Slashdot Mirror


Defense Department Eyes Hacker Con For New Recruits

alphadogg writes "The US Air Force has found an unlikely source of new recruits: the yearly Defcon hacking conference, which has been running since Thursday in Las Vegas. Col. Michael Convertino came to Defcon for the first time last year, and after finding about 60 good candidates for both enlisted and civilian positions, decided to come back again. Federal agencies have only recently begun embracing the hacker crowd. When US Department of Defense director of futures exploration Jim Christy hosted his first Defcon 'Meet the Fed' panel in 1999, he was one of two people onstage. At this week's Defcon, there may be several thousand federal employees in attendance, he said."

154 comments

  1. Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seriously, these events attract at lot of smart, independent thinking people who love technology. What better place to recruit people? If it works at Universities, then it probably works better at DefCon.

    I guess they were worried about the "independent thinking" before...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by russotto · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Seriously, these events attract at lot of smart, independent thinking people who love technology. What better place to recruit people?

      Emphasis mine. Civilian positions are one thing, but it seems to me if you put a smart and independent thinking person through the military's recruit-crusher, you're either going to get a non-independent-thinking person, a smart and independent thinking person who has been faking non-independent thinking and hates the military for it, or a corpse.

      Hackers & discipline... probably not the best combination ever.

    2. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Darth_brooks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hackers & discipline... probably not the best combination ever.

      Score -1: So wrong it hurts to read.

      The best hackers i know of are the ones who *are* disciplined. Go to sourceforge and look at the overwhelming number of half assed, dead projects the clutter up the works. The best open source projects are the ones that have taken years of hard work to reach maturity. That's real discipline.

      The linux kernel wasn't written in a nights hacking in Linus' moms basement. It takes years of dedication and hard work to get to the level of "holy freaking crap, that guy is amazing" hacking. Simply knocking around around in perl does not a hacker make. For ever 10 hackers out there that won't put up with the bullshit that military service brings, there are probably one or two who will go that extra mile. Kudos to the air force for figuring that out.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    3. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Mprx · · Score: 1

      Or possibly several corpses. The military is based on the principle that some evil people are beyond the reach of civilized justice so the morally correct thing to do is to kill them. In boot camp, you're faced with an abusive psychopath who also happens to be beyond the reach of civilized justice. He probably believes what he is doing is right, but then so do the "enemy combatants". By any logical standpoint, the fat guy in Full Metal Jacket was the real hero.

    4. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Depends on the task. Strict discipline is needed in some parts of the military because if you hesitate when following an order, it can cost lives. This isn't the case for a lot of support services. Hackers recruited by this kind of process are going to be doing things like penetration testing on the DoD networks, designing ways of compromising enemy systems without detection, and so on. This kind of thing doesn't have anything like the same requirements as a front-line soldier. It's been a while since I worked with the military, but they're generally willing to put up with a lot of eccentricities if they don't threaten lives. If they weren't, they'd have a serious shortage of senior officers...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by jgarra23 · · Score: 1

      They don't look much like independent thinkers when they're all lined up in their LAN parties... more like drones pressing buttons...

    6. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by biryokumaru · · Score: 3, Informative

      You obviously aren't in the military. Trust me, there is no mind-crushing mentality in any branch save possibly the marines. In fact, most good supervisors encourage lateral thinking from junior level enlisted men, and I don't know a single Master Chief (I'm Navy) who hasn't told that story of the Seaman who saved the day by saying something didn't seem right.

      Independent thinking, smart people are exactly the type of folk we want in the military, not brain-dead puppets. The military does a heck of a lot more than serve as cannon fodder in the middle east.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    7. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You obviously aren't in the military.

      And they've probably never met anyone who was. Military knowledge in this crowd usually stops somewhere around the US Civil War or WWI, because they really do think of those guys as cannon fodder.

      Hint to the /. crowd at large: the military has really, really cool toys, and when you work for them you can break into systems without worrying about going to jail. I knew a guy who did ROTC and joined the Army solely to be able to fly combat helicopters - if you want to fly high-performance aircraft, military's the only game in town. Hacking is not terribly different in that regard.

    8. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "it seems to me if you put a smart and independent thinking person through the military's recruit-crusher, you're either going to get a non-independent-thinking person, a smart and independent thinking person who has been faking non-independent thinking and hates the military for it, or a corpse."

      And, may I ask how many years you served, and in what branch?

      In my 8 years of service, I was never made aware that I should think some sort of "group think". In fact, those people who were advanced most rapidly generally though "outside the box". My own meritorious advancement to E-5 was a result of having both balls and brains. (lest anyone asks, I never had brawn - just plenty of balls) That is to say, I saw the situation differently than my leaders, and I took some initiative to accomplish the mission.

      The day the military begins hammering independent thought out of men's heads, the military will most definitely fail.

      To be perfectly honest, your statement is pretty insulting to veterans. It suggests that men and women who complete one or more tours of duty successfully are either mindless puppets, or dishonest people. If that is what you really mean, then maybe you should look around you. Wherever you live, there are good men and women around you who are veterans and are very successful. Maybe your boss? Maybe HIS boss?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    9. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by StickyWidget · · Score: 1

      It's the freaking Air Force, the IT branch of the military. The normal run of the mill Air Force recruit's combat training is 15 minutes with an M-16 and then 18 weeks of procurement training.

      ~Sticky

    10. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because if you hesitate when following an order, it can cost lives"

      and if you don't hesitate, that can cost lives too. disciple for hackers? yes. rigid authoritarian hierarchy? not so much.

    11. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Eil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Civilian positions are one thing, but it seems to me if you put a smart and independent thinking person through the military's recruit-crusher, you're either going to get a non-independent-thinking person, a smart and independent thinking person who has been faking non-independent thinking and hates the military for it, or a corpse.

      Hackers & discipline... probably not the best combination ever.

      Be careful not to overgeneralize. Not all geeks/hackers are anti-authority by nature. Many of those that are learn to get over it as they mature. To get very far in the real world, you have to be willing to accept that other people (often daft ones) will get to boss you around once in awhile. If you want to succeed, you have to learn to take it in stride. By all means, stand up for what you believe in, but don't think that being a belligerent idealist will win you many friends in any field or environment.

      While I wouldn't necessarily call myself a hacker, I am a pretty independent geek and despite that I enjoyed most of my time in the active duty military. Granted, I worked on autopilots rather than PCs, but if I could hack it, I think any geek can. Plus, the discipline that the military provides is exactly what a lot of young hackers need to turn their raw skills and knowledge into a career that can propel them into positions where they can call the shots and do what's needed for the security of the nation's infrastructure.

      The fact that the DoD is starting to see hackers as resources rather than adversaries is extremely encouraging and should be applauded. Just a decade or two ago, this was the stuff of science fiction.

    12. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 1

      The military is based on the principle that some evil people are beyond the reach of civilized justice so the morally correct thing to do is to kill them.

      Ok, so what does "civilized justice" even mean, and how would you have used it to defeat Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan and North Korea?

      In boot camp, you're faced with an abusive psychopath who also happens to be beyond the reach of civilized justice.

      No, I'm pretty sure instructors are bound by laws and regulations.

      He probably believes what he is doing is right, but then so do the "enemy combatants".

      And?

    13. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by xxuserxx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was an IT in the navy for 6 years and I still encountered high stress. I was on a DDG so the crew was around 300. We had a lot of colatteral duties requiring me to take up arms from a 9mm to .50 cal mounted big ass gun. Also General Quarters requires everyone to be in a critical thinking life or death situation. Its very rare that you will never be put in danger. 9/11 one of the planes that hit the Pentagon hit the one of the offices of a Navy IT dept that was basicly an intel command. Your a target just for being in the military.

    14. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Mprx · · Score: 1

      Ok, so what does "civilized justice" even mean, and how would you have used it to defeat Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan and North Korea?

      "Civilized justice" means the civilian legal system with all its checks and balances.

      No, I'm pretty sure instructors are bound by laws and regulations.

      But those laws and regulations allow for conscription and infliction of immense psychological harm on innocent victims (although not in my country). Military people often claim it's not like that anymore, but every military person has strong incentive to lie about it (as each new recruit lowers their chance of death), and I've read many reports that "sock parties" and the like are still standard practice.

      And?

