www.absolute.com/products/lojack
    FAQ: http://www.absolute.com/resources/public/FAQ/L4L-FAQ-E.pdf

    Costs $59.95/year for the premium package which supports Remote Wipe. Embeds itself in the BIOS/EFI. Supports XP and OS X.

    1. Re:Lojack for Laptops by zhiwenchong · · Score: 1

      I did read the summary. I passed on information on a remote wipe service, which is one of the many options for doing what the poster wanted.
      What part of the summary did you have trouble understanding?

    2. Re:Lojack for Laptops by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      The part of the summary that the grandparent probably meant you missed was this: "But it's not good if they can extract the HD and get at the data some other way. "

      Remote wipe does no good if the hard drive isn't in the machine.

    3. Re:Lojack for Laptops by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      Only embeds itself in the BIOS of "supported models"..
      Also, just for the curious.. All the BIOS part does is try to re-install the agent in windows. I was very disappointed to find that out, they sure make it sound like its a chip on the MB. I was really hoping they would have something on there that would actually communicate out my NIC and Wireless card without the OS, at the hardware level.. But no. And since I run linux, it would never be tracked. (note to self.. If I ever steal a laptop, load Linux on it.. ) However, some of that coolness seems to be coming in the form of a poison pill feature for the Intel VPro tech.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    4. Re:Lojack for Laptops by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      This works. Posting anonymously as I do not wish to violate opsec.

      It's cute that the marketing department for the product understands some of the government security jargon.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  9. alpha particles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Carefully paint over the letters on the "T" and "E" keys with polonium-218 laced paint, then just remember to wear gloves when typing unless your name is something like "Frank" and your password is all digits.

  10. Truecrypt + fake account by dargaud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As others will have already said: use truecrypt. In addition, use two account: yours with a password, and another one (visible from the login shell) without password. Put a script in it that wipes the disk if anybody logs in it.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by nil_orally · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And the way to test this has been done correctly would be........?

    2. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by Zebedeu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Image the disk, test, bitcopy. Obviously.

      The bonus is that you now have a ready-made image for your next netbook when this one is stolen.

    3. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by Pastis · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't have kids, do you ?

      You just gave a recipe for disaster :)

    4. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by tygerstripes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just be thankful there's no way of cramming buttered toast into a netbook.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    5. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've obviously not had a 4 year old play "Sandwich maker" with a laptop.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    6. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by Firehawk · · Score: 1

      You really don't have kids, do you?

    7. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

      Shhh.. don't give them ideas.. they could be reading this..

    8. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by batquux · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... you don't have kids, do you?

    9. Re:Truecrypt + fake account by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      As others will have already said: use truecrypt. In addition, use two account: yours with a password, and another one (visible from the login shell) without password. Put a script in it that wipes the disk if anybody logs in it.

      Then they'll just swap out the disk. If they open the open account, have a program that turns off the cpu fan. In a few hours, the CPU will cook itself and fry the netbook's guts. That way, if you accidently log into the wrong account (or some coworker logs in while you're at lunch) you can log out or log them out within 20 minutes or so without losing all your data -- and a thief (or his buyers) will have nothing but a paperweight.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  11. Encryption and BIOS settings by orzetto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course full-disk encryption, as lots of people have already suggested, but since you want the thief's time to be wasted, remember to password-protect the BIOS and disallow booting from USB drives or external units. Same goes for GRUB if you were on Linux. That way the thief will not be able to resell the netbook.

    Yes, the thief could remove the BIOS battery, but he would have to tear the case open. If he knew how to open a laptop without breaking it, he has more skill than I would associate with a petty thief.

    You might also consider Adeona.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    1. Re:Encryption and BIOS settings by JSBiff · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Yes, the thief could remove the BIOS battery, but he would have to tear the case open. If he knew how to open a laptop without breaking it, he has more skill than I would associate with a petty thief."

      Did it ever occur to you that the thief might be part of a larger crime organization, which organization might have a few people with pretty advanced technical skills? Or, even if they aren't, it's entirely possible/probable that after the thief fences the stolen computer, it will end up in the hands of someone both unscrupulous, and technically saavy?

    2. Re:Encryption and BIOS settings by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      Of course full-disk encryption, as lots of people have already suggested, but since you want the thief's time to be wasted, remember to password-protect the BIOS and disallow booting from USB drives or external units. Same goes for GRUB if you were on Linux. That way the thief will not be able to resell the netbook.

      Yes, the thief could remove the BIOS battery, but he would have to tear the case open. If he knew how to open a laptop without breaking it, he has more skill than I would associate with a petty thief.

      I don't know what it's like where you live, but around here a thief is likely to be a junky who wants to transform your laptop into smack ASAP. The fence he sells it to has more skill; maybe he even specializes in computers.

    3. Re:Encryption and BIOS settings by maxume · · Score: 1

      Adeona is currently broken. It says so right on the page that you linked.

      (The issue is that OpenDHT, which they depend on, is wobbly, and the maintainer has announced plans to shut it down (the announced plan was to shut it down on July 1, but I haven't checked to see if that happened or not))

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Encryption and BIOS settings by Locklin · · Score: 1

      It still might make that person work for their ill-gotten gains. My netbook is a pain in the ass to open up.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    5. Re:Encryption and BIOS settings by oneal13rru · · Score: 1

      However, thinking from a security standpoint: the more difficult it is to get to it, the more worthwhile it likely is to invest that time. If I have to start working before I even see a system post, odds are, the time just became worth it.

      --
      Never disregard the raw power inherent to stupidity... they call it "dumb luck" for a reason...
  12. Are you evil enough? by saynt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First, get truecrypt, that takes care of your data.

      Now then, If you have the spark of evil in you, here's the plan.

        1. Set up multi-boot config.
        2. Create a bootable partition that has enough OS on it to run the drive and network, name it something interesting like 'Confidential'.
        3. Get the BIOS flash utils for your netbook, create a corrupt bios image that will still pass muster enough to install.
        4. Set up a boot time process on the netbook that does a 'wget' from a web site that you control. If it gets a file, quietly flash the BIOS with what it downloads.

        If you ever get ripped off, move the nasty BIOS image to the file location on your web site and bask in the glow of pure wickedness...

        You can test this with a valid BIOS image, but don't look at me if something terrible happens, you're playing with fire here.

    1. Re:Are you evil enough? by saynt · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, but there are ways to get a reasonably high level of confidence that something will happen. Most flash utils that I've dealt with either do no checking on the image, which is awful, or simply check it for size, extension, or a basic checksum. I'm guessing that this is because the developers believe that only an insane person would try to flash a .jpg or whatever to their BIOS. Since this is one of a very few things that can actually make your computer unusable, you would think that they would take more care, but they don't. As for testing, most of the flash utilities that I've used give you at least two chances to confirm that you really want to perform the flash, usually the last one is after the new BIOS has been read in and, presumably, passed any checks being done. If you were very familiar with the flash program and had the fortitude, you could run the process right up to the point of no return and then say 'no', and I would be pretty confident that something bad would have happened should you have gone ahead...

  13. Try a File Shredder by fragmentate · · Score: 1

    Try Eraser

    Works fine for removing data. Might not work if advanced forensic techniques are used.

    Most thieves don't have access to those forensic tools. And I'm assuming you don't need this level of protection. I'm assuming you're not trying to obfuscate your illegal Tracy Lord mpegs.

    1. Re:Try a File Shredder by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Having used (and being a current user of) the program, your suggestion implies that he has the netbook in his posession.

      If it is stolen, it is no longer in his posession. Note that this is not Netbook "Piracy" where the original is left with the owner and a duplicate is taken instead.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  14. Re:folder encrypt by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    Well, there is are a couple arguments for encrypting the whole drive. . .

    1) Are you 100% certain that every program you use is allowing you to store data in the folder of your choosing (the TC 'drive') instead of shoving data either in program files (any app dev who puts data in Program Files needs to be taken out, have their geek card torn up, thrown on the ground, spit on, stomped on, then the dev gets beat up till they bleed, damn dumbasses, but unfortunately, it happens all the time, even with programs from very large IT vendors who should know better), or somewhere like %userprofile%\Application Data\AppName (that, at least, is not an actively *bad* place to put it, but doesn't always work well with encryption)? Or under a Unix-like environment, even if your home directories are encrypted, data might be getting saved to other folders like /usr/local, /var, /opt, etc.

    2) What about the temp files directory? The page file? Interesting stuff might get stored in the temp files directory, and copies of all the encrypted data will likely be loaded into memory, and copied into the page file, at some point.

    The only way to really be sure your data actually is encrypted, is to encrypt the whole drive.

  15. OS on a flashdrive? by NoPantsJim · · Score: 1

    This might be a bit of overkill, and personally it is not something I've tried myself (yet). Install a user un-friendly version of Linux (just to confound the criminal) and use an Iron Key to run a super small Linux distro on. Keep all of your important data on the key. Don't store the laptop and the key together.

    Added bonus - if you are around a desktop or a laptop better than a netbook, you can run your OS and all your documents through the drive.

