Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Offline Due To DDoS

The elusive Precision dropped a submission in my lap about a DDoS taking down Twitter running on CNet. It's been down for several hours, no doubt wreaking havoc on the latest hawtness in social networking. Won't someone please think of the tweeters? Word is that both Facebook & LiveJournal have been having problems this AM as well.

77 of 398 comments (clear)

  1. And nothing of value was lost by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Funny

    If any story deserves that tag, its this.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:And nothing of value was lost by wilsoniya · · Score: 5, Funny

      Zomg, how will corporations do their grassroots marketing now?!?!?!

      --
      I can't remember the last time I forgot anything.
    2. Re:And nothing of value was lost by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know you're joking, but Twitter does have a nearly unique architecture that makes it very difficult, if not impossible, to block without blocking the entire Internet. Now, say what you will about the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of using it as a protest or organization tool, but at least it keeps the lines of communication open in spite of government interference.

    3. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Zantac69 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe Twitter can have a new slogan: "You never knew how much you didnt need us until we were not there."

      --
      1331461 is only semiprime *sigh* Alas - I am just short of 1337.
    4. Re:And nothing of value was lost by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, just the fact that Twitter is a centralized service makes it easier to block. If I were looking for a channel that was "unblockable," the first thing I would look at is P2P networking, followed by Usenet, followed by email. Only if all else failed would I start looking at the Web or SMS.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    5. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only reason I need twitter to remain up is to prevent people from flooding other communication channels with "Twitter's down! Fail Whale!"

    6. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Allicorn · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought it was "twats".

      So did David Cameron apparently.

      --
      OMG!!! Ponies!!!
    7. Re:And nothing of value was lost by tdobson · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed twitter's centralised service is what makes it such a problem.
      Personally I use http://identi.ca/

      It's based on laconica, is free software and is federated. eg. http://army.twit.tv/

      I'm at http://identi.ca/tdobson and this downtime is not causing me any problems! :)

  2. Confirmed by Twitter by ScotlynHatt · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Confirmed by Twitter by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 5, Funny

      And now you've /.ed them just for fun :)

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  3. And adding ... by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 4, Funny

    a slashdot effect will certainly help in resolving the troubles.

    --
    ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
  4. The Dark Side. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is what happens when you anger the googles.

  5. Status page confirms its a DDOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://status.twitter.com/

  6. Quick! by erKURITA · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've got to re-tweet this!!


    ... oh wait

  7. Re:Nelson ------- by iamapizza · · Score: 5, Funny

    The blogosphere is buzzing about this. The amount of crap being spouted related to this incident is now causing blogal warming.

    --
    Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
  8. It's kinda back... by pdboddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My tweets are getting through, albeit slower than usual.

    --
    Julie Moult is an idiot.
    1. Re:It's kinda back... by Verdatum · · Score: 2, Funny

      twwweeeeeeeeeee...eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...eeeeee...eet!

  9. what is twitter? by tritonman · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is twitter? Is that some new web site or something?

  10. Parent is insightful, not funny by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who the hell modded that "funny?" Nothing of value was lost -- social networking is about as important as celebrity gossip. The only actual loss to social is the lost revenue that these websites will experience, which will hardly be a blip on the radar.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Parent is insightful, not funny by lymond01 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nothing of value was lost -- social networking is about as important as celebrity gossip.

      Cue James Earl Jones:

      I find your lack of faith disturbing. The ramifications of social networking have yet to be truly felt in the outer colonies. Communication is key to productivity and morale of the people. The Emperor is a fool to take it away and not realize it for the tool that it is. It is also quite helpful to keep tabs on the new T-17. Hot little number there. If the rebel alliance is to be deterred we must know where they are, what they're doing at all times, what they're currently dining on, when they've returned from the bathroom, and how they're wearing their hair today. Twitter is the key.

      Do not fail me again.

    2. Re:Parent is insightful, not funny by GreggBz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For people that actually socialize it provides benefits. I've reconnected with old friends, made dates, organized parties, laughed (at someones silly pictures) and learned (from someones interesting post) countless times on facebook. I've found a few people that meant a lot to me, and have restarted some kind of relationship with them. I've joined groups that share like interests and attended events that I would have otherwise missed. It has value. I don't know of any other thing that does this stuff quite as well. In short, it's a useful way to communicate with most everyone you know.