      Therefore a drill instructor is morally equivalent to a terrorist. Torturing recruits is not necessary for a functional armed forces. You could just as easily prepare recruits by a program of gradual desensitization, eg. having them attack cardboard cutouts, then realistic 3D dummies, then live animals, then realistic animatronic dummies. This could be combined with biofeedback training to train reduced stress response. A similar program could be used for reducing stress response to danger. Typical "boot camp" scenario is such that suicide is indeed the logical response for anybody not of the bullying personality, and in that case it seems sensible to take any action that would reduce the chances of others having to suffer in the same way.

    15. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hackers, at least the good ones, are highly disciplined people. Lack of discipline leads to sloppyness, which invariably eventually leads to big problems. If you're working illegally, you'll be sloppy in covering your tracks. If you're legal, you'll be sloppy in your security and someone will break it. Either case, you're not a good hacker.

      Discipline doesn't necessarily mean obedience, though. Don't confuse those two.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by russotto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And they've probably never met anyone who was. Military knowledge in this crowd usually stops somewhere around the US Civil War or WWI, because they really do think of those guys as cannon fodder.

      So there's no more breaking down recruits as individuals in order to build them up as soldiers? I find that hard to believe.

    17. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      My own meritorious advancement to E-5 was a result of having both balls and brains. (lest anyone asks, I never had brawn - just plenty of balls)

      And your modesty probably didn't hurt ;-)

    18. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by invalid-access · · Score: 1

      That is to say, I saw the situation differently than my leaders, and I took some initiative to accomplish the mission.

      I think the "group think" starts when they convinced you that their mission was your mission.

    19. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Or, maybe the group think starts when young people get hungry, so they go bargain with "the man" for a job, so they can eat. Helluva thing, huh? They use your greed and hunger to coerce you to do their work, and eventually you start thinking like them. It's the hippies who really "think outside the box".

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    20. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 1

      "Civilized justice" means the civilian legal system with all its checks and balances.

      Ok, so you just disband the military and hand their job over to the civilian legal system. Defending the country and dealing with overseas commitments like Korea and Japan is going to be pretty tough, so they'll need lots of guns, tanks, jets, bombers, aircraft carriers and missiles. Manpower will be needed too, and the easiest solution will probably be to hire former military personnel.

      Hey, wait a minute...

      But those laws and regulations allow for conscription and infliction of immense psychological harm on innocent victims (although not in my country).

      Is military discipline now defined as "immense psychological harm?"

      Military people often claim it's not like that anymore, but every military person has strong incentive to lie about it (as each new recruit lowers their chance of death), and I've read many reports that "sock parties" and the like are still standard practice.

      I've never heard anyone mention any "sock parties." Oh wait, I forgot: they're all part of the conspiracy.

      Therefore a drill instructor is morally equivalent to a terrorist.

      Because enemy combatants such as Al-Qaeda terrorists believe in their cause, American drill instructors are terrorists?

      Wait, what?

      Torturing recruits is not necessary for a functional armed forces.

      Did someone say it is? I have not heard of recruits being tortured in the US military.

    21. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      You could just as easily prepare recruits by a program of gradual desensitization, eg. having them attack cardboard cutouts, then realistic 3D dummies, then live animals, then realistic animatronic dummies.

      I feel cheated! I only got to shoot at targets that looked only vaguely human.
      Live animals - what, bears wearing ushankas with little red star pins?
      Well, there were those speeches about the "Soviet Threat", but we already knew that totalitarian bullies are assholes.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    22. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOUBLE PURPOSE - Those who either are unsuitable for recruitment or deemed "dangerous" will probably be logged into a database in Virginia or Maryland, to be sure.

      It would be good to have a "short list" of people and their capabilities, wouldn't it, in the event that something bad happened? Moreover, with the newly found enthusiasm
      for cyberwar and anti-terrorism "first-strike" doctrines, would it surprise you if these candidates were subject to surveillance and/or a more complete background check?

      Would it surprise you if the military wanted to find out how you managed your systems, and possibly attempt to break into them for training purposes? Not me.

    23. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      "the military has really, really cool toys, and when you work for them you can break into systems without worrying about going to jail."

      this would be about the only E (ring) ticket left for folks today

      and besides Basements are cooler if they are DOD spec basements :-)
      "I do live in a Command Center!!"

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    24. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by metrix007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I love that some people still try to reclaim the word hacker. In a story about DEFCON no less.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    25. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, these events attract at lot of smart, independent thinking people who love technology. What better place to recruit people? If it works at Universities, then it probably works better at DefCon.

      I guess they were worried about the "independent thinking" before...

      It's a love hate relationship. Though the military doesn't like free or independent thinkers, it has also used them. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or DARPA has funded research at a number of universities, some considered more leftist than others. The internet itself is built in part by hackers and other explorers and uses open source software.

      Falcon

    26. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Civilian positions are one thing, but it seems to me if you put a smart and independent thinking person through the military's recruit-crusher, you're either going to get a non-independent-thinking person, a smart and independent thinking person who has been faking non-independent thinking and hates the military for it, or a corpse.

      There are other possibilities, someone who gets discharged early or stays in longer than planned.

      Falcon

    27. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love that some people still try to reclaim the word hacker. In a story about DEFCON no less.

      Even with the new hacker definition, people at DEFCON are hackers, not script kiddies. It takes a lot of discipline, intelligence, and hard work to FIND security flaws. Not the same as browsing miw0rm for the latest exploit tool and pressing a few buttons.

    28. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by rindeee · · Score: 1

      This is how I got in to the INFOSEC field...20 years ago. Nothing new.

    29. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Of course they do some of that - as others point out in this thread, you have to learn to work within a large, hierarchical organization where lives are at stake all the time. But that's not the same as being a dumb piece of meat that is marched forth into blazing enemy fire on the assumption that going over the top will work this time.

      People join the military for all sorts of reasons. Some really do just want to be allowed to kill people. Some feel that it's a great way to contribute to their country. Some are from military families and are keeping up a family tradition. The success of the American military - and it's enormously successful at fighting wars, to the point that nobody tries to fight straight-up wars with us anymore - depends heavily on being full of intelligent soldiers who can improvise.

    30. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by db32 · · Score: 1

      Yes...because that is exactly what history has shown us. Why is it that people get to say totally uninformed, moronic, and rather offensive crap about the military and get modded insightful? Maybe, JUST MAYBE, you should go read up on some of those poor stupid people... The fact is, those independent-thinkers frequently rise to leadership positions, or are otherwise well decorated people for superior performance. Almost every last single one of the wartime heroes that are celebrated in military history got their name into the history book by being exceptionally clever, fast thinking, and very brave. You don't make history by simply following orders. So please...you should at least do some valid research rather than spout of nonsense like this.

      Now...in terms of the technology...most of this technology is very new and the military has been notorious for resisting "the new thing". If you go look up some of the early history of how flight entered military service you will find a huge history of incredibly bright and free thinking people. General Billy Mitchell is a good one to look up on that. It doesn't surprise me at all that the military is once again lagging. The new up and comers are fighting the battle of trying to sell the new thing to people that perfected the old methods. This is no different than the last major battle of convincing guys that were trench and tank warfare experts that aircraft were going to be the next big thing. Eventually they come around and embrace the new stuff and then typically excel at it. The airline pilot that recently put down his plane in the Hudson for an emergency landing that saved everyone was an ex fighter pilot.

      So please...do at least a little research before spouting off with ill informed anti-military rhetoric.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    31. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by sdiz · · Score: 2, Funny

      9/11 one of the planes that hit the Pentagon hit the one of the offices of a Navy IT dept that was basicly an intel command.

      I guess you should have used AMD.

    32. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by michaelhood · · Score: 2, Funny

      The linux kernel wasn't written in a nights hacking in Linus' moms basement.

      Yes, it took many thousands of nights' hacking in Linus' mom's basement.

    33. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by russotto · · Score: 1

      I've never heard anyone mention any "sock parties." Oh wait, I forgot: they're all part of the conspiracy.

      I think the OP may have meant "blanket party". You know, where the recruit who won't get with the program and keeps getting his unit assigned punishment duty has a blanket thrown over him and is then beaten to within an inch of his life to make him conform. The best part about it is the military hierarchy doesn't actually have to do it and can even strictly warn against it (in case the recruits don't get the idea on their own) -- it's done by fellow recruits.

    34. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by SlashWombat · · Score: 1

      The really good hackers they extradite from The UK!