  16. Quick'n'easy by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1) Set up two accounts. Your actual one behind a password and an unprotected one.
    2) In the unprotected one's startup, set it to delete all of your personal data.

    You'll never log on via the unprotected account. Therefore you'll never accidentally delete everything. Even if you do manage to, as soon as you're next near a net connection it sounds like you can pull it back anyway.

    Most casual thieves (sorry, your life isn't actually important enough that crack teams of ninja espionage winged monkeys will track you down and deliberately steal your data) will be perfectly happy to log on via the one account they can get on via and won't notice a suitably disguised process quietly cleaning everything sensitive off the machine.

    It's not perfect, it's not infallible but, honestly, your data really isn't worth the hassle of defeating it for the average opportunistic thief.

    You want to have more fun with them...

    Set a scheduled task on that account to open Firefox 3.5 every 15 minutes and go to an address on your own server where it promptly gives its geolocation info before more obviously redirecting itself to some apparent malware site. They'll assume your machine's just infected with malware while you and the cops are given constant updates on their location.

    Again, it's not perfect and most of /. could easily defeat it... But the average thief isn't a /. reader, they're just an opportunist who thinks they're getting something for free.

    1. Re:Quick'n'easy by Mistlefoot · · Score: 3, Insightful



      And while at Custom's, have the border guard try to log in to your computer. Have him "access" the second account, delete all the data and then discover that you find yourself in some foreign court charged with destroying whatever it is they claim you destroy.

      I do believe there have been cases in the US where people have been compelled by the courts to produce encryption keys for data on laptops they have tried to carry past customs. The poster does want to do this for protection while traveling "overseas". I wouldn't suggest entering some countries and claiming you just had a script delete everything on your harddrive - when their customs tried to log - but "you have nothing to hide - honest".

    2. Re:Quick'n'easy by prograde · · Score: 1

      What if a "friend" decides to "borrow" it without asking permission? You know, just checking email, no harm done. I'll just use this unprotected account...

    3. Re:Quick'n'easy by giuda · · Score: 1

      I am an average thief, you insensitive clod!

  17. Multilayered Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You could also use two layers of security. 1) Truecrypt the entire laptop and run a mobile OS with truecrypt off a flash drive, then make sure the flash drive never leaves your sight. 2) Truecrypt the entire laptop and store your personal data on a flash drive, again with truecrypt.

  18. On a netbook? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Funny

    The laptop is as good as bricked to anyone who gets it.

    Including the owner!

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  19. What do they want to steal? by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most casual thieves want the hardware to use, resell, or simply because it's pretty. They don't give a toss about your data unless they can get easy cash out of it.

    Encrypt the disk to protect your data. It doesn't even have to be very strong encryption but obviously good encryption is better if your CPU can handle it. You can save CPU cycles by only encrypting data that really needs to be kept personal.

    Personally I'd be tempted to have some kind of low trick on there just to fuck with their minds. Add a script like
    echo "GPS location tracking started..."
    sleep 13
    echo "Device location found and reported."
    read x

    There is absolutely no security in this but casual thieves are normally not too smart so might shit their pants.

    1. Re:What do they want to steal? by subreality · · Score: 4, Informative

      It doesn't even have to be very strong encryption but obviously good encryption is better if your CPU can handle it.

      AES is quite fast on 32-bit CPUs. There's no excuse for bad crypto.

  20. Take to it with a hammer! by syousef · · Score: 4, Funny

    Right now! No thief will ever get your data if you destroy it right now!

    Oh you wanted to use it in the meantime. Well that's different...

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Take to it with a hammer! by sqldr · · Score: 1

      Paint it pink! NOBODY would steal a pink laptop!

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    2. Re:Take to it with a hammer! by guppysap13 · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend's laptop is pink you insensitive clod. And it was stolen. Oh wait...no girlfriend...Slashdot...Right...

  21. THERMITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    come on! this isn't tagged with 'thermite' yet? Consider me disappointed...

  22. truecrypt is not brickin it by fsiefken · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the poster meant to truly "brick" the netbook instead of just making sure no sensitive data can get stolen from the hard drive. In this case autoflashing the rom/bios with something nasty under some condition can do the trick.

  23. encrypt anything mobile for the love of god by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    people this is 2009, how is it you haven't heard of encryption???!!

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  24. Why do they want your E-mail? by ogl_codemonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Firstly: You're not that interesting - nobody wants to read your E-mail, and the 'important' stuff (like your PGP keys) are individually passphrase protected, aren't they.

    Secondly: You're not that interesting - the thief either wants the device for themselves, or to fence it for $50 worth of crack (or food, depending on where you travel). If they want it for themselves - chances are they'll just wipe it with a clean Windows install (you even leave the registration key on that little sticker on the back, don't you...) to get past your login/resume password. If they don't whoever fences it will.

  25. Google docs and security? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    I find it hilarious that the submitter is worried about security, but keeps their "most" of their "important" stuff on google docs. If more people were biting on that obvious contradiction I'd say the submitter had successfully trolled the /. front page.

  26. Multi boot by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Set it up with multiple boot options, and the default one does something nasty.

     

    If you don't select the right boot option when you switch it on ... Zap! One wiped disk.

     

    If you can wipe the BIOS...even better.

    --
    No sig today...
  27. You already have your solution... by stms · · Score: 1

    If it has Winxp on it it will self destruct eventually anyway.

  28. Slow News Day - WTF? by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google: windows encrypted drive + "I'm feeling lucky".

    Here's what I got:

    http://www.truecrypt.org/

    I'm OK with "Ask Slashdot" being used to gather the collective experience of the techies that like to hang out off-hours here at /. - but.. this?!?

    Something that could be addressed by a moment or two spent at Google or even (god's sake) Bing is a WASTE OF HITS. But maybe that's the plan - get droves of angry techies to bitch about the lameness of the stories, delivering ad impressions?

    Crazy like a fox?

    I'm on to you, Cmdr Taco, if that is your real name!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by killthepoor187 · · Score: 1

      I think that he was looking for more solutions to a problem that he had little idea how to address effectively. Search engines only work so much as you know what words to put in, and even then there are often better solutions if you had known more.

      Also, internet ads are sooooo 10 years ago. l2adp

    2. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      I'm on to you, Cmdr Taco, if that is your real name!

      It is, call up the army now to find out where he is based at.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    3. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by DiLLeMaN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have this "Disable ads" checkbox near the top of the page because I've been a good /.'er, you insensitive clod!

      Besides, ABP is for n00bs. Squid -- with some general blocking rules -- keep ALL my browsers on ALL my machines ad-free.

      --
      /var/run/twitter.sock is a twitter socket puppet.
    4. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by eggy78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realize that maybe it's obnoxious for you, but I actually clicked over to /. from my RSS reader to view this post because it actually sounded pretty interesting and it's the kind of thing I wouldn't normally think about. There are a lot of really sharp people here and there have been times where I've spent a long while searching Google for just the right solution to come up with nothing, and then a week or two later somebody on /. has the perfect answer. I, for one, really appreciate this kind of post. Plus it's not like you can't skip over it. That's what I do with at least 30% of the stuff that shows up for me. Of course, you're welcome to your opinion; I just thought I'd say that you're not speaking on behalf of everyone. Unfortunately, I don't have any great advice for the OP because I came here to learn something cool!

    5. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      If you're going to the trouble of setting up a squid proxy, I'm surprised you haven't thought of using a DNS blackhole... Just use a list from a site like http://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers/, with a cron job set to automatically update the list. It's doubly trivial if you're running a squid proxy, since you could simply update it as a hosts file.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    6. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by sagematt · · Score: 1

      I'm on to you, Cmdr Taco, if that is your real name!

      I think it's actually Cowboy Neal.

    7. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have it on good authority that neither one of them is actually a real cowboy or a taco. They built this house on LIES!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by DiLLeMaN · · Score: 1

      I might, yes, good idea. Setting up the squid wasn't that much work tbh, just sudo port install squid and a little tinkering in the config file

      I'll have a look into the DNS stuff. Thanks for pointing that out!

      --
      /var/run/twitter.sock is a twitter socket puppet.
    9. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by humphrm · · Score: 1

      I like giving people the "Let me google that for you treatment":

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=windows+encrypted+drive

      --
      -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    10. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by DJLuc1d · · Score: 1

      I could understand the frustration of the whole 'Google is your friend' mentality, if the OP had actually asked about whole disk encryption... but he didn't, and instead of /. actually staying on topic, the usual happened. I would love to see some slashdotters bid on a job. Client: "We need to roll out 10 new serves onsite." Slashdotter: "Ok, so we're gonna go ahead and rent out the rackspace, because it is more cost effective."

    11. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      The OP asked a stupid fucking question. Slashdotters are trying to answer an intelligent question, instead of the obvious "my butt itches" "well wipe it better retard" article we got. The only problem is, there IS no intelligent question buried under the prose.

      It comes down to one simple truth that apparently a bunch of people haven't learned yet, so here it is thricely so it's emphasized properly;

      Physical control = fucked

      Physical control = fucked

      Physical control = fucked.

      Clear yet?