      I can't speak for twitter, but millions of other people find use in it.

      The whole "I'm to cool for the popular social networking sites" crowd gets on my nerves.

      Because here we sit, sharing opines with like minded individuals on a public website.
      Does that make us elite?
      Pot-kettle-black as they say.

    3. Re:Parent is insightful, not funny by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Twitter isn't completely worthless. Like MySpace is serves a very good purpose - it keeps the idiots occupied on a very small chunk of the web so the rest of us can easily avoid them and get on with out lives.

    4. Re:Parent is insightful, not funny by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I am just going to take a shot in the dark here, and guess that a typical exchange with an old friend you find on Facebook goes something like this:
      1. Add the person to your friends list
      2. Send message to the person, catch up with a quick exchange of 3-4 messages
      3. Never speak to the person again

      Maybe it is different for you, but that seems to be the general trend that I have noticed. People find these old friends on Facebook, but never seem to really communicate with then for very long. I would guess that if it really was so important to talk to someone, you could have called or emailed them; there are a few exceptional cases where a person really did vanish for a few years and nobody knew how to get in touch with them, but that is not as common as people seem to think it is.

      As a case-in-point, a friend of mine from high school who had been unreachable for 4 years because of her drug problems contacted me on AIM a few months ago; we reconnected with no social networking site, just using the same communication system we had been using before. I still have hundreds of email addresses, phone numbers, and screen names of people I was friends with at one point or another, most of whom are still reachable through those channels, who I simply do not talk to. Social networking websites do not solve this problem.

      With regard to events that you would not have known about...well, unless those events were not happening before the advent of social networking services, I strongly doubt that Facebook really made you more aware of the events or more able to find them. I still manage to find out about relevant events by email, phone calls, and word of mouth, just like people did 10, 50, and 100 years ago. Can you honestly say that you go to events that you would not have heard about except over Facebook? That you did not receive any emails, phone calls, or hear any of your friends (in real life) talking about? Maybe you can; that would make you an exceptional case, at least from what I have encountered over the past few years.

      It's not that I am too cool for social networking sites; I just do not use them, and that has not been a problem for me.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    5. Re:Parent is insightful, not funny by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can you honestly say that you go to events that you would not have heard about except over Facebook? That you did not receive any emails, phone calls, or hear any of your friends (in real life) talking about?

      Yeah actually that's how I hear about most things first. Then when I see people we might talk about the event,but its a great casual way to organize an event amongst groups of friends. Less intrusive than a phone call or aim. Email could be sort of an alternative, but not as rich.

      For most catching up of friends you are right, but you can also discover more common interests than what was possible before through a quick aim chat. You get to listen in on their conversations with other people and see how they interact with their friends and how they react to the days events. I can honestly say that I am now a much closer fired to some people I went through high school with, than when we were in high school.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  11. Whoops. by BigglesZX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Might it have had something to do with the Twitter-based HTML demo (http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/05/2348219/HTML-5-Canvas-Experiment-Hints-At-Things-To-Come?art_pos=8) that made Slashdot earlier today? The site in question hits Twitter for a large number of tweets, and I imagine a lot of /.'ers were checking it out earlier. I doubt it helped, at the very least...

    --

    $ mv *.sig >/dev/null
  12. Re:I Only Use Slashdot Anyway by bakana · · Score: 4, Interesting
  13. aha. by jrothwell97 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So THAT's what Conficker's for.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    1. Re:aha. by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So THAT's what Conficker's for.

      Now I wish I hadn't patched my machines.

  14. In other news... by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the nation's IQ spontaneously rose 23 points this morning. Scientists are investigating this puzzling phenomenon but have yet to discover the cause.

    --
    To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    1. Re:In other news... by jerep · · Score: 2, Funny

      myspace is still holding 32 points of collective IQ, and the medias and entertainments the remaining 78.