    35. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by garompeta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and it's enormously successful at fighting wars

      What war was won by the US after World War II?
      I mean important modern warfare.
      Korean war? Technically still in war.
      Vietnam War? Lost. (although some people are still confused about this fact. YES, the US LOST the Vietnam war)
      Persian Gulf War? Won. (heh, a last)
      Afghanistan War? Still ongoing, still spending humongous amounts of money trying to fix a country that it is becoming more and more unstable.
      Iraq War? Still ongoing (with horrible results, everybody agrees it is a failure everybody can't help but see the overwhelming parallelism with "Vietnam", some even started to call it "The new Vietnam")

      And that's all so far.

      So where is the supposedly American supremacy and the enormous success in wars you talk about?
      Yeah, now the US has thermonuclear bombs, stealth planes, supersonic planes, robots flying and crawling, and spy satellites all that propagandistic shit that is aired again and again on TV still can't win.
      The US is always backed up by its crew at the UN, but even with all the allies and the embarrasingly large coalition with the support of the most powerful nations and with the irrationally largest budget and resources in the world, still can't win a war.

    36. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Navy, 4 years. officer (O-3)

      If you only made it to E-5 after 8 years, you weren't being rewarded for thinking outside of the box - most every enlisted person makes it to E-5 after 4 years. The the OP is right, you do best in the military by mostly following the crowd; a little bit of free thinking is encouraged and even rewarded, but you step outside that very tight box and you get hammered quickly

    37. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By any logical standpoint, the fat guy in Full Metal Jacket was the real hero.

      By 4chan standards, he's An Hero.

    38. Re:Isn't this an obvious way to recruit by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You'll note that I limited that superiority to straight-up war, which we win quite handily. We don't do as well with prolonged low-level conflict - then again, nobody does.

      Yes, the Korean War is still technically in action, but I think that - unless Kim Jong-Il has stepped things up quite a bit overnight - it's very much a cold war. The Vietnam War was the war that we won until we decided it would be better to lose, and then even more embarrassingly decided that the South Vietnamese needed to lose too.

      Then we got rid of conscript soldiers. The Gulf Wars - I and II - pretty clearly showed that we can wipe any standard force off the map.

      Afghanistan is going badly, and will end worse. Unfortunately our government is a bit too respectful of Pakistan's sovereignty - something it doesn't even exercise itself in those areas - to run down the Taliban. I'm pretty certain that the way to do Afghanistan is the way we started it - don't try to run the place, don't try to fix it, just make sure that the Taliban can't use it. Anything else is overreaching.

      As for Iraq, it's done quite well for itself. While not forgetting all the bad things that have happened there lately, let's not pretend it was sunshine and rainbows around every corner in 2002.

  2. Drop and give me 20!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you seen most of the people who attend these conferences?

    Most of them can't do a single push-up, and you expect them to work in the military?

    1. Re:Drop and give me 20!!! by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 1

      Just a guess, but I don't think they're recruiting hackers to be front-line infantry.

    2. Re:Drop and give me 20!!! by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you seen most of the people who attend these conferences?

      Most of them can't do a single push-up, and you expect them to work in the military?

      It's the Air Force. No need to do pushups.

      Seriously, if the military needs certain skills they find ways to get people in. Not every job requires raw strength.

      Oh, and Go Navy.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:Drop and give me 20!!! by Norsefire · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're recruiting COD players for that.

    4. Re:Drop and give me 20!!! by koolfy · · Score: 2, Informative

      In fact, you're not far from reality, they use America's Army, for that...

      --
      Segmentation Fault in "Life, Universe and Everything" at line 42. Don't Panic.
    5. Re:Drop and give me 20!!! by ir · · Score: 1, Funny

      This just in: Military discovers "bunny hopping" as a valid evasive technique.

      --
      Irina Romanov
  3. "during a discussion panel ... at blackhat" by Norsefire · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next year at Blackhat:

    - Moxie Marlinspike demonstrates how to pwn an F22-Raptor has it passes your datacenter

    - K Chen describes how an attacker can install malicious code into the firmware of the steering console in a M1A2

    - Joshua Abraham demonstrates several flaws in secret identities used by CIA agents

    - Marc Bevand disarms Russian missiles with an ATI Graphics card

    - Joe Grand now gets free parking in a Black Hawk

    1. Re:"during a discussion panel ... at blackhat" by HBI · · Score: 1

      They sign a contract with the government when you get your security clearance. The contract basically pledges you to a lifetime of keeping whatever secrets you were given access to. The price if you break it is lengthy imprisonment, which is spelled out in the contract. I forget the form name, someone else probably remembers it.

      It would be hard to do any of those things without falling afoul of that.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    2. Re:"during a discussion panel ... at blackhat" by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you signed such a form, you obviously didn't read it. It is not a contract, and it does not have any legal weight as a contract. All that the form says is that you are aware that you are bound by existing laws which protect official secrets. If you don't sign, you are still bound by exactly the same laws, but if you do (and you generally need to, although they forgot to have me sign mine for a couple of months) then you can't claim ignorance of the law in court (which isn't a defence, but may lead to a reduced sentence).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:"during a discussion panel ... at blackhat" by HBI · · Score: 1

      Sigh. You're wrong. Standard form 312 is perfectly enforceable, as many people who have been prosecuted and sued into oblivion have found out to their despair.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    4. Re:"during a discussion panel ... at blackhat" by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Read the form again. The penalty for breaching the conditions laid down is not imprisonment, it is termination of security clearance and firing. If you disclose classified information to people without clearance you are subject to prison irrespective of whether you sign the form or not. Clauses 1 and 3, in particular, both clearly state that the signing the form is signing that you are aware of the relevant laws regarding disclosure of classified material. Read clause 4 in particular, which states that you may have your security clearance revoked, but even if you don't you are still bound by the laws regarding disclosure indicated at the end of the clause.

      People are not sued for breaking the conditions of the form (although it may be used if they attempt to file a suit for wrongful dismissal), people are prosecuted for violating the relevant statutes if they disclose classified information. You can not disclose classified material and then say 'but I never signed standard form 312' and expect to be let off, although the fact that you didn't sign it (assuming you didn't) may be used as evidence that you were unaware that you were breaking the law, which may reduce your sentence (if you are very, very, lucky).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:"during a discussion panel ... at blackhat" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon, it's trivial to get free parking in a Blackhawk. Just land it and there it is. Try to tow it, I dare you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:"during a discussion panel ... at blackhat" by chrisG23 · · Score: 1

      Read the form that is classified that actually allows you access to sensitive materials, not the one that earns you a clearance making you elgible to have access to sensitive materials.

  4. Good recruits? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    An American bomb falls on a wedding in the Swat Valley and creates 50 new terrorist recruits.

    An American soldier kills three people in a private home in Iraq. The youngest son witnesses the carnage and becomes a life-long anti-American soldier.

    A young girl witnesses her mother ripped to shreds by a missile fired by an unmanned American drone.

    The War Against Terrorism (TWAT) is a fight against innocents. To claim any less is simply a rationalization of the pani inflicted upon those who have nothing to do with with true terrorism. And what's worse: Each attack leads to the creation of new terrorists.

    Maybe the US government can hire script kiddies to wage war against "terrorists", but true hackers should fight the government. It is our enemy. It is the enemy of every life-loving person in the world.

    1. Re:Good recruits? by Norsefire · · Score: 1

      And where better to fight the Government than within it?

      Other than a different country, with slack extradition laws.

    2. Re:Good recruits? by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 1

      Dear sir,

      Thanks for not posting as an Anonymous Coward.

      Your sincerely,
      The FBI.

    3. Re:Good recruits? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How sad I am that I should fear my own government.

      I am American. I am American. I am America.

    4. Re:Good recruits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very cool that someone has the guts to say the obvious to the real black hats and suits.

    5. Re:Good recruits? by clang_jangle · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is no real "government" to fight anymore; the Federal govt in the US is just the administrative arm of the corporate oligarchy. We're all screwed.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    6. Re:Good recruits? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Despite the tendency towards corporatism, I believe that there is still power in the government. It is the power of each individual to exercise his vote.
      I don't believe corporate interests have taken over.

      Like Luke Skywalker, I can feel the good in the system.

    7. Re:Good recruits? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You can always buy shares in the corporate oligarchy and vote out your current oligarch at the next shareholders' meeting. Or you could vote for politicians who are willing to withdraw corporate charters.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Good recruits? by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      In every steaming pile there lies a grain of truth.

      despite what you find pretty to believe, the military as a whole goes to great lengths to minimize collateral damage.