      The answer "how do I brick my laptop remotely?" is "You don't you inexperienced little fuck, you encrypt the thing and not only protect against what happens during laptop theft but a WHOLE BUNCH OF OTHER SCENARIOS too."

      Whole disk encryption is the ONLY way to reliably solve the problem of being out of physical control, all other discussion is either stupid or for entertainment purposes only. So don't you go bitching about the entertainment purposes only posts as being "offtopic" because that's pretty much all this can be once the first person to say "Use TrueCrypt whole disk encryption" Would you prefer 190 posts saying "Use encryption"?

    12. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by zen-theorist · · Score: 1

      Dude that lithium looks like helium to me.

    13. Re:Slow News Day - WTF? by drclaw007 · · Score: 1

      I use Dan Pollock's list (http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/) - I have a script that grabs the latest copy from there every week or so, and append it to my local hosts file. Easy If you use it with something like dnsmasq (which provides DNS + DHCP serving) it's pretty painless, and largely transparent. That way it works with clients not configured to use the squid proxy, or if you have protocols that don't really like being proxied, as all the requests are stopped at a DNS level.

  29. Odd by PGC · · Score: 1

    You are sharing your important data with a third party, however, the unimportant data should be destroyed?

    --
    The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
  30. SurfMan by SurfMan · · Score: 1

    I think the poster should worry about other things, like who the hell gave you the idea that storing your stuff at Google's is safe in the first place?? Fuck the netbook, get a decent place to store your "important" shizzle.

  31. Maybe I don't understand something... by jalet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but if you care about confidentiality of your datas once your laptop is stolen, and at the same time you store most of your datas on servers owned and administered by someone who is not you (the Google company in this case), then maybe you should think twice about what you do.

    --
    Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
  32. Groove by pljvp · · Score: 1

    Try MS Groove. It supports offline working, synchronizes your data (and forms and stuff) when your connection is up, and stores local copies in an encryped 'vault'. ...But there's a catch: you need to build something for your geared Gmail and Groove to sync.

  33. crypto by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    A good encrypted filesystem is better than deleting: It's equivalent to overwriting the disc with random data.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  34. fencing by reiisi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All the more reason to use a Linux or BSD based OS.

    To the average thief or receiver of stolen goods, a netbook running an alternate OS is as good as bricked.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    1. Re:fencing by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Why do you keep saying this? They don't care, it switched on, something comes on the screen, it works and they can sell it. The person who buys it is probably a little more savvy, and will install windows on it.

      This is in no way bricked, it is perfectly useable.

    2. Re:fencing by HappyDrgn · · Score: 1

      You'll need to do a little tinkering beyond that.

      My MSI Wind boots up and one of the options (F3 if I recall correctly) reinstalls Windows XP to the factory settings off a hidden volume.

  35. Easy and Free by spyguy99 · · Score: 1

    I use LaptoLock http://www.thelaptoplock.com/, its free to use and easy to set up, but it is Windows only. It is a bit old though, the last time it was updated was in 2007, but it works like a charm.

  36. fencing (repost) by reiisi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To the average thief, and to the average receiver of a stolen netbook, if the netbook boots an alternative OS, it might as well be bricked.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    1. Re:fencing (repost) by robthebloke · · Score: 3, Funny

      nah... they'll just think it's windows 7 :p

    2. Re:fencing (repost) by ozbon · · Score: 1

      Isn't that synonymous with "bricked" anyway?

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    3. Re:fencing (repost) by eth1 · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet that more and more, laptops are stolen for the data on them as much as for the value of the hardware. They might be more clueful than you think.

    4. Re:fencing (repost) by reiisi · · Score: 1

      Well, you're right. May of the thieves these days, or the guys who receive the stolen goods, are somewhat clueful.

      The real solution is to keep your sensitive data on your person, in something you can keep in a waste pouch under your shirt where it isn't obvious.

      A cheap USB drive, encrypted, does that job, sort of. Not really well enough, but it's the best we have. I think we all realize that.

      For the rest of it, putting a decoy or two on the netbook will help keep the thieves busy while we (or our scripts) recover and/or make our escape.

      --
      Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  37. nobody cares? by reiisi · · Score: 1

    A number of people have suggested that the data is not important.

    But what about cached credit card numbers or passwords?

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    1. Re:nobody cares? by andy.ruddock · · Score: 1

      Set your browser not to cache non-SSL pages and don't enter your credit-card number into a non-SSL page.

      Passwords can be protected by the use of a master-password (at least in Firefox) or don't save them locally.

      --
      God: An invisible friend for grown-ups.
    2. Re:nobody cares? by jandoedel · · Score: 1

      but if the thief thinks there might be credit card numbers or passwords in it, he WILL be more interested in getting the data, and therefore in trying to access his documents, instead of just erasing everything. YOU know you don't have interesting documents and don't cache non-SSL pages,but THE THIEF doesn't know that...

    3. Re:nobody cares? by andy.ruddock · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter, you can't know what the thief thinks. As long as there's no data to steal they can search as much as they like.

      --
      God: An invisible friend for grown-ups.
    4. Re:nobody cares? by jandoedel · · Score: 1

      my point was that
      IF you make someone more motivated to break into something, the probability is higher that he WILL try to break into it, instead of just wiping immediately.

  38. on a 2-year working holiday visa by sofar · · Score: 1

    "I have just moved overseas on a 2-year working holiday visa"

    gimme one of those!!!

    1. Re:on a 2-year working holiday visa by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Australia + UK both offer these.

  39. paint a STOLEN FROM ... message on the front by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Use indelible paint, or burn it into the surface of the netbook's plastic case. However you decide to do it, make sure that it's obvious and can be seen by the user and everyone around them (incl. airport security people when they inspect the device). Have a message something like:

    THIS COMPUTER WAS STOLEN FROM <your name/phone number>

    In large, contrasting letters - for extra points write it in the language(s) of the countries to be visited. Not only will it draw unwanted attention to whoever tries to use it, but it will make the stolen item impossible to sell on errr, auction sites, where most of this stuff ends up.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:paint a STOLEN FROM ... message on the front by velen · · Score: 1

      O' rly? What happens in a foreign country when you take out a laptop like this in a cafe and every Tom, Dick and Harry decides to ask you for your ID and they can't read English? You wrote it on the local language using babbelfish, now you are screwed.

    2. Re:paint a STOLEN FROM ... message on the front by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 1

      umm... then keep your netbook hidden at all times, so that an overzealous airport security guy, who doesn't speak your language, won't decide to search your rectum for other stolen items.

      --
      Obama is a twitter sock puppet
    3. Re:paint a STOLEN FROM ... message on the front by noidentity · · Score: 1

      paint a STOLEN FROM ... message on the front. Use indelible paint, or burn it into the surface of the netbook's plastic case.

      Yes, this will be sure to make using the laptop yourself a pleasant experience anywhere public. Plus if you ever decide to sell it, it'll be sure to raise its resale value (especially if it's a Mac).

    4. Re:paint a STOLEN FROM ... message on the front by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      People who don't speak English are quite capable of comparing the characters of your name from your ID with the characters you wrote on your netbook for your name and address (I think the GP meant to say English AND the local language). You can help them along by using the same font.

    5. Re:paint a STOLEN FROM ... message on the front by japhering · · Score: 1

      Use indelible paint, or burn it into the surface of the netbook's plastic case. However you decide to do it, make sure that it's obvious and can be seen by the user and everyone around them (incl. airport security people when they inspect the device). Have a message something like:

      THIS COMPUTER WAS STOLEN FROM <your name/phone number>

      Be careful with this, otherwise you will spend a LOT of time in police stations explaining how you came into possession of a stolen netbook. If you do decide to go this route, be sure that you are NEVER, EVER without your passport ...

  40. Re:hardware/wifi "Lojack" for disk drives? by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Use the intelligent disk controller's intelligence for something?

    Sure, it would require some significant modifications to the drive, but it ought to be possible. And, I guess, triggered by lack of signal rather than by signal.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  41. Ironkey, anyone? by whizzleteats · · Score: 1

    I'd keep all my sensitive files on an Ironkey https://www.ironkey.com/ and do a full-disk encrypt on the system drive of the netbook... That way if they jack your netbook, it's pretty much useless, and if they jack your Ironkey, it self destructs after 10 incorrect password attempts.

  42. Mod parent way up! by reiisi · · Score: 1

    This is probably the best solution for anyone not carrying trade secrets.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  43. nt by shentino · · Score: 1

    Unless you can tell it to brick the firmware you won't get squat.

    Besides, once it's been stolen all you can do is deny the thief any gain, or help him get caught. You've already lost the equipment.

    My suggestion would be to invest in some physical security, such as a locked bag. If permissible, a loaded gun wouldn't hurt either.

    1. Re:nt by Nowhere.Men · · Score: 1

      True, if you get killed waving a gun around.

      It would be harder to stole your identity using the data from the laptop.

  44. Difficult to take seriously... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1, Informative

    You're worried about security and privacy? Then why are you using Gmail and Google Docs for that oh-so-important data? If you're going to be paranoid, you might want to start there...