      Oh well, its a start :)

    2. Re:In other news... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dimwit! 32 and 78 is 110, and everyone knows 100 is the maximum. So I'm quite happy with my 90 score!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:In other news... by i+love+pineapples · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you kidding? I've been obsessively reloading status.twitter.com since I got in this morning!

    4. Re:In other news... by recharged95 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also: unexpected power surge across the nation today as everyone reports Twitter is down.

      imagine the amount of power being used (on data centers, routers, switchboards, computers, monitors, data lines, cellphone lines, radio towers, TV stations, newspaper centers, printing presses, etc...) just to spread the word there's a 404 error on www.twitter.com?

  15. Oh No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...what will Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore do?

    1. Re:Oh No... by drodal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      have sex :p

  16. Re:Who is hitting it that hard? by ohcrapitssteve · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, that segway was about as awkward as some kind of two-parallel-wheeled auto-balancing minute-muscle-movement-controlled vehicle. Of some sort.

  17. Defcon to blame? by zcold · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whats more, she blames defcon at the end of the article.. "There has been no indication that any of these various attacks are connected. But it's probably not a coincidence that they all coincide with the annual Defcon hacker convention." yes, not a coincidence at all... thats what happens when "hackers" get together...

    --
    you know you can fry stuff putting things into things that dont like the things you put into it...
    1. Re:Defcon to blame? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Say about Defcon what you want. Yes, it lost its edge. Yes, it got watered down. Yes, it's not the top notch hacker con it used to be. Yes, it's been turned into the BH stepchild-still-in-puberty.

      But even there nobody is yet so low to consider Twitter a worthy target.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. Cloud? Decentralize by Bob9113 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Decentralization is the solution to single-link failures.

    Cloud is centralization.

    JM2C, YMMV.

    1. Re:Cloud? Decentralize by Relic+of+the+Future · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Agreed.

      The reason email was such a boon, and the only reason it's lasted so long, is because you didn't need a login on someone else's system in order to communicate with them. Of course, that's also why the folks who came up with it never (directly) made any money off of it. (Finding interviews with the inventor of '@' are left as a googlecise for the reader.)

      It's a tough position: the only way to last longer than a flash-in-the-pan fad is to give up your only obvious way to turn a profit... but no flash-in-the-pan fads have ever turned a profit either. So we'll continue to get these cyclical fads, all of us moving from service provider to service provider, like a migrating swarm of locusts, leaving fields of venture capital devastated in our wake, hoping that someone will figure out the magic formula to make money from it.

      --
      Those who fail to understand communication protocols, are doomed to repeat them over port 80.
  19. What we will do now? by sxedog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally. now everyone can get back to work.

    --
    If it ain't broke, DON'T fix it.
  20. Re:Nelson ------- by eln · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I expect bloggers to go nuts about this sort of thing. What's truly disheartening to me is that a formerly relevant news site like cnn.com has it on their front page. Oh CNN, I remember when you used to report actual news...now look what you've become.

  21. Oh come on. by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is how their "journalists" report news on CNet? FTA - the very last line:

    There has been no indication that any of these various attacks are connected. But it's probably not a coincidence that they all coincide with the annual Defcon hacker convention.

    You mean the one that ended Sunday? Nice. Real nice.

    1. Re:Oh come on. by Eil · · Score: 2, Funny

      On top of that,

      "it's probably not a coincidence that they all coincide"

      makes me want to break pencils and kick puppies.

  22. Re:Nelson ------- by TomHandy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No it wouldn't.

  23. HTML5 demo by tom17 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm wondering if that HTML5 demo http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/05/2348219/HTML-5-Canvas-Experiment-Hints-At-Things-To-Come?art_pos=8 had anything to do with it. If the normal /. crowd went to the demo, which then in turn loads 100 'tweets' from twitter, is that not equivalent to twitter receiving a 100x slash-dotting?

    Tom...

    1. Re:HTML5 demo by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Twitter's API returns tweets in chunks; it's not one call per tweet.

      A slashdotting is not really an appreciable bump in traffic for Twitter. They have a lot of throughput at any given time.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  24. Re:I Only Use Slashdot Anyway by religious+freak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, my first thought is this

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  25. Costly by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    This could be an expensive attack. There are estimates that just a few hours without social networking could lead to billions of dollars in increased productivity.