      The fact of the matter is that every action has the risk of collateral damage.

      and yeah - killing a certain percentage of innocents has always been, and always will be acceptable once the decision to prosecute a war has been made.

      The logical extension of your statements is that all armed conflict will fail, which is demonstrably not the case.

    9. Re:Good recruits? by protologix · · Score: 1

      Each attack leads to the creation of new terrorists

      Actually, I'm pretty sure its SecuROM that makes new terrorists. They're all just angry about their copies of Spore, the Sims 2, and Fallout 3 not working.

    10. Re:Good recruits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rubbish!
      You can't vote for the important issues. Western democracy is false.

    11. Re:Good recruits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's funny is that you actually don't have to fear the government because of what you posted. You may fear for other reasons (national security, government incompetence, or all of these), but you don't have to worry about what you say critical of the government.

      The right to free speech was not given to us by the writer, but the soldier.
      Wars incur massive collateral damage, and that is truly unfortunate. But, you owe some credit to the government for your freedoms, even if you refuse to admit that you have any.

    12. Re:Good recruits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always buy shares in the corporate oligarchy and vote out your current oligarch at the next shareholders' meeting.

      Usually the people that complain can't buy more than a few shares, let alone enough to do that.

      Or you could vote for politicians who are willing to withdraw corporate charters.

      That might work if the majority of the voters weren't braindead.

  5. They will need a good motto by thedirektor · · Score: 1

    This being slashdot i think along the lines of:
    Chicks dig the airforce boys and! we got dark basements you can work in.

  6. So much for "spot the fed". by jcr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess in the next year or two, it will be "spot the non-fed."

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:So much for "spot the fed". by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      One reason why I stopped going. Other cons get "too commercial". DefCon got "too government". One half of the "good" people doesn't dare to present because they fear being hauled away, the other half presents only part of their findings because they want to lure the .gov into buying the rest.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. They should scour Slashdot and other tech sites by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I'm sure more than a few of us have the skill set and maturity level they are looking for.

    On the other hand, more than a few of us may not have the patience for office- and real-world politics that they require.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:They should scour Slashdot and other tech sites by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      You just have to seek the level at which you are comfortable.

      Government work, whether military of civilian is really no different than non-government work.

      You gradually reinvent your position as your employer reinvents you.

      You eventually reach a stable symbiotic relationship.

      Or you become a disgruntled /. poster.

  8. Troll? by Repossessed · · Score: 0, Troll

    Somebody mod the parent up.

    He's wrong, but he has a good point.

    --
    Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    1. Re:Troll? by koolfy · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod him up, he's wrong, has no point, but made me laugh so hard :')

      --
      Segmentation Fault in "Life, Universe and Everything" at line 42. Don't Panic.
  9. Most of them will not be able to pass Boot camp an by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Most of them will not be able to pass Boot camp and I am talking about non push-up part of it just trying putting a DI in there face and see how much back talk you get from them and if they mess up and cost the platoon someting or more PT then they can get there ass kicked by the platoon.

    boot camp by give some of them a psychological brake down.

  10. Discipline vs patriotism by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While perhaps not the most disciplined troops in the group, Americans who hvae passed through the educational system and who have access to a television are well-versed in patriotism.

    What the military doesn't need is free-thinkers. Hackers, by virtue of their status as hackers, are not necessarily free-thinkers. If they've passed through the American educational system, they've already been trained as much as the military needs. The American public school system is designed to train patriots. I wouldn't worry that these "hackers" are incompletely trained.

    1. Re:Discipline vs patriotism by tibman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think you understand the military very well. They NEED freethinkers. A soldier who can look at facts and make a decision based on the knowledge at hand (not tied down to racial/religious bias and a lot of other baggage) is a key part of military leadership. Not all thoughts can be acted upon however. The action itself must adhere to the current regulations, SOP, and ROE. But that doesn't mean they can't express that opinion, by all means do so.

      The biggest goal for any military unit is "mission accomplishment" and many times you have to get their via unconventional means. Freethinkers can only advance that front.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    2. Re:Discipline vs patriotism by Narnie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From my enlistment w/ the military, I found that in the wartime situation, enlisted freethinkers were the most beneficial to the military and often helped the unit the most and were most rewarded. Conversely, during the peace time, the enlisted followers/conformist were most often rewarded because they were least bored and had the least amount of issues with adhering to the regulations, SOP, and ROE. Of course, this leads to an interesting dichotomy of the enlisted ranks--those senior NCOs who demanded strict adherence to orders (because they expect conformists), and those NCOs that would let a few minor things slide if you could get shit done.

      Sure, freethinkers who can conform to regulations are the ideal, but many times the junior ranks are beaten with the "conform stick" enough that the freethinkers leave the military before they advance to a rank that encourages creativity.

      --
      greed@All_Evils:~#
    3. Re:Discipline vs patriotism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The American educational system isn't for training patriots. It was designed to train an underclass of factory workers.

      It's a little out of date. :\

    4. Re:Discipline vs patriotism by cenc · · Score: 1

      That is why every time the U.S. goes to war again after being out for a few years, we go through a rapid replacement of officers at the top. Piece time officers that got promoted for storming their desk, rarely make good leaders in combat because they do not adapt well.

    5. Re:Discipline vs patriotism by jawahar · · Score: 1

      I think Patriotism is Oxymoron in Globalization.

  11. Except your story doesnt really work by voss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pretty much every Al queda leader has come from a country weve never attacked, many of the countries are in fact our "allies"

    The leaders of Al queda come from Saudi Arabia and Egypt, its not our wars that create our enemies its our support for repressive regimes.

    In Vietnam a country where we waged a 15 year war, they welcome american tourists and even former american GI's. We dropped atomic
    bombs on Japan and now we are their strongest ally.

    The problems in Afghanistan have been there before the US arrived (for 30 years) and will be there after the US leaves

    1. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Well, gollleee. We oughta just drop a fuckin nucular bomb on those inconsiderate ingrates in afganastam. That ought to make them see the light (no pun intended).

      Seriously, what is your argument exactly? Our enemies will stop hating us when we kill them more efficiently? Time heals all wounds?

      Do you support our full withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan?

    2. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      We dropped atomic
      bombs on Japan and now we are their strongest ally.

      well clearly we have the answer!

      we nuke iraq, iran, and north korea, and they'll absolutely love us!

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    3. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, what is your argument exactly?

      He wasn't implying we should drop a nuclear bomb on anyone, but you're just stupid enough to gather that.

      Pointing out a pun is almost as bad as pointing out a pun you "refuse" to make. Thanks for insulting my intelligence by pointing out the possibility of a pun in that sentence.

    4. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Pretty much every Al queda leader has come from a country weve never attacked, many of the countries are in fact our "allies"

      And, oddly enough, none of the leadership are willing to strap explosives to themselves and die for their cause. Strange how that works out.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      No need, when they lead a group of people who collectively are culturally primitive, and only marginally literate.

      People who would think Sharia Law is something to be desired really aren't fit to eat at the Big People's Table.

      It's a backward culture, fools led by hucksters.

    6. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by koolfy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      After a great war, civilians who lost their families, houses and so are willing to build their country back, live in peace and forget about war, forever.

      Germans could want a WWII, only because WWI did not affected German civilians the way WWII did, most of WWI happened outside German soil, and on France's one. People in Germany felt frustrated when their government gave up on a war civilians didn't even see with their eyes, they could not conceive a war can be lost abroad one's country, and wanted revenge to political restrictions made by the "winners" of that war they did not see they were loosing.
      That's how Hitler could hit people with his hate speech, otherwise, people would have slap his face with ruins of their house shouting "didn't we suffered enough ??" ;)
      Now, France and Germany are strong friends, and really not willing to get into a war again.

      There is this famous french popular quote, after WWI : "Plus jamais ca." ("never again."), I think we all feel the same across the world, after a real war.

      The US keeps voting YES to wars because they never had to feel bombs above their heads, nor their parents.
      Though it's a terrible tragedy in human history, WTC was nothing compared to a war on one's soil.

      only exceptions are people weak against religious/political/media manipulation, and that's mostly an education level problem, the US weren't at war against Afghanistan, or Irak as far as I know, they were at war with a minority of religious terrorists, a dictator, and the people the dictator had under control. I don't think intellectuals and non-manipulated civilians and farmers ever wanted a fight against world's no.1 army...