    I mean, I use Gmail too, but as a student, I don't exactly have a lot to hide - a few forum passwords, slashdot credentials, a few measly bucks in the bank. If you were really AT ALL serious about privacy and security, you should be using services that aren't paid for by a company that makes money from knowing your private data...

    Sorry, but this makes it very difficult to take your post seriously...

    1. Re:Difficult to take seriously... by stonertom · · Score: 1

      Even with those few passwords in there, wouldn't you consider your Google Account (credentials) to be 'important'.

      --
      Shameless plugs and inaccessible site design FTW! - www.mistletoestreetmusic.com
    2. Re:Difficult to take seriously... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      That's not quite what I meant, but I'll bite nonetheless.

      My Google account credentials are important, yes - but not important enough for me to go to the trouble of installing full disk encryption and/or a way to brick my laptop if it's stolen... Again, if you're that worried about your data, why on Earth would you store it "in the cloud"?

  45. Dongles by rysiek · · Score: 1, Informative

    You can do the same with Bluetooth and you mobile - I bet the netbook in question has Bluetooth. For Linux, there's KBlueMon (and some GTK equivalent), it let's you define the Bt devices that need to be in range; if they're not, it locks the machine. I am sure there must be something like this for Windows.

  46. Thermite NO, Lithium YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Adding a home made thermite device to a computer is not highly recommended. The nice people at airport security check might mistake your computer for improvised explosive and delay your flight.

    For safe and secure disposal of hard disk I recommend installing an extra lithium battery from a certain manufacturer. The LHDDU (Lithium Hard Drive Disposal Unit) is both legal and functional as proven numerous times in Internet video clips. Just remember to keep the laptop on the table, not in your lap while using it yourself.

  47. Re:Napalm by umghhh · · Score: 1

    by wiping it you mean with ICBMs or? At least some sensible use of tax payers money.

  48. So instead by Norsefire · · Score: 1

    Leave the Netbook in tact but take a hammer with you, just in case it gets stolen and you need to destroy it.

  49. Consider a secure USB stick like IronKey by Dr_Paranoid · · Score: 1

    Check out IronKey (http://ironkey.com). A hardware encrypted USB stick may help you - especially with the netbook. The newer S200 models with 256-bit AES encryption gives the security you imply and they have (or will have) models with what I'd consider more than ample storage for "traveling around" (I see this as trips away from where you are staying). When looking at encryption, seriously think about the plausible deniability feature - providing a password that opens the volume to enable innocuous data that you would want an adversary to see and not the volume with your protected data. Also think about making the USB device a bootable device (Ubuntu being my preferred) so you can leave little to no trace of your data on the netbook. The USB stick is far easier to carry (and lose!) than the netbook... and the IronKey can even go into the shower with you!!

  50. Sadly true by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

    Full drive encryption can brick netbooks/laptops unintentionally. Bad sectors, which might under other circumstances corrupt a file in a recoverable way, can render a whole drive unrecoverable if it's encrypted. Overheating is a commonly cited cause.

    I don't know if some drive-encryption methods/settings are more susceptible than others, but if anyone is seriously considering this route then it's worth reading up on this type of failure.

    --
    Meta will eat itself
  51. To the OP by pinkushun · · Score: 1

    Full disk encryption is what you want, http://www.truecrypt.org/ will do this for you. However, consider the overhead, and even as fast as TrueCrypt might be, Netbooks have only so many cycles to burn.

    Consider switching to Linux so that you won't need additional (read: expensive) malware/antivirus/crapware eating up the remaining cycles :) Try https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UNR

  52. Hire Jack Bauer by berpi · · Score: 1

    Oh, the terror! What if the thief kidnaps you and tortures you to obtain the passphrase or bomb deactivation code? I suggest you hire Jack Bauer as bodyguard. No, seriously. Encrypt the disk and you're good to go.

  53. C4 by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would have recommended 10 grams of C4 explosives linked to a USB deactivation key for ultimate satisfaction, but you might have a few problems at airports....

    --
    Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
    1. Re:C4 by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      The tricky part about this is getting the timing right, so that the laptop is actually in the lap of the thief when the C4 goes off...

  54. Don't place an OS on the drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Many netbooks boot from USB or an SDcard. Run the OS off of one of these. If you use an Ubuntu live CD, there will be no information on the drive upon reboot. For local storage use a USB drive with Truecrypt.

  55. Just toss the internal drive before use! by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    Most of these netbooks support boot over USB. Why not just use an external USB powered drive as the machine's only boot and data storage media? When not in use, keep the drive in your pocket. Anyone who'd be interested in stealing the netbook would probably just be satisfied with the machine itself and probably wouldn't think to see if it boots before taking it.

    Perhaps future netbook iterations will use a similar setup where you can simply eject the drive from the system and run the interface off the internal USB.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Just toss the internal drive before use! by oneal13rru · · Score: 1

      He said XP. Repair disk anyone?

      --
      Never disregard the raw power inherent to stupidity... they call it "dumb luck" for a reason...
  56. Built-in Secure Wipe Like the iPhone? by WebScud · · Score: 1

    As far as login security goes, the iPhone can be pretty slick. It can be setup so if someone enters the password wrong five times a secure wipe begins. Does anyone know of something that gives XP similar functionality? Tiggering remote wipe functionality like Exchange or MobileMe would be a huge plus too.

  57. If you want deletion by selven · · Score: 1

    Many other posters have already commented on the idea of encrypting your data but if you want it destroyed (you're paranoid about aliens with 10^40 flop computers or the 5-dollar-wrench attack) there are 2 solutions with their own weaknesses. First, you can install a program to remotely view your desktop, hope the box is connected to the internet, then wipe the hard drive right there. Second is the fail-deadly solution - require a password every 10-30 hours or the data is automatically wiped. This has a high risk of destroying the data when you could have recovered it, but if you have another copy of all the data (preferably a disk image to clone right onto your netbook for ease) in a secure location it can work.

  58. Re:Other question by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    A 30 page dissertation from http://www.bestdissertation.com/prices.html is $550, possibly more to the original author. Along with family photos and facebook entries, making contact for a cash exchange might be on the mind of some criminals.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  59. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  60. Backing data up "in the cloud" by J'raxis · · Score: 1

    If you're backing up your data "in the cloud," all manner of people probably have access to it already.

  61. No Login Password, Just Encrypt by Francis · · Score: 1

    Hi there :)

    I have a similar situation as you - I have a netbook with data I'd prefer to keep to myself. My solution, as many others have suggested, is to use Truecrypt. My particular configuration is to encrypt a secondary partition where most of my more sensitive data resides.

    My email, instant messengers, and even Firefox & firefox profile are installed on this partition, so my cookies and saved passwords are safe.

    My netbook has basically two modes, "insecure" mode where the sensitive data's not mounted, and "secure" mode for whenever the computer is physically close by.

    What this allows me to do is to not even bother with a login screen. This comes in handy because I can boot it and start using it without having to fuss with the tiny keyboard. Secondly, I can loan it out to friends who want to borrow it, even for a day or two.

    --

    --
    #include <malloc.h>
    free(your.mind);
  62. Use GRUB with DukeBoot&Nuke by Dark$ide · · Score: 1

    Here's an idea.

    Install Grub as the bootloader. Make the default boot partition (labeled as WinXP or something,like that) into a small linux that runs Duke's Boot & Nuke. Have a selectable option to boot the windows partition with a password.

    The thief gets a boot menu, ignores it and it will take the default after 10 seconds so DB&N boots and trashes the HD

    The normal user chooses his protected entry and can boot the machine into Windows normally. The only risk is if he misses the GRUB menu and heads into DB&N by accident.

    There's also things like BIOS passwords that can be used to defeat the casual thief

    --

    Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

  63. Thermite by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  64. mod parent up by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    Unlike those who just say "encryption" the parent of this post links to TrueCrypt. TrueCrypt is free, very easy to install, very safe, very flexible, and quite secure. I've used it on laptops before and found the performance degradation to be minimal. The installation walks you through the selection of choices with enough information to help you make smart decisions. Just go get it and install it.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  65. More to your point - DoS (Denial of Stolen) by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    You hinted at wanting to deny the thief the use of the stolen netbook - so far I've not seen many practical suggestions that won't land you in jail (hand grenades, explosives, etc). Here's a relatively simple way that's airplane-friendly.

    • Find the pins that feed power to your hard drive.
    • Connect a small but manly switch from the output side of the battery fuse to +3.3V or one of the other low voltage pins (not ground, naturally).
    • After you shut down, flip the switch so that +Vbatt is shorted to +3.3V.
    • Don't forget to flip it before starting up!

    When Mr. Thief tries to start it up it'll either not start at all or will smoke some of the laptop's internal workings.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  66. Encryption (plus second line of defense?) by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    As others have already pointed out on this thread, use encryption. If you're booting Linux, use LUKS encryption on all of /(root). For Windows, use TrueCrypt. Use a strong passphrase! If a thief ever gets your laptop, they won't be able to access anything on the drive.