    Imagine if Slashdot went down. Spam would be wiped out in a day, Linux audio would be bug free in a week, and next month we'd see the release of GNU Hurd.

    1. Re:Costly by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "This could be an expensive attack. There are estimates that just a few hours without social networking could lead to billions of dollars in increased productivity. Imagine if Slashdot went down. Spam would be wiped out in a day"
      Your post advocates a

      (X) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based (X) vigilante

      approach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)

      ( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
      (X) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would see increased use
      ( ) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
      (X) It requires brute force attacks
      ( ) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
      (X) Users of slashdot will not put up with it
      ( ) Microsoft will not put up with it
      ( ) The police will not put up with it
      ( ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
      ( ) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
      ( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers
      ( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
      ( ) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

      Specifically, your plan fails to account for

      (X) Laws expressly prohibiting it
      ( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
      ( ) Open relays in foreign countries
      ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
      (X) Asshats
      ( ) Jurisdictional problems
      ( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
      ( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
      ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
      (X) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack Oh, wait, it relies on that.
      ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
      (X) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes Oh, wait, it relies on that.
      ( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
      ( ) Extreme profitability of spam
      ( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
      ( ) Technically illiterate politicians
      ( ) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
      ( ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
      ( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
      ( ) Outlook

      and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

      ( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever
      been shown practical
      ( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
      ( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
      ( ) Blacklists suck
      ( ) Whitelists suck
      ( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
      ( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
      ( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
      ( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
      ( ) Sending email should be free
      ( ) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
      ( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
      ( ) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
      ( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
      ( ) I don't want the government reading my email
      ( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

      Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

      (X) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work, but it's the closest I've seen.
      ( ) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
      ( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn your
      house down!

  26. Re:Not DDoS, SlashDotted by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Compared to Twitter's usual activity load, a slashdotting is not going to be that big a deal.

    --
    "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
  27. Lets look at this by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Millions of people use it

    2) It is uses to allow poeple to follow people that are interesting to them. Not just gossip, but science information, events.

    3) Nearly instant knowledge of world events.

    4) Allows protesters to disseminate information

    5) Is allowing for a deeper understanding od human nature in large societies.

    6) It's another tool for expression.

    So I would say that it does have value.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Lets look at this by tthomas48 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, I get CDC outbreak updates, political updates, software updates. These are hardly social nonsense. If you don't "get" twitter, that's fine, but don't assume it's useless.

      Twitter is like the news ticker with RSS feeds being the newspaper.

    2. Re:Lets look at this by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      1) Millions of people use it

      2) It is uses to allow poeple to follow people that are interesting to them. Not just gossip, but science information, events.

      3) Nearly instant knowledge of world events.

      4) Allows protesters to disseminate information

      5) Is allowing for a deeper understanding od human nature in large societies.

      6) It's another tool for expression.

      So I would say that it does have value.

      You need to look at opportunity cost: what is lost in order to gain these benefits?

      1) Millions of people could be using something else.
      2) "Following" people on Twitter is necessarily superficial compared to other media, which offer the same benefits without the message size limit.
      3) Instant knowledge of world events is available in many media, with Twitter again being more superficial than the others.
      4) No, it's a means by which protesters disseminate information. It worked in Iran because it's new and the government didn't know how to block it as well as other services at first. It has no inherent advantage in this area.
      5) Your point is preposterous. It allows for a deeper understanding of how people use Twitter, sure, but that's not valuable.
      6) And an inferior one at that.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    3. Re:Lets look at this by aj50 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2) "Following" people on Twitter is necessarily superficial compared to other media, which offer the same benefits without the message size limit.

      And that's exactly the point, following someone on Twitter isn't even close to declaring them a "friend", it merely means that you find their thoughts interesting and would like to subscribe to their newsletter.

      --
      I wish to remain anomalous
  28. Re:Give me a break by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, so the fact that all of these sites are reporting on a temporary outage on a social networking site says more about the overall decline in the mainstream media than CNN specifically.