      I don't know about Vietnam, but the USAÂdid a really good job helping Japan after the war, I have been told in school that US people sent in Japan after the war felt terrible about what war did to the country and did their best, for the good of Japanese people. Really.


      Please if you disagree, don't mod me down : I'm young, and still have much to learn, instead reply and feed me with the facts I don't know... AC, I'm looking at you.

      --
      Segmentation Fault in "Life, Universe and Everything" at line 42. Don't Panic.
    7. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "its not our wars that create our enemies its our support for repressive regimes."

      Question is - how do we convince the money grubbers who actually run Washington of that? I'm quite tired of seeing blood spilled to "protect American interests", which invariably translates to "influential wealty American's financial interests".

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 1

      The US keeps voting YES to wars because they never had to feel bombs above their heads, nor their parents.

      France has been engaged in various military operations for a long time now (mostly in Africa), and several European countries have or had troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, and other places.

      only exceptions are people weak against religious/political/media manipulation, and that's mostly an education level problem, the US weren't at war against Afghanistan, or Irak as far as I know, they were at war with a minority of religious terrorists, a dictator, and the people the dictator had under control.

      That's not how Muslims see it.

      I don't think intellectuals and non-manipulated civilians and farmers ever wanted a fight against world's no.1 army...

      You underestimate the power of religious fanaticism.

      I don't know about Vietnam, but the USAÂdid a really good job helping Japan after the war, I have been told in school that US people sent in Japan after the war felt terrible about what war did to the country and did their best, for the good of Japanese people. Really.

      That's all fine and well, but you can't forget the fact that Japan started the war.

    9. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by koolfy · · Score: 1

      France has been engaged in various military operations for a long time now (mostly in Africa), and several European countries have or had troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, and other places.

      Yeah, you're right, I forgot about that. Still, it's not wars they started, it's mostly help to allies's troops, for diplomatic reasons.
      I was talking about willingness to start a war from nothing, or take part in a major conflict with a great number of their troops (more like the USA in WWII)

      That's not how fanatic Muslims see it.

      Just wanted to make this clear for what follows :

      You underestimate the power of religious fanaticism.

      No, as I stated before :

      only exceptions are people weak against religious/political/media propaganda

      (I changed manipulation with propaganda, I think that word expresses better what I wanted to say)
      those fanatic Muslims are that very exception I was talking of, and my point was that they are only minority. But if you can convince me that in those countries most people are Muslims and most of them are fanatics, I would agree, and be wrong stating that civilians did not wanted to be at war.

      --
      Segmentation Fault in "Life, Universe and Everything" at line 42. Don't Panic.
    10. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      We dropped atomic bombs on Japan and now we are their strongest ally.

      Yeah, but then they turn around and give us Dragonball Z: it's clear their intentions are to culturally destroy the world as punishment.

    11. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to make this clear for what follows :

      No, I am talking about Muslims in general. It's pretty hard to tell the difference between "normal" Muslims and "fanatical" ones.

      those fanatic Muslims are that very exception I was talking of, and my point was that they are only minority.

      They're not a minority.

    12. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by koolfy · · Score: 1

      No, I am talking about Muslims in general. It's pretty hard to tell the difference between "normal" Muslims and "fanatical" ones.

      Well, I live in Europe, and due to immigration, there are plenty of them, I know a bunch, and to me it's not that hard :

      Those who want to kill people or/and themselves : fanaticals
      Those who believe in their religion, in peace, and in love (with different degrees of tolerance to non-believers, like in all religions) : not fanaticals

      see? that was easy. And none of my Muslim friends wants to/has killed anyone yet.

      They're not a minority.

      What do you know ? What do I know ? How do you know ?

      --
      Segmentation Fault in "Life, Universe and Everything" at line 42. Don't Panic.
    13. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      "its not our wars that create our enemies its our support for repressive regimes."

      Question is - how do we convince the money grubbers who actually run Washington of that?

      They don't need to be convinced, they want it that way.

      Falcon

    14. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 1

      Those who want to kill people or/and themselves : fanaticals
      Those who believe in their religion, in peace, and in love (with different degrees of tolerance to non-believers, like in all religions) : not fanaticals

      Most Muslims who are hostile towards infidels do not kill people. Actual terrorists who blow things up and shoot people are a minority. But there are plenty of Muslims who fight infidels in other ways.

      And none of my Muslim friends wants to/has killed anyone yet.

      None of my friends are Chinese, ergo Chinese people do not exist.

      How do you know ?

      Research.

    15. Re:Except your story doesnt really work by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Sounds good. Somebody get the plutonium. I'll start making plans.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  12. This years Defcon: Not good by thenextstevejobs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I drove all the way down to Vegas from SF Thursday, and by Friday evening I was ready to get out of there. I went to a few panels and was thoroughly underwhelmed. It was crowded, not exciting. Several people walked out of talks. I overheard some other people say "maybe tomorrow will be better". Well, I don't know because I sold my badge and bailed early.

    Not to say that there couldn't have been some good smart people to hire there. But after the level of disappointingness Defcon had to offer, I'm no longer impressed. The atmosphere definitely did not inspire me to want to hire anybody.

    --
    Long live the BSD license
    1. Re:This years Defcon: Not good by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Please elaborate.

      Presentations were bad? how so?

      Booths sucked? how so?

    2. Re:This years Defcon: Not good by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      DC kinda got stale lately. I can't put my finger on it, but compared to other cons, even the public ones like BH or even VB, they really lost their edge. As much as I hate the word "mainstream", but it seems DC got that label. It's become yet another con where business and government goes to exchange views, it's gone from a hacker's "insider" con to a "commercial" con. Certainly good for their income and maybe the only way to finance something like that, but depressing when you think of the things that happened there a few years ago.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:This years Defcon: Not good by jofny · · Score: 1

      If the only thing you focused on at Defcon were talks and panels, you sort of missed the point and the benefit of being there. The talks and panels are just excuses to get a bunch of smart people together to jam. Next time, stay after the talks and grab some of the speakers to chat. Find some of the parties, chat. Meet people, network, discuss ideas, drink heavily and relax.

    4. Re:This years Defcon: Not good by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Once DT started up Black Hat, all of the real technical content left DefCon and never really came back. DefCon became the social scene for the hacker community. I went to the first five and have only been to a couple since then. I almost went this year but the flu kept me home. I wasn't planning on going for all of the elite hackerness of it. I was planning on going to see friends I hadn't seen in years.

    5. Re:This years Defcon: Not good by threat_or_menace · · Score: 1

      If the talks aren't new and interesting, and you are just going to socialize, that's okay, but it's hardly what the conference could be. It's not what I want to go to Defcon for; I liked the first few I went to, where there were some very good technical talks and that was the expectation. What you are describing sounds a lot like retirement or senescence.

      It seems that many speakers are chosen based on who they know, and there's way too much inside baseball going on in speaker selection. An example seems to be the talk I walked out on early today, where some kid who's professor is a friend of Kaminsky's gave a presentation pointing out that university hostname assignment and resolution practices may constitute a privacy leak. Now, the talk may have heated up something fierce after I left the room, but tieing a DNS lookup to an ARP address and then having the (attractive blonde) professor talk about how the uni had recruited the student who presented, and about the legality or not of it, and then who knows what Dan contributed, if anything? I left to see if the biohacking guy had anything to say. Sadly, he did not; he had very few examples, and lots and lots of words explaining why he thought biohackers were of interest. Fewer words and more examples, possibly even an actual biohacker - would have helped immensely.

      One thing I thought was interesting last year and did not particularly see this year was talk about policy. I got called out on an incident in the middle of Saturday afternoon, so sadly I missed the long analysis of the PLA, and I hope that is worth watching later. Last year, though I disagreed with it a great deal, there was a long policy panel. (The thrust was 'we're done, this is what we are suggesting to the Feds, please congratulate us.' The speakers were current or former military. They were not interested in actual input from the audience and were very insulting of audience members who wanted to give any. It was good to see these guys out in daylight and understand what they were doing, though.)

      No one had interesting SCADA work to talk about this year? Really? Last year there was a talk about SCADA that seems to me to have pretty much had to have been a stepping stone for more. But I didn't see any such talks this year.

      The poster who compared Defcon to Burning Man may have hit it on the head. Defcon is unusual in that it brings together a lot of very different perspectives - the lock folks were out in force again this year, and did a pretty good presentation which was good to see.