    I do this on all the laptops I have access to. Makes it very secure. I even have an 8GB flash drive that I use to boot my subnotebook (runs Windows when I'm at work, now runs Linux when I'm at home.) Works great.

    If you're really paranoid, create a multi-boot system. You have a netbook, so you don't have a lot of hard drive space to install a (second?) Linux distro. You need something tiny like FreeDOS or a really minimal Linux install. Then set it up to nuke the entire drive without prompting the user first. (Linux can easily do an unattended shred, but FreeDOS will need a third party program to do it.) Set the bootloader to not boot an operating system by default but instead to just prompt the user. The default option should be the "nuke" instance, labeled something obvious like 'Microsoft Windows XP'. Label your real operating system something less obvious like 'Tools'. Guess what option the thief would choose?

    Just don't forget and choose the wrong one yourself, or you're going to spend some time rebuilding your system.

  67. 3 methods by deviceb · · Score: 1

    Yes... first go with whole disk encryption. (TrueCrypt)
    Then personalize yourself a nice rootkit, hide your copy of PoisonIvy or similar, and keep the keylogger running.
    If the thief does not reboot the pc, you will capture any personal information on him before he does. Once the PC reboots, your 20 diget key is in full effect..

    --
    Kill your TV
  68. Script it by dmsuperman · · Score: 1

    I can't say much for windows, but I can say that one possible solution would be to put a key on a pendrive, don't mark it as such, and require that the pen drive be in in order to decrypt the data. If the system is booted without the drive then begin a wipe, shredder works great for ensuring a very clean drive.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };: Go!
  69. Re:earth-shattering kaboom by crashumbc · · Score: 1

    It's the only way to be sure...

  70. On top of encryption... by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1

    ... to prevent booting, I would rewire the connector of the disk so if extracted, and connected to a normal interface, it would malfunction / self destruct, with the bonus that any other disk plugged in place would also suffer from the non-standard interface (like applying power in a place reserved to data for instance).

  71. Online script by Kegetys · · Score: 1

    Create a service/background task that downloads a program or script from your website and executes it. Have it do nothing by default, but if your laptop ever gets stolen replace the script with one that wipes the hard drive... Only works if the thief uses an internet connection with your laptop though.

  72. Re:Locking the machine by crashumbc · · Score: 1

    of course any smart fence these days, probably will spend at least a little time trying to get into a laptop.

    A stolen netbook/laptop is probably only worth a 100-200 dollars...

    There's enough stupid users out there that access to bank account/credit cards/ etc. could be worth 5 times that much..

    So yes at some point during the "re-distribution" process I bet someone is going to try and access the laptop...

  73. Nuke it from Orbit... by MoToMo · · Score: 1

    Nuke it from Orbit.
    It's the only way to be sure.

  74. Malicious Shortcuts by This+name+in+use · · Score: 1

    You could simply put a couple attractive shortcuts on the desktop that are really linked to a batch file that formats/departitions the disk. That could be fun.
    It would make it even easier if you restricted your key files to a small separate partition.

  75. Install a red button by gubers33 · · Score: 1

    The red button will trigger a self destruct when pushed...think about it if you saw a red button you would definitely push it to see what it does.

    --
    Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
  76. just write some sort of dead man script... by rivaldufus · · Score: 1

    Make it so you have to cancel a pop up window every five minutes, or it will reboot the box and run dban in automated mode. Of course, this means that you'll have to be in front of your PC and awake 24x7, but that's a small price to pay to know your data is safe if the laptop is stolen. It's more elegant than using something really impractical like encryption.

  77. Ob. XKCD by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    http://xkcd.com/538/

    I guess the only alternative left is thermite!

  78. Sellers and Buyers by AlpineR · · Score: 1

    Uh, and who is going to be in a habit of buying cheap laptops quick from that average thief? Maybe Jonas 6-liter, but more likely an above average thief who is experienced at extracting the extra value from a stolen laptop before selling the hardware. He's the one who might take the time to look for credit card numbers, passwords, or even hotel room numbers if the previous owner looks like a really valuable target.

    Just because the first thief won't look at the data doesn't mean the data is safe.

  79. A brick is hardware, not software by CKW · · Score: 1

    Bricks are hardware, if you want to brick it, you need a hardware hack, not software.

    Here's what I'd attempt (if I was rich). Open the sucker. Find a resistor. Rip it off. Solder in leads going to a USB port that you've disconnected. Hack a usb-stub kit to contain the right resistor.

    Voila, now you're the only person that can use the laptop, short of another hardware hacker who has access to a nearly identical motherboard model who can figure out what's missing (or who cares to risk the hardware by guessing.

    Of course, with everything being surface mount ... I'm not saying this would be easy. But I am saying this'd make the netbook itself useless to the thief. You of course would still need to truecrypt the drive, to protect your privacy.

    Hmmm, of course a smart thief would know that the battery and hard drive are worth money. No way of preventing him from selling those. But you could label them in a permanent way with "STOLEN, CALL XXX-XXXX OR CRIMESTOPPERS".

  80. Obligatory by houghi · · Score: 1

    Nuke it from space - it's the only way to be sure.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  81. Going old school... by Lester67 · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the old-school trashing technique of using the chemicals from strike anywhere matches on a 5.25 floppy disk. Insert disk, r/w head hits surface, ignition.

    So I offer, pack the shell with ohio blue tip matches. A bigger brain than mine (not so much) will need to figure out how to light them. :-)

  82. Just don't go where the thieves are by evilandi · · Score: 1

    The answer to your problem is ... reduce your risk, massively. Don't go anywhere where there are thieves. Move away.

    Except...

    This whole urbanisation thing bothers the hell out of me. Weren't we all told that ubiquitous internet would mean we could telecommute to our jobs from wherever we wanted? Shouldn't we all be living in the countryside with WiMax, mesh and fast-latency low-altitude satellite connections? Y'know, a long, long way from the thieves and the druggies and the traffic and the idiots who queue for coffee?

    I wouldn't work in a big city or commute along a busy train line if you paid me, and believe me plenty of people have offered. I've been offered three times my salary to work 20 miles distant from London. No effing chance. Too many people too close together, all getting on each other's nerves and that leads to crime as sure as night follows day.

    And yet, the rollout of cable fiber slows to a crawl, the PSTN telcos write small print about fibre-to-cabinet never getting past 80% of the population, and our government's sum total of technology horizon is that one day, one day, every house in the UK might, just might, be entitled to a whopping 2 megabit Internet connection (with indeterminiate latency), the temptation of the urban life becomes more and more irresistible every day.

    Me? I've stopped believing in telecommuting like I stopped believing we'd live on the moon. I grew up and had kids. The wife's up the duff with twins and our cosy little Victorian country cottage now looks distinctly pokey. I've had the same ADSL connection speed for over five years and it just ain't gonna change any time soon. The closest we came to 3G was one distant and barely visible hilltop got upgraded to EDGE last year. I can now get 128kbps from outside Winchcombe fish and chip shop. Woo effing hoo.

    I'm looking at new build box houses, three storeys high with five bedrooms AND a study, hot and cold running fiber, built on the edge of town between the motorway and the flood plain, the developers keep knocking ten grand off the asking price, and I'm thinking, I'm going to have to call time on this rural adventure sooner or later. It just ain't happening.

    Garden the size of a matchbox, though. No orchard, I'll miss that. And streetlights. I'll miss the Milky Way, it'll be like a dagger through my heart when I look up one night and see nothing but angry orange fuzz.

    I wonder if I'll need a burglar alarm?

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  83. thermite? C4? PAH whimpy that is by AlizarinCrimson · · Score: 1

    You want to make sure they learn a lesson? Make sure they never steal anything again? securely erase your data? Try Chlorine Trifluodide http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorine_trifluoride

  84. Try using Portable OS by andvark · · Score: 1

    Hi, Try using Portable OS a linux distribution that boots from USB pendrive. http://www.linconsulo.com/ You can browse the web on this and no data is stored in the harddisk. ( including browsing history)

  85. encryption is not the answer by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But there is a free solution which is more like thermite.

    Encryption is wrong for netbooks because the Atom is a slow, single-core chip. It really can't afford the extra overhead.

    Encryption also won't do what the submitter asks: bricking the device.

    But ATA passwords will do this! Sometimes called "drivelock," these are firmware passwords you type when powering on a disk. If it doesn't get the right password, the disk will refuse to cooperate. Recovering the data from such a disk requires expensive equipment that almost certainly isn't available or worth the effort to the common thief. This solution meets the submitters requirement of bricking the device, and it also keeps his data safe.

    Disclaimer: There are many drives out there from major manufactures which have flawed ATA password implementations. Check and see if your HD is among the list of drives which are so flawed.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:encryption is not the answer by mlts · · Score: 1

      There are very lengthy discussions on the performance of full disk encryption. From what is usually stated, the performance overhead of a FDE program is very little, and not noticable by the average person.

      It might come into play for a server doing large amounts of I/O to database container volumes, but for an OS partition, it shouldn't be noticable by most people, even on a lower power chipset like the Atom.