    Also, as of right now, I don't see the story on the front page of the BBC. Fox News now has it listed as "Urgent" and has the headline in huge letters on the front page. CNN currently shows it as its top story. Reuters has it much further down the page, but it's still there.

    Reporting on a story like this deep in the Technology section is one thing, but displaying it prominently as major breaking news is entirely another.

  29. Re:I Only Use Slashdot Anyway by Jesse_vd · · Score: 2, Informative

    9:18 PST and it is down for me in B.C.

  30. Twitter != Reliable news source by CodingHero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    3) Nearly instant knowledge of world events.

    Instant AND not necessarily accurate. A two-for-one!

    4) Allows protesters to disseminate information

    Information that is more than likely one sided and ignorant of "the big picture" of any given event.

  31. In other news... by cjb658 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...office productivity is up 50 percent today.

  32. Twitter crashes for 90 minutes, nerds horrified by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Funny
    Twitter.com crashed on Thursday at about 3pm BST due to a "denial of twat" attack from thousands of virus-infected Windows PCs under the control of terrorist masterminds.

    Stephen Fry has been hospitalised and is queueing messages from his PatientLine text terminal in readiness for the site returning. "Twatter ++ungood sweeties zomg I do believe I'm feeling a little faint."

    The source of the attack is unknown, but is hypothesised to be either the Russian Mafia, the Iranian security forces, the Chinese government or Alan Davies recoiling from his latest humiliation on QI.

    News agencies around the world condemned the attack, which hits at the root of their online news-gathering processes, and have had to resort to following the Wikipedia "Recent Changes" feed. "Apparently BUSH IS GAY LOLOLOL," says the current CNN front page headline. "Who knew?"

    A new site, "Grunter," has attempted to take up the slack. Users of "Grunter" are freed from the wordy excesses of Twitter's 140-character limit and can post one of twelve pre-programmed onomatopoeic noises, such as "mmrph," "huh," "grah" or "tubgirl."

    Popular teenage angst poetry blogging and fan fiction site LiveJournal was affected by a similar attack at about the same time, but that attack was considered "just as well, really."

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  33. Re:Nelson ------- by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's truly disheartening to me is that a formerly relevant news site like cnn.com has it on their front page. Oh CNN, I remember when you used to report actual news...now look what you've become.

    Obviously you haven't watched CNN lately, otherwise you would know how dependent they are on Twitter now. Seems like all they do these days is read Twitter messages from viewers.

  34. Re:Nelson ------- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You mean like cats stuck in trees and some random missing girl out of the 100s or thousands missing just because this one happens to be rich (and/or) pretty?

  35. How Will CNN Survive?!? by MartinSchou · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't they get most of their stuff from Twitter these days?

    Granted, I don't watch CNN and get my impression of them from The Daily Show, but judging by that coverage it seems like CNN is reduced to just reading aloud stuff from Twitter.

    I'm still waiting for The Daily Show showing a clip showing a CNN host trying to read out "OMG PWNIES!!1!!111oneONE"

  36. My First thought was this by BOUND4DOOM · · Score: 3, Funny

    I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.

    1. Re:My First thought was this by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 5, Funny

      We're talking about twitter. This is the equivalent of running a steam roller over a chipmunk farm: Somewhat disturbing, oddly hilarious, and ultimately a loss of nothing but a bunch of chattering rodents.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    2. Re:My First thought was this by rs79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "We're talking about twitter. This is the equivalent of running a steam roller over a chipmunk farm: Somewhat disturbing, oddly hilarious, and ultimately a loss of nothing but a bunch of chattering rodents."

      That's what some poeple say about slashdot.

      I've bashed twitter more than anybody I know, but I will admit now it's actually useful for some things.

      Opinions about the marginal utility of various internet services notwithstanding, when any site is targeted it hurts us all.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    3. Re:My First thought was this by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's what some poeple say about slashdot.

      At least slashdot gives loud mouthed assholes like me more than 140 characters to express our opinions that nobody else cares about ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  37. Re:I Only Use Slashdot Anyway by kristjansson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and mine is this... think about it, every /.er that fired up the test pulled 100-ish tweets simultaneously for the sparkling dot bling on the test page. that would make the site a slashdot-effect magnifier with a factor of about 100...
    then again, how many slashdotters actually RTFA?