      There's still a real opportunity for Defcon to be interesting, but this year was indeed a fail. Also, they are bound for fire marshall trouble if they don't get the fuck out of the Riviera. They made a decision this year to axe what had been the largest room in the venue and put most of the big talks into a four room area served by a single hallway. They cleared each room ahead of the next talk; if you wanted to see two talks deemed by the group to be interesting back to back, you were SOL - and so was everyone else, as the halls clotted insanely.

      As of now, I'm unlikely to go back until such time as the con moves out of the Riviera. And by then, it will probably be larger, fluffier and have even less content - I don't see it relocating too soon, and it's going to keep being bigger and bigger.

      What's needed is more stuff like FX' presentation, exploiting Cisco routers with one packet giving you configuration access - using ICMP! Now damn, that was good stuff. Less UFOs, less inspirational speakers, less interest in media whoring. These would all be valuable things.

      But it's very possible that Defcon is in some ways intentionally aping burning man - and hopes one day in the future to start co-hosting events with burning man.

  13. If they go this route they'd better do deep by Dr_Ken · · Score: 1

    ...background and psych testing on their new contractors. "Independent minded hackers" are just the sort that would blackmail, leak, sabotage or otherwise betray the military's efforts in a second if they ever felt dissed, slighted or P.O.'d for whatever reason. That's the nature of the beast. You'd only need one guy who felt slighted or got yelled at by some uptight Air Force colonel and the next thing you know the US missile defense satellites all go dark until the brass apologizes.

    --
    "If you want to know what happens to you when you die, go look at some dead stuff."
    1. Re:If they go this route they'd better do deep by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      And yet, that's never happened.

      Do you seriously think that the average DefCon attendee is more disenchanted with government than were people like me?

      I was a stoner high school drop out who was also a Mensan,
      It was either the military, or living in my parents' basement.

      The culture shock was huge.

      Finding holes in security systems controlling Polaris missile systems was fun, but only an intellectual exercise.

      I found several different ways in which it would be trivial for one person with no special access to destroy (not detonate) all the missiles on board in such a way that the only option would be to scuttle the boat.

      I also found out that lots of other people before me had found those same holes.

      You conjecture from the vacuum of ignorance.

    2. Re:If they go this route they'd better do deep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...background and psych testing on their new contractors. "Independent minded hackers" are just the sort that would blackmail, leak, sabotage or otherwise betray the military's efforts in a second if they ever felt dissed, slighted or P.O.'d for whatever reason.

      Oh you are so wrong... A hacker that gets pissed off will not betray his or her country but just might put a knife in the upper spinal column of someone they interpret as betraying the group. On the other hand, said hacker might be too self-controlled and eventually self-destruct in an attempt to escape those he or she perceives as being an impediment to his or her happiness and performance of his or her duties. I speak from experience.

  14. If you can't beat them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't beat them, hire them.

  15. What hacker? by codepunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now what sort of hacker is going to enlist in the military? First of all he will make 1/10 th of what he can just using his existing skills. Second
    of all he would likely be enlisted man and even if he was a officer he would have to put up with the incredible amount of crap that
    comes with military service.

    Then you have the same sort of issue with civilian govt service, who wants to put up with it. Half of these guys have no degree so the pay
    scale does not benefit them either. On top of this it likely requires a TS clearance and how many of these people could actually obtain
    the required clearance.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:What hacker? by blhack · · Score: 1

      Now what sort of hacker is going to enlist in the military?

      You might not be very familiar with hacker culture. Most hackers, myself included, would pay for the privilege of being able to toy with the sort of computing systems that the military has...

      Echelon? That is a real, live, working system. Any hacker out there that DOESN'T start salivating at the mere thought of an opportunity to play with that can turn in their membership card at the door.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    2. Re:What hacker? by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      But what happens if you end up shining your boots more than coding, or are reassigned to drive a truck in Iraq? I suggest you find an alternate means of accessing ECHELON.

    3. Re:What hacker? by lidocaineus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, 99% of most military computing systems are terrible in terms of computing power. Any of the big projects (of which there are not that many that are even interesting) will have maybe a handful of people that can do anything outside of a set working template of "fill in the blanks for your query" type interfaces. The military portrayed in movies does not exist.

    4. Re:What hacker? by blhack · · Score: 1

      Not to be morbid, but hackers are considerably more expensive than grunts. They likely would be treated the same as pilots are; they're too costly to not be utilized, and are a pain to replace.

      Aside from that, if you're working as a civilian contractor, they can't just reassign you at will.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    5. Re:What hacker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Echelon? That is a real, live, working system. Any hacker out there that DOESN'T start salivating at the mere thought of an opportunity to play with that can turn in their membership card at the door.

      An ethical hacker would puke, not salivate, at the prospect of working on such a project as Echelon.
      --
      DK

    6. Re:What hacker? by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      The military isn't going to let hackers play with their big "guns" willy-nilly like it was a spare box at home to test out software and shit on.

    7. Re:What hacker? by xxuserxx · · Score: 1

      Systems do not need to be powerful in the military. 90% of the time systems have 1 job to do and 1 job only with a handful of technicians supporting that system. However you do need to know how to operate a crapload of these systems and that's where you get your robustness from.

    8. Re:What hacker? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Now what sort of hacker is going to enlist in the military?

      One who feels a sense of duty and knows sacrifices need to be made for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Those who know "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Before going to college with a major in Computer Engineering I first enlisted in the military.

      Second of all he would likely be enlisted man and even if he was a officer he would have to put up with the incredible amount of crap that comes with military service.

      This brings up something that puzzles me some. Sure people are going to have to be knowledgeable and or spend a lot of tyme in training, but that's true with the infantry as well. Just as not everyone can be a hacker, not everyone can be an infantryman either. And infantry is a lot more dangerous. They're both specialized knowledge and should only be treated differently because of the level of danger. A hacker can get a civilian job and be paid a lot better than someone enlisted, on the other hand the only way an infantryman is going to get paid as much is by becoming an assassin, mercenary, or hitman.

      Falcon

    9. Re:What hacker? by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      ...and your point is? Read my post again. The point is that the allure of working for the military for interesting tech or powerful computers is a gigantic myth; most of the military stuff is NOT interesting and is nothing out of the ordinary in terms of probing for weaknesses (which is what most of these civilians at the con would be hired for). For the most part, the interesting stuff lies in the private sector

    10. Re:What hacker? by codepunk · · Score: 1

      And having spent 10 years in the military I can tell you that you may wish to rethink that. 10 years ago I was on ship that had
      analog gear driven computers for the fire control system. It was a impressive piece of gear but high tech it was not.

      --


      Got Code?
  16. Re:Most of them will not be able to pass Boot camp by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

    You seriously need to breathe some fresh air into your view of the military.

    The picture you have in your head of basic training was out of date when I went - and that was over 30 years ago.

    The Air Farce has no DI's.

    What boot camp does is teach people how to operate within a large hierarchical system.

    It also puts a person through a mild physical fitness regimen.

    I benefited greatly from basic training, though I wouldn't realize it for years.

    A lot of the stuff seems silly at the time, like being inspected for one's ability to fold one's clothes exactly as instructed.

    The actual lesson being taught by that exercise is that breaking a routine function down to basics, and standardizing it, has value in a complex system.

    Hackers recruited for the military will still go through basic -they have to in order to speak the same language and fit in at all.

    We had plenty of out of shape people who still managed to pass.

  17. Security is very discouraging. by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Security is very discouraging. I was in the field a long time ago and got fed up. It's just hopeless. The same problems come up over and over.

    • Microsoft has the mindset that anything executable that comes near their operating system should immediately be executed. CDs and DVDs autorun. USB devices autorun. Active-X controls autorun. Universal Plug and Play stuff autoruns. Yes, they now have some "security controls" on this, which sometimes actually work.
    • Remote update. Not only is patch downloading a lousy way to prevent security problems, the download process itself introduces a huge backdoor. With every two-bit application now supporting remote update, it's easy to find an attack vector.
    • Overly powerful "install" mechanisms. Apple had it approximately right in the original MacOS; an application was one file with a resource fork. Delete one file and the app was gone. Now, installers expect to run with administrator privileges and blither all over the machine.
    • Crappy security models. We know what works - mandatory security with integrity levels. The trouble is that most apps whine when made to work under those restrictions.
    • Thirty years of buffer overflows. The fundamental problem is that the C and C++ concept of arrays is broken. The language has no idea how big an array is. That's defective by design. The C++ crowd tries to paper over the problem with templates, but the mold always comes through the wallpaper. Most of the newer languages come with a gonzo interpretive system underneath, which makes them slow, overly complex, or both.