    2. Re:encryption is not the answer by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      The Atom can only barely play higher-quality youtube videos. Any little thing will tip it over the edge. I agree that it is only a minor impact for most users. But Atoms are a different case.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:encryption is not the answer by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Atom can only barely play higher-quality youtube videos. Any little thing will tip it over the edge. I agree that it is only a minor impact for most users. But Atoms are a different case.

      You should actually try it. I have an OLPC XO-1 (with a Geode processor -- even slower than the Atom) and full-disk encryption makes no detectable difference in performance.

      What you're missing is the fact that symmetric ciphers, which are actually what the bulk encryption is done with, are very fast. Even low-end processors are typically able to encrypt/decrypt *many* times faster than they can read or write data to disk/flash. And, actually, there shouldn't be any storage I/O involved in playing a youtube video, so even if full-disk encryption were slow, it wouldn't cause a problem with that.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:encryption is not the answer by HappyDrgn · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. I have an MSI Wind (U100) and I use TrueCrypt as someone above recommended. I've not noticed a huge performance decrease on the machine. I have one mount point and I add all personal files in there, leaving apps and OS files unencrypted. On my HP notebook I use Safeboot, which uses whole disk encryption. I used it without safeboot for nearly two years, and so far about six months with it installed. Again, I have no noticeable performance loss. Someone else who uses their computer more heavily than I might have more to add here, but for normal use whole disk encryption works fine. I don't have any problems with streaming youtube (or netflix) on either of the computers. Netflix and compiling C#/.Net stuff on VS2008 are about as CPU heavy as I get on these machines though, so again, there may be others with different experiences.

    5. Re:encryption is not the answer by pizzap · · Score: 1

      The msi wind has a sata harddisk. Using dm-crypt will bring down your read performance from 35mb/s to 10mb/s. This is due the poor performance of the atom cpu. Via netbooks are considerably faster due to padlock.

      Maybe you don't notice the performance drop, but believe me it does exist. Also, if you pass on full-disk encryption you risk partial exposure of data via temp directories, swap and hibernate files ...

    6. Re:encryption is not the answer by scratch · · Score: 1

      Encryption also won't do what the submitter asks: bricking the device.

      How is the device not bricked when stolen if it's encrypted with TrueCrypt or another FDE product?

  86. Remote Software by Mahalalel · · Score: 1

    I worked for MyLaptopGPS.com for a couple of years. They do pretty much what is being asked, offering the ability to delete certain files and even transfer files off of the laptop before deletion. This is in addition to the tracking-over-IP ability.

    I saw some other comments to the effect that most thieves don't try to reformat, look for covert software, or things like that. That's true based on my experience. Most thieves either want to resell or use it.

  87. Thumb drive by Battle_Ratt · · Score: 1

    Thumb drive.
    Why not just use true crypt and keep every single file you think is critical on that thumb drive. You can even default set your MyDocuments and force the drive type to a specific drive letter, so its transparent when you boot.
    Bonus points because if your laptop is stolen, odds are you still have the drive in your pocket or wallet. Don't think you can cram a thumb drive in your fat wallet. Try this one on for size.
    http://shopping.trustedreviews.com/UK/product/88435015/Crucial_8GB_Gizmo_Jr/

  88. Before it's stolen by AlpineR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Simple. Cover the message with black duct tape. Nobody sees the message and nobody bothers you. But when the thief peels off the tape, they are DOOMED.

  89. Speaking of TrueCrypt... by antdude · · Score: 1

    ... Does anyone know why I can't format a new container with a MS file system/FS under Mac OS X 10.5.7? I don't even get FAT32 option which I want the container to be portable between Linux, Windows, and Mac OS X. I posted this in http://forums.truecrypt.org/viewtopic.php?p=70861 but got no replies so far. :(

    Thank you in advance. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  90. A few sugguestions by scubanator87 · · Score: 1

    Since your running XP, you can use truecrypt to do a full disk encryption. This way it would require a password on boot. My personal solution, i just don't save any real data to my drive. Also use a "master password" in firefox to encrypt my stored passwords. I have plans on setting up home directory encryption (im running linux). That way only my personal settings and files are encrypted. Less preforance hit that way. Also, you could just use an encrypted USB drive and keep all your settings there and use online backup when you have connection.

  91. Hacking With Ramsey by booyabazooka · · Score: 1

    A very good guide to the thermite solution:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EVJFg4dxVA

    As you can see, it takes a lot of care and finesse to pull of this laptop mod :)

  92. Only slightly better by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    Paint the inside around the HD with tacky ink, as around fire alarms. Seal the thing with a little tape. If a thief or someone willing to buy stolen goods wants to get at the drive, he'll be unhappy and cussing. There will be ink all over the laptop, his tools, hands, clothes, etc.

    The good news: the same thing will happen to a customs person. Be sure to warn them first.

  93. I don't want your data by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    "GPP doesn't mention what level of risk there is with having a weee pc from being stolen"

    Maybe I'm alone here, but I would just like to say I do not want your data. I don't think anyone does. I've bought many a used drive, PC and laptop and I've never ever tried to recover data from them (even though I know how) to see what the previous owner was up to. Frankly I didn't care and was too concerned with my own data, and if I were to steal someone's laptop I think I'd probably do the same.

    Unless you're smuggling government secrets or you're pedobear (pedobear video) your data will probably be wiped clean by whoever steals it so they can use it or resell it.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:I don't want your data by soren202 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? I would in a heart beat.

      I mean, I suppose I'm a bit of a creeper by most standards, but at the same time, scouring a stolen hard drive seems like a nice way to try and squeeze more out of an already decent catch, money wise.

  94. "That's ALWAYS been the rule!" by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Airport inspection rules are arbitrary - the only thing consistent is that they'll tell you that whatever random thing they made up this week has *always* been the rule and that *you* should know that and obey them. There was a while in the mid-90s when laptops were still viewed as new and shiny and the airport people made you turn them on. (I remember getting asked once if I was carrying a laptop - I had to refrain from saying "Is this the wrong airport - I'm at San Jose aren't I? Have you seen anybody today who didn't have a laptop, duh!")

    But recently the Bush Administration's Customs thugs were stopping laptop-carrying people coming from Canada (I think this was in Seattle) because there might be (gasp!) *pr0n* on some of the computers and asserting their right to hold onto your machine until they were sure it was Pure. And Canada sometimes stops people to inspect their papers to see if they're carrying commercial material that might be taxable, so it wouldn't surprise me if they might randomly do something obnoxious (politely, of course, unlike the American customs thugs.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  95. Re: Your signature line... by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Of course you should bring a knife to a bun fight - and butter!

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  96. Um ... hello? by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    How about the dvd drive? The USB, network and card slots are also nice little spots for jamming in already been chewed and disliked candy or gum. I'd be willing to bet some kid might try stuffing jellied toast or peanut butter into any opening on a PC. I had to keep a very vigilant eye on my daughter, who still managed to insert a paper clip into one of my dvd drives, and thus laid the trap for me to destroy an important DVD.

    1. Re:Um ... hello? by tsalaroth · · Score: 1

      When my nephew was 3 or 4 (he's now getting ready for college in the fall), he was apparently stuffing video game tokens into my 3.5" floppy drive. I didn't know this. Over the course of a year, I'd have more and more problems with the drive, bad sectors, disks just not reading - but it would work just enough to lead me to believe it was just old disks going bad.

      Then one day, I was replacing it with an internal zip drive. I pulled out the floppy drive, and when it went faceplate-down, four or five of those damned tokens fell out.

    2. Re:Um ... hello? by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      See, this is exactly why I said "netbook" instead of "laptop". Everyone else is right though - I don't have kids.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
  97. TrueCrypt? by grikdog · · Score: 1

    I notice somebody mentioned IronKey, a jazzed up USB thumb drive. Shounds good. If you'd rather not spend money, you can also use Open Source tools like TrueCrypt, which can encrypt an entire USB thumb drive. All the usual caveats apply about weak spots in apparently secure systems: Suboptimum human behavior (both laziness and ignorance), weak passwords, failure to actually use the encrypted volume, residual OS or Application (such as FireFox!) data caches in unencrypted storage, backup routines that back up unencrypted data to insecure volumes, etc.

    There's some utility in farming out that kind of foresight and expertise to off-the-shelf solutions, but you balance that against the value of the data you're protecting so assiduously. Of course, if you put a TrueCrypt file on your onboard HD, it appears as a separate volume when mounted. Use a keyfile (an MP3 file, e.g.) which you store on USB thumb, then if the two are separated they're both useless. In theory.

    Not all TrueCrypts are equal, apparently. The Mac and Windoze versions may have better thought out user interfaces than Linux does, although I haven't actually seen these for awhile. Good front ends can ameliorate newbie or casual or business user blunders, such as automating a "turnkey" logon which completely defeats the purpose of security in the first place.

    TrueCrypt uses 256-bit AES, Serpent, TwoFish and cascading versions of these on 128 bit blocks in XTS mode. It's hash algorithms are RIPEMD-160, SHA-512 or Whirlpool, user selectable. Open source and recommended, and reasonably idiot proof, not for beginners or sophomores.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  98. Recovery Partition by edrawr · · Score: 1

    Create an image partiton, and set your bootloader to offer a "Factory Restore", set a good windows password, and hope for the best. I figure if every time they boot, and they dont have ERD or something similar, they see something to do a restore (most windows machines come with it anyway) they will go that route, and format off all your data.