  38. Re:I Only Use Slashdot Anyway by haifastudent · · Score: 2, Funny

    then again, how many slashdotters actually RTFA?

    What is that A in there for? Is there some part of this whole slashdot thing that I'm missing?

    --
    Thank for reading to the sig. You may stop reading now. It is safe. There is no more content. Why are you still reading?
  39. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The funny thing is that nobody used or cared about twitter outside of a handful of nerds until the people in charge of twitter struck on the advertising idea of "convince everyone that everyone is already using it, and it's the most popular thing online". After that, it started being reported on weekly by sites like Slashdot as well as major news sites, until it started getting massive buyout offers.

    Honestly, I still don't think that many people care about it. There are a handful of popular bloggers, but I don't think I've ever met a person in "real life" that has twittered for longer than a week. I'm 26, by the way.

    A similar strategy was/is used by Second Life, which is why corporations started flocking to it and then realized they'd been duped.

  40. Re:I Only Use Slashdot Anyway by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's always ironic when these articles pop up on Slashdot. These are movements largely brought about by anti-social geeks, so they detest the technology they bore. What's the point in DDoS twitter? Did your ex- tweet what a small sausage you had? Are you angry at the technology gods or think, "A) DDoS Twitter B) Make the news C) PROFIT!!!$$$"?

    Twitter works just fine for me, unlike the new format of updating /. as I scroll down the page.

  41. Re:I Only Use Slashdot Anyway by rs79 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some people didn't like what was posted to twitter in the past 24 hours and had other people take it down. It's a distraction. Scrutinize what happened before it down and not the distraction of it going down and you'll have your answer.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  42. All those "I've having X for lunch" tweets by sarkeizen · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...lost! Oh the humanity.

    Perhaps this is just me but...probably what you had for lunch is pretty low on most peoples "care-dar". When I get together with my friends...know how often we talk about lunch...almost never. Know how may SMSs I've received about peoples lunch? or IMs or emails for that matter? Those figures hang pretty close to zero too. But Twitter? From my modest sampling of tweets it seems like it's pretty close to mandatory to shoutout about your ingestibles. I can think of some reasons for why this particular subject comes up but the real revelation for tweeters (or twits or whatever you call yourselves) should be that MOST OF YOU ARE REACHING PRETTY DAMN FAR TO COME UP WITH SOMETHING TO TALK ABOUT!!

  43. Re:I Only Use Slashdot Anyway by sverrehu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know about the new attacks, but I researched a bit after
    Gregory Steuck posted about "XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack" on
    Bugtraq in 2002 (http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/297714).

    You can easily do DoS attacks on a Java-based thing running on
    e.g. Linux if you manage to trick the server into parsing one of the
    following two XML documents:

            <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
            <!DOCTYPE foo [
                <!ENTITY xee SYSTEM "file:/dev/tty">
            ]>
            <foo>foo: &xee;</foo>

            <?xml version="1.0"?>
            <!DOCTYPE foo SYSTEM "file:/dev/tty">

    Both will make the XML parser try to read from the TTY, thus blocking
    "forever" waiting for input that never comes. The fun thing is that
    it doesn't help to setExpandEntityReferences(false), even though the
    name sounds like it would help. The only thing that works (afaik), is
    to install a custom made EntityResolver that refuses to look up
    external entities. Since nobody does that, this vulnerability may be
    found all over the place.

    Variations exist for other OS-es and other web platforms as well. I
    even found that Adobe Reader was vulnerable once
    (http://shh.thathost.com/secadv/adobexxe/), and I recently stumbled
    across a similar thing in a commercial web-protecting security
    application. (They're working on a fix.)

  44. Re:Nelson ------- by ichimunki · · Score: 3, Funny

    OTOH, Mod parent up would be a good name for a rock band.

    --
    I do not have a signature
  45. Re:Nelson ------- by MrCrassic · · Score: 3, Funny

    No it wouldn't.

  46. Re:I Only Use Slashdot Anyway by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's posting from over 2000 years in the past, and you're quibbling over a single hour?