    That's just part of the list. I don't see a determined effort to fix the underlying problems. Given that, it's hopeless.

    1. Re:Security is very discouraging. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has the mindset that anything executable that comes near their operating system should immediately be executed. CDs and DVDs autorun. USB devices autorun. Active-X controls autorun. Universal Plug and Play stuff autoruns. Yes, they now have some "security controls" on this, which sometimes actually work.

      And can you name a couple of examples of this happening in Windows Vista or Windows 7? Vista has been out for 2 years now, it is, like it or not, "the current Windows version." And it does none of the things you mention, except Auto-Run, but even that has a big security screen in front of it.

      If you're going to post anti-Microsoft screeds, please at least make sure they're up-to-date. Yours sounds like you haven't used a copy of Windows since Windows 98.

      Thirty years of buffer overflows. The fundamental problem is that the C and C++ concept of arrays is broken. The language has no idea how big an array is. That's defective by design. The C++ crowd tries to paper over the problem with templates, but the mold always comes through the wallpaper. Most of the newer languages come with a gonzo interpretive system underneath, which makes them slow, overly complex, or both.

      That is something I 100% agree with, and also one of the reasons Microsoft's emphasis of C#/.net is so important.

    2. Re:Security is very discouraging. by Animats · · Score: 1

      And can you name a couple of examples of this happening in Windows Vista or Windows 7? Vista has been out for 2 years now, it is, like it or not, "the current Windows version."

      Yes, I can.: "Hypponen detailed how Conficker's code triggered an autorun on Windows, even when a user might have had autorun disabled for USB media."

    3. Re:Security is very discouraging. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      That's an exploit, not "the mindset that anything executable that comes near their operating system should immediately be executed."

      If you meant to include exploits, well, ok, but that's not what you *said* originally. Also, all OSes have exploits.

  18. Re:Most of them will not be able to pass Boot camp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seriously need to breathe some fresh air into your view of the military.

    The picture you have in your head of basic training was out of date when I went - and that was over 30 years ago.

    The Air Farce has no DI's.

    The Air Force is a fucking joke, and in no way represents the real military. They have TWO occupational specialties that could be considered honest-to-goodness combat arms (PJs and combat controllers) and the rest are civilians wearing a blue uniform.

    A lot of the stuff seems silly at the time, like being inspected for one's ability to fold one's clothes exactly as instructed.

    No silly at all if you've ever called in a fire mission and realized that transposing one digit even under extreme stress is going to end with the wrong people dying. Attention to detail is *always* key in the military.

    We had plenty of out of shape people who still managed to pass.

    Yes, something to brag about. What makes me laugh about this is that your average wing nut can't run 2-4 miles, yet now they've thrown in additional training with the M-16 in the event they're called upon to protect their own ground assets (supply convoys, bases, etc). That's a sure recipe for getting you and your buddies dead in a hurry.

  19. Sounds like oil and water to me. by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

    I think the military would get along with hackers as well as suits in the corporate world have in the past, unless they do something radical like offer unlimited Doritos, caffeine, a "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Folder, and someone to pick up the pizza boxes.

    --
    "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
  20. Re:This years Defcon: SERIOUSLY Not good by q2a · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I held in and was probably the one you heard, "maybe tomorrow will be better." Nope.

    The words "sell out" came to mind. Remember the early burning-man days? Defcon was once a group that met for a "love of the craft" that has become a certification desktoper recruitment fest.

    Sad really, maybe time to let this one go the way of E3 no?

  21. Recruiting at DEFCON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dudes and Dudetts: This is late, late, late! Years late. a Decade Late! Each year at DEFCON there is a "Find the Fed" contest where the identified federal agents and the spotter each get a T-Shirt. Feds from many nations are there in all forms and shapes. One "news" reporter was found out to be from the French Foreign Legion one year. This may be the first time they admitted it publicly, but each year they came knowing that DEFCON vulnerabilities would be about three (3) years ahead of when they appear in the trade press. (The Foreign Legion guy got his T-Shirt.)

  22. They're hiring. by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now what sort of hacker is going to enlist in the military?

    An unemployed one. At least the U.S. military is hiring.

    Of course, even if you go in for a technical job, you may be deployed to Iraq, wiring up CAT-5 cable and Cisco routers while dodging IEDs on your way to work.

    Much military work today is about systems for sorting out who's enemy and who isn't. The days when everybody in front of you is enemy are over. (In recent decades, enemies who've tried stand-up battles against US troops were defeated within days.)

  23. Re:Most of them will not be able to pass Boot camp by chrisG23 · · Score: 1

    Speaking from experience its amazing what sort of bodily transformation can happen in 2 short months. But they do have some standards for letting people in. They let people that are over the weight/body fat percentage in, because boot camp will reduce that drasticly, but there is a limit to how fat you can be before they take a chance. And if you havent made it by the 8th week, you are recycled back a few weeks. The physical part is much easier to build up. Go see any graduating class at boot camp and compare that to what they looked like 8 weeks before. And be especially amazed by Marine transformations, they go through 12 weeks of hell instead of 8 weeks of tough shit.

  24. Re:Most of them will not be able to pass Boot camp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking from experience its amazing what sort of bodily transformation can happen in 2 short months.

    If BMT made that much of a difference in your life, you were a pussy to begin with. Seriously.

    1.5 mile run: 11:57 (an 8 minute mile? really?)
    45 pushups (I've seen guys with manboobs do better)
    50 situps (a joke.. and the military still hasn't gotten the memo that situps != abs)

    And be especially amazed by Marine transformations, they go through 12 weeks of hell instead of 8 weeks of tough shit.

    Air Force BMT is not tough... not even close. It's summer camp.

  25. Re:Most of them will not be able to pass Boot camp by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

    boot camp by give some of them a psychological brake down.

    As is apparent by the effect it has had on your grammar and spelling. Thank you, sir, for your service.

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  26. In boot camp, by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    you're faced with an abusive psychopath

    have you ever went through boot camp? I've been through it and Advanced Individual Training for the infantry. I did not face any abusive psychopaths while in training for either one. The only tyme I had trouble was in Germany, where they make up their own rules.

    Falcon

    1. Re:In boot camp, by Mprx · · Score: 1

      I faced the public school system (state school system in UK terminology), which is boot camp on easy mode, so I'm certain that if I ever somehow ended up in real boot camp it would be a corpse producing situation. Stories of boot camp may be exaggerated in some cases, but stereotypes are based on truth.

  27. discipline by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Strict discipline is needed in some parts of the military because if you hesitate when following an order, it can cost lives. This isn't the case for a lot of support services. Hackers recruited by this kind of process are going to be doing things like penetration testing on the DoD networks, designing ways of compromising enemy systems without detection, and so on. This kind of thing doesn't have anything like the same requirements as a front-line soldier.

    Yes discipline is needed but that does not mean free thinkers aren't. Someone above made the remark that free thinkers and the creative are valuable and are the ones that promotions in combat while those who strictly follow orders are the ones getting promotions in peacetime. After having served in the military in general I'd have to agree. While in I had one Commanding Officer, CO, who asked me if I wanted to go to this school or that school. I figured he did because I kept on asking questions. Another CO I had though didn't like me asking all the questions.

    And as for "front-line" combat, as has been shown in Iraq, there's more than one type of combat. There, they've had to deal with desert and urban combat in summer as well as winter. In Alaska at Fort Greeley there was the Northern Warfare Training Center that taught two classes, summer school and winter school. Before the US left there was a Jungle Warfare Training Center at Fort Sherman, Panama.

    Falcon

    Oh, in case you're wondering, in the army I was in the infantry and would have been on the front lines if sent to combat. And I enlisted in the Army to save money to go to college where I wanted to major in Computer Engineering. I could have picked another MOS or Military Occupation Speciality such as electronics which would have been a closer field to my major but I liked shooting and the martial arts and wanted to learn to fight. Actually I almost went into the Navy where I would have went into Advanced Electronics, however I had already decided I would only go in for 4 years however to go into Advanced Electronics the Navy required people to enlist for 6 years.

  28. It's the hippies who really "think outside the box by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I was one of those hippies when I enlisted in the Army. The hardest thing about going in was having my shoulder length hair cut. But I had specific goals and enlisting would allow me to meet those goals. So I was willing to set aside some things to meet my goals.