    --
    Sauer
  99. Other people *do* want your data! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Many people use their laptops to work on projects for their employers, and companies really don't like having their corporate data exposed - especially if they're in California or other states that require corporations to disclose to the public if customer information is exposed, which makes them look stupid.

    There are upmarket criminals who do want data, typically credit card and bank account information. Does your browser have your bank's password cached? That can be worth far more than a used laptop. And spammers may pay trivial amounts for Facebook/etc. logins. On the other hand, yeah, most low-level criminals just want to sell the hardware fast, and it might be easier if they can just wipe your user data and leave Windows installed rather than having to reinstall pirated Windows themselves.

    The real technical question is whether you want to encrypt the whole disk, or only encrypt the file systems or partitions that have your files (and maybe swap and spool) and leave the vanilla operating system partition unencrypted for performance reasons.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Other people *do* want your data! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Many people use their laptops to work on projects for their employers,

      Many fools use their laptops to work on projects for their employers, instead of using the corporate machine.

      There, fixed that for you.

      No, seriously. If you mix work and non-work on a machine, then you're just asking for trouble. Just get your boss into the habit of thinking "project X, laptop Y" when it comes to providing the necessary facilities for doing your job. It also makes your life considerably easier.

      Don't forget to keep the receipts for your excess baggage etc. If you're on work, then it's a fully allowable expense. If you've got a boss that cavails about paying that sort of costs, then you've seriously got to get out of that job. Already.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  100. why not TrueCrypt on Linux? by KWTm · · Score: 1

    TrueCrypt claims to do whole-system encryption for Windows, and is mostly open-source. I haven't tried it myself, though (I use Linux).

    You seem to be implying that, because you use Linux, you cannot use TrueCrypt.

    I use TrueCrypt on Linux (Ubuntu 8.04). Works great.

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
    1. Re:why not TrueCrypt on Linux? by barncha · · Score: 1

      Surely he was implying he hasn't used it with Windows?

  101. Bricking is not the requirement by billstewart · · Score: 1

    The submitter didn't say he wanted the machine bricked - he said he wanted his data protected, and if that means bricking the machine, he's ok with that. After all, if a thief is trying to resell the hardware, not the data, even ATA passwords aren't enough, because the thief can replace the drive with a new one. On the other hand, encryption will protect your data against smart thieves as well as dumb ones, and ATA passwording won't, unless you get lucky and have a disk from a non-flawed manufacturer.

    Encryption doesn't take that much horsepower, especially if you're also doing compression, which lets you run your disks a lot faster. If it's still a problem, encrypt the file systems where you keep data (including /home and /var and maybe swap) and leave the operating system itself on a non-encrypted partition.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  102. I'm hoping Pointsec worked :-) by billstewart · · Score: 1

    No, my laptop didn't get stolen this time. It was a brand new machine, with the OS and my files installed on it, and got sent in for "repairs" because the hardware clock wasn't working - probably needed the battery seated correctly or whatever. And either our outsourced corporate desktop support people didn't get the message requesting them to fix the clock, or Dell didn't get the message requesting them to fix the clock, or something else happened, because they allegedly scrapped the machine and sent me a new one. Did they crush it, or rip it apart, or fix the battery and send it to a new users? Nobody can tell me :-)

    But it had Pointsec, so allegedly my data's protected from outsiders, and my old laptop is left over from our *old* corporate desktop bureaucracy, so it's company-owned rather than leased, and I've been using it while they "fix" my new one, so I haven't lost my data.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  103. LiveCDs vs. Netbook with Whole Disk Encryption by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Well, it nullifies the query in the sense of saying "instead of carrying a netbook, carry a flash drive with your data and a Linux LiveCD, so you can use whatever hardware's available at your destination, and you'll probably be safe from viruses or keyloggers by running the US you brought with you." And it's becoming much more common these days for machines to boot from USB, and 4GB flash drives cost under $10, you can even carry a fairly full environment on your keychain.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  104. Not yet possible but here's an idea by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    Modify a boot loader (GRUB, LILO) to require updates via the internet. When you can't resolve after 10 days, or the kill switch is flipped, it automatically writes over the hard drive. The idea is a system-level service would re-write the boot loader periodically with a new time stamp as long as the network service does not activate the kill switch. Of course, you should always keep a backup of your system somewhere in case you pass the cut-off :-)

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  105. Inaccessible data != bricked. Damage the hardwar by MCRocker · · Score: 1

    To truly 'brick' a machine, it should be unusable afterwards. Even if truecrypt makes the data inaccessible, the thief can just install an OS and re-sell the device.

    Some posters have suggested some sort of explosive for bricking, but I suspect that there are more reasonable solutions. In the Comodore Pet days, there was a poke that would route 12V to the drive controller and fry it. Another would stop the raster and, if left long enough, damage the phosphor at the center of the screen.

    These days, you can get a similar effect with XVidtune deliberately configured to damage the display (I accidentally smoked a CRT monitor that way once). A bit of research for the specifications of the particular hardware on the poster's device could probably find a few other hardware damaging tricks that could be employed to make the device useless to a thief.

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  106. bricked vs. bricked by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Bricked can mean many things.

    It was intended (and, I think, understood) to be a partially clueful joke.

    The real answers, decoy OSses, decoy easy logins, tripwire scripts, external devices for actual data, (thermite or high density caps where appropriate) are touched on elsewhere, although not nearly well enough. This was just intended as a nudge in the right direction.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  107. Skills by Sierpinski · · Score: 1

    I don't know who you are. I don't know what you want. If you are looking for ransom, I can tell you I don't have money. But what I do have are a very particular set of skills; skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you let my laptop go now, that'll be the end of it. I will not look for you, I will not pursue you. But if you don't, I will look for you, I will find you, and I will upgrade your Windows XP to the original version of Vista that is completely unpatched and very vulnerable.

  108. part-timers by reiisi · · Score: 1

    The mode for thieves is part-time. The clueful thief graduates from the dirty work, and goes into fencing, but even fencing is part-time.

    Most commercial encryption stuff is actually not that hard to break. So encrypting a drive should be less effective than using a separate device for your data, but it is probably better than nothing.

    The problem with separate devices for data is that even the alternative OSses tend to leak a little in the caches.

    So, you use an alternative OS, and that means you can make it harder for the guy who does the dirty work stealing your box to take a joyride.

    So, yeah, there's more to it. Maybe between my jest and your partial analysis (and many other posts of varying cluefulness under this article) more people will think a bit beyond relying on Microsoft to make everything easy for them.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  109. Protect a Thumb Drive Instead by KakhiKid · · Score: 1

    Perhaps since the laptop isn't the zippiest thing, it might be worth protecting the documents rather than the laptop. You could try storing them on a flash drive. Keep it close to you on your key chain and if you want to go the extra mile you can encrypt it or get a "secure" dirve rather than encrypting the netbook's drive. Then you don't have to do anything to the laptop and you get the added bonus of being able to use your files on anyone's computer.

  110. hidden install volumes by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Hopefully, when you were installing the alternate OS, you took care of that "hidden" partition. You didn't skip the partitioning step, did you?

    Or are you saying that current netbooks have firmware capable of hiding a disk partition from the install CD's partitioning software?

    (And I'm guessing these netbooks are not running their OSses from flash drives, if there's room for an install partition.

    Hmm. This sounds like it could be fun. Install a live CD to an install partition. Blast your OS and use the re-install key combo to boot into something that can repair it.)

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  111. Hackintosh YOS! by seabasstin · · Score: 1

    We all know windows sucks.
    We also know that Linuxs is funny.
    The real solution is just to install osX (see osx86projects).
    Then go to "System Preferences/Security/"
    1) Disable automatic login
    2) Check on require a password to wake this computer from sleep or screen saver.
    3) Turn on "FileVault" or home directory encryption, this will encrypt all your good stuff.

    That is it.
    No extra software, no fancy shmancy tricks, nothing.
    just straight out of the bittorentbox Kalyway OSX.

    IF you want to get super fancy, you could write an "AppleScript" that requires a usb key or other volume to be mounted to let you use the computer on top of that.
    see easy peasy.

    UNIX os, shmoodelicious interface, use any MS & Adobe shyte software you would normally use (albeit very slowly) and have a native encryption system + continuous backups with "Time Machine" --onto the usb key that is required to start/use the computer.

    Tada!!!
    Vive le Mac!
    Hourra pour le Linux!
    A Bat le Weendozs

    --
    Content + Container; Content = Container; Content â Container... which is the question?
  112. Re:Inaccessible data != bricked. Damage the hardwa by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    If he is using one of the SSD based netbooks, couldn't he simply run a batch file to "slam" the SSD and use up its read/writes? Say something that will constantly write and erase files based on wildcards until you have used up the read write cycles on the SSD?