    Falcon

  29. How sad I am that I should fear my own government. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I fear it but I still speak out about it. Actually I speak out because I fear it.

    I know that's backwards, people shouldn't fear government, government should fear the people. However the past couple of centuries have shown government should be feared.

    Falcon

  30. In Vietnam a country where we waged a 15 year war, by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Actually the US waged war with Viet Nam more than 20 years. President Eisenhower, the same one that warned against the military-industrial complex, sent Colonel Edward Lansdale to Indo-china in 1953. France and the Democratic Republic of Vietnam agreed to the Geneva Accords in 1954 wherein the people of Viet Nam, both north and south, would vote on whether to reunite. However Ngo Dinh Diem who won in rigged elections as South Vietnam's first president and Eisenhower opposed the voting. So Lansdale who was Diem's adviser and friend armed and trained supporters of him starting in 1955 to oppose it.

    The problems in Afghanistan have been there before the US arrived (for 30 years) and will be there after the US leaves

    Except the US supported the Mujahideen with arms and training after the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan. The US then made the mistake of pulling out after the Soviets left. Once the US did the Mujahideen which was made up of different ethnic, religious, and tribal groups, fractured. Some groups joined to become the United Islamic Front for the Salvation of Afghanistan or Northern Alliance and others became the Taliban. These groups then started fighting each other for power.

    Falcon

  31. I faced the public school system by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Same here. And despite the bad rep public education has how good or bad a school is is partially due to the school administration and teachers. That's one reason I support charter schools, magnet schools, and school choice. Schools should compeat against each other. The one thing I do not support is taxpayer funded Christian theology unless is part of an understanding religion curriculum with other religions being taught the same way.

    Falcon

  32. RE: Live-Action Homeless Man Punks TSA/HSA NY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a joke! The Om-Impotent TSA goon-squads and their Goon-Administration Homeland Security were punked at LaGuardia.

    The DoD should hire this guy .. quick!

    Cum Monday, we'll see the specticle of HSA Sec filp up her skirt and masterbate with a big dildo -- with the US Flag (Fag).

    TSA is the biggest joke of the 21st century --- what faggot loosers!

    Arrest them all ... crate them up is cattle cars ... send them off to Afghanistan ... new meat for the grinder!

    Their splattered gutts will be a red carpet for Obama -- Obama's Beautiful America -- in Afghanistan.

  33. Muslims by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    No, I am talking about Muslims in general. It's pretty hard to tell the difference between "normal" Muslims and "fanatical" ones.

    those fanatic Muslims are that very exception I was talking of, and my point was that they are only minority.

    They're not a minority.

    Except they are a minority. Ask most Iranians if they want to wipe Israel off the map and most say no. In "Commentary" magazine Ze'ev Maghen wrote the article "Eradicating the 'Little Satan'". He says "It is not their genuine, vehement hatred that we have to fear; it is their endless, drone-like training" Iranians hear and see in the media as well as at mosques and on the streets. He further argues that because Iranians don't "mean it" they are actually more dangerous. He compares what's happening today in Iran to what happened in NAZI Germany. Most Germans didn't hate Jews but the repetitive drumming of antisemitism, which isn't really antisemitism, dehumanized Jews.

    Falcon

    Oh, people may question my remark about how I say what's perceived as antisemitism really isn't. Broken down antisemitism is "anti", against and "Semite", "a member of a group of Semitic-speaking peoples of the Middle East and northern Africa". Both Hebrews and Arabs are Semites however many Anti-Semitics are against Jews or Hebrews but not Arabs. Also not all Arabs are Muslims, there are some Christians and Jewish Arabs too. There are also Jews for Allah.

    1. Re:Muslims by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 1

      those fanatic Muslims are that very exception I was talking of, and my point was that they are only minority.

      They're not.

      Except they are a minority.

      Nah.

    2. Re:Muslims by koolfy · · Score: 1

      those fanatic Muslims are that very exception I was talking of, and my point was that they are only minority.

      They're not.

      Except they are a minority.

      Nah.

      I guess if I had mod points I would just mod that "Funny", I really can't think this is something else :p

      --
      Segmentation Fault in "Life, Universe and Everything" at line 42. Don't Panic.
    3. Re:Muslims by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Where is your evidence fanatic Muslims are the exception? I provide some but you provide none, because you're wrong.

      Falcon

    4. Re:Muslims by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 1

      Er. I was arguing that they're not an exception. And I'm not wrong.

  34. Al-Qaeda by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    And, oddly enough, none of the leadership are willing to strap explosives to themselves and die for their cause. Strange how that works out.

    Except those who started and led Al-Qaeda went to Afghanistan to fight against the Soviet Union. Osama bin Laden started by fighting the Soviets. Like politicians there are some who are willing to fight while others are chicken hawks.

    Falcon

  35. It's a backward culture, fools led by hucksters. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    That can pretty much be applied to followers of almost all religions. Here in the US we have a number of Christian Talibans, Reconstructionists, and those who believe in Manifest Destiny who like some Muslims believe in stoning.

    Falcom

  36. They don't actually beat you with a stick... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

    but many times the junior ranks are beaten with the "conform stick"

    Maybe it has changed, but IIRC they don't actually beat you with a stick. Rather, you paint rocks; lots and lots of rocks; rocks that already have lots and lots of layers of paint on them...

    Oh, and as you get promoted anyway 'cuz of actual job performance, qualification tests and so forth, you find that you are the one who is always scheduled to cover Xmas, and Thanksgiving, and six straight months of 12-hour night shifts, and...

    Hey, wait...is the "conform stick" a euphemism?

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  37. Its about time by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    You know most of the real geeks could not get into the armed forces because of their lack of physical stamina, so they end up on the side lines, someone finally woke up and say, hey hackers don't need to run 5 miles everyday....!
    I think it is great for the public sector to finally get a hand in what security (gov. security) is all about.
    You have much better chance getting scure with people who are used to eluding the keystone capers.

  38. HOW 2 Determine Array Size in C/C++, easily... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ". The fundamental problem is that the C and C++ concept of arrays is broken. The language has no idea how big an array is" - by Animats (122034) on Sunday August 02, @12:38PM (#28917823) Homepage

    That's NOT quite true: You can do some "independent thinking", & figure out the length of ANY array, w/out knowing the total # of elements, like so:

    HOW TO DETERMINE ARRAY SIZE/LENGTH, USING TWO POINTERS (1 is always DOUBLE the size of the other, 1st "++" vectors thru array, other is always double its size):

    ----

    1.) Make 2 pointers, starting @ the "Zeroeth array element" position (the start, in other words)

    2.) Advance 1 by 1 & then, double the size of the 2nd pointer

    3.) Then, advance the first one to 2, double the size of the 2nd pointer

    4.) Continue this, always advancing the first pointer ++ by 1, until the 2nd pointer can no longer advance... THIS YIELDS THE ARRAY's MIDPOINT!

    5.) Simply doubling the midpoint will yield the total # of array elements, & thus, its size...

    ----

    THAT'S HOW YOU CAN DETERMINE THE SIZE OF ANY ARRAY (or string) AND ITS LENGTH... & w/out using functions like StrLen (strings.h), for string lengths in NULL strings or otherwise (strings are, after all, nothing more than "Character Arrays" anyhow)...

    APK

    P.S.+> I see a lot of TALK here about "independent thinkers", only trouble is? I don't SEE too much of it here... mostly "regurgitations" of already known information which is what I see mostly "network techs/network administrators" are @ best/most, capable of... &, because of it? I'm not very impressed... apk

  39. I was arguing that they're not an exception. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Yet you provide no evidence to back up your claim, you are wrong.

    Falcon

    1. Re:I was arguing that they're not an exception. by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 1

      I'm going to spend days and days of my limited free time gathering up links just so you can go "HUR HUR FOX NEWS ZIONIST CONSPIRACY." Your ignorance isn't a priority in my life.

    2. Re:I was arguing that they're not an exception. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      In other words you don't want to debate or inform, so why did you reply at all? Afterall it's a waste to tyme.. So is posting on Slashdot, but you do anyways. Therefore I conclude you're a troll.

      Falcon

    3. Re:I was arguing that they're not an exception. by Dr.+Impossible · · Score: 1

      I conclude you're a troll.

      You shouldn't use words you don't understand. It's bad form.