    I admit I haven't messed with SSDs much which is why I'm asking. I know they have a limited number of read/writes and since it probably wouldn't be hard to cook up a batch file to do a buttload of read writes and maybe change the time stamps causing files to be rewritten is why I'm asking. But the problem is he also wants he data secured, which means short of using Truecrypt's plausible deniability option to boot into a "clean" OS to run the destruction I don't see how he could toast it, short of doing some serious hardware hacking. Today's machine simply aren't easy to totally fry like the older ones were.

    Now if he had one of those Celeron/Athlon 64 desktop CPU based laptops it would be another story, as I have seen plenty of those fry from overheat. you could probably rig up a software override of the CPU fan causing it to overheat and fry the board and the battery with one of those. But I don't think there is a way to actually get an Atom hot enough to cook a board like a desktop CPU can.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  113. The only solution by stanjam · · Score: 1

    As far as I know there is no sure fire way of deleting the data once the book is already stolen. They might not even power it up, but remove the hard drive and read it as a slave drive. Your BEST option is to encrypt the drive with something like TrueCrypt. You can either encrypt the entire thing, or just a data holding area you want to keep your sensitive files on. I recommend doing the whole disk encryption if you can. To securely erase all hard drives on your notebook, I recommend DBan. Essentially this is a bootable Linux disk, and will allow you to wipe all data when you boot from the disk. You can choose a quick wipe, simple DoD wipe (3X), Standard DoD wipe (7X), or a 32X wipe (which takes forever). However, initiating such a wipe once the notebook is already stolen? That could be tough. This is especially true because wipes take time, and the thief might get wise to what is happening, shut it down, and read the disk by some other method. You are MUCH better off using encryption. Used properly, there is little to no chance that they will be getting your data that way.

    --
    Open Source: Eroding the Digital Divide
  114. If the contents has value for the thief... by PensivePeter · · Score: 1

    run a stripped down XP installation and run only VirtualPC on that. Then create and run everything you want from a virtual machine and encrypt that VM. This means you can switch the VM image to another machine or copy it, back it up, etc. - as long as you have the key - but the contents if stolen will be total garbage for the thief who will, as other posters say, probably dump the disk anyway.

  115. Lojack or full disk encryption by anotherncbeachbum · · Score: 1

    Lojack is an option. Or just encrypt the entire disk with something like TrueCrypt or GuardianEdge. Those two won't delete the data but they'll make it really difficult to get to it. One of my offices had 4 laptops stolen a few years ago. They showed up at a pawn shop....as is, nothing had changed on them. The person who stole it needed money for their meth habit, that was it. Myself, if I lifted a laptop I'd wipe the drive and reinstall my OS of choice if I was going to keep it.

  116. Google by highonv8splash · · Score: 1

    You've already let the biggest data thief in the world at your laptop, whats one extra petty criminal?

  117. Use AxCrypt by CaptainTux · · Score: 1

    Get a copy of the free AxCrypt program and encrypt sensitive data with a key stored on a USB flash drive. That way, if your netbook is ever stolen the data would be useless without your drive. Easy to do and pretty fast.

    --
    Anthony Papillion
    Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
    "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
  118. Data removal by Mortgage · · Score: 1

    You could reformat the hard drive 5 or 6 times to try and wipe it clean first. Or how about removing the hard drive totally? I was also advised by a hard drive company that running a strong magnet over it wipes it (I know because we accidently did it to one of ours) and this is how some of the external hard drive firms deal with the faulty ones returned by businesses.

  119. relativity by reiisi · · Score: 1

    It's a bit of a joke, but it's also a bit of a comment on the tragedy of monoculture.

    Some things are relative to your physical state, some things are relative to your emotional state, some things are relative to how good you are with computers.

    Yeah, there are thieves who are technically savvy. There are a lot more who aren't.

    Bricked, in the sense of being made unusable, may mean being fried by lightening to one person, and, to another person, it may mean presenting a login screen. And there's a whole range of thresholds for a whole range of people in between.

    Shoot. Some people have the time and money to fix a computer that has been burned by lightening. Depending on whether the pulse came through the power or the network cabling, or through the air, it may not even be that expensive or that time consuming. Some people even get a sense of satisfaction out of taking a burned out chassis, cleaning up the insides, sending the hard disk to a recovery service, installing new P/S, motherboard, etc., etc., and showing their friends a re-al scorchin' mo-cheen.

    Some people are completely frustrated when you change the wallpaper on them, unless you hold their hand and reassure them that nothing will break while they re-establish their relationship with the machine.

    So, maybe not bricked for you just by installing an OS outside the monoculture, but likely bricked for many, if not most of the petty thieves.

    You can look elsewhere under this article for not a small amount of discussion of how technically savvy the people who steal notebooks generally are (or are not).

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    1. Re:relativity by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      I understand what you are saying, but it's still not bricked.

      Since this is Slashdot, I will use a car analogy. It's like saying a brand new BMW is totaled because there's a hole in the gas tank and the car won't go anymore. Most people probably don't know how to replace or patch a gas tank, but no one is going to say it's totaled. Most people may not know how to reinstall an operating system, but no one with common sense would say it's bricked.

  120. Use a Mem Stick by shadocat2 · · Score: 1
    Why store the docs on the drive at all? Keep them on a memory stick and keep that stick on you.

    Then all you have to worry about are temporary files. If you learn where they are stored for each app you can write a script to delete them. In Windows XP, they are usually either stored in the same folder as the application or in the hidden folder Application Data.

    There are also apps out there that phone home whenever the computer is connected to the internet. These apps typically log the timestamp and the IP address. Some collect more data and/or geo-locate the IP.

    --
    Jeff Miller
    http://www.assistsolar.com
    http://businesscredittips.weebly.com
  121. totaled? by reiisi · · Score: 1

    My sister totaled my favorite car in a little three-way argument with the sun and a cow. (The cow lost that argument, and the rancher was not happy. My sister was a bit shaken, but otherwise, okay.)

    The insurance company covered it for replacement cost, estimated at buying a similar car used., because we had chosen that kind of coverage.

    I drove that car for at least ten years after that.

    And we didn't even have to put a new engine in it. I think we replaced the radiator and some of the steering chain. The same insurance company that had called the car totaled inspected our repairs and called it insurable. It did cost a bit more than the coverage they gave us to fix it, so we were just being environment-conscious (and a little bit sentimental).

    How's that for a car analogy? (I kind of thought my comments on a burned-out chassis addressed this point, but you insist on a car analogy.)

    But that's a red herring. Let's change our point of view a bit.

    You know it's not bricked, if only you had it in your hands.

    I know it's not bricked, if only I had it in my hands.

    The owner knows it's not really bricked, if only he/she had it in his/her hands where it belongs.

    But the thief, in whose hands it is, likely does not know how to make it usable. Neither you nor I, nor the owner, are on hand to show the thief how to get past the barrier to use.

    Unless the thief's fence or good buddy knows how to get past the barrier, it's unusable to the person who has possession of it. Thus, to the person who has physical access, in the mode case, it's effectively bricked.

    Statistically, the thief tosses it in the nearest bin as more liability than it's worth to try to un-"brick" it.

    Perhaps we should call it statistically half-bricked, since the probability it gets tossed rather than re-installed or brute-forced or whatever is somewhere above 33% and less than 100%.

    As I said. It's a joke. Something of an inside joke, I suppose, but everyone here should know the joke, should understand that we aren't recommending depending on merely using an alternate OS to thumb your nose at all the potential thieves.

    It's a joke with a point.

    The point being that, the reasonable steps to protect your data will also, statistically speaking, make it harder for the thief to even use the hardware. At the bare minimum, proper security measures are going to cost the thief time and trouble.

    Even inserting a system re-install CD is going to cost, time-wise, somewhat close to the value of the box on the black market.

    Which should (at least partially) answer the desire that the author of the article had to get a bit of revenge on the theoretical thief.

    Okay? Can we quit talking around each other?

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    1. Re:totaled? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      We aren't talking around each other. I was commenting on your inappropriate use of the term "bricked."

      It's simply not bricked. You can try to talk logic circles or add special qualifiers all day long to try to shoehorn your claim that it's bricked into fitting the common definition of bricked. The problem is, though, it doesn't work.

      A trashed OS does not brick a machine. Does it make it effectively useless to a computer illiterate person? Yes, perhaps it does... that point has never been in dispute. But it's still not bricked. Don't use a word improperly and then try to give it a new definition... doing that just makes words useless. Use the proper word to describe the situation to begin with.

      It's like saying "My door is open" when really it's closed but unlocked. So your door is unlocked, not open. You're trying to redefine the word open when there's already a word to describe the state of your door accurately.

      In this case, there's already a word to describe the state of the computer with a trashed OS (to the person who is possession of it at the time) - that word is "unusable." That word is NOT, by any stretch of the definition, "bricked."

  122. fill it full of cement? by reiisi · · Score: 1

    The original poster (who has not bothered continuing his part of the conversation) said, "as good as bricked."

    Oh, well. Brick it. Fill it full of cement.

    Hmm. I have a computer that you could fill full of cement without actually making it non-functional.

    Whatever.